<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (stilist)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:stilist/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from stilist</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hnn.us/articles/51847.html"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://hnn.us/articles/51847.html">
    <title>Jeremy Cameron Young—Why Historians Should Write Books Ordinary People Want to Read (History News Network)</title>
    <dc:date>2008-07-30T13:46:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://hnn.us/articles/51847.html</link>
    <dc:creator>stilist</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Presents the argument that because academics lose social standing when they write for the masses, historical books are primarily written by those who take a less rigourous approach. Specialisation is evil, ignore peer pressure and inform the commoners, ra]]></description>
<dc:subject>rel:02008 by:jeremycameronyoung historynewsnetwork history culture writing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:stilist/b:216a5267fdd2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:stilist/t:rel:02008"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:stilist/t:by:jeremycameronyoung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:stilist/t:historynewsnetwork"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:stilist/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:stilist/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:stilist/t:writing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>