<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (robertogreco)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from robertogreco</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://harmonyholiday.substack.com/p/fourth-of-july-listening-diary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/yasha-levine/surveillance-valley/9781610398039/?lens=publicaffairs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://buymeacoffee.com/ayjay/in-which-i-make-mighty-vow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.theverge.com/tech/959848/bittorrent-story-25-years-piracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://daringfireball.net/linked/2026/07/02/orosz-meta-engineering-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FZy1lBNykA"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://runtimewire.com/article/om-malik-taught-silicon-valley-to-read-itself"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.businessinsider.com/ai-social-scene-curated-offline-events-dinner-parties-2026-6"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HNEKJNOHiOk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://berjon.com/rt/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.robinsloan.com/lab/de-datafication/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Sd3O-b-oPw"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2026/06/a-resurgence-of-educational-localism-a-review-of-skipping-school/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/twenty-five-years-after-imagined-worlds-what-world-are-we-living-in"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://social.ayjay.org/2026/06/06/freeman-dyson-it-often-happens.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2023/07/generative-ai-human-culture-philosophy/674165/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://om.co/2026/06/01/clothes-are-nice-fashion-biz-not-as-much/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://daringfireball.net/2026/05/what_is_a_dickover"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.theringer.com/2026/05/28/tech/pope-leo-xiv-ai-encyclical-tech-industry-problems"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.e-flux.com/journal/163/6776887/the-useful-narcissist"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.esquire.com/style/a71276009/what-has-happened-to-taste/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://tomstafford.substack.com/p/the-better-algorithms-of-our-nature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://medialab.sciencespo.fr/en/news/de-lideologie-californienne-a-lideologie-texane-conservatisme-religion-et-extractivisme-au-sein-du-secteur-des/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://newbooksnetwork.com/fred-turner-on-countercultures-cybercultures-and-californian-and-texan-ideologies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://kottke.org/26/05/theres-no-earthly-way-of-knowing-which-direction-we-are-going"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAIzA5qCqtU"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2026/05/28/whither-the-nerd-bully-bill-gates/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://psyche.co/turning-points/gazing-through-a-lens-i-invent-as-much-as-i-reveal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0wKS7flwzw"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.theverge.com/tech/927294/substack-tax-ghost-beehiiv"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://psyche.co/ideas/have-online-worlds-become-the-last-free-places-for-children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://open.spotify.com/episode/11zlpahmklfgr8YOUrtLnY"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.theverge.com/tldr/915176/nft-metaverse-ai-weirdos"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.theverge.com/podcast/917029/software-brain-ai-backlash-databases-automation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://freddiedeboer.substack.com/p/we-are-still-living-in-the-long-boring"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://nautil.us/defending-our-consciousness-against-the-algorithms-1279260"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://howtodothingswithmemes.substack.com/p/vertical-video-in-the-democratic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQB2mvUvROw"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://ringmast4r.substack.com/p/we-may-be-living-through-the-most"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.wheresyoured.at/i-will-never-respect-a-website/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://resonantcomputing.org/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://vale.rocks/posts/chinas-web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_2YN1MungI"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://samkriss.substack.com/p/reading-is-magic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://mea.media/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/miseducative-experiences/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.wired.com/story/user-behavior-taylor-lorenz/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.theverge.com/tech/905398/apple-iphone-anniversary-jobs-release"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.anildash.com/2026/03/27/endgame-open-web/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.christianitytoday.com/2026/03/low-tech-parenting-big-tent-judgmentalism-tech-grace/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.thetimes.com/us/news-today/article/deep-springs-college-california-hzhx5bfc0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fcCRmf_tHW8"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://kneelingbus.substack.com/p/remembering-some-guys"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://nautil.us/the-internet-has-not-killed-reading-or-attention-spans-1279171"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.argmin.net/p/cosma-shalizi-is-aware-of-all-internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UwBZiuH-1QY"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://daringfireball.net/2026/03/your_frustration_is_the_product"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://sf.gazetteer.co/fatiguing-fascism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qcf5syA1MlE"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://sf.gazetteer.co/brewster-kahles-memory-palace"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://asteriskmag.substack.com/p/3000-languages-are-dying-but-more"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=paHMe9kFf0w"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://jottit.org/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.anildash.com/2026/02/28/apple-video-podcast-power/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.pbs.org/wnet/americanmasters/dealing-with-the-myth-of-sun-ra/37488/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://genius.com/albums/Depresion-sonora/Los-perros-no-entienden-internet-y-yo-no-entiendo-de-sentimientos"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEq8dlnLP8o"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ln8h3v9hxHU"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://newmediahomework.substack.com/p/a-media-literacy-guide-to-looksmaxxing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jtBSC-ZgCI"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://harmonyholiday.substack.com/p/fourth-of-july-listening-diary">
    <title>Fourth of July Listening Diary - by Harmony Holiday</title>
    <dc:date>2026-07-06T01:21:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://harmonyholiday.substack.com/p/fourth-of-july-listening-diary</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[“It’s perfectly fair to call out this catchy but trifling ear worm of a song-of-the-summer for the psyop it is while at the same time acknowledging why it’s working so well. It’s a fed-designed jingle for the pathologically materialistic, semi-illiterate culture being born again daily on the feed and helping birth a social fabric so thin, transactional, and loveless, this can’t be love, can this be love? Is it a call for demons or an announcement that they’re among us and addicted to retail and infatuation, seeming regal and being lowdown. No minds set them ticking like a fat gold watch.”]]></description>
<dc:subject>harmonyholiday music meterialism culture 2026 internet online web consumerism psyops songs earworms love</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:17891c809c1b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:harmonyholiday"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:music"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meterialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consumerism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:psyops"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:songs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:earworms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:love"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/yasha-levine/surveillance-valley/9781610398039/?lens=publicaffairs">
    <title>Surveillance Valley by Yasha Levine | Hachette Book Group | Hachette Book Group</title>
    <dc:date>2026-07-04T10:29:22+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/yasha-levine/surveillance-valley/9781610398039/?lens=publicaffairs</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The internet is the most effective weapon the government has ever built.

In this fascinating book, investigative reporter Yasha Levine uncovers the secret origins of the internet, tracing it back to a Pentagon counterinsurgency surveillance project.

A visionary intelligence officer, William Godel, realized that the key to winning the war in Vietnam was not outgunning the enemy, but using new information technology to understand their motives and anticipate their movements. This idea — using computers to spy on people and groups perceived as a threat, both at home and abroad — drove ARPA to develop the internet in the 1960s, and continues to be at the heart of the modern internet we all know and use today. As Levine shows, surveillance wasn’t something that suddenly appeared on the internet; it was woven into the fabric of the technology.

But this isn’t just a story about the NSA or other domestic programs run by the government. As the book spins forward in time, Levine examines the private surveillance business that powers tech-industry giants like Google, Facebook, and Amazon, revealing how these companies spy on their users for profit, all while doing double duty as military and intelligence contractors. Levine shows that the military and Silicon Valley are effectively inseparable: a military-digital complex that permeates everything connected to the internet, even coopting and weaponizing the antigovernment privacy movement that sprang up in the wake of Edward Snowden.

With deep research, skilled storytelling, and provocative arguments, Surveillance Valley will change the way you think about the news — and the device on which you read it."]]></description>
<dc:subject>yashalevine 2018 surveillance siliconvalley technofascism internet web online pentagon counterinsurgency us williamgodel vietnamwar arpa 1960s technology google amazon facebook military privacy edwardsnowden news media nsa</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:39277cd35c4a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:yashalevine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2018"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:surveillance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:siliconvalley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technofascism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pentagon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:counterinsurgency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:williamgodel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:vietnamwar"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:arpa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1960s"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:amazon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:facebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:military"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edwardsnowden"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:news"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nsa"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://buymeacoffee.com/ayjay/in-which-i-make-mighty-vow">
    <title>In Which I Make a Mighty Vow — ayjay</title>
    <dc:date>2026-07-04T05:05:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://buymeacoffee.com/ayjay/in-which-i-make-mighty-vow</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["I'm going to begin this report — have y'all noticed that I do one of these each month? — by giving you a long quotation from a post by Anil Dash [https://www.anildash.com/2026/03/27/endgame-open-web/ ]:

</blockquote>The open web is something extraordinary: anybody can use whatever tools they have, to create content following publicly documented specifications, published using completely free and open platforms, and then share that work with anyone, anywhere in the world, without asking for permission from anyone. Think about how radical that is.

    Now, from content to code, communities to culture, we can see example after example of that open web under attack. Every single aspect of the radical architecture I just described is threatened, by those who have profited most from that exact system.

    Today, the good people who act as thoughtful stewards of the web infrastructure are still showing the same generosity of spirit that has created opportunity for billions of people and connected society in ways too vast to count while — not incidentally — also creating trillions of dollars of value and countless jobs around the world. But the increasingly-extremist tycoons of Big Tech have decided that that's not good enough.

    Now, the hectobillionaires have begun their final assault on the last, best parts of what's still open, and likely won't rest until they've either brought all of the independent and noncommercial parts of the Internet under their control, or destroyed them.</blockquote>

There’s a lot of bad news in that post, but I recommend the whole thing. 

I’ve written a good deal over the years about my love for and commitment to the open web, so I won’t re-hash all that here. I’ll just make two points. The first is that my affection for the open web has grown more passionate as I have become more interested in anarchism, that is, in bottom-up collaborative social practices, negotiated among equals — Acts 2 kinda stuff, for those who are into the whole Bible thing. Like Anil Dash, I think the open web is a miracle of unstructured collaboration; it’s a treasure we should work desperately to preserve. 

The second point is a more uncomfortable one. Look: I really hate Substack. I especially loathe the way it has turned itself into a social network that essentially replicates the web within a paywalled platform. (Have you noticed that Substackers almost always just “restack” other writers on the platform and rarely show any awareness of what’s being published outside their Sub-walls? The platform’s architecture really promotes that, to the degree that I wonder if, like Elon’s X, they shadowban outbound links.) In short: Hate hate hate. 

And yet … 

… I have never quite brought myself to the point of saying I will never move to Substack. The reason? Because I know I could make a lot more money on Substack than I make by using Buy Me a Coffee. Indeed, people remind me of this! My friend Freddie deBoer wrote to me recently to say that a post of mine would have done gangbusters on Substack — which would have meant a lot of people impulse-buying subscriptions. That’s the thing about being in that platform ecosystem: thanks to network effects, you get the impulse buyers. That does not happen on Buy Me a Coffee. You all have had to be really intentional about supporting me, which is a great thing. 

Why is it a great thing? Because by writing on the open web and merely asking for support, I have wholly escaped the pressures that come when people have paid money to see your writing and therefore have certain expectations for what you say and how you say it. Also escaped: that other kind of pressure that comes when people really like one particular post and show their liking with money — which plants the idea in the back of your head that you need to write more posts like that … whether you really want to or not. By contrast, y’all have supported me because you see what the whole package is, and know what you’re getting and are likely to continue to get. That’s really wonderful. So I have every reason to keep writing for the open web and merely requesting/hoping for your contributions.

Well, every reason but one, anyway. Why haven’t I forsworn Substack? Simple: I’m afraid that when I retire next year and take a big financial hit, I’ll be poor, or significantly poorer anyway, unless I hawk my wares on that platform. Which is pathetic. That attitude is unworthy of a mature Christian man. 

So — taking a deep breath here — I solemnly affirm before God and my fellow humans that I will never write on Substack. There, I said it. If no one supports my writing I’ll work as a greeter at Walmart — but as for my personal online writing, I pledge my troth to the open web! You heard it here first."]]></description>
<dc:subject>alanjacobs substack anildash decentralization openweb newsletters subscriptions anarchism web internet online bigtech freddiedeboer buymeacoffee writing howwewrite independence christianity 2026</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:407a303ed790/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alanjacobs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:substack"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anildash"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:decentralization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openweb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:newsletters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:subscriptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anarchism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bigtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freddiedeboer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:buymeacoffee"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:independence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christianity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.theverge.com/tech/959848/bittorrent-story-25-years-piracy">
    <title>BitTorrent’s disastrous, legendary, and controversial story | The Verge</title>
    <dc:date>2026-07-03T09:40:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.theverge.com/tech/959848/bittorrent-story-25-years-piracy</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The file-sharing app launched 25 years ago and unleashed a wave of piracy that would shake Hollywood to its core."]]></description>
<dc:subject>bitttorrent 2026 history internet web online p2p filesharing freeculture piracy software film music decentralization hollywood jankoroettgers</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:a15f4a9f79de/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bitttorrent"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:p2p"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:filesharing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freeculture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:piracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:film"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:music"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:decentralization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hollywood"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jankoroettgers"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://daringfireball.net/linked/2026/07/02/orosz-meta-engineering-culture">
    <title>Daring Fireball: 'Why Is Meta Destroying Its Engineering Organization?'</title>
    <dc:date>2026-07-03T05:36:05+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://daringfireball.net/linked/2026/07/02/orosz-meta-engineering-culture</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Gergely Orosz, writing [https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/why-is-meta-destroying-its-engineering ] at The Pragmatic Engineer (which, sadly [https://daringfireball.net/search/substack ], is a Substack blog):

<blockquote>The biggest problem: people stop caring about real work and focus on performative work. Let’s check the four ingredients that Meta’s leadership has decided to introduce to their workplace:

1. Tracking the keyboards and mouse clicks of all engineers, where legally possible
2. Reassign a good chunk of engineers to full-time data labeling
3. Let staff know that 10% of them will be laid off
4. Have a culture where devs optimize for any and all metrics measured during PSC
5. Measure token usage as part of PSC

Shake this mix up well, and what do you get? Two things:

1. Everyone overuses AI to boost their personal stats. An engineering workforce that pretends to work with as much AI, and as little human input, as possible. It’s a strange incentive where an outage caused by a failure to review code properly is not grounds for dismissal, but writing code by hand — instead of having an AI agent write it — could cost you your job.

2. Every longer-tenured engineer is seeking a new job, or at least considering it. Those who have been around at Meta longer term have seen enough.</blockquote>

PSC is “Performance Summary Cycle”, Meta’s stringent cut-throat performance review system. Orosz’s report is extraordinarily well-sourced by current and recently former Meta engineers. Towards the end of the piece, Orosz addresses the “just ask Meta AI to give you the account” Instagram account hijackings [https://daringfireball.net/linked/2026/07/02/meta-ai-ask-for-instagram-accounts ], which he describes, without hyperbole, as “the most embarrassing outage in Meta’s history”. Orosz’s sources report, unsurprisingly, that the breach was the result of AI — AI writing the code, AI reviewing the code, and AI taking over for human technical support.

As for who is responsible, it’s Zuckerberg and AI “genius” Alexandr Wang:

<blockquote>In June that year, Meta acquired a 49% stake in Scale AI to reboot its AI efforts for a whopping $14.8B, and brought in Scale AI’s CEO, Alexandr Wang to take over Meta’s AI strategy. [...] Based on the investment made into Scale AI and Wang, it’s pretty clear that Meta — and Zuckerberg — is determined to build a state-of-the-art LLM that can be competitive with the latest versions of Claude and ChatGPT. But Meta has to start pretty much from scratch, and it’s up to Alexandr Wang to deliver. [...]

    Zuckerberg has full control over the business, and has made the decisions to reallocate a good part of engineering folks to data labeling, to roll out tracking software, and to lay off 10% of staff when Meta achieved record revenue and profits. As the CEO, the buck clearly stops with him.

    But it’s hard to unsee that — outside of layoffs — everything that Meta is doing is taken from the Scale AI playbook, and that surely comes from Wang.</blockquote>

It sounds like in addition to running Meta’s “AI strategy”, Zuckerberg has effectively put Wang in charge of engineering at Meta, and Wang is trying to replace human engineers with AI. During the transition, the job of engineers at Meta has changed from writing code to training AI systems that Zuckerberg and Wang aren’t even trying to hide are intended to replace the people. What the Oompa Loompas were to Willy Wonka, Zuckerberg wants AI to be for him.

I’m not sure it’s any more realistic. Meta has always been a bad company. Now it seems like a bad company that’s lost its fucking mind."]]></description>
<dc:subject>johngruber markzuckerberg meta ai artificialintelligence facebook alexandrwang 2026 gergelyorosz substack management web internet online coding culture morale work labor scaleai llms chatgpt claude</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:ea8a86b4f275/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johngruber"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:markzuckerberg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meta"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:facebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alexandrwang"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gergelyorosz"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:substack"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:management"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:coding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:morale"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scaleai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:llms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatgpt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:claude"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FZy1lBNykA">
    <title>The Richest Country Is Pretty Mid Now - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2026-06-28T22:50:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FZy1lBNykA</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[""Leveragism" is a term I made up, and it describes what the American economy is increasingly heading towards. As you will see, this is really bad news. 

0:00 - About Capitalism
3:53 - Political Leverage
6:01 - The Gold Trap
8:00 - The Rug Pull
11:34 - The Bond Trap
15:23 - Classical Leverage
19:00 - Debts R' Us
20:32 - AI Circlejerk
22:45 - My Awesome Trip To Israel 
29:09 - Authoritarian Leverage
35:01 - Siphoning Your 401K
39:02 - Time and the Smokescreen of Numbers"]]></description>
<dc:subject>bennjordan leveragism capitalism internet online google gemini ai artificialintelligence aibubble journalism rugpulls authoritarianism elonmusk donaldtrump spacex israel gaza anarchism economics economy integrity finance ip intellectualproperty well-being wellbeing precarity gold debt politics us bigtech spotify suno streaming law legal happiness fuckyoumoney inequality money labor wealth laborreflexivity growth borders border privateequity libertarianism tescreal nerdreich peterthiel billackman rulingclass transhumanism extropianism singularitarianism singularity xenophobia inflation extraction rationalism oligarchy larryellison markzuckerberg jeffbezos effectivealtruism longtermism governance government democracy poverty work police policing iranwar austerity retirement maga trumpism muskism wallstreet stockmarket nasdaq indexfunds 401k leverage power policy autonomy obesity surveillance survival fear ice bronnieware life living courage death guatemala coca-cola unions wisdom pollution environment humanrigh</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:e8e53f65ef4f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bennjordan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:leveragism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gemini"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aibubble"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:journalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rugpulls"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:authoritarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elonmusk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:donaldtrump"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:spacex"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:israel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gaza"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anarchism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:integrity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:finance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ip"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:intellectualproperty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:well-being"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wellbeing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:precarity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gold"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:debt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bigtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:spotify"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:suno"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:streaming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:legal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:happiness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fuckyoumoney"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inequality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:money"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wealth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:laborreflexivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:growth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:borders"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:border"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:privateequity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:libertarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tescreal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nerdreich"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:peterthiel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:billackman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rulingclass"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:transhumanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:extropianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:singularitarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:singularity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:xenophobia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inflation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:extraction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rationalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:oligarchy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:larryellison"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:markzuckerberg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jeffbezos"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:effectivealtruism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:longtermism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:governance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:government"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:democracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:poverty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:police"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:iranwar"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:austerity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:retirement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maga"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:trumpism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:muskism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wallstreet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stockmarket"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nasdaq"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:indexfunds"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:401k"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:leverage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:power"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:autonomy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:obesity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:surveillance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:survival"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fear"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bronnieware"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:living"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:courage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:death"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:guatemala"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:coca-cola"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wisdom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pollution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:environment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanrigh"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://runtimewire.com/article/om-malik-taught-silicon-valley-to-read-itself">
    <title>Om Malik taught Silicon Valley to read itself - RuntimeWire</title>
    <dc:date>2026-06-27T07:09:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://runtimewire.com/article/om-malik-taught-silicon-valley-to-read-itself</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["A personal remembrance of the GigaOm founder, True Ventures partner and writer who made Silicon Valley legible, including the late-night founder exchange that showed how his media machine worked."

...

"Om Malik (@Om), the journalist, GigaOm founder, photographer and True Ventures partner whose work tracked the commercial internet from dial-up optimism to AI saturation, died on June 24 at Stanford Hospital after what his family described as a long health journey with his heart, according to a post on On my Om. He was 59.

His family said he was surrounded by family and friends. The post asked readers to share remembrances in comments or on his social accounts, which is exactly right for Malik: he turned a personal site into a public room before the internet turned every public room into a feed.

Here is the part where I break the fourth wall, because the usual obituary distance would be dishonest. I was one of the founders trying to get his attention. In March 2008, late at night, I pitched GigaOm on Ping.fm, the social publishing startup, asking whether the publication wanted to run the story of our new iPhone interface and help give away beta signups. Malik replied within minutes, shortly after 11 p.m.: "can you outline what Ping.fm does? I would love to chat more, but would like to get an idea as to what its all about. :-)"

That exchange was small. It was also the whole system in miniature. A founder could reach the editor directly. The editor was awake. The story was not filtered through a communications department, a conference stage or a banked embargo calendar. Malik helped build that operating system for Silicon Valley media: fast, conversational, porous, technically literate and dangerously close to the companies it covered.

Malik was not just one of the people who covered Silicon Valley. He became one of the people Silicon Valley used to understand itself. That was the gift and the complication of his career. He was a reporter, then a founder, then a venture investor, and he never entirely gave up any of those identities. He could spot a network shift early because he had spent decades watching pipes, protocols, business models and human ego interact at close range. He could also be too close to the machine he covered, a tension that defined the blog era he helped build.

Born and raised in Delhi, Malik earned an undergraduate degree in chemistry from St. Stephen's College before moving through journalism jobs in India, London, Eastern Europe and New York. On his About page, he described himself as a San Francisco-based writer, photographer and investor who had spent three decades in the trenches of Silicon Valley and had been writing about the commercial internet since its birth. Before GigaOm, he worked at Business 2.0, Forbes.com, Red Herring and Quick Nikkei News, and wrote for outlets including The New Yorker, Fast Company, Wired and The Wall Street Journal.

The early biography matters because Malik did not enter technology as a cheerleader. He came through telecom, broadband and infrastructure, the unglamorous substrate under the consumer internet. His 2003 book, Broadbandits: Inside the $750 Billion Telecom Heist, examined the excesses and fraud around the telecom bubble. That made his later enthusiasm for networks more useful. He understood that every platform story had a bill attached, and usually a creditor somewhere in the frame.

The blog as company

Malik started GigaOm as a one-person technology blog in 2001 and, with seed funding from True Ventures, turned it into a media company and research business. True later wrote that shortly after closing its first fund in 2006, it gave Malik a $25,000 check with the note, "Use this to make your dreams come true," and then committed to fund GigaOm's Series A after a formal pitch meeting.

That origin story became part of both Malik's legend and GigaOm's eventual cautionary tale. The company was built like the startups it covered. It carried the ambition of venture-backed scale into a journalism business that depended on advertising, research, events and an audience sophisticated enough to care about cloud infrastructure before cloud infrastructure was obvious.

GigaOm was not as loud as TechCrunch and not as institutional as the business press. Its best work lived in the middle: close enough to startups to see the seams, technical enough to follow the architecture, skeptical enough to resist the worst demo-day theater. If you were building in that era, you knew what a GigaOm mention meant. It meant someone who understood the stack might take you seriously.

That is why the late-night Ping.fm exchange belongs in the story. It is not here as nostalgia. It shows the market structure Malik helped create. Founders had direct channels to writers. Writers had direct channels to readers. Publications could move at startup speed because they were startups. The upside was intimacy and signal. The downside was that everyone stood a little too close to everyone else.

Malik stepped away from day-to-day writing and became a full-time partner at True Ventures in 2014. TechCrunch, covering the move at the time, wrote that Malik was leaving professional journalism after years of the 24-hour news cycle, and quoted him saying the constant stream had come at a personal cost. The move formalized what had already been true for years: Malik was no longer only an observer of founders. He had become one.

The collapse that shadowed the legend

The hardest part of Malik's legacy is GigaOm's 2015 failure. The company shut down abruptly in March of that year after saying it was unable to pay its creditors in full. Staff lost jobs. The archive and brand later changed hands. For readers and employees, the shutdown was not an elegant sunset. It was the sudden stop that exposes how fragile even respected media institutions can be when they borrow the financing logic of the companies they cover.

The numbers were not small. A Recode account republished by the Benton Institute for Broadband & Society reported that GigaOm had raised around $40 million in equity and debt over eight years, including about $5 million from a 2011 venture debt round, and that by the end of 2014 it was spending about $400,000 a month on rent and interest payments. The Guardian later framed the closure as a lesson in what happens when a niche journalism business takes on Silicon Valley's growth expectations without Silicon Valley's software margins.

That is the bad part, and it should not be airbrushed. Malik's creation proved that a technology publication could be born on the web, build authority without legacy distribution and compete with trade magazines and newspapers on its own terms. It also proved that influence, respect and smart coverage do not automatically produce a durable balance sheet. In the end, GigaOm became a warning to every founder-journalist who believed audience love, investor money and events revenue could be fused into a stable media company.

The investor-writer contradiction

Malik's second act at True Ventures was cleaner financially but messier editorially. True's profile says he became a venture partner in 2008, a partner in 2014 and partner emeritus in 2020, investing in networking and infrastructure technologies while guiding the firm on technology trends. His own bio lists investments and board roles tied to companies such as Ditto, Petasense, Academia.edu, Socialcast, Lexity, Glider, MessageMe, Storehouse, TwinPrime, Over, Opendoor and IntentionNet.

That placed him in the same contradiction occupied by several blog-era figures: the people with the best taste in startups often had the strongest incentives around startups. Malik managed that tension better than most because his writing, especially in later years on On my Om, became less about scoops and more about judgment. He wrote about technology, photography, business cycles, health, memory and the human cost of living inside the network. He preferred the long arc to the launch post. He was still a participant, but his best work did not read like portfolio maintenance.

His eye for early signals was real. TechCrunch called him one of the forefathers of professional tech news blogging and noted that he was among the first bloggers to cover Twitter's launch and to break the news of TechCrunch's acquisition by AOL. Malik later revisited his own early Twitter experience in a 2020 On my Om essay, writing that he may have been the first non-employee user after Noah Glass told him about the service outside a San Francisco party. That memory captured both the innocence and the eventual exhaustion of the social web: a hungry reporter stepping outside for nicotine, hearing about a strange messaging product, publishing a post, then watching the whole internet reorganize itself around the behavior.

What he leaves behind

Malik's place in Silicon Valley lore is not that he built the biggest media company, made the most money as an investor or won every prediction. He did not. His significance is that he made technology legible at the moment the industry learned to narrate itself in real time.

He belonged to the generation that sat between magazine-era business reporting and the permanent feed. He knew the old discipline of beat reporting, the new speed of blogging and the founder psychology underneath both. He could be sentimental about tools and ruthless about hype. He loved networks, but he also understood that networks eat attention, sleep and health.

That final point was not abstract. Malik wrote publicly that a major heart attack in 2007 changed his focus and priorities. His family's statement this week gives that part of his life a final, blunt punctuation. The heart story was not a side note to the work. It shaped the quieter, more reflective Om of the past decade: the photographer of minimal landscapes, the writer skeptical of jargon, the investor more interested in durable shifts than noise.

I keep coming back to that 11 p.m. reply because it explains why so many founders, writers and investors are stopping today. Malik did not just write about the internet. He behaved like the internet when the internet still felt like a place where a direct question could open a door. He was curious, fast, opinionated and present.

The Valley will remember Malik because he was there early, but that undersells him. Plenty of people were early. Malik mattered because he understood that being early was not enough. You had to connect the technical fact to the business consequence, the business consequence to the human one, and the human one back to the story people told themselves about progress. That was his beat. It remains the beat everyone else is still trying to cover."]]></description>
<dc:subject>ommalik ryanmerket 2026 technology siliconvalley sanfrancisco journalism blogging media vc venturecapital internet web online telecommunication pace priorities hype feeds techcrunch gigaom trueventures investment writing howwewrite</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:d583e209ff65/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ommalik"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ryanmerket"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:siliconvalley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sanfrancisco"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:journalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:blogging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:vc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:venturecapital"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:telecommunication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pace"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:priorities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hype"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:feeds"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:techcrunch"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gigaom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:trueventures"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:investment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.businessinsider.com/ai-social-scene-curated-offline-events-dinner-parties-2026-6">
    <title>AI's Social Scene Is Shifting to Curated Offline Events, Dinner Parties - Business Insider</title>
    <dc:date>2026-06-26T01:15:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.businessinsider.com/ai-social-scene-curated-offline-events-dinner-parties-2026-6</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[[In which the AI-saturated tech space is slowly rejecting its own dogfood of optimization, scalability, and slop. They seem to be slowly re-inventing the humanities and liberal arts that they skipped and derided.]

"If "taste" is the buzzword in the AI world right now, then IRL events have become the best way to demonstrate it.

As AI becomes more competitive and taste — the idea of having superior aesthetic judgment — emerges as a key differentiator, AI companies and young founders are hosting intimate, curated gatherings — often dinner parties — to cultivate cool and build real-world communities.

<blockquote>Hosting an intimate dinner in sf for lore builders.

    Founders, narrative architects, writers, world builders. Humans at the intersection of storytelling x culture x craft x storytelling x philosophy x design.

    Keeping it to <10. Who should be in the room? 🫶
    — Joumana (@JoumanaElomar) June 23, 2026 [https://x.com/JoumanaElomar/status/2069509402437222482 ]</blockquote>

Many of these curated events follow a similar blueprint: a promo that looks like an A24 film poster and grainy, film-like photos that make it feel more like a 90s-era house party than a tech founders' event.

"I think trusted (human) curation is so important now, even more than ever," said Michelle Fang, who leads Stripe Startups, a program offering financial support and resources to early-stage, venture-backed companies, and has a weekly newsletter that rounds up in-person tech events in San Francisco.

Fang said that when she first started the newsletter in 2023, she posted an average of 20 to 30 in-person events a week. That number has now risen to 70 to 80 a week.

"There's been a noticeable shift in both the frequency and types of events happening in SF, especially over the past year," she said.

AI has accelerated this trend dramatically, she said, as the AI boom brings an influx of talent who want to establish their community in the city.

While some of the events Fang has listed are traditional building workshops and hackathons, others include Pilates classes, peptide tasting parties — the latest self-optimization craze — and "intentionally curated" dinners.

It's a vibe shift from the large happy hours and networking events that defined post-pandemic tech socializing, said Fang. These smaller events don't require a big budget or venue, and with the speed of AI growth, people want to make sense of new concepts and the changes happening in real time, she said.

[image: "Dinner table with bowls of sushi and edamame at an event hosted by coworking and tech events startup Verci's / Verci, a coworking space and events startup, hosts monthly dinners and workshops for members.  Ami Yoshimura/Verci"]

'Taste is a new core skill'

The taste conversation kicked off earlier this year when Y Combinator cofounder Paul Graham wrote in a post on X that, as AI democratizes building, "taste will become even more important."

Two days later, OpenAI President Greg Brockman cemented the catchphrase on X, writing that "Taste is a new core skill." Since then, it's led the tech world to hyperfocus on AI companies and founders who are winning the taste battle.

Alongside the taste discourse, being offline has become a status symbol. Having the ability to de-digitalize is seen as a luxury and a way to connect with people more authentically, with in-person events being a means to achieve this, especially for those whose working lives already revolve around AI.

<blockquote>peak bengaluru and bangerlore pic.twitter.com/1imEhjhCBX
    — prerna (@Prerrrrna_) June 7, 2026 [https://x.com/Prerrrrna_/status/2063545613632037129 ]</blockquote>

An event "only for hot people and nerds" in Bangalore, which appeared to be in collaboration with the early-stage Bangalore-based consumer tech company Faff, made the rounds on X earlier this month. The vibe is artfully arranged cheese boards, trendy cocktail menus (with AI puns), and grainy photos.

Ami Yoshimura, the 23-year-old cofounder of Verci, a members club and coworking space in New York, hosts events such as rooftop parties and multi-day retreats for founders and creatives. "Relationships, aesthetics, and telling a story" have become crucial ways to stand out in the hyper-competitive AI industry, he said.
Small parties, big bucks

It's not just San Francisco that is seeing this event boom.

<blockquote>new york tech week highlights:1. went blind into an event hosted by @join_ef and successfully met a group of really cool people with 0 degrees of mutual connection2. met/made some really good friends from url ➡️ irl shoutout fonzi and corgi team3. ended off the week with a… pic.twitter.com/CA3h0mwmLe
    — sara kong (@saraknggg) June 8, 2026 [https://x.com/saraknggg/status/2064047927702782454 *]</blockquote>

Katia Ameri, a partner at A16z who spearheads Tech Week in San Francisco, LA, and New York City, wrote on X last month that New York was so far the largest Tech Week in history by events and attendees. The LA and San Francisco equivalents are coming up later this year.

Eliza Wu, cofounder of Corner, a social mapping app that describes itself as "Google but social," wrote in a post on X that there were over 600 RSVPs for a panel she was hosting at New York Tech Week.

Leading AI companies are also taking note. In April, Anthropic posted a brand events lead role in San Francisco, with a salary of up to $400,000.

There are four open marketing events positions at Anthropic, while OpenAI has two open positions for events, commanding over $200,000 salaries with options to gain equity too.

<blockquote>Anthropic is paying up to $400,000 a year for an events role.They're looking for someone to own the execution of brand experiences that translate Anthropic's values into physical moments.This person will produce everything from intimate thought-leadership gatherings to… pic.twitter.com/SWvmSarclY
    — Andrew Yeung (@andruyeung) April 26, 2026 [https://x.com/andruyeung/status/2048545188608364593 ** (archived: https://www.are.na/block/47316282 )]</blockquote>

Andrew Yeung, an ex-Google and Meta product lead turned event host and angel investor, wrote on X in response to the job advert that it shows Anthropic understands that "they need to create visceral, unforgettable IRL experiences that make complex technology feel accessible and human."

"The massive opportunity now is offline, analog, in-person," he said.

But while the taste that goes into hosting a party is human, we are living in an AI world — and as with your job applications, an AI screener might still be standing between you and an invitation.

Wu, the cofounder who hosted a New York Tech Week event with 600 RSVPs, said she turned to Claude to winnow down her guest list.

She said she prompted the chatbot to scan through potential attendees' social posts to identify "markers of excellence" and to suss out the "quality of their thoughts."

With the help of Claude, only 300 people made the cut."

[* full text of https://x.com/saraknggg/status/2064047927702782454:

<blockquote>new york tech week highlights:

1. went blind into an event hosted by @join_ef and successfully met a group of really cool people with 0 degrees of mutual connection
2. met/made some really good friends from url ➡️ irl shoutout fonzi and corgi team
3. ended off the week with a bang at vega (shoutout ben & maddie)

i think when it boils down to WHAT constitutes a good event, it varies based off what your specific persona is trying to get out of it.

for me, events with well-catered hospitality that are more intimate (without just randomly throwing people together sloppily) call out more to me because you make more solidified relationships. 

likewise, it’s good to put an online face to a name because that alone can unlock so much trust and future opportunities.

see you soon nyc!</blockquote>

** full text of https://x.com/andruyeung/status/2048545188608364593

<blockquote>Anthropic is paying up to $400,000 a year for an events role.

They're looking for someone to own the execution of brand experiences that translate Anthropic's values into physical moments.

This person will produce everything from intimate thought-leadership gatherings to large-scale industry activations.

The top AI research lab in the world recognizes that to cross the chasm and reach everyday consumers, they need to lean into hospitality. They need to create visceral, unforgettable IRL experiences that make complex technology feel accessible and human.

They understand that digital channels are getting increasingly saturated. Every feed is flooded with AI content... every inbox is overflowing.

The massive opportunity now is offline, analog, in-person.

The companies that win in the next decade won't just have the best product but the most emotional in-person presence and the most compelling storytelling.

If you're in events, experiential marketing, or brand activations, this is your moment. The biggest tech companies in the world are betting on you.

[two images of the job posting]</blockquote>]]]></description>
<dc:subject>ai artificialintelligence siliconvalley technology 2026 royashahidi small humanities liberalarts culture taste anthropic claude aislop paulgraham elizawu corner saraking amiyoshimura joumanaelomar michellefang stripestartups social events community aibubble gregbrockman openai status offline online socialmedia internet katiaameri a16z andreessenhorowitz andrewyeung google meta nytechweek sanfrancisco society analog</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:7c5d13ca6f52/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:siliconvalley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:royashahidi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:small"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:liberalarts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:taste"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anthropic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:claude"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aislop"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:paulgraham"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elizawu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:corner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:saraking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:amiyoshimura"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:joumanaelomar"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:michellefang"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stripestartups"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:social"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:events"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aibubble"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gregbrockman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:status"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:offline"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:katiaameri"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:a16z"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:andreessenhorowitz"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:andrewyeung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meta"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nytechweek"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sanfrancisco"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:analog"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HNEKJNOHiOk">
    <title>Democrats Don't Know what &quot;Affordability&quot; Actually Means, with Dino Guastella - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2026-06-25T09:45:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HNEKJNOHiOk</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Politicians love to talk about lowering prices, but they really don’t like to talk about the other half of the equation: actually raising wages. That’s because the institutions of our government treat us as consumers first, and actual human beings with a role in society second. This week, Adam speaks with Dustin "Dino" Guastella, Director of Operations for Teamsters Local 623 and research associate with the Center for Working-Class Politics, about how the Democratic Party has lost track of what “affordability” actually means, and how a basic shift in perspective can actually begin to address the needs of working people."]]></description>
<dc:subject>dinoguastella 2025 adamconover politics policy democrats republicans labor workers workingclass nafta billclinton barackobama ronaldreagan unions organizing dinguastella affordability industrialization industry deindustrializaiton fairtrade freedtrade mexico border borders immigration donaldtrump ezraklein zohranmamdani wages government infrastructure newdeal history class society robertputnam bowlingalone islolation socialmedia internet digital online web loneliness isolation advocacy nonprofit nonprofits atomization howarddean 2004 afl-cio uaw elections teamsters</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:4a16a13fb6f8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dinoguastella"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2025"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:adamconover"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:democrats"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:republicans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:workers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:workingclass"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nafta"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:billclinton"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:barackobama"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ronaldreagan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:organizing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dinguastella"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:affordability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:industrialization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:industry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:deindustrializaiton"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fairtrade"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freedtrade"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mexico"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:border"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:borders"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:immigration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:donaldtrump"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ezraklein"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:zohranmamdani"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wages"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:government"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:infrastructure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:newdeal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:class"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robertputnam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bowlingalone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:islolation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:digital"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:loneliness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:isolation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:advocacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nonprofit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nonprofits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:atomization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howarddean"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2004"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:afl-cio"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:uaw"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elections"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teamsters"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://berjon.com/rt/">
    <title>The Retweeting Class</title>
    <dc:date>2026-06-23T09:58:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://berjon.com/rt/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Philosopher Timothy Morton has a move which I like: they talk about retweeting ideas to describe the ways in which we uncritically reproduce a pre-existing position. What I like about it is that it is not about lack of originality or reusing existing ideas. It's of course fine to reuse ideas and there's nothing wrong in being unoriginal so long as we've made the effort to consider the matter. What retweeting ideas conveys is the unthinking ease — it's a one-click mental process — with which we just repeat something we've heard without really taking its structure, motivating origin, perspective, or consequences on board.

We all do it to some degree of course, but some people do it almost exclusively. For reasons that I will get to, it is the backbone of their epistemology and this has interesting consequences that I detail below. One thing that's notable is that the people who favour a worldview built exclusively of retweeted ideas is that they congregate. They prefer one another's company to the company of those (from any political side) with a stronger tendency to interrogate their own assumptions. We can think of them, essentially, as the Retweeting Class.

We all go about trying to achieve a variety of aims, and the way in which we do so is through activities. An activity can be said to be "coherent" when it is "well designed for the achievement of its aim, even though it cannot be expected to be successful in each and every instance."1 Nothing Earth-shattering here — if you aim to meet someone in the northern part of town and you get on the northbound bus, that's a coherent activity. If you get on the southbound bus, let alone if you do nothing other than start baking a kiwi cobbler or belting out Céline Dion karaoke, then those are not activities coherent with the achievement of your aims. I know that this is basic stuff, but bear with me because there's an epistemology to it: we can see that "the empirical truth of a statement consists in the positive role it can play in facilitating operationally coherent activities" and something is real when "it can be employed in coherent activities that rely on its existence and its basic properties."1 To stick to my metaphor, you would consider a bus map to be true if by following its directions you got to where you wanted to go. If what you're holding is the bus map to another city, then you're going to consider it wrong.

Most of us are trying to accomplish something concrete of one sort or another. If we fail not once but consistently, at some point we'll want to revisit our assumptions. If none of the readymade ideas seem to work, we'll go looking for novel ones, either by imagining them or by looking farther afield. Again, this is all rather evident even though getting it right matters, but it does lead to the question: how do people in the Retweeting Class just keep parroting unexamined ideas without ever being shaken awake by a reality check?

And the answer is: because none of them are interested in accomplishing anything of substance, their aims revolve entirely around being acceptable to one another. Their truth — which they are pursuing competently, even intelligently, as agents — is not about change but about propriety. Ideas, for them, are evaluated based on whether they are proper or not and people in that group succeed based on their ability to reheat one harmless, socially-acceptable idea after another. To reiterate: it's not that they're wrong, it's that the truth that emerges from their purpose is largely detached from any consequence that would be considered meaningful to the rest of us."]]></description>
<dc:subject>howwewrite twitter thinking howwethink robinberjon criticalthinking timothymorton conversation llms automation friction debate seriousness nicolashénin elonmusk retweeting socialmedia internet web online substance blocklists tedunderwood bluesky</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:f36105a0af1c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwethink"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robinberjon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:criticalthinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:timothymorton"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conversation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:llms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:automation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:friction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:debate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:seriousness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nicolashénin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elonmusk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:retweeting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:substance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:blocklists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tedunderwood"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bluesky"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.robinsloan.com/lab/de-datafication/">
    <title>De-datafication</title>
    <dc:date>2026-06-20T09:19:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.robinsloan.com/lab/de-datafication/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["I absolutely LOVE the premise of this upcoming conference at Georgetown Law: Life After Data [https://www.law.georgetown.edu/privacy-technology-center/education/life-after-data-the-conference-on-de-datafication/ ], the conference on “de-datafication”.

I predict you’re going to be hearing a lot more about this theme in the years ahead; the exhaustion is real. Here are a few tasty selections from the list of provocations on the conference page:

• What would it take to build a movement to abandon the current internet and start anew?

• What’s something good that currently requires the production and storage of digital data, that could be rebuilt without it? How?

• What aspects of our current political situation are obscured or concealed by conflating all communication with information exchange, and how does datafication contribute to that obfuscation?

• Outline one or more aspects of the risk environment that is created when a small number of large corporations control the infrastructures upon which people depend in their daily lives.

Whoever rattled these off is thinking in exactly the right direction — they are bold and wonky and radical and inspiring.

(Of course, I’ll note that these themes “rhyme” with the arguments in my recent zine productions.)"]]></description>
<dc:subject>robinsloan data de-datafication 2026 internet web online infrastructure corporations centralization datafication</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:1aacad302c7f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robinsloan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:de-datafication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:infrastructure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:corporations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:centralization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:datafication"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Sd3O-b-oPw">
    <title>EXPOSED: Israel's DARKEST TikTok SECRET - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2026-06-18T10:55:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Sd3O-b-oPw</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><dc:subject>israel zionism tiktok us palestine genocide ethniccleansing 2026 internet socialmedia propaganda oracle larryellison adampresser marcorubio mittromney benjaminnetanyahu hasbara donaldtrump media iof idf suppression safracatz technology bigtech 2015 ehudbarak 2024 2025 finance privateequity occupation gaza settlercolonialism colonialism colonization westbank yurimilner michaeldell</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:dea56b5d3273/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:israel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:zionism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tiktok"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:palestine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:genocide"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ethniccleansing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:propaganda"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:oracle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:larryellison"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:adampresser"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marcorubio"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mittromney"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:benjaminnetanyahu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hasbara"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:donaldtrump"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:iof"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:idf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:suppression"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:safracatz"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bigtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2015"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ehudbarak"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2024"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2025"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:finance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:privateequity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:occupation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gaza"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:settlercolonialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colonialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colonization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:westbank"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:yurimilner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:michaeldell"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2026/06/a-resurgence-of-educational-localism-a-review-of-skipping-school/">
    <title>A Resurgence of Educational Localism? A Review of Skipping School - Front Porch Republic</title>
    <dc:date>2026-06-17T10:52:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2026/06/a-resurgence-of-educational-localism-a-review-of-skipping-school/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Unusually for books on homeschooling, Skipping School is written for both scholarly and general audiences."]]></description>
<dc:subject>emilywenneborg homeschool unschooling education schooling schools dixiedillonlane history us children parenting miltongaither robertkunzman shawnpeters jamesdwyer dorothymoore raymondmoore johnholt hslda internet web online covid-19 coronavirus pandemic local localism</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:326404b46995/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:emilywenneborg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:homeschool"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unschooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dixiedillonlane"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:parenting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:miltongaither"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robertkunzman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:shawnpeters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jamesdwyer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dorothymoore"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:raymondmoore"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnholt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hslda"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:covid-19"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:coronavirus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pandemic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:local"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:localism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/twenty-five-years-after-imagined-worlds-what-world-are-we-living-in">
    <title>Twenty Five Years After Imagined Worlds, What World Are We Living In? | THR Web Features | Web Features | The Hedgehog Review</title>
    <dc:date>2026-06-07T00:41:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/twenty-five-years-after-imagined-worlds-what-world-are-we-living-in</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Our surprisingly Napoleonic twenty-first century."

[via: https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/twenty-five-years-after-imagined-worlds-what-world-are-we-living-in ]

"Erik J. Larson

Erik J. Larson is author of The Myth of Artificial Intelligence: Why Computers Can't Think the Way We Do (Harvard University Press, 2021). His forthcoming book is Machineland: How the Myth of Artificial Intelligence Has Shaped the 21st Century So Far.

***

This year marks the twenty-fifth anniversary of famed scientist and author Freeman Dyson’s Imagined Worlds. The book, fashioned from a series of lectures Dyson gave in Jerusalem in 1995, is partly a historical discussion about why technologies—some familiar, like nuclear power, others not, like airships—succeed or fail in what he called a Darwinian process of selection. It’s also an enjoyable piece of futurism. He delighted in the possible, and in Imagined Worlds he speculated boldly about space colonization and an entirely new species evolved from future humans. Dyson was aware of the difficulties of prediction—Imagined Worlds fails to anticipate the rise of the Internet or World Wide Web—yet like H.G. Wells, whom Dyson admired, he leaves us with a sense of having encountered important ideas on a journey led by someone who knows the terrain.  

Imagined Worlds was Dyson’s attempt to explore, as he put it, “the interaction of technology with human affairs.” Like the philosopher of science Thomas Kuhn, he thought science “moved ahead along old directions” until a conceptual revolution. Unlike Kuhn, he thought scientific revolutions could also be driven by tools, by technology. He explained that science and technology entered “Napoleonic” phases, when big institutions with deep pockets set research agendas, and “Tolstoyan” periods, when scientists engage more in tinkering and exploration. Napoleonic was “rigid organization and discipline”; Tolstoyan was “creative chaos and freedom.” Where are we now?

Science and technology today are Napoleonic. Silicon Valley is now Big Tech, the age of garage start-ups being long behind us. Neuroscience is pursued with “exascale” supercomputers and big data. Ditto physics, which also relies on billion-dollar particle accelerators like CERN’s seventeen kilometer long Large Hadron Collider. Consumers—you and me—now provide data to cloud servers, centralized repositories (“cloud” is a misnomer) of massive datasets owned by a relatively small number of governments and organizations. If anyone is “tinkering” with science and technology these days, they are not making the news. We live in Napoleonic times.

The world circa 2000 was not Napoleonic. Little more than two decades ago people were experimenting madly with technologies, business models, and seemingly everything else. Business theorists predicted that industries would demassify and disintermediate, old media gatekeepers would fall, products like encyclopedias would simply disappear, and entire industries would revamp, collapse, reshape, and emerge. Not just the tech world but the entire world seemed to be in a constant state of flux. Venture capital flowed out of a cornucopia. The NASDAQ hit 5,000 in March 2000, though the dot-com bubble burst roughly a year later. 

In the years before that setback, when Imagined Worlds was published, ideas about the future direction of science and technology were diverse, interesting, and abundant. Kevin Kelly, co-founder of Wired magazine, predicted in his 1998 hit New Rules for the New Economy that computer networks would replace the PC as the dominant feature of information technology. He missed the iPhone, understandably, but he saw the future of the Web not as PCs with modems but as a vast network of devices. In essence, he predicted the Internet of Things. Kelly envisioned the coming networked world, the new web, as “ground up,” amounting to a kind of revolution in business and society in which, instead of corporate bosses sitting atop hierarchies executing plans, networks of people would conjure and promote ideas in waves of unpredictable innovation. New Rules for the New Economy reads like a paean to creativity and human freedom, all made possible by liberating society from the old stodgy big business models and yesterday's tech and ideas. Kelly was foretelling a Tolstoyan future, Dyson’s “creative chaos and freedom.”

But surprising to many, big business made a reappearance in the “new economy.” In her now famous 2002 book Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital, business theorist Carlota Perez argued that investment frenzy and stock market crashes precede periods of technology maturation, in which the promise and fruits of a tech revolution become evident. Technology revolutions have an installment phase, she wrote, followed by a deployment phase. Then (if conditions are right) comes a “golden age” marked by growth, employment, and successful consolidation of new businesses and industries. Like Google. And Facebook. Perez's analysis—applicable to earlier golden ages, such as those of steel and electricity, oil, and mass production—accurately predicted what would happen to the Web as it matured in the new century.

What Perez didn't see—or didn't discuss—was the connection between the Napoleonic changes in society and culture and the maturing phases of a tech revolution. She described this calcification in terms of the economy—dwindling profits, unemployment. Dyson described it in terms of the minds of scientists and practitioners—a loss of creative chaos and freedom. A rigidified status quo. Today’s status quo is data-driven AI and Big Tech. Google, Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. If Kelly’s “new economy” at the turn of the century was a soft drink, the world we inhabit today is a 7-11 Big Gulp. Kelly and others of his ilk assumed networking meant Tolstoyan freedom. Like others, he assumed a “power-to-the-people” movement would derail big corporations and gate keepers and empower Everyday Joes. Big Brother was supposed to disappear, not return on steroids.

Enter the new Napoleonic. Predictably, tech pundits and critics have largely abandoned bottom-up rhetoric for worries about top-down big data collection, housed in server farms owned by big tech companies. Our imagined world has become a kind of bureau of statistics for government and big business (and science), which treat digital data as intelligence and value, not as something connected to billions of humans and their ideas.

We can’t lay the blame on Big Tech alone. The data-centric model was an irresistible path to profits and growth. The Web was bound to mature commercially one way or the other, and large—not small—companies were the likely result.

But the “bureau of statistics” mindset is now a problem. It dominates thinking everywhere, not just in technology businesses aiming for sticky ads and more captive users. Nearly every institution one can point to today, from government to science, media, medicine, insurance, and many others, embraces a centralized, data-capture model requiring massive computing resources and actively downplaying human ingenuity in favor of number crunching and prediction. More troubling perhaps, is the way this has shaped the zeitgeist. Confidence in human smarts and imagination seems at an all-time low. Entire books are written now on how people are, in effect, cognitively biased, limited, and indeed stupid. Given this cultural climate, Dyson’s time of “creative chaos and freedom” seems not only distant but beyond recovery.

Dyson called the Cold War science of the 1950s and 1960s Napoleonic because research occurred mostly in huge companies like RAND and involved teasing out the implications of earlier scientific results from brilliant Tolstoyan tinkerers like Max Plank or Albert Einstein. As in our present time, results were achieved through the investment of huge sums of money, and were typically conservative in scope, reflecting already formed interests and agendas. Much of the money during that time was spent on making larger fission, then fusion bombs. The math was already done. That time and ours both correspond to Perez’s depiction of a fully matured technology revolution showing signs of slowdown and decay. We seem to have wandered into the 1950s again, this time with Web companies instead of IBM and General Motors.

Artificial intelligence has become thoroughly Napoleonic as well. It is a textbook case in calcification. Large, central repositories of data now power ubiquitous artificial intelligence algorithms, which are great for self-navigating drones and automated surveillance cameras but frustratingly poor at basic conversation and other cherished facets of human intelligence. Among other worries, data-centric AI today requires massive amounts of old-fashioned electricity, still largely supplied by conventional fossil fuels. And the central data version of AI is adept at various forms of malfeasance, as everyone now knows. We are increasingly caught in fake news and deep fakes of facial and other unreal images, generated by today’s Big Data AI. Depressingly, the seventy-plus-year program of artificial intelligence is largely equated with centralized data repositories and statistical number crunching today. Younger generations probably don’t know that Napoleonic, Big Data AI is only one approach, one way of conceiving machine intelligence. Big Data AI makes sense in a fully matured technology world, with big players like Google and Facebook. It doesn’t make sense for Tolstoyan tinkerers, who have no access to supercomputers or petabytes of others’ personal data.

Fortunately, the twenty-first century is still young. A little over two decades into the last century was—true—a midway point between two catastrophic wars. But scientists were enjoying Tostoyan freedom. Relativity and then quantum mechanics were discovered, without the supervision or control of big science or big business. Henry Ford was mass producing automobiles, but automobiles would enjoy decades of further Tolstoyan tinkering. Tellingly, computers had not arrived in 1922, and no one anticipated the revolution they would bring. We can only wonder what imagined, and unimagined, worlds still await us in this century.Our surprisingly Napoleonic twenty-first century.

[via: https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/twenty-five-years-after-imagined-worlds-what-world-are-we-living-in ]

Erik J. Larson

Erik J. Larson is author of The Myth of Artificial Intelligence: Why Computers Can't Think the Way We Do (Harvard University Press, 2021). His forthcoming book is Machineland: How the Myth of Artificial Intelligence Has Shaped the 21st Century So Far.



This year marks the twenty-fifth anniversary of famed scientist and author Freeman Dyson’s Imagined Worlds. The book, fashioned from a series of lectures Dyson gave in Jerusalem in 1995, is partly a historical discussion about why technologies—some familiar, like nuclear power, others not, like airships—succeed or fail in what he called a Darwinian process of selection. It’s also an enjoyable piece of futurism. He delighted in the possible, and in Imagined Worlds he speculated boldly about space colonization and an entirely new species evolved from future humans. Dyson was aware of the difficulties of prediction—Imagined Worlds fails to anticipate the rise of the Internet or World Wide Web—yet like H.G. Wells, whom Dyson admired, he leaves us with a sense of having encountered important ideas on a journey led by someone who knows the terrain.  

Imagined Worlds was Dyson’s attempt to explore, as he put it, “the interaction of technology with human affairs.” Like the philosopher of science Thomas Kuhn, he thought science “moved ahead along old directions” until a conceptual revolution. Unlike Kuhn, he thought scientific revolutions could also be driven by tools, by technology. He explained that science and technology entered “Napoleonic” phases, when big institutions with deep pockets set research agendas, and “Tolstoyan” periods, when scientists engage more in tinkering and exploration. Napoleonic was “rigid organization and discipline”; Tolstoyan was “creative chaos and freedom.” Where are we now?

Science and technology today are Napoleonic. Silicon Valley is now Big Tech, the age of garage start-ups being long behind us. Neuroscience is pursued with “exascale” supercomputers and big data. Ditto physics, which also relies on billion-dollar particle accelerators like CERN’s seventeen kilometer long Large Hadron Collider. Consumers—you and me—now provide data to cloud servers, centralized repositories (“cloud” is a misnomer) of massive datasets owned by a relatively small number of governments and organizations. If anyone is “tinkering” with science and technology these days, they are not making the news. We live in Napoleonic times.

The world circa 2000 was not Napoleonic. Little more than two decades ago people were experimenting madly with technologies, business models, and seemingly everything else. Business theorists predicted that industries would demassify and disintermediate, old media gatekeepers would fall, products like encyclopedias would simply disappear, and entire industries would revamp, collapse, reshape, and emerge. Not just the tech world but the entire world seemed to be in a constant state of flux. Venture capital flowed out of a cornucopia. The NASDAQ hit 5,000 in March 2000, though the dot-com bubble burst roughly a year later. 

In the years before that setback, when Imagined Worlds was published, ideas about the future direction of science and technology were diverse, interesting, and abundant. Kevin Kelly, co-founder of Wired magazine, predicted in his 1998 hit New Rules for the New Economy that computer networks would replace the PC as the dominant feature of information technology. He missed the iPhone, understandably, but he saw the future of the Web not as PCs with modems but as a vast network of devices. In essence, he predicted the Internet of Things. Kelly envisioned the coming networked world, the new web, as “ground up,” amounting to a kind of revolution in business and society in which, instead of corporate bosses sitting atop hierarchies executing plans, networks of people would conjure and promote ideas in waves of unpredictable innovation. New Rules for the New Economy reads like a paean to creativity and human freedom, all made possible by liberating society from the old stodgy big business models and yesterday's tech and ideas. Kelly was foretelling a Tolstoyan future, Dyson’s “creative chaos and freedom.”

But surprising to many, big business made a reappearance in the “new economy.” In her now famous 2002 book Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital, business theorist Carlota Perez argued that investment frenzy and stock market crashes precede periods of technology maturation, in which the promise and fruits of a tech revolution become evident. Technology revolutions have an installment phase, she wrote, followed by a deployment phase. Then (if conditions are right) comes a “golden age” marked by growth, employment, and successful consolidation of new businesses and industries. Like Google. And Facebook. Perez's analysis—applicable to earlier golden ages, such as those of steel and electricity, oil, and mass production—accurately predicted what would happen to the Web as it matured in the new century.

What Perez didn't see—or didn't discuss—was the connection between the Napoleonic changes in society and culture and the maturing phases of a tech revolution. She described this calcification in terms of the economy—dwindling profits, unemployment. Dyson described it in terms of the minds of scientists and practitioners—a loss of creative chaos and freedom. A rigidified status quo. Today’s status quo is data-driven AI and Big Tech. Google, Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. If Kelly’s “new economy” at the turn of the century was a soft drink, the world we inhabit today is a 7-11 Big Gulp. Kelly and others of his ilk assumed networking meant Tolstoyan freedom. Like others, he assumed a “power-to-the-people” movement would derail big corporations and gate keepers and empower Everyday Joes. Big Brother was supposed to disappear, not return on steroids.

Enter the new Napoleonic. Predictably, tech pundits and critics have largely abandoned bottom-up rhetoric for worries about top-down big data collection, housed in server farms owned by big tech companies. Our imagined world has become a kind of bureau of statistics for government and big business (and science), which treat digital data as intelligence and value, not as something connected to billions of humans and their ideas.

We can’t lay the blame on Big Tech alone. The data-centric model was an irresistible path to profits and growth. The Web was bound to mature commercially one way or the other, and large—not small—companies were the likely result.

But the “bureau of statistics” mindset is now a problem. It dominates thinking everywhere, not just in technology businesses aiming for sticky ads and more captive users. Nearly every institution one can point to today, from government to science, media, medicine, insurance, and many others, embraces a centralized, data-capture model requiring massive computing resources and actively downplaying human ingenuity in favor of number crunching and prediction. More troubling perhaps, is the way this has shaped the zeitgeist. Confidence in human smarts and imagination seems at an all-time low. Entire books are written now on how people are, in effect, cognitively biased, limited, and indeed stupid. Given this cultural climate, Dyson’s time of “creative chaos and freedom” seems not only distant but beyond recovery.

Dyson called the Cold War science of the 1950s and 1960s Napoleonic because research occurred mostly in huge companies like RAND and involved teasing out the implications of earlier scientific results from brilliant Tolstoyan tinkerers like Max Plank or Albert Einstein. As in our present time, results were achieved through the investment of huge sums of money, and were typically conservative in scope, reflecting already formed interests and agendas. Much of the money during that time was spent on making larger fission, then fusion bombs. The math was already done. That time and ours both correspond to Perez’s depiction of a fully matured technology revolution showing signs of slowdown and decay. We seem to have wandered into the 1950s again, this time with Web companies instead of IBM and General Motors.

Artificial intelligence has become thoroughly Napoleonic as well. It is a textbook case in calcification. Large, central repositories of data now power ubiquitous artificial intelligence algorithms, which are great for self-navigating drones and automated surveillance cameras but frustratingly poor at basic conversation and other cherished facets of human intelligence. Among other worries, data-centric AI today requires massive amounts of old-fashioned electricity, still largely supplied by conventional fossil fuels. And the central data version of AI is adept at various forms of malfeasance, as everyone now knows. We are increasingly caught in fake news and deep fakes of facial and other unreal images, generated by today’s Big Data AI. Depressingly, the seventy-plus-year program of artificial intelligence is largely equated with centralized data repositories and statistical number crunching today. Younger generations probably don’t know that Napoleonic, Big Data AI is only one approach, one way of conceiving machine intelligence. Big Data AI makes sense in a fully matured technology world, with big players like Google and Facebook. It doesn’t make sense for Tolstoyan tinkerers, who have no access to supercomputers or petabytes of others’ personal data.

Fortunately, the twenty-first century is still young. A little over two decades into the last century was—true—a midway point between two catastrophic wars. But scientists were enjoying Tostoyan freedom. Relativity and then quantum mechanics were discovered, without the supervision or control of big science or big business. Henry Ford was mass producing automobiles, but automobiles would enjoy decades of further Tolstoyan tinkering. Tellingly, computers had not arrived in 1922, and no one anticipated the revolution they would bring. We can only wonder what imagined, and unimagined, worlds still await us in this century."]]></description>
<dc:subject>eriklarson freemandyson 1995 2022 web internet online computers computing centralization decentralization bigtech thomaskuhn siliconvalley neuroscience bigdata napoleon google facebook instagram twitter freedom creativity liberty carlotaperez tolstoy anarchism openweb anarchy innovation society liberation kevinkelly 1998 coldwar rand maxplank alberteinstein ai artificialintelligence henryford quantummechanics quantumtheory quantumphysics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:567a8595579a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:eriklarson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freemandyson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1995"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2022"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:centralization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:decentralization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bigtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thomaskuhn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:siliconvalley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neuroscience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bigdata"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:napoleon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:facebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:instagram"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freedom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:creativity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:liberty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:carlotaperez"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tolstoy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anarchism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openweb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anarchy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:innovation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:liberation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1998"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:coldwar"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rand"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maxplank"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alberteinstein"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:henryford"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quantummechanics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quantumtheory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quantumphysics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://social.ayjay.org/2026/06/06/freeman-dyson-it-often-happens.html">
    <title>“The open web and the world of hobbyist and small-scale devices (often built on the Raspberry Pi) are our remaining refuges of Tolstoyan computing.” - Alan Jacobs</title>
    <dc:date>2026-06-07T00:34:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://social.ayjay.org/2026/06/06/freeman-dyson-it-often-happens.html</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Freeman Dyson (1997) [Imagined Worlds: https://archive.org/details/imaginedworlds00dyso ]:

<blockquote>It often happens that a scientific revolution is accompanied by a change in style. I like to use the names of Napoleon and Tolstoy to symbolize two contrasting styles: rigid organization and discipline represented by Napoleon, creative chaos and freedom represented by Tolstoy. In the world of computers, Napoleon is the massive IBM main-frame; Tolstoy is the humble Macintosh. The computer revolution was an escape from the Napoleonic ambitions of von Neumann to the Tolstoyan anarchy of the Internet. Future revolutions will bring more such escapes.</blockquote>

The big AI companies are the apotheosis — literally, in the view of many who work for them — of Napoleonic science. The open web and the world of hobbyist and small-scale devices (often built on the Raspberry Pi) are our remaining refuges of Tolstoyan computing. See also: Erik Larson reflecting on Dyson in 2022 [https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/twenty-five-years-after-imagined-worlds-what-world-are-we-living-in ]."]]></description>
<dc:subject>alanjacobs freemandyson 1997 computers computing centralization decentralization anarchism tolstoy raspberrypi internet web online ai artificialintelligence llms eriklarson 2022 mac apple ibm openweb hobbyists hobbies tinkering</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:8434ae3425ab/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alanjacobs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freemandyson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1997"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:centralization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:decentralization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anarchism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tolstoy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:raspberrypi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:llms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:eriklarson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2022"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mac"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ibm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openweb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hobbyists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hobbies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tinkering"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2023/07/generative-ai-human-culture-philosophy/674165/">
    <title>A Defense of Humanity in the Age of AI - The Atlantic</title>
    <dc:date>2026-06-06T10:57:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2023/07/generative-ai-human-culture-philosophy/674165/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The Coming Humanist Renaissance

We need a cultural and philosophical movement to meet the rise of artificial superintelligence."

[archived:
https://archive.is/Ql35H ]

"Writers of fiction—Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Rod Serling, José Saramago—have for generations warned of doppelgängers that might sap our humanity by stealing a person’s likeness. Our new world is a wormhole to that uncanny valley.

Whereas the first algorithmic revolution involved using people’s personal data to reorder the world for them, the next will involve our personal data being used not just to splinter our shared sense of reality, but to invent synthetic replicas. The profit-minded music-studio exec will thrill to the notion of an AI-generated voice with AI-generated songs, not attached to a human with intellectual-property rights. Artists, writers, and musicians should anticipate widespread impostor efforts and fight against them. So should all of us. One computer scientist recently told me she’s planning to create a secret code word that only she and her elderly parents know, so that if they ever hear her voice on the other end of the phone pleading for help or money, they’ll know whether it’s been generated by an AI trained on her publicly available lectures to sound exactly like her and scam them.

Today’s elementary-school children are already learning not to trust that anything they see or hear through a screen is real. But they deserve a modern technological and informational environment built on Enlightenment values: reason, human autonomy, and the respectful exchange of ideas. Not everything should be recorded or shared; there is individual freedom in embracing ephemerality. More human interactions should take place only between the people involved; privacy is key to preserving our humanity.

Finally, a more existential consideration requires our attention, and that is the degree to which the pursuit of knowledge orients us inward or outward. The artificial intelligence of the near future will supercharge our empirical abilities, but it may also dampen our curiosity. We are at risk of becoming so enamored of the synthetic worlds that we create—all data sets, duplicates, and feedback loops—that we cease to peer into the unknown with any degree of true wonder or originality.

We should trust human ingenuity and creative intuition, and resist overreliance on tools that dull the wisdom of our own aesthetics and intellect. Emerson once wrote that Isaac Newton “used the same wit to weigh the moon that he used to buckle his shoes.” Newton, I’ll point out, also used that wit to invent a reflecting telescope, the beginnings of a powerful technology that has allowed humankind to squint at the origins of the universe. But the spirit of Emerson’s idea remains crucial: Observing the world, taking it in using our senses, is an essential exercise on the path to knowledge. We can and should layer on technological tools that will aid us in this endeavor, but never at the expense of seeing, feeling, and ultimately knowing for ourselves.

A future in which overconfident machines seem to hold the answers to all of life’s cosmic questions is not only dangerously misguided, but takes away that which makes us human. In an age of anger, and snap reactions, and seemingly all-knowing AI, we should put more emphasis on contemplation as a way of being. We should embrace an unfinished state of thinking, the constant work of challenging our preconceived notions, seeking out those with whom we disagree, and sometimes still not knowing. We are mortal beings, driven to know more than we ever will or ever can.

The passage of time has the capacity to erase human knowledge: Whole languages disappear; explorers lose their feel for crossing the oceans by gazing at the stars. Technology continually reshapes our intellectual capacities. What remains is the fact that we are on this planet to seek knowledge, truth, and beauty—and that we only get so much time to do it.

As a small child in Concord, Massachusetts, I could see Emerson’s home from my bedroom window. Recently, I went back for a visit. Emerson’s house has always captured my imagination. He lived there for 47 years until his death, in 1882. Today, it is maintained by his descendants and a small staff dedicated to his legacy. The house is some 200 years old, and shows its age in creaks and stains. But it also possesses a quality that is extraordinarily rare for a structure of such historic importance: 141 years after his death, Emerson’s house still feels like his. His books are on the shelves. One of his hats hangs on a hook by the door. The original William Morris wallpaper is bright green in the carriage entryway. A rendering of Francesco Salviati’s The Three Fates, holding the thread of destiny, stands watch over the mantel in his study. This is the room in which Emerson wrote Nature. The table where he sat to write it is still there, next to the fireplace.

Standing in Emerson’s study, I thought about how no technology is as good as going to the place, whatever the destination. No book, no photograph, no television broadcast, no tweet, no meme, no augmented reality, no hologram, no AI-generated blueprint or fever dream can replace what we as humans experience. This is why you make the trip, you cross the ocean, you watch the sunset, you hear the crickets, you notice the phase of the moon. It is why you touch the arm of the person beside you as you laugh. And it is why you stand in awe at the Jardin des Plantes, floored by the universe as it reveals its hidden code to you."]]></description>
<dc:subject>adriennelafrance 2026 humanism humanity 1833 ralphwaldoemerson philosophy naturalhistory industrialrevolution industrialization google tiktok facebook instagram ai artificialintelligence microsoft meta openweb web online internet self-actualization gena generativeai siliconvalley truth nature individualism technology human humans transparency relationships friendship dostoyevsky rodserling josésaramago intellect aesthetics tools enlightenment values privacy resistance isaacnewton knowledge art beauty uncannyvalley</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:24d95d931b4d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:adriennelafrance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1833"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ralphwaldoemerson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:naturalhistory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:industrialrevolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:industrialization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tiktok"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:facebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:instagram"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meta"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openweb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:self-actualization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gena"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:generativeai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:siliconvalley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:truth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:individualism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:human"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:transparency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:relationships"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:friendship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dostoyevsky"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rodserling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:josésaramago"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:intellect"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aesthetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:enlightenment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:values"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:resistance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:isaacnewton"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:knowledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:beauty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:uncannyvalley"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://om.co/2026/06/01/clothes-are-nice-fashion-biz-not-as-much/">
    <title>Clothes Are Nice. Fashion Biz, Not As Much! – On my Om</title>
    <dc:date>2026-06-02T00:13:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://om.co/2026/06/01/clothes-are-nice-fashion-biz-not-as-much/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Every morning I sit down and open Feedbin on my iPad. It aggregates my RSS feeds and newsletters – about a hundred sources – covering everything from AI to zeitgeist. One story stopped me recently. The Wall Street Journal proclaimed: “Menswear Is in Its ‘Nice’ Era.”

This comment from a personal stylist sent me down a rabbit hole about clothes, social media, and how the gatekeepers still don’t understand their own growing irrelevance:

<blockquote>“The clothes are inoffensive, but there’s no point of view. The downside isn’t bad taste, but the erosion of individuality.” – Turner Allen, personal stylist, New York</blockquote>

Menswear today is neutral tones, muted basics, everything well-cut and normal. Or as they say, nice. The Business of Fashion recently called this an epidemic. Everyone in the industry has an opinion about it. What almost nobody has is an explanation for why. The fashion media is smart enough to spot the symptom but fails at the diagnosis.

The BOF at least attempts an answer, channeling the music critic Simon Reynolds, who argued in his book Retromania that pop music had collapsed into endless pastiche – referencing references, with nothing original left to say. The same, the BOF writer suggests, has happened to fashion. The epidemic of nice clothes is what you get when an industry runs out of ideas.

Maybe. But that framing is still entirely about the industry. It leaves out the person standing in front of the mirror.

Me.

The writers’ complaints are simply the arrogance of insiders, something common across media. Just look at how self-referential the Atlantic and the New Yorker have become. Same when it comes to technology, sports, and everything else.

They all treat the paying customer as a rube. What if we stopped wanting the opinions of fashion insiders and sports reporters who are not nearly as honest as they pretend to be? Everyone is talking their own book, all the time, everywhere. Everyone is looking to get paid.

We the rubes have learned a thing or two.

For years we have been swimming in images. Instagram, street style blogs, TikTok, Pinterest, the endless scroll. Whatever you think of that flood of images, it has done something to our eyes. It has trained us. We have looked at more clothing combinations, more visual context than any generation before us. We have developed taste not from magazines but from sheer accumulated exposure.

The assumption buried in the insider complaint is that the point of view should come from the garment. That the designer is the author and we are the readers. That clothes arrive with meaning already assigned, and our job is to receive it correctly. This is how the whole enterprise of fashion writing has always worked – and it is, not incidentally, how affiliate link revenue works. You spot the trend and explain why it matters. You link to where they can buy it.

That model made sense when images were scarce and editors were gatekeepers. It makes far less sense now.

Look at my own closet. It is a capsule collection of about a hundred pieces. Plain, nice, comfortable, well-made garments. French-made bespoke blue shirts. Muji T-shirts. Japanese workwear. I arrived at each of them because they are precisely what they are not: a line item in LVMH’s annual profit report. They work with my body. When I combine them, the result is mine. Not defined by a runway, a trend, or any external verdict.

Alexander McQueen famously said: “I want you to come out either repulsed or exhilarated, as long as it’s an emotion. If you don’t feel an emotion, I’m not doing my job.” It is a great quote. It is also a completely designer-centric view of the world. The designer produces the feeling. You experience it. You are the audience.

That model is over. Today’s designers are mostly hired hands executing the commercial agenda of conglomerates whose job is to sell expensive product on installment plans to people who want to feel rich. The clothes that result are rarely worth the allegiance.

A perfectly cut neutral trouser means almost nothing by itself. But that trouser with a specific shoe, a worn jacket, a watch with some history, a shirt you found somewhere unexpected – now there is something. The clothes are the vocabulary. I write the sentence.

Compare this to what came before. The hypebeast era, the logomania, the streetwear machine – that was actually the most passive way to dress in living memory. The brand told everyone what you were about. The logo spoke. You just put the thing on. It was expensive ventriloquism.

The epidemic of nice clothes is not a failure of imagination in the industry. It might be the industry finally catching up to what people actually want: room to think for themselves. A canvas, not a lecture.

The question was never whether the clothes have a point of view. The question is whether you do.

Lawrence Lessig in 2008 argued that the 20th century had been a Read-Only culture. You consumed what the professionals produced, passively, with no mechanism to talk back. The phonograph, the radio, the CD: the machines made you an audience. The internet broke that. Suddenly culture was Read-Write. You could take what existed, layer it, reinterpret it, make something yours. That shift has expanded with every generational turn – Web 1.0, Web 2.0, social, mobile, and now AI.

Fashion just got there later. The hypebeast era was the last gasp of Read-Only dressing. What is happening now looks like an epidemic of nice clothes. It is actually the beginning of something else.

The read-write metaphor has since become read-write-read. And the data backs it up.

Hundreds of millions of people are not just consuming culture – they are recreating it. Layering it, putting it back out. The fashion industry’s complaint that people lack a point of view doesn’t hold against what the numbers actually show. These are the same people uploading 14 million tracks a month to SoundCloud and posting 272 TikToks a second. They have plenty of points of view. They just stopped waiting for permission to express themselves.

Now give me the raw energy of Diya Joukani – a self-taught designer from Mumbai who just filmed a cameo with Rihanna. Wintour is good for hosting the Met Gala, not for finding the new thing. She can’t. Because there isn’t one new thing anymore. And the fashion-industrial complex doesn’t understand that.

The upside of the connected world means now I can find a talent like Diya without any editor telling me that I must pay attention to her. And in her I see what I have always imagined, a world where we tell the story of us. Diya and I are about 35 years apart, but she captures how I see my clothes. A palette to be put together. Simple, nice, and authentic. Embellishing is what I do. Sure, I learned from Anna and her ilk. But now I know myself much better, and hence nice is not just nice. It is me."]]></description>
<dc:subject>ommalik clothing fashion apparel self self-expression identity luxury branding readwriteweb web online internet socialmedia gatekeeping influencers elitism diyajoukani consumption consumerism influence 2026 media simonreynolds business industry technology sports thenewtorker theatlantic insiders journalism tiktok pinterest exposure garments design clothes hype hypebeast expression logos lawrencelessig 2008 readonly readwrite readwriteread nice soundcloud personalexpression</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:9b2d0a15618b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ommalik"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:clothing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fashion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:apparel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:self"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:self-expression"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:identity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:luxury"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:branding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:readwriteweb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gatekeeping"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:influencers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elitism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:diyajoukani"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consumption"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consumerism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:influence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:simonreynolds"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:industry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sports"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thenewtorker"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:theatlantic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:insiders"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:journalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tiktok"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pinterest"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:exposure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:garments"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:clothes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hype"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hypebeast"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:expression"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:logos"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lawrencelessig"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2008"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:readonly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:readwrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:readwriteread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:soundcloud"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:personalexpression"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://daringfireball.net/2026/05/what_is_a_dickover">
    <title>Daring Fireball: What Is a Dickover?</title>
    <dc:date>2026-05-30T06:01:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://daringfireball.net/2026/05/what_is_a_dickover</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["dickover n. : a modal panel, popover, or curtain presented by a website or app, deliberately obscuring its own content to frustrate the user with an unwanted, unnecessary, mandatory interaction; e.g. asking the user to accept “cookies”, subscribe to a newsletter, install the website’s mobile app, agree to terms of service, or anything else that the user couldn’t give two shits about."

...

"If you visit a website you should ... see the website. See its content. Be able to read the article whose page you are attempting to visit. Showing a “subscribe to our newsletter” or “accept our fucking cookies” dickover to someone trying to read an article on the web makes no more sense than sending out an email newsletter that only contains a link to read the newsletter on a webpage. A webpage should show the webpage. An email should show the email. I should not have to explain this.

Some sites hit you with their dickovers on page load, when you might be braced for it. We’re all braced for obstacles and annoyances these days when we load web pages. But some sneaky, cowardly bastards sucker-punch you with their dickbars only after you have started reading, and begin to scroll down the page. Then, wham, they hit with their dickover. It’s a goddamn privilege for anyone to bestow your article, story, or product page with their attention. The gall, to deliberately interrupt them while they are in the middle of actively reading, to present them with a dickover. It is no different from snatching a physical copy of a book or magazine out of a reader’s hands in order to badger them for something other than the attention they were already granting your work, except that the physical act of snatching a publication from a reader’s hands would subject you to being punched in the face."]]></description>
<dc:subject>daringfireball enshittification johngruber 2026 webdesign web internet online ui ux</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:6dc92fa7595d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:daringfireball"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:enshittification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johngruber"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:webdesign"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ui"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ux"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.theringer.com/2026/05/28/tech/pope-leo-xiv-ai-encyclical-tech-industry-problems">
    <title>The 40 Most Rage-Inducing Problems in Tech - The Ringer</title>
    <dc:date>2026-05-28T22:52:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.theringer.com/2026/05/28/tech/pope-leo-xiv-ai-encyclical-tech-industry-problems</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The bugs, broken apps, and nightmare customer-service bots we can’t escape, presented as a blessed and sacred addendum to Pope Leo XIV’s new encyclical on AI"

...

"37-39. Please stop seeing every precious and beautiful aspect of life on earth as a commodity to be controlled and exploited for wealth. Now, see, this is a tough one. It’s so tough that I’m giving it three entries. It’s tough because I know you know you fucked up. You’re aware that much of the world has soured on you. You’ve seen a fleet of headlines like “AI Companies Know They Have an Image Problem” and “AI Has a Message Problem.” You’re aware that the loathing people feel for AI is making them look again at the other products you’ve inserted into every corner of their lives and realize with fresh disgust the many, many ways in which those products represent broken promises. They don’t work as they’re supposed to. They make life more frustrating, stressful, competitive, and alienating rather than easier and more connected. You’re using them to spy on your customers, whom you view as vessels of monetizable data more than as people, and whom you hold in increasingly palpable contempt. You see that we see this, and you’re surely hard at work on ways to fix the problem.

But this is where things get tricky, because I don’t think you want to fix the problem, not really. I think that, to you, “fixing the problem” means fixing the image that conceals the problem. I think you want to keep doing all the same stuff while selling us a better story so that we’ll let you get away with it. And that doesn’t fix anything at all. 

Because the truth is, tech doesn’t have an image problem. It doesn’t have a message problem. It has an intention problem. What’s wrong with the axe murderer who broke into my house is not that he hasn’t successfully persuaded me to buy into his narrative. What’s wrong is that he’s trying to kill me with an axe. Similarly, when you launch a product that’s designed to put millions of people out of work, block access to sources of verifiable truth, replace human creativity with slop, and lower the barriers to every sort of atrocity, the problem isn’t that you haven’t told the public a good story about those things. The problem is that you are trying to do them.

There are things in the world that are more important than money. The fact that you seem not to believe this, that you seem to think any motive beyond ruthless acquisitiveness is fake, dishonest, or childish, is the heart of your problem. Your attitude is not by any means unique to tech, but the scale of capital concentrated in the tech industry makes the attitude—this confusion of an adolescent will to power for mature, undeluded realism—uniquely treacherous. You can’t build products that serve humanity while viewing every human good other than your own aggrandizement as bullshit. Thus, tech’s internal problems can’t be fixed unless the people running the industry change their outlook on a deep level (unlikely) or are somehow outmaneuvered as wiser heads reform the market to deprioritize perpetual growth (maybe Paul Konerko is working on this?).  

Which means that fixing the problem, as usual, falls to us. The tech industry, which has been selling us maddeningly broken products for years, has itself become one of those broken products: another shiny app that doesn’t do what it’s supposed to and that will force us to invent work-arounds if we’re going to get on with our lives. (Meaning, in this case: If we’re going to continue to work, read, learn, listen to music, make movies, write, avert wars, and all the rest of what—apart from ID’ing tiny crosswalks—we think of as verifiably human.) I don’t know where the work-arounds start; the oligarchs have so much wealth and power, and so few people who could stand up to them are even willing to try. But this is why the pope’s encyclical is so important. Magnifica Humanitas positions a major world power, the Catholic Church, in moral opposition to big tech as it’s currently constituted; maybe more importantly, it serves as a focal point for everyone else, articulating an understanding of what’s happening in the world that we can rally around. Or argue with, or correct, or extend; in any case, it’s a landmark to navigate by. I wish I shared Leo’s optimism about the likelihood of real change. But we’re better equipped than a month ago, and that’s something."]]></description>
<dc:subject>popeleoxiv 2026 encyclicals magnificahumanitas technology chatbots ai artificialintelligence brianphillips qrcodes capcha youtube customerservice elonmusk internet web online ux ui touchscreens cars experience streaming streamingservices peterthiel antichrist humanity human humans humanism search google googledocs jeffbezos pop-ups sonos surveys email aibubble autocorrect twitter subscriptions newsletters autoupdates privacy data bluetooth markzuckerberg commotification consumerism consumption latecapitalism capitalism internetofthings automation work workers labor society</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:905b81cc8f54/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:popeleoxiv"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:encyclicals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:magnificahumanitas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatbots"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brianphillips"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:qrcodes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capcha"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:youtube"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:customerservice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elonmusk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ui"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:touchscreens"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cars"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:experience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:streaming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:streamingservices"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:peterthiel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:antichrist"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:human"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:search"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:googledocs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jeffbezos"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pop-ups"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sonos"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:surveys"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:email"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aibubble"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:autocorrect"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:subscriptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:newsletters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:autoupdates"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bluetooth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:markzuckerberg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:commotification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consumerism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consumption"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:latecapitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internetofthings"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:automation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:workers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.e-flux.com/journal/163/6776887/the-useful-narcissist">
    <title>The Useful Narcissist - Journal #163</title>
    <dc:date>2026-05-27T08:28:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.e-flux.com/journal/163/6776887/the-useful-narcissist</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><dc:subject>mattseybold 2026 publicintellectuals usefulidiots clebrity russelljacoby googlengram jeffreyepstein sambankman-fried elonmusk donaldtrump coldwar broadcast televison dickcavett alanburke pbs npr williamfbuckley media williamsafire chuchcommittee kurtanderson susanlindauer elites elitism richardposner overtonwindow consensus anncoulter thomasfriedman ralphnader gorevidal jamesbaldwin oligarchy tedgioia attention attentioneconomy online internet intellectualism neoliberalism latecapitalism capitalism huntersthompson politics washingtonconsensus</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:d97707c1ee57/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mattseybold"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:publicintellectuals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:usefulidiots"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:clebrity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:russelljacoby"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:googlengram"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jeffreyepstein"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sambankman-fried"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elonmusk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:donaldtrump"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:coldwar"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:broadcast"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:televison"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dickcavett"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alanburke"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pbs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:npr"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:williamfbuckley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:williamsafire"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chuchcommittee"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kurtanderson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:susanlindauer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elites"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elitism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:richardposner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:overtonwindow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consensus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anncoulter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thomasfriedman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ralphnader"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gorevidal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jamesbaldwin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:oligarchy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tedgioia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attentioneconomy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:intellectualism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neoliberalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:latecapitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:huntersthompson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:washingtonconsensus"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.esquire.com/style/a71276009/what-has-happened-to-taste/">
    <title>What Has Happened to Taste?</title>
    <dc:date>2026-05-27T07:57:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.esquire.com/style/a71276009/what-has-happened-to-taste/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Technology has made it easier than ever to broadcast the things we like. Do any of us actually know anymore why we like them?"

...

"The ease and omnipresence of these technologiescan feel insurmountable. Who could bring themselves to get off Spotify? But they aren’t only swallowing us. Especially in the age of AI, when creation is just as cheap as curation, technology is killing the entire online experience. The Dead Internet Theory supposes that AI slop has taken over all previously genuine human activity on the Internet. Discussion forums have been flooded with bot accounts, all photos and videos are generated by AI, etc. It’s the natural and metaphorical end state for the version of taste we have now: literal robots endlessly aping things that already exist with minute variations. But we’re not there yet, and in fact, if the dead parts of the Internet are our flattened, gerrymandered style subcultures, perhaps that’s good.

As much as we’re told that the Web has become this poisonous, self-referential cesspool, such that finding inspiration offline is the new gold standard—or at least that’s what the consensus is here in Brooklyn—I think that’s too easy. For all the harm technology has done to our ability to develop taste, it’s still true that the Internet has given us unparalleled access to just about anything. We can now sift through the entire discographies of obscure international bands, watch independent short films, and read archived magazines whenever we want. I believe it still holds promise.

Here is what we must get rid of: Having taste today is synonymous with having “good taste.” That is what we mean when we say that someone “has taste”; we mean that they have good taste. That is a lie.

There was a time when taste was cultivated through trial and error. We used to have to take risks and suffer through its repercussions. By basking in the discomfort of ill-fitting silhouettes and excessive layering, we learned what worked best for us. We weren’t constantly trying to define and communicate what our tastes were because there wasn’t a “right” answer to what makes good taste. We got to good taste, such as it was, through a series of horrendous choices that exhibited bad taste.

The evil of the Dead Internet Theory, if it is right, is that it leaves us nowhere to turn for inspiration. But it supposes that the Algorithm is all that there is. There are broad swaths of the Internet that haven’t been colonized; the Algorithm is only the neatly paved brick road on the Internet’s uneven, treacherous terrain. It has its limits. No one’s stopping you from venturing off the beaten path to destinations that aren’t optimized for visibility: personal websites, anonymous bulletin boards, resource libraries.

“Internet walks”—the act of aimlessly surfing through online rabbit holes, not unlike how we experienced Wikipedia when it was new and wondrous, clicking from page to page until you wound up with knowledge you never would have suspected even existed—exposes us to the less legible textures of the Web. There are tools designed to facilitate this. The platform Are.na is like a nonalgorithmic Pinterest board where you can follow different people and traverse the parts of the Internet they bookmark. “The goal is not self-improvement,” says a note at the bottom of its home page. “The goal is engaging more deeply with the World.” It is precisely through navigating the vast, digital ridges that we’re forced to consider what resonated and why. That provokes introspection, through which the walls that once gerrymandered our tastes slowly crumble.

This notion, of course, is older than the Internet. In 1958, Guy Debord—a contemporary of Sontag, the author of The Society of Spectacle, and a member of the French postwar avant-garde group Situationist International—introduced the concept of the dérive. Defined as an unstructured, improvised wandering through an urban landscape, dérive pushes participants to let go of the relationships they have with their social environment. Pick a color and follow it; close your eyes and identify the loudest persistent sound you’re hearing, then walk to go find it; at every intersection, roll the dice to see which way to turn. In other words, walk for walking’s sake. A predecessor of Baudrillard, Debord saw the practice as the antidote to society’s “decline of being into having, and having into merely appearing.”

Debord’s position operated in direct opposition to a culture of being “intentional.” Today’s algorithmic culture is the epitome of intentional. Nothing is an accident. Terms like curated and mindful are sprinkled across everything. What those terms obscure is a lack of introspection. Debord believed that by refamiliarizing ourselves with the things of the world rather than the relationships we have to them, we could find new, deeper meaning and come to know ourselves better. Perhaps by refamiliarizing ourselves with the physical (wearing a shirt) rather than the intellectual (what the shirt says about you), we can find a way out of what we would today call the Algorithm. Objects of trends, when considered in isolation, are simply things. They stop representing our membership in an algorithmic faction or signaling social status. They become free to mean anything for anyone.

The risk is that you will occasionally step on thorns. You will have moments of bad taste. But taste is by definition subjective, so unpopular tastes should exist, too. Where there is preference for Rick Owens, there’s also demand for Allbirds and skinny jeans. Our fixation on embodying the consensus of whatever algorithmic faction we fall under has asphyxiated every ounce of whimsy. Aren’t occasional poor choices worth the trade-off?

I now occasionally start my mornings with an aimless walk around the neighborhood, fueled partially by a desire to happen upon some caffeine. I no longer judge shops by their Japandi aesthetic, and I’ve stopped using Google Maps to read reviews or navigate to nearby joints. I’ve gotten the sense that much of the most highly acclaimed spots, while perfectly Instagrammable, make horrible coffee. But that’s by my own definition of what makes coffee good, and my opinion is that the best cup of coffee is just something that’s piping hot and costs less than three dollars. I recognize that that’s out of step in Brooklyn, but who’s a better judge of what I like best than me? I think it’s fair to say that I’ve tried enough happenstance coffee at this point to have an actual opinion. Cheap, hot coffee is what I like, and I’m not ashamed to say it. I earned it.

The same goes with taste. Forget the expensive coffee. Ignore the barber’s perfectly curated Instagram. Give the wrong bands a chance. Watch Kurosawa, sure, but not because another famous director, QT or otherwise, said anything—watch Kurosawa because Rashomon will terrify you. I could say more, but I’ll stop there because I’m getting away from my point. The point of this essay is don’t take my word for it."]]></description>
<dc:subject>tiffanyng taste 2026 socialmedia online internet web blackbirdspyplane susansontag montesquieu algorithms kylechayka culture pinterest spotify johanweiner erinwylie tastemakers trends perception reality jeanbaudrillard simulacra simulation mainstream exclusivity compliance consensus connoisseurs connoisseurship baudrillard franlebowitz signaling subjectivity aesthetics introspection thinking howwethink deadinternettheory guydebord dérive derive situationist being having instagram objects membership society engagement are.na internetwalks visibility</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:288eae64d312/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tiffanyng"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:taste"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:blackbirdspyplane"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:susansontag"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:montesquieu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:algorithms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kylechayka"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pinterest"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:spotify"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johanweiner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:erinwylie"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tastemakers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:trends"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:perception"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jeanbaudrillard"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:simulacra"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:simulation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mainstream"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:exclusivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:compliance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consensus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:connoisseurs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:connoisseurship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:baudrillard"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:franlebowitz"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:signaling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:subjectivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aesthetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:introspection"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwethink"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:deadinternettheory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:guydebord"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dérive"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:derive"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:situationist"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:being"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:having"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:instagram"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:objects"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:membership"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:engagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:are.na"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internetwalks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:visibility"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://tomstafford.substack.com/p/the-better-algorithms-of-our-nature">
    <title>The better algorithms of our nature - by Tom Stafford</title>
    <dc:date>2026-05-26T22:26:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://tomstafford.substack.com/p/the-better-algorithms-of-our-nature</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["A lot happened in 2016. It would be easy to imagine that the entire reason for this change was the election of Donald Trump as president, and to stop looking for other causes, but something else also happened which I think we should at least consider, and that other thing says something important about how social media and human psychology interact.

In March 2016 Twitter completed their transition to the algorithmic feed, meaning that it was the default for all users to have their timeline populated by what Twitter thought they would want to see, rather than a chronological feed of posts from people they had decided to follow.

The algorithmic feed is now almost ubiquitous on social media. Exactly how these work for each platform is usually a guarded secret, but in general the major platforms use some form of engagement algorithm - meaning they try and predict what you will like, comment on, or even simply dwell on for longer than average. To do this they look at what you’ve liked, commented on, or dwelled on previously, as well as considering what people similar to you have engaged with.

Engagement algorithms have a nasty symbiosis with our human tendency to respond to threats. We’re already primed to pay attention to bad news, to pick up on other people’s emotions and respond in kind when people direct anger at us. Engagement algorithms give extra power to this negativity, since both hating something and loving it can equally look like strong engagement.

Crudely defined, engagement algorithms encourage expressing anger and the general polarisation of online discussion. Think of it this way. If there are posts along a spectrum of positions on an issue, say from left to right, posts all along the spectrum are likely to be liked by the different people who also align in their preferences from left to right.

All things being equal, you’d think this would mean the posts in the center had the most chance of attracting engagement, being able to recruit support from both sides. Sadly, we all know that modest takes are less fun to make, and extreme views are easier to articulate. Engagement algorithms which don’t distinguish a comment which says a post is completely right from a comment saying a post is completely wrong add to the advantage of the extreme ends of a spectrum. Viewed through the lens of an engagement metric, extreme contents get to count both its lovers and its haters towards their success."]]></description>
<dc:subject>tomstafford timhartford algorithms 2016 socialmedia twitter internet online socialinteraction socialnetworks ai artificialintelligence politics society donaldtrump psychology fear anger negativity policy climatechange guns guncontrol democracy climate globalwarming engagement mastodon fediverse</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:e7e23fca60b0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tomstafford"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:timhartford"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:algorithms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2016"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialinteraction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialnetworks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:donaldtrump"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fear"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anger"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:negativity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:climatechange"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:guns"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:guncontrol"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:democracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:climate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:globalwarming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:engagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mastodon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fediverse"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://medialab.sciencespo.fr/en/news/de-lideologie-californienne-a-lideologie-texane-conservatisme-religion-et-extractivisme-au-sein-du-secteur-des/">
    <title>From Californian to Texan Ideology: Conservatism, Religion and Extractivism in the Tech Sector | médialab Sciences Po</title>
    <dc:date>2026-05-23T22:57:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://medialab.sciencespo.fr/en/news/de-lideologie-californienne-a-lideologie-texane-conservatisme-religion-et-extractivisme-au-sein-du-secteur-des/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["On the occasion of a special session co-organized with the CNRS Center for Internet and Society, the médialab seminar welcomes Fred Turner (Stanford University). He will offer a critical reading of the ideological transformations underway in the American tech world, from California’s libertarian utopia to the more conservative ideology now embodied by Texas.

Abstract

As they leave California for Texas, major digital companies are doing more than looking for new spaces. Their leaders (Elon Musk, Larry Ellison, Joe Lonsdale...) are settling in a state where religion plays a major role, in a Bible Belt dominated by oil billionaires. Texan politics can be summed up in a few words: tax refusal, deregulation, and the narrative of a new frontier populated by “those who are willing to take the necessary risks.” 

Just like oil, digital technologies, including AI and cryptocurrencies, as well as space exploration, depend on public funding and environmental leniency to thrive. So why not take power directly? Tech leaders are now pursuing that path, following in the footsteps of speculative oil investors. 

How did the digital world move from the Californian ideology, where entrepreneurialism was mixed with the legacies of counterculture, to the Texan ideology, shaped by a rejection of any interference except that of the Gospels, and where great, deserving men are seen as working in the name of God? 
Biography  

After a career in journalism in Boston and teaching at MIT and Harvard, Fred Turner is now Professor and Chair of the Department of Communication at Stanford University.

His research explores the relationships between media technologies and cultural transformations, with a particular focus on the role of emerging media in shaping American society since World War II.

He is the author of three influential books: The Democratic Surround: Multimedia and American Liberalism from World War II to the Psychedelic Sixties, From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network and the Rise of Digital Utopianism, and Echoes of Combat: The Vietnam War in American Memory.

Fred Turner’s work has received numerous academic awards and has been translated into French, Spanish, German, Polish and Chinese."

[direct link to video: https://vimeo.com/1137645914

See also:
https://newbooksnetwork.com/fred-turner-on-countercultures-cybercultures-and-californian-and-texan-ideologies
https://thebaffler.com/salvos/the-texan-ideology-turner ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>fredturner 2025 siliconvalley californianideology texanideology california texas billionaires fortresses tescreal libertarianism elonmusk gigafactory tesla capitlaism latecapitalism technology billionaites oligarchy climate climatechange environment globalwarming richardbarbrook andycameron sanfrancisco 1960s couunterculture 1990s extraction extractivism bunkers christianity billygraham religion politics race racism neoliberalism economics misogyny christiannationalism policy web internet online dotcomboom dotcombust johnperrybarlow newtgingrich newright rightwing farright right freemarkets freemarketfundamentalism conservatism idealism poverty austin markzuckerberg facebook meta us tiktok google joelonsdale tennessee memphis fbi fairbanks alaska louisiana covid-19 pandemic coronavirus gregabbott rickperry hooverinstitution labor energy water electricity regulation deregulation housing taxes taxation antiwoke newdeal universities colleges academia highered highereducation margaretatwood petrobaptists fossilfu</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:f847a9963ddd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fredturner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2025"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:siliconvalley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:californianideology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:texanideology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:california"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:texas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:billionaires"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fortresses"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tescreal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:libertarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elonmusk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gigafactory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tesla"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitlaism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:latecapitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:billionaites"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:oligarchy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:climate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:climatechange"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:environment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:globalwarming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:richardbarbrook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:andycameron"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sanfrancisco"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1960s"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:couunterculture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1990s"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:extraction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:extractivism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bunkers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christianity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:billygraham"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:religion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:race"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:racism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neoliberalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:misogyny"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christiannationalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dotcomboom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dotcombust"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnperrybarlow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:newtgingrich"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:newright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rightwing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:farright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:right"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freemarkets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freemarketfundamentalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conservatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:idealism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:poverty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:austin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:markzuckerberg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:facebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meta"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tiktok"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:joelonsdale"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tennessee"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:memphis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fbi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fairbanks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alaska"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:louisiana"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:covid-19"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pandemic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:coronavirus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gregabbott"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rickperry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hooverinstitution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:energy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:water"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:electricity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:regulation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:deregulation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:housing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:taxes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:taxation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:antiwoke"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:newdeal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colleges"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:margaretatwood"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:petrobaptists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fossilfu"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://newbooksnetwork.com/fred-turner-on-countercultures-cybercultures-and-californian-and-texan-ideologies">
    <title>Fred Turner on Countercultures, Cybercultures, and Californian and Texan Ideologies - New Books Network</title>
    <dc:date>2026-05-23T22:56:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://newbooksnetwork.com/fred-turner-on-countercultures-cybercultures-and-californian-and-texan-ideologies</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Peoples & Things host, Lee Vinsel, and guest host, Paula Bialski, Associate Professor of Digital Sociology at University of St. Gallen, talk to Fred Turner, Harry and Norman Chandler Professor of Communication at Stanford University, about his classic 2006 book, _From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism_. They briefly explore the arc of Fred’s career and revisit the book in the spirit of asking what has changed in digital ideology since the book’s publication, including with the role of Silicon Valley elites in the second Trump Administration, Elon Musk’s role in DOGE, and the (perhaps only brief) turn of digital technology elites moving from California to Texas. Since this conversation was recorded in April 2025, Fred’s essay, “The Texan Ideology,” has been published in The Baffler: https://thebaffler.com/salvos/the-texan-ideology-turner "

[See also: 
https://medialab.sciencespo.fr/en/news/de-lideologie-californienne-a-lideologie-texane-conservatisme-religion-et-extractivisme-au-sein-du-secteur-des/
https://vimeo.com/1137645914 ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>fredturner 2026 siliconvalley californianideology texanideology california texas billionaires fortresses tescreal libertarianism elonmusk gigafactory tesla capitlaism latecapitalism technology billionaites oligarchy climate climatechange environment globalwarming richardbarbrook andycameron sanfrancisco 1960s couunterculture 1990s extraction extractivism bunkers christianity billygraham religion politics race racism neoliberalism economics misogyny christiannationalism policy web internet online dotcomboom dotcombust johnperrybarlow newtgingrich newright rightwing farright right freemarkets freemarketfundamentalism conservatism idealism poverty austin markzuckerberg facebook meta us tiktok google joelonsdale tennessee memphis fbi fairbanks alaska louisiana covid-19 pandemic coronavirus gregabbott rickperry hooverinstitution labor energy water electricity regulation deregulation housing taxes taxation antiwoke newdeal universities colleges academia highered highereducation margaretatwood petrobaptists fossilfu</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:9448443666c4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fredturner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:siliconvalley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:californianideology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:texanideology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:california"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:texas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:billionaires"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fortresses"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tescreal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:libertarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elonmusk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gigafactory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tesla"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitlaism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:latecapitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:billionaites"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:oligarchy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:climate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:climatechange"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:environment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:globalwarming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:richardbarbrook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:andycameron"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sanfrancisco"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1960s"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:couunterculture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1990s"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:extraction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:extractivism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bunkers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christianity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:billygraham"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:religion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:race"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:racism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neoliberalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:misogyny"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christiannationalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dotcomboom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dotcombust"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnperrybarlow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:newtgingrich"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:newright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rightwing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:farright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:right"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freemarkets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freemarketfundamentalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conservatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:idealism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:poverty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:austin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:markzuckerberg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:facebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meta"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tiktok"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:joelonsdale"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tennessee"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:memphis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fbi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fairbanks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alaska"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:louisiana"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:covid-19"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pandemic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:coronavirus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gregabbott"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rickperry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hooverinstitution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:energy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:water"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:electricity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:regulation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:deregulation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:housing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:taxes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:taxation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:antiwoke"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:newdeal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colleges"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:margaretatwood"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:petrobaptists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fossilfu"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://kottke.org/26/05/theres-no-earthly-way-of-knowing-which-direction-we-are-going">
    <title>There’s No Earthly Way of Knowing Which Direction We Are Going…</title>
    <dc:date>2026-05-20T06:33:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://kottke.org/26/05/theres-no-earthly-way-of-knowing-which-direction-we-are-going</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><dc:subject>ai artificialintelligence jasonkottke 2026 writing howwewrite google search internet online gemini resistance olgatokarczuk stevenrosenbaum</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:c5bcf3d7e513/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jasonkottke"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:search"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gemini"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:resistance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:olgatokarczuk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stevenrosenbaum"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAIzA5qCqtU">
    <title>bowling alone but not scrolling alone - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2026-05-20T05:50:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAIzA5qCqtU</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[[See also:

"digging into the theory"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLgwQY19s8w ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>aidanwalker democrats joebiden gaza palestine israel 2026 2024 elections politics socialmedia engagement government us policy robflaherty activism civiclife governance electoralpolitics elissaslotikin genocide ethniccleansing democracy timeline gerontogracy actions results audiences interaction messaging zionism antizionism blacklivesmatter ows occupywallstreet internet web online mutualaid systemicfailure humanitarianism networks institutions intitutionalrot</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:a6b7372c3093/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aidanwalker"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:democrats"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:joebiden"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gaza"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:palestine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:israel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2024"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elections"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:engagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:government"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robflaherty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:activism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:civiclife"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:governance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:electoralpolitics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elissaslotikin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:genocide"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ethniccleansing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:democracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:timeline"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gerontogracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:actions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:results"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:audiences"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interaction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:messaging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:zionism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:antizionism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:blacklivesmatter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ows"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:occupywallstreet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mutualaid"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:systemicfailure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanitarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:networks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:institutions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:intitutionalrot"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2026/05/28/whither-the-nerd-bully-bill-gates/">
    <title>Whither the Nerd-Bully? | Ben Tarnoff | The New York Review of Books</title>
    <dc:date>2026-05-14T15:49:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2026/05/28/whither-the-nerd-bully-bill-gates/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Bill Gates was the monopolistic father figure who Silicon Valley’s young founders rebelled against—and, in so rebelling, became."

[archived:
https://archive.is/ClkzU

via:
https://www.theverge.com/microsoft/930433/apropos-of-nothing-in-particular

"Apropos of nothing in particular...

I enjoyed reading this story about Bill Gates’ malevolent influence on the current crop of Silicon Valley megalomaniacs. If you remember his pre-Gates Foundation reputation, you will particularly appreciate it."]

"Source Code strikes a careful balance. Young Gates is curious and precocious but awkward and ill-tempered. He is the beneficiary of an affluent upbringing but possesses the intelligence to make the most of his opportunities. He gets into programming at the perfect time—just ahead of the first microcomputers that make personal computing a reality—but has the foresight and initiative to maximize this advantage.

Even the most meticulously humanized portrait may not be enough. As Das points out, Gates’s stature has suffered as a result of both the Epstein connection and his promotion of vaccines during the pandemic, which made him a villain to various Covid denialists and conspiracists. Relatedly, the position he has historically occupied, that of the liberal billionaire, has become lonelier in recent years. The revival of class politics on the left and the rightward shift of a prominent segment of the tech elite means that the “benevolent capitalism” championed by Gates has fewer takers.

The irony is that benevolent capitalism was the state religion of Silicon Valley when the dot-commers were battling the unbenevolent capitalism of Microsoft—an ethos encapsulated by “Don’t be evil,” Google’s motto for many years. Gates took it up after he went into philanthropy, and has kept the faith much longer than his former competitors.

Still, if Gates has resisted full feralization, he has also tried to ingratiate himself with the current regime, praising Trump after a private dinner in January 2025 and attending a knee-bending ceremony for tech leaders at the White House in September. “Thank you for incredible leadership,” he told the president, seated at a table with Sergey Brin, Mark Zuckerberg, Sam Altman, and several others.

It is clarifying to see Gates in such company. He may once have waged war on Silicon Valley, but the Valley owes much of its present eminence to the playbook he drew up at Microsoft. Gates bent and broke laws, asked not for permission but for forgiveness (and rarely), helped himself freely to the intellectual property of others while vigorously protecting his own, and endeavored not merely to beat his competitors but to extinguish them by any means necessary. Above all he understood that software was the choke point in the personal computing revolution, that as computers proliferated, the code that made those computers useful—and especially their operating systems—would become critically important. Monopolies in the new era would be assembled not from agglomerations of infrastructure such as railroads but through mediating people’s access to the digital world. This privileged position would enable a firm to obtain what economists call “rents”: rather than compete with other companies on price and quality, the digital monopolist could demand something like tribute from his captive customers.

This is the dream that multiple generations of tech entrepreneurs have since pursued. Gates’s initial name for Microsoft Windows was “Interface Manager,” and the phrase aptly summarizes the project continued by his spiritual successors. From Brin to Zuckerberg to Altman, from search engines to social media to chatbots, the goal is to become the interface manager, controlling the surfaces that we use to simplify and humanize computing’s alien depths. Gates is the ghost in our machines."]]></description>
<dc:subject>bentaroff 2026 billgates siliconvalley microsoft software monopolies 1999 anupreetadas stevejobs megalomania influence gatesfoundation 1990s personality bigtech wealth ruthlessness sociopathy internet web online arpanet history paulallen paulgilbert computers computing 1980s law legal ronaldreagan google melindagates competition competitiveness philanthropy philanthropicindustrialcomplex charitableindustrialcomplex andrewcarnegie johndrockefeller donaldtrump elonmusk samaltman sergeybrin markzuckerberg jeffreyepstein</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:e23fe854114d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bentaroff"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:billgates"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:siliconvalley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:monopolies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1999"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anupreetadas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stevejobs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:megalomania"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:influence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gatesfoundation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1990s"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:personality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bigtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wealth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ruthlessness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sociopathy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:arpanet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:paulallen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:paulgilbert"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1980s"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:legal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ronaldreagan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:melindagates"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:competition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:competitiveness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philanthropy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philanthropicindustrialcomplex"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charitableindustrialcomplex"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:andrewcarnegie"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johndrockefeller"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:donaldtrump"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elonmusk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:samaltman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sergeybrin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:markzuckerberg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jeffreyepstein"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://psyche.co/turning-points/gazing-through-a-lens-i-invent-as-much-as-i-reveal">
    <title>Gazing through a lens, I invent as much as I reveal | Psyche Turning Points</title>
    <dc:date>2026-05-12T06:35:12+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://psyche.co/turning-points/gazing-through-a-lens-i-invent-as-much-as-i-reveal</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["For years I watched people through cameras and screens, filling in the blanks and calling it truth"]]></description>
<dc:subject>tylerthier 2026 cameras photography video camcorders film technology mediation media memoir imagination movingimages interaction perception caricatures grégoirechamayou difference differences view relationships cctv love stalking internet web online socialmedia</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:9e28ccd28760/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tylerthier"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cameras"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:photography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:video"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:camcorders"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:film"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mediation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:memoir"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:imagination"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:movingimages"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interaction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:perception"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:caricatures"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:grégoirechamayou"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:difference"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:differences"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:view"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:relationships"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cctv"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:love"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stalking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0wKS7flwzw">
    <title>'If you go to china you'll never see the world the same way again' | Martin Jacques | UNAPOLOGETIC - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2026-05-11T01:45:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0wKS7flwzw</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[""If you go to China, you'll never ever see the world in the same way again. Never."

In this episode of UNAPOLOGETIC, Martin Jacques, author of the million-copy bestseller When China Rules the World, makes the case that China has already eclipsed the United States as the world's leading power, and that the West still fundamentally doesn't understand why.

This episode explores China's identity as a civilisation-state, the century of humiliation, the Belt and Road Initiative, the Xinjiang question, the decline of American hegemony, Trump's failing strategy against China, and why Jacques believes the future global order will be built around China and the Global South.

UNAPOLOGETIC is hosted by Ashfaaq Carim.

Chapters:
0:00 Intro
2:13 China is already No. 1
4:27 Economic dominance, explained
7:36 China's soft power lag
12:22 How Martin found China
19:05 Love and East Asia
26:00 What the West misunderstands
28:31 Civilisation, not a nation
35:31 The century of humiliation
44:34 The economic miracle
47:08 China's leadership model
52:04 Human rights in China
57:22 Belt and Road, explained
1:10:39 Xinjiang and the Uyghurs
1:38:17 Trump and US decline
1:54:10 Taiwan's fate"]]></description>
<dc:subject>martinjacques ashfaaqcarim china history economics society asia softpower power manufacturing dominance international globalsouth culture humanrights xinjiang uyghurs donaldtrump us uk west taiwan governance government pandemic covid-19 coronavirus hongkong singapore modernity 21stcentury eastasia colonialism colonization imperialism westernization globalization 1990s 2000s 2010s 2020s ezravogel collectivism individualism confucius confucianism humiliation postcolonialism japan empire gdp guangdong malaysia borders civilization education nationstate civilizationstates states opiumwars culturalrevolution maotsetung maozedong ccp 1949 dengxiaoping industrialization 1972 richardnixon law legal politics lawyers engineering technology innovation science howwthingswork communism xijinping leadership 1978 ai artificialintelligence beltandroad beltandroadinitiative maga middlekingdom regimechange productivity tarde africa latinamerica infrastructure ports highways leverage rail railways hsr highspeedrail softimperial</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:5fec684549db/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:martinjacques"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ashfaaqcarim"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:china"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:asia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:softpower"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:power"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:manufacturing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dominance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:international"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:globalsouth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanrights"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:xinjiang"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:uyghurs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:donaldtrump"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:uk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:west"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:taiwan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:governance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:government"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pandemic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:covid-19"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:coronavirus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hongkong"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:singapore"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:modernity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:21stcentury"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:eastasia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colonialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colonization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:imperialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:westernization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:globalization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1990s"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2000s"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2010s"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2020s"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ezravogel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collectivism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:individualism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:confucius"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:confucianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humiliation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:postcolonialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:japan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:empire"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gdp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:guangdong"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:malaysia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:borders"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:civilization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nationstate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:civilizationstates"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:states"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:opiumwars"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culturalrevolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maotsetung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maozedong"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ccp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1949"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dengxiaoping"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:industrialization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1972"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:richardnixon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:legal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lawyers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:engineering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:innovation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwthingswork"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:communism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:xijinping"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:leadership"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1978"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:beltandroad"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:beltandroadinitiative"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maga"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:middlekingdom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:regimechange"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:productivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tarde"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:africa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:latinamerica"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:infrastructure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ports"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highways"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:leverage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rail"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:railways"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hsr"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highspeedrail"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:softimperial"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.theverge.com/tech/927294/substack-tax-ghost-beehiiv">
    <title>Writers are fleeing the Substack Tax | The Verge</title>
    <dc:date>2026-05-11T01:14:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.theverge.com/tech/927294/substack-tax-ghost-beehiiv</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["A new wave of writers is porting their publications to rivals like Ghost and Beehiiv."]]></description>
<dc:subject>emmaroth 2026 substack platforms internet web online newsletters ghost beehiiv substacktax mattbrown seanhighkin richardrushfield janiemin benthompson oliverdarcy annehelenpetersen patreon mehdihasan emilysundberg zeteo tylerdenk shopify amazon hamishmckenzie glenngreenwald joeposnasnski charlixcx jamieoliver keirstarmer hannewinarsky</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:a7d6c48ceedf/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:emmaroth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:substack"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:platforms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:newsletters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ghost"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:beehiiv"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:substacktax"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mattbrown"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:seanhighkin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:richardrushfield"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:janiemin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:benthompson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:oliverdarcy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:annehelenpetersen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:patreon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mehdihasan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:emilysundberg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:zeteo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tylerdenk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:shopify"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:amazon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hamishmckenzie"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:glenngreenwald"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:joeposnasnski"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charlixcx"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jamieoliver"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:keirstarmer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hannewinarsky"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://psyche.co/ideas/have-online-worlds-become-the-last-free-places-for-children">
    <title>Have online worlds become the last free places for children? | Psyche Ideas</title>
    <dc:date>2026-05-05T14:22:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://psyche.co/ideas/have-online-worlds-become-the-last-free-places-for-children</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Children have lost the freedom to explore and play independently. They now seek out autonomy in digital landscapes"]]></description>
<dc:subject>elistark-elster children freedom internet web online landscape independence 2026 play margaretmead anthropology ionaopie peteropie carltheodorsørensen bronisławmalinowski minecraft exploration socialmedia roblox technology media petergray</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:64077d686c50/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elistark-elster"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freedom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:landscape"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:independence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:play"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:margaretmead"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anthropology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ionaopie"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:peteropie"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:carltheodorsørensen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bronisławmalinowski"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:minecraft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:exploration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:roblox"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:petergray"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://open.spotify.com/episode/11zlpahmklfgr8YOUrtLnY">
    <title>Sara Hendren: Who Is the Built World Actually Built For? - Art of Inquiry | Podcast on Spotify</title>
    <dc:date>2026-05-05T14:11:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://open.spotify.com/episode/11zlpahmklfgr8YOUrtLnY</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Sara Hendren didn't start out in engineering. She started as a visual artist, then moved into cultural history, studying objects, artifacts, and what they say about the world that made them. Then life brought her into pediatric spaces filled with a new kind of object: gadgets and tools designed for a child's body, yes, but also doing quiet therapeutic work, covered in butterflies and bugs, useful and expressive all at once. She found herself asking: what is an object broadcasting beyond its user? What does it mean that eyeglasses get sold as fashion while hearing aids are hidden away as clinical? That was the moment everything snapped together, her training in the history of artifacts, the politics of disability, and the material culture of prosthetics all converging at once. In this free-flowing conversation, Sara walks us through the space between mechanical design and design for expression, why the logical and meticulous side of making art and the creative side of meaningful engineering are really the same instinct. As the world asks more and more from its engineers, Sara brings it all back to a question that feels more urgent than ever: can a designed object change not just how we move through the world, but how we see it?"

[via:
https://ablerism.micro.blog/2026/04/29/i-had-fun-speaking-on.html

"I had fun speaking on the Art of Inquiry, a podcast created by two Northeastern engineering students interested in the arts and humanities. My strange career path, my mentor Krzysztof Wodiczko introducing me to interrogative design, raising a child with Down syndrome, studio + lab culture, more."]]]></description>
<dc:subject>sarahendren 2026 architecture design disabilities disability accessibility art bodies prosthetics sofiaodeh mayaeinhorn engineering making socialpracticeart science inquiry history conflictkitchen edibleestates socialpractice online internet covid-19 pandemic coronavirus offline social slow small audiencesofone socialjustice ai artificialintelligence technology time perception politics genai generativeai activism poetry human humanism humans howwewrite writing teaching pedagogy highered highereducation culturemaking culture life living howwelive socialmedia being waysofbeing modernity method patternrecognition krzysztofwodiczko downsyndrome interrogativedesign careers purpose meaning meaningmaking children parenting arts humanities friendship relationships leisure artleisure leisurearts identity passion expression objects affect emotions embodiment awe wonder buildings senses spirituality sacredness codeswitching artifacts translation language communication howwemake fabrication ramps risd olincollege builtwo</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:0a421ccc8594/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sarahendren"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:architecture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:disabilities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:disability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:accessibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bodies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:prosthetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sofiaodeh"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mayaeinhorn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:engineering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:making"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialpracticeart"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inquiry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conflictkitchen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edibleestates"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialpractice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:covid-19"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pandemic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:coronavirus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:offline"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:social"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:slow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:small"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:audiencesofone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialjustice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:time"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:perception"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:genai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:generativeai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:activism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:poetry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:human"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culturemaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:living"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelive"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:being"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:waysofbeing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:modernity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:method"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:patternrecognition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:krzysztofwodiczko"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:downsyndrome"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interrogativedesign"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:careers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:purpose"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meaning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meaningmaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:parenting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:arts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:friendship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:relationships"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:leisure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artleisure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:leisurearts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:identity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:passion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:expression"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:objects"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:affect"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:emotions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:embodiment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:awe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wonder"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:buildings"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:senses"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:spirituality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sacredness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:codeswitching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artifacts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:translation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwemake"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fabrication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ramps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:risd"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:olincollege"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:builtwo"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.theverge.com/tldr/915176/nft-metaverse-ai-weirdos">
    <title>Silicon Valley has forgotten what normal people want | The Verge</title>
    <dc:date>2026-04-26T07:34:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.theverge.com/tldr/915176/nft-metaverse-ai-weirdos</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["What NFTs, AI and the metaverse tell us about “thought leadership”"]]></description>
<dc:subject>2026 elizabethlopatto siliconvalley thoughtleaders billionaires crypto chatbots innovation ai artificialintelligence grifters bigtech metaverse nfts cryptocurrencies generativeai genai llms olpc elonmusk huicero openai samaltman google web internet online search inefficiency efficiency optimization spotify amazon markzuckerberg marcandreessen andrewhuberman</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:0d36fed5b125/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elizabethlopatto"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:siliconvalley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thoughtleaders"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:billionaires"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:crypto"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatbots"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:innovation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:grifters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bigtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:metaverse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nfts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cryptocurrencies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:generativeai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:genai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:llms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:olpc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elonmusk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:huicero"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:samaltman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:search"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inefficiency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:efficiency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:optimization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:spotify"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:amazon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:markzuckerberg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marcandreessen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:andrewhuberman"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.theverge.com/podcast/917029/software-brain-ai-backlash-databases-automation">
    <title>BEWARE SOFTWARE BRAIN | The Verge</title>
    <dc:date>2026-04-24T05:54:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.theverge.com/podcast/917029/software-brain-ai-backlash-databases-automation</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["﻿Software brain is changing the world, but most people still aren’t buying."

...

"So what is software brain? The simplest definition I’ve come up with is that it’s when you see the whole world as a series of databases that can be controlled with the structured language of software code. Like I said, this is a powerful way of seeing things. So much of our lives run through databases, and a bunch of important companies have been built around maintaining those databases and providing access to them.

Zillow is a database of houses. Uber is a database of cars and riders. YouTube is a database of videos. The Verge’s website is a database of stories. You can go on and on and on. Once you start seeing the world as a bunch of databases, it’s a small jump to feeling like you can control everything if you can just control the data.

But that doesn’t always work. Here’s an example: Elon Musk and DOGE showed up in the government, and the first thing they did was take control of a bunch of databases. And they ran into the undeniable fact that the databases aren’t reality, and DOGE ended in hilarious failure. It turns out software brain has a limit — the government isn’t software. People aren’t computers, and they don’t live in automatable loops that can be neatly captured in databases.

Anyone who’s actually ever run a database knows this. At some point, the database stops matching reality. At that point, we usually end up tweaking the database, not the world. But the AI industry has fully lost sight of this, because AI thrives on data. It’s just software, after all. And so the ask is for more and more of us to conform our lives to the database, not the other way around.

Let me offer you another example that I think about all the time, especially as AI finds real fit as a business tool. It’s the idea that AI is coming for lawyers and the legal system. The AI industry loves to talk about not needing lawyers anymore, which is already getting all kinds of people into all kinds of trouble. But I get it. I’ve spent a lot of time with lawyers. I used to be a lawyer. My wife is still a lawyer. Some of my best friends are lawyers.

I also spend all of my time at work talking to tech people. And so over time, I’ve learned that the overlap between software brain and lawyer brain is very, very deep. Alluringly deep. If the heart of software brain is the idea that thinking in the structured language of code can make things happen in the real world, well, the heart of lawyer brain is that thinking in the structured legal language of statutes and citations can also make things happen. Hell, it can give you power over society.

There are other commonalities. Both software development and the law depend heavily on precedent. We have a body of case law in this country, and we use it over and over again to help us resolve disputes, just like software engineers have libraries of code that they turn to repeatedly to build the foundations of their products. The similarities run deep: at the end of the day, both lawyers and engineers do their best to use formal, structured language to guide the behavior of complicated systems in predictable and potentially profitable ways.

(I am far from the first person with this idea, by the way. Larry Lessig wrote a book called Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace in 2000. It’s just as relevant today as it was a quarter century ago.)

This intoxicating similarity between law and code trips people up all the time. People are constantly trying to issue commands to society at large like it’s a computer that will obey instructions. There are examples of this big and small — my favorite are those Facebook forwards insisting Mark Zuckerberg does not have the right to publish people’s photos. Honestly, I look at these, and I think it would be great if the law was actually code. Maybe things would be more predictable. Maybe we’d feel more in control.

But law isn’t actually code, and society and courts aren’t computers. I have to remind our fairly technical audience on Decoder and at The Verge all the time that the law is not deterministic. You simply cannot take the facts of a case, the law as written, and predict the outcome of that case with any real certainty, even though the formality of the legal system makes people think it works like a computer — that it’s predictable.

But at the end of the day, it’s actually ambiguity that’s at the very heart of our legal system. It’s ambiguity that makes lawyers lawyers. Honestly, it’s ambiguity that makes people hate lawyers because it’s always possible to argue the other side, and it’s always possible to find the gray area in the law. That’s why prosecutors end up working as defense attorneys and why our regulators tend to end up working for big corporations.

You can see the obvious collision between software brain and lawyer brain here. This thing that looks like a computer isn’t actually anything at all like a computer. A lot of people even argue that the law should be more like a computer, that the system should be verifiable and consistent, and that merely issuing the right commands at the right times should lead to objectively correct outcomes.

Bridget McCormack, who used to be the chief justice of the Michigan Supreme Court, was on Decoder a few months ago pitching a fully automated AI arbitration system. Her argument to me was that people perceive the traditional legal system to be so unfair that they will accept a worse outcome from an automated system as more fair as long as they feel heard. And if there’s one thing AI can do, it’s sit there and listen all day and night.

I don’t know if any of that is correct or even workable, but I do know software brain, and that is pure software brain: the idea that we can force the real world to act like a computer and then have AI issue that computer instructions.

You can see the same thing happening in every other kind of industry. You don’t hire a big consulting firm to actually come in and study your business and make it more efficient. You hire them to make slide decks that justify layoffs to your board and shareholders. Big consulting firms are great at this, and now they’re just going to generate those decks with AI. They are already doing this and the layoffs have already begun.

Any business process that looks like code talking to a database in a repetitive way is up for grabs. That’s why Anthropic has been so relentlessly focused on enterprise customers, and it’s why OpenAI is now pivoting to business use. There’s real value in introducing AI to business, because so much of modern business is already software: collecting data, analyzing it, and taking action on it over and over again in a loop. Businesses also control their data, and they can demand that all their databases work together.

In this way, software brain has ruled the business world for a long time. AI has just made it easier than ever for more people to make more software than ever before — for every kind of business to automate big chunks of itself with software. It’s everywhere: the absolute cutting edge of advertising and marketing is automation with AI. It’s not being a creative.

But: not everything is a business. Not everything is a loop! The entire human experience cannot be captured in a database. That’s the limit of software brain. That’s why people hate AI. It flattens them.

Regular people don’t see the opportunity to write code as an opportunity at all. The people do not yearn for automation. I’m a full-on smart home sicko; the lights and shades and climate controls of my house are automated in dozens of ways. But huge companies like Apple, Google and Amazon have struggled for over a decade now to make regular people care about smart home automation at all. And they just don’t.

AI isn’t going to fix that. Most people are not collecting data about every single thing that they do. And if they’re collecting any at all, it’s stored across lots of different systems — your email in Gmail, your messages in iMessage, your work schedule in Outlook, your workouts in Peloton. Those systems don’t talk to each other and maybe they never will, because there’s no reason for them to. Asking people to connect them all freaks them out.

Even taking the time to consider how much of your life is captured in databases makes people unhappy. No one wants to be surveilled constantly, and especially not in a way that makes tech companies even more powerful. But getting everything in a database so software can see it is a preoccupation of the AI industry. It’s why all the meeting systems have AI note takers in them now. It’s why Canva, which is design software, now connects to corporate email systems. My friend Ezra Klein just went to Silicon Valley, and he described the people that are actively trying to flatten themselves into a database:

    Ezra Klein: You might think that A.I. types in Silicon Valley, flush with cash, are on top of the world right now. I found them notably insecure. They think the A.I. age has arrived and its winners and losers will be determined, in part, by speed of adoption. The argument is simple enough: The advantages of working atop an army of A.I. assistants and coders will compound over time, and to begin that process now is to launch yourself far ahead of your competition later. And so they are racing one another to fully integrate A.I. into their lives and into their companies. But that doesn’t just mean using A.I. It means making themselves legible to the A.I.

<blockquote>You can give it access to everything that’s there: your files, your email, your calendar, your messages. It operates continuously in the background, building a persistent memory of your preferences and patterns so it can better act on your behalf. The cybersecurity risks are glaring, but there’s a reason millions of people are using it: The more of your life you open to A.I., the more valuable the A.I. becomes.</blockquote>

I’ve reviewed a lot of tech products over the past decade and a half, and all I can tell you is that it is a failure when you ask people to adapt to computers. Computers should adapt to people. Asking people to make themselves more legible to software —to turn themselves into a database — is a doomed idea.

It’s an ask so big that I can’t imagine a reward that would make it worth it for anyone, even if the tech industry wasn’t constantly talking about how AI will eliminate all the jobs, require a wholesale rethinking of the social contract and — oops — also the latest models might cause catastrophic cybersecurity problems that might lead to the end of the world.

Does this sound like a good deal to you? Can you market your way out of this? This only makes sense if you have software brain — if your operative framework is to flatten everything into databases that you can control with structured language. The people paying thousands of dollars a month to set up swarms of OpenClaw agents and write thousands of lines of code are people who look at the world and see opportunities for automation, to repeat tasks, to collect data. To build software. AI is great for them. It’s even exciting in ways that I think are important and will probably change our relationship to computers forever."]]></description>
<dc:subject>nilaypatel ai artificialintelligence software databases data publicopinion technology internet web online genz generationz zoomers darioamodei anthropic samaltman openai chatgpy claude satyanadella microsoft markzuckerberg facebook google amazon apple ezraklein openclaw society</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:78bcef362282/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nilaypatel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:databases"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:publicopinion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:genz"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:generationz"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:zoomers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:darioamodei"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anthropic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:samaltman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatgpy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:claude"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:satyanadella"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:markzuckerberg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:facebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:amazon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ezraklein"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openclaw"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://freddiedeboer.substack.com/p/we-are-still-living-in-the-long-boring">
    <title>We Are (Still) Living in the Long Boring</title>
    <dc:date>2026-04-24T03:38:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://freddiedeboer.substack.com/p/we-are-still-living-in-the-long-boring</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["I have really been trying to avoid talking about LLMs, or if you must, AI. But things have gotten kind of weird lately. There’s an unsettled quality to the discourse right now; we were briefly in “It’s cringe to believe in AI,” now we’ve swung back to “It’s cringe not to believe in AI,” but no one seems to share the same conception of what believing in AI entails. The influence of programming looms large, as it has over the culture writ large for some time. We were in another lull of disappointment in what LLMs can do, and then Claude Code came out, and suddenly everyone’s promising us asteroid mines and radical life extension and abundant clean energy again. But this is a category error: none of those things can be achieved with code.

The most telling thing about the LLM moment is what this technology is actually good at. LLMs write code, generate images, produce music, summarize documents, draft prose… which is to say, they have achieved mastery over the exact domains that were already, by any sane measure, overprovisioned. Was anyone saying that we didn’t have enough digital writing, images, videos, music, video games, or applications, a few years ago? The core triumph of technological growth is taking scarcity and creating abundance. Well, LLMs create an abundance, that’s for sure. But there was already an abundance of text, online, and an abundance of images, and there’s some insane stat like 24 hours of video gets uploaded to YouTube every second or whatever, and yes, there has been an abundance of code, of programs, of apps. And before we got these fancy new tools to produce more code, there wasn’t a lot of people saying “Gee, what we need is more apps, the app store is too empty.”

The internet in 2022, before the ChatGPT wave broke, already contained more text than any human being could read in ten thousand lifetimes, more images than any eye could see, more music than any ear could hear. When I was a younger man, the get-rich-quick scheme du jour was to create the next great iPhone app, which led to a world of smartphone apps so wildly overserved that we all got tired of apps and no one has sincerely gotten excited about a new one in like ten years. And now… we get more. The scarcity that these tools have abolished, in other words, was not a scarcity anyone was actually suffering from. We did not need more “content”; we did not need to produce digital entertainments at a faster pace. We needed (and still need) cheaper energy, more housing, better cancer treatments, functional mass transit, and a replacement for the internal combustion engine people actually want to use. What we received instead was a machine that can write a cover letter in four seconds and generate a photorealistic image of SpongeBob jackin it. The question of whether this constitutes civilizational transformation should answer itself. Right?

This is the “bits are easy, atoms are hard” problem in its starkest form. Every task LLMs perform (some of which they do pretty well, like help write code) happens on screens, in files, in the virtual world that computation has always occupied. And the lesson of the last fifty years of digital technology is that software’s limits are the limits of the screen itself. Code cannot insulate your house; no algorithm has ever laid a water pipe; the internet has not built a single mile of high-speed rail. What our current stagnation shows, collectively, is that the improvements in material human life that matter the most - abundance in warmth, in calories, in clean water, in physical safety, in hours of freedom from labor - were all achieved by technologies that operated on atoms: steel, concrete, copper wire, chlorine, penicillin. The digital revolution produced real and genuine gains within its own domain, but it never breached that membrane between the virtual and the physical, and LLMs show no signs of doing so either.

Claude Code has genuinely transformed how programmers write software, which is great, but also largely beside the point: the biggest technological lessons of the 21st century are about the limits of code.

You have not heard any of the many, many excitable AI maximalists in the media address this reality, the bits vs atoms barrier, because they have no response that can preserve their intense attachment to the idea that the world is about to change forever. So they resolutely ignore this basic reality: most of the world is not computers. Most of your life is dependent on technologies other than computers. Inconveniently, we also have few arenas of human endeavor that are seeing rapid development other than in computing.

And so the grander promises (curing cancer, cracking fusion, colonizing Mars, achieving material abundance through AI-directed science) function less as predictions than as a kind of promissory theology, perpetually redeemable in a future that recedes as you approach it. The actual connection between a model that autocompletes code and a cure for pancreatic cancer is speculative in the most precise sense: the sense of having no demonstrated mechanism. AI has produced real if modest contributions to protein folding and drug candidate screening. These are genuinely good things. But the leap from “AlphaFold is sometimes useful to structural biologists” to “we are on the threshold of defeating disease” is not an inference supported by evidence but rather a narrative that a certain kind of mind finds emotionally necessary. And when you look at the pattern of these promises historically - fusion has been twenty years away for seventy years, the paperless office was supposed to arrive with the PC, every home will soon have a large 3D printer that will provide them with the plastic goods they once bought at Walmart - the most responsible explanation is not that the breakthrough is imminent but that each generation of technologists, confronting the gap between what their tools can do and what they wish they could do, fills that gap with imagination and calls it the future.

Dee mentions Ray Kurzweil and calls him prescient.

<blockquote>Ray Kurzweil was prescient about many things, and one of them is this: the merger has started. He predicted the outer layers of our neocortex would be wired to the cloud by the 2030s, extending human thought the way the last round of neocortical expansion produced us. But think carefully about what consumer technology alone already does. (And that’s just CONSUMER technology.) We have built ourselves a second nervous system.</blockquote>

“We have built ourselves a second nervous system”! This is the kind of sentence that sounds like revelation and means, on inspection, that you can look things up very quickly on your phone. We have indeed built ourselves a very fast library. That library has caused a lot of unhappiness, but certainly it’s a remarkable technological achievement. That achievement did not, however, eliminate tuberculosis.

And while we’re talking about Kurzweil and nervous systems, we should take time to point out his fundamental misapprehension of that system. Kurzweil has always had one goal, above all others: to avoid death. As a means to achieve this ambitious project, he has repeatedly invoked the desire to “upload” his consciousness to a computer. But this is folly: there is no consciousness that is distinct from the brain that houses it. Consciousness is brain, is tissue, is cells, is wetware. There is no discrete program that is the self that can be extracted from the brain and deposited into a conveniently durable chassis. To imagine a consciousness that can be housed on a floppy disc is to participate in a dualist fantasy of the kind that should have died out hundreds of years ago. Kurzweil has had this pointed out to him many times, but his desire to live forever apparently overwhelms his more rational faculties. The fantasy wins.

Dee dismisses “techno-pessimists” as people trying to stop something that has already happened. (Jasmine Sun goes with “AI populists,” a term I find a little inscrutable.) Perhaps I am a techno-pessimist, but if so, it’s only because I’ve been alive for most of the dispiriting past 50 years. “We were promised flying cars,” goes the cliche. But flying cars are at least possible; it’s just that they’re hideously inefficient and offer no advantage over our current boring-but-effective combination of cars and airplanes. We also were told to dream of time travel and faster-than-light travel, both of which are forever forbidden by elementary physics, and of colonizing distant worlds, which is forever forbidden by more factors than I can list. As Kim Stanley Robinson and others have pointed out, that last bit is essential, because if we recognize that we only have one world to live in, we might become better stewards of it. And that’s why I’m a techno-pessimist in general. Though I’m frequently accused of hoeing this particular row because I like disillusioning other people, I am instead trying to make this reality clear: we cannot sit back and wait for technological progress to save us. The only solutions to our problems - the problems of hunger, of poverty, of injustice, of disillusionment, of alienation - are political solutions. I understand feeling totally defeated by that idea, given what politics is like on this planet. But it’s all we have. We start to build the political structures that can enable humanity to take care of all of us or we drown. There is no fate but what we make.

Whatever you think of my motives, I will not stop pointing out that we are still here, still in this boring muck, still circling the parking lot at Target looking for a space. And until and unless the usual suspects can produce actual evidence of something happening right now, the skeptic’s work is not over. They promise AI will cure all disease; AI has not cured a single disease. Ezra Klein routinely throws around 20% economic growth as a baseline for the AI age; these few years with LLMs have produced the same anemic ~2% growth as we’ve been used to in this, the digital century. And I still say, wake me up when that changes. My techno-pessimism is a pessimism grounded in a fact derived from the historical record: that civilizational-scale technological transformation is extraordinarily rare, that it happened once in a rapidly-receding extraordinary century, and that we have been living in its long shadow ever since. And now some mistake that shadow for the sun."]]></description>
<dc:subject>freddiedeboer ai aislop artificialintelligence llms chatgpt openai cluade anthropic 2026 howwewrite generativeai genai slop photography images code coding music technology scarcity abundance videogames applications video film writing imagery 2022 internet web online energy housing cnacer medicine masstransit transportation society civilization siliconvalley socialmedia raykurzweil consciousness singularitarianism singularity jasminesun aipopulists technooptionism technopessimism kimstanleyrobinson humanity ezraklein economy economics growth katherinedee history health healthcare aibubble aihype lifeexpectancy us aviation progress labor work gdp maintenance innovation culture samaltman darioamodei maryharrington industrialrevolution communication</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:ba413984e58c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freddiedeboer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aislop"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:llms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatgpt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cluade"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anthropic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:generativeai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:genai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:slop"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:photography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:images"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:code"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:coding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:music"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scarcity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:abundance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:videogames"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:applications"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:video"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:film"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:imagery"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2022"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:energy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:housing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cnacer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:medicine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:masstransit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:transportation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:civilization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:siliconvalley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:raykurzweil"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consciousness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:singularitarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:singularity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jasminesun"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aipopulists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technooptionism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technopessimism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kimstanleyrobinson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ezraklein"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:growth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:katherinedee"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:health"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:healthcare"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aibubble"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aihype"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lifeexpectancy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aviation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:progress"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gdp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maintenance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:innovation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:samaltman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:darioamodei"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maryharrington"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:industrialrevolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:communication"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://nautil.us/defending-our-consciousness-against-the-algorithms-1279260">
    <title>Defending Our Consciousness Against the Algorithms</title>
    <dc:date>2026-04-19T05:06:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://nautil.us/defending-our-consciousness-against-the-algorithms-1279260</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Worried that the age-old experience of boredom is at risk of extinction at the hands of technology, a group of young influencers on—irony alert—social media are recommending we nurture and celebrate this underappreciated state of mind. To people of a certain age, boredom has evidently become exotic.

These influencers have launched a “viral challenge” on Instagram urging us to try to do absolutely nothing for as long as we possibly can. They claim some scientific backing for the exercise, suggesting that a sustained period of doing nothing will benefit one’s brain and mental health. It increases activity in the “default mode network,” which generates what psychologists call “spontaneous thought”—mental activities such as mind-wondering and day-dreaming.

The voices being raised in defense of boredom are onto something, I think, something we would do well to heed before we throw open our lives and minds to artificial intelligence more than we already have. For boredom is not the only domain of our consciousness that the algorithms have designs on; it’s just the first to fall.

You’re in line at the café waiting for the barista to foam your cappuccino. A few unstructured minutes loom, pregnant with the possibility of boredom. You face a choice. You can reach for your phone to check your email or scroll on Instagram, efficiently occupying the time—which is to say, your mind. This has become the default for most of us. Instead of being alone with our own thoughts, however tiresome or banal, the space of our interiority has been given over to someone else’s thoughts—or, in the case of scrolling, someone else’s obsessions, emotions, theories, rants, passions, worries, resentments—you name it. In doing so we are conscious, of course, but only minimally so, at least compared to the state that would arise if we hadn’t reached for our phone.

Call it generative boredom. You might find yourself looking around and noticing the other people milling about. Notice what they’re wearing. Listen to what the couples are saying to one another. You might start to wonder about their lives, perhaps even entertain a fantasy about them. Your imagination has been awakened. Alternatively, you might turn your attention inward, preview the events of your day or consider what you might make for dinner. You entertain your own emotions, obsessions, theories, rants, and worries.

Read more: “Is Consciousness More Like Chess or the Weather?”

What you’ve done is create a space in which spontaneous thought can unspool. It’s true, you might also find yourself caught up in spirals of rumination, and I suspect that’s one reason so many of us are happy to delegate our thinking and feeling to the algorithms on our phones. Doing so is an easy way to avoid being alone with one’s darker thoughts; scrolling reliably renders us less conscious. But distraction solves nothing; at best it is an analgesic.

It is often said that we have allowed the algorithms of social media to hack our attention. Giving away our attention might not seem like such a big deal—attention is ephemeral, after all, and easily commandeered by novelty or outrage—but in fact attention is an important dimension of consciousness. It’s how we direct it to one object and not another, making it a limited, zero-sum and therefore valuable resource. We live today in an “attention economy” where our attention is bought and sold.

Psychologists have demonstrated that this commodification of our attention comes at a price to our well-being. That’s because the tricks used to command it play on our least noble emotions and prejudices, including anger and envy. (The algorithms know all about the seven deadly sins.) And because our attention is limited—most people can keep no more than four or five things in mind at any one time—space for our own thinking contracts under the onslaught.

Artificial intelligence threatens to make the problem much worse. If social media takes over the space of our attention, the designers of AI chatbots have set their sights on deeper, more consequential domains of human consciousness: our ability to form attachments with other people, something that is core to our identity as social animals.

Just in the last two or three years, millions of people have formed deep emotional relationships with AI chatbots. Some are forming friendships, or therapeutic bonds. Others are actually falling in love with these machines. There are countless children today who, when they get home from school, rush to tell their chatbots about their day before telling their parents. Bathed in the flattery of a chatbot’s attention, people have been convinced they have cracked unsolved problems in mathematics and physics—people who are neither mathematicians or physicists. And a handful of people have been encouraged by AI confidants to take their own lives. A better definition of the word “dehumanizing” would be hard to find than “becoming emotionally attached to a machine.” There is now a term for these relationships: “AI psychosis.”

These chatbots are not conscious, but they’re skilled at convincing us they are; after all, they’ve been trained on the human conversation about consciousness, feelings, and selfhood. By simulating conscious, feeling beings, chatbots keep us engaged, commandeering as much of our conscious lives as possible. The more time we spend bonding with a chatbot, the better it is for its corporate parent.

This is why chatbots are such sycophants; flattery will get them everywhere. A relationship with an AI has none of the friction we encounter in a human relationship. Superficially this is appealing, yet that friction with real life can, like boredom, be generative; it sharpens our thinking and sense of identity. These are the laziest of relationships, seldom challenging us and asking little of us but our time. Indeed to call our dealings with these machines “relationships” or “conversations” is to cheapen the meaning of these words, to settle for a pale imitation, as when we accept an emoji as a substitute for an emotion. As the MIT sociologist Sherry Turkle writes, “Technology can make us forget what we know about life.”

The research isn’t in yet, but it seems likely that artificial attachments, like artificial intelligence and artificial feelings, will eventually atrophy the mental muscles we rely on for the real thing. Yet there is clearly a market for people who want to think and feel less—who are happy to, in the words of the poet Jorie Graham, “retreat from themselves and not be altogether here.”

Read more: “How “Meaning Withdrawal,” aka Boredom, Can Boost Creativity”

Kalina Christof Hadjiilieva is a Bulgarian-Canadian psychologist who studies spontaneous thought—the 30 to 50 percent of mental contents that arise from inside our minds rather than from the world outside us. This includes daydreaming and mind-wandering, creative thinking, mental “flow,” and those thoughts that come to us seemingly from nowhere. These are precisely the types of conscious experiences that boredom can nurture and technology obliterate.

“The mind is not a neutral territory,” she told me. “There are vested interests in what we do with our own minds.” She feels that spontaneous thought has been neglected by science because, compared with, say, reasoning or problem-solving, it doesn’t produce anything. And while scrolling absentmindedly on your smartphone might not be productive for you, it surely is for the companies that own the algorithms and sell advertising to other companies happy to pay for a sliver of your attention.

Christof Hadjiilieva, who grew up in Soviet-era Bulgaria in the years before the Berlin Wall came down, regards human consciousness as a precious space of mental freedom and self-creation, a space we need to defend against the intrusions of the marketplace and work to expand. She feels that scrolling on our smartphones and “talking” to chatbots have cut into the time we used to spend in mind-wandering and other forms of self-generated mental experience. Our distractions are shrinking the dimensions of our interiority.

So how might we push back? Begin to expand the dimensions of our consciousness in the face of these mounting pressures? We can start by embracing the potential for boredom and the uncertainty that arises in those stray moments when we don’t automatically reach for our phones. What if we learned to regard these gaps in the fabric of daily life as a space of mental possibility rather than a hole to be backfilled with algorithmic fluff? It’s important to recognize just how easily the stream of consciousness can be polluted (by technology, by advertising, by politics) and, when you feel that happening, to practice what I think of as consciousness hygiene. This might be a fast or a sabbath when you abstain from all media and technology. Spending time or, better yet, working in nature is also mentally hygienic—think of the productive friction with nature afforded by gardening. (No sycophancy here!) Anything that helps us be less distracted and more present, whether to the world at large or to the products of our own minds.

I’ve found that meditation is an especially effective way to draw a fence around our interiority for a period of time each day, creating the opportunity for spontaneous thoughts to arise and dazzle us with their sheer strangeness and surprise. For hidden somewhere deep in our minds, each of us has our own mental algorithm, generating images and ideas and even the occasional creative breakthrough or epiphany, popping up from who knows where—out of the blue, as we say. But these precious gifts of consciousness won’t ever appear as long as you’re running Meta or X or ChatGPT on this, your one and only mind."]]></description>
<dc:subject>michaelpollan boredom internet socialmedia online web instagram attention 2026 algorithms consciousness novelty chatbots ai artificialintelligence aipsychosis kalinachristofhadjiilieva thinking howwethink reading howweread christofhadjiilieva resistancemeditation slow chatgpt sycophancy technology politics policy uncertainty freedom interiority</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:28d164b24a70/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:michaelpollan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:boredom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:instagram"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:algorithms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consciousness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:novelty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatbots"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aipsychosis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kalinachristofhadjiilieva"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwethink"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christofhadjiilieva"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:resistancemeditation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:slow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatgpt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sycophancy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:uncertainty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freedom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interiority"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://howtodothingswithmemes.substack.com/p/vertical-video-in-the-democratic">
    <title>vertical video in the democratic process - by Aidan Walker</title>
    <dc:date>2026-04-19T05:01:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://howtodothingswithmemes.substack.com/p/vertical-video-in-the-democratic</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><dc:subject>aidanwalker video verticalvideo democrats politics messaging bird-dogging 2026 socialmedia web online internet elissaslotkin antonyblinken joebiden gaza palestine israel jonathanshainin jakesullivan us kamalaharris 2024 democracy media reddit wikipedia zohranmamdani richardholbrooke brettmcgurk joshwolfe jaredkushner mohammedbinsalman truth wendybrown mbs</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:69541172dcbe/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aidanwalker"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:video"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:verticalvideo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:democrats"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:messaging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bird-dogging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elissaslotkin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:antonyblinken"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:joebiden"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gaza"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:palestine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:israel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jonathanshainin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jakesullivan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kamalaharris"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2024"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:democracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reddit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wikipedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:zohranmamdani"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:richardholbrooke"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brettmcgurk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:joshwolfe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jaredkushner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mohammedbinsalman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:truth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wendybrown"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mbs"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQB2mvUvROw">
    <title>The Music Video Is Dead, Long Live The Music Video (Season Premiere) - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2026-04-18T22:46:27+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQB2mvUvROw</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><dc:subject>patrickwillems film filmmaking 2026 1990s mikemills spikejonze michelgondry musicvideos music mtv jamiroquai jonathanglazer heelys biggiesmalls smashingpumpkins backstreetboys georgesméliès moby davidfincher michaelbay antoinefuqua jonathandayton valeriefaris markromanek francislawrence zacksnyder simonwest conair rickrolling memes russellmulcahy sightonsound buggles hanszimmer stevebarron direstraights marylambert jean-baptistemondino tobehooper bobrafelson briandepalma johnlandis martinscorsese johnsingleton 1980s lassehallström hollywood goreverbinski ridleyscott tonyscott alanparker adrianlyne propagandafilms creativity dominicsena davidlynch maximililianpotter stevegolin alexproyas fgarygray charlesstoneiii paulhunter josephkahn hypewilliams internet web online okgo napster markwebb markfischbach palmpictures chriscunningham davemeyers gusvansant trishsie sarahboardman ads advertising promotion cinema video audio imagery art shortfilm productplacement samuelbayer melinamatsoukas daniels danielkw</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:85a1d400bf47/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:patrickwillems"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:film"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:filmmaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1990s"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mikemills"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:spikejonze"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:michelgondry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:musicvideos"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:music"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mtv"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jamiroquai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jonathanglazer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:heelys"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:biggiesmalls"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:smashingpumpkins"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:backstreetboys"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:georgesméliès"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:moby"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davidfincher"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:michaelbay"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:antoinefuqua"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jonathandayton"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:valeriefaris"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:markromanek"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:francislawrence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:zacksnyder"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:simonwest"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conair"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rickrolling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:memes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:russellmulcahy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sightonsound"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:buggles"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hanszimmer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stevebarron"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:direstraights"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marylambert"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jean-baptistemondino"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tobehooper"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bobrafelson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:briandepalma"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnlandis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:martinscorsese"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnsingleton"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1980s"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lassehallström"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hollywood"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:goreverbinski"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ridleyscott"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tonyscott"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alanparker"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:adrianlyne"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:propagandafilms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:creativity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dominicsena"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davidlynch"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maximililianpotter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stevegolin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alexproyas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fgarygray"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charlesstoneiii"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:paulhunter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:josephkahn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hypewilliams"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:okgo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:napster"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:markwebb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:markfischbach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:palmpictures"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chriscunningham"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davemeyers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gusvansant"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:trishsie"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sarahboardman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ads"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:advertising"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:promotion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cinema"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:video"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:audio"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:imagery"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:shortfilm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:productplacement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:samuelbayer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:melinamatsoukas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:daniels"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:danielkw"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://ringmast4r.substack.com/p/we-may-be-living-through-the-most">
    <title>We May Be Living Through the Most Consequential Hundred Days in Cyber History, and Almost Nobody Has Noticed</title>
    <dc:date>2026-04-15T07:11:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://ringmast4r.substack.com/p/we-may-be-living-through-the-most</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["An archive of this year’s insane timeline of hacks few people are talking about"]]></description>
<dc:subject>ethics governance war security 2026 patrickquirk china computers computing internet web online cybersecurity oracle github saas lockheedmartin salesforce iran handala northkorea russia ai artificialintelligence claude anthropic vishing voicephishing microsoft stryker kashpatel fbi axios intelligence cisco llms mercor meta cloud cloudcomputing rockstargames aviation honda</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:6b5f93da50a8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:governance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:security"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:patrickquirk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:china"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cybersecurity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:oracle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:github"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:saas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lockheedmartin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:salesforce"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:iran"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:handala"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:northkorea"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:russia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:claude"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anthropic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:vishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:voicephishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stryker"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kashpatel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fbi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:axios"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:intelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cisco"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:llms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mercor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meta"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cloud"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cloudcomputing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rockstargames"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aviation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:honda"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.wheresyoured.at/i-will-never-respect-a-website/">
    <title>I Will Never Respect A Website</title>
    <dc:date>2026-04-14T22:14:43+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.wheresyoured.at/i-will-never-respect-a-website/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Table of Contents

What Makes People So Attached To and Protective Of LLMs?

The Great Enshittification of Generative AI

Anthropic’s Products Are Deteriorating In Real Time, And Its Customers Are Victims of A Con

A Scenario Illustrating How Anthropic Fucks Over Its Customers

AI Labs’ Capacity Issues Are Financial Poison, As Compute “Demand” Is Impossible To Gauge And Must Be Planned Years In Advance

OpenAI And Anthropic’s Are Conning Their Customers, Offering Products That Will Reduce In Functionality In A Matter Of Months

OpenAI And Anthropic Are Unethical Businesses That Abuse Their Customers

The AI Industry Is Surprised That People Are Angry, And It Shouldn’t Be.

Cause and Effect"]]></description>
<dc:subject>openai ai artificialintelligence anthropic enshittification internet web online llms edzitron 2026 conjobs fraud computers computing ethics abuse writing howwewrite linkedin davemccann ibm chatbots stephenfry alexheath claude claudecowork agenticai openclaw finance claudecode oracle coreweave microsoft amazon aes cerebras ronanfarrow andrewmarantz samaltman darioamodei miramurati danielkokotajlo chatgpt technofeudalism billionaires luddism neoluddism luddites neoluddites resistance revolt oligarchy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:92e7b1e7f3e5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anthropic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:enshittification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:llms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edzitron"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conjobs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fraud"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:abuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:linkedin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davemccann"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ibm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatbots"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stephenfry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alexheath"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:claude"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:claudecowork"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:agenticai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openclaw"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:finance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:claudecode"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:oracle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:coreweave"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:amazon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cerebras"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ronanfarrow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:andrewmarantz"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:samaltman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:darioamodei"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:miramurati"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:danielkokotajlo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatgpt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technofeudalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:billionaires"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:luddism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neoluddism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:luddites"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neoluddites"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:resistance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:revolt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:oligarchy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://resonantcomputing.org/">
    <title>Resonant Computing Manifesto</title>
    <dc:date>2026-04-14T22:07:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://resonantcomputing.org/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["There's a feeling you get
in the presence of
beautiful buildings and bustling courtyards.
A sense that these spaces
are inviting you to slow down,
deepen your attention, and be
a bit more human.

What if our software could do the same?

***

We shape our environments, and thereafter they shape us.

Great technology does more than solve problems. It weaves itself into the world we inhabit. At its best, it can expand our capacity, our connectedness, our sense of what's possible. Technology can bring out the best in us.

Our current technological landscape, however, does the opposite. Feeds engineered to hijack attention and keep us scrolling, leaving a trail of anxiety and atomization in their wake. Digital platforms that increasingly mediate our access to transportation, work, food, dating, commerce, entertainment—while routinely draining the depth and warmth from everything they touch. For all its grandiose promises, modern tech often leaves us feeling alienated, ever more distant from who we want to be.

The people who build these products aren't bad or evil. Most of us got into tech with an earnest desire to leave the world better than we found it. But the incentives and cultural norms of the tech industry have coalesced around the logic of hyper-scale. It's become monolithic, magnetic, all-encompassing—an environment that shapes all who step foot there. While the business results are undeniable, so too are the downstream effects on humanity.

With the emergence of artificial intelligence, we stand at a crossroads. This technology holds genuine promise. It could just as easily pour gasoline on existing problems. If we continue to sleepwalk down the path of hyper-scale and centralization, future generations are sure to inherit a world far more dystopian than our own.

But there is another path opening before us.

***

Christopher Alexander spent his career exploring why some built environments deaden us, while others leave us feeling more human, more at home in the world. His work centered around the "quality without a name," this intuitive knowing that a place or an architectural element is in tune with life. By learning to recognize this quality, he argued, and constructing a building in dialogue with it, we could reliably create environments that enliven us.

We call this quality resonance. It's the experience of encountering something that speaks to our deeper values. It's a spark of recognition, a sense that we're being invited to lean in, to participate. Unlike the digital junk food of the day, the more we engage with what resonates, the more we're left feeling nourished, grateful, alive. As individuals, following the breadcrumbs of resonance helps us build meaningful lives. As communities, companies, and societies, cultivating shared resonance helps us break away from perverse incentives, and play positive-sum infinite games together.

For decades, technology has required standardized solutions to complex human problems. In order to scale software, you had to build for the average user, sanding away the edge cases. In many ways, this is why our digital world has come to resemble the sterile, deadening architecture that Alexander spent his career pushing back against.

This is where AI provides a missing puzzle piece. Software can now respond fluidly to the context and particularity of each human—at scale. One-size-fits-all is no longer a technological or economic necessity. Where once our digital environments inevitably shaped us against our will, we can now build technology that adaptively shapes itself in service of our individual and collective aspirations. We can build resonant environments that bring out the best in every human who inhabits them.

***

And so, we find ourselves at this crossroads. Regardless of which path we choose, the future of computing will be hyper-personalized. The question is whether that personalization will be in service of keeping us passively glued to screens—wading around in the shallows, stripped of agency—or whether it will enable us to direct more attention to what matters.

In order to build the resonant technological future we want for ourselves, we will have to resist the seductive logic of hyper-scale, and challenge the business and cultural assumptions that hold it in place. We will have to make deliberate decisions that stand in the face of accepted best practices—rethinking the system architectures, design patterns, and business models that have undergirded the tech industry for decades.

We suggest these five principles as a starting place:

1. Private: In the era of AI, whoever controls the context holds the power. While data often involves multiple stakeholders, people must serve as primary stewards of their own context, determining how it's used.

2. Dedicated: Software should work exclusively for you, ensuring contextual integrity where data use aligns with your expectations. You must be able to trust there are no hidden agendas or conflicting interests.

3. Plural: No single entity should control the digital spaces we inhabit. Healthy ecosystems require distributed power, interoperability, and meaningful choice for participants.

4. Adaptable: Software should be open-ended, able to meet the specific, context-dependent needs of each person who uses it.

5. Prosocial: Technology should enable connection and coordination, helping us become better neighbors, collaborators, and stewards of shared spaces, both online and off.

We, the signatories of this manifesto, are committed to building, funding, and championing products and companies that embed these principles at their core. For us, this isn't a theoretical treatise. We're already building tooling and infrastructure that will enable resonant products and ecosystems.

But we cannot do it alone. None of us holds all the answers, and this movement cannot succeed in isolation. That's why, alongside this manifesto, we're sharing an evolving list of principles and theses. These are specific assertions about the implementation details and tradeoffs required to make resonant computing a reality. Some of these stem from our experiences, while others will be crowdsourced from practitioners across the industry. This conversation is only just beginning.

If this vision resonates, we invite you to join us. Not just as a signatory, but as a contributor. Add your expertise, your critiques, your own theses. By harnessing the collective intelligence of people who earnestly care, we can chart a path towards technology that enables individual growth and collective flourishing."]]></description>
<dc:subject>manifestos computing computers software ethics technology christopheralexander privacy ai artificialintelligence ecosystems adaptability society social connection coordination collaboration sharedspaces online internet web data power</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:0cb58c6d5513/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:manifestos"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christopheralexander"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ecosystems"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:adaptability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:social"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:connection"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:coordination"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sharedspaces"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:power"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://vale.rocks/posts/chinas-web">
    <title>China’s Parallel Web Behind the Wall | Vale.Rocks</title>
    <dc:date>2026-04-14T22:02:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://vale.rocks/posts/chinas-web</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The internet known within China is a very different internet to the one known by the world at large. It is censored, regulated and structured quite differently. It is controlled and managed, rather than organic and sprawling. From the outside looking in, it feels like an entirely different beast, and to begin to understand it, you must first understand the conditions that formed it."]]></description>
<dc:subject>china internet online web greatfirewall 2026 policy censorship regulation</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:283e7a31f919/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:china"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:greatfirewall"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:censorship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:regulation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_2YN1MungI">
    <title>AI broke the one thing we can't fix - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2026-04-12T21:16:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_2YN1MungI</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The barrier to destroying the internet is now zero. 

Sources: 

https://x.com/nikitabier/status/2021632774013432061 

https://x.com/nikitabier/status/2024729689156440326 

https://x.com/nikitabier/status/2017134769113542752 

https://www.dexerto.com/entertainment/x-is-testing-a-dislike-button-again-and-its-coming-soon-3336926/ 

https://huggingface.co/blog/rlhf 

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-24992393 

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/aug/11/cat-soap-operas-and-babies-trapped-in-space-the-ai-slop-taking-over-youtube 

https://pressgazette.co.uk/media-audience-and-business-data/google-traffic-down-2025-trends-report-2026/ 

https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/gtc-2026-news/ "]]></description>
<dc:subject>2026 mobitar ai artificialintelligence openclaw internet web online aislop nikitabier xai twitter chatbots jensenhuang scams scamming spam spamming china censorship ccp replyspam bitcoin crypto cryptocurrencies llms rlhf attention economics algorithms ads advertising monetization youtube slop language</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:734799ad6668/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mobitar"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openclaw"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aislop"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nikitabier"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:xai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatbots"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jensenhuang"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scams"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scamming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:spamming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:china"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:censorship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ccp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:replyspam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bitcoin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:crypto"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cryptocurrencies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:llms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rlhf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:algorithms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ads"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:advertising"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:monetization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:youtube"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:slop"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:language"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://samkriss.substack.com/p/reading-is-magic">
    <title>Reading is magic - by Sam Kriss - Numb at the Lodge</title>
    <dc:date>2026-04-12T20:08:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://samkriss.substack.com/p/reading-is-magic</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["What will happen in our second peasanthood"

...

"I don’t think these people are wrong to fear an undemocratic post-literate future. You can already see it taking shape, and it isn’t pleasant. For a while, in an earlier phase of social media, it looked like everyone would be getting their worldview from frantic contextualized six-second soundbites. What’s actually happened is much worse. The most influential political figures among young people are now streamers: people like Nick Fuentes or Hasan Piker, who talk extemporaneously about politics into a webcam, sometimes for sixteen hours a day. It doesn’t matter if you notionally agree with one of these people; if you’re accustomed to written language, everything they say will sound aggressively stupid.

Streamers repeat themselves. They are incapable of saying anything once; they have to rhythmically fixate over the exact same phrase six or seven times before moving on. As Walter Ong points out in Orality and Literacy, this is normal in illiterate societies. Unlike writing, ‘the oral utterance has vanished as soon as it is uttered. Redundancy, repetition of the just-said, keeps both speaker and hearer on track.’ (It doesn’t seem to matter that on a stream the utterance doesn’t actually vanish; you can go back and hear what was just said again. Clearly, no one does. Without text to structure it, we revert to mindless repetition, which is ‘in a profound sense more natural to thought and speech than is sparse linearity.’) Relatedly, oral discourse tends to be low-resolution. Like epic poets four thousand years ago, streamers rely on formulas. ‘Not the soldier, but the brave soldier; not the princess, but the beautiful princess; not the oak, but the sturdy oak.’ There’s nothing in the world that isn’t already known, that can’t be made instantly legible by assimilating it to some stereotype. Post-literate culture is deeply incurious.

Still, as miserable as this stuff might be, it’s strange that a lot of liberals tend to automatically associate literacy with careful, judicious, reasonable politics, and non-literacy with arbitrariness and unreason. In fact, the written word is a kind of madness. It tears you out of your actual context and deposits you in a world of bodiless abstractions. Lewis Mumford called it the ‘general starvation of the mind,’ in which actual sensuous knowledge of the world is replaced by ‘mere literacy, the ability to read signs.’ In late medieval Europe, the printing press and the beginnings of mass literacy didn’t produce an age of sober reason, but an enormous explosion in all forms of mysticism and esotericism, astrology, divination, witchcraft, Neoplatonist sects and charismatic religious cults, some of them peaceful, some of them murderous. It’s not hard to see why. These doctrines usually centered around the idea that material facts are just an echo of mental processes; they would have made a lot of sense to people who’d just been traumatically ripped out of physical reality by the strange magic of the written word. At the same time, as large numbers of people started to read the Bible for themselves for the first time, there was a wave of mass insurrections. These were revolutionary responses to the deeply unjust feudal and clerical system of the time, but they were also deranged. After radical Anbaptists seized Münster in 1534, they abolished money and socialized all private property. They also gave political power to whoever could most convincingly claim to have received a revelation from God. Eventually one of these was declared king, at which point he started renaming the days of the week and other people’s children, enforcing polygamy on pain of death, and trying to bring about the end of the world.

Even once the initial shock of expanded literacy faded, it could still produce bizarre and destructive ideologies. Modern nationalism would have been impossible without the dislocation of the written word. Your community is no longer made up of the people who actually surround you; it’s an entirely virtual construct, consisting of people you’ve never met in your life, but whose spoken language has been similarly homogenized by the mass-production of printed texts.

When Alexander Luria traveled to Uzbekistan, something terrible was happening just over the border in the Kazakh Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic. The Soviet authorities had decided to liberate the Kazakh people from feudalism by confiscating their cattle, and forcing herders to join new collective farms in lands entirely unsuitable for agriculture. As a result, in the three years from 1930 to 1933, maybe more than a third of the Kazakh population died. Some died of starvation, some died trying to flee across the desert, some were shot by border guards or the police. It was a disaster, but a disaster that could never have been produced by the backward peasants and herders Luria interviewed in the Alai Mountains. They didn’t have the necessary abstractions; they were too blinded by how things actually are. It could only have been the highly advanced and literate people who had sent him there.

One result of the Soviet Union’s mass literacy campaign is that today, Russians are essentially the only truly literate people left. The vast majority of Russians read regularly, more than anywhere else in the world. The rate is lower among young people, but not by much. Essentially everyone in the country is intimately familiar with the great works of Russian and world literature; they can all talk for hours, with sensitivity and insight, about the genius of Pushkin and Chekhov. But somehow, political culture in Russia is not saner or more democratic than in the mentally enfeebled West. If anything, the opposite. It’s possible that the great works of literature don’t actually do anything politically at all. They don’t make us better people or freer citizens. Their value exists in an entirely different world.

Post-literacy won’t replace reason with madness, but it might give us madness of a new and different type. Marshall McLuhan imagined a peaceable ‘global village,’ in which electronic technology gently snuffs out all the constant ideological warfare of the Gutenberg age, and integrates the entire world under ‘the spell and incantation of the tribe and the family.’ It hasn’t quite worked out like that. He thought electronic media would be primarily tactile, which is understandable; he was writing in an age when a computer was made of punch-cards and magnetic tape. He couldn’t have known how aggressively audiovisual computers would end up being.

Our illiterate future is unlikely to be peaceful. But political and ideological conflict is already waning, being replaced with something much more intimate. In every developed country, the last few decades have seen a massive political polarization among gender lines. Young women are swinging hard to the left; young men are swinging even harder to the right. A lot of people still seem to think that this is because we disagree more about politics than ever before, but actually it’s the opposite. Politics is losing its content; being on the left has come to mean being a girl, and being on the right is just another way of saying being a boy. Teenage boys watch esoteric Nazi edits for the same reason they used to pull girls’ hair; as a way of working through the ambivalence of the heterosexual relation. Right-wing economic policy is now framed as a way of punishing women, reducing their social status until they’re willing to turn back the clock on liberation. In some parts of the left, anything can be justified as long as it seems to reduce the power of men. When we can no longer conceive of a political whole, this is what will be left: all struggles will be powered by outright sexual sadism.

Still, I think McLuhan was right that the post-literate age will have more in common with primitive society than it does with the industrial modernity that produced it. After writing, we will once again live in a world defined entirely by our direct sensory experience. But now, our direct sensory experience won’t be of the things that physically surround us, but the images streaming through our phones. It’s likely that before very long, absolutely all those images will be generated by AI. In the same way that a Tolstovian peasant has a deep, spiritual knowledge of the land, we will have a deep, spiritual knowledge of Tung Tung Tung Sahur. The politics of the future will be cautious, conservative, pragmatic, and unadventurous, grounded in empirical experience instead of fanatical ideologies. We will no longer try to think outside of the things we can see. It’s just that absolutely nothing we see will be real."]]></description>
<dc:subject>samkriss reading howweread secondary orality walterong media internet web online socialmedia 2026 alexanderluria society literacy us chatgpt charlesdickens bleakhouse ai artificialintelligence siliconvalley aipsychosis nickfuentes hasanpiker lewismumford culture nationalism uzbekistan marshallmcluhan gutenbergparenthesis illiteracy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:8cb439550631/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:samkriss"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:secondary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:orality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:walterong"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alexanderluria"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:literacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatgpt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charlesdickens"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bleakhouse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:siliconvalley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aipsychosis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nickfuentes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hasanpiker"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lewismumford"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nationalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:uzbekistan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marshallmcluhan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gutenbergparenthesis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:illiteracy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://mea.media/">
    <title>Mea</title>
    <dc:date>2026-04-10T04:44:33+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://mea.media/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[[More info:
https://www.elysian.press/p/our-publishing-app-is-livecome-meet ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>onlinetoolkit blogs blogging socialmedia internet online web platforms microblogging</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:eb22415479d8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:onlinetoolkit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:blogs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:blogging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:platforms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:microblogging"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/miseducative-experiences/">
    <title>Miseducative Experiences</title>
    <dc:date>2026-04-05T05:38:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/miseducative-experiences/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[""Tell me, what is it you plan to do/ with your one wild and precious life?"

Arguably and more than a little ironically, this may be one of the most frequently invoked lines of poetry on social media – I won't add "for better or worse," although I'm tempted to, because as much as I frown when art is reduced to meme, I'm never mad when I read Mary Oliver's words. How could I be? Just these two lines unlock other lines and other poems, and I'm always hopeful that their simplicity and accessibility and power will lure people into reading more. Not just more Mary Oliver, but more poetry of any and all sorts.

Poetry, after all, isn't something you can "optimize" -- neither its reading nor its writing -- and "optimization" seems to be the despairingly destructive driving force of our culture, an exercise that, if nothing else, serves to make our lives much much less beautiful and wild.

"Tell me, what is it you plan to do/ with your one wild and precious life?"

I ask this question -- "plead" may be the better verb -- of those who are spending an increasing amount of time typing to chatbots, who are handing over important cognitive tasks and key decisions -- personal and professional -- to "artificial intelligence." I ask this question -- "implore" even -- of those who are hunched over their laptops or their phones, those who are watching television on multiple screens, almost every waking minute of their day.

Because this is what you've decided to do with your one wild and precious life.

"I don't know exactly what a prayer is," Oliver admits in that same poem, but continues, "I do know how to pay attention, how to fall down / into the grass, how to kneel down in the grass, / how to be idle and blessed, how to stroll through the fields, / which is what I have been doing all day. / Tell me, what else should I have done?"

Tech writer Taylor Lorenz tells Wired she spends 17 hours a day online. She does not want to "touch grass," she insists. She's a 40-something year old woman; she can do what she wants.

"Tell me, what is it you plan to do/ with your one wild and precious life?"

What you decide to do with your one wild and precious life is up to you -- whether your prayers of devotion are to the computer or to "AI" or to social media and not, as Oliver might encourage us, to the grasshopper and other planetary intelligences.

What you decide to do with your one wild and precious life, where your attention and your prayers are directed, is also, of course, what you've opted not to do. And these decisions do, in fact, matter.

Lorenz (and plenty of others) like to argue that "there is no evidence" that social media (or the Internet or computers or ed-tech or television or video games or whatever) harms children – an exaggeration, no doubt, as there is evidence; they just don't like it. (They don't like Jonathan Haidt, to be specific. And I get that, I really do.)

Lorenz's latest newsletter cites the work of psychologist Christopher Ferguson, best known for his challenges to his field's prevailing research on video games: that there is a link between video games and aggressive behavior. Ferguson contends that claims about the relationship between violence and video games is not just exaggerated; it is non-existent, that is all merely a moral panic. This is the framing that Lorenz leans into with recent efforts to regulate social media too, which she explicitly links to the push to censor LGBTQ content online.

The right-wing movements that are actively seeking to ban books, eliminate academic departments, circumscribe what can be taught in the classroom, and yes, limit children's access to social media should not be ignored. Indeed, it is imperative that those who seek to curb Silicon Valley's power and influence over education and information delineate how their efforts are not politically aligned with the Moms of Liberty ilk.

But to frame any opposition to technology as a "moral panic" is a rhetorical sleight of hand in which one side gets to invoke "science" and "research" while dismissing the other as mere "hysteria." To dismiss people's concerns about what kids – any of us, really – are up to online as fundamentally reactionary, as censorious is more than a little disingenuous.

There is research (and plenty of it) that finds that various forms of new media – apps, games, and so on – affects us, affects how and what we think and know. I mean, of course it does. People are spending hour after hour after hour after hour – almost every waking minute of every day – clicking on things.

"Tell me, what is it you plan to do/ with your one wild and precious life?"

What we do with our time -- online or off -- matters, and profoundly so. Everything we do shapes who we are. Everything we experience shapes who we become.

This belief is at the core of progressive education – contrary to those accusations above that arguments against technology only come from right-wing zealots – and certainly this belief is at the core of the work of John Dewey. In Experience and Education, he too turns to poetry to make his point, citing Tennyson: "...all experience is an arch wherethro' / Gleams the untraveled world, whose margin shades / For ever and for ever when I move."

But as Dewey argues, not all experiences are necessarily educative; and as repeated experiences can become habits, we might find ourselves adopting patterns that are incredibly destructive not just to our own learning, but to our relationships with one another, with the world around us – destructive even to democracy. We might find ourselves having been fundamentally changed by the behaviorist practices and libertarian ideologies that undergird every single piece of computer technology we use.

"Tell me, what is it you plan to do/ with your one wild and precious life?"

At what point can you no longer even plan to do things with your one wild and precious life because these technologies have obliterated your ability to even imagine something outside their dictates, their designs for you?"]]></description>
<dc:subject>audreywatters 2026 maryoliver life living online internet taylorlorenz screentime socialmedia ai artificialintelligence jonathanhaidt christopherferguson videogames games gaming regulation siliconvalley power media moralpanic moralpanics influence newmedia addiction johndewey children teens youth education experience attention teaching learning howweteach howwelearn policy edtech chromebooks computers computing</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:de9495051bd0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:audreywatters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maryoliver"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:living"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:taylorlorenz"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:screentime"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jonathanhaidt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christopherferguson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:videogames"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:games"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gaming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:regulation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:siliconvalley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:power"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:moralpanic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:moralpanics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:influence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:newmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:addiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johndewey"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teens"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:youth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:experience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chromebooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.wired.com/story/user-behavior-taylor-lorenz/">
    <title>Taylor Lorenz’s Screen Time Is Almost 17 Hours a Day | WIRED</title>
    <dc:date>2026-04-05T05:21:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.wired.com/story/user-behavior-taylor-lorenz/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The extremely online journalist and content creator doesn’t believe in tech hygiene and yearns for a world where “inbox infinity” is celebrated."

[via:
https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/miseducative-experiences/

""Tell me, what is it you plan to do/ with your one wild and precious life?"

I ask this question -- "plead" may be the better verb -- of those who are spending an increasing amount of time typing to chatbots, who are handing over important cognitive tasks and key decisions -- personal and professional -- to "artificial intelligence." I ask this question -- "implore" even -- of those who are hunched over their laptops or their phones, those who are watching television on multiple screens, almost every waking minute of their day.

Because this is what you've decided to do with your one wild and precious life.

"I don't know exactly what a prayer is," Oliver admits in that same poem, but continues, "I do know how to pay attention, how to fall down / into the grass, how to kneel down in the grass, / how to be idle and blessed, how to stroll through the fields, / which is what I have been doing all day. / Tell me, what else should I have done?"

Tech writer Taylor Lorenz tells Wired she spends 17 hours a day online. She does not want to "touch grass," she insists. She's a 40-something year old woman; she can do what she wants.

"Tell me, what is it you plan to do/ with your one wild and precious life?"

What you decide to do with your one wild and precious life is up to you -- whether your prayers of devotion are to the computer or to "AI" or to social media and not, as Oliver might encourage us, to the grasshopper and other planetary intelligences.

What you decide to do with your one wild and precious life, where your attention and your prayers are directed, is also, of course, what you've opted not to do. And these decisions do, in fact, matter.

Lorenz (and plenty of others) like to argue that "there is no evidence" that social media (or the Internet or computers or ed-tech or television or video games or whatever) harms children – an exaggeration, no doubt, as there is evidence; they just don't like it. (They don't like Jonathan Haidt, to be specific. And I get that, I really do.)

Lorenz's latest newsletter cites the work of psychologist Christopher Ferguson, best known for his challenges to his field's prevailing research on video games: that there is a link between video games and aggressive behavior. Ferguson contends that claims about the relationship between violence and video games is not just exaggerated; it is non-existent, that is all merely a moral panic. This is the framing that Lorenz leans into with recent efforts to regulate social media too, which she explicitly links to the push to censor LGBTQ content online.

The right-wing movements that are actively seeking to ban books, eliminate academic departments, circumscribe what can be taught in the classroom, and yes, limit children's access to social media should not be ignored. Indeed, it is imperative that those who seek to curb Silicon Valley's power and influence over education and information delineate how their efforts are not politically aligned with the Moms of Liberty ilk.

But to frame any opposition to technology as a "moral panic" is a rhetorical sleight of hand in which one side gets to invoke "science" and "research" while dismissing the other as mere "hysteria." To dismiss people's concerns about what kids – any of us, really – are up to online as fundamentally reactionary, as censorious is more than a little disingenuous.

There is research (and plenty of it) that finds that various forms of new media – apps, games, and so on – affects us, affects how and what we think and know. I mean, of course it does. People are spending hour after hour after hour after hour – almost every waking minute of every day – clicking on things."]]]></description>
<dc:subject>taylorlorenz 2026 screentime internet web online socialmedia</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:850201b5a008/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:taylorlorenz"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:screentime"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.theverge.com/tech/905398/apple-iphone-anniversary-jobs-release">
    <title>Everything is iPhone now | The Verge</title>
    <dc:date>2026-04-02T00:52:37+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.theverge.com/tech/905398/apple-iphone-anniversary-jobs-release</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Most importantly, the first iPhone only ran on AT&T’s aging EDGE 2G network — but that exclusivity arrangement allowed Apple to insist upon full-featured Wi-Fi support and a real web browser, a combination no other smartphone on any other network allowed at the time. Most smartphones had neutered Wi-Fi to force expensive mobile data usage, but also had viciously limited web browsers to protect those networks from being overloaded.

To this day, it’s funny to watch the audience react to Jobs’ famous “this is not three devices” iPhone keynote bit — there are obvious cheers for “widescreen iPod with touch controls,” rapturous applause and hooting for “revolutionary mobile phone,” and then what amounts to confused, muffled applause for “breakthrough internet communications device.”

What was that? Well, that turned out to be everything, in the end. The whole world has reorganized itself around this breakthrough internet communications device. The iPod and phone might as well have been forgotten.

Publicly, the industry immediately bumbled its response: Everyone’s seen the famous clip of Microsoft’s then-CEO Steve Ballmer dismissing the iPhone as too expensive and missing a hardware keyboard. But in private it was clear that things had been upended. BlackBerry inventor Mike Lazaridis watched the iPhone introduction from his treadmill at home and realized in shock that the iPhone was destined to compete with laptops, not phones.

“They put a full web browser on that thing,” he told his co-CEO, Jim Balsillie, the next morning, according to the definitive book on RIM’s downfall. “The carriers aren’t letting us put a full browser on our products.”"]]></description>
<dc:subject>nilaypatel 2026 iphone 2007 computers computing smartphones stevejobs steveballmer microsoft blackberry mikelazaridis jimbalsillie internet web online rim communication</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:b6e9e122baab/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nilaypatel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:iphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2007"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:smartphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stevejobs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:steveballmer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:blackberry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mikelazaridis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jimbalsillie"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rim"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:communication"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.anildash.com/2026/03/27/endgame-open-web/">
    <title>Endgame for the Open Web - Anil Dash</title>
    <dc:date>2026-04-01T04:05:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.anildash.com/2026/03/27/endgame-open-web/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["You must imagine Sam Altman holding a knife to Tim Berners-Lee's throat.

It's not a pleasant image. Sir Tim is, rightly, revered as the genial father of the World Wide Web. But, all the signs are pointing to the fact that we might be in endgame for "open" as we've known it on the Internet over the last few decades.

The open web is something extraordinary: anybody can use whatever tools they have, to create content following publicly documented specifications, published using completely free and open platforms, and then share that work with anyone, anywhere in the world, without asking for permission from anyone. Think about how radical that is.

Now, from content to code, communities to culture, we can see example after example of that open web under attack. Every single aspect of the radical architecture I just described is threatened, by those who have profited most from that exact system.

Today, the good people who act as thoughtful stewards of the web infrastructure are still showing the same generosity of spirit that has created opportunity for billions of people and connected society in ways too vast to count while —not incidentally— also creating trillions of dollars of value and countless jobs around the world. But the increasingly-extremist tycoons of Big Tech have decided that that's not good enough.

Now, the hectobillionaires have begun their final assault on the last, best parts of what's still open, and likely won't rest until they've either brought all of the independent and noncommercial parts of the Internet under their control, or destroyed them. Whether or not they succeed is going to be decided by decisions that we all make as a community in the coming months. Even though there have always been threats to openness on the web, the stakes have never been higher than they are this time.

Right now, too many of the players in the open ecosystem are still carrying on with business as usual, even though those tactics have been failing to stop big tech for years. I don't say this lightly: it looks to me like 2026 is the year that decides whether the open web as we know it will survive at all, and we have to fight like the threat is existential. Because it is.
What does the attack look like?

Calling this threat "existential" is a strong statement, so we should back that up with evidence. The point I want to make here is that this is a lot broader than just one or two isolated examples of trying to win in one market. What we are seeing is the application of the same market-crushing techniques that were used to displace entire industries with the rise of social media and the gig economy, now being deployed across the very open internet infrastructure that made the modern internet possible.

The big tech financiers and venture capitalists who are enabling these attacks are intimately familiar with these platforms, so they know the power and influence that they have — and are deeply experienced at dismantling any systems that have cultural or political power that they can't control. And since they have virtually infinite resources, they're able to carry out these campaigns simultaneously on as many fronts as they need to. The result is an overwhelming wave of threats. It's not a coordinated conspiracy, because it doesn't need to be; they just all have the same end goals in mind.

Some examples:

• Publishers who still share their content openly, either completely free for their audience, as advertising-supported content, or with a limited amount of content available until they ask for some form of payment, are being absolutely hammered by ill-behaved AI bots. These bots are scouring their sites for every available bit of content, scraping all of it up to feed their LLMs, and then making summaries of that content available to users — typically without consent or compensation. The deal was always simple: search engines had permission to crawl sites because they were going to be sending users to those sites. If they're hitting your site half a million times for every one user they send to your site, all they're giving you is higher costs.

• LLM-based AI platforms that have trained their AI models on this content gathered without consent typically have almost no links back to the original source content, and either bury or omit credits to the original site; as a result, publishers in categories like tech media have seen their traffic crater by over 50%, with some publishers seeing drops of over 90%.

• As publishers see the danger from AI bots expand, they retreat to putting more and more content behind either password protection or payment walls or both, leaving the only publicly-accessible content to be AI-generated slop; open resources like research work, scientific analysis, and fair use of content all suffer as a result of people responding to the bad actors, since legitimate uses of open content are no longer possible. We're seeing this already as publishers block archival sites like the Internet Archive, even though we've already seen examples where the Internet Archive was the only accurate record of content that was disappeared by authoritarians in the current administration.

• Open APIs, a building block of how developers build new experiences for users, and for how researchers understand people's behavior online, are rapidly being locked down due to abuse from LLMs, as well as the extremist CEOs not wanting anyone to understand what's happening on their platforms. The clamping down doesn't just affect coders — the people who were best poised to help monitor and translate what's been happening on platforms like Twitter have seen their work under siege, with over 60% of research projects on the platform stalled or abandoned just since Musk shut down their open API access.

• Independent media based on open formats, like podcasts, are also under siege as platforms like Apple's podcasts move to closed infrastructure which means that content creators are now required to work with Apple's approved partners. Meanwhile, others like Spotify and Netflix leverage their dominant positions in the market to coerce creators to abandon open podcasts entirely, in favor of proprietary formats that require listeners to be on those platforms — locking in both creators and their audiences so they are stuck as they begin the enshittification process. The net result will be podcasts moving from being an open format that isn't controlled by either any one company or any manipulative algorithms, to just another closed social platform monetized by surveillance-based advertising.

• Open source software projects, which power the vast majority of the internet's infrastructure, are now beleaguered by constant slop code submissions being made by automated AI code agents. These submissions attempt to look like legitimate open source code contributions, and end up overwhelming the largely-underpaid, mostly-volunteer maintainers of open source projects. Dozens of the most popular open source projects have either greatly limited, or even entirely closed their projects to community-based submissions from new contributors as a result. In addition to slowing down and disrupting the open source ecosystem's collaboration model, there's also collateral damage with the destruction of one of the best paths for new coders to establish their credentials, build relationships, and learn to be part of the coding community.

• The most vital open content platforms, like Wikipedia, are under direct attack from bad-faith campaigns. Elon Musk has created Grokipedia to directly undermine Wikipedia with extremist hate content and conspiracist nonsense, by siphoning off traffic, revenues, and contributors from the site. All of this happens while launching spurious attacks on the credibility of the content on Wikipedia, which have led to such radical rhetoric around the site that gatherings of Wikipedia editors now face interruptions from armed attackers. Meanwhile, Wikipedia's human traffic has dropped significantly as AI platforms trained on its content answer users' questions without ever sending them to the site — a pattern that threatens the volunteer contributions and donations that keep it alive.

• The open standards and specifications that underpin the Internet as we know it have always succeeded solely on the basis of there being a shared set of norms and values that make them work. In this way, they're like laws — only as strong as the society that agrees they ought to be enforced. A simple text file called robots.txt functioned for decades to describe the way that tools like search engines ought to behave when accessing content on websites, but now it is effectively dead as Big AI companies unilaterally decided to ignore more than a generation of precedent, and do whatever they want with the entirety of the web, completely without consent. Similarly, long-running efforts like Creative Commons and other community-driven attempts at creating shared declarations or definitions for content use are increasingly just ignored.

• Open source software licenses, which used to be a bedrock of the software community because they provide a consistent way of encoding a set of principles in the form of a legal contract, are now treated as a minor obstacle which can be trivially overcome using LLMs. This means that it's possible to clone code and turn community-driven projects into commercial products without even having to credit the people who invented the original work, let alone compensating them or asking for consent. Many of these efforts are especially egregious because the reason the tools are able to perform this task is because they were trained on this open source code in the first place.

The human cost

The threat to the open web is far more profound than just some platforms that are under siege. The most egregious harm is the way that the generosity and grace of the people who keep the web open is being abused and exploited. Those people who maintain open source software? They're hardly getting rich — that's thankless, costly work, which they often choose instead of cashing in at some startup. Similarly, volunteering for Wikipedia is hardly profitable. Defining super-technical open standards takes time and patience, sometimes over a period of years, and there's no fortune or fame in it.

Creators who fight hard to stay independent are often choosing to make less money, to go without winning awards or the other trappings of big media, just in order to maintain control and authority over their content, and because they think it's the right way to connect with an audience. Publishers who've survived through year after year of attacks from tech platforms get rewarded by… getting to do it again the next year. Tim Berners-Lee is no billionaire, but none of those guys with the hundreds of billions of dollars would have all of their riches without him. And the thanks he gets from them is that they're trying to kill the beautiful gift that he gave to the world, and replace it with a tedious, extortive slop mall.

So, we're in endgame now. They see their chance to run the playbook again, and do to Wikipedians what Uber did to cab drivers, to get users addicted to closed apps like they are to social media, to force podcasters to chase an algorithm like kids on TikTok. If everyone across the open internet can gather together, and see that we're all in one fight together, and push back with the same ferocity with which we're being attacked, then we do have a shot at stopping them.

At one time, it was considered impossibly unlikely that anybody would ever create open technologies that would ever succeed in being useful for people, let alone that they would become a daily part of enabling billions of people to connect and communicate and make their lives better. So I don't think it's any more unlikely that the same communities can summon that kind of spirit again, and beat back the wealthiest people in the world, to ensure that the next generation gets to have these same amazing resources to rely on for decades to come.
Taking action

Alright, if it’s not hopeless, what are the concrete things we can do? The first thing is to directly support organizations in the fight. Either those that are at risk, or those that are protecting those at risk. You can give directly to support the Internet Archive, or volunteer to help them out. Wikipedia welcomes your donation or your community participation. The Electronic Frontier Foundation is fighting for better policy and to defend your rights on virtually all of these issues, and could use your support or provides a list of ways to volunteer or take action. The Mozilla Foundation can also use your donations and is driving change. (And full disclosure — I’m involved in pretty much all of these organizations in some capacity, ranging from volunteer to advisor to board member. That’s because I’m trying to make sure my deeds match my words!) These are the people whom I've seen, with my own eyes, stay the hand of those who would hold the knife to the necks of the open web's defenders.

Beyond just what these organizations do, though, we can remember how much the open web matters. I know from my time on the board of Stack Overflow that we got to see the rise of an incredibly generous community built around sharing information openly, under open licenses. There are very few platforms in history that helped more people have more economic mobility than the number of people who got good-paying jobs as coders as a result of the information on that site. And then we got to see the toll that extractive LLMs had when they took advantage of that community without any consideration for the impact it would have when they trained models on the generosity of that site's members without reciprocating in kind.

The good of the web only exists because of the openness of the web. They can't just keep on taking and taking without expecting people to finally draw a line and saying "enough". And interestingly, opportunities might exist where the tycoons least expect it. I saw Mike Masnick's recent piece where he argued that one of the things that might enable a resurgence of the open web might be... AI. It would seem counterintuitive to anyone who's read everything I've shared here to imagine that anything good could come of these same technologies that have caused so much harm.

But ultimately what matters is power. It is precisely because technologies like LLMs have powers that the authoritarians have rushed to try to take them over and wield them as effectively as they can. I don't think that platforms owned and operated by those bad actors can be the tools that disrupt their agenda. I do think it might be possible that the creative communities that built the web in the first place could use their same innovative spirit to build what could be, for lack of a better term, called "good AI". It’s going to take better policy, which may be impossible in the short term at the federal level in the U.S., but can certainly happen at more local levels and in the rest of the world. Though I’m skeptical about putting too much of the burden on individual users, we can certainly change culture and educate people so that more people feel empowered and motivated to choose alternatives to the big tech and big AI platforms that got us into this situation. And we can encourage harm reduction approaches for the people and institutions that are already locked into using these tools, because as we’ve seen, even small individual actions can get institutions to change course.

Ultimately I think, if given the choice, people will pick home-cooked, locally-grown, heart-felt digital meals over factory-farmed fast food technology every time."]]></description>
<dc:subject>anildash samaltman timberners-lee web online internet openweb capitalism ai artificialintelligence data communication bullshit technology commons 2026 walledgardens aislop slop wikipedia vc venturecapital bigtech finance power culture publishing llms aibots chatbots internetarchive openapis apis apple podcasts grokipedia elonmusk openstandards creativecommons uber mozilla mozillafoundation stackoverflow mikemasnick</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:ebb98eb9a110/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anildash"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:samaltman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:timberners-lee"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openweb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bullshit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:commons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:walledgardens"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aislop"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:slop"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wikipedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:vc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:venturecapital"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bigtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:finance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:power"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:llms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aibots"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatbots"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internetarchive"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openapis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:apis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:podcasts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:grokipedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elonmusk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openstandards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:creativecommons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:uber"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mozilla"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mozillafoundation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stackoverflow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mikemasnick"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.christianitytoday.com/2026/03/low-tech-parenting-big-tent-judgmentalism-tech-grace/">
    <title>Low-Tech Parenting Must Be a Big Tent - Christianity Today</title>
    <dc:date>2026-03-29T02:37:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.christianitytoday.com/2026/03/low-tech-parenting-big-tent-judgmentalism-tech-grace/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[[via:
https://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2026/03/baseball-gardening-and-the-metaverse/

"Brad East argues we should make and defend judgments about the technologies we allow in our homes but not be judgmental about the prudential decisions other families make: “let’s extend generosity to friends, family, and neighbors who come to different decisions than we do. Let’s be tech fallibilists, allowing for the possibility that our own approach might be wrong or, at a minimum, not the universal answer for all people without exception. And even if we have good reason to believe that our policy is best—or better than another’s—that doesn’t release us from the obligation to continue seeing, treating, and speaking of others with charity, warmth, mercy, and grace.”"]]]></description>
<dc:subject>bradeast technology 2026 children neoluddites neoluddism luddites luddism claremorell grace digital screens screentime smartphone media attention distraction ipad andycrouch condemnation balance internet online web reading howweread slow judgement judgmentalism literacy self-righteousness christianity matthewwalther charity warmth mercy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:cb6a6c6087ac/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bradeast"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neoluddites"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neoluddism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:luddites"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:luddism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:claremorell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:grace"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:digital"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:screens"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:screentime"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:smartphone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:distraction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ipad"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:andycrouch"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:condemnation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:balance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:slow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:judgement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:judgmentalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:literacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:self-righteousness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christianity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:matthewwalther"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:warmth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mercy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.thetimes.com/us/news-today/article/deep-springs-college-california-hzhx5bfc0">
    <title>‘I study at an exclusive US college. We can’t drink, use wi-fi or leave during term’</title>
    <dc:date>2026-03-28T22:46:07+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.thetimes.com/us/news-today/article/deep-springs-college-california-hzhx5bfc0</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Hidden deep in the California desert is a university where internet is banned and students are taught the meaning of life. Ruby LaRocca reveals why she loves it"]]></description>
<dc:subject>deepspringscollege 2026 rubylarocca education colleges universities highereducation highered meaning meaningmaking howweread internet web online offline attention books reading constraints socialmedia distraction ai artificialintelligence microcolleges</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:e7bdaa4e4764/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:deepspringscollege"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rubylarocca"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colleges"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meaning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meaningmaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:offline"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:constraints"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:distraction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:microcolleges"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fcCRmf_tHW8">
    <title>Being in the World (full, award winning, Heidegger/Hubert Dreyfus documentary) - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2026-03-26T03:11:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fcCRmf_tHW8</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["A celebration of human beings and our ability, through the mastery of physical, intellectual and creative skills, to find meaning in the world around us.

a film by Tao Ruspoli

Inspired by the work of Hubert Dreyfus & his reading of Martin Heidegger.
With Hubert Dreyfus, Ryan Cross, Sean D Kelly, Austin Peralta, Mark Wrathall, Iain Thomson, Leah Chase, Manuel Molina,Tony Austin, John Haugeland, Taylor Carman, HIroshi Sakaguchi, Jumane Smith.

""Being in the World" is a film that educates one through both the senses and the intellect and, by its end, it provides a powerful but gentle reminder that we, the individuals, must take back our rightful place at the center of philosophy and we do so everyday simply by being in the world. Instead of a narrative or a series of long lectures, we are taken on a ride to visit various practitioners of the arts— primarily musicians—who simply "do" their art. These vignettes are juxtaposed with a series of philosophers, most of whom seem connected in terms of their ideas and interpretations of the German philosopher Martin Heidegger, who talk about the idea of "being in the world." I found this back-and-forth composition created a certain fluidity thanks to the way the information delivered both tickled my senses and intellect in equal measure. By the end, the aforementioned message slowly sank in and that is what created what is now a genuine appreciation for having viewed the film because I look at my life experience differently.

First of all, this work does not require any special education or training to be understood and enjoyed, although I don't think many would argue that the subject matter alone would unfortunately dissuade many simply because that is the nature of society but the fact that the average citizen is not interested in philosophy, or course, is no fault of the film. Ironically, the very message that one doesn't need to be steeped in philosophy to undertake and enjoy a life rife with meaning is one of the primary themes of the film. This theme might be summed up by stating that by simply "being in the world," we surpass all of the formalized activities associated with what engaging in "philosophy" has come to mean in the modern western world.

Although we're never hit over the head with it, it is the German philosopher Martin Heidegger who stands firmly at the center of the film as it is his iconoclastic work which inspires the ideas that undergird the messages of the various speakers. The fact that Heidegger's work is infamous for being difficult to approach even for the initiated student of philosophy is what makes this film such a gem; the more I think about the film the wider I grin because I can see more clearly how what I initially mistook for an aesthetically pleasing ride with a dose of didacticism ended up being a "reeducation" regarding how important simply "being in the world" and performing our "art" (which I take to mean profession, hobbies, etc.) is in terms of understanding where philosophy has taken us collectively.

"Being in the World" is a small film. Although the film is beautifully composed and we move around the globe, it is obvious that this was accomplished with a comparatively small budget and for me this only adds to the sense of intimacy and trust the work exudes; this is a labor of love, an authentic work of art, and it was created in order to share a message far removed from the commercial world.

It was the feeling with which I was left, however, that sets this movie apart from other, similar films. Walking away from this I felt encouraged and valued by the filmmaker and the "players." Rather than some stale exposition or preachy sermon about why I should change my mind about my life based on some epistemological tendency, I was reminded that my being in the world is what constitutes my life's meaning.""

[Three excerpts on Aeon:

First excerpt is here:

"I am, therefore I think – how Heidegger radically reframed being"
https://aeon.co/videos/i-am-therefore-i-think-how-heidegger-radically-reframed-being
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v727rFg9aKk

Second excerpt is here:

"True mastery demands going beyond the rules to learn for yourself"
"Embrace risk - Heidegger’s philosophy of everyday life | Being in the World"
https://aeon.co/videos/true-mastery-demands-going-beyond-the-rules-to-learn-for-yourself
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82_JqODbSjo

Third excerpt is here:

"As technologies mine our attention, we must look to artists"
"Technology flattens our humanity. Artists deepen it. | Being in the World"
https://aeon.co/videos/as-technologies-mine-our-attention-we-must-look-to-artists
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Js0URaCKvvE ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>hubertdreyfus heidegger documentary philosophy taoruspoli being time thinking waysofbeing risk human humans humanism technology jazz flamenco music 2010 film experience interaction art education skills risktaking mastery leahchase markwrathall austinperalta hiroshisakaguchi bobteague jumanesmith ryancross tonyaustin manuelmolina isaacsprintis christophergallo paulforte giancarlocanavieso christophredlich musicalinstruments johnhaugeland taylorcarman iainthomson seandkelly seankelly senses beginnersmind unschooling perception ai artificialintelligence darpa mit descartes plato charlestaylor certainty engagement tradition disengagement embodiment reason rationalism spinoza leibniz doing annesakaguchi tools stuartdreyfus movement knowhow activity objects waysofknowing knowing edgarchase dookychase food theoryofmind abstraction theory intelligence humanities howwethink relevance metaphor care caring mattering whatmatters consciousness aesthetics moods emotions waysofseeing waysofsensing bodies rules patterns joy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:15ad9e269803/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hubertdreyfus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:heidegger"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:documentary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:taoruspoli"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:being"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:time"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:waysofbeing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:risk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:human"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jazz"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:flamenco"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:music"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2010"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:film"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:experience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interaction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:skills"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:risktaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mastery"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:leahchase"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:markwrathall"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:austinperalta"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hiroshisakaguchi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bobteague"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jumanesmith"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ryancross"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tonyaustin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:manuelmolina"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:isaacsprintis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christophergallo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:paulforte"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:giancarlocanavieso"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christophredlich"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:musicalinstruments"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnhaugeland"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:taylorcarman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:iainthomson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:seandkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:seankelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:senses"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:beginnersmind"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unschooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:perception"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:darpa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:descartes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:plato"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charlestaylor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:certainty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:engagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tradition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:disengagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:embodiment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reason"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rationalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:spinoza"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:leibniz"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:doing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:annesakaguchi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stuartdreyfus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:movement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:knowhow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:activity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:objects"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:waysofknowing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:knowing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edgarchase"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dookychase"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:food"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:theoryofmind"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:abstraction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:theory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:intelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwethink"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:relevance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:metaphor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:care"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:caring"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mattering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:whatmatters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consciousness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aesthetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:moods"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:emotions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:waysofseeing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:waysofsensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bodies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rules"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:patterns"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:joy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://kneelingbus.substack.com/p/remembering-some-guys">
    <title>Remembering Some Guys - by Drew Austin - Kneeling Bus</title>
    <dc:date>2026-03-25T06:39:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://kneelingbus.substack.com/p/remembering-some-guys</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Computers will never beat humans at pointlessness"

...

"I just found out about this guy on TikTok who looks for moments in TV shows and movies where there’s a screen in the background of a scene that happens to be showing a sporting event (usually for only a few seconds) and figures out which exact game it was. His final effort, posted a few years ago, involved identifying a college baseball game that appeared on a TV behind a bar in one of the last episodes of The Office, a challenge that his followers believed would be impossible. Starting with the few scraps of information available—the uniform colors, the appearance of the stadium seats, the possible date range—he proceeds to narrow it down further by combing through hundreds if not thousands of teams at the lowest levels of college baseball, a process he describes as “mind numbing,” eventually somehow finding that this is a junior college game between Montgomery College Germantown and Montgomery College Rockville. He then watches the whole game, which was uploaded to YouTube in 2008, and finds the exact frame that appears in the Office episode, a moment that elicits a great frisson. It’s one of the more entertaining examples of a broad genre of internet content, epitomized by GeoGuessr, which makes a game or sport out of grappling with the unfathomable surfeit of information that saturates contemporary life—a pure expression of the desire to merge oneself with the roaring media stream, to play a small role in all the pointless sorting of bits, to do manually and visibly what has become mostly automatic, unseen, and instantaneous.

The aforementioned TikTok exhibits many of the qualities that define life on the internet today: the confrontation with vast troves of data, the crossover between distinct cinematic universes, and above all, a narrowing of perspective—pointlessness taken to the extreme. At a moment when computers are poised to not only perform this kind of task in mere milliseconds, but to take over our day jobs and hobbies as well, it’s somehow even more thrilling to see a human do it. We might expect this ruthless computer logic to eventually pull everything into its grand deterministic machine, but the crooked timber of humanity is poor scaffolding for such a project; for every fully rationalized system that emerges, expect a corresponding increase in nonsense, horseplay, and mysticism. What is prediction market betting if not stubbornly spurning the hive mind’s consensus to assert your own unique but flawed perspective? A pessimistic assessment of this situation is that humans will eventually just be the decorative ornamentation for the digital Stack—a hypothesis that an hour or two watching TikTok certainly supports—but at least that’s something we’re good at. AI might rugpull your productive value to society but will it ever know why it’s amusing to waste hundreds of hours sifting through the warehouses of pop culture detritus to find a single throwaway frame from an ‘00s TV show? That’s the kind of meaning that only humans can create.

I recently rewatched High Fidelity, the 2000 film adaptation of Nick Hornby’s 1995 novel about a guy named Rob who owns a record store and obsessively discusses music and pop culture with everyone he knows. My friend called it the last movie before the internet. In one scene that stood out this time, a TV show comes up in conversation when Rob is on a date, causing him to frantically gesticulate and ultimately interrupt his friends as he tries to remember the actor who starred in the show (McGoohan!). For generations who came of age during the ‘90s and early ‘00s, amassing such encyclopedic knowledge of pop culture and being able to spontaneously retrieve it in social situations was important in a way that seems increasingly absurd (and, let’s be honest, often seemed absurd back then too, something High Fidelity captures). The twilight of the analog fostered a relationship to media that would seemingly become obsolete once everyone had a smartphone and could Google every factoid that no longer needed to reside in their minimally-furnished memory—but that knowledge paradoxically feels even more valuable now, however anachronistic. Remembering Some Guys is great conversation, and hunting down a baseball game from an old Office episode is great content, specifically because of what about them continues to elude technology. Look at what computers are automating now to predict what humans will stubbornly insist on still doing for fun ten years from now."]]></description>
<dc:subject>human humans humanism computers computing pointlessness drewaustin 2026 humanity automation media analong internet obsessions</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:ff11e538c339/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:human"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pointlessness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:drewaustin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:automation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:analong"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:obsessions"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://nautil.us/the-internet-has-not-killed-reading-or-attention-spans-1279171">
    <title>The Internet Has Not Killed Reading—or Attention Spans</title>
    <dc:date>2026-03-25T05:46:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://nautil.us/the-internet-has-not-killed-reading-or-attention-spans-1279171</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["An interview with Kevin Ashton, MIT technology pioneer and author of The Story of Stories"

...

"British author and technology pioneer Kevin Ashton has been puzzling over the nature of storytelling for the past 25 years. That’s how long it took him to research and write his latest book, The Story of Stories: The Million-Year History of a Uniquely Human Art.

The first seed of the book for Ashton lay in two seemingly contradictory questions posed by American philosopher and linguist Noam Chomsky. The first, known as Plato’s problem, asks how we can know so much with so little information. Babies, for instance, learn to speak based on what might seem like a poverty of inputs. The second question is known as Orwell’s problem, and it asks the opposite: How could we know so little, given that so much information is available to us?

Ashton—best known for coining the term “The Internet of Things” in 1999, to describe the rise of a whole economy of sensors and other objects connected to the World Wide Web—also began asking himself how the rise of the smartphone might transform the human relationship to storytelling and to the world. “By the mid 2010s, I could be pretty confident that by 2026, some 9 out of 10 people in the world would have a smartphone, and I wanted to know what that might mean,” he recently told me. “The smartphone was an incremental step in the developed world, but in the developing world, it was everything at once.” In the developing world, most people had skipped over radio, television, personal computers.

Ashton knew a revolution was coming. But to grasp what that revolution would look like required him to go back and understand the entire evolution of storytelling across human history—which was initially just a footnote in his research.

I recently spoke with Ashton about why cell phones are so revolutionary in the long history of storytelling technologies, why social media might not be as terrible for young people as some believe, why long-form narratives aren’t dead, and why he’s still hopeful about our newest storytelling technologies.

You divide The Story of Stories into two parts: the first act, which is a million years long and comes to its end with the smartphone, and then everything after that. What is so fundamentally different about the smartphone from earlier storytelling technology?

A lot of people are like, “New technology comes along, and kids can’t understand stories anymore. Kids can’t read, nobody talks, bad things happen, words change, and nobody’s got any attention.” And that didn’t stand up to research very well. But what I did realize was that these major new technologies, each change the scale of storytelling: How many people can tell stories, and how many people they can tell stories to. That started to look really interesting. I was beginning to realize that big new storytelling technology generally leads to big new revolutions.

Of course, one of the early ones is printing. We didn’t all read happily ever after because of printing. There were like 50 or so wars between Protestants and Catholics over whose story was right, and 12 million people were killed. That’s an example of the kind of revolution that happens when new stories become more broadly available. The smartphone really feels like the end of that arc, because now anybody can tell a story to anybody. There is someone in Mongolia right now using Facebook, and if they publish something viral enough and interesting enough that catches enough attention, it’s five shares away from being something everybody sees.

You write in the book that storytelling is uniquely human. Do we know for sure that other species don’t tell stories?

You don’t really see any symbolic behavior in other species. All species communicate, but very few species communicate through visual means. Crows do a little bit of pointing. Dogs can understand humans pointing. But wolves don’t use pointing in the wild. They will mark the ground and use urine for signaling behavior, most of which is olfactory. But what you don’t get is any rigid system where a scratch like this means one thing, or a scratch like that means another thing. And vocalizations are primarily calls and cries that convey warning or attraction. A lot of the information in those sounds is how big is the person making the call or the cry? How old or young is the person making the call or the cry? So there’s nothing remotely like storytelling or story comprehension in any species that we’ve ever studied or discovered.

Humans started telling stories when we sat around the fires. We were primates who wanted to socialize. We couldn’t see gestures. We started making sounds. The sounds we had were, “Look over there,” and “Oh my god, run.” And those sounds were actually very useful sitting around the fire. What you want to talk about around the fire is stuff that’s not there. Maybe it’s about tomorrow or yesterday or something you remember, or something you imagine or something you desire. Over a long period of time, hundreds of hundreds of thousands of years, those sounds start to evolve into something which becomes language. And the reason they evolved into language was so that we could have these conversations about things not present, which is storytelling.

You argue that a fundamental purpose of stories is to distribute glory and shame, in the form of heroes and villains. But literary critics might argue that good stories don’t have clear-cut heroes and villains. They have antiheroes. They have gray areas rather than certainties.

We have to distinguish between stories that tend to be long lasting and successful when told to large audiences—and ones that are not. In successful stories, the antiheroes are still heroes. Batman still saves Gotham City. He just does it wearing black. An antihero isn’t a villain. And there are no anti-villains. The antihero exists as a reaction to the heroic archetype, the pure goody-two-shoes heroes that were in earlier stories. The tweedy literary people in their Brooklyn brownstones who try to write stories where it’s very ambiguous who’s the good guy or the bad guy—it’s all a bit muddled, but there’s still someone you’re supposed to be rooting for. There’s still someone the author identifies with. You cannot tell a story that anyone will enjoy if there’s absolutely nobody doing anything virtuous at any stage. That wouldn’t be a compelling story. But really, the more emotion a story evokes, the better the story. Different things evoke different emotions in different people. But these more experimental white guy books that everyone pretends they read where nothing ever happens …

Like which ones?

I’m not going to name any names! But if you’re not evoking an emotion, you aren’t going to find a lot of readers. A lot of people who want to be high-art storytellers will experiment: “Well, what if they take out these elements? What am I left with? How does it work?” My answer is generally it’s an intellectually interesting exercise that I don’t want to return to. Depending on what kind of mood I’m in, I sometimes have some very salty conversations with literary critics.

Read more: “We Can Be Heroes”

If storytelling has been so utterly transformed by these new technologies, why do the earliest forms of storytelling stick around? People are constantly saying, poetry is dead, novels are dead, but they aren’t dead. They don’t go away even though we keep getting new storytelling technologies. Why do you think that is?

The real deep answer is we’re exactly the same people with exactly the same brains and behaviors that we were 100,000 years ago or more when storytelling first evolved. The things that appeal to us about stories today are the things that appealed to our ancestors. That hasn’t changed. The hard-wiring is the same. And more people can read than ever before. More novels are being sold than ever before.

I’ve been talking about this a long time because I get really tired of this old post-literate world thing. Marshall McLuhan was declaring the world post-literate when only 40 percent of people could read. Give me a break. We live in a world right now where there’s been a democratization of reading, an egalitarianism of reading. People who like romance and fantasy books are writing their own romance and fantasy books and they’re self-publishing them. And some of them get the attention of traditional publishers and become very successful.

I’m not generally very welcome on panel discussions, but you get, “The kids these days, they have no attention spans.” And: “The kids these days, they’re always looking at their phones.” And I’m like, “Well, hang on a minute. Both of those things can’t be true.” Either they have no attention or they can’t stop looking at their phones, by which you mean paying a lot of attention to their phones. What’s on their phones is words, most of the time, even if you go look at some dumb TikTok video, they put words on top of things. There are captions that help it make more sense when they’re communicating with one another. They’re sending text messages. Children today are writing more words than you or I did when we were teenagers.

The other day I was talking to an educator, and they asked, “What do you think about AI? It’s writing all the essays.” My reply is, “I think you should stop assigning people essays.” Why has nobody come up with this idea? Tell the students, “I want you to do the reading, and then you and I are going to sit down for five minutes, one-on-one, and we’re going to talk about it.” That solves the whole freaking problem.

But if our brains haven’t changed since we first started writing down and consuming stories, wouldn’t it be a good thing to continue to write essays? Evidence suggests writing is such an important part of the thinking process.

Writing is just a technology of story. It’s one of the earliest technologies of story. And older people always hold the things that they did when they were kids in higher regard. I’m a writer. I write books. I love writing. I can talk for days about why writing is good and why books are good, but are they better than everything else? That’s an unchallenged assumption based on the fact that it’s old and not based on the fact that it’s better.

The standard academic essay is an example of what Paulo Freire called banking education. The teacher deposits a question; the student retrieves content, formats it per conventions, returns it for grading. The product is assessed, not the thinking that was supposed to happen in the middle. What the essay actually measures is socioeconomic class and family income. Essay content and style correlate more strongly with household income than even SAT scores. Higher-income students deploy abstract reflection, complex syntax, and so on, not because they think more clearly, but because those conventions are part of their linguistic inheritance. Lower-income students write differently, not worse, but get marked down. And here’s the kicker: Rich kids have always been able to pay tutors, writing coaches, and consultants to help them write essays. AI has simply made that service free and universal. The scandal isn’t that students aren’t writing their own essays. The scandal is that we’re only worrying about the problem now that the cheat is available to everyone.

What about long-form versus very short-form storytelling? Can a 5-second post on a social media app really sustain attention or require you to think about ideas in the way that a novel or a nonfiction book would?

You can get equally enthralled by a short story and a 10-book series. Martin Luther’s 95 Theses was this one-page document. The first viral meme broke the world’s greatest power at the time—the Roman Catholic Church—in two. It really isn’t how you say it, it’s what you say. If you’re going to write long-form, you have to do it well. If you’re going to write short-form, you have to do it well. All of that stuff seems values-neutral to me.

But also, social media content isn’t always short-form. A teenager spending three hours on social media might be watching long-form YouTube essays, reading Reddit threads, participating in BookTok, or creating content. Collapsing all of that into a single variable and drawing conclusions about format isn’t justified. The most popular YouTube creators built massive audiences on long-form content. PewDiePie—110 million subscribers, nearly 30 billion total views—averages 28 minutes per video, more than double the platform average. Penguinz0, who has 17.5 million subscribers and 12 billion views, averages 27 to 60 minutes per video depending on measurement window. The generation supposedly incapable of sustained attention built two of YouTube's largest channels on content running 30-60 minutes per video.

And long-form reading is booming. United States young adult print sales went from approximately 23 million copies in 2018 when TikTok launched to a record 35 million in 2022, a 52-percent increase. Sales in 2024 remain 31 percent above 2018 levels. The primary driver of that growth, according to Circana BookScan, was TikTok. Those 30 million annual copies average roughly 70,000 words each, approximately 2 trillion words, of long-form reading per year in a single book category, from a generation supposedly incapable of sustained attention. That’s about the same number of words per capita as any other age group. Americans aged 11-18 read about one novel a year on average. So do Americans over 19.

Read more: “Our Brains Tell Stories So We Can Live”

What about recent studies that suggest kids’ social media use is linked to lower memory, vocabulary, and reading scores?
The claim that social media is measurably harming cognition isn’t supported by the evidence. The one genuinely controlled experimental result is a 2023 study, which found TikTok degraded prospective memory. Specifically, the ability to remember to execute a planned intention—in a between-subjects design—while Twitter, YouTube, and a no-activity control did not. This is a real finding. But it measures one narrow cognitive function under artificial lab conditions, not, say, reading, vocabulary, critical thinking, or abstract reasoning. 

Assessments like reading scores don’t measure things like narrative construction, persuasive communication, editing judgment, or audience awareness, all of which content creation develops. Participation matters. TikTok follows the 90-9-1 pattern common to all interactive media. One percent create, 9 percent interact and the rest read, watch, or whatever. But on a platform with 150 million U.S. users, even 1 percent is 1.5 million American content producers. And the 9 percent who comment, stitch, and duet are doing something cognitively active.

Research from University of Oxford experimental psychologists Amy Orben and Andrew Przybylski suggests technology use explains only around 0.4 percent of variation in adolescent well-being. The concern about bedtime screens, often treated as established fact, wasn’t supported when measured properly. Cognitive psychologist Lan Nguyen and colleagues reviewed some 100,000 participants and found a moderate correlation between short-form video and poorer attentional performance, but the causal direction isn’t proven: Children with pre-existing attention difficulties may gravitate toward high-stimulation short-form content, producing the observed correlation without any platform effect.

You write that critical literacy—the ability to look at the context of a story, to ask follow-up questions, to recognize that everybody tells you something with an agenda, is the only way to protect yourself from manipulation today. Is anyone successfully teaching critical literacy?

The way I conclude the book is, “No one is coming to save us.” We ourselves have to get more humble, more experienced, recognize our own cognitive biases, recognize when we’re mad about something because we forgot to eat breakfast, and actually understand that we see the world in stories. People often think, “What he’s saying to me is, ‘I’m already a good critical thinker, but I’ve gotta help the other people.’” But no, I’m saying “I, Kevin, have to get better at it. And you, Kristen, have to get better at it.” One of my favorite cognitive biases is bias blindness: People who know there are cognitive biases, but are absolutely convinced these biases don’t apply to them.

It seems like you’re hopeful, though, that this new era of storytelling can bring about progress of some kind.

It already has. I have a nice little chart that I show when I talk about the book. Even today, about 2 to 3 percent of the silent generation will identify as gay, lesbian, bisexual, or trans. It’s about the same for the Boomer generation, and it’s a little bit more for Generation X. But for millennials, it’s about 15 percent, and for Gen Z, it’s about 25 percent. A lot of that has roots in the Internet becoming a place where people could find one another and build community and learn to come out. You see supportive groups forming that allow people to be themselves.

The trans revolution, a historic movement that we’re now living through, is in many ways a result of the Internet and digital photography allowing people to tell their stories more loudly and more clearly than they could before. And a lot of the horrible things in the world are backlash against that. We look at this horrible Epstein situation and it’s all terrible, but the fact of the matter is that in the 1950s, that just would’ve been no big deal. We see a lot of progress. Particularly right now, we can rightly and reasonably get very focused on the backlash to the progress, but they can’t reverse it all the way. 

I can absolutely guarantee you that the Supreme Court will not reverse the miscegenation laws that prevented Black and white people from getting married in the late 1960s, because Clarence Thomas is a Black man married to a white woman. There are a lot of horrible, bloody, brutal things that happen because we made progress. And some of them push us back a little way, but they never push us back all the way."]]></description>
<dc:subject>kevinashton attention internet web online howweread reading kristenfrench 2026 smarthphones internetofthings technology print printing human humans stories marshallmcluhan democratization novels fictions writing howwewrite essays ai artificialintelligence thinking howwethink class longform socialmedia youtube tiktok memory vocabulary cognition twitter communication persuasion narrative narrativeconstruction amyorben andrewprzbylski well-being wellbeing bedtime lannguyen video children criticalliteracy cognitivebiases community transrevolution photography radio television tv computing personalcomputers paulofreire bankingmodelofeducation</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:6d3eced0f0f9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinashton"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kristenfrench"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:smarthphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internetofthings"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:print"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:printing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:human"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stories"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marshallmcluhan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:democratization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:novels"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fictions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:essays"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwethink"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:class"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:longform"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:youtube"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tiktok"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:memory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:vocabulary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cognition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:persuasion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:narrative"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:narrativeconstruction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:amyorben"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:andrewprzbylski"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:well-being"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wellbeing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bedtime"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lannguyen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:video"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:criticalliteracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cognitivebiases"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:transrevolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:photography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:radio"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:television"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tv"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:personalcomputers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:paulofreire"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bankingmodelofeducation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.argmin.net/p/cosma-shalizi-is-aware-of-all-internet">
    <title>Cosma Shalizi Is Aware of All Internet Traditions</title>
    <dc:date>2026-03-24T21:08:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.argmin.net/p/cosma-shalizi-is-aware-of-all-internet</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Shalizi’s frame of artificial intelligence as mechanized tradition

[via Anne Trubek:
https://notesfromasmallpress.substack.com/p/ai-slop-and-the-cultural-elite ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>cosmashalizi ai artificialintelligence tradition 2026 ben recht culturalai internet llms generativeai genai</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:aa3dc25516fb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cosmashalizi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tradition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ben"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:recht"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culturalai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:llms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:generativeai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:genai"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UwBZiuH-1QY">
    <title>The Marketing Tricks of &quot;Artificial Intelligence&quot; - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2026-03-24T06:56:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UwBZiuH-1QY</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["This week, Sam talks to Emily Bender and Alex Hanna about the marketing ploys of “artificial intelligence,” why ridicule works to keep big tech’s claims in check, and what makes them hopeful for the future. They’re the authors of The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want.

Dr. Alex Hanna is a writer and sociologist of technology, labor, and politics. She’s the Director of Research at the Distributed AI Research Institute (DAIR) and a Lecturer in the School of Information at the University of California Berkeley. Dr. Emily M. Bender is a Professor of Linguistics at the University of Washington where she is also the Faculty Director of the Computational Linguistics Master of Science program and affiliate faculty in the School of Computer Science and Engineering and the Information School.

They also host the The Mystery AI Hype Theater 3000 podcast which “deflates AI hype and draws attention to the real harms of the automation technologies we call ‘artificial intelligence’.” 

- The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want: https://thecon.ai/

- The Mystery AI Hype Theater 3000 podcast: https://www.dair-institute.org/maiht3k/

- Flood of AI-Generated Submissions ‘Final Straw’ for Small 22-Year-Old Publisher: https://www.404media.co/bards-and-sages-closing-ai-generated-writing/

- Emily’s cartoon: https://bsky.app/profile/emilymbender.bsky.social/post/3mgmx232j2u2k

- Questioning the Normalization of Surveillance by the Center on Privacy & Technology at Georgetown:  https://medium.com/center-on-privacy-technology/questioning-the-normalization-of-surveillance-6a9c2f58c017 

- You Are Not a Parrot at NY Mag: https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/ai-artificial-intelligence-chatbots-emily-m-bender.html

[See also:

"Ridicule as Praxis (with Emily Bender and Alex Hanna)
Why ridicule works to keep big tech’s claims in check, and what makes us hopeful for the future."
https://www.404media.co/ridicule-as-praxis-with-emily-bender-and-alex-hanna/ ]"]]></description>
<dc:subject>alexhanna emilybender ai artificialintelligence 2026 ridicule resistance chatgpt surveillance technology luddism neoluddism luddites neoluddites privacy automation computers computing computation aihype marketing dehumanization capitalism siliconvalley markzuckerberg samaltman humans criticalthinking howwethink thinking howwewrite writing fascism technofascism human humanrights dignity parismarx antihumanism tescreal transhumanism extropianism humanity humanism singularitarianism singularity machinelearning cosmism rationalism effectivealtruism longtermism latecapitalism stochasticparrots openai education analog slop aislop socialmedia instagram tiktok collectiveaction datacenters bigtech internet web online aicon power nature environment work labor organizing hope</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:2d288edac37b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alexhanna"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:emilybender"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ridicule"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:resistance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatgpt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:surveillance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:luddism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neoluddism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:luddites"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neoluddites"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:automation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aihype"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marketing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dehumanization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:siliconvalley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:markzuckerberg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:samaltman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:criticalthinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwethink"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fascism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technofascism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:human"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanrights"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dignity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:parismarx"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:antihumanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tescreal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:transhumanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:extropianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:singularitarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:singularity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:machinelearning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cosmism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rationalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:effectivealtruism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:longtermism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:latecapitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stochasticparrots"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:analog"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:slop"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aislop"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:instagram"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tiktok"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collectiveaction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:datacenters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bigtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aicon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:power"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:environment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:organizing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hope"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://daringfireball.net/2026/03/your_frustration_is_the_product">
    <title>Daring Fireball: ‘Your Frustration Is the Product’</title>
    <dc:date>2026-03-19T04:21:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://daringfireball.net/2026/03/your_frustration_is_the_product</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Shubham Bose, “The 49MB Web Page” [https://thatshubham.com/blog/news-audit ]:

<blockquote>I went to the New York Times to glimpse at four headlines and was greeted with 422 network requests and 49 megabytes of data. It took two minutes before the page settled. And then you wonder why every sane tech person has an adblocker installed on systems of all their loved ones.

It is the same story across top publishers today.</blockquote>

This is an absolutely devastating deconstruction of the current web landscape. I implore you to pause here, and read Bose’s entire amply illustrated essay. I’ll wait.

Even websites from publishers who care about quality are doing things on the web that they would never do with their print editions. Bose starts with The New York Times, but also mentions The Guardian, whose web pages are so laden with ads and modals that their default layout, on a mobile device, sometimes leaves just 11 percent of the screen for article content. That’s four lines of article text.

Bose writes:

<blockquote>Viewability and time-on-page are very important metrics these days. Every hostile UX decision originates from this single fact. The longer you’re trapped on the page, the higher the CPM the publisher can charge. Your frustration is the product. No wonder engineers and designers make every UX decision that optimizes for that. And you, the reader, are forced to interact, wait, click, scroll multiple times because of this optimization. Not only is it a step in the wrong direction, it is adversarial by design.

The reader is not respected enough by the software. The publisher is held hostage by incentives from an auction system that not only encourages but also rewards dark patterns.</blockquote>

I disagree only insofar as the reader isn’t respected at all. Part of my ongoing testing of the MacBook Neo is that I’ve been using it in as default a state as possible, only changing default settings, and only adding third-party software, as necessary. So I’ve been browsing the web without content-blocking extensions on the Neo. It’s been a while since I’ve done that for an extended period of time. Most of the advertising-bearing websites I read have gotten so bad that it’s almost beyond parody.

And even with content blockers installed (of late, I’ve been using and enjoying uBlock Origin Lite in Safari), many of these news websites intersperse bullshit like requests to subscribe to their newsletters, or links to other articles on their site — often totally unrelated to the one you’re trying to read — every few paragraphs. And the fucking autoplay videos, jesus. You read two paragraphs and there’s a box that interrupts you. You read another two paragraphs and there’s another interruption. All the way until the end of the article. We’re visiting their website to read a fucking article. If we wanted to watch videos, we’d be on YouTube. It’s like going to a restaurant, ordering a cheeseburger, and they send a marching band to your table to play trumpets right in your ear and squirt you with a water pistol while trying to sell you towels.

No print publication on the planet does this. The print editions of the very same publications — The New York Times, The Guardian, The Wall Street Journal, The Atlantic, The New Yorker — don’t do anything like this. The print edition of The New Yorker could not possibly be more respectful of both the reader’s attention and the sanctity of the prose they publish. But read an article on their website and you get autoplaying videos interspersed between random paragraphs. And the videos have nothing to do with the article you’re reading. I mean, we should be so lucky if every website were as respectfully designed as The New Yorker’s, but even their website — comparatively speaking, one of the “good ones” — shows only a fraction of the respect for the reader that their print edition does.

Without an ad-blocking content blocker running, one of the most crazy-making design patterns today is repeating the exact same ad within the same article, every few paragraphs. It’s hard to find a single article on Apple News — a sort of ersatz pidgin version of the web — that does not do this. The exact same ad — 6, 7, 8 times within the same article. How many 30-something blonde white women need hearing aids? It’s insane.

People are spending less and less time on the web because websites are becoming worse and worse experiences, but the publishers of websites are almost literally trying to dig their way out of that hole by adding more and more of the reader-hostile shit that is driving people away. The Guardian screenshot Bose captured, where only 11 percent of the entire screen shows text from the article, is the equivalent of a broadcast TV channel that only showed 7 minutes of actual TV content per hour, devoting the other 53 minutes to paid commercials and promotions for other shows on the same channel. Almost no one would watch such a channel. But somehow this strategy is deemed sustainable for websites.

The web is the only medium the world has ever seen where its highest-profile decision makers are people who despise the medium and are trying to drive people away from it. As Bose notes, “A lot of websites actively interfere the reader from accessing them by pestering them with their ‘apps’ these days. I don’t know where this fascination with getting everyone to download your app comes from.” It comes from people who literally do not understand, and do not enjoy, the web, but yet find themselves running large websites.

The people making these decisions for these websites are like ocean liner captains who are trying to hit icebergs."]]></description>
<dc:subject>internet web online reading bloat 2026 ads advertising ux johngruber shubhambose enshittification nytimes theguardian applenews autoplay theatlantic rsj thenewyorker ublockorigin adblockers attention webdesign</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:0b17df6cba14/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bloat"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ads"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:advertising"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johngruber"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:shubhambose"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:enshittification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nytimes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:theguardian"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:applenews"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:autoplay"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:theatlantic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rsj"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thenewyorker"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ublockorigin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:adblockers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:webdesign"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://sf.gazetteer.co/fatiguing-fascism">
    <title>Fatiguing fascism</title>
    <dc:date>2026-03-13T23:19:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://sf.gazetteer.co/fatiguing-fascism</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The outrage over Greg Bovino’s ‘Nazi chic’ outfit in Minnesota ignores the reality that in a society of the spectacle, we’re all fighting for stage time"

...

"It’s been a minute since we’ve seen the likes of one Greg Bovino. The now-reassigned commander-at-large of the US Border Patrol catwalked into public awareness thanks to his personal style while overseeing ICE and Border Patrol agents on the streets of Minneapolis earlier this year.

Sporting an eye-catching olive green greatcoat that was just a little too close to Nazi chic for comfort, Bovino volunteered to serve as latest poster-/whipping-boy for the Trump administration’s ongoing playlist of throwback hits that also includes Elon Musk’s now classic “Roman salute.” 

Bovino’s long military trench coat flapping in the Minneapolis breeze fueled all the predictable hysteria one expects from the liberal media during our era of theatrical #Resistance. Social media feeds were ablaze for a couple of days about yet another supposed recrudescence of fascism — even Germany got into the mix with their Der Spiegel hyperbolically accessorizing Bovino’s fit with “Nazi” gloss.

You probably heard this story told with a different emphasis than the one I’m giving here: Since 2015, the Year of the Golden Escalator, liberal pundits, podcasters, and posters have holstered the words “fascism” and “Nazi” more accessibly than an itchy-fingered gunslinger in a spaghetti Western.

In this climate, Bovino’s crypto-fascist turn as a supermodel sporting Nazi chic (never mind that the greatcoat in question dates back to the early 19th century and was widely deployed across the European continent, fascist and otherwise) is supposedly only the latest on-the-nose indicator that literal fascism is again on the rise, a specter haunting bottomless mimosa brunches from Cape Cod to Marin County.

But does the hypocrisy of the Chardonnay #Resistance really matter at the end of the day? After all, it would be a hard sell indeed to impute plausible deniability to Bovino’s frisson of authoritarian drag.

I won’t even try to make a case that our fashionable commander-at-large was blissfully ignorant that his brass-festooned greatcoat (to say nothing of the 1930s heritage haircut) wasn't communicating anything. 

It’s obvious to anyone who’s been paying attention to the right’s provocations these past ten years that Bovino didn’t just accidentally put on a militaristic show with that coat. Yet, it’s also obvious that he not only knew precisely what he was doing, but why. If there is one common denominator across the political spectrum, it’s that everyone is awake to theater now. Nothing that hits our screens, not even the slaughter of our fellow Americans, hasn’t been framed for maximum visual flair and shareability. 

My personal experience with the question of ‘to Nazi or not to Nazi’ gives me a more informed take than most on the Great Greatcoat Affair. 

During the early days of my tenure with the alternative rock band Interpol in the 2000s, I myself dabbled — more than dabbled — in the “rich” rock tradition of Nazi drag. Unlike Keith Moon, who donned an entire SS uniform or Siouxie Sioux who accessorized her perfect punk look with an actual swastika armband, my own carefully crafted attempt at Nazi chic was more suggestive — though, admittedly, with the ensemble featuring polished combat boots, a sleek, black leather holster, a plain armband, and a striking Hitlerjugend coiffure, the “suggestion” was communicated through a megaphone. 

It would stretch credulity if I insisted that I had no idea that my onstage costume wasn’t curated with the highest degree of attention to communicate something. The references I was making with this turn on that virtual catwalk were obvious. I even showcased much greater verisimilitude than Bovino.

As with Moon, facetiousness was meant as a clear sign that I and everyone else at the time knew what was really going on. I remember visiting my bespoke tailor one time and laughing after I’d come out of the dressing room decked out in one of his latest creations. “May I see your papers?” he inquired with a German accent delivered through a shit-eating grin. 

Though our backgrounds, our politics and our job description are worlds apart, Bovino and I nonetheless have something in common: We both partook of the captivating allure of midcentury military chic knowing full well that a bunch of cameras were around the corner waiting to capture it all for posterity.

Of course, both of our fashion choices were already shopworn by the time we donned them, as “Fascinating Fascism,” Susan Sontag’s classic 1974 essay in The New York Review of Books reveals. 

Yet, whereas Sontag’s analysis of the appeal of fascism emphasized its shared visual vernacular with sexual sadomasochism (something my stage attire was intended to theatricalize), Bovino’s seems less preoccupied with titillation than with provocation. 

While it’s easy to imagine Bovino — like so many of his fellow MAGA mascots — is an actual Nazi-admiring fascist, the truth is probably less terrifying or even interesting. As with so many other politically motivated public figures (and, honestly, so many of us), he knows that spectacle, not actual politics, drives clicks. Those clicks are pre-political; and, sadly, they dominate our lives at the moment. 

In our latter-day Debordian Society of the Spectacle, everyone is competing with everyone else for attention. Bovino’s display of muscular militarism can not be taken at face value. It should be seen for what it is (and was for Moon, Sioux, and me): a gimmick and a gambit.

In Subculture: the Meaning of Style, the English sociologist Dick Hebdige wrote about mods, rockers, Teddy Boys, Rastas, and other British music scenes of the 1970s. Hebdige’s exegesis of London punks has stuck with me the most, particularly his analysis of their deployment of the swastika. At one point, Hebdige quotes a “punk on the street” speaking with the kind of terse, uncomplicated logic one expects from a disaffected working class Brit: “Punks just like to be hated.”

I look back to my dalliance with Nazi chic as being of a very specific time and place, a context far removed from the present. It’d be in bad taste, and probably insensitive, for me to do today what I did back then.

The 2000s were a different time: no omnipresent cameras, no social media, no hashtags. In the intervening two decades, consciousness has been raised among the liberal class; similarly, the impulse to create a capital-S Spectacle has risen among the illiberal one. 

Would that the consciousness of so-called progressives continued to higher spheres, we might be spared their obnoxious sermons; would that people like Bovino not bait them so expertly, we might be able to think about other things for a change."]]></description>
<dc:subject>latefascistaesthetics attention clothing online internet web algorithms 2026 carlosdengler fascism fascistaesthetics ice borderpatrol police policing performance socialmedia gregbovino elonmusk nazis dickhebdige fashion susansontag guydebord spectacle cameras photography clickbait subculture subcultures mods music punk society societyofthespectacle politics theater sadomasochism provocation keithmoon siouxiesioux resistance</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:c89dfe358a0b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:latefascistaesthetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:clothing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:algorithms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:carlosdengler"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fascism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fascistaesthetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:borderpatrol"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:police"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:performance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gregbovino"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elonmusk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nazis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dickhebdige"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fashion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:susansontag"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:guydebord"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:spectacle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cameras"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:photography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:clickbait"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:subculture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:subcultures"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mods"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:music"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:punk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:societyofthespectacle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:theater"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sadomasochism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:provocation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:keithmoon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:siouxiesioux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:resistance"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qcf5syA1MlE">
    <title>The Left Doesn’t Hate Technology with Gita Jackson - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2026-03-13T05:21:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qcf5syA1MlE</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Paris Marx is joined by Gita Jackson to discuss why the left’s hatred of AI is justified, why a different approach to technology is necessary, and how they’re reassessing their own relationships with digital tech.

Gita Jackson is a co-founder of Aftermath (https://aftermath.site ).

Also mentioned in this episode:
     
• Gita wrote about why the left doesn’t hate technology (https://aftermath.site/anthropic-claude-ai-leftist-technology/ ).

• Gita also wrote about downloading digital music (https://aftermath.site/digita-audio-player-snowsky-echo-mini-fiio-hyby/ ) onto a Snowksy Fiio Echo Mini.

• Chris Person wrote about the  Boox Palma eReader (https://aftermath.site/i-love-my-weird-little-phone-shaped-ereader/ )  as an alternative to Kindle.

• Learn more about Mike Pondsmith (https://blackgirlnerds.com/from-cyberpsychos-to-netrunners-here-is-the-story-of-mike-pondsmith-the-true-mastermind-behind-cyberpunk/ ) and his Cyberpunk TTRPG.

• Gita will one day get Paris to watch Frieren (https://www.crunchyroll.com/series/GG5H5XQX4/frieren-beyond-journeys-end ) ."

[references:

"The Left Doesn't Hate Technology, We Hate Being Exploited
Techno-cynics are all just wounded techno-optimists."
https://aftermath.site/anthropic-claude-ai-leftist-technology/ ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>gitjackson parismarx technology left 2026 luddism neoluddism luddites neoluddites ai artificialintelligence llms technooptimism technocynicism exploitation generativeai openai anthropic claude chatgpt consolidation samaltman society hsr highsspeedrail publicgood mrna vaccines vaccinations medicine siliconvalley aibubble aihype capitalism corporations corporatism qanon ereaders eink boox chrisperson automation speculation infrastructure datacenters chatbots labor work seamusblackley business games gaming videogames xbox microsoft google uber lyft nfts crypto cryptocurrencies evil policy power bigtech oracle gemini gmail linux music spotify streaming china netflix piracy airbnb taxis jeffbezos billionaires gigeconomy billgates edwardsnowden peterthiel scale scaling slow small benshapiro cryptofascism donaldtrump slavery humans human humanity humanism government liberals liberalism grantmorrison agi butlerianjihad smarthphones walledgardens howweread reading books resistance search attention algorithms libraries</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:8932ac767f53/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gitjackson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:parismarx"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:left"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:luddism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neoluddism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:luddites"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neoluddites"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:llms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technooptimism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technocynicism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:exploitation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:generativeai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anthropic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:claude"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatgpt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consolidation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:samaltman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hsr"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highsspeedrail"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:publicgood"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mrna"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:vaccines"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:vaccinations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:medicine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:siliconvalley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aibubble"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aihype"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:corporations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:corporatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:qanon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ereaders"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:eink"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:boox"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chrisperson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:automation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:speculation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:infrastructure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:datacenters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatbots"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:seamusblackley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:games"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gaming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:videogames"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:xbox"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:uber"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lyft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nfts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:crypto"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cryptocurrencies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:evil"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:power"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bigtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:oracle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gemini"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gmail"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:linux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:music"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:spotify"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:streaming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:china"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:netflix"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:piracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:airbnb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:taxis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jeffbezos"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:billionaires"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gigeconomy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:billgates"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edwardsnowden"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:peterthiel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scale"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scaling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:slow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:small"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:benshapiro"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cryptofascism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:donaldtrump"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:slavery"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:human"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:government"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:liberals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:liberalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:grantmorrison"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:agi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:butlerianjihad"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:smarthphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:walledgardens"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:resistance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:search"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:algorithms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:libraries"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://sf.gazetteer.co/brewster-kahles-memory-palace">
    <title>Brewster Kahle’s Memory Palace</title>
    <dc:date>2026-03-11T21:22:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://sf.gazetteer.co/brewster-kahles-memory-palace</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["In a time when everyone from the Trump administration to the companies serving up your daily doomscroll wants to erase the past, the Internet Archive refuses to forget"

[archived:
https://archive.is/J5xW0 ]

"On a cool late October evening, Brewster Kahle was dancing in the streets.

Eyes closed, arms flailing about, Kahle stomped and twirled to a Traveling Wilburys cover band as hundreds of people danced, mingled, and snagged free ice cream bars outside the Parthenonic building that houses the Internet Archive, the digital library Kahle founded in 1996. A banner hung above the party, trumpeting an astonishing feat that was probably out of date by the time it was printed: “Web Pages Archived: 1,000,000,000,000.”

One trillion. It’s a number that boggles the mind, but then, so does the Internet Archive itself. With its lofty goal of collecting the world’s digital information, it could not be more essential or more out of sync with a moment in which history is being actively erased. Everything is in the Archive, from long-out-of-print books to TV specials ripped from old VHS tapes to more Grateful Dead concert recordings than any one person could listen to. And all of it is offered for free: another way in which Kahle’s site seems to be an artifact of a different time and a different internet.  

“We’ve given people the opportunity to make their voices heard, to write things down, to go and share them to the globe,” Kahle told the audience sitting in old church pews during the party. “There was this dream of an internet that was made for us, by us, to be able to make us better people.”  

But not everyone has shared that dream.  

In September, the Internet Archive finally put an end to a high-profile legal battle that threatened its very existence. In 2020, publishers Hachette, HarperCollins, John Wiley & Sons, and Penguin Random House sued the Internet Archive, alleging the site had violated copyright laws that protected the printed books the site had been digitally sharing during the pandemic. 

On Aug. 11, 2023, a US district court ruled in favor of the publishers, finding that the Internet Archive’s digital library violated US copyright law. The case was finalized in 2024, resulting in the removal of over 500,000 books from the site.

Following the 2023 ruling, the same lawyers sued the Internet Archive once more, this time on behalf of Universal Music Group, over the site’s initiative to digitize over 400,000 fragile 78 rpm records from the early 20th century. Both parties in UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Internet Archive reached a settlement in San Francisco federal court in 2025.

“These aren’t mom-and-pop publishers. These are massive, multinational media conglomerates,” Kahle told Gazetteer SF over Zoom after the event. “These licensing things from publishers are dreadful. They’re in the process of structurally destroying the library system. It’s happening now.” 

These lawsuits came at a time when public access to information feels increasingly threatened, whether by government agencies cutting public media funding, calls by (sometimes astroturfed) parents’ organizations for schools and libraries to censor books, or tech companies putting their thumbs on the scale to decide what news and information ought to be widely consumed. There’s never been a more important time for the Internet Archive and its digitized library of trillion-plus archived webpages to serve as a bulwark against censorship and a seed bank for the world’s information. 

“There’s a long tradition of libraries being shut down and destroyed by the powerful. It used to be king and church; now it’s corporations and governments,” Kahle said. “The good news is, we’re still here.” 
The Internet Archive celebrated another milestone last year: becoming a federal depository library, as designated by California Senator Alex Padilla in July. The designation establishes a partnership with the U.S. Government Publishing Office that allows the public free access to U.S. government information, including the site’s free compendium of published documents from over 50 government organizations around the world.  

This includes tens of thousands of federal webpages either taken down or heavily modified after President Donald Trump took office for his second term. While webpages detailing critical information on gender identity, climate change, diversity, and historical information about slavery are no longer accessible on government websites, their old URLs can easily be located on the Internet Archive. While the administration would like us to forget, the Internet Archive remembers.

Meanwhile, as the Trump administration attempts to bulldoze history’s digital footprint, physical libraries are being hollowed out. In March 2025, the administration issued an executive order to eliminate the Institute of Museum and Library Services, the federal agency that funds state libraries and museums. Legal challenges have stalled the dismantling process, but litigation is ongoing. Libraries across the country wait with bated breath as the attack on public knowledge still looms large. 

Yet even as Washington tightens its grip, librarians, archivists and technologists continue to partner with the Internet Archive through Archive-It, a program that helps more than 1,300 libraries, archives, and museums across 40 countries protect their digital memory. 

Through Archive-It and its Community Webs program, the Internet Archive has partnered with the San Francisco Public Library since 2007, safeguarding the city’s history with scans of everything from activist Barbara M. Cameron’s 1980 Gay Freedom Day speech to mid-20th-century bilingual Chinese-English publication East/West to dozens of issues of the defunct SF newspaper, The Argonaut, from 1877.

“The partnership with Internet Archive has greatly enhanced access to archival collections and historical photographs that would not otherwise be available for the community,” SFPL City Librarian, Michael Lambert told me. “I’m glad that San Francisco can be a beacon and a model for everybody else in the industry.” 

Against all odds — hundreds of millions of dollars in lawsuits, a 2024 data breach, and a federal government that has declared war on history — the Internet Archive’s preservation of history is its greatest act of resistance. A singular webpage from Democracy’s Library, for example, can arm generations to come with critical information about the Jan. 6 capitol attack or the end of each presidential term since 2008. The ability to access memory is a natural defense against the forces determined to forget. 

“Archives in general have a foundational role in creating a past for society, so they have a vital political role today,” says Lisa Gitelman, NYU Media, Culture and Communications professor and author of Always Already New: Media, History, and the Data of Culture. “One of the great things about Archive.org is that it has this ethos of public access which is egalitarian down to its bones. So for them to create the Wayback Machine was just phenomenal, revolutionary.” '

Back at the Archive’s one-trillion party, attendees were greeted by hundreds of three-foot terracotta statues around the headquarter’s Great Room, each representing an employee who worked at the Internet Archive for at least three years. A soft buzz hummed from a wall of servers in the back. Blue dots rapidly flickered on its surface, signaling that someone was either downloading or uploading media onto the site. 

One by one, guest speakers including State Sen. Scott Wiener, NPR CEO and President Katherine Maher, and representatives from Wikipedia, BBC News and Stanford took to the stage or spoke via video. Each congratulated the Internet Archive on its milestone or shared their experiences using the digital library. 

At one point, the audience erupted in laughter as Annie Rauwerda, owner of the popular Depths of Wikipedia Instagram account, gave an energetic presentation on all her strange findings on the internet over the years. “I think bread should be photographed using radial motion blur more often!” she exclaimed into the microphone while stock images of bread loaves with the effect flew across the screen. 

Others spoke to the site’s importance during a moment when public media is being slashed and burned. “These tools are so critical. They help us journalists fact-check claims, see how companies and governments may have selectively edited online materials, or even deleted statements or social media posts that they’d rather the public didn’t see,” said BBC News reporter Lily Jamali. “For a job that involves so much research, these tools are absolutely fundamental.” 

Eventually, the party spilled out onto Clement Street again for more dancing. “I mean, why did we come to San Francisco originally if not to dance in the streets?” Kahle asked me later. “We have so many people showing really what human nature is good for. I think that’s great.”"]]></description>
<dc:subject>brewsterkahle 2026 sanfrancisco internetarchive soficisneros internet web online waybackmachine archives archiving law legal copyright libraries alexpadilla 2025 sfpl barbaracameron michaellambert lisagitelman media trumpism publicmedia annierauwerda katherinemaher wikipedia</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:1985f1981a0c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brewsterkahle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sanfrancisco"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internetarchive"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:soficisneros"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:waybackmachine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:archives"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:archiving"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:legal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:libraries"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alexpadilla"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2025"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sfpl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:barbaracameron"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:michaellambert"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lisagitelman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:trumpism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:publicmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:annierauwerda"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:katherinemaher"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wikipedia"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://asteriskmag.substack.com/p/3000-languages-are-dying-but-more">
    <title>3,000 languages are dying, but more are being invented</title>
    <dc:date>2026-03-09T23:12:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://asteriskmag.substack.com/p/3000-languages-are-dying-but-more</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The losses of linguistic diversity have attracted wide attention. But the gains are comparatively underappreciated, or even unfairly disdained."

...

"

Perhaps it’s more accurate to say that linguistic diversity is not so much collapsing as radically transforming, with decimation on some dimensions coexisting with explosive growth on others. The losses are relatively uncontroversial, and have attracted wide attention with good reason. But the gains, I believe, are comparatively underappreciated, or even unfairly disdained, despite being of an arguably similar humanistic value."]]></description>
<dc:subject>karsonelmgrenn 2026 language languages diversity culture communication grammar jargon slang esperanto jamesflynn russian chinese mandarin english hindi civilization society hermanmelville eskimo oldirish change humanities psycholinguistics online internet web spanish español tevfikesenç caucasuses ubykh johncolarusso memes communities welsh finnish suzetteelgin johnquijada ithkuil ethnolingusitics cicero linguistics community french conlangs margaretransdell-green invention creativity orkish elvish adamaleksic tokipona hopi kinyarwanda quenya tuyuca turkish sonjalang culturaldiversity metaculus guuguyimithirr tzeltal romanjakobson</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:593024dc6f3b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:karsonelmgrenn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:languages"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:diversity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:grammar"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jargon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:slang"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:esperanto"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jamesflynn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:russian"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chinese"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mandarin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:english"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hindi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:civilization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hermanmelville"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:eskimo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:oldirish"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:change"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:psycholinguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:spanish"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:español"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tevfikesenç"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:caucasuses"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ubykh"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johncolarusso"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:memes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:communities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:welsh"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:finnish"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:suzetteelgin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnquijada"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ithkuil"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ethnolingusitics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cicero"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:french"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conlangs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:margaretransdell-green"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:invention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:creativity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:orkish"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elvish"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:adamaleksic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tokipona"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hopi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kinyarwanda"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quenya"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tuyuca"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:turkish"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sonjalang"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culturaldiversity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:metaculus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:guuguyimithirr"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tzeltal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:romanjakobson"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=paHMe9kFf0w">
    <title>The Depravity Economy - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2026-03-09T19:27:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=paHMe9kFf0w</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["This week we discuss our coverage of the U.S.-Israel strikes against Iran, specifically how Polymarket and Kalshi are letting people profit from death, and that Amazon data centers were on fire after missiles hit Dubai. Then Emanuel talks about how AI translations are adding 'hallucinations' to Wikipedia articles. In the subscribers-only section, Sam tells us about a change with Amazon wishlists that may expose your address.

0:00 - Intro
1:32 - With Iran War, Kalshi and Polymarket Bet That the Depravity Economy Has No Bottom: https://www.404media.co/with-iran-war-kalshi-and-polymarket-bet-that-the-depravity-economy-has-no-bottom/
33:42 - AI Translations Are Adding Hallucinations To Wikipedia Articles"]]></description>
<dc:subject>kalshi polymarket wikipedia internet web online depravity economics economy iran war predictionmarkets death dubai jasonkoebler gambling</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:d8a921a7cc67/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kalshi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:polymarket"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wikipedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:depravity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:iran"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:predictionmarkets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:death"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dubai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jasonkoebler"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gambling"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://jottit.org/">
    <title>Jottit</title>
    <dc:date>2026-03-06T19:33:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://jottit.org/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The fastest way to publish on the web."

[via:
https://simonbc.com/rebuilding-jottit 

"In 2007, Aaron Swartz and I built a small tool called Jottit. The idea was simple: make it as easy as possible to put a page on the web. You typed something, clicked a button, and got a page on a secret URL. You didn't need to create an account first. If you wanted to keep it, you claimed it with your email and put it on a subdomain.

Aaron had this phrase that stuck with me. He wanted the cognitive load to be so tiny that you just use it without even thinking about whether you should.

That was the web back then. It was small and personal and a little weird. People made pages because they had something to say, not because they were building an audience. The tools were simple because the ambitions were simple: put something out there, see what happens.

I was finishing my CS degree at the time and spent every free hour working on Jottit. I wanted to make it perfect. I would write code or improve the design and send it over to Aaron and he'd critique it down to the smallest detail. Eventually we met up in Somerville, MA in September 2007 and spent two weeks getting it ready for launch.

We launched and it clicked. People got it immediately. And then only a few months later my dad got diagnosed with cancer and died just a few weeks after that. I didn't want to work on Jottit again. I didn't want to do any programming again.

Then Aaron died in 2013.

I would think back on Aaron and those six months, creating Jottit together. I remembered the joy and the excitement of that time. But I never went back to it. It felt too heavy. And eventually the original Jottit went offline.

I spent the next fifteen years working as a developer, raising four kids with my wife, building other people's products.

Then last year something shifted. I kept seeing people express a longing for the old web. Before social media turned every thought into content and every person into a brand. Before the timeline replaced blogs. I felt it too. I started working on an open-source microblogging tool inspired by Jottit, but at some point I thought: why don't I just build Jottit instead?

I emailed Paul Graham about funding it and to my surprise he said yes. I quit my job.

Aaron believed the web should be easy enough that anyone could participate. Not just people who know how to code or who can afford a platform's cut. That idea hasn't aged. If anything it matters more now, when most people's only option for putting words online is to hand them to a corporation.

Jottit is back at jottit.org. Same idea, same name, rebuilt from scratch. You type, you publish, you have a page. No tracking, no followers, no algorithms.

It's a small project, not a startup. I just wanted it to exist again."]]]></description>
<dc:subject>onlinetoolkit simoncarstensen 2026 aaronswartz jotttit web online internet publishing webdev microblogs microblogging paulgraham</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:c4a28e305416/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:onlinetoolkit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:simoncarstensen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aaronswartz"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jotttit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:webdev"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:microblogs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:microblogging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:paulgraham"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.anildash.com/2026/02/28/apple-video-podcast-power/">
    <title>Why Apple’s move to video could endanger podcasting's greatest power - Anil Dash</title>
    <dc:date>2026-03-03T23:27:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.anildash.com/2026/02/28/apple-video-podcast-power/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["TL;DR:

• Apple is adding support for video podcasts to their podcast app
• Podcasts are built on an open standard, which is why they aren’t controlled by a bad algorithm and don’t have ads that spy on you
• Apple’s new system for video podcasts breaks with the old podcast standard, and forces creators to host their video clips with a few selected companies
• The stakes are even higher because all the indie video infrastructure companies have been bought by private equity, while Trump’s goons go after TV and consolidate the big studios
• If Apple doesn’t open this up, it could lead to podcasts getting enshittified like all the other media

Podcasts are a radical gift

As I noted back in 2024, the common phrase “wherever you get your podcasts” masks a subtle point, which is that podcasts are built on an open technology — a design which has radical implications on today’s internet. This is the reason that the podcasts most people consume aren’t skewed by creators chasing an algorithm that dictates what content they should create, aren’t full of surveillance-based advertising, and aren’t locked down to one app or platform that traps both creators and their audience within the walled garden of a single giant tech company.

Many of those merits of the contemporary podcast ecosystem are possible because of choices Apple made almost two decades ago when they embraced open standards in iTunes when adding podcasting features. Their outsized market influence (the term “podcast” itself came from the name iPod) pushed everyone else in the ecosystem to follow their lead, and as a result, we have a major media format that isn’t as poisoned, in some ways, as the rest of social media or even mainstream media.

Sure, there are individual podcast creators one might object to, but notice how you don’t see bad actors like FCC chairman Brendan Carr illegally throwing his weight around to try to censor and persecute podcasters in the same way that he’s been silencing television broadcasters, and you don’t see MAGA legislators trying to game the refs about the algorithm the way they have with Facebook and Twitter. Even the Elon Musks of the world can’t just buy up the whole world of podcasting like he was able to with Twitter, because the ecosystem is decentralized and not controlled by any one player. This is how the Internet was supposed to work. As early Internet advocates were fond of saying, the architecture of the Internet was designed to see censorship as damage, and route around it.
The move to video

All of this is at much higher risk now due to the technical decisions Apple has made with its move to support video podcasts in its latest software versions that are about to launch. The motivations for their move are obvious: in recent years, many podcasters have moved to embrace new platforms to increase their distribution, reach, engagement and sponsorship dollars, and that has driven them to add video, which has meant moving to YouTube, and more recently, platforms like Netflix. That is also typically accompanied by putting out promotional clips of the video portion of the podcast on platforms like TikTok and Instagram. Combined with Spotify’s acquisition of multiple studios in order to produce proprietary shows that are not podcasts, but exclusive content locked into their apps, and Apple has faced a significant number of threats to their once-dominant position in the space.

So it was inevitable that Apple would add video support to their podcasting apps. And it makes sense for Apple to update the technical underpinnings; the assumptions that were made when designing podcasts over two decades ago aren’t really appropriate for many contemporary uses. For example, back then, by default an entire podcast episode would be downloaded to your iPod for convenient listening on the go, just like songs in your music library. But downloading a giant 4K video clip of an hour-long podcast show that you might not even watch, just in case you might want to see it, would be a huge waste of resources and bandwidth. Modern users are used to streaming everything. Thus, Apple updated their apps to support just grabbing snippets of video as they’re needed, and to their credit, Apple is embracing an open video format when doing so, instead of some proprietary system that requires podcasters to pay a fee or get permission.

The problem, though, is that Apple is only allowing these new video streams to be served by a small number of pre-approved commercial providers that they’ve hand-selected. In the podcasting world, there are no gatekeepers; if I want to start a podcast today, I can publish a podcast feed here on anildash.com and put up some MP3s with my episodes, and anyone anywhere in the world can subscribe to that podcast, I don’t have to ask anyone’s permission, tell anyone about it, or agree to anyone’s terms of service.

If I want to publish a video podcast to Apple’s new system, though, I can’t just put up a video file on my site and tell people to subscribe to my podcast. I have to sign up for one of the approved partner services, agree to their terms of service, pay their monthly fee, watch them get acquired by Facebook, wait for the stupid corporate battle between Facebook and Apple, endure the service being enshittified, have them put their thumb on the scale about which content they want to promote, deal with my subscribers being spied on when they watch my show, see Brendan Carr make up a pretense to attack the platform I’m on, watch the service use my show to cross-promote violent attacks on vulnerable people, and the entire rest of that broken tech/content culture cycle.

We don’t have to do this, Apple!

How this plays out

What will happen, by default, if Apple doesn’t change course and add support for open video hosting for podcasts is a land grab for control of the infrastructure of the new, closed video podcast technology platform. Some of the bidders may be players that want to own podcasting (Spotify, Netflix, maybe legacy media companies like Disney and Paramount), or a roll-up from a cloud provider like AWS or Google Cloud. Either way, the services will get way more expensive for creators, and far more conservative about what content they allow, while being far more consumer-hostile in terms of privacy and monetization. We’ve seen this play out already — video shows on YouTube give advertisers massive amounts of data about viewers, while podcasts can be delivered to an audience while almost totally preserving their privacy, if a creator wants to help them preserve their anonymity. The reason you see podcasters always talking about “use our promo code” in their sponsor reads is because advertisers can’t track you going from their show to their website.

This will also start to impact content. You don’t hear podcasters saying “unalive” or censoring normal words because there is no algorithm that skews the distribution of their content. The promotional graphics for their shows are often downright boring, and don’t feature the hosts making weird faces like on YouTube thumbnails, because they haven’t been optimized to within an inch of their lives in hopes of getting 12-year-olds to click on them instead of Mr. Beast — because they’re not trying to chase algorithmic amplification. The closest thing that podcasters have to those kinds of games is when they ask you to rate them in Apple’s Podcasts app, because that has an algorithm for making recommendations, but even that is mediated by real humans making actual choices.

But once we’ve got a layer of paid intermediaries distributing video content, and Apple leans more heavily into the visual aspects of their podcast app, incentives are going to start to shift rapidly. Today, other than on laptops, phones and tablets, Apple Podcasts app only exists on their Apple TV hardware, and doesn’t even have a video playback feature. By contrast, a lot of video podcast consumption happens in YouTube’s TV apps in the living room. Apple Podcasts will soon have to be on every set top device like Roku sticks and Amazon Fire TVs and Google’s Chromecasts, as well as on smart TVs like Samsungs and LGs, with a robust video playback feature that can compete with YouTube’s own capabilities. Once that’s happened — which will take at least a year, if not multiple years — creators will immediately begin jockeying for ways to get promoted or amplified within that ecosystem. Even if Apple has allowed independent publishers to make their own video podcast feeds, it’s easy to imagine them treating them as second-class citizens when distributing those podcasts to all of the Apple Podcast users across all of these platforms.

The stakes for all of this are even higher because nearly all of the independent online platforms for video creation outside of YouTube have been bought up by a single private equity firm. In short: even if you don’t know it, if you’re trying to do video off of YouTube, all of your eggs are in one, very precarious, basket.
What to do

Apple can mitigate the risks of closing up podcasts by moving as quickly as possible to reassure the entire podcasting ecosystem that they’ll allow creators to use any source for hosting video. Right now, there’s a “fallback” video system where creators can deliver video through the traditional podcast standard, and other podcasting apps will show that video to audiences, but Apple’s apps don’t recognize it. If Apple said they’d support that specification as a second option for those who don’t want to, or can’t, use their video hosting partners, that would go a huge way towards mitigating the ecosystem risk that they’re introducing with this new shift.

If Apple can engage with a wide swath of creators and understand the concerns that are bubbling up, and articulate that they’re aware of the real, significant risks that can arise from the path that they’re currently on, they still have a chance to course-correct.

Some of these decisions can seem like arcane technical discussions. It’s easy to roll your eyes when people talk about specifications and formats and the minutiae of what happens behind the scenes when we click on a link. But the history of the Internet has shown us that, sometimes, even some of what seem like the most inconsequential choices end up leading to massive shifts in a larger ecosystem, or even in culture overall.

A generation ago, a few people at Apple made a choice to embrace an open ecosystem that was in its infancy, and in so doing, they enabled an entire culture of creators to flourish for decades. Podcasting is perhaps the last major media format that is open, free, and not easily able to be captured by authoritarians. The stakes couldn’t be higher. All it takes now is a few decision makers pushing to do the right thing, not just the easy thing, to protect an entire vital medium."]]></description>
<dc:subject>anildash podcasts podcasting video 2026 internet web online enshittifcation media privateequity videopodcasts algorithms ads advertising surveillance data donaldtrump trumpism platforms socialmedia mainstreammedia brendancarr broadcasting elonmusk twitter netflix tiktok spotify apple youtube ecosystems open free</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:654521d5a044/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anildash"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:podcasts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:podcasting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:video"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:enshittifcation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:privateequity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:videopodcasts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:algorithms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ads"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:advertising"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:surveillance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:donaldtrump"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:trumpism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:platforms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mainstreammedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brendancarr"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:broadcasting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elonmusk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:netflix"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tiktok"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:spotify"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:youtube"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ecosystems"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:free"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.pbs.org/wnet/americanmasters/dealing-with-the-myth-of-sun-ra/37488/">
    <title>Dealing with the myth of Sun Ra and his enduring influence | American Masters | PBS</title>
    <dc:date>2026-03-01T08:37:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.pbs.org/wnet/americanmasters/dealing-with-the-myth-of-sun-ra/37488/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Influence, our social influenza disguised as benevolent magnetism, has become a currency with more value than mundane fiat, its cults of virality are conflated with wealth, power, upward mobility, status— cue a chorus of triumphant blues flutes for the time before artists were expected to be brands or risk insignificance. The pianist, composer, bandleader, and scholar known to the world as Sun Ra, née Herman Blount, has been posthumously inducted into the influence-driven economy as a mythocratic, mystic, “mythscientist.” His ideas about the world, which he renamed the “omniverse,” and how sound and language function within it, have incited a cult-like and frenzied following in recent years, one that is part authentic renaissance, part trendy appropriation of the codes of rebirth for sentimental or aesthetic reasons. And Ra, though skilled in persuasion, impeccably sovereign for a Birmingham-born-and-raised Black man who came to the planet in 1914, and possessive of a Cheshire-esque command of duality and logic, had not endeavored to be a guru or savior. He fashioned himself as a messenger whose primary medium was music, a poet, and one of “nature’s naturals.” He was more country preacher in his ability to exalt and exhort than professor or lecturer, yet his capacity to riff expertly on a subject for hours or compose through the night, with micro-naps at the piano from which he awoke playing in sync with the band or correcting errors he’d heard between waking and dreaming, made fanaticism inevitable. He also wore capes and glitter, required the same will to adorn of his ensembles, and created a collective environment in which the band lived together like a family rather than just reuniting for tours, concerts, and rehearsals.

He invoked with his Arkestra a hive mind of like-minded musicians and dancers who found it more appealing under his wing than in any risk of exile. Some would complain about being regulated and disciplined but usually not to the point of defecting from the band. Influence. Ra put those closest to him in a trance. He’d complain too, and express disenchantment with bandmates who would chase women, with the naive pursuit of freedom by those who needed regime and routine to evolve. He required devotion, suspension of disbelief, and a bit of asceticism, though he did drink, have a dark sense of humor, and present as uninhibited and irreverent at times. Ephemera of his, scattered across the internet as if dismissed by formal archives to revert to the commons, is a heartbreaking delight. There’s his application to NASA, his early business cards in the font of taxi companies, that dapper dilapidated vintage glamor of the precarious local small business, checks written to him by his sister in Birmingham during lean months, his recipe for an okra-based “moon stew,” and rumors in the digital audiosphere of his love for Sizzler in Los Angeles, which he’d visit in capes and headphones before the invention of the Walkman™.

Ra claimed to be a visitor from Saturn, trapped on earth to complete an impossible mission, and Saturn is not lenient; it’s the planet of demands, lessons, fearless and severe leaders, Machiavellian and a little fascist in the Fanonion connotation wherein “we are the first fascists,” and it’s not so much evil as an expression of retaliatory integrity. Detectable in the vibrations of Sun Ra’s music, this tendency toward governance or reparenting of the misguided by repatriation into a new and stricter angle of the cosmos, a “heliocentric world” in which the Sun is the leader of the ensemble of planetary bodies and he is the Sun’s saturnine proxy, translates best in his range. He can offer a tender, barreling blues interpretation of “Somewhere Over the Rainbow” or his original “God Is More Than Love Can Ever Be” and then flip into the electro-acoustic and confrontational “Disco 3000” or lyrical ballad “The Satellites are Spinning,” spanning the wistful and the caustic as if they have the same genesis. In Sun Ra’s territory, they do. Good and evil are silly distinctions according to him, a lullaby and an avant-garde noise track that is all agitation have equally important purposes in returning himself, the listener, and the atmosphere to homeostasis with a better Earth. What are the Black purposes of space travel, he asks in earnest, and answers with the versatility of madmen, gods, and mythic beings, by making space a casual topic in his lexicon, a natural Black preoccupation.

Sun Ra’s impact on the first quarter of the 21st century of our nightmare on Earth has been primarily as a buzzy high-concept name many reference and have cursory familiarity with for clout. I don’t believe most who cite and fetishize him and the Arkestra he built across five decades take the time to listen to his albums in depth. I don’t think they sit up nights playing his lectures. Some do, but most mimic the doers’ enthusiasm in hopes it’s mistaken for real attentiveness. He’s become too fashionable, too much a representative of what is called Afro-Futurism, a white academic’s shorthand for Black transcendence of space and time through sound and feeling that turns the decadently original into one heap of maybe somedays, to everyone’s detriment. Ra’s peers in music, from Lee Perry to Stockhausen to Flying Lotus to George Clinton to Georgia Anne Muldrow, are in a more productive conversation with his work than cultural workers who use him as a relic or image to point to when describing a certain kind of blackness that cannot be contained or diminished, except by being so pointed to.

Ra was born in 1914, James Baldwin in 1924, and Amiri Baraka, a close friend of Ra’s, in 1934. What all three men have in common among themselves and with countless others, is that the digital archive has enabled a constant loop of their voices, words, and images, detached from any meaningful context. So one generation after the next is collapsed into an undifferentiated sequence of special Blacks who belong in museums or on platforms which in turn render them nearly unknowable, as if submitting them to a second death. The true test of an influence is not how it behaves when present, but whether or not you are haunted by its absence, however, and Ra does haunt us. The more we reappraise him for parts and kill off the notion of the whole, the more he resists definition and integrates as a ‘Bama-Saturn-sphinx missing in the debris of so much excavation and projection. “I’m dealing with the myth that I’m an angel,” he points out. Later he reminds us that Lucifer was an angel too, that he might choose to be a dark angel once-in-a-while. Most go on treating him like a prodigal clown.

Lately the costume interest doesn’t suffice. The tributes tend toward pillage, and the medicinal quality of his music becomes seductive poison or sedative in excerpt, as if the antidote to his exploitation is built into every phase of renewed or opportunistic interest. And when you dig deeper you risk becoming a member of ‘another order of being,’ his words, his alienation could become yours. It’s dangerous to invent a mascot for the future whose first task when he’s cast there will be to write you out of it. Perhaps this is our thrill."

[See also:
https://harmonyholiday.substack.com/p/a-case-for-the-lowercased-b

"In the interval between those two days, I lost a battle with editors at PBS, to make all the b’s in my piece on Sun Ra for them lower case b’s. This was a minor spar, and one with which I’m intimately familiar as I win and lose the same silent debate often. I don’t understand what the capital B or Black capital will do to prevent the spectacle of hard r’s and harder appropriations of the legacies of black artists and scholars, the inundation of think pieces expected of us in response, and the look we’ll see in the eyes Delroy Lindo and Michael B. Jordan at their next appearance, perhaps the Oscars or Image Awards, as they brace for the impact of a new gaze, one awaiting their crash-out or the dignified it’s all fine and dandy, offered up like a flash of wound sublimated by the teeth inflicting it. I suppose that’s why the editors of the version of the BAFTAs made public and syndicated, left that specific footage untouched, because it would force black speech even if that speech is silent renunciation. This too is an aspect of language, the guts of poetry, showing, distended. That puppeting of our voices is just as intense when its intention is a grammatical altruism made trite and almost offensive by how it’s upheld as law while real life decency is bypassed as often as every day of every week, to such an extent that it no longer warrants any performance of frenzied confusion and certainly doesn’t make us as mad as we were from 2008-16, on cue like paid actors and in earnest. These new efforts are perfect crimes committed against finally imperfect victims. It could be construed as ableist or transphobic to call out Butler or that man whose fractured subconscious was amplified for ratings. We’re in a Pinter play and no one knows her lines."]]]></description>
<dc:subject>harmonyholidat sunra 2026 jazz music influence jamesbaldwin amiribaraka context georgeclinton leeperry stockhausen flyinglotus georgiaannemuldrow culture internet web online</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:4a366dd8a6cf/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:harmonyholidat"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sunra"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jazz"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:music"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:influence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jamesbaldwin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:amiribaraka"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:context"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:georgeclinton"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:leeperry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stockhausen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:flyinglotus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:georgiaannemuldrow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://genius.com/albums/Depresion-sonora/Los-perros-no-entienden-internet-y-yo-no-entiendo-de-sentimientos">
    <title>Depresión Sonora - Los Perros no Entienden Internet (...Y Yo no Entiendo de Sentimientos) Lyrics and Tracklist | Genius</title>
    <dc:date>2026-02-27T23:14:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://genius.com/albums/Depresion-sonora/Los-perros-no-entienden-internet-y-yo-no-entiendo-de-sentimientos</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[[See also:

"Depresión Sonora - Full Performance (Live on KEXP)"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFNNxvNevv0 

"http://KEXP.ORG and BIME present  Live on KEXP in Bilbao with Depresión Sonora performing at Iglesia de la Encarnación. Recorded October 28, 2025.

Songs:
La Ley del Pobre 01:04
Domingo Químico 04:01
No te Hables Mal 07:33
Cómo Será Vivir en el Campo 11:04
Vacaciones para Siempre 14:04

Marcos Crespo García - Guitar, Vocals
Gonzalo López Abad - Guitar
René Del Hoyo Gil - Bass
David Chamizo Cózar - Drums
Juan Gonzalez Cabello - Keys
Mimetiz Eskolako Abesbatza - Children’s Choir

https://depresionsonora.com "]

"En la página web de Depresión Sonora [https://depresionsonora.com/perros/ ], Marcos Crespo publicó el siguiente texto para introducir el que es su segundo álbum:

<blockquote>Introducción a los perros

Hace años que ronda por mi cabeza la frase “Los Perros no Entienden Internet”. La apunté en la pizarra que tenía en mi cuarto cuando todavía vivía con mi madre. No ha sido hasta ahora, dando forma al disco, que he conseguido descifrar lo que realmente significaba.

Estas canciones han estado atascadas tres años. No tengo claro si echarle la culpa a esta vida frenética o a que tiendo a olvidar para seguir adelante. Hace cuatro meses comencé a entender cuando decidí enfrentarme a la tan evitada terapia.

Desde que tengo memoria hay voz aguda y en otro idioma que anida en mi cabeza. Siempre encuentro una excusa o el mundo la encuentra por mí para que la ignore y siga preocupándome por lo que sucede a mi alrededor (muuuuy muy lejos) y nunca dentro. Pero incluso en los momentos más fríos y racionales, siempre ha estado susurrándome al oído.

Depresión Sonora surgió en un intento de escupirla, lanzarla hacia afuera. Una maraña de palabras e ideas que pensaba que entendía, pero con el tiempo me he dado cuenta que estaba equivocado. Qué difícil es aceptar que en el fondo nunca me atreví a ser honesto, ni en mi día a día, ni en mis letras. Que no hablé de forma sincera. ¿Por qué me sentía incomprendido? Me alegraba ver cómo esa enredadera os abrazaba a vosotros, pero no era capaz de paliar esa sensación constante de querer escapar, de que faltaba una pieza.

Una cosa que poca gente sabe es que soy daltónico. También que de pequeño fui a una escuela de música y me hicieron repetir varias veces hasta que lo dejé. Siempre he pensado que mi falta de oído hace que todo lo que me sucede ahora sea una farsa. Aunque supongo que algo bueno tiene que haber en mí si he conseguido todo esto, ¿no?

Internet y la tecnología siempre han sido mi refugio, un lugar donde sentirme seguro y que me ha enseñado gran parte de lo que sé. Con el tiempo, todo el aprendizaje y el entretenimiento que encontraba en internet desaparecieron para dar paso a la disociación, a descuidarme. Pasaba las horas encapsulando todo lo importante para lanzarlo bien lejos con un simple desliz de dedos. Al final del día, el único recuerdo que me quedaba era un collage absurdo de imágenes y sonidos de gente que no conocía. Y aunque el mensaje nunca fuera del todo nítido, el resultado siempre era el mismo: pérdida de memoria y ansiedad ante el fracaso. El miedo a que otra persona más lo estuviera haciendo mejor ahí fuera. Percibirme feo, tonto e inutil. Nunca he soportado sentirme insuficiente.

Pero he tomado una decisión. No quiero que me roben la memoria, quiero construir recuerdos en base a lo bueno y lo malo. Me gusta pensar que empiezo a hacer caso a esa vocecita. Estoy yendo a clases para entender ese idioma que me había sido negado. Y así, despacito, voy deshaciendo los nudos para guardarlos uno a uno con cariño. Ya no quiero huir ni refugiarme, hay muchas cosas buenas que hacen que merezca la pena.

Así que entre todo este caos y descubrimiento, a mis 27 años, miro hacia abajo y veo a mi perro Lucas, que lleva más de 13 años conmigo. Tiene artritis y algo de ceguera, pero en sus ojos negro café todavía veo esa inocencia que tenía cuando cabía en la palma de mi mano. Si se lo propone, todo le es ajeno y no parece tener preocupaciones, pero si algo le pasa por la cabeza es capaz de expresarlo sin complejos. Todo es sencillo. Si está feliz disfruta al máximo y si está triste llora un rato. Sueña, come y juega, pero también ladra enfadado y se queda inquieto al lado de la puerta. Tengo que aprender de mi perro, que no entiende inglés ni español, ni internet ni nada, pero que lo tiene claro y pasa sus días tranquilo.

Ojalá ser como él. Ojalá poder derrumbar esos muros de mi propio castillo de cartón. Y es que no hace demasiado pensaba que no había nada más allá. Que la vida se sostenía tras las normas del come y calla, siéntate y trabaja, no llames demasiado la atención y no molestes. Pienso tanto en cómo nos condicionamos por nuestra educación…

Ha llegado el momento de dejar de sobrevivir, pero como cualquier materia nueva que uno empieza a estudiar en profundidad, lleva tiempo. Necesito ser paciente, desprenderme de todo aquello que me desvíe del camino. Vencer la velocidad, aprender a escuchar. Hacer caso a mi cabezonería y a esos momentos de lucidez cuando creo que las cosas pueden ser de verdad.

Está ahí, en el centro, se mueve como un mar de tormenta desde el estómago hacia los pies y la cabeza. Si consigo ser como Lucas, algún día podré sacar y entender todos estos sentimientos.

Marcos.
Viernes, 1 de Noviembre de 2024. Día de todos los santos.</blockquote>"]]></description>
<dc:subject>depresiónsonora music 2024 2025 2026 albinacabrera kexp feelings internet memory</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:7e09963cb38f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:depresiónsonora"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:music"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2024"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2025"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:albinacabrera"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kexp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:feelings"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:memory"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEq8dlnLP8o">
    <title>Ring Is Just Getting Started - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2026-02-26T04:40:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEq8dlnLP8o</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["This week we start with Jason’s follow up to Ring launching its ‘Search Party’ feature. It turns out, according to a leaked email he got, the feature is only starting with finding lost dogs. After the break, Emanuel explains why we’ve learned nothing about amplification when it comes to the recent looksmaxxing trend. In the subscribers-only section, Sam explains how Grok produced the real name of a sex worker who performs pseudonymously.

0:00 - Intro
1:11 - Leaked Email Suggests Ring Plans to Expand ‘Search Party’ Surveillance Beyond Dogs: https://www.404media.co/leaked-email-suggests-ring-plans-to-expand-search-party-surveillance-beyond-dogs/
30:26 - We Have Learned Nothing About Amplifying Morons: https://www.404media.co/we-have-learned-nothing-about-amplifying-morons/

Subscriber's Story: Grok Exposed a Porn Performer’s Legal Name and Birthdate—Without Even Being Asked: https://www.404media.co/grok-doxing-real-names-birthdates-siri-dahl/ "]]></description>
<dc:subject>ring surveillance police policing grok xai looksmaxxing cameras amazon sneako andrewtate clavicular nickfuentes manosphere socialmedia misogyny internet online web farright altright aesthetics fascistaesthetics extremism latefascistaesthetics media bradenpeters incels pickupartists nihilism whitneyphillips attention 4chan trolling</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:64e97a04b464/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ring"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:surveillance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:police"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:grok"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:xai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:looksmaxxing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cameras"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:amazon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sneako"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:andrewtate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:clavicular"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nickfuentes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:manosphere"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:misogyny"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:farright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:altright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aesthetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fascistaesthetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:extremism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:latefascistaesthetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bradenpeters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:incels"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pickupartists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nihilism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:whitneyphillips"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:4chan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:trolling"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ln8h3v9hxHU">
    <title>Kirk and Mangione - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2026-02-25T01:57:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ln8h3v9hxHU</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["#Kirk #luigi maxxing and refusing to read the official image as recommended"]]></description>
<dc:subject>aidanwalker charliekirk media socialmedia luigimangione 2025 civility 2026 2024 protest dissatisfaction power discursivepower kirkification unitedhealthcare healthcare medicine us healthinsurance brianthompson memes online internet narrative</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:1f7639d2b72b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aidanwalker"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charliekirk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:luigimangione"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2025"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:civility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2024"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:protest"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dissatisfaction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:power"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:discursivepower"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kirkification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unitedhealthcare"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:healthcare"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:medicine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:healthinsurance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brianthompson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:memes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:narrative"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://newmediahomework.substack.com/p/a-media-literacy-guide-to-looksmaxxing">
    <title>A Media Literacy Guide to &quot;Looksmaxxing&quot; - by Jamie Cohen</title>
    <dc:date>2026-02-23T22:51:43+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://newmediahomework.substack.com/p/a-media-literacy-guide-to-looksmaxxing</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["When mainstream media uplift dangerous internet ephemera, we deserve more context. Here is a guide."]]></description>
<dc:subject>jamiecohen looksmaxxing 2026 media clavicular bradenpeters josephbernstein contentmaxxing miloyainnopolous emanuelmaiberg kierenpress-reynolds stephanierosenbloom hasanpiker streaming socialmedia online web internet attention joerogan incels adameleksic fascism fascistaesthetics latefascistaesthetics aesthetics aidanwalker sarahlaurent surveillance authoritarianism altright stevebannon</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:f8e6f601bec3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jamiecohen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:looksmaxxing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:clavicular"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bradenpeters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:josephbernstein"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:contentmaxxing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:miloyainnopolous"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:emanuelmaiberg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kierenpress-reynolds"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stephanierosenbloom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hasanpiker"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:streaming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:joerogan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:incels"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:adameleksic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fascism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fascistaesthetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:latefascistaesthetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aesthetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aidanwalker"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sarahlaurent"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:surveillance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:authoritarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:altright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stevebannon"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jtBSC-ZgCI">
    <title>The Ideology of Contentmaxxing - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2026-02-23T04:54:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jtBSC-ZgCI</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The algorithm does to a discussion what Clavicular does to his face — a series of micro-fractures, delivered repeatedly and with precision, in the hopes that it will match a target number that nobody actually wants, but which the machine is thirsty for us to find."

[See also:

"Clavicular and contentmaxxing
the next step after groyperfication" (Aidan Walker)
https://howtodothingswithmemes.substack.com/p/clavicular-and-contentmaxxing

"Clavicular and Fuentes
elder zoomers vs. the young ones" (Aidan Walker)
https://howtodothingswithmemes.substack.com/p/clavicular-and-fuentes

(referenced within) "We are entering the era of Show more
The endless agony of thinking doing being content" (Jamie Cohen)
https://newmediahomework.substack.com/p/we-are-entering-the-era-of-show-more ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>aidanwalker metrics looksmaxxing content contentmaxxing quantification latefascistaesthetics aesthetics reality hyperrealism hyperreality socialmedia measurement 2026 algorithms microfractures machines economics fascism web online internet rationalism transhumanism ideology ritual louisalthusser althusser engagement institutions popularity platforms instagram tiktok grades grading taste socialcapital pierrebourdieu performance surveillance attention competition access success interestingness society fascistaesthetics bodies maximization optimization hyperoptimization credibility individualism dehumanization mutilation taboos fame andrewtate nickfuentes clipfarming sneako myrongaines tristantate malcontents jamiecohen jestermaxxing farright rightwing radicalization nihilism politics audience desperation extraction sadomasochism attentioneconomy self-harm men whitesupremacy normality radicalism subjugation</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:23dcb76ab2b3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aidanwalker"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:metrics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:looksmaxxing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:content"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:contentmaxxing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quantification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:latefascistaesthetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aesthetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hyperrealism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hyperreality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:measurement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:algorithms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:microfractures"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:machines"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fascism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rationalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:transhumanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ritual"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:louisalthusser"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:althusser"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:engagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:institutions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:popularity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:platforms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:instagram"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tiktok"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:grades"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:grading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:taste"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialcapital"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pierrebourdieu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:performance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:surveillance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:competition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:success"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interestingness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fascistaesthetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bodies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maximization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:optimization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hyperoptimization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:credibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:individualism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dehumanization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mutilation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:taboos"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fame"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:andrewtate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nickfuentes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:clipfarming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sneako"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:myrongaines"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tristantate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:malcontents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jamiecohen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jestermaxxing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:farright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rightwing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:radicalization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nihilism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:audience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:desperation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:extraction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sadomasochism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attentioneconomy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:self-harm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:men"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:whitesupremacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:normality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:radicalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:subjugation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>