<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (shusta)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from shusta</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fluff.info/blog/arch/00000213.htm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/03/why-patent-lawyers-are-clueless-about-the-software-industry/254963/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.leancrew.com/all-this/2011/06/the-patent-balance/"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://fluff.info/blog/arch/00000213.htm">
    <title>GPL v3, Microsoft, Patents, and bloat</title>
    <dc:date>2016-04-18T20:05:41+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://fluff.info/blog/arch/00000213.htm</link>
    <dc:creator>shusta</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[“Version 2 of the GPL has won every legal challenge it faced. It is immensely popular--partly because a programmer anywhere in the world, with no legal background and a modest command of English, can read it in its entirety and understand its intent. The same goes for any judge. That is, it was elegant and worked well thanks to that elegance. Version 3 follows the unfortunate path of many computer projects past: given a product so good that the users don't need anything further, the producers wonder how they can get out a new product, and so add more and more little details until the elegance is drowned. In short, GPL v 3 is bloatware, that provides little or no benefit over the elegant and effective version 2. ”]]></description>
<dc:subject>software patents open-source</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/b:55fadd62bd56/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/t:open-source"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/03/why-patent-lawyers-are-clueless-about-the-software-industry/254963/">
    <title>Why Patent Lawyers Are Clueless About the Software Industry - Megan McArdle - Business - The Atlantic</title>
    <dc:date>2012-04-17T17:33:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/03/why-patent-lawyers-are-clueless-about-the-software-industry/254963/</link>
    <dc:creator>shusta</dc:creator><dc:subject>patents</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/b:d7b9124062bb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/t:patents"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.leancrew.com/all-this/2011/06/the-patent-balance/">
    <title>The patent balance - All this</title>
    <dc:date>2011-06-02T16:39:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.leancrew.com/all-this/2011/06/the-patent-balance/</link>
    <dc:creator>shusta</dc:creator><dc:subject>law patents</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/b:32f35f853af0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/t:patents"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>