<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (rybesh)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from rybesh</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://lu.is/2026/03/on-monsters-and-men/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://3d.laboratorium.net/2025-01-02-a-quarter-century"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.patreon.com/posts/78074244"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://op.europa.eu/en/web/eu-vocabularies/eli"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://lu.is/blog/2023/05/31/the-brief-guide-to-mscd-5/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.akomantoso.org/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.law.cornell.edu/topn/0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/playing-by-the-rules-9780198258315?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;#"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://james.grimmelmann.net/files/articles/platform-message.pdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://auskadi.com/files/nix1.pdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/TR/publishing-linking/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aclweb.org/anthology-new/P/P12/P12-1078.pdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-874/paper7.pdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2134553"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://law.gsu.edu/plombardo/Great%20Cases/Legal%20Archaeology.pdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1026&amp;context=mireille_hildebrandt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1917950"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=709121"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ecommons.library.cornell.edu/handle/1813/14142"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thepublicindex.org/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://whimsley.typepad.com/whimsley/2009/01/lawrence-lessigs-remix-a-rambling-review.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://laboratorium.net/archive/2008/11/08/principles_and_recommendations_for_the_google_book#summary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/21630"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.oldbaileyonline.org/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=15370150"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.homelandsecurity.org/newjournal/Commentary/displayCommentary2.asp?commentary=21"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://madisonian.net/archives/2007/11/24/conditions-for-the-digital-library-of-alexandria/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ci.berkeley.ca.us/environmentalhealth/noise.htm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.macworld.com/news/2007/03/06/franceban/index.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.law.berkeley.edu/clinics/samuelson/faculty_lerner.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.law.duke.edu/cspd/comics/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.law.duke.edu/boylesite/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.law.berkeley.edu/institutes/bclt/events/unblinking/unblink.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.boingboing.net/2006/04/28/dirty_snitches_earn_.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.centerforsocialmedia.org/fairuse.htm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/conferences/cultural/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hiit.fi/u/hietanen/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/james-love/a-unwipo-plan-to-regulat_b_11480.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.eff.org/IP/WIPO/broadcasting_treaty/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/etel/2006/01/13/the-problem-with-webcasting.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0674012046/webservices-20?dev-t=D151B5UYK93CM2%26camp=2025%26link_code=xm2"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0804729603/webservices-20?dev-t=D151B5UYK93CM2%26camp=2025%26link_code=xm2"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1573928895/webservices-20?dev-t=D151B5UYK93CM2%26camp=2025%26link_code=xm2"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0814788076/webservices-20?dev-t=D151B5UYK93CM2%26camp=2025%26link_code=xm2"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://lu.is/2026/03/on-monsters-and-men/">
    <title>Of Monsters, Men, and Lawyers - lu.is</title>
    <dc:date>2026-03-05T02:32:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://lu.is/2026/03/on-monsters-and-men/</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Programmers can be very bad about (1) because we tend to underestimate how much LLM-based coding tools have had massive investment in what are coming to be called “harnesses”: complex combinations of tooling+prompting+context that wrap the generalist LLM in a tight cocoon of specific knowledge about coding and codebases. So programmers tend to say “LLMs are great at coding” when what they really mean is “LLMs plus extremely extensive harnesses are great at coding”. This is an extremely important difference, and one that misleads non-programmers (and again, many programmers) into thinking that “LLMs” will be great at other fields without the big investment in harnesses.
Programmers are also bad about (1) because the biggest pot of money in the long history “sell pickaxes to miners” is at stake, so when I say “big investment” I mean literally hundreds of billions of dollars. Not yet so much in lawyer harnesses. Both developers and lawyers having this discussion need to remember that.
Lawyers cannot rest on our laurels. Our pot of money is still pretty big, so there will be broad and deep legal harnesses, most likely sooner rather than later. Those harnesses will have carefully crafted instructions and context, and will absolutely crush general-purpose tools + naive lawyer-drafted instructions. We’re not there yet, and I’m pretty skeptical that the existing duopoly will be the ones to produce those harnesses. (Harvey and Clio are of course both frantically trying to do this, but I haven’t been able to test them much yet.) But it absolutely will come, and thanks to aggregation theory, it is going to come for your niche no matter how niche you think it is.]]></description>
<dc:subject>agent harness law</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:72b1c511a95c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:agent"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:harness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://3d.laboratorium.net/2025-01-02-a-quarter-century">
    <title>A Quarter Century of Statutory Interpretation | The Laboratorium (3d ser.)</title>
    <dc:date>2025-01-15T15:00:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://3d.laboratorium.net/2025-01-02-a-quarter-century</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[By my reckoning, the FCC has treated broadband Internet as an information service, then a telecommunications service, then an information service again, then a telecommunications service again, and is now poised to treat it as an information service for a third time. At various times, federal appellate courts have held that the Telecommunications Act can be read to treat broadband Internet as a telecommunications service, must be read to treat broadband Internet as an telecommunications service, can be read to treat broadband Internet as an information service, and must be read to treat broadband Internet as an information service.

Is this any way to run an information superhighway?]]></description>
<dc:subject>telecom law policy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:c62895d7b4db/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:telecom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:policy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.patreon.com/posts/78074244">
    <title>Time to preserve those floppy disks! | Patreon</title>
    <dc:date>2023-09-08T15:27:27+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.patreon.com/posts/78074244</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Here's a story that has been a long time in the making.  In fact, I started writing this post at the beginning of the year, and then there were added details and parts so we held off until we had a complete story.

I should note before we get carried away with this story that the museum played but a small role in a big overarching case and picture. Since we weren't really a part of the rest of the investigation, this post will focus on the technical details of the part we were involved in, so please keep that in mind. Some of them are still popping up online, and I'll try to edit and link out to relevant stories when I can.]]></description>
<dc:subject>law digital preservation</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:ee98b022d45b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:digital"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:preservation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://op.europa.eu/en/web/eu-vocabularies/eli">
    <title>ELI - EU Vocabularies - Publications Office of the EU</title>
    <dc:date>2023-08-17T14:04:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://op.europa.eu/en/web/eu-vocabularies/eli</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The European Legislation Identifier (ELI) is a framework to make legislation metadata available online in a standardised format, so that it can be accessed, exchanged and reused across borders.]]></description>
<dc:subject>law vocabulary ontology</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:e1be579e7e4c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:vocabulary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:ontology"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://lu.is/blog/2023/05/31/the-brief-guide-to-mscd-5/">
    <title>The brief guide to MSCD 5 – Luis Villa: Open Tech and Policy</title>
    <dc:date>2023-06-06T23:27:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://lu.is/blog/2023/05/31/the-brief-guide-to-mscd-5/</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[My primary goal when trying to improve a contract’s drafting is not “plain english”. The goal is simplicity, clarity, and consistency, because complexity is a source of errors. As a pleasant side-effect, contracts drafted with rigorous attention to consistency and clarity are generally shorter, and almost always much easier to read.

Ken Adam’s Manual of Style for Contract Drafting has helped me immeasurably in reaching that primary goal, both by teaching me habits of mind and by being a reference for better linguistic structures.

But it’s also hefty.

So I prepared this mini-guide to MSCD for an outside counsel: it’s what I recommend first-timers read, skim, and skip. I share it here in hopes it may be useful for others.]]></description>
<dc:subject>contracts language law</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:9f0d9afaf32f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:contracts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.akomantoso.org/">
    <title>Akoma Ntoso | Akoma Ntoso Site</title>
    <dc:date>2022-12-06T21:09:24+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.akomantoso.org/</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Akoma Ntoso (“linked hearts” in the Akan language of West Africa) defines a set of simple technology-neutral electronic representations in XML format of parliamentary, legislative and judiciary documents.

The XML schemas of Akoma Ntoso make explicit the structure and semantic components of the digital documents so as to support the creation of high value information services that deliver the power of ICTs and increase efficiency and accountability in parliamentary, legislative and judiciary contexts.]]></description>
<dc:subject>law xml opengov standards</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:339020b3ef3d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:xml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:opengov"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:standards"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.law.cornell.edu/topn/0">
    <title>TOPN: Table of Popular Names | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute</title>
    <dc:date>2022-12-06T20:41:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.law.cornell.edu/topn/0</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Our Table of Popular Names is organized alphabetically by popular name. You'll find three types of link associated with each popular name (though each law may not have all three types). One, a reference to a Public Law number, is a link to the bill as it was originally passed by Congress, and will take you to the LRC THOMAS legislative system, or GPO FDSYS site. So-called "Short Title" links, and links to particular sections of the Code, will lead you to a textual roadmap (the section notes) describing how the particular law was incorporated into the Code. Finally, acts may be referred to by a different name, or may have been renamed, the links will take you to the appropriate listing in the table.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>law information naming authority inls201</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:0edaacff7c70/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:information"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:naming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:inls201"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/playing-by-the-rules-9780198258315?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;#">
    <title>Playing by the Rules - Frederick Schauer - Oxford University Press</title>
    <dc:date>2020-07-11T19:35:37+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://global.oup.com/academic/product/playing-by-the-rules-9780198258315?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;#</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Rules are a central component of such diverse enterprises as law, morality, language, games, religion, etiquette, and family governance, but there is often confusion about what a rule is, and what rules do. Offering a comprehensive philosophical analysis of these questions, this book challenges much of the existing legal, jurisprudential, and philosophical literature, by seeing a significant role for rules, an equally significant role for their stricter operation, and making the case for rules as devices for the allocation of power among decision-makers.]]></description>
<dc:subject>book rules law philosophy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:745428fb6f77/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:book"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:rules"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:philosophy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://james.grimmelmann.net/files/articles/platform-message.pdf">
    <title>The Platform is the Message</title>
    <dc:date>2018-03-04T00:58:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://james.grimmelmann.net/files/articles/platform-message.pdf</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Facebook and YouTube have promised to take down Tide Pod Challenge videos. Eas- ier said than done. For one thing, on the Internet, the line between advocacy and parody is undefined. Every meme, gif, and video is a bit of both. For another, these platforms are structurally at war with themselves. The same characteristics that make outrageous and offensive content unacceptable are what make it go viral in the first place.
The arc of the Tide Pod Challenge from The Onion to Not The Onion is a mi- crocosm of our modern mediascape. It illustrates how ideas spread and mutate, how they take over platforms and jump between them, and how they resist attempts to stamp them out. It shows why responsible content moderation is necessary, and why respon- sible content moderation is impossibly hard. And it opens a window on the disturbing demand-driven dynamics of the Internet today, where any desire no matter how perverse or inarticulate can be catered to by the invisible hand of an algorithmic media ecosystem that has no conscious idea what it is doing. Tide Pods are just the tip of the iceberg.]]></description>
<dc:subject>inls201 economics law categorization policy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:f4c8f546e777/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:inls201"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:categorization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:policy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://auskadi.com/files/nix1.pdf">
    <title>an alternative history of *nix</title>
    <dc:date>2014-10-20T13:41:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://auskadi.com/files/nix1.pdf</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[There is a popular story about the birth of *nix 5 and it is tied deeply to some ideas of law and of America. What I want to do in here is start to tell the story of the birth of *nix and its subsequent history, but in so doing address the way in which the popular story has dealt with it.]]></description>
<dc:subject>unix history politics law</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:a78c38bfacc8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:unix"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/TR/publishing-linking/">
    <title>Publishing and Linking on the Web</title>
    <dc:date>2013-04-30T16:26:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.w3.org/TR/publishing-linking/</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This document is intended to inform future social and legal discussions about the architecture of the Web: the ways in which the Web's technical facilities operate to store, publish and retrieve information, and by providing definitions for terminology as used within the Web's technical community. Specifically, this document has the following goals:

Clarify that linking - providing the location of some content - is different in intention from including - embedding content developed elsewhere within your own - and should be treated differently by the law.
Intermediaries, such as proxies and caches, and more controversially, search engines and agggregators that merely refer to or collect content developed elsewhere, should be treated differently than websites that create orginal content.
In many cases, websites put legal restrictions on how the material they make available may be linked or reused. Such restrictions can be better enforced by using mechanisms provided by the web rather than by legal terms of use.]]></description>
<dc:subject>web linking policy publishing law * inls620</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:92faa0ca9f99/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:linking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:*"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:inls620"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://aclweb.org/anthology-new/P/P12/P12-1078.pdf">
    <title>ACL 2012/Historical Analysis of Legal Opinions with a Sparse Mixed-Effects Latent Variable Model</title>
    <dc:date>2012-10-06T23:51:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://aclweb.org/anthology-new/P/P12/P12-1078.pdf</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[We show that the joint learning scheme of our sparse mixed-effects model improves on other state-of-the-art generative and discriminative models on the region and time period identification tasks.]]></description>
<dc:subject>textanalysis law periodization place machinelearning history opinion datamining</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:6c3b2a080cb1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:textanalysis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:periodization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:place"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:machinelearning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:opinion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:datamining"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-874/paper7.pdf">
    <title>Legal Rules, Text and Ontologies Over Time</title>
    <dc:date>2012-09-03T22:13:22+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-874/paper7.pdf</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The current paper presents the “Fill the gap” project that aims to design a set of XML standards for modelling legal documents in the Semantic Web over time. The goal of the project is to design an information system using XML standards able to store in an XML-native database legal resources and legal rules in an integrated way for supporting legal knowledge engineers and end-users (e.g., public administrative officers, judges, citizens).]]></description>
<dc:subject>law ontology documentation time temporality modeling inls520</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:80b5aa7ba3ea/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:ontology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:documentation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:time"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:temporality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:modeling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:inls520"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2134553">
    <title>Room for Maneuver: Julie Cohen's Theory of Freedom in the Information State by Jack Balkin :: SSRN</title>
    <dc:date>2012-08-24T02:00:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2134553</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This essay is part of a symposium on Julie Cohen's book, Configuring the Networked Self: Law, Code, and the Play of Everyday Practice (Yale University Press 2012). It discusses a central idea in Cohen's theory: semantic discontinuity.

"Semantic discontinuity" means gaps, flexibilities, and inconsistencies in systems of digital control. As we build digital systems to achieve our goals -- for example, social order, national security, or property protection -- we generate an increasingly complicated amalgam of practices, norms, and technologies of control. And as those practices, norms and technologies become increasingly powerful and pervasive, they may do more than protect our rights; they may actually decrease our practical freedom.

An imperfect system of control, rather than being a hindrance to human liberty, may sometimes be necessary to it, even if this means that some laws will go unpunished and some norms will be only imperfectly realized. As techniques of surveillance, governance, and control multiply and overlap in modern societies, gaps and imperfections in these systems -- some designed, and some accidental -- become increasingly important. That is because they allow room for maneuver and space for improvisation.

Cohen’s concept of semantic discontinuity is not a complete account of human freedom. It is merely one aspect of what freedom might mean in a networked world, along with (for example) other values like access to knowledge and effective transparency. 

The essay discuses the strengths and weaknesses of semantic discontinuity as a theory of digital freedom. I conclude by applying Cohen's ideas to the problems of freedom of speech in the digital world. Cohen's account has important parallels to my own theory of democratic culture. Moreover, her idea of semantic discontinuity has interesting analogies in free speech doctrine; two examples are immunities for digital intermediaries and the rule against prior restraints.]]></description>
<dc:subject>law theory technology organization</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:b7b8d2a9c843/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:theory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:organization"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://law.gsu.edu/plombardo/Great%20Cases/Legal%20Archaeology.pdf">
    <title>Paul A Lombardo - Legal Archaeology: Recovering the Stories behind the Cases</title>
    <dc:date>2012-01-21T20:44:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://law.gsu.edu/plombardo/Great%20Cases/Legal%20Archaeology.pdf</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Every lawsuit is a potential drama: a story of conflict, often with victims and villains, leading to justice done or denied.  Yet a great deal, if not all, that we learn about the most noteworthy of lawsuits — the truly great cases — comes from reading the opinion of an appellate court, written by a judge who never saw the parties of the case, who worked at a time and a place far removed from the events that gave rise to litigation.  We focus on “the facts of the case,” as described in a judge’s opinion, and then we describe the way the court applied the law to such facts as doctrine, hardly pausing to note the irony of this ex cathedra image, smacking of infallibility.  Rarely do we admit that the official factual account contained in an appellate opinion may have only the most tenuous relationship to the events that actually led the parties to court.  The complex stories — turning on small facts, seemingly trivial circumstances, and inter-contingent events — fade away as the “case” takes on a life of its own as it leaves the court of appeals.

Developments in legal scholarship pose a challenge to our continued near-exclusive reliance on a court’s version of the “facts.”  The last 20 years have seen a trend toward increased emphasis on “stories” as a feature of legal teaching and scholarship.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>law narrative history facts archives archaeology health</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:dd7e91d3c3f1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:narrative"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:facts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:archives"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:archaeology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:health"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1026&amp;context=mireille_hildebrandt">
    <title>The Meaning and The Mining of Legal Texts</title>
    <dc:date>2012-01-08T23:37:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1026&amp;context=mireille_hildebrandt</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Positive law, inscribed in legal texts, entails an authority not inherent in literary texts, generating legal consequences that can have real effects on a person’s life and liberty. The interpretation of legal texts, necessarily a normative undertaking, resists the mechanical application of rules, though still requiring a measure of predictability, coherence with other relevant legal norms and compliance with constitutional safeguards. The present proliferation of legal texts on the internet (codes, statutes, judgments, treaties, doctrinal treatises) renders the selection of relevant texts and cases next to impossible. We may expect that systems to mine these texts to find arguments that support one’s case, as well as expert systems that support the decision-making process of courts, will end up doing much of the work.

This raises the question of the difference between human interpretation and computational pattern-recognition and the issue of whether this difference makes a difference for the meaning of law. Possibly, data mining will produce patterns that disclose habits of the minds of judges and legislators that would have otherwise gone unnoticed (reinforcing the argument of the ‘legal realists’ at the beginning of the 20th century). Also, after the data analysis it will still be up to the judge to decide how to interpret the results or up to the prosecution which patterns to engage in the construction of evidence (requiring a hermeneutics of computational patterns instead of texts). My focus in this paper regards the fact that the mining process necessarily disambiguates the legal texts in order to transform them into a machine-readable data set, while the algorithms used for the analysis embody a strategy that will co-determine the outcome of the patterns. There seems a major due process concern here to the extent that these patterns are invisible for the naked human eye and will not be contestable in a court of law, due to their hidden complexity and computational nature.

This position paper aims to explain what is at stake in the computational turn with regard to legal texts. This prepares for the question I want to put forward to those involved in distant reading and not-reading of texts: could a visualization of computational patterns constitute a new way of un-hiding the complexity involved, opening the results of computational ‘knowledge’ to citizens’ scrutiny?]]></description>
<dc:subject>textmining machinelearning visualization digitalhumanities law</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:0f19fa010aaa/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:textmining"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:machinelearning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:visualization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:digitalhumanities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1917950">
    <title>Intellectual Property and the Concept of Dematerialised Property by Andreas Rahmatian :: SSRN</title>
    <dc:date>2011-09-26T15:45:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1917950</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[A property right (ius in rem, real right) is an abstract legal concept which relates to an object, referred to as “thing” or “res,” or imprecisely, but commonly, “property.” This object of property is a product of legal categorisation; it may be represented by a physical thing or it can be an abstract legal creation itself, as is the case with an intellectual property right. In any event, for the law the “property-object” (whether tangible, intangible or purely intangible) is the product of a legal conceptualisation. The law (private law) creates any res or thing, whether corporeal or not, through the legal concept of real rights. That enables legal recognition of the res in question. The material object (if there is one) only becomes a res in law if real rights are attached to it. Therefore, real rights and res are both “property”, and particularly with (purely intangible) intellectual property, property rights and property objects merge into one. The abstract conceptual res typically has a reifier to make it recognisable in the material world and for the purpose of social interactions. This reifier can be a corporeal object, in which case it is a direct reifier (a table being a direct reifier and incident of a res, chattel), but, for example in case of copyright, a chattel may act not only as direct reifier of the notional personal (moveable) property right (e.g. a canvas of a painting, the score of a symphony, the paper of a manuscript), but also as an indirect reifier of the notional copyright (artistic work, musical work, literary work). The chattel in question represents directly the personal/moveable property (but does not constitute it, because the res remains a legal concept), and, in addition, the chattel represents indirectly the copyright in the work which is expressed and recorded in the chattel in question (a painting, sculpture etc.).]]></description>
<dc:subject>law policy categorization concepts inls520</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:b49c2b464f8a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:categorization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:concepts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:inls520"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=709121">
    <title>Law as Design: Objects, Concepts and Digital Things by Michael Madison :: SSRN</title>
    <dc:date>2011-09-26T15:44:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=709121</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This Article initiates an account of things in the law, including both conceptual things and material things. Human relationships matter to the design of law. Yet things matter too. To an increasing extent, and particularly via the advent of digital technology, those relationships are not only considered ex post by the law but are designed into things, ex ante, by their producers. This development has a number of important dimensions. Some are familiar, such as the reification of conceptual things as material things, so that computer software is treated as a good. Others are new, such as the characterization of material things as conceptual things, so that digital goods become licensable. The regulatory consequences of the thing are increasingly built into the construction of the thing. These developments appear to be poised to envelop things beyond the digital sphere. It may no longer be apt to divide the world cleanly into conceptual and material objects. Things combine features of both. As a result, they can no longer be viewed solely as passive backgrounds against which relation-based legal analysis unfolds. To ensure that society maintains the ability to regulate as broadly as it deems legitimate, law must account for the creation and design of the things that increasingly dominate developments across a variety of legal domains, from intellectual property law to antitrust law to commercial law. The Article describes how things exercise the authority that characterizes classic legal regulation, and it reviews the different mechanisms that legal institutions have used to recognize and differentiate things. Understanding those mechanisms is a step toward appreciating the nature of the regulatory landscape in which both legal institutions and individuals exist.]]></description>
<dc:subject>law policy categorization concepts inls520</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:3918d9bba621/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:categorization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:concepts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:inls520"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ecommons.library.cornell.edu/handle/1813/14142">
    <title>Copyright and Cultural Institutions: Guidelines for U.S. Libraries, Archives, and Museums</title>
    <dc:date>2009-11-09T00:35:33+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://ecommons.library.cornell.edu/handle/1813/14142</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Addresses the basics of copyright law and the exclusive rights of the copyright owner, the major exemptions used by cultural heritage institutions, and stresses the importance of “risk assessment” when conducting any digitization project.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>library archives museums digitization copyright law policy reference</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:e4f62e5da45f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:library"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:archives"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:museums"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:digitization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:reference"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thepublicindex.org/">
    <title>The Public Index</title>
    <dc:date>2009-07-24T04:09:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://thepublicindex.org/</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Welcome to the Public Index, a site to study and discuss the proposed Google Book Search settlement. Here, you can browse and annotate the proposed settlement, section-by-section.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>google books library policy law</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:37bfc6d54195/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:library"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://whimsley.typepad.com/whimsley/2009/01/lawrence-lessigs-remix-a-rambling-review.html">
    <title>Whimsley: Lawrence Lessig's Remix: a rambling review</title>
    <dc:date>2009-01-15T05:35:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://whimsley.typepad.com/whimsley/2009/01/lawrence-lessigs-remix-a-rambling-review.html</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[While Lessig is incensed at the raising of a generation of criminals, he is unfazed at the thought of raising a generation of commodities, whose attention and interest is a source of revenue for some venture capitalist. At a time when advertising directly to children is under increasing scrutiny, and for good reason, the commodification of friendship and of home videos should make a parent of young children concerned. But it does not.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>opinion copyright law remix capitalism commodification book review Books</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:90b94fa23c0b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:opinion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:remix"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:commodification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:book"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:review"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:Books"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://laboratorium.net/archive/2008/11/08/principles_and_recommendations_for_the_google_book#summary">
    <title>The Laboratorium: Principles and Recommendations for the Google Book Search Settlement</title>
    <dc:date>2008-11-11T00:37:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://laboratorium.net/archive/2008/11/08/principles_and_recommendations_for_the_google_book#summary</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[I hope that these recommendations will prove equally appealing to those who think that Google can do no evil and those who think it does only evil. Perhaps they will prove equally frustrating. The settlement is good as it stands, but it could stand to be better.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>google books search law policy</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:e1432d87bc31/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:search"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:policy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/21630">
    <title>Google Books Without Pix - The New York Review of Books</title>
    <dc:date>2008-06-29T11:33:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nybooks.com/articles/21630</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Unless and until some deal can be worked out for digital rights to images, the focus of the digital library is limited to text—just as we enter the golden age of visual narration.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>illustration narrative digital library scanning law policy copyright archives</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:86b850bb72f6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:illustration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:narrative"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:digital"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:library"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:scanning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:archives"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.oldbaileyonline.org/">
    <title>The Proceedings of the Old Bailey, London 1674 to 1834</title>
    <dc:date>2008-03-13T19:30:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.oldbaileyonline.org/</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[A fully searchable online edition of the largest body of texts detailing the lives of non-elite people ever published, containing accounts of over 100,000 criminal trials held at London's central criminal court.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>prosopography history database uk london archives crime digitization documents law</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:16226e837693/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:prosopography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:database"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:uk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:london"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:archives"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:crime"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:digitization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:documents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=15370150">
    <title>How many events was 9/11?</title>
    <dc:date>2008-02-14T22:05:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=15370150</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[In the trials, the attorneys disputed the applicable meaning of the term event.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>events language semantics law</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:c270ffea28ca/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:events"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:semantics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.homelandsecurity.org/newjournal/Commentary/displayCommentary2.asp?commentary=21">
    <title>John Shore - Public Versus Private Surveillance</title>
    <dc:date>2007-11-28T19:55:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.homelandsecurity.org/newjournal/Commentary/displayCommentary2.asp?commentary=21</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Democracy won’t fall just because our privacy is invaded; it will fall if we don’t ensure due process for those on whom data is collected and accountability of those who collect and control the data.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>privacy surveillance policy government business law</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:f55414bcb1d6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:surveillance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:government"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://madisonian.net/archives/2007/11/24/conditions-for-the-digital-library-of-alexandria/">
    <title>Conditions for the Digital Library of Alexandria</title>
    <dc:date>2007-11-28T01:39:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://madisonian.net/archives/2007/11/24/conditions-for-the-digital-library-of-alexandria/</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[To the extent it or other search engines limit access to parts of their index, their public-spirited defenses of their archiving and indexing projects are suspect.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>books digitization infrastructure copyright law fairuse archives search policy ideas</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:8f102b044664/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:digitization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:infrastructure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:archives"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:search"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:ideas"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.ci.berkeley.ca.us/environmentalhealth/noise.htm">
    <title>Environmental Health Community Noise Program</title>
    <dc:date>2007-10-06T20:32:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.ci.berkeley.ca.us/environmentalhealth/noise.htm</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The program is driven by requests for service from the public.  Inspectors respond to complaints and enforce, interpret, and educate citizens about  the noise ordinance.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>berkeley noise law</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:fe150609f814/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:berkeley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:noise"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.macworld.com/news/2007/03/06/franceban/index.php">
    <title>Macworld: News: France bans citizen journalists from filming or broadcasting violence</title>
    <dc:date>2007-03-07T17:09:37+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.macworld.com/news/2007/03/06/franceban/index.php</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The government has also proposed a certification system for Web sites, blog hosters, mobile-phone operators and Internet service providers, identifying them as government-approved sources of information if they adhere to certain rules.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>news media citmedia journalism france law policy authority government newmedia politics image video vismedia</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:0f3fe81d5f27/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:news"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:citmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:journalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:france"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:government"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:newmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:image"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:video"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:vismedia"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.law.berkeley.edu/clinics/samuelson/faculty_lerner.html">
    <title>Jack Lerner</title>
    <dc:date>2006-06-26T19:09:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.law.berkeley.edu/clinics/samuelson/faculty_lerner.html</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Worked to develop an online entertainment cooperative, a nonprofit digital music distribution system modeled after proposals to reform the current entertainment industry and intellectual property system via collective licensing and revenue-pooling regimes
]]></description>
<dc:subject>people policy ip law berkeley media music entertainment</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:18292c71626d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:people"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:ip"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:berkeley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:music"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:entertainment"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.law.duke.edu/cspd/comics/">
    <title>CSPD Comics</title>
    <dc:date>2006-05-12T13:29:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.law.duke.edu/cspd/comics/</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Bound By Law reaches beyond documentary film to provide a commentary on the most pressing issues facing law, art, property and an increasingly digital world of remixed culture.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>comics IP law policy copyright documentary film media art remix culture beyondbroadcast</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:2aa5887f726b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:comics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:IP"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:documentary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:film"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:remix"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:beyondbroadcast"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.law.duke.edu/boylesite/">
    <title>James Boyle</title>
    <dc:date>2006-05-12T13:21:12+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.law.duke.edu/boylesite/</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[William Neal Reynolds Professor of Law and co-founder of the Center for the Study of the Public Domain at Duke Law School.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>commons copyright IP law policy academia people beyondbroadcast</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:5bd52dbdcedc/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:commons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:IP"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:people"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:beyondbroadcast"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.law.berkeley.edu/institutes/bclt/events/unblinking/unblink.html">
    <title>UnBlinking: New Perspectives on Visual Privacy in the 21st Century</title>
    <dc:date>2006-04-29T16:50:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.law.berkeley.edu/institutes/bclt/events/unblinking/unblink.html</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Privacy is a complex and often abstract topic: this symposium will address "visual privacy," a subset of the much broader topic of data privacy, and bring together experts from a range of perspectives.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>privacy surveillance camera image video conference berkeley art law policy psychology sociology architecture</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:e294010875ac/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:surveillance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:camera"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:image"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:video"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:conference"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:berkeley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:sociology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:architecture"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.boingboing.net/2006/04/28/dirty_snitches_earn_.html">
    <title>Boing Boing: Dirty snitches earn $50 for fingering fellow students smoking pot</title>
    <dc:date>2006-04-29T04:17:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.boingboing.net/2006/04/28/dirty_snitches_earn_.html</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Smart mobs" used to enforce marijuana prohibition. Proof that open/participatory architecture need not be linked to progressive/liberatory ends.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>drugs prohibition participatory media image law marijuana surveillance</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:a3468126a47b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:drugs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:prohibition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:participatory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:image"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:marijuana"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:surveillance"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.centerforsocialmedia.org/fairuse.htm">
    <title>Center for Social Media: Fair Use</title>
    <dc:date>2006-02-22T07:37:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.centerforsocialmedia.org/fairuse.htm</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Documentary filmmakers have created, through their professional associations, a clear, easy to understand statement of fair and reasonable approaches to fair use.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>documentary copyright IP howto appropriation law reference</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:52531c90750c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:documentary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:IP"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:howto"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:appropriation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:reference"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/conferences/cultural/">
    <title>Cultural Environmentalism at 10</title>
    <dc:date>2006-02-22T05:59:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/conferences/cultural/</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[On March 11-12, 2006, Stanford Law School's Center for Internet and Society will host a symposium to explore the development and expansion of the metaphor of "cultural environmentalism."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>culture copyright activism conference IP law commons</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:0a4673c7ca45/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:activism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:conference"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:IP"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:commons"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.hiit.fi/u/hietanen/">
    <title>Herkko Hietanen</title>
    <dc:date>2006-02-13T18:56:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.hiit.fi/u/hietanen/</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Researcher at Helsinki Institute for Information Technology and at Lappeenranta University of Technology where he teaches Information and Technology law. He is also leader of the Finnish Creative Commons.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>people law creative commons berkeley helsinki fans</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:fde60096e971/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:people"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:creative"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:commons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:berkeley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:helsinki"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:fans"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/james-love/a-unwipo-plan-to-regulat_b_11480.html">
    <title>A UN/WIPO Plan to Regulate Distribution of Information on the Internet</title>
    <dc:date>2006-01-15T23:53:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/james-love/a-unwipo-plan-to-regulat_b_11480.html</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The call for this new regulation is being led by the United States government and the European Commission, pushed by highly paid lobbyists for a trade association that includes Yahoo, Microsoft, AOL, Real Networks and a handful of other companies.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>collaboration commons copyright drm IP law news remix video yahoo policy</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:79eefa8fb6db/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:commons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:drm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:IP"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:news"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:remix"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:video"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:yahoo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:policy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.eff.org/IP/WIPO/broadcasting_treaty/">
    <title>EFF: WIPO Broadcasting Treaty</title>
    <dc:date>2006-01-15T23:48:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.eff.org/IP/WIPO/broadcasting_treaty/</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The treaty would give broadcasters 50 years of copyright-like control over the content of their broadcasts, even when they have no copyright in what they show. A TV channel broadcasting your Creative Commons-licensed movie could legally demand that no one
]]></description>
<dc:subject>copyright policy media law commons insanity IP</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:8322da3e7338/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:commons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:insanity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:IP"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/etel/2006/01/13/the-problem-with-webcasting.html">
    <title>The Problem with Webcasting</title>
    <dc:date>2006-01-15T23:43:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/etel/2006/01/13/the-problem-with-webcasting.html</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[There's a new restriction on content waiting in the wings--a "webcaster's right" that allows websites to control the dissemination of content they put up.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>business copyright corporate culture drm law media politics web policy yahoo YRB</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:019aca0a8a59/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:corporate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:drm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:yahoo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:YRB"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0674012046/webservices-20?dev-t=D151B5UYK93CM2%26camp=2025%26link_code=xm2">
    <title>William M. Landes, Richard A. Posner: The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law</title>
    <dc:date>2005-06-23T20:58:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0674012046/webservices-20?dev-t=D151B5UYK93CM2%26camp=2025%26link_code=xm2</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><dc:subject>books 2003 urn:asin:0674012046 wishlist law legalreference usa economics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:6354ba33288f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:2003"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:urn:asin:0674012046"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:wishlist"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:legalreference"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:economics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0804729603/webservices-20?dev-t=D151B5UYK93CM2%26camp=2025%26link_code=xm2">
    <title>William P. Alford: To Steal a Book Is an Elegant Offense</title>
    <dc:date>2005-06-23T19:21:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0804729603/webservices-20?dev-t=D151B5UYK93CM2%26camp=2025%26link_code=xm2</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[With China joining the WTO at the end of last year it has become more important for Westerners to understand this aspect of Chinese society...
]]></description>
<dc:subject>books 1997 urn:asin:0804729603 wishlist law legalreference reference</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:4d42cddfcbfa/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:1997"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:urn:asin:0804729603"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:wishlist"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:legalreference"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:reference"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1573928895/webservices-20?dev-t=D151B5UYK93CM2%26camp=2025%26link_code=xm2">
    <title>Jessica Litman: Digital Copyright</title>
    <dc:date>2005-06-23T19:10:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1573928895/webservices-20?dev-t=D151B5UYK93CM2%26camp=2025%26link_code=xm2</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This is a good book if you want a detailed history of how copyright law evolved to accomodate digital technology and the Internet...
]]></description>
<dc:subject>books 2000 urn:asin:1573928895 wishlist copyright internet law legalreference patent trademark usa</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:000deef00302/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:2000"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:urn:asin:1573928895"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:wishlist"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:legalreference"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:patent"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:trademark"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:usa"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0814788076/webservices-20?dev-t=D151B5UYK93CM2%26camp=2025%26link_code=xm2">
    <title>Siva Vaidhyanathan: Copyrights and Copywrongs</title>
    <dc:date>2005-06-23T19:10:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0814788076/webservices-20?dev-t=D151B5UYK93CM2%26camp=2025%26link_code=xm2</link>
    <dc:creator>rybesh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This is an insightful though often quick and unfocused examination of the history of copyright law...
]]></description>
<dc:subject>books 2003 urn:asin:0814788076 wishlist copyright law legalreference patent trademark</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/b:e269da45ac59/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:2003"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:urn:asin:0814788076"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:wishlist"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:legalreference"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:patent"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:rybesh/t:trademark"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>