Pinboard (robertogreco)
https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/public/
recent bookmarks from robertogrecoAgainst Technoableism | A Working Library2024-02-20T18:35:08+00:00
https://aworkinglibrary.com/reading/against-technoableism
robertogrecomandybrown ashleyshew 2023 technoableism ableism technology disability disabilitieshttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:2abdaa103501/Look to your neighbors | everything changes2024-02-20T18:32:46+00:00
https://everythingchanges.us/blog/look-to-your-neighbors/
robertogrecoWe’ve come through 75 years where having neighbors was essentially optional: if you had a credit card, you could get everything you needed to survive dropped off at your front door. But the next 75 years aren’t going to be like that; we’re going to need to return to the basic human experience of relying on the people around you.
This has been on my mind as I talk to folks who are contemplating a change in their work, and wondering about a related question: where should I work? Most people can name a few places where they know enough about the ground conditions to dismiss it as a possibility—places that are too hot or too toxic or where the risk of floods and storms is far too high. But then I watch as they scan all the other locales and contemplate if any of them are safe, or see their face fall as they imagine how to evaluate the relative safety of one place over another.
We’ve all either lived long enough to experience more than one unsafe workplace, or else we’ve heard the stories from our elders. Even the seemingly healthy places aren’t immutable, aren’t immune to the rigors of capitalism and investor brain worms. You might find that the flexible, friendly atmosphere evaporates the moment the c-suite sees clouds in the market. You might show up one day to discover that your boss has been replaced by three interest rates in a trench coat mumbling about declining productivity. You might find that you are the boss reading from a script about severance while your soul scrambles to exit your body. (I know, because I’ve been there.) You might suddenly realize that the product you were eager to work on is actually doing more harm than good, or that the fundraisers are using your org to launder filthy reputations. You might despair when you realize that the path to changing things for the better is guarded by a coterie of demons cloaked as financial instruments.
I’m inclined to agree with McKibben: no place is safe.
And yet. We can return to the basic human experience of relying on the people around us. We can get to know our neighbors and colleagues and users; we can orient our work and our lives towards them and away from the inhuman and unliving systems that want us to behave like machines. We may not be able to stop a storm from coming, but we can get together to line up sandbags and buckets, to organize mutual aid, to create places for people to talk and share their needs, to laugh and cry and howl at each clap of thunder. We may not be able to stop a layoff or exorcise the CFO but we can sure as hell take care of each other.
This is where I’m wont to say you deserve a union, and that’s true. But even more than that, you deserve to be fully human, interdependent with the people around you and the more-than-human world. The greatest lie that capitalism ever told was that risk is a solitary affair. But we can never bear the risks of work (or climate change) on our own, because we have never actually been alone.
What I’ve learned, over and over in my own work and with the people I work with, is that the only thing that saves us from uncertain and capricious futures is each other. This is not to say that you shouldn’t contemplate where you want to work, any less than you should consider where you want to live. It is to say that with whom is the more important question. It is to say that asking how do you want to be? may be the trick that gets you past the demons at the head of the path. Those demons are expecting you to show up head bowed and alone, because alone they know how to deter you. But just watch what happens when you show up with a crowd."]]>mandybrown 2024 billmckibben belonging unions humanism humans community mutualaid workplace safety neighbors neighborliness climatechange globalwarming uncertainty interconnected interconnectednesshttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:5e46a8ea25f4/Writers and talkers and leaders, oh my! | everything changes2023-09-16T18:28:03+00:00
https://everythingchanges.us/blog/writers-and-talkers-and-leaders/
robertogrecomandybrown 2023 howwethink thinking writing talking howwewrite process management leadership communication inquiry lcdhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:e9f6f198dcad/Official myths • Buttondown2022-09-10T03:14:57+00:00
https://buttondown.email/aworkinglibrary/archive/official-myths/
robertogrecomandybrown remotework covid-19 pandemic coronavirus 2022 howweworkhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:6e333658083f/Disambiguation • Buttondown2022-03-07T21:19:05+00:00
https://buttondown.email/aworkinglibrary/archive/disambiguation-a-working-letter/
robertogrecomandybrown ambuguity ursulaleguin 2022 clarity taoteching adriennemareebrown learning perspective individualism howwelearn conversation utopia fiction nonfiction borges samueldelaney laotzu thedispossessed yinyang dichotomy devonprice davidwengrow davidgraeber tishanidoshi jakeskeet elisepaschen louiseerdich cliffordgeertzhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:a1211e1d9c38/Oddkin: A working letter · Buttondown2021-09-01T16:08:21+00:00
https://buttondown.email/aworkinglibrary/archive/oddkin-a-working-letter/
robertogrecomandybrown 2021 kin oddkin relationships donnaharaway octaviabutler careers work kinship gavinmueller davidgraeber kathiweeks ursulaleguin solidarity love organizing laborhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:535455aa23c2/Office politics: A working letter • Buttondown2021-05-14T05:14:20+00:00
https://buttondown.email/aworkinglibrary/archive/office-politics-a-working-letter/
robertogrecomandybrown 2021 work labor politics organizing democracy everydayhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:2860f47dd5fc/Burned: A working letter • Buttondown2021-04-27T16:47:05+00:00
https://buttondown.email/aworkinglibrary/archive/burned-a-working-letter/
robertogrecopurpose work labor pandemic covid-19 coronavirus 2021 mandybrown burnout whatmatters employment exploitationhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:75553111f7ef/Remote to who? A working letter2021-04-13T19:02:34+00:00
https://tinyletter.com/aworkinglibrary/letters/remote-to-who-a-working-letter
robertogrecomandybrown work labor solidarity workfromhome remotework community organizing neighborhoods workplace time life worklifebalance friendship loneliness annehelenpetersen capitalism power control realestate economicshttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:b13766d89a99/Books on social justice | A Working Library2016-11-28T01:15:02+00:00
http://aworkinglibrary.com/collections/social-justice/
robertogrecobooks mandybrown socialjustice readinglists booklistshttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:30f7abd677d9/A theory of nonscalability | A Working Library2016-07-11T19:20:58+00:00
http://aworkinglibrary.com/writing/theory-of-nonscalability/
robertogrecoProgress itself has often been defined by its ability to make projects expand without changing their framing assumptions. This quality is “scalability.” The term is a bit confusing, because it could be interpreted to mean “able to be discussed in terms of scale.” Both scalable and nonscalable projects, however, can be discussed in relation to scale. When Ferdand Braudel explained history’s “long durée” or Niels Bohr showed us the quantum atom, these were not projects of scalability, although they each revolutionized thinking about scale. Scalability, in contrast, is the ability of a project to change scales smoothly without any change in project frames. A scalable business, for example, does not change its organization as it expands. This is possible only if business relations are not transformative, changing the business as new relations are added. Similarly, a scalable research project admits only data that already fit the research frame. Scalability requires that project elements be oblivious to indeterminacies of encounter; that’s how they allow smooth expansion. Thus, too, scalability banishes meaningful diversity, that is, diversity that might change things.
(Emphasis mine.) I think about scalability and diversity in my work-life quite a bit: the tech and media industries have explicitly acknowledged the need for diversity (while so far only making token steps towards achieving it). But there’s often a notion that diversifying an organization will not require changes to that organization’s culture: the concept of “culture fit” presumes someone can neatly fit into the existing culture, as opposed to challenging it or expanding it—or even razing it. That tech (and, increasingly, media—and oh, that boundary is nothing if not fluid) also speaks of scalability in religious terms puts Tsing’s contention here in an even more interesting light. Scalability is expressed not only in the external artifacts of an organization—the software, the servers, the business model—but also the people who work for it and the people who interact with it as customers, clients, and, increasingly, inconstant laborers. That latter category—the Uber drivers, TaskRabbits, and Postmates—seems especially relevant to notions of scalability. Uber can scale, but the single parent who works as a driver and can’t predict what they’ll make from week to week cannot.
Tsing continues:
Scalability is not an ordinary feature of nature. Making projects scalable takes a lot of work. Even after that work, there will still be interactions between scalable and nonscalable project elements. Yet, despite the contributions of thinkers like Braudel and Bohr, the connection between scaling up and the advancement of humanity has been so strong that scalable elements receive the lion’s share of attention. The nonscalable becomes an impediment. It’s time to turn attention to the nonscalable, not only as objects for description but also as incitements to theory.
A theory of nonscalability might begin in the work it takes to create scalability—and the messes it makes. One vantage point might be that early and influential icon for this work: the European colonial plantation. In their sixteenth- and seventeenth-century sugarcane plantations in Brazil, for example, Portuguese planters stumbled on a formula for smooth expansion. They crafted self-contained, interchangeable project elements, as follows: exterminate local people and plants; prepare now-empty, unclaimed land; and bring in exotic and isolated labor and crops for production. This landscape model of scalability became an inspiration for later industrialization and modernization.
There’s the savage bit again: scalability often swamps all other considerations. If you define scalability as the solitary success metric, then you are bound to ignore—or violently overcome—all other measures. So another place to begin to build a theory of nonscalability might be to ask by what other metrics we should measure progress. Scalability cannot be our only aim."]]>mandybrown leadership management scalability hiring scale 2016 annalowenhaupttsing nonscalability diversity small business annatsinghttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:356f05a3cf2f/All our imagined futures | A Working Library2016-02-22T00:28:53+00:00
http://aworkinglibrary.com/writing/all-our-imagined-futures/
robertogrecoSuch cuts can be made more or less fairly, and the richest really ought to pay the most, but the crucial thing is that they are made. Because, above all, stopping climate change means giving up on growth.
That will be hard. Not only will our standards of living almost certainly drop, but it’s likely that the very quality of our society—equality, safety, and trust—will decline, too. That’s not something to be giddy about, but it’s still a price that those of us living in affluent countries should prepare to pay. Because however difficult it is to slow down, flooding Bangladesh cannot be an option. In other words, we can and should act. It’s just going to hurt.
There’s the rub: those of us living in affluent countries must pay. Porter presumes that technology can get us out of climate change without that payment—that nuclear energy, renewables, carbon capture, and electric cars will let us continue to consume at current levels as if nothing had changed. (As an aside: you can follow the American love of cars all the way to Immortan Joe’s citadel.) But I don’t think it’s likely we’re going to get off that easy. Carbon capture is still a pipe dream, nuclear energy will take too long to ramp up even absent strong local objections, electric cars are hardly a panacea, and renewables such as solar and wind, while certainly promising, won’t help much if we continue to pull coal and oil out of the ground at the rates we are now.
As it happens, though, I think Porter’s instinct to reach for science fiction to understand the future is a useful one. In Submergence, J.M. Ledgard’s novel of planetary depths, Danny remarks: “If this was happening in a science-fiction world we would see it clearly for what it is, but we don’t because it’s happening here and now.” Fiction, and science fiction in particular, can help us imagine many futures, and in particular can help us to direct our imaginations towards the futures we want. Imagining a particular kind of future isn’t just day dreaming: it’s an important and active framing that makes it possible for us to construct a future that approaches that imagined vision. In other words, imagining the future is one way of making that future happen. Writing in Essence in 2000, Octavia Butler asked,
So why try to predict the future at all if it’s so difficult, so nearly impossible? Because making predictions is one way to give warning when we see ourselves drifting in dangerous directions. Because prediction is a useful way of pointing out safer, wiser courses. Because, most of all, our tomorrow is the child of our today. Through thought and deed, we exert a great deal of influence over this child, even though we can’t control it absolutely. Best to think about it, though. Best to try to shape it into something good. Best to do that for any child.
Butler’s Parable of the Sower is, like Mad Max, a tale of the road. And, like Mad Max, it’s a difficult but hopeful one. Maybe Porter should read it."]]>mandybrown 2016 octaviabutler mikeculfield eduardoporter zizek peterwirzbicki submergence hungergames dystopia optimism hope scifi sciencefiction danielimmerwahl jmledgard fiction imagination future futurism capitalism growth zerosum change economics climatechange globalwarminghttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:5db432331289/Hypertext for all | A Working Library2016-01-04T03:41:08+00:00
http://aworkinglibrary.com/writing/hypertext-for-all/
robertogrecomandybrown 2016 web hypertext maciejceglowski geocities myspace webrococo waybackmachine pinboard javascript webdesign webdev images multiliteracies video flash zefrank design writing text words language listening elitism typography tools onlinetoolkit democacy activism maciejcegłowskihttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:ca197be0c22f/Building an inclusive culture | Vox Product Blog2015-11-22T00:25:14+00:00
http://product.voxmedia.com/2015/11/10/9704296/product-code-of-conduct
robertogrecomandybrown codeofconduct vox voxmedia diversity feminism 2015 inclusivity inclusionhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:2c95b7e2d1eb/The Whole of Work - Features - Source: An OpenNews project2015-09-25T04:34:26+00:00
https://source.opennews.org/en-US/articles/whole-work/
robertogrecoThe acculturation to compliance and conformity has, in turn, accelerated the use of prescriptive technologies in administrative, government, and social services. The same development has diminished resistance to the programming of people. (19)
The programming of people. In other words, prescriptive technologies lend themselves towards systems and structures that treat people as automatons, diminishing both their talents and their humanity. If we want communities of creative people—that is, people who do not merely accept the way things have always been done but try to improve them—then we cannot afford to breed compliance, in either our workplaces or among our users. The Times expose of Amazon also notes, almost as an aside, that the inhumane culture extends all the way down to warehouse workers who are expected to operate under conditions better suited to robots. If we bristle at working under those kinds of conditions ourselves, what excuse have we for imposing them on others? Moreover, what makes us believe that the programming of people will be limited to those on the lower rungs?
We can’t hoard holistic processes for ourselves—we need to also imbue the tools and systems we create with those same principles. That is, we should encourage collaboration and documentation; anticipate needs for both synchronous and asynchronous workflows; create meaningful ways to denote time working and time away; and most importantly we should resist, at all costs, the temptation to build rigid, prescriptive processes that users must slavishly follow.
Holistic technologies represent better ways of working—and living. We should both enthusiastically adopt them and work to ensure they are the norm, not the exception."]]>mandybrown work collaboration communication diversity 2015 ursulafranklin generalists specialists labor technology burnout care caring productivity autonomy competition documentation process transparencyhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:8a5ee28b73e6/No legal merit | A Working Library2015-03-30T21:15:05+00:00
http://aworkinglibrary.com/writing/no-legal-merit/
robertogreco2015 mandybrown metrics journalism activism justice policy politics business measurement publishing success change changemaking socialwelfare society law legal progress climatechange science education happiness ellenpao gender inequality amazon labor exploitation women facebook html text images video youtubehttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:9704207b7638/Hypertext as an Agent of Change on Huffduffer2014-09-08T21:03:51+00:00
http://huffduffer.com/dConstruct/178673
robertogrecomandybrown change dconstruct dconstruct2014 storytelling antigone tejucole thomaspynchon anthropocene 2014 ferguson michaelbrown geoheliocentrism thomaskuhn perspective paradigmshifts context framing metcontexts transcontextualism transcontextualizationhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:5be742b0e7b8/dConstruct : dconstruct2014 on Huffduffer2014-09-08T20:20:43+00:00
http://huffduffer.com/dConstruct/tags/dconstruct2014
robertogrecodconstruct 2014 dconstruct2014 mandybrown anabjain georginavoss aaronstraupcope clarereddington warrenellis corydoctorow tomscott briansuda superfluxhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:ffd210d2944e/The parable of the bees | A Working Library2014-04-28T20:01:53+00:00
http://aworkinglibrary.com/reading/the-parable-of-the-bees/
robertogrecoEconomics, moreover, deals with goods in accordance with their market value and not in accordance with what they really are. The same rules and criteria applied to primary goods, which man has to win from nature, and secondary goods, which presuppose the existence of primary goods and are manufactured from them. All goods are treated the same, because the point of view is fundamentally that of private profit-making, and this means that it is inherent in the methodology of economics to ignore man’s dependence on the natural world.
"I’ve long thought (though I’m aware just how unlikely this is) that economics, as a discipline, ought to be kicked down a notch or two. We treat it, in our ordinary political conversations, as if it were all that mattered, or at least as if it mattered more than many other things. The subtitle to Small Is Beautiful—“Economics as if People Mattered”—remains an aspiration."
[More from the MacKinnon: http://aworkinglibrary.com/reading/once-and-future-world/ ]
[More from the Schumacher: http://aworkinglibrary.com/reading/small-is-beautiful/ ]]]>mandybrown jbmackinnon efschumacher economics sustainability bees nature capitalism profits measurement value valueshttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:4b08794d22fe/Together - Rob Brackett2014-04-24T05:25:15+00:00
http://robbrackett.com/thinks/together
robertogreco“It’s important to remember that many of these tools are built as side-projects, whereas Editorially benefited from a full-time team working on the product for a year. There is plenty of promise in each of these apps, and with continued development we may see a worthy successor.”
I think of all the teams I’ve known that don’t collaborate well. I think, too, of all the individuals and side projects I’ve seen be highly successful because of a few close collaborators. And I think of everyone I could depend on at Editorially to push back on my hare-brained schemes, sometimes encourage them, and always force me to think more critically about my work.
The strength of our collaborations just might be the most essential part of every endeavor we take on."]]>robbrackett collaboration mandybrown teamwork howwework criticism slow critique 2014 editorially remotehttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:1d0ae6c37eea/18. Webstock 2014 Talk Notes and References - postarchitectural2014-04-24T04:19:25+00:00
http://blog.postarchitectural.com/18-Webstock-2014-Talk-Notes-and-References
robertogrecoshahwang 2014 webstock donellameadows jamescscott seeinglikeastate davidgraeber debt economics barrylopez trevorpaglen google technology prism robotics robots surveillance systemsthinking growth finance venturecapital maciejceglowski millsbaker mandybrown danhon advertising meritocracy democracy snapchat capitalism infrastructure internet web future irrationalexuberance github geopffmanaugh corproratism shareholders oligopoly oligarchy fredscharmen kenmcleod ianbanks eleanorsaitta quinnorton adamgreenfield marshallbrain politics edwardsnowden davidsimon georgepacker nicolefenton power responsibility davidfosterwallace christinaxu money adamcurtis dmytrikleiner charlieloyd wealth risk sarahkendxior markjacobson anildash rebeccasolnit russellbrand louisck caseygollan alexpayne judsontrue jamesdarling jenlowe wilsonminer kierkegaard readinglist startups kiev systems control data resistance obligation care cynicism snark change changetheory neoliberalism intervention leveragepoints engagement nonprofit changemakihttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:6db34f8de043/The Pastry Box Project: Mandy Brown: Tuesday, 25 March 20142014-03-25T20:53:43+00:00
https://the-pastry-box-project.net/mandy-brown/2014-march-25
robertogrecomandybrown information software 2014 discrimination violence poverty exposure privacy anonymity policy meritocracy power abuse circumspection consequenceshttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:b7f7e21ab675/The Pastry Box Project: Mandy Brown [Tuesday, 25 February 2014]2014-02-25T20:15:04+00:00
https://the-pastry-box-project.net/mandy-brown/2014-february-25
robertogrecomandybrown trickster worldview leisure artleisure leisurearts comedy tragedy 2014 heroism humor ambition disruptionhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:6ad2c7dadf82/STET | Making remote teams work2014-01-31T06:56:26+00:00
http://stet.editorially.com/articles/making-remote-teams-work/
robertogrecomandybrown collaboration tools communication 2014 stet technology remote work howwework editorially accessibility inclusivity chat video management organization organizations administration inclusion inlcusivityhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:cee2991e4bf4/Writing on Writing and Other Resources ∙ An A List Apart Blog Post2014-01-23T00:06:21+00:00
http://alistapart.com/blog/post/writing-on-writing-and-other-resources
robertogrecowriting resources via:nicolefenton annelamott williamzinsser sallykerrigan marieconnelly rellyannett-baker mandybrown nicolefenton stethttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:feb0a5df4150/STET | You keep using that word2013-12-12T19:50:46+00:00
http://stet.editorially.com/articles/you-keep-using-that-word/
robertogrecomandybrown 2013 meritocracy siliconvalley economics society michaelyoung stevesoutherland newpuritans homeslessness povertyhttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:75d0368022e5/Robin Rendle · Call Me Interactivity2012-08-22T04:59:43+00:00
http://www.robinrendle.com/call-me-interactivity/
robertogrecotechnology mobydick leonwiedeltier oliverreichenstein craigmod content flexibility control mandybrown design ebooks digitalpublishing publishing interactivity interactive 2012 future books robinrendle epub3 html html5 moby-dickhttps://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:23d6446b2f11/Starts / from a working library2012-06-02T21:53:31+00:00
http://aworkinglibrary.com/library/archives/starts/
robertogrecogrowth howwegrow howwelearn cv leaving starting movingon learning yearoff 2012 mandybrownhttps://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:ff3e8806a354/Deploy / from a working library2012-02-28T05:45:19+00:00
http://aworkinglibrary.com/library/archives/deploy/
robertogrecopublishing marginalia readingexperience reading unfinished editing fixity elizabetheinstein change permanence impermanence stability metadata revision print productdesign design deployment contentstrategy content digitalpublishing digitial process writing 2012 unbook iteration mandybrown aworkinglibraryhttps://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:1d71a497b42f/On the library / from a working library2012-01-03T11:35:51+00:00
http://aworkinglibrary.com/library/archives/on_the_library/
robertogrecobooks library reading mandybrown via:tealtan librarieshttps://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:8291d6f6a0d0/Reading Systems · tealtan · Storify2012-01-03T04:09:47+00:00
http://storify.com/tealtan/reading-systems
robertogrecofindings gimmebar ui diigo organization text dropbox internet online readmill meditation kenosis adamgreenfield derrickschultz search memory forgetting decay peterrichardson christopherfahey peterbrantley nickdisabato 2011 instapaper readability thomaserickson coreymenscher comments mandybrown frankchimero erinkissane maxfenton informationsystems workflow reading allentan storifyhttps://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:0b83ff359ea9/Lifespan of Content · tealtan · Storify2011-12-30T19:18:03+00:00
http://storify.com/tealtan/lifespan-of-content
robertogrecorediscoverability rediscovery discovery reading internet web aspirationalreading oppression anticipation sorting publishing persistence metadata resurfacing webclippings bookmarking archives searching search serendipity instapaper singly mattbrown markllobrera maxfenton nickdisabato 2011 orbitalcontent memory personaldigitalarchives digitalarchiving conversation twitter comments frankchimero davidsleight erinkissane mandybrown joshclark allentan storifyhttps://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:29459943bf79/Represent / from a working library2011-12-10T23:16:08+00:00
http://aworkinglibrary.com/library/archives/represent/
robertogrecoadvocacy community belonging tcsnmy presence commitment participation observation understanding lcproject organizations leadership administration publishing mandybrown audience internethttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:20d25ce68384/Ways of reading / from a working library2009-12-28T10:08:10+00:00
http://aworkinglibrary.com/library/archives/ways_of_reading/
robertogrecowriting reading books howto tcsnmy 2009 library literature libraries mandybrown howweread howwewrite howwelearnhttps://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:49e1a88f8b10/