<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (robertogreco)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from robertogreco</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://matthewbattles.substack.com/p/a-prayer-for-limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2026/06/the-humane-localism-of-pope-leo-xiv/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.plough.com/en/topics/faith/discipleship/the-secret-of-the-third-monk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://samhenri.gold/blog/20260312-this-is-not-the-computer-for-you/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.hcn.org/articles/the-mystery-of-wildlife-and-a-world-beyond-our-understanding/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.theatlantic.com/books/2025/11/paul-kingsnorth-against-the-machine/684848/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2025/07/24/the-red-and-the-green-slow-down-degrowth-manifesto-saito/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://danmcquillan.org/decomputing.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYoCyEulBV8"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://meantforyou.beehiiv.com/p/our-own-devices"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2025/04/quaker-parenting-research/682277/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.lavanguardia.com/libros/libro/los-limites-de-la-ciencia-9788410214453"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-5mecyWUgI"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/05/magazine/letter-of-recommendation-recently-returned-books.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eg9rqkqGGKM"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.worldwisdom.com/public/viewpdf/default.aspx?article-title=Two_Economies_by_Wendell_Berry.pdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/from-tech-critique-to-ways-of-living"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://sarahendren.substack.com/p/the-city-and-the-limiting-virtues"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://theconvivialsociety.substack.com/p/the-art-of-living"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19q4pWKPlj0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://blog.ayjay.org/the-mondragon-moment/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNdJOX_hk58"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.chrbutler.com/personal-machines-and-portable-worlds"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://theconvivialsociety.substack.com/p/children-and-technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-new-yorker-interview/going-home-with-wendell-berry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://harpers.org/archive/2008/05/faustian-economics/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://metaquestions.me/2014/10/12/experts-and-the-corruption-of-truth/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thefrailestthing.com/2014/11/29/do-artifacts-have-ethics/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ethel-baraona.tumblr.com/post/67557761651/twelve-subversive-acts-to-dodge-the-system-1-open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.neh.gov/about/awards/jefferson-lecture/wendell-e-berry-lecture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dirtystylus.com/2013/08/08/but-sleep-is-work/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.ableparris.com/post/18423983560/social-media-and-friendship-a-response"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://therumpus.net/2011/07/you-cant-read-everything/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://places.designobserver.com/entry.html?entry=26888"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://journal.davidbyrne.com/2010/03/031810-collaborations-updated.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sidsavara.com/personal-development/start-things-you-cant-finish"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOP2V_np2c0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/04/take-it-to-the-limit/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://happydays.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/17/the-referendum/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://liftlab.com/think/laurent/2009/01/08/the-early-adopters-crisis/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/nov2007/gb20071119_822069.htm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.disambiguity.com/gardening-tools-for-social-networks/"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://matthewbattles.substack.com/p/a-prayer-for-limits">
    <title>A Prayer for Limits - by Matthew Battles</title>
    <dc:date>2026-07-03T07:04:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://matthewbattles.substack.com/p/a-prayer-for-limits</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["I’ve found myself stretched and challenged by Pope Leo’s encyclical, Magnifica humanitas [https://www.vatican.va/content/leo-xiv/en/encyclicals/documents/20260515-magnifica-humanitas.html ], which has helped to reset the public conversation about the perils of AI (perils that exist in the present, coarsening and riving us at every touchpoint). And beyond the horse-race punditry of so much of the media response, I’ve been grateful for nourishing commentary both appreciative and critical. Some thoughtful critics have pointed out how the encyclical blunts its effect in taking up some of the more shopworn tropes of tech criticism—in particular, the pale nostrum that tech is somehow “neutral.” For all the idolatrous evangelism of Silicon Valley, millions of users are turning to the bot not as oracle but as assistant—as a “tool,” anodyne and frictionless, with which to offload much of their mundane decision-making. Writing at the Hedgehog Review [https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/should-the-lion-lie-down-with-the-electric-lamb ], Antón Barba-Kay incisively describes the serpentine infiltration of the technocratic paradigm with its framework of “habitual incentives that, once internalized, become practically imperative.”

In the same spirit, Mike Sacasas describes how the technocratic framework of utility, which poses problems of alignment and impact as mere matters of habit and skill, misses the extent to which technology is not a tool but an environment [https://theconvivialsociety.substack.com/p/your-ai-is-not-a-tool ]. Following Marshall McLuhan’s observation that tech works to “alter sense ratios or patterns of perception steadily and without any resistance,” Sacasas suggests that we might best understand AI as “a denial of service attack on the human psyche.” I find this framing resonant—and to be sure, there’s much in the encyclical that unpicks this pattern as well.

I want to say that Magnifica Humanitas does its most important work not where it seeks to apprehend technology, but where it reminds us of all that we bring to our encounter with it—and all that we risk losing to it. Again and again the encyclical steps back from a speculative and theoretical encounter with technology and its perils to express, enumerate, and celebrate the richness of being human. This homiletic thread struck me especially while listening to Matthew Sitman and Sam Adler-Bell’s recent, glorious conversation with Jack Hanson on their podcast, Know Your Enemy [https://dissentmagazine.org/online_articles/know-your-enemy-pope-leo-xiv-magnifica-humanitas/ ]. I was moved by their recital of paragraphs 119 and 120 of the encyclical, where Leo voices the beauty and grace of our limits—the very limits of knowledge and the body which technocracy seeks to abolish. I will quote from them here:

<blockquote>Our relationship with life seems to be in crisis today. Everything that appears as a “limit” — incapacity, illness, old age, suffering, vulnerability — tends to be seen primarily as a defect to be corrected, rather than as a reality through which our humanity matures and opens itself to relationship. And yet we must remember that humanity flourishes not despite limitations, but often through them….

    It is precisely within our limitations that the following find a place: compassion, as well as a sincere concern for the needs of others; a generosity that can emerge even in the midst of darkness and failure; spiritual experience and the worship of God…. Mysteriously, it is precisely in such moments that we can discover a new wisdom, tangibly experience the closeness of others and encounter the presence of the Lord.</blockquote>

I found myself wanting not merely to assent to these words, but to pray with them. It was a curious and inexorable feeling. I have not made a practice of composing and sharing prayers; but a spiritual confidante whose fellowship I trust has encouraged me to share this one. And so here is a prayer for our limits, offered not for intercession or supplication but in adoration:

It is through your love, O Lord, that we learn to love our limits, 
which give force to our compassion
and shape to the fear we feel for others in their need; 
which nurture our generosity even as we fall and fail; 
which frame and enfold our measures of adoration. 
Confronted as we shall be by rejection, 
grieving as we must at the loss of all we hold dear, 
quaking as we do in the face of our failures, 
may we gather our wits, sense your nearness, 
and come to rest in the embrace of our entanglement.

We suffer from these limits and we learn from them. 
Without them, we would cease yearning even for love. 
To love, to learn, and to desire is to wound and be wounded. 
What a gift it is to be drawn into your woundedness, 
into this adventure of failure and freedom, disappointment and dream. 
In you, we affirm the tragedy and splendor and glorious mystery 
of being your body together; with you, we choose the human."]]></description>
<dc:subject>matthewbattles 2026 popeleoxiv magnificahumanitas encyclicals ai artificialintelligence catholicchurch catholicism antónbarba-kay technology siliconvalley lmsacasas technocracy utility tools environment marshallmcluhan perception resistance matthewsitman samadler-bell jackhanson beauty grace life living limits incapacity illness age aging suffering vulnerability humanity humanism compassion wisdom experience prayer spirituality failure freedom disappointment entanglement human humanness humans knowyourenemy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:d7e82e1856b5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:matthewbattles"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:popeleoxiv"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:magnificahumanitas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:encyclicals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:catholicchurch"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:catholicism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:antónbarba-kay"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:siliconvalley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lmsacasas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technocracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:utility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:environment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marshallmcluhan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:perception"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:resistance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:matthewsitman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:samadler-bell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jackhanson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:beauty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:grace"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:living"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:incapacity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:illness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:age"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:suffering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:vulnerability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:compassion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wisdom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:experience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:prayer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:spirituality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:failure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freedom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:disappointment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:entanglement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:human"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:knowyourenemy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2026/06/the-humane-localism-of-pope-leo-xiv/">
    <title>The Humane Localism of Pope Leo XIV - Front Porch Republic</title>
    <dc:date>2026-06-13T01:44:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2026/06/the-humane-localism-of-pope-leo-xiv/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Both global solidarity and local subsidiarity are needed if we are to address the emerging technology of so-called AI in sane and humane ways."

...

"The Catholic Church is globalist by definition. Its very name, translated from Greek, means “universal.” The Church has a single authority which oversweeps the planet, and, indeed, applies in theory to the whole cosmos. Its theology is grounded on the idea that the human race forms a sort of unity, a single family, beloved by God. In the realm of ethics, then, it has increasingly called for a more and more universal solidarity and brotherhood throughout its 2000 years of history. It is not possible with consistency to be a Catholic and a nationalist, a jingoist, or a racist.

This presents an interesting challenge for those who are by default skeptical of globalism and global organizations. The Vice President of the United States is perhaps of this sort; one who rails against globalism, international alliances, treaty organizations, and obligations to persons outside one’s own national community. Such a view is incompatible with the global solidarity of Catholic social teaching, which sees nations, and citizens of nations, as related in a “family” and as responsible to and for one another. The globalism of the Church is not the economic globalism which would erase cultures and borders for the sake of maximizing profit–far from it–it is rather a solidarity which means that rich nations cannot wash their hands of global poverty or the sufferings of foreigners.

The Church, particularly since the Second World War, has seen the need for international collaboration, and, indeed, for a common international forum for the resolution of disputes. It was devout Catholics who formed the European Union for purposes like this, in order to keep the peace in Europe. The popes have generally seen a need for something like the United Nations, even if, today, that organization is weak in many respects and in need of serious reform. Without an effective international forum, there is no space for peaceful adjudication of disagreement, too often leaving war as the only means available to nations to settle serious disputes. In the era of nuclear, biological, and chemical weaponry, the popes have put emphasis on the need for increased international collaboration to prevent catastrophe.

Such international agreements and cooperation, Pope Leo has said, are also necessary for a just governance of so-called artificial intelligence. Left totally unregulated, the immense power of these technologies will consolidate in the hands of a few hyper-powerful companies, unaccountable to the public. These companies cannot be trusted to ethically regulate their own conduct, and so what is needed is a collaborative, democratic process of governance to establish rules and laws that will apply to all AI companies. This is the dichotomy he sets up in framing the distinction between Babel and Jerusalem. Will technology be developed in a way that erases all individuality, subjecting the planet to the egos of a few, or will it be a collaborative process that includes all?

In the context of AI, it is not enough for one country to establish just laws. There is a concern that if a nation like the United States unilaterally “disarms” on AI by placing limits on its development and use, other nations, like China, will grow disparately powerful. It may seem unlikely that nations could agree on a common framework, but Pope Leo points to the international agreements that have, up to now, led to a reduction in total nuclear arms and avoided the bellicose release of any nuclear weaponry since those first two bombs in Japan.

Almost anything you predicate of the Catholic Church has to be qualified. Italians have a phrase “si, ma anche no”—”yes, but also no.” And so after describing the ways in which the Church is necessarily globalist, it is important to say “also, no.” As much as the Church is internationalist, it is also intensely localist. To the extent that it is universalist in ethics, it is also particularist. This is the Catholic frame of mind, sometimes also referred to as the “et-et” or “both/and.” Body and soul, man and God, heaven and earth, spirit and matter, freedom and responsibility, order and liberty, grace and free will.

And so, in Catholic social thought, global solidarity is always balanced by the principle of subsidiarity. This is the principle that power and decision-making should always devolve to the lowest and most local level appropriate. The reason the Church wants something like a United Nations is that nothing smaller can facilitate international accords. But it does not desire that such an organization interfere with the integrity of national self-determination, let alone with local, familial, or personal decision-making. Subsidiarity, the Pope writes, is “the principle according to which the role of individuals, families, local communities and intermediary organizations should not be supplanted by higher-level authorities.”

Both global solidarity and local subsidiarity are needed if we are to address the emerging technology of so-called AI in sane and humane ways. In order to regulate the tech giants, the power of international agreements and national legislation are required, but the responsibility for the reception of AI in local communities, schools, and families, require responsibility and freedom from individuals, too. The state may set general guardrails, but local authorities must decide how to implement new technologies in their own contexts. These technologies must not be forced on families or schools or churches.

Although the Church embraces an ethic of global, universal concern, in which each and every person is the subject of inviolable human rights, regardless of ethnicity, class, ability, or other conditions, its interest remains profoundly particular. What must not be lost in the age of AI is the individual value, dignity, and creativity of the unique human person: “The quality of a civilization is measured not by the power of its means, but by the care it is able to offer, by its ability to recognize the other as a face not merely as a function.”

The great risk of AI is that we reduce the human person to nothing but his function. If that is all man is, then why not replace him with a machine? On the grand scale, this might mean displacing the human being from his work, from his power of judgment, from his decision-making, even from his responsibility in war. On the personal level, this might mean replacing real relationships with the isolated hell of simulated friendship and fake belonging.

The Pope’s encyclical merits reading for its response to these problems, but also for its humane and balanced approach to globalism and localism. I was reminded of the approach that the philosopher David McPherson takes in his book The Virtues of Limits, which argues for a “humane localism.” The modifier “humane” is the adjective that keeps localism from devolving into bigotry and selfishness. Such a localism recognizes the principle of subsidiarity and the legitimacy of particular attachments. One really should be particularly attached to the land and the people immediately around them. One is responsible for the people and things that are “there” in their lives.

There is a great deal more that could be said on these themes and their concrete application to AI technology, but for that, I recommend a patient reading of the Pope’s recent letter. For the average reader, who is not a policymaker, the responsibility is to take action in one’s own most local context. International rules or laws are not enough. Whether these are passed and established or not, it is the responsibility of the person to protect his own humanity and to facilitate the humanity of his or her family, neighborhood, and town. The Pope says we have a “duty to remain profoundly human.” For most of us, this will be a very personal and local task. What can we do to keep ourselves and our communities close to one another and close to reality? Responsibility and creativity are required in each of our small, hidden lives.

Beneath the story of regulation and international agreements, the Pope says there is a “hidden and more decisive story,” the local, concrete stories of millions choosing to live well or badly. The good of the world depends on “the ‘martyrs of everyday life’ who care for, educate, accompany and comfort without fanfare, such as parents, nurses, doctors, volunteers and those who remain alongside an elderly person or an outcast. Their testimony demonstrates that goodness does not advance automatically, but requires the perseverance, memory and interior conversion necessary to begin anew, even after defeat.” The responsibility of remaining profoundly human belongs to all of us at every level. This is a hopeful thought, because it means that wherever you are, there is something that you can do, and do today, that can protect the greatness of the human person in the face of our current challenges.

The humane localism of Pope Leo is expressed in what he says must not be lost, which, ultimately, is the care, love, and attention found in concrete human relationships: “The ability to care for one another is a fundamental dimension of our humanity, one that is learned and mastered through lived experience. Reading stories to a child, offering company to an elderly person and arranging a home so that it is welcoming are simple gestures often rooted in family life. They teach us to value care at a societal level and train us to recognize others as persons worthy of attention.”

I think the holy father might agree with the Kentucky farmer, Wendell Berry, that it “all turns on affection.” Only those who have paid close attention to what is around them will learn to love and properly value what is around them. Only the attentive person becomes affectionate, and only the affectionate person becomes good. Lawmakers and businessmen must be shaped by affection for certain particular persons, and, indeed, certain particular woods, fields, and lakes, if they are not to become destructive. And we, too, if we are not to let the computers swamp, isolate, surveil, and manipulate us, must pay attention to what is real around us and learn to love it."]]></description>
<dc:subject>localism popeleoxiv catholicchurch catholicism 2026 nathanbeacon ai artificialintelligence magnificahumanitas globalism local smalll dignity humanism human humans davidmcpherson limits wendellberry</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:d6450d7d2c3d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:localism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:popeleoxiv"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:catholicchurch"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:catholicism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nathanbeacon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:magnificahumanitas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:globalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:local"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:smalll"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dignity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:human"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davidmcpherson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wendellberry"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.plough.com/en/topics/faith/discipleship/the-secret-of-the-third-monk">
    <title>The Secret of the Third Monk by Tish Harrison Warren</title>
    <dc:date>2026-05-11T01:20:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.plough.com/en/topics/faith/discipleship/the-secret-of-the-third-monk</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The desert monks tended to value withdrawal obsessively. One would have to in order to leave civilization and survive as a hermit for decades. Though the Desert Fathers and Mothers universally insist that we must respond materially when someone sick or in need crosses our path, at times their writings seem to elevate solitude and withdrawal as being more spiritually important than participation in the workaday world.

In contrast, our culture tends to be equally obsessive in the opposite direction. We overvalue work, accolades, output, and applause. We live in and among the crowd, nearly constantly. Today, many would feel as if the third monk wasted his life. What’s he good for? What’s he contributing to society? Or to the GDP? Or to the causes of justice? Why does he even matter?

Yet here he is, the exemplar in this weird, ancient story, calling to us from another place, culture, and time, asking us to reexamine our true purpose.

It’s not that, in our day, we never see solitude or stillness as valuable. We likely think of them as necessary acts of “self-care.” Yet we primarily view them as means to the end of more exertion, more rigor, more impact. They are merely fuel for a machine whose chief purpose is output and productivity. But this story implies that solitude and silence are our orienting goals, the rehumanizing rhythms that teach us that we are not, in fact, machines, but creatures – creatures with faults, limits, beauty, and worth, creatures made to dwell deeply with God.

If we see solitude and stillness primarily as a means to more productivity, we will try to get by with just enough to keep us going and no more. But if these practices are essential to our very being, to our purpose and humanity, then we will orient our work and our days, our weeks and our years, around them. These countercultural, seemingly wasteful things will become our first, most important, order of business. The third monk will turn out to be our surprise hero."]]></description>
<dc:subject>tishharrisonwarren 2026 monks solitude civilization society gpd justice work labor production productivity culture time purpose life living beauty worth value humanity limits silence selfcare</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:607263959b17/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tishharrisonwarren"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:monks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:solitude"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:civilization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gpd"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:justice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:production"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:productivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:time"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:purpose"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:living"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:beauty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:worth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:value"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:silence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:selfcare"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://samhenri.gold/blog/20260312-this-is-not-the-computer-for-you/">
    <title>“This Is Not The Computer For You” · Sam Henri Gold</title>
    <dc:date>2026-03-25T18:48:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://samhenri.gold/blog/20260312-this-is-not-the-computer-for-you/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["There is a certain kind of computer review that is really a permission slip. It tells you what you’re allowed to want. It locates you in a taxonomy — student, creative, professional, power user — and assigns you a product. It is helpful. It is responsible. It has very little interest in what you might become.

The MacBook Neo has attracted a lot of these reviews.

The consensus is reasonable: $599, A18 Pro, 8GB RAM, stripped-down I/O. A Chromebook killer, a first laptop, a sensible machine for sensible tasks. “If you are thinking about Xcode or Final Cut, this is not the computer for you.” The people saying this are not wrong. It is also not the point.

Nobody starts in the right place. You don’t begin with the correct tool and work sensibly within its constraints until you organically graduate to a more capable one. That is not how obsession works. Obsession works by taking whatever is available and pressing on it until it either breaks or reveals something. The machine’s limits become a map of the territory. You learn what computing actually costs by paying too much of it on hardware that can barely afford it.

I know this because I was running Final Cut Pro X on a 2006 Core 2 Duo iMac with 3GB RAM and 120GB of spinning rust. I was nine. I had no business doing this. I did it every day after school until my parents made me go to bed.

The machine came as a hand-me-down from my nana. She’d wiped it, set it up in her kitchen in Massachusetts. It was one software update away from getting the axe from Apple. I torrented Adobe CS5 the same week. Downloaded Xcode and dragged buttons and controls around in Interface Builder with no understanding of what I was looking at. I edited SystemVersion.plist to make the “About this Mac” window say it was running Mac OS 69, which is the s*x number, which is very funny. I faked being sick to watch WWDC 2011 — Steve Jobs’ last keynote — and clapped alone in my room when the audience clapped, and rebuilt his slides in Keynote afterward because I wanted to understand how he’d made them feel that way.

I knew the machine was wrong for what I wanted to do with it. I didn’t care. Every limitation was just the edge of something I hadn’t figured out yet. It was green fields and blue skies.

I thought about all of this when I opened the Neo for the first time.

What Apple put inside the Neo is the complete behavioral contract of the Mac. Not a Mac Lite. Not a browser in a laptop costume. The same macOS, the same APIs, the same Neural Engine, the same weird byzantine AppKit controls that haven’t meaningfully changed since the NeXT era. The ability to disable SIP and install some fuck-ass system modification you saw in a YouTube tutorial. All of it, at $599.

They cut the things that are, apparently, not the Mac. MagSafe. ProMotion. M-series silicon. Port bandwidth. Configurable memory. What remains is the Retina display, the aluminum, the keyboard, and the full software platform. I held it and thought, “yep, still a Mac.”

Yes, you will hit the limits of this machine. 8GB of RAM and a phone chip will see to that. But the limits you hit on the Neo are resource limits — memory is finite, silicon has a clock speed, processes cost something. You are learning physics. A Chromebook doesn’t teach you that. A Chromebook’s ceiling is made of web browser, and the things you run into are not the edges of computing but the edges of a product category designed to save you from yourself. The kid who tries to run Blender on a Chromebook doesn’t learn that his machine can’t handle it. He learns that Google decided he’s not allowed to. Those are completely different lessons.

Somewhere a kid is saving up for this. He has read every review. Watched the introduction video four or five times. Looked up every spec, every benchmark, every footnote. He has probably walked into an Apple Store and interrogated an employee about it ad nauseam. He knows the consensus. He knows it’s probably not the right tool for everything he wants to do.

He has decided he’ll be fine.

This computer is not for the people writing those reviews — people who already have the MacBook Pro, who have the professional context, who are optimizing at the margin. This computer is for the kid who doesn’t have a margin to optimize. Who can’t wait for the right tool to materialize. Who is going to take what’s available and push it until it breaks and learn something permanent from the breaking.

He is going to go through System Settings, panel by panel, and adjust everything he can adjust just to see how he likes it. He is going to make a folder called “Projects” with nothing in it. He is going to download Blender because someone on Reddit said it was free, and then stare at the interface for forty-five minutes. He is going to open GarageBand and make something that is not a song. He is going to take screenshots of fonts he likes and put them in a folder called “cool fonts” and not know why. Then he is going to have Blender and GarageBand and Safari and Xcode all open at once, not because he’s working in all of them but because he doesn’t know you’re not supposed to do that, and the machine is going to get hot and slow and he is going to learn what the spinning beachball cursor means. None of this will look, from the outside, like the beginning of anything. But one of those things is going to stick longer than the others. He won’t know which one until later. He’ll just know he keeps opening it.

That is not a bug in how he’s using the computer. That is the entire mechanism by which a kid becomes a developer. Or a designer. Or a filmmaker. Or whatever it is that comes after spending thousands of hours alone in a room with a machine that was never quite right for what you were asking of it.

I was that kid.

He knows it’s probably not the right tool. It doesn’t matter. It never did.

The reviews can tell you what a computer is for. They have very little interest in what you might become because of one."


[Feels like that fourth paragraph is a metaphor for a lot of things, like cities, like how children grow, like governments and civilizations, how change comes over time. We learn what is by bumping up against its edges and then we can be part of the conversation about what can or should come next and the process of making it. The Child Is the City × The City Is the Child]]]></description>
<dc:subject>macbookneo apple computers computing 2026 samhenrigold obsessions howwelearn tools machines learning limits limitations understanding boundaries howwework beginnersmind mac</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:66cfe5e5c360/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:macbookneo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:samhenrigold"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:obsessions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:machines"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limitations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:understanding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:boundaries"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwework"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:beginnersmind"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mac"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.hcn.org/articles/the-mystery-of-wildlife-and-a-world-beyond-our-understanding/">
    <title>The mystery of wildlife and a world beyond our understanding - High Country News</title>
    <dc:date>2025-11-26T20:35:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.hcn.org/articles/the-mystery-of-wildlife-and-a-world-beyond-our-understanding/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Science is essential to managing wildlife populations, but there are limits to what we know."]]></description>
<dc:subject>science wildlife multispecies morethanhuman unknowning notknowing knowledge limits 2025 nature animals plants nicholascranemoore alaska biology ecology governent research endangeredspecies</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:feb4e245a5f0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wildlife"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:multispecies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:morethanhuman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unknowning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:notknowing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:knowledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2025"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:animals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:plants"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nicholascranemoore"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alaska"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:biology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ecology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:governent"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:research"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:endangeredspecies"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.theatlantic.com/books/2025/11/paul-kingsnorth-against-the-machine/684848/">
    <title>Paul Kingsnorth’s Case for Limits - The Atlantic</title>
    <dc:date>2025-11-15T22:40:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.theatlantic.com/books/2025/11/paul-kingsnorth-against-the-machine/684848/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Paul Kingsnorth argues that much of today’s culture is intent on eroding what it means to be human."

[archived:
https://archive.ph/EaXNq ]

"If Against the Machine is one of the most insightful works on culture, technology, and the environment published in some time—and I believe it is—it is not so much because Kingsnorth is persuasive, or likely to win acolytes to his cause. It is not even because I think the limits he chooses to draw are necessarily the right ones. It is valuable because he sees with uncommon clarity that not only nature, but human nature, is being redefined by an anti-limit culture, economic system, and technology sector that treat minds, bodies, and environments as ripe for plundering and optimization in the name of progress. “What progress wants is to replace us,” Kingsnorth writes. “Perhaps the last remaining question is whether we will let it.”"

...


"What is novel about Against the Machine is Kingsnorth’s account of what is at stake in the 21st century: what he calls the “unmaking of humanity.” Human biology, as he sees it, is rooted in a few basic facts: We are born to sexed bodies on a planet with finite resources, endowed with minds capable of exercising creativity and seeking wisdom, and then we die. His book attempts to demonstrate that much of today’s scientific, economic, technological, and cultural activity is predicated on an effort, sometimes explicit and sometimes implicit, to overcome these realities. He offers several examples of ideas and innovations that he believes are part of this effort: biotech for billionaires seeking immortality; state-assisted suicide for the suffering; IVF and other results of “the technologisation of sex”; hormone therapy that allows children to change their gender; plans to geoengineer the planet and to abandon it and colonize Mars; robot “priests” that can preside over funerals. In isolation, the importance of any one of these examples may be easy to downplay. But Kingsnorth argues that, in the aggregate, they point toward a future in which the realities of human life—sex, death, environment—are negotiable.

The English writer G. K. Chesterton, a favorite of Kingsnorth’s, once argued that “the thing which keeps life romantic and full of fiery possibilities is the existence of these great plain limitations which force all of us to meet the things we do not like or do not expect.” It is these sorts of “great plain limitations” that Against the Machine frames as being undermined today. Kingsnorth encourages his readers to ask: If civilization is accelerating down a freeway that’s taking us away from our shared humanity—not to mention destroying the ecosystems we depend on—at what exit do we get off? Artificial intelligence, new medical interventions, and other modern marvels allow us some choice about which natural limits we accept, and which we decide to blow past. According to Kingsnorth, each person must make individual decisions about where to begin “drawing a line, and saying ‘no further.’”

Will you watch television shows written by large language models? Will you let the machines craft your emails, your college essays, obituaries for your loved ones? Will you get an AI-enabled virtual girlfriend? Will you let AI into your life knowing that data centers are metastasizing, while already-parched deserts are drained dry to cool them, while content moderators in Africa labor in quasi-slave conditions, sorting through images of beheadings and child abuse? Will you draw the line at letting algorithms design your baby? When the time comes, will you get your chip? Your brain-computer interface? Will you upload your consciousness to the cloud?

Kingsnorth’s most contentious claims concern his insistence that technoculture and its products—large language models, genetic engineering, and so on—share a great deal in common with progressive ideas about sex, sexuality, and gender. They all, in his telling, attempt to use technology to overcome what were once hard natural limits. Unlike some other critics of the transgender movement, however, Kingsnorth shows compassion for those struggling with their identity and does not scapegoat them for larger problems in society. “People with gender dysphoria, girls with short hair, boys who play with dolls, people whose sexualities differ from the norm: they are not, in fact, the real issue,” he writes. But he rejects assertions that “biology is a problem to be overcome” and that the “body is a form of oppression.” These ideas, first aired on his Substack, have, not surprisingly, alienated some fans of his earlier environmental writing. The writer, green activist, and former Kingsnorth enthusiast John Halstead said that Kingsnorth has become a “transphobic proto-fascist.” Specifically, Halstead argues that Kingsnorth confuses sex with gender, and is mistaken to call binary sex “natural,” given that other species have more sexual variation.

For my part, I don’t find Halstead’s objections especially persuasive. Rather, the principal problem with Kingsnorth’s gender analysis is that it mostly ignores the ways that those of us who live in the aftermaths of the industrial, scientific, sexual, and digital revolutions are all already “cyborgs,” as the science and technology theorist Donna Haraway would put it. Microplastics permeate our bodies, birth control courses through our veins, smartphones rewire our neural pathways, medical devices keep our hearts pumping. If, as Kingsnorth claims, gender-affirming medicine is an assault on human nature and the human body, then so, too, are pacemakers and prosthetic limbs, or Botox and condoms, for that matter.

But even though some of Kingsnorth’s claims may be too simplistic, and vulnerable to these kinds of rebuttals, and even though some readers may understandably be turned off by some of his stances, I do think he is getting at something important. William F. Buckley famously said that the purpose of his conservative magazine, National Review, was to stand “athwart history, yelling Stop, at a time when no one is inclined to do so.” It is a quip that Kingsnorth himself invokes, yet he is no true conservative. His philosophy has less in common with Buckley than with the refusenik scrivener of Herman Melville’s short story, a man who does not shriek or resort to violence or cruelty or name-calling, but who looks at what is being asked and offered by modernity and says, simply, “I would prefer not to.” For Kingsnorth, this ethic has led him to go off the grid, moving to Ireland, converting to Orthodox Christianity, and toiling on a subsistence farm with his wife and homeschooled children.

Kingsnorth knows full well that this hermit’s path is closed to most of his readers, just as he knows that he himself is no purist. He acknowledges that he makes his living off The Machine as a Substacker: “Even we romantic Luddites are doing much of our lamenting on the internet.” What is most provocative about Against the Machine is not Kingsnorth’s diagnosis of modernity but his insistence that, if you are troubled by a culture of no limits, you can still take some stands, even if they’re only small ones: Shun the chatbots and don’t engage with AI unless you have no choice. Lose the smartphone and “bring your children up to understand that the blue light is as dangerous as cocaine.” Seek out wild places and remember that your body is not made to be hacked or optimized but to connect you to the earth beneath your feet. Touch grass, quite literally, and do your best to connect with other people who want to do the same."]]></description>
<dc:subject>paulkingsnorth tyleraustinharper slow small human humans humanism technology modernity culture internet web online resistance rachelcarson efschumacher sustainability environment environmentalism ecology green degrowth hermits luddism neoluddism luddites neoluddites chatbots ai artificialintelligence socialmedia substack limits limitations progress economics smartphones maryharrington christopherlasch charlestaylor catholicism conservatism carltrueman philiprieff jonathanhaidt humanity gkchesterson llms compassion johnhalstead biology transphobia gender sex sexuality cyborgs medicine bodies hermanmelville williamfbuckley philosophy williamfbuckleyjr</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:9f3b78ff7ca8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:paulkingsnorth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tyleraustinharper"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:slow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:small"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:human"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:modernity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:resistance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rachelcarson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:efschumacher"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sustainability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:environment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:environmentalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ecology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:green"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:degrowth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hermits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:luddism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neoluddism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:luddites"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neoluddites"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatbots"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:substack"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limitations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:progress"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:smartphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maryharrington"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christopherlasch"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charlestaylor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:catholicism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conservatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:carltrueman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philiprieff"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jonathanhaidt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gkchesterson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:llms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:compassion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnhalstead"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:biology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:transphobia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gender"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sex"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sexuality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cyborgs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:medicine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bodies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hermanmelville"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:williamfbuckley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:williamfbuckleyjr"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2025/07/24/the-red-and-the-green-slow-down-degrowth-manifesto-saito/">
    <title>‘The Red and the Green’ | Casey A. Williams | The New York Review of Books</title>
    <dc:date>2025-07-11T20:16:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2025/07/24/the-red-and-the-green-slow-down-degrowth-manifesto-saito/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The Japanese philosopher Kohei Saito’s proposal for “degrowth communism” as a solution to the climate crisis has inspired fierce debate, including among other Marxists."

[archived:
https://archive.ph/I0JrH ]

"Saito never cites Huber in his most recent book, Marx in the Anthropocene: Towards the Idea of Degrowth Communism, but he spends the bulk of it making a case against any Marxism that treats growth as the basis for collective prosperity. Drawing on the earlier work of the Japanese Marxist Sadao Ohno, among others, he warns against acting as if “the productive forces developed under capitalism” are “neutral forces that can be taken over by the proletariat and utilized for establishing a socialist society.” As anyone who has read about concentrated animal feeding operations or Amazon warehouses knows, capitalism hardly organizes production in neutral ways: the profit imperative encourages the development of “productive forces” that cannot necessarily satisfy social needs in an ecologically rational fashion. For instance, using colossal amounts of insecticides to produce ever-increasing quantities of genetically identical bananas may be good business, but today’s banana plantations could not simply be seized by workers and made to serve an ecologically conscious socialism. What’s needed is a totally different way of producing bananas—and probably far fewer of them.

What did Marx himself have to say on the subject? In The Communist Manifesto he and Engels sound not unlike Huber when they argue that the task—and perhaps the fate—of the revolutionary working class is to release capitalism’s productive forces from the “fetters” of private property relations and enable their full, humane potential. This strikes Saito as a naive and “hopelessly outdated” theory of social development, but he also wants to show that it is not what Marx ultimately believed. By the end of his life, Saito argues, Marx had realized “that the availability of natural wealth is inevitably limited” and come to understand communism as a matter of collectively managing finite resources.

Marx recognized capitalism’s tendency to cannibalize itself early in his career, Saito observes. “Capitalist production,” Marx wrote in volume 1 of Capital, “only develops…by simultaneously undermining the original sources of all wealth: the soil and the worker.” Marx increasingly came to see such “robbery” of society’s sustaining conditions as intrinsic to capitalist production. Starting in the 1860s he studied precapitalist societies in Germany and Russia, as well as the work of natural scientists who were observing declines in soil productivity caused by concentrated farming to feed booming factory towns. Saito points to Marx’s notes on overgrazing in Ireland, collected in the Marx-Engels-Gesamtausgabe, as an example: “It will not be long before the Irish farmer experiences that this system will end in the total exhaustion of the land.”

During the same period, Saito suggests, Marx revised his view of premodern agrarian communes. He no longer saw them as feudal remnants that would have to be replaced, first by bourgeois private property and then by a communist state, but as models of healthy relations between people and nature. In his late notebooks and in draft letters to the Russian revolutionary Vera Zasulich, Marx suggested that communism might look not like capitalist technology plus a dictatorship of the proletariat but like a scaled-up version of the traditional Russian mir, which seemed capable of supporting a sustainable relationship between people and their environments.

“If the revolution…concentrates all its forces to ensure the unfettered rise of the rural commune, the latter will soon develop as a regenerating element of Russian society and an element of superiority over the countries enslaved by the capitalist regime,” he wrote. This would mean advancing toward what, in the first draft of an 1881 letter to Zasulich, Marx called a “higher form of an ‘archaic type’ of collective ownership and production.” For Saito, all this makes Marx, in effect, a degrowth communist.

Degrowth hardly stands or falls on Marx’s proleptic endorsement, but returning to Marx gives Saito a chance to underscore perhaps his most important claim: It is possible to devise systems of small-scale, collective resource management that expand social wealth and personal freedom while lessening our demands on the earth. This will be a difficult position for even the most sympathetic readers to fully endorse. Our world is so urbanized, globalized, and developed—the vast majority of people in the US and Japan live in cities and depend on transoceanic supply chains for basic necessities—that it is difficult to picture the transformations Saito proposes without some apocalyptic event.

Indeed, Slow Down’s principal weakness, shared with many degrowth proposals, is that it spends too little time spelling out what such a radically different system would look like, how it would work, and what it would take to move from today’s deeply entrenched global capitalism to something like its opposite. Where he does offer specifics, Saito suggests a range of more modest reforms: policies to rein in polluting industries, such as banning short-haul flights, as France has done, and to decommodify basic goods, such as making low-emission public transit free for all residents, as Boston has proposed as part of its municipal Green New Deal. He praises workers’ coops in Spain’s Basque region and Jackson, Mississippi, and points to La Via Campesina—a global network of peasant movements defending locally controlled, nonindustrial agriculture—as evidence that treating farmland as a “commons” is not only ecologically sustainable but feasible.

Saito’s poster child, though, is Barcelona’s “solidarity economy.” Cooperatively owned businesses from restaurants to tech companies employ 8 percent of Barcelona’s residents, and dozens of collectively owned enterprises, credit unions, and cooperative schools allow people to share resources and labor. The idea is to unlink the provision of goods and services from profit: for instance, Barcelona’s housing coops guarantee members a “use right” to their homes that they can bequeath but not sell, preventing the speculation that plagues housing markets.

Partly due to the political strength of these cooperatives, residents have pushed the city to “decarbonize and decommodify” a range of municipal services, including by establishing a public energy company that provides renewable energy to residents as a “basic right.” Expanded public services have come with restrictions on private property: to ease its tourism-fueled housing crisis, Barcelona will prohibit Airbnb starting in 2028, and at the national level Spain’s socialist government recently levied an unprecedented wealth tax on the superrich.

Scaling up the Barcelona model would require redistribution on a global scale as well as a dramatic reduction in economic output. This would demand abstemiousness from the global middle classes. They may need to sacrifice such luxuries as frequent air travel, next-day delivery, out-of-season produce, and F-150s, as well as shoulder some of the work of building houses, growing food, and caring for the elderly. Like almost all degrowth proponents, Saito insists that such sacrifices would, under conditions of greater social equality, open more avenues for self-fulfillment. The hollow pleasures of private consumption would be traded for greater “public affluence” in the form of mass transit, efficient urban neighborhoods, and common parks, theaters, and gyms.

Here Saito envisions a profound cultural shift. Degrowth, he suggests, would require redefining what it means to live well—valuing sufficiency, generosity, and care over quantity, convenience, and speed. “The only way to realize happiness for all in a just and sustainable way is through the exercise of voluntary ‘self-limitation,’” he writes. Only such sacrifice “will allow the realm of freedom to expand.”

Certainly some aspects of the present seem conducive to this kind of collective slowing down—not least the mounting recognition that fossil fuel combustion cannot continue if we wish to live on a habitable planet. As Saito points out, in cities like Barcelona many people have already managed to achieve more communal, ecologically rational ways of life. But the political barriers to achieving anything like degrowth communism on a global scale are formidable, to say the least—and Saito’s proposal for social transformation would be more persuasive if he explained what forces could challenge a political and economic system defended by some of the richest people in the history of the world.

In Slow Down, Saito encourages readers to start small: launch “a workers’ co-op, a school strike, an organic farm—it doesn’t matter the form it takes.” These all seem like worthwhile projects that might improve the lives of participants and build support for more sweeping reforms. But for now degrowth communism is a destination without a map. You won’t leave Saito’s books with a clear sense of how to revolutionize an alienating and destructive society. What he offers instead is a challenge. “We cannot solve a problem triggered by capitalism while still preserving capitalism,” he writes. Readers who buy this claim will have to decide what to do with it."]]></description>
<dc:subject>koheisaito degrowth economics marxism marxists degrowthcommunism communism climatecrisis climate climatechange globalwarming 2025 via:javierarbona policy politics efschumacher nicholasgeorgescu-roegen dennismeadows cluborome capitalism gdp eu europe japan growth ipcc society humanity inflationreducationact anthropocene shinsho sustainability slow small germany soil competition capital maxroser wilfredbeckerman robertpollin worldbank stéphanehallegatte greengrowth fossilfuels renewables emissions carbonemissions globalnorth globalsouth economy congo promethianism matthewhuber consumption consumerism luddism neoluddites neoluddism luddites sergelatouche workingclass work labor socialism property privateproperty ownership karlmarx limitations limits nature environment verazasulich sadaoohno solidarity cooperation collectivism sufficiency enough happiness well-being wellbeing self-limitation sacrifice masstransit urbanism parks publicparks commons housing food agriculture class airtravel flights care caring ag</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:d339e784fec2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:koheisaito"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:degrowth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marxism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marxists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:degrowthcommunism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:communism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:climatecrisis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:climate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:climatechange"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:globalwarming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2025"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:via:javierarbona"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:efschumacher"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nicholasgeorgescu-roegen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dennismeadows"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cluborome"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gdp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:eu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:europe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:japan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:growth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ipcc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inflationreducationact"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anthropocene"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:shinsho"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sustainability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:slow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:small"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:germany"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:soil"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:competition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capital"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maxroser"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wilfredbeckerman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robertpollin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:worldbank"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stéphanehallegatte"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:greengrowth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fossilfuels"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:renewables"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:emissions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:carbonemissions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:globalnorth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:globalsouth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:congo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:promethianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:matthewhuber"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consumption"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consumerism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:luddism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neoluddites"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neoluddism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:luddites"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sergelatouche"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:workingclass"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:privateproperty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ownership"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:karlmarx"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limitations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:environment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:verazasulich"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sadaoohno"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:solidarity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cooperation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collectivism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sufficiency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:enough"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:happiness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:well-being"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wellbeing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:self-limitation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sacrifice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:masstransit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:urbanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:parks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:publicparks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:commons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:housing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:food"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:agriculture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:class"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:airtravel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:flights"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:care"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:caring"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ag"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://danmcquillan.org/decomputing.html">
    <title>Decomputing</title>
    <dc:date>2025-05-15T23:06:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://danmcquillan.org/decomputing.html</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[[direct link to video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCnSCB19l7A ]

"One of the concepts I introduce in this talk is the idea of 'decomputing', as a 50:50 hybrid of decolonial and degrowth approaches.

"Decomputing challenges the expansionism of scale that AI brings to its technical form, to its environmental demands and to its social impacts. This expansionism is AI's version of 'growth', and it's empty metrics echo GDP in the ways they conceal the underlying destructiveness. Decomputing takes the idea of ‘computing within limits’ to refer not only to the scale of computational machinery but to limits of extractive and colonial logics, limits to a biosphere’s ability to recover, limits to our Western knowledge systems and limits to tech solutionism.

Decomputing is the reassertion of relationality over abstraction, and of the vernacular, as Ivan Illich would put it, over scale; that is, of vernacular forms-of-living that presuppose limits to property, limits to technology, and limits to scarcity. It's a logic for resisting datacentres, a way of cutting through the climate-washing and a way of extending those struggles. It's a rationale for more collective action to constrain computing which is out of balance with social & environmental justice.""]]></description>
<dc:subject>danmcquillan 2024 computers computing decomputing ivanillich growth ai artificialintelligence gdp economics colonialism colonization extraction expansionism relationships relational abstraction vernacular scale small slow living life scarcity limits technology property resistance luddism neoluddism luddites neoluddites balance environmentaljustice socialjustice datacenters environment climate climatechange nvidia fascism ecology ethics algorithms crises science necorpolitics chatgpt openai technopsychopathy uk us education schools schooling infrastructure teachers teaching healthcare virtuality nurses nursing generationalai context livedexperience bureaucracy cruelty thatcherism alorithms wallstreet identity control criticalthinking bureaucraticcruelty bubbles accountability shockdoctine finance greatrecession globalfinancialcrisis microfasicisms gillesdeleuze deleuze&amp;guattari félixguattari effectivealtruism eugenics inequality globalsouth surveillance border borders gaza palestine genocide ethniccleansing</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:4bfd6a0cd45b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:danmcquillan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2024"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:decomputing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ivanillich"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:growth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gdp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colonialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colonization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:extraction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:expansionism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:relationships"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:relational"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:abstraction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:vernacular"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scale"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:small"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:slow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:living"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scarcity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:resistance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:luddism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neoluddism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:luddites"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neoluddites"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:balance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:environmentaljustice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialjustice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:datacenters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:environment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:climate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:climatechange"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nvidia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fascism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ecology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:algorithms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:crises"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:necorpolitics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatgpt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technopsychopathy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:uk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:infrastructure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teachers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:healthcare"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:virtuality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nurses"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nursing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:generationalai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:context"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:livedexperience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bureaucracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cruelty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thatcherism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alorithms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wallstreet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:identity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:control"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:criticalthinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bureaucraticcruelty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bubbles"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:accountability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:shockdoctine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:finance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:greatrecession"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:globalfinancialcrisis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:microfasicisms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gillesdeleuze"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:deleuze&amp;guattari"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:félixguattari"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:effectivealtruism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:eugenics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inequality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:globalsouth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:surveillance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:border"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:borders"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gaza"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:palestine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:genocide"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ethniccleansing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYoCyEulBV8">
    <title>The Left vs. Abundance with Malcolm Harris - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2025-04-15T03:47:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYoCyEulBV8</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Malcolm Harris, on how pragmatism has been monopolized by centrists who fail to take climate change seriously—the same kind of centrists who'd trust tech industrialists to save the human race. We discuss why you need a pharmacist on your apocalypse team, and Malcolm's new book, 'What's Left', which understands how our survival depends on anti-capitalist collectivity, unlike Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson's Libertarian-leaning Democratic Party think tank bestseller, 'Abundance.' 

'What's Left' 
https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/malcolm-harris/whats-left/9781668646861/

"What's the Matter with Abundance?" The Baffler
https://thebaffler.com/latest/whats-the-matter-with-abundance-harris "]]></description>
<dc:subject>malcolmharris 2025 sadfrancisco abundance ezraklein derekthompson yimby yimbyism yimbys toshiomeronek paloalto history housing left capitalism democrats oligarchy bigtech technosolutionism technooptimism libertarianism trickledowneconomics ronaldreagan reaganism politics economics economy evolutionarypsychology markets marketfundamentalism socialplanning society existence competition marketcraft keynesianism pragmatism limits climate climatechange globalwarming civilization trickledown liberalism neoliberalism inequality deregulation innovation growrh environment regulation policy housingcrisis sanfrancisco law legal government governance growth cities abundanceagenda abundancenetwork abundancemovement accelerationism progressivism</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:b0a5cb70c9e0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:malcolmharris"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2025"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sadfrancisco"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:abundance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ezraklein"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:derekthompson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:yimby"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:yimbyism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:yimbys"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:toshiomeronek"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:paloalto"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:housing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:left"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:democrats"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:oligarchy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bigtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technosolutionism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technooptimism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:libertarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:trickledowneconomics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ronaldreagan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reaganism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:evolutionarypsychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:markets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marketfundamentalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialplanning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:existence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:competition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marketcraft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:keynesianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pragmatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:climate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:climatechange"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:globalwarming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:civilization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:trickledown"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:liberalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neoliberalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inequality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:deregulation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:innovation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:growrh"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:environment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:regulation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:housingcrisis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sanfrancisco"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:legal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:government"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:governance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:growth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:abundanceagenda"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:abundancenetwork"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:abundancemovement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:accelerationism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:progressivism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://meantforyou.beehiiv.com/p/our-own-devices">
    <title>Our Own Devices</title>
    <dc:date>2025-04-14T06:38:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://meantforyou.beehiiv.com/p/our-own-devices</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Some thoughts on the middle distance

I’ve been thinking lately about perspective as a sort of angel, a source of strength and protection, and wishing I could pass it along like a whisper or a kiss on the cheek because it’s only ever been given to me, it’s not something I can create alone. Last year, perspective rescued me from hopelessness. It rescues me still by providing a ground of reassurance that makes participation possible. I’ll give a small example. The fact of fire affects me differently if I regard it as a phenomenon we can understand, prepare for, and coexist with instead of an annihilating absolute newly wrought by climate change. The former offers opportunity, a place to move from, experience to build on, while the latter is simply “we’re cooked, so why bother?”

My problem in 2023* was an incomplete perspective, which is to say a wrong one. I was convinced human beings had passed a point of no return, cleaved irrevocably from our own future by violent repudiation of the conditions of our existence, and that our spectacular, rapid eradication was close at hand. What I believe now is nearer to the refrain used years ago by me and my friends during our yoga teacher training: “well, it is and it isn’t.” We answered any yes/no question and corrected each other’s statements this way, poking fun at our teachers. It’s a joke about truth and the absurdity of reality, a coin made of two sides that are not extricable. The whole that is unintelligible when treated as parts.

Our species will end because everything ends, even the sun, that avatar of unchangeability in which we are meant to take solace and do, because it lasts longer than us. Something always continues beyond ourselves and something always precedes us. We each die yet while we are alive, our actions have meaning and their impacts (for better or worse) are not negated by death. This is demonstrably so. Everyone is here by way of ancestors whose names they’ll never know and life forms that preceded names. Everyone reading this, I’m certain, has been intimately changed by those who’ve died—family members, teachers, pets, friends, musicians and writers you never met. But even if you accept this intellectually, it can be very hard to believe that your own presence and choices are consequential. The inadequacy, the sense of futility, can be so acute.

[image: "from Giovanni di Paolo’s The Creation and the Explosion from the Paradise"]

Fatalism, both in sincerity and as a joke that thinks it’s the truth, is all over social media. It’s contagious and self-reinforcing because the algorithm, as we know, rewards hyperbole and first reaction—the hottest one, the ready one, whatever billows up to the surface like a belch. There’s such a strong public undercurrent now of what is often called nihilism, but when people say “nothing matters” out of hopelessness, they don’t mean literally that. Ironically, they often speak out of the feeling that something matters, deeply, yet it feels like they can’t protect or even touch it. That’s not nihilism. Nor is the expression usually nihilistic; rather, it is cynical. In the words of Brother David Steindl-Rast, cynicism is an anger that arises when you’ve “set yourself limits you aren’t willing to transcend.”

I’ve come to suspect that the greatest injury inflicted on us by the internet is its perpetual circumscription of perspective. Content consumption, in whatever form the content comes, gives the sense of being immobilized at a near remove. You’re not forced to look at or read or listen to any particular thing but you’re locked into the same sense of distance from everything you see or hear: too close to be ignorant or apathetic, too far to intervene. Its limits are fabricated, false, and utterly debilitating. We feel powerless to do anything other than consume, so we keep watching and clicking and reading. Consumption becomes our action and commentary is the most one can hope to contribute—comment and circulation to others who will consume and “engage” in the same fashion. Across platforms and posts I see the recurring sentiment of “I don’t know what to do” and it’s shared with the implication that knowing what to do, and therefore doing something, is categorically impossible.

[image: "Peter Schmidt’s Evening Star"]

There’s so much inside and around this topic, I’ve written and removed thousands of words to get to the point: I think jailbreaking from the middle distance is transformative and liberatory, and I don’t think it happens automatically by putting your phone away. I think you have to make a conscious, curious effort and find the right teachers. The tools that worked best for me were history and religion, which are of course tightly entwined. With these lens, my perspective expanded a lot.

I was so subconsciously stuck on the notion of newness, the idea that everything about our moment is unprecedented: the rapaciousness of the bloodlust, the deterioration of conditions, the massacres and greed. Newness and insurmountability were one in my mind. The anguish and existential inquiry that I found in religious texts, especially, comforted me because it convinced me none of what I’m feeling or witnessing is new. The human condition itself is a sorrow so strong that it cracks open into hope, over and over again, generation after generation. The evil we’re pervaded by has always been part of us. The one struggle under many faces.

And once you zoom out, you can zoom in to find the individual acts of assistance. Reparative and corrective action requires getting close because it requires specificity and care. Weapons don’t; bombs don’t. But moral and loving work does. After zooming out, I was not so troubled by the insufficiency of action because I understood it differently—I am small but I am part of something that isn’t—and so action became available. In the middle distance, I think the most you can do is sign petitions or donate money remotely, neither of which feel like involvement. I’m not saying they shouldn’t be done, only that they are not acts that close the distance. They don’t bring me nearer to others or my own agency.

I’m coming to an awkward close. There’s more to say but saying more isn’t always helpful. I’ve been slowly reading Robert Antelme’s The Human Race, his account of his time in the concentration camps where he very nearly died. It was the only book he ever wrote and no superlative can convey what it’s like. The wind blows on his body outside and he thinks: the wind is part of the resistance, the wind brings France back to us. Gravity, too, is part of the resistance. The Nazis control so many things but if they trip, they fall. How did he see the situation this way while starving to death, scabbed from lice bites? How did he see them this way after he returned home? When he got back to Paris, he weighed 80 pounds, and no one wanted to tell him that his younger sister had died in Ravensbruck. I am overwhelmed by this remarkable world we have shared and are sharing, the world in which, for a moment, 78 years after he wrote it, 35 years after his death, he can help me see, too.

“We cannot have it that the SS does not exist or has not existed,” he writes. “They shall have burned children, they shall have done it willingly… They are a force… And as we are, too; for even now they cannot stop us from exerting our power.”

“The reign of man,” he writes, “man who acts and invests things with meaning, does not cease.”

*https://meantforyou.beehiiv.com/p/writing-again "]]></description>
<dc:subject>charlotteshane 2025 perspective hopelessness reassurance climate climatechange globalwarming 2023 unchangeability change giovannidipaolo fatalism sincerity truth socialmedia internet online nihilism davidsteindl-rast limits circumspection contentconsumption powerlessness power consumptions consumerism engagement platfforms peterschmidt attention history religion newness bloodlust greed inquiry existentialism humancondition care caring specificity zoomininandout action agency robertantelme nazis fascism</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:a5a12a28ecdf/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charlotteshane"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2025"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:perspective"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hopelessness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reassurance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:climate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:climatechange"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:globalwarming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2023"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unchangeability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:change"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:giovannidipaolo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fatalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sincerity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:truth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nihilism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davidsteindl-rast"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:circumspection"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:contentconsumption"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:powerlessness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:power"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consumerism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:engagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:platfforms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:peterschmidt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:religion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:newness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bloodlust"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:greed"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inquiry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:existentialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humancondition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:care"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:caring"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:specificity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:zoomininandout"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:action"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:agency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robertantelme"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nazis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fascism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2025/04/quaker-parenting-research/682277/">
    <title>Quaker Parents Were Ahead of Their Time - The Atlantic</title>
    <dc:date>2025-04-14T01:07:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2025/04/quaker-parenting-research/682277/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The nearly 375-year-old religion’s principles line up surprisingly well with modern parenting research."

...

"The Religious Society of Friends—“Quaker” being a derogatory term, reclaimed—is a hard faith to explain, because it tries to eschew dogma. It’s now possible to be a Muslim Quaker or a Hindu one, or to not believe in any god at all. That said, Quakers all over the world tend to talk about the same principles and take part in some of the same practices. For example, in place of rules, Quakers publish “advices and queries,” which prompt individuals to make good, considered choices. Attendees of Quaker meetings near me were recently asked to ponder: “Do I make my home a place of friendliness, joy, and peace, where residents and visitors feel God’s presence?” The children’s version read: “In what ways am I kind to people in my home?” Certain expectations underlie these questions—that one should try to be kind, for example—but so do curiosity and an openness to differing answers.

As it turns out, leading with questions is a great way for parents to talk to children. Encouraging kids to come up with their own solutions grants them autonomy. And as Emily Edlynn, a psychologist and the author of Autonomy-Supportive Parenting, told me, kids who feel like they have control over their life experience better emotional health, including less depression and anxiety. Fostering kids’ autonomy has also been tied to children building stronger self-regulation skills, doing better in school, and navigating social situations more effectively. Best of all, once kids get used to the self-discipline that comes with exercising autonomy, it can become habitual. Give your kids agency in one area, and they tend to “develop internal motivation even for things that they do not want to do,” Edlynn said, “because they’re integrating the understanding of the ‘why’ those things are so important.”

It can be scary to trust children with independence. But kids are better problem-solvers than some people might think. When my son, at age 10, asked me if he could play laser tag with friends, I asked him how he could avoid pulling a trigger (in deference to the Quaker value of pacifism). He decided to serve as referee. I was proud of him for exercising “discernment,” another Quaker value, all on his own, for listening to his “still, small voice within” and letting it guide him to a solution that satisfied his need for belonging. He is now 13 and recently couldn’t decide whether to accept a babysitting job or relax at home. I asked him, “What do you think tomorrow-you will wish today-you had done?” He picked out stuffed animals to give his charges, spent the evening feeling needed, and had cash the next day when he wanted to buy boba for a friend.

Obviously, real damage could come from giving kids complete autonomy, and Quakerism recognizes this. Early Quaker epistles inveigh against permissiveness, and a 1939 text, Children & Quakerism, quotes William Penn, the Quaker who founded Pennsylvania, saying, “If God give you children, love them with wisdom, correct them with affection.” In other words, pacifism doesn’t mean that parents can’t set boundaries. As a 1967 book about Quaker education, Friends and Their Children, put it, “There is a difference in principle between setting an army on the march and carrying a tired and hysterical child up to bed.” So when my son used to leave toys out, I wouldn’t clean up for him. I’d prompt him to do so: “I see blocks still sitting on the floor.” That was usually enough. When it wasn’t, I would stage a mini sit-in, and we wouldn’t go on with our evening until the blocks were put away—the type of consequence that’s crucial for raising considerate kids. If he hollered, I would “bear witness” to his suffering and “be with” him, silent but unwavering.

In addition to sit-ins, both civic and domestic, Quakers have a tradition known as “spiritual gifts.” That involves treating individual talents as assets that belong to the community and ought to be developed in ourselves and encouraged in others. For parents, this means focusing on what our children choose to do, are good at, and enjoy. You can’t ignore your kids’ weaknesses—but you can spend less energy on them. For my youngest’s terrible handwriting, that meant aiming for legibility and saving the time that could have gone toward cursive lessons for activities that animate her, such as building boats and airplanes from the contents of the recycling bin. Research backs up this approach. According to Lea Waters, a psychology professor at the University of Melbourne and the author of The Strength Switch, focusing on children’s strengths “has been shown to increase self-esteem, build resilience, decrease stress, and make kids more healthy, happy, and engaged in school.”

But perhaps the most important element of Quaker parenting is the edict to “let your life speak.” In practice, that looks like apologizing to your kids freely, saying please and thank you, and, yes, trying not to shout at them. It means acting in accordance with your values, such as when my grandma took me to pack toothbrushes and soap into “kits for Kosovo,” and when my kids make PB&Js for our unhoused neighbors or bring games to a family shelter. The idea, supported by common sense and reams of research, is that kids develop empathy by living it alongside their caregivers. What’s more, another study establishes that knowing that their parents value kindness above achievement protects kids’ well-being.

Infused in all of these practices is the conviction that children are not lesser proto-adults, but fellow beings worthy of respect and agency regardless of their behavior. The closest that Quakers come to dogma is the belief, first expressed by the religion’s founder, that there is “that of God” in every person, children very much included. That’s why, as Friends and Their Children notes, Quakers try to make children feel “welcome at the very centre of life”—a concept quite similar to the “unconditional positive regard” that psychologists today know leads to secure kids. Children who feel valued in this way, and who believe that what they do adds value, generally come to understand that they matter. And a sense of mattering makes kids more likely to be happy, resilient, academically high-achieving, and satisfied with their life, as well as less likely to struggle with perfectionism or addiction, Gordon Flett, the author of the American Psychological Association’s Mattering as a Core Need in Children and Adolescents, told me.

So here I am, nearly 375 years after Quakerism’s founding, asking my kids questions, giving them bounded autonomy, and nudging them to invest in their strengths and be stewards of their community—all while communicating that their worth is in no way contingent. Put together, these Quaker practices result in a parenting style considered ideal by psychologists: authoritative parenting. As Judith Smetana, a University of Rochester psychology professor whose work focuses on parent-adolescent interactions, explained to me, authoritative parenting is characterized by the effort to warmly and responsively set limits, and to support kids rather than punish them harshly when they overstep those limits.

Some people might argue that Quaker parents aren’t doing anything special. What is free-range parenting if not oodles of agency? When Quaker parents try to stay calm and acknowledge their kids’ feelings when they act out, aren’t we just doing what the so-called Millennial parenting whisperer Dr. Becky recommends? In telling my teenage son that I see the packaging from his graphing calculator lying on the table rather than in the trash, am I not just following “Say What You See” coaching?

But pop parenting philosophies can be unhelpful, especially because parents not infrequently misinterpret them. Take gentle parenting. At its best, it encourages parents to give kids the respect and empathy they need to thrive. But gentle parenting, at least as it’s presented in Instagram reels, can result in children doing as they please. “What it really leaves out,” Smetana told me, “is the importance of structure and being clear about where the boundaries are.” Many parents are left feeling helpless—a common experience among pop-parenting adherents. In the aughts, a friend of mine tried attachment parenting, an approach centered on enhancing the bond between mother and child with, among other practices, maximum physical proximity. She ended up feeling like a failure each time she put her baby down to use the restroom."

[archived:
https://archive.ph/dg2c4 ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>quaker quakers parenting 2025 gailcornwall children education positivereinforcement motivation quakerism snowplowparents restraint learning howwelearn permissiveness boundaries structure attachementparenting judithsmetana psychology limits boundedautonomy autonomy authority authoritativeparenting gordonflett schools schooling friendsschools values behavior modeling williampenn spiritualgifts leawaters self-esteem encouragement 1939 history trust independence agency discernment quakervalues emilyedlynn freerangeparenting kindness joy friendliness</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:e515e38b9350/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quaker"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quakers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:parenting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2025"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gailcornwall"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:positivereinforcement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:motivation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quakerism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:snowplowparents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:restraint"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:permissiveness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:boundaries"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:structure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attachementparenting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:judithsmetana"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:boundedautonomy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:autonomy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:authoritativeparenting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gordonflett"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:friendsschools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:values"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:behavior"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:modeling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:williampenn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:spiritualgifts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:leawaters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:self-esteem"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:encouragement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1939"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:trust"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:independence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:agency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:discernment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quakervalues"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:emilyedlynn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freerangeparenting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kindness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:joy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:friendliness"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.lavanguardia.com/libros/libro/los-limites-de-la-ciencia-9788410214453">
    <title>LOS LÍMITES DE LA CIENCIA (libro del 2024). Escrito por Javier Arguello. ISBN 9788410214453 | La Vanguardia</title>
    <dc:date>2024-11-24T07:36:05+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.lavanguardia.com/libros/libro/los-limites-de-la-ciencia-9788410214453</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Un persuasivo ensayo que nos invita a imaginar nuevas maneras de mirar el mundo.

No hay prácticamente ningún tema de los importantes que no se trate en este libro: la vida y la conciencia, el espacio y el tiempo. Y el modo en que el momento que nos toca vivir nos obliga a repensar casi todo lo que creíamos saber acerca de nosotros mismos y del universo.

La colección Endebate es el hogar de aquellos textos breves que presentan una opinión, defienden una actitud o cuentan una historia, pero son más un aperitivo que un banquete, estimulan la conversación más que saciarla e inician un festín (que no clausuran). Como los mejores bocados, entran por los ojos y dejan un largo poso en el paladar."]]></description>
<dc:subject>2024 javierargüello science limits consciousness conscience life</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:b458e2246ffa/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2024"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:javierargüello"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consciousness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conscience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:life"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-5mecyWUgI">
    <title>Entre partículas y palabras. Física y literatura en la construcción de la realidad - Javier Argüello - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2024-11-23T20:01:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-5mecyWUgI</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["A partir de sus visitas al acelerador de partículas del CERN, el centro de investigación de física de partículas más grande del mundo, y de las conversaciones mantenidas con los renombrados físicos que allí trabajan, el escritor Javier Argüello abordó el fascinante momento que está viviendo la física y los límites con los que se está encontrando. También revisó qué tienen que decir al respecto las estructuras literarias como fórmulas capaces de incluir el papel de la conciencia en la construcción de la realidad.

Presenta Colbún y Coopeuch. Proyecto financiado por PAOCC"]]></description>
<dc:subject>2024 javierargüello physics literature reality conscience consciousness cern quantumphysics time space precision timekeeping juravalley jura switzerland limits alberteinstein beauty mechanism language math mathematics understanding universe quantummechanics largehadroncollider science material higgsboson peterhiggs mass symmetry stringtheory poerdspective pointofview nielsbohr complementarity objectivity experience observation experimentation automatons ai artificialintelligence calvinism history johncalvin france life bodies humans human alessandrovolta maryshelley frankenstein robots robotics measurement unions religion sciencefiction scifi intelligence imagination wonder cycles nature labor work industrialrevolution reductionism regulation monasteries mechanics wernerheisenberg wolfgangpauli truth philosophy soul god belief being existence details detail taboos order clarity pragmatism positivism bigdata constellationalthinking alchemy nightsky constellations astronomy humaninty totality arthureddington</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:a997054dc15f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2024"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:javierargüello"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:physics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conscience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consciousness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cern"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quantumphysics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:time"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:space"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:precision"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:timekeeping"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:juravalley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jura"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:switzerland"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alberteinstein"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:beauty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mechanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:math"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mathematics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:understanding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quantummechanics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:largehadroncollider"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:material"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:higgsboson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:peterhiggs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mass"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:symmetry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stringtheory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:poerdspective"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pointofview"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nielsbohr"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:complementarity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:objectivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:experience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:observation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:experimentation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:automatons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:calvinism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johncalvin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:france"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bodies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:human"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alessandrovolta"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maryshelley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:frankenstein"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robots"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robotics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:measurement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:religion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sciencefiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scifi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:intelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:imagination"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wonder"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cycles"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:industrialrevolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reductionism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:regulation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:monasteries"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mechanics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wernerheisenberg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wolfgangpauli"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:truth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:soul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:god"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:belief"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:being"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:existence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:details"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:detail"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:taboos"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:order"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:clarity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pragmatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:positivism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bigdata"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:constellationalthinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alchemy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nightsky"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:constellations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:astronomy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humaninty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:totality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:arthureddington"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/05/magazine/letter-of-recommendation-recently-returned-books.html">
    <title>Letter of Recommendation: Recently Returned Books - The New York Times</title>
    <dc:date>2024-08-30T17:47:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/05/magazine/letter-of-recommendation-recently-returned-books.html</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[[via:
https://austinkleon.substack.com/p/recently-returned

"In Elisa’s latest collection [Any Person Is the Only Self: Essays], she writes about the magic of the “recently returned” shelf at the public library: “I like how it reduced the scope of my options, but without imposing any one person’s taste or agenda upon me, or the generalized taste of the masses suggested by algorithms. The books on that shelf weren’t being marketed to me; they weren’t omnipresent in my social media feeds. They were often old and very often ugly. I came to think of that shelf as an escape from hype. It was negative hype. It was anti-curation.”"]

"My favorite spot in my local library — the central branch in Denver — is not the nook for new releases; not the holds room, where one or two titles are usually waiting for me; not the little used-book shop, full of cheap classics for sale; and not the fiction stacks on the second floor, though I visit all those areas frequently. It’s a shelf near the Borrower Services desk bearing a laminated sign that reads RECENTLY RETURNED.

This shelf houses a smallish selection of maybe 40 to 60 books — about the number you might see on a table in the front of a bookstore, where the titles have earned a position of prominence by way of being new or important or best sellers or staff favorites. The books on the recently returned shelf, though, haven’t been recommended by anyone at all. They simply limit my choices by presenting a near-random cross section of all circulating parts of the library: art books and manga and knitting manuals next to self-help and philosophy and thrillers, the very popular mixed up with the very obscure. Looking at them is the readerly equivalent of gazing into the fridge, hungry but not sure what you’re hungry for.

The shelf is a form of what’s known as “readers’ advisory,” which almost all public libraries have in one form or another. Some are more direct, like a recommendation from a librarian, and others less so, like a display of Newbery Medal winners, or a “You might also like ... ” card posted near a popular author’s books. The “recently returned” shelf is perhaps the subtlest, most indirect way of advising readers, nudging them toward what others in the community are reading — an index of local interests, a record of your neighbors’ whims. Even if your library doesn’t have a formal one, it probably does have carts of books waiting to be reshelved, open and available to the curious browser and serving essentially the same purpose.

So much of what we encounter each day is designed to influence our decisions and purchases, but the books on this shelf have no agenda. They are not being pushed by the publishing industry. There is no marketing budget behind them. They’re not trending on my social-media feeds or selected by a recommendation algorithm. They were not chosen to signal anyone’s intellect or righteousness or in-the-know-ness. They are often old and very often ugly. I’ve come to think of this shelf as an escape from hype, a kind of anti-curation.

When I pick the books up, a part of me expects them to be warm, like a just-vacated seat. They often still contain the life detritus of the last person to open them: makeshift bookmarks, boarding passes or receipts; oil stains or flecks of melted chocolate or even blood; an eyelash. Sometimes the books make me itchy, and I know the last borrower owns a dog. Sometimes there are clusters of related books that must have been checked out by the same patron. It’s like getting to look at someone’s night stand, but whose? The shelf is everyone’s night stand, an average of night stands. Once I spotted a distinct group of lyric-essay collections, all of which I owned or had read, and thought they must have been returned by someone I knew.

On a recent trip to the library, I took photos of all the books on this shelf with my phone, to study in detail at home. Between a book about treehouses and one called “Star Wars Made Easy” (is “Star Wars” hard?), I saw one called simply “Plague.” (How had I not noticed it while taking the picture? For months I’d been researching epidemics for a piece I called “the plague essay” in my mind.) Above that was a book I remembered seeing on my own coffee table not long ago, pink jellyfish on a blue background. Had my own husband, a lover of aquatic life, just returned it? (We’d recently picked up “Other Minds,” a book about how octopuses think, from this same shelf.) Or were multiple readers in Denver suddenly drawn to oceanic invertebrates at the same time?

I have taken books from this shelf I never would have sought out otherwise. One was by Rachael Ray, grabbed on impulse in a rush to get home and make dinner. It turned out not to be just a cookbook, but a kind of food diary, recording her meals for a year, full of nonprofessional snapshots: the dishes she cooks for her husband over and over, multiple variations on deviled eggs, her mother’s requests on holidays. It demonstrated a sort of recursive model for cooking, where bits of yesterday’s dinner end up in tonight’s, and bits of tonight’s in tomorrow’s and so on — as if you’re giving your food a sense of memory. Years later, I still think about it; I found it surprisingly poignant.

It wasn’t the first time a recently returned book had infiltrated my thinking. On an earlier occasion, I found on this shelf an orange paperback called “What Should We Be Worried About?” in which dozens of scientists and scholars pontificate about which threats to human existence are the most urgent. What anxious individual was out there in the city, questioning, like me, if her anxieties were misplaced, if she was worrying right? I never read the book, but I kept it around for weeks, looking at the spine and meditating on the title: What should we be worried about? Then it was due, and back on the returns shelf it went."]]></description>
<dc:subject>elisagabbert libraries books reading howweread limits browsing denver publiclibraries algorithms curation anti-curation</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:6fb50527877e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elisagabbert"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:libraries"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:browsing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:denver"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:publiclibraries"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:algorithms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:curation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anti-curation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eg9rqkqGGKM">
    <title>AI SuperCut of Big Questions about life, death, love, work, and the future of humanity - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2024-08-29T20:34:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eg9rqkqGGKM</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["created this as a conversation starter for my Introduction to Cultural Anthropology class

The Art of Being Human https://amzn.to/2vDOPUo 
Free Anthropology Course: http://anth101.com 
Social Media: @mwesch"]]></description>
<dc:subject>michaelwesch 2024 ai artificialintelligence life death love work humanity technology alexa sciencefiction scifi generalintelligence agi dystopia intelligence negativeexternalities externalities unknowns avs climatechange driverlesscars globalwarming labor society economics civilization socialstructure kinship superstructure infrastructure environment demographics power powerrelations politics policy change consequences law legal finance medicine cance diseases skills humans humanism anthropology bard ibm automation automationanxiety computers computing productivity wellbeing standardofliving robots capitalism latecapitalism socialsafetynet ethics ubi universalbasicincome wealthinequality inequality manufacturing thomaspaine mlk miltonfriedman andrewyang purpose meaning meaningmaking careers significance unemployment living experience humanexperience philosophy socialsciences relationships socialscience knowledge knowledgeproduction humanities machines machinelearning intimacy emotionalsupport friendship fulfi</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:2c04debfeee1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:michaelwesch"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2024"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:death"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:love"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alexa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sciencefiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scifi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:generalintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:agi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dystopia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:intelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:negativeexternalities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:externalities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unknowns"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:avs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:climatechange"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:driverlesscars"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:globalwarming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:civilization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialstructure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kinship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:superstructure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:infrastructure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:environment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:demographics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:power"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:powerrelations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:change"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consequences"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:legal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:finance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:medicine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:diseases"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:skills"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anthropology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bard"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ibm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:automation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:automationanxiety"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:productivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wellbeing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:standardofliving"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robots"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:latecapitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialsafetynet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ubi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universalbasicincome"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wealthinequality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inequality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:manufacturing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thomaspaine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mlk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:miltonfriedman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:andrewyang"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:purpose"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meaning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meaningmaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:careers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:significance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unemployment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:living"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:experience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanexperience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialsciences"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:relationships"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialscience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:knowledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:knowledgeproduction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:machines"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:machinelearning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:intimacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:emotionalsupport"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:friendship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fulfi"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.worldwisdom.com/public/viewpdf/default.aspx?article-title=Two_Economies_by_Wendell_Berry.pdf">
    <title>&quot;Two Economies&quot; by Wendell Berry</title>
    <dc:date>2024-08-18T00:25:27+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.worldwisdom.com/public/viewpdf/default.aspx?article-title=Two_Economies_by_Wendell_Berry.pdf</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[[also here:
https://www.are.na/block/27902355 ]

[See also:
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/003463738408100204

via:
https://blog.ayjay.org/creating-the-vernacular-republic/ ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>wendellberry economics humans limits</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:1c20913ca82d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wendellberry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/from-tech-critique-to-ways-of-living">
    <title>From Tech Critique to Ways of Living — The New Atlantis</title>
    <dc:date>2024-06-12T02:51:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/from-tech-critique-to-ways-of-living</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Neil Postman was right. So what?"

[See also from Alan Jacobs himself (2024):
https://blog.ayjay.org/excerpt-from-my-journal/

"I want to write a post about why my “Cosmotechnics” essay ended up being a dead end for me. Though I need to think harder about just why I believe that’s the case. I was looking for a way to think about technology that did not involve critique or enthusiasm but rather a kind of ironic detachment. But having made that point I think I exhausted the relevance of Daoism to me. Daoism could teach me ironic detachment from Technopoly but it could not teach me how to get from such detachment to the love of God and my neighbor. 

N. B. I’m posting this excerpt instead of writing that post."]]]></description>
<dc:subject>alanjacobs 2021 neilpostman technology philosophy mashallmcluhan cosmotechnics daoism technopoly 2024 critique enthusiasm criticism detachment irony christianity ivanillich ursulafranklin albertborgmann sct standardcritiqueoftechnology mooreslaw gordonmoore lithium mining us canada quebec nevada china chile bolivia argentina salars wireless telecommunications surveillancecapitalism shoshanazuboff cornwall england uk batteries amazon spacex capitalism uighurs paulkingsnorth machines ethics economics wendellberry gerd-güntervoß behavior karlmarx friedrichengels labor work georgesturt appropriation preservation externality economists nature environment enironmentalists leviathan heidegger positiionality enframing yukhui kant taoteching daodejing excellence unhoarding ursulaleguin flourishing society civilization limits confucianism buddhism culture bureaucracy tongdongbai confucians meritocracy hierarchy ccp danielbell wangpei hierarchies equality west politics skepticism micheldemontaigne montaigne anarch</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:4603756cf60a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alanjacobs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2021"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neilpostman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mashallmcluhan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cosmotechnics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:daoism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technopoly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2024"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:critique"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:enthusiasm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:criticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:detachment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:irony"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christianity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ivanillich"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ursulafranklin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:albertborgmann"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sct"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:standardcritiqueoftechnology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mooreslaw"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gordonmoore"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lithium"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mining"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:canada"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quebec"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nevada"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:china"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chile"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bolivia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:argentina"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:salars"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wireless"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:telecommunications"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:surveillancecapitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:shoshanazuboff"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cornwall"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:england"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:uk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:batteries"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:amazon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:spacex"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:uighurs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:paulkingsnorth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:machines"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wendellberry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gerd-güntervoß"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:behavior"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:karlmarx"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:friedrichengels"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:georgesturt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:appropriation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:preservation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:externality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:environment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:enironmentalists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:leviathan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:heidegger"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:positiionality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:enframing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:yukhui"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kant"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:taoteching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:daodejing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:excellence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unhoarding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ursulaleguin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:flourishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:civilization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:confucianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:buddhism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bureaucracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tongdongbai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:confucians"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meritocracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hierarchy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ccp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:danielbell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wangpei"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hierarchies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:equality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:west"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:skepticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:micheldemontaigne"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:montaigne"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anarch"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://sarahendren.substack.com/p/the-city-and-the-limiting-virtues">
    <title>the city and the limiting virtues - by Sara Hendren</title>
    <dc:date>2024-04-06T20:48:41+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://sarahendren.substack.com/p/the-city-and-the-limiting-virtues</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[""freedom to" and "freedom from" in the cafe, church, and library

Faro café, in Harvard Square, gets its name from the Spanish word for “lighthouse,” and it’s got a no-laptops policy that is gently, but strictly, enforced.

You can look at your phone. You can use a little gaming tablet. But they’ve outlawed laptops — upright and rectangular cognitive anchors that suck all energy toward themselves. Multiplied across a room, laptops erect an office where a café had been. And Faro is trying to keep the office at bay.

But the office-style café is really great, you say. It is! You can go a few doors down in a couple directions and find some good ones. But Faro has their little manifesto printed and hung on one wall — unobtrusive, easy to miss — and they just want something else happening in the space.

I sent my architecture students to Faro and two other nearby sites this spring — a scavenger hunt to find some of the “limiting virtues” embedded in buildings. I got inspired by David McPherson’s The Virtues of Limits, where he lays out humility, reverence, moderation, contentment, neighborliness, and loyalty as virtues that constrain us in order to set us free.

All these virtues are laudable, surely, but not exactly high on the aspirational list in a culture more enamored of the active virtues, like courage and magnanimity. I wanted students to see where a built space takes away some freedoms — enforcing the moderation and contentment that mitigates all-screens-all-the-time, for example — and thereby opens up other freedoms. A no-laptops policy means you can’t get a certain kind of work done, but it does mean everyone present will be a little more eyes-up-and-talking, or maybe absorbed by a book or notebook. The activities will be at the speed of the body, one to another. Is it nostalgic and precious? Maybe. But it’s not the only café in town to make this move, and I think there’s some signal there. Faro started out with no-laptops only on weekends, and the policy was welcome enough to make it a daily norm. Over at Zuzu’s Petals, it’s no devices of any kind.

Across the street from Faro is St. Paul’s Parish, where you can come exactly as you are, but reverence is always encouraged — including in the weekday noon masses sung by a boys’ choir, complete with Elizabethan collars. (St. Paul’s has one of the only choir schools in the United States!) Sacred spaces aren’t a popular subject in architecture schools except as antiquarian study, I find. I suggested students visit either this great cavernous space in the middle of the bustling university square or the Cambridge Insight Meditation Center nearby, with its beautifully pared-down top floor of a grand old Victorian house. I could also have suggested a visit to the nearby monks’ dwelling at the Society of Saint John the Evangelist, whose exquisite stone chapel often features a sandwich board out front, enticing passersby not with lunch deals or storewide discounts but that rarest (limiting) thing: silence.

And speaking of silence, their last stop was the main branch of the Cambridge Public Library, especially its contemporary addition to the 19th century original.

The library holds a gradation of the limiting virtues: a half-quiet first floor with new books, tables and chairs for afterschool tutoring, and the information desks for everyone — the neighborliness of a public institution’s front door. The second floor features enclosed meeting spaces for groups on a first-come, first-serve basis, plus a really really quiet room for patrons wanting the moderation of all notifications off. The entire third floor is devoted to children — a beautiful raucous energy, with activity rooms, cozy nooks, and floor-to-ceiling windows on every side. A teen room in the old structure holds high-backed wing chairs and booths for semi-sedentary socializing, and a maker space occupies much of the basement. Things you can do and things you can’t, by design.

McPherson writes that the limiting virtues are grounded in the dispositional substrate of an “accepting-appreciating” stance toward the world, as opposed to the “choosing-controlling” stance that is the naturalized, invisible, and totalizing definition of 21st century technocratic freedom. No one wants life without choices, of course. But McPherson writes that the limiting virtue of loyalty — especially “loyalty to the given world” — is one way to cultivate this accepting-appreciating posture and to enjoy the freedom that it brings.

What’s the opposite of loyalty to the given world? Maybe it’s what Tyler Austin Harper calls “therapeutic libertarianism”:

<blockquote>the belief that self-improvement is the ultimate goal of life, and that no formal or informal constraints — whether imposed by states, faith systems, or other people —should impede each of us from achieving personal growth. This attitude is therapeutic because it is invariably couched in self-help babble. And it is libertarian not only because it makes a cult out of personal freedom, but because it applies market logic to human beings. We are all our own start-ups. We must all adopt a pro-growth mindset for our personhood and deregulate our desires. We must all assess and reassess our own “fulfillment,” a kind of psychological Gross Domestic Product, on a near-constant basis. And like the GDP, our fulfillment must always increase.</blockquote>

Harper, reviewing Molly Roden Winter’s More: A Memoir of an Open Marriage, finds its account of polyamory not a breathless liberation but an anguished slog of misery, led by endless choices. Some philosophers would call this “radical autonomy” — the idea that a choice is automatically good just for having been chosen. Harper is skewering the particular alloy of individualism and therapy-speak among the cosseted classes:

<blockquote>In this way, More is a near-perfect time capsule of the banal pleasure-seeking of wealthy, elite culture in the 2020s, and a neat encapsulation of its flaws. This culture would have us believe that interminable self-improvement projects, navel-gazing, and sexual peccadilloes are the new face of progress. The climate warms, wars rage, and our country lurches toward a perilous election—all problems that require real action, real progress. And somehow “you do you” has become the American ruling class’s three-word bible.

The philosopher Charles Taylor has argued that, since at least the late 20th century, Western societies have been defined by “a generalized culture of ‘authenticity,’ or expressive individualism, in which people are encouraged to find their own way, discover their own fulfillment, ‘do their own thing.’” Taylor describes a phenomenon that’s all too easy to recognize in today’s pop psychology and the maundering of wellness influencers, but his concept doesn’t quite capture the extent to which this relentless quest for self-optimizing authenticity has infused our social and even political sensibilities.</blockquote>

I want architecture students to see that the flexible, modular, all-purpose and all-choices box of a room isn’t always what’s called for. It sounds right — surely your client wants a space that could be anything you need it to be — but unprogrammed space is often tractionless, characterless. A city should contain a whole panoply of richly imagined and specific spaces, containers built with interior features for freedoms and limits alike. McPherson calls us to a life with “enhanced autonomy”— a life with choices that are also informed by our loyalty to the given, unchosen world — what we might just call living with obligations. I’d like to see designers take a renewed look at limits in their partnership for civic goods: rules that constrain and liberate."]]></description>
<dc:subject>sarahendren cafes libraries rules constrains loyalty neighborliness davidmcpherson architecture design space place freedom churches cathedrals moderation contentment attention courage magnanimity libertarianism reverence humility cambridge institutions social society cities urban urbanism tyleraustinharper mollyrodenwinter polyamory philosophy individualism collectivism commitment charlestaylor welness influencers relentlessness liberation civics obligation obligations limits canon choices misery coffeeshops coffeehouses</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:b0e6ac3acd9a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sarahendren"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cafes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:libraries"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rules"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:constrains"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:loyalty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neighborliness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davidmcpherson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:architecture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:space"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:place"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freedom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:churches"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cathedrals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:moderation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:contentment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:courage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:magnanimity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:libertarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reverence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cambridge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:institutions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:social"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:urban"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:urbanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tyleraustinharper"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mollyrodenwinter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:polyamory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:individualism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collectivism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:commitment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charlestaylor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:welness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:influencers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:relentlessness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:liberation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:civics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:obligation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:obligations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:canon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:choices"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:misery"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:coffeeshops"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:coffeehouses"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://theconvivialsociety.substack.com/p/the-art-of-living">
    <title>The Art of Living - by L. M. Sacasas</title>
    <dc:date>2024-03-01T20:55:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://theconvivialsociety.substack.com/p/the-art-of-living</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["A thought for your consideration on a Friday afternoon:

The art of living, like any other art, is the art of learning to work creatively within the constraints of the medium.

I would not claim to be an artist, of life or of any other medium. But this thought came to mind recently as I washed dishes and mulled over some of Wendell Berry’s work, which I’d just been reading.

I’m drawn to the idea of an art of living much more so than to the compulsive search for life hacks, regimens of self-improvement, or self-optimization schemes. These too often feel like a doubling down on the insistence that we can always do more if only we apply the right technique. They also suggest that the path to happiness involves the discovery of a set of methods which I might readily apply to my work, my relationships, my health, etc. independently of any virtues I might need to cultivate or vices I ought to correct. They draw my attention to what more I might do and what more I might have rather than who I might become.

An art, on the other hand, presupposes limits and invites the artist to work with and within those limits.1 These limits, inherent to the medium itself, can be disregarded, but then you would not have art. The limits of the medium are precisely what call forth the creative effort. They are what create the conditions that make art possible.

Thinking in terms of an art of living also invites me to consider how I might need to change in order to practice it well. It suggests not a set of methods which demand nothing of me, but a set of practices or skills which I must cultivate and whose cultivation changes me in the process. These skills enable me not only to produce something, but also to see the possibilities latent within the medium and to imaginatively draw these out—not to make a demand, but to perceive and respond to an invitation.

By way of contrast, the ideal of limitlessness consumption serves the modern economy quite well, but it does not serve the person well at all.2 This ideal imparts to us all a spirit of scarcity that darkens our experience: not enough time, not enough attention, not enough capacity to care. But upon what does this spirit feed? It feeds, in part, on the temptation to live as if there were no limits to what I am able to do: the tasks I can accomplish, the things I can care about, the information I can consume, etc.

We are formed by the structures of modern society to be insatiable consumers of an increasing range of commodified things and experiences and services. There is no art in this, because the tacit assumption that we must buy into along the way is that there is no limit to what we can consume.

But if the constraints of a medium of art appear self-evident—the canvas is only so large, the instrument plays only a certain range of notes—what are the limits of the medium on which the art of life plays. Indeed, what exactly is the medium in view?

This post is meant to be suggestive rather than prescriptive, so I hesitate to answer that question in definitive fashion (as if I could). Rather, I’ll simply tell you how I thought about the matter.

Perhaps because I had Berry on my mind and had recently written about his distinction between those who wish to live as creatures and those who wish to live as machines, I thought of our embodied condition as the medium of the art of living. The stuff of life is our bones and flesh. We may be more than bone and flesh, but we are not less.

The constraints of the medium, then, are the constraints of our embodiment, or at least that is my proposition to you. And these are, in part, the constraints of place and time. I can only be here now, and I can be here now only for so long, which means there are only so many things to which I can meaningfully attend at length and at depth. I may choose to accept this reality and respond creatively to it, or I can resist it and seek to transcend it and embrace every tool that promises to help me do so.

However, to pursue the art of life is, again in part, to learn to perceive the possibilities latent in the here and now rather than to submit to the temptation of digitally-abetted telepresence or to defer our “real” living to another more propitious time that never quite arrives.

To practice the art of living is to learn to see not what we wish were before us but what is, in fact, there, but also what it can be. What can this encounter with the stranger be? What can be made of this moment I am given? It is, fundamentally, a matter of learning to draw out the fullness latent in our encounters with the world, rather than perpetually skimming the surface of our experience. But to practice this art we must first accept and even celebrate the limits of our embodiment, the right and proper medium of our living. In doing so, we might be surprised by what can be made out of the stuff of life."]]></description>
<dc:subject>lmsacasas 2024 wendellberry hartmutrosa slow small artleisure leisurearts everyday life living bodies attention embodiment society modernism consumerism consumption commodification capitalism practice limits self-improvement lifehacks self-optimization quantifiedself technique happiness limitations creativity art economics experience information control uncontrollability hereandnow presence place time</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:3d31f8bfe200/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lmsacasas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2024"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wendellberry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hartmutrosa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:slow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:small"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artleisure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:leisurearts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:everyday"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:living"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bodies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:embodiment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:modernism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consumerism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consumption"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:commodification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:practice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:self-improvement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lifehacks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:self-optimization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quantifiedself"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technique"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:happiness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limitations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:creativity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:experience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:information"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:control"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:uncontrollability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hereandnow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:presence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:place"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:time"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19q4pWKPlj0">
    <title>Ave Maria/Sophia/Gaia: Katherine Bubel and Michelle Berry Lane on Illich and the Sacred Feminine (Conversation #4) - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2023-11-29T07:11:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19q4pWKPlj0</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["For our fourth and final conversation, around and beyond the legacy of Ivan Illich, we hear reflections and discussion from Katherine Bubel and Michelle Berry Lane before moving into an extended open discussion.

Katherine discusses Illich's mythopoetics of Prometheus, Epimetheus, and Pandora, the latter a patriarchally diminished version of the Earth Goddess Gaia, who Katherine connects to the biblical divine wisdom figure of Sophia, and Mary, Mother of God. Where Prometheus pursues mastery and technology, "Epimethean man stays and listens to the dream of Gaia/the Earth."

Michelle talks about about the conviviality with and of bees, and connects Illich with Suzanne Simard’s work on tree talk, and Lynn Margulis' work on symbiogenesis. She makes the case that the lost sense of contingency--life hanging moment by moment on God's grace--can be recaptured in the modern awareness of the complete contingence of our life on the health of our relationships.

Katharine Bubel is assistant professor of English at Trinity Western University

Michelle Berry Lane is a poet, a teacher of environmental science and a student of theopoetics, and part of Rochester Pollinators, a pollinator advocacy organization in southeast Michigan. 

Here is the video, "Un Certain Regard," in which gives his take on the myth of Pandora, Prometheus & Epimetheus: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_ByKXCr9TA "

[Conversation #1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvbzuQdO19M

Conversation #2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJOwHQXpMbQ

Conversation #3
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Avh1AJ9sls

Conversation #4 (this bookmark)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19q4pWKPlj0

See also:

Ivan Illich/David Cayley Book Club #3 of 6
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhCYH95t768 ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>ivanillich 2023 marcusrempel katherinebubel michelleberrylane conviviality suzannesimard davidblower religion myth prometheus sophia theology life living slow control modernity polarity francisbacon aliveness nature gender prometheanman technology diversity pandora thomasmerton erichfromm descartes climatechange humans capitalism extraction interconnectedness technosolutionism hubris complementarity renégirard charlestaylor catholicism relations relationships epimetheanman mary mastery measurement gaia ecology earth lynnmargulis forests trees environment epimetheus paulkingsnorth indigenous indigeneity listening johnmoriarty wisdom bees land property georgegrant colonization colonialism colonizers science domination homogeneity samemaking otherness terrencemalick presence rebeccasolnit rediscovery catastrophe mutualaid multispecies morethanhuman resilience mythology michellelane intuition spirituality deschooling unschooling hope convivialscience wonder symbiosis symbiogenesis jameslovelock microbiomes bio</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:9002d2ba9953/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ivanillich"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2023"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marcusrempel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:katherinebubel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:michelleberrylane"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conviviality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:suzannesimard"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davidblower"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:religion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:myth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:prometheus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sophia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:theology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:living"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:slow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:control"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:modernity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:polarity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:francisbacon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aliveness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gender"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:prometheanman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:diversity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pandora"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thomasmerton"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:erichfromm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:descartes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:climatechange"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:extraction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interconnectedness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technosolutionism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hubris"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:complementarity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:renégirard"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charlestaylor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:catholicism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:relations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:relationships"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:epimetheanman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mastery"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:measurement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gaia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ecology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:earth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lynnmargulis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:forests"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:trees"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:environment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:epimetheus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:paulkingsnorth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:indigenous"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:indigeneity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:listening"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnmoriarty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wisdom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bees"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:land"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:georgegrant"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colonization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colonialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colonizers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:domination"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:homogeneity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:samemaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:otherness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:terrencemalick"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:presence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rebeccasolnit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rediscovery"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:catastrophe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mutualaid"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:multispecies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:morethanhuman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:resilience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mythology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:michellelane"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:intuition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:spirituality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:deschooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unschooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hope"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:convivialscience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wonder"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:symbiosis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:symbiogenesis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jameslovelock"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:microbiomes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bio"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://blog.ayjay.org/the-mondragon-moment/">
    <title>the Mondragon moment – The Homebound Symphony</title>
    <dc:date>2023-10-02T18:40:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://blog.ayjay.org/the-mondragon-moment/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><dc:subject>alanjacobs mondragon conservaism 2021 anarchism capitalism christopherlasch markets freemarkets limits profits luxury adamsmith hume populism proprietorship shoshanazuboff surveillancecapitalism consumption amanacolonies williamjenningsbryant distributissm individualism us russelarbenfox davidhume</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:b56d9f22b04b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alanjacobs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mondragon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conservaism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2021"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anarchism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christopherlasch"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:markets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freemarkets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:profits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:luxury"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:adamsmith"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hume"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:populism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:proprietorship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:shoshanazuboff"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:surveillancecapitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consumption"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:amanacolonies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:williamjenningsbryant"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:distributissm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:individualism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:russelarbenfox"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davidhume"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNdJOX_hk58">
    <title>If I were President w/ Dr. Cornel West - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2023-07-22T21:12:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNdJOX_hk58</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Dr. Cornel West is a prolific author, professor, preacher, and activist.  He is running for US President in 2024. We ask Dr. West how his campaign challenges the brutalities of settler colonialism while also lifting the spirits of people in struggle.

Learn more about his campaign here
https://www.cornelwest24.org/ "]]></description>
<dc:subject>nickestes cornelwest 2023 imperialism us politics economics palestine israel indigenous indigeneity elections justice decline revolution civilwar slavery apartheid genocide ecology environment land landback culture memory history parties democrats republicans struggle liberation freedom oppression africa asia roma latinamerica internationalism cynicism demoralization standingrock spiritualism spirituality dispossession reservations slums ghettos socialmovements socialjustice christianity society commodification brasil brazil liberationtheology philosophy soulcraft theology purpose motivation music sound blackness preaching church pain blackmusic expression lifeofthemind bodies memories communities integrity courage love families utilitarianism secularism left leftism contemplation prayer ceremony tradition blackpantherparty blackpanthers blackfreedommovement resistance movements wisdom ideology science scientism immeasurables measurement objectivity conviction virtue character characterformation humility radi</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:70a019620668/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nickestes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cornelwest"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2023"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:imperialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:palestine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:israel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:indigenous"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:indigeneity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elections"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:justice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:decline"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:revolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:civilwar"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:slavery"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:apartheid"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:genocide"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ecology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:environment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:land"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:landback"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:memory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:parties"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:democrats"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:republicans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:struggle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:liberation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freedom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:oppression"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:africa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:asia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:roma"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:latinamerica"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internationalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cynicism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:demoralization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:standingrock"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:spiritualism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:spirituality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dispossession"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reservations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:slums"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ghettos"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmovements"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialjustice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christianity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:commodification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brasil"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brazil"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:liberationtheology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:soulcraft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:theology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:purpose"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:motivation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:music"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sound"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:blackness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:preaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:church"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pain"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:blackmusic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:expression"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lifeofthemind"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bodies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:memories"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:communities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:integrity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:courage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:love"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:families"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:utilitarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:secularism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:left"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:leftism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:contemplation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:prayer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ceremony"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tradition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:blackpantherparty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:blackpanthers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:blackfreedommovement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:resistance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:movements"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wisdom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scientism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:immeasurables"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:measurement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:objectivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conviction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:virtue"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:character"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:characterformation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:radi"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.chrbutler.com/personal-machines-and-portable-worlds">
    <title>Personal Machines and Portable Worlds - Christopher Butler</title>
    <dc:date>2023-07-09T19:58:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.chrbutler.com/personal-machines-and-portable-worlds</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["A lifelong fascination with technology begins with a single object.

Think back to when you were a child, to when you first encountered something you could hold in your hand that held you in awe. Perhaps you thought to yourself, “Wow, this does that?!”"

...

"There’s something about the personal device that I have always found fascinating and now find to be almost mysterious. But to be personal it has to be a certain kind of device — the kind that balances access to another world with the kinds of limits and boundaries that make a thing private. That balance is something I’ve always been able to point to in particular objects — this has it, but that does not — but describing it on its own, as a set of rules or characteristics, has always eluded me. But, for me, a personal device is defined by this balance, not by virtue of being the thing in my pocket and not the one in yours.

I think this notion of a personal technology is deeply meaningful. So I’d like to find a way to explain it.

Nearly everyone I asked returned the question — That was the gadget for me… So, what was yours?

I can point to my own origin-objects — gadgets like the Fisher Price Movie Viewer, the Pocket Rocker, the Etch A Sketch Animator, or, from a bit later, the Arion Hot-Watt II — and describe why they had that thing. Besides being quirky, niche products, they all let me enter another world that, at times, seemed both bigger and smaller than this one. It was as if that world was outside of this one, made accessible by the push of a button and, at the same time, that it sprang into existence as a me-sized bubble universe, Population: 1. This is the paradox of the personal device.

The tension between knowing that the world a personal device creates has boundaries defined by its code and materials and not knowing exactly what they are is one that, when kept in balance, activates the imagination. It allows for exploration, both of the object and through the object.

People of a certain age who remember spending hours exploring Hyrule, the world of The Legend of Zelda, will immediately understand this feeling. You could explore the world, and you could play the game. I’m not sure I ever tired of exploring enough to actually play the game.

The most magical of personal devices are those which offer access to the experience of infinitude without measuring it for you. The unknown is the stuff of imagination.

That is the opposite of our most common device-based experiences today. Whether you use a phone, tablet, laptop, or any other computer, the digital “world” today is always defined by an acute awareness of measure. Of more. But more is the easiest way to obstruct the imagination. Persistent input keeps cognition at its lower levels — maintaining attention, storing memory, applying perception, and processing language — without allowing a transition to thought and learning.

The best personal device supports thought — with it, within it, and most importantly, within you. Carl Jung once wrote that “in each of us there is another whom we do not know.” The purpose of introspection, for Jung, was to become acquainted with that person — to deepen our understanding of ourselves so that we may be more fully ourselves.

What if technology had the same purpose?

What if personal technology saw imagination — open, unresolved, interior, and subjective as it is — not just as a byproduct of use but as a purpose for it; as equal to utility, communication, or entertainment?"

...

"Kyle Chayka is working on a book that sounds like it may make a good case for my invisible mechsuit world. In a post titled, “The dream of the personal machine,” [https://kylechayka.substack.com/p/the-dream-of-the-personal-machine ] Chayka writes:

<blockquote>“My book is so much about how technology dictates culture. The devices that we use aren’t just accessories to culture or windows that we consume things through; they are collaborators, gateways, and molds…the idea of a personal computer had to be invented, manufactured, and marketed. We had to imagine computers as personal machines.”</blockquote>

This is an important point. We could live in a world where computing is a public works — where terminals to central processing work like telephones used to. You can pick them up or put them down, but nothing inside of them is yours. But we don’t live in that world. As soon as the first computer booted up in the first home, the computer became a personal object. And when an object becomes personal, it is difficult to leave it behind. We want it with us.

Perhaps that one thing — a simple desire for a personal machine — set us on the course we have followed since. Not Moore’s Law, not Capitalism, but personhood.

Later, in the same post, Chayka writes of the Palm Pilot — an early attempt at portable computing — that, despite it not providing much in the way of “fun” features for a kid, there was still an “ineffable appeal to holding a gateway to a digital world in your hand.”

A world. There’s that word again.

Why a world? There is a sense of dimensional transcendence to computers. As C.S. Lewis wrote of the wardrobe, “It’s inside is bigger than its outside.” In the early days of mobile computing, it was hard to not compare the capaciousness of a computer you could carry with you to something like a book. Of both you could say their insides were bigger than their outsides, but when it came to information, you’d have to settle for figurative capaciousness in a book; their actual contents are literally cover to cover. A digital machine’s contents are an entirely different thing.

In the time of the Palm Pilot, a tiny door to a vast digital world was more powerful as an idea than a tool. The digital world just wasn’t as big back then as it is now. But to Chayka’s first point, we built the digital world using these little devices that didn’t do very much. We made it worth the journey. And meanwhile, the object was our companion, and inside was a tiny, personal digital world — our notes, our messages, our few digital texts. It was not much, but it was ours."

...

"Many of the examples I’ve looked at so far align with my ideas of what makes a machine personal because they were designed with limitations imposed upon them, and many of the examples I’ve discussed that no longer feel personal have been designed to surpass those limitations. If machines were designed to be more personal, we’d have very different machines.

Sometimes it feels like it is simply a matter of whether a machine is connected to the internet or not. But of course it’s more than that. It’s as much about what we do with our machines as it is about what they were designed to do.

I think we can still experience the personal machine by choosing to experience a machine that way.

In a way, the continued popularity of vinyl is a good example of this. For the same price as a single record, you can get several months of access to more music than you could ever hear in that time. Still, some people choose records over digital files. It’s too easy to dismiss this as an affectation. It’s a choice to experience music in a particular way. It’s also a choice of a personal machine — a record player rather than a phone.

One benefit of personal technology reaching the maturity it has is the abundance of choices. It may seem like you must use an iPhone — perhaps everyone you know and care about is group messaging with iMessage — but you can choose something else. Every choice has benefits and costs. Ten years ago, I chose to leave Facebook. The benefits were many; the costs were not having easy access to where people I cared about shared information I wanted to know. A few years ago, I stopped using an e-reader — I had used a Kindle, and then a Kobo, both great machines. The cost was no longer being able to send articles from the web to my machine and reading them, as well as books, in bed. The benefit was not having too many choices in front of me when I just want to read one thing. I went back to the printed book. You could say that’s as much of an affectation in 2023 as playing a vinyl record. Maybe. But it’s a choice.

I haven’t owned a laptop for many years. My primary machine is a Mac Mini set up in my home office. The cost is I can’t work from my couch or the local coffee shop. The benefit is I have some separation in my life between work and not work.

For me, these choices turn using the same machines everyone uses into a more personal experience."

...

"I also notice that when I look at these older machines and the old media they use, I often find myself feeling like I’m looking at a door to a world. I look at a book — there’s a world. Every playable disc in our house — each a world.

Once you become accustomed to worldspotting, you can see them in anything. Every object is a world.

In the World; of the Worlds

Perhaps the days of personal machines are over. Maybe the complexities that Mau and his cohort wrote about are not safely reducible. Maybe we can’t decomplexify the world of things. Maybe. And if we can, I wouldn’t dare imagine it could happen quickly.

But if we can, where do we start? What do we look at? What do we use again, despite there being sleeker, faster, frictionless options available? What limits do we embrace so that we can re-balance the human with the machine?

I have spent the last few years slowly disconnecting in various ways. I’ve chosen to use things that only do a part of what readily available alternatives do and more. I’ve chosen to stop using some things altogether. I have found that these choices have enhanced my experiences because they’ve supported true insight; they’ve helped me be more aware of what I’m doing, why I’m doing it, and who I am becoming. I have found that they change the world because they change my world.

Jung said that in each of us is another. I think that in each of us is another world. A good personal machine reveals that world and helps us shape it."]]></description>
<dc:subject>christopherbutler whatisacomputer porability computers computing objects 2023 personal personalmachines machines gadgets communication expression imagination toys technology laptops smartphones phones purpose utility entertainment infinitude devices audiencesofone portals identity exploration legendofzelda zelda worldbuilding brucemau massivechange complexity institutewithoutboundaries potential thoreau simplicity human humans balance invention creation distraction attention waste want voyeurism kylechayka personhood palmpilot capitalism mooreslaw worlds companions maremecum vademecum designfiction sciencefiction scifi projectara robinsloan marydoriarussell quantumleap limitations constraints choice kindle kobo iphone tradeoffs limits facebook disconnecting carljung jung</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:8225eb3c6c52/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christopherbutler"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:whatisacomputer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:porability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:objects"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2023"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:personal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:personalmachines"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:machines"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gadgets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:expression"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:imagination"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:toys"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:laptops"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:smartphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:phones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:purpose"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:utility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:entertainment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:infinitude"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:devices"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:audiencesofone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:portals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:identity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:exploration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:legendofzelda"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:zelda"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:worldbuilding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brucemau"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:massivechange"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:institutewithoutboundaries"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:potential"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thoreau"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:simplicity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:human"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:balance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:invention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:creation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:distraction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:waste"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:want"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:voyeurism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kylechayka"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:personhood"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:palmpilot"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mooreslaw"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:worlds"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:companions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maremecum"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:vademecum"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:designfiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sciencefiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scifi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:projectara"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robinsloan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marydoriarussell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quantumleap"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limitations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:constraints"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:choice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kindle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kobo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tradeoffs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:facebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:disconnecting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:carljung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jung"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://theconvivialsociety.substack.com/p/children-and-technology">
    <title>Children and Technology - by L. M. Sacasas</title>
    <dc:date>2023-06-15T21:57:22+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://theconvivialsociety.substack.com/p/children-and-technology</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["1. Resist technocratic models of what it means to raise a child

2. Resist a reactionary approach to technology

3. Resist technologies that erode the space for childhood

4. Resist technologically mediated liturgies of consumption

5. Be skeptical of running unprecedented social experiments on children

6. Embrace limits

7. Embrace convivial tools

8. Cultivate wonder

9. Tell stories, read poetry"]]></description>
<dc:subject>lmsacasas education children 2020 childhood technology wonder neilpostman consumption consumerism conviviality ivanillich albertborgmann storytelling stories poetry teaching howweteach parenting resistance mediation experimentation limits limitations constraints</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:83607cbbf7c0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lmsacasas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2020"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:childhood"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wonder"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neilpostman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consumption"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consumerism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conviviality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ivanillich"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:albertborgmann"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:storytelling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stories"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:poetry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:parenting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:resistance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mediation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:experimentation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limitations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:constraints"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-new-yorker-interview/going-home-with-wendell-berry">
    <title>Going Home with Wendell Berry | The New Yorker</title>
    <dc:date>2019-07-16T02:27:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-new-yorker-interview/going-home-with-wendell-berry</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[[via: https://twitter.com/annegalloway/status/1150867868696772608 ]

[Too much to quote, so here’s what Anne quoted:]

“Lancie Clippinger said to me, and he was very serious, that a man oughtn’t to milk but about twenty-five cows, because if he keeps to that number, he’ll see them every day. If he milks more than that, he’ll do the work but never see the cows! The number will vary from person to person, I think, but Lancie’s experience had told him something important.”]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:anne wendellberry rural slow small empathy kindness georgesaunders relationships neighbors amish care caring maintenance human-animalrelations human-animalrelationships culture farming agriculture local locality place trees history multispecies morethanhuman language restorativejustice justice climatejustice socialjustice johnlukacs environment sustainability kentucky land immigration labor work gender ownership collectivism conversation lancieclippinger god faith religion christianity submission amandapetrusich individualism stewardship limits constraints memory robertburns kafka capitalism corporations life living provincialism seamusheaney patrickkavanagh animals cows freedom limitlessness choice happiness davidkline thomasmerton service maurytilleen crops us donaldtrump adlaistevenson ezrataftbenson politics conservation robertfrost pleasure writing andycatlett howwewrite education nature adhd wonder schools schooling experience experientiallearning place-based hereandnow presence learning</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:8fe586521de3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:via:anne"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wendellberry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rural"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:slow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:small"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:empathy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kindness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:georgesaunders"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:relationships"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neighbors"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:amish"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:care"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:caring"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maintenance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:human-animalrelations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:human-animalrelationships"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:farming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:agriculture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:local"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:locality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:place"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:trees"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:multispecies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:morethanhuman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:restorativejustice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:justice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:climatejustice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialjustice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnlukacs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:environment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sustainability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kentucky"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:land"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:immigration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gender"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ownership"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collectivism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conversation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lancieclippinger"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:god"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:faith"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:religion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christianity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:submission"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:amandapetrusich"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:individualism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stewardship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:constraints"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:memory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robertburns"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kafka"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:corporations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:living"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:provincialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:seamusheaney"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:patrickkavanagh"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:animals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cows"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freedom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limitlessness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:choice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:happiness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davidkline"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thomasmerton"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:service"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maurytilleen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:crops"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:donaldtrump"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:adlaistevenson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ezrataftbenson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conservation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robertfrost"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pleasure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:andycatlett"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:adhd"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wonder"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:experience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:experientiallearning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:place-based"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hereandnow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:presence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://harpers.org/archive/2008/05/faustian-economics/">
    <title>[Essay] | Faustian Economics, by Wendell Berry | Harper's Magazine</title>
    <dc:date>2019-05-06T02:22:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://harpers.org/archive/2008/05/faustian-economics/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The general reaction to the apparent end of the era of cheap fossil fuel, as to other readily foreseeable curtailments, has been to delay any sort of reckoning. The strategies of delay, so far, have been a sort of willed oblivion, or visions of large profits to the manufacturers of such “biofuels” as ethanol from corn or switchgrass, or the familiar unscientific faith that “science will find an answer.” The dominant response, in short, is a dogged belief that what we call the American Way of Life will prove somehow indestructible. We will keep on consuming, spending, wasting, and driving, as before, at any cost to anything and everybody but ourselves.

This belief was always indefensible — the real names of global warming are Waste and Greed — and by now it is manifestly foolish. But foolishness on this scale looks disturbingly like a sort of national insanity. We seem to have come to a collective delusion of grandeur, insisting that all of us are “free” to be as conspicuously greedy and wasteful as the most corrupt of kings and queens. (Perhaps by devoting more and more of our already abused cropland to fuel production we will at last cure ourselves of obesity and become fashionably skeletal, hungry but — thank God! — still driving.)"

…

"The normalization of the doctrine of limitlessness has produced a sort of moral minimalism: the desire to be efficient at any cost, to be unencumbered by complexity. The minimization of neighborliness, respect, reverence, responsibility, accountability, and self-subordination — this is the culture of which our present leaders and heroes are the spoiled children.

Our national faith so far has been: “There’s always more.” Our true religion is a sort of autistic industrialism. People of intelligence and ability seem now to be genuinely embarrassed by any solution to any problem that does not involve high technology, a great expenditure of energy, or a big machine. Thus an X marked on a paper ballot no longer fulfills our idea of voting. One problem with this state of affairs is that the work now most needing to be done — that of neighborliness and caretaking — cannot be done by remote control with the greatest power on the largest scale. A second problem is that the economic fantasy of limitlessness in a limited world calls fearfully into question the value of our monetary wealth, which does not reliably stand for the real wealth of land, resources, and workmanship but instead wastes and depletes it.

That human limitlessness is a fantasy means, obviously, that its life expectancy is limited. There is now a growing perception, and not just among a few experts, that we are entering a time of inescapable limits. We are not likely to be granted another world to plunder in compensation for our pillage of this one. Nor are we likely to believe much longer in our ability to outsmart, by means of science and technology, our economic stupidity. The hope that we can cure the ills of industrialism by the homeopathy of more technology seems at last to be losing status. We are, in short, coming under pressure to understand ourselves as limited creatures in a limited world.

This constraint, however, is not the condemnation it may seem. On the contrary, it returns us to our real condition and to our human heritage, from which our self-definition as limitless animals has for too long cut us off. Every cultural and religious tradition that I know about, while fully acknowledging our animal nature, defines us specifically as humans — that is, as animals (if the word still applies) capable of living not only within natural limits but also within cultural limits, self-imposed. As earthly creatures, we live, because we must, within natural limits, which we may describe by such names as “earth” or “ecosystem” or “watershed” or “place.” But as humans, we may elect to respond to this necessary placement by the self-restraints implied in neighborliness, stewardship, thrift, temperance, generosity, care, kindness, friendship, loyalty, and love.

In our limitless selfishness, we have tried to define “freedom,” for example, as an escape from all restraint. But, as my friend Bert Hornback has explained in his book The Wisdom in Words, “free” is etymologically related to “friend.” These words come from the same Indo-European root, which carries the sense of “dear” or “beloved.” We set our friends free by our love for them, with the implied restraints of faithfulness or loyalty. And this suggests that our “identity” is located not in the impulse of selfhood but in deliberately maintained connections."

…

"And so our cultural tradition is in large part the record of our continuing effort to understand ourselves as beings specifically human: to say that, as humans, we must do certain things and we must not do certain things. We must have limits or we will cease to exist as humans; perhaps we will cease to exist, period. At times, for example, some of us humans have thought that human beings, properly so called, did not make war against civilian populations, or hold prisoners without a fair trial, or use torture for any reason.

Some of us would-be humans have thought too that we should not be free at anybody else’s expense. And yet in the phrase “free market,” the word “free” has come to mean unlimited economic power for some, with the necessary consequence of economic powerlessness for others. Several years ago, after I had spoken at a meeting, two earnest and obviously troubled young veterinarians approached me with a question: How could they practice veterinary medicine without serious economic damage to the farmers who were their clients? Underlying their question was the fact that for a long time veterinary help for a sheep or a pig has been likely to cost more than the animal is worth. I had to answer that, in my opinion, so long as their practice relied heavily on selling patented drugs, they had no choice, since the market for medicinal drugs was entirely controlled by the drug companies, whereas most farmers had no control at all over the market for agricultural products. My questioners were asking in effect if a predatory economy can have a beneficent result. The answer too often is No. And that is because there is an absolute discontinuity between the economy of the seller of medicines and the economy of the buyer, as there is in the health industry as a whole. The drug industry is interested in the survival of patients, we have to suppose, because surviving patients will continue to consume drugs.

Now let us consider a contrary example. Recently, at another meeting, I talked for some time with an elderly, and some would say an old-fashioned, farmer from Nebraska. Unable to farm any longer himself, he had rented his land to a younger farmer on the basis of what he called “crop share” instead of a price paid or owed in advance. Thus, as the old farmer said of his renter, “If he has a good year, I have a good year. If he has a bad year, I have a bad one.” This is what I would call community economics. It is a sharing of fate. It assures an economic continuity and a common interest between the two partners to the trade. This is as far as possible from the economy in which the young veterinarians were caught, in which the powerful are limitlessly “free” to trade, to the disadvantage, and ultimately the ruin, of the powerless.

It is this economy of community destruction that, wittingly or unwittingly, most scientists and technicians have served for the past two hundred years. These scientists and technicians have justified themselves by the proposition that they are the vanguard of progress, enlarging human knowledge and power, and thus they have romanticized both themselves and the predatory enterprises that they have served."

…

"If the idea of appropriate limitation seems unacceptable to us, that may be because, like Marlowe’s Faustus and Milton’s Satan, we confuse limits with confinement. But that, as I think Marlowe and Milton and others were trying to tell us, is a great and potentially a fatal mistake. Satan’s fault, as Milton understood it and perhaps with some sympathy, was precisely that he could not tolerate his proper limitation; he could not subordinate himself to anything whatever. Faustus’s error was his unwillingness to remain “Faustus, and a man.” In our age of the world it is not rare to find writers, critics, and teachers of literature, as well as scientists and technicians, who regard Satan’s and Faustus’s defiance as salutary and heroic.

On the contrary, our human and earthly limits, properly understood, are not confinements but rather inducements to formal elaboration and elegance, to fullness of relationship and meaning. Perhaps our most serious cultural loss in recent centuries is the knowledge that some things, though limited, are inexhaustible. For example, an ecosystem, even that of a working forest or farm, so long as it remains ecologically intact, is inexhaustible. A small place, as I know from my own experience, can provide opportunities of work and learning, and a fund of beauty, solace, and pleasure — in addition to its difficulties — that cannot be exhausted in a lifetime or in generations.

To recover from our disease of limitlessness, we will have to give up the idea that we have a right to be godlike animals, that we are potentially omniscient and omnipotent, ready to discover “the secret of the universe.” We will have to start over, with a different and much older premise: the naturalness and, for creatures of limited intelligence, the necessity, of limits. We must learn again to ask how we can make the most of what we are, what we have, what we have been given. If we always have a theoretically better substitute available from somebody or someplace else, we will never make the most of anything. It is hard to make the most of one life. If we each had two lives, we would not make much of either. Or as one of my best teachers said of people in general: “They’ll never be worth a damn as long as they’ve got two choices.”

To deal with the problems, which after all are inescapable, of living with limited intelligence in a limited world, I suggest that we may have to remove some of the emphasis we have lately placed on science and technology and have a new look at the arts. For an art does not propose to enlarge itself by limitless extension but rather to enrich itself within bounds that are accepted prior to the work.

It is the artists, not the scientists, who have dealt unremittingly with the problem of limits. A painting, however large, must finally be bounded by a frame or a wall. A composer or playwright must reckon, at a minimum, with the capacity of an audience to sit still and pay attention. A story, once begun, must end somewhere within the limits of the writer’s and the reader’s memory. And of course the arts characteristically impose limits that are artificial: the five acts of a play, or the fourteen lines of a sonnet. Within these limits artists achieve elaborations of pattern, of sustaining relationships of parts with one another and with the whole, that may be astonishingly complex. And probably most of us can name a painting, a piece of music, a poem or play or story that still grows in meaning and remains fresh after many years of familiarity."

We know by now that a natural ecosystem survives by the same sort of formal intricacy, ever-changing, inexhaustible, and no doubt finally unknowable. We know further that if we want to make our economic landscapes sustainably and abundantly productive, we must do so by maintaining in them a living formal complexity something like that of natural ecosystems. We can do this only by raising to the highest level our mastery of the arts of agriculture, animal husbandry, forestry, and, ultimately, the art of living.

It is true that insofar as scientific experiments must be conducted within carefully observed limits, scientists also are artists. But in science one experiment, whether it succeeds or fails, is logically followed by another in a theoretically infinite progression. According to the underlying myth of modern science, this progression is always replacing the smaller knowledge of the past with the larger knowledge of the present, which will be replaced by the yet larger knowledge of the future.

In the arts, by contrast, no limitless sequence of works is ever implied or looked for. No work of art is necessarily followed by a second work that is necessarily better. Given the methodologies of science, the law of gravity and the genome were bound to be discovered by somebody; the identity of the discoverer is incidental to the fact. But it appears that in the arts there are no second chances. We must assume that we had one chance each for The Divine Comedy and King Lear. If Dante and Shakespeare had died before they wrote those poems, nobody ever would have written them."]]></description>
<dc:subject>wendellberry 2008 economics science technology art limits limitlessness arts ecosystems limitations local humanism humanity humility community communities knowledge power expansion growth interdependence greed neighborliness stewardship thrift temperance christianity generosity care kindness friendship loyalty love self-restraint restraint watershed land caring caretaking morality accountability responsibility respect reverence corruption capitalism technosolutionism fossilfuels waste</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:9d35d08799ce/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wendellberry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2008"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limitlessness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:arts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ecosystems"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limitations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:local"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:communities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:knowledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:power"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:expansion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:growth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interdependence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:greed"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neighborliness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stewardship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thrift"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:temperance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christianity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:generosity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:care"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kindness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:friendship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:loyalty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:love"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:self-restraint"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:restraint"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:watershed"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:land"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:caring"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:caretaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:morality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:accountability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:responsibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:respect"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reverence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:corruption"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technosolutionism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fossilfuels"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:waste"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://metaquestions.me/2014/10/12/experts-and-the-corruption-of-truth/">
    <title>Experts and the corruption of truth! | Metaquestions</title>
    <dc:date>2015-03-06T04:56:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://metaquestions.me/2014/10/12/experts-and-the-corruption-of-truth/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["We all need to be able to understand our first principles are probably wrong. We need to realise field testing only tells us a bit of what we need to know within limits. It is just not simple, if its simple it need to be a belief like religion and that leads to people holding onto something that is not proven. Those people will stop innovation and improvement on our global knowledge base."

…

"There is no short-cut, there is no final proof, we are merely allowed to see only part of what makes the universe work, we do not know gravity, anti matter, black holes or even if any of these things exist! We cannot even tell why prime numbers happen in the order they do, what we do not know is very simple things that we really should know. So how on earth could we know the big stuff? Bottom line, this game we are playing only shows us a few of the rules at any one time, things will change as we discover more rules, but they force us to reconsider all our previous moves continually and as nature shows us more rules it will force us to be humble and start again.

The number of unknowns is enormous and trying to ignore them by simply an equation, fancy word for something, a measurement or even a series of experiments is simply not enough. All together they offer an ability to start to ask, none of them offer a final answer (and never will). So don’t be an expert, be an explorer and if you are nice to your fellow explorers they may even show you ways you have not yet considered. If they talk in maths riddles and hide behind fancy papers and equations then they are safe to ignore. There is no easy answer, only more information and potentially all you know may be wrong, certainly the majority is certainly wrong, so don’t be a believer, be ready to infer new conclusions as you find out more info, which may not even look related. So look at everything and prepare for massive surprises, they will happen!

This is why I struggle to give simple answers to folk, I hate lies and part of a truth is closer to a lie that saying nothing. Many understand this position, but many don’t yet. It is interesting to see though that the experts seem to be the very people who are the believers and not explorers, when folk also realise what they know is trivial and likely wrong then perhaps things will move along faster.

In saying that I also agree that the inability to easily explain something is an indication of a lack of understanding. A quandary, well yes … Just another thing I don’t know, I wish I did."]]></description>
<dc:subject>experts via:Taryn 2015 truth math science mathematics scientificmethod unlearning learning certainty uncertainty understanding belief unknowns limits davidirvine</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:2a9375263e4e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:experts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:via:Taryn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2015"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:truth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:math"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mathematics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scientificmethod"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unlearning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:certainty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:uncertainty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:understanding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:belief"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unknowns"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davidirvine"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thefrailestthing.com/2014/11/29/do-artifacts-have-ethics/">
    <title>Do Artifacts Have Ethics? | The Frailest Thing</title>
    <dc:date>2014-11-30T05:15:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://thefrailestthing.com/2014/11/29/do-artifacts-have-ethics/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Years ago, Langdon Winner famously asked, “Do artifacts have politics?” In the article that bears that title, Winner went on to argue that they most certainly do. We might also ask, “Do artifacts have ethics?” I would argue that they do indeed. The question is not whether technology has a moral dimension, the question is whether we recognize it or not. In fact, technology’s moral dimension is inescapable, layered, and multi-faceted.

When we do think about technology’s moral implications, we tend to think about what we do with a given technology. We might call this the “guns don’t kill people, people kill people” approach to the ethics of technology. What matters most about a technology on this view is the use to which a technology is put. This is of course a valid consideration. A hammer may indeed be used to either build a house or bash someones head in. On this view, technology is morally neutral and the only morally relevant question is this: What will I do with this tool?

But is this really the only morally relevant question one could ask? For instance, pursuing the example of the hammer, might I not also ask how having the hammer in hand encourages me to perceive the world around me? Or, what feelings does having a hammer in hand arouse?

Below are a few other questions that we might ask in order to get at the wide-ranging “moral dimension” of our technologies. There are, of course, many others that we could ask, but this is a start.

1. What sort of person will the use of this technology make of me?
2. What habits will the use of this technology instill?
3. How will the use of this technology affect my experience of time?
4. How will the use of this technology affect my experience of place?
5. How will the use of this technology affect how I relate to other people?
6. How will the use of this technology affect how I relate to the world around me?
7. What practices will the use of this technology cultivate?
8. What practices will the use of this technology displace?
9. What will the use of this technology encourage me to notice?
10. What will the use of this technology encourage me to ignore?
11. What was required of other human beings so that I might be able to use this technology?
12. What was required of other creatures so that I might be able to use this technology?
13. What was required of the earth so that I might be able to use this technology?
14. Does the use of this technology bring me joy?
15. Does the use of this technology arouse anxiety?
16. How does this technology empower me? At whose expense?
17. What feelings does the use of this technology generate in me toward others?
18. Can I imagine living without this technology? Why, or why not?
19. How does this technology encourage me to allocate my time?
20. Could the resources used to acquire and use this technology be better deployed?
21. Does this technology automate or outsource labor or responsibilities that are morally essential?
22. What desires does the use of this technology generate?
23. What desires does the use of this technology dissipate?
24. What possibilities for action does this technology present? Is it good that these actions are now possible?
25. What possibilities for action does this technology foreclose? Is it good that these actions are no longer possible?
26. How does the use of this technology shape my vision of a good life?
27. What limits does the use of this technology impose upon me?
28. What limits does my use of this technology impose upon others?
29. What does my use of this technology require of others who would (or must) interact with me?
30. What assumptions about the world does the use of this technology tacitly encourage?
31. What knowledge has the use of this technology disclosed to me about myself?
32. What knowledge has the use of this technology disclosed to me about others? Is it good to have this knowledge?
33. What are the potential harms to myself, others, or the world that might result from my use of this technology?
34. Upon what systems, technical or human, does my use of this technology depend? Are these systems just?
35. Does my use of this technology encourage me to view others as a means to an end?
36. Does using this technology require me to think more or less?
37. What would the world be like if everyone used this technology exactly as I use it?
38. What risks will my use of this technology entail for others? Have they consented?
39. Can the consequences of my use of this technology be undone? Can I live with those consequences?
40. Does my use of this technology make it easier to live as if I had no responsibilities toward my neighbor?
41. Can I be held responsible for the actions which this technology empowers? Would I feel better if I couldn’t?"]]></description>
<dc:subject>artifacts objects ethics technology 2014 morality via:tealtan limits knowledge responsibility time place experience habits behavior assumptions michaelsacasas culture lmsacasas</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:066df6978631/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artifacts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:objects"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2014"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:morality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:via:tealtan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:knowledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:responsibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:time"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:place"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:experience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:habits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:behavior"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:michaelsacasas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lmsacasas"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ethel-baraona.tumblr.com/post/67557761651/twelve-subversive-acts-to-dodge-the-system-1-open">
    <title>Ethel Baraona | dpr-barcelona | TWELVE SUBVERSIVE ACTS TO DODGE THE SYSTEM 1. Open...</title>
    <dc:date>2013-11-20T17:28:38+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://ethel-baraona.tumblr.com/post/67557761651/twelve-subversive-acts-to-dodge-the-system-1-open</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["TWELVE SUBVERSIVE ACTS TO DODGE THE SYSTEM

1. Open the imaginary 
2. Operate in illusion 
3. Dislodge the immobile 
4. Think continuity 
5. Surf on the surface
6. Live in obliqueness
7. Destabilize
8. Use the fall
9. Fracture
10. Practice inversion
11. Orchestrate conflict 
12. Limit without closing 

Claude Parent, 2001"]]></description>
<dc:subject>subversion claudeparent 2001 obliqueness limits conflict inversion fracture destabilization surfaces continuity mobility imagination illusion</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:3660cbab4d46/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:subversion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:claudeparent"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2001"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:obliqueness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conflict"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inversion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fracture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:destabilization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:surfaces"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:continuity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mobility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:imagination"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:illusion"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.neh.gov/about/awards/jefferson-lecture/wendell-e-berry-lecture">
    <title>Wendell E. Berry Lecture | National Endowment for the Humanities</title>
    <dc:date>2013-09-30T17:18:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.neh.gov/about/awards/jefferson-lecture/wendell-e-berry-lecture</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[[via: https://twitter.com/dirtystylus/status/384660397238026240 ]

"“Because a thing is going strong now, it need not go strong for ever,” [Margaret] said. “This craze for motion has only set in during the last hundred years. It may be followed by a civilization that won’t be a movement, because it will rest upon the earth.
E. M. Forster, Howards End (1910)1"

…

"The economic hardship of my family and of many others, a century ago, was caused by a monopoly, the American Tobacco Company, which had eliminated all competitors and thus was able to reduce as it pleased the prices it paid to farmers. The American Tobacco Company was the work of James B. Duke of Durham, North Carolina, and New York City, who, disregarding any other consideration, followed a capitalist logic to absolute control of his industry and, incidentally, of the economic fate of thousands of families such as my own.

My effort to make sense of this memory and its encompassing history has depended on a pair of terms used by my teacher, Wallace Stegner. He thought rightly that we Americans, by inclination at least, have been divided into two kinds: “boomers” and “stickers.” Boomers, he said, are “those who pillage and run,” who want “to make a killing and end up on Easy Street,” whereas stickers are “those who settle, and love the life they have made and the place they have made it in.”2 “Boomer” names a kind of person and a kind of ambition that is the major theme, so far, of the history of the European races in our country. “Sticker” names a kind of person and also a desire that is, so far, a minor theme of that history, but a theme persistent enough to remain significant and to offer, still, a significant hope.

The boomer is motivated by greed, the desire for money, property, and therefore power. James B. Duke was a boomer, if we can extend the definition to include pillage in absentia. He went, or sent, wherever the getting was good, and he got as much as he could take.

Stickers on the contrary are motivated by affection, by such love for a place and its life that they want to preserve it and remain in it. Of my grandfather I need to say only that he shared in the virtues and the faults of his kind and time, one of his virtues being that he was a sticker. He belonged to a family who had come to Kentucky from Virginia, and who intended to go no farther. He was the third in his paternal line to live in the neighborhood of our little town of Port Royal, and he was the second to own the farm where he was born in 1864 and where he died in 1946."

…

"Because I have never separated myself from my home neighborhood, I cannot identify myself to myself apart from it. I am fairly literally flesh of its flesh. It is present in me, and to me, wherever I go. This undoubtedly accounts for my sense of shock when, on my first visit to Duke University, and by surprise, I came face-to-face with James B. Duke in his dignity, his glory perhaps, as the founder of that university. He stands imperially in bronze in front of a Methodist chapel aspiring to be a cathedral. He holds between two fingers of his left hand a bronze cigar. On one side of his pedestal is the legend: INDUSTRIALIST. On the other side is another single word: PHILANTHROPIST. The man thus commemorated seemed to me terrifyingly ignorant, even terrifyingly innocent, of the connection between his industry and his philanthropy. But I did know the connection. I felt it instantly and physically. The connection was my grandparents and thousands of others more or less like them. If you can appropriate for little or nothing the work and hope of enough such farmers, then you may dispense the grand charity of “philanthropy.”

After my encounter with the statue, the story of my grandfather’s 1906 tobacco crop slowly took on a new dimension and clarity in my mind. I still remembered my grandfather as himself, of course, but I began to think of him also as a kind of man standing in thematic opposition to a man of an entirely different kind. And I could see finally that between these two kinds there was a failure of imagination that was ruinous, that belongs indelibly to our history, and that has continued, growing worse, into our own time."

…

"It may seem plausible to suppose that the head of the American Tobacco Company would have imagined at least that a dependable supply of raw material to his industry would depend upon a stable, reasonably thriving population of farmers and upon the continuing fertility of their farms. But he imagined no such thing. In this he was like apparently all agribusiness executives. They don’t imagine farms or farmers. They imagine perhaps nothing at all, their minds being filled to capacity by numbers leading to the bottom line. Though the corporations, by law, are counted as persons, they do not have personal minds, if they can be said to have minds. It is a great oddity that a corporation, which properly speaking has no self, is by definition selfish, responsible only to itself. This is an impersonal, abstract selfishness, limitlessly acquisitive, but unable to look so far ahead as to preserve its own sources and supplies. The selfishness of the fossil fuel industries by nature is self-annihilating; but so, always, has been the selfishness of the agribusiness corporations. Land, as Wes Jackson has said, has thus been made as exhaustible as oil or coal."

…

"In such modest joy in a modest holding is the promise of a stable, democratic society, a promise not to be found in “mobility”: our forlorn modern progress toward something indefinitely, and often unrealizably, better. A principled dissatisfaction with whatever one has promises nothing or worse.

James B. Duke would not necessarily have thought so far of the small growers as even to hold them in contempt. The Duke trust exerted an oppression that was purely economic, involving a mechanical indifference, the indifference of a grinder to what it grinds. It was not, that is to say, a political oppression. It did not intend to victimize its victims. It simply followed its single purpose of the highest possible profit, and ignored the “side effects.” Confronting that purpose, any small farmer is only one, and one lost, among a great multitude of others, whose work can be quickly transformed into a great multitude of dollars."

…

"Statistical knowledge once was rare. It was a property of the minds of great rulers, conquerors, and generals, people who succeeded or failed by the manipulation of large quantities that remained, to them, unimagined because unimaginable: merely accountable quantities of land, treasure, people, soldiers, and workers. This is the sort of knowledge we now call “data” or “facts” or “information.” Or we call it “objective knowledge,” supposedly untainted by personal attachment, but nonetheless available for industrial and commercial exploitation. By means of such knowledge a category assumes dominion over its parts or members. With the coming of industrialism, the great industrialists, like kings and conquerors, become exploiters of statistical knowledge. And finally virtually all of us, in order to participate and survive in their system, have had to agree to their substitution of statistical knowledge for personal knowledge. Virtually all of us now share with the most powerful industrialists their remoteness from actual experience of the actual world. Like them, we participate in an absentee economy, which makes us effectively absent even from our own dwelling places. Though most of us have little wealth and perhaps no power, we consumer–citizens are more like James B. Duke than we are like my grandfather. By economic proxies thoughtlessly given, by thoughtless consumption of goods ignorantly purchased, now we all are boomers."

…

"In this age so abstracted and bewildered by technological magnifications of power, people who stray beyond the limits of their mental competence typically find no guide except for the supposed authority of market price. “The market” thus assumes the standing of ultimate reality. But market value is an illusion, as is proven by its frequent changes; it is determined solely by the buyer’s ability and willingness to pay."

…

"By now all thoughtful people have begun to feel our eligibility to be instructed by ecological disaster and mortal need. But we endangered ourselves first of all by dismissing affection as an honorable and necessary motive. Our decision in the middle of the last century to reduce the farm population, eliminating the allegedly “inefficient” small farmers, was enabled by the discounting of affection. As a result, we now have barely enough farmers to keep the land in production, with the help of increasingly expensive industrial technology and at an increasing ecological and social cost. Far from the plain citizens and members of the land-community, as Aldo Leopold wished them to be, farmers are now too likely to be merely the land’s exploiters."

…

"In thinking about the importance of affection, and of its increasing importance in our present world, I have been guided most directly by E. M. Forster’s novel, Howards End, published in 1910. By then, Forster was aware of the implications of “rural decay,”10 and in this novel he spoke, with some reason, of his fear that “the literature of the near future will probably ignore the country and seek inspiration from the town. . . . and those who care for the earth with sincerity may wait long ere the pendulum swings back to her again.”"

…

"“The light within,” I think, means affection, affection as motive and guide. Knowledge without affection leads us astray every time. Affection leads, by way of good work, to authentic hope. The factual knowledge, in which we seem more and more to be placing our trust, leads only to hope of the discovery, endlessly deferrable, of an ultimate fact or smallest particle that at last will explain everything."

…

"No doubt there always will be some people willing to do anything at all that is economically or technologically possible, who look upon the world and its creatures without affection and therefore as exploitable without limit. Against that limitlessness, in which we foresee assuredly our ruin, we have only our ancient effort to define ourselves as human and humane. But this ages-long, imperfect, unendable attempt, with its magnificent record, we have virtually disowned by assigning it to the ever more subordinate set of school subjects we call “arts and humanities” or, for short, “culture.” Culture, so isolated, is seen either as a dead-end academic profession or as a mainly useless acquisition to be displayed and appreciated “for its own sake.” This definition of culture as “high culture” actually debases it, as it debases also the presumably low culture that is excluded: the arts, for example, of land use, life support, healing, housekeeping, homemaking."

…

"But I would insist that the economic arts are just as honorably and authentically refinable as the fine arts. And so I am nominating economy for an equal standing among the arts and humanities. I mean, not economics, but economy, the making of the human household upon the earth: the arts of adapting kindly the many human households to the earth’s many ecosystems and human neighborhoods. This is the economy that the most public and influential economists never talk about, the economy that is the primary vocation and responsibility of every one of us."

…

"My grandparents were fortunate. They survived their debts and kept their farm—finally, and almost too late, with help from my father, who had begun his law practice in the county seat. But in the century and more since that hard year of 1907, millions of others have not been so fortunate. Owing largely to economic constraints, they have lost their hold on the land, and the land has lost its hold on them. They have entered into the trial of displacement and scattering that we try to dignify as “mobility.”"

…

"We do not have to live as if we are alone."]]></description>
<dc:subject>wendellberry capitalism corporations economy imagination stickers boomers 2012 economics land place memory industrialists philanthropy charitableindustrialcomplex culture art liberalarts humanism humanity rural farming history debt affection knowledge materialism howardsend emforster ruraldecay agriculture aldoleopold environmentalism environment sustainability destruction destructiveness local scale mobility change adaptability adaptation evolution ecology technology machines alberthoward wesjackson johnlukacs growth data quantification wealth remoteness jamesbduke industialism power greed consumerism plannedobsolescence nature corporatism allentate property ownership effectiveownership human humans limits limitations modesty democracy wallacestegner via:markllobrera philanthropicindustrialcomplex babyboomers control nonprofit nonprofits charities charity</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:0e9197f85444/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wendellberry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:corporations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:imagination"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stickers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:boomers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2012"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:land"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:place"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:memory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:industrialists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philanthropy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charitableindustrialcomplex"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:liberalarts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rural"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:farming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:debt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:affection"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:knowledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:materialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howardsend"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:emforster"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ruraldecay"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:agriculture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aldoleopold"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:environmentalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:environment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sustainability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:destruction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:destructiveness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:local"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scale"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mobility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:change"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:adaptability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:adaptation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ecology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:machines"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alberthoward"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wesjackson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnlukacs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:growth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quantification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wealth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:remoteness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jamesbduke"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:industialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:power"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:greed"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consumerism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:plannedobsolescence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:corporatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:allentate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ownership"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:effectiveownership"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:human"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limitations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:modesty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:democracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wallacestegner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:via:markllobrera"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philanthropicindustrialcomplex"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:babyboomers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:control"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nonprofit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nonprofits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charity"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dirtystylus.com/2013/08/08/but-sleep-is-work/">
    <title>But Sleep *is* Work | dirtystylus</title>
    <dc:date>2013-08-10T01:58:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://dirtystylus.com/2013/08/08/but-sleep-is-work/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["I once asked my wife why she didn’t nap when our kids took their afternoon nap. “Because that’s my only time to get things done”, she replied. And this is true, except that we don’t sleep much in the evenings, either. Parents make kids take naps because we know that they don’t function well without them, yet somehow we convince ourselves that those same physical/cognitive/emotional limits don’t apply to us. We’re adults. We’ll power through."

…

"Bluecadet is moving to a new office this fall, and there’s been lots of half-jokes about the need for a nap room. We laugh, because we know it would never happen. But what if it did? I’d wager we’d see more productive people. The danger that I see is if people use the nap as a way to shortchange themselves even further from their evening sleep.

Perhaps our true weakness lies not in our inability to push ourselves past limits, but in our refusal to take care of our very selves."]]></description>
<dc:subject>sleep markllobrera naps napping 2013 parenting idleness well-being productivity limits self-care wellbeing</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:a4e8e6bcc03f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sleep"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:markllobrera"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:naps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:napping"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2013"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:parenting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:idleness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:well-being"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:productivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:self-care"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wellbeing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.ableparris.com/post/18423983560/social-media-and-friendship-a-response">
    <title>Able Parris - Social Media and Friendship: A Response</title>
    <dc:date>2012-02-29T19:28:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.ableparris.com/post/18423983560/social-media-and-friendship-a-response</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["But I can only be close friends with a limited amount of people, and this disappoints me. I’d love to spend more time with my friends. I’d love to spend more time with my wife. I’d love to spend more time alone. I’d love to spend more time making things. I’d love to spend more time sleeping. (I should be sleeping.) I can’t do more of all these things. In fact, I’ve basically given up trying to make time to play guitar; I just can’t do it all. 

The only answer I’ve come up with is to make sure I get enough time to be in isolation. It’s the only thing I can truly control. Plus, I’m a terrible friend, husband, and employee if I don’t get enough time alone to sort out my thoughts. I’ll continue meeting new people, and I’m sure there will be meaningful friendships that emerge, but only of I take care and nurture myself."]]></description>
<dc:subject>social limits finite attention sleep family making isolation relationships life time cv twitter introverts socialmedia 2012 ableparris</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:ccd88b6a813a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:social"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:finite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sleep"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:family"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:making"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:isolation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:relationships"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:time"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cv"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:introverts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2012"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ableparris"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://therumpus.net/2011/07/you-cant-read-everything/">
    <title>You Can’t Read Everything - The Rumpus.net</title>
    <dc:date>2011-07-03T23:37:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://therumpus.net/2011/07/you-cant-read-everything/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[“I had gone through and thought about the number of books you could conceivably read in a year, for example. And then if you extrapolate it out over your lifetime, how many can you reasonably read? And it got me thinking about how vast the world of books is, and how small what you will ever take in actually is. And it becomes a sort of overwhelming thought when you realize that no matter how hard you try, no matter how smart you are, no matter how much you love to read – as I put it in the piece, statistically speaking, you’re going to die having missed almost everything.”

[via: http://jslr.tumblr.com/post/7205844487/i-had-gone-through-and-thought-about-the-number ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>reading limits human scale books insignificance antilibraries life wisdomofcrowds statistics lindaholmes slow patience knowledge</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:543cf91c04b8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:human"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scale"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:insignificance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:antilibraries"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wisdomofcrowds"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:statistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lindaholmes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:slow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:patience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:knowledge"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://places.designobserver.com/entry.html?entry=26888">
    <title>No More Play: Los Angeles on the verge of a new era: Places: Design Observer</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-30T01:09:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://places.designobserver.com/entry.html?entry=26888</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[[now here: https://placesjournal.org/article/no-more-play/ ]

"Los Angeles has been compared to a laboratory — an urban ground for experiments both prescribed and accidental. Laboratory is a perfect word. Enveloping, chaotic and mutable, LA is a nocturnal workshop where the constant experiments leave no time to tidy up and reset the data in order to start fresh in the morning. In LA, you are both the experiment and the scientist. One is forced to be the object of fascination and fray, while simultaneously judging and monitoring the urban experiment…

what is the new identity for a city whose entire life has been marked by its ability and desire to endlessly expand? Perhaps the lack of perceptible hierarchies — or, likely, the reality that traditional thresholds and boundaries in this city are hidden and constantly transgressed — makes LA a difficult case study in the urban milieu…

As an evolving being, its dynamics make description difficult. Perhaps it is not a city — perhaps it can only be described as Los Angeles."]]></description>
<dc:subject>psychogeography losangeles hierarchy hierarchies cv michaelmaltzan architecture urban urbanism history cities sprawl 2011 1992 limits change experimentation maturation density levittown future present design jessicavarner nomoreplay iwanbaan</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:76e6e7f7b630/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:psychogeography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:losangeles"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hierarchy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hierarchies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cv"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:michaelmaltzan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:architecture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:urban"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:urbanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sprawl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2011"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1992"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:change"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:experimentation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maturation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:density"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:levittown"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:future"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:present"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jessicavarner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nomoreplay"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:iwanbaan"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://journal.davidbyrne.com/2010/03/031810-collaborations-updated.html">
    <title>David Byrne's Journal: 03.18.10: Collaborations [updated]</title>
    <dc:date>2011-02-27T06:37:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://journal.davidbyrne.com/2010/03/031810-collaborations-updated.html</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["why collaborate if one doesn’t have to? … one big reason is to restrict one’s own freedom in the writing process. There’s a joy and relief in being limited, restrained. … But one might also ask: Is writing ever NOT collaboration? Doesn’t one collaborate with oneself, in a sense? Don’t we access different aspects of ourselves, different characters and attitudes and then, when they’ve had their say, switch hats and take a more distanced and critical view — editing and structuring our other half’s outpourings? Isn’t the end product sort of the result of two sides collaborating? Surely I’m not the only one who does this?"]]></description>
<dc:subject>music collaboration creativity davidbyrne writing constraints limits tcsnmy classideas editing via:preoccupations</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:941a036864f3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:music"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:creativity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davidbyrne"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:constraints"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tcsnmy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:classideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:editing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:via:preoccupations"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://sidsavara.com/personal-development/start-things-you-cant-finish">
    <title>Start Things You Can’t Finish</title>
    <dc:date>2010-07-03T21:00:38+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://sidsavara.com/personal-development/start-things-you-cant-finish</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["So, if there is something you truly are passionate about, something that you really want to try – I think just because it may seem difficult and out of reach, that shouldn’t stop you from starting. Just because it’s not possible right now, doesn’t mean it’ll never be. And even if it is, failure and quitting is an option. It’s ok to start things you can’t finish."]]></description>
<dc:subject>failure advice cv quitting learning sidsavara finishing practice limits</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:8f84bd2e4985/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:failure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:advice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cv"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quitting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sidsavara"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:finishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:practice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOP2V_np2c0">
    <title>YouTube - RSA Animate - Crises of Capitalism</title>
    <dc:date>2010-06-30T22:13:05+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOP2V_np2c0</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["In this RSA Animate, radical sociologist David Harvey asks if it is time to look beyond capitalism towards a new social order that would allow us to live within a system that really could be responsible, just, and humane?"]]></description>
<dc:subject>davidharvey capitalism economics politics rsaanimate homeownership us culture germany greece policy banks finance banking canon housing worldbank imf neoliberalism liberalism alangreenspan marxism instability systemicrisk capitalaccumulation crisis labor capital 1970s 1980s unions offshoring power wagerepression wages credit creditcards debt personaldebt 2010 limits greed profits industry london uk latinamerica wealth india china inequality incomeinequality wealthinequality hedgefunds</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:5b37838e36e8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davidharvey"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rsaanimate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:homeownership"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:germany"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:greece"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:banks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:finance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:banking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:canon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:housing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:worldbank"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:imf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neoliberalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:liberalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alangreenspan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marxism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:instability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:systemicrisk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalaccumulation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:crisis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capital"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1970s"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1980s"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:offshoring"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:power"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wagerepression"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wages"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:credit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:creditcards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:debt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:personaldebt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2010"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:greed"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:profits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:industry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:london"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:uk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:latinamerica"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wealth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:india"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:china"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inequality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:incomeinequality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wealthinequality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hedgefunds"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/04/take-it-to-the-limit/">
    <title>Take It to the Limit - Opinionator Blog - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2010-04-07T14:51:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/04/take-it-to-the-limit/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["What’s so charming about this calculation is the way infinity comes to the rescue.  At every finite stage, the scalloped shape looks weird and unpromising.  But when you take it to the limit — when you finally “get to the wall” — it becomes simple and beautiful, and everything becomes clear.  That’s how calculus works at its best."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>math infinity archimedes pi circles circumference area calculus mathematics via:migurski proof visualization geometry limits education history</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:9acc765abcb3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:math"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:infinity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:archimedes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:circles"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:circumference"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:area"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:calculus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mathematics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:via:migurski"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:proof"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:visualization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:geometry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://happydays.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/17/the-referendum/">
    <title>The Referendum - Happy Days Blog - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2009-10-18T18:32:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://happydays.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/17/the-referendum/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The Referendum is a phenomenon typical of (but not limited to) midlife, whereby people, increasingly aware of the finiteness of their time in the world, the limitations placed on them by their choices so far & the narrowing options remaining to them, start judging their peers' differing choices w/ reactions ranging from envy to contempt. The Referendum can subtly poison formerly close & uncomplicated relationships, creating tensions between the married and the single, the childless & parents, careerists & the stay-at-home...The problem is, we only get one chance at this, with no do-overs. Life is, in effect, a non-repeatable experiment with no control. In his novel about marriage, “Light Years,” James Salter writes: “For whatever we do, even whatever we do not do prevents us from doing its opposite. Acts demolish their alternatives, that is the paradox."...One of the hardest things to look at in this life is the lives we didn’t lead, the path not taken, potential left unfulfilled."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>happiness life psychology culture marriage parenting choices relationships via:kottke regret time limitations limits options children perspective choice philosophy aging emotions love midlife careers families health referendum envy contempt decisions competitiveness jealousy</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:737974c49179/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:happiness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marriage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:parenting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:choices"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:relationships"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:via:kottke"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:regret"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:time"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limitations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:options"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:perspective"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:choice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:emotions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:love"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:midlife"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:careers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:families"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:health"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:referendum"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:envy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:contempt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:decisions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:competitiveness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jealousy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://liftlab.com/think/laurent/2009/01/08/the-early-adopters-crisis/">
    <title>Laurent Haug’s blog » Blog Archive » The early adopters crisis</title>
    <dc:date>2009-01-09T06:29:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://liftlab.com/think/laurent/2009/01/08/the-early-adopters-crisis/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["There is a disturbingly increasing number of early adopters who tell me they are fed up with their jobs. Those same people who were creating homepages with 28k modems back in the 90s are now closing their blogs, snubbing Facebook, moving around with no computer or iPhone, wishing aloud they had less commitments and more money to open a restaurant, a store, or engage in a life involving more down to earth activities. It could be anodyne - and probably is in some ways as we all tend to always want the opposite of what we have - but I feel there is something interesting here. Let’s review some of the arguments involved: The web industry got boring ... Humans need to have something to show for their work. ... the partiality of online interactions. ... Tools are limiting. ... It will be interesting to see if what happens these days is a fundamental shift, or just a temporary crisis worsened by hard economical conditions. Can the people who built new technologies really reject it?"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>technology internet trends simpolicity tangibility blogging limits tools twitter web culture life simplicity slow laurenthaug</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:dfd123cd84d0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:trends"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:simpolicity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tangibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:blogging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:simplicity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:slow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:laurenthaug"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/nov2007/gb20071119_822069.htm">
    <title>Trend: Overloaded Kids Turning Low-Tech</title>
    <dc:date>2007-11-19T22:23:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/nov2007/gb20071119_822069.htm</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The older generation is rediscovering clouds and craft fairs and kids are turning to activities that involve actual human interactions"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>children youth technology overload society human limits interaction analog us uk canada retro online internet web ebay simplicity slow</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:562ca24149d3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:youth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:overload"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:human"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interaction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:analog"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:uk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:canada"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:retro"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ebay"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:simplicity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:slow"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.disambiguity.com/gardening-tools-for-social-networks/">
    <title>disambiguity - » Gardening Tools for Social Networks</title>
    <dc:date>2007-10-11T09:04:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.disambiguity.com/gardening-tools-for-social-networks/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["I want more information to help me ‘fine tune’ my social network so that I can make better decisions about who I include in my network so that I can continually fine tune it in a way that gives me the best ongoing value over time."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>socialnetworking overload human limits scale information dopplr jaiku socialsoftware informationmanagement management time ai recommendations googlereader trends socialnetworks social twitter flickr del.icio.us collections tools gamechanging future artificialintelligence</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:01ae5c188047/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialnetworking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:overload"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:human"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:limits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scale"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:information"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dopplr"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jaiku"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialsoftware"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:informationmanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:management"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:time"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:recommendations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:googlereader"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:trends"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialnetworks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:social"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:flickr"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:del.icio.us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collections"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gamechanging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:future"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>