<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (shusta)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from shusta</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://medium.com/the-nib/sex-positive-d351b9f484a8"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://letterstomycountry.tumblr.com/post/48419941177/some-brief-legal-commentary-on-the-decision-not-to"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.volokh.com/2013/04/20/tsarnaev-and-miranda-rights/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/mar/28/supreme-court-problem-anti-gay-bigotry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scotusblog.com/2012/07/were-getting-wildly-differing-assessments"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/books/2012/03/12/120312crbo_books_lithwick?currentPage=all"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.leancrew.com/all-this/2011/06/the-patent-balance/"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://medium.com/the-nib/sex-positive-d351b9f484a8">
    <title>Sex Positive</title>
    <dc:date>2015-02-25T17:15:37+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://medium.com/the-nib/sex-positive-d351b9f484a8</link>
    <dc:creator>shusta</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The science and ethics of hiv disclosure.]]></description>
<dc:subject>medicine hiv lgbt law legal</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/b:41b9cdfe244e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/t:medicine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/t:hiv"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/t:lgbt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/t:legal"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://letterstomycountry.tumblr.com/post/48419941177/some-brief-legal-commentary-on-the-decision-not-to">
    <title>Letters To My Country - Some Brief Legal Commentary On The Decision Not To Mirandize The Surviving Marathon Bombing Suspect</title>
    <dc:date>2013-04-20T15:55:24+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://letterstomycountry.tumblr.com/post/48419941177/some-brief-legal-commentary-on-the-decision-not-to</link>
    <dc:creator>shusta</dc:creator><dc:subject>legal law government politics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/b:6ee54311a3a8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/t:legal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/t:government"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/t:politics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.volokh.com/2013/04/20/tsarnaev-and-miranda-rights/">
    <title>The Volokh Conspiracy » Tsarnaev and Miranda Rights</title>
    <dc:date>2013-04-20T15:55:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.volokh.com/2013/04/20/tsarnaev-and-miranda-rights/</link>
    <dc:creator>shusta</dc:creator><dc:subject>legal law government politics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/b:362b5df97061/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/t:legal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/t:government"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/t:politics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/mar/28/supreme-court-problem-anti-gay-bigotry">
    <title>The supreme court's problem: how to back America out of anti-gay bigotry</title>
    <dc:date>2013-04-15T21:02:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/mar/28/supreme-court-problem-anti-gay-bigotry</link>
    <dc:creator>shusta</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[“Protect Marriage Maine scrubbed its site of that statement fairly quickly. In general, defenders of "traditional marriage" have learned to couch their arguments with increasing circumspection when it comes to outright judgments of morality. This has led, ironically, to a crude emphasis on the corporal: the central, almost only, basis for defending Proposition 8 lay in heterosexual couples being baby-makers – or, in the words of lawyer for the defense Charles Cooper:

"The state's interest and society's interest in what we have framed as responsible procreation is – is vital, but at bottom, with respect to those interests, our submission is that same-sex couples and opposite-sex couples are simply not similarly situated."

Let it be known for evermore that it was the defenders of traditional values that forced the highest court in the land to ponder just how it is that "with respect to procreation" – "at bottom", no less – same-sex and opposite-sex couples are "not similarly situated". Do I need to draw you a map?”]]></description>
<dc:subject>sexuality politics lgbt scotus legal law</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://instapaper.com/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/b:b5cc0ae815e2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/t:sexuality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/t:lgbt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/t:scotus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/t:legal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/t:law"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.scotusblog.com/2012/07/were-getting-wildly-differing-assessments">
    <title>SCOTUSblog's postmortem on the ACA verdict mess</title>
    <dc:date>2012-07-09T16:01:24+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.scotusblog.com/2012/07/were-getting-wildly-differing-assessments</link>
    <dc:creator>shusta</dc:creator><dc:subject>politics healthcare scotus law</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://instapaper.com/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/b:0102c8776f13/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/t:healthcare"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/t:scotus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/t:law"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/books/2012/03/12/120312crbo_books_lithwick?currentPage=all">
    <title>Lawrence v Texas: How Laws Against Sodomy Became Unconstitutional :</title>
    <dc:date>2012-03-21T19:03:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/books/2012/03/12/120312crbo_books_lithwick?currentPage=all</link>
    <dc:creator>shusta</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[“That’s the punch line: the case that affirmed the right of gay couples to have consensual sex in private spaces seems to have involved two men who were neither a couple nor having sex. In order to appeal to the conservative Justices on the high court, the story of a booze-soaked quarrel was repackaged as a love story. Nobody had to know that the gay-rights case of the century was actually about three or four men getting drunk in front of a television in a Harris County apartment decorated with bad James Dean erotica.”]]></description>
<dc:subject>lgbt sexuality legal law scotus</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://instapaper.com/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/b:15b509908744/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/t:lgbt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/t:sexuality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/t:legal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/t:scotus"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.leancrew.com/all-this/2011/06/the-patent-balance/">
    <title>The patent balance - All this</title>
    <dc:date>2011-06-02T16:39:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.leancrew.com/all-this/2011/06/the-patent-balance/</link>
    <dc:creator>shusta</dc:creator><dc:subject>law patents</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/b:32f35f853af0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:shusta/t:patents"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>