<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (taestell)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:taestell/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from taestell</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2010-03-19-n11.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://gigaom.com/2011/12/12/copyright-and-remix-culture-the-new-prohibition/"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2010-03-19-n11.html">
    <title>For years, Viacom secretly uploaded its content to YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2013-06-03T18:39:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2010-03-19-n11.html</link>
    <dc:creator>taestell</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["For years, Viacom continuously and secretly uploaded its content to YouTube, even while publicly complaining about its presence there. It hired no fewer than 18 different marketing agencies to upload its content to the site. It deliberately 'roughed up' the videos to make them look stolen or leaked. It opened YouTube accounts using phony email addresses. It even sent employees to Kinko’s to upload clips from computers that couldn’t be traced to Viacom."]]></description>
<dc:subject>viacom youtube google media</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:taestell/b:27fa8b5bf2df/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:taestell/t:viacom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:taestell/t:youtube"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:taestell/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:taestell/t:media"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://gigaom.com/2011/12/12/copyright-and-remix-culture-the-new-prohibition/">
    <title>Copyright and remix culture: The new Prohibition?</title>
    <dc:date>2011-12-14T18:37:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://gigaom.com/2011/12/12/copyright-and-remix-culture-the-new-prohibition/</link>
    <dc:creator>taestell</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Under current copyright law, nearly every cover song on YouTube is technically illegal. [...] No amount of lawsuits or legal threats will change the fact that this behavior is considered normal — I’d wager the vast majority of people under 25 see nothing wrong with non-commercial sharing and remixing, or think it’s legal already."]]></description>
<dc:subject>copyright law remix youtube riaa mpaa</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://instapaper.com/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:taestell/b:39cbd5360fcf/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:taestell/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:taestell/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:taestell/t:remix"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:taestell/t:youtube"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:taestell/t:riaa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:taestell/t:mpaa"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>