<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (sogrady)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from sogrady</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/302435/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/06/19/Red_Hat_Summit_panel_Who_won_OOXML_battle_1.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2008/03/11/1205125864040.html?page=fullpage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2008/02/19.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/02/punct-contrapunct.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.sun.com/malte/entry/sun_odf_plugin_1_11"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Berlind/?p=910"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.linux.com/feature/121930"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.com/pipermail/odf-discuss/2007-October/thread.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.sun.com/dancer/entry/apple_starts_supporting_odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.msdn.com/jasonmatusow/archive/2007/09/12/independent-implementations-of-open-xml.aspx"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.oreillynet.com/xml/blog/2007/09/harmonization_by_augmenting_od.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20070904053108577"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/08/21/microsoft_google_osi/page2.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/132"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.sun.com/webmink/entry/odf_plug_in_for_ms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.msdn.com/jasonmatusow/archive/2007/07/02/open-xml-denmark-now-massachusetts.aspx"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9584_22-6183476.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10533-0.html?forumID=1&amp;threadID=33171&amp;messageID=609088&amp;start=-9746"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fallenpegasus.com/code/mysql-awss3/presentations/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://intertwingly.net/blog/2007/04/11/ODF-Validator"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9012760&amp;pageNumber=1"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tatler.typepad.com/nose/2007/02/minnesota_and_t.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.robweir.com/blog/2007/01/more-matter-with-less-art.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2007/Jan-30.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://opendocument.foundation.googlepages.com/home"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.sun.com/webmink/entry/odf_tookit_project#comments"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/internet/01/24/microsoft.wikipedia.ap/index.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.linux-watch.com/news/NS9314284615.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://odftoolkit.openoffice.org/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fussnotes.typepad.com/plexnex/2007/01/analyzing_the_m.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/12/05/quick-thoughts-on-novell-blogs-as-journalism-etc/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=2006120505160143"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2006/Dec-04.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20061120050934120"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2006/10/18/they-re-bringing-out-the-big-guns.aspx"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20061004161417881"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bizjournals.com/masshightech/stories/2006/10/02/daily35.html?jst=b_ln_hl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Google/index.php?p=319"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20060823131715736"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.robweir.com/blog/2006/07/traduttore-traditore.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9001713&amp;source=rss_news10"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20060712095750385"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fussnotes.typepad.com/plexnex/2006/07/microsoft_suppo.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.stephenmcgibbon.co.uk/blogs/notes2self/archive/2006/07/06/434.aspx"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jonobacon.org/?p=708"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/software/soa/Heed_Microsoft_s_move_adopt_OpenDocument_OSIA/0,2000061733,39262586,00.htm?feed=rss"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sourceforge.net/projects/odf-converter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://gotzespace.dk/archives/2006/05/odf_in_denmark.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20060506173536926"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20060504015438308"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/dancer?entry=you_have_to_read_this"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/dancer?entry=viewer_for_opendocument_files_as"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.25hoursaday.com/weblog/CommentView.aspx?guid=21b0466a-6547-432d-8f98-10e449275c7c"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.consortiuminfo.org/newsblog/blog.php?ID=1961"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog_comments.jspa?blog=384&amp;entry=104645&amp;ca=drs-bl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://deladequacy.blogspot.com/2006/01/bloggerview-with-doug-heintzman-swg.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://consortiuminfo.org/newsblog/blog.php?ID=1825"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/dancer?entry=openoffice_org_support_in_gmail"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.line56.com/articles/default.asp?ArticleID=7126"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://computerworld.com.sg/ShowPage.aspx?pagetype=2&amp;articleid=3104&amp;pubid=3&amp;issueid=75"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/index.php?p=2230"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.msdn.com/jasonmatusow/archive/2005/12/02/499412.aspx"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2005/11/26/romney_administration_reviewing_trips_made_by_technology_chief/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.consortiuminfo.org/newsblog/blog.php?ID=1771"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/windows/0,39020396,39237450,00.htm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.washingtontechnology.com/news/20_23/emerging-tech/27459-1.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://consortiuminfo.org/newsblog/blog.php?ID=1762"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog_comments.jspa?blog=384&amp;entry=100456&amp;ca=drs-bl"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/302435/">
    <title>LWN.net Weekly Edition for October 16, 2008 [LWN.net]</title>
    <dc:date>2008-11-04T16:16:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/302435/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["While there have been various responses to the analysis—including this LWN comment thread—there has, as yet, been no real counter-analysis that comes to a different conclusion." - this is the answer to a previous question i received on why i considered Meeks' post interesting.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>oo.o go-oo sun novell openoffice michaelmeeks odf</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:680f114eff6b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:oo.o"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:go-oo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sun"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:novell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:openoffice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:michaelmeeks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/06/19/Red_Hat_Summit_panel_Who_won_OOXML_battle_1.html">
    <title>Red Hat Summit panel: Who 'won' OOXML battle? | InfoWorld | News | 2008-06-19 | By Chris Kanaracus, IDG News Service</title>
    <dc:date>2008-06-22T12:46:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/06/19/Red_Hat_Summit_panel_Who_won_OOXML_battle_1.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[let me get this straight: the MSFT guy said ODF won? anyone there care to provide some context?
]]></description>
<dc:subject>ooxml odf standards microsoft office</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:a800a3b44d99/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ooxml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2008/03/11/1205125864040.html?page=fullpage">
    <title>When standards ain't standards - Perspectives - Opinion - Technology</title>
    <dc:date>2008-03-16T17:41:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2008/03/11/1205125864040.html?page=fullpage</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["It's a shame, really. Microsoft Office 2007 is a fabulous piece of work, but few people are using it, partly because of the new file format. OOXML works well, but things would have been much better had Microsoft adopted ODF."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>ooxml odf standards office2007 via:jdub</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:6d511c5a23e2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ooxml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office2007"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:via:jdub"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2008/02/19.html">
    <title>Why are the Microsoft Office file formats so complicated? (And some workarounds) - Joel on Software</title>
    <dc:date>2008-02-20T03:24:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2008/02/19.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[an interesting perspective on the Microsoft Office file format complexity question
]]></description>
<dc:subject>joelspolsky file formats interoperability microsoft office ooxml odf reverse-engineering specifications standards</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:9986b04b4a0d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:joelspolsky"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:file"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:formats"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:interoperability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ooxml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:reverse-engineering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:specifications"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/02/punct-contrapunct.html">
    <title>An Antic Disposition: Punct Contrapunct</title>
    <dc:date>2008-02-12T22:57:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/02/punct-contrapunct.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[wherein Rob is not happy with the Burton Group
]]></description>
<dc:subject>robweir odf ooxml burtongroup</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:9c35ce87be71/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:robweir"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ooxml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:burtongroup"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.sun.com/malte/entry/sun_odf_plugin_1_11">
    <title>Malte Timmermann's Blog</title>
    <dc:date>2007-12-13T21:52:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.sun.com/malte/entry/sun_odf_plugin_1_11</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[nice to see
]]></description>
<dc:subject>odf microsoft office openoffice staroffice sun via:simon</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:684ccaf3da4f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:openoffice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:staroffice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sun"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:via:simon"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Berlind/?p=910">
    <title>» OpenDocument Format community steadfast despite theatrics of now impotent ‘Foundation’ | Berlind’s Testbed | ZDNet.com</title>
    <dc:date>2007-11-30T17:29:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.zdnet.com/Berlind/?p=910</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[i've heard quite a bit about this, and despite knowing both Gary and Sam, i can't say i really understand what's going on.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>odf foundation cdf politics ibm sun</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:50c3fdb90383/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:foundation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:cdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ibm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sun"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.linux.com/feature/121930">
    <title>Linux.com :: GNOME Foundation defends OOXML involvement</title>
    <dc:date>2007-11-25T18:25:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.linux.com/feature/121930</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<sigh> i was hoping i could skip this one, as it seem clear cut from where i sit, but i guess it's more nebulous than i'd hoped
]]></description>
<dc:subject>gnome microsoft novell odf ooxml standards</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:0698ad886d9f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gnome"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:novell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ooxml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.com/pipermail/odf-discuss/2007-October/thread.html">
    <title>The odf-discuss October 2007 Archive by thread</title>
    <dc:date>2007-11-01T03:08:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://lists.opendocumentfellowship.com/pipermail/odf-discuss/2007-October/thread.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[wasted almost an hour today watching this trainwreck of a line of commentary today. unfortunate, and unproductive.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>gnome odf ooxml openstandards</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:f0b1784df030/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gnome"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ooxml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:openstandards"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.sun.com/dancer/entry/apple_starts_supporting_odf">
    <title>Erwin's StarOffice Tango</title>
    <dc:date>2007-10-22T17:41:07+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.sun.com/dancer/entry/apple_starts_supporting_odf</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[this is excellent news indeed: ODF support for OS X fiends like Cote
]]></description>
<dc:subject>oo.o odf standards office</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:18d1c7f7e311/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:oo.o"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.msdn.com/jasonmatusow/archive/2007/09/12/independent-implementations-of-open-xml.aspx">
    <title>Matusow's Blog : Independent Implementations of Open XML</title>
    <dc:date>2007-09-18T03:20:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jasonmatusow/archive/2007/09/12/independent-implementations-of-open-xml.aspx</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Jason's right, the comments attached to this post - including those from Andy Updegrove - are very educational. read them all, whether you come down on the OOXML or ODF side of the fence.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>ooxml odf office formats jasonmatusow andyupdegrove standards</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:477828fb5321/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ooxml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:formats"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:jasonmatusow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:andyupdegrove"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.oreillynet.com/xml/blog/2007/09/harmonization_by_augmenting_od.html">
    <title>Harmonization by augmenting ODF with OOXML elements - O'Reilly XML Blog</title>
    <dc:date>2007-09-12T16:27:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.oreillynet.com/xml/blog/2007/09/harmonization_by_augmenting_od.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[couple of people have sent this along, and it's a very interesting idea; be interesting to see how the namespace embedding affected performance. wondering too if this isn't the approach some of the plugin providers have taken.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>harmonization odf rickjelliffe ooxml office productivity formats</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:742a6916f664/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:harmonization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:rickjelliffe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ooxml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:productivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:formats"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20070904053108577">
    <title>ConsortiumInfo.org - Microsoft Fails to Gain Approval for OOXML</title>
    <dc:date>2007-09-04T13:28:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20070904053108577</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Andy breaks down the news for you
]]></description>
<dc:subject>microsoft ooxml odf iso standards</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:275264aca14a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ooxml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:iso"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/08/21/microsoft_google_osi/page2.html">
    <title>Microsoft vs. Google – the open source shame | The Register</title>
    <dc:date>2007-08-22T13:14:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/08/21/microsoft_google_osi/page2.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[agree with Ashlee on the questions around open source, disagree on questions of standards. apart from my query history, everything i put into Google i can extract via POP3, XMPP, ODF, and so on.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>microsoft google opensource openstandards ashleevance pop3 xmpp odf</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:cf187260f8d0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:openstandards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ashleevance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:pop3"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:xmpp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/132">
    <title>Mark Shuttleworth » Blog Archive » Emerging consensus in favour of a unified document format standard?</title>
    <dc:date>2007-08-14T14:39:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/132</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Mark Shuttleworth urges users to vote for a single ISO document format: as someone who believes that multiple formats are in the best interests of vendors but not users, i agree.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>microsoft linux odf office ooxml openoffice standards markshuttleworth</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:eea05956a3c6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:linux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ooxml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:openoffice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:markshuttleworth"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.sun.com/webmink/entry/odf_plug_in_for_ms">
    <title>Simon Phipps, SunMink: ODF Plug-in for MS Office Released</title>
    <dc:date>2007-07-04T01:46:05+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.sun.com/webmink/entry/odf_plug_in_for_ms</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["I'm pleased to say that the Sun ODF Plug-In for MS Office has now been officially released." - will have to give this a whirl
]]></description>
<dc:subject>sun odf plugin microsoft office simonphipps</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:88faa6dc788f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sun"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:plugin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:simonphipps"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.msdn.com/jasonmatusow/archive/2007/07/02/open-xml-denmark-now-massachusetts.aspx">
    <title>Matusow's Blog : Open XML- Denmark, now Massachusetts</title>
    <dc:date>2007-07-02T22:17:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jasonmatusow/archive/2007/07/02/open-xml-denmark-now-massachusetts.aspx</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[not surprised that Jason thinks this is a positive development - this is a big PR win for MSFT, which came as a result of significant lobbying efforts. as someone who believes redundant formats are an issue, i do not regard this as positive
]]></description>
<dc:subject>microsoft ooxml odf Massachusetts</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:aa28973b6c16/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ooxml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:Massachusetts"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9584_22-6183476.html">
    <title>Crushed by the Wheels of Industry | Tech News on ZDNet</title>
    <dc:date>2007-05-15T21:20:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9584_22-6183476.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[half a dozen folks pointed me over here, and honestly, i can see why - cut and paste don't work? seriously?
]]></description>
<dc:subject>jeremyallison odf ooxml office oo.o</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:3724b9e2477a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:jeremyallison"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ooxml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:oo.o"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10533-0.html?forumID=1&amp;threadID=33171&amp;messageID=609088&amp;start=-9746">
    <title>This might interest you -- bportlock's comment on &quot;MS Office 2007 versus Open Office 2.2 shootout&quot; | TalkBack on ZDNet</title>
    <dc:date>2007-04-30T05:45:24+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-10533-0.html?forumID=1&amp;threadID=33171&amp;messageID=609088&amp;start=-9746</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[here we go again: Ou's apparently still using that absurd several hundred megabyte file for his testing - why, i wonder?
]]></description>
<dc:subject>georgeou microsoft office oo.o odf ooxml</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:26bcfee6f85a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:georgeou"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:oo.o"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ooxml"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fallenpegasus.com/code/mysql-awss3/presentations/">
    <title>Index of /code/mysql-awss3/presentations</title>
    <dc:date>2007-04-25T18:58:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://fallenpegasus.com/code/mysql-awss3/presentations/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Mark's slides on the S3 Engine here at MySQL Conference - ODF versions available, outstanding
]]></description>
<dc:subject>markatwood s3 mysql storageengine presentation odf</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:11ab31704b7f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:markatwood"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:s3"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:mysql"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:storageengine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:presentation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://intertwingly.net/blog/2007/04/11/ODF-Validator">
    <title>Sam Ruby: ODF Validator</title>
    <dc:date>2007-04-12T16:31:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://intertwingly.net/blog/2007/04/11/ODF-Validator</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["I’m very pleased to announce an ODF validation service: Similar to the W3C validation service for HTML, you can use this website to verify a document’s compliance with the OpenDocument Format." - interesting
]]></description>
<dc:subject>odf validator format</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:18379222a9df/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:validator"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:format"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9012760&amp;pageNumber=1">
    <title>Q&amp;A: Former Mass. CIO feels 'bittersweet pride' after battles with Microsoft, legislature</title>
    <dc:date>2007-03-13T20:45:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9012760&amp;pageNumber=1</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[lots of folks have already linked here, and the interview is indeed fascinating
]]></description>
<dc:subject>Massachusetts cio odf microsoft ibm sun openstandards</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:bab6ccc8c8be/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:Massachusetts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:cio"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ibm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sun"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:openstandards"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tatler.typepad.com/nose/2007/02/minnesota_and_t.html">
    <title>The NOSE: Information Technology in Higher Education: ODF Under Consideration in Minnesota and Texas</title>
    <dc:date>2007-02-19T01:48:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://tatler.typepad.com/nose/2007/02/minnesota_and_t.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Al looks at the possibility that Texas and Minnesota would move to ODF - or OOXML
]]></description>
<dc:subject>odf ooxml texas minnesota office formats standards</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:9fd28f3ff390/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ooxml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:texas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:minnesota"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:formats"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.robweir.com/blog/2007/01/more-matter-with-less-art.html">
    <title>An Antic Disposition: More Matter with Less Art</title>
    <dc:date>2007-02-01T19:18:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2007/01/more-matter-with-less-art.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[a response to Miguel's post that pissed a lot of people off; lots of substance here, but i maintain - as i did in a few private conversations yesterday - that some of Miguel's original contentions are quite legitimate
]]></description>
<dc:subject>deicaza odf ooxml openformula microsoft ibm sun</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:95c091767306/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:deicaza"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ooxml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:openformula"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ibm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sun"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2007/Jan-30.html">
    <title>The EU Prosecutors are Wrong. - Miguel de Icaza</title>
    <dc:date>2007-01-31T00:22:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2007/Jan-30.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[interesting and thoughtful post from Miguel arguing on behalf of OOXML; don't agree with all of it, but there are some good points in here
]]></description>
<dc:subject>odf ooxml deicaza microsoft oo.o</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:658e7c93546d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ooxml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:deicaza"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:oo.o"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://opendocument.foundation.googlepages.com/home">
    <title>opendocument.foundation - The OpenDocument Foundation</title>
    <dc:date>2007-01-29T22:36:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://opendocument.foundation.googlepages.com/home</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[will be testing this out on our RedMonk report templates which are fairly heavily complex in terms of formatting
]]></description>
<dc:subject>odf office ooxml microsoft opensource plugins opendocumentfoundation</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:e394a00dc2f1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ooxml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:plugins"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opendocumentfoundation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.sun.com/webmink/entry/odf_tookit_project#comments">
    <title>Simon Phipps, SunMink</title>
    <dc:date>2007-01-25T05:12:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.sun.com/webmink/entry/odf_tookit_project#comments</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Simon on the ODF toolkit news; even more add to my plate to cover...sigh
]]></description>
<dc:subject>odf toolkit ecosystems community plugins</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:1f0bc026164b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:toolkit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ecosystems"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:plugins"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/internet/01/24/microsoft.wikipedia.ap/index.html">
    <title>Microsoft in hot water over Wikipedia edits - CNN.com</title>
    <dc:date>2007-01-25T05:10:41+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/internet/01/24/microsoft.wikipedia.ap/index.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[will have more on this in an upcoming ODF/OOXML post, but for now let me say that i'm less worried about this than some other posters
]]></description>
<dc:subject>microsoft odf ooxml wikipedia transparency</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:08d664a80653/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ooxml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:wikipedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:transparency"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.linux-watch.com/news/NS9314284615.html">
    <title>Getting people to say nice things about Microsoft</title>
    <dc:date>2007-01-24T19:19:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.linux-watch.com/news/NS9314284615.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Wikipedia is a farce that far too many people assume is gospel. If Microsoft can put a pro-Microsoft spin in Wikipedia's articles, you know darn well they will." - strongly disagree; this seems to assume that any "spin" is permanent
]]></description>
<dc:subject>wikipedia vaughan-nichols microsoft odf ooxml</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:34133bdd6a84/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:wikipedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:vaughan-nichols"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ooxml"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://odftoolkit.openoffice.org/">
    <title>odftoolkit: The OpenOffice.org ODF Toolkit Project</title>
    <dc:date>2007-01-24T17:54:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://odftoolkit.openoffice.org/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[thank to Louis for letting me know about this via email; will have more to say hopefully in the near future
]]></description>
<dc:subject>suarez-potts oo.o odf toolkit</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:1626e6941470/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:suarez-potts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:oo.o"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:toolkit"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fussnotes.typepad.com/plexnex/2007/01/analyzing_the_m.html">
    <title>PlexNex: Analyzing the Microsoft Office Open XML License</title>
    <dc:date>2007-01-12T23:34:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://fussnotes.typepad.com/plexnex/2007/01/analyzing_the_m.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[be interested for the 'Softies answers to some of the questions raised here; as Sam says, a dialogue would be great
]]></description>
<dc:subject>microsoft ooxml odf licensing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:eb3ad1e32a77/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ooxml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/12/05/quick-thoughts-on-novell-blogs-as-journalism-etc/">
    <title>Luis Villa’s Blog » quick thoughts on novell, blogs as journalism, etc.</title>
    <dc:date>2006-12-06T04:02:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2006/12/05/quick-thoughts-on-novell-blogs-as-journalism-etc/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Luis' also debunks the "forking" call re: Novell and OO.o
]]></description>
<dc:subject>oo.o novell villa odf msxml</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:7f3c7ab8af2e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:oo.o"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:novell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:villa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:msxml"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=2006120505160143">
    <title>ConsortiumInfo.org - Novell, ODF and Castles in the Sand</title>
    <dc:date>2006-12-06T04:00:33+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=2006120505160143</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[once more, Andy's said (more eloquently) what i would have
]]></description>
<dc:subject>novel odf updegrove msxml microsoft sun ibm</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:0a6a1c3457db/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:novel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:updegrove"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:msxml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sun"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ibm"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2006/Dec-04.html">
    <title>OpenOffice Forks? - Miguel de Icaza</title>
    <dc:date>2006-12-05T00:13:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2006/Dec-04.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Miguel responds - aggressively - to PJ's piece on the 'fork' of OO.o
]]></description>
<dc:subject>oo.o deicaza groklaw novell microsoft odf msxml</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:195f50ea53f8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:oo.o"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:deicaza"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:groklaw"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:novell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:msxml"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20061120050934120">
    <title>ConsortiumInfo.org - The Happy State of (ODF implementation in) Massachusetts</title>
    <dc:date>2006-11-22T05:05:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20061120050934120</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[great (as usual) summary of ODF progress in MA from Andy; even better? it's in Q&A format ;)
]]></description>
<dc:subject>updegrove odf ma massachusetts malaysia standards open Q&amp;A</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:dc39d560f876/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:updegrove"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ma"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:massachusetts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:malaysia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:Q&amp;A"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2006/10/18/they-re-bringing-out-the-big-guns.aspx">
    <title>Brian Jones: Open XML Formats : They’re bringing out the big guns</title>
    <dc:date>2006-10-24T06:07:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2006/10/18/they-re-bringing-out-the-big-guns.aspx</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Microsoft's Brian Jones responds to some of the Open XML critiques from Phipps, Sutor & Weir
]]></description>
<dc:subject>weir sutor phipps microsoft Open xml odf sun ibm standards interoperability jones office</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:c0f4e1afe799/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:weir"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sutor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:phipps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:Open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:xml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sun"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ibm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:interoperability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:jones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/">
    <title>GullFOSS</title>
    <dc:date>2006-10-20T20:47:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[just a note to the GullFOSS authors: you are making my job *much* easier - thank you
]]></description>
<dc:subject>oo.o odf community blogging transparency</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:ab7a8f060d60/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:oo.o"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:blogging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:transparency"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20061004161417881">
    <title>Consortiuminfo.org - Louis Gutierrez Resigns: Deja Vu on Beacon Hill</title>
    <dc:date>2006-10-04T21:43:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20061004161417881</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[as usual, Andy's got the scoop on ODF related news out of MA
]]></description>
<dc:subject>ma massachusetts odf gutierrez resignation</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:928226f6adcc/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ma"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:massachusetts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gutierrez"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:resignation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.bizjournals.com/masshightech/stories/2006/10/02/daily35.html?jst=b_ln_hl">
    <title>Gutierrez resigns his post as Mass. CIO - Mass High Tech: The Journal of New England Technology:</title>
    <dc:date>2006-10-04T17:35:22+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.bizjournals.com/masshightech/stories/2006/10/02/daily35.html?jst=b_ln_hl</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[what's going to be the impact here to ODF, i wonder?
]]></description>
<dc:subject>gutierrez odf ma cio massachusetts it</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:e533d0f8cd93/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gutierrez"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ma"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:cio"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:massachusetts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:it"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Google/index.php?p=319">
    <title>» Google Spreadsheets 1.1.5g released | Googling Google | ZDNet.com</title>
    <dc:date>2006-09-10T22:01:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.zdnet.com/Google/index.php?p=319</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Google Spreadsheets adds ODF support; while there will still undoubtedly be many who mistakenly (IMO) compare this offering to Excel, the fact is that Writely/Spreadly have the potential to be the most widely available ODF application set
]]></description>
<dc:subject>odf google spreadsheet</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:01dd6866bfeb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:spreadsheet"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20060823131715736">
    <title>Consortiuminfo.org - Mass ITD Resolved Accessibility Issues, Adjusts ODF Rollout Details</title>
    <dc:date>2006-08-24T21:17:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20060823131715736</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Andy, as usual, has this covered; the problem from where i sit is relatively simple - lots of folks are confusing open standards (e.g. ODF) with open source (e.g. OO.o) - a natural error, but one that shouldn't be made at this point
]]></description>
<dc:subject>oo.o massachusetts microsoft odf formats updegrove</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:4829f7f5baaa/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:oo.o"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:massachusetts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:formats"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:updegrove"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.robweir.com/blog/2006/07/traduttore-traditore.html">
    <title>An Antic Disposition: Traduttore, Traditore</title>
    <dc:date>2006-07-19T13:31:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.robweir.com/blog/2006/07/traduttore-traditore.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[the most detailed explanation of the shortcomings of Microsoft's ODF plugin i've seen yet; let's hope they're addressed, either by this plugin or an alternative
]]></description>
<dc:subject>odf microsoft plugin msxml open xml formats office</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:9fa4d79c5989/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:plugin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:msxml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:xml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:formats"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9001713&amp;source=rss_news10">
    <title>Google backs OpenDocument format</title>
    <dc:date>2006-07-12T19:55:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9001713&amp;source=rss_news10</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[interesting addition to the ODF alliance; have received a couple of calls on this already
]]></description>
<dc:subject>odf google office opensource alliance</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:446b85c2b947/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:alliance"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20060712095750385">
    <title>Consortiuminfo.org - The Microsoft Converter, News Shopping and Tectonic Shifts</title>
    <dc:date>2006-07-12T16:54:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20060712095750385</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[*must* read piece on the Microsoft ODF news - see especially the reflections on his conversation with Jason; also, on a personal note, hugely appreciate the kind words coming from a guy like Andy
]]></description>
<dc:subject>updegrove microsoft odf open standards xml</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:b091460cc1b5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:updegrove"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:xml"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fussnotes.typepad.com/plexnex/2006/07/microsoft_suppo.html">
    <title>PlexNex: Microsoft &quot;Supports&quot; ODF</title>
    <dc:date>2006-07-08T13:45:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://fussnotes.typepad.com/plexnex/2006/07/microsoft_suppo.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Sam's with David in thinking i got this wrong - give it a read, although i still maintain my position
]]></description>
<dc:subject>support odf microsoft Open xml formats</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:c09d4b3f08cd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:support"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:Open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:xml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:formats"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.stephenmcgibbon.co.uk/blogs/notes2self/archive/2006/07/06/434.aspx">
    <title>Notes2Self.net : ODF Add-In - Screenshots</title>
    <dc:date>2006-07-07T20:25:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.stephenmcgibbon.co.uk/blogs/notes2self/archive/2006/07/06/434.aspx</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[screenshots of the ODF plugin
]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:cote odf office 12 plugin screenshots migration conversion</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:650de4ea033b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:via:cote"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:12"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:plugin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:screenshots"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:migration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:conversion"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.jonobacon.org/?p=708">
    <title>jonobacon@home » Microsoft supports OpenDocument</title>
    <dc:date>2006-07-07T20:18:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.jonobacon.org/?p=708</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Microsoft seem define interoperability as ‘making things work with specific vendors’. " - interesting notion, and a charge that frankly could be levelled at a variety of commercial vendors
]]></description>
<dc:subject>vendors opensource interoperability microsoft odf</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:0cd94572cfc2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:vendors"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:interoperability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/software/soa/Heed_Microsoft_s_move_adopt_OpenDocument_OSIA/0,2000061733,39262586,00.htm?feed=rss">
    <title>Heed Microsoft's move, adopt OpenDocument: OSIA: ZDNet Australia: News: Software</title>
    <dc:date>2006-07-07T15:13:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/software/soa/Heed_Microsoft_s_move_adopt_OpenDocument_OSIA/0,2000061733,39262586,00.htm?feed=rss</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Australia sees Microsoft's decision as a validation of ODF - we'll see more and more of this, i think
]]></description>
<dc:subject>odf microsoft open opensource xml formats office via:jdub osia australia</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:ad9a2b8b94a8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:xml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:formats"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:via:jdub"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:osia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:australia"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://sourceforge.net/projects/odf-converter">
    <title>SourceForge.net: ODF Add-in for Word 2007</title>
    <dc:date>2006-07-06T18:20:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://sourceforge.net/projects/odf-converter</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[the project that's got everyone talking: adding ODF support to Word 2007
]]></description>
<dc:subject>word odf oo.o Open xml migration compatability office formats sourceforge opensource bsd</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:2f86347ddb6d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:word"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:oo.o"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:Open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:xml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:migration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:compatability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:formats"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sourceforge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:bsd"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://gotzespace.dk/archives/2006/05/odf_in_denmark.html">
    <title>Gotzeblogged: ODF in Denmark</title>
    <dc:date>2006-05-30T15:31:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://gotzespace.dk/archives/2006/05/odf_in_denmark.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[some adoption news re: ODF in Denmark (via James)
]]></description>
<dc:subject>government standards odf office productivity xml formats</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:960724757422/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:government"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:productivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:xml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:formats"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20060506173536926">
    <title>Consortiuminfo.org - ODF Plug-ins and a Microsoft Promise of Cooperation</title>
    <dc:date>2006-05-08T05:47:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20060506173536926</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Matusow's commentary is going to generate a lot of talk, i'm sure
]]></description>
<dc:subject>matusow odf microsoft office xml open productivity Massachusetts</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:79495d7ea87e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:matusow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:xml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:productivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:Massachusetts"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20060504015438308">
    <title>GROKLAW</title>
    <dc:date>2006-05-04T15:52:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20060504015438308</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[an ODF plugin for Microsoft Word? this would be a Very Big Deal, IMO, as it would allow organizations to embrace ODF while continuing to leverage their investments in Office
]]></description>
<dc:subject>office microsoft odf edwards plugin Open xml</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:c45e9c44fedb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:edwards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:plugin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:Open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:xml"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/dancer?entry=you_have_to_read_this">
    <title>Erwin's StarOffice Tango</title>
    <dc:date>2006-02-07T06:23:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/dancer?entry=you_have_to_read_this</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[some interesting feedback from a disabled user of Microsoft technologies - give it a read
]]></description>
<dc:subject>odf accessibility microsoft office jaws assitive technologies at</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:b32fed4fd876/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:accessibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:jaws"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:assitive"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:technologies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:at"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/dancer?entry=viewer_for_opendocument_files_as">
    <title>Erwin's StarOffice Tango</title>
    <dc:date>2006-02-07T06:19:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/dancer?entry=viewer_for_opendocument_files_as</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[ODF viewer for Firefox - has anyone tried this yet? i would, but i've gunked up my Firefox install  pretty good so my results would be meaningless
]]></description>
<dc:subject>odf viewer firefox</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:772e9e99b406/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:viewer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:firefox"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.25hoursaday.com/weblog/CommentView.aspx?guid=21b0466a-6547-432d-8f98-10e449275c7c">
    <title>Dare Obasanjo aka Carnage4Life - WordPerfect to Support Microsoft Office Open XML Formats</title>
    <dc:date>2006-01-27T22:29:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.25hoursaday.com/weblog/CommentView.aspx?guid=21b0466a-6547-432d-8f98-10e449275c7c</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[interesting news, but i agree with the commenter: this was pretty much expected from Corel
]]></description>
<dc:subject>corel odf office microsoft formats open xml</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:eaca290c5454/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:corel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:formats"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:xml"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.consortiuminfo.org/newsblog/blog.php?ID=1961">
    <title>Consortiuminfo.org Standards Blog</title>
    <dc:date>2006-01-26T22:15:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.consortiuminfo.org/newsblog/blog.php?ID=1961</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[great summary and update from Andy on where ODF is vis a vis MA
]]></description>
<dc:subject>updegrove odf Massachusetts office open xml</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:a2262bb8a656/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:updegrove"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:Massachusetts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:xml"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog_comments.jspa?blog=384&amp;entry=104645&amp;ca=drs-bl">
    <title>developerWorks : Blogs : Bob Sutor</title>
    <dc:date>2006-01-18T16:43:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog_comments.jspa?blog=384&amp;entry=104645&amp;ca=drs-bl</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[IBM's Sutor's wishes for the upcoming year
]]></description>
<dc:subject>odf sutor opensource standards economics business-models</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:bee13c5292e5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sutor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:business-models"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://deladequacy.blogspot.com/2006/01/bloggerview-with-doug-heintzman-swg.html">
    <title>Delusions of Adequacy: Bloggerview with Doug Heintzman - SWG Strategist: Analysts - It's a Partnership of Discovery</title>
    <dc:date>2006-01-18T16:37:12+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://deladequacy.blogspot.com/2006/01/bloggerview-with-doug-heintzman-swg.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[outstanding interview w/ one of the more important IBMers; speaking of, if you get this Teressa, we need to chat about continuing the chats
]]></description>
<dc:subject>heintzman ibm odf opensource linux strategy innovatorsdilemma</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:de188ddf1a83/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:heintzman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ibm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:linux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:innovatorsdilemma"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://consortiuminfo.org/newsblog/blog.php?ID=1825">
    <title>Consortiuminfo.org Standards Blog</title>
    <dc:date>2005-12-15T23:19:43+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://consortiuminfo.org/newsblog/blog.php?ID=1825</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[you can always count on Andy to give a blow by blow account of these activities - excellent work, sir
]]></description>
<dc:subject>updegrove odf Massachusetts sutor phipps yates microsoft Open xml formats</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:493dbe446d17/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:updegrove"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:Massachusetts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sutor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:phipps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:yates"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:Open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:xml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:formats"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/dancer?entry=openoffice_org_support_in_gmail">
    <title>Erwin's StarOffice Tango</title>
    <dc:date>2005-12-08T23:12:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/dancer?entry=openoffice_org_support_in_gmail</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Erwin says that Gmail's support OpenOffice files, but while Word and Excel files give me an HTML option, thus far ODT does not - do they mean sxw pehaps?
]]></description>
<dc:subject>gmail google openoffice odf xml rendering</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:643d83f8c53f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gmail"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:openoffice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:xml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:rendering"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.line56.com/articles/default.asp?ArticleID=7126">
    <title>Line56.com: OpenDocument Tipping Point</title>
    <dc:date>2005-12-06T20:48:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.line56.com/articles/default.asp?ArticleID=7126</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Sun's Tenhumberg on ODF traction and more
]]></description>
<dc:subject>odf tenhumberg microsoft office open xml formats</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:f93c8eb59093/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:tenhumberg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:xml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:formats"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://computerworld.com.sg/ShowPage.aspx?pagetype=2&amp;articleid=3104&amp;pubid=3&amp;issueid=75">
    <title>Microsoft to open Office</title>
    <dc:date>2005-12-06T17:55:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://computerworld.com.sg/ShowPage.aspx?pagetype=2&amp;articleid=3104&amp;pubid=3&amp;issueid=75</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Computerworld, November 30th, 2005
]]></description>
<dc:subject>redmonkpress ibm sun microsoft odf</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:f569ea82f1ff/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:redmonkpress"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ibm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sun"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/index.php?p=2230">
    <title>» ODF subpar for the disabled? Not so fast says Google researcher. | Between the Lines | ZDNet.com</title>
    <dc:date>2005-12-06T04:48:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/index.php?p=2230</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[more on ODF and accessibility
]]></description>
<dc:subject>odf accessibility microsoft office open xml google ibm sun</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:5e9f85581f61/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:accessibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:xml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ibm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sun"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.msdn.com/jasonmatusow/archive/2005/12/02/499412.aspx">
    <title>Matusow's Blog : And Now, For My Next Act....</title>
    <dc:date>2005-12-02T17:51:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jasonmatusow/archive/2005/12/02/499412.aspx</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[so my intelligence was correct; Jason's taking on a new challenge. this is an interesting move for Microsoft, and has implications for the ODF/MSXML strife
]]></description>
<dc:subject>odf microsoft standards matusow office open xml</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:7605d1fbf296/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:matusow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:xml"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2005/11/26/romney_administration_reviewing_trips_made_by_technology_chief/">
    <title>Romney administration reviewing trips made by technology chief - The Boston Globe</title>
    <dc:date>2005-11-28T16:44:05+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2005/11/26/romney_administration_reviewing_trips_made_by_technology_chief/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[i know the reporter's won a couple of Pulitzers, but this seems a bit fishy to me
]]></description>
<dc:subject>quinn bostonglobe travel odf</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:72c2c12ead4e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:quinn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:bostonglobe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:travel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.consortiuminfo.org/newsblog/blog.php?ID=1771">
    <title>Consortiuminfo.org Standards Blog</title>
    <dc:date>2005-11-28T16:41:27+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.consortiuminfo.org/newsblog/blog.php?ID=1771</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Andy on the 'investigation' of MA CIO Peter Quinn's travel
]]></description>
<dc:subject>quinn Massachusetts updegrove odf politics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:3f3ca91b9759/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:quinn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:Massachusetts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:updegrove"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:politics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/windows/0,39020396,39237450,00.htm">
    <title>Microsoft's standardisation move divides experts</title>
    <dc:date>2005-11-23T07:47:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/windows/0,39020396,39237450,00.htm</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[ZDNet UK, November 22nd, 2005
]]></description>
<dc:subject>redmonkpress odf oo.o microsoft</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:d7bd8375978c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:redmonkpress"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:oo.o"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.washingtontechnology.com/news/20_23/emerging-tech/27459-1.html">
    <title>Open source gains momentum</title>
    <dc:date>2005-11-23T07:46:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.washingtontechnology.com/news/20_23/emerging-tech/27459-1.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Washington Technology, November 21st, 2005
]]></description>
<dc:subject>redmonkpress odf oo.o microsoft</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:fb7a393012e3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:redmonkpress"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:oo.o"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://consortiuminfo.org/newsblog/blog.php?ID=1762">
    <title>Consortiuminfo.org Standards Blog</title>
    <dc:date>2005-11-23T04:52:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://consortiuminfo.org/newsblog/blog.php?ID=1762</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[very informative look at the covenant agreements side by side
]]></description>
<dc:subject>microsoft sun odf office open xml formats ecma standards</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:d3d48ec8b17a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sun"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:xml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:formats"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ecma"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog_comments.jspa?blog=384&amp;entry=100456&amp;ca=drs-bl">
    <title>developerWorks : Blogs : Bob Sutor</title>
    <dc:date>2005-11-21T20:26:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog_comments.jspa?blog=384&amp;entry=100456&amp;ca=drs-bl</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[good news from Bob: Writely is now supporting ODF
]]></description>
<dc:subject>odf writely saas collaboration</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:85f5422bf246/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:writely"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:saas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:collaboration"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>