<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (willowtrees)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from willowtrees</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://notes.pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/40b539ebf71759a600d7"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://english.ryukyushimpo.jp/2016/07/05/25341/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://notes.pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/9ebfab6a16ac66ebbb5c"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.viewpointmag.com/2017/02/03/beyond-lean-in-for-a-feminism-of-the-99-and-a-militant-international-strike-on-march-8/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://notes.pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/ddc80ca4c338b7001f55"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/larry-womack/stop-pretending-you-dont-_b_12191766.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://twitter.com/Miirwais/status/794216578653032448"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://time.com/4350339/barack-obama-hiroshima-speech-full-text/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/05/the-hell-after-isis/476391/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://twitter.com/Miirwais/status/721035013479907328"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://berniesanders.com/issues/war-and-peace/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-34440965"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.globalresearch.ca/russia-bombs-isis/5479071"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://notes.pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/ef675c6a91a68f253f71"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://peacephilosophy.blogspot.jp/2015/08/the-world-is-watching-international.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://notes.pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b6ca081893da24a607cb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pajhwok.com/en/opinions/afghan-lives-matter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://notes.pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/70f65cc27cdfb31fe744"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://notes.pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/2e13c183854a93297ef8"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://networks.h-net.org/system/files/contributed-files/japan-scholars-statement-2015.5.4-eng_0.pdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://notes.pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/9ff32e0bd5f8a178b364"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nikkan-gendai.com/articles/view/news/158422/1"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/isis-terror/burned-alive-isis-video-purports-show-murder-jordanian-pilot-n299361"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://powerofnarrative.blogspot.com/2015/01/these-crimes-will-never-be-purged-away.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.presstv.com/Detail/2015/01/04/391547/Who-are-the-real-human-traffickers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.usatoday.com/story/theoval/2014/12/28/obama-afghanistan-combat-operations-end-statement/20969021/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://electronicintifada.net/content/still-reeling-summer-assault-gaza-faces-new-israeli-threats/14150"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.dawn.com/news/1151866/military-courts-being-established-for-terror-trials-says-khawaja-asif"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.washingtonpost.com/page/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2014/12/16/National-Politics/Polling/release_376.xml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://socialistworker.org/2014/12/15/a-movement-demands-to-be-heard"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://socialistworker.org/2014/12/04/americas-longest-war-gets-longer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/22/us/politics/in-secret-obama-extends-us-role-in-afghan-combat.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://iraqhope.exblog.jp/23691621/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://socialistworker.org/2014/11/10/imperialist-feminism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://moriyama-law.cocolog-nifty.com/machiben/2014/11/post-1b35.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://notes.pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/753054a0fe1f4f752b36"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://yushisha.blog.ocn.ne.jp/blog/2014/08/post_8a42.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://moriyama-law.cocolog-nifty.com/machiben/2014/10/post-b111.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://iwj.co.jp/wj/open/archives/181719"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cbsnews.com/news/muslims-in-france-protest-against-extremism/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.un.org/en/ga/69/meetings/gadebate/24sep/usa.shtml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://socialistworker.org/2014/09/24/obamas-ever-expanding-war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/2014/07/24/bureau-study-reveals-vacuum-of-information-around-afghanistan-drone-strikes/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pajhwok.com/en/2014/08/05/herat-civilian-killings-touch-protest"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2014/07/28/liby-j28.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/pity_the_children_20140630"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/15/opinion/sunday/chelsea-manning-the-us-militarys-campaign-against-media-freedom.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_ghoulish_face_of_empire_20140623"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2014/06/03/national/politics-diplomacy/obama-called-sdf-involvement-africa/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://shinsho.shueisha.co.jp/kotoba/tachiyomi/140303.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2014/05/28/afgh-m28.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.goo.ne.jp/kentanakachan/e/faaa12c53e0ba635de5fc7e09226e66c"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://twitter.com/masanorinaito/status/468408724185296898"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.japan-press.co.jp/modules/news/index.php?id=7141"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://nakano-kenji.blogspot.com/2014/05/2014.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pajhwok.com/en/2014/04/15/mother-killed-2-children-khost-airstrike"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.marxist.com/russian-annexation-of-crimea-what-consequences-for-world-relations.htm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://upsidedownworld.org/main/uruguay-archives-48/4757-a-step-toward-justice-in-the-long-war-on-terror-uruguay-offers-to-welcome-guantanamo-detainees"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/03/18/obama-backs-down-on-crimea/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://socialistworker.org/2014/03/12/two-wrong-sides-in-ukraine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.uruknet.de/?p=m104954&amp;hd=&amp;size=1&amp;l=e"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2014/02/19/business/japan-to-offer-tariff-reduction-for-u-s-beef-in-tpp-talks/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.wsj.com/japanrealtime/2014/02/13/kennedy-invokes-jfk-episode-as-she-seeks-to-woo-okinawa/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blackagendareport.com/content/freedom-rider-boycott-america-not-russia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://williamblum.org/aer/read/125"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rt.com/news/us-military-sex-abuse-281/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.uruknet.de/?p=m104728&amp;hd=&amp;size=1&amp;l=e"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ohtarzie.wordpress.com/2014/01/25/passing-noam-on-my-way-out-part-1/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://unama.unmissions.org/Default.aspx?tabid=12254&amp;ctl=Details&amp;mid=15756&amp;ItemID=37692&amp;language=en-US"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/feb/07/west-criminal-bloodbath-iraq-media-cover-up"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://notes.pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/40b539ebf71759a600d7">
    <title>full text of my comment about &quot;Naha prosecutors bring additional charges against US military contractor in murder case&quot;</title>
    <dc:date>2017-03-23T02:43:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://notes.pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/40b539ebf71759a600d7</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[last month, follow-up articles on this incident exposed in may 2016 was released, because the suspect, shinzato, US military contractor and ex-US-Marine, wanted to tell US people his thought, and his ...]]></description>
<dc:subject>usa japan asia afghanistan pakistan death military-bases military occupation okinawa</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://notes.pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:7af84e8e4e83/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:japan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:asia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:afghanistan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:pakistan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:death"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:military-bases"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:military"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:occupation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:okinawa"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://english.ryukyushimpo.jp/2016/07/05/25341/">
    <title>Naha prosecutors bring additional charges against US military contractor in murder case | July 1, 2016 Ryukyu Shimpo</title>
    <dc:date>2017-03-23T02:38:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://english.ryukyushimpo.jp/2016/07/05/25341/</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[...her death and the two deaths have been etched on my mind. whenever I remember one of them, I remember the rest of them whether or not I want to do so. though I attempted to write a comment about the three deaths/lives late in May when media stared to report the deaths (her body was discovered on 19th May, and the two men were killed by US drones on 21th May), I couldn't do so because I couldn't resolve my feelings. and so I wrote a comment only about the latter, probably because there was virtually no US people's voice of protest against the US killing of the latter. to be precise, no US people saw killing Mullah Akhtar Mansoor as a problem, very very very few US people said that it's a problem that US forces killed taxi driver Mohammad Azam as "collateral damage" and that the drone bombing was infringement of sovereignty of pakistan, and very very few US people released a statement about killing her to protest and condole. because I heard the news of the deaths of three people at approximately the same time, and because I believed that if US hadn't occupied afghanistan/japan, these three people wouldn't have been killed, and because there were very very little US people's protest against the killing of them, in short, because their deaths have several points in common, I collectively remember these three deaths/lives...
(to be continued)]]></description>
<dc:subject>japan usa occupation military military-bases death okinawa afghanistan pakistan</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:e29c4c42960e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:japan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:occupation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:military"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:military-bases"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:death"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:okinawa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:afghanistan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:pakistan"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://notes.pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/9ebfab6a16ac66ebbb5c">
    <title>full text of my comment about &quot;Beyond Lean-In: For a Feminism of the 99% and a Militant International Strike on March 8&quot;</title>
    <dc:date>2017-03-23T02:32:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://notes.pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/9ebfab6a16ac66ebbb5c</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><dc:subject>usa feminism memo</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://notes.pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:6aa9ebda925f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:feminism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:memo"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.viewpointmag.com/2017/02/03/beyond-lean-in-for-a-feminism-of-the-99-and-a-militant-international-strike-on-march-8/">
    <title>Beyond Lean-In: For a Feminism of the 99% and a Militant International Strike on March 8 | by Angela Davis, Barbara Ransby, Cinzia Arruzza, Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor, Linda Martín Alcoff, Nancy Fraser, Rasmea Yousef Odeh and Tithi Bhattacharya February 3,</title>
    <dc:date>2017-03-23T02:29:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.viewpointmag.com/2017/02/03/beyond-lean-in-for-a-feminism-of-the-99-and-a-militant-international-strike-on-march-8/</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[what comes from US when feminists living in US criticize "lean-in" feminism and corporate feminism? it seems to be nationalist feminism. does "feminism for the 99%" include the following people among the "99%"?: women who are about to be killed as "collateral damage" by US forces, women whose relatives are about to be killed as "terrorists" by US soldiers, and women whose relatives were killed by US military, and women who are about to die of hunger due to US financial/military support to dictators. because this statement seems to call for international solidarity movement, I guess "the 99%" include non-US people. but they seem to exclude them.

in addition, do they include these US people among "99%"?
-US soldiers who occupy other countries, and bomb/raid people living there.
-US soldiers, their families, and civilian personnel, all of who enjoy immunity/privileges in countries US occupy, at the expensive of local people.
-US humanitarian activists and anthropologists who support/join PRT (provincial reconstruction team) which US occupation forces use to weak-US experts/scholars who train local people as disposable soldiers/experts used for US occupation policy.
(to be continued)]]></description>
<dc:subject>usa feminism</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:30a1cd1e4e8b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:feminism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://notes.pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/ddc80ca4c338b7001f55">
    <title>2 Stop Pretending You Don't Know Why People Hate Hillary Clinton 09/26/2016 Larry Womack | Huffington Post</title>
    <dc:date>2016-11-04T21:48:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://notes.pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/ddc80ca4c338b7001f55</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[(rest of my comment)]]></description>
<dc:subject>democracy election usa nation state</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://notes.pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:60a4fd847c45/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:democracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:election"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:nation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:state"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/larry-womack/stop-pretending-you-dont-_b_12191766.html">
    <title>Stop Pretending You Don't Know Why People Hate Hillary Clinton 09/26/2016 Larry Womack | Huffington Post</title>
    <dc:date>2016-11-04T21:43:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/larry-womack/stop-pretending-you-dont-_b_12191766.html</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[because huggingtonpost of japan translated this disgusting piece into japanese, I unluckily came across it. I'm indifferent to the corrupt/ugly election. but this writer's omission of humans who "have fallen through the cracks" is overstepping the limit. the writer keeps silent on humans whom the writer and she, who produced results as politician, have been ignoring, marginalizing and dehumanizing. (I wonder how US citizens prevent themselves from losing their thinking power and morality, while watching news on it, which leads viewers to decay them. in japan also, mainstream media of my country have been devotedly spread such news as have the same bad effect on japanese viewers.)

> "..One, as a young woman..went door to door searching for ways to guarantee an education to the countless disabled and disadvantaged children who had fallen through the cracks. The other, as a young millionaire, exacted revenge on his recently deceased brother's family by cutting off the medical insurance desperately needed by his nephew's newborn son.." 

she has been eagerly hugging many US wars against muslim countries, which have been killing countless children and women and destroyed their homelands, and which have been mass-producing "countless disabled, disadvantaged", malnourished, traumatized, displaced, homeless, parentless children, and which have been taking lives of countless women's fathers, mothers, husbands, brothers, sisters, children, cousins, nephews, and nieces. she and her supporters are accomplices of have been dropping them to the cracks. and they've never "gone door to door searching for ways to" give them apology/compensation, nor to stop dropping humans to the cracks. and her close relation with israel lobbies and her speeches for them show her cold-bloodedness to "countless disabled and disadvantaged" palestinian children.

she has been graspingly hugging the greedy ruling elites of wall street and washington and fully supporting policies which give favorable treatment to them, at the expense of countless poor parents whose "disabled and disadvantaged children" are allegedly cared about by her. one of her policies --opposing discrimination and advocating LGBTs' and women's rights-- , which her supporters acclaim, is empowering quite few of the minorities, who are expected to be useful to reinforce the present system only for the ruling-elite, and other minorities will "fall through the cracks" as usual.

(she was a strong supporter for US iraq war and afghan war and reinforcement of US soldiers. in afghanistan, not only armed muslims but many afghan children and womens have been killed by US forces and afghan soldiers trained by US forces on a daily basis. they are killed again today and the bereaved stage a protest demonstration again today.  US iraq war torn apart iraq forever and brought IS to iraq/syria, and iraq won't never restore such a multi-ethnic and multi-sectarian country as people lived peacefully. total silence of candidates who supported the wars on their suffering and the necessity of apology/compensation shows their lack a sense of responsibility, which need to fulfill their duty as a politician. at the same time, it proves that they regard what their decisions have caused in iraq/afghanistan as trivial, in other words, they think what they've caused are so trivial that they and their country need not make apology/compensation. as long as they think/regard so, they will repeat such "trivial" mistakes unsolicitously. she said she learned the right lessons from the wars against iraq/afghanistan. but iraqis/afghans are never disposable things to give US citizens a lesson that they need to learn to be a president candidate. what both the people have been losing are unspeakably tremendous, and most of them are irreparable. her words "she learned the right lessons" sound good, but such elementary lessons should be learned by all US citizens whose country's history is full of wars in primary school. her words aren't appropriate for richly experienced lawyer/politician to use. and her making wrong decisions about waging the wars, which have been causing catastrophic damage and suffering to iraqis/afghans, and her keeping silent on them and the necessity of apology/compensation, and a fact that there is no sign of ending their damage and suffering, don't pave the way for such politicians as had such worst mistakes to take stronger power, but show that their power should be weakened. (in the first place, it's difficult to suppose that such politicians as had a close relationship with wall-street made the decisions "in error" without taking account of US ruling class's interests in oil and pipe-line.) 

what's more, when the world needs to dissolve "war on terror" --privileged ruling elites label as "terrorist" humans who resist the established order under which they can maximize their own interests and kill them freely to protect the order and the interests--, it's highly dangerous that warmongers take power. but we aren't prepared for it at all. (to be continued)]]></description>
<dc:subject>election usa disgust democracy nation states</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:a687a043134b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:election"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:disgust"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:democracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:nation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:states"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://twitter.com/Miirwais/status/794216578653032448">
    <title>Mirwais Afghan on Twitter &quot;And they call it &quot;precision strikes&quot; .. #Kunduz&quot;</title>
    <dc:date>2016-11-04T21:36:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://twitter.com/Miirwais/status/794216578653032448</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[from the page: "One of the 36 victims (mostly children&women) killed by US airstrike in Kunduz 3/11/2016"

US/EU people will take no notice of this photo of an afghan baby killed by US forces. US/EU mainstream media focused on the photo of drowned alan kurdi and published reports, and european leaders made a comment about him and other syrian refugees, and mentioned their responsibilities to help them. (though thinking about it now, they did only lip service.) these european leaders, who have deployed their soldiers in afghanistan, won't make a comment about this afghan baby and more than 30 people killed together with the baby by US forces and those killed by US/NATO forces for 15 years. though western mainstream media wrote a profile of alan and his family, they won't write that of the baby and the bereaved. though US/EU people were shocked at the photo of alan, and made a large donation to charities helping syrian refugees (but such donation was just a drop in the bucket, considering syrians' vastly great suffering), they won't concerned about the photo of the baby nor make donation to NGOs helping afghans nor make a protest against the 15-year-old US/NATO occupation of afghanistan, which is the most major reason why afghanistan is the second biggest source of refugees. who will ask to the bereaved: what is the baby's name, how old it is, its parents and brothers and sisters are alive? ]]></description>
<dc:subject>afghanistan asia usa civilians death war kunduz photos</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:f9fd8335e8e7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:afghanistan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:asia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:civilians"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:death"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:kunduz"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:photos"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://time.com/4350339/barack-obama-hiroshima-speech-full-text/">
    <title>The Full Text of President Obama’s Speech In Hiroshima | May 27, 2016 time.com</title>
    <dc:date>2016-05-30T16:56:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://time.com/4350339/barack-obama-hiroshima-speech-full-text/</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[scenes engraved on his memory recurred to him.

scene 1: a little boy living in a tranquil village walk to primary school with his friends. after school, he plays with them. at home, he helps his parents/grandparents. at mealtimes, he sits around the table with them, talking about his today's events. his family listens to him with a smile. he is full and gets into bed without anxiety. one day, his friend says to him "my father said "a war might start."" "war? what is it?"
scene 2: a boy sees villagers carry bloodstained bodies of his neighbors, their families screamed and cried before them, some are moaning in their pain, others are seem to be unvital, a breeze carry the smell of blood to him. he mutters to himself "again today. i want to hurry up and become a man and take enemies apart." some friends come to him, saying goodbye, "my father and mother decided my family would leave this war-torn village." poorest villagers have nothing else to do but stay there. graves, widows, orphans, disabled are increasing and the village becomes poorer. his grandfather advices him to attend a distant madrasa.
scene 3: he listens to the lecture of islam carefully. he enjoys competing with his classmates in military training class. a teacher brings him the news that his home village is fiercely attacked. he says, "i want to go back home just now for the defense of my fellow people and homeland." his classmates gather round him, saying "same here." the teacher calms them down, making reference to the islamic teachings.
scene 4: the teacher says "at last, mujahideen fighters have just liberated our homeland from the invaders!"
scene 5: in a small mosque scarred by countless bullet holes, one of his elder friend says, "i can't bear with this situation. they've been raping women, girls and boys. looters stripped our fellow muslims of valuables and kill them, including children. we have an obligation to protect our fellow people at the risk of our lives." he responds, "I totally agree with you. I'll join you." he arms himself.
scene 6: he kills an enemy human for the first time on the battlefield. he moves to other battlefields, where some of his comrades are killed, and where he get hurt. he enters the capital for the first time, hearing hearty welcoming cheers of people. he confidently says, "let's rebuild our country with peace." soon, he notices that the city is very different from his quiet/plain village, "we must watch over the morals and behavior here." the welcoming eyes for him and his comrades turn to those filled with fear.
scene 7: wedding ceremony and happy married life, his first child arrives.
scene 8: the deterioration of farmlands has been intensified. there is nothing that can be done. his fellow people are now on the brink of starvation. there is no foreign aids. he and his comrades desperately search for a solution for saving these starving people and preventing suffering invasion, in line with islamic teachings and pashtunwali. the air attack on him and his fellow people starts.
scene 9: his fellow people are dying due to foreign forces' bombing and raids and to lack of medical service, foods, and clean water. he pledges to remove humiliation that he and his fellow people are forced to endure by invaders, who strip them of their lives, dignities, cultures, and traditions. his subordinate informs him that villagers are restarting poppy cultivation. he says "turn a blind eye to them. in this village suffering from water shortage, impoverished soil, poverty, and high unemployment, if we eradicate the cultivation, they'll inevitably die from severe starvation." 
scene 10: in winter, he returns to his family. his wife and his children who have grown bigger in the time since he saw them last run up to him and hug him. she examines wounds on his body and treat them. his elder son decisively says, "father, i'll fight against invaders with you."
scene 11: he listens to the news of the death of the leader. he prays. 
scene 12: he orders his subordinates, who are as old as his eldest child, to carry out a suicide bomb attack, emphatically telling them not to hurt unarmed civilians, according to the islamic teachings. the next day, he makes his subordinates confirm information about their deaths and civilians killed in the operation. he prays at a mosque. he orders them to make an operation to rescue several persons of ethnic minority, who are captured by foreign armed muslims. after the operation is successfully carried out, the freed people thank him and his subordinates from the bottom of their hearts. but media write a piece that the nation's armed forces rescued them. he says, "as usual. whatever we do, media always call us terrorist group. but allah knows everything."
scene 13: he and his comrades discuss how they get war chest, how they help the starved, how they increase schools/madrasas for children, how they secure public order in their areas of influence, how they decrease casualties, how they prevent intensifying civil war and division, what preconditions they set to participate in peace-talk, how they lead the govts and occupiers accept them, and how they establish a sanctuary outside pakistan.

as soon as the bombing sent a powerful shock wave through him, these scenes passed before his mind's eye in an instant. they got mixed with his dream --his homeland, where his fellow people are living peacefully without hunger and oppression, following islamic teachings, and where his grandchildren are growing up without anxiety, and his leaders, family, deceased/living comrades, and someone are calling him, with koranic verses. his mind becomes clouded, blank. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

he might have been one of many humans whom the current US president ordered and will order US forces/cia to assassinate. what shaped the course of his life are the fist foreign invasion caused by the soviet and by US which adopted a scheme to bring the soviet suffering as acute as that they had received from the vietnam war and the second one caused by US and NATO. US asserts that he is an obstacle to peace-talk. peace for US is not peace.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
i imagine another scene: the president received a copy of his speech in hiroshima from a speechwriter, quickly scanned it, were exactly pleased with it, and gave him a bright smile. at the same time, another staff gave him a brief: "mission accomplishment. in accordance with your, US president's order, US forces assassinated mansour by drone strike near the border." he nodded with smile. origami cranes which he are folding in the name of pray for the abolition of nuclear weapons become blood-red with blood of mansour, azam (civilian taxi driver of the car that US bombed to kill mansour), and countless victims around the world mass-produced by the obama's war. 

these deaths "fell from the sky" on US president, obama's orders. the obama's war, which his predecessor began, and which he transformed into the endless war not only against muslims but also probably against us, in other words, against humans resisting existing systems and against humans useless for maintaining them. he hears/imagines voices/lives only of dead/living humans who are useful for maintaining/developing them.

today, hiroshima/nagasaki tells us how shamelessly citizens of japan and usa have been playing the innocent since the end of WWII, by rewriting histories, covering up some of them, shifting their own responsibilities, obscuring and keeping silent on the locations of responsibilities, escaping from realities, exploiting souls of the silent deceased, interpreting what humans whom they oppress say to suit their own purpose, speaking on behalf of them, scapegoating them, and regarding them as subhumans. both the citizens are accomplices. this is a very reason why both the citizens are impressed by the speech, which gives a official stamp of approval from the president for their decades-long inhumane attitudes to victims of their wars/colonialism.

(p.s. 
as i've said before, about hiroshima/nagasaki, US has a moral responsibility to abandon nuclear weapons before other countries do. there is nothing for it but to do so, to show hibakushas that US admits the nuclear-bombings weren't justice. though a few americans, including "conscientious" US intellectuals/historians, criticize contradiction between his words and actions about nuclear weapons, they never specifically mention about this --how US should take the responsibility. their remarks are on an assumption that US is the last country which abandons nuclear weapons if humanity achieves a world without nuclear weapons. if US chooses to be the last country, it means that US abandons the responsibility and sifts it onto other countries that haven't committed the nuclear-bombing on the populated cities. US is the only country which committed it, and so, it has the responsibility that other countries obtaining nuclear weapons don't have. but even these "conscientious" US citizens allow themselves and US not to confront it. just like the president, they're US exceptionalists, too.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>japan asia usa history obama speech war</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:53669ba69d9b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:japan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:asia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:obama"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:speech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:war"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/05/the-hell-after-isis/476391/">
    <title>The Hell After ISIS by Anand Gopal May 2016 Issue | The Atlantic</title>
    <dc:date>2016-04-18T19:52:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/05/the-hell-after-isis/476391/</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[from the page: "Even as the militant group loses ground in Iraq, many Sunnis say they have no hope for peace. One family’s story shows why."]]></description>
<dc:subject>war middle-east iraq sunni IDPs refugees massacre usa</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:8e8de28a0725/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:middle-east"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:iraq"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:sunni"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:IDPs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:refugees"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:massacre"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://twitter.com/Miirwais/status/721035013479907328">
    <title>Mirwais Afghan on Twitter: &quot;Protest against last week's Dronestrike in #Paktika that killed 20 civilians. Does anyone care about Afghans?&quot;</title>
    <dc:date>2016-04-18T19:23:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://twitter.com/Miirwais/status/721035013479907328</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[from the page: "Protest against last week's Dronestrike in #Paktika that killed 20 civilians. Does anyone care about Afghans?　@hrw" 

(1)
US committed this drone strike on 6 april in paktika. (according to others report, not 20 but 17 civilian were killed.) a few days ago, Afghan-US forces killed 12 people including three children in logar. as usual, americans are keeping turning a deaf ear to howls of protest among afghans. in addition, media don't report such a protest in english that they can understand. not only protest but killing civilians by the occupying forces and afghan ones supported by US/NATO are often ignored and we don't notice their deaths. of course, there is killing by anti-govt groups, too, and whoever they are killed by, bereaved families suffer terribly.]]></description>
<dc:subject>afghanistan asia usa nato civilians death drones protest photos</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:42ffa4d15ba6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:afghanistan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:asia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:nato"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:civilians"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:death"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:drones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:protest"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:photos"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://berniesanders.com/issues/war-and-peace/">
    <title>War and Peace (1) | Bernie Sanders</title>
    <dc:date>2016-02-10T00:19:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://berniesanders.com/issues/war-and-peace/</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[some japanese leftists who denounce japanese communist party (I think their criticism is fair) are excited by growing popularity of Sanders as comeback of socialism in US. so, I read this page to know his thought about US imperialism. I think the leftists in US/japan are destroying themselves.


> Sanders will protect America, defend our interests and values... strongly believes that we must pursue policies that uphold the core values that make us proud to be Americans...
US successive presidents said the same thing. then, US has driven the middle-east and afghanistan into chaos.


> Sanders knows what the cost of war is...
while he concretely explains what the US cost of the US aggressive war against iraq is, he never mention iraqis' suffering, which US has been causing. to defend US interests and values, based on US exceptionalism (or US ultra-nationalism), he will abandon iraqi people.


> Sanders voted to authorize military strikes against Afghanistan, after it became clear that the Taliban regime harbored and gave support to Osama...
US bombed afghanistan without existing a necessity of self-defence, instant, overwhelming, leaving no choice of means. it's illegal. to defend US interests and values, he voted for violating international laws. taliban, in accordance with Pashtun tradition, treated bin Laden as a guest who had supported afghan resistance against the soviet, which doesn't mean taliban supported ones who attacked US on 9/11. in addition, by US assassinating him without trial, US prevented exposing what role he had played in the attack. additionally, taliban stated that if US showed evidence that bin Laden was the leader of the attack, they would hand over him. ignoring it, US bombed afghanistan. Sanders omits/distorts facts inconvenient for US exceptionalism and for his vote.


> Sanders called on both Presidents Bush and Obama to withdraw U.S. troops as soon as possible...
US forces must withdraw from afghanistan. but he must mention afghans' suffering, which the US war/occupation against/on afghanistan has been causing, and who is to blame for it.
I likened USA to a band of robbery-murders a few years ago. I say it again. this band breaks into a house where a family lives, and kill a few members of the family, destroy interior equipment, and wrest monetary values and foods from the family, and say, "if you want foods, if you don't want your children to be killed by us, kill each other, and break the equipment into pieces, in order to prevent yourselves from rebuilding your house and bringing about reconciliation among you." the band provides guns to the family to incite to kill and break. days later, the boss of the band, wearing a humanitarian expression, says to bloodstained, starving, surviving members of the family, "our taking responsibility for suffering which we've brought you is against our interests/values. so, not we but you must take it." just now, members of the band are treating him and themselves as socialists, and expressing enthusiastic support for him.

> Sanders strongly condemned indiscriminate rocket fire by Hamas...The Palestinians must unequivocally recognize Israel’s right to exist, and hold accountable those who have committed terrorist...
only when he mentions palestinians' violence, he uses words "indiscriminate" "terrorists". when he does israelis' one, he uses moderate words. in addition to this, his remark that palestinians must recognize the right, omitting a fact that most palestinians have done so, makes palestinians look like bad people.

> The Israelis must end the blockade of Gaza... 
he is silent on palestinians' suffering under israeli occupation. though it's true that the blockade has been driving palestinians to utmost despair, the decades-long occupation, which has been strongly supported by US, has striped palestinians of their dignities and prevented them from living a human life. and by not distinguishing between violence to resist occupation and that to oppress humans and to occupy others' lands, he diverts readers' attention away from the structural, extensive violence caused by the occupation. it's natural for a US politician who loves US exceptionalism and never mentions some facts -- US has countless military bases around the world, which have brought suffering to local people, and US was built by invaders' occupation of indigenous americans lands, which have brought suffering to indigenous people, and most americans justify their ignoring both the sufferings by using US exceptionalism -- regard palestinians' suffering caused by the occupation as trivial and call their resistance as "terrorist".


> by all sides, to the tenets of international humanitarian law is necessary...
it's funny that one who voted for the illegal US bombing on afghanistan, and who looks away from iraqis'/afghans' suffering caused by US and who keeps silent on US responsibility to ease their suffering (US should remove it but it's impossible to do so), says so. 

]]></description>
<dc:subject>usa elections imperialism exceptionalism nationalism iraq syria afghanistan middle-east war terrorism palestine</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:5f91e01b81a7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:elections"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:imperialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:exceptionalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:nationalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:iraq"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:syria"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:afghanistan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:middle-east"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:terrorism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:palestine"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-34440965">
    <title>Afghan conflict: MSF 'disgust' at government hospital claims | BBC 5 October 2015</title>
    <dc:date>2015-10-07T21:36:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-34440965</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[(1)
for 14 years, US/NATO have killed/injured countless afghans by bombing/raiding homes, madrasas, other non-military facilities, groups of children who gathered firewood or who were on way home from school, etc. and they've insisted repeatedly that they killed just only taliban, or that they were "collateral damage" or that it was an "mistake". on the other hands, the bereaved and local people have made a march of protest against the killings. in other words, they've raised a voice in protest, just like the present MSF. but only when they were "lucky", they were in the news. the NATO bombing a MSF hospital in kunduz and other atrocities by US/NATO soldiers who were charged with war crimes later are just the tip of the iceberg. by giving news of the prosecutions broad coverage, the media lead people to believe that US/NATO established justice and that they except "bad apples" have done good things in afghanistan. afghans might criticize my words, but I dare say, I guess that they probably regard the bombing the hospital in kunduz as usual atrocity, not as unusual one, unlike the international community which is suddenly focusing on afghanistan. (of course, it's preferable that more people know afghans' miseries caused by the US/NATO war/occupation.)

I remember an atrocity: US soldiers carried out a night raid, and killed an afghan whole family including children and women, and a baseless rumor became rampant in pieces written by some western media that afghans traditionally torture their children. I guessed that they intended to lead their readers think that the children were killed not by the soldiers but by their parents before the raid or that the latter were as brutal as the former, in order to belittle the atrocity by exploiting innocent victims.

why the bombing in kunduz is reported by the media widely and tweeted by many people, while others have been ignored? because a world-renowned Western NGO become "collateral damage" and they regard the NGO becoming it as much more serious than others becoming it. two months ago, iraqi army bombed (barrel bombs) a maternity and children's hospital in falluja, which caused 22 deaths (mothers and their children), which didn't hit the headlines. only few people mention both the bombings. (in addition, in 2014, israel bombed hospitals in gaza.) the media have a ranking list, in which well-known organizations/persons of the west are at the top, others of the west are underneath them. ones of the non-west are underneath them, and non-western persons who resist against western-established systems/rules, in shorts, those called "terrorists", and their families are at the bottom.

(2)
it's just natural MSF is denouncing. but it doesn't do for other "collateral damage", probably because it stays "neutral" to prevent all sides from hindering its activity. (it seems that US/NATO or afghan national forces can't stand the "neutrality".) but is it appropriate? I understand the acute/essential need for medical service and medical providers' free activity and safety on battlefields. I side with MSF which demands for an independent investigation. but I want those denouncing this bombing and demanding the investigation to open their eyes not only it but also to reality of the war/occupation of afghanistan and other wars/occupations.

no one wants to be "collateral damage". when one is killed or seriously injured, she/he and her/his family can never agree to regard her/him as "collateral damage". when people realize it, which do they resist against, ranking human lives or placing their own lives in the bottom? if they resist only the later, they should find themselves accomplices of war/occupation. even if MSF denouncing prevents US/NATO bombing another hospital, it doesn't mean they stop bombing and causing "collateral damage" and refugees. by allowing/forcing US/NATO to rank human lives to protect medical facilities and humans there, people become accomplices of war/occupation, which inevitably cause victims, whose lives (and dignities) are put in the bottom of the ranking list.

people have been looking away from a very grave question: is the US/NATO war/occupation of afghanistan just? articles written by the media have never mentioned this question and prevented people considering it. if US/NATO hadn't waged the war/occupation of afghanistan, this bombing the hospital in kundus wouldn't have occurred. suffering of afghans has proved this war/occupation is immoral. not only that, from a perspective of international laws, the US, UK, france, etc, bombing afghanistan as a start of the war was against the laws, because US wasn't in clear and imminent danger of being attacked, and the war/occupation is clearly against proportionality. in addition, US attacked afghanistan, despite no afghan participating in 911. and the occupation of afghanistan, which has been carried out by the US/NATO soldiers, ISAF, established by the UN security council resolution is regarded as "legal". but its legality was built on the illegal start of the war. (when UN security council or general assembly adopted "improper" resolutions, what should/can we do? for example, resolutions related to palestine generally took advantage of palestinians' large tolerance, and forced life-threatened palestinians to accept harsh conditions, while passing over western responsibility for the palestinian issue, whose roots were the western colonization of the middle-east and anti-semitism. who should take responsibility for taking away suffering caused by the past colonization and "improper" resolutions?) 

it's high time that we took action necessary to question the responsibility/accountability of US which waged the war against the international laws, and of countries of the UN security council which adopted the resolution, of countries which have/had implemented the resolution by sending their soldiers, and of other countries which have/had unmilitary supported the occupation. (regarding japan, US military bases in japan were used as launch pad, training yard, and logistic base of the US war of afghanistan. and accepting US request, japan sent its soldiers who performed refueling mission as backup logistic support to the indian ocean, and has provided an immense amount of money on the afghan puppet govt and carried out DDS（disarmament, demobilization, reintegration) mission. I'm always disgusted that some anti-war japanese have praised this failed DDS mission as an example of success of japan's positive peace activity and have never taken up the war/occupation as a legal/moral issue for discussion. and many japanese who protest against approval of japan's use of the right of collective self-defense and making the war/security laws based on this approval have never regarded the japan's refueling mission and japan's nearly silence on US's virtually free use of its military bases in japan for the war as japan's use of the right, and thought japan as an innocent country about the war/occupation. they are escapist.) as long as we don't question the responsibility/accountability of them, afghans' suffering and destruction of afghanistan are ignored or deadly downplayed as "collateral damage". 

in addition, we should face up to defects of the laws. for example, by only saying that they made efforts to discriminate between combatants and civilians, they are virtually allowed to make indiscriminate attacks and granted immunity. in afghanistan, pakistan, iraq, syria, and palestine, the number of civilian deaths compared with that of combatant ones shows that the discrimination has never been realized. if I, whose country has history that japanese empire committed the bombing of chongqing in china, and that US committed the bombings of tokyo and other cities and the bombings of hiroshima/nagasaki with the nuclear weapons, may say so, it's absolutely impossible to discriminate between combatants and civilians during bombings. additionally, japan's history of japanese empire's aggressive wars on asia and oceania and the battle of okinawa prove that it's absolutely impossible to discriminate between combatants and civilians on the ground which become a battlefield, where civilians are forced to inevitably use arms to protect themselves, their families and their land/property, and where they inevitably get drawn into the battle even if they refuse to carry arms, and where they are forced to be collaborators by aggressors and attacked by friend and foe alike, and where aggressor soldiers in living space of armed/unarmed local people often lose their inhibitions about cruelly treating all of them including children as subhuman/enemy and committing genocide. we need to amend the laws, with consideration for these impossibilities. it's not enough just to denounce persons/countries who committed war crimes under the existing laws. those whose lives are put in the bottom of the ranking list or ranked below human lives, in shorts, the dehumanized will keep resisting for generations until they restore their dignities, even if some of them get killed or tame. as long as they rank human lives, war --including "war on terror" won't end.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>afghanistan hospitals death usa nato military ngo kunduz asia</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:17eff86eb8f3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:afghanistan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:hospitals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:death"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:nato"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:military"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:ngo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:kunduz"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:asia"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.globalresearch.ca/russia-bombs-isis/5479071">
    <title>Russia Bombs ISIS By Stephen Lendman Global Research, October 01, 2015</title>
    <dc:date>2015-10-01T23:34:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.globalresearch.ca/russia-bombs-isis/5479071</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[I suggest reading your own piece again, replacing syria with afghanistan, US/russia with russia/US, ISIS with taliban, assad with karzai, and putin with bush/obama. I don't intend to equate the situation of syria with that of afghanistan, US with russia, ISIS with taliban, assad with karzai, putin with bush/obama. what I want to show you is that your article received the replacement of these words very closely resembles those written by US warmonger rightists who strongly support the US aggressive war/occupation on/of afghanistan, especially those who never imagine nor mention afghan bloody humans/remains under rubble caused by US bombings, and who regard US military intervention not as a source of worsening humanitarian crisis but as a tool for imperialistic power game. you know the US rightists are mouthpieces/propagandists of US govt. are US leftists those of russian govt? isn't there any american who can catch cries of humans who are bombed, regardless of bomber's nationality?]]></description>
<dc:subject>disgust usa warmonger syria russia war middle-east left propaganda</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:7c5adeb27384/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:disgust"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:warmonger"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:syria"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:russia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:middle-east"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:left"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:propaganda"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://notes.pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/ef675c6a91a68f253f71">
    <title>all text of my comment about a statement &quot;The World is Watching: International Scholars, Artists, and Activists Petition to Prevent a New U.S. Military Base in Okinawa&quot;</title>
    <dc:date>2015-09-07T03:00:43+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://notes.pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/ef675c6a91a68f253f71</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[I intended to ignore this buckpasser statement, which is totally ignored by people of mainland japan, as I expected. but on second thoughts, I post a comment. I point out problems of the statement, wi...]]></description>
<dc:subject>usa japan okinawa military military-bases occupation colony bills war hypocrisy disgust constitution</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://notes.pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:ecf3ec6d2328/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:japan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:okinawa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:military"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:military-bases"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:occupation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:colony"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:bills"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:hypocrisy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:disgust"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:constitution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://peacephilosophy.blogspot.jp/2015/08/the-world-is-watching-international.html">
    <title>The World is Watching: International Scholars, Artists, and Activists Petition to Prevent a New U.S. Military Base in Okinawa | August 24, 2015, Peace Philosophy Centre</title>
    <dc:date>2015-09-07T02:53:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://peacephilosophy.blogspot.jp/2015/08/the-world-is-watching-international.html</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[I intended to ignore this buckpasser statement, which is totally ignored by people of mainland japan, as I expected. but on second thoughts, I post a comment. I point out problems of the statement, with explaining the context of the mass protest against the security/war bills in japan, which is related to it. 

there might be something common between what this statement caused in my mind and what afghans have felt when they read some international human-right NGOs' reports, which denounce afghan armed resistance's violence, blatantly ignoring US/NATO aggressive war and occupation on afghanistan and mentioning only few atrocities committed by US/NATO. their suffering is beyond description and I never intend to equate mine with theirs. what I want to say is western intellectuals' covering up and buck-passing.


> The World is Watching

though the world was watching US, US destroyed the middle-east, afghanistan, and libya, and you're watching it. though the world has watched palestine for decades, israel has oppressed it and you have watched it. though the world has watched syrian govt's atrocities/torture on syrians, the world and you haven't stopped it, and been silent on spreading weapons by russia, iran, the west, saudi arabia, qatar, etc. though for years, the world has watched refugees who struggle to enter europe, they have been lost in the deep, and even if they luckily enter europe, they are treated as subhuman, and the world and you have silently watched it. is there any meaning if the world is watching? even if you use a phrase "the world is watching", you can't make it an excuse for not doing what you should do. before you, US conscientious intellectuals write such a statement, expecting non-americans to take an action, why don't you, US prominent citizens, block US govt's way by yourselves and encourage your people (US citizens) to take an action to stop it? the world has been watching your insensitiveness to be watched by the world and your keeping silent on something disadvantageous to you and your people. (to be continued)]]></description>
<dc:subject>usa statement intellectuals japan military-bases okinawa asia disgust hypocrisy military constitution</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:5084fd02df07/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:statement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:intellectuals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:japan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:military-bases"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:okinawa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:asia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:disgust"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:hypocrisy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:military"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:constitution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://notes.pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b6ca081893da24a607cb">
    <title>full text of my comment about a piece &quot;Afghan Lives Matter&quot;</title>
    <dc:date>2015-09-07T02:45:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://notes.pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b6ca081893da24a607cb</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[to satisfy their desire that they make a peaceful country by removing US/NATO forces and installing islamic political system in afghanistan, taliban, whose govt was overthrown by US, are fighting agai...]]></description>
<dc:subject>afghanistan death endless-war endless-occupation asia usa nato EU hypocrisy aid</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://notes.pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:e57ebdf35864/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:afghanistan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:death"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:endless-war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:endless-occupation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:asia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:nato"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:EU"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:hypocrisy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:aid"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.pajhwok.com/en/opinions/afghan-lives-matter">
    <title>Afghan Lives Matter By Mr. Ambassador Franz-Michael Mellbin | Aug 17, 2015 pajhwok</title>
    <dc:date>2015-09-07T02:42:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.pajhwok.com/en/opinions/afghan-lives-matter</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[to satisfy their desire that they make a peaceful country by removing US/NATO forces and installing islamic political system in afghanistan, taliban, whose govt was overthrown by US, are fighting against and killing afghan national armed forces and police, and arbakis (ALPs), US/EU(NATO) soldiers, and IS members (pakistanis) in afghanistan. to satisfy their desire, other armed groups and pakistani members of IS caused mainly by US/NATO military interventions of the middle-east, are fighting against and killing taliban, US/EU(NATO) soldiers, afghan national armed forces and police and other afghans. to satisfy their desire that they make a living by defend afghan govt and US/NATO soldiers, or make a peaceful country, afghan national armed forces and police are using arms provided by US/NATO and killing taliban and other afghans. to satisfy their incurably selfish desire, ALPs, afghan local militia armed by US/NATO are arbitrarily using force and detaining and killing afghans. for imperialistic reason and saving NATO/US appearances, ten thousand US soldiers and five thousand NATO soldiers with immunity are oppressing and killing taliban and other afghans. under this conditions, it's inevitable for civilians to get involved with/in battles, regardless of whether the armed people want to involve civilians in/with them or not, and of whether civilians want themselves to involve in/with them or not. in addition, to protect US/EU(NATO), they seem to intend to make afghanistan a battlefield to wage their war against IS by using afghan armed forces and taliban as their shields. (to be continued)]]></description>
<dc:subject>afghanistan asia occupation usa nato EU death endless-war endless-occupation polio hypocrisy aid</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:4fb7d3239d47/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:afghanistan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:asia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:occupation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:nato"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:EU"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:death"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:endless-war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:endless-occupation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:polio"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:hypocrisy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:aid"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://notes.pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/70f65cc27cdfb31fe744">
    <title>memo</title>
    <dc:date>2015-05-12T14:08:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://notes.pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/70f65cc27cdfb31fe744</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[some ex-" korean comfort women" for japanese soldiers and their supporters say that they weren't prostitutes. and other ex-"comfort women" refuse to be called ex-"sex-slaves", because they might feel ...]]></description>
<dc:subject>comfort-women japan usa koreas asia middle-east afghanistan iraq syria military-bases occupation war women sex-slavery prostitution exploitation double-starndard society discrimination intellecuals statement</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://notes.pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:cb2dd418feb9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:comfort-women"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:japan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:koreas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:asia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:middle-east"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:afghanistan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:iraq"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:syria"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:military-bases"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:occupation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:women"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:sex-slavery"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:prostitution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:exploitation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:double-starndard"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:discrimination"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:intellecuals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:statement"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://notes.pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/2e13c183854a93297ef8">
    <title>OPEN LETTER IN SUPPORT OF HISTORIANS IN JAPAN</title>
    <dc:date>2015-05-08T10:47:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://notes.pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/2e13c183854a93297ef8</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[(my full comment)
I realize that I have something rightist in my mind, but I hope that what I am about to tell you will be free from it.

I'm  really fed up with a statement like this written western intellectuals. t...]]></description>
<dc:subject>sex-slavery comfort-women prostitution japan history asia korea china usa military statement</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://notes.pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:64e4a619efa2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:sex-slavery"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:comfort-women"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:prostitution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:japan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:asia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:korea"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:china"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:military"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:statement"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://networks.h-net.org/system/files/contributed-files/japan-scholars-statement-2015.5.4-eng_0.pdf">
    <title>OPEN LETTER IN SUPPORT OF HISTORIANS IN JAPAN</title>
    <dc:date>2015-05-08T10:44:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://networks.h-net.org/system/files/contributed-files/japan-scholars-statement-2015.5.4-eng_0.pdf</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[I'm  really fed up with a statement like this... as long as focusing only on korean "comfort women" for japanese soldiers, japanese rightists regard this issue just as a political dispute between japan and south korea, and foster nationalism and inequality of the sexes. we should start from making them realize that "comfort women" are as ordinary as they themselves, and so, this issue must be separated temporarily from nations, nationality. as a consequence, unless you confront the issues of "comfort women for US soldiers and prostitutes in brothel districts around US military bases around the world... furthermore, unless you abandon US-exceptionalism..., even a partial solution to the issue might appear far away... lastly, if a historian who specializes in asia doesn't squarely facing US empire, it means that he/she never intend to realize the fundamental goal of historical inquiry in the asia. rather, he/she intends to serve US empire. (I post my full comment soon.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>comfort-women prostitution sex-slavery japan usa korea china history double-standard nationalism asia peace historian war intellectuals west occupation exploitation open-letter statement</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:259051f0308f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:comfort-women"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:prostitution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:sex-slavery"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:japan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:korea"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:china"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:double-standard"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:nationalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:asia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:peace"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:historian"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:intellectuals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:west"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:occupation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:exploitation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:open-letter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:statement"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://notes.pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/9ff32e0bd5f8a178b364">
    <title>沖縄在住作家・目取真俊氏 「県民の怒りは日本全体に向かう」 2 | 2015年3月30日 ゲンダイ</title>
    <dc:date>2015-04-02T20:05:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://notes.pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/9ff32e0bd5f8a178b364</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[（続き） 

（2）一つ目の問題 
基地問題が語られるとき、たいてい沖縄の人々が受ける苦痛・被害についてのみ説明がなされる。それら基地が、同時にベトナムや中東やアフガニスタンを侵略・破壊するための基地であったこと、そのことによって数え切れない現地住民が辛酸をなめてきたことは滅多に言及されない。]]></description>
<dc:subject>okinawa military-bases japan aisa usa democracy memo</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://notes.pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:7878c4aaab67/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:okinawa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:military-bases"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:japan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:aisa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:democracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:memo"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nikkan-gendai.com/articles/view/news/158422/1">
    <title>沖縄在住作家・目取真俊氏 「県民の怒りは日本全体に向かう」 | 2015年3月30日, ゲンダイ</title>
    <dc:date>2015-04-02T19:57:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nikkan-gendai.com/articles/view/news/158422/1</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[（民主主義や人権という言葉が様々な問題を含んでいることは今回は触れない。）

（1）日本の歴代政権の沖縄への対応にしても、日本本土の沖縄基地問題への無関心にしても、現政権の沖縄への専制にしても、終わらせなければならないことは明白である。しかし、基地問題に対する日本人の発言について、私は幾つかの点で違和感を覚える。一つ目は、内向きの議論しかなされないこと。二つ目は、「沖縄蔑視・差別だ」との主張に対して。沖縄の人々に対する蔑視・差別というより、自分以外の人間に対する蔑視・差別という方が、私にはしっくりくる。（続く）]]></description>
<dc:subject>japan okinawa military-base usa asia democracy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:a71295914a0b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:japan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:okinawa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:military-base"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:asia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:democracy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/isis-terror/burned-alive-isis-video-purports-show-murder-jordanian-pilot-n299361">
    <title>Burned Alive: ISIS Video Purports to Show Murder of Jordanian Pilot | February 3 2015, NBC News</title>
    <dc:date>2015-02-03T23:21:05+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/isis-terror/burned-alive-isis-video-purports-show-murder-jordanian-pilot-n299361</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[some say it's barbarity. I think so, too. but what's barbarity? US said US-led coalition bombings on IS killed 6,000 "militants" and caused unknown number of civilian casualties. more bombing/raid will bring more suffering to the poor oppressed in IS and lead some of them to be IS "militants". remember, the sanctions against iraq which caused half a million children deaths, US torture in guantanamo/abughraib/bagram, and barrel bombs by iraqi/syrian govts. the US great tokyo air raid of 10 march 1945 burned a hundred thousand people to death. the US A-bombings were accompanied by ultrahigh temperature atomic blast. to display its power, US shot videos and showed them to the world. US regards them as justice. when the issues of US military bases in japan surface, north korea often takes military action advantageous to US/japanese vested interests of the bases. with whom IS decision-makers of a series of the incidents share their interests? there're persons who want endless war for money.]]></description>
<dc:subject>middle-east soldiers death hostages japan Jordan usa barbarism war</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:a9f60ebb3d13/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:middle-east"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:soldiers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:death"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:hostages"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:japan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:Jordan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:barbarism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:war"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://powerofnarrative.blogspot.com/2015/01/these-crimes-will-never-be-purged-away.html">
    <title>These crimes &quot;will never be purged away, but with Blood&quot; | Arthur Silber, Once Upon a Time...</title>
    <dc:date>2015-01-11T19:06:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://powerofnarrative.blogspot.com/2015/01/these-crimes-will-never-be-purged-away.html</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[from the page: "The obsession with "justification" and "approval" in this manner -- an obsession shared, it appears, by almost every semiconscious human being, who is breathlessly eager to tell us what he thinks of world events, on the assumption that masses of idiots can't wait to hear what one additional idiot thinks of it all -- is the mark of an arrested narcissistic adolescent, who still believes at the age of 30, or 40, or 50 or more, that the world, and history, require his approval to move forward. ..when there is no place on Earth to make oneself safe from the barbaric violence unleashed by the ruling class every minute, of every hour, of every day -- resistance which includes violence is not only understandable, but inevitable. Facts do not ask for your approval.. You may find comfort in the mob, with its gutter talk of "justification" and what is "approved," and what kinds of resistance are permissible. Always remember: the mob that comforts you today will kill you tomorrow.]]></description>
<dc:subject>history usa france violence nonviolence war justification murders approval empire mob inevitable obsession resistance</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:09ef88dbf6ef/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:france"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:violence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:nonviolence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:justification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:murders"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:approval"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:empire"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:mob"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:inevitable"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:obsession"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:resistance"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.presstv.com/Detail/2015/01/04/391547/Who-are-the-real-human-traffickers">
    <title>Who are the real human traffickers? | Jan 4, 2015 | By FINIAN CUNNINGHAM, press tv</title>
    <dc:date>2015-01-05T23:48:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.presstv.com/Detail/2015/01/04/391547/Who-are-the-real-human-traffickers</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[from the page: "To the burgeoning numbers risking their lives attempting to cross the Mediterranean are nationals from Libya, Palestine, and the African countries of Mali, Niger, and the Central African Republic – all countries where US-led NATO powers have directly fuelled violence. So, let’s not be distracted by Western media hype about anonymous “heartless human traffickers” abandoning “ghost ships” of refugees on the rocks of European coastlines. The real heartless human traffickers are the governments responsible for creating the flood of refugees from the Middle East and Africa in the first place. This is a crisis made in Washington, London and Paris."]]></description>
<dc:subject>middle-east europe africa palestine libya trafficking war usa france uk refugees syria mali Niger</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:d1da3efd9f9c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:middle-east"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:europe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:africa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:palestine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:libya"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:trafficking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:france"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:uk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:refugees"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:syria"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:mali"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:Niger"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.usatoday.com/story/theoval/2014/12/28/obama-afghanistan-combat-operations-end-statement/20969021/">
    <title>Obama hails end of combat operations in Afghanistan | David Jackson, USA TODAY December 28, 2014</title>
    <dc:date>2015-01-01T18:15:12+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.usatoday.com/story/theoval/2014/12/28/obama-afghanistan-combat-operations-end-statement/20969021/</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[there's a very short japanese piece about this statement on japanese main-stream media. it was no better than a piece composed only of a few quotations --"extraordinary sacrifices" "the longest war in American history is coming to a responsible conclusion" "devastating the core al Qaeda leadership,..disrupting terrorist plots and saving countless American lives." I didn't want read this. but a phrase caught my eye. I accessed the original text, which completely omitted afghan victims, and which regarded the war as "just/good", and which made me think that a planet where obama lived was different from our planet earth. interestingly, the japanese piece omitted "delivering justice to Osama bin Laden". I guess that the writer couldn't accept the assassination without trial as "delivering justice", which is probably common sense of japan, though the media always take sides with US empire.

the said phrase is "saving countless American lives". it reminds me of myths of the US A-bombings on japan, which US/UK top military brass/politicians developed after they were criticized: "the A-bombings saved one million US casualties" "they saved one million american and half that number of british lives". whenever US commits genocide, it spreads extreme nationalistic, unfounded, inhuman, absurd story. before long, it may spread another myth that "the war saved countless afghans", just like they spread "they saved hundreds of thousands japanese people". the latest example is that in 2007, R. Joseph, US special envoy for nuclear nonproliferation at the time asserted that "the A-bombings saved several million japanese". (it's a horror that humans say, "genocide that killed tens of thousands of humans at a single city in a single moment is a means to save human lives". according to data at the end of 1950, the bombings caused more than 300 thousand people deaths and countless hibakushas.)

there have been some US historians who challenge the myths. but they're firmly embedded in US public, thanks to US public education, and because they say not that the A-bombings shouldn't have been allowed from a human point of view, but that they were "unnecessary" from a strategic standpoint. what conditions they set to call it "necessary"? I conjecture that it's they suspect japan of possessing an A-bomb. they say that US waged the iraqi war due to a lie that iraq possessed WMDs. they have no viewpoint of human. their honest thought is "if iraq had possessed them, we could have justified the war, which killed more than a million people, and which ruined iraq, and called it "good/necessary war"". this thought is a horror. if they had a human point of view, they'd have said, "it's not allowed regardless of whether it possessed them or not" "just like we never accept US, which possess WMDs, being bombed, we must reject US bombing iraq." after all, they've been nationalistic accomplices of rooting both total disregard for lives of non-americans and delusion that there's "good war" in US public mind, and not brought US public time to consider war from a viewpoint of human.

is there americans who pay attention to a horror meaning of the said phrase? say to afghan orphans in the streets, "thanks to US soldiers who killed your parents, brothers and sisters, countless american lives were saved. they're heroes. after a few years, you'll be of age to be a soldier and be able to receive training to kill your people from them. then, you'll make a living to be it."; say to afghan parents who hold their burnt baby in their arms, "extraordinary sacrifices of US soldiers brought your baby death and saved countless american lives. compared to american lives, afghan ones are nothing. you have no right to blame us. we delivered your country justice. you should be more thankful for us."; say to afghan youths in a refugee camp, "by destroying your houses, farmlands, livelihoods, and madrasa, and by displacing you and all people in your village, US soldiers saved countless american lives. you should thank US for bringing you democracy."; say to afghan prostitutes, "US soldiers killed your fathers, husbands, and brothers. now, you can earn your living as prostitute of your own free will. US soldiers not only saved countless american lives but also liberated you."

humans treated as subhuman by US soldiers are done so again by US civilians. whenever US intellectuals/teachers/children mention the myths as justice, or argue justification of it from a strategic standpoint, they feel they're treated as subhuman. whenever they're shown off US people from children to elderly gratefully treating US soldiers who committed genocide as heroes, and glorying it as justice, they endlessly feel forced into accepting themselves as subhuman, by dehumanizing themselves. US justice are with its justification of its founding at the sacrifice of countless indigenous lives, which is the root of US myth: genocide on non-americans is justice.]]></description>
<dc:subject>afghanistan asia usa occupation war statement omission fabrication obama endless-occupation endless-war</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:b1c43579e7bb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:afghanistan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:asia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:occupation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:statement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:omission"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:fabrication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:obama"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:endless-occupation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:endless-war"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://electronicintifada.net/content/still-reeling-summer-assault-gaza-faces-new-israeli-threats/14150">
    <title>Still reeling from summer assault, Gaza faces new Israeli threats | Patrick O. Strickland, The Electronic Intifada, 27 December 2014</title>
    <dc:date>2015-01-01T18:13:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://electronicintifada.net/content/still-reeling-summer-assault-gaza-faces-new-israeli-threats/14150</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[from the page: "..2,257 Palestinians were killed.. Some 100,000 persons are still displaced,.. 1,500 are estimated to have been made orphans ... the international community has failed to successfully pressure Israel to lift the blockade... much of Gaza’s infrastructure still remains in shambles. In cities, towns and villages across the territory, entire neighborhoods are flattened"... As a result of the ongoing Israeli blockade, which enjoys the support of the US-backed dictatorship in Egypt, construction supplies, such as steel and concrete, have trickled into the territory in quantities that don’t even come close to meeting Gaza’s immediate needs."--


the reason palestinians endured the 51-day brutal offensive by israel is to lift the blockade, which is needed for them to live a life in a humane manner. for the people whose homeland isn't a battlefield, end of battle means end of war. so, as soon as the "final" figures of casualties in battle are reported, the war becomes out of touch to them. but for the people whose homeland was a battlefield, end of battle means only a pass point on the road to end of war, ensuring peaceful life without shortage and oppression. but I think the reason news on palestine disappeared from media as soon as the battle ended is not only this but an intention.

when people reconstruct buildings/infrastructure, they clarify who destroyed them, because the destroyer should take care of cost. but about palestine, the international community, especially europe, always provide money. a reason for it is that europe doesn't want to clarify it. if it does, --it's israel (and historically, roots of palestinians' suffering are europe's anti-semitism and colonization in the middle-east)--, israel demands that it should face up to its history of colonialism/imperialism in the non-west, which were not less bloody than israel's one, and which is closely related to the present great suffering of the middle-east under chaos/dictatorships. it wants to keep playing the third party in good faith about palestine, syria, iraq, IS, etc, who is a volunteer without any responsibility. playing it is comfortable and is cheaper than behaving responsibly to build peace and incurring liability as victimizers. the reason it clings to the past UN's/UN security council's resolutions is it wants to ignore its responsibility/liability in the middle-east. to cloud the palestinian issue and to conceal the europe's responsibility/liability are two sides of the same coin. (I don't intend to say that the resolutions should be abandoned. but we should consider the possibility that peace-building programs based on such unfair ones will cause other difficulties, which will bear squarely on palestinians/israelis, especially the former, as usual. and we should caution ourselves against adhering to establishing so-called "absolute/perfect" justice, which may result in increasing/prolonging of suffering of palestinians. of course, it's palestinians who decide.)

an accelerator to make israel accept its responsibility/liability for suffering of palestine is that europe performs exemplary deeds. specifically, it accepts its ones in the non-west. if it does, it'll strongly encourage israelis who have scorned the west's double-standard to tackle the palestinian issue, and boost the world into creating a common sense that aggressors/occupiers must accept their war/occupation responsibility/liability, which prevents increase of war victims, and which leads war industry to decline, and which decreases arms supply. but it, following US, ignoring its past, has been making wars.

generally, europe sincerely accepted responsibility/liability for suffering of white europeans. but it tends to regard its colonialism/imperialism in the non-west as good. it threw the weight of all responsibilities of WWII and colonization in asia/oceania on japan. of course, it has terribly grave responsibilities for them, but not only it but the west was a colonizer/aggressor there. (US is the occupier even now.) frankly, what the west has done after it is not building peace but ensuring "privileges" to wage war with immunity for itself. what I want to say is not that japan's responsibility/liability should be downplayed in view of the brutal western past, but that the world must stop double-standard, and that it's inhumane/unjust that victims caused by the west and dictators backed by it have been abandoned, though they're sometimes given a bit of aid by "third parties", and that as long as the west's responsibility/liability are passed over, it'll repeat war/occupation and the palestinian issue will remain unsolved. and powers in the non-west, including japan, will follow the west which asserts its right to wage "just war", and which makes/joins it in the name of "self-defensive" "global peace". (russia's brutality to north caucasus and china's to uighur/tibet, and their excuses of it are similar to those of the west.) ]]></description>
<dc:subject>palestine middle-east reconstruction israel Qatar saudi-arabia europe usa aid destruction blockade death displacement refugees dictatorship occupation egypt</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:f7e6eeff109e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:palestine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:middle-east"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:reconstruction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:israel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:Qatar"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:saudi-arabia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:europe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:aid"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:destruction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:blockade"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:death"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:displacement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:refugees"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:dictatorship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:occupation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:egypt"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.dawn.com/news/1151866/military-courts-being-established-for-terror-trials-says-khawaja-asif">
    <title>Special courts being established for terror trials, says Khawaja Asif | Dawn.com | Abdul Shakoor Khan, Dec 20, 2014</title>
    <dc:date>2014-12-20T13:08:38+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.dawn.com/news/1151866/military-courts-being-established-for-terror-trials-says-khawaja-asif</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[pakistani authorities lift the moratorium on capital punishment to execute persons whom they call "terrorists" and keep bombing on the north waziristan, where pakistani taliban's families live. (do death-penalty opponent organizations of the west have anything to say?) executing persons who are willing to be suicide bombers never acts as a deterrent to violence. according some news sites, pakistan taliban said, "we selected the army's school for the attack because the government is targeting our families and females.. we want them to feel the pain.. if our women and children died as martyrs your children will not escape.." a survivor student said, "he [attacker] told our teacher: 'Watch as your loved ones die. Ours are also being killed in the same way.'" judging from these words, the incident is a revenge for their families being killed by pakistani military. but the authorities are adding fuel to the fire to protect their vested interests and are building up and tighten the chain of hatred/murder.

pakistani govt/military/media should stop discriminating between children of hostile people and their own children including those whom they use as poster child for their propaganda that leads people to believe that they stand on the side of "justice", if they sincerely want to protect lives of all pakistani children. while they regard the latter children being killed as massacre, they are shameless enough to call their killing the former children as "collateral damage". they as much as sort children into two categories: human and subhuman, which persons who fight for justice never do. if they keep protecting only their own children and vested interests at the expense of other children, it's inevitable that every child will be shackled by the chain of hatred/murder.

US has destabilized the north waziristan to exploit it for its own end, the war on afghanistan, and carried out drone attacks drastically for a decade. in the name of "war on terror", pakistani authorities have displaced a million people living there, and demolished their houses and schools. of course, there are those who refused to leave their own beloved land. how many people there have been killed by US/pakistani military? how many communities there have been destroyed/bombed by them? how miserable life the IDPs are forced to live? to begin with, nothing can justify causing a million IDPs and forcing them to abandon their livelihoods. why the international community tolerate this? the pakistani govt/media haven't reported the unimaginable situation there, while spreading information on the incident at the army public school. they've covered up their own atrocities. the international community doesn't pointed out their double-standards, and while mourning for innocent children at the school, it isn't shocked at deaths of innocent children of "terrorists" nor mourned for them.

labelling as "terrorists" is allowing themselves not only to kill both them and their whole families but also to looking away from sources of "terror" --one of them is that they have heart, which is crushed with grief for deaths of their families and fellows, and which suffers from trauma caused by loss of their beloved people and by feeling of helplessness that they couldn't prevent their deaths. humans are many-sides. but by labelling "terrorists", they deny multifaceted nature of humans and dehumanize them. we must face up to the fact of deaths of the pitiful children killed by pakistani taliban, but we should have uncovered and faced up to that of children concealed by pakistani military/govt, if we claim to be persons who consider the welfare of children.

in the name of "war on terror", though its aim is to convert the world with diversity into only a single market under global capitalism to effectively squeeze humanity and nature dry, the international community regards persons who refuse to be consumables/consumers of the market as "terrorists". at the same time, it marginalizes persons whom it regards as "no market value", and uses the whole communities which "terrorists" and the marginalized belong to as test/disposal site for its weapons, hazardous materials, and dumpsite for dead/living bodies. persons who are regarded as consumables/consumers are surrounded by propaganda that provokes hatred/fear, and believe blindly that the marginalized are "terrorists" who aren't worth living, even though they've been pushed into marginal place day by day. because the media treat central's killing the marginalized children (including deaths caused by poverty due to central's exploitation) as marginal and the marginalized's killing the central children makes headlines, and because they don't want to acknowledge that they already belong to marginalized place where their objects of hared/fear live, they keep taking side with the central.

I think the world is becoming something like the current colonized-palestine. non-palestinians, especially the people in advanced countries, who have enjoyed economic wealth and so-called freedom, might fall into same difficulties that palestinians have struggled to solve for decades. (but it doesn't mean that the former have same brave spirit of resistance and of mutual assistance that the latter have.) the international community has practically connived in Israel's bombing/exploiting palestinians and stripping them of their all rights including a right to self-determination and to living their life in a humane manner, while playing the humanitarian to help their accomplice, israel to "tame" them by delivering empty peace-building support and very minimum "aid" food, even which the occupiers use to make money. it's now conniving to convert the whole world into such colonized-place, and become willing to deliver nothing but arms, their moneymaker. but we keep focusing on the few chosen by it, think we know all the answers, and force ourselves into a corner by fomenting our own hatred/fear.]]></description>
<dc:subject>pakistan afghanistan asia usa military terrorism children death death-penalty war school</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:d5efe26926d5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:pakistan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:afghanistan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:asia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:military"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:terrorism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:death"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:death-penalty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:school"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.washingtonpost.com/page/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2014/12/16/National-Politics/Polling/release_376.xml">
    <title>Majority says CIA harsh interrogations justified | Washington Post-ABC News poll December 11-14, 2014</title>
    <dc:date>2014-12-20T13:06:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/page/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2014/12/16/National-Politics/Polling/release_376.xml</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[from the pages: "..there should or should not be criminal charges filed against officials who were responsible for the CIA interrogation activities? should (White: 27%, Non-White: 48%, Hispanic: 47%).  ..CIA treatment of suspected terrorists was justified or unjustified? unjustified (White: 25%, Non-White: 43%, Hispanic: 43%)" -- (I don't know the reliability of the polls.) conclusion: the US public intensely brace US empire up. I never never never think that the figures of Non-White (48%, 43%) are large. the low figures show that Non-White have enjoyed US supremacy (US exceptionalism) and violent culture. I guess that about 20 percentage points between White and Non-White/Hispanic are caused by the reality that the latter are much more constantly exposed to violence of the authorities than the former, and that the latter can imagine suffering caused by torture. the extremely low figures of White, who have enjoyed both US/white supremacy and violent culture, are terrifying. ]]></description>
<dc:subject>usa poll cia torture justification violence race religion american-style exceptionalism</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:5371eee2f7b6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:poll"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:cia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:torture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:justification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:violence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:race"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:religion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:american-style"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:exceptionalism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://socialistworker.org/2014/12/15/a-movement-demands-to-be-heard">
    <title>A new movement demands to be heard | Danny Katch, December 15, 2014, socialistworker.org</title>
    <dc:date>2014-12-15T20:27:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://socialistworker.org/2014/12/15/a-movement-demands-to-be-heard</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[I recall posting a similar comment in the beginning of the US occupy movement a few years ago. the "new movement" is extreme nationalism, i.e, usual US exceptionalism. another latest typical example of it is Cheney's saying that it's an outrage to draw some kind of moral equivalent between CIA's waterboarding and the japanese's one during WWII. both the demonstrators and he make an exception in favor of americans. M.L. King's philosophy wasn't handed down to now US generation. 

according to press TV, US bombing killed five afghans in Parwan on 10 Dec, at least ten in Kunar on 7 Dec, four in Laghman on 6 Dec, eight in Nangarher on 1 Dec, at least seven in Helmand on 27 Nov, and three in Wardak on 27 Nov. do the demonstrators think this even for a moment? this is the WAR, which they've been looking away from, no matter how many piles of dead afghan bodies US soldiers have made, while their being getting off on so-called war for "rebuilding the struggle against racism and injustice in the U.S.". this is the WAR, in which US soldiers have killed afghans whose bereaved families have never been sympathized with by them nor have been cuddled up with by them, while their doing with the american bereaved.

considering all americans' 70-year-old silence on ongoing 70-year-old immunity of US in japan on the basis of japan-US security treaty and SOFA, which are similar to those that US, dangling "aid" money/military, imposed on near-bankrupt corrupt afghan govt, and considering most americans' 13-year-old silence on it in afghanistan, the "new movement" by nationalistic americans, who disapprove of granting public armed americans at home (US police) immunity, and who approve of granting public armed americans abroad (US soldiers) immunity, would be a new stage for them to play the usual "lovers of justice". (but their reaction might not be as bad as japanese's crazy servility to US and connivance/acceptance in/of US/japanese authorities' oppression, though both are very harmful.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>usa exceptionalism nationalism immunity violence movements police demonstration war racism bereaved</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:ecc9cc2561ee/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:exceptionalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:nationalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:immunity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:violence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:movements"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:police"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:demonstration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:racism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:bereaved"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://socialistworker.org/2014/12/04/americas-longest-war-gets-longer">
    <title>America's longest war gets even longer | Helen Redmond, December 4, 2014, socialistworker.org</title>
    <dc:date>2014-12-05T01:43:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://socialistworker.org/2014/12/04/americas-longest-war-gets-longer</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[>"..war for over 13 years with no victory.."
when US lefts mention US "victory" in afghanistan, they should explain what it means. is it annihilating taliban? is it that afghan muslims accept US values -- neoliberalism in the name of liberty, commercialization of sex in the name of liberation of women, and just bombing/shooting of colors in the name of self-defense? is it that US puppet govt prevents civil war and corruption, and strike a balance among US interests, its own ones and afghan public welfare? is it that most afghans accept the US occupation, regard all US says as righteous, and are servile to US, just like japan, which puts US interests before its public welfare and avoiding its national bankruptcy, has done since 1945?

>"..crucial factor is the unfolding catastrophe.."
do you want say that keeping US occupation of iraq would have prevented the rise of IS, and that iraqis should have accepted the US occupation and giving immunity to US? the problem has started when the west colonized the middle-east. and after independence of countries in the middle-east, whose borders the west had drown only for its own interests, the west has kept interference in their internal affairs and supported dictatorships to keep exploiting them, which have brought suffering to ordinary people in the middle-east. in other words, for a hundred years, the west has created conflicts, inequality and injustice that muslims regard as, and hindered activities of muslims who have risked their lives to struggle to solve these issues under oppression of the dictators. this is one of major reasons of the rise of IS. and then, US started the war against iraq, which might have been an ignition point. and so, I guess that there're these said people who have burned with a sense of justice, criminals, extremists, murderers, oppressed, oppressors, and US puppets in IS, which US lefts demonize.

>"over 4,000 Afghan soldiers and police have died.."
you don't mention the number of other armed afghans --taliban/warlords killed. they wouldn't have been killed if US hadn't started the war. do you think that US killing them is just and that if US had killed only them and prevented "collateral damages", US could have been called "champion of justice"?

> "..then the ambassador to Pakistan, recounted in.."
it's good to mention the fact that taliban seriously negotiated with US to avoid war. but you omit something. is it true that "the White House wanted revenge for 9/11"? allegedly criminals were not afghans but saudis. why US "revenged" not saudi arabia, but afghanistan? what US has done in afghanistan isn't revenge.

>"the majority of Afghans supported the U.S..."
during US occupation of iraq, it's said that pictures of iraqis' pulling statues of Hussein down proved that they welcomed US occupation. but later, the context of taking the pictures and spreading them were disclosed. when US soldiers entered kabul, afghan womens, unveiling burqa, waved to them. it's said that they welcomed them. but according to a humanitarian activist who has lived in afghanistan for many years, they did to show that they weren't their enemies to avoid war. without understanding cultures of others, americans interpret their behaviors based on US culture. and they, who never live in a battlefield, think that people who survive in it, especially in one of civil war, where their neighbors and members of their own families sometimes become their enemies, readily pour their hearts out to others. and they in it can't access some information. during US bombing, many afghans didn't even the reason they were bombed.

about "failure" of "US drug war" in afghanistan. what is "failure"? under taliban govt, afghanistan eradicated poppy cultivation, though it used a violent way, which is unacceptable for me. even under the US occupation, it has decreased sharply in some areas, where afghans have retrieved grain production and prevented and mitigated famine, despite their being disturbed by US/NATO forces and suffering from climate issues. US forces bombed even there. is it unintentional "failure"? 

US lefts explain the US war/occupation of afghanistan on the premise that "there's good war/occupation". they regard US bombing japan during WWII and US occupation of japan as rightness. they've never got suspicious about the confidence that US bombing/occupation of japan were/are right, nor have they put it as a problem to US public. and so, it strongly believes "there's good war/occupation". they've looked away from japanese victims of US war crimes during WWII, and those of US crimes after WWII--landgrabs, rapes, other violence including murder-robbery, censorship of letters, newspapers and other publications, wiretapping (which were much more exhaustive than US espionages what snowden disclosed), etc. and they've preserved silence on japanese women who were exploited sexually as "comfort women" (sex slaves) for US soldiers, and those who were crammed in back of truck by US soldiers because they seemed to US soldiers to be prostitutes, and who were forced to have examination of sexual diseases as suspects in giving US soldiers venereal diseases, in other words, they were enforced to have internal examination in the name of US securing japanese venereal-diseases-free "prostitutes" for US soldiers. "legal" sexual exploitation by US soldiers has continued. they've kept silent on the ongoing US occupation of japan after "US occupation of japan from 1945 to 1951", which is based on the japan-US security treaty and SOFA, which give US immunity, and which set US as japan's ultimate authority above the japanese constitution and sovereign. under this occupation, both japanese women and men have been exploited and impaired their dignities by US. whenever the japanese file a suit related to breach of the constitution issues, including violation of fundamental human rights, which have been caused by US soldiers and military bases in japan, japanese courts reject it according to the treaty and SOFA. (except a single decision by the tokyo district court in 1959. but the supreme court overturned it at US request.) US lefts haven't informed US public that US occupation of japan, south korea, philippines, etc, has been causing serious suffering to the occupied. it contributed to americans' easily approving the US war on afghanistan and bombing IS, as soon as US govt touched on "women's rights".

US lefts' 70-year-long silence on these things means that they've believed that issues of these japanese victims of US bombing/occupying are so trivial that americans should ignore them as "collateral damages". such US lefts as disregard human rights of the japanese oppose US occupation of afghanistan. I think reasons of their opposing the occupation of afghanistan are fundamentally different from mine. their silence on the japanese victims also shows that they believe that if US "succeeds (not fail)" or "win a victory (not defeated)" in war/occupation, "collateral damages" caused by US should be ignored by americans, the world, and victims of US. it could be said that when US "succeeds" in silencing the non-american victims of US war/occupation, americans call it "good war/occupation". not US war/occupation but US "defeat/failure", victims' continuous outcry against US discomforts US lefts. ultimately, they believe that there're victims of US whom americans should allow themselves to ignore, and that their dignities are inferior to americans'. the birth parent of the myth that "there's good war/occupation" must be the US founding covered with blood of indigenous people and the slavery. though they superficially regard them as evil, they've not dissolved racism in their own hearts, nor have they encouraged US govt to make concrete compensations for them. and so, US public hasn't got into an argument about the necessity of US compensating for iraqis/afghans and failed to prevent new war/occupation.]]></description>
<dc:subject>occupation usa afghanistan iraq war death women poppy myth military</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:2329d896c2e0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:occupation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:afghanistan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:iraq"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:death"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:women"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:poppy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:myth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:military"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/22/us/politics/in-secret-obama-extends-us-role-in-afghan-combat.html">
    <title>In a Shift, Obama Extends U.S. Role in Afghan Combat | By MARK MAZZETTI and ERIC SCHMITTNOV. 21, 2014 nytimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2014-11-22T18:44:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/22/us/politics/in-secret-obama-extends-us-role-in-afghan-combat.html</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[in summary, taliban are so strong that US and afghan govt, both of whose priority matter is to protect/promote their own rights and interests in afghanistan at the expense of afghan people, can't do so without its keeping bombing/raiding them by using "F-16 fighters, B-1B bombers and Predator and Reaper drones." to serve US, the writers completely omit US lowest-priority matter: US/NATO occupation of afghanistan has brought afghans great suffering for 13 years, and will be continued. and what they cover up is that if US/NATO withdraw from afghanistan, they need not to "take appropriate measures to keep Americans safe..to the extent that Taliban members directly threaten the United States and coalition forces in Afghanistan or provide direct support to Al Qaeda", because taliban have been attacking US/NATO forces only within afghanistan to drive them out from afghanistan and to gain independence, and say many times that they never allow others to use afghan soil to threat other nations.]]></description>
<dc:subject>afghanistan asia usa nato occupation endless-war military italy turkey germany traning sofa puppet immunity disgusting-usa</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:80fed9f26603/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:afghanistan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:asia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:nato"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:occupation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:endless-war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:military"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:italy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:turkey"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:germany"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:traning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:sofa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:puppet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:immunity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:disgusting-usa"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://iraqhope.exblog.jp/23691621/">
    <title>【お知らせ】11/19~27元海兵隊員ロス・カプーティ氏スピーキングツアー : イラク・ホープ・ダイアリー</title>
    <dc:date>2014-11-20T05:19:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://iraqhope.exblog.jp/23691621/</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[彼が書いた記事を数年前に読んだのを今も憶えている。当時、大多数の米国の反戦活動家達は、米兵死傷者数と血税としての戦費とムスリムの暴力にのみ焦点を当て、米国人をイラク・アフガン人と同等の戦争被害者とみなし、自分達の加害性に背を向けていた。その中にあって、イラク戦争における米軍の残虐・非道を象徴するファルージャ攻撃に加わった元海兵隊員の彼が、加害者として、同時にイラク人と同じ人間として、イラク人被害者に向き合う姿は、とても印象的だった。主宰者側は、彼と世代の近い日本の若者達に戦争のリアルを知ってもらうために彼を招聘したようなので、できるだけ多くの若い人達が彼に耳を傾けてくれたらいいと思う。だけど、敗戦後は戦争責任を追及せず被害者面しつつ、イラク・アフガン戦争の日本の加害性は無視しつつ、日本の平和を守れ、9条守れ、と主張することが正しい反戦・平和運動だ、と考えてきた中・高齢者層達も、彼の話から何かを得られると思う。]]></description>
<dc:subject>irq war speech fallujah usa atrocity compensation soldiers veterans</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:791e768ce47c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:irq"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:speech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:fallujah"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:atrocity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:compensation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:soldiers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:veterans"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://socialistworker.org/2014/11/10/imperialist-feminism">
    <title>Imperialist feminism | November 10, 2014 Deepa Kumar, SocialistWorker.org, Open Democracy.net</title>
    <dc:date>2014-11-10T15:45:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://socialistworker.org/2014/11/10/imperialist-feminism</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[from a point of view, US always "liberates" women in countries which US forces occupy. the reason US does it is to "comfort" US soldiers at the sacrifice of those women. in short, US gives them a right to be at liberty to be a prostitute there. US says that those "liberated" women become a prostitute of their own "free will", and that the ones to blame are not US soldiers who pick a prostitute. those women's countries, houses, and livelihoods were destroyed by US forces, and their husbands and fathers were killed by US forces, and their children and they themselves are on starvation. but US says that those women aren't forced to be a prostitute. not only imperialist feminists but also western lefts, who always call for improvement of labor conditions and of poverty of workers, and western anti-war activists including some US veterans, who explain the experience of committing atrocities, don't mention how US soldiers have sexually exploited those helpless women "legally".]]></description>
<dc:subject>women feminism imperialism colonialism racism occupation usa nato war afghanistan liberties</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:606ac7ff9499/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:women"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:feminism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:imperialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:colonialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:racism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:occupation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:nato"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:afghanistan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:liberties"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://moriyama-law.cocolog-nifty.com/machiben/2014/11/post-1b35.html">
    <title>米国に収奪される年金資産: 街の弁護士日記　SINCE１９９２at名古屋</title>
    <dc:date>2014-11-10T15:40:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://moriyama-law.cocolog-nifty.com/machiben/2014/11/post-1b35.html</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><dc:subject>japan usa finance economy exploitation pension stock colony treason</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:317c8922b95b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:japan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:finance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:economy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:exploitation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:pension"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:stock"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:colony"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:treason"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://notes.pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/753054a0fe1f4f752b36">
    <title>memo2</title>
    <dc:date>2014-10-28T20:58:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://notes.pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/753054a0fe1f4f752b36</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[『日本占領とジェンダー－米軍･売買春と日本女性たち－』（平井和子著）の感想の続き。

1.
まず印象的だったのは、著者が、ジョン・ダワーと...]]></description>
<dc:subject>books women gender sex-slavery history japan usa korea military-bases occupation</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://notes.pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:81c9e2e1c62e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:women"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:gender"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:sex-slavery"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:japan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:korea"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:military-bases"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:occupation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://yushisha.blog.ocn.ne.jp/blog/2014/08/post_8a42.html">
    <title>『日本占領とジェンダー－米軍･売買春と日本女性たち－』発刊 | 有志舎の日々</title>
    <dc:date>2014-10-28T20:47:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://yushisha.blog.ocn.ne.jp/blog/2014/08/post_8a42.html</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[この本の表紙の写真は、ジェンダーを強く意識させるものだが、私には、裏表紙の日本の慰安所の前で行列をつくる米兵の写真の方が強烈だった。著者は、従軍慰安婦問題について、「なぜ日本だけが非難されるのか」とナショナリズムに陥るのでもなく、「「慰安婦」支援運動が強調する日本軍「慰安所」の犯罪性や特殊性でもって、他国の軍隊と区別する」のでもなく、ジェンダー視点から捉え直す必要がある、と言う。その視点から見えてくるのは、日本に限らず各国は、軍組織を維持するために女性の性利用をしてきたということであり、それを可能にしたのが「女性の性を一貫して利用・搾取してきた軍事組織と家父長的国家間のホモソーシャルな共犯関係」の構造である、という。この構造の解体を目指すべきだ、というのが著者の主張。故に「女性の性的支配という点では、旧日本軍と米軍の両者は根っこでつながっている。米下院決議[2007年の「慰安婦制度を「強制軍事売春」「性奴隷」と位置づけ、日本政府に対して、「明確かつ曖昧さのない形で歴史的責任を正式に認め、謝罪し、受け入れるべき」]は、日本に対してと同時に冷戦下のアジアで行った米軍自らの行為へもむけられるべきではないか」と著者は言う。著者のこうした主張に私は同意する。そして、韓国もまた、韓国政府が共謀した米国の韓国人慰安婦問題に向き合わねばならぬはずだ。日本左翼やリベラルは、日本政府の朝鮮人慰安婦問題に対する最近の動きを批判しているが、彼らにはこのジェンダー視点が殆どないために、彼らの批判は問題を硬直化させる方向にしか働いていないように見える。ただ、読み進めていくうちに私が思い知らされたのは、敗戦後と現代の日本の共通性だった。このことを考えながら読んだ。続きはメモに書く。]]></description>
<dc:subject>occupation military usa japan history history-education gender women sex-slavery prostitution exploitation military-bases books comfort-women accomplices</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:72da00ac16a5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:occupation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:military"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:japan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:history-education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:gender"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:women"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:sex-slavery"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:prostitution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:exploitation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:military-bases"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:comfort-women"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:accomplices"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://moriyama-law.cocolog-nifty.com/machiben/2014/10/post-b111.html">
    <title>予断許さぬＴＰＰ情勢 | 2014年10月16日 街の弁護士日記　SINCE１９９２at名古屋</title>
    <dc:date>2014-10-22T17:30:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://moriyama-law.cocolog-nifty.com/machiben/2014/10/post-b111.html</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><dc:subject>tppa japan usa</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:1c1b9044ef84/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:tppa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:japan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://iwj.co.jp/wj/open/archives/181719">
    <title>2014/10/13 【京都】公開講演会ラジ・スラーニ「ガザに生きる―尊厳と平等を求めて」（動画） | IWJ Independent Web Journal</title>
    <dc:date>2014-10-15T06:32:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://iwj.co.jp/wj/open/archives/181719</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Raji Sourani's lecture on Palestine "living in Gaza --for dignity and equality"]]></description>
<dc:subject>palestine middle-east usa europe japan accomplices silence destruction civilians death pride war dignity human-rights democracy rule-of-law justice resistance occupation mutual-support illegal</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:0a64b4f2564b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:palestine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:middle-east"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:europe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:japan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:accomplices"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:silence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:destruction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:civilians"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:death"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:pride"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:dignity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:human-rights"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:democracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:rule-of-law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:justice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:resistance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:occupation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:mutual-support"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:illegal"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.cbsnews.com/news/muslims-in-france-protest-against-extremism/">
    <title>Muslims in Europe rally against extremist violence | CBS/AP, September 26, 2014</title>
    <dc:date>2014-09-29T12:43:41+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.cbsnews.com/news/muslims-in-france-protest-against-extremism/</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[this piece makes me think two things: (1) muslims in the west, (2) "not in my name".

(1) (because I barely know islam, my comment may have my misunderstanding on it.) comments in this piece were made by muslims in the west. they keep silent on a fact that there're violent teachings of islam, though islam is generally peaceful. islamic teachings tell muslims what they should do, when (fellow) muslims are assaulted. they are silent on it. instead, they made comments, following standards of western value and outlook on muslims based on westerners' misunderstanding of and disdain for muslims/islam. 
under what conditions islamic teachings allow muslims to use violence? if they want to prevent armed muslims from using violence, they need to block such conditions from being satisfied. i guess if muslims are neither invaded, bombed, killed, tortured, displaced, nor oppressed, the conditions aren't satisfied. why are they unwilling to inform non-muslims about them? why are they so uncooperative to encourage dialogue/understanding between muslims and non-muslims? unless muslims explain them, non-muslims including me can't create basic understanding of islam/muslims. a japanese scholar in the field of muslim society provides us some basic information about islam and says, "brutality of IS might come from iraqi soldiers who had cruelly oppressed iraqi people under hussein admin. they've been joining IS. and so, it's wrong to consider IS's brutality in connection with islam." muslims in the west in this piece don't say either such explanations or a fact that behind the rise of IS, there're the west's colonialism, aggressive wars, export of weapons, support to dictators, etc. (there's a possibility that the writer of this piece omitted such comments.) maybe, because they're religious minorities in western society with islamophobia, they avoid criticizing western politics/society out of self protection, (or there is a possibility that they're ignorant in or prejudiced to islamic teachings/world because they are very assimilated to the west. if so, their thoughts/information about islam are useless to understand islam to stop IS's brutality.) as a consequence, the west keeps misunderstanding islam/muslims and waging aggressive wars on muslims, and some young muslims around the world are disillusioned with them. and the root of the issue remains concealed, which is advantageous to ruling class, who harvests huge profits from war. war victims keep increasing.


(2) though US/UK antiwar activists often say "not in our name", UK/US have never stopped war, and start new one. when a war is waged in others' name, what they do? for example, most of them don't react to atrocities by syrian govt. it seems that the purpose of saying "not in my name" is informing people around on their own "innocence", rather than stopping war. muslims in the west with islamophobia seem to say "not in the name of islam" to protect themselves. US/UK antiwar activists seem to say "not in our name", fearing that they might be retaliated with indiscriminate attack for their own military's atrocities on muslims in the middle-east, africa and asia.
activists against arms export don't say "not in my name". not their nation states but corporations export arms, and not their own soldiers but importing nation's soldiers use them. citizens, whose nation state imposes economic sanctions on other countries, don't say "not in my name". their own soldiers don't have a direct hand in killing people. they seem to say "no in my name" to avoid facing responsibility for "direct" killing. for them, israel's attack on palestinians is "indirect" killing, because they know the west support israel. and so, they say "don't kill palestinians!", which helps them to look away from responsibility for suffering of victims of the west's "direct" killing of iraqis/afghans, etc, and to satisfy themselves as "advocates for justice". (and as long as their living standards and statuses aren't damaged, they keep saying it.) people seem to oppose "indirect" killing, and to be indifferent to other's killing, and to look away from or say "not in my name" to "direct" killing. one of major reasons why i oppose the US/NATO occupation of afghanistan is related to this.
in japan, i've never heard "not in our name", even when japanese antiwar-activists made a protest against japan's sending the self-defense forces to iraq in 2004-2009. I guess german antiwar activists don't say so, either. i guess the nations feel that "not in my name" has a negative meaning. under democracy, citizens must keep an eye on their state power to prevent it from trampling on democratic values -- human rights, dignities and freedom. if it commit it, they must stop it. they didn't stop it, and soon it got out of hand. and there was no point in insisting on their own "innocence" to people around and victims of their own military.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>muslims demonstration europe west usa islam our-name IS middle-east beheading</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:2671ea9821b5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:muslims"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:demonstration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:europe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:west"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:islam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:our-name"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:IS"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:middle-east"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:beheading"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.un.org/en/ga/69/meetings/gadebate/24sep/usa.shtml">
    <title>Obama's speech at General Debate of the 69th Session of the UN General Assembly</title>
    <dc:date>2014-09-27T01:58:27+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.un.org/en/ga/69/meetings/gadebate/24sep/usa.shtml</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[on the net, a japanese quoted few sentences from his speech, without making a remark on them. americans seem to pay no attention to them. this page shows UN does, too. but i trembled, remembering another's.

obama's: "The only language understood by killers like this is the language of force. So the United States of America will work with a broad coalition to dismantle this network of death."

another's: "The only language they seem to understand is the one we have been using to bombard them. When you have to deal with a beast you have to treat him as a beast."

by saying the latter, Truman justified a-bombs on japan. what he'll ultimately doing? which he regards ordinary people in mideast as, human or beast? as the use of a-bombs was a US-UK joint decision, so members of NATO are acting in concert with US. as most US/UK citizens have thought it's just, so US/NATO ones will do. as americans have the Truman State university, they'll name institutions for youths after obama in honor of him.]]></description>
<dc:subject>usa obama speech statement UN UN-general-assembly dehumanization language middle-east</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:3b08d20b11a3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:obama"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:speech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:statement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:UN"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:UN-general-assembly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:dehumanization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:middle-east"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://socialistworker.org/2014/09/24/obamas-ever-expanding-war">
    <title>The never-ending, ever-expanding war | Alan Maass, September 24, 2014, SocialistWorker.org</title>
    <dc:date>2014-09-25T05:45:41+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://socialistworker.org/2014/09/24/obamas-ever-expanding-war</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[i think this article is good.

when i read a piece about politics/societies of muslims written by western lefts, i usually feel odd. for example, a sentence in this piece "This was a bald attempt to shift the balance of forces inside the opposition--away from radical, secular proponents of democracy and toward the reactionary Islamists." discomforts me. it implicates that secularity/democracy are superior to islam. though this piece doesn't implicate anything else besides it, other pieces written by them often hint that democracy/secularity are absolute right, and that western political/social system is superior to non-western ones.

i don't think that secularity/non-secularity is a matter of choosing between two options. if muslims hadn't done zakat, nor embodied a spirit of mutual assistance following islamic teachings, so many more muslims in occupied areas, especially gaza blockaded by israel, would have died of hunger/illness over decades. (after 3.11 earthquake, muslims in japan went to disaster area many times and distributed hot meal to victims, non-muslims.) these deeds are islamic. but western lefts think that their western secular society is best/most advanced in the world, by comparing between muslim oppressors and themselves. why don't they compare between some violent teachings of islam, which only few muslims observe, and neoliberalism, which has spread broadly into western secular society, and which the west has imposed on the world, and which was born from christianity? why don't they compare between atrocities committed by IS and those by the US and NATO? it's quite obvious which has been causing so many more victims, who were destroyed their livelihoods, families houses, hospitals, schools, infrastructure, communities, and environment. additionally, i wonder if they notice that secularity in west is christian. they seem to regard their secularity as universal. when they impose it on the non-west, they impose christian thoughts and system on it.

is democracy best? western democracies had waged aggressive wars against iraq/afghanistan and their democratic people hadn't been able to prevent them, and now they can't prevent new one. today's suffering of palestinians shows that western democracy is powerless to put an end to israeli occupation of palestine. when the US started to occupy iraq, it trumpeted a success story about its installing democracy in japan, but in reality, it installed democracy which enabled itself to indirectly rule japan as its colony. till now, japan's major policies and foreign ones to countries/organizations --china, russia, IS, etc-- which are deeply linked to US national interests have been at the mercy of the US. but it's called democracy. both US democracy and democracy which US imposes on other countries are good-looking masks to hide the true face of the system for the ruling class. (the ruling class has made people believe that election is democracy, though democracy is so difficult that people can't establish it by only elections.) despite these facts, western lefts shout, "democracy!!!" and some muslims do so, too, and model western democracy on their ideal. the islamic teachings have affinities for democracy. i think muslims can attain their islamic democracy, by following the teaching of islam (they might need to reconsider some interpretation of them), though westerners may not regard it as democracy but disdain it as reactionary, and though some muslims might refuse to call it, which they achieve, democracy.

political system of arab "coalition partners" of the US, which enables the ruling class to have wealth and power, violates teachings of islam. it, backed by the west, has oppressed movements for islamic democracy to protect their vested interests. their oppression against islam has contributed to branding islam as un-democratic/oppressive. IS's intolerance to minorities is offensive to islam. IS, which declared itself caliphate by the islamic teaching, must show accountability for and take on the responsibility for its barbaric violence, and take preventive steps of it. (but at the risk of my being denounced, i guess there's a possibility that IS's barbarities are exaggerated, because taliban have been stigmatized as barbarians for more than a decade, and west's not-factbased propaganda about them is malicious enough to disgust me, though i don't support all their thoughts/activities, and because the west spreads propaganda/lies convenient for itself, whenever it starts military intervention or aggressive wars.) 

IS was born from western colonization of middle-east, support to muslim dictators who crack down against movements for islamic democracy, aggression, occupation, and destruction since the WWI. west's action on muslims is same as always, and is so violent/destructive to IS that it all but encourges IS to be more violent. the terrible reality of a great number of muslim casualties and refugees caused by west's military and support to dictators will send more muslims with a strong sense of justice to deadly jihad. however the west tries to destroy IS, it or successors of it, which follow the islamic teachings, and which are supported by many muslims, will survive. west's lack of understanding of muslims' suffering must be created by their sense of superiority.

> we need to..stand in solidarity with those challenging imperialism, oppression and tyranny...
china is hostile to uighur, russia to chechen, and other permanent members of the UN security council to IS. all world powers share a mutual interest on oppressing muslims. and there is islamophobia in these countries. before standing in solidarity, western lefts need to realize that they have prejudice against and a sense of superiority to muslims, and that even if they think the west has been secularized, from the point of view of non-westerners, westerners' way of thinking and system are christian. and don't forget west's reality: western democracies haven't been able to prevent their wars; western lefts haven't turned democracy as their ideal in reality and it historically has  never existed. by calling such a fantasy world democracy, and deifying it, they prevent people from raising a question about democracy, especially one that the west imposes on the non-west. and they should realize they, who use only the western lens, haven't hesitated to trample over non-westerners' feelings by despising everything that seems un-democratic/un-secular in the non-west. in addition, while perceiving western govts' demonizing armed muslims as a problem, they judge them by seeing only few sides of them according to their western lights, which is no better than demonizing them. and they should admit a fact that not only propaganda by western mainstream media and govts but also westerners' racism lead western public to approve west's waging wars. (of course, i must send the same alert to the japanese.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>middle-east IS islam muslims war oppression iraq syria saudi-arabia uae iran russia usa europe west destruction military sectarianism imperialism</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:78d39a9648eb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:middle-east"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:IS"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:islam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:muslims"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:oppression"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:iraq"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:syria"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:saudi-arabia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:uae"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:iran"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:russia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:europe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:west"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:destruction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:military"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:sectarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:imperialism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/2014/07/24/bureau-study-reveals-vacuum-of-information-around-afghanistan-drone-strikes/">
    <title>Bureau study reveals vacuum of information around Afghanistan drone strikes | July 24, 2014 by Alice K Ross, The Bureau of Investigative Journalism</title>
    <dc:date>2014-08-06T15:12:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/2014/07/24/bureau-study-reveals-vacuum-of-information-around-afghanistan-drone-strikes/</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><dc:subject>afghanistan asia drones death secret nato usa military</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:878cce0b5c95/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:afghanistan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:asia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:drones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:death"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:secret"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:nato"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:military"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.pajhwok.com/en/2014/08/05/herat-civilian-killings-touch-protest">
    <title>Herat civilian killings touch off protest |By Storai Karimi Aug 5, 2014, Paihwok</title>
    <dc:date>2014-08-06T15:10:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.pajhwok.com/en/2014/08/05/herat-civilian-killings-touch-protest</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[this is a photo of bodies of afghans killed by NATO bombing a few days ago. I've come across such photos of afghans many times only for a few years. when some western lefts, who are devoting their energies to protesting israeli massacre and occupation of palestine, see it, what do they think?

many israelis' approval of israel's massacre and occupation of palestine and many westerners' silence on US/NATO' massacre and occupation of afghanistan, iraq, etc, have a lot in common. when their own countries commit inhumanity, they avoid facing the fact or regard it as justice, (just like they've justified US indiscriminate bombing on more than a hundred cities, including hiroshima/nagasaki, during WWII,) to protect their sense of superiority. and when other countries commit inhumanity, they spend their time not to face their own countries' inhumanity but to show a compassion for victims of other countries' inhumanity, and enjoy feeling of superiority by playing compassionate persons.

US/NATO ongoing massacre on afghans since 2001 and afghans' protest against US/NATO occupation don't become big news for the westerners. and as soon as their own soldiers withdraw from afghanistan, they think nothing of afghanistan or behave like innocent third persons. once their own soldiers return to their own countries, they don't care either their victims or the present and the future of the countries, afghanistan, iraq, and libya, which their own countries turned into a battleground. on the other hands, the massacre of palestinians by israel and palestinians' protest against israeli occupation become big news for them. (and US/NATO soldiers deaths becomes big news for them, too, while non-westerners' deaths caused by US/NATO soldiers don't do so. it's related to a nationalist feeling.) because the west hasn't had a direct hand in the massacre and occupation of palestine, they regard themselves as innocent third persons. and so, they easily face the fact of palestine and take part in protests against israeli policy, (though their protests are too weak to change it). similarly, israelis generally show a compassion for war victims and oppressed who live outside the middle-east, and who aren't seemingly victims of israel. (it's similar to most japanese who regard its country as a pacifist and themselves as innocent third persons, despite the fact that it has strongly supported US wars, and display a feeling of compassion for victims of US wars, without thinking of themselves as accomplices of US.) 

some westerners, who denounce israel's indiscriminate bombing and refuse its excuse that it's a mistake, often keep silent on the ongoing US/NATO bombing in afghanistan. do they want to think that US/NATO have bombed afghans in the interests of justice or that they've bombed on them not indiscriminately but by decade-long mistake? while they don't easily believe the propaganda that hamas is terrorists and strongly argue against it, they've swallowed the propaganda that armed muslims in afghanistan, iraq, pakistan, syria, libya, etc, are terrorists, and haven't objected to it. (many japanese lefts have exhibited the same behavior, too, because they like to blindly follow western lefts. and they've kept silent on issues of inequality and poverty in japan, which they, as petite bourgeoisie, hate to face.) 

as regards syria, no matter how many people are killed, tortured and displaced by syrian govt, just like palestinians are done so by israeli govt, some western lefts who are devotees of putin keep silent horrifyingly on suffering of syrians, to defend putin who supports assad. just like many israelis feel nothing for lives and dignities of palestinians, they feel nothing for those of syrians.

whenever I come across photos on this latest israeli attack on palestine on the net, photos of similar scenes in afghanistan, iraq, pakistan, and syria that I've seen pass in review before my eyes: dead bodies, crying and screaming people, people fighting for lives of bloody victims, people struggling to pull their families from the rubble, people standing motionless in front of a heap of rubble of destroyed their houses, people in extreme grief and despair who speechlessly stare into their children' faces in death at funeral, protest demonstration with carrying victims' bodies, beggary of tattered, malnourished people bombed out of their home. as these scenes pass in review before my eyes many times, I get to think that whenever the victims see (photos of) such scenes, even if they occur in other countries, they might feel an agonizing pain, unless we remove scenes that someone becomes a war victim from the world, even if the victims now live in a country without war.

recently, I often feel that not they but I might be a hypocrite and lover of double-standard and want to look away from the reality. ]]></description>
<dc:subject>afghanistan asia nato usa civilians death protest herat occupation military</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:9515242180e9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:afghanistan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:asia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:nato"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:civilians"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:death"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:protest"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:herat"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:occupation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:military"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2014/07/28/liby-j28.html">
    <title>US evacuates Libyan embassy | By Patrick Martin, 28 July 2014, WSWS</title>
    <dc:date>2014-07-30T01:52:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2014/07/28/liby-j28.html</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[> the Benghazi disaster was a case of “blowback,” in which CIA-trained and equipped Islamist terrorists turned their guns... The evacuation became the occasion for the largest display of force by the US military in Libya since the 2011 bombing campaign... The US-NATO war in 2011..killed tens of thousands and overthrew... as in Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan, imperialist intervention has effectively destroyed the society of the conquered country...

you call them "islamist terrorists". you NEVER call US military and NATO, which committed bombing campaign and killed tens of thousands and destroyed the society in iraq, syria, afghanistan, and libya, "terrorists". you NEVER call US and NATO presidents/PMs who have waged these wars "terrorists". you NEVER call Netanyahu, who has waged war against palestine, "terrorist". you NEVER call Putin, al-Assad, al-Maliki, Xi Jinping, who kill the minorities in their own countries, "terrorists".

what I want to say is not that you should call these people "terrorists" but that you, western lefts lightly label muslims as terrorists, especially armed ones. they use double-standards to defend the west. I don't know whether they're terrorists or not. in the first place, I'm not interested in who should be categorized as terrorists. when people label someone as "terrorist", they regard themselves as righteous ones or as advocates for justice, and treat him/her as one whom they permit themselves (their own soldiers) to assassinate with immunity. since I realized this labeling is violent, I've not used this word lightly, because I want to avoid using violence, and because I have neither sufficient information nor good judgment about politics and cultures outside japan, and because I know I'm not a righteous person. as a citizen of an advanced country which has exploited and contaminated developing countries, and of a country which has unsolved issues of its war and colonization responsibility, and of an allied country of the US, which has repeated aggressive war and occupation in the name of "just war", and of a country which has inflicted US military bases on okinawa and placed the greatest emphasis on establishing perfect neoliberalization, trampling human dignity and life, I can't allow myself to play a justice or an innocent third person.

the following is what I feel now. western lefts use other double-standards. they keep silent on west's colonization of the middle-east and anti-semitism in europe, with the consequence that many jews emigrated from euorpe to palestine and that they founded israel. by focusing on UN resolutions, they draw attention away from west's responsibility for suffering of palestine, which caused by the west before passing the resolution, and which is a root of suffering of today's palestine. and they play a third party in good faith and denounce israel. though it's clear for non-westerners that not only israel but the west have responsibilities for suffering of palestine, it seems to be taboo for westerners to mention it. though they mention suffering of asians, which caused by the japanese empire's colonizations and wars, and never regard it as a thing of the past, they keep silent on or praise its colonizations and wars of the world (except nazis' ones), and downplay non-westerners' suffering caused by the west and regard it as a thing of the past. they regard even ongoing iraqis'/afghans' suffering caused by US, NATO, (and japan) as a thing of the past or as one that isn't there. (if BDS movements is effective, ones against not only israel but US, NATO, and japan should have been launched. why didn't western lefts propose it? because their economic powers are too big. if so, the movement against israel supported by US is effective? another reason is that if the movement against US/NATO is effective, their living standards must be worsened. I don't intend to criticize palestinians/israelis who promote it. what I feel is that western lefts use it as a cover for their hypocrisy.) in addition, they say nothing about the former colonial masters' ongoing efforts since the colonial period --military intervention, backing dictators and promoting conflicts in the middle-east-- so as to preserve the vested interests, natural resources and geopolitical interests, which contributed to improvement of living standards of westerners, though they try to prevent israeli corporations and farms from exploiting palestinians, which contributed to that of israelis.

if western lefts keep avoiding confronting them, their words and actions against israeli occupation/massacre of palestine might not have an effect on most israeli people, just like their words that denounce japan don't have an effect on most japanese people, including me. making an end of the israeli occupation will bring severe pain and damage to israelis. (imagine that US, australia, etc., return their lands to indigenous people.) unless international community, especially the west, which has shifted its serious responsibility onto palestine and israel, decides to undertake part of this pain and damage, and unless it faces its own inhumanities, israel would keep the occupation, following the example of the west. israel is a reflection of the west in a mirror. if they consider what they must do to make the westerners accept west's responsibilities of colonizations, wars and occupations around the world, and to attain to making apology and compensation for victims of west's inhumanities, they might know how to move israeli people.

though causalities in iraq, syria, afghanistan, pakistan, libya, ukraine are as heavy as or much heavier than those in palestine, world lefts write fewer articles and hold much smaller demonstrations for them. this is double-standard, too. this is our true colors. ]]></description>
<dc:subject>libya usa nato military destruction evacuation double-standard terrorist africa middle-east</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:11aec8ad3387/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:libya"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:nato"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:military"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:destruction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:evacuation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:double-standard"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:terrorist"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:africa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:middle-east"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/pity_the_children_20140630">
    <title>Pity the Children | Chris Hedges, Jun 30, 2014, Truthdig</title>
    <dc:date>2014-07-04T23:15:27+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/pity_the_children_20140630</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[I often feel something is wrong when I read a piece about muslim countries, written by western lefts.

I don't lump all armed muslim groups together, though I can't distinguish them due to my indifference, ignorance, information shortage, and unstable situation of the middle east. some are like mercenaries of blackwater, and others are like resistance against nazis, and there are many groups which think differently between the two, and members in a group don't always achieve a consensus. what I want them and unarmed ones to work together, to liberate themselves from oppression and to build communities, where all muslims live peacefully regardless of faith, and which ensures human dignity and necessities, without sticking to framework of nation state and the present economic system, under the condition of minimizing harm, if breaking them is less harmful than sticking to them.

western lefts don't say clearly that now armed muslims may have suffered from trauma, because they, like US veterans, committed/witnessed atrocities, and because since they were children, they've lived under occupation/aggressive war by the west, dictatorship backed by it, civil war provoked by it, and/or extreme poverty/starvation caused by (neo)colonialism by it. they don't say that now armed muslims who go from the west to the middle-east may have suffered from trauma, because they've experienced racism, islamophobia, and discrimination against immigrant from childhood in the west. (I don't intend to say all muslims arm themselves because of their harsh experiences.) instead, they keep silent on their wishes, suffering and its roots, and put all of them in one bag, which they label "terrorists" "extremists" who must be wiped out.

while showing pity to US veterans and iraqi/afghan civilians and mentioning something common between suffering of the former and that of latter, they never show pity to armed muslims nor try to find common ground between US veterans and armed muslims. ie, they don't put US soldiers in the category of the armed, which is the same one as they put armed muslims in, though they accuse armed muslims of not distinguishing between civilians and soldiers. (armed muslims usually distinguish them, following islamic teachings.) they may think that US veterans are so human that they endure suffering and struggle to bring an end to war or commit suicide because the suffering is too much to bear, while armed muslims are less human, free of the suffering, and obsessed only with vengefulness, extremism and violence.

you say, "They [these veterans and children] wanted..love", without saying, "armed muslims wanted..". it leads your readers to make little of dignities of armed muslims, and to trample dignities not only of armed muslims but of civilian muslims including children, other non-americans, and americans. it helps the ruling class to repeat war and to keep exploiting humans as disposable in battlefields, factories, and everyplace in the world.]]></description>
<dc:subject>children pity somalia afghanistan iraq trauma ptsd veterans usa war humiliation raid atrocities memory</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:cd2930e29dfa/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:pity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:somalia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:afghanistan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:iraq"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:trauma"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:ptsd"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:veterans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:humiliation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:raid"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:atrocities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:memory"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/15/opinion/sunday/chelsea-manning-the-us-militarys-campaign-against-media-freedom.html">
    <title>The Fog Machine of War: Chelsea Manning on the U.S. Military and Media Freedom | By CHELSEA MANNING, JUNE 14, 2014, NYT</title>
    <dc:date>2014-06-23T21:41:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/15/opinion/sunday/chelsea-manning-the-us-militarys-campaign-against-media-freedom.html</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[she said, "I was shocked by our military’s complicity in the corruption of that election [in iraq]. Yet these deeply troubling details flew under the American media’s radar." they must have been doing the same thing in afghanistan since they began occupying it. but without US media reports, many people around the world have noticed it, because the people of countries where US military bases have been located have seen/heard it. (for example, in japan, there are many history books about japan-US relations, which mention it, and which anyone can easily access at nearby libraries or bookstores.) they've pretended that they don't notice it or regarded it as trivial, because it's a familiar sight, and because they choose to look away from it as long as they don't become direct victims to it. and of course, they've noticed that occupation is neither clean nor just nor democratic.]]></description>
<dc:subject>usa whistle-blower iraq afghanistan election corruption asia middle-east media accomplices embedded censorship propaganda</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:df5ba9956bcc/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:whistle-blower"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:iraq"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:afghanistan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:election"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:corruption"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:asia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:middle-east"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:accomplices"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:embedded"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:censorship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:propaganda"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_ghoulish_face_of_empire_20140623">
    <title>The Ghoulish Face of Empire | By Chris Hedges, Jun 22, 2014, truthdig</title>
    <dc:date>2014-06-23T21:37:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_ghoulish_face_of_empire_20140623</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[> they are the specters of...
some US intellectuals love to dehumanize/demonize muslims. the black-clad fighters are neither "specters" nor "ghosts" nor "risen remains " but humans. have you ever regarded a westerner as such things? the west dehumanized/demonize taliban to justify the US/NATO aggressive war on afghanistan. and now, you demonize black-clad fighters.

> The language of violence engenders violence...
the language of dehumanization/demonization engenders dehumanization/demonization.

> “Those to whom evil is done do evil in return."...
while the US has committed genocide against muslims in iraq/afghanistan and other muslim countries many times since 9.11 occurred, afghans/iraqis have never done evil to americans in the US. taliban never say, "we'll do payback in the US," but say, "get out of our beloved homeland, every foreign soldier!" can you notice a difference in meaning between the two sentences? even if your people "to whom evil is done always do evil in return", others don't always do so. (it doesn't mean either that they choose to endure pain silently or that americans don't have to do anything.)

> In the 1990s there was a considerable effort made in the military, but also in the larger community...
some US intellectuals like to have a delusion about "the US in the good, old days." the sanction on iraq from 1990 had brought great suffering and deaths to iraqis. what had the US done in yugoslavia in the 90s? how many military bases had the US had abroad in the 90s?

> There is an analogy to be made with Great Britain..
what concerns you is only the US, which has something in common with the downfallen UK. you keep silent on the fact that the UK inflicted endless suffering on the people of the middle-east, in other words, not only the US aggressive war on and occupation of iraq but also borders which the UK and other western countries had drawn in the middle east in the age of the WWI have been bringing oppression, displacement and ethnic/sectarian conflicts to them till now.

> And in these two wars [Afghanistan and Iraq] there does seem to be this increase in PTSD.. 
I guess that you don't consider iraqi/afghan sufferers from PTSD, who have been forced by the US to live in battlefields, and to witness US murders of their families, and to be bereaved/orphaned, and to live in extreme poverty without accessing medical service.


> The callous slaughter we deliver is no different from the callous slaughter we receive...
do you want US readers to equate suffering of US public with that of iraqis/afghans? does the US have a city like fallujah/kandahar, where the US slaughtered countless local people, destroyed their houses, hospitals, and schools, and contaminated their lands with DU and other bombs, and where many civilians including children have suffered PTSD/disabilities, and where iraqi/afghan state soldiers armed with US-made weapons have massacred local people? (I don't deny that the people of the US and a US colony, japan are out of control on the road to ruin.)

> Our jihadists..are no less demented than the jihadists approaching Baghdad..
you demonize muslims again. these "jihadists", unlike the US politicians whose names you call out, have no intention to wage aggressive war on the west, though in accordance with the islam teachings, they defy borders that the west draw in muslim lands and cross them. you seem to want to regard as demon, people who remake order which the west made and which you regard as right. though you label these muslims as "jihadists", they don't share the same thinking. I believe that some of them, by the teachings of islam, have been struggling to bring peace to muslims, and to control violence, and to minimize harm to them. I want to encourage such people. (you should find out the meaning of jihad. some mulsims may be offended by calling bush, etc, jihadists.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>usa war occupation destruction military iraq civil-war demonization history uk</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:06ba2935be51/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:occupation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:destruction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:military"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:iraq"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:civil-war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:demonization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:uk"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2014/06/03/national/politics-diplomacy/obama-called-sdf-involvement-africa/">
    <title>Obama called for more SDF involvement in Africa | Jun 3, 2014, Kyodo, The Japan Times</title>
    <dc:date>2014-06-02T23:25:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2014/06/03/national/politics-diplomacy/obama-called-sdf-involvement-africa/</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><dc:subject>japan usa africa collective-self-defense UN war peacekeeping-mission military</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:1632d65b9267/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:japan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:africa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:collective-self-defense"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:UN"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:peacekeeping-mission"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:military"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://shinsho.shueisha.co.jp/kotoba/tachiyomi/140303.html">
    <title>水野和夫×白井聡 立ち読み「資本主義の死の時代を生き抜く」｜kotoba（コトバ）</title>
    <dc:date>2014-05-31T02:58:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://shinsho.shueisha.co.jp/kotoba/tachiyomi/140303.html</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><dc:subject>economy capitalism oil empire japan usa china slavery books history</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:f67b495e4184/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:economy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:oil"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:empire"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:japan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:china"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:slavery"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:history"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2014/05/28/afgh-m28.html">
    <title>Announcing Afghan drawdown, Obama pledges military forces for other “priorities around the globe” | By Jerry White 28 May 2014, WSWS</title>
    <dc:date>2014-05-29T19:36:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2014/05/28/afgh-m28.html</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[> Military analysts say this would allow the US military, working with Afghan forces, to operate six bases and maintain air bases and drone operations in key parts of the country...
the day might come when the US forces in US military bases in afghanistan conduct drone strikes against japan, just like the US often has used its military bases in japan as launchpad for its wars. when it does, how can the japanese, who have debated the issue of the collective right to self-defense only in terms of preventing japanese soldiers from being killed from war, not in terms of preventing war, nor from a critical perspective about US bloody, warlike foreign policy, denounce afghans? 


> By the end of 2016, an unspecified number of troops would be left to defend the US Embassy and maintain a “security assistance component” similar to the current US force level in Iraq...
the US wants afghanistan to be another iraq, which the US ruined, and where US soldiers carried out genocide on iraqis, and where now iraqis backed by the US have committed genocide on their own people. because americans don't accept that they must make apology and give compensation for suffering of iraqis, which is one of deterrents to war, they, who have empty anti-war sentiments, never really intend to prevent the US from waging war, occupying, destroying other countries. 


> ...such an agreement, which would give US troops immunity from Afghan and international law and thereby allow the continuation of night raids and air strikes against civilian targets. A bilateral agreement would allow for a continued and open-ended US military presence in the country...
how many americans are ready to understand that all BSAs and SOFAs have stripped non-americans of their dignities and freedom, and rights to self-determination? they refuse to understand that such agreements enable not only US soldiers to kill non-americans legally but also the US to undermine non-americans' bodies and souls. when will they stop thinking that the sum total of cost of the occupied/aggressed is only the number of casualties and money (material damage)?


> The squandering of an estimated half trillion dollars on the Afghan War and the death of 3,441 coalition forces, including 2,322 American soldiers, has deepened popular hostility to the war in the United States... 
it seems that afghans' suffering has nothing at all to do with "americans' hostility to the war". you should distinguish between "hostility to the war" and "hostility to own cost of prosecuting the war", because they've not had the former from the beginning, and the latter won't occur, if the US forces its allies and colonies to prosecute US imperialist wars instead of its prosecuting them, which is what now the US wants to do, in the name of "pivot to asia".

some americans say that the iraq war was wrong, because it was started from a lie that iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction. they never say that the afghan war is wrong. but nothing can't justify US's ruthless and great destruction and massacre in iraq, regardless of whether it possessed the weapons or not. if not, the hard fact that the US is the No.1 possessor of the weapons can justify destroying the US root and branch and massacring americans. as long as americans place responsibility for US wars on liar politicians, and as long as they look away from their obligation to make apology and give compensation, as long as they underestimate the cost of the occupied/aggressed, all of which are linked dehumanization and racism and disdain for cultures of other people, they won't say that the afghan war is wrong, in other words, "hostility to war" won't occur in the US. 

I must point out one more thing: because WSWS has not "hostility to war" but "hostility to own cost of prosecuting war", it keeps silent on suffering of the oppressed in rival states of the US or under dictators' regimes backed by these states --for example, syrians, uighurs, tibetans, crimean tatars, etc. while denouncing bombing by the US, it keeps silent on bombing by these states. while denouncing guantanamo, it keeps silent on torture/detention by these states. what it pays attention to is not dignities of these oppressed people but future compensation that will have to be paid from US taxpayers' money. since the end of the WWII, to minimize their own cost of war, the left of the US and japan haven't resisted war but supported war, by pretending to be anti-war and by ignoring human dignities of others.]]></description>
<dc:subject>afghanistan asia usa occupation military-bases hypocrisy endless-war</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:7f8e00a418c6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:afghanistan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:asia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:occupation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:military-bases"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:hypocrisy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:endless-war"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.goo.ne.jp/kentanakachan/e/faaa12c53e0ba635de5fc7e09226e66c">
    <title>”此のデモクラシーの奥には幾百万の尊い民族の血が今尚濤々として流れてゐる” - 空</title>
    <dc:date>2014-05-29T19:16:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.goo.ne.jp/kentanakachan/e/faaa12c53e0ba635de5fc7e09226e66c</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[anti-war/leftist japanese people say, "we must defend peace and democracy, which have come at the sacrifices of our people in the past (victims of the WWII)." whenever I hear this phrase, I feel unexplainable discomfort. reading a book review of a japanese history book (both the reviewer and the author are wellknown japanese historians), this blogger makes a comment with a little bit of scoff, "they seem to say that the idea that now japan stands on top of the sacrifices of our people in the past is a japanese tradition. how about if the japanese who attach importance to democracy visiting yasukuni?" this comment helps me understand why the phrase discomforts me: the phrase is nationalistic. in the phrase, the sacrifices are beautified. advocates of members of the diet who visit yasukuni, rightist japanese often say, "now japan is founded on the sacrifice of our people in the past." in japan, both the left and the right like this phrase, because it helps them stop thinking and turning a blind eye to what they don't want to see.

they regard the japanese who died from the war as beautiful sacrifices to postwar japan. of course, the leftist japanese and some rightist ones say that they were war victims but were also aggressors, and that japan inflicted enormous damage on asians. but the phrase doesn't ask questions: "why were sacrifices needed? who selected them as sacrifices?" 

when fascism was rising before the war, many "our people in the past" kept silent, and followed the authorities, and supported the war passively or actively. the phrase doesn't ask questions: "why fascism was rising? why they kept silent? why they supported the war?" now, we're puzzled about what we must do to prevent war.

our postwar people have regarded postwar japan as clean, because they've thought that the sacrifices wiped out every evil of japan, which had been rampant before and during the war. the phrase doesn't ask questions: "have our postwar people broken these evils of japan? have they fulfilled an obligation to face them, to demolish them, to realize true democracy and peace, and to spread peace around the world? has postwar japan, which has been occupied by the US, and which has swallowed US systems and values, has ever been a true democracy? US occupation of japan has had a strong affinity for these evils, hasn't it?"

our postwar people have enjoyed "peace and democracy" only for themselves. they've believed that unlike "our people in the past", they, living in the present, haven't sacrificed anyone in their own times, and that they've been innocent. but they've looked away from the fact that japan has supported US imperialistic wars --korean war, vietnam war, gulf war, iraq war, afghan war, etc. they've not asked a question: "haven't we sacrificed victims of these wars for our "peace and democracy"? haven't we sacrificed the people living near US military bases for our "peace and democracy"? "

and just now, japanese advocates for the no-war constitution and opponents against US military bases in japan never ask themselves whether they've sacrificed the poor/minorities at home and abroad for their "peace and democracy". they never doubt that their own words and actions may have contributed to increase in the number of exclusionist nationalists, historical revisionists, poor/starving people, war victims, and oppressed people at home and abroad. they say, "because war survivor are getting old, and few members of the diet have horrible war memories. as a result, more and more japanese can't understand the pricelessness and blessings of peace and the no-war constitution." but in reality, they've neither asked nor answered the above-mentioned questions. they've defended only the status quo to pamper their egos, which come from their claiming to be defenders for "peace and democracy". what they've defended are pseudo-peace and pseudo-democracy only for themselves, founded on the sacrifices of others at home and abroad, and so, there're only such pseudo-peace and pseudo-democracy in japan, and so, the day is coming when the issue of the use of the right to collective self-defense is occurring. if they had made efforts to achieve true peace and democracy since the end of the war, the japanese wouldn't have established legal totalitarian/exploitation systems, nor have been blindly servile to warmonger US, nor have been insensitive to fascism.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>japan history usa peace democracy oradition nationalism historian pseudo</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:273c67066e8e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:japan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:peace"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:democracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:oradition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:nationalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:historian"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:pseudo"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://twitter.com/masanorinaito/status/468408724185296898">
    <title>Twitter / masanorinaito: 米軍と協調して集団的自衛権の行使に踏み切るなら、なにをするにせよ、タリバンは日本人を攻撃の対象にする。これまでアフガンに注いできた日本の政府開発援助ODAは60</title>
    <dc:date>2014-05-20T04:26:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://twitter.com/masanorinaito/status/468408724185296898</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[from the page: "...タリバンに限らず、アフガン市民は、アメリカや同盟国のNATO軍がさんざん罪もない人びとを誤爆や誤射で殺害したことを決して忘れない。そこへ米軍との協力関係にあることを見せつけるように自衛隊を派遣したら..タリバンのみならずアフガン市民は、日本軍は米軍の仲間であることを認識する。..日本は敵意を受けていない。アメリカはそういう日本と組んで駐留軍への敵意を緩和しよう、あるいは、攻撃対象を分散させようとする"

if afghan govt makes the BSA with US govt and japanese govt approves the use of the right to collective self-defense, which the japanese PM is persistently pushing ahead with, under the encouragement of US govt, despite opposition from japanese public, US govt will make japanese govt invoke its right of collective self-defense in afghanistan. until now, using the no-war constitution as a shield, japanese govt has been allowed to refuse US demand that japan deploy its soldiers in afghanistan by the US, in exchange for supplying "aid" money (ODA to afghanistan: six hundred billion yen) and "civilian" support services inside afghanistan and logistic support outside afghanistan to help the US military occupation of afghanistan. but from now on, possibly US govt will use japanese soldiers inside afghanistan, who have never killed a single afghan, in hopes of afghans' easing their hostility to the occupation or weakening their offense against US soldiers by leading them to attack japanese soldiers, to facilitate the US endless occupation militarily and unmilitarily (culturally, mentally, politically, and/or economically, etc.), --in short, americanization of afghanistan to enable the US to exploit afghanistan easily. but afghans' reaction will be a far cry from what US govt expects, because they've endured wars/occupation by soviet/US/NATO and poverty/insecurity caused by them for decades beyond their physical/psychological limits, and because they have strong spirit of independence, and because it means japan betrays afghans at this late date. afghans will resist the occupation more fiercely, have great hostility to japanese soldiers as US allies, and attack the japanese in afghanistan. it's only natural afghans do so. I never want to see the day when afghan and japanese people, both of whose countries are virtually colonies of the US, and who have never hated/killed each other, kill/hate each other for the US and japanese fascists. ]]></description>
<dc:subject>japan afghanistan collective-self-defense military soldiers occupation usa constitution death</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:e012baa525d3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:japan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:afghanistan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:collective-self-defense"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:military"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:soldiers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:occupation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:constitution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:death"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.japan-press.co.jp/modules/news/index.php?id=7141">
    <title>Allowing US access to Japan’s fingerprint database invades privacy: lawyer | April 21, 2014, akahata, @JapanPress_wky</title>
    <dc:date>2014-05-04T05:08:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.japan-press.co.jp/modules/news/index.php?id=7141</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><dc:subject>fingerprint usa japan database privacy colony</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:b2ca7b240217/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:fingerprint"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:japan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:database"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:colony"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://nakano-kenji.blogspot.com/2014/05/2014.html">
    <title>批評する工房のパレット: 大学研究と軍事研究 2014</title>
    <dc:date>2014-05-04T00:13:07+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://nakano-kenji.blogspot.com/2014/05/2014.html</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><dc:subject>japan military academics restrictions usa universities money asia</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:9fc81d15f3a4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:japan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:military"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:academics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:restrictions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:universities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:money"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:asia"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.pajhwok.com/en/2014/04/15/mother-killed-2-children-khost-airstrike">
    <title>Mother killed with 2 children in Khost NATO airstrike | By Mohammad Haroon Apr 15, 2014 Pajhwok Afghan News</title>
    <dc:date>2014-04-15T20:57:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.pajhwok.com/en/2014/04/15/mother-killed-2-children-khost-airstrike</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[whenever US/NATO killed afghan civilians, karzai condemned it. but, to protect his family's vested interests, he was always the biggest supporter of the US occupation of afghanistan, which is the very root of US/NATO killing. whoever is elected as president, because candidates have approved the occupation, the US keeps killing afghans by using its airstrikes and afghan soldiers, which enables to put US soldiers in safe place. it further promotes US public, who haven't regarded afghans as humans since the beginning of the occupation, to ignore the occupation and afghans' suffering caused by it. in the "democratic" election under the occupation, afghans who opposed the occupation were rejected for a fair crack of the whip, and they had no choice but to vote for proponents of the occupation or to boycott it. if the US had withdrawn from afghanistan, afghans, including proponents of the occupation, would have realized dialogues for peace in accordance with islam teaching and their culture.]]></description>
<dc:subject>afghanistan asia children murders death women nato usa military occupation</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:c9c01058cd4b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:afghanistan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:asia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:murders"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:death"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:women"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:nato"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:military"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:occupation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.marxist.com/russian-annexation-of-crimea-what-consequences-for-world-relations.htm">
    <title>Russian annexation of Crimea – What consequences for world relations? | Written by Francesco Merli Friday, 21 March 2014, International Marxist Tendency</title>
    <dc:date>2014-03-24T07:25:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.marxist.com/russian-annexation-of-crimea-what-consequences-for-world-relations.htm</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[from the page: "What Russia is showing to the whole world is that when fundamental interests collide, they can only be resolved by the use of force.. now the crisis is acquiring a logic of its own where all participants are reacting empirically in order to preserve their strategic interests. The only actors who have no say are the people of the Ukraine, Russian, Tatars, or Ukrainians, who will suffer the consequences of this power struggle... Putin warned that all Russian-speaking minorities in former Soviet Union republics, as in Ukraine, will be regarded as part of a single Russian nation. This would represent the basis for future Russian interventions across the board... Russia is the most unequal country.. A mere 110 Russian citizens now control 35 percent of the total household wealth across the country.. The ruling class will resort to any means at their disposal in order to defend their privileges if the workers and youth of Russia dare demand better conditions for themselves."]]></description>
<dc:subject>ukraine russia EU usa military intervention nation nationalism annexation imperialism military-bases exploitation capitalism</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:73d36f8a1ef4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:ukraine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:russia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:EU"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:military"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:intervention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:nation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:nationalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:annexation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:imperialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:military-bases"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:exploitation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:capitalism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://upsidedownworld.org/main/uruguay-archives-48/4757-a-step-toward-justice-in-the-long-war-on-terror-uruguay-offers-to-welcome-guantanamo-detainees">
    <title>A Step Toward Justice in the Long “War on Terror”: Uruguay Offers to Welcome Guantanamo Detainees | Benjamin Dangl, 22 March 2014, Upside Down World</title>
    <dc:date>2014-03-23T04:57:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://upsidedownworld.org/main/uruguay-archives-48/4757-a-step-toward-justice-in-the-long-war-on-terror-uruguay-offers-to-welcome-guantanamo-detainees</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><dc:subject>uruguay latin-america guantanamo justice detention torture humanity usa</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:cb394fb5090c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:uruguay"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:latin-america"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:guantanamo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:justice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:detention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:torture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:humanity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/03/18/obama-backs-down-on-crimea/">
    <title>Obama Backs Down on Crimea by MIKE WHITNEY | March 18, 2014</title>
    <dc:date>2014-03-19T13:58:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/03/18/obama-backs-down-on-crimea/</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[I feel some western lefts are amused to see putin beats obama, maybe because they have no power to do so and think putin does so in place of them. what we must do is to restore dignities to everyone all over the world, not to feel pleasure in seeing ugly political fights among world ruling elites.


> The balloting, in which more than 93 percent of voters "approved splitting off...
> by using basic democratic institutions to block Washington from implementing its plan to deploy NATO and US missile bases in Ukraine? It sounds like a smart move to me...

you keep silent on minority who boycotted the referendum. democracy isn't majority rule that overrides minorities' wills. you respect wills of majority in crimea, in other words, minority in ukraine, while you defy those of minority in crimea and majority in ukraine. and though it's obvious that nation state backed by international laws infringes on rights of self-determination of minorities/majorities, you ignore this contradiction.
I scorn both those who claims that no fair vote took place under the russian occupation without mentioning elections in iraq and afghanistan under the US/NATO occupations and those who deride this claim by mentioning the elections. why? both of them don't care about iraqis and afghans, who have suffered from their oppressive governments installed virtually by US/NATO, as a consequence of unfair elections under the US/NATO occupations. the reason the latter mention these elections is to defend putin, not to remedy the situation of iraqis/afghans. if they had cared about afghans, they would have strongly opposed the present presidential election race in afghanistan, the 13-year-old occupation of afghanistan, and the elected karzai admin. they never regard the race as a problem, nor oppose it. similarly, as soon as US forces, which had ruined iraq, withdrew from iraq, though a considerable number of mercenaries have stayed there to protect US "national interests", they abandoned helpless iraqis in civil-war, poverty, and oppression by the elected al-maliki admin, all of which US created. compared with their voice for putin, they as much as keep silent on afghans/iraqis. (and they never perceive as problems, all elections in japan under the 69-year-old US occupation.)


> Putin, who was attending the Paralympic games in Sochi, has wisely stayed...

to begin with, when wars in iraq, syria, afghanistan, etc., have been mass-producing war victims, should the sochi olympic/paralympic games have been held? both putin and obama made no effort to secure cease-fire, and the western lefts didn't demand that they, especially putin as the president of the host country, do so. besides, today olympic game is used by ruling class as a tool to commercialize sports and to foster nationalism, for the purpose of diverting public attention from their exploitation of humans and corruption. but the western lefts who are in favor of putin don't point these issues.


> Putin has a very clear view of Russia's genuine national interests, and reliable access to the Crimean base of the Black Sea fleet is one of them, it has been for centuries, and it will remain...

you omit history of ukraine and don't mention the soviet's forcible deportation of crimean tatars, and that ukraine was conquered by the russian empire in the 17th century and by soviet in the 20th century. you downplay ukrainians' suffering from annexation and deportation, maybe just like you downplay indigenous americans' centuries-long sufferings. both EU/US and russia have exploited ukraine to maximize their own interests. historically, countries sandwiched between the major powers have been used by the major powers as frontline bases for them. the major powers promote their own interests at the expense of the sandwiched countries. you approve of favorably calling it "thorough lesson in how the adult leader of a nation protects his country's genuine national interests." what I have in my mind now are not only ukraine, but also afghanistan which had/has been occupied by soviet/US, and japan and south korea which had/have been used as US frontline bases against soviet during the cold-war era and as ones against china now. for you, these sandwiched countries' people's national interests which have been always harmed by the major powers, sufferings that have been caused by them, and struggle against them are too trivial to think, when you consider US/russian national interests. and you don't mention that putin's decision on ukraina has impact on the right-wingers of some sandwiched countries which have a territorial issue with the major powers.


> He must now prepare for the typical litany of asymmetrical attacks including covert operations, special ops, arming Tatar jihadis to incite violence in Crimea, US-backed NGOs fomenting unrest in Moscow, etc etc, as well as stepped up US military and logistical support for Kiev’s thriving fascist..

you want to describe ukraine as den of vice to justify putin's decision. do you think there's no ukrainian who resists violence, corruption, occupation, neoliberalism, fascism, IMF, russia, and US/EU? you don't focus on ukrainians who resist them. you stand not with them but with the ruling elite, putin.


> Despite the fact that the Kremlin does not want to see Washington “lose face...

kremlin and you pay no attention to ukrainians who think that russian occupation of crimea made them "lose face." you ignore the fact that the major powers always sacrifice the sandwiched countries for preventing themselves from "losing face". for you, the sandwiched countries' face is dirt. you discriminate against the sandwiched countries, which means you support the law of the jungle. I'm disgusted at major powers' exceptionalism approved by the lefts. is it ridiculous for you that the people of the sandwiched countries want to and struggle to acquire true independence from the major powers? ]]></description>
<dc:subject>left ukraine russia usa fascism nation-state neoliberalism EU occupation military referendum international-law</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:3d3036b2a993/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:left"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:ukraine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:russia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:fascism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:nation-state"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:neoliberalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:EU"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:occupation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:military"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:referendum"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:international-law"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://socialistworker.org/2014/03/12/two-wrong-sides-in-ukraine">
    <title>Two wrong sides don't make one of them right | March 12, 2014, SocialistWorker.org</title>
    <dc:date>2014-03-12T08:51:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://socialistworker.org/2014/03/12/two-wrong-sides-in-ukraine</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[from the page: "The new government in Ukraine is infested with far-right nationalists and backed by the U.S.--but the left can't build an alternative by defending Russia's intervention."]]></description>
<dc:subject>ukraine intervention russia nato usa left minorities military neoliberalism corruption imperialism division pipelines nationalism</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:badeee07d28d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:ukraine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:intervention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:russia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:nato"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:left"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:minorities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:military"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:neoliberalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:corruption"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:imperialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:division"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:pipelines"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:nationalism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.uruknet.de/?p=m104954&amp;hd=&amp;size=1&amp;l=e">
    <title>From Anbar with Love.. | Layla Anwar, February 14, 2014, uruknet.info</title>
    <dc:date>2014-02-20T00:56:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.uruknet.de/?p=m104954&amp;hd=&amp;size=1&amp;l=e</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[he is a muslim with his deformed, voiceless child, home destroyed by maliki admin bombing, and memories of his children killed by US bombing, who has been living in battle-fields for more than a decade, and who is exiled from his home, and who is repeatedly uttering two words, "God" and "Allah". I don't know what to say to him. there are westerners who believe that it's meaningful to fill up cyberspace with a message, "your (muslims') faith is wrong. you need to develop a consciousness of the world." do they tell him the same thing? I think that what he needs is new home, where he and his family can live without fear, and livelihoods, and health-care, which helps them survive trauma, and which his deformed child needs, and fellow muslims' consolation and support. (of course, non-muslims should support him. but I guess that they can't be as good spiritual consolations as his fellow muslims.) and as long as the west supplies arms to maliki admin, persons like him continue to increase.]]></description>
<dc:subject>video iraq middle-east civil-war usa deformity children religion destruction refugees</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:452b80e3c222/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:video"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:iraq"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:middle-east"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:civil-war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:deformity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:religion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:destruction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:refugees"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2014/02/19/business/japan-to-offer-tariff-reduction-for-u-s-beef-in-tpp-talks/">
    <title>Japan to offer tariff reduction for U.S. beef in TPP talks | Kyodo</title>
    <dc:date>2014-02-19T22:51:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2014/02/19/business/japan-to-offer-tariff-reduction-for-u-s-beef-in-tpp-talks/</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[he is unlimitedly servile to the US. japan's food security and safety, whose destruction will bring starvation and sickness to us, is trivial for him. he does anything for making his and his grandfather's dream, a fascist nation under US wing --whose ruling class can legally maintain a patrimonial position of US colony's japanese administrator, and whose people, including japanese soldiers who send to US wars, the japanese ruling class can legally treat as disposables, just like kamikaze pilots and liquidators in fukushima-- happen. while japanese main-stream media are mouthpiece for him, western mainstream media call him nationalist. both help him look like a nationalist, so as to lead the japanese to approve his neoliberal policy, which enables US multinationals to legally squeeze them dry. no matter how much national resources the japanese supply to the multinationals by believing the media, which has brought them poverty, they, especially lefts, keep trusting the western media.]]></description>
<dc:subject>tppa fta japan usa food food-security treason neoliberalism</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:b4accde56c86/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:tppa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:fta"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:japan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:food"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:food-security"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:treason"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:neoliberalism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.wsj.com/japanrealtime/2014/02/13/kennedy-invokes-jfk-episode-as-she-seeks-to-woo-okinawa/">
    <title>Kennedy Invokes JFK Episode as She Seeks to Woo Okinawa | February 13, 2014, WSJ</title>
    <dc:date>2014-02-14T06:13:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.wsj.com/japanrealtime/2014/02/13/kennedy-invokes-jfk-episode-as-she-seeks-to-woo-okinawa/</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["a copy of her father's visa application" that she gave okinawa is just like a photo of a hollywood star, which his daughter, mediocre actress/celebrity, gave big fans of his to delight them, or one of a crown, which his daughter, who is too naive to know how to retain her subjects' loyalty except using her father's coattails, gave her subjects. (the okinawa gov might dutifully build an exhibit room for the copy.) when she can play the gracious, human-rights advocate in japan, she meets them face to face and say something to them. in okinawa, she refused to do so. she totally ignored okinawans' demonstration and meeting, which they held to directly and politely tell the US ambassador their opinion that they oppose the relocation. some japanese have expected the "pro-environmental" ambassador to agree to their wish by her gazing at nature of henoko. haven't they seen her repeated arrogance in japan? she, "women's rights activist" with paternalistic smile which every colonial master has, is always a strong supporter of US military occupation of japan, iow, US dehumanization of the people of japan. and the US hasn't hesitated to destroy nature of asia, middle-east, africa, oceania, and america. it might make a deceptive-pseudo-pro-environmental plan of the relocation, not rethink it. I'm disgusted that US media repeat "residents feel they bear a disproportional share of the burden of...". the reason of their repeating it is different from that of okinawans'. the latter is a just demand that mainland japanese should remove japan's differential treatment to okinawans as citizens of japan. the former is to play the fair advocate for okinawans by making this issue look like a japanese domestic one, and by covering up the root of the issue: the presence of US occupation forces in japan. by doing so, they support endless US military occupation/exploitation of japan. if they want to be fair advocates, take their own soldiers back the US, their own homeland.]]></description>
<dc:subject>celebrity usa okinawa japan asia military-bases occupation colony copy relocation</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:552c52987f19/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:celebrity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:okinawa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:japan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:asia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:military-bases"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:occupation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:colony"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:copy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:relocation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blackagendareport.com/content/freedom-rider-boycott-america-not-russia">
    <title>Freedom Rider: Boycott America, Not Russia | 02/12/2014 Margaret Kimberley</title>
    <dc:date>2014-02-13T08:17:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blackagendareport.com/content/freedom-rider-boycott-america-not-russia</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[you didn't utter even a single word for syrians and caucasians. you previously wrote an insightful piece "Malala the Worthy Victim". I ask you a question: aren't victims of non-US govts worth mentioning to you?

just like "the vehemence with which Russia has been castigated should raise other issues for Americans," "the vehemence with which" russia has been defended as an opponent of the US "should raise other issues for" western lefts. it's diverting western people's attention away from suffering of syrians/caucasians (and palestinian refugees in syria), which contributes to prolonging/increasing the suffering. though putin/assad resist obama, it doesn't means that they're humane. though the US govt has incited some syrian/russian citizens and other muslims to civil-war, and though these US-sponsored armed groups and other resistance against russia/syrian govts have committed atrocities, it can't justify western lefts' silence on syrian struggle to liberate themselves from bloody oppression and on their suffering and on russian support on syrian govt.

"While Barack Obama claims the right to kill anyone he wants", syrian govt has been killing/torturing any syrians it wants and that russian govt has been intentionally killing muslims in russia before their arrest in the name of "war on terror". is only US "war on terror" bad?

though "it is America that uses more of its resources for making war", it can't justify either russia's support to syrian dictatorship or russian military base in syria. nor does it mean that russia doesn't contribute to inhumanity.

though "Of these 3,278 people, 65 percent are black, which is further proof of the systemic racism which is still rampant in this country", it doesn't mean that suffering of caucasians/syrians (and palestinian refugees in syria) is less terrible than that of US black. imagine despair of black americans, which is caused by silence across the globe when they cry for help.

"Instead of looking at how their most vulnerable/abandoned citizens" in the world "are treated", you "prefer to" focusing on american victims of US govt.

though "There are at least ten nations considered American allies that have anti-gay laws far more harsh than Russia's", it doesn't mean that there's no nation considered russian ally that bloody oppresses their citizens.

though "Russia has spoken out against U.S. imperialism, given sanctuary to Edward Snowden and prevented a U.S. attack on Syria", it doesn't mean either that russia/syria haven't obstructed/assassinated journalists who reported their oppression/murder, or that russia hasn't supported US imperialistic occupation of afghanistan, or that russia has prevented assad's attack on syrian people with indiscriminate bombs, torture, abduction, detention, and starvation. until the US empire is dismantled, do they, who don't suit western lefts' way of thinking based on binary opposition, have to keep being abandoned?]]></description>
<dc:subject>black usa russia double-standard boycott Olympic-Games minorities</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:905759997a1c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:black"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:russia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:double-standard"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:boycott"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:Olympic-Games"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:minorities"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://williamblum.org/aer/read/125">
    <title>The Anti-Empire Report #125 | By William Blum – Published February 4th, 2014</title>
    <dc:date>2014-02-11T09:14:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://williamblum.org/aer/read/125</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[the last paragraph "Killing suicide" is odd. is it an example composition to explore your readers' level of understanding of media-literacy? or is it your real thought? below is mine. but because I totally lack information about mentality of suicide bombers and understanding of religions, and because human hearts are so complicated that it's difficult to know their inside, it's just my guesswork, which isn't worth reading. but it's thoughtless to regard only religious faith as the root of suicide bombing, and to put all suicide bombers in one bag. and some muslims might feel insulted.

(1) I stress a fact: a small minority of muslims launch a suicide attack. though the teachings of islam tolerate violence under certain restricted conditions, most muslims hate violence and don't use it even under such conditions. historically, missionaries actively contributed to western colonization of the non-west, which caused countless genocide. it means that chiristian message tolerate violence under certain conditions. and I hear a news that a US christian fundamentalist killed a medical doctor who carried out an abortion. but most US christians hate violence and don't use it.


(2) some kamikaze pilots believed state shinto and others didn't. some of the latter, who had no option to refuse military service, were forced to launch a suicide attack on orders. others of the latter did so because they wanted to protect their families/homeland (not state). facing overwhelming military power of the US and shortage of resources of the japanese empire, they believed that only a effective tactics was suicide attack. without war, all of them wouldn't have gone on a suicide mission, and regardless of religious faith, the latter did so.


(3) the media sometimes report female muslim suicide bombers. according to them, their powerful motive for doing so is revenge of their murdered husbands.  if their husbands hadn't been murdered, or if murderers of their husbands had been  brought to fair justice, most of them wouldn't have done so. the same applies to most humans, regardless of sex and religious faith.

(4) western occupation forces in muslim lands promote sectarian conflicts and distrust, destroy society, cause serious poverty and financial inequality, which drive the occupied to despair. in addition, they see that the international community support it, and that some muslim govts and islamic leaders  support or keep silent on it against the teaching of islam. to overcome a feeling of helplessness, some of them go deeply into fundamentalism. because the teachings of islam tolerate violence under special conditions, they target "enemy" and launch a suicide attack when they think they're under such conditions. though in some cases, they embroil civilians in bombing, probably they don't intend to do so. without western occupation, they wouldn't have done so.

(5) there're tibetans who commit suicide by fire. they resist oppression and  assimilationism, and want to get attention of the international community to protect their own people/community. there're defenseless muslims who stand in front of demonstration in egypt to resist oppression and dictatorship, despite knowing their being shot to death. without oppression, they wouldn't have done so.

(6) persons in (3)(4) do so, not only because their homelands are far from their ideal based on their religious understandings, but also because they want to liberate themselves/families/communities from oppression/dictatorship/assimilationism/occupation. the latter reason is common wish for humans, regardless of which religion they believe, and people who prevent carrying out this wish are accusable, though it can't necessarily justify their assassination by suicide bombing.

(7) there're muslim suicide bombers who intend to embroil civilians, which is against the teaching of islam. just like there're self-proclaimed christians, there're self-proclaimed/pseudo muslims. to be specific, they're mercenaries whose job is to promote civil-war and demonization of muslims. some destitute muslims is said to become suicide bombers to get money to prevent their family from dying of hunger. I raise another possibility. the media report shooting rampages in the US, which often ends with suicide. such indiscriminate shooters have serious problems, and are isolated from the community, hold rage at its disregard for them, and get desperate. they need help to improve their situation and time and place when/where they can safely consider life. and the community reflects on involvement with sending them over the edge into desperation. I think such shooters and this type of suicide bombers have in common. your comment is similar to saying to potential such shooters, "your faith is wrong." and the west doesn't give potential such bombers safe place/time to think, but spreads arms and keeps occupying their homelands and killing them, and increases their problems.]]></description>
<dc:subject>media-literacy history usa muslim suicide-bombings omission bias propaganda</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:7d29ebae549a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:media-literacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:muslim"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:suicide-bombings"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:omission"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:bias"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:propaganda"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://rt.com/news/us-military-sex-abuse-281/">
    <title>Two-thirds of US military sex-abuse perpetrators in Japan 'not incarcerated' | 2.9.2014 RT News</title>
    <dc:date>2014-02-10T17:09:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://rt.com/news/us-military-sex-abuse-281/</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><dc:subject>japan military-bases usa occupation immunity soldiers rape sofa</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:5ff39c8f5e2a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:japan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:military-bases"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:occupation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:immunity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:soldiers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:rape"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:sofa"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.uruknet.de/?p=m104728&amp;hd=&amp;size=1&amp;l=e">
    <title>Iraq: Right from the field | Ibrahim Ebeid, February, 6, 2014 www.uruknet.info</title>
    <dc:date>2014-02-10T14:57:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.uruknet.de/?p=m104728&amp;hd=&amp;size=1&amp;l=e</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[from the page: "The Iraqi Revolt is not a rebellion to achieve tribal gains; it is a popular revolt to restore the homeland to the people. It is a revolt to expel Maliki and all those who sold Iraq to the United States and Iran. The people realized that Iran is controlling Iraq and ripping it apart and dividing the people into sects in order to abolish and diminish Iraq to nothingness. For this reason the armed popular revolt is taking place."]]></description>
<dc:subject>iraq middle-east resistance dictatorship usa iran prisons detention violence oppression civilians death</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:8af16dec9813/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:iraq"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:middle-east"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:resistance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:dictatorship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:iran"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:prisons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:detention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:violence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:oppression"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:civilians"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:death"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ohtarzie.wordpress.com/2014/01/25/passing-noam-on-my-way-out-part-1/">
    <title>Passing Noam on My Way Out – Part 1 | The Rancid Honeytrap</title>
    <dc:date>2014-02-10T11:36:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://ohtarzie.wordpress.com/2014/01/25/passing-noam-on-my-way-out-part-1/</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><dc:subject>usa intellectuals journalism media-literacy cover-up journalist propaganda left</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:90d96b58c8c3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:intellectuals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:journalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:media-literacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:cover-up"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:journalist"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:propaganda"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:left"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://unama.unmissions.org/Default.aspx?tabid=12254&amp;ctl=Details&amp;mid=15756&amp;ItemID=37692&amp;language=en-US">
    <title>Afghan civilian casualties similar to record levels of 2011 | 8 February 2014 - UNAMA report</title>
    <dc:date>2014-02-10T11:31:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://unama.unmissions.org/Default.aspx?tabid=12254&amp;ctl=Details&amp;mid=15756&amp;ItemID=37692&amp;language=en-US</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[I don't trust data by UN, which has given the US and NATO endorsement of aggression and occupation of afghanistan for more than a decade. (of course, regardless of which groups/organizations cause casualties, suffering of victims and bereaved families is indescribably terrible, and the international community should support them.) though it compares 2013 with 2012, it should compare the occupied period with the age of taliban admin. if the US and NATO hadn't made an aggression to afghanistan, these casualties wouldn't have been caused. by comparing 2013 with 2012, it, which repeatly requires taliban to comply with international law, covers up not only illegality of US and NATO aggression and occupation but also its 13-year-old complicity in them. additionally, by releasing this report, which will lead people to believe that the withdrawal will cause civil-war, it wants to keep supporting the US and NATO. what is needed to prevent civil-war is dialogue among afghans. but the occupation forces have prevented it by supporting their puppet admin and warlords, who want to protect their exclusive vested interest, which discourages them from having such dialogue. why are they there? the first reason was al Qaeda. it's not there anymore. the second reason was women's rights. occupation forces have kept murdering afghan women and their families. surviving ones and theier children have worst nutritional health. the third reason was elimination of corruption? they gave themselves privileges, which enables themselves and puppets to make laws to seize wealth and power. it's similar to corruption. the fourth, present reason seems to bring afghans security. granting US soldiers immunity, which is part of BSA that the US demands of afghanistan accepting, is to enable them to freely use force on afghans. armed people with immunity are obstacles to ensure public safety. if it truly has concerns about safety of civilians, why does it kept silent on this demand? as a consequence of the occupation forces being behind "PGFs" to keep the occupation with decreasing casualties of the occupation forces, afghans have been forced to kill each other. destruction caused by their aggression and occupation has made ordinary afghans seriously poor, which are often forced ordinary afghans to work either side to support their families. and some families send their sons to both sides in hope of improving the safety of their families as much as possible, which might be tragic wisdom to survive, created by people living in battlefields for decades. how long the UN supports this inhumanness? what it should do is to encourage the US and NATO to stop supplying weapons to afghanistan, gather weapons from "PGFs", withdraw their soldiers from afghanistan, pay reparations to afghanistan that has suffered from their aggression and occupation, and provide only humanitarian aid to enable afghans to make their own living in a sustainable way.]]></description>
<dc:subject>afghanistan occupation asia usa nato civilians death civil-war UN reports data accomplices</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:87281bd45bf2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:afghanistan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:occupation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:asia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:nato"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:civilians"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:death"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:civil-war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:UN"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:reports"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:accomplices"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/feb/07/west-criminal-bloodbath-iraq-media-cover-up">
    <title>The truth about the west's criminal bloodbath in Iraq can't be 'countered' indefinitely | John Pilger | Comment is free | The Guardian</title>
    <dc:date>2014-02-10T10:52:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/feb/07/west-criminal-bloodbath-iraq-media-cover-up</link>
    <dc:creator>willowtrees</dc:creator><dc:subject>usa iraq middle-east genocide sanctions media history rewriting counting death civilians new-weapon</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/b:5099e5e0c247/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:iraq"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:middle-east"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:genocide"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:sanctions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:rewriting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:counting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:death"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:civilians"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:willowtrees/t:new-weapon"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>