<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (sogrady)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from sogrady</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://stu.mp/2010/02/why-i-hate-the-agpl.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2010/01/html5-video-and-h-264-what-history-tells-us-and-why-were-standing-with-the-web/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.infoworld.com/print/85922"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://lessig.org/blog/2008/11/enormously_important_news_from.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.getdropbox.com/install?plat=linux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/09/17/progress-on-firefox-license-issues/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://alexking.org/blog/2008/09/10/progressive-license-10"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.lizardwrangler.com/2008/09/15/ubuntu-firefox-and-license-issues/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.illuminata.com/perspectives/?p=347"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.weiqigao.com/blog/2008/05/23/sun_wavering_on_open_sourcing_javafx.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.springsource.com/main/2008/05/27/open-source-open-strategy-the-springsource-manifesto/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://nanocr.eu/2008/03/15/rogue-developers/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.linuxworld.com/news/2008/030608-mix-novells-de-icaza-criticizes.html?page=1"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.sun.com/webmink/entry/openoffice_org_goes_to_lgplv3"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.betaversion.org/~stefano/linotype/news/137/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://robertogaloppini.net/2007/12/02/open-source-licensing-sugarcrms-original-way-to-abide-the-gpl/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.funambol.com/blog/capo/2007/11/agpl-and-future-of-open-source.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.news.com/8301-13580_3-9820397-39.html?part=rss&amp;tag=feed&amp;subj=Underexposed"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.openhandsetalliance.com/android_faq.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/09/20/three-more-things-worth-noting-about-the-gpl-case/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.linuxworld.com/community/?q=node/1407"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/09/06/simon-phipps-and-moonlight-give-me-an-excuse-to-post-a-cool-picture/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.aptana.com/legal/apl/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.netbeans.org/cddl-gplv2.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.venturecake.com/the-vmware-house-of-cards/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/?p=1283"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3:mss:12951:200707:nifbaainbjiiahpeankh"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://lawandlifesiliconvalley.blogspot.com/2007/07/general-public-license-version-3-legal.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,133619/article.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.sun.com/webmink/entry/welcome_to_gplv3"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf-maintainers/2007-06/msg00002.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/26/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-2-developers/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://robilad.livejournal.com/14460.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://stephesblog.blogs.com/my_weblog/2007/05/the_microsoft_o.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/112"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sauria.com/blog/2007/04/25/adobe-open-sources-flex/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www-03.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/pmuellr?entry=java_please_evolve&amp;ca=dat-bl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2007/04/gplv3_linux_and.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.apache.org/jcp/sunopenletter.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/WikiLicensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://milinkovich.blogspot.com/2007/04/epl-business-friendly-copyleft-license.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.madduck.net/debian/2007.04.03_zimbra-in-debian"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.covalent.net/roller/covalent/entry/20070330"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://consumerist.com/consumer/riaa/npr-vs-the-riaa-244318.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theopenforce.com/2007/02/alfresco_goes_g.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://saviorodrigues.wordpress.com/2007/02/13/fighting-analysis-paralysis/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=23034&amp;tstart=0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=23035&amp;tstart=0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://weblog.infoworld.com/openresource/archives/2007/01/open_source_lic_1.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0%2C1759%2C2084284%2C00.asp?kc=EWRSS03129TX1K0000616"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fussnotes.typepad.com/plexnex/2007/01/analyzing_the_m.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.planetmysql.org/kaj/?p=81"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://doctau.blogspot.com/2006/10/rhythmbox-re-licencing.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/200422/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.microsoft.com/interop/osp/default.mspx#EGG"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2006/May-19-2.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/webmink?entry=jdk_on_gnu_linux_something"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2006/May-11.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.thepimp.net/index.php/2006/03/04/42-php-is-developed-by-exclusively-by-20-zend-emplyees"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://weblog.rubyonrails.com/articles/2006/01/24/pick-a-license-for-your-rails-additions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/webmink?entry=gpl_v3_released"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.msdn.com/jasonmatusow/archive/2005/11/13/492285.aspx?CommentPosted=true#commentmessage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.eclipsezone.com/archives/2005/07/14/professional-open-source/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.advogato.org/person/Uraeus/diary.html?start=480"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.cocoondev.org/dims/archives/003214.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1829797,00.asp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/index.php?p=327&amp;part=rss&amp;tag=feed&amp;subj=zdblog"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/wlg/7213"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2005/05/google_maps_hac.html"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://stu.mp/2010/02/why-i-hate-the-agpl.html">
    <title>Why I hate the AGPL – stu.mp</title>
    <dc:date>2010-03-11T13:00:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://stu.mp/2010/02/why-i-hate-the-agpl.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[everyone's got an opinion on the AGPL, and none of them are in the middle, far as i can tell]]></description>
<dc:subject>agpl licensing opensource neo4j</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:83c03f62c632/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:agpl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:neo4j"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2010/01/html5-video-and-h-264-what-history-tells-us-and-why-were-standing-with-the-web/">
    <title>Christopher Blizzard · HTML5 video and H.264 – what history tells us and why we’re standing with the web</title>
    <dc:date>2010-01-29T19:42:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/2010/01/html5-video-and-h-264-what-history-tells-us-and-why-were-standing-with-the-web/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[i'm torn. i have to admit that my affection for the open web is warring with my pragmatism.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>christopherblizzard mozilla opensource firefox patents flash analysis openstandards theora h.264 h264 codec openvideo html5 web licensing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:c330870de267/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:christopherblizzard"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:mozilla"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:firefox"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:flash"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:analysis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:openstandards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:theora"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:h.264"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:h264"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:codec"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:openvideo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:html5"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.infoworld.com/print/85922">
    <title>Does GPL still matter?</title>
    <dc:date>2009-08-10T22:05:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.infoworld.com/print/85922</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[a bit one sided, because it's quite obvious that the GPL still matters, but it makes some good points. i'll look at this more later.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>gpl opensource foss licensing apache eclipse</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:1e3bca3299b1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gpl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:foss"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:apache"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:eclipse"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://lessig.org/blog/2008/11/enormously_important_news_from.html">
    <title>Enormously important news from the Free Software Foundation (Lessig Blog)</title>
    <dc:date>2008-11-04T16:26:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://lessig.org/blog/2008/11/enormously_important_news_from.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The Free Software Foundation has released the GNU Free Document License version 1.3. Section 11 of that license now (essentially) permits certain wikis to be relicensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (v3.0) license, so long as the relicensing is completed by August 1, 2009. That means, the Wikipedia community now has the choice to relicense Wikipedia under a Creative Commons license. (Here's the FAQ for the amendment.)" - interesting news indeed
]]></description>
<dc:subject>wikipedia opensource licensing licenses lessig gfdl creativecomons</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:54556b88d55b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:wikipedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licenses"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:lessig"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gfdl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:creativecomons"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.getdropbox.com/install?plat=linux">
    <title>Dropbox - Download Dropbox - Secure backup, sync and sharing made easy.</title>
    <dc:date>2008-09-29T18:10:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.getdropbox.com/install?plat=linux</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Q: I found a bug, I have a patch! A: That's awesome. You rule! Due to legal requirements, we can only accept patches verbatim into our release if you file a copyright assignment to Evenflow, Inc. Alternatively, you can release your patch into the public domain, that allows us to sidestep all legal issues. Don't worry we'll still credit you in our CONTRIBUTORS file :) This is similar to the way GNU does things."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>dropbox licensing copyright assignment</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:c188a85b89a4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:dropbox"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:assignment"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/09/17/progress-on-firefox-license-issues/">
    <title>John’s Blog » Progress on Firefox license issues</title>
    <dc:date>2008-09-17T22:40:37+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/09/17/progress-on-firefox-license-issues/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["After a bunch of work the last couple of days, I think we’re in a much better place with respect to notices & licenses for Firefox...Canonical/Ubuntu has worked with us on this a lot, and has been very helpful, as have the RedHat and Fedora teams."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>johnlilly mozilla firefox ubuntu eula licensing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:4993277bc16e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:johnlilly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:mozilla"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:firefox"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ubuntu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:eula"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://alexking.org/blog/2008/09/10/progressive-license-10">
    <title>Progressive License 1.0 | alexking.org</title>
    <dc:date>2008-09-16T18:21:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://alexking.org/blog/2008/09/10/progressive-license-10</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Alex, talking about the plugin we had the Crowd Favorite guys build. excellent.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>progressivelicense wp wordpress creativecommons plugin licensing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:b70638a9d930/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:progressivelicense"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:wp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:wordpress"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:creativecommons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:plugin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.lizardwrangler.com/2008/09/15/ubuntu-firefox-and-license-issues/">
    <title>Mitchell’s Blog » Blog Archive » Ubuntu, Firefox and License Issues</title>
    <dc:date>2008-09-15T22:57:05+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.lizardwrangler.com/2008/09/15/ubuntu-firefox-and-license-issues/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[fun w/ EULAs
]]></description>
<dc:subject>mozilla eula ubuntu firefox licensing mitchellbaker</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:c2a0af958a69/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:mozilla"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:eula"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ubuntu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:firefox"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:mitchellbaker"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.illuminata.com/perspectives/?p=347">
    <title>Illuminata Perspectives » Blog Archive » VMware and the GPL</title>
    <dc:date>2008-08-07T16:41:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.illuminata.com/perspectives/?p=347</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[had missed this the first time around, and while i'm not as entirely sure as Gordon that there's no legal gray area, the case he presents is solid
]]></description>
<dc:subject>gordonhaff vmware gpl licensing virtualization</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:c79b40bbea2d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gordonhaff"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:vmware"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gpl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:virtualization"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.weiqigao.com/blog/2008/05/23/sun_wavering_on_open_sourcing_javafx.html">
    <title>Sun Wavering On Open Sourcing JavaFX? - Weiqi Gao's Observations</title>
    <dc:date>2008-06-04T01:32:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.weiqigao.com/blog/2008/05/23/sun_wavering_on_open_sourcing_javafx.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[what's the status of this? does anyone have an update?
]]></description>
<dc:subject>javafx opensource sun ria licensing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:f7743c7602ad/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:javafx"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sun"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ria"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.springsource.com/main/2008/05/27/open-source-open-strategy-the-springsource-manifesto/">
    <title>SpringSource Team Blog » Open Source, Open Strategy: The SpringSource Manifesto</title>
    <dc:date>2008-06-01T23:18:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.springsource.com/main/2008/05/27/open-source-open-strategy-the-springsource-manifesto/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["We are not changing and will not change the license of any existing project. The Spring Portfolio will remain under the Apache License. This covers the Spring Framework, Spring Security, Spring Web Flow and the rest of the Spring Portfolio."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>spring opensource java business foss licensing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:088311315944/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:spring"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:java"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:foss"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://nanocr.eu/2008/03/15/rogue-developers/">
    <title>nanocr.eu » Blog Archive » Rogue developers</title>
    <dc:date>2008-03-16T17:58:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://nanocr.eu/2008/03/15/rogue-developers/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[looks like the Rogue folks are violating the GPL; unfortunate
]]></description>
<dc:subject>licensing gpl mac osx rogueamoeba airfoil</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:8578205f7de7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gpl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:mac"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:osx"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:rogueamoeba"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:airfoil"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.linuxworld.com/news/2008/030608-mix-novells-de-icaza-criticizes.html?page=1">
    <title>MIX - Novell's de Icaza criticizes Microsoft patent deal - LinuxWorld</title>
    <dc:date>2008-03-10T22:26:24+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.linuxworld.com/news/2008/030608-mix-novells-de-icaza-criticizes.html?page=1</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[interesting to see Miguel this outspoken on the subject. one wonders if there are wider implications.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>opensource migueldeicaza patents ip microsoft novell licensing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:859051cedd18/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:migueldeicaza"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ip"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:novell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.sun.com/webmink/entry/openoffice_org_goes_to_lgplv3">
    <title>OpenOffice.org goes to LGPLv3 [on Simon Phipps, SunMink]</title>
    <dc:date>2008-03-07T00:29:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.sun.com/webmink/entry/openoffice_org_goes_to_lgplv3</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[i still hope to see OO.o become a foundation, but in the meantime this represents progress
]]></description>
<dc:subject>webmink simonphipps oo.o foundation lgplv3 licensing opensource</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:0bc589c5b8e6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:webmink"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:simonphipps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:oo.o"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:foundation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:lgplv3"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.betaversion.org/~stefano/linotype/news/137/">
    <title>Stefano’s Linotype » Blog Archive » Why Sun bought MySQL</title>
    <dc:date>2008-01-19T00:41:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.betaversion.org/~stefano/linotype/news/137/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[an interesting perspective on the MySQL acquisition
]]></description>
<dc:subject>stefanomazzocchi mysql sun m&amp;a economics businessmodels gpl licensing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:43c3266d0424/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:stefanomazzocchi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:mysql"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sun"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:m&amp;a"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:businessmodels"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gpl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://robertogaloppini.net/2007/12/02/open-source-licensing-sugarcrms-original-way-to-abide-the-gpl/">
    <title>Open Source Licensing: SugarCRM’s original way to abide the GPL | Commercial Open Source Software</title>
    <dc:date>2007-12-05T07:03:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2007/12/02/open-source-licensing-sugarcrms-original-way-to-abide-the-gpl/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[can't wait for the debate on this one
]]></description>
<dc:subject>licensing attribution gplv3 sugarcrm badgeware opensource</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:eff4f3a0455c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:attribution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gplv3"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sugarcrm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:badgeware"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.funambol.com/blog/capo/2007/11/agpl-and-future-of-open-source.html">
    <title>Mobile Open Source :: Fabrizio Capobianco</title>
    <dc:date>2007-11-22T18:07:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.funambol.com/blog/capo/2007/11/agpl-and-future-of-open-source.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["I believe AGPL will save open source." - much as i respect Fabrizio, i don't agree with this assessment. it will be interesting, nevertheless, to see what the reaction to the refreshed license is
]]></description>
<dc:subject>fabriziocapobianco agpl gpl licensing saas</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:e3489089f4a3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:fabriziocapobianco"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:agpl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gpl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:saas"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.news.com/8301-13580_3-9820397-39.html?part=rss&amp;tag=feed&amp;subj=Underexposed">
    <title>Affero: A new GPL for software as a service | Underexposed - CNET News.com</title>
    <dc:date>2007-11-20T04:45:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.news.com/8301-13580_3-9820397-39.html?part=rss&amp;tag=feed&amp;subj=Underexposed</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[a more stringent version of the GPL which extends the definition of distribution (and thereby the reciprocal provision) to SaaS; this is Google et al's worst nightmare
]]></description>
<dc:subject>saas affero gpl distribution software opensource licensing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:d7c209134618/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:saas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:affero"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gpl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:distribution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.openhandsetalliance.com/android_faq.html">
    <title>Open Handset Alliance</title>
    <dc:date>2007-11-05T21:21:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.openhandsetalliance.com/android_faq.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Because these innovations and differentiated features can be kept proprietary, manufacturers and mobile operators are protected from the 'viral infection' problem often associated with other licenses." - the use of viral is a major faux pas. ]]></description>
<dc:subject>android viral gpl apache licensing google gphone</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:903d83eb9be9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:android"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:viral"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gpl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:apache"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gphone"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/09/20/three-more-things-worth-noting-about-the-gpl-case/">
    <title>Luis Villa’s Blog / three more things worth noting about the GPL case</title>
    <dc:date>2007-09-21T01:54:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/09/20/three-more-things-worth-noting-about-the-gpl-case/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[as always, rely on Luis for analysis on all things legal. as a bunch of us were discussing this afternoon in #redmonk, this is a big deal.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>gpl sflc luisvilla legal analysis licensing contracts trademarks</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:0b091a8dbaa7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gpl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sflc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:luisvilla"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:legal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:analysis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:contracts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:trademarks"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.linuxworld.com/community/?q=node/1407">
    <title>More translating corporate speak | LinuxWorld Community</title>
    <dc:date>2007-09-13T06:02:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.linuxworld.com/community/?q=node/1407</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["English: 'Remember Unix source licenses? We're doing that with QNX.' " - high comedy
]]></description>
<dc:subject>qnx opensource donmarti licensing via:jdub</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:027303b4f71a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:qnx"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:donmarti"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:via:jdub"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/09/06/simon-phipps-and-moonlight-give-me-an-excuse-to-post-a-cool-picture/">
    <title>Luis Villa’s Blog / Simon Phipps and Moonlight give me an excuse to post a cool picture</title>
    <dc:date>2007-09-07T18:16:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/09/06/simon-phipps-and-moonlight-give-me-an-excuse-to-post-a-cool-picture/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["License says ‘you can use it without restrictions…but the patent license says…as long as you get it from Novell.‘ If you...can live with that sort of uncertainty, go for it and use Moonlight; if you can’t, well, don’t say you weren’t warned
]]></description>
<dc:subject>copyright patents opensource licensing moonlight silverlight novell microsoft</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:bf2e9680e64c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:moonlight"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:silverlight"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:novell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.aptana.com/legal/apl/">
    <title>Aptana Public License - 1.0</title>
    <dc:date>2007-09-04T20:22:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.aptana.com/legal/apl/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[the OSI's license index site is down, but it doesn't appear that this license is OSI approved
]]></description>
<dc:subject>aptana osi license proliferation vanity epl opensource licensing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:48e8f1b1efb9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:aptana"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:osi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:license"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:proliferation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:vanity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:epl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.netbeans.org/cddl-gplv2.html">
    <title>License</title>
    <dc:date>2007-08-20T21:15:33+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.netbeans.org/cddl-gplv2.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[i thought this was still in the discussion stage, but apparently not. interesting.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>netbeans licensing opensource gpl ide cddl duallicensing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:d42b2c14941b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:netbeans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gpl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ide"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:cddl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:duallicensing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.venturecake.com/the-vmware-house-of-cards/">
    <title>VentureCake » Blog Archive » The VMware house of cards</title>
    <dc:date>2007-08-15T00:32:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.venturecake.com/the-vmware-house-of-cards/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[a rather startling - and curiously timed - attack on VMWare's ESX product
]]></description>
<dc:subject>vmware esx licensing linux via:#redmonk virtualization</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:2823b894b0a5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:vmware"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:esx"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:linux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:via:#redmonk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:virtualization"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/?p=1283">
    <title>Infrastructure and economics of online journalism at Churbuck.com</title>
    <dc:date>2007-08-05T22:24:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.churbuck.com/wordpress/?p=1283</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["I still maintain, as I did in December, that it is entirely possible to create a publishing company with zero investment in software licenses. It’s the destruction of that barrier to entry that is crushing the big publishers more than any other."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>davidchurbuck publishing economics licensing opensource contentmanagement sales management overhead</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:a87e22d7d280/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:davidchurbuck"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:contentmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sales"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:management"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:overhead"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3:mss:12951:200707:nifbaainbjiiahpeankh">
    <title>license-discuss@opensource.org: 12951: RE: Submitting GPLv3 and LGPLv3 for OSI inclusion.</title>
    <dc:date>2007-07-06T19:35:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3:mss:12951:200707:nifbaainbjiiahpeankh</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[interesting to hear that MSFT is considering OSI approval for their licenses
]]></description>
<dc:subject>microsoft billhilf ms-pl ms-cl opensource licensing osi via:#redmonk</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:2aecf115b7d3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:billhilf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ms-pl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ms-cl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:osi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:via:#redmonk"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://lawandlifesiliconvalley.blogspot.com/2007/07/general-public-license-version-3-legal.html">
    <title>Law &amp; Life: Silicon Valley: General Public License Version 3: A Legal View</title>
    <dc:date>2007-07-06T18:45:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://lawandlifesiliconvalley.blogspot.com/2007/07/general-public-license-version-3-legal.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Mark's thoughts on GPLv3
]]></description>
<dc:subject>markradcliffe dlapiper gplv3 opensource licensing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:d8401439a153/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:markradcliffe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:dlapiper"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gplv3"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,133619/article.html">
    <title>PC World - Sun CEO Mum on GPLv3, Reveals Licensing Hopes</title>
    <dc:date>2007-07-04T03:57:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,133619/article.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["One of my great fantasies in life is that the number of people with opinions on open source licenses will come roughly into balance with the number of people who have read them." - priceless
]]></description>
<dc:subject>sun jonathanschwartz licensing opensource gplv3</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:64896dc25ee5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sun"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:jonathanschwartz"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gplv3"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.sun.com/webmink/entry/welcome_to_gplv3">
    <title>Simon Phipps, SunMink: Welcome to GPLv3</title>
    <dc:date>2007-07-02T17:34:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.sun.com/webmink/entry/welcome_to_gplv3</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Simon's take on GPLv3; consistent with what i've heard from him from day one, i think
]]></description>
<dc:subject>gplv3 gpl opensource simonphipps webmink licensing patents sun</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:8126a4280085/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gplv3"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gpl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:simonphipps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:webmink"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sun"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/">
    <title>Luis Villa’s Blog / GPL v3, the Q&amp;A: part 3- companies</title>
    <dc:date>2007-06-28T19:08:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/28/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-3-companies/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[another excellent segment of Luis' continuing GPLv3 analysis
]]></description>
<dc:subject>gplv3 analysis opensource licensing sun novell microsoft luisvilla</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:869c45f9e8e7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gplv3"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:analysis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sun"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:novell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:luisvilla"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf-maintainers/2007-06/msg00002.html">
    <title>upgrading GNU packages to GPLv3</title>
    <dc:date>2007-06-27T18:01:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf-maintainers/2007-06/msg00002.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Stallman un upgrading packages to the forthcoming GPLv3
]]></description>
<dc:subject>gnu gplv3 richardstallman fsf opensource licensing gpl via:#redmonk</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:ef97728a4334/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gnu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gplv3"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:richardstallman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:fsf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gpl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:via:#redmonk"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/26/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-2-developers/">
    <title>Luis Villa’s Blog / GPL v3, the Q&amp;A: part 2- developers</title>
    <dc:date>2007-06-27T03:26:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/06/26/gpl-v3-the-qa-part-2-developers/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[part 2 in Luis' excellent GPLv3 analysis
]]></description>
<dc:subject>luisvilla gplv3 Q&amp;A analysis developers opensource licensing gpl fsf sflc patents drm</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:04f55434aab6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:luisvilla"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gplv3"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:Q&amp;A"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:analysis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:developers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gpl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:fsf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sflc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:drm"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://robilad.livejournal.com/14460.html">
    <title>robilad: QotD: FSF on Apache License 2.0 compatibility</title>
    <dc:date>2007-05-31T23:56:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://robilad.livejournal.com/14460.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[QoTD, indeed: "We are pleased to report that the Final Draft makes the Apache License, version 2.0, fully compatible with GPLv3. We are grateful to the Apache Software Foundation for working with us to achieve this long-sought goal."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>gplv3 apache compatibility fsf opensource licensing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:40e1a59e0cec/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gplv3"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:apache"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:compatibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:fsf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://stephesblog.blogs.com/my_weblog/2007/05/the_microsoft_o.html">
    <title>Once More unto the Breach: The Microsoft Open Source Patent Gambit</title>
    <dc:date>2007-05-15T16:48:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://stephesblog.blogs.com/my_weblog/2007/05/the_microsoft_o.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[brilliant response from Mr. Walli; would love to see the patent wiki idea take shape - anybody needs help with that, let us know
]]></description>
<dc:subject>stephewalli microsoft patents licensing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:ee4e1e3ec4d4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:stephewalli"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/112">
    <title>Mark Shuttleworth » Blog Archive » Trademarks redux</title>
    <dc:date>2007-05-01T15:51:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/112</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[good to see some creative thinking re: trademarks, as they are increasingly the bane of existence for many a project
]]></description>
<dc:subject>trademarks markshuttleworth ubuntu copyright patents licensing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:08786a5f16d0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:trademarks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:markshuttleworth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ubuntu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.sauria.com/blog/2007/04/25/adobe-open-sources-flex/">
    <title>Ted Leung on the Air » Blog Archive » Adobe open sources Flex</title>
    <dc:date>2007-04-26T04:44:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.sauria.com/blog/2007/04/25/adobe-open-sources-flex/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Ted's educated opinion on what is without question significant news from the Adobe gang; Flex is open source
]]></description>
<dc:subject>flex opensource adobe mpl licensing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:90e0a0543b3d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:flex"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:adobe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:mpl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www-03.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/pmuellr?entry=java_please_evolve&amp;ca=dat-bl">
    <title>IBM developerWorks : Blogs : Patrick Mueller</title>
    <dc:date>2007-04-25T14:46:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www-03.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/pmuellr?entry=java_please_evolve&amp;ca=dat-bl</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[pmueller is frustrated with the state and pace of innovation in the Java world
]]></description>
<dc:subject>java .net patrickmueller innovation licensing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:80b6f9ced6e5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:java"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:.net"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:patrickmueller"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:innovation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2007/04/gplv3_linux_and.html">
    <title>O'Reilly Radar &gt; GPLv3, Linux and GPLv2 Compatibility</title>
    <dc:date>2007-04-13T21:53:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2007/04/gplv3_linux_and.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[had a good debate about this in #redmonk today; while many of the regulars were far more sanguine about the potential for problems than Allison, i'm not sure where i stand
]]></description>
<dc:subject>gplv3 gpl linux gplv2 licensing opensource compatibility</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:5f0b808ee2c4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gplv3"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gpl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:linux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gplv2"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:compatibility"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.apache.org/jcp/sunopenletter.html">
    <title>Open Letter to Sun Microsystems - JCK - The Apache Software Foundation</title>
    <dc:date>2007-04-11T01:20:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.apache.org/jcp/sunopenletter.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[here's the letter; already wrote this up, so see the blog for comments
]]></description>
<dc:subject>openletter apache sun opensource jck legal licensing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:a861541499d3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:openletter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:apache"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sun"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:jck"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:legal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/WikiLicensing">
    <title>WikiLicensing - Ubuntu Wiki</title>
    <dc:date>2007-04-10T02:59:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://wiki.ubuntu.com/WikiLicensing</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[the Ubuntu folks are looking to relicense their wiki content under a CC license: as an infrequent contributor, i'm all for it - sounds like a great idea
]]></description>
<dc:subject>ubuntu wiki licensing creativecommons relicensing documentation</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:d960fcfe75d4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ubuntu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:wiki"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:creativecommons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:relicensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:documentation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://milinkovich.blogspot.com/2007/04/epl-business-friendly-copyleft-license.html">
    <title>Life at Eclipse: EPL: The Business-Friendly Copyleft License</title>
    <dc:date>2007-04-05T17:54:27+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://milinkovich.blogspot.com/2007/04/epl-business-friendly-copyleft-license.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Mike's thoughts on EPL vs GPL, and a response to Matt Asay
]]></description>
<dc:subject>mattasay mikemilinkovich gpl epl opensource licensing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:3356a36811c5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:mattasay"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:mikemilinkovich"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gpl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:epl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.madduck.net/debian/2007.04.03_zimbra-in-debian">
    <title>madduck's droppings : /debian/2007.04.03_zimbra-in-debian</title>
    <dc:date>2007-04-03T18:52:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.madduck.net/debian/2007.04.03_zimbra-in-debian</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Please, someone package it alright, if the licence is DFSG-compatible (I have not checked). If it's not, I think we should coerce the developers into making it such. After all, we're Debian." ;)
]]></description>
<dc:subject>zimbra debian opensource licensing mpl gpl dfsg</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:f2a1696ba2ff/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:zimbra"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:debian"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:mpl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gpl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:dfsg"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.covalent.net/roller/covalent/entry/20070330">
    <title>Covalent Technologies</title>
    <dc:date>2007-04-02T21:22:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.covalent.net/roller/covalent/entry/20070330</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[bunch of folks - including some of the #redmonk guys - are upset about the dropped goal of Apache compatibility
]]></description>
<dc:subject>gplv3 apache compatibility licensing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:e208fd593371/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gplv3"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:apache"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:compatibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://consumerist.com/consumer/riaa/npr-vs-the-riaa-244318.php">
    <title>NPR vs The RIAA - Consumerist</title>
    <dc:date>2007-03-19T01:48:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://consumerist.com/consumer/riaa/npr-vs-the-riaa-244318.php</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<sigh> - the RIAA seems determined to be dragged kicking and screaming out the door; good on NPR for fighting the good fight here
]]></description>
<dc:subject>npr riaa streaming licensing royalties</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:caa6a5336e86/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:npr"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:riaa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:streaming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:royalties"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.theopenforce.com/2007/02/alfresco_goes_g.html">
    <title>TheOpenForce.com: Alfresco Goes GPL</title>
    <dc:date>2007-02-23T17:52:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.theopenforce.com/2007/02/alfresco_goes_g.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Zack sums up the news
]]></description>
<dc:subject>alfresco opensource licensing gpl</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:b47f09337f98/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:alfresco"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gpl"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://saviorodrigues.wordpress.com/2007/02/13/fighting-analysis-paralysis/">
    <title>Fighting Analysis Paralysis with Open Source? « rand($thoughts);</title>
    <dc:date>2007-02-19T02:03:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://saviorodrigues.wordpress.com/2007/02/13/fighting-analysis-paralysis/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[analysis from Savio of the actual Linux kernel licensing
]]></description>
<dc:subject>linux kernel licensing torvalds gpl gplv2 gplv3</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:68a888b89d91/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:linux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:kernel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:torvalds"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gpl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gplv2"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gplv3"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=23034&amp;tstart=0">
    <title>OpenSolaris Forums: GPLv3? ...</title>
    <dc:date>2007-02-01T00:50:38+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=23034&amp;tstart=0</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[thread 1 on OpenSolaris & GPLv3
]]></description>
<dc:subject>gplv3 opensolaris cddl licensing opensource community</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:8e7676a73a96/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gplv3"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensolaris"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:cddl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:community"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=23035&amp;tstart=0">
    <title>OpenSolaris Forums: [Fwd: Re: GPLv3?] ...</title>
    <dc:date>2007-02-01T00:50:38+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=23035&amp;tstart=0</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[thread 2 on OpenSolaris & the GPL; some legitimate questions being asked, but a whole lot of unnecessary anti-GPL rhetoric, IMO
]]></description>
<dc:subject>gplv3 opensolaris cddl licensing opensource community</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:475fee9b415c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gplv3"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensolaris"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:cddl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:community"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://weblog.infoworld.com/openresource/archives/2007/01/open_source_lic_1.html">
    <title>Open Sources | InfoWorld | Open Source Licensing: An enigma wrapped in a mystery, wrapped in legal fees | January 30, 2007 10:13 PM | By Dave Rosenberg</title>
    <dc:date>2007-01-31T16:51:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://weblog.infoworld.com/openresource/archives/2007/01/open_source_lic_1.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[great response from Dave to the attribution "crisis"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:Dalibor via:#redmonk rosenberg mulesource mule bsd mpl attribution licensing gpl</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:bda4e9a133a7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:via:Dalibor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:via:#redmonk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:rosenberg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:mulesource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:mule"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:bsd"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:mpl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:attribution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gpl"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0%2C1759%2C2084284%2C00.asp?kc=EWRSS03129TX1K0000616">
    <title>Sun to License OpenSolaris Under GPLv3</title>
    <dc:date>2007-01-17T05:37:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.eweek.com/article2/0%2C1759%2C2084284%2C00.asp?kc=EWRSS03129TX1K0000616</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Take the GNU Userland, which is an interesting piece of technology that Sun is looking at closely, and we may do something similar with, say, a container flavor," he said. - no secret, i'm a big fan of this approach
]]></description>
<dc:subject>gnuuserland kernel solaris gplv3 cddl licensing opensource</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:09ebf3f44854/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gnuuserland"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:kernel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:solaris"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gplv3"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:cddl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fussnotes.typepad.com/plexnex/2007/01/analyzing_the_m.html">
    <title>PlexNex: Analyzing the Microsoft Office Open XML License</title>
    <dc:date>2007-01-12T23:34:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://fussnotes.typepad.com/plexnex/2007/01/analyzing_the_m.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[be interested for the 'Softies answers to some of the questions raised here; as Sam says, a dialogue would be great
]]></description>
<dc:subject>microsoft ooxml odf licensing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:eb3ad1e32a77/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ooxml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:odf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.planetmysql.org/kaj/?p=81">
    <title>Kaj Arnö’s blog » Blog Archive » MySQL refines its GPL licensing scheme under MySQL 5.0 and MySQL 5.1</title>
    <dc:date>2007-01-04T19:26:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.planetmysql.org/kaj/?p=81</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["MySQL has today refined its licensing scheme from “GPLv2 or later” to “GPLv2 only“, in order to make it an option, not an obligation for the company to move to GPLv3." - interesting decision, made possible by the dual license model
]]></description>
<dc:subject>gpl gplv2 gplv3 mysql licensing opensource dual</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:349e55cc2978/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gpl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gplv2"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gplv3"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:mysql"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:dual"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://doctau.blogspot.com/2006/10/rhythmbox-re-licencing.html">
    <title>Doc's Playground: Rhythmbox re-licencing</title>
    <dc:date>2006-10-30T07:35:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://doctau.blogspot.com/2006/10/rhythmbox-re-licencing.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[this is why a lot of projects require JCA's
]]></description>
<dc:subject>copyright jca assignment licensing governance</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:695505663db3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:jca"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:assignment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:governance"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/200422/">
    <title>LWN: Kernel developers' position on GPLv3</title>
    <dc:date>2006-09-22T23:15:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/200422/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[the aforementioned Kernel developers' position piece on GPLv3
]]></description>
<dc:subject>gplv3 licensing gpl linux opensource freedom kernel f/oss fsf</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:4fa4e939f514/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gplv3"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gpl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:linux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:freedom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:kernel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:f/oss"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:fsf"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.microsoft.com/interop/osp/default.mspx#EGG">
    <title>Microsoft Open Specification Promise</title>
    <dc:date>2006-09-20T20:30:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.microsoft.com/interop/osp/default.mspx#EGG</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[there are some useful questions to be asked here -  as Sam's indicated - but i'm with most of the other commenters in saying that this is a Good. Thing.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>microsoft via:Jason standards Open Specification promise covenant legal licensing opensource</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:98dc2bde896f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:via:Jason"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:Open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:Specification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:promise"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:covenant"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:legal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2006/May-19-2.html">
    <title>Open Source Java, Part 3 - Miguel de Icaza</title>
    <dc:date>2006-05-19T21:25:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2006/May-19-2.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[very interesting and thoughtful piece from Miguel on open sourcing Java; check out especially his commentary on OO.o and Solaris - as well as the comparions in the last sentence
]]></description>
<dc:subject>deicaza sun opensource java mono f/oss dlj licensing solaris oo.o</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:40fbfda5c3d5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:deicaza"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sun"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:java"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:mono"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:f/oss"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:dlj"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:solaris"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:oo.o"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/webmink?entry=jdk_on_gnu_linux_something">
    <title>SunMink : SunMink</title>
    <dc:date>2006-05-16T17:03:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/webmink?entry=jdk_on_gnu_linux_something</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[it will be interesting to see what impact this has on demand for open sourcing Java; this was my major problem with it
]]></description>
<dc:subject>java debian ubuntu gentoo opensource licensing barriers-to-entry</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:e85c5eb5b88e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:java"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:debian"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ubuntu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gentoo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:barriers-to-entry"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2006/May-11.html">
    <title>Mono on ArsTechnica - Miguel de Icaza</title>
    <dc:date>2006-05-12T06:07:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2006/May-11.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[i'm not sure i buy that this is the explanation, but i can say that i've made that connection to Sun folks before - just as i have with PHP and other languages
]]></description>
<dc:subject>php sun java licensing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:eb18d7994c8e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sun"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:java"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.thepimp.net/index.php/2006/03/04/42-php-is-developed-by-exclusively-by-20-zend-emplyees">
    <title>PHP developed exclusively by 20 Zend employees - The Pimp</title>
    <dc:date>2006-03-08T07:48:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.thepimp.net/index.php/2006/03/04/42-php-is-developed-by-exclusively-by-20-zend-emplyees</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[some debate over who's responsible for PHP - timely comments from Andi; also check out the Update
]]></description>
<dc:subject>php zend opensource bsd gutmans credit licensing ownership</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:52112e35adf3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:zend"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:bsd"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gutmans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:credit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ownership"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://weblog.rubyonrails.com/articles/2006/01/24/pick-a-license-for-your-rails-additions">
    <title>Pick a license for your Rails additions</title>
    <dc:date>2006-03-06T16:17:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://weblog.rubyonrails.com/articles/2006/01/24/pick-a-license-for-your-rails-additions</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[some interesting thoughts on license choices as debated by Ruby on Rails advocates
]]></description>
<dc:subject>ruby rubyonrails licensing opensources licenses bsd mit gpl</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:7bcbb1544582/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ruby"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:rubyonrails"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensources"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licenses"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:bsd"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:mit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gpl"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/webmink?entry=gpl_v3_released">
    <title>SunMink : SunMink</title>
    <dc:date>2006-01-17T17:33:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/webmink?entry=gpl_v3_released</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Simon and Danese's notes from the GPL v3 conference (which i was regrettably unable to attend)
]]></description>
<dc:subject>gpl phipps opensource licensing gpl-3.0</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:cec40ee08070/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gpl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:phipps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gpl-3.0"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.msdn.com/jasonmatusow/archive/2005/11/13/492285.aspx?CommentPosted=true#commentmessage">
    <title>Matusow's Blog : Dynamic...Static...hmmm</title>
    <dc:date>2005-11-14T02:31:22+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.msdn.com/jasonmatusow/archive/2005/11/13/492285.aspx?CommentPosted=true#commentmessage</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Jason weighs in on Ian's Debian/Nexenta GPL/CDDL post
]]></description>
<dc:subject>murdock matusow dynamic static debian nexenta fsf moglen gpl cddl opensource licensing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:f7b57f2ed145/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:murdock"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:matusow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:dynamic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:static"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:debian"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:nexenta"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:fsf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:moglen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gpl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:cddl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.eclipsezone.com/archives/2005/07/14/professional-open-source/">
    <title>EclipseZone ‽ Professional Open Source</title>
    <dc:date>2005-07-18T17:51:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.eclipsezone.com/archives/2005/07/14/professional-open-source/</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[a sympathetic look at some of Fleury's most recent comments
]]></description>
<dc:subject>foss gpl licensing eclipse fleury</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:80b6a249490e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:foss"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gpl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:eclipse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:fleury"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.advogato.org/person/Uraeus/diary.html?start=480">
    <title>Diary for Uraeus</title>
    <dc:date>2005-07-05T17:30:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/Uraeus/diary.html?start=480</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Google having licensing issues?
]]></description>
<dc:subject>licensing google mplayer xine</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:fb0ddc046f04/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:mplayer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:xine"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.cocoondev.org/dims/archives/003214.html">
    <title>Davanum Srinivas' weblog: Patent problems implementing WS-Security</title>
    <dc:date>2005-06-23T15:44:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.cocoondev.org/dims/archives/003214.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[is WS-Security "open?"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>ws-security licensing ibm microsoft ip ws-*</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:0f245f54a568/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ws-security"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ibm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ip"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ws-*"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1829797,00.asp">
    <title>Microsoft Puts Roadblock in Front of Open-Sourcing Avalon and Indigo</title>
    <dc:date>2005-06-22T23:43:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1829797,00.asp</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[more on the Mono / Avalon/Indigo situation
]]></description>
<dc:subject>vaughan-nichols Avalon indigo mono microsoft ip licensing novell</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:67d150b5d561/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:vaughan-nichols"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:Avalon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:indigo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:mono"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ip"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:novell"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/index.php?p=327&amp;part=rss&amp;tag=feed&amp;subj=zdblog">
    <title>Linus on Licensing | Open Source | ZDNet.com</title>
    <dc:date>2005-06-10T15:51:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/index.php?p=327&amp;part=rss&amp;tag=feed&amp;subj=zdblog</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Linus' take on GPL vs BSD; very rational
]]></description>
<dc:subject>bsd gpl torvalds licensing ope opensource</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:928dea4ba81e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:bsd"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:gpl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:torvalds"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:ope"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/wlg/7213">
    <title>The EnterpriseDB pitch: Pay $0 For Oracle</title>
    <dc:date>2005-06-09T20:21:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/wlg/7213</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Sequeira on the EnterpriseDB pitch; if EnterpriseDB runs across this, give me a call, i'd like to catch up
]]></description>
<dc:subject>sequeira enterprisedb oracle databases licensing opensource</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:3a3d084c1e48/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:sequeira"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:enterprisedb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:oracle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:databases"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:opensource"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2005/05/google_maps_hac.html">
    <title>O'Reilly Radar &gt; Google Maps Hacks at the Factory Tour</title>
    <dc:date>2005-05-23T22:10:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2005/05/google_maps_hac.html</link>
    <dc:creator>sogrady</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[be good for Google if they can work out some sort of official API
]]></description>
<dc:subject>google Maps api licensing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/b:9dcb3ce76231/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:Maps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:api"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:sogrady/t:licensing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>