<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (robertogreco)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from robertogreco</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.theideasletter.org/essay/the-cult-of-optimization/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/twenty-five-years-after-imagined-worlds-what-world-are-we-living-in"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://unsung.aresluna.org/book-review-maintenance-of-everything-part-one/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://asteriskmag.com/issues/12-books/the-dream-of-the-universal-library"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1dIC287Zz0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/27/technology/writer-silicon-valley-criticism.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://afraw.substack.com/p/the-china-tech-canon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://jasmi.news/p/from-counterculture-to-cyberculture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://austinkleon.com/2023/03/22/ai-as-intern/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/attending-to-technology-theses-for-disputation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://talk-out-of-school.simplecast.com/episodes/audrey-watters-on-the-history-of-teaching-machines-in-our-schools-and-the-misuse-of-ed-tech-today"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZM9mRYpnD7E"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.wired.com/story/future-book-is-here-but-not-what-we-expected/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hurryslowly.co/003-craig-mod/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCcVyuq9aRE"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.ayjay.org/fys2017/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/tag/history-of-qs/?order=ASC"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/books-and-media/book-reviews/review-david-saxs-the-revenge-of-analog-extols-the-superiority-of-real-things/article32675146/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hackeducation.com/2015/08/10/digpedlab/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://iasc-culture.org/THR/channels/Infernal_Machine/2015/03/79-theses-on-technology-for-disputation/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://medium.com/press-play/press-play-4b26bed77b7d"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://medium.com/@hansdezwart/ai-weiwei-is-living-in-our-future-474e5dd15e4f"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aeon.co/magazine/technology/the-problem-with-too-much-information/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://futurismic.com/2014/10/12/make-technological-utopia-easier-with-this-one-weird-trick/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjgXwp7gQRA"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hackeducation.com/2014/09/03/monsters-altc2014"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://kk.org/cooltools/archives/624"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hackeducation.com/2013/03/26/ed-tech-solutionism-morozov/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bookforum.com/inprint/019_05/10825"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2013/01/pain_of_the_new"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2013/01/the_improbable.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2013/01/the_post-produc.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2012/08/ff_stewartbrand/all/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://boingboing.net/2012/05/11/kk.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.findings.com/post/19346681104/how-we-will-read-kevin-kelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://startmaking.com/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.wired.com/magazine/2012/02/ff_dysonqa/all/1"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/09/you_are_a_robot.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.brainpickings.org/index.php/2011/08/01/networked-knowledge-combinatorial-creativity/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.kk.org/cooltools/archives/005797.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/07/generatives.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/07/your_two_things.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://plus.google.com/116416314233992548280/posts/8d6QYE2dmbB"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ireadwhereiam.com/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/04/techno_life_ski.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/04/what_books_will.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/04/the_invisible_h.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/04/the_art_of_endl.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/03/the_satsisfacti.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/03/laser-back_trav.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/03/art_is_what_you.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/03/simultanology.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/02/possibilians_vs.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ok-do.eu/projects/oivallus-a-project-on-future-education/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://nearfuturelaboratory.com/2010/12/23/what-innovation/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/09/mf_kellyjohnson/all/1"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/19/magazine/19FOB-WWLN-Kelly-t.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.kk.org/cooltools/archives/004626.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/3.05/eno_pr.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/07/ff_fred_brooks/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.kk.org/cooltools/the-best-magazi.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.kk.org/cooltools/archives/004610.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.wired.com/techbiz/media/magazine/16-06/st_15th_eno?currentPage=all"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.kk.org/newrules/blog/2010/07/who-is-in-charge-of-devolution.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://search.barnesandnoble.com/What-Technology-Wants/Kevin-Kelly/e/9780670022151/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2010/05/predicting_the.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2010/04/two_kinds_of_ge.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2010/04/collections_of.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2010/04/the_shirky_prin.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/03/ff_tablet_levy/"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://www.theideasletter.org/essay/the-cult-of-optimization/">
    <title>The Cult of Optimization</title>
    <dc:date>2026-06-26T00:41:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.theideasletter.org/essay/the-cult-of-optimization/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[[https://www.theideasletter.org/issue/la-longue-duree/

"Phil Tinline argues that optimization—using mathematical models and data to pursue specific objectives—has spread from engineering and wartime logistics to nearly every area of modern life. Optimization models show up in the workplace, on tech platforms, in economics, and in social policy. You don’t need to be a critic of instrumental rationality to recognize that optimization is a powerful but problematic tool when elevated into a creed that claims to improve society by through quantification."]]]></description>
<dc:subject>philtinline 2026 optimization measurement quantification georgedantzig economics engineering algorithms objectivity judgement joaquimmartins andrewning diversification finance modeling 2021 leighhunt 1817 danwang china theodoreporter science publiclife corporations operations ideology governance democracy socialmedia tracking gilduran networkstate nerdreich technooptimism marcandreessen siliconvalley mattyglesias quantifiedself kevinkelly technology technosolutionism karlpopper 1945 friedrichhayek maxhorkheimer theodoradorno technofeudalism standardeconomicmodel evgenymorozov complexity johndrockefeller charlesdarwin socialdarwinism andrewcarnegie robberbarrons richardhofstadter business whitesupremacy imperialism eugenics standardoil us government friedrichvonhayek modernity rationalism rationality society policy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:3458830a446e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philtinline"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:optimization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:measurement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quantification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:georgedantzig"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:engineering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:algorithms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:objectivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:judgement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:joaquimmartins"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:andrewning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:diversification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:finance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:modeling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2021"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:leighhunt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1817"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:danwang"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:china"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:theodoreporter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:publiclife"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:corporations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:operations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:governance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:democracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tracking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gilduran"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:networkstate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nerdreich"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technooptimism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marcandreessen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:siliconvalley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mattyglesias"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quantifiedself"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technosolutionism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:karlpopper"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1945"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:friedrichhayek"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maxhorkheimer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:theodoradorno"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technofeudalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:standardeconomicmodel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:evgenymorozov"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johndrockefeller"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charlesdarwin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialdarwinism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:andrewcarnegie"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robberbarrons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:richardhofstadter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:whitesupremacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:imperialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:eugenics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:standardoil"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:government"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:friedrichvonhayek"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:modernity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rationalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rationality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/twenty-five-years-after-imagined-worlds-what-world-are-we-living-in">
    <title>Twenty Five Years After Imagined Worlds, What World Are We Living In? | THR Web Features | Web Features | The Hedgehog Review</title>
    <dc:date>2026-06-07T00:41:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/twenty-five-years-after-imagined-worlds-what-world-are-we-living-in</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Our surprisingly Napoleonic twenty-first century."

[via: https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/twenty-five-years-after-imagined-worlds-what-world-are-we-living-in ]

"Erik J. Larson

Erik J. Larson is author of The Myth of Artificial Intelligence: Why Computers Can't Think the Way We Do (Harvard University Press, 2021). His forthcoming book is Machineland: How the Myth of Artificial Intelligence Has Shaped the 21st Century So Far.

***

This year marks the twenty-fifth anniversary of famed scientist and author Freeman Dyson’s Imagined Worlds. The book, fashioned from a series of lectures Dyson gave in Jerusalem in 1995, is partly a historical discussion about why technologies—some familiar, like nuclear power, others not, like airships—succeed or fail in what he called a Darwinian process of selection. It’s also an enjoyable piece of futurism. He delighted in the possible, and in Imagined Worlds he speculated boldly about space colonization and an entirely new species evolved from future humans. Dyson was aware of the difficulties of prediction—Imagined Worlds fails to anticipate the rise of the Internet or World Wide Web—yet like H.G. Wells, whom Dyson admired, he leaves us with a sense of having encountered important ideas on a journey led by someone who knows the terrain.  

Imagined Worlds was Dyson’s attempt to explore, as he put it, “the interaction of technology with human affairs.” Like the philosopher of science Thomas Kuhn, he thought science “moved ahead along old directions” until a conceptual revolution. Unlike Kuhn, he thought scientific revolutions could also be driven by tools, by technology. He explained that science and technology entered “Napoleonic” phases, when big institutions with deep pockets set research agendas, and “Tolstoyan” periods, when scientists engage more in tinkering and exploration. Napoleonic was “rigid organization and discipline”; Tolstoyan was “creative chaos and freedom.” Where are we now?

Science and technology today are Napoleonic. Silicon Valley is now Big Tech, the age of garage start-ups being long behind us. Neuroscience is pursued with “exascale” supercomputers and big data. Ditto physics, which also relies on billion-dollar particle accelerators like CERN’s seventeen kilometer long Large Hadron Collider. Consumers—you and me—now provide data to cloud servers, centralized repositories (“cloud” is a misnomer) of massive datasets owned by a relatively small number of governments and organizations. If anyone is “tinkering” with science and technology these days, they are not making the news. We live in Napoleonic times.

The world circa 2000 was not Napoleonic. Little more than two decades ago people were experimenting madly with technologies, business models, and seemingly everything else. Business theorists predicted that industries would demassify and disintermediate, old media gatekeepers would fall, products like encyclopedias would simply disappear, and entire industries would revamp, collapse, reshape, and emerge. Not just the tech world but the entire world seemed to be in a constant state of flux. Venture capital flowed out of a cornucopia. The NASDAQ hit 5,000 in March 2000, though the dot-com bubble burst roughly a year later. 

In the years before that setback, when Imagined Worlds was published, ideas about the future direction of science and technology were diverse, interesting, and abundant. Kevin Kelly, co-founder of Wired magazine, predicted in his 1998 hit New Rules for the New Economy that computer networks would replace the PC as the dominant feature of information technology. He missed the iPhone, understandably, but he saw the future of the Web not as PCs with modems but as a vast network of devices. In essence, he predicted the Internet of Things. Kelly envisioned the coming networked world, the new web, as “ground up,” amounting to a kind of revolution in business and society in which, instead of corporate bosses sitting atop hierarchies executing plans, networks of people would conjure and promote ideas in waves of unpredictable innovation. New Rules for the New Economy reads like a paean to creativity and human freedom, all made possible by liberating society from the old stodgy big business models and yesterday's tech and ideas. Kelly was foretelling a Tolstoyan future, Dyson’s “creative chaos and freedom.”

But surprising to many, big business made a reappearance in the “new economy.” In her now famous 2002 book Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital, business theorist Carlota Perez argued that investment frenzy and stock market crashes precede periods of technology maturation, in which the promise and fruits of a tech revolution become evident. Technology revolutions have an installment phase, she wrote, followed by a deployment phase. Then (if conditions are right) comes a “golden age” marked by growth, employment, and successful consolidation of new businesses and industries. Like Google. And Facebook. Perez's analysis—applicable to earlier golden ages, such as those of steel and electricity, oil, and mass production—accurately predicted what would happen to the Web as it matured in the new century.

What Perez didn't see—or didn't discuss—was the connection between the Napoleonic changes in society and culture and the maturing phases of a tech revolution. She described this calcification in terms of the economy—dwindling profits, unemployment. Dyson described it in terms of the minds of scientists and practitioners—a loss of creative chaos and freedom. A rigidified status quo. Today’s status quo is data-driven AI and Big Tech. Google, Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. If Kelly’s “new economy” at the turn of the century was a soft drink, the world we inhabit today is a 7-11 Big Gulp. Kelly and others of his ilk assumed networking meant Tolstoyan freedom. Like others, he assumed a “power-to-the-people” movement would derail big corporations and gate keepers and empower Everyday Joes. Big Brother was supposed to disappear, not return on steroids.

Enter the new Napoleonic. Predictably, tech pundits and critics have largely abandoned bottom-up rhetoric for worries about top-down big data collection, housed in server farms owned by big tech companies. Our imagined world has become a kind of bureau of statistics for government and big business (and science), which treat digital data as intelligence and value, not as something connected to billions of humans and their ideas.

We can’t lay the blame on Big Tech alone. The data-centric model was an irresistible path to profits and growth. The Web was bound to mature commercially one way or the other, and large—not small—companies were the likely result.

But the “bureau of statistics” mindset is now a problem. It dominates thinking everywhere, not just in technology businesses aiming for sticky ads and more captive users. Nearly every institution one can point to today, from government to science, media, medicine, insurance, and many others, embraces a centralized, data-capture model requiring massive computing resources and actively downplaying human ingenuity in favor of number crunching and prediction. More troubling perhaps, is the way this has shaped the zeitgeist. Confidence in human smarts and imagination seems at an all-time low. Entire books are written now on how people are, in effect, cognitively biased, limited, and indeed stupid. Given this cultural climate, Dyson’s time of “creative chaos and freedom” seems not only distant but beyond recovery.

Dyson called the Cold War science of the 1950s and 1960s Napoleonic because research occurred mostly in huge companies like RAND and involved teasing out the implications of earlier scientific results from brilliant Tolstoyan tinkerers like Max Plank or Albert Einstein. As in our present time, results were achieved through the investment of huge sums of money, and were typically conservative in scope, reflecting already formed interests and agendas. Much of the money during that time was spent on making larger fission, then fusion bombs. The math was already done. That time and ours both correspond to Perez’s depiction of a fully matured technology revolution showing signs of slowdown and decay. We seem to have wandered into the 1950s again, this time with Web companies instead of IBM and General Motors.

Artificial intelligence has become thoroughly Napoleonic as well. It is a textbook case in calcification. Large, central repositories of data now power ubiquitous artificial intelligence algorithms, which are great for self-navigating drones and automated surveillance cameras but frustratingly poor at basic conversation and other cherished facets of human intelligence. Among other worries, data-centric AI today requires massive amounts of old-fashioned electricity, still largely supplied by conventional fossil fuels. And the central data version of AI is adept at various forms of malfeasance, as everyone now knows. We are increasingly caught in fake news and deep fakes of facial and other unreal images, generated by today’s Big Data AI. Depressingly, the seventy-plus-year program of artificial intelligence is largely equated with centralized data repositories and statistical number crunching today. Younger generations probably don’t know that Napoleonic, Big Data AI is only one approach, one way of conceiving machine intelligence. Big Data AI makes sense in a fully matured technology world, with big players like Google and Facebook. It doesn’t make sense for Tolstoyan tinkerers, who have no access to supercomputers or petabytes of others’ personal data.

Fortunately, the twenty-first century is still young. A little over two decades into the last century was—true—a midway point between two catastrophic wars. But scientists were enjoying Tostoyan freedom. Relativity and then quantum mechanics were discovered, without the supervision or control of big science or big business. Henry Ford was mass producing automobiles, but automobiles would enjoy decades of further Tolstoyan tinkering. Tellingly, computers had not arrived in 1922, and no one anticipated the revolution they would bring. We can only wonder what imagined, and unimagined, worlds still await us in this century.Our surprisingly Napoleonic twenty-first century.

[via: https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/twenty-five-years-after-imagined-worlds-what-world-are-we-living-in ]

Erik J. Larson

Erik J. Larson is author of The Myth of Artificial Intelligence: Why Computers Can't Think the Way We Do (Harvard University Press, 2021). His forthcoming book is Machineland: How the Myth of Artificial Intelligence Has Shaped the 21st Century So Far.



This year marks the twenty-fifth anniversary of famed scientist and author Freeman Dyson’s Imagined Worlds. The book, fashioned from a series of lectures Dyson gave in Jerusalem in 1995, is partly a historical discussion about why technologies—some familiar, like nuclear power, others not, like airships—succeed or fail in what he called a Darwinian process of selection. It’s also an enjoyable piece of futurism. He delighted in the possible, and in Imagined Worlds he speculated boldly about space colonization and an entirely new species evolved from future humans. Dyson was aware of the difficulties of prediction—Imagined Worlds fails to anticipate the rise of the Internet or World Wide Web—yet like H.G. Wells, whom Dyson admired, he leaves us with a sense of having encountered important ideas on a journey led by someone who knows the terrain.  

Imagined Worlds was Dyson’s attempt to explore, as he put it, “the interaction of technology with human affairs.” Like the philosopher of science Thomas Kuhn, he thought science “moved ahead along old directions” until a conceptual revolution. Unlike Kuhn, he thought scientific revolutions could also be driven by tools, by technology. He explained that science and technology entered “Napoleonic” phases, when big institutions with deep pockets set research agendas, and “Tolstoyan” periods, when scientists engage more in tinkering and exploration. Napoleonic was “rigid organization and discipline”; Tolstoyan was “creative chaos and freedom.” Where are we now?

Science and technology today are Napoleonic. Silicon Valley is now Big Tech, the age of garage start-ups being long behind us. Neuroscience is pursued with “exascale” supercomputers and big data. Ditto physics, which also relies on billion-dollar particle accelerators like CERN’s seventeen kilometer long Large Hadron Collider. Consumers—you and me—now provide data to cloud servers, centralized repositories (“cloud” is a misnomer) of massive datasets owned by a relatively small number of governments and organizations. If anyone is “tinkering” with science and technology these days, they are not making the news. We live in Napoleonic times.

The world circa 2000 was not Napoleonic. Little more than two decades ago people were experimenting madly with technologies, business models, and seemingly everything else. Business theorists predicted that industries would demassify and disintermediate, old media gatekeepers would fall, products like encyclopedias would simply disappear, and entire industries would revamp, collapse, reshape, and emerge. Not just the tech world but the entire world seemed to be in a constant state of flux. Venture capital flowed out of a cornucopia. The NASDAQ hit 5,000 in March 2000, though the dot-com bubble burst roughly a year later. 

In the years before that setback, when Imagined Worlds was published, ideas about the future direction of science and technology were diverse, interesting, and abundant. Kevin Kelly, co-founder of Wired magazine, predicted in his 1998 hit New Rules for the New Economy that computer networks would replace the PC as the dominant feature of information technology. He missed the iPhone, understandably, but he saw the future of the Web not as PCs with modems but as a vast network of devices. In essence, he predicted the Internet of Things. Kelly envisioned the coming networked world, the new web, as “ground up,” amounting to a kind of revolution in business and society in which, instead of corporate bosses sitting atop hierarchies executing plans, networks of people would conjure and promote ideas in waves of unpredictable innovation. New Rules for the New Economy reads like a paean to creativity and human freedom, all made possible by liberating society from the old stodgy big business models and yesterday's tech and ideas. Kelly was foretelling a Tolstoyan future, Dyson’s “creative chaos and freedom.”

But surprising to many, big business made a reappearance in the “new economy.” In her now famous 2002 book Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital, business theorist Carlota Perez argued that investment frenzy and stock market crashes precede periods of technology maturation, in which the promise and fruits of a tech revolution become evident. Technology revolutions have an installment phase, she wrote, followed by a deployment phase. Then (if conditions are right) comes a “golden age” marked by growth, employment, and successful consolidation of new businesses and industries. Like Google. And Facebook. Perez's analysis—applicable to earlier golden ages, such as those of steel and electricity, oil, and mass production—accurately predicted what would happen to the Web as it matured in the new century.

What Perez didn't see—or didn't discuss—was the connection between the Napoleonic changes in society and culture and the maturing phases of a tech revolution. She described this calcification in terms of the economy—dwindling profits, unemployment. Dyson described it in terms of the minds of scientists and practitioners—a loss of creative chaos and freedom. A rigidified status quo. Today’s status quo is data-driven AI and Big Tech. Google, Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. If Kelly’s “new economy” at the turn of the century was a soft drink, the world we inhabit today is a 7-11 Big Gulp. Kelly and others of his ilk assumed networking meant Tolstoyan freedom. Like others, he assumed a “power-to-the-people” movement would derail big corporations and gate keepers and empower Everyday Joes. Big Brother was supposed to disappear, not return on steroids.

Enter the new Napoleonic. Predictably, tech pundits and critics have largely abandoned bottom-up rhetoric for worries about top-down big data collection, housed in server farms owned by big tech companies. Our imagined world has become a kind of bureau of statistics for government and big business (and science), which treat digital data as intelligence and value, not as something connected to billions of humans and their ideas.

We can’t lay the blame on Big Tech alone. The data-centric model was an irresistible path to profits and growth. The Web was bound to mature commercially one way or the other, and large—not small—companies were the likely result.

But the “bureau of statistics” mindset is now a problem. It dominates thinking everywhere, not just in technology businesses aiming for sticky ads and more captive users. Nearly every institution one can point to today, from government to science, media, medicine, insurance, and many others, embraces a centralized, data-capture model requiring massive computing resources and actively downplaying human ingenuity in favor of number crunching and prediction. More troubling perhaps, is the way this has shaped the zeitgeist. Confidence in human smarts and imagination seems at an all-time low. Entire books are written now on how people are, in effect, cognitively biased, limited, and indeed stupid. Given this cultural climate, Dyson’s time of “creative chaos and freedom” seems not only distant but beyond recovery.

Dyson called the Cold War science of the 1950s and 1960s Napoleonic because research occurred mostly in huge companies like RAND and involved teasing out the implications of earlier scientific results from brilliant Tolstoyan tinkerers like Max Plank or Albert Einstein. As in our present time, results were achieved through the investment of huge sums of money, and were typically conservative in scope, reflecting already formed interests and agendas. Much of the money during that time was spent on making larger fission, then fusion bombs. The math was already done. That time and ours both correspond to Perez’s depiction of a fully matured technology revolution showing signs of slowdown and decay. We seem to have wandered into the 1950s again, this time with Web companies instead of IBM and General Motors.

Artificial intelligence has become thoroughly Napoleonic as well. It is a textbook case in calcification. Large, central repositories of data now power ubiquitous artificial intelligence algorithms, which are great for self-navigating drones and automated surveillance cameras but frustratingly poor at basic conversation and other cherished facets of human intelligence. Among other worries, data-centric AI today requires massive amounts of old-fashioned electricity, still largely supplied by conventional fossil fuels. And the central data version of AI is adept at various forms of malfeasance, as everyone now knows. We are increasingly caught in fake news and deep fakes of facial and other unreal images, generated by today’s Big Data AI. Depressingly, the seventy-plus-year program of artificial intelligence is largely equated with centralized data repositories and statistical number crunching today. Younger generations probably don’t know that Napoleonic, Big Data AI is only one approach, one way of conceiving machine intelligence. Big Data AI makes sense in a fully matured technology world, with big players like Google and Facebook. It doesn’t make sense for Tolstoyan tinkerers, who have no access to supercomputers or petabytes of others’ personal data.

Fortunately, the twenty-first century is still young. A little over two decades into the last century was—true—a midway point between two catastrophic wars. But scientists were enjoying Tostoyan freedom. Relativity and then quantum mechanics were discovered, without the supervision or control of big science or big business. Henry Ford was mass producing automobiles, but automobiles would enjoy decades of further Tolstoyan tinkering. Tellingly, computers had not arrived in 1922, and no one anticipated the revolution they would bring. We can only wonder what imagined, and unimagined, worlds still await us in this century."]]></description>
<dc:subject>eriklarson freemandyson 1995 2022 web internet online computers computing centralization decentralization bigtech thomaskuhn siliconvalley neuroscience bigdata napoleon google facebook instagram twitter freedom creativity liberty carlotaperez tolstoy anarchism openweb anarchy innovation society liberation kevinkelly 1998 coldwar rand maxplank alberteinstein ai artificialintelligence henryford quantummechanics quantumtheory quantumphysics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:567a8595579a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:eriklarson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freemandyson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1995"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2022"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:centralization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:decentralization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bigtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thomaskuhn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:siliconvalley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neuroscience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bigdata"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:napoleon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:facebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:instagram"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freedom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:creativity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:liberty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:carlotaperez"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tolstoy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anarchism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openweb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anarchy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:innovation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:liberation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1998"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:coldwar"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rand"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maxplank"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alberteinstein"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:henryford"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quantummechanics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quantumtheory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quantumphysics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://unsung.aresluna.org/book-review-maintenance-of-everything-part-one/">
    <title>Book review: Maintenance: Of Everything (Part One) – Unsung</title>
    <dc:date>2026-04-02T00:18:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://unsung.aresluna.org/book-review-maintenance-of-everything-part-one/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The new book by Stewart Brand is tackling a subject that’s important to me. The introduction struck a chord:

<blockquote>The apparent paradox is profound: Maintenance is absolutely necessary and maintenance is optional. It is easy to put off, yet it has to be done. Defer now, regret later. Neglect kills.

What to do? Here’s a suggestion: Soften the paradox, and the misbehavior it encourages, by expanding the term “maintenance” beyond referring only to preventive maintenance to stave off the trauma of repair—brushing the damn teeth, etc. Let “maintenance” mean the whole grand process of keeping a thing going.</blockquote>

Ultimately, alas, the book doesn’t really expand on this suggestion. While the volume feels rich and dense in some ways – illustrations, extra commentary, highlights – its surface area ultimately appears to be rather shallow. Ironically, given the subject matter, it feels like Brand fell prey to a bunch of “sexy” stories, some of them only tangentially related to maintenance.

I will just say it: I wish the author was more woke. The book is very male-coded. The main chosen areas of investigation are: motorcycles! tanks! guns! wars! There are moments towards the end where Elon Musk and Bill Gates are talked about as if it was still 15 years ago and we haven’t actually learned anything since. (No word of Cybertruck, either.)

We know maintenance tends to be unrewarded and forgotten come promotion time. We know that tedious tasks are often assigned to women and people of color while white men go around doing “genius things.” It’s hard to imagine women not being present in a book about maintenance, and yet – and I wish I was joking – the only woman of any significance in the entire book is… The Statue Of Liberty.

That aside, before opening the book, I hoped it would provide me some vocabulary and evolved thinking about maintenance that I could put to use, and there are some moments where it almost approaches what I wanted from it. Here’s a passage:

<blockquote>Powell credits the Israeli military with a mindset that naturally viewed damaged tanks as soon-to-be-repaired tanks, rather than the irredeemable flotsam of battle. The fact that [Israeli] commanders thought in these terms gave purpose and direction to the maintenance-related technical and tactical skill their crews possessed.</blockquote>

This is fascinating. Tell me how? Tell me what was needed to make it happen? But, unfortunately, outside of some basic tenets of “give the rank and file more freedom to do things” and “embrace improvisation,” the book doesn’t seem to offer more.

Elsewhere, there is this quote:

<blockquote>In almost every plant I worked at, QA was seen as a hindrance to hitting productivity metrics. We never got credit for a well-maintained manufacturing capability, but QA almost always got blamed when things went wrong.</blockquote>

…which, again, felt like a fascinating thread to pull on. But instead of digging deeper, this is left hanging without investigation.

The book doesn’t really have a proper ending with synthesis of what came before, and generally meanders a lot – to a point that the table of contents has more “digressions” than actual subjects. It also feels occasionally rambling and occasionally showing off (name-dropping people like Kevin Kelly and Freeman Dyson, or quotes from “beta-tester” readers that mostly serve to paint Brand in a positive light), which takes away from otherwise brisk writing and at times truly excellent storytelling. (The first chapter in particular is fantastic.)

If you want an easy-to-read, breezy, well-typeset book filled with historical anecdotes, and the above caveats do not bother you, this might be a fun read! But I expected more from it.

The one place where the book shines is pointing people toward other books – there are pages that feel more like literature review (done really well!), and the end matter has bibliography and recommended reading with notes. So in that way, while disappointing in and of itself, it could also become an interesting starting off point for more research."

[See also:
https://kottke.org/26/04/stewart-brand-maintenance

"I was thankful to read Marcin Wichary’s review of Stewart Brand’s Maintenance: Of Everything. I first heard about the book months and months ago; it sounded potentially interesting but I was afraid it was going to suffer from a now-familiar myopia of the “tech” old guard. Wichary writes:

<blockquote>I will just say it: I wish the author was more woke. The book is very male-coded. The main chosen areas of investigation are: motorcycles! tanks! guns! wars! There are moments towards the end where Elon Musk and Bill Gates are talked about as if it was still 15 years ago and we haven’t actually learned anything since. (No word of Cybertruck, either.)

We know maintenance tends to be unrewarded and forgotten come promotion time. We know that tedious tasks are often assigned to women and people of color while white men go around doing “genius things.” It’s hard to imagine women not being present in a book about maintenance, and yet — and I wish I was joking — the only woman of any significance in the entire book is… The Statue Of Liberty.</blockquote>

Oof. Yeah. Writing a book with that title (and its attendant aspirations) while ignoring the expertise and experiences of the vast majority of the world’s population (and more than half of the US population) is just not good enough at this point. It’s lazy and incurious, especially for an author frequently lauded as the opposite of both.

(Bit of a sharp turn perhaps, but a recent contrast to Brand’s approach is the PBS series The American Revolution, directed by Ken Burns, Sarah Botstein, and David Schmidt. Instead of yet another retelling of the Revolutionary War focused on battles, Founding Fathers, and heroic tales of the good guys, Burns and his team drew from a broader pool of participants (many voices of women, free & enslaved Black people, Native Americans, etc.) and emphasized the extent to which the Revolution was many different things to many different people: a fight for freedom, a campaign to continue the enslavement of Black people, a cover for raping & pillaging, and the birth of a new colonizing nation. The result was a balanced, truthful, and insightful look at the war, an event that should be reckoned with at least as much as it’s celebrated.)"

and 

Take this as you will, but I asked Claude if Brand had written substantively about women during his career and it responded:

<blockquote>Based on my research, here's what I can tell you about when Stewart Brand has written substantively about women across his books and magazine work. The short answer is: remarkably rarely, and this absence has itself become a subject of scholarly attention.</blockquote>

Lol."]]]></description>
<dc:subject>marcinwichary stewartbrand maintenane 2026 billgates elonmusk technology gender cybertruck kevinkelly freemandyson superficiality women siliconvalley kenburns sarahbotstein davidschmidt diversity whitesupremacy patriarchy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:97c45150743e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marcinwichary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stewartbrand"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maintenane"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:billgates"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elonmusk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gender"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cybertruck"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freemandyson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:superficiality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:women"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:siliconvalley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kenburns"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sarahbotstein"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davidschmidt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:diversity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:whitesupremacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:patriarchy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://asteriskmag.com/issues/12-books/the-dream-of-the-universal-library">
    <title>The Dream of the Universal Library—Asterisk</title>
    <dc:date>2026-01-22T05:52:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://asteriskmag.com/issues/12-books/the-dream-of-the-universal-library</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The Internet promised easy access to every book ever written. Why can’t we have nice things?"]]></description>
<dc:subject>internet libraries 2026 monicawestin books reading howweread kevinkelly web online michaelgorman google googlebooks digitization llms digitaloptimism digital 2006 2004 copyright licensing 1997 2015 law legal internetarchive</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:c6ba65f7d8db/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:libraries"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:monicawestin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:michaelgorman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:googlebooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:digitization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:llms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:digitaloptimism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:digital"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2006"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2004"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1997"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2015"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:legal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internetarchive"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1dIC287Zz0">
    <title>Tech Billionaires Want Us Dead - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2026-01-19T22:29:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1dIC287Zz0</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Tech billionaires are planning for a future where humans don’t exist, and they’re already building it.
  
For decades, tech elites have sold us a shiny future powered by artificial intelligence. But what if the future they’re building doesn’t include us?

I investigated the dangerous worldview known as TESCREALism that has taken hold across the world’s most powerful tech companies, from OpenAI to Tesla. It’s the belief that biological humans are flawed and temporary, and that a post-human future dominated by AGI (artificial general intelligence) is both inevitable and desirable.

Under this ideology, human obsolescence is framed as progress, while billionaires like Elon Musk, Sam Altman, Peter Thiel, and Mark Zuckerberg prepare to outlive the collapse they are helping to create.

KEY CONCEPTS: From the Singularity to billionaire bunkers, TESCREAL ideology is the invisible force driving the AI arms race.

TESCREAL: Transhumanism, Extropianism, Singularitarianism, Cosmism, Rationalism, Effective Altruism, Accelerationism, Longtermism.

Special thanks to Dr. Émile P. Torres for his extensive research on this topic. Follow Dr. Torres: https://x.com/xriskology "]]></description>
<dc:subject>taylorlevy 2026 2025 elonmusk samaltman peterthiel markzuckerberg ideology tescreal transhumanism rationalism extropianism singularitarianism singularity cosmism effectivealtruism longtermism humans agi artificialgeneralintelligence billionaires oligarchy vc venturecapital dehumanization dossdoubthout openai tesla bunkers posthumanism collapse humanextinction siliconvalley technology culture society deathcults history future labor work workers automation robots jonyive airbnb próspera netwrokstate bryanjohnson immortality kosa inequality power escape grimes cults marcandreessen technofascism technosolutionism technooptimism larrypage stevewozniak stevejobs hackerculture seassteading dystopia accellerationism eattherich datacenters ai artificialintelligence humanity kanyewest kimkardashian californianideology bayarea counterculture stewartbrand mindchildren computers computing personalcomputers personalcomputing design life living émiletorres sanhillroad startups hansmoravec charlesplatt raykurzweil kevi</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:fa49dd72711f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:taylorlevy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2025"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elonmusk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:samaltman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:peterthiel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:markzuckerberg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tescreal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:transhumanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rationalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:extropianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:singularitarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:singularity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cosmism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:effectivealtruism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:longtermism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:agi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialgeneralintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:billionaires"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:oligarchy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:vc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:venturecapital"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dehumanization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dossdoubthout"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tesla"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bunkers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:posthumanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collapse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanextinction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:siliconvalley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:deathcults"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:future"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:workers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:automation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robots"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jonyive"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:airbnb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:próspera"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:netwrokstate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bryanjohnson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:immortality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kosa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inequality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:power"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:escape"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:grimes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cults"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marcandreessen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technofascism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technosolutionism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technooptimism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:larrypage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stevewozniak"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stevejobs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hackerculture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:seassteading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dystopia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:accellerationism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:eattherich"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:datacenters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kanyewest"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kimkardashian"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:californianideology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bayarea"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:counterculture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stewartbrand"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mindchildren"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:personalcomputers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:personalcomputing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:living"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:émiletorres"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sanhillroad"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:startups"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hansmoravec"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charlesplatt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:raykurzweil"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevi"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/27/technology/writer-silicon-valley-criticism.html">
    <title>The Writer Who Dared Criticize Silicon Valley - The New York Times</title>
    <dc:date>2025-11-27T16:53:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/27/technology/writer-silicon-valley-criticism.html</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Paulina Borsook’s “Cyberselfish,” which offered dire predictions about the tech world’s love for libertarianism, is finding fans. It only took 25 years."

[archived:
https://archive.ph/74rSu

referenced here:
https://www.thenerdreich.com/tech-critic-paulina-borsook-profiled-in-new-york-times/ ]

"Even Silicon Valley dislikes Silicon Valley.

More than two-thirds of residents agreed in a 2024 poll that the tech companies have partially or completely misplaced their moral compass. And that was before so many in tech embraced the Trump administration.

Some of those who believe tech lost its way are finding explanations in a book published a quarter century ago.

Paulina Borsook’s “Cyberselfish” saw the seeds of disaster in the late-1990s dot-com boom, which, she argued, transformed a community that was previously sober, civic-minded and egalitarian into something toxic.

Silicon Valley, Ms. Borsook wrote, hated governments, rules and regulations. It believed if you were rich, you were smart. It thought people could be, and indeed should be, programmed just like a computer. “Techno-libertarianism,” as she labeled it, had no time for the messy realities of being human.

At the time, Silicon Valley was just a bunch of young people boasting and hyping. But Ms. Borsook predicted that when the tech world had amassed sufficient money and power, it would start imposing its beliefs on everyone outside the valley.

“If empathy has now become a distasteful personal failing; if surveillance capitalism has become the default shrugged-off business practice; if the environmental impacts of A.I. are waved away: then we are alas living in the tech-driven culture I saw headed our way 30 years ago,” Ms. Borsook said in an interview. “It’s terrible that I was right.”

Her prescience did her no favors. “Cyberselfish,” published in 2000, was such a setback to her career that she refers to it as “T.D.B.” — That Damn Book. She never wrote another. She spent years as an Airbnb superhost in exchange for free rent. Now, at 71 and in poor health, she lives a precarious life in the East Bay of San Francisco, dependent on a Go Fund Me that friends set up.

Her revival began in May with Jonathan Sandhu’s radical political criticism site, FakeSoap. “She was too right, too early, and too unwilling to flatter the cathedral of code,” Mr. Sandhu wrote. It accelerated recently with “The Nerd Reich,” a podcast by Gil Duran, a former spokesman for several California politicians. His talk with Ms. Borsook garnered over 120,000 views on YouTube in three weeks. Ms. Borsook’s champions are celebrating her on social media. “I was quoting Paulina Borsook before it was cool!” the speculative fiction writer Charlie Jane Anders bragged.

“Cyberselfish” has been out of print forever, but the secondhand copies have all been scooped up. Amazon does not have any. Even libraries say they don’t have it. Would-be readers have placed “wanted” notices on X to no avail. International publishers are asking Ms. Borsook about republishing it.

Ms. Borsook’s comeback arrives at a moment of soul-searching for some of the Silicon Valley writers who have charted its rise to power over the decades. How did the glorious dreams of liberation through technology — immortalized in Apple’s ad asserting that the company would save us from “1984” — morph into the current landscape of trillion-dollar companies flexing control over everyone’s life?

“I Thought I Knew Silicon Valley. I Was Wrong” was the headline on Steven Levy’s September feature in Wired magazine. Mr. Levy, like Ms. Borsook, has been around the valley forever, but his reporting generally reflected, and sometimes celebrated, the view from the executive suites.

Now those executives are behaving in unexpected ways. Mr. Levy noted, for instance, that Apple’s chief executive, Tim Cook, presented President Trump in August with a special engraved statute — which the writer called “the most dubious, most obsequious product in the company’s near half-century.”

Mr. Levy wrote, “Here’s something that took me by surprise: how quickly and decisively the visionaries I chronicled aligned themselves with Trump, a man whose values violently clashed with the egalitarian impulses of the digital revolution. How did I miss that?”

The Techno-Libertarian Ethos

The mid-1990s was an era of great hope for the freedom that computers would inevitably bring. John Perry Barlow, a onetime lyricist for the Grateful Dead, wrote a Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace. It was addressed to governments and those who believed in traditional governments:

“On behalf of the future, I ask you of the past to leave us alone. You are not welcome among us. You have no sovereignty where we gather,” the declaration stated. “We are creating a world where anyone, anywhere may express his or her beliefs, no matter how singular, without fear of being coerced into silence or conformity.”

Ms. Borsook found the hatred of government puzzling. “No one has benefited more and suffered less from the government than the inhabitants of Silicon Valley,” Ms. Borsook said. “I always wondered, Why are they so mad?” Much of “Cyberselfish” traces the roots of a budding techno-libertarian ethos among the tech elite, a philosophy that scorned the greater good in favor of the bottom line.

“The notion that because one is rich one must be smart, however fallacious, is deeply embedded: People can equate piles of money — or the promise of it — with good sense, wisdom, and savoir faire,” she wrote.

Ms. Borsook saw things differently from her boosterist colleagues for two reasons. One, she had deep experience in Silicon Valley, so knew the technology that was being celebrated. And two, she experienced a personal tragedy. She grew up in Pasadena, the heart of the Southern California 1960s engineering culture that made the moonshots and the internet possible. When she was 14, a friend shot her with a Colt .45, a horrendous accident that left her with a traumatic brain injury.

“There was no way I could have gone to law school, medical school, public policy school, become a geologist, gotten an M.B.A., learned a foreign language — in some ways I remain cognitively as I was at age 14,” Ms. Borsook wrote in an autobiographical essay. She had a hard time processing information in an academic format.

So she drifted into the world of computers. She worked at Data Communications magazine, covering the 1984 news conference where Bill Gates introduced Microsoft Windows to the world. Her view of tech was practical, the way many engineers thought at the time. It was just like indoor plumbing or electricity: infrastructure, not magic.

“I would never argue that technology hasn’t done some good things,” she said in an interview at a Mexican restaurant near her apartment on a recent rainy East Bay afternoon. “I just don’t see why this toxic ideology had to accompany it. These are tools. I mean, modern dentistry is great. But your dentist doesn’t insist you worship him.”

In 1993, a new San Francisco publication called Wired began publishing. “The Digital Revolution is whipping through our lives like a Bengali typhoon — while the mainstream media is still groping for the snooze button,” a co-founder, Louis Rossetto, wrote in the first issue. Ms. Borsook was among Wired’s earliest and most prolific contributors. She was also one of the few women.

Wired was one of those publications that come along at the right moment, like Rolling Stone in the late 1960s or Playboy in the 1950s, creating as well as covering an emerging way of life. In Wired’s case, it embraced technology as culture. The magazine made geeks sexy, which in turn made Wired hot.
The geeks were creating the future that Wired wanted. By the end of the decade, Wired editors had developed a list of hot stocks that were sure to capitalize on the tech boom, and licensed the magazine’s name to a real-life fund that invested in the companies.

It was all too cozy for Ms. Borsook. “I couldn’t, simply couldn’t, entirely get with the program — nor keep my mouth shut about it,” she wrote in “Cyberselfish.”

“Cyberselfish” was dropped by its first publisher, then picked up by a second for less money. It was published just as the dot-com boom began to unravel. It got some good reviews. The New York Times critic Michiko Kakutani called it “smart, funny and irreverent.” But it didn’t sell, and it didn’t lead to anything.

“It flatlined me in the cultural universe,” Ms. Borsook said.
Kevin Kelly, the executive editor of Wired from its founding until 1999, said he only vaguely recalled “Cyberselfish.” He rejected Ms. Borsook’s notion, made at length in the book, that the magazine validated and encouraged the more unsavory aspects of the tech industry.

Silicon Valley Truth and Reconciliation?

Ms. Borsook’s friends remember hard times. “Paulina saw the dark lining in every silver cloud and insisted on her own intuitions — she followed her muse rather than money,” recalled Jeff Ubois, a former entrepreneur. “There wasn’t much market demand for pessimism and foreboding in San Francisco.”

She wasn’t the only critic of Silicon Valley. Clifford Stoll, an astronomer and writer, wrote “Silicon Snake Oil: Second Thoughts on the Information Highway” in 1995, saying the internet would never be anything more than a toy. The book’s predictions garnered a lot of attention. “No online database will replace your daily newspaper,” he wrote.

In 2010, with newspapers reeling, Mr. Stoll renounced his own book. “Wrong? Yep,” he said in an online forum. In 2025, living not far from Ms. Borsook in the East Bay, Mr. Stoll has changed his mind yet again. “Only a fool believes that technology is a cornucopia of wonderful stuff without a price to be paid,” he said in an interview.

Even Wired, for so long a booster, has become increasingly Borsookian. It now reports aggressively on Silicon Valley. A recent video: “Has the U.S. Become a Surveillance State?”

“Hope it works out,” Ms. Borsook said of the magazine’s newfound fervor. Her own attitudes have remained remarkably consistent. New rhetoric came along, she noted in a 2015 “Cyberselfish” update, but the political impulses always remained the same.

“I still believe in regulation and that there is such a thing as the public good and don’t believe the market can or should provide everything,” she wrote. She added that the vast amounts of money generated by the valley were, as always, at the root of the problem. Money is power.

So what is to be done? In the new issue of In Formation, a very irregular tech-critical tech magazine with the slogan “Every day, computers are making people easier to use,” Ms. Borsook proposes a Silicon Valley Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

She imagines testimony from a long list of tech journalists turned investors as well as reporters turned celebrants. Also: confessions from the men who came up with the labels “sharing economy,” “disruptive innovation” and “thought leader.” The proceedings would, at the least, clear the air and provide greater understanding.

Her editor asked, “Is this humor or is this serious?” Ms. Borsook’s answer: “I don’t know.”"]]></description>
<dc:subject>paulinaborsook siliconvalley libertarianism politics 2025 davidstreifield cyberselfish cliffordstoll kevinkelly 2010 michikokakutani gilduran via:javierarbona 1993 rollingstone 1984 billgates windows microsoft boosterism johnperrybarlow regulation governance government deregulation apple timcook donaldtrump charliejaneanders stevenlevy 2000 ai artificialintelligence nerdreich tescreal singularitarianism singularity transhumanism humanism humans human extropianism cosmism rationalism effectivealtruism longtermism dotcomboom dotcombubble dotcombust civics egalitarianism selfishness capitalism greed toxicity morality ethics technosolutionism technology technooptimism</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:bfba8d1ed21a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:paulinaborsook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:siliconvalley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:libertarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2025"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davidstreifield"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cyberselfish"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cliffordstoll"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2010"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:michikokakutani"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gilduran"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:via:javierarbona"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1993"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rollingstone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1984"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:billgates"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:windows"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:boosterism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnperrybarlow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:regulation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:governance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:government"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:deregulation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:timcook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:donaldtrump"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charliejaneanders"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stevenlevy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2000"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nerdreich"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tescreal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:singularitarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:singularity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:transhumanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:human"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:extropianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cosmism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rationalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:effectivealtruism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:longtermism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dotcomboom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dotcombubble"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dotcombust"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:civics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:egalitarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:selfishness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:greed"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:toxicity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:morality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technosolutionism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technooptimism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://afraw.substack.com/p/the-china-tech-canon">
    <title>The China Tech Canon - by afra - Concurrent</title>
    <dc:date>2025-10-22T21:18:22+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://afraw.substack.com/p/the-china-tech-canon</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["How does the paideía of the Chinese tech elite differ from their counterparts in Silicon Valley?"]]></description>
<dc:subject>china siliconvalley 2025 philosophy a16z tannergreer patrickcollison danwang kaiserkuo winnology ruguanxue claracollier jakeeaton leijun apple microsoft ibm xiaomi stevejobs nilsgilman tgreer maosim statepower georffreymoore ericries jumcollins innovation elonmusk qingdynasty fanfou peterthiel clayshirky tencent ponyma robinli raydalio malcolmgladwell baidu benhorowitz lixiang ashleevance yangzhilin yukai kevinkelly wechat zhangxiaolong wuchen jamesgleick wujun maotsetung maozedong renzhengfei wangxing temu meituan confucius laozi laotzu taoteching hanfaeizi plato artistotle west confucianism arthurkroeber jinyong liucixin issacasimov jrrtolkien identity anduril palantir alibaba jackma huashanschool mounthua yanfeng jeffbezos iaianbanks technolibertarianism robertheinlein nealstephenson snowcrash scifi sciencefiction deepseek unitree wangxingxing robotics daviddeutsch stephencovey walterisaacson xijinping dengxiaoping ezravogel suntzu theartofwar afrazhaowang afrawang</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:94800aac803d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:china"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:siliconvalley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2025"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:a16z"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tannergreer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:patrickcollison"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:danwang"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kaiserkuo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:winnology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ruguanxue"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:claracollier"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jakeeaton"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:leijun"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ibm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:xiaomi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stevejobs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nilsgilman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tgreer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maosim"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:statepower"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:georffreymoore"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ericries"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jumcollins"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:innovation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elonmusk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:qingdynasty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fanfou"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:peterthiel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:clayshirky"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tencent"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ponyma"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robinli"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:raydalio"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:malcolmgladwell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:baidu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:benhorowitz"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lixiang"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ashleevance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:yangzhilin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:yukai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wechat"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:zhangxiaolong"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wuchen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jamesgleick"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wujun"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maotsetung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maozedong"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:renzhengfei"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wangxing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:temu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meituan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:confucius"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:laozi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:laotzu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:taoteching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hanfaeizi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:plato"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artistotle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:west"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:confucianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:arthurkroeber"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jinyong"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:liucixin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:issacasimov"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jrrtolkien"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:identity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anduril"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:palantir"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alibaba"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jackma"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:huashanschool"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mounthua"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:yanfeng"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jeffbezos"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:iaianbanks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technolibertarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robertheinlein"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nealstephenson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:snowcrash"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scifi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sciencefiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:deepseek"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unitree"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wangxingxing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robotics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:daviddeutsch"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stephencovey"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:walterisaacson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:xijinping"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dengxiaoping"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ezravogel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:suntzu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:theartofwar"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:afrazhaowang"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:afrawang"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://jasmi.news/p/from-counterculture-to-cyberculture">
    <title>from counterculture to cyberculture (ft. fred turner)</title>
    <dc:date>2025-09-26T01:36:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://jasmi.news/p/from-counterculture-to-cyberculture</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Stewart Brand, accelerationism, dating apps"

[on YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TNg34K85-8

"Today's guest is Fred Turner, a Professor of Communication at Stanford and probably the best historian of Silicon Valley culture over the past 100 years
.
His book, From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism, is my favorite book on Silicon Valley's history, focusing on how hippies and hackers came together from the 60s to the 90s.

Fred is also one of the warmest, most enthusiastic storytellers I know—the kind of history teacher everyone wishes they had. You’ll leave this listen with a bunch of fun facts about the Whole Earth Catalog, Burning Man, and the Italian futurists; but more importantly, a deep appreciation for what humans and the humanities can offer.

01:00 The two types of Bay Area hippies
10:59 Military tech since the Vietnam War 
22:59 Disembodiment and dating apps
45:30 Zuckerberg, Chappell Roan, and the free market
1:02:50 Accelerationism from Mussolini to now
1:30:03 Teaching the humanities in 2025"]]]></description>
<dc:subject>fredturner jasminesun 2025 stewartbrand siliconvalley datingapps history markzuckerberg chappellroan mussolini hippies californianideology miliary vietnamwar humanities teaching howweteach benitomussolini toddgitlin newleft berkeley marissavio newcommunalists haight-ashbury thehaight politics psychedelics lsd janisjoplin left escape communalism sharedconsciousness computers computing technology military vietnam 1960s 1970s wiredmagazine buckminsterfuller decentralization hierarchy hierarchies geodesicdome bureaucracy individualism counterculture burningman design liberation kenkesey apple wholeearthcatalog tescreal immateriality class war singularity singularitarianism transhumanism dematerialization online internet web abstraction disembodiment combat bodies veterans iraq iraqwar militaryindustrialcomplex stanford italianfuturists italianfuturism futurism information godcomplex stevejobs cybernetics immaterial philosophy networks networkedthinking cyberculture google catalogs race segregation racism privilig</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:56ace5aeab77/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fredturner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jasminesun"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2025"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stewartbrand"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:siliconvalley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:datingapps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:markzuckerberg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chappellroan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mussolini"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hippies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:californianideology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:miliary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:vietnamwar"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:benitomussolini"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:toddgitlin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:newleft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:berkeley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marissavio"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:newcommunalists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:haight-ashbury"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thehaight"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:psychedelics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lsd"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:janisjoplin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:left"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:escape"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:communalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sharedconsciousness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:military"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:vietnam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1960s"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1970s"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wiredmagazine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:buckminsterfuller"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:decentralization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hierarchy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hierarchies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:geodesicdome"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bureaucracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:individualism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:counterculture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:burningman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:liberation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kenkesey"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wholeearthcatalog"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tescreal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:immateriality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:class"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:singularity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:singularitarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:transhumanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dematerialization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:abstraction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:disembodiment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:combat"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bodies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:veterans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:iraq"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:iraqwar"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:militaryindustrialcomplex"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stanford"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:italianfuturists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:italianfuturism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:futurism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:information"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:godcomplex"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stevejobs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cybernetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:immaterial"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:networks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:networkedthinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cyberculture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:catalogs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:race"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:segregation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:racism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:privilig"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://austinkleon.com/2023/03/22/ai-as-intern/">
    <title>AI as intern - Austin Kleon</title>
    <dc:date>2023-04-09T03:37:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://austinkleon.com/2023/03/22/ai-as-intern/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["This, so far, has been the most convincing case I’ve heard [for AI].

But then, I’ve always resisted having an assistant — in my experience, doing the “grunt work” of researching, writing a first draft, etc., is where a lot of my good discoveries are made. I want my hands on the work, because that’s how I find it."]]></description>
<dc:subject>ai chatgpt artificialintelligence slow austinkleon 2023 howwework howwelearn gruntwork discovery understanding labor efficiency inefficiency technology kevinkelly</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:da5c7505eef5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatgpt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:slow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:austinkleon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2023"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwework"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gruntwork"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:discovery"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:understanding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:efficiency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inefficiency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/attending-to-technology-theses-for-disputation">
    <title>Attending to Technology: Theses for Disputation</title>
    <dc:date>2022-12-11T07:30:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/attending-to-technology-theses-for-disputation</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><dc:subject>2016 alanjacobs technology surveillance attention conviviality luddism mindfulness matthewcrawford evgenymorozov simoneweil charlestaylor christopheralexander apatternlanguage seangallagher adnuttall facebook mondragon paulgriffiths paulford mikhailbakhtin charlessimic nietzsche frankkermode literature writing kevinkelly nedo'gorman georgebernardshaw cyborgs twitter socialmedia kant umbertoeco richardrorty johnruskin cslewis tomhiddleston alextabarrok turingtest jaronlanier virginiawoolf mauricemerleau-ponty ivanillich toolsforconviviality immanuelkant luddites</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:49fb85a8f1db/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2016"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alanjacobs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:surveillance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conviviality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:luddism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mindfulness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:matthewcrawford"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:evgenymorozov"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:simoneweil"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charlestaylor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christopheralexander"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:apatternlanguage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:seangallagher"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:adnuttall"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:facebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mondragon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:paulgriffiths"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:paulford"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mikhailbakhtin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charlessimic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nietzsche"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:frankkermode"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nedo'gorman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:georgebernardshaw"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cyborgs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kant"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:umbertoeco"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:richardrorty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnruskin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cslewis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tomhiddleston"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alextabarrok"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:turingtest"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jaronlanier"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:virginiawoolf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mauricemerleau-ponty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ivanillich"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:toolsforconviviality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:immanuelkant"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:luddites"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://talk-out-of-school.simplecast.com/episodes/audrey-watters-on-the-history-of-teaching-machines-in-our-schools-and-the-misuse-of-ed-tech-today">
    <title>Audrey Watters on the history of teaching machines in our schools and the misuse of ed tech today | Talk Out of School</title>
    <dc:date>2021-09-27T21:01:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://talk-out-of-school.simplecast.com/episodes/audrey-watters-on-the-history-of-teaching-machines-in-our-schools-and-the-misuse-of-ed-tech-today</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[“EPISODE SUMMARY
Leonie spoke to Audrey Watters, author of the new book, Teaching Machines, about the history and politics of education technology, and how its increasing penetration into our schools should and must be resisted.

EPISODE NOTES
Resources: 
Audrey Watters new book, published by MIT Press, “Teaching Machines: The History of Personalized Learning”  

Latest NY Times article on the current state of the vaccine mandate for teachers and school staff

New New York State Senate bill requiring a remote learning option for NYC students and AM NY article about it

NYC Public School Parents on the new interim computerized assessments purchased by DOE for $36 million

Allen Golston of Gates Foundation quote on the purpose of education
https://www.ced.org/blog/entry/repost-americas-businesses-need-the-common-core

Video of Mario Savio 1964 speech
https://news.berkeley.edu/2014/09/30/words-of-freedom-video-made-from-mario-savios-1964-machine-speech/ “]]></description>
<dc:subject>audreywatters 2021 edtech education technology freedomschools bfskinner teachingmachines schools imperialism mechanization learning howwelearn howweteach history schooling schooliness capitalism economics danieltanner billgates industry children humanism kevinkelly whattechnologywants training standardization standardizedtesting gatesfoundation policy politics allengolston mariosavio personalization exploitation inevitability resistance business schooldistricts relationships social luddites luddism testproctoring privacy contracts data information datagathering surveillance surveillancecapitalism shoshanazuboff marketing corporations privatization investments branding equity inequality individualization individualism collectivism theranos elizabethholmes ethics experimentation consent society software faketilyoumakeit</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:aa1849f2c5b0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:audreywatters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2021"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freedomschools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bfskinner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teachingmachines"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:imperialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mechanization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooliness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:danieltanner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:billgates"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:industry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:whattechnologywants"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:training"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:standardization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:standardizedtesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gatesfoundation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:allengolston"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mariosavio"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:personalization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:exploitation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inevitability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:resistance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooldistricts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:relationships"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:social"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:luddites"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:luddism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:testproctoring"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:contracts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:information"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:datagathering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:surveillance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:surveillancecapitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:shoshanazuboff"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marketing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:corporations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:privatization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:investments"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:branding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:equity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inequality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:individualization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:individualism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collectivism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:theranos"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elizabethholmes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:experimentation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consent"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:faketilyoumakeit"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZM9mRYpnD7E">
    <title>The Pedagogy of Design in the Age of Computation: Mindy Seu - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2019-05-08T07:26:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZM9mRYpnD7E</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><dc:subject>mindyseu 2019 hypertest wholeearthcatalog survivalcatalog feminism activism publishing bibliographies history design pedagogy computation mailart art counterculture democracy rayjohnson neutrality bias politics elitism lucylippard correspondence usps networks accessibility aesthetics reciprocity benvautier guybleus steewartband kevinkelly annabanana yokoono horizontality samhart decentralization decentralizedweb p2p experimentation chuckwelch robertfillou georgebrecht cyberfeminism iosifkiraly counternarrative online web internet frontierism hyperlinks tools susanrennie kirstengrimstad megmiller grassroot revolution alessandroludovico links expeience nancyfraser alternative diy discourse patriarchy johnfisk 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s vnsmatrix sadieplant manifestos cooperation mutualaid claireevans liberation corneliasollfrank dat beakerbrowser p2ppublishing p2pweb distributed brianhuddleston stephschapowal sampanter maps mapping connections connectivity mubshirbaweja nfbc nfb dweb</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:fb46d5feac08/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mindyseu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2019"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hypertest"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wholeearthcatalog"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:survivalcatalog"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:feminism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:activism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bibliographies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mailart"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:counterculture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:democracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rayjohnson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neutrality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bias"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elitism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lucylippard"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:correspondence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:usps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:networks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:accessibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aesthetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reciprocity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:benvautier"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:guybleus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:steewartband"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:annabanana"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:yokoono"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:horizontality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:samhart"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:decentralization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:decentralizedweb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:p2p"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:experimentation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chuckwelch"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robertfillou"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:georgebrecht"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cyberfeminism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:iosifkiraly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:counternarrative"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:frontierism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hyperlinks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:susanrennie"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kirstengrimstad"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:megmiller"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:grassroot"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:revolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alessandroludovico"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:links"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:expeience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nancyfraser"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alternative"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:diy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:discourse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:patriarchy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnfisk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1960s"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1970s"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1980s"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1990s"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:vnsmatrix"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sadieplant"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:manifestos"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cooperation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mutualaid"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:claireevans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:liberation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:corneliasollfrank"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dat"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:beakerbrowser"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:p2ppublishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:p2pweb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:distributed"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brianhuddleston"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stephschapowal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sampanter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mapping"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:connections"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:connectivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mubshirbaweja"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nfbc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nfb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dweb"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.wired.com/story/future-book-is-here-but-not-what-we-expected/">
    <title>The 'Future Book' Is Here, but It's Not What We Expected | WIRED</title>
    <dc:date>2019-01-06T05:16:12+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.wired.com/story/future-book-is-here-but-not-what-we-expected/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["THE FUTURE BOOK was meant to be interactive, moving, alive. Its pages were supposed to be lush with whirling doodads, responsive, hands-on. The old paperback Zork choose-your-own-adventures were just the start. The Future Book would change depending on where you were, how you were feeling. It would incorporate your very environment into its story—the name of the coffee shop you were sitting at, your best friend’s birthday. It would be sly, maybe a little creepy. Definitely programmable. Ulysses would extend indefinitely in any direction you wanted to explore; just tap and some unique, mega-mind-blowing sui generis path of Joycean machine-learned words would wend itself out before your very eyes.

Prognostications about how technology would affect the form of paper books have been with us for centuries. Each new medium was poised to deform or murder the book: newspapers, photography, radio, movies, television, videogames, the internet.

Some viewed the intersection of books and technology more positively: In 1945, Vannevar Bush wrote in The Atlantic: “Wholly new forms of encyclopedias will appear, ready made with a mesh of associative trails running through them, ready to be dropped into the memex and there amplified.”

Researcher Alan Kay created a cardboard prototype of a tablet-like device in 1968. He called it the "Dynabook," saying, “We created a new kind of medium for boosting human thought, for amplifying human intellectual endeavor. We thought it could be as significant as Gutenberg’s invention of the printing press 500 years ago.”

In the 1990s, Future Bookism hit a kind of beautiful fever pitch. We were so close. Brown University professor Robert Coover, in a 1992 New York Times op-ed titled “The End of Books,” wrote of the future of writing: “Fluidity, contingency, indeterminacy, plurality, discontinuity are the hypertext buzzwords of the day, and they seem to be fast becoming principles, in the same way that relativity not so long ago displaced the falling apple.” And then, more broadly: “The print medium is a doomed and outdated technology, a mere curiosity of bygone days destined soon to be consigned forever to those dusty unattended museums we now call libraries.”

Normal books? Bo-ring. Future Books? Awesome—indeterminate—and we were almost there! The Voyager Company built its "expanded books" platform on Hypercard, launching with three titles at MacWorld 1992. Microsoft launched Encarta on CD-ROM.

But … by the mid-2000s, there still were no real digital books. The Rocket eBook was too little, too early. Sony launched the eink-based Librie platform in 2004 to little uptake. Interactive CD-ROMs had dropped off the map. We had Wikipedia, blogs, and the internet, but the mythological Future Book—some electric slab that would somehow both be like and not like the quartos of yore—had yet to materialize. Peter Meirs, head of technology at Time, hedged his bets perfectly, proclaiming: “Ultimately, there will be some sort of device!”

And then there was. Several devices, actually. The iPhone launched in June 2007, the Kindle that November. Then, in 2010, the iPad arrived. High-resolution screens were suddenly in everyone’s hands and bags. And for a brief moment during the early 2010s, it seemed like it might finally be here: the glorious Future Book."

…

"Yet here’s the surprise: We were looking for the Future Book in the wrong place. It’s not the form, necessarily, that needed to evolve—I think we can agree that, in an age of infinite distraction, one of the strongest assets of a “book” as a book is its singular, sustained, distraction-free, blissfully immutable voice. Instead, technology changed everything that enables a book, fomenting a quiet revolution. Funding, printing, fulfillment, community-building—everything leading up to and supporting a book has shifted meaningfully, even if the containers haven’t. Perhaps the form and interactivity of what we consider a “standard book” will change in the future, as screens become as cheap and durable as paper. But the books made today, held in our hands, digital or print, are Future Books, unfuturistic and inert may they seem."

[sections on self-publishing, crowdfunding, email newsletters, social media, audiobooks and podcasts, etc.]

…

"It turns out smartphones aren’t the best digital book reading devices (too many seductions, real-time travesties, notifications just behind the words), but they make excellent audiobook players, stowed away in pockets while commuting. Top-tier podcasts like Serial, S-Town, and Homecoming have normalized listening to audio or (nonfiction) booklike productions on smartphones."

…

"Last August, a box arrived on my doorstep that seemed to embody the apotheosis of contemporary publishing. The Voyager Golden Record: 40th Anniversary Edition was published via a crowdfunding campaign. The edition includes a book of images, three records, and a small poster packaged in an exquisite box set with supplementary online material. When I held it, I didn’t think about how futuristic it felt, nor did I lament the lack of digital paper or interactivity. I thought: What a strange miracle to be able to publish an object like this today. Something independently produced, complex and beautiful, with foil stamping and thick pages, full-color, in multiple volumes, made into a box set, with an accompanying record and other shimmering artifacts, for a weirdly niche audience, funded by geeks like me who are turned on by the romance of space.

We have arrived to the once imagined Future Book in piecemeal truths.

Moving images were often espoused to be a core part of our Future Book. While rarely found inside of an iBooks or Kindle book, they are here. If you want to learn the ukulele, you don’t search Amazon for a Kindle how-to book, you go to YouTube and binge on hours of lessons, stopping when you need to, rewinding as necessary, learning at your own pace.

Vannevar Bush's “Memex” essentially described Wikipedia built into a desk.

The "Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy" in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is an iPhone.

In The Book of Sand, Borges wrote of an infinite book: "It was then that the stranger told me: 'Study the page well. You will never see it again.'" Describing in many ways what it feels like to browse the internet or peek at Twitter.

Our Future Book is composed of email, tweets, YouTube videos, mailing lists, crowdfunding campaigns, PDF to .mobi converters, Amazon warehouses, and a surge of hyper-affordable offset printers in places like Hong Kong.

For a “book” is just the endpoint of a latticework of complex infrastructure, made increasingly accessible. Even if the endpoint stays stubbornly the same—either as an unchanging Kindle edition or simple paperback—the universe that produces, breathes life into, and supports books is changing in positive, inclusive ways, year by year. The Future Book is here and continues to evolve. You’re holding it. It’s exciting. It’s boring. It’s more important than it has ever been.

But temper some of those flight-of-fancy expectations. In many ways, it’s still a potato."]]></description>
<dc:subject>craigmod ebooks reading howweread 2018 kindle eink print publishing selfpublishing blurb lulu amazon ibooks apple digital bookfuturism hypertext hypercard history vannevarbush borges twitter animation video newsletters email pdf mobi epub infrastructure systems economics goldenrecord voyager audio audiobooks smarthphones connectivity ereaders podcasts socialmedia kevinkelly benthompson robinsloan mailchimp timbuktulabs elenafavilli francescacavallo jackcheng funding kickstarter crowdfunding blogs blogging wikipedia internet web online writing howwewrite self-publishing youtube epaper</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:96903d413e84/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:craigmod"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ebooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2018"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kindle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:eink"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:print"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:selfpublishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:blurb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lulu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:amazon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ibooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:digital"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bookfuturism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hypertext"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hypercard"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:vannevarbush"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:borges"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:animation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:video"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:newsletters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:email"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mobi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:epub"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:infrastructure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:systems"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:goldenrecord"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:voyager"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:audio"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:audiobooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:smarthphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:connectivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ereaders"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:podcasts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:benthompson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robinsloan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mailchimp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:timbuktulabs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elenafavilli"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:francescacavallo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jackcheng"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:funding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kickstarter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:crowdfunding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:blogs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:blogging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wikipedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:self-publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:youtube"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:epaper"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hurryslowly.co/003-craig-mod/">
    <title>003: Craig Mod - I Want My Attention Back! • Hurry Slowly</title>
    <dc:date>2017-11-21T21:58:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://hurryslowly.co/003-craig-mod/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Did you know that the mere presence of a smartphone near you is slowly draining away your cognitive energy and attention? (Even if it’s tucked away in a desk drawer or a bag.) Like it or not, the persistent use of technology is changing the quality of our attention. And not in a good way.

In this episode, I talk with writer, designer and technologist Craig Mod — who’s done numerous experiments in reclaiming his attention — about how we can break out of this toxic cycle of smartphone and social media addiction and regain control of our powers of concentration.

Key takeaways from the interview:

• How Facebook and other social media apps are lulling us into “attention slavery”

• Why interrupting your workflow to post on social media — and sharing pithy thoughts or ideas — shuts down your creative process

• How short digital detox retreats and/or meditation sessions can “defrag your mind” so that you can deploy your attention more consciously and more powerfully

• Why mapping your ideas in large offline spaces — e.g. on a whiteboard or blackboard — gives you “permission” to get messy and evolve your thinking in a way that’s impossible on a screen

• How changing the quality of your attention can change your relationship to everything — art, conversations, creativity, and business"

…

"Favorite Quotes

“If there was a meter of 1 to 10 of how present you are or how much you can manipulate your own attention — how confident you are that you could, say, read a book for three hours without an interruption, without feeling pulled to something else. I would say the baseline pre-smartphone was a 4 or 3. Now, it’s a 1.”

“I think that a life in which you are never present, in which you have no control over your attention, in which you’re constantly being pulled in different directions, is kind of sad — because there is this incredible gift of consciousness. And when that consciousness is deployed smartly, it’s amazing the things that can be built out of it.”

Resources

Here’s a shortlist of things Craig and I talked about in the course of the conversation, including where you can go on a meditation retreat. You should be aware that vipassana retreats are offered free of charge, and are open to anyone.

Craig’s piece on attention from Backchannel magazine
https://www.wired.com/2017/01/how-i-got-my-attention-back/

Vipassana meditation retreat locations
https://www.dhamma.org/en-US/index

Craig’s article on post-100 hours of meditation
https://craigmod.com/roden/013/

Film director Krzysztof Kieslowski
http://www.indiewire.com/2013/03/the-essentials-krzysztof-kieslowski-100770/

Writer and technologist Kevin Kelly
http://kk.org/thetechnium/

The Large Hadron Collider at Cern
http://www.wired.co.uk/article/large-hadron-collider-explained "]]></description>
<dc:subject>attention craigmod zoominginandout ideas thinking focus meditation technology blackboards messiness presence writing relationships conversation art creativity digitaldetox maps mapping brainstorming socialmedia internet web online retreats jocelynglei howwethink howewrite concentration interruption kevinkelly vipassana krzysztofkieslowski largehadroncollider cern</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:ec2fb2dcb6a2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:craigmod"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:zoominginandout"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:focus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meditation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:blackboards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:messiness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:presence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:relationships"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conversation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:creativity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:digitaldetox"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mapping"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brainstorming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:retreats"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jocelynglei"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwethink"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:concentration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interruption"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:vipassana"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:krzysztofkieslowski"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:largehadroncollider"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cern"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCcVyuq9aRE">
    <title>Ellen Ullman: Life in Code: &quot;A Personal History of Technology&quot; | Talks at Google - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2017-10-08T19:19:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCcVyuq9aRE</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The last twenty years have brought us the rise of the internet, the development of artificial intelligence, the ubiquity of once unimaginably powerful computers, and the thorough transformation of our economy and society. Through it all, Ellen Ullman lived and worked inside that rising culture of technology, and in Life in Code she tells the continuing story of the changes it wrought with a unique, expert perspective.

When Ellen Ullman moved to San Francisco in the early 1970s and went on to become a computer programmer, she was joining a small, idealistic, and almost exclusively male cadre that aspired to genuinely change the world. In 1997 Ullman wrote Close to the Machine, the now classic and still definitive account of life as a coder at the birth of what would be a sweeping technological, cultural, and financial revolution.

Twenty years later, the story Ullman recounts is neither one of unbridled triumph nor a nostalgic denial of progress. It is necessarily the story of digital technology’s loss of innocence as it entered the cultural mainstream, and it is a personal reckoning with all that has changed, and so much that hasn’t. Life in Code is an essential text toward our understanding of the last twenty years—and the next twenty."]]></description>
<dc:subject>ellenullman bias algorithms 2017 technology sexism racism age ageism society exclusion perspective families parenting mothers programming coding humans humanism google larrypage discrimination self-drivingcars machinelearning ai artificialintelligence literacy reading howweread humanities education publicschools schools publicgood libertarianism siliconvalley generations future pessimism optimism hardfun kevinkelly computing publicgoods</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:85bf3b814259/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ellenullman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bias"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:algorithms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2017"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sexism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:racism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:age"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ageism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:exclusion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:perspective"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:families"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:parenting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mothers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:programming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:coding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:larrypage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:discrimination"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:self-drivingcars"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:machinelearning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:literacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:publicschools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:publicgood"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:libertarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:siliconvalley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:generations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:future"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pessimism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:optimism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hardfun"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:publicgoods"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.ayjay.org/fys2017/">
    <title>FYS 2017: Living and Thinking in a Digital Age – Snakes and Ladders</title>
    <dc:date>2017-07-21T20:21:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.ayjay.org/fys2017/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Instructor: Alan Jacobs

Office: Morrison 203.7

Email: alan [underscore] jacobs [at] baylor [dot] edu

This class is all about questions: How is the rise of digital technologies changing some of the fundamental practices of the intellectual life: reading, writing, and researching? How does writing on a computer differ from writing on a typewriter, or (still more) writing by hand? Has Google made information just too easy to find? Is the experience of reading on a Kindle or iPad significantly different from that of reading a paper codex? Moreover, how are these changes affecting the intellectual culture and communal practices of the Christian faith? We will explore these questions through a range of readings and conversational topics, and through trying out some interesting digital and analog tools.

But this is also a class in which we will reflect more generally on why you are here, in the Honors College of Baylor, and what you need to do (and be) to flourish. So we will also spend some time thinking about the character and purposes of liberal education, and I will explain to you why you need to buy earplugs and wash your hands regularly.

I have ordered two books for you to buy: Kevin Kelly, The Inevitable: Understanding the 12 Technological Forces that Will Shape the Future and David Sax, The Revenge of Analog: Real Things and Why They Matter. All other readings will be PDFs available in this Dropbox folder. [https://www.dropbox.com/sh/54uu45mhespvubo/AAAETUCU6U0YuyXgl6HbxVTva?dl=0 ]

Assignments

1. There will be frequent (pop!) quizzes on your readings; these will count a total of 25% of your grade.

2. You will choose a digital or analog tool with which to organize your academic life this semester, learn to use it well, and give an oral report on it to the class, along with a handout. 15%

3. You will write a 3500-word research essay on a topic of your choosing, subject to approval by me. I will work with you to choose a good topic and focus it properly, and will read and evaluate a draft of the essay before you hand in a final version. 40%

4. In lieu of a final exam, you will write a personal narrative identifying the most important things you leaned in this class; as part of that you’ll offer a final evaluation of your chosen organizational tool. 20%

5. Borderline grades will be decided by class participation.

Here’s a handy list of organizational tools you might try, starting with digital ones:

• emacs org-mode
• Evernote
• Google Keep
• OneNote
• Pinboard
• Trello
• Workflowy
• Zotero

And now analog (paper-based) ones:

• Bullet Journal
• Hipster PDA
• Noguchi filing system
• Personal Kanban
• Zettelkasten

Here’s a guide [https://lifehacker.com/productivity-101-a-primer-to-the-getting-things-done-1551880955 ] to helping you think through the options — keyed to the Getting Things Done system, which is fine, though it’s not the only useful system out there. The key to this assignment is that you choose a tool and seriously commit to it, for this semester, anyway. You are of course welcome to ditch it as soon as the term is over. But what I am asking for is a semester-long experiment, so that you will have detailed information to share with the rest of us. N.B.: All the options I am suggesting here are free — if you want to pay for an app or service, you are certainly welcome to, but I wouldn’t ask that of you.

Policies

My policies on attendance, grading, and pretty much everything else may be found here [http://ayjay.org/FAQ.html ]. You’ll find a good deal of other useful information on that site also.

Schedule

This is a course on how the digital worlds we live in now — our technologies of knowledge and communication — will inevitably shape our experience as learners. So let’s begin by trying to get a grip on the digital tech that shapes our everyday lives:

8.22 Introduction to course (with handouts)
8.24 boyd, It’s Complicated, Introduction and Chapter 7
8.29 Wilmer, Sherman, and Chein, “Smartphones and Cognition”
8.31 Rosen, “My Little Sister Taught Me How to Snapchat”

But you’re not just smartphone users, you’re college students. So let’s try to get a better understanding of why we’re here — or why we might be:

9.5 Meilaender, “Who Needs a Liberal Education?“
9.7 Carr, “The Crisis in Higher Education”; Robbins, “Home College”

With some of the initial coordinates in place, let’s get some historical context:

9.12 Jacobs, “Christianity and the Book”
9.14 Blair, “Information Overload”

And now let’s take a deeper dive into the conditions of our moment, and of the near future:

9.19 Kelly, The Inevitable, Introduction and Chapters 1-4
9.21 Kelly, Chapters 5-8
9.26 Kelly, Chapters 9-12
9.28 Sax, The Revenge of Analog, Introduction and Part I
10.3 Sax, Part II
10.5 Concluding discussion of Kelly and Sax

We’ll spend a couple of days finding out how your experiments in organization have been going:

10.10 reports from half of you
10.12 reports from the rest of you

Now that we’re pretty well equipped to think more seriously about the technological and educational challenges facing us, we’ll spend the rest of the term learning some practical strategies for information management, and revisiting some of the key issues we’ve raised in light of our recently acquired knowledge. First, you’re going to get a break from reading:

10.17 Dr. J’s Handy Guide to Owning Your Online Turf, Part 1
10.19 Dr. J’s Handy Guide to Owning Your Online Turf, Part 2

So, back to reading:

10.24 Web Literacy for Student Fact-Checkers, Parts I-III
10.26 Web Literacy for Student Fact-Checkers, Parts IV-VI
10.31 further discussion of Web Literacy
11.2 Piper, “Out of Touch” and Clive Thompson, “Reading War and Peace on my Phone”
11.7 Mueller and Oppenheimer, “The Pen is Mightier than the Keyboard”; Hensher, “Why Handwriting Matters”; Trubek, “Handwriting Just Doesn’t Matter”
11.9 Zomorodi, “Bored and Brilliant”; draft of research essay due

And finally, we’ll put what we’ve learned to use in thinking about what kind of education we’re pursuing here in the Honors College at Baylor:

11.14 Jacobs, “Renewing the University”
11.16 writing day; research essay due 11.17
11.21 “Engaging the Future of Higher Education”
11.23 THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY
11.28 continued discussion of “Engaging the Future”
11.30 Wrapping up
12.5 Personal narrative due"]]></description>
<dc:subject>alanjacobs syllabus online internet tools onlinetoolkit reading education highered highereducation classideas gtd productivity kevinkelly davidsax readinglists technology cognition socialmedia christianity humanities infooverload webliteracy wen handwriting notetaking thewhy digital analog digitalage syllabi</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:26cb76e1a399/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alanjacobs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:syllabus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:onlinetoolkit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:classideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gtd"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:productivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davidsax"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:readinglists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cognition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christianity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:infooverload"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:webliteracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:handwriting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:notetaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thewhy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:digital"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:analog"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:digitalage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:syllabi"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/tag/history-of-qs/?order=ASC">
    <title>Cyborgology: What is The History of The Quantified Self a History of?</title>
    <dc:date>2017-05-30T01:17:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/tag/history-of-qs/?order=ASC</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[[from Part 1: https://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/2017/04/13/what-is-the-history-of-the-quantified-self-a-history-of-part-1/]

"In the past few months, I’ve posted about two works of long-form scholarship on the Quantified Self: Debora Lupton’s The Quantified Self and Gina Neff and Dawn Nufus’s Self-Tracking. Neff recently edited a volume of essays on QS (Quantified: Biosensing Technologies in Everyday Life, MIT 2016), but I’d like to take a not-so-brief break from reviewing books to address an issue that has been on my mind recently. Most texts that I read about the Quantified Self (be they traditional scholarship or more informal) refer to a meeting in 2007 at the house of Kevin Kelly for the official start to the QS movement. And while, yes, the name “Quantified Self” was coined by Kelly and his colleague Gary Wolf (the former founded Wired, the latter was an editor for the magazine), the practice of self-tracking obviously goes back much further than 10 years. Still, most historical references to the practice often point to Sanctorius of Padua, who, per an oft-cited study by consultant Melanie Swan, “studied energy expenditure in living systems by tracking his weight versus food intake and elimination for 30 years in the 16th century.” Neff and Nufus cite Benjamin Franklin’s practice of keeping a daily record of his time use. These anecdotal histories, however, don’t give us much in terms of understanding what a history of the Quantified Self is actually a history of.

Briefly, what I would like to prove over the course of a few posts is that at the heart of QS are statistics, anthropometrics, and psychometrics. I recognize that it’s not terribly controversial to suggest that these three technologies (I hesitate to call them “fields” here because of how widely they can be applied), all developed over the course of the nineteenth century, are critical to the way that QS works. Good thing, then, that there is a second half to my argument: as I touched upon briefly in my [shameless plug alert] Theorizing the Web talk last week, these three technologies were also critical to the proliferation of eugenics, that pseudoscientific attempt at strengthening the whole of the human race by breeding out or killing off those deemed deficient.

I don’t think it’s very hard to see an analogous relationship between QS and eugenics: both movements are predicated on anthropometrics and psychometrics, comparisons against norms, and the categorization and classification of human bodies as a result of the use of statistical technologies. But an analogy only gets us so far in seeking to build a history. I don’t think we can just jump from Francis Galton’s ramblings at the turn of one century to Kevin Kelly’s at the turn of the next. So what I’m going to attempt here is a sort of Foucauldian genealogy—from what was left of eugenics after its [rightful, though perhaps not as complete as one would hope] marginalization in the 1940s through to QS and the multi-billion dollar industry the movement has inspired.

I hope you’ll stick around for the full ride—it’s going to take a a number of weeks. For now, let’s start with a brief introduction to that bastion of Western exceptionalism: the eugenics movement."

[from Part 2: https://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/2017/04/20/what-is-the-history-of-the-quantified-self-a-history-of-part-2/

"Here we begin to see an awkward situation in our quest to draw a line from Galton and hard-line eugenics (we will differentiate between hardline and “reform” eugenics further on) to the quantified self movement. Behaviorism sits diametrically opposed to eugenics for a number of reasons. Firstly, it does not distinguish between human and animal beings—certainly a tenet to which Galton and his like would object, understanding that humans are the superior species and a hierarchy of greatness existing within that species as well. Secondly, behaviorism accepts that outside, environmental influences will change the psychology of a subject. In 1971, Skinner argued that “An experimental analysis shifts the determination of behavior from autonomous man to the environment—an environment responsible both for the evolution of the species and for the repertoire acquired by each member” (214).  This stands in direct conflict with the eugenical ideal that physical and psychological makeup is determined by heredity. Indeed, the eugenicist Robert Yerkes, otherwise close with Watson, wholly rejected the behaviorist’s views (Hergenhahn 400). Tracing the quantified-self’s behaviorist and self-experimental roots, then, leaves us without a very strong connection to the ideologies driving eugenics. Still, using Pearson as a hint, there may be a better path to follow."]

[from Part 3: https://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/2017/04/27/what-is-the-history-of-the-quantified-self-a-history-of-part-3/

"The history of Galton and eugenics, then, can be traced into the history of personality tests. Once again, we come up against an awkward transition—this time from personality tests into the Quantified Self. Certainly, shades of Galtonian psychometrics show themselves to be present in QS technologies—that is, the treatment of statistical datasets for the purpose of correlation and prediction. Galton’s word association tests strongly influenced the MBTI, a test that, much like Quantified Self projects, seeks to help a subject make the right decisions in their life, though not through traditional Galtonian statistical tools. The MMPI and 16PFQ are for psychological evaluative purposes. And while some work has been done to suggest that “mental wellness” can be improved through self-tracking (see Kelley et al., Wolf 2009), much of the self-tracking ethos is based on factors that can be adjusted in order to see a correlative change in the subject (Wolf 2009). That is, by tracking my happiness on a daily basis against the amount of coffee I drink or the places I go, then I am acknowledging an environmental approach and declaring that my current psychological state is not set by my genealogy. A gap, then, between Galtonian personality tests and QS."]

[from Part 4 (Finale): https://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/2017/05/08/what-is-the-history-of-the-quantified-self-a-history-of-the-finale/

"What is the history of the quantified self a history of? One could point to technological advances in circuitry miniaturization or in big data collection and processing. The proprietary and patented nature of the majority of QS devices precludes certain types of inquiry into their invention and proliferation. But it is not difficult to identify one of QS’s most critical underlying tenets: self-tracking for the purpose of self-improvement through the identification of behavioral and environmental variables critical to one’s physical and psychological makeup. Recognizing the importance of this premise to QS allows us to trace back through the scientific fields which have strongly influenced the QS movement—from both a consumer and product standpoint. Doing so, however, reveals a seeming incommensurability between an otherwise analogous pair: QS and eugenics. A eugenical emphasis on heredity sits in direct conflict to a self-tracker’s belief that a focus on environmental factors could change one’s life for the better—even while both are predicated on statistical analysis, both purport to improve the human stock, and both, as argued by Dale Carrico, make assertions towards what is a “normal” human.

A more complicated relationship between the two is revealed upon attempting this genealogical connection. What I have outlined over the past few weeks is, I hope, only the beginning of such a project. I chose not to produce a rhetorical analysis of the visual and textual language of efficiency in both movements—from that utilized by the likes of Frederick Taylor and his eugenicist protégés, the Gilbreths, to what Christina Cogdell calls “Biological Efficiency and Streamline Design” in her work, Eugenic Design, and into a deep trove of rhetoric around efficiency utilized by market-available QS device marketers. Nor did I aim to produce an exhaustive bibliographic lineage. I did, however, seek to use the strong sense of self-experimentation in QS to work backwards towards the presence of behaviorism in early-twentieth century eugenical rhetoric. Then, moving in the opposite direction, I tracked the proliferation of Galtonian psychometrics into mid-century personality test development and eventually into the risk-management goals of the neoliberal surveillance state. I hope that what I have argued will lead to a more in-depth investigation into each step along this homological relationship. In the grander scheme, I see this project as part of a critical interrogation into the Quantified Self. By throwing into sharp relief the linkages between eugenics and QS, I seek to encourage resistance to fetishizing the latter’s technologies and their output, as well as the potential for meaningful change via those technologies."]]]></description>
<dc:subject>gabischaffzin quantifiedself 2017 kevinkelly garywolf eugenics anthropometrics psychometrics measurement statistics heredity francisgalton charlesdarwin adolphequetelet normal psychology pernilsroll-hansen michelfoucault majianadesan self-regulation marginalization anthropology technology data personality henryfairfieldosborn moralbehaviorism behaviorism williamepstein mitchelldean neoliberalism containment risk riskassessment freedom rehabilitation responsibility obligation dalecarrico fredericktaylor christinacogdell surveillance nikolasrose myers-briggs mbti katherinebriggs isabelbriggsmeyers bellcurve emilkraepelin charlesspearman rymondcattell personalitytests allenneuringer microsoft self-experimentation gamification deborahlupton johnwatson robertyerkes ginaneff dawnnufus self-tracking melanieswan benjaminfranklin recordkeeping foucault darwin thebellcurve</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:693ce3caa110/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gabischaffzin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quantifiedself"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2017"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:garywolf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:eugenics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anthropometrics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:psychometrics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:measurement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:statistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:heredity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:francisgalton"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charlesdarwin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:adolphequetelet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:normal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pernilsroll-hansen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:michelfoucault"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:majianadesan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:self-regulation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marginalization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anthropology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:personality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:henryfairfieldosborn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:moralbehaviorism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:behaviorism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:williamepstein"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mitchelldean"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neoliberalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:containment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:risk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:riskassessment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freedom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rehabilitation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:responsibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:obligation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dalecarrico"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fredericktaylor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christinacogdell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:surveillance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nikolasrose"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:myers-briggs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mbti"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:katherinebriggs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:isabelbriggsmeyers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bellcurve"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:emilkraepelin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charlesspearman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rymondcattell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:personalitytests"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:allenneuringer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:self-experimentation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gamification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:deborahlupton"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnwatson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robertyerkes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ginaneff"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dawnnufus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:self-tracking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:melanieswan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:benjaminfranklin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:recordkeeping"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:foucault"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:darwin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thebellcurve"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/books-and-media/book-reviews/review-david-saxs-the-revenge-of-analog-extols-the-superiority-of-real-things/article32675146/">
    <title>Review: David Sax’s The Revenge of Analog extols the superiority of ‘real things’ - The Globe and Mail</title>
    <dc:date>2016-11-06T05:23:38+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/books-and-media/book-reviews/review-david-saxs-the-revenge-of-analog-extols-the-superiority-of-real-things/article32675146/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The key change wrought by digital is that, where scarcity was once the norm, surfeit is now our default. Digital thus represents a kind of inversion. Once, more was better: Technology was improved by more features, knowledge increased with ever more facts and greater choice. Now, it is subtraction that in fact adds to a scenario. The best digital services are those that constrain in some fashion. Netflix and Spotify have both succeeded because they have figured out how to recommend small numbers of titles from thousands of choices.

In his book, Sax outlines the many ways in which analog tech bests digital because of what it does not do. Your paperback novel cannot interrupt your reading to tell you the weather, your newspaper has a start and a finish, and your analog recording studio forces you to make decisions and just cut a track, rather than the malleability of digitally creating “a moving target of unachievable perfection.” In the face of such endlessness, it is subtraction, boundaries – less – that is the strategy for survival in the digital era.

For many, though, this upending of Western thought also represents a world gone topsy-turvy. Sax echoes Sullivan’s complaints about the relentless pace of digital, and its related psychological effects. These are real issues, not to be dismissed lightly. At this early stage of the digital era, we are still stuck on how to achieve balance, particularly now that our technology and the flood of information it brings is with us all the time. When Sax cites the tendency of even young millennials to prefer print, it is because they, like we, are seeking relief. Digital as a tool or medium seems primed to plug most directly into our receptors for pleasure, for the dopamine and serotonin centres that thrive on novelty, lust or conflict, and the unending flow can quickly turn to excess. In contradistinction to that torrent, it is the tactile, physical nature of analog that is its saving grace – its seeming permanence, it’s there-ness, its tendency, quite unlike digital, to be in one place at one time doing one thing. In his book, Sax’s lively, evocative prose conjures reminders of the physical world: Record presses spit and heave, cameras satisfyingly click, and paper crinkles and smells in ways pleasingly familiar.

But the neat line separating digital from analog is more fuzzy than it might appear. Sullivan, Sax, and I – all part of a generation who spent their formative years before the Internet and their adult ones completely saturated with it – have also grown up with plastic Nintendo controllers, button-filled digital cameras, and DVD players armed with an array of LED lights. My own home is littered with the tactile remains of no end of technology, and the chubby, reassuring thickness of the first iPhone I still keep tucked in a drawer has already taken on the same sheen of nostalgia I reserve for old school notebooks or sweaters.

As Sullivan’s piece spoke of a return from the seductive screens, Sax’s constantly extols the superiority of what the text calls “real things.” It is, however, a world cleaved neatly into two neat spheres, digital and analog – so much so that near the end of the book, Sax claims that “digital is not reality. It never was and never will be.” It’s a claim that one might generously characterize as nonsense. To assert that the almost unfathomable explosion of human creativity that fills the Internet sits somehow lower on a hierarchy of ontological realness is absurd.

It is this needless, false dualism that should make one skeptical of claims not only of the superiority of analog, but that such a neat distinction exists at all. In The Revenge of Analog, the alluring material quality of objects is always highlighted, but ignores the fetishism that has led us to revalue it, skipping over the more simple fact that analog has become appealing for the same reason you can’t put your phone down: novelty. Similarly, when speaking of Silicon Valley’s tendency to use lots of paper, Sax’s claim that “analog proves the most efficient way to run a business,” simply isn’t true. One would hardly be better served by doing one’s accounting or inventory using a pen and paper. What works better is finding the right balance between analog and digital – largely because at this moment, that is the only choice there is.

***

The Revenge of Analog is at its core a business book, each chapter the revenge of a new sector – retail, print, film – and is thus a work meant to uncover entrepreneurial opportunities lying in wait. It works best as polemic, as an interjection into a world that has too eagerly assumed digital is in some simple sense better, and perhaps ignored that the limitations of analog are more vital than ever. But in the eagerness to sell a marketable idea, Sax mistakes the fact that digital things cannot be touched for the fact that they are insubstantial.

It is what can be held that enthralls Sax, however, and he is most transfixed by Kevin Kelly’s Cool Tools, a thing he calls “exhibit A in analog’s revenge.” Kelly, the founder of Wired magazine, created the Cool Tools book as an homage to the Whole Earth Catalogue, a kind of how-to guide for life from the late sixties that told you how to grow food or build a home – and the sort of thing rendered quite obsolete by the Internet. Cool Tools began as a blog, and started out simply reviewing tools that you need for a dizzying array of practical endeavours – everything from milling your own grains to ways to increase the WiFi signal in your home. Kelly then made the decision to create the book, which quickly sold out on its first run.

For Sax, the book highlights what is best about analog. It lends itself to idle browsing, drawing in anyone who happens to pick it up, its catalogue of useful things evoking the possibility of a life better lived. But beyond its obvious digital origins, or even the inevitability of its creation on and through computers, Cool Tools reveals a world forever changed by the digital landscape. The book’s non-linear mishmash of ideas, the serendipity of their discovery, is a function of its digital past, now formalized by the analog. The two spheres are inextricable, indivisible, not simply in practical terms (each review has a QR code leading to an online store) but in ideological, epistemological ones, too. We cannot help but read the book from our moment in the present where there is no offline and online, but only what scholar J. Sage Elwell calls “onlife”: an existence that is always both digital and analog at once, and irrevocably so. For now, we may struggle to pay attention, but this is our lot. It is already too late for analog’s revenge – the thing to do is figure out how to be human after digital’s victory. There is no going back."]]></description>
<dc:subject>navneetalang 2016 davidsax kevinkelly andrewsullivan digital analog less subtraction louismenand jsageelwell humans humanity boundaries</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:ccd1180ab70a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:navneetalang"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2016"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davidsax"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:andrewsullivan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:digital"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:analog"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:less"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:subtraction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:louismenand"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jsageelwell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:boundaries"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hackeducation.com/2015/08/10/digpedlab/">
    <title>Teaching Machines and Turing Machines: The History of the Future of Labor and Learning</title>
    <dc:date>2015-08-13T16:24:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://hackeducation.com/2015/08/10/digpedlab/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["In all things, all tasks, all jobs, women are expected to perform affective labor – caring, listening, smiling, reassuring, comforting, supporting. This work is not valued; often it is unpaid. But affective labor has become a core part of the teaching profession – even though it is, no doubt, “inefficient.” It is what we expect – stereotypically, perhaps – teachers to do. (We can debate, I think, if it’s what we reward professors for doing. We can interrogate too whether all students receive care and support; some get “no excuses,” depending on race and class.)

What happens to affective teaching labor when it runs up against robots, against automation? Even the tasks that education technology purports to now be able to automate – teaching, testing, grading – are shot through with emotion when done by humans, or at least when done by a person who’s supposed to have a caring, supportive relationship with their students. Grading essays isn’t necessarily burdensome because it’s menial, for example; grading essays is burdensome because it is affective labor; it is emotionally and intellectually exhausting.

This is part of our conundrum: teaching labor is affective not simply intellectual. Affective labor is not valued. Intellectual labor is valued in research. At both the K12 and college level, teaching of content is often seen as menial, routine, and as such replaceable by machine. Intelligent machines will soon handle the task of cultivating human intellect, or so we’re told.

Of course, we should ask what happens when we remove care from education – this is a question about labor and learning. What happens to thinking and writing when robots grade students’ essays, for example. What happens when testing is standardized, automated? What happens when the whole educational process is offloaded to the machines – to “intelligent tutoring systems,” “adaptive learning systems,” or whatever the latest description may be? What sorts of signals are we sending students?

And what sorts of signals are the machines gathering in turn? What are they learning to do?
Often, of course, we do not know the answer to those last two questions, as the code and the algorithms in education technologies (most technologies, truth be told) are hidden from us. We are becoming as law professor Frank Pasquale argues a “black box society.” And the irony is hardly lost on me that one of the promises of massive collection of student data under the guise of education technology and learning analytics is to crack open the “black box” of the human brain.

We still know so little about how the brain works, and yet, we’ve adopted a number of metaphors from our understanding of that organ to explain how computers operate: memory, language, intelligence. Of course, our notion of intelligence – its measurability – has its own history, one wrapped up in eugenics and, of course, testing (and teaching) machines. Machines now both frame and are framed by this question of intelligence, with little reflection on the intellectual and ideological baggage that we carry forward and hard-code into them."

…

"We’re told by some automation proponents that instead of a future of work, we will find ourselves with a future of leisure. Once the robots replace us, we will have immense personal freedom, so they say – the freedom to pursue “unproductive” tasks, the freedom to do nothing at all even, except I imagine, to continue to buy things.
On one hand that means that we must address questions of unemployment. What will we do without work? How will we make ends meet? How will this affect identity, intellectual development?

Yet despite predictions about the end of work, we are all working more. As games theorist Ian Bogost and others have observed, we seem to be in a period of hyper-employment, where we find ourselves not only working numerous jobs, but working all the time on and for technology platforms. There is no escaping email, no escaping social media. Professionally, personally – no matter what you say in your Twitter bio that your Tweets do not represent the opinions of your employer – we are always working. Computers and AI do not (yet) mark the end of work. Indeed, they may mark the opposite: we are overworked by and for machines (for, to be clear, their corporate owners).

Often, we volunteer to do this work. We are not paid for our status updates on Twitter. We are not compensated for our check-in’s in Foursquare. We don’t get kick-backs for leaving a review on Yelp. We don’t get royalties from our photos on Flickr.

We ask our students to do this volunteer labor too. They are not compensated for the data and content that they generate that is used in turn to feed the algorithms that run TurnItIn, Blackboard, Knewton, Pearson, Google, and the like. Free labor fuels our technologies: Forum moderation on Reddit – done by volunteers. Translation of the courses on Coursera and of the videos on Khan Academy – done by volunteers. The content on pretty much every “Web 2.0” platform – done by volunteers.

We are working all the time; we are working for free.

It’s being framed, as of late, as the “gig economy,” the “freelance economy,” the “sharing economy” – but mostly it’s the service economy that now comes with an app and that’s creeping into our personal not just professional lives thanks to billions of dollars in venture capital. Work is still precarious. It is low-prestige. It remains unpaid or underpaid. It is short-term. It is feminized.

We all do affective labor now, cultivating and caring for our networks. We respond to the machines, the latest version of ELIZA, typing and chatting away hoping that someone or something responds, that someone or something cares. It’s a performance of care, disguising what is the extraction of our personal data."

…

"Personalization. Automation. Management. The algorithms will be crafted, based on our data, ostensibly to suit us individually, more likely to suit power structures in turn that are increasingly opaque.

Programmatically, the world’s interfaces will be crafted for each of us, individually, alone. As such, I fear, we will lose our capacity to experience collectivity and resist together. I do not know what the future of unions looks like – pretty grim, I fear; but I do know that we must enhance collective action in order to resist a future of technological exploitation, dehumanization, and economic precarity. We must fight at the level of infrastructure – political infrastructure, social infrastructure, and yes technical infrastructure.

It isn’t simply that we need to resist “robots taking our jobs,” but we need to challenge the ideologies, the systems that loath collectivity, care, and creativity, and that champion some sort of Randian individual. And I think the three strands at this event – networks, identity, and praxis – can and should be leveraged to precisely those ends.

A future of teaching humans not teaching machines depends on how we respond, how we design a critical ethos for ed-tech, one that recognizes, for example, the very gendered questions at the heart of the Turing Machine’s imagined capabilities, a parlor game that tricks us into believing that machines can actually love, learn, or care."]]></description>
<dc:subject>2015 audreywatters education technology academia labor work emotionallabor affect edtech history highered highereducation teaching schools automation bfskinner behaviorism sexism howweteach alanturing turingtest frankpasquale eliza ai artificialintelligence robots sharingeconomy power control economics exploitation edwardthorndike thomasedison bobdylan socialmedia ianbogost unemployment employment freelancing gigeconomy serviceeconomy caring care love loving learning praxis identity networks privacy algorithms freedom danagoldstein adjuncts unions herbertsimon kevinkelly arthurcclarke sebastianthrun ellenlagemann sidneypressey karelčapek productivity efficiency bots chatbots sherryturkle mattyglesias</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:379a214f06d0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2015"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:audreywatters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:emotionallabor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:affect"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:automation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bfskinner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:behaviorism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sexism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alanturing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:turingtest"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:frankpasquale"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:eliza"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robots"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sharingeconomy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:power"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:control"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:exploitation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edwardthorndike"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thomasedison"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bobdylan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ianbogost"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unemployment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:employment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freelancing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gigeconomy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:serviceeconomy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:caring"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:care"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:love"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:loving"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:praxis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:identity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:networks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:algorithms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freedom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:danagoldstein"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:adjuncts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:herbertsimon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:arthurcclarke"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sebastianthrun"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ellenlagemann"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sidneypressey"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:karelčapek"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:productivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:efficiency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bots"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatbots"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sherryturkle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mattyglesias"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://iasc-culture.org/THR/channels/Infernal_Machine/2015/03/79-theses-on-technology-for-disputation/">
    <title>79 Theses on Technology. For Disputation. | The Infernal Machine</title>
    <dc:date>2015-04-13T17:49:05+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://iasc-culture.org/THR/channels/Infernal_Machine/2015/03/79-theses-on-technology-for-disputation/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Alan Jacobs has written seventy-nine theses on technology for disputation. A disputation is an old technology, a formal technique of debate and argument that took shape in medieval universities in Paris, Bologna, and Oxford in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries. In its most general form, a disputation consisted of a thesis, a counter-thesis, and a string of arguments, usually buttressed by citations of Aristotle, Augustine, or the Bible.

But disputations were not just formal arguments. They were public performances that trained university students in how to seek and argue for the truth. They made demands on students and masters alike. Truth was hard won; it was to be found in multiple, sometimes conflicting traditions; it required one to give and recognize arguments; and, perhaps above all, it demanded an epistemic humility, an acknowledgment that truth was something sought, not something produced.

It is, then, in this spirit that Jacobs offers, tongue firmly in cheek, his seventy-nine theses on technology and what it means to inhabit a world formed by it. They are pithy, witty, ponderous, and full of life. And over the following weeks, we at the Infernal Machine will take Jacobs’ theses at his provocative best and dispute them. We’ll take three or four at a time and offer our own counter-theses in a spirit of generosity.

So here they are:

1. Everything begins with attention.

2. It is vital to ask, “What must I pay attention to?”

3. It is vital to ask, “What may I pay attention to?”

4. It is vital to ask, “What must I refuse attention to?”

5. To “pay” attention is not a metaphor: Attending to something is an economic exercise, an exchange with uncertain returns.

6. Attention is not an infinitely renewable resource; but it is partially renewable, if well-invested and properly cared for.

7. We should evaluate our investments of attention at least as carefully and critically as our investments of money.

8. Sir Francis Bacon provides a narrow and stringent model for what counts as attentiveness: “Some books are to be tasted, others to be swallowed, and some few to be chewed and digested: that is, some books are to be read only in parts, others to be read, but not curiously, and some few to be read wholly, and with diligence and attention.”

9. An essential question is, “What form of attention does this phenomenon require? That of reading or seeing? That of writing also? Or silence?”

10. Attentiveness must never be confused with the desire to mark or announce attentiveness. (“Can I learn to suffer/Without saying something ironic or funny/On suffering?”—Prospero, in Auden’s The Sea and the Mirror)

11. “Mindfulness” seems to many a valid response to the perils of incessant connectivity because it confines its recommendation to the cultivation of a mental stance without objects.

12. That is, mindfulness reduces mental health to a single, simple technique that delivers its user from the obligation to ask any awkward questions about what his or her mind is and is not attending to.

13. The only mindfulness worth cultivating will be teleological through and through.

14. Such mindfulness, and all other healthy forms of attention—healthy for oneself and for others—can only happen with the creation of and care for an attentional commons.

15. This will not be easy to do in a culture for which surveillance has become the normative form of care.

16. Simone Weil wrote that ‘Attention is the rarest and purest form of generosity’; if so, then surveillance is the opposite of attention.

17. The primary battles on social media today are fought by two mutually surveilling armies: code fetishists and antinomians.

18. The intensity of those battles is increased by a failure by any of the parties to consider the importance of intimacy gradients.

19. “And weeping arises from sorrow, but sorrow also arises from weeping.”—Bertolt Brecht, writing about Twitter

20. We cannot understand the internet without perceiving its true status: The Internet is a failed state.

21. We cannot respond properly to that failed-state condition without realizing and avoiding the perils of seeing like a state.

22. If instead of thinking of the internet in statist terms we apply the logic of subsidiarity, we might be able to imagine the digital equivalent of a Mondragon cooperative.

23. The internet groans in travail as it awaits its José María Arizmendiarrieta."

[continues on]

[A collection of follow-ups and responses is accummulating here:
http://iasc-culture.org/THR/channels/Infernal_Machine/tag/79-theses-on-technology/

For example: “79 Theses on Technology: On Attention”
http://iasc-culture.org/THR/channels/Infernal_Machine/2015/03/79-theses-on-technology-on-attention/

And another round-up of responses:
http://text-patterns.thenewatlantis.com/2015/04/more-on-theses.html ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>alanjacobs anthropology culture digital history technology attention dunning-krugereffect anosognosia pleasure ethics writing howwewrite jaronlanier alextabattok stupidity logic loki cslewis algorithms akrasia physical patheticfallacy hacking hackers kevinkelly georgebernardshaw agency philosophy tommccarthy commenting frankkermode text texts community communication resistance mindfulness internet online web josémaríaarizmendiarrieta simonwiel society whauden silence attentiveness textualist chadwellmon surveillance 2015 auden</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:022b6f49ca41/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alanjacobs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anthropology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:digital"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dunning-krugereffect"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anosognosia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pleasure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jaronlanier"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alextabattok"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stupidity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:logic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:loki"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cslewis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:algorithms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:akrasia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:physical"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:patheticfallacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hacking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hackers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:georgebernardshaw"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:agency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tommccarthy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:commenting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:frankkermode"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:text"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:texts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:resistance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mindfulness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:josémaríaarizmendiarrieta"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:simonwiel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:whauden"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:silence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attentiveness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:textualist"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chadwellmon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:surveillance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2015"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:auden"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://medium.com/press-play/press-play-4b26bed77b7d">
    <title>Press Play — Press Play: Making and distributing content in the present future we are living through. — Medium</title>
    <dc:date>2015-02-20T07:49:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://medium.com/press-play/press-play-4b26bed77b7d</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["This thing of ours:

This course, Press Play, aspires to be a place where you make things. Good things. Smart things. Cool things. And then share those things with other people. The idea of Press Play is that after we make things we are happy with, that we push a button and unleash it on the world. Much of it will be text, but if you want to make magic with a camera, your phone, or with a digital recorder, knock yourself out. But it will all be displayed and edited on Medium because there will be a strong emphasis on working with others in this course, and Medium is collaborative.

While writing, shooting, and editing are often solitary activities, great work emerges in the spaces between people. We will be working in groups with peer and teacher edits. There will be a number of smaller assignments, but the goal is that you will leave here with a single piece of work that reflects your capabilities as a maker of media.But remember, evaluations will be based not just on your efforts, but on your ability to bring excellence out of the people around you. Medium has a remarkable “notes” function where the reader/editor can highlight a specific word, phrase or paragraph and comment, suggest a tweak or give an attaboy. This is counter-intuitive, but you will be judged as much by what you put in the margins of others work as you are for your own. (You should sign on to Medium as soon as you can. You can log in with Facebook or Twitter credentials. Pithy instructions on writing and collaborating on Medium: here, here, here, and, yes, here.)To begin with, we will look at the current media ecosystem: how content is conceived, made, made better, distributed, and paid for. We will discuss finding a story, research and reporting, content management systems, voice, multimedia packaging, along with distribution and marketing of work. If that sounds ambitious, keep in mind that in addition to picking this professor and grad assistant, we picked you. We already know you are smart, and we just want you to demonstrate that on the (web) page.

What we‘ll create:

Together, we will make a collection of stories on Medium around a specific organizing principle — it could be a genre, topic, reading time, or event — which we’ll decide on in collaboration as well. And once we get stories up and running, we will work on ways of getting them out there into the bloodstream of the web.

In order to have a chance of making great work, you have to consume remarkable work. Fair warning: There will be a lot of weekly reading assignments. I’m not sliming you with a bunch of textbooks, so please know I am dead serious about these readings. Skip or skim at your peril.

I will be bringing in a number of guest speakers. They will be talented, accomplished people giving their own time. Please respond with your fullest attention.

So, to summarize: We will make things — in class, in groups, by our lonely selves — we will work to make those things better, and, if we are lucky, we will figure out how to beckon the lightning of excellence along the way."]]></description>
<dc:subject>davidcarr 2014 web online internet syllabus education journalism writing howwewrite ta-nehisicoates teaching mooc moocs lesliejamison clayshirky alexismadrigal jessicatesta nrkleinfield sarahkoenig davidfosterwallace elizabethroyte zachseward joshuadavis shanesnow brianlam kevinkelly luciamoses storytelling vincentmorisset emilygibson caityeaver mischaberlinski triciaromano hamiltonnolan camilledodero erinleecarr mariakonikkova tonyhaile ralphabellino mashacharnay santiagostelly timstelloh jayrosen felixsalmon multimedia socialmedia canon engagement media distribution voice syllabi</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:0db14f5b454b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davidcarr"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2014"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:syllabus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:journalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ta-nehisicoates"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mooc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:moocs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lesliejamison"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:clayshirky"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alexismadrigal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jessicatesta"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nrkleinfield"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sarahkoenig"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davidfosterwallace"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elizabethroyte"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:zachseward"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:joshuadavis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:shanesnow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brianlam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:luciamoses"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:storytelling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:vincentmorisset"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:emilygibson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:caityeaver"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mischaberlinski"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:triciaromano"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hamiltonnolan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:camilledodero"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:erinleecarr"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mariakonikkova"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tonyhaile"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ralphabellino"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mashacharnay"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:santiagostelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:timstelloh"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jayrosen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:felixsalmon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:multimedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:canon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:engagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:distribution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:voice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:syllabi"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://medium.com/@hansdezwart/ai-weiwei-is-living-in-our-future-474e5dd15e4f">
    <title>Ai Weiwei is Living in Our Future — Medium</title>
    <dc:date>2015-01-02T18:11:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://medium.com/@hansdezwart/ai-weiwei-is-living-in-our-future-474e5dd15e4f</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA['Living under permanent surveillance and what that means for our freedom'

…

"Put a collar with a GPS chip around your dog’s neck and from that moment onwards you will be able to follow your dog on an online map and get a notification on your phone whenever your dog is outside a certain area. You want to take good care of your dog, so it shouldn’t be a surprise that the collar also functions as a fitness tracker. Now you can set your dog goals and check out graphs with trend lines. It is as Bruce Sterling says: “You are Fluffy’s Zuckerberg”.

What we are doing to our pets, we are also doing to our children.

The ‘Amber Alert’, for example, is incredibly similar to the Pet Tracker. Its users are very happy: “It’s comforting to look at the app and know everyone is where they are supposed to be!” and “The ability to pull out my phone and instantly monitor my son’s location, takes child safety to a whole new level.” In case you were wondering, it is ‘School Ready’ with a silent mode for educational settings.

Then there is ‘The Canary Project’ which focuses on American teens with a driver’s license. If your child is calling somebody, texting or tweeting behind the wheel, you will be instantly notified. You will also get a notification if your child is speeding or is outside the agreed-on territory.

If your child is ignoring your calls and doesn’t reply to your texts, you can use the ‘Ignore no more’ app. It will lock your child’s phone until they call you back. This clearly shows that most surveillance is about control. Control is the reason why we take pleasure in surveilling ourselves more and more.

I won’t go into the ‘Quantified Self’ movement and our tendency to put an endless amount of sensors on our body attempting to get “self knowlegde through numbers”. As we have already taken the next step towards control: algorithmic punishment if we don’t stick to our promises or reach our own goals."

…

"Normally his self-measured productivity would average around 40%, but with Kara next to him, his productiviy shot upward to 98%. So what do you do with that lesson? You create a wristband that shocks you whenever you fail to keep to your own plan. The wristband integrates well, of course, with other apps in your “productivity ecosystem”."

…

"On Kickstarter the makers of the ‘Blink’ camera tried to crowdfund 200.000 dollars for their invention. They received over one millions dollars instead. The camera is completely wireless, has a battery that lasts a year and streams HD video straight to your phone."

…

"I would love to speak about the problems of gentrification in San Francisco, or about a culture where nobody thinks you are crazy when you utter the sentence “Don’t touch me, I’ll fucking sue you” or about the fact this Google Glass user apparently wasn’t ashamed enough about this interaction to not post this video online. But I am going to talk about two other things: the first-person perspective and the illusionary symmetry of the Google Glass.

First the perspective from which this video was filmed. When I saw the video for the first time I was completely fascinated by her own hand which can be seen a few times and at some point flips the bird."

…

"The American Civil Liberties Union (also known as the ACLU) released a report late last year listing the advantages and disadvantages of bodycams. The privacy concerns of the people who will be filmed voluntarily or involuntarily and of the police officers themselves (remember Ai Weiwei’s guards who were continually watched) are weighed against the impact bodycams might have in combatting arbitrary police violence."

…

"A short while ago I noticed that you didn’t have to type in book texts anymore when filling in a reCAPTCHA. Nowadays you type in house numbers helping Google, without them asking you, to further digitize the physical world."

…

"This is the implicit view on humanity that the the big tech monopolies have: an extremely cheap source of labour which can be brought to a high level of productivity through the smart use of machines. To really understand how this works we need to take a short detour to the gambling machines in Las Vegas."

…

"Taleb has written one of the most important books of this century. It is called ‘Anti-fragile: Things That Gain from Disorder’ and it explores how you should act in a world that is becoming increasingly volatile. According to him, we have allowed efficiency thinking to optimize our world to such an extent that we have lost the flexibility and slack that is necessary for dealing with failure. This is why we can no longer handle any form of risk.

Paradoxically this leads to more repression and a less safe environment. Taleb illustrates this with an analogy about a child which is raised by its parents in a completely sterile environment having a perfect life without any hard times. That child will likely grow up with many allergies and will not be able to navigate the real world.

We need failure to be able to learn, we need inefficiency to be able to recover from mistakes, we have to take risks to make progress and so it is imperative to find a way to celebrate imperfection.

We can only keep some form of true freedom if we manage to do that. If we don’t, we will become cogs in the machines. I want to finish with a quote from Ai Weiwei:

<blockquote>“Freedom is a pretty strange thing. Once you’ve experienced it, it remains in your heart, and no one can take it away. Then, as an individual, you can be more powerful than a whole country.”</blockquote>"]]></description>
<dc:subject>aiweiwei surveillance privacy china hansdezwart 2014 google maps mapping freedom quantification tracking technology disney disneyland bigdog police lawenforcement magicbands pets monitoring pettracker parenting teens youth mobile phones cellphones amberalert canaryproject autonomy ignorenomore craiglist productivity pavlok pavlov garyshteyngart grindr inder bangwithfriends daveeggers transparency thecircle literature books dystopia lifelogging blink narrative flone drones quadcopters cameras kevinkelly davidbrin googleglass sarahslocum aclu ferguson michaelbrown bodycams cctv captcha recaptcha labor sousveillance robots humans capitalism natashadowschüll design facebook amazon addiction nassimtaleb repression safety society howwelearn learning imperfection humanism disorder control power efficiency inefficiency gambling lasvegas doom quantifiedself measurement canon children</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:c30349c2ba50/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aiweiwei"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:surveillance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:china"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hansdezwart"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2014"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mapping"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freedom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quantification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tracking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:disney"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:disneyland"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bigdog"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:police"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lawenforcement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:magicbands"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:monitoring"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pettracker"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:parenting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teens"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:youth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mobile"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:phones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cellphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:amberalert"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:canaryproject"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:autonomy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ignorenomore"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:craiglist"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:productivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pavlok"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pavlov"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:garyshteyngart"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:grindr"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inder"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bangwithfriends"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:daveeggers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:transparency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thecircle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dystopia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lifelogging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:blink"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:narrative"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:flone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:drones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quadcopters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cameras"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davidbrin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:googleglass"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sarahslocum"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aclu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ferguson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:michaelbrown"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bodycams"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cctv"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:captcha"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:recaptcha"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sousveillance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robots"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:natashadowschüll"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:facebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:amazon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:addiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nassimtaleb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:repression"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:safety"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:imperfection"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:disorder"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:control"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:power"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:efficiency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inefficiency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gambling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lasvegas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:doom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quantifiedself"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:measurement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:canon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:children"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://aeon.co/magazine/technology/the-problem-with-too-much-information/">
    <title>The problem with too much information – Dougald Hine – Aeon</title>
    <dc:date>2014-11-21T05:35:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://aeon.co/magazine/technology/the-problem-with-too-much-information/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The journalist John Markoff, himself an early contributor to the WELL, gave a broader history of how the counterculture shaped personal computing in his book What the Dormouse Said (2005). As any Jefferson Airplane fan can tell you, what the Dormouse said was: ‘Feed your head! Feed your head!’ The internet needed a story that would make sense to those who would never be interested in the TCP/IP protocol, and the counterculture survivors gave it one – the great escapist myth of their era: turn on, tune in, drop out. In this new version of the fable, information took the place of LSD, the magic substance whose consumption could transform the world.

The trouble is that information doesn’t nourish us. Worse, in the end, it turns out to be boring.

A writer friend was asked to join a pub quiz team in the village where he has lived for more than half a century. ‘You know lots of things, Alan,’ said the neighbour who invited him. The neighbour had a point: Alan is the most alarmingly knowledgeable person I know. Still, he declined politely, and was bemused for days. There can be a certain point-scoring pleasure in demonstrating the stockpile of facts one has accumulated, but it is in every other sense a pointless kind of knowledge.

This is more than just intellectual snobbery. Knowledge has a point when we start to find and make connections, to weave stories out of it, stories through which we make sense of the world and our place within it. It is the difference between memorising the bus timetable for a city you will never visit, and using that timetable to explore a city in which you have just arrived. When we follow the connections – when we allow the experience of knowing to take us somewhere, accepting the risk that we will be changed along the way – knowledge can give rise to meaning. And if there is an antidote to boredom, it is not information but meaning.

There is a connection, though, between the two. Information is perhaps the rawest material in the process out of which we arrive at meaning: an undifferentiated stream of sense and nonsense in which we go fishing for facts. But the journey from information to meaning involves more than simply filtering the signal from the noise. It is an alchemical transformation, always surprising. It takes skill, time and effort, practice and patience. No matter how experienced we become, success cannot be guaranteed. In most human societies, there have been specialists in this skill, yet it can never be the monopoly of experts, for it is also a very basic, deeply human activity, essential to our survival. If boredom has become a sickness in modern societies, this is because the knack of finding meaning is harder to come by.

It is only fair to note that the internet is not altogether to blame for this, and that the rise of boredom itself goes back to an earlier technological revolution. The word was invented around the same time as the spinning jenny. As the philosophers Barbara Dalle Pezze and Carlo Salzani put it in their essay ‘The Delicate Monster’ (2009):

<blockquote>Boredom is not an inherent quality of the human condition, but rather it has a history, which began around the 18th century and embraced the whole Western world, and which presents an evolution from the 18th to the 21st century.</blockquote>

For all its boons, the industrial era itself brought about an endemic boredom peculiar to the division of labour, the distancing of production from consumption, and the rationalisation of working activity to maximise output.

My point is not that we should return to some romanticised preindustrial past: I mean only to draw attention to contradictions that still shape our post-industrial present. The physical violence of the 19th-century factory might be gone, at least in the countries where industrialisation began, but the alienation inherent in these ways of organising work remains.

When the internet arrived, it seemed to promise a liberation from the boredom of industrial society, a psychedelic jet-spray of information into every otherwise tedious corner of our lives. In fact, at its best, it is something else: a remarkable helper in the search for meaningful connections. But if the deep roots of boredom are in a lack of meaning, rather than a shortage of stimuli, and if there is a subtle, multilayered process by which information can give rise to meaning, then the constant flow of information to which we are becoming habituated cannot deliver on such a promise. At best, it allows us to distract ourselves with the potentially endless deferral of clicking from one link to another. Yet sooner or later we wash up downstream in some far corner of the web, wondering where the time went. The experience of being carried on these currents is quite different to the patient, unpredictable process that leads towards meaning.

The latter requires, among other things, space for reflection – allowing what we have already absorbed to settle, waiting to see what patterns emerge. Find the corners of our lives in which we can unplug, the days on which it is possible to refuse the urgency of the inbox, the activities that will not be rushed. Switch off the infinity machine, not forever, nor because there is anything bad about it, but out of recognition of our own finitude: there is only so much information any of us can bear, and we cannot go fishing in the stream if we are drowning in it. As any survivor of the 1960s counterculture could tell us, it is best to treat magic substances with respect – and to be careful about the dosage."]]></description>
<dc:subject>dougaldhine web online internet information thewell stewartbrand kevinkelly johnmarkoff 2014 reflection meaning meaningmaking knowledge alienation behavior industrialization society purpose kenkesey eff johnperrybarlow</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:93cd74dd1d9c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dougaldhine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:information"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thewell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stewartbrand"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnmarkoff"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2014"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reflection"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meaning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meaningmaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:knowledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alienation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:behavior"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:industrialization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:purpose"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kenkesey"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:eff"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnperrybarlow"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://futurismic.com/2014/10/12/make-technological-utopia-easier-with-this-one-weird-trick/">
    <title>Make technological utopia easier with this one weird trick | Blog | Futurismic</title>
    <dc:date>2014-10-13T23:20:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://futurismic.com/2014/10/12/make-technological-utopia-easier-with-this-one-weird-trick/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Now, as a card-carrying Harawayian, I am in no way averse to ascribing agency to non-human and/or artefactual subjects; what bothers me about these scenarios is that they largely remove agency from human subjects, being variations on the Software Salvationism which believes that all obstacles might be overcome through the addition of EVN MOAR ALGOS PLZ*, and assumes (falsely, I hope) that people would like less direct control over the way their world works rather than more. But it’s kind of inevitable, really: when you ask “how can technology make a better future?” you foreclose (whether deliberately or not) on the possibility of making that better future with anything other than new technology; this is one of the epistemological bear-traps of technological determinism, which Kelly and many other tech-centric futures people have been circling around for decades.

But it’s easily enough stepped out of; all you need to do is take the “technology” specifier out of the question, and/or avoid asking it of people who identify with technology in either a entrepreneurial or quasi-religious manner (no beer for you, Ray Kurzweil). By way of example, here’s my own late submission to Kelly’s call, a 101-word haiku describing a desirable future:

<blockquote>No one goes hungry. No one sleeps outdoors, unless they choose to. No one is conscripted as a child-soldier. No one is maimed by land-mines made on the other side of the world. No one is exploited for the betterment or gain of another. No one is a second class citizen to anyone. Nothing is wasted. Things – whether material or digital – are made with care and thought, and are made to last a long, long time. We appreciate a plurality of systems of value alongside the legacy cash-money system, which we keep going as a honey-trap distraction for the instinctively acquisitive.</blockquote>

If that’s not utopian and desirable, I don’t know what it is. And as implausible, unlikely and peacenik-pie-in-the-sky as you might (very reasonably) choose to call it, it is possible — because it doesn’t require us to make a single damned invention or piece of software we don’t already have. We have everything we need already; it’s just, as Gibson didn’t quite say, not yet evenly distributed. That means my little scenario above is intrinsically more plausible than any future that requires a technological novum to make it work, because [Occam's Razor]. And if you’re aching to say “but hang on, you’ll never get that to work because getting people to change the way they do things isn’t at all simple”, then congratulations –you’ve internalised the very point I’ve been trying to make all along. Have a cookie.

In short, then, and in hope of answering Kelly’s rhetorical question: the reason it is no longer possible/easy to write believable technological utopias is that we’ve had enough historical and personal experience with previous technologies failing to deliver on their utopian promises that we are no longer willing to take them at face value; we no longer believe that new technologies are an unalloyed good in and of themselves, and there have been sufficient charlatan futurists that we’ve started to assume they’re all charlatans until proven otherwise.

So perhaps we’re edging closer to utopia faster than we thought."]]></description>
<dc:subject>paulgrahamraven 2014 utopia economics donnnaharaway transhumanism humanism technology inequality kevinkelly future futures policy politics waste environment care thought</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:d66132d0dca8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:paulgrahamraven"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2014"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:utopia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:donnnaharaway"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:transhumanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inequality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:future"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:futures"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:waste"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:environment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:care"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thought"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjgXwp7gQRA">
    <title>▶ Monthly Talk - Adam Greenfield - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2014-10-07T06:20:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjgXwp7gQRA</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[“At the End of the World, Plant a Tree”]]></description>
<dc:subject>adamgreenfield optimism dystopia future solarpunk 2014 jugaad resilience mending repairing occupysandy occupywallstreet ows technology globalwarming environment sustainability mutualaid wikipedia ubicomp civilization inequality response networks utopia militarization commercialization iplaw intellectualproperty ownership consumerism rentseeking nathanmyhrvold privatization finance californiaideology raykurzweil kevinkelly transcendence hope technosolutionism growth economics progress latecapitalism neoliberalism wealth winnertakeall precarity collapse safetynet escape torredavid vannevarbush memex kowlooncity kowloon kowloonwalledcity bladerunner survival reality elysium sãopaulo riodejaneiro childrenofmen informationtechnology history dougengelbart knowledge collectivism singularity death mortality pollution cycles process structure mindfulness qualityoflife acculturation repair socialsafetynet singularitarianism</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:40fb4465c605/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:adamgreenfield"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:optimism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dystopia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:future"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:solarpunk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2014"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jugaad"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:resilience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mending"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:repairing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:occupysandy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:occupywallstreet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ows"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:globalwarming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:environment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sustainability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mutualaid"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wikipedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ubicomp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:civilization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inequality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:response"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:networks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:utopia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:militarization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:commercialization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:iplaw"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:intellectualproperty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ownership"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consumerism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rentseeking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nathanmyhrvold"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:privatization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:finance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:californiaideology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:raykurzweil"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:transcendence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hope"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technosolutionism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:growth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:progress"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:latecapitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neoliberalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wealth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:winnertakeall"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:precarity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collapse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:safetynet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:escape"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:torredavid"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:vannevarbush"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:memex"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kowlooncity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kowloon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kowloonwalledcity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bladerunner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:survival"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elysium"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sãopaulo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:riodejaneiro"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:childrenofmen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:informationtechnology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dougengelbart"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:knowledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collectivism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:singularity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:death"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mortality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pollution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cycles"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:process"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:structure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mindfulness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:qualityoflife"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:acculturation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:repair"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialsafetynet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:singularitarianism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hackeducation.com/2014/09/03/monsters-altc2014">
    <title>Ed-Tech's Monsters #ALTC</title>
    <dc:date>2014-09-05T19:52:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://hackeducation.com/2014/09/03/monsters-altc2014</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[[video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kiotl4G6fMw ]

"No doubt, we have witnessed in the last few years an explosion in the ed-tech industry and a growing, a renewed interest in ed-tech. Those here at ALT-C know that ed-tech is not new by any means; but there is this sense from many of its newest proponents (particularly in the States) that ed-tech has no history; there is only now and the future. 

Ed-tech now, particularly that which is intertwined with venture capital, is boosted by a powerful forms of storytelling: a disruptive innovation mythology, entrepreneurs' hagiography, design fiction, fantasy.

A fantasy that wants to extend its reach into the material world. 

Society has been handed a map, if you will, by the technology industry in which we are shown how these brave ed-tech explorers have and will conquer and carve up virtual and physical space. 

Fantasy.

We are warned of the dragons in dangerous places, the unexplored places, the over explored places, the stagnant, the lands of outmoded ideas — all the places where we should no longer venture. 

Hic Sunt Dracones. There be dragons.

Instead, I’d argue, we need to face our dragons. We need to face our monsters. We need to face the giants. They aren’t simply on the margins; they are, in many ways, central to the narrative."

…

"I’m in the middle of writing a book called Teaching Machines, a cultural history of the science and politics of ed-tech. An anthropology of ed-tech even, a book that looks at knowledge and power and practices, learning and politics and pedagogy. My book explores the push for efficiency and automation in education: “intelligent tutoring systems,” “artificially intelligent textbooks,” “robo-graders,” and “robo-readers.” 

This involves, of course, a nod to “the father of computer science” Alan Turing, who worked at Bletchley Park of course, and his profoundly significant question “Can a machine think?” 

I want to ask in turn, “Can a machine teach?” 

Then too: What will happen to humans when (if) machines do “think"? What will happen to humans when (if) machines “teach”? What will happen to labor and what happens to learning? 

And, what exactly do we mean by those verbs, “think” and “teach”? When we see signs of thinking or teaching in machines, what does that really signal? Is it that our machines are becoming more “intelligent,” more human? Or is it that humans are becoming more mechanical? 

Rather than speculate about the future, I want to talk a bit about the past."

…

"To oppose technology or to fear automation, some like The Economist or venture capitalist Marc Andreessen argue, is to misunderstand how the economy works. (I’d suggest perhaps Luddites understand how the economy works quite well, thank you very much, particularly when it comes to questions of “who owns the machinery” we now must work on. And yes, the economy works well for Marc Andreessen, that’s for sure.)"

…

"But even without machines, Frankenstein is still read as a cautionary tale about science and about technology; and Shelley’s story has left an indelible impression on us. Its references are scattered throughout popular culture and popular discourse. We frequently use part of the title — “Franken” — to invoke a frightening image of scientific experimentation gone wrong. Frankenfood. Frankenfish. The monster, a monstrosity — a technological crime against nature.

It is telling, very telling, that we often confuse the scientist, Victor Frankenstein, with his creation. We often call the monster Frankenstein.

As the sociologist Bruno Latour has argued, we don’t merely mistake the identity of Frankenstein; we also mistake his crime. It "was not that he invented a creature through some combination of hubris and high technology,” writes Latour, "but rather that he abandoned the creature to itself.” 

The creature — again, a giant — insists in the novel that he was not born a monster, but he became monstrous after Frankenstein fled the laboratory in horror when the creature opened his “dull yellow eye,” breathed hard, and convulsed to life.

"Remember that I am thy creature,” he says when he confronts Frankenstein, "I ought to be thy Adam; but I am rather the fallen angel, whom thou drivest from joy for no misdeed. Everywhere I see bliss, from which I alone am irrevocably excluded. I was benevolent and good— misery made me a fiend.”

As Latour observes, "Written at the dawn of the great technological revolutions that would define the 19th and 20th centuries, Frankenstein foresees that the gigantic sins that were to be committed would hide a much greater sin. It is not the case that we have failed to care for Creation, but that we have failed to care for our technological creations. We confuse the monster for its creator and blame our sins against Nature upon our creations. But our sin is not that we created technologies but that we failed to love and care for them. It is as if we decided that we were unable to follow through with the education of our children.”

Our “gigantic sin”: we failed to love and care for our technological creations. We must love and educate our children. We must love and care for our machines, lest they become monsters.

Indeed, Frankenstein is also a novel about education. The novel is structured as a series of narratives — Captain Watson’s story — a letter he sends to his sister as he explores the Arctic— which then tells Victor Frankenstein’s story through which we hear the creature tell his own story, along with that of the De Lacey family and the arrival of Safie, “the lovely Arabian." All of these are stories about education: some self-directed learning, some through formal schooling.

While typically Frankenstein is interpreted as a condemnation of science gone awry, the novel can also be read as a condemnation of education gone awry. The novel highlights the dangerous consequences of scientific knowledge, sure, but it also explores how knowledge — gained inadvertently, perhaps, gained surreptitiously, gained without guidance — might be disastrous. Victor Frankenstein, stumbling across the alchemists and then having their work dismissed outright by his father, stoking his curiosity. The creature, learning to speak by watching the De Lacey family, learning to read by watching Safie do the same, his finding and reading Volney's Ruins of Empires and Milton’s Paradise Lost."

…

"To be clear, my nod to the Luddites or to Frankenstein isn’t about rejecting technology; but it is about rejecting exploitation. It is about rejecting an uncritical and unexamined belief in progress. The problem isn’t that science gives us monsters, it's that we have pretended like it is truth and divorced from responsibility, from love, from politics, from care. The problem isn’t that science gives us monsters, it’s that it does not, despite its insistence, give us “the answer." 

And that is problem with ed-tech’s monsters. That is the problem with teaching machines.

In order to automate education, must we see knowledge in a certain way, as certain: atomistic, programmable, deliverable, hierarchical, fixed, measurable, non-negotiable? In order to automate that knowledge, what happens to care?"

…

"I’ll leave you with one final quotation, from Hannah Arendt who wrote,

<blockquote>"Education is the point at which we decide whether we love the world enough to assume responsibility for it and by the same token save it from that ruin which, except for renewal, except for the coming of the new and young, would be inevitable. And education, too, is where we decide whether we love our children enough not to expel them from our world and leave them to their own devices, nor to strike from their hands their chance of undertaking something new, something unforeseen by us, but to prepare them in advance for the task of renewing a common world.”</blockquote>

Our task, I believe, is to tell the stories and build the society that would place education technology in that same light: “renewing a common world.” 

We in ed-tech must face the monsters we have created, I think. These are the monsters in the technologies of war and surveillance a la Bletchley Park. These are the monsters in the technologies of mass production and standardization. These are the monsters in the technologies of behavior modification a la BF Skinner. 

These are the monsters ed-tech must face. And we must all consider what we need to do so that we do not create more of them."]]></description>
<dc:subject>audreywatters edtech technology education schools data monsters dragons frankenstein luddites luddism neoluddism alanturing thomaspynchon society bfskinner standardization surveillance massproduction labor hannaharendt brunolatour work kevinkelly technosolutionism erikbrynjolfsson lordbyron maryshelley ethics hierarchy children responsibility love howwelearn howweteach teaching learning politics policy democracy exploitation hierarchies progress science scientism markets aynrand liberarianism projectpigeon teachingmachines personalization individualization behavior behaviorism economics capitalism siliconvalley neoluddites</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:d3850b33014f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:audreywatters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:monsters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dragons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:frankenstein"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:luddites"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:luddism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neoluddism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alanturing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thomaspynchon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bfskinner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:standardization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:surveillance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:massproduction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hannaharendt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brunolatour"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technosolutionism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:erikbrynjolfsson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lordbyron"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maryshelley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hierarchy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:responsibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:love"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:democracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:exploitation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hierarchies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:progress"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scientism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:markets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aynrand"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:liberarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:projectpigeon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teachingmachines"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:personalization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:individualization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:behavior"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:behaviorism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:siliconvalley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neoluddites"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://kk.org/cooltools/archives/624">
    <title>Cool Tools – The Message</title>
    <dc:date>2014-08-05T23:41:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://kk.org/cooltools/archives/624</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["At least once in your life you should read the Bible all the way through because it does not say what you expect it to say, no matter what you expect it to say.

Here is the translation of the Bible you want to read: The Message. This new street-wise paraphrase is looser than a translation and so irks purists. But it is storming Christian campuses and youth groups with its boldness, readability, and strong vernacular. Translated by one amazing guy, it’s as far from old King James as one can imagine. For those who find the Bible warmed-over old news, The Message is like reading it for the first time.

– KK"]]></description>
<dc:subject>kevinkelly bible 2004 religion literature</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:42c009c96afe/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bible"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2004"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:religion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:literature"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hackeducation.com/2013/03/26/ed-tech-solutionism-morozov/">
    <title>Click Here to Save Education: Evgeny Morozov and Ed-Tech Solutionism</title>
    <dc:date>2013-03-27T07:35:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://hackeducation.com/2013/03/26/ed-tech-solutionism-morozov/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["This flight from thinking and the urge to replace human judgments with timeless truths produced by algorithms is the underlying driving force of solutionism. Bruno Latour distinguishes between “matters of facts,” the old unrealistic way of presenting all knowledge claims as stable, natural, and apolitical, and “matters of concern,” a more realistic mode that recognizes that knowledge claims are usually partial and reflect a particular set of problems, interests, and agendas. For Latour, one way to reform our political system is to acknowledge that knowledge is made of matters of concern and to identify all those affected by such matters; the proliferation of self-tracking—and the displacement of thinking by numbers—risks forever grounding us in the matters-of-fact paradigm. Once we abandon thinking for optimizing, it becomes much more difficult not only to enact but to actually imagine possible reforms of the system being “measured” and “tracked.”"

“Technostructuralists,” he argues, “view information technologies ‘neither as technologies of freedom nor of tyranny but primarily as technologies of power that lock into existing or emerging technostructures of power.’ Thus, any given technology is allowed to centralize and decentralize, homogenize and pluralize, empower and disempower simultaneously.”

"I’ve been told quite often that I’m too negative. Too critical. Too unsupportive of education technology entrepreneurship. Too loud. Too mean. And lately, I’ve wanted to retort, "Maybe. But I’m no Evgeny Morozov” — even though, truth be told, I think ed-tech desperately needs one. Ed-tech, once so deeply grounded in progressive educational theory and practice, has been largely emptied of both."]]></description>
<dc:subject>audreywatters 2013 evgenymorozov technology solutionism technosolutionism education mattersoffacts mattersofconcern criticalthinking quantifiedself knowledge brunolatour optimization efficience scale questions questioning edtech technostructuralism kevinkelly janmcgonigal jeffjarvis clayshirky timoreilly timwu books problemsolving problemdefining</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:702c37a71c8b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:audreywatters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2013"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:evgenymorozov"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:solutionism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technosolutionism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mattersoffacts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mattersofconcern"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:criticalthinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quantifiedself"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:knowledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brunolatour"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:optimization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:efficience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scale"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:questions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:questioning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technostructuralism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:janmcgonigal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jeffjarvis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:clayshirky"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:timoreilly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:timwu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:problemsolving"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:problemdefining"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bookforum.com/inprint/019_05/10825">
    <title>future shock - bookforum.com / current issue</title>
    <dc:date>2013-03-05T18:28:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://bookforum.com/inprint/019_05/10825</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[“Fixing government” for Newsom and Brand means getting rid of its vast bureaucracy. But if the Tea Partiers, steeped in Ayn Rand, want to dismantle government bureaucracy because they hate government, Newsom and Brand want to dismantle it simply because they have the tools to do it. And this is where Newsom’s tract moves beyond mere callow publishing opportunism into a broader, more pernicious rejection of progressive ideas. The purely formal urge to overhaul government along notionally digital lines is a manifestation of what I call “solutionism”—a tendency to justify reforms of social and political institutions by invoking the easy availability of powerful technological fixes rather than by engaging in a genuine analysis of what, if anything, is ailing those institutions and how to fix it.

Solutionists are not interested in investigating the subtle but constitutive roles of supposed vices like bureaucracy, opacity, or inefficiency in enabling liberal subjects to pursue their own life projects. Solutionists simply want to eliminate those vices—and the institutions that produce them—because technology permits them to do so. In his discussion of bureaucracy, for example, Newsom doesn’t even bother with the standard Weberian explanation that bureaucracy is a decidedly modernist institution for minimizing nepotism and introducing some fairness and neutrality to public administration. Instead, he simply views bureaucracy as a consequence of inadequate technology, concluding that better technology will allow us to get rid of it altogether—and why shouldn’t we?

“Our government is clogged with a dense layer of bureaucracy,” he complains. “It’s like a clay layer, a filler that serves only to slow everything down. But technology can get rid of that clay layer by making it possible for people to bypass the usual bureaucratic morass.” In a very limited sense, Newsom is right: Modern technology does allow us to bypass “the usual bureaucratic morass.” But to fail to examine why that morass exists and simply proceed to eliminate it because we have the technology is to fall for a very narrow-minded, regressive, and (paradoxically enough) antimodern kind of solutionism.]]></description>
<dc:subject>evgenymorozov gavinnewson scathing review book solutionism california technology government bureaucracy democracy stewartbrand californianideology via:migurski books teaparty clayshirky timoreilly dontapscott kevinkelly estherdyson longnow</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:d2871c9ea189/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:evgenymorozov"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gavinnewson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scathing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:review"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:book"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:solutionism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:california"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:government"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bureaucracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:democracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stewartbrand"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:californianideology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:via:migurski"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaparty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:clayshirky"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:timoreilly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dontapscott"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:estherdyson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:longnow"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2013/01/pain_of_the_new">
    <title>The Technium: Pain of the New</title>
    <dc:date>2013-01-12T05:09:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2013/01/pain_of_the_new</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["I predict that on each step towards increased realism new media take, there will be those who find the step physically painful. It will hurt their eyes, ears, nose, touch,and peace of mind. It will seem unnecessarily raw, ruining the art behind the work. This disturbance is not entirely in our heads, because we train our bodies to react to media, and when it changes, it FEELS different. There may be moments of uncomfort.

But in the end we tend to crave the realism -- when it has been mastered -- and will make our home in it.

The scratchy sound of vinyl, the soft focus of a Kodak Brownie, and the flickers of a 24 frame per second movie will all be used to time-stamp a work of nostalgia."]]></description>
<dc:subject>kevinkelly 2013 change technium technology film reality framerate history photography audio cds thehobbit hfr</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:a8e5b63e8844/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2013"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:change"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technium"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:film"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:framerate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:photography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:audio"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cds"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thehobbit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hfr"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2013/01/the_improbable.php">
    <title>The Technium: The Improbable is the New Normal</title>
    <dc:date>2013-01-10T20:23:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2013/01/the_improbable.php</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["To the uninformed, the increased prevalence of improbable events will make it easier to believe in impossible things. A steady diet of coincidences makes it easy to believe they are more than just coincidences, right? But to the informed, a slew of improbably events make it clear that the unlikely sequence, the outlier, the black swan event, must be part of the story. After all, in 100 flips of the penny you are just as likely to get 100 heads in a row as any other sequence. But in both cases, when improbable events dominate our view -- when we see an internet river streaming nothing but 100 heads in a row -- it makes the improbable more intimate, nearer.

I am unsure of what this intimacy with the improbable does to us. What happens if we spend all day exposed to the extremes of life, to a steady stream of the most improbable events, and try to run ordinary lives in a background hum of superlatives? What happens when the extraordinary becomes ordinary?"]]></description>
<dc:subject>internet web exposure information coincidence blackswans expectations photography video cameras everyday believability improbable 2013 kevinkelly technium</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:dab0b6fc6e43/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:exposure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:information"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:coincidence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:blackswans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:expectations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:photography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:video"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cameras"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:everyday"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:believability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:improbable"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2013"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technium"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2013/01/the_post-produc.php">
    <title>The Technium: The Post-Productive Economy</title>
    <dc:date>2013-01-10T19:42:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2013/01/the_post-produc.php</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Civilization is not just about saving labor but also about "wasting" labor to make art, to make beautiful things, to "waste" time playing, like sports. Nobody ever suggested that Picasso should spend fewer hours painting per picture in order to boost his wealth or improve the economy. The value he added to the economy could not be optimized for productivity. It's hard to shoehorn some of the most important things we do in life into the category of "being productive." Generally any task that can be measured by the metrics of productivity -- output per hour -- is a task we want automation to do. In short, productivity is for robots. Humans excel at wasting time, experimenting, playing, creating, and exploring. None of these fare well under the scrutiny of productivity. That is why science and art are so hard to fund. But they are also the foundation of long-term growth. Yet our notions of jobs, of work, of the economy don't include a lot of space for wasting time, experimenting, playing, creating, and exploring."

"The are two senses of growth: scale, that is, more, bigger, faster; and evolution. The linear progression of steam power, railways, electrification, and now computers and the internet is a type of the former; just more of the same, but only better. Therefore the productivity growth curve should continue up in a continuous linear fashion.

I suggest the growth of this 3rd regime is more like evolutionary growth, rather than developmental growth. The apparent stagnation we see in productivity, in real wages, in debt relief, is because we don't reckon, and don't perceive, the new directions of growth. It is not more of the same, but different."]]></description>
<dc:subject>growth robertgordon industrialization generativity leisurearts evolution internet networks plumbing china future technology productivity economics kevinkelly 2013 technium post-productiveeconomy artleisure</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:5b7c886cd64b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:growth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robertgordon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:industrialization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:generativity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:leisurearts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:networks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:plumbing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:china"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:future"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:productivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2013"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technium"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:post-productiveeconomy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artleisure"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2012/08/ff_stewartbrand/all/">
    <title>Futurist Stewart Brand Wants to Revive Extinct Species | Wired Enterprise | Wired.com</title>
    <dc:date>2012-10-01T19:34:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2012/08/ff_stewartbrand/all/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Most of the stuff that my fellow hippies tried turned out not to have legs. Communes didn’t. Dope didn’t!"

"Brand: I take my cue from technology historian George Dyson, who argues that, from the perspective of the real world, the digital universe is accelerating rapidly but, from the view of the digital universe, the biological world is slllllooooowwwwwiiing doooowwwwn. Since we humans are amphibians and live in both universes, we are being torn by acceleration on one side and deceleration on the other. That sounds rough, but it’s actually pretty exciting."

"Brand: I want them to know that de-extinction is coming. And I also want the eventual semi-amateur de-extinctors, as they start doing this out in the barn, to understand that there’s a framework of norms about ethics and transparency.

Kelly: What we all need is a manual on how to worry intelligently."]]></description>
<dc:subject>amateurresearch acceleratingchange drugs communes communitymanagement trolls netiquette identity pseudonyms anonymity stupidityofmobs wisdomofcrowds mooreslaw well digitalera usergenerated user-generated biohacking counterculture geneticengineering biotechnology biotech evolution change technology transparency ethics science georgedyson 2012 interviews de-extinction extinction kevinkelly stewartbrand psychedelics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:88a58867e89c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:amateurresearch"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:acceleratingchange"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:drugs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:communes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:communitymanagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:trolls"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:netiquette"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:identity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pseudonyms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anonymity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stupidityofmobs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wisdomofcrowds"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mooreslaw"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:well"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:digitalera"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:usergenerated"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:user-generated"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:biohacking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:counterculture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:geneticengineering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:biotechnology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:biotech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:change"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:transparency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:georgedyson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2012"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interviews"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:de-extinction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:extinction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stewartbrand"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:psychedelics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://boingboing.net/2012/05/11/kk.html">
    <title>Such a Long Journey - An Interview with Kevin Kelly - Boing Boing</title>
    <dc:date>2012-05-16T17:49:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/11/kk.html</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["…we should be open to assignments and changing our mind. I think that's what I had, a change of mind. I'm a huge believer in science and scientific method…every time that we get an answer in science it also provokes two new questions…in a certain curious way science is expanding our ignorance - our ignorance is expanding faster than what we know…what we know is just a small, small fraction of what is going on in the world…

…the most active theologians today are science fiction authors…asking the important questions of "What if?"… [Examples of questions]…Those are the kinds of questions that not theologians are asking in any religion that I am aware of, but science fiction authors constantly are exploring that. And they're the ones who are going to have the answers for us that the theologians will have to look to. But at the same time these are fundamentally religious questions that are not being asked in that vocabulary."]]></description>
<dc:subject>darkmatter whatwedon'tknow ignorance curiosity thinking scientificmethod technology jaronlanier technium philosophy avisolomon interviews 2012 openminded mindchanges experience religion scifi sciencefiction science kevinkelly via:litherland mindchanging</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:5b7711c58787/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:darkmatter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:whatwedon'tknow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ignorance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:curiosity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scientificmethod"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jaronlanier"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technium"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:avisolomon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interviews"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2012"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openminded"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mindchanges"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:experience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:religion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scifi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sciencefiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:via:litherland"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mindchanging"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.findings.com/post/19346681104/how-we-will-read-kevin-kelly">
    <title>How We Will Read: Kevin Kelly</title>
    <dc:date>2012-04-12T18:00:07+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.findings.com/post/19346681104/how-we-will-read-kevin-kelly</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I’m an active reader, and I mostly read to write.</blockquote>

<blockquote>I’m so far onto the left of the copyright issue. I believe that the natural home of all creation is in the public domain.</blockquote>

<blockquote>Money follows attention. Wherever attention goes, money will follow.</blockquote>

<blockquote>And what a book is, in my kind of formulation, is a coherent, sustained long argument or narrative, with a beginning, middle, and end.</blockquote>

<blockquote>I’m not a born writer. I’m a natural editor.</blockquote>

<blockquote>A website does not want to be a book.</blockquote>
Revisit.

<blockquote>A book was a very powerful device because it did so many different things. We’re taking some of those apart.</blockquote>

<blockquote>There’s no reason in my mind that you can’t make an e-book that’s a sheaf of flexible electronic pages that resemble a book that you turn.</blockquote>
Why?]]></description>
<dc:subject>thinking reading writing marginalia via:litherland kevinkelly howwewillread</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:dc54f1bc01d0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marginalia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:via:litherland"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewillread"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://startmaking.com/">
    <title>[Stop Talking] Start Making</title>
    <dc:date>2012-02-23T03:08:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://startmaking.com/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Reserve a spot in General Assembly's new online program, Fundamentals of Entrepreneurship. By signing up, you will receive access to a collection of classes that guide you through a structured path to starting a company people love."]]></description>
<dc:subject>generalassembly 2012 stoptalkingstartmaking startmaking stoptalking stoptalkingstartdoing entrepreneurship yvesbehar peterbuchanan-smith lewislapham hosainrahman brepettis amandahesser michaelbloomberg mariobatali kevinkelly glvo doing making business design</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:df57389f4598/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:generalassembly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2012"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stoptalkingstartmaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:startmaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stoptalking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stoptalkingstartdoing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:entrepreneurship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:yvesbehar"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:peterbuchanan-smith"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lewislapham"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hosainrahman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brepettis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:amandahesser"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:michaelbloomberg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mariobatali"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:glvo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:doing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:making"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:design"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.wired.com/magazine/2012/02/ff_dysonqa/all/1">
    <title>Q&amp;A;: Hacker Historian George Dyson Sits Down With Wired's Kevin Kelly | Wired Magazine | Wired.com</title>
    <dc:date>2012-02-19T21:36:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.wired.com/magazine/2012/02/ff_dysonqa/all/1</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["In some creation myths, life arises out of the earth; in others, life falls out of the sky. The creation myth of the digital universe entails both metaphors. The hardware came out of the mud of World War II, and the code fell out of abstract mathematical concepts. Computation needs both physical stuff and a logical soul to bring it to life…"

"…When I first visited Google…I thought, my God, this is not Turing’s mansion—this is Turing’s cathedral. Cathedrals were built over hundreds of years by thousands of nameless people, each one carving a little corner somewhere or adding one little stone. That’s how I feel about the whole computational universe. Everybody is putting these small stones in place, incrementally creating this cathedral that no one could even imagine doing on their own."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>artificialintelligence ai software nuclearbombs stanulam hackers hacking alanturing coding klarivanneumann nilsbarricelli MANIAC digitaluniverse biology computing freemandyson johnvanneumann interviews creation kevinkelly turing'smansion turing'scathedral turing wired history computers georgedyson digitalorganisms nuclearweapons atomicbomb atomicbombs wiredmagazine</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:540a147075a9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nuclearbombs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stanulam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hackers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hacking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alanturing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:coding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:klarivanneumann"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nilsbarricelli"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:MANIAC"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:digitaluniverse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:biology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freemandyson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnvanneumann"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interviews"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:creation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:turing'smansion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:turing'scathedral"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:turing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wired"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:georgedyson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:digitalorganisms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nuclearweapons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:atomicbomb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:atomicbombs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wiredmagazine"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/09/you_are_a_robot.php">
    <title>The Technium: You Are a Robot</title>
    <dc:date>2011-10-03T07:23:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/09/you_are_a_robot.php</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Everywhere we look in pop culture today, some of the coolest expressions are created by humans imitating machines. Exhibit A would be the surging popularity of popping, tutting, and dub step dancing. You've seen these dancers on YouTube: the best of them look exactly like robots dancing, with the mechanical stutter of today's crude robots trying to move like humans. Except the imitators robotically dance better than any robot could -- so far."]]></description>
<dc:subject>kevinkelly robots trends technology jaronlanier computers computing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:71fbd8102195/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robots"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:trends"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jaronlanier"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.brainpickings.org/index.php/2011/08/01/networked-knowledge-combinatorial-creativity/">
    <title>Networked Knowledge and Combinatorial Creativity | Brain Pickings</title>
    <dc:date>2011-08-03T07:56:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.brainpickings.org/index.php/2011/08/01/networked-knowledge-combinatorial-creativity/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["In May, I had the pleasure of speaking at the wonderful Creative Mornings free lecture series masterminded by my studiomate Tina of Swiss Miss fame. I spoke about Networked Knowledge and Combinatorial Creativity, something at the heart of Brain Pickings and of increasing importance as we face our present information reality. The talk is now available online — full (approximate) transcript below, enhanced with images and links to all materials referenced in the talk."

"This is what I want to talk about today, networked knowledge, like dot-connecting of the florilegium, and combinatorial creativity, which is the essence of what Picasso and Paula Scher describe. The idea that in order for us to truly create and contribute to the world, we have to be able to connect countless dots, to cross-pollinate ideas from a wealth of disciplines, to combine and recombine these pieces and build new castles."

"How can it be that you talk to someone and it’s done in a second? But it IS done in a second — it’s done in a second and 34 years. It’s done in a second and every experience, and every movie, and every thing in my life that’s in my head.” —Paula Scher]]></description>
<dc:subject>creativity behavior planning process combinatorialcreativity combinations lego networkedknowledge networks mariapopova florilegium picasso paulascher pentagram alberteinstein breakthroughs stevenjohnson ideas alvinlustig rogersperry jacquesmonod biology richarddawkins science art design wheregoodideascomefrom books designthinking insight information ninapaley oliverlaric similarities proximity adjacentpossible everythingisaremix curiosity choice jimcoudal claychristensen intention attention philosophy buddhism work labor kevinkelly gandhi pablopicasso</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:1adb118a9df4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:creativity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:behavior"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:planning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:process"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:combinatorialcreativity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:combinations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lego"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:networkedknowledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:networks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mariapopova"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:florilegium"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:picasso"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:paulascher"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pentagram"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alberteinstein"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:breakthroughs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stevenjohnson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alvinlustig"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rogersperry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jacquesmonod"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:biology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:richarddawkins"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wheregoodideascomefrom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:designthinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:insight"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:information"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ninapaley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:oliverlaric"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:similarities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:proximity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:adjacentpossible"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:everythingisaremix"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:curiosity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:choice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jimcoudal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:claychristensen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:intention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:buddhism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gandhi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pablopicasso"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.kk.org/cooltools/archives/005797.php">
    <title>Cool Tools: Writing Tools</title>
    <dc:date>2011-07-30T20:02:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.kk.org/cooltools/archives/005797.php</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["This two-sided page contains the wisdom of an entire book on how to write better. Nay, it distills an entire shelf of the world's greatest writing manuals (and I have them all). After 30 years as both a writer and editor I can't think of much I would add to these 50 short tips. This PDF is now my favorite guide to writing well. You can print it out for free. If you want its pithy reminders fleshed out with more examples, see the book form, or the website. But the free tip sheet itself -- one paper printed both sides -- rewards a quick review anytime you get down to serious writing."]]></description>
<dc:subject>writing language kevinkelly cooltools classideas howto english tools</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:d212d3eb2dc0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cooltools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:classideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howto"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:english"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tools"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/07/generatives.php">
    <title>The Technium: Generatives</title>
    <dc:date>2011-07-29T06:04:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/07/generatives.php</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["I've reduced the future of the internet to six verbs.

*Screening
*Interacting
*Sharing
*Flowing
*Accessing
*Generating

These stand for six large-scale trends moving through and comprising this new media. I expanded the notions in this 25-minute talk I did recently for Wired, at their Nextwork gathering in NYC."]]></description>
<dc:subject>kevinkelly internet screening sharing flow access generative interaction interactive 2011 future</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:779904413939/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:screening"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sharing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:flow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:generative"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interaction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interactive"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2011"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:future"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/07/your_two_things.php">
    <title>The Technium: Your Two Things</title>
    <dc:date>2011-07-27T17:05:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/07/your_two_things.php</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["…2 devices each person will carry are one general purpose combination device, & one specialized device (per your major interests & style)…

At the same time the attraction of a totem object, or something to hold in your hands, particularly a gorgeous object, will not diminish. We may remain w/ one single object that we love, that does most of what we need okay, & that in some ways comes to represent us. Perhaps the highly evolved person carries one distinctive object—which will be buried w/ them when they die.

…I don't think we'll normally carry more than a couple of things at once, on an ordinary day. The # of devices will proliferate, but each will occupy a smaller & smaller niche. There will be a long tail distribution of devices.

50 yrs from now a very common ritual upon meeting of old friends will be the mutual exchange & cross examination of what lovely personal thing they have in their pocket or purse. You'll be able to tell a lot about a person by what they carry."]]></description>
<dc:subject>kevinkelly totems possessions evocativeobjects objects devices future predictions technology specialization generalpurpose combinationdevices beauty 2011 specialists</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:3a03aff384db/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:totems"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:possessions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:evocativeobjects"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:objects"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:devices"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:future"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:predictions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:specialization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:generalpurpose"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:combinationdevices"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:beauty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2011"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:specialists"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://plus.google.com/116416314233992548280/posts/8d6QYE2dmbB">
    <title>Kevin Kelly - Google+ [&quot;All companies die. All cities are nearly immortal…Is the internet more like a company or more like a city?&quot;]</title>
    <dc:date>2011-07-27T07:16:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://plus.google.com/116416314233992548280/posts/8d6QYE2dmbB</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["All companies die. All cities are nearly immortal.

Both are type of networks. But there are two basic network forms: organisms or ecosystems. Companies are like organisms, while cities are like ecosystems.

All organisms (and companies) have share many universal laws of growth. Creatures age in the same way, whether they are small animals, large mammals, starfish, bacteria, and even cells. All ecosystems (and cities) also share universal laws. They evolve and scale in a similar fashion among themselves — whether they are forests, meadows, coral reefs, or grasslands, or villages."]]></description>
<dc:subject>kevinkelly cities web internet biology organizations organisms networks ecosystems companies 2011 geoffreywest coral</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:d4fb7cd80bd6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:biology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:organizations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:organisms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:networks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ecosystems"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:companies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2011"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:geoffreywest"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:coral"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.ireadwhereiam.com/">
    <title>I Read Where I Am</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-25T04:19:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.ireadwhereiam.com/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Exploring New Information Cultures"

"For example, words are colour-coded in a gradient from dark (more) to light (less) as a comparative value of frequency versus uniqueness. Also, several indexes are featured as random access interfaces to the articles. And finally, the subject matter in the texts is extended beyond the book through comparisons with Wikipedia entries of similar semantic meaning (micro- versus macro-context).So in essence, in the conceptualization of this book, we are not only trying to produce graphic and typographic design. But, by augmenting code and form with critical language theories, we are also practising what we like to call Digital Anthropology."]]></description>
<dc:subject>design art culture future writing reading toread ellenlupton kevinkelly erikspiekermann dunne&amp;raby jamesbridle bobstein digital books text digitalanthropology wikipedia indexing typography criticallanguage language narrative semantic literaryanthropology screens screen behavior etexts linguistics bookfuturism experience fionaraby anthonydunne</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:9d27080c04b3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:future"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:toread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ellenlupton"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:erikspiekermann"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dunne&amp;raby"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jamesbridle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bobstein"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:digital"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:text"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:digitalanthropology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wikipedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:indexing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:typography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:criticallanguage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:narrative"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:semantic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:literaryanthropology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:screens"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:screen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:behavior"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:etexts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bookfuturism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:experience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fionaraby"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anthonydunne"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/04/techno_life_ski.php">
    <title>The Technium: Techno Life Skills</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-01T05:05:05+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/04/techno_life_ski.php</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Anything you buy, you must maintain. Each tool you use requires time to learn how to use, to install, to upgrade, or to fix. A purchase is just the beginning…

You will be newbie forever…

Often learning a new tool requires unlearning the old one…

Take sabbaticals [from the tools]…

Tools are metaphors that shape how you think. What embedded assumptions does the new tool make?…

What do you give up? This one has taken me a long time to learn. The only way to take up a new technology is to reduce an old one in my life already…

Every new technology will bite back. The more powerful its gifts, the more powerfully it can be abused. Look for its costs…

Nobody has any idea of what a new invention will really be good for. To evaluate don't think, try…

The older the technology, the more likely it will continue to be useful.

Find the minimum amount of technology that will maximize your options."

[See also: http://snarkmarket.com/2011/6833 ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>education learning technology future 2011 kevinkelly tcsnmy unschooling unlearning maintenance tools philosophy technium assumptions upgrades change perpetualchange life lifeskills lcproject edg srg impermanence</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:0d2210221277/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:future"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2011"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tcsnmy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unschooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unlearning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maintenance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technium"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:upgrades"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:change"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:perpetualchange"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lifeskills"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lcproject"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:srg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:impermanence"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/04/what_books_will.php">
    <title>The Technium: What Books Will Become</title>
    <dc:date>2011-04-23T22:39:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/04/what_books_will.php</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["In the long run (next 10-20 years) we won't pay for individual books any more than we'll pay for individual songs or movies. All will be streamed in paid subscription services; you'll just "borrow" what you want. That defuses the current anxiety to produce a container for ebooks that can be owned. Ebooks won't be owned. They'll be accessed. The real challenge ahead is finding a display device that will focus the attention a book needs. An invention that encourages you onward to the next paragraph before the next distraction. I guess that this will be a combination of software prompts, highly evolved reader interfaces, and hardware optimized for reading. And books written with these devices in mind."]]></description>
<dc:subject>books ebooks future publishing technology subscriptions 2011 kevinkelly kevinkelly2</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:d418529807d4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ebooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:future"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:subscriptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2011"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly2"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/04/the_invisible_h.php">
    <title>The Technium: The Invisible Hook</title>
    <dc:date>2011-04-23T20:21:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/04/the_invisible_h.php</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["According to this surprising book, high-seas pirates were bands of volunteers who democratically elected their captains, and minimized harm to their victims in order to maximize their profits. Pirates hired many blacks as freeman during slave times, and built up one of the best branding campaigns ever. Just seeing the Jolly Roger's skull and bones approaching would prompt surrender -- the whole point of the flag logo. Pirates were outlaws, and no saints, but they were not crazy marauders, but more like shrewd businessmen. Economist Peter Leeson shows how most of the legendary customs and behaviors of sea pirates can be explained by the dynamics of free market economics. They were governed by the invisible hand, or rather, the invisible hook. This refreshing perspective resolved a lot of mysteries for me about this famous subculture (why they didn't rob each other, or mutiny more often, or die more often)…"]]></description>
<dc:subject>kevinkelly books pirates economics culture toread via:lukeneff peterleeson theinvisiblehook history</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:4aae089a7460/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pirates"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:toread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:via:lukeneff"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:peterleeson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:theinvisiblehook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/04/the_art_of_endl.php">
    <title>The Technium: The Art of Endless Upgrades</title>
    <dc:date>2011-04-18T15:51:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/04/the_art_of_endl.php</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["I used to upgrade begrudgingly (why upgrade if it still works?), and at the last possible moment. The trouble is familiar. Upgrade this and suddenly you need to upgrade that, which triggers upgrades everywhere. A "tiny" upgrade of even a minor part can be hugely disruptive. But as our personal technology became more complex, more co-dependent, more like a personal ecosystem, delaying upgrading is even more disruptive. So I now see upgrading as a type of maintenance: you do it to survive. Technological life in the future will be a series of endless upgrades.

Expecting to spend your life upgrading should be a life skill taught in school. Indeed, I'd like to learn how to manage maintaining my digital ecosystem better myself. There must be a zen and art to upgrading."]]></description>
<dc:subject>maintenance upgrading kevinkelly obsolescence technology 2011 disruption</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:7c41ec924b90/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maintenance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:upgrading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:obsolescence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2011"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:disruption"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/03/the_satsisfacti.php">
    <title>The Technium: The Satisfaction Paradox</title>
    <dc:date>2011-04-04T00:02:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/03/the_satsisfacti.php</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Let's say that after all is said and done, in the history of the world there are 2,000 theatrical movies, 500 documentaries, 200 TV shows, 100,000 songs, and 10,000 books that I would be crazy about. I don't have enough time to absorb them all, even if I were a full time fan. But what if our tools could deliver to me only those items to choose from? How would I -- or you -- choose from those select choices?"]]></description>
<dc:subject>kevinkelly serendipity choice paradox paradoxofchoice satisfaction satisfactionparadox netflix amazon scarcity abundance google spotify music film curation filters filtering discovery recommendations psychology economics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:b9f253c34599/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:serendipity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:choice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:paradox"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:paradoxofchoice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:satisfaction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:satisfactionparadox"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:netflix"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:amazon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scarcity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:abundance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:spotify"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:music"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:film"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:curation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:filters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:discovery"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:recommendations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/03/laser-back_trav.php">
    <title>The Technium: Laser-Back Travel</title>
    <dc:date>2011-04-03T23:59:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/03/laser-back_trav.php</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["This method is somewhat contrary to many people's first instincts, which are to immediately get acclimated to the culture in the landing city before proceeding to the hinterlands. Get a sense of what's going on, stock up, size up the joint. Then slowly work up to the more challenging remoter areas. That's reasonable, but not optimal because most big cities around the world are more similar than different.

In Laser-back travel what happens is that you are immediately thrown into the Very Different, the maximum otherness that you will get on this trip. You go from your home to extreme difference almost like the dissolve in a slide show. Bam! Your eyes are wide open. You are on your toes. All ears. And here at the end of the road (but your beginning), your inevitable mistakes are usually cheaper, easier to recover from, and more fun. You take it slower, no matter what country you are in."]]></description>
<dc:subject>travel tourism kevinkelly laser-back otherness cultureshock immersion vacations</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:02d728497d24/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:travel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tourism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:laser-back"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:otherness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cultureshock"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:immersion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:vacations"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/03/art_is_what_you.php">
    <title>The Technium: Art Is What You Get Away With</title>
    <dc:date>2011-03-22T05:30:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/03/art_is_what_you.php</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><dc:subject>art kevinkelly definitions classideas andywarhol</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:6c3a97b1ba07/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:definitions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:classideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:andywarhol"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/03/simultanology.php">
    <title>The Technium: Simultanology</title>
    <dc:date>2011-03-14T03:33:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/03/simultanology.php</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Right now simulatnology is rampant on the web. Anything that can be communicated can be communicated instantly. Thats' good news for intangible goods and services. But it wasn't always that way. In the pre-web days of internet, documents used to be stored in public at ftp sites. There was a period of several years when folks would go to a ftp site & download all the files, because like books, you never knew when you might need them. It took a while to realize that having continuous immediate access to the files was better than downloading them before hand. You only downloaded them when you were ready to.

While the media has been very well served by simultanology, there's much in the rest of our lives that has yet to become real time. Medicine…Why the delay in diagonstics, test results, & applying remedies? Education is not real time enough, although that is changing (see Khan Academy). Most of governance & politics…And we need more simmultanology in science and discovery."]]></description>
<dc:subject>technology web realitime justintimeju justinintimelearning netflix instantgratification instantplay business amazon kindle books ebooks immediacy kevinkelly medicine education learning change schools online internet kindlewishlist media intangibles 2011 consumption reading watching film khanacademy</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:db311723b7db/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:realitime"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:justintimeju"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:justinintimelearning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:netflix"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:instantgratification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:instantplay"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:amazon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kindle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ebooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:immediacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:medicine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:change"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kindlewishlist"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:intangibles"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2011"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consumption"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:watching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:film"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:khanacademy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/02/possibilians_vs.php">
    <title>The Technium: Possibilians vs Agnostics</title>
    <dc:date>2011-02-22T01:39:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/02/possibilians_vs.php</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Eagleman: "Our ignorance of the cosmos is too vast to commit to atheism, and yet we know too much to commit to a particular religion. A third position, agnosticism, is often an uninteresting stance in which a person simply questions whether his traditional religious story is true or not true. But with Possibilianism I'm hoping to define a new position -- one that emphasizes the exploration of new, unconsidered possibilities. Possibilianism is comfortable holding multiple ideas in mind; it is not interested in committing to any particular story."

…Agnostics end w/ lack of an answer. Possibilians begin w/ lack of an answer. Agnostics say, we can't decide between this & that. Possibilians say, there are other choices… Agnostics say, I Don't Know, it's impossible to answer that question. Possibilians say, I Don't Know, there must be better questions. Both start in humility, but agnosticism is bounded by our great ignorance, while possibilism is unbounded by our limited knowledge."]]></description>
<dc:subject>davideagleman kevinkelly uncertainty possibility possibilianism religion certainty science belief agnosticism atheism doubt curiosity humility skepticism storytelling criticalthinking philosophy ambiguity hubble ultradeepfield ralphwaldoemerson literature myths greekmyths greeks romans creationstories stories</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:e4b20f73c039/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davideagleman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:uncertainty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:possibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:possibilianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:religion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:certainty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:belief"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:agnosticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:atheism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:doubt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:curiosity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:skepticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:storytelling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:criticalthinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ambiguity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hubble"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ultradeepfield"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ralphwaldoemerson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:myths"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:greekmyths"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:greeks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:romans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:creationstories"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stories"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.ok-do.eu/projects/oivallus-a-project-on-future-education/">
    <title>OK Do | Oivallus – A Project on Future Education</title>
    <dc:date>2011-01-23T07:50:07+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.ok-do.eu/projects/oivallus-a-project-on-future-education/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Oivallus (‘a sudden insight’ in Finnish) project explores the future of education in a networked economy. It is conducted by the Confederation of Finnish Industries EK. The 3-year undertaking builds on critical dialogue within multidisciplinary groups of thinkers, including OK Do. We are also responsible for the visual communication of Oivallus in collaboration with the creative agency…

"New ideas originate in the boundaries of different fields. In the future, challenges will be solved in learning networks."

The goal of Oivallus is to make governmental decision-making in education policies meet the future needs of Finnish industries. What will working life be like in the 2020s? What kinds of knowledge and skills will the labor market and entrepreneurship require? The project seeks to explore and outline progressive operating and learning environments."

[Final report: http://ek.multiedition.fi/oivallus/fi/liitetiedostot/arkisto/Oivallus-Final-Report.pdf ]
[See also: http://ek.multiedition.fi/oivallus/en/index_copy.php ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>oivallus finland future education collaboration learning okdo multidisciplinary interdisciplinary crossdisciplinary design designthinking tcsnmy schooldesign futurism kevinkelly charlesleadbeater lcproject</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:e9602bff1ab2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:oivallus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:finland"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:future"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:okdo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:multidisciplinary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interdisciplinary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:crossdisciplinary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:designthinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tcsnmy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooldesign"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:futurism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charlesleadbeater"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lcproject"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://nearfuturelaboratory.com/2010/12/23/what-innovation/">
    <title>Near Future Laboratory » What Innovation</title>
    <dc:date>2010-12-24T07:30:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://nearfuturelaboratory.com/2010/12/23/what-innovation/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["best part of book is last sentence…

"Go for a walk; cultivate hunches; write everything down, but keep your folders messy; embrace serendipity; make generative mistakes; take on multiple hobbies; frequent coffeehouses & other liquid networks; follow the links; let others build on your ideas; borrow, recycle, reinvent. Build a tangled bank."

Had Johnson followed the walks of those innovators he was curious about, followed them along their mistakes & noted the ways they borrowed, recycled, reinvented he could have done away with the silly biology analogies. It’s all right there in the hands-on work that’s going on — there’s no need for a big, grand, one-size-fits-all theory about how ideas come to be and how they circulate, or don’t circulate and how they inflect and influence and change the way we understand and act and behave in the world. That’s the “innovation” story — or the way that *change-in-the-way-we-understand-the-world* comes about story."

[Now here: http://nearfuturelaboratory.com/2010/12/23/what-innovation/ ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>stevenjohnson julianbleecker innovation crossdisciplinary interdisciplinary serendipity learning wheregoodideascomefrom books criticism biology walking thinking cv analogies analogy adjacentpossible stuartkauffman science robertkrulwich kevinkelly radiolab</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:6e9ea60cb67c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stevenjohnson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:julianbleecker"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:innovation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:crossdisciplinary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interdisciplinary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:serendipity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wheregoodideascomefrom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:criticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:biology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:walking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cv"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:analogies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:analogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:adjacentpossible"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stuartkauffman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robertkrulwich"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:radiolab"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/09/mf_kellyjohnson/all/1">
    <title>Kevin Kelly and Steven Johnson on Where Ideas Come From | Magazine</title>
    <dc:date>2010-10-03T04:04:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/09/mf_kellyjohnson/all/1</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Kelly: It’s amazing that the myth of the lone genius has persisted for so long, since simultaneous invention has always been the norm, not the exception. Anthropologists have shown that the same inventions tended to crop up in prehistory at roughly similar times, in roughly the same order, among cultures on different continents that couldn’t possibly have contacted one another.

Johnson: Also, there’s a related myth—that innovation comes primarily from the profit motive, from the competitive pressures of a market society. If you look at history, innovation doesn’t come just from giving people incentives; it comes from creating environments where their ideas can connect.

Kelly: The musician Brian Eno invented a wonderful word to describe this phenomenon: scenius. We normally think of innovators as independent geniuses, but Eno’s point is that innovation comes from social scenes,from passionate and connected groups of people."]]></description>
<dc:subject>stevenjohnson kevinkelly innovation ideas history technology creativity scenius brianeno networks books crosspollination evolution life</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:59a27bb5e8b1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stevenjohnson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:innovation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:creativity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scenius"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brianeno"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:networks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:crosspollination"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:life"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/19/magazine/19FOB-WWLN-Kelly-t.html">
    <title>The Way We Live Now - Home-Schooling for the Techno-Literate - NYTimes.com [&quot;Here is the kind of literacy that we tried to impart:…&quot;]</title>
    <dc:date>2010-09-18T21:15:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/19/magazine/19FOB-WWLN-Kelly-t.html</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Every new tech will bite back. The more powerful its gifts, the more powerfully it can be abused. Look for its costs. • Technologies improve so fast you should postpone getting anything you need until last second. Get comfortable w/ fact that anything you buy is already obsolete. • Before you can master device, program or invention, it will be superseded; you will always be beginner. Get good at it. • Be suspicious of any tech that requires walls. If you can fix, modify or hack it, that is a good sign. • The proper response to a stupid tech is to make a better one, just as proper response to stupid idea is not to outlaw it but to replace it w/ better idea. • Every tech is biased by its embedded defaults: what does it assume? • Nobody has any idea of what a new invention will really be good for…crucial question: what happens when everyone has one? • The older the tech, the more likely it will continue to be useful. • Find minimum amount of tech that will maximize your options."]]></description>
<dc:subject>teaching parenting literacy learning education technology kevinkelly glvo tcsnmy obsolescence homeschool schools criticalthinking utility unschooling lcproject abuse costs hackability modification fixability invention homework stress self-directedlearning autodidacts learningtolearn autodidactism</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:060b9c1941c9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:parenting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:literacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:glvo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tcsnmy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:obsolescence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:homeschool"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:criticalthinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:utility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unschooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lcproject"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:abuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:costs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hackability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:modification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fixability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:invention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:homework"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stress"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:self-directedlearning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:autodidacts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learningtolearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:autodidactism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.kk.org/cooltools/archives/004626.php">
    <title>Cool Tools: Cheap RV Living</title>
    <dc:date>2010-08-11T05:11:12+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.kk.org/cooltools/archives/004626.php</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Roomier than a car, but cheaper than an RV, a retrofitted van makes a cool inexpensive house. Once popular during hippie days, the ancient American tradition of modifying a van is undergoing a resurgence as rents continue to rise. More folks each year commute from work and then park their home, instead of parking in front of it. On this lovely free website, you can find inspiring examples of cheap nomads, detailed instructions for conversions, gear recommendations, and lots of advice for living in a low rent or homemade RV from "them that's doin' it.""

[points to: http://cheaprvliving.com/index.html ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>kevinkelly nomads neo-nomads vans travel</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:497c2668435f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nomads"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neo-nomads"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:vans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:travel"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/3.05/eno_pr.html">
    <title>3.05: Gossip is Philosophy</title>
    <dc:date>2010-08-04T05:42:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/3.05/eno_pr.html</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The right word is "unfinished." Think of cultural products, or art works, or the people who use them even, as being unfinished. Permanently unfinished. We come from a cultural heritage that says things have a "nature," and that this nature is fixed and describable. We find more and more that this idea is insupportable - the "nature" of something is not by any means singular, and depends on where and when you find it, and what you want it for. The functional identity of things is a product of our interaction with them. And our own identities are products of our interaction with everything else. Now a lot of cultures far more "primitive" than ours take this entirely for granted - surely it is the whole basis of animism that the universe is a living, changing, changeable place. Does this make clearer why I welcome that African thing? It's not nostalgia or admiration of the exotic - it's saying, Here is a bundle of ideas that we would do well to learn from."

[via: http://preoccupations.tumblr.com/post/897984340/unfinished ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>1995 kevinkelly brianeno art generative hypertext philosophy unfinished imperfection culture via:preoccupations africa technology wired society learning nostalgia animism interactivity interaction functionalidentity ambient wabi-sabi wiredmagazine</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:352c75f3e812/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1995"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brianeno"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:generative"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hypertext"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unfinished"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:imperfection"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:via:preoccupations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:africa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wired"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nostalgia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:animism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interactivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interaction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:functionalidentity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ambient"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wabi-sabi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wiredmagazine"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/07/ff_fred_brooks/">
    <title>Master Planner: Fred Brooks Shows How to Design Anything | Magazine</title>
    <dc:date>2010-08-02T03:55:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/07/ff_fred_brooks/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Wired: How does a guy who grew up in the 1940s among North Carolina tobacco farmers get into computers?

Fred Brooks: I collected maps as a kid. I had tried all kinds of ways to index my map collection, which got me interested in the notion of automatic data retrieval. In 1944, when I was 13, I read about the Harvard Mark 1 computer in a magazine, and I knew then that computers was what I wanted to do...

Brooks: You can learn more from failure than success. In failure you’re forced to find out what part did not work. But in success you can believe everything you did was great, when in fact some parts may not have worked at all. Failure forces you to face reality...

Wired: Do you have any advice for young industrial designers and software architects?

Brooks: Design, design, and design; and seek knowledgeable criticism."]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:cervus fredbrooks collecting collections maps programming process failure history computing advice technology kevinkelly indexing dataretrieval data computers interviews mapping</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:c45a1cce1399/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:via:cervus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fredbrooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collecting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collections"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:programming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:process"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:failure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:advice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:indexing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dataretrieval"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interviews"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mapping"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.kk.org/cooltools/the-best-magazi.php">
    <title>Cool Tools: The Best Magazine Articles Ever</title>
    <dc:date>2010-08-01T18:16:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.kk.org/cooltools/the-best-magazi.php</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["This is a work in progress. It is a on-going list of suggestions collectively made by readers of this post. At this point the list has not been vetted or selected by me. In fact, other than the original five items I suggested, all of the articles mentioned here have been recommended by someone other than me. (Although I used to edit Wired magazine none of the article from Wired were suggested by me or anyone who worked at Wired. I also did not suggest my own pieces.)"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>kevinkelly lists magazines instapaper writing toread reading essays culture bestof journalism davidfosterwallace</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:77b47d9f28af/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:magazines"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:instapaper"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:toread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:essays"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bestof"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:journalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davidfosterwallace"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.kk.org/cooltools/archives/004610.php">
    <title>Cool Tools: Long Form * Instapaper</title>
    <dc:date>2010-08-01T18:14:22+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.kk.org/cooltools/archives/004610.php</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Longer than a newspaper item but shorter than a book, a magazine article is the ideal length for my attention span. I'd rather spend an hour with a great magazine article rather than read a book any day. Ditto for hopscotching through shallow blogs and newspaper bits. But there are fewer print publications running long form journalism. Ironically, a new website, called Long Form, points to the best long form articles appearing anywhere in print, and also collects the great magazine articles from the past. Long Form fits perfectly into a small ecosystem whereby you can read these great pieces of writing on a Kindle, iPad, or phone. I've found the easy-reading portable screens of these tablet devices fit a 1 to 2-hour window perfectly."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>kevinkelly longform instapaper givemesomethingtoread toread magazines ipad ereaders kindle reading</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:6b27763ba78c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:longform"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:instapaper"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:givemesomethingtoread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:toread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:magazines"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ipad"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ereaders"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kindle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reading"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.wired.com/techbiz/media/magazine/16-06/st_15th_eno?currentPage=all">
    <title>15th Anniversary: The Brian Eno Evolution</title>
    <dc:date>2010-07-31T21:14:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.wired.com/techbiz/media/magazine/16-06/st_15th_eno?currentPage=all</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["In an age of digital perfectability, it takes quite a lot of courage to say, "Leave it alone" and, if you do decide to make changes, [it takes] quite a lot of judgment to know at which point you stop. A lot of technology offers you the chance to make everything completely, wonderfully perfect, and thus to take out whatever residue of human life there was in the work to start with. It would be as though someone approached Cezanne and said, "You know, if you used Photoshop you could get rid of all those annoying brush marks and just have really nice, flat color surfaces." It's a misunderstanding to think that the traces of human activity — brushstrokes, tuning drift, arrhythmia — are not part of the work. They are the fundamental texture of the work, the fine grain of it."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:preoccupations brianeno davidbyrne kevinkelly interviews art imperfection unfinished music writing 2008 perfectability perfection photoshop human texture glvo conversation learning collaboration wabi-sabi</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:4dccdee133ec/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:via:preoccupations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brianeno"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davidbyrne"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interviews"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:imperfection"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unfinished"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:music"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2008"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:perfectability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:perfection"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:photoshop"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:human"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:texture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:glvo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conversation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wabi-sabi"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.kk.org/newrules/blog/2010/07/who-is-in-charge-of-devolution.php">
    <title>New Rules for the New Economy - Who is in charge of devolution?</title>
    <dc:date>2010-07-19T00:24:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.kk.org/newrules/blog/2010/07/who-is-in-charge-of-devolution.php</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["It is a rare leader who can creatively destroy as well as relentlessly build. It's a rare committee that will vote to terminate what works. It's a rare outsider whose advice to relinquish a golden oldie will be heeded. You are in charge of devolving. Everyone is. It's just one more chore in the network economy."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>devolution kevinkelly newrulesfortheneweconomy economics leadership tcsnmy progress change gamechanging cv management administration fixingtheunbroken</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:c6afdaacdff4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:devolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:newrulesfortheneweconomy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:leadership"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tcsnmy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:progress"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:change"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gamechanging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cv"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:management"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:administration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fixingtheunbroken"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://search.barnesandnoble.com/What-Technology-Wants/Kevin-Kelly/e/9780670022151/">
    <title>What Technology Wants, Kevin Kelly, Book - Barnes &amp; Noble</title>
    <dc:date>2010-07-08T18:33:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://search.barnesandnoble.com/What-Technology-Wants/Kevin-Kelly/e/9780670022151/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["A refreshing view of technology as a living force in the world.

This provocative book introduces a brand-new view of technology. It suggests that technology as a whole is not a jumble of wires and metal but a living, evolving organism that has its own unconscious needs and tendencies. Kevin Kelly looks out through the eyes of this global technological system to discover "what it wants." He uses vivid examples from the past to trace technology's long course and then follows a dozen trajectories of technology into the near future to project where technology is headed.

This new theory of technology offers three practical lessons: By listening to what technology wants we can better prepare ourselves and our children for the inevitable technologies to come. By adopting the principles of pro-action and engagement, we can steer technologies into their best roles. And by aligning ourselves with the long-term imperatives of this near-living system, we can capture its full gifts."]]></description>
<dc:subject>books toread kevinkelly technium technology society civilization engagement pro-action singularity future singularitarianism</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:f1a8e75f088b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:toread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technium"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:civilization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:engagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pro-action"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:singularity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:future"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:singularitarianism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2010/05/predicting_the.php">
    <title>The Technium: Predicting the Present, First Five Years of Wired</title>
    <dc:date>2010-05-29T23:02:07+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2010/05/predicting_the.php</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["I was digging through some files the other day and found this document from 1997. It gathers a set of quotes from issues of Wired magazine in its first five years. I don't recall why I created this (or even if I did compile all of them), but I suspect it was for our fifth anniversary issue. I don't think we ever ran any of it. Reading it now it is clear that all predictions of the future are really just predictions of the present. Here it is in full:"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>kevinkelly technium future futurism guidance history quotes trends value 90s web wired death dannyhillis paulsaffo nicholasnegroponte peterdrucker jaychiat alankay vernorvinge nathanmyhrvold sherryturkle stevejobs nealstephenson marcandreessen newtgingrich brianeno scottsassa billgates garywolf johnnaisbitt mikeperry marktilden hughgallagher billatkinson michaelschrage jimmetzner brendalaurel jaronlanier douglashofstaster frandallfarmer rayjones jonkatz davidcronenberg johnhagel joemaceda tompeters meaning ritual technology rituals wiredmagazine</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:f00564f002de/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technium"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:future"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:futurism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:guidance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quotes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:trends"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:value"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:90s"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wired"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:death"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dannyhillis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:paulsaffo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nicholasnegroponte"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:peterdrucker"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jaychiat"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alankay"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:vernorvinge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nathanmyhrvold"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sherryturkle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stevejobs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nealstephenson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marcandreessen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:newtgingrich"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brianeno"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scottsassa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:billgates"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:garywolf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnnaisbitt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mikeperry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marktilden"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hughgallagher"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:billatkinson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:michaelschrage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jimmetzner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brendalaurel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jaronlanier"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:douglashofstaster"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:frandallfarmer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rayjones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jonkatz"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davidcronenberg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnhagel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:joemaceda"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tompeters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meaning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ritual"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rituals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wiredmagazine"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2010/04/two_kinds_of_ge.php">
    <title>The Technium: Two Kinds of Generativity</title>
    <dc:date>2010-05-11T18:32:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2010/04/two_kinds_of_ge.php</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["There is a natural arc by which each invention moves from generative openness in a new-born to refined generativity of a well defined idea. Some folks mistakenly believe that modern regime of manufacturing & consumerism inevitably closes off all cool inventions to first kind of generativity, but this maturity has always happened, long before industrial age. Technology's natural cycle is merely being accelerated now.

New-borns w/ infinite potential but low-productivity become middle-agers generating great productivity & unleashing fantastic creativity; in turn the mature keep frontiers expanding by generating more newborns. I speak here of ideas & devices.

Each new unformed, hackable, potential invention is quickly refined by use & this use makes a technology more specific, conditional, & open to use by know-nothings. Therefore each tech eventually becomes less malleable, less powerful in undefined ways but more powerful in defined ways. It moves from the margins to the center."]]></description>
<dc:subject>hackability ipad kevinkelly maturity technium technology development innovation opensource generativity progress gamechanging closedsystems opensystems manufacturing consumerism invention cylces commoditization</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:e40a969b218a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hackability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ipad"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maturity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technium"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:development"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:innovation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:generativity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:progress"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gamechanging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:closedsystems"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:opensystems"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:manufacturing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consumerism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:invention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cylces"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:commoditization"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2010/04/collections_of.php">
    <title>The Technium: Collections of the Material Subconscious</title>
    <dc:date>2010-04-22T04:07:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2010/04/collections_of.php</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["if you are going to collect something that you want to be significant in future, collect things that everyone ignores now. Stuff that is too insignificant to save, that no one in their right mind would save. These "subconcious" things are ones that will be most valuable in future. Not Star Wars action figures, but fruit stickers. Not Barbie doll outfits but lids of take-out beverages. Not mint condition Chevy cars, but bread bag ties. Because they are not trying to be anything other than what they are - any beauty they contain is functional - they also transmit subtexts of their time. The "meaning" of the placement of the ridges & holes in take-out beverage lids reveal all kinds of things about how & where these beverages are being sold & consumed. The designs will tell folks in the future far more about our lives today than tiny models of Darth Vader.

& if history is any guide, we'll find their functional beauty far more everlasting than the fashions of more conscious designs."]]></description>
<dc:subject>kevinkelly fuure history artifacts fruit fruitstickers mundane beauty function form design longevity lasting meaning memory suptext time archaeology</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:959ff1eec773/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fuure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artifacts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fruit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fruitstickers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mundane"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:beauty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:function"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:form"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:longevity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lasting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meaning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:memory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:suptext"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:time"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:archaeology"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2010/04/the_shirky_prin.php">
    <title>The Technium: The Shirky Principle</title>
    <dc:date>2010-04-08T07:18:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2010/04/the_shirky_prin.php</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["In a strong sense we are defined by the problems we are solving. Yin/Yang, problem/solution, both sides form one unit. Because of the Shirky Principle, which says that every entity tends to prolong the problem it is solving, progress sometimes demands that we let go of problems. We can then look to marginal solutions and ask ourselves, what marginal problem is this solving that might be a more appreciated problem later on?"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>kevinkelly problemsolving organizations tcsnmy progress stagnation change reform self-preservation</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:9901af9e85ed/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:problemsolving"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:organizations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tcsnmy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:progress"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stagnation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:change"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reform"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:self-preservation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/03/ff_tablet_levy/">
    <title>How the Tablet Will Change the World | Magazine</title>
    <dc:date>2010-04-05T23:44:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/03/ff_tablet_levy/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The fact is, the way we use computers is outmoded. The graphical user interface that’s still part of our daily existence was forged in the 1960s and ’70s, even before IBM got into the PC business. Most of the software we use today has its origins in the pre-Internet era, when storage was at a premium, machines ran thousands of times slower, and applications were sold in shrink-wrapped boxes for hundreds of dollars. With the iPad, Apple is making its play to become the center of a post-PC era. But to succeed, it will have to beat out the other familiar powerhouses that are working to define and dominate the future."

[Guest essays here: http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/03/ff_tablet_essays/all/1 ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple computers computing ebooks edtech future gadgets tablet tablets gui innovation interface internet ipad media mobile technology trends stevenjohnson kevinkelly nicholasnegroponte olpc chrisanderson marthastewart bobstein jamesfallows</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:e564cbfdd5b5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ebooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:future"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gadgets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tablet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tablets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gui"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:innovation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interface"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ipad"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mobile"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:trends"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stevenjohnson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nicholasnegroponte"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:olpc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chrisanderson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marthastewart"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bobstein"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jamesfallows"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>