<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (sogrady)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from sogrady</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/cookieAbsent"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://theconversation.edu.au/do-patents-create-software-innovation-computer-says-no-3808"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.technet.com/b/microsoft_on_the_issues/archive/2011/10/23/microsoft-s-new-patent-agreement-with-compal-a-new-milestone-for-our-android-licensing-program.aspx"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Investing/Forbes/the-10-most-inventive-us-companies.aspx"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/onepercent/2011/09/oecd-confirms-patent-quality-o.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&amp;nsref=online-news"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thenextweb.com/apple/2011/08/17/apple-nokia-want-interdigitals-8800-patents-but-dont-count-google-out-yet/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Google-doodles-itself-a-patent-1212681.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tieguy.org/blog/2010/06/28/first-thoughts-on-bilski/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2010/07/sawyer-on-why-bilski-really-means-that-software-companies-should-leave-the-us.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://entrepreneur.venturebeat.com/2010/03/04/in-favor-of-software-patents/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pmuellr.blogspot.com/2010/02/prior-art.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2010/01/html5-video-and-h-264-what-history-tells-us-and-why-were-standing-with-the-web/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1075505"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cnbc.com/id/33656799"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bx.businessweek.com/open-source-software/view?url=http%3A%2F%2Farstechnica.com%2Fopen-source%2Fnews%2F2009%2F10%2Fred-hat-bilski-brief-says-software-patents-stifle-innovation.ars"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.tuxdeluxe.org/node/299"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.h-online.com/open/features/print/114041"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://lawandlifesiliconvalley.com/blog/?p=134"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.betaversion.org/~stefano/linotype/news/237/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pli.edu/patentcenter/blog.asp?view=plink&amp;id=368"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.sun.com/dillon/entry/one_more_thing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.sun.com/dillon/entry/more_on_the_netapp_litigation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.newyorker.com/talk/financial/2008/08/11/080811ta_talk_surowiecki"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://googledataapis.blogspot.com/2008/04/google-data-apis-patent-license.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.linuxworld.com/news/2008/030608-mix-novells-de-icaza-criticizes.html?page=1"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://boycottnovell.com/2008/02/22/mark-shuttleworth-on-patents/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/20/intel-amd-nvidia-others-sued-by-implicit-networks-in-patent-b/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pcworld.com/printable/article/id,140081/printable.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://joyeur.com/2007/10/27/the-case-of-netapp-versus-sun-sun-versus-netapp-and-both-versus-common-sense"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.sun.com/jonathan/entry/harvesting_from_a_troll"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theregister.com/2007/10/12/novell_red_hat_linux_patent_sued/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/10/10/on-joe-on-patents/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2200717/microsoft-sharpens-aims-patent"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/09/06/simon-phipps-and-moonlight-give-me-an-excuse-to-post-a-cool-picture/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.technologyreview.com/read_article.aspx?id=16280&amp;ch=infotech&amp;a=f"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.amber.org/2007/07/11/ibm-and-patents/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.sun.com/webmink/entry/welcome_to_gplv3"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/26/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-2-developers/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.funtoo.org/drobbins/blog/2007/06/microsoft-silverlight-on-linux-via.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/127"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/09/opinion/09lee.html?ex=1339041600&amp;en=a2f3d8f1f3cfcb61&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://stephesblog.blogs.com/my_weblog/2007/06/microsoft_messa.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://news.com.com/Novell+worries+that+GPL+3+could+foil+Microsoft+pact/2100-7344_3-6187127.html?tag=nefd.top"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.sun.com/webmink/entry/patent_reform"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20070516070856610"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/118"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.sun.com/jonathan/entry/what_we_did"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://robilad.livejournal.com/12420.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://diveintomark.org/archives/2007/05/15/outrageous"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://stephesblog.blogs.com/my_weblog/2007/05/the_microsoft_o.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://shebanation.com/2007/05/15/more-links-on-microsofts-foss-war/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://rc3.org/2007/05/stephen_ogrady.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.sun.com/Gregp/entry/are_software_patents_useful"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2007/05/microsoft_foss_.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2007/05/28/100033867/index3.htm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tatler.typepad.com/nose/2007/05/linux_kernel_vi.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/112"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://news.com.com/Oracle+bands+with+open-source+patent+group/2100-7344_3-6170717.html?tag=html.alert"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://weblog.infoworld.com/openresource/archives/2007/02/uk_reaffirms_it.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://news.com.com/Ballmer+repeats+threats+against+Linux/2100-7344_3-6160604.html?tag=st.rc.targ_mb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://stephesblog.blogs.com/my_weblog/2007/02/three_things_st.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/95"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tatler.typepad.com/nose/2007/02/blackboards_pat.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.groklaw.net/comment.php?mode=display&amp;sid=20061204130954610&amp;title=I+agree+with+the+parent%2C+PJ+you+should+rethink+this+one...&amp;type=article&amp;order=&amp;hideanonymous=0&amp;pid=512816#c512937"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cbronline.com/article_news.asp?guid=C1856F2A-F214-4A65-A8C1-4B6CBC1CEED5"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=112"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20061120203431766"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9005171&amp;pageNumber=2"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9005338&amp;source=rss_topic89"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://savas.parastatidis.name/2006/11/02/ae15762f-e3e5-4b20-b0ea-a5168cfbac8c.aspx"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/cookieAbsent">
    <title>An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie</title>
    <dc:date>2013-02-12T16:36:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/cookieAbsent</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[RT @EdwardTufte: "No empirical evidence that patents serve to increase innovation or productivity."
Wow!  #patents # ...]]></description>
<dc:subject>patents</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://twitter.com/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:b62a823d6486/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://theconversation.edu.au/do-patents-create-software-innovation-computer-says-no-3808">
    <title>Do patents create software innovation? Computer says no</title>
    <dc:date>2011-11-01T23:27:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://theconversation.edu.au/do-patents-create-software-innovation-computer-says-no-3808</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Do patents create software innovation? Computer says no" on @ConversationEDU:  #swpats #patents #gov2au]]></description>
<dc:subject>swpats gov2au patents</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://twitter.com/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:f65cd61f9188/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:swpats"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gov2au"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.technet.com/b/microsoft_on_the_issues/archive/2011/10/23/microsoft-s-new-patent-agreement-with-compal-a-new-milestone-for-our-android-licensing-program.aspx">
    <title>Microsoft’s New Patent Agreement with Compal: A New Milestone for Our Android Licensing Program - Microsoft on the Issues - Site Home - TechNet Blogs</title>
    <dc:date>2011-10-25T15:20:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.technet.com/b/microsoft_on_the_issues/archive/2011/10/23/microsoft-s-new-patent-agreement-with-compal-a-new-milestone-for-our-android-licensing-program.aspx</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[this is as inevitable as it is a sad statement on the current patent system

]]></description>
<dc:subject>microsoft android patents</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:d9dc90319fe0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:android"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Investing/Forbes/the-10-most-inventive-us-companies.aspx">
    <title>Top companies for inventions: IBM, Microsoft, Intel - MSN Money</title>
    <dc:date>2011-10-25T15:19:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Investing/Forbes/the-10-most-inventive-us-companies.aspx</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[wrong metric]]></description>
<dc:subject>patents ibm microsoft intel</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:549a20a7428f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ibm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:intel"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/onepercent/2011/09/oecd-confirms-patent-quality-o.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&amp;nsref=online-news">
    <title>One Per Cent: Quality of patents 'falling dramatically', warns OECD</title>
    <dc:date>2011-09-21T14:48:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/onepercent/2011/09/oecd-confirms-patent-quality-o.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&amp;nsref=online-news</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Quality of #patents 'falling dramatically', warns #OECD -  no, really?]]></description>
<dc:subject>OECD patents</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://twitter.com/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:39e8915ee667/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:OECD"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thenextweb.com/apple/2011/08/17/apple-nokia-want-interdigitals-8800-patents-but-dont-count-google-out-yet/">
    <title>Apple, Nokia want InterDigital's 8,800 patents, but don't count Google out yet - TNW Apple</title>
    <dc:date>2011-08-17T17:11:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://thenextweb.com/apple/2011/08/17/apple-nokia-want-interdigitals-8800-patents-but-dont-count-google-out-yet/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Apple, Nokia want InterDigital’s 8,800 patents, but don’t count Google out yet -  this is just the beginning #patents]]></description>
<dc:subject>patents</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://twitter.com/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:295685570cf0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Google-doodles-itself-a-patent-1212681.html">
    <title>Google doodles itself a patent - The H Open Source: News and Features</title>
    <dc:date>2011-03-22T17:10:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Google-doodles-itself-a-patent-1212681.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Google doodles itself a patent -  shame on you, #Google, double shame on #USPTO #patents]]></description>
<dc:subject>USPTO patents Google</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://twitter.com/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:b3cf26cdb918/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:USPTO"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:Google"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tieguy.org/blog/2010/06/28/first-thoughts-on-bilski/">
    <title>First thoughts on Bilski « Luis Villa</title>
    <dc:date>2010-07-16T03:12:41+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2010/06/28/first-thoughts-on-bilski/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Luis' thoughts on the Bilski decision. always worth reading. ]]></description>
<dc:subject>luisvilla bilski software patents</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:fb051c271d54/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:luisvilla"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:bilski"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2010/07/sawyer-on-why-bilski-really-means-that-software-companies-should-leave-the-us.html">
    <title>Sawyer on Why Bilski Really Means That Software Companies Should Leave the US</title>
    <dc:date>2010-07-16T03:11:43+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2010/07/sawyer-on-why-bilski-really-means-that-software-companies-should-leave-the-us.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[friend of BFeld's on why Bilski might encourage non-US development]]></description>
<dc:subject>bilski software patents bradfeld us development</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:9bbb6f0b4254/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:bilski"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:bradfeld"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:development"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://entrepreneur.venturebeat.com/2010/03/04/in-favor-of-software-patents/">
    <title>In favor of software patents | VentureBeat</title>
    <dc:date>2010-03-05T04:20:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://entrepreneur.venturebeat.com/2010/03/04/in-favor-of-software-patents/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[disagree with this more or less completely. the point is not that software can't be inventive, it's that a.) there is no system by which patents can be successfully vetted and granted, b.) it is self-evident that we have zero issues with the incentive for innovation (the nominal purpose for patents), and c.) if anything, the system is disincentive would be inventors b/c they have no way of knowing if what they're inventing is patented or not. 

also, 7 years is far, far too long. consider the Apple/HTC issue presently. how does telling HTC they can release an Android handset in 2017 help, at all?]]></description>
<dc:subject>patents software</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:1f16fd623f3c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:software"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://pmuellr.blogspot.com/2010/02/prior-art.html">
    <title>pmuellr: prior art</title>
    <dc:date>2010-03-04T15:39:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://pmuellr.blogspot.com/2010/02/prior-art.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[serving as a fact witness in a patent trial]]></description>
<dc:subject>patents priorart technology software pmuellr factwitness</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:413d50f05daf/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:priorart"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:pmuellr"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:factwitness"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2010/01/html5-video-and-h-264-what-history-tells-us-and-why-were-standing-with-the-web/">
    <title>Christopher Blizzard · HTML5 video and H.264 – what history tells us and why we’re standing with the web</title>
    <dc:date>2010-01-29T19:42:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2010/01/html5-video-and-h-264-what-history-tells-us-and-why-were-standing-with-the-web/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[i'm torn. i have to admit that my affection for the open web is warring with my pragmatism.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>christopherblizzard mozilla opensource firefox patents flash analysis openstandards theora h.264 h264 codec openvideo html5 web licensing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:c330870de267/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:christopherblizzard"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:mozilla"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:firefox"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:flash"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:analysis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:openstandards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:theora"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:h.264"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:h264"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:codec"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:openvideo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:html5"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1075505">
    <title>Hacker News | Ask HN: Cases where software patents have prevented progress?</title>
    <dc:date>2010-01-26T16:19:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1075505</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[just for my later reference
]]></description>
<dc:subject>patents software hackernews ip</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:e0c89336ea60/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:hackernews"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ip"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.cnbc.com/id/33656799">
    <title>Keith Bergelt: The Case for Market Based Patent Reform - CNBC Guest Blog - CNBC.com</title>
    <dc:date>2009-11-11T17:37:43+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.cnbc.com/id/33656799</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The foregoing dynamics underscore the need for legislative, regulatory and judicial patent reform coupled with market-led patent reform. Absent a joint market, industry and government effort that is comprehensive and seeks to resolve all of the challenges posed by today’s patent system, the result of legislative reform will be suboptimal."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>patents system legislativereview regulation oin software</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:6855cc9f2412/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:system"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:legislativereview"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:regulation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:oin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:software"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bx.businessweek.com/open-source-software/view?url=http%3A%2F%2Farstechnica.com%2Fopen-source%2Fnews%2F2009%2F10%2Fred-hat-bilski-brief-says-software-patents-stifle-innovation.ars">
    <title>Red Hat tells Supremes: software patents stifle innovation - Business Exchange</title>
    <dc:date>2009-10-21T04:25:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://bx.businessweek.com/open-source-software/view?url=http%3A%2F%2Farstechnica.com%2Fopen-source%2Fnews%2F2009%2F10%2Fred-hat-bilski-brief-says-software-patents-stifle-innovation.ars</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[couldn't agree more. i can't say it enough: there is no realistic process for processing and granting software patents, so allowing the current system to persist is borderline criminal.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>software patents redhat scotus</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:857cb9044374/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:redhat"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:scotus"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.tuxdeluxe.org/node/299">
    <title>Monomania | Tux Deluxe</title>
    <dc:date>2009-10-21T04:23:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.tuxdeluxe.org/node/299</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Jeremy Allison on Mono, though, as @segphault observed, it's worth noting that the Samba devs have their own NDA history not discussed here
]]></description>
<dc:subject>jeremyallison samba mono opensource patents</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:c031263d963d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:jeremyallison"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:samba"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:mono"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.h-online.com/open/features/print/114041">
    <title>Health Check: Mono - The H Open Source: News and Features</title>
    <dc:date>2009-08-21T14:59:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.h-online.com/open/features/print/114041</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[pretty even handed look at the history and future of Mono
]]></description>
<dc:subject>mono migueldeicaza patents richardstallman tomboy linux .net java sun microsoft foss</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:c47fb670faf9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:mono"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:migueldeicaza"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:richardstallman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:tomboy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:linux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:.net"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:java"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sun"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:foss"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://lawandlifesiliconvalley.com/blog/?p=134">
    <title>Law &amp; Life: Silicon Valley » Top Ten Open Source Legal Developments: 2008</title>
    <dc:date>2009-01-07T23:22:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://lawandlifesiliconvalley.com/blog/?p=134</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[very useful list from Mark
]]></description>
<dc:subject>2008 opensource legal developments foss sco gpl patents</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:970ced902fd7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:2008"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:legal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:developments"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:foss"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sco"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gpl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.betaversion.org/~stefano/linotype/news/237/">
    <title>Stefano’s Linotype » Blog Archive » Android, say thanks to Bilski</title>
    <dc:date>2008-12-12T21:23:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.betaversion.org/~stefano/linotype/news/237/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Stefano on Android and its potential patent implications vis a vis Java
]]></description>
<dc:subject>android java stefanomazzocchi software patents sun</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:e8a8e81ad2ea/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:android"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:java"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:stefanomazzocchi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sun"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.pli.edu/patentcenter/blog.asp?view=plink&amp;id=368">
    <title>Practising Law Institute - Patent Practice Center - Federal Circuit Decides Software No Longer Patentable</title>
    <dc:date>2008-11-27T16:45:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.pli.edu/patentcenter/blog.asp?view=plink&amp;id=368</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[has Luis written on this and i just missed it?
]]></description>
<dc:subject>luisvilla software patents bilski</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:04973e26ecaa/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:luisvilla"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:bilski"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.sun.com/dillon/entry/one_more_thing">
    <title>the legal thing... by Mike Dillon: Just one more thing.</title>
    <dc:date>2008-10-09T00:55:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.sun.com/dillon/entry/one_more_thing</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[more on the pending NetApp litigation from Sun
]]></description>
<dc:subject>mikedillon sun netapp zfs litigation patents</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:705423f737fd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:mikedillon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sun"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:netapp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:zfs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:litigation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.sun.com/dillon/entry/more_on_the_netapp_litigation">
    <title>the legal thing... by Mike Dillon: More on the NetApp litigation</title>
    <dc:date>2008-10-09T00:53:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.sun.com/dillon/entry/more_on_the_netapp_litigation</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Sun's general counsel on the ongoing NetApp legal matters
]]></description>
<dc:subject>mikedillon zfs netapp sun litigation patents</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:0d3f32b48383/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:mikedillon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:zfs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:netapp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sun"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:litigation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.newyorker.com/talk/financial/2008/08/11/080811ta_talk_surowiecki">
    <title>The Permission Problem: Financial Page: The New Yorker</title>
    <dc:date>2008-08-13T00:45:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.newyorker.com/talk/financial/2008/08/11/080811ta_talk_surowiecki</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Opportunities forgone aren’t always easy to see. The effects of overuse are generally unmistakable—you can’t miss the empty nets of fishing boats working overfished oceans, or the scrub that covers an overgrazed field. But the effects of underuse created by too much ownership are often invisible. They’re mainly things that don’t happen: inventions that don’t get made, useful drugs that never get to market." - one of the primary concerns with software patents
]]></description>
<dc:subject>society rights reference property politics patents jamessurowiecki</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:455479511682/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:rights"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:reference"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:jamessurowiecki"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://googledataapis.blogspot.com/2008/04/google-data-apis-patent-license.html">
    <title>Official Google Data APIs Blog: Google Data APIs patent license</title>
    <dc:date>2008-04-02T05:31:05+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://googledataapis.blogspot.com/2008/04/google-data-apis-patent-license.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Well, those concerns end today as we are giving a no-charge, royalty-free license to any patents we have that you would need to implement Atom, AtomPub, or any of those extensions." - more of this, please
]]></description>
<dc:subject>joegregorio api atom gdata google patents</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:8c769d996a22/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:joegregorio"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:api"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:atom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gdata"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.linuxworld.com/news/2008/030608-mix-novells-de-icaza-criticizes.html?page=1">
    <title>MIX - Novell's de Icaza criticizes Microsoft patent deal - LinuxWorld</title>
    <dc:date>2008-03-10T22:26:24+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.linuxworld.com/news/2008/030608-mix-novells-de-icaza-criticizes.html?page=1</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[interesting to see Miguel this outspoken on the subject. one wonders if there are wider implications.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>opensource migueldeicaza patents ip microsoft novell licensing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:859051cedd18/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:migueldeicaza"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ip"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:novell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://boycottnovell.com/2008/02/22/mark-shuttleworth-on-patents/">
    <title>Boycott Novell » Mark Shuttleworth’s Stance on Mono Inside Ubuntu</title>
    <dc:date>2008-02-28T23:39:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://boycottnovell.com/2008/02/22/mark-shuttleworth-on-patents/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Mark on the situation with respect to Mono and patents
]]></description>
<dc:subject>markshuttleworth mono patents ubuntu</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:d80877ac11db/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:markshuttleworth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:mono"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ubuntu"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/20/intel-amd-nvidia-others-sued-by-implicit-networks-in-patent-b/">
    <title>Intel, AMD, NVIDIA, others sued by Implicit Networks in patent brouhaha - Engadget</title>
    <dc:date>2008-02-20T21:17:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/20/intel-amd-nvidia-others-sued-by-implicit-networks-in-patent-b/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[who doesn't love patents?
]]></description>
<dc:subject>patents intel amd nvidia implicitnetworks</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:3d4e29449b3a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:intel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:amd"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:nvidia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:implicitnetworks"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.pcworld.com/printable/article/id,140081/printable.html">
    <title>PC World - The Most Anti-Tech Organizations in America</title>
    <dc:date>2007-12-04T17:41:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.pcworld.com/printable/article/id,140081/printable.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[AKA - the folks desperately trying to throttle useful innovation so that they are not compelled to adapt in any way, shape or form
]]></description>
<dc:subject>business copyright culture patents technology drm via:randy</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:1fc8c3680668/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:drm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:via:randy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://joyeur.com/2007/10/27/the-case-of-netapp-versus-sun-sun-versus-netapp-and-both-versus-common-sense">
    <title>Joyeur: NetApp versus Sun, Sun versus NetApp, and Both versus Common Sense</title>
    <dc:date>2007-10-28T06:05:12+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://joyeur.com/2007/10/27/the-case-of-netapp-versus-sun-sun-versus-netapp-and-both-versus-common-sense</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[unique perspective on the NetApp vs Sun conflict; worth a read
]]></description>
<dc:subject>netapp sun joyent patents litigation zfs wafl nfs solaris jasonhoffman</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:7e4a38769477/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:netapp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sun"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:joyent"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:litigation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:zfs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:wafl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:nfs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:solaris"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:jasonhoffman"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.sun.com/jonathan/entry/harvesting_from_a_troll">
    <title>Jonathan Schwartz's Weblog: ZFS Puts Net App Viability at Risk?</title>
    <dc:date>2007-10-24T18:56:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.sun.com/jonathan/entry/harvesting_from_a_troll</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[this should be fun to watch
]]></description>
<dc:subject>zfs jonathanschwartz opensource netapp nfs litigation patents indemnification</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:7241e0f17f79/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:zfs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:jonathanschwartz"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:netapp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:nfs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:litigation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:indemnification"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.theregister.com/2007/10/12/novell_red_hat_linux_patent_sued/">
    <title>Red Hat, Novell sued for patent infringment | The Register</title>
    <dc:date>2007-10-12T16:13:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.theregister.com/2007/10/12/novell_red_hat_linux_patent_sued/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[here we go...
]]></description>
<dc:subject>redhat novell patents litigation linux opensource</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:628d8b074fac/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:redhat"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:novell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:litigation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:linux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/10/10/on-joe-on-patents/">
    <title>Luis Villa’s Blog / on joe on patents</title>
    <dc:date>2007-10-11T04:19:22+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/10/10/on-joe-on-patents/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Which is why they are going after Linux users, most of whom have no patents of their own to retaliate with." - this is obviously possible, and Ballmer loves to imply it, but i think MSFT suing customers would be absolute brand suicide. i'd be surprised.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>microsoft litigation linux steveballmer luisvilla patents</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:412b14ce828d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:litigation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:linux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:steveballmer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:luisvilla"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2200717/microsoft-sharpens-aims-patent">
    <title>Microsoft aims patent guns at Red Hat - vnunet.com</title>
    <dc:date>2007-10-09T03:11:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2200717/microsoft-sharpens-aims-patent</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["People who use Red Hat, at least with respect to our intellectual property, in a sense have an obligation to compensate us" - here we go again
]]></description>
<dc:subject>steveballmer microsoft opensource innovation patents redhat via:jdub</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:6ba98beb440b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:steveballmer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:innovation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:redhat"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:via:jdub"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/09/06/simon-phipps-and-moonlight-give-me-an-excuse-to-post-a-cool-picture/">
    <title>Luis Villa’s Blog / Simon Phipps and Moonlight give me an excuse to post a cool picture</title>
    <dc:date>2007-09-07T18:16:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/09/06/simon-phipps-and-moonlight-give-me-an-excuse-to-post-a-cool-picture/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["License says ‘you can use it without restrictions…but the patent license says…as long as you get it from Novell.‘ If you...can live with that sort of uncertainty, go for it and use Moonlight; if you can’t, well, don’t say you weren’t warned
]]></description>
<dc:subject>copyright patents opensource licensing moonlight silverlight novell microsoft</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:bf2e9680e64c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:moonlight"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:silverlight"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:novell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.technologyreview.com/read_article.aspx?id=16280&amp;ch=infotech&amp;a=f">
    <title>Technology Review: A Haven for Patent Pirates</title>
    <dc:date>2007-09-06T17:34:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.technologyreview.com/read_article.aspx?id=16280&amp;ch=infotech&amp;a=f</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[interesting background on the legal venue for NetApp's pending patent litigation vs Sun
]]></description>
<dc:subject>legal patents litigation east texas sun netapp</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:521bd01ccc71/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:legal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:litigation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:east"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:texas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sun"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:netapp"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.amber.org/2007/07/11/ibm-and-patents/">
    <title>IBM and patents at Pensieri di un lunatico minore</title>
    <dc:date>2007-07-16T20:56:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.amber.org/2007/07/11/ibm-and-patents/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["IBM pledges access to patents covering 150 standards. This is a big deal, and should help with a lot of open source projects, as explained here." - Chris likes the IBM patent announcement
]]></description>
<dc:subject>ibm chrispetrilli patents standards</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:87c321d2fc58/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ibm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:chrispetrilli"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.sun.com/webmink/entry/welcome_to_gplv3">
    <title>Simon Phipps, SunMink: Welcome to GPLv3</title>
    <dc:date>2007-07-02T17:34:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.sun.com/webmink/entry/welcome_to_gplv3</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Simon's take on GPLv3; consistent with what i've heard from him from day one, i think
]]></description>
<dc:subject>gplv3 gpl opensource simonphipps webmink licensing patents sun</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:8126a4280085/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gplv3"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gpl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:simonphipps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:webmink"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sun"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/26/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-2-developers/">
    <title>Luis Villa’s Blog / GPL v3, the Q&amp;A: part 2- developers</title>
    <dc:date>2007-06-27T03:26:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/26/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-2-developers/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[part 2 in Luis' excellent GPLv3 analysis
]]></description>
<dc:subject>luisvilla gplv3 Q&amp;A analysis developers opensource licensing gpl fsf sflc patents drm</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:04f55434aab6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:luisvilla"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gplv3"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:Q&amp;A"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:analysis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:developers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gpl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:fsf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sflc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:drm"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.funtoo.org/drobbins/blog/2007/06/microsoft-silverlight-on-linux-via.html">
    <title>hello to you!: Microsoft's Silverlight on Linux via Novell</title>
    <dc:date>2007-06-22T02:13:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.funtoo.org/drobbins/blog/2007/06/microsoft-silverlight-on-linux-via.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Daniel is not a fan, i take it
]]></description>
<dc:subject>silverlight mono microsoft danielrobbins linux novell patents</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:f3bacdcd7fb4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:silverlight"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:mono"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:danielrobbins"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:linux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:novell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/127">
    <title>Mark Shuttleworth » Blog Archive » No negotiations with Microsoft in progress</title>
    <dc:date>2007-06-18T00:25:33+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/127</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["We have declined to discuss any agreement with Microsoft under the threat of unspecified patent infringements." - just what i expected Ubuntu's position would be
]]></description>
<dc:subject>microsoft ubuntu canonical distros legal license law patents</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:9a28e30c1284/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ubuntu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:canonical"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:distros"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:legal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:license"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/09/opinion/09lee.html?ex=1339041600&amp;en=a2f3d8f1f3cfcb61&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss">
    <title>A Patent Lie - New York Times</title>
    <dc:date>2007-06-10T22:27:05+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/09/opinion/09lee.html?ex=1339041600&amp;en=a2f3d8f1f3cfcb61&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[tons of folks have already pointed to this, but it's worth another link; how many times do we need to explain why software patents don't work?
]]></description>
<dc:subject>software patents economics microsoft ip copyright</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:36d32b080b9c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ip"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:copyright"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://stephesblog.blogs.com/my_weblog/2007/06/microsoft_messa.html">
    <title>Once More unto the Breach: Microsoft Messaging on Patents and Open Source Software</title>
    <dc:date>2007-06-02T13:57:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://stephesblog.blogs.com/my_weblog/2007/06/microsoft_messa.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[better piece than mine on patent messaging, marketing and so on
]]></description>
<dc:subject>microsoft ibm sun patents marketing messaging ip R&amp;D legal litigation</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:1dcb79ff675c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ibm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sun"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:marketing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:messaging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ip"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:R&amp;D"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:legal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:litigation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://news.com.com/Novell+worries+that+GPL+3+could+foil+Microsoft+pact/2100-7344_3-6187127.html?tag=nefd.top">
    <title>Novell worries that GPL 3 could foil Microsoft pact | CNET News.com</title>
    <dc:date>2007-05-30T17:32:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://news.com.com/Novell+worries+that+GPL+3+could+foil+Microsoft+pact/2100-7344_3-6187127.html?tag=nefd.top</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[i'd be concerned too, if i was Novell
]]></description>
<dc:subject>gplv3 novell microsoft patents royalties</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:0e955e0ac178/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gplv3"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:novell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:royalties"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.sun.com/webmink/entry/patent_reform">
    <title>Simon Phipps, SunMink: Seven Patent Reforms While We Wait For Nirvana</title>
    <dc:date>2007-05-24T02:09:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.sun.com/webmink/entry/patent_reform</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[absolutely *phenomenal* patent post from Simon - absolutely outstanding; even the noted Sun critic Michael Dolan likes it
]]></description>
<dc:subject>simonphipps patents software</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:9519d9461949/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:simonphipps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:software"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20070516070856610">
    <title>ConsortiumInfo.org - Through the Patent Looking Glass with Microsoft's Brad Smith</title>
    <dc:date>2007-05-23T14:51:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20070516070856610</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[insightful (as usual) commentary from Andy on Microsoft's recent patent FUD
]]></description>
<dc:subject>patents blog business ip law legal andyupdegrove opensource microsoft</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:2eec1383d3ee/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:blog"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ip"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:legal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:andyupdegrove"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/118">
    <title>Mark Shuttleworth » Blog Archive » Microsoft is not the real threat</title>
    <dc:date>2007-05-23T14:30:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/118</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Microsoft already spends a huge amount of money on patent settlements...That number will creep upwards until it’s abundantly clear to them that they would be better off if software patents were history." - a point i tried to make at NXT
]]></description>
<dc:subject>nxt patents markshuttleworth microsoft software</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:1d3ee74caf10/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:nxt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:markshuttleworth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:software"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.sun.com/jonathan/entry/what_we_did">
    <title>Jonathan Schwartz's Weblog : Weblog</title>
    <dc:date>2007-05-15T21:46:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.sun.com/jonathan/entry/what_we_did</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[here's hoping his advice is heeded
]]></description>
<dc:subject>jonathanschwartz litigation patents opensource</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:b5a7ae5018d3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:jonathanschwartz"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:litigation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://robilad.livejournal.com/12420.html">
    <title>robilad: Power to the people</title>
    <dc:date>2007-05-15T21:22:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://robilad.livejournal.com/12420.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Dalibor's summary of JavaOne - was *excellent* to meet him, just sorry i didn't get to hang with mjw as well
]]></description>
<dc:subject>dalibortopic javaone openjdk microsoft patents</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:574d0a4e52e2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:dalibortopic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:javaone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:openjdk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://diveintomark.org/archives/2007/05/15/outrageous">
    <title>Outrageous [dive into mark]</title>
    <dc:date>2007-05-15T21:16:33+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://diveintomark.org/archives/2007/05/15/outrageous</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[not a surprise - Mark's not a fan of patents; unfortunately, in today's system, vendors are more or less obligated to pursue them
]]></description>
<dc:subject>markpilgrim patents ibm</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:eda5cde96b90/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:markpilgrim"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ibm"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://stephesblog.blogs.com/my_weblog/2007/05/the_microsoft_o.html">
    <title>Once More unto the Breach: The Microsoft Open Source Patent Gambit</title>
    <dc:date>2007-05-15T16:48:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://stephesblog.blogs.com/my_weblog/2007/05/the_microsoft_o.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[brilliant response from Mr. Walli; would love to see the patent wiki idea take shape - anybody needs help with that, let us know
]]></description>
<dc:subject>stephewalli microsoft patents licensing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:ee4e1e3ec4d4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:stephewalli"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://shebanation.com/2007/05/15/more-links-on-microsofts-foss-war/">
    <title>More links on Microsoft's FOSS War « Shebanation</title>
    <dc:date>2007-05-15T16:30:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://shebanation.com/2007/05/15/more-links-on-microsofts-foss-war/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Finally we have Steven O’Grady of Redmonk doing one of his trademark Q&A discussions. Its great stuff, and though he does try to walk a fine to not offend Microsoft (one of his customers)" - interesting, it apparently reads as less harsh than i thought
]]></description>
<dc:subject>redmonk andrewshebanow microsoft patents fortune</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:30c835783625/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:redmonk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:andrewshebanow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:fortune"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://rc3.org/2007/05/stephen_ogrady.php">
    <title>rc3.org: Stephen O'Grady on Microsoft's patent assertions</title>
    <dc:date>2007-05-15T06:43:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://rc3.org/2007/05/stephen_ogrady.php</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Rafe agrees
]]></description>
<dc:subject>RedMonk tecosystems rafecolburn microsoft patents</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:86d3dd097221/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:RedMonk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:tecosystems"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:rafecolburn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.sun.com/Gregp/entry/are_software_patents_useful">
    <title>Greg Matter : Weblog</title>
    <dc:date>2007-05-15T06:40:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.sun.com/Gregp/entry/are_software_patents_useful</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[couple of folks pointed me to this, and they're right - it's a very useful, and very rational, take on patents and other mechanisms like copyright, trade secrets and so forth
]]></description>
<dc:subject>gregpapadopoulos copyright ip opensource patents software sun tradesecrets</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:4097d012341f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gregpapadopoulos"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ip"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sun"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:tradesecrets"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2007/05/microsoft_foss_.html">
    <title>Patent Law Blog (Patently-O): Microsoft: FOSS Infringes Our Patents</title>
    <dc:date>2007-05-14T06:59:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2007/05/microsoft_foss_.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Microsoft refuses to state which particular patents are infringed in an attempt to avoid retaliation from FOSS advocates...The statements certainly put Linux and its users under a dark cloud -- potentially sufficient for a declaratory judgment action"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>patents microsoft litigation opensource foss linux via:Digg</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:1cbd94c95bac/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:litigation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:foss"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:linux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:via:Digg"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2007/05/28/100033867/index3.htm">
    <title>Microsoft takes on the free world (cont.) - May 28, 2007</title>
    <dc:date>2007-05-14T03:38:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2007/05/28/100033867/index3.htm</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["If push comes to shove, would Microsoft sue its customers for royalties, the way the record industry has? 'That's not a bridge we've crossed," says CEO Ballmer, "and not a bridge I want to cross today on the phone with you.' " - that's not a no <sigh>
]]></description>
<dc:subject>microsoft patents royalties ip opensource litigation</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:c0d96e4ad768/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:royalties"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ip"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:litigation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tatler.typepad.com/nose/2007/05/linux_kernel_vi.html">
    <title>The NOSE: Information Technology in Higher Education: Linux Kernel Violates 42 Microsoft Patents</title>
    <dc:date>2007-05-14T03:23:07+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://tatler.typepad.com/nose/2007/05/linux_kernel_vi.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Al's got the details for you; really wish this hadn't hit the week before i'm to speak at a Microsoft event - personally, i'm going to try and ignore this until they get more specific
]]></description>
<dc:subject>microsoft patents linux oo.o X</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:9583d6b5a4e1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:linux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:oo.o"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:X"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/112">
    <title>Mark Shuttleworth » Blog Archive » Trademarks redux</title>
    <dc:date>2007-05-01T15:51:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/112</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[good to see some creative thinking re: trademarks, as they are increasingly the bane of existence for many a project
]]></description>
<dc:subject>trademarks markshuttleworth ubuntu copyright patents licensing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:08786a5f16d0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:trademarks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:markshuttleworth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ubuntu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://news.com.com/Oracle+bands+with+open-source+patent+group/2100-7344_3-6170717.html?tag=html.alert">
    <title>Oracle bands with open-source patent group | CNET News.com</title>
    <dc:date>2007-03-27T12:59:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://news.com.com/Oracle+bands+with+open-source+patent+group/2100-7344_3-6170717.html?tag=html.alert</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Good news for the OIN, but it still seems like an unfortunate necessity
]]></description>
<dc:subject>oin patents oracle</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:f2c9134e6e12/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:oin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:oracle"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://weblog.infoworld.com/openresource/archives/2007/02/uk_reaffirms_it.html">
    <title>Open Sources | InfoWorld | UK reaffirms its stance on software patents (&quot;Yankee patent system, go home&quot;) | February 27, 2007 09:28 AM | By Matt Asay</title>
    <dc:date>2007-02-28T02:28:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://weblog.infoworld.com/openresource/archives/2007/02/uk_reaffirms_it.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[i've often thought that the UK's arms length attitude towards open source was perplexing, but at least they have a sensible attitude towards software patents
]]></description>
<dc:subject>uk software patents</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:f9b26243428e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:uk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://news.com.com/Ballmer+repeats+threats+against+Linux/2100-7344_3-6160604.html?tag=st.rc.targ_mb">
    <title>Ballmer repeats threats against Linux | CNET News.com</title>
    <dc:date>2007-02-27T16:44:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://news.com.com/Ballmer+repeats+threats+against+Linux/2100-7344_3-6160604.html?tag=st.rc.targ_mb</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[these threats are growing very tiresome; rumor has it this presentation wasn't well received, incidentally
]]></description>
<dc:subject>steveballmer linux ip patents novell microsoft fud</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:0c4f00e16a38/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:steveballmer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:linux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ip"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:novell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:fud"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://stephesblog.blogs.com/my_weblog/2007/02/three_things_st.html">
    <title>Once More unto the Breach: Three Things Steve Ballmer (and Brad Smith) Get Wrong about Free and Open Source Software</title>
    <dc:date>2007-02-22T21:42:37+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://stephesblog.blogs.com/my_weblog/2007/02/three_things_st.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[i know there are folks within Microsoft - Matusow, Hilf, et al - that get it, but it's more apparent every day that Ballmer et al do not; Stephe explains why here
]]></description>
<dc:subject>microsoft patents opensource ip freesoftware steveballmer</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:701736b8912d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ip"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:freesoftware"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:steveballmer"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/95">
    <title>Mark Shuttleworth » Blog Archive » Clarification on Feisty’s proprietary drivers</title>
    <dc:date>2007-02-14T08:58:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/95</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["We have not been forceful enough about our policy on software patents and other, similar threats to software freedom. As a result, we have joined FFII and other organisations that are fighting software patents..." - Luis should be pleased
]]></description>
<dc:subject>ubuntu patents ffii eff markshuttleworth freedom</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:5fb1b93ffc63/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ubuntu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ffii"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:eff"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:markshuttleworth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:freedom"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tatler.typepad.com/nose/2007/02/blackboards_pat.html">
    <title>The NOSE: Information Technology in Higher Education: Blackboard's Patent Pledge</title>
    <dc:date>2007-02-01T17:35:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://tatler.typepad.com/nose/2007/02/blackboards_pat.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[potentially good news re: the Blackboard patent situation - will look for more from Al shortly
]]></description>
<dc:subject>blackboard patents opensource</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:0aee24bc2f52/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:blackboard"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.groklaw.net/comment.php?mode=display&amp;sid=20061204130954610&amp;title=I+agree+with+the+parent%2C+PJ+you+should+rethink+this+one...&amp;type=article&amp;order=&amp;hideanonymous=0&amp;pid=512816#c512937">
    <title>Groklaw - Digging for Truth</title>
    <dc:date>2006-12-04T23:52:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.groklaw.net/comment.php?mode=display&amp;sid=20061204130954610&amp;title=I+agree+with+the+parent%2C+PJ+you+should+rethink+this+one...&amp;type=article&amp;order=&amp;hideanonymous=0&amp;pid=512816#c512937</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Novell is not exactly OO.o's best friend these days, what with Florian's reassignment, but i think this is piece is a reach
]]></description>
<dc:subject>oo.o novell microsoft patents fork</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:8b163fc2d160/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:oo.o"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:novell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:fork"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.cbronline.com/article_news.asp?guid=C1856F2A-F214-4A65-A8C1-4B6CBC1CEED5">
    <title>Microsoft patent deal could leave Novell behind - Computer Business Review</title>
    <dc:date>2006-11-28T02:31:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.cbronline.com/article_news.asp?guid=C1856F2A-F214-4A65-A8C1-4B6CBC1CEED5</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[my first though on hearing some of the GPLv3 saber rattling was that it wasn't likely due to the friction b/twn the kernel.org guys and the FSF, but this is a good reminder that there's more to Linux than the kernel
]]></description>
<dc:subject>kernel linux gplv3 fsf gpl novell microsoft patents</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:c8992f51f9f2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:kernel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:linux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gplv3"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:fsf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gpl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:novell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=112">
    <title>» More on Microsoft's need to show (if it can) Linux's patent infringement | All about Microsoft | ZDNet.com</title>
    <dc:date>2006-11-28T02:28:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=112</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Mary Jo joins the call for MSFT to assert if they can
]]></description>
<dc:subject>microsoft patents fud linux opensource</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:d08d5fdbc44d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:fud"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:linux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20061120203431766">
    <title>Groklaw - Novell Speaks - Updated</title>
    <dc:date>2006-11-22T00:06:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20061120203431766</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["In any case, the deal is falling apart, I'd say." - tough to argue with this position in light of the various corrections and clarifications that continue to emerge
]]></description>
<dc:subject>groklaw microsoft novell ballmer partnership patents</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:c82c2b3025ce/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:groklaw"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:novell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ballmer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:partnership"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9005171&amp;pageNumber=2">
    <title>Ballmer: Linux users owe Microsoft</title>
    <dc:date>2006-11-22T00:02:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9005171&amp;pageNumber=2</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["is important to us, because [otherwise] we believe every Linux customer basically has an undisclosed balance-sheet liability." - wow
]]></description>
<dc:subject>ballmer microsoft patents novell suse ip litigation cio</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:cfce9e841e1e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ballmer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:novell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:suse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ip"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:litigation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:cio"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9005338&amp;source=rss_topic89">
    <title>Linux users to Microsoft: What 'balance sheet liability'?</title>
    <dc:date>2006-11-22T00:01:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9005338&amp;source=rss_topic89</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Like many IT executives, I took great offense to Ballmer's comments," Strasnick wrote in an e-mail. - so it wasn't just us analysts that think MSFT should step up if they've got something to say
]]></description>
<dc:subject>ballmer linux strasnick citistreet cio novell microsoft patents fud via:michael</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:14438f453fde/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ballmer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:linux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:strasnick"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:citistreet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:cio"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:novell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:fud"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:via:michael"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://savas.parastatidis.name/2006/11/02/ae15762f-e3e5-4b20-b0ea-a5168cfbac8c.aspx">
    <title>&lt;savas:weblog/&gt;</title>
    <dc:date>2006-11-21T06:40:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://savas.parastatidis.name/2006/11/02/ae15762f-e3e5-4b20-b0ea-a5168cfbac8c.aspx</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[interest in Mono post-Microsoft deal from a 'Softie
]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:trs81 mono microsoft novell partnership patents opensource</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:650c3a29a64f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:via:trs81"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:mono"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:novell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:partnership"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>