Pinboard (pwhaley)
https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/
recent bookmarks from pwhaleyToward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis | Systematic Reviews | Full Text2019-07-15T06:49:21+00:00
https://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13643-019-1074-9
pwhaleyAutomation AIhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:e61fb528ff01/Letter re: stratification of meta-analyses based on risk of bias is appropriate and does not induce selection bias - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology2019-07-08T11:56:21+00:00
https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(19)30382-8/fulltext
pwhaleyRiskOfBiashttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:c6725b380cc6/Reporting quality in systematic reviews of in vitro studies: a systematic review: Current Medical Research and Opinion: Vol 0, No 02019-06-21T18:02:37+00:00
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03007995.2019.1607270?scroll=top&needAccess=true
pwhaleySRStandardshttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:b097a1c90c37/Risk of bias assessments for blinding of participants and personnel in Cochrane reviews were frequently inadequate2019-06-07T22:43:55+00:00
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31132470
pwhaleyRiskOfBias SRStandardshttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:ed910e6b5d50/Assessments of attrition bias in Cochrane systematic reviews are highly inconsistent and thus hindering trial comparability2019-05-02T08:44:01+00:00
https://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12874-019-0717-9
pwhaleyRiskOfBiashttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:d5a1e399d1c1/Protocol registration or development may benefit the design, conduct and reporting of dose-response meta-analysis: empirical evidence from a literature survey2019-05-02T08:43:20+00:00
https://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12874-019-0715-y
pwhaleyProtocolhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:947e3e6af52d/Noblesse oblige: critical issues at the highest level of clinical evidence2019-01-21T16:59:54+00:00
https://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(18)31144-2/fulltext
pwhaleySRStandardshttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:e3fae9af9350/A review of methods used for hazard identification and risk assessment of environmental hazards2019-01-15T19:00:20+00:00
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412018322979?dgcid=raven_sd_via_email
pwhaleySynthesisMethods RiskAssessmenthttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:a2082ef2f10d/How did the US EPA and IARC reach diametrically opposed conclusions on the genotoxicity of glyphosate-based herbicides?2019-01-15T18:57:48+00:00
https://enveurope.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s12302-018-0184-7
pwhaleyControversyhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:d3332732274b/Low-calorie sweeteners and health outcomes: A demonstration of rapid evidence mapping (rEM)2019-01-06T13:21:39+00:00
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412018316465
pwhaleyEvidenceMapping AIhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:919e8d0850b6/Rapid reviews may produce different results to systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study2018-12-31T11:43:49+00:00
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30590190
pwhaley20% could be tolerated. This could be the case in scoping reviews, resource limitation, or where syntheses are needed urgently. Other situations, such as clinical guidelines and regulatory decisions, favour more comprehensive systematic review methods.]]>RapidReviewshttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:4626b7e9f523/Applying software engineering principles to address current problems in the systematic review ecosystem2018-12-31T11:42:15+00:00
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30582972
pwhaleyAI Automationhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:97c27f3cfe6d/The risk of bias in observational studies of exposures (ROBINS-E) tool: concerns arising from application to observational studies of exposures2018-12-30T12:09:28+00:00
https://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13643-018-0915-2
pwhaleyRiskOfBiashttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:b80f3de05d8a/A third of chemicals break EU safety laws2018-10-12T08:21:52+00:00
https://eeb.org/a-third-of-chemicals-break-eu-safety-laws/
pwhaleyRiskAssessmenthttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:9e83a95376eb/Un tiers des substances chimiques les plus utilisées en Europe non conformes à la réglementation2018-10-12T08:20:12+00:00
https://www.lemonde.fr/pollution/article/2018/10/12/un-tiers-des-substances-chimiques-les-plus-utilisees-en-europe-pas-conformes-a-la-reglementation_5368179_1652666.html#Echobox=1539301755
pwhaleyRiskAssessmenthttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:f96d3416fee6/Research on research2018-09-21T05:56:35+00:00
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/361/6408/1178
pwhaleyBetterSciencehttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:552f2983338f/Lack of transparency in reporting narrative synthesis of quantitative data: a methodological assessment of systematic reviews2018-09-10T18:02:17+00:00
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30196129
pwhaleySynthesisMethods MetaAnalysishttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:682ceb97c62f/Mercury Exposure, Blood Pressure, and Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Dose–response Meta-analysis2018-08-14T13:25:59+00:00
https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/ehp2863/#t2n1
pwhaleySRCaseStudyhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:41eb32043728/Machine learning of toxicological big data enables read-across structure activity relationships (RASAR) outperforming animal test reproducibility | Toxicological Sciences | Oxford Academic2018-07-15T17:34:23+00:00
https://academic.oup.com/toxsci/advance-article/doi/10.1093/toxsci/kfy152/5043469
pwhaleyAIhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:7f6197c13511/WHO/ILO work-related burden of disease and injury: Protocol for systematic reviews of occupational exposure to dusts and/or fibres and of the effect of occupational exposure to dusts and/or fibres on pneumoconiosis - ScienceDirect2018-07-15T17:25:21+00:00
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412017321785
pwhaleySRCaseStudy Protocolhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:ad6d96ed8f4f/WHO/ILO work-related burden of disease and injury: Protocol for systematic reviews of exposure to long working hours and of the effect of exposure to long working hours on stroke - ScienceDirect2018-07-15T17:24:39+00:00
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412018300631
pwhaleySRCaseStudy Protocolhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:129de3df8594/DISEASES: Text mining and data integration of disease–gene associations2018-07-06T18:23:56+00:00
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1046202314003831?_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_origin=gateway&_docanchor=&md5=b8429449ccfc9c30159a5f9aeaa92ffb&dgcid=raven_sd_recommender_email
pwhaleyAI TextMininghttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:27bdf4b3ff3f/Unsupervised biomedical named entity recognition: Experiments with clinical and biological texts2018-07-06T18:22:13+00:00
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046413001196?_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_origin=gateway&_docanchor=&md5=b8429449ccfc9c30159a5f9aeaa92ffb&dgcid=raven_sd_recommender_email
pwhaleyAI NamedEntityhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:51676b9745d1/A fresh approach to evidence synthesis2018-06-27T04:58:16+00:00
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-05472-8
pwhaleyhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:c782f2bc963a/Four principles to make evidence synthesis more useful for policy2018-06-27T04:57:13+00:00
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-05414-4
pwhaleyhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:ccf9c86d5a65/Evidence synthesis needs greater incentives2018-06-27T04:55:39+00:00
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-05464-8
pwhaleyhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:013ed30befb6/Paraquat and Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review protocol according to the OHAT approach for hazard identification2018-05-17T15:36:58+00:00
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5433017/
pwhaleyProtocol SRCaseStudyhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:5e48fa4f1e48/Quality of epidemiological studies: Procedural rules for uncertain science for policy, a case study on bisphenol-A2018-04-26T16:12:43+00:00
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901117313114
pwhaleyExpertElicitationhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:a374d7073788/The Scientific Paper Is Obsolete. Here's What's Next2018-04-24T10:45:25+00:00
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/04/the-scientific-paper-is-obsolete/556676/
pwhaleyMediahttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:449a2836a519/Something for everyone? 2nd REACH Review has received a mixed response2018-04-16T12:33:53+00:00
https://chemicalwatch.com/65813/something-for-everyone
pwhaleyMedia SystematicMaphttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:7e9c81a327e5/PRISMA and AMSTAR Show Systematic Reviews of Health Literacy and Cancer Screening are Good Quality2018-04-16T11:48:08+00:00
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29654821
pwhaleySRStandardshttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:6851479c3018/Coca cola war with public health science over obesity2018-04-03T19:16:54+00:00
http://www.ehn.org/coca-cola-war-on-science-2555599081.html
pwhaleyMediahttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:e128bea3cb91/Software support for environmental evidence synthesis2018-03-29T13:00:45+00:00
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-018-0502-x
pwhaleyAutomationhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:e09163ba656f/Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis2018-03-17T09:46:56+00:00
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature25753
pwhaleySRStandardshttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:a4563897e0fd/Tools for assessing risk of reporting biases in studies and syntheses of studies: a systematic review | BMJ Open2018-03-15T10:05:54+00:00
http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/8/3/e019703
pwhaleyRiskOfBiashttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:fe6ec364c427/Measurement error is often neglected in medical literature: a systematic review2018-03-12T11:28:30+00:00
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29522827
pwhaleySRStandards MeasurementErrorhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:dc06d5fbb896/Systematic reviews do not adequately report, or address missing outcome data in their analyses: a methodological survey2018-03-12T11:27:18+00:00
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29505859
pwhaleyMissingOutcomeData RiskOfBiashttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:2a238eddcc65/Prenatal exposure to bisphenol A and hyperactivity in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis2018-03-12T10:54:33+00:00
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412017311960
pwhaleySRCaseStudyhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:666803b83508/Association between Exposure to p,p'-DDT and Its Metabolite p,p'-DDE with Obesity: Integrated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis2018-03-11T11:32:40+00:00
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28934091
pwhaleySRCaseStudyhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:d278b2109e40/DDT and Obesity in Humans: Exploring the Evidence in a New Way2018-03-11T11:27:52+00:00
https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/ehp2545/
pwhaleyMedia SRCaseStudyhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:f6398fd369da/Systematic review of the literature on triclosan and health outcomes in humans2018-02-24T11:01:00+00:00
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28741979
pwhaleySRCaseStudyhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:e379711597f9/How citation distortions create unfounded authority: analysis of a citation network2018-02-12T10:23:10+00:00
http://www.bmj.com/content/339/bmj.b2680
pwhaleyRiskOfBiashttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:fe1a0690314f/Stop this waste of people, animals and money2018-02-03T17:17:26+00:00
https://www.nature.com/news/stop-this-waste-of-people-animals-and-money-1.22554?platform=hootsuite
pwhaleySRStandardshttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:d84b3a9bff54/Online tools supporting the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and systematic maps: a case study on CADIMA and review of existing tools2018-02-02T12:52:53+00:00
https://environmentalevidencejournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13750-018-0115-5
pwhaleyToolshttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:7820d56bf63c/Evaluating Data Abstraction Assistant, a novel software application for data abstraction during systematic reviews: protocol for a randomized controlled trial2018-01-29T15:52:29+00:00
https://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13643-016-0373-7
pwhaleyDataExtractionhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:97ab7a3acb12/Robust research needs many lines of evidence2018-01-25T11:37:29+00:00
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-01023-3
pwhaleyMediahttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:8d165f54a1f8/Role of Risk of Bias in Systematic Review for Chemical Risk Assessment: A Case Study in Understanding the Relationship Between Congenital Heart Defects and Exposures to Trichloroethylene2018-01-23T12:06:17+00:00
http://journals.sagepub.com/eprint/i6TSUnm8pTZbTrxiRHat/full
pwhaleyRiskOfBiashttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:a96ae1a3c7e0/Facilitating healthcare decisions by assessing the certainty in the evidence from preclinical animal studies2018-01-22T15:30:20+00:00
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0187271
pwhaleyGradingEvidence ExternalValidityhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:366ac733ff25/Gray literature: An important resource in systematic reviews2018-01-22T13:31:40+00:00
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28857505
pwhaleyGrayLiterature SearchMethodshttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:ca1ab526a145/Systematic review and evaluation of aspartame carcinogenicity bioassays using quality criteria2018-01-22T13:16:45+00:00
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29339245
pwhaleySRCaseStudy PrimaryStudies RiskOfBiashttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:b8aee793cb33/We need better animal research, better reported2018-01-21T12:02:35+00:00
http://www.bmj.com/content/360/bmj.k124
pwhaleyPrimaryStudies Mediahttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:76afabf90232/Unit of analysis issues in laboratory-based research2018-01-17T08:47:44+00:00
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5762161/
pwhaleyStatsMethodshttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:5c1c151f2838/Inclusive development and prioritization of review questions in a highly controversial field of regulatory science2018-01-16T11:09:05+00:00
https://environmentalevidencejournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13750-017-0113-z
pwhaleyProblemFormulationhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:0555330c5d86/What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences2018-01-11T14:55:31+00:00
https://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12874-017-0468-4
pwhaleyProblemFormulation SRStandardshttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:96ea410ab000/A call for action: Improve reporting of research studies to increase the scientific basis for regulatory decision-making2018-01-08T14:41:07+00:00
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jat.3578/abstract
pwhaleyRiskAssessment Reportinghttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:40757b6e7ebf/Refining tools to bridge the gap between academia and chemical regulation: perspectives for WikiREACH2018-01-08T14:11:18+00:00
http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2017/em/c7em00422b#!divAbstract
pwhaleyAutomationhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:66b1f8d1670a/Declarations and conflicts of interest in WHO guidelines2018-01-08T12:57:17+00:00
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29292204
pwhaleyInterestshttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:296961e1cbfa/Evidence & Gap Maps: A tool for promoting evidence informed policy and strategic research agendas2018-01-04T14:45:03+00:00
http://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(16)30190-1/fulltext
pwhaleySystematicMaphttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:f29636c9a0f0/Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions for risk factors correlate weakly with global risk factor burden: A cross-sectional study2018-01-02T11:24:55+00:00
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29288132
pwhaleyhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:3c9529b205e9/Technology-assisted risk of bias assessment in systematic reviews: A prospective cross-sectional evaluation of the RobotReviewer machine learning tool2018-01-02T11:13:05+00:00
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29289761
pwhaleyAutomationhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:730c55ed3e74/A systematic decision-making process on the need for updating clinical practice guidelines proved to be feasible in a pilot study2018-01-02T11:11:22+00:00
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29289763
pwhaleyProblemFormulationhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:160d9c1cf452/Recommendations for Assessing the Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions2017-12-29T14:36:08+00:00
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29248724
pwhaleyRiskOfBiashttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:738990db262d/Systematic reviews with published protocols compared to those without: more effort, older search2017-12-29T14:21:41+00:00
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29258907
pwhaleyProtocol SRStandardshttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:a9f9c50220db/Fostering responsible research practices is a shared responsibility of multiple stakeholders2017-12-29T14:17:57+00:00
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435617310004
pwhaleySRStandardshttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:7c8866d8c7c7/No difference in knowledge obtained from infographic or plain language summary of a Cochrane systematic review: three randomized controlled trials2017-12-29T14:01:02+00:00
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29269021
pwhaleySRStandardshttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:900ce73d8eab/Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review2017-12-20T15:15:10+00:00
https://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13643-017-0663-8
pwhaleySRStandardshttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:6f5e6eba8701/A retrospective comparison of systematic reviews with same-topic rapid reviews2017-12-18T12:13:36+00:00
http://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(17)30547-4/fulltext
pwhaleyRapidReviewshttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:aa64fccac9d7/Some Cochrane risk of bias items are not important in osteoarthritis trials: A meta-epidemiological study based on Cochrane reviews2017-12-11T12:47:48+00:00
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29222059
pwhaleyRiskOfBiashttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:cfc0eebe3c25/Flaws in the application and interpretation of statistical analyses in systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions were common: a cross-sectional analysis2017-12-11T12:46:01+00:00
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29203419
pwhaleyStatsMethodshttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:beab6cf076e4/Between-trial heterogeneity in meta-analyses may be partially explained by reported design characteristics2017-12-11T12:42:34+00:00
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29217451
pwhaleyRiskOfBiashttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:pwhaley/b:2b11bbb0e79b/