<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (sogrady)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from sogrady</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://adambosworth.net/2009/10/29/talking-to-dc/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20090914102959510"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.technologyreview.com/computing/22611/page2/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.consortiuminfo.org/bulletins/oct08.php#policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008Dec/0145.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.forbes.com/2008/11/14/computer-standards-compatibility-oped-cx_rs_1117sutor.html?feed=rss_popstories"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.elasticvapor.com/2008/11/cloud-standardization-unified-cloud.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.unto.net/open/on-fighting-the-web-itself/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/06/19/Red_Hat_Summit_panel_Who_won_OOXML_battle_1.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://stephesblog.blogs.com/my_weblog/2008/04/a-standards-pri.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://diveintomark.org/archives/2008/05/07/when-the-fall-is-all-thats-left"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2008/03/11/1205125864040.html?page=fullpage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2008/02/19.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/14/books/14dumb.html?em&amp;ex=1203483600&amp;en=1d68ad601de3ed4a&amp;ei=5087%0A"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.msdn.com/jasonmatusow/comments/7068820.aspx"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://labs.mozilla.com/2007/12/introducing-weave/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.linux.com/feature/121930"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.sun.com/dancer/entry/apple_starts_supporting_odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.msdn.com/jasonmatusow/archive/2007/09/12/independent-implementations-of-open-xml.aspx"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://stephesblog.blogs.com/my_weblog/2007/08/microsofts-fail.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20070904053108577"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/132"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.amber.org/2007/07/11/ibm-and-patents/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://intertwingly.net/blog/2007/05/02/Different-Drummer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tatler.typepad.com/nose/2007/02/minnesota_and_t.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://gigaom.com/2007/01/29/gizmo-now-making-browser-based-phone-calls/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://weblog.infoworld.com/openresource/archives/2007/01/fsg_and_osdl_me.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/22/technology/22linux.html?_r=2&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ianmurdock.com/?p=384"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/2006/12/microsoft_testi.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20061120050934120"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://edward.oconnor.cx/2006/11/DIY-standards-body"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2006/10/18/they-re-bringing-out-the-big-guns.aspx"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.microsoft.com/interop/osp/default.mspx#EGG"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://stephesblog.blogs.com/my_weblog/2006/08/sun_and_open_so.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.infoworld.com/article/06/08/09/33OPstrategic_1.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20060712095750385"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2006/06/02/613702.aspx"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://gotzespace.dk/archives/2006/05/odf_in_denmark.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://stephesblog.blogs.com/my_weblog/2006/04/is_microsoft_pl.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog_comments.jspa?blog=384&amp;entry=104645&amp;ca=drs-bl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://technology.guardian.co.uk/weekly/story/0,16376,1660763,00.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.msdn.com/jasonmatusow/archive/2005/12/02/499412.aspx"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-234.htm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://consortiuminfo.org/newsblog/blog.php?ID=1762"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://deladequacy.blogspot.com/2005/11/ibm-bloggers-who-are-we-bob-sutor.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/home/home?wid=10&amp;func=viewSubmission&amp;sid=837"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tieguy.org/blog/index.cgi/498"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,172063,00.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tango-project.org/Tango_Desktop_Project"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.thinkphp.de/archives/64-Is-XUL-the-next-hot-topic-after-AJAX.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20050930181153972"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2005/09/10/Mass-Opposition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://stephesblog.blogs.com/my_weblog/2005/09/massachusetts_m.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.dwheeler.com/essays/why-opendocument-won.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ecommercetimes.com/story/nadhlpLj7zvZ4F/Massachusetts-Weighs-Dropping-Office-for-Open-Alternative.xhtml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2005/08/31/458879.aspx"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sauria.com/blog/2005/08/30#1380"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.devsource.com/article2/0,1895,1852372,00.asp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.redmonk.com/sogrady/archives/000861.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.tbray.org/atom/RSS-and-Atom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.acm.org/ubiquity/views/v6i5_simoneli.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/02/11/hakon_on_ms_interroperability/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://stephesblog.blogs.com/my_weblog/2005/01/osdl_summit_jim.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://stephesblog.blogs.com/my_weblog/2005/01/osdl_summit_mat.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.linuxbase.org/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=45"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://lxer.com/module/newswire/view/28195/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://persistent.info/archives/2004/10/05/gmail-skinning"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://adambosworth.net/2009/10/29/talking-to-dc/">
    <title>Talking to DC « Adam Bosworth’s Weblog</title>
    <dc:date>2009-11-05T22:00:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://adambosworth.net/2009/10/29/talking-to-dc/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Adam Bosworth on the standards process and its lessons. must read.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>adambosworth standards design architecture</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:74b6c5c40397/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:adambosworth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:architecture"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20090914102959510">
    <title>The CodePlex Foundation: First Impressions (and Recommendations) - ConsortiumInfo.org</title>
    <dc:date>2009-09-23T04:23:27+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20090914102959510</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[good advice, as always, from Andy
]]></description>
<dc:subject>codeplex opensource community andyupdegrove standards microsoft</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:8f5419b63fe3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:codeplex"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:andyupdegrove"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.technologyreview.com/computing/22611/page2/">
    <title>Technology Review: Industry Challenges: The Standards Question</title>
    <dc:date>2009-06-24T22:31:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.technologyreview.com/computing/22611/page2/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Mike Evans, vice president of corporate development at the open-source technology provider Red Hat, compares clouds today to the earliest online communities, such as CompuServe and America Online. "They were all siloed communities," he says. "You couldn't necessarily inter­operate with anybody else until the openness of the Internet came along." Evans believes that open-source projects are "critical" to establishing standards that would encourage more companies to use cloud technology.]]></description>
<dc:subject>cloud standards interoperability hadoop eucalyptus</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:bf2836de9513/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:cloud"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:interoperability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:hadoop"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:eucalyptus"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.consortiuminfo.org/bulletins/oct08.php#policy">
    <title>Consortiuminfo.org Consortium Standards Journal — October – November 2008</title>
    <dc:date>2008-12-19T15:27:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.consortiuminfo.org/bulletins/oct08.php#policy</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[great suggestions, as usual, from Andy
]]></description>
<dc:subject>standards obama government</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:73a3553b66b4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:obama"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:government"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008Dec/0145.html">
    <title>Sam Ruby appointed co-chair for HTML Working Group, effective January 5 from Michael(tm) Smith on 2008-12-15 (public-html@w3.org from December 2008)</title>
    <dc:date>2008-12-17T20:00:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008Dec/0145.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[excellent news, as echoed elsewhere. everywhere, actually.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>html5 samruby co-chair workinggroup standards</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:4892962f80e1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:html5"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:samruby"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:co-chair"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:workinggroup"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.forbes.com/2008/11/14/computer-standards-compatibility-oped-cx_rs_1117sutor.html?feed=rss_popstories">
    <title>Computers Of The World, Unite! - Forbes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2008-12-01T20:39:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.forbes.com/2008/11/14/computer-standards-compatibility-oped-cx_rs_1117sutor.html?feed=rss_popstories</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[standards are indeed important. it's just difficult to get buyers to think beyond the present.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>open standards ibm bobsutor interoperability</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:444c6c6adfdf/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ibm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:bobsutor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:interoperability"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.elasticvapor.com/2008/11/cloud-standardization-unified-cloud.html">
    <title>ElasticVapor :: Life in the Cloud: Cloud Standardization: Unified Cloud Interface (UCI)</title>
    <dc:date>2008-11-24T19:45:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.elasticvapor.com/2008/11/cloud-standardization-unified-cloud.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[XMPP as a cloud interface component? sounds good to me
]]></description>
<dc:subject>xmpp uci cloud reuvencohen standards standarization</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:35a93e51f7a2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:xmpp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:uci"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:cloud"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:reuvencohen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standarization"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.unto.net/open/on-fighting-the-web-itself/">
    <title>DeWitt Clinton » Blog Archive » On Fighting the Web Itself</title>
    <dc:date>2008-08-11T16:40:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.unto.net/open/on-fighting-the-web-itself/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[brilliant post. i'd argue with bits - the assertion that richer environments = better UIs, for example - but the general point is well made and well taken. i'll need to comment on this.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>dewittclinton webdev web standards software silverlight programming opensource fork fight google adobe microsoft</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:254d91ddd360/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:dewittclinton"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:webdev"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:silverlight"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:programming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:fork"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:fight"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:adobe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/06/19/Red_Hat_Summit_panel_Who_won_OOXML_battle_1.html">
    <title>Red Hat Summit panel: Who 'won' OOXML battle? | InfoWorld | News | 2008-06-19 | By Chris Kanaracus, IDG News Service</title>
    <dc:date>2008-06-22T12:46:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/06/19/Red_Hat_Summit_panel_Who_won_OOXML_battle_1.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[let me get this straight: the MSFT guy said ODF won? anyone there care to provide some context?
]]></description>
<dc:subject>ooxml odf standards microsoft office</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:a800a3b44d99/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ooxml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://stephesblog.blogs.com/my_weblog/2008/04/a-standards-pri.html">
    <title>Once More unto the Breach: A Standards Primer</title>
    <dc:date>2008-05-14T21:07:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://stephesblog.blogs.com/my_weblog/2008/04/a-standards-pri.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[still on my to read list, but in case you haven't seen it
]]></description>
<dc:subject>stephewalli standards primer</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:03d7cf770850/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:stephewalli"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:primer"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://diveintomark.org/archives/2008/05/07/when-the-fall-is-all-thats-left">
    <title>When the fall is all that’s left [dive into mark]</title>
    <dc:date>2008-05-13T19:21:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://diveintomark.org/archives/2008/05/07/when-the-fall-is-all-thats-left</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[my primary mission in life is not to be on the receiving end of one of Mark's broadsides
]]></description>
<dc:subject>mozilla firefox acid3 webstandards standards web webkit writing opera</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:e7034ff7ed28/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:mozilla"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:firefox"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:acid3"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:webstandards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:webkit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opera"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2008/03/11/1205125864040.html?page=fullpage">
    <title>When standards ain't standards - Perspectives - Opinion - Technology</title>
    <dc:date>2008-03-16T17:41:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2008/03/11/1205125864040.html?page=fullpage</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["It's a shame, really. Microsoft Office 2007 is a fabulous piece of work, but few people are using it, partly because of the new file format. OOXML works well, but things would have been much better had Microsoft adopted ODF."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>ooxml odf standards office2007 via:jdub</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:6d511c5a23e2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ooxml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office2007"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:via:jdub"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2008/02/19.html">
    <title>Why are the Microsoft Office file formats so complicated? (And some workarounds) - Joel on Software</title>
    <dc:date>2008-02-20T03:24:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2008/02/19.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[an interesting perspective on the Microsoft Office file format complexity question
]]></description>
<dc:subject>joelspolsky file formats interoperability microsoft office ooxml odf reverse-engineering specifications standards</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:9986b04b4a0d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:joelspolsky"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:file"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:formats"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:interoperability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ooxml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:reverse-engineering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:specifications"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/14/books/14dumb.html?em&amp;ex=1203483600&amp;en=1d68ad601de3ed4a&amp;ei=5087%0A">
    <title>Hand-wringing About American Culture - Are Americans Hostile to Knowledge? - New York Times</title>
    <dc:date>2008-02-19T03:35:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/14/books/14dumb.html?em&amp;ex=1203483600&amp;en=1d68ad601de3ed4a&amp;ei=5087%0A</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["But now, Ms. Jacoby said, something different is happening: anti-intellectualism (the attitude that 'too much learning can be a dangerous thing') and anti-rationalism ('the idea that there is no such things as evidence or fact, just opinion') have fused
]]></description>
<dc:subject>american culture ignorance knowledge standards intelligence anti-rationalism anti-intellectualism susanjacoby</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:7b76a70b70db/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:american"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ignorance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:knowledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:intelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:anti-rationalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:anti-intellectualism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:susanjacoby"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.msdn.com/jasonmatusow/comments/7068820.aspx">
    <title>Matusow's Blog : There are NO intellectual property rights issues with Open XML</title>
    <dc:date>2008-01-15T03:45:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jasonmatusow/comments/7068820.aspx</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[fascinating. note especially the discussion in the comments.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>jasonmatusow ip ooxml references standards</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:fa6804efafa0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:jasonmatusow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ip"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ooxml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:references"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://labs.mozilla.com/2007/12/introducing-weave/">
    <title>Mozilla Labs Blog » Blog Archive » Introducing Weave</title>
    <dc:date>2007-12-22T06:04:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://labs.mozilla.com/2007/12/introducing-weave/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[fascinating, and potentially relevant to Luis' open services discussion. from my initial read, however, it does seem as if they're a bit ambitious.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>mozilla weave open services standards online cloud</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:5d010e616248/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:mozilla"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:weave"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:services"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:cloud"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.linux.com/feature/121930">
    <title>Linux.com :: GNOME Foundation defends OOXML involvement</title>
    <dc:date>2007-11-25T18:25:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.linux.com/feature/121930</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<sigh> i was hoping i could skip this one, as it seem clear cut from where i sit, but i guess it's more nebulous than i'd hoped
]]></description>
<dc:subject>gnome microsoft novell odf ooxml standards</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:0698ad886d9f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gnome"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:novell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ooxml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.sun.com/dancer/entry/apple_starts_supporting_odf">
    <title>Erwin's StarOffice Tango</title>
    <dc:date>2007-10-22T17:41:07+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.sun.com/dancer/entry/apple_starts_supporting_odf</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[this is excellent news indeed: ODF support for OS X fiends like Cote
]]></description>
<dc:subject>oo.o odf standards office</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:18d1c7f7e311/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:oo.o"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.msdn.com/jasonmatusow/archive/2007/09/12/independent-implementations-of-open-xml.aspx">
    <title>Matusow's Blog : Independent Implementations of Open XML</title>
    <dc:date>2007-09-18T03:20:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jasonmatusow/archive/2007/09/12/independent-implementations-of-open-xml.aspx</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Jason's right, the comments attached to this post - including those from Andy Updegrove - are very educational. read them all, whether you come down on the OOXML or ODF side of the fence.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>ooxml odf office formats jasonmatusow andyupdegrove standards</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:477828fb5321/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ooxml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:formats"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:jasonmatusow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:andyupdegrove"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://stephesblog.blogs.com/my_weblog/2007/08/microsofts-fail.html">
    <title>Once More unto the Breach: Microsoft's Failures with the OOXML Standard</title>
    <dc:date>2007-09-04T13:40:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://stephesblog.blogs.com/my_weblog/2007/08/microsofts-fail.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[stinging indictment of OOXML's implementability by Stephe
]]></description>
<dc:subject>stephewalli microsoft ooxml standards office</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:5a4978e36f06/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:stephewalli"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ooxml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20070904053108577">
    <title>ConsortiumInfo.org - Microsoft Fails to Gain Approval for OOXML</title>
    <dc:date>2007-09-04T13:28:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20070904053108577</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Andy breaks down the news for you
]]></description>
<dc:subject>microsoft ooxml odf iso standards</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:275264aca14a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ooxml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:iso"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/132">
    <title>Mark Shuttleworth » Blog Archive » Emerging consensus in favour of a unified document format standard?</title>
    <dc:date>2007-08-14T14:39:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/132</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Mark Shuttleworth urges users to vote for a single ISO document format: as someone who believes that multiple formats are in the best interests of vendors but not users, i agree.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>microsoft linux odf office ooxml openoffice standards markshuttleworth</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:eea05956a3c6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:linux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ooxml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:openoffice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:markshuttleworth"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.amber.org/2007/07/11/ibm-and-patents/">
    <title>IBM and patents at Pensieri di un lunatico minore</title>
    <dc:date>2007-07-16T20:56:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.amber.org/2007/07/11/ibm-and-patents/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["IBM pledges access to patents covering 150 standards. This is a big deal, and should help with a lot of open source projects, as explained here." - Chris likes the IBM patent announcement
]]></description>
<dc:subject>ibm chrispetrilli patents standards</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:87c321d2fc58/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ibm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:chrispetrilli"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://intertwingly.net/blog/2007/05/02/Different-Drummer">
    <title>Sam Ruby: Different Drummer</title>
    <dc:date>2007-05-09T11:44:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://intertwingly.net/blog/2007/05/02/Different-Drummer</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["A worst case scenario may very well be that, over time, increasingly more and more content gets rendered by a common plugin that is closed source and controlled by a single vendor."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>business freedom html microsoft standards w3c web silverlight</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:eb814ae4faad/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:freedom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:w3c"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:silverlight"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tatler.typepad.com/nose/2007/02/minnesota_and_t.html">
    <title>The NOSE: Information Technology in Higher Education: ODF Under Consideration in Minnesota and Texas</title>
    <dc:date>2007-02-19T01:48:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://tatler.typepad.com/nose/2007/02/minnesota_and_t.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Al looks at the possibility that Texas and Minnesota would move to ODF - or OOXML
]]></description>
<dc:subject>odf ooxml texas minnesota office formats standards</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:9fd28f3ff390/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ooxml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:texas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:minnesota"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:formats"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://gigaom.com/2007/01/29/gizmo-now-making-browser-based-phone-calls/">
    <title>GigaOM » Gizmo, now making browser based phone calls</title>
    <dc:date>2007-01-30T20:56:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://gigaom.com/2007/01/29/gizmo-now-making-browser-based-phone-calls/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[doesn't work on Linux yet, but this is still very interesting - the browser is increasingly the center of activity
]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:Alex gizmo skype sip standards voip jahjah browser</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:8b43cf970ce7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:via:Alex"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gizmo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:skype"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sip"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:voip"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:jahjah"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:browser"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://weblog.infoworld.com/openresource/archives/2007/01/fsg_and_osdl_me.html">
    <title>Open Sources | InfoWorld | FSG and OSDL merge | January 22, 2007 11:34 AM | By Matt Asay</title>
    <dc:date>2007-01-23T14:05:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://weblog.infoworld.com/openresource/archives/2007/01/fsg_and_osdl_me.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[It is still, however, an open question as to how much value any organization can bring to the market, given that the market is already voting for a vendor-sponsored standard, otherwise known as "Red Hat." - would debate this notion as well
]]></description>
<dc:subject>asay redhat linux fsg osdl standards</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:3d0eb409d5cf/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:asay"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:redhat"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:linux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:fsg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:osdl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/22/technology/22linux.html?_r=2&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin">
    <title>Group Formed to Support Linux as Rival to Windows - New York Times</title>
    <dc:date>2007-01-22T14:57:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/22/technology/22linux.html?_r=2&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[already getting questions on this; more later
]]></description>
<dc:subject>osdl fsg linux consortium standards development advocacy</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:ab03d2475912/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:osdl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:fsg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:linux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:consortium"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:development"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:advocacy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ianmurdock.com/?p=384">
    <title>Ian Murdock’s Weblog » Blog Archive » VMware as operating system?</title>
    <dc:date>2006-12-17T20:02:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://ianmurdock.com/?p=384</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Finally, what about standards?...There are going to be multiple application platforms if history is any indication...so how do applications take advantage of the new platforms without the inevitable fragmentation?" - an excellent question
]]></description>
<dc:subject>murdock vmware standards virtualization operating systems</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:c1b429d8f4fe/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:murdock"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:vmware"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:virtualization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:operating"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:systems"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/2006/12/microsoft_testi.html">
    <title>Monkey Bites</title>
    <dc:date>2006-12-17T19:05:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/2006/12/microsoft_testi.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Microsoft’s VoIP will use the Session Initiation Protocol, the standard signaling protocol for internet conferencing and telephony, unlike Skype for instance, which uses its own proprietary network." - this is definitely an area to watch closely
]]></description>
<dc:subject>voip microsoft sip office standards</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:70cb0c6cca02/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:voip"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sip"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20061120050934120">
    <title>ConsortiumInfo.org - The Happy State of (ODF implementation in) Massachusetts</title>
    <dc:date>2006-11-22T05:05:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20061120050934120</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[great (as usual) summary of ODF progress in MA from Andy; even better? it's in Q&A format ;)
]]></description>
<dc:subject>updegrove odf ma massachusetts malaysia standards open Q&amp;A</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:dc39d560f876/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:updegrove"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ma"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:massachusetts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:malaysia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:Q&amp;A"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://edward.oconnor.cx/2006/11/DIY-standards-body">
    <title>Do-It-Yourself: Rolling Your Own Standards Body | (format nil &quot;Edward ~@R O'Connor&quot; 1450)</title>
    <dc:date>2006-11-16T19:52:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://edward.oconnor.cx/2006/11/DIY-standards-body</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[REST is to WS-* as DIYs are to the W3C, OASIS, etc
]]></description>
<dc:subject>o'connor standards bodies openid microformats</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:46983f090c1b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:o'connor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:bodies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:openid"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microformats"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2006/10/18/they-re-bringing-out-the-big-guns.aspx">
    <title>Brian Jones: Open XML Formats : They’re bringing out the big guns</title>
    <dc:date>2006-10-24T06:07:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2006/10/18/they-re-bringing-out-the-big-guns.aspx</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Microsoft's Brian Jones responds to some of the Open XML critiques from Phipps, Sutor & Weir
]]></description>
<dc:subject>weir sutor phipps microsoft Open xml odf sun ibm standards interoperability jones office</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:c0f4e1afe799/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:weir"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sutor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:phipps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:Open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:xml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sun"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ibm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:interoperability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:jones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.microsoft.com/interop/osp/default.mspx#EGG">
    <title>Microsoft Open Specification Promise</title>
    <dc:date>2006-09-20T20:30:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.microsoft.com/interop/osp/default.mspx#EGG</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[there are some useful questions to be asked here -  as Sam's indicated - but i'm with most of the other commenters in saying that this is a Good. Thing.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>microsoft via:Jason standards Open Specification promise covenant legal licensing opensource</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:98dc2bde896f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:via:Jason"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:Open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:Specification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:promise"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:covenant"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:legal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://stephesblog.blogs.com/my_weblog/2006/08/sun_and_open_so.html">
    <title>Once More unto the Breach: Sun and Open Source Java versus the Microsoft .NET Efforts</title>
    <dc:date>2006-08-15T19:27:37+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://stephesblog.blogs.com/my_weblog/2006/08/sun_and_open_so.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[don't miss Stephe's take on the recent open source Java news and roadmap, particularly the contrast via .NET; i'll try and weigh in on this sometime soon - agree with just about everything except the lack of risk
]]></description>
<dc:subject>microsoft .net C# standards opensource java sun</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:28bdf294261f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:.net"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:C#"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:java"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sun"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.infoworld.com/article/06/08/09/33OPstrategic_1.html">
    <title>Why Microsoft should open XAML | InfoWorld | Column | 2006-08-09 | By Jon Udell</title>
    <dc:date>2006-08-15T15:53:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.infoworld.com/article/06/08/09/33OPstrategic_1.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Here’s a crazy idea: Open-source the WPF/E, endorse a Mono-based version, and make XAML an open standard." - amen. really glad to hear this coming from someone else
]]></description>
<dc:subject>Avalon opensource mono xaml standards</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:84e69780a015/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:Avalon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:mono"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:xaml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20060712095750385">
    <title>Consortiuminfo.org - The Microsoft Converter, News Shopping and Tectonic Shifts</title>
    <dc:date>2006-07-12T16:54:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20060712095750385</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[*must* read piece on the Microsoft ODF news - see especially the reflections on his conversation with Jason; also, on a personal note, hugely appreciate the kind words coming from a guy like Andy
]]></description>
<dc:subject>updegrove microsoft odf open standards xml</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:b091460cc1b5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:updegrove"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:xml"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2006/06/02/613702.aspx">
    <title>Brian Jones: Open XML Formats : Legal issues around PDF support</title>
    <dc:date>2006-06-08T02:05:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2006/06/02/613702.aspx</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[i haven't talked to Adobe about this news yet, but the last i had spoken with them they claimed to be *for* Microsoft supporting PDF
]]></description>
<dc:subject>adobe microsoft pdf jones office productivity formats standards open</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:937dd7f2197a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:adobe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:pdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:jones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:productivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:formats"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:open"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://gotzespace.dk/archives/2006/05/odf_in_denmark.html">
    <title>Gotzeblogged: ODF in Denmark</title>
    <dc:date>2006-05-30T15:31:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://gotzespace.dk/archives/2006/05/odf_in_denmark.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[some adoption news re: ODF in Denmark (via James)
]]></description>
<dc:subject>government standards odf office productivity xml formats</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:960724757422/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:government"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:productivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:xml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:formats"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://stephesblog.blogs.com/my_weblog/2006/04/is_microsoft_pl.html">
    <title>Once More unto the Breach: Is Microsoft playing well with others?</title>
    <dc:date>2006-04-14T05:00:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://stephesblog.blogs.com/my_weblog/2006/04/is_microsoft_pl.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[great, thoughtful piece from Stephe on perceptions of Microsoft; DeWitt's got a good story here
]]></description>
<dc:subject>walli microsoft open standards dodge source</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:0fde7a3b60cc/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:walli"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:dodge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:source"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog_comments.jspa?blog=384&amp;entry=104645&amp;ca=drs-bl">
    <title>developerWorks : Blogs : Bob Sutor</title>
    <dc:date>2006-01-18T16:43:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog_comments.jspa?blog=384&amp;entry=104645&amp;ca=drs-bl</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[IBM's Sutor's wishes for the upcoming year
]]></description>
<dc:subject>odf sutor opensource standards economics business-models</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:bee13c5292e5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sutor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:business-models"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://technology.guardian.co.uk/weekly/story/0,16376,1660763,00.html">
    <title>Guardian Unlimited Technology | Technology | If this suite's a success, why is it so buggy?</title>
    <dc:date>2006-01-09T16:15:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://technology.guardian.co.uk/weekly/story/0,16376,1660763,00.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[mostly accurate summary of OO.o's limitations and flaws
]]></description>
<dc:subject>oo.o opensource bugs standards</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:c788d7a1540a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:oo.o"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:bugs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.msdn.com/jasonmatusow/archive/2005/12/02/499412.aspx">
    <title>Matusow's Blog : And Now, For My Next Act....</title>
    <dc:date>2005-12-02T17:51:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jasonmatusow/archive/2005/12/02/499412.aspx</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[so my intelligence was correct; Jason's taking on a new challenge. this is an interesting move for Microsoft, and has implications for the ODF/MSXML strife
]]></description>
<dc:subject>odf microsoft standards matusow office open xml</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:7605d1fbf296/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:matusow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:xml"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-234.htm">
    <title>Ecma WEB SITE</title>
    <dc:date>2005-12-01T14:14:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-234.htm</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[another Microsoft Ecma standard, this time the Windows C APIs - anybody ever seen this utilized? (via Fileformat.info)
]]></description>
<dc:subject>ecma microsoft windows apis standards</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:14c61250b087/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ecma"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:windows"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:apis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://consortiuminfo.org/newsblog/blog.php?ID=1762">
    <title>Consortiuminfo.org Standards Blog</title>
    <dc:date>2005-11-23T04:52:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://consortiuminfo.org/newsblog/blog.php?ID=1762</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[very informative look at the covenant agreements side by side
]]></description>
<dc:subject>microsoft sun odf office open xml formats ecma standards</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:d3d48ec8b17a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sun"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:xml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:formats"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ecma"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://deladequacy.blogspot.com/2005/11/ibm-bloggers-who-are-we-bob-sutor.html">
    <title>Delusions of Adequacy: IBM Bloggers, Who are we? - Bob Sutor</title>
    <dc:date>2005-11-17T17:32:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://deladequacy.blogspot.com/2005/11/ibm-bloggers-who-are-we-bob-sutor.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[good interview with one of the hosts of the ODF Summit, Bob Sutor - love the interviews John, keep 'em coming
]]></description>
<dc:subject>odf standards ibm sutor simonds interview executive opensource</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:668ccb904000/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ibm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sutor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:simonds"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:interview"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:executive"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/home/home?wid=10&amp;func=viewSubmission&amp;sid=837">
    <title>Home - Berkman Center for Internet &amp; Society</title>
    <dc:date>2005-10-31T05:47:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/home/home?wid=10&amp;func=viewSubmission&amp;sid=837</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[session on standards at the Berkman center
]]></description>
<dc:subject>standards audio Bray business information internet research opensource web sutor bricklin</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:e695ceb84949/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:audio"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:Bray"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:information"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:research"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sutor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:bricklin"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tieguy.org/blog/index.cgi/498">
    <title>Luis Villa's Blog</title>
    <dc:date>2005-10-31T05:43:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://tieguy.org/blog/index.cgi/498</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[i've heard the TCP/IP to ODF comparions a number of times before, but they're no less effective for that
]]></description>
<dc:subject>villa Bray tcp/ip odf oo.o office productivity file formats xml standards</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:37bfe33e88f7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:villa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:Bray"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:tcp/ip"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:oo.o"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:productivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:file"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:formats"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:xml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,172063,00.html">
    <title>FOXNews.com - Views - &lt;i&gt;Your Mail:&lt;/i&gt; Open Debate About OpenDocument</title>
    <dc:date>2005-10-13T23:19:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,172063,00.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[pushback to the nonsensical previous Fox News anti-ODF piece
]]></description>
<dc:subject>microsoft news oasis odf opendocument opensource politics standards xml</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:dbe7723cc7d5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:news"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:oasis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opendocument"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:xml"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tango-project.org/Tango_Desktop_Project">
    <title>Tango Desktop Project - Tango Desktop Project</title>
    <dc:date>2005-10-12T01:20:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://tango-project.org/Tango_Desktop_Project</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[like betterdesktop.org, this will be interesting to follow
]]></description>
<dc:subject>opensource linux desktop standards ui design gnome</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:db0333d71caf/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:linux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:desktop"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ui"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gnome"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.thinkphp.de/archives/64-Is-XUL-the-next-hot-topic-after-AJAX.html">
    <title>Is XUL the next hot topic after AJAX?</title>
    <dc:date>2005-10-10T23:11:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.thinkphp.de/archives/64-Is-XUL-the-next-hot-topic-after-AJAX.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[be talking to Bjoern about this tomorrow; COBOL, PHP and Ajax - who would have figured?
]]></description>
<dc:subject>cobol ajax php xul web2.0 standards</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:8663c5ce67ee/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:cobol"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ajax"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:xul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:web2.0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20050930181153972">
    <title>GROKLAW</title>
    <dc:date>2005-10-05T17:44:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20050930181153972</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[very solid breakdown of the Brian Jones OASIS License FUD claims and Sun's response
]]></description>
<dc:subject>groklaw Massachusetts microsoft odf ooo opendocument patents standards sun oasis</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:0bf6d8b5ce62/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:groklaw"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:Massachusetts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ooo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opendocument"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sun"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:oasis"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2005/09/10/Mass-Opposition">
    <title>ongoing ‽ Massachusetts Back-Room</title>
    <dc:date>2005-09-12T02:51:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2005/09/10/Mass-Opposition</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Tim's take on the Microsoft MA response
]]></description>
<dc:subject>Massachusetts Bray microsoft oasis opendocument standards odf office open xml formats</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:3b1e3b73bacf/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:Massachusetts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:Bray"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:oasis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opendocument"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:xml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:formats"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://stephesblog.blogs.com/my_weblog/2005/09/massachusetts_m.html">
    <title>Once More unto the Breach: Massachusetts, Microsoft, and Open Document Format Standards</title>
    <dc:date>2005-09-11T23:26:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://stephesblog.blogs.com/my_weblog/2005/09/massachusetts_m.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[wherein Stephe articulates his side of our Fri AM breakfast
]]></description>
<dc:subject>walli Massachusetts microsoft odf open office format standards</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:ede99674232d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:walli"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:Massachusetts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:format"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.dwheeler.com/essays/why-opendocument-won.html">
    <title>Why OpenDocument Won (and Microsoft Office Open XML Didn’t)</title>
    <dc:date>2005-09-06T16:25:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.dwheeler.com/essays/why-opendocument-won.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[interesting ODF & MA essay
]]></description>
<dc:subject>odf oo.o office open xml microsoft standards formats</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:36041f40d52e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:oo.o"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:xml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:formats"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.ecommercetimes.com/story/nadhlpLj7zvZ4F/Massachusetts-Weighs-Dropping-Office-for-Open-Alternative.xhtml">
    <title>Massachusetts Weighs Dropping Office for Open Alternative</title>
    <dc:date>2005-09-02T22:40:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.ecommercetimes.com/story/nadhlpLj7zvZ4F/Massachusetts-Weighs-Dropping-Office-for-Open-Alternative.xhtml</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[E-Commerce Times, September 2nd, 2005
]]></description>
<dc:subject>redmonkpress office oo.o odf open standards formats</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:1fc7b18480c2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:redmonkpress"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:oo.o"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:formats"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2005/08/31/458879.aspx">
    <title>Brian Jones: Office XML Formats : Article on Proposal for Massachusetts to move to OpenDocument</title>
    <dc:date>2005-09-01T21:36:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2005/08/31/458879.aspx</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Brian Jones of the Office team's take on the MA/ODF announcement; be sure to read the comments (via Scoble)
]]></description>
<dc:subject>odf opendocumentformat open standards formats office productivity openoffice oo.o</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:6708a6bffeab/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opendocumentformat"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:formats"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:productivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:openoffice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:oo.o"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.sauria.com/blog/2005/08/30#1380">
    <title>Ted Leung on the air : Modern Attraction and Instant Messaging</title>
    <dc:date>2005-08-31T05:33:27+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.sauria.com/blog/2005/08/30#1380</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[great post from Ted: competition over users needs (amen), and a Google Talk is to closed IM as Gizmo (?) is to Skype comparion
]]></description>
<dc:subject>gizmo skype google im closed open standards silos jabber</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:06c84f551777/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gizmo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:skype"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:im"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:closed"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:silos"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:jabber"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.devsource.com/article2/0,1895,1852372,00.asp">
    <title>Skype Pushes Voice Further By Opening API</title>
    <dc:date>2005-08-27T18:05:38+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.devsource.com/article2/0,1895,1852372,00.asp</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[here comes skype
]]></description>
<dc:subject>skype voip open standards</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:eb777ad75494/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:skype"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:voip"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.redmonk.com/sogrady/archives/000861.html">
    <title>tecosystems: Open Source, Ecosystems, The Second Law of Thermodynamics, and a Random Belgian Mathematician</title>
    <dc:date>2005-08-12T20:10:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.redmonk.com/sogrady/archives/000861.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[a post of mine, but if you haven't read it, be sure to check out the comment (which is several hundred words long :) from Gary Edwards. brilliant as usual, and thanks for contributing Gary
]]></description>
<dc:subject>adoption innovation formats standards edwards opensource</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:91ae9ebe86a5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:adoption"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:innovation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:formats"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:edwards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.tbray.org/atom/RSS-and-Atom">
    <title>RSS 2.0 and Atom 1.0, Compared</title>
    <dc:date>2005-07-15T12:58:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.tbray.org/atom/RSS-and-Atom</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[format comparison, according to Atom's Bray
]]></description>
<dc:subject>Bray atom rss standards feeds syndication xml</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:2ad8b25b533c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:Bray"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:atom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:rss"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:feeds"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:syndication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:xml"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.acm.org/ubiquity/views/v6i5_simoneli.html">
    <title>ACM Ubiquity - A Concise Guide to the Major Internet Bodies</title>
    <dc:date>2005-03-04T04:11:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.acm.org/ubiquity/views/v6i5_simoneli.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[IETF, W3C, IANA, etc (via /.)
]]></description>
<dc:subject>ietf w3c iana standards</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:12e8e3118f8b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ietf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:w3c"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:iana"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/02/11/hakon_on_ms_interroperability/">
    <title>Opera to MS: Get real about interoperability, Mr Gates | The Register</title>
    <dc:date>2005-02-13T14:15:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/02/11/hakon_on_ms_interroperability/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[good critique of MS's interoperability failings; i've observed a similar bias against Firefox (via many)
]]></description>
<dc:subject>Opera microsoft interoperability browser ie firefox css standards</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:796445deee0b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:Opera"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:interoperability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:browser"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ie"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:firefox"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:css"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://stephesblog.blogs.com/my_weblog/2005/01/osdl_summit_jim.html">
    <title>Once More into the Breach: OSDL Summit: Jim Zemlin on App Portability on Linux</title>
    <dc:date>2005-02-01T03:22:12+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://stephesblog.blogs.com/my_weblog/2005/01/osdl_summit_jim.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[just what it says
]]></description>
<dc:subject>lsb linux standards open-standards application-portability</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:5b154779b667/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:lsb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:linux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:open-standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:application-portability"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://stephesblog.blogs.com/my_weblog/2005/01/osdl_summit_mat.html">
    <title>Once More into the Breach: OSDL Summit: Mats Wichmann on LSB Compliant Apps</title>
    <dc:date>2005-02-01T03:21:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://stephesblog.blogs.com/my_weblog/2005/01/osdl_summit_mat.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[just what it says
]]></description>
<dc:subject>lsb linux standards open-standards application-portability</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:ad42a4ed968f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:lsb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:linux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:open-standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:application-portability"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.linuxbase.org/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=45">
    <title>Linux Standard Base Project - LSB 2.0.1 released; submitted to ISO</title>
    <dc:date>2005-01-18T04:27:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.linuxbase.org/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=45</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[good to see LSB becoming a standard
]]></description>
<dc:subject>lsb linux standards open-standards</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:b9f440823ca7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:lsb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:linux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:open-standards"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://lxer.com/module/newswire/view/28195/">
    <title>LXer: Open Letter to Brin &amp; Page</title>
    <dc:date>2005-01-04T23:08:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://lxer.com/module/newswire/view/28195/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[the purpose? adopt the OASIS Open Document std of OOo (via Phipps)
]]></description>
<dc:subject>openoffice oasis open-document standards google office</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:9302b79b353d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:openoffice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:oasis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:open-document"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://persistent.info/archives/2004/10/05/gmail-skinning">
    <title>Skinning Gmail with a Custom Stylesheet [persistent.info]</title>
    <dc:date>2004-10-07T02:48:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://persistent.info/archives/2004/10/05/gmail-skinning</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[what you can do when presentation is separated from markup (via asa)
]]></description>
<dc:subject>css standards web-design</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:59e3caee26e2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:css"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:web-design"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>