<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (robertogreco)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from robertogreco</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thenewinquiry.com/essays/against-ted/"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://thenewinquiry.com/essays/against-ted/">
    <title>Against TED – The New Inquiry</title>
    <dc:date>2012-02-19T23:18:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://thenewinquiry.com/essays/against-ted/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["TED is not simply “engaging” & “entertaining” but a specific type of entertainment that is increasingly out of touch & exclusionary.

…appears that whole TED brand induces laughter from many of those skeptical of corporate speak & techno-jargon. At first, I thought I was laughing alone; however, it turns out that lots of other people are equally unimpressed by the current state of TED…I’m not the only one who does not take TED very seriously or worse, views the whole project as suspect…

Perhaps the biggest complaint I heard was that TED smells of corporatism…

So many of the TED talks take on the form of those famous patent medicine tonic cure-all pitches of previous centuries, as though they must convince you not through the content of what’s being said but through the hyper-engaging style of the delivery…

As Mike Bulajewski pointed out in a Tweet, “TED’s ‘revolutionary ideas’ mask capitalism as usual, giving it a narrative of progress and change.”"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>technology alexismadrigal popularity exclusionary exclusivity bias ideology paulcurrion mikebulajewski evangelism delivery snakeoilsalesmen 2012 epistemology corporatism nathanjurgenson criticism ted</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:4ff748a5c6cc/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alexismadrigal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:popularity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:exclusionary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:exclusivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bias"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:paulcurrion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mikebulajewski"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:evangelism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:delivery"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:snakeoilsalesmen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2012"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:epistemology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:corporatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nathanjurgenson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:criticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ted"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>