<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (robertogreco)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from robertogreco</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://dohadebates.com/arts-media/contemporary-art-progressive-or-pointless/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://macleans.ca/society/my-university-students-cheat-i-dont-blame-them/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://open.spotify.com/episode/11zlpahmklfgr8YOUrtLnY"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://aeon.co/videos/ai-isnt-merely-bad-at-writing-it-does-not-and-cannot-write"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/the-devils-citadel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9etjAosHGzA"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.artforum.com/features/long-walks-208841/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/life-is-more-than-an-engineering-problem/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/banking-on-it/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.nplusonemag.com/issue-51/politics/stupidology/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r73s-YMcNTI"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://nilsgilman.substack.com/p/stop-with-the-bullshit?triedRedirect=true"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYVWbj8naBM"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cabinetmagazine.org/issues/23/gschwandtner.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.compactmag.com/article/postliberalisms-reluctant-godfather/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.hamiltonnolan.com/p/ideas-that-cannot-be-spoken"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.paraguaypress.com/publications/1334/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTTqnrer48c"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://aeon.co/essays/if-you-ask-why-youre-a-philosopher-and-youre-awesome"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjT53b6qXHw"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://psyche.co/guides/how-to-critique-stories-about-the-nature-of-romantic-love"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.theguardian.com/books/2024/nov/07/david-graeber-optimistic-anarchist-rebecca-solnit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-jazz-musicians-guide-to-the-universe/id1081584611?i=1000666609060"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMQJrNbgGIo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://aeon.co/essays/the-realist-vs-the-pragmatist-view-of-epistemology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://aeon.co/essays/what-hannah-arendt-proposed-as-an-alternative-to-authenticity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://harpers.org/archive/2024/07/yesterdays-men-alan-jacobs/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eegzTvPT6xY"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-OFnHwuTBg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://every.to/p/writing-is-a-tool-for-making-new-ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.vox.com/culture/23005220/benjamin-labatut-interview-when-we-cease-to-understand-the-world"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/newsletter/2022-07-09/benjamin-labatut-when-we-cease-to-understand-the-world-novel-essential-arts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.nyrb.com/collections/new-york-review-books/products/when-we-cease-to-understand-the-world?_pos=1&amp;_sid=adc3a07ae&amp;_ss=r&amp;variant=37890166784168"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJXadXhP5ew"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://sub.rescapement.com/p/cover-watches-and-accessibility-of?s=r"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://twitter.com/ZoeSTodd/status/1451922675295682569"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/13/podcasts/ezra-klein-podcast-tressie-mcmillan-cottom-transcript.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9aK4OztueuE"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/the-analog-city-and-the-digital-city"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvaTDayyT18"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://directory.libsyn.com/episode/index/id/15743372/tdest_id/1617341"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://sites.google.com/ucsd.edu/commplayground/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://hyperallergic.com/525985/why-libraries-have-a-public-spirit-that-most-museums-lack/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://soundcloud.com/citationsneeded/episode-87-nate-silver-and-the-crisis-of-pundit-brain"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://zine-machine.glitch.me/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.warscapes.com/conversations/conversation-mahmood-mamdani"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRPyql3cezo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.instagram.com/p/BnEEKkpFJtE/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://austinkleon.com/2018/07/10/ideas-in-cars-honking/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jonbecker.net/are-we-overthinking-general-education/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://twitter.com/jsamlarose/status/982550369619398656"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://thecreativeindependent.com/people/jenny-odell-how-to-grow-an-idea/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.fs.blog/2018/03/dacher-keltner-power/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/22/books/review/brian-selznick-by-the-book.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://austinkleon.com/2018/02/24/the-tools-matter-and-the-tools-dont-matter/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://medium.com/@sts_news/design-thinking-is-kind-of-like-syphilis-its-contagious-and-rots-your-brains-842ed078af29"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hurryslowly.co/003-craig-mod/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o341S4xh1r0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://theundefeated.com/features/ibram-kendi-leading-scholar-of-racism-says-education-and-love-are-not-the-answer/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.wordworkskingston.com/WordWorks/Home.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.theguardian.com/film/2017/jan/06/john-berger-obituary-letter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://web.stanford.edu/~manup/CabinetofCuriosity.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://alyssafisher.tumblr.com/post/134129230588/i-have-a-million-ideas-im-boiling-over-with"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://medium.com/@zachlieberman/lessons-for-students-cf1acf200ee#.7an1bo5as"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://adanewmedia.org/2013/11/issue3-haraway/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://tinyletter.com/vruba/letters/6-67-side-pass"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://early-access.notion.so/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67EKAIY43kg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theparisreview.org/interviews/4485/the-art-of-fiction-no-34-jean-cocteau"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://medium.com/@kevin_ashton/the-end-of-creativity-cc5c27e7e42d"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://dohadebates.com/arts-media/contemporary-art-progressive-or-pointless/">
    <title>Contemporary art: Progressive or pointless? - Doha Debates</title>
    <dc:date>2026-07-07T15:50:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://dohadebates.com/arts-media/contemporary-art-progressive-or-pointless/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["How do we define great art in the 21st century?

Some critics argue that contemporary art has lost touch with the universal principles and artistic traditions that define its greatness. Others see its break with tradition as liberating, a move toward more inclusion, experimentation and personal and political expression.

This conversation is an exploration of what makes great art, particularly in this century. Is it defined by adherence to tradition, or disruption and reinvention? Is artistic beauty understood across time and culture, or does each generation need to redefine it? And with the AI era upon us, what even constitutes art in the first place?"

[direct link to video on YouTube:

"Doha Debates: Is it time to reconsider contemporary art?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=352DIUX4QMk

"Is contemporary art relevant today?

In this episode of @DohaDebates podcast, host Nadir Nahdi is joined by Wafaa Bilal, Samar Younes, Fen de Villiers and Molly Crabapple to discuss whether contemporary art remains relevant in today’s world, as well as the role of artists in addressing social issues. 

The views expressed in this episode are the guests’ own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera’s editorial stance. Visit the @DohaDebates YouTube channel for the extended version."

on Apple Podcasts:

https://podcasts.apple.com/lu/podcast/is-contemporary-art-relevant-today/id1867847336?i=1000767406512

also here:
https://omny.fm/shows/doha-debates/is-contemporary-art-relevant-today

mentioned (but not linked) here:
https://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2026/07/consuming-swatch-or-valuing-craftsmanship/ ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>art making 2026 craft theory abstraction nadirnahdi wafaabilal samaryounes fendevilliers mollycrabapple materiality contemporary labor work time materials ideas dohadebates ai artificialintelligence expression experimentation gee'sbend craftsmanship ingenuity knowledge artisanship culturarelevancy legacy conservatism capitalism democraticsocialism politics policy culture tradition postmodernism language aesthetics design artmaking neuroscience education urbanplanning hospitals architecture elitism artists beauty value futurists sculpture power italianfuturism italianfuturists futurism</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:f84556a45818/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:making"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:craft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:theory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:abstraction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nadirnahdi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wafaabilal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:samaryounes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fendevilliers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mollycrabapple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:materiality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:contemporary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:time"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:materials"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dohadebates"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:expression"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:experimentation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gee'sbend"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:craftsmanship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ingenuity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:knowledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artisanship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culturarelevancy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:legacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conservatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:democraticsocialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tradition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:postmodernism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aesthetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artmaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neuroscience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:urbanplanning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hospitals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:architecture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elitism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:beauty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:value"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:futurists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sculpture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:power"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:italianfuturism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:italianfuturists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:futurism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://macleans.ca/society/my-university-students-cheat-i-dont-blame-them/">
    <title>My University Students Cheat. I Don’t Blame Them. - Macleans.ca</title>
    <dc:date>2026-07-02T02:26:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://macleans.ca/society/my-university-students-cheat-i-dont-blame-them/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Marks reward cheating over learning—and students can’t afford to fail"

...

"Last semester, on the final exam of the health-care law class I teach, my students scored the highest grades I’ve seen in 20 years as an instructor. It was an at-home, closed-book exam. Eight per cent of the class scored perfect on the multiple-choice section, and over half scored over 90. In the long-answer section, the responses were formulaic, typo-free and detached from the course material; they lacked the telltale signs of rushed exam writing. It was clear my students were using AI to cheat.

After the exam, I gave the class an anonymous, informal poll: I asked how many of them were cheating. Of those who responded, eight per cent admitted to it. How many students did they think were cheating? Over a quarter of respondents indicated they knew other students had cheated on the exam, and 73 per cent indicated they knew of students cheating in other classes. And that doesn’t account for the response bias: just under half the class responded to the poll, and I suspect those who didn’t respond were more likely to have cheated. I decided to annul the exam results, not counting them toward final grades.

I’ve spent my whole life in academia, first in theology, then in law. I know cheating has always been around. But I’m deeply alarmed by the idea that students are cheating en masse. There’s a whole online ecosystem for cheating: forums to share advice on circumventing AI detectors and proctor technology; software for humanizing AI-generated writing; tips for using AI to reduce (or eliminate) workload. Cheating is becoming culturally normalized. Two thirds of the people who responded to my survey agreed that students widely perceive cheating as acceptable. I’m not surprised. Think about what this generation has witnessed: the mortgage crisis driven by corrupt bankers, an American president who cheats and lies and is still elected; lawyers using AI to write for them and lying about it, a sporting world full of doping scandals. Students are repeating what we’ve modelled for them.

In the past few years, the way young people value their education has shifted. Universities are increasingly corporatized. They function as businesses, oriented toward maximizing revenue: professors are rewarded for grants and publications rather than leadership or mentorship, and students are reduced to head counts and tuition dollars. In turn, students behave like customers. It’s a fee for service: they pay their tuition and expect good grades and a degree. Learning becomes superfluous.

When I was studying the humanities, my classmates and I were concerned with ideas and arguments. We were reading course material to understand it, not to get a mark. Now, grades have become the sole currency of academic life. Students frequently email me asking outright for a higher grade, sometimes literally seconds after they receive it. They all want a 90 or higher. Marks are inflated across the board. At Ontario high schools, there was a six per cent increase in grade averages for graduating students between 2011 and 2021. I’ve seen 100 per cent averages on scholarship applications. Some schools are implementing policies to try to curb the inflation—including Harvard, which just put a cap on the number of As assigned in each undergraduate course.

Students know an undergraduate degree doesn’t automatically land a well-paying job—or any job, for that matter—so they’re vying for acceptance to highly competitive postgraduate programs. There’s an enormous financial imperative to succeed academically, and students tell me that if you don’t cheat, you’re at a disadvantage. I went to university on my own dollar; my parents couldn’t afford to support me. I only paid off my undergraduate student loans last year, at 45 years old. For students today, the debts are even worse. They’re pushed to maximize productivity and output, racking up accolades and resumé entries while maintaining previously unattainable averages.

At the same time, cheating has become more accessible than ever thanks to AI. I see students using generative AI in all aspects of their work: summarizing the readings, research, note-taking, essay writing. Not all AI usage is cheating by default, and in some ways, it’s even levelling the playing field by making the same shortcuts available to everyone. When I was in law school, you could purchase CANS—consolidated annotated notes—from previous years as study aids. But they were expensive. Resources like CANS and tutors were reserved for students who could afford them. For the rest of us, AI could have been a free alternative. The problems arise when students use AI despite instructions not to, as was the case with my exam.

My options as an educator are limited. I’m exploring different grading schemas, but all of them require more resources than are made available to me. I could have one in-person exam worth 100 per cent of the course grade and put all my TA hours toward grading it. I could rely on oral exams, which would take weeks out of the semester to schedule and administer. One professor I know tried to introduce a participation grade in a class with hundreds of students. Students could scan a QR code to register their attendance. They would show up, talk until they got the code, then walk out.

Ultimately, this reveals the failures of an antiquated grading system. Our standard modes of assessment primarily track recall and memorization, not engagement or progress. One semester, I had a student who had some challenges with her grammar and syntax. We worked on her writing together throughout the semester, and it was a successful learning experience. Another student that semester had a flair for well-crafted drivel. I couldn’t give the first student an A-plus—her end product couldn’t justify it. But who put more work in? Who learned the most? The people with the highest grades are not necessarily my best or hardest-working students. They may just have the most free time, money, educational support or family backing. Some schools are attuned to this tension and adapting accordingly. The U of T law school, for example, uses an honours-pass-fail grading system. If we reimagined grading to assess skills that can’t be replicated by ChatGPT, students wouldn’t use it. As it is, marks are a perverse incentive—they reward cheating over learning.

My colleagues and I feel completely unsupported by the school administration. Publishing requirements are going up, and class sizes are ballooning. We have less faculty doing more work with less support, meaning there’s less time to build relationships with students. When I annulled the exam results, I told the administration that I need substantive guidance on how to run a class this large because I can no longer reliably mark it. They didn’t have a useful policy in place to address my concerns. Instead, they overrode my decision. Against my recommendations, they included the multiple-choice portion of the exam in the final grade—despite knowing that I called out cheating in this section. Their decision sent a singular message: cheating is fine and faculty has to accept it. This is anathema to the goals of education.

I’ve been told I should just use anti-cheating technology, like online proctors or AI detectors. I don’t use either in my classes. For one, they can easily be circumvented. More importantly, you can’t police people into having integrity. Instead, I try to impart to my students the reasons why cheating is morally wrong. The first question on my exam was about the deontological duty not to cheat. It was something we’d discussed at length throughout the semester. Within this ethical framework, relationships give rise to duties—the health-care provider to the patient or the lawyer to the client—and the rightness of your actions depends on how they align with those duties. Students have a duty not to cheat. It should be that simple. Anti-cheating technology can’t teach them that, and we can’t expect that students who lack integrity in school will spontaneously develop it in order to meet their professional obligations after they graduate.

Academic integrity needs to be taught starting on day one at every level of education. Every university student should have to take an ethics course in their first year, no matter their major. And there needs to be accountability when there are breaches. Administrators need to support their faculty, not railroad them. Colleagues have shared with me that even when students have been caught cheating, no penalty was imposed. Cheating is a product of the society we’ve created. It’s learned behaviour—and that means, with enough work, it can be unlearned."]]></description>
<dc:subject>jacobshelly highered highereducation academia education universities colleges grades grading assessment ethics cheating pedagogy ai artificialintelligence culture behavior ideas humanities gradeinflation memorization recall writing howwewrite howwelearn learning teaching howweteach economics motivation technology integrity academicintegrity society</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:c1abc1e9db1d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jacobshelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colleges"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:grades"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:grading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:assessment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cheating"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:behavior"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gradeinflation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:memorization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:recall"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:motivation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:integrity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academicintegrity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://open.spotify.com/episode/11zlpahmklfgr8YOUrtLnY">
    <title>Sara Hendren: Who Is the Built World Actually Built For? - Art of Inquiry | Podcast on Spotify</title>
    <dc:date>2026-05-05T14:11:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://open.spotify.com/episode/11zlpahmklfgr8YOUrtLnY</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Sara Hendren didn't start out in engineering. She started as a visual artist, then moved into cultural history, studying objects, artifacts, and what they say about the world that made them. Then life brought her into pediatric spaces filled with a new kind of object: gadgets and tools designed for a child's body, yes, but also doing quiet therapeutic work, covered in butterflies and bugs, useful and expressive all at once. She found herself asking: what is an object broadcasting beyond its user? What does it mean that eyeglasses get sold as fashion while hearing aids are hidden away as clinical? That was the moment everything snapped together, her training in the history of artifacts, the politics of disability, and the material culture of prosthetics all converging at once. In this free-flowing conversation, Sara walks us through the space between mechanical design and design for expression, why the logical and meticulous side of making art and the creative side of meaningful engineering are really the same instinct. As the world asks more and more from its engineers, Sara brings it all back to a question that feels more urgent than ever: can a designed object change not just how we move through the world, but how we see it?"

[via:
https://ablerism.micro.blog/2026/04/29/i-had-fun-speaking-on.html

"I had fun speaking on the Art of Inquiry, a podcast created by two Northeastern engineering students interested in the arts and humanities. My strange career path, my mentor Krzysztof Wodiczko introducing me to interrogative design, raising a child with Down syndrome, studio + lab culture, more."]]]></description>
<dc:subject>sarahendren 2026 architecture design disabilities disability accessibility art bodies prosthetics sofiaodeh mayaeinhorn engineering making socialpracticeart science inquiry history conflictkitchen edibleestates socialpractice online internet covid-19 pandemic coronavirus offline social slow small audiencesofone socialjustice ai artificialintelligence technology time perception politics genai generativeai activism poetry human humanism humans howwewrite writing teaching pedagogy highered highereducation culturemaking culture life living howwelive socialmedia being waysofbeing modernity method patternrecognition krzysztofwodiczko downsyndrome interrogativedesign careers purpose meaning meaningmaking children parenting arts humanities friendship relationships leisure artleisure leisurearts identity passion expression objects affect emotions embodiment awe wonder buildings senses spirituality sacredness codeswitching artifacts translation language communication howwemake fabrication ramps risd olincollege builtwo</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:0a421ccc8594/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sarahendren"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:architecture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:disabilities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:disability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:accessibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bodies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:prosthetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sofiaodeh"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mayaeinhorn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:engineering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:making"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialpracticeart"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inquiry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conflictkitchen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edibleestates"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialpractice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:covid-19"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pandemic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:coronavirus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:offline"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:social"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:slow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:small"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:audiencesofone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialjustice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:time"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:perception"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:genai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:generativeai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:activism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:poetry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:human"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culturemaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:living"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelive"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:being"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:waysofbeing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:modernity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:method"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:patternrecognition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:krzysztofwodiczko"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:downsyndrome"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interrogativedesign"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:careers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:purpose"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meaning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meaningmaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:parenting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:arts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:friendship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:relationships"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:leisure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artleisure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:leisurearts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:identity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:passion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:expression"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:objects"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:affect"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:emotions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:embodiment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:awe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wonder"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:buildings"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:senses"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:spirituality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sacredness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:codeswitching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artifacts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:translation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwemake"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fabrication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ramps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:risd"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:olincollege"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:builtwo"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://aeon.co/videos/ai-isnt-merely-bad-at-writing-it-does-not-and-cannot-write">
    <title>AI isn’t merely bad at writing. It does not and cannot write | Aeon Videos</title>
    <dc:date>2026-02-20T05:40:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://aeon.co/videos/ai-isnt-merely-bad-at-writing-it-does-not-and-cannot-write</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["‘Why did you write it?’

As an English professor, the YouTube video essayist known as ‘josh (with parentheses)’ has, over the past few years, witnessed a faculty-wide panic about students using large language models (LLMs) to plagiarise assignments. The experience inspired him to create this sprawling video essay on the meaning of LLMs – what they can do and, more to the point, what they can’t. To him, this includes the very act of writing itself, which he contends, borrowing the words of Stephen King, requires a ‘meeting of the minds’. The entertaining and insightful piece spans the poetry of Gertrude Stein and contemporary ‘brainrot’ videos, all while he prods at ChatGPT and his friends. Travelling to some surprising places, he generates an unusually perceptive meditation on what might, at first glance, seem like a near-exhausted topic."

[direct link to video:

"You are a better writer than AI. (Yes, you.)"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5wLQ-8eyQI

"As an English professor, I hear people at every level talking constantly about the use of AI in writing, but nobody seems to be talking about the thing that matters most: AI cannot write. Writing has language, and writing has communication, but the communication does not live inside the language. This is a video essay about what writing is. Meetings of the mind with Stephen King, Gertrude Stein, Lewberger, Max Teeth, CyberGrapeUK, and others--but by necessity not with ChatGPT.

Recorded on a Macbook Pro using OBS and a little bit of editing trickery. If you look at the timestamps on the files you can probably deduce that when I say "two weeks ago" I mean about four months ago."]]]></description>
<dc:subject>ai artificialintelligence llms chatgpt writing howwewrite videoessays gertrudestein stephenking teaching howweteach edtech technology maxteeth language communication policy joshwithparenthesis modernism ernesthemingway fscottfitzgerald sinclairlewis thorntonwilder jamesjoyce ezrapound nonsense poetry poems decoding keatonpatti lingusitics meaning meaningmaking understanding titosantana autocomplete linguistics tenderbuttons connection human humanism humans openai literature humanexperience consciousness perception experience subjectivity humansubjectivity plagiarism mashups recombinance remixing milesdavis lcdsoundsystem media mediamixing kleptones dangermouse macglocky cubism lasmeninas picasso velázquez recombination variation thinking howwethink education humanunderstanding criticalthinking context confusion playfulness 2025 notice turingtest personhood senses sensoryperception feeling feelings logic algortihms victorhugo lesmisérables damienowens onelsaymore brainrot intention conversation barbaraeh</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:906a8da3152e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:llms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatgpt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:videoessays"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gertrudestein"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stephenking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maxteeth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:joshwithparenthesis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:modernism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ernesthemingway"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fscottfitzgerald"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sinclairlewis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thorntonwilder"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jamesjoyce"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ezrapound"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nonsense"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:poetry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:poems"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:decoding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:keatonpatti"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lingusitics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meaning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meaningmaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:understanding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:titosantana"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:autocomplete"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tenderbuttons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:connection"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:human"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanexperience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consciousness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:perception"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:experience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:subjectivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humansubjectivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:plagiarism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mashups"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:recombinance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:remixing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:milesdavis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lcdsoundsystem"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mediamixing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kleptones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dangermouse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:macglocky"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cubism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lasmeninas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:picasso"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:velázquez"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:recombination"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:variation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwethink"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanunderstanding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:criticalthinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:context"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:confusion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:playfulness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2025"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:notice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:turingtest"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:personhood"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:senses"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sensoryperception"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:feeling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:feelings"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:logic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:algortihms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:victorhugo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lesmisérables"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:damienowens"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:onelsaymore"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brainrot"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:intention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conversation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:barbaraeh"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/the-devils-citadel">
    <title>The Devils’ Citadel | THR Web Features | Web Features | The Hedgehog Review</title>
    <dc:date>2026-02-16T04:40:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/the-devils-citadel</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["A documentary of the Industrial Revolution in the words of its contemporaries."

[See also:

"The Devils’ Citadel Extended
Must mechanization be a blind agent of change?"
https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/the-devils-citadel-extended ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>alanjacobs 2025 ideas technology history documentary film filmmaking johnmilton paradiselost humphreyjennings montage georgeorwell marie-louisejennings dannyboyle mass-observation foliosociety christopherfrayling thomascarlyle thomasgray felixmendelssohn jamesnasmyth industrialrevolution</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:aeaf54d7edfb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alanjacobs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2025"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:documentary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:film"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:filmmaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnmilton"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:paradiselost"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humphreyjennings"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:montage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:georgeorwell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marie-louisejennings"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dannyboyle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mass-observation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:foliosociety"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christopherfrayling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thomascarlyle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thomasgray"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:felixmendelssohn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jamesnasmyth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:industrialrevolution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9etjAosHGzA">
    <title>Charlie Kirk: The Man Who Broke Politics - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2026-02-05T22:02:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9etjAosHGzA</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["BIBLIOGRAPHY & FOOTNOTES:
https://tinyurl.com/kirkvideosources

TIMESTAMPS:

INTRO: 00:00:00
PART 1: The American Question: 00:08:55
PART 2: Time for a Turning Point: 00:12:49
PART 3: Big Government Sucks: 00:34:23
PART 4: The Great American Horseshoe: 01:04:12
PART 5: Charlie's New Friends: 01:17:18
PART 6: The Noble Lie: 01:40:25
PART 7: Trump 2.0: 01:53:23
PART 8: Ouch, Charlie: 02:04:19
PART 9: The Demos 02:14:27
Credits: 02:46:57"]]></description>
<dc:subject>alexanderavila charliekirk politics us schoolshootings donaldtrump government democracy tpusa turningpointusa politcalviolence violence assassinations history conservatism fascism farright rightwing jdvance maga trumpism oligarchy christiannationalism nationalism constitution ronaldreagan joebiden kamalaharris whitesupremacy heritage teaparty libertarianism fredkoch nazis johnbirchsociety racism davidkoch charliekoch economics policy medicare socialsecurity governance trust vietnamwar watergate johnolin bradelybrothers kichbrothers richardscaife catoinstitute manhattaninstitute nonprofit nonprofits philanthropicindustrialcomplex charitableindustrialcomplex neoliberalism republicans darkmoney 2008 greatrecession globalfinancialcrisis barackobama capitalism welfare welfarestate wokeness socialjustice justice democrats 2016 2020 popularism anger freespeech freedomofspeech rhetoric liberalism liberals diversity equity inclusion inclusivity dei identity debate colleges universities elections harassment freemarkets</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:89e0f1c36a71/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alexanderavila"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charliekirk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schoolshootings"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:donaldtrump"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:government"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:democracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tpusa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:turningpointusa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politcalviolence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:violence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:assassinations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conservatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fascism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:farright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rightwing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jdvance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maga"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:trumpism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:oligarchy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christiannationalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nationalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:constitution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ronaldreagan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:joebiden"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kamalaharris"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:whitesupremacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:heritage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaparty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:libertarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fredkoch"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nazis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnbirchsociety"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:racism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davidkoch"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charliekoch"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:medicare"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialsecurity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:governance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:trust"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:vietnamwar"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:watergate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnolin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bradelybrothers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kichbrothers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:richardscaife"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:catoinstitute"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:manhattaninstitute"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nonprofit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nonprofits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philanthropicindustrialcomplex"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charitableindustrialcomplex"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neoliberalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:republicans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:darkmoney"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2008"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:greatrecession"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:globalfinancialcrisis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:barackobama"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:welfare"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:welfarestate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wokeness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialjustice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:justice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:democrats"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2016"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2020"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:popularism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anger"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freespeech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freedomofspeech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rhetoric"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:liberalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:liberals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:diversity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:equity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inclusion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inclusivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dei"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:identity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:debate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colleges"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elections"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:harassment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freemarkets"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.artforum.com/features/long-walks-208841/">
    <title>Long Walks</title>
    <dc:date>2026-01-25T21:51:43+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.artforum.com/features/long-walks-208841/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["WHY GO FOR A WALK? Not to get anywhere; the lack of destination makes it a walk rather than a journey. But a walk is never aimless; you set limits even before you start out: “as far as the woods,” “around the lake,” “along the river to the bridge and back.” Expediency determines the structure of a journey; on a walk you impose your own.

A walk offers a chance to check up on nature, to give in to your senses. You can take your self along for company, or leave it behind, depending on your mood. You can take the dog—an ideal arrangement, since your separate amusements don’t intrude on one another. It’s usually a mistake, as William Hazlitt has said, to go with a friend. Chatting turns the walk into a visit, and miles roll by without your once managing to come in touch with the sensibility of walking.

A walk is an abstraction, an idea. It is a particular kind of passage through space and time; you embark on it to stretch your consciousness as much as your legs. A journey is aimed at its end; the point of a walk is the walk itself.

Richard Long’s art must touch somehow on our experience of walking. Otherwise, why would we find his solitary travels so oddly affecting? When news of them reaches us they are long over. All we get is an Ordnance Survey map, a few photographs, and terse notations of location and duration, deliberately edited of seductive detail. Unlike his literary counterparts, who delight in describing their shanks’ mare adventures, Long tells only that he went.

This absence of rhetoric results in a kind of transparency; Long passes through the countryside, a figure only hinted at, eluding the art audience. There is no way to visit his temporary sculptures of stones or brush, no invitation to follow his carefully structured routes. So the work remains largely cerebral: a mind, more than a body, traveling through the landscape. If we let our minds wander after him, however, we begin to gain limited access to his art. We will never be privy to his experience, but we can reconstrue it to a certain extent. “Going for a walk” can put us in step with him.

Long’s work takes several forms: walks with a stated purpose and duration, site sculptures made in remote places from whatever materials he finds when he gets there, and large floor installations in galleries and museums (the most tangible, though least evocative). All have an economy of gesture; concept, method and materials converge neatly. In the walks the three are synonymous. Less obviously, this is also true of the outdoor pieces.

Long never “forces” a work; stones are used when there are stones, branches when there are branches, brush when there is brush. It’s all local produce; nothing is imported. His works may last or they may become overgrown or wash away. It doesn’t matter, since he doesn’t intend anyone to see them. In the end, we are left with nothing but the knowledge of Long’s intervention, handed to us in the form of photographs and captions describing two generalized particulars—medium and place: Sticks in Somerset, A Circle in the Andes, Stones in Clare.

The indoor pieces—lines, circles and spirals of stones, sticks or dirt placed on the floor—share aspects of this conceptual and structural oneness, for each remains tied to its site despite its deportation. Stones and sticks are often from the vicinity of the installation; their source becomes the work’s title. The position of a specific element within a piece is usually determined by its relation to the other elements, so that while individual installations might differ, a work’s concept remains the same. Driftwood sticks of various lengths are laid down in rows so that each stick is a certain number of its own lengths in front of its predecessor. A track of muddy footprints, “the length of a straight walk from the bottom to the top of Silbury Hill,” is curled into a spiral, the size of the room determining the number of coils. Presumably these works could be redone; I know of a large circle of loose stones that is periodically picked up and put back. Long specified the diameter of the circle and left written instructions that the stones lie randomly within it, resting on their longest, flattest and most stable sides without touching each other.

The scale of Long’s art is often ambiguous. Considering its utter privacy, its lack of pretension and its scanty traces, it seems intimate and small (a dot or a line on a vast plane; a moment in an aeon). But a walk’s dimensions (often hundreds of miles) or duration (many hours, even several days) are quite sizable. Long’s works are not performances, his unknown endurances are not the stuff of body art. Did he take sandwiches, get caught in the rain, camp out for the night? We are told nothing of this. (How different from Peter Hutchinson’s Foraging, an esthetic hike in the Rockies where recording of detail was the purpose and survival the issue—a theme that became particularly poignant after the artist and his companion dined on the wrong mushrooms.)

Though time and distance complicate our perceptions of scale in Long’s work, they tend to crystallize its structure. One or the other is predetermined on a walk—usually distance, though sometimes, as in A Walk of Four Hours and Four Circles, Dartmoor, 1972, time is the determining factor. This walk is recorded as four concentric circles on an Ordnance map, each representing a one-hour walk. How four trips of such obviously different lengths could all take the same time is not explained—but the artist’s decisions are hinted at: perhaps he strolls slowly, then speeds up, even runs around the largest circle.

The site sculptures are seldom presented within the context of a walk, but occasionally these two facets of Long’s art come together in an enterprise that is conceptually quite terse. For 164 Stones/164 Miles, Long walked across Ireland (164 miles) “placing a nearby stone on the road at every mile along the way.” He lists the number of stones per county he passed through: Clare 49 stones, Tipperary 38 stones/Kilkenny 27 stones, Leix 9 stones, Carlow 20 stones, Wicklow 21 stones. The piece combines a long walk, an immense stone sculpture (or is it? It only has 164 stones; much shorter lines have contained more) and a substructure in which the counties, boundaries in themselves, are represented by stones, which represent miles, which are arbitrary measurements in the first place. It is a major work, but Long boils it down to a two-page spread in a book, with text on the left and a photograph of the road, and a stone, on the right.

Though much of Long’s work is linear, its development is not. Ideas appear again and again. His art is cyclical, like time, when thought of in terms of hours, seasons, and finally, history. It is natural to perceive time as linear, since one’s life occupies such a short segment of it that the curve isn’t always noticed. But time circles around and around, renewing, altering, passing by again. A dialogue between the constantly changing and the enduringly permanent takes place in the landscape. Long’s recurring motifs—the line, the circle, the spiral—emerge from landscape, and have acquired something of its character.

It is tempting to take an art/historical walk through time, back from Richard Long’s work. One could start at the stone circles of neolithic Britain and the spiral carvings of the Bronze Age, travel along early Roman roads, and take in Medieval pilgrimages, especially that of Edward I, who erected stone crosses at each resting place of the funeral procession of his queen. The 17th and 18th centuries become even more interesting. Not only is there all that theory about the “natural artifice” of parks and gardens; you could also make the Grand Tour of Europe, de rigueur for the well-heeled young Englishman. Traveling within the British Isles became equally popular about this time, Samuel Johnson’s trip with Boswell to the Hebrides being one literary result. Next century you could drop in on Constable and Turner and take a stroll around the Lake District with Wordsworth and friends. And once you hit the 20th, if you’re at a loss for directions, just consult the Blue Guide, that compendium of fanatical detail that fascinates the English traveler and reveals as much as any romantic poet.

In trying to attach any of this to Long, however, one inevitably comes a cropper. It has everything—and nothing—to do with him. Long makes no secret of his interest in the ancient work; some pieces draw directly on it. Stonehenge and the Cerne Abbas giant have been focal points for walks; a labyrinth carved in a boulder in Ireland generated his Connemara Sculpture, 1971, where he reproduced the design in stones on the ground. Other works, which involve spirals and circles, especially circles of standing stones, incorporate this history as fully, if not as specifically.

The differences between Long and his unknown ancestors are more subtle than the similarities. Were the ancient monuments religious, funereal, astronomical? Convincing arguments have been put forth for all three. But Long does not borrow his sources’ presumed content, as does much recent art that depends on deliberate “primitivizing.” His primary concern seems to be with the geography and topography of the landscape; with measuring and marking on it, with echoing its character in his choice of sculptural materials and methods. Long’s connection with the ancient monuments has more to do with their presence in the landscape than with their role in prehistoric culture.

The pilgrimage model also turns out to be a dead end. Pilgrims undertook arduous journeys propelled by faith and the hope of salvation, or for the good time and good company, as Chaucer would claim. Neither motivation can profitably be applied to Long.

The builders of the great 18th-century gardens and parks may seem closer at first, since their endeavors were at least artful, and involved imposing a structure on nature. But again the connection fades out; those designers were after visual effects—carefully planned vistas that would be pleasing to the eye and mind. With the exception of a very early work, England, 1967, in which he erected a rectangular frame in the landscape and placed a circle on the ground some distance away that was meant to be seen either through or outside of the frame, I know of nothing Long has done that places much emphasis on visual effect. So again he remains, fundamentally, separate.

But Long does have something in common with all of these predecessors, even if specific connections continue to elude us. For their activities are carried out within the landscape itself, particularly the English landscape. A feeling for the countryside has always informed the English sensibility. A small, well-groomed island, spared extremes of climate, Britain has been under cultivation for so long that few parts remain untouched. The traces of the past to be found are not glimpses of its primeval state, but endless evidence of previous tenants (unlike America, where immense areas of wilderness and desert still allow you to preserve at least the illusion that no one has been there before you). In Britain landscape is in short supply; the English dream most fervently of cottages in the country. But their fascination is with the landscape’s spirit, rather than its geology, which offers no challenge to conquer—no vast peaks or wastelands, no major wonders. England offers a landscape of tranquility, solace, respite. A gentle communion with the countryside pervades all English art, Long’s no less than his forebears’.

It is so fundamental to his work, in fact, that he does not alter his approach or methods in foreign terrain. Long has worked in far more rugged places than the British Isles—Alaska, Canada, the Andes, the Himalayas. But the results all evidence the same softness of touch; it is not as though he embarks on such trips for more remote or more challenging quests.

Long’s work may have its roots in the English attitude to the countryside, but it also catalyzes some of the definitive ideas of 1970s art. The abrupt retreat from the frenetic ’60s; the renewed interest in natural rather than industrial forms and materials; a shift in the approach to the art audience, not to mention the change within that audience; the move out of doors, away from the museums and galleries—such developments have characterized, and helped to form, the diffuse activities that composed ’70s art. It is interesting that Long has never worked in a more traditional medium; he has walked only ’70s territory, adapting its recurring themes—the line, the circle, even the grid.

Over the past ten years Long’s work has remained much the same; his gentle interventions in the landscape have maintained their discretion, his indoor pieces continue along similar paths. The line, the circle and the spiral still form the basis of his sculptural vocabulary. But although there has been no radical shift in direction, he continues to hone his processes. For one thing, his work has become more conceptually tight as he has intertwined it with its generating impulse—the landscape. Walks have become less rigid in structure as he has turned from formal to natural yardsticks.

Earlier walks, such as the concentric circles, the grid, or the many straight lines, skirt the issue of how one executes such a project accurately on natural terrain. On maps they can, of course, be diagrammed precisely, but on foot this would be impossible. More recently, however, Long has been drawing the structure of his pieces from geography instead of geometry/focusing especially on rivers. The choice is particularly suited to the cogency of his thinking, since rivers are also lines; they mark on, and in a sense “structure” the landscape. (The landscape also determines the course of the rivers, much as it influences the direction of Long’s art.)

The Avon has provided the impetus for several recent works, among them A Walk of the Same Length as the River Avon. There is no difficulty here about rendering straight lines or perfect curves. The Avon “walks” from its source to its mouth; Long walks the same distance, not along the river itself, but on an ancient road that follows it. At one point the road crosses the river; a photograph of a footbridge, along with maps of the river and the road, become the evidence.

Another recent river work has a slightly different inflection, but is just as harmonious conceptually. In 130 Miles from the Source to the Sea, Dumfriesshire, Scotland, 1978, Long placed a pile of 130 stones at the source of the River Clyde, furnishing on his return a photograph of the pile of stones, duly labeled. Again the gesture is entirely suited to the circumstance; concept and method remain inextricable. Long’s work has always been extremely economical, but the recent pieces seem particularly well resolved.

For an art that gives us so little to go on, Long’s work is surprisingly rewarding. There is an element of romance in our knowledge that it is, for the most part, unattainable. Or is it? There is no law against pushing our imagination; it can become our passage to England, our Himalayan trek. We can negotiate our own progress through space and time as surely as Long can. That’s where walking comes in.

On one of this walks, Long went around a mountain range in Ireland—Macgillicuddy’s Reeks—throwing a stone. Anyone who does this knows. As you start out your eye scans the roadside for the right stone. You find one and give it a toss; it skitters along and rolls to a stop some yards ahead. Eye fixed on it to make sure you don’t lose track of it among the others, you catch up to it, toss it again. Before you know it, you have become very attached to that stone. It structures your walk; you go where it goes.

—————————

The soul of a journey is liberty, perfect liberty, to

think, feel, do just as one pleases. We go a journey

chiefly to be free of all impediments and of all

inconveniences; to leave ourselves behind, much

more to get rid of others.

—William Hazlitt, On Going a Journey

In climbing, the summit is nearly always hidden,

and nothing but a track will save you from false

journeys. In descent it alone will save you a

precipice or an unfordable stream. It knows upon

which side an obstacle can be passed . . . and

where there is the best going. . . . It will find what

nothing but long experiment can find for an

individual traveller . . . everywhere The Road,

especially the very early Road, is wiser than it

seems to be.

—Hilaire Belloc, The Old Road

. . . de Selby makes the point that a good road will

have character and a certain air of destiny, an

indefinable intimation that it is going somewhere,

be it east or west, and not coming back from there.

If you go with such a road, he thinks, it will give

you pleasant traveling, fine sights at every corner

and a gentle ease of peregrination that will

persuade you that you are walking forever on

falling ground. But if you go east on a road that is

on its way west, you will marvel at the unfailing

bleakness of every prospect and the great number

of sore-footed inclines that confront you to make

you tired.

—Flann O’Brien, The Third Policeman

It is not indifferent to us which way we walk. There

is a right way; but we are very liable from

heedlessness and stupidity to take the wrong one.

We would fain take that walk, never yet taken by us

through this actual world, which is perfectly

symbolical of the path which we love to travel in

the interior and ideal world; and sometimes, no

doubt, we find it difficult to choose our direction,

because it does not yet exist distinctly in our idea.

—Henry David Thoreau, Walking

A walking tour should be gone upon alone,

because freedom is of the essence; because you

should be able to stop and go on/and follow this

way or that, as the freak takes you; . . . you must

be open to all impressions, and let your thoughts

take colour from what you see. You should be as a

pipe for any wind to play on.

—Robert Louis Stevenson, Walking Tours

Nancy Foote is an art critic.

—————————

NOTES

With all ephemeral art, documentation becomes of major importance. It takes several forms in Richard Long’s work: photographs and maps framed together with text; photographs and text presented in books (often published by museums and galleries at the artist’s request instead of conventional catalogues); and artists’ books. Much of Long’s documentation wavers between “primary” and “secondary” information—the work itself versus a reproduction of that work. Photographs of site sculptures would normally fall into the second category, but as Long presents them, with laconic captions, they become, in a sense, primary. His interest in “art” photography is minimal, unlike that of his friend and sometime walking companion Hamish Fulton, whose images, though related to Long’s in concept, are much more self-consciously concerned with photography. In addition to strict recording, Long sometimes uses a photograph to stake an esthetic claim, as when he takes a spot of conceptual interest, such as the source of a river that generates a walk. And in books such as A Hundred Stones; One Mile Between First and Last, the photographs are, in a sense, primary because they gather the stones into a single work."]]></description>
<dc:subject>1980 art walking nancyfoote ideas abstraction senses aimlessness expediency chatting conversation consciousness richardlong williamhazlitt hilairebelloc flanno'brien thoreau robertlouisstevenson artforum nature temporary experience installations peterhurchinson foraging cycles time slow spirals circles samueljohnson pilgrimage landscape 1970s</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:40a33c6c7688/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1980"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:walking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nancyfoote"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:abstraction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:senses"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aimlessness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:expediency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conversation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consciousness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:richardlong"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:williamhazlitt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hilairebelloc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:flanno'brien"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thoreau"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robertlouisstevenson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artforum"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:temporary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:experience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:installations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:peterhurchinson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:foraging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cycles"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:time"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:slow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:spirals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:circles"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:samueljohnson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pilgrimage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:landscape"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1970s"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/life-is-more-than-an-engineering-problem/">
    <title>Life Is More Than an Engineering Problem | Los Angeles Review of Books</title>
    <dc:date>2025-10-20T20:16:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/life-is-more-than-an-engineering-problem/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Julien Crockett speaks with Ted Chiang about the search for a perfect language, the state of AI, and the future direction of technology."]]></description>
<dc:subject>juliencrockett tedchiang engineering ai artificialintelligence agi artificialgeneralintelligence literature philosophy ideas technology human humans humanities humanism</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:c1a04db9e7d6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:juliencrockett"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tedchiang"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:engineering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:agi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialgeneralintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:human"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/banking-on-it/">
    <title>Banking on It</title>
    <dc:date>2025-10-11T03:49:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/banking-on-it/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The news is bad. I mean that in both senses: "bad news" and "news, bad."

There's been much discussion this week of Trump's "university compact," his attempt to bribe the administrations at nine universities by promising them access to funding in exchange for agreeing to support Trump's political agenda. "The compact would require colleges to freeze tuition for five years, cap the enrollment of international students and commit to strict definitions of gender. Among other steps, universities would also be required to change their governance structures to prohibit anything that would 'punish, belittle and even spark violence against conservative ideas'," according to The New York Times. 

Political scientist Henry Farrell argues that this is a demonstration of weakness, not strength. As he wrote in a NYT op-ed, "The struggle over regime change is about whether the aspiring authoritarians can subdue civil society. Their strategy is to play divide and conquer, rewarding friends and brutally punishing opponents. They win when society cracks, creating a self-enforcing set of expectations, in which everyone shuts up and complies because everyone expects everyone else to shut up and comply, too." 

But as Timothy Burke observes, there are a fair number of people in positions of power – university leadership, corporate leadership, media leadership – who seem quite happy to comply, not so much as a full-throated embrace of fascism, as a smug sense of retribution: "They’re not seeing Trumpism for what it is nor what it is set to become, but instead as a kind of brief, evanescent opportunity for settling scores and putting themselves back in charge as they were meant to be." This moment provides them an opportunity to pushback on "DEI," most obviously, but all sort of changing norms around race, gender, religion, health, language, labor, behavior, bodies. – changes about which these people are so incredibly uncomfortable, so incredibly aggrieved.

I've written repeatedly about the role that venture capitalism plays in (mis)shaping education: through the funding of particular startups, through the manufacturing of particular narratives about school, for example. But it would be a mistake to reduce this to the efforts of the Marc Andreessens of the world. As we see in this new "university compact," the pressures here are coming from a different billionaire from a different financial sub-sector: namely Marc Rowan, the head of the private equity firm Apollo Global Management. (Apollo's education portfolio includes the University of Phoenix and McGraw-Hill.) While Rowan's efforts here are overtly ideological – he's mad about pro-Palestinian activism on college campuses, The NYT suggests – he is quite literally in the business of another ongoing shift in education (also ideological, I'd say): that is, its financialization. Here, the key outcome of school is profit for investors, with less and less and less of any semblance of academic mission – certainly no room for curiosity or play. Students, research, the very brick-and-mortar itself – these are all reduced to capital, to data, to transactions, and – investors hope – to value that can be extracted and monetized and sold off to the highest bidder.

Ideas – ideas that challenge the status quo of capitalism, sure, but really, any sort of new or critical thinking at all – are a threat. Trump provides an opportunity – and I can almost almost write this with a straight face – to put an end to ideas.

As does "AI."

"AI" promises the end of ideas, the end of thinking, the end of professors and intellectuals (good riddance), the end of work (or at least, the end of organized labor) – and a future of endless wealth.

(I am reminded here of a quote by David Graeber, that "if working-class Bush voters tend to resent intellectuals more than they do the rich, then, the most likely reason is because they can imagine scenarios in which they might become rich, but cannot imagine one in which they, or any of their children, cold ever become members of the intelligentsia.")"]]></description>
<dc:subject>audreywatters henryfarrell donaldtrump 2025 highereducation highered colleges universities academia power politics education schools schooling edtech ai timothyburke administration leadership marcrowan universityofphoenix mcgraw-hill privatization financialization capitalism ideas criticalthinking thinking howwethink artificialintelligence davidgraeber us policy estherschindeler china neuroscience justinreich technology jasonkoebler bookbans libraries deliacai surveillance authoritarianism fascism maga trumpism government governance marcandreessen</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:6c6235eebf19/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:audreywatters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:henryfarrell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:donaldtrump"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2025"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colleges"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:power"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:timothyburke"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:administration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:leadership"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marcrowan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universityofphoenix"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mcgraw-hill"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:privatization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:financialization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:criticalthinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwethink"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davidgraeber"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:estherschindeler"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:china"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neuroscience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:justinreich"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jasonkoebler"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bookbans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:libraries"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:deliacai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:surveillance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:authoritarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fascism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maga"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:trumpism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:government"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:governance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marcandreessen"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.nplusonemag.com/issue-51/politics/stupidology/">
    <title>Stupidology | Issue 51 | n+1 | William Davies</title>
    <dc:date>2025-10-07T06:35:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.nplusonemag.com/issue-51/politics/stupidology/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><dc:subject>williamdavies 2025 stupidity cyberculture conspiracy ignorance ideology crisis ideas donaldtrump us uk brexit fakenews maga davidbrooks politics hillaryclinton richardseymour rfkjr robertkennedyjr truth government governance mikejudge idiocracy consumerism consumption quinnslobodian liztruss andréspicer matsalvesson socialsystems kant philosophy enlightenment totalitarianism frankfurtschool 1953 hannaharendt authoritarianism friedrichhayek friedrichvonjayekchrisanderson abhijitbanerjee siliconvalley judgement elonmusk publichealth policy usaid gaza pauledwards walterbloomberg tariffs economics russellmuirhead nancyrosenblum conspiricism conspiracytheories democracy qanon republicans facebook meta capitalism technology libertarianism reason intelligence markets macroeconomics llms trumpism financialmarkets financen bots machines friedrichvonhayek immanuelkant</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:18a484942c1c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:williamdavies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2025"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stupidity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cyberculture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conspiracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ignorance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:crisis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:donaldtrump"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:uk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brexit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fakenews"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maga"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davidbrooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hillaryclinton"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:richardseymour"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rfkjr"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robertkennedyjr"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:truth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:government"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:governance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mikejudge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:idiocracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consumerism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consumption"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quinnslobodian"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:liztruss"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:andréspicer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:matsalvesson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialsystems"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kant"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:enlightenment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:totalitarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:frankfurtschool"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1953"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hannaharendt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:authoritarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:friedrichhayek"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:friedrichvonjayekchrisanderson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:abhijitbanerjee"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:siliconvalley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:judgement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elonmusk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:publichealth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:usaid"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gaza"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pauledwards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:walterbloomberg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tariffs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:russellmuirhead"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nancyrosenblum"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conspiricism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conspiracytheories"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:democracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:qanon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:republicans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:facebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meta"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:libertarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reason"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:intelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:markets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:macroeconomics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:llms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:trumpism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:financialmarkets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:financen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bots"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:machines"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:friedrichvonhayek"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:immanuelkant"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r73s-YMcNTI">
    <title>Ursula Le Guin's Anarchist Alternative - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2025-10-02T16:10:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r73s-YMcNTI</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["In this Conversation on Anarres, we celebrate the 50th anniversary of the publication of Ursula K. Le Guin's classic novel, The Dispossessed. We talk with Dr. Alexis Shotwell who is working to spell out Le Guin's anarchist philosophy. Shotwell speculates as to the features of "Odoian anarchism"--what values it expresses and how it is related to other classical anarchist thinkers such as Emma Goldman and Peter Kropotkin-- and she envisions what lessons it might have for our political organizing today."]]></description>
<dc:subject>anarchism ursulaleguin 2025 alexisshotwell emmagoldman peterkropotkin anarresproject josephorosco futures philosophy thedispossesed utopia politics politicalphilosophy purity feminism gender race ethics angusmaguire jamesrowe sciencefiction scifi octaviabutler marionzimmerbradley robertheinlein activism buddhism omelas samueldelaney horizontality hierarchy hierarchies power williammorris erricomalatesta humannature mutualaid collectivity collectivism alexanderberjman taoism daoism imagination society exploitation misery horror odo nkjemisin relationships oppression critique speculativefiction anarres politcalphilosophy humans human property organizing anarcho-communism cooperation solidarity libertarianism nonownership capitalism anticapitalism sociability ammari comradeship kinship togetherness antoniogramsci vulnerability patriarchy humility charity difference deviance sameness individualism individuality kathrynnorlock stoicism murraybookchin unfinshed ongoingness staffordbeer lifestyle infrastructure inst</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:fe77f9b848a5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anarchism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ursulaleguin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2025"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alexisshotwell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:emmagoldman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:peterkropotkin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anarresproject"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:josephorosco"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:futures"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thedispossesed"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:utopia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politicalphilosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:purity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:feminism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gender"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:race"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:angusmaguire"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jamesrowe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sciencefiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scifi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:octaviabutler"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marionzimmerbradley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robertheinlein"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:activism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:buddhism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:omelas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:samueldelaney"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:horizontality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hierarchy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hierarchies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:power"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:williammorris"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:erricomalatesta"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humannature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mutualaid"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collectivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collectivism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alexanderberjman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:taoism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:daoism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:imagination"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:exploitation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:misery"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:horror"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:odo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nkjemisin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:relationships"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:oppression"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:critique"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:speculativefiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anarres"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politcalphilosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:human"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:organizing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anarcho-communism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cooperation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:solidarity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:libertarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nonownership"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anticapitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sociability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ammari"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:comradeship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kinship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:togetherness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:antoniogramsci"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:vulnerability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:patriarchy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:difference"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:deviance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sameness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:individualism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:individuality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kathrynnorlock"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stoicism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:murraybookchin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unfinshed"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ongoingness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:staffordbeer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lifestyle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:infrastructure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inst"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://nilsgilman.substack.com/p/stop-with-the-bullshit?triedRedirect=true">
    <title>Stop with the Bullshit - by Nils Gilman - Small Precautions</title>
    <dc:date>2025-09-15T21:25:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://nilsgilman.substack.com/p/stop-with-the-bullshit?triedRedirect=true</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Dialogue without listening, states without capacity, science without rigor, logos without quality — the fakes want the glory but not the good-faith grind"

...

"It’s been a long, ugly, and dangerous week in American politics, and a hot take is the last thing that is needed in the already-overheated atmosphere of the moment. But I want to take a gander at one of the most howlingly bad takes that emerged this week, namely Ezra Klein’s much- and rightly-dunked upon op-ed-paean to the late Charlie Kirk.

Most people may not have gotten much past the headline, but you really don’t need to, because the whole essay was predicated on a category error so impressive it deserves recognition as its own art form. Klein, who has emerged as the most influential liberal public intellectual, confused Kirk’s heavily stage-managed content-creation pipeline with the difficult, unglamorous craft of democratic engagement. The mistake was not just that Klein misjudged Kirk’s motives (I’m not going to discuss the vile ideological content of Kirk’s politics), it was that he failed to distinguish between authenticity and inauthenticity, between practices that require effort, humility, and risk, and imitations that only borrow the trappings.

Let’s talk directly about what Charlie Kirk’s mode of “politics” entailed. The goal was never good faith engagement with opponents — an indubitable bedrock of democratic politics. Rather, it was always about content creation for his media machine. He did not engage with informed opponents in a spirit of inquiry or persuasion, but instead preferred to spar with jejune undergraduates who he could make look foolish, in order to create social media clips that would go viral among his fans. As a content-creation machine for confirming and amplifying the biases of his fanbase, his “practice” was undoubtedly brilliant — even if he sometimes ended up looking foolish.

But the fact that Klein considers this form of political practice “the right way” is bizarre, especially because Klein himself often demonstrates what genuine dialogue looks like. Consider for example his conversation last month with Yoram Hazony, the brains behind the neo-reactionary “national conservatism” movement. That podcast was truly a model of good faith dialog between two people who sharply disagree politically. It unfolded slowly, sometimes awkwardly, with Klein engaging seriously someone who is just as politically and intellectually experienced as himself. That was practicing politics “the right way” — not because Hazony convinced Klein or vice versa, but both men in the dialog embodied democratic cognitive virtues of attempting to understand before dismissing, and probing assumptions before condemning. Both men took a risk in engaging the other on equal terms. It wasn’t merely about content-creation to amplify priors.

Most of what Kirk produced was a simulacrum of such dialog. His “debates” contained the surface features of dialogue — microphones, arguments about politics, a supposed clash of ideas — but none of the substance. The goal was not persuasion of his interlocutors but the creation of content that could go viral. Everything about these events, from the lame opponents to the camera angles, were stage managed not to promote comprehension but to enact Kirk’s domination routine. It looked like conversation but its function and purpose was fundamentally theatrical. To mistake this for good faith democratic dialog is like mistaking a wax apple for lunch: superficially convincing, but nutritionally empty.

Kirk’s “practice of politics” forms part of a larger pattern: the collapse of good faith, sincerity, and authenticity — what we might call, echoing Cory Doctorow, the enbullshittification of everything.

Authentic versions of human practices are difficult, costly, and sometimes dangerous. They command respect precisely because of the risks involved. Their imitations are easy, cheap, and flattering. They borrow the aesthetic while dodging the substance. Sometimes the imitation is outright lying, but more often it is, in Harry Frankfurt’s famous distinction, “bullshit.” The liar at least cares about the truth: he wants to conceal it. The bullshitter is indifferent: truth is beside the point, what matters is only the performative effect of his words. Kirk’s debates were bullshit in exactly this sense. Whether his opponent has a good argument or whether Kirk’s response was accurate was irrelevant. The only metric that mattered was whether it output a selectively-edited clip that could go viral. Though composed in 1986, long before the commercial Internet even existed, Frankfurt’s description could have been written for social media politics: an entire economy built not on truth or falsehood, but on performative command of the attention economy.

Consider this distinction with respect to governments. James Scott once argued that the definition of a modern government is that it “sees like a state,” building a machinery of taxation, census-taking, and bureaucratic enumeration designed to render their societies legible to the governors. This legibility can be oppressive, but it is real: it creates the capacity to govern. By contrast, Steven Pierce has observed that many postcolonial states merely “look like a state” without actually being one in Scott’s sense. They sport flags, uniforms, and colonnaded buildings, but lack the capacity to collect taxes or deliver services. Police checkpoints sprout across highways, staffed by men in uniform with rifles. The aesthetic is one of authority, but the function is extortion. The checkpoints do not protect; they prey. And yet the performance continues, because it is profitable to the performers. The truth — that governance is absent — becomes irrelevant. Here again, the lie is less important than the bullshit. The roadblock is not pretending to enforce safety; it is indifferent to safety altogether. What matters is that it looks like a state — and that the passers-by pay up. The state as performative bullshit.

Science, too, has its bullshit twin: so-called pseudoscience. Genuine scientific work is punishing: experiments fail, hypotheses collapse, reviewers sneer, careers stall. Above all, science accepts the possibility of being wrong. That humility is what makes it trustworthy. Pseudoscience cannot accept such humility. It craves the prestige of science and takes on its trappings — the white coat, the jargon, the graphs — without accepting its discipline. The result is a facsimile: journals that mimic peer review but never reject manuscripts so long as they confirm cherished beliefs, conferences that feature badly dressed people reading aloud boring papers, popularizers who push the message to a poorly-informed audience. What matters is that it looks like science, that it comforts an audience, that it flatters priors. Science is inquiry. Pseudoscience is performance. Authenticity lies in the willingness to be disproved. Inauthenticity lies in donning the aesthetic of rigor while never accepting its risk.

Counterfeit luxury brands do the same thing in the language of commerce. A Louis Vuitton bag purchased at a street stall in Bangkok can look almost indistinguishable from the real thing. The pattern is right, the logo attracts, the aura of exclusivity shimmers. But it is not the product of costly craftsmanship, durable materials, or decades of accumulated brand equity. It is a simulacrum, designed not to perform the high-quality function of a real luxury good but rather to signal the appearance of one for socially performative reasons. The buyer is often in on the trick: they want the social recognition of a logo without paying the premium. Again, this is not always lying; it is bullshit. Whether the bag is real is irrelevant; what matters is that it’s cheap and looks “real enough.” The prestige of the genuine brand is borrowed by the counterfeit while producing none of the quality that underwrites it. Authentic brands accumulate legitimacy over years of investment; counterfeiters free-ride on that legitimacy by selling the look. Authenticity here is the cost of production; inauthenticity is the shortcut.

These examples all rhyme. Authentic practices are slow, costly, and sometimes dangerous: dialogue requires humility, governance requires capacity, science requires discipline, and brands require investment. Inauthentic practices are fast, cheap, and rewarding. They produce the look without the work, indifferent to whether the thing is real, so long as the effect is convincing enough. The intellectual equivalent of empty calories.

The social cost of all these practices is not only that the fakers are cheating the people who do the real work, but more deeply, that they erode the category of the real. Kirk’s pseudo-debates trained audiences to misrecognize domination spectacles as democratic dialog. Governments that merely “look like” states normalize predation as governance. Pseudoscience muddies the authority of real science, making voters and patients doubt whether expertise exists at all. Counterfeits hollow out the value of brands and weaken the very notion of quality. In each case, the parasite gnaws away at the host. Frankfurt’s warning about bullshit is apt: once indifference to truth becomes widespread, the very category of truth loses meaning. The counterfeit becomes “good enough.” The real is devalued.

Jean-Paul Sartre’s distinction between good and bad faith helps to explain why this persists. Good faith requires acknowledging what one is really doing. It demands that dialogue be recognized as risky, governance as difficult, science as humbling, branding as costly. Bad faith is self-deception: living inside the imitation as if it were the real thing. Kirk very likely believed that he was “practicing politics the right way.” The uniformed thug at a roadblock may believe he is governing. The pseudoscientist may claim he is merely raising questions. The counterfeit buyer may insist the bag is “just as good.” These are not pure cons; they are inauthentic practices performed in bad faith, half-or-more-believed by their practitioners. That is why they are sticky: they are not only frauds on others but frauds on the self.

Klein’s error was to treat Kirk’s bad-faith performances as good faith practice. But the distinction matters. A society that cannot tell the difference between authentic and inauthentic, between truth and bullshit, between good faith and bad, is a society in which legitimacy is slipping away. The clip is not the conversation. The roadblock is not the state. The graph is not the science. The logo is not the brand.

The authentic article is costly; that is why it deserves respect. The inauthentic version is cheap; that is why it spreads. The question is whether we still care about the difference — or whether we are content to live among counterfeits and call it real."]]></description>
<dc:subject>nilsgilman 2025 charliekirk ezraklein goodfaith badfaith debate politics authenticity propaganda influencers ideas via:javierarbona yoramhazony conservatism corydoctorow sincerity harrygrankfurt jamescscott seeinglikeastate stevenpierce psuedoscience science jargon myths work inquiry conterfeits dialog humility governance discipline government authority self-deception performance fraud frauds bullshit pseudoscience inauthenticity aesthetics persuasion ideology</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:7a69afd54f03/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nilsgilman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2025"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charliekirk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ezraklein"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:goodfaith"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:badfaith"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:debate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:authenticity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:propaganda"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:influencers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:via:javierarbona"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:yoramhazony"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conservatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:corydoctorow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sincerity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:harrygrankfurt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jamescscott"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:seeinglikeastate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stevenpierce"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:psuedoscience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jargon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:myths"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inquiry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conterfeits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dialog"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:governance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:discipline"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:government"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:self-deception"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:performance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fraud"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:frauds"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bullshit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pseudoscience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inauthenticity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aesthetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:persuasion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideology"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYVWbj8naBM">
    <title>Does Anarchy Need Leaders? - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2025-06-04T03:58:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYVWbj8naBM</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["When you think of anarchism, leaders probably don’t spring to mind. Anarchism is known for its rejection of authority. But what exactly is leadership, and how does it relate to the tension between authority and anarchy?

Introduction - 0:00
Anarchist Leadership? - 3:36
The Risk of Leadership - 8:44"]]></description>
<dc:subject>2025 andrewism anarchism anarchy leadership authority power horizontality hierarchy privilege patriarchy capitalism liberalism authoritarianism oppression exploitation mutualism solarpunk expertise influence respect force guidance autonomy interdependence responsibility situational ideas example organizing organization unions examples revolution mutuality action struggle consciousness education emmagoldman erricomalatesta domingospassos hectormorel shawnwilbur reversedominance relations relationships powerdynamics behavior despotism egalitarianism practice praxis vigilance watchfulness malatesta andrewsage</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:20028cfcc4f1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2025"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:andrewism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anarchism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anarchy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:leadership"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:power"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:horizontality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hierarchy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:privilege"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:patriarchy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:liberalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:authoritarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:oppression"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:exploitation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mutualism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:solarpunk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:expertise"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:influence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:respect"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:force"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:guidance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:autonomy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interdependence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:responsibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:situational"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:example"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:organizing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:organization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:examples"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:revolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mutuality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:action"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:struggle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consciousness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:emmagoldman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:erricomalatesta"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:domingospassos"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hectormorel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:shawnwilbur"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reversedominance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:relations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:relationships"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:powerdynamics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:behavior"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:despotism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:egalitarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:practice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:praxis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:vigilance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:watchfulness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:malatesta"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:andrewsage"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.cabinetmagazine.org/issues/23/gschwandtner.php">
    <title>CABINET // A Brief History of String</title>
    <dc:date>2025-05-26T22:03:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.cabinetmagazine.org/issues/23/gschwandtner.php</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><dc:subject>string quipu sabrinagschwandtner 2006 writing line material space language ideas history information eruv loop enclosure inca perru precolumbian garyurton binarycode ceciliavicuna andes stringfigure alfredhaddon game pastime process spider password khipus via:quarry khipu inka knots rope textiles math mathematics records computing recordkeeping</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:a285689d4b55/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:string"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quipu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sabrinagschwandtner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2006"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:line"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:material"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:space"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:information"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:eruv"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:loop"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:enclosure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inca"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:perru"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:precolumbian"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:garyurton"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:binarycode"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ceciliavicuna"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:andes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stringfigure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alfredhaddon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:game"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pastime"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:process"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:spider"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:password"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:khipus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:via:quarry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:khipu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inka"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:knots"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rope"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:textiles"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:math"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mathematics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:records"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:recordkeeping"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.compactmag.com/article/postliberalisms-reluctant-godfather/">
    <title>Postliberalism’s Reluctant Godfather | Compact</title>
    <dc:date>2025-05-26T04:16:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.compactmag.com/article/postliberalisms-reluctant-godfather/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><dc:subject>alasdairmacintyre obituary 2025 philosophy academia ethics nathanpinkoski thomaskuhn marxism activism politics capitalism determinism progress prospertiy isolation economics liberalism neutrality rights governance government utilitarianism elizabethasnsombe morality stalinism hungary 1956 left hungarianrevolution kant aristiotle moralphilosophy virtueethics virtue sociology society practices institutions human humans money prestige power humangood immanuelkant aristotle marriage life living religion families postliberalism individualism 1980s 1990s rightwing farright us jamesdavisonhunter culturewars universities colleges highered highereducation michaelwalzer michaelsandel johnrawls charlestaylor marthanussbaum reason catholicism conservatism enlightenment progressivism consequences ideas thinking howwethink civilization managerialism autonomy moraltheory theology culturewar</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:3f49d1dc25ac/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alasdairmacintyre"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:obituary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2025"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nathanpinkoski"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thomaskuhn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marxism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:activism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:determinism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:progress"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:prospertiy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:isolation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:liberalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neutrality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rights"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:governance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:government"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:utilitarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elizabethasnsombe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:morality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stalinism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hungary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1956"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:left"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hungarianrevolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kant"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aristiotle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:moralphilosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:virtueethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:virtue"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sociology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:practices"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:institutions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:human"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:money"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:prestige"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:power"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humangood"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:immanuelkant"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aristotle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marriage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:living"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:religion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:families"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:postliberalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:individualism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1980s"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1990s"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rightwing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:farright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jamesdavisonhunter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culturewars"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colleges"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:michaelwalzer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:michaelsandel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnrawls"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charlestaylor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marthanussbaum"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reason"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:catholicism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conservatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:enlightenment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:progressivism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consequences"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwethink"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:civilization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:managerialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:autonomy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:moraltheory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:theology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culturewar"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.hamiltonnolan.com/p/ideas-that-cannot-be-spoken">
    <title>Ideas That Cannot Be Spoken - by Hamilton Nolan</title>
    <dc:date>2025-04-30T04:32:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.hamiltonnolan.com/p/ideas-that-cannot-be-spoken</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Spotting cowards in the public discourse."

...

"Most jobs come with a series of unappetizing demands. You must wake up early. You must endure a long commute. You must perform sweaty physical labor, or serve the thankless public, or corral a classroom of unruly kids, or waste away in a dreary cubicle. You must perform these grueling, tedious tasks, in exchange for an amount of money that is surely smaller than you deserve, in order to obtain food, clothing, and shelter, lest you and your family become destitute. This is the baseline reality of work for the average person.

Then there are the minority of jobs that are easier, more enriching, that offer fulfillment and meaning and a sense of purpose and a humane lifestyle. One place that some of these rare good jobs can be found is in the Ideas industry—among the journalists, pundits, political thinkers, activists, and self-styled Thought Leaders who collectively produce the National Discourse. In comparison to most real jobs, these are great gigs. Instead of hammering nails, you are talking to interesting people; instead of making sandwiches, you are doing research; instead of manning a cash register, you are writing some essay; and instead of being treated as a replaceable and undervalued cog in the machine of capitalism, you get to enjoy the enlivening process of people seriously engaging with your ideas. Whether you are getting rich or not, there is no question that you are blessed with a career that is infinitely more rewarding than that which is given to most of America’s 170 million working people.

Participating in the Ideas industry carries one underlying moral demand: To tell the truth. You do not have to sweat and slave and struggle and serve in the same way that most working people do, but in exchange, you owe to the world your very best effort to say things that are true, and that are righteous, and that reflect exactly what you believe to be an accurate reading off the world. Different thinkers will deliver different and competing ideas, but all of the ideas they deliver—in order to justify the presumption that they are worth your time—must come with the implicit guarantee, “Here is my best argument for something true.”

This quality is what makes The Discourse worth a damn. If everyone argues forthrightly for their own vision of truth and justice, the interplay of all of these arguments produces a national conversation that progresses in a productive, informative, enlightening way. That’s the deal. As soon as you lose track of this, you begin straying off the path of Thinker and onto the path of Propagandist. That is the path to the Bullshit industry—a separate (and more lucrative) world than the Ideas industry. That is where political communicators try to trick you with half-truths, and public relations strategists scheme to avoid difficult questions, and advertising executives concoct campaigns designed to bathe you in illusion. All of that exists, but it is a different thing. The thing that distinguishes those of us who purport to operate in the world of ideas is that we are not trying to rip you off—we are trying to persuade you with the truth.

A happy quality of this arrangement is that it treats all consumers of the ideas as equal. My job as a writer is not to go into some secret back room with The People Who Really Matter and agree on a narrative designed to dupe you and then to emerge and perform this narrative for you in a way that I think you are likely to fall for. No! My job is to squeeze my little brain as hard as possible until I feel like I have a clear picture of something that is true and important and then squeeze it some more until I have figured out the best way to say these things and then say, to everyone who cares to listen, “Here is what is true, and here is why it’s important, and here is why doing this thing will be good for humanity.” You may think I’m an idiot. You may find my knowledge base lacking, my moral framework twisted, my arguments unpersuasive. You may curse me as a vile socialist, an unsophisticated ignoramus, a repetitive bore. All of that comes standard in the course of writing for the public. (Indeed, your thoughtful attacks on what you see as the holes in my argument are the things that produce The Discourse that we are all a part of.) The one thing that you should not be able to say about my work is that I am not telling you what I really think. That is the price of entry to the worthwhile part of the Ideas industry. We may be bastards, but we are not bullshitting you.

You should therefore be very suspicious of anyone who claims to be in the Genuine Ideas business but who is afraid to fully speak their mind in public. For the past half decade at least, America has been bombarded with the grumblings of influential people griping that they are not “allowed” to say what they really think, these days. Because of wokeness, and witch hunts, and things like that. What do they mean when they argue that they are not “allowed” to say something? Do they mean that they might be snatched by government agents and deported for writing a humanitarian op-ed in a student newspaper? No. What they mean, usually, is that they hold opinions that many people would find objectionable and if they say those opinions out loud people will get mad at them. In many cases, they also hold prestigious positions at media or business or academic institutions that claim to have some anodyne progressive values, and because their objectionable ideas are objectionable in the specific sense of “being some variety of bigotry,” their colleagues at those institutions would be mad at them, making their lives unpleasant. (It is darkly funny that, in the years that all of these people have been complaining about the woke censorship they are suffering, the people who have actually suffered the most professional retaliation for voicing their beliefs have been those who spoke out for the human rights of Palestinians. That has proven to be far more dangerous to one’s livelihood than being a bigot.)

It is important to notice the fact that, in truth, all of these whining people very much are allowed to say what they think. They sure can. No one is stopping them. What they are really objecting to is not censorship, but rather the honest reactions that their honest ideas will elicit. In other words, they cannot handle The Discourse. They are not equipped to participate in the Ideas industry. They are unable to carry the burden of telling the truth as they see it. This is fine, if you’re a regular person; no one is obligated to get yelled at for their beliefs. But it is not fine if you are someone—a writer, a leader, an intellectual influencer of the public—who is supposed to be pushing ideas. Those people must either say what they believe, change what they believe, or accept the fact that they are intellectual cowards.

These are the things that I thought last night when I read Ben Smith’s Semafor story about the many exclusive group chats, full of pundits and quasi-journalists and Substack writers and Silicon Valley business titans and political activists, that have served as private petri dishes of reactionary thinking since the start of the pandemic. It is a juicy story, replete with tales of the wounded signatories of the infamous Harper’s Letter forming and reforming little Signal chat groups where they could hold masturbatory agreement sessions with Marc Andreesen and Mark Cuban and similar tech gurus who fancy themselves masters of the nation’s future. Over and over again, participants in these chats explain that they were places where they could speak more openly than they would in public. “People during 2020 felt that there was a monoculture on social media,” goes one typical comment from an entrepreneur, “and if they didn’t agree with something, group chats became a safe space to debate that, share that, build consensus, feel that you’re not alone.” It’s not just the businessmen— “Group chats are now where everything important and interesting happens,” agrees one popular blog thinkfluencer, who presumably is not giving his public readers his important or interesting stuff.

I used to write for Gawker. The founding premise of Gawker can be described as, “All the stuff these group chat people said is fucking poisonous.” Nick Denton often told the legend of Gawker by saying that when he was a reporter, all the reporters would go to the bar after work and talk about the real stories, the ones that had not made it into the official stories that went in the paper. He thought the public should get the real stories too. Hence Gawker. There is a lot to criticize about Gawker, but this premise is one that the site generally tried to adhere to. It was not a high-minded publication, and we don’t need to pretend that most of its work was fancy or charitable, but I do think of that premise as a kind of high-minded ideal: We will do our best to say what we actually think.

Sometimes you say what you think, and guess what happens? People get mad. People yell at you. Yes. That goes with the territory. I will put the = hate mail and death threats and angry internet comments that I received during my Gawker years up against anyone’s. And, hey: that’s the fucking job. Whether you write for Gawker or Substack or the New York Times or Harper’s—or whether you are a CEO or tech visionary or a venture capitalist who goes to the Aspen Ideas festival and has a bazillion Twitter followers—the only requirement of the job is to speak your mind honestly. Because, because, by asking the public to listen to you, you are telling the public that they will be getting, as best as you can manage it, your truest ideas. We ask people to give us their attention, and their time, and in turn we give them our honest thoughts. When you are operating in this world and you stop giving people your honest thoughts, you begin ripping people off.

Feel free to hide your honest thoughts in private group chats if you like. Rather than speaking forthrightly, retreat into a little hole where you can stage manage and coordinate the rollout of soft versions of your unpopular ideas in friendly forums. But if you do, don’t pretend that you are a member in good standing of the (absurd, enraging, pompous, but ultimately socially valuable) Ideas industry. Say what you think, cowards! Or stop pretending that your beliefs are important enough for other people to care about in the first place."]]></description>
<dc:subject>hamiltonnolan 2025 jobs work labor class bluecollar whitecollar ideas discouse marcandreessen markcuba monoculture gawker nickdenton substack journalism gorupchat nytimes pundits honesty cowardice politics policy activism capitalism thoughtleaders truth propaganda</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:16760ed26b2a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hamiltonnolan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2025"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jobs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:class"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bluecollar"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:whitecollar"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:discouse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marcandreessen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:markcuba"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:monoculture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gawker"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nickdenton"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:substack"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:journalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gorupchat"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nytimes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pundits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:honesty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cowardice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:activism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thoughtleaders"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:truth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:propaganda"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.paraguaypress.com/publications/1334/">
    <title>The Social Life Of the Book - Paraguay Press</title>
    <dc:date>2025-04-18T05:05:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.paraguaypress.com/publications/1334/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["A collaboration between castillo/corrales, Paris and graphic designer and editor Will Holder, The Social Life Of the Book (2011-2015) was a collection of commissioned texts reflecting on books, and how they engage with the circulation of ideas and the agency of social situations. The series brought together artists, publishers, writers, designers, booksellers, etc. who consider books less as finished objects or forms but for their disruptive potential and their ability to produce new relationships, new publics and new meanings.

S.L.O.B developed as a series of 16-page, saddle-stitched signatures, available on postal subscription and in selected bookstores. In its contents as well as its distribution, the series aimed to focus readers’ attention on not only printed material as such, but also to the ecosystem that knowledge, writing, publishing and distributing form together."]]></description>
<dc:subject>books writing howwewrite reading howweread publishing distribution willholder ideas agency social text design graphics graphicdesign relationships</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:23620fcdff06/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:distribution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:willholder"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:agency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:social"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:text"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:graphics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:graphicdesign"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:relationships"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTTqnrer48c">
    <title>La filosofía creativa de David Lynch - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2025-01-27T19:03:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTTqnrer48c</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["En este video casi me suelto a llorar mientras recuerdo todo lo que le he aprendido a David Lynch."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>teoríadelcaos 2025 davidlynch film filmmaking art writing howwewrite creativity intuition philosophy contradiction painting digital attention relationships love listening cafes conversation ideas renélópezvillamar</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:2bcf7371d57c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teoríadelcaos"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2025"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davidlynch"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:film"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:filmmaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:creativity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:intuition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:contradiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:painting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:digital"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:relationships"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:love"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:listening"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cafes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conversation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:renélópezvillamar"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://aeon.co/essays/if-you-ask-why-youre-a-philosopher-and-youre-awesome">
    <title>If you ask ‘Why?’, you’re a philosopher, and you’re awesome | Aeon Essays</title>
    <dc:date>2025-01-20T03:36:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://aeon.co/essays/if-you-ask-why-youre-a-philosopher-and-youre-awesome</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Diving into the ring of darkness beyond things easily answerable, asking ‘Why?’ questions is what make humans awesome"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>ericschwitzgebel 2025 darkness why whys humans humanity knowledge ideas meaning meaningmaking curiosity understanding reverence awe philosophy questions questioning inquiry kurtgödel gödel universe nietzsche confusius alberteinstein penumbra intelligence</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:f0330657696a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ericschwitzgebel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2025"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:darkness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:why"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:whys"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:knowledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meaning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meaningmaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:curiosity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:understanding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reverence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:awe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:questions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:questioning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inquiry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kurtgödel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gödel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nietzsche"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:confusius"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alberteinstein"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:penumbra"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:intelligence"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjT53b6qXHw">
    <title>David Hammons: Day's End - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2024-12-30T21:27:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjT53b6qXHw</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The Whitney, in collaboration with Hudson River Park, has developed a permanent public art project by David Hammons. Entitled Day's End (2014–21), this monumental installation is located in Hudson River Park along the southern edge of Gansevoort Peninsula, directly across from the Museum.

Proposed to the Whitney by Hammons, Day's End takes inspiration from an artwork of the same name by Gordon Matta-Clark. In 1975, Matta-Clark cut five openings into the Pier 52 shed that formerly occupied the site. Hammons's Day's End is an open structure that precisely follows the outlines, dimensions, and location of the original shed—and, like Matta-Clark's intervention, it will offer an extraordinary place to experience the waterfront.

Taking both Day's Ends, as envisaged by Hammons and Matta-Clark, as jumping-off points, the Whitney has also created the Museum's first podcast, Artists Among Us, narrated by artist Carrie Mae Weems. Listen at https://whitney.org/podcast/days-end . 

Learn more at https://whitney.org/exhibitions/david-hammons-days-end "

[See also:

"Queer Histories of the Piers | David Hammons: Day's End" (2021)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tS990SCeQIE

"The Whitney, in collaboration with Hudson River Park, has developed a permanent public art project by David Hammons. Entitled Day's End (2014–21), this monumental installation is located in Hudson River Park along the southern edge of Gansevoort Peninsula, directly across from the Museum.

Hammons’s Day’s End takes inspiration from an artwork of the same name by Gordon Matta-Clark, who cut five openings into the Pier 52 shed in 1975. Pier 52 was one of several piers inhabited by a vibrant Queer community in Manhattan’s Meatpacking District. Featuring interviews with artist and filmmaker Elegance Bratton; activist and Director of Client Services at the Sylvia Rivera Law Project Stefanie Rivera; photographer and archivist Efrain John Gonzalez; activist and performer Egyptt Labeija; and artist and art historian Jonathan Weinberg, this video recalls a time when sex, art, and creativity converged on the waterfront."

"Gordon Matta-Clark's Day's End | David Hammons: Day's End" (2022)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uecdwXKuUco

"The Whitney, in collaboration with Hudson River Park, has developed a permanent public art project by David Hammons. Entitled Day's End (2014–21), this monumental installation is located in Hudson River Park along the southern edge of Gansevoort Peninsula, directly across from the Museum.

Hammons’s Day’s End takes inspiration from an artwork of the same name by Gordon Matta-Clark, who cut five openings into the dilapidated Pier 52 shed in 1975, transforming it into a "cathedral of light.""

"Preview: Day's End by David Hammons" (2019)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vv3rVp3g9Ic

"The Whitney, in collaboration with the Hudson River Park Trust, has developed a permanent public art project by David Hammons. Entitled Day's End (2021), this monumental installation is located in Hudson River Park along the southern edge of Gansevoort Peninsula, directly across from the Museum.

Proposed to the Whitney by Hammons, Day's End takes inspiration from an artwork of the same name by Gordon Matta-Clark. In 1975, Matta-Clark cut five openings into the Pier 52 shed that formerly occupied the site. Hammons's Day's End is an open structure that precisely follows the outlines, dimensions, and location of the original shed—and, like Matta-Clark's intervention, it will offer an extraordinary place to experience the waterfront.

Featuring interviews with Darren Walker (President, Ford Foundation), Lorna Simpson (Artist), Alex Fialho (Programs Director, Visual AIDS), Scott Rothkopf (Deputy Director for Programs and Nancy and Steve Crown Family Chief Curator, Whitney Museum of American Art), Adam D. Weinberg (Alice Pratt Brown Director, Whitney Museum of American Art), and Guy Nordenson (Structural Engineer)"

"Adam D. Weinberg and David Hammons discuss Day's End" (2021)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4si3OLbVEI

"Adam D. Weinberg and artist David Hammons discuss the conception of Hammons's permanent public art project Day's End. This monumental installation is located in Hudson River Park along the southern edge of Gansevoort Peninsula, directly across from the Whitney.

Day's End takes inspiration from an artwork of the same name by Gordon Matta-Clark. In 1975, Matta-Clark cut five openings into the Pier 52 shed that formerly occupied the site. Hammons's Day's End is an open structure that precisely follows the outlines, dimensions, and location of the origina"]]]></description>
<dc:subject>davidhammons 2021 art nyc gordonmatta-clark 1975 architecture philosophy race class beauty us noticing debris observation dawoudbey elegancebratton stephanierivera egypttlabeija efrainjohngonzalez darrenwalker lornasimpson alexfialho scottrothkopf guynordenson adrienneedwards monuments community benokri dialog sculpture adamweinberg provocation juliemehretu materials everyday invention experimentation foundobjects transformation identity howwework audience humanism populism democratic improvisation ideas conceptualart absorbtion fragments unseen seeing howwesee queer place creativity history histories time past sociality memorials. culture aesthetics lightness celebration destination memory ephemerality ephemeral readymade erasure gentrification ghosts carriemaeweems water</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:cd544f565eee/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davidhammons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2021"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nyc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gordonmatta-clark"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1975"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:architecture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:race"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:class"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:beauty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:noticing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:debris"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:observation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dawoudbey"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elegancebratton"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stephanierivera"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:egypttlabeija"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:efrainjohngonzalez"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:darrenwalker"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lornasimpson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alexfialho"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scottrothkopf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:guynordenson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:adrienneedwards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:monuments"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:benokri"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dialog"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sculpture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:adamweinberg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:provocation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:juliemehretu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:materials"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:everyday"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:invention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:experimentation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:foundobjects"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:transformation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:identity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwework"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:audience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:populism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:democratic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:improvisation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conceptualart"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:absorbtion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fragments"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unseen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:seeing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwesee"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:queer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:place"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:creativity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:histories"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:time"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:past"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sociality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:memorials."/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aesthetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lightness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:celebration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:destination"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:memory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ephemerality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ephemeral"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:readymade"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:erasure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gentrification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ghosts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:carriemaeweems"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:water"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://psyche.co/guides/how-to-critique-stories-about-the-nature-of-romantic-love">
    <title>How to think differently about love | Psyche Guides</title>
    <dc:date>2024-12-19T21:49:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://psyche.co/guides/how-to-critique-stories-about-the-nature-of-romantic-love</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Poets, philosophers and scientists all tell stories about the nature of romantic love. It can be liberating to critique them"

...

"Key points – How to think differently about love

1. Love is a complex idea with different origin stories. These carry implications for our understanding of love’s function and role in individuals’ lives. They do little or nothing, however, to shed light on some of the philosophical conundrums raised by love’s contradictions.

2. Neuroscience explains the brain mechanisms behind the excitement and longing of romantic love. But it leads us to ask more questions about the ways in which biology and culture interact to create the unique experience we call romantic love.

3. The dominant evolutionary story views romantic love as an adaptation. Its best-known hypotheses, however, are grounded in a parochial paradigm of 20th-century nuclear families with rigid gender roles assigned to just two sexes.

4. Recognising love as a social construct suggests that it’s not an immutable human experience. It frees you to deconstruct your own beliefs about love and think creatively about the kinds of romantic relationships that will allow you to thrive.

5. Our dominant love script reinforces gender roles and power inequality. The feminist critique encourages a rethinking of romantic love as potentially liberating rather than oppressive, when grounded in a mutual recognition of each other’s freedom."]]></description>
<dc:subject>arinapismenny love poetry philosophy science critique critcism 2024 emotions ideas johannwolfgangvongoethe neuroscience romance exclusivity loving sarahhrdy anthropology evolution paternity fidelity monogamy stephaniecoontz history society franksinatra françoisdelarochefoucauld culture denisderougemont feminism simonedebeauvoir carolhanisch freedom elizabethbrake beritbrogaard ronalddesousa bennetthelm carriejenkins lukebrunning sophiarosa johndanaher aaronben-ze'ev neilmcarthur hi-phination panpsycast mitchelldelbianco</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:b310a8126ec0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:arinapismenny"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:love"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:poetry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:critique"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:critcism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2024"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:emotions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johannwolfgangvongoethe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neuroscience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:romance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:exclusivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:loving"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sarahhrdy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anthropology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:paternity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fidelity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:monogamy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stephaniecoontz"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:franksinatra"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:françoisdelarochefoucauld"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:denisderougemont"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:feminism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:simonedebeauvoir"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:carolhanisch"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freedom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elizabethbrake"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:beritbrogaard"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ronalddesousa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bennetthelm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:carriejenkins"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lukebrunning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sophiarosa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johndanaher"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aaronben-ze'ev"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neilmcarthur"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hi-phination"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:panpsycast"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mitchelldelbianco"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.theguardian.com/books/2024/nov/07/david-graeber-optimistic-anarchist-rebecca-solnit">
    <title>‘It does not have to be this way’: the radical optimism of David Graeber | Books | The Guardian</title>
    <dc:date>2024-11-13T18:28:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.theguardian.com/books/2024/nov/07/david-graeber-optimistic-anarchist-rebecca-solnit</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["As a new collection of his writing is published, Rebecca Solnit remembers her friend, the late activist and anarchist who believed ordinary people had the power to change the world"

...

"David Graeber was a joyful, celebratory person. An enthusiast, voluble, on fire with the possibilities in the ideas and ideologies he wrestled with. Every time we met – from New Haven in the early 00s to London a few years before his death in 2020 – he was essentially the same: beaming, rumpled, with a restless energy that seemed to echo the constant motion of his mind, words tumbling out as though they were, in their unstoppable abundance, overflowing. But he was also much respected in activist circles for being a good listener, and his radical egalitarianism was borne out in how he related to the people around him.

He was always an anthropologist. After doing fieldwork among traditional peoples in Madagascar, he just never stopped, but he turned his focus to his own society. Essays such as Dead Zones of the Imagination: On Violence, Bureaucracy, and ‘Interpretive Labor’ and his book Bullshit Jobs came from using the equipment of an anthropologist on stuff usually regarded as boring, or not regarded at all – the function and impact of bureaucracy. His 2011 bestseller on debt reminded us that money and finance are among the social arrangements that could be rearranged for the better.

He insisted, again and again, that industrialised Euro-American civilisation was, like other societies past and present, only one way of doing things among countless options. He cited times when societies rejected agriculture or technology or social hierarchy, when social groups chose what has often been dismissed as primitive because it was more free. And he rejected all the linear narratives that present contemporary human beings as declining from primordial innocence or ascending from primitive barbarism. He offered, in place of a single narrative, many versions and variations; a vision of societies as ongoing experiments, and human beings as endlessly creative. That variety was a source of hope for him, a basis for his recurrent insistence that it doesn’t have to be this way.

As Marcus Rediker wrote in his review of David’s posthumous book Pirate Enlightenment, “Everything Graeber wrote was simultaneously a genealogy of the present and an account of what a just society might look like.” He was concerned about inequality of all kinds, including gender inequality in this society and others, and the violence that enforces inequality and unfreedom, as well as how they might be delegitimised and where and when societies might have escaped them. He focused, in short, on freedom and its impediments.

He was often credited with coining the Occupy Wall Street slogan “We are the 99%”, but he insisted on paring his credit down to having contributed the 99% part to a phrase so compelling that “the 1%” remains a widely used description of the uppermost elite. “The 99%” is a hopeful phrase, in opposition to the old layer-cake description of the working, middle, and upper classes. It’s an assertion that the great majority of us are working, and often financially struggling or precarious; that most of us have a lot in common – and a lot of reasons to oppose the super-rich.

David took joy in his work, and in how that work intersected with actualities on the ground – especially with the radical movements of the late 1990s and the new millennium, including the anti-corporate-globalisation movement that peaked with the shutdown of the World Trade Organization ministerial conference in Seattle in 1999, the Zapatista uprising in Mexico that began in 1994, and the many forms of radical egalitarianism manifesting as direct-democracy experiments and resistance to unjust institutions and governments, especially 2011’s Occupy Wall Street, in which he was deeply involved.

That joy: maybe this is how everyone should feel about ideas and the ways that they open up or close off possibilities. The way that, as he wrote, “The ultimate hidden truth of the world is that it is something we make and could just as easily make differently.” If you truly believe that, if you perceive a world that is constructed according to certain assumptions and values, then you see that it can be changed, not least by changing those assumptions and values.

We have to recognise that ideas are tools that we wield – and with them, some power. David wanted to put these tools in everyone’s hands, or remind them that they are already there. Which is part of why he worked hard at – and succeeded in – writing in a style that wasn’t always simple but was always as clear and accessible as possible, given the material. Egalitarianism is a prose style, too. Our mutual friend the writer, film-maker, and debt abolitionist Astra Taylor texted him: “Re-reading Debt. You are such a damn good writer. A rare skill among lefties.” He texted back that August, a month before his demise: “Why thanks! Well at least I take care to do so – I call it ‘being nice to the reader,’ which is an extension of the politics, in a sense.”

In order to believe that people can govern themselves in the absence of coercive institutions and hierarchies, anarchists must have great faith in ordinary people, and David did. A sentence Lyndsey Stonebridge wrote about Hannah Arendt could apply equally well to him: “To fixate on her exceptional mind is to miss something that is important about her lessons in thinking: thinking is ordinary, she teaches; that is its secret power.”

He had a strained academic career, despite his brilliance and originality – or because of them. In the first book of his that I read, Fragments of an Anarchist Anthropology, a tiny book bursting with big ideas, he wrote, “In the United States there are thousands of academic Marxists of one sort or another, but hardly a dozen scholars willing openly to call themselves anarchists … It does seem that Marxism has an affinity with the academy that anarchism never will. It was, after all, the only great social movement that was invented by a PhD, even if afterwards, it became a movement intending to rally the working class.” And then he argues that anarchism was not, by comparison, an idea created by a few intellectuals; instead, “the basic principles of anarchism – self-organisation, voluntary association, mutual aid” – have been around “as long as humanity.”

David’s recurrent rallying cry as both a scholar and an activist was: “It does not have to be this way.” Where academia can be cool and guarded, pulling away from direct engagement, he was warm and enthusiastic, wanting to see ideas lead to actions that could change the world. Taylor notes: “While he despised the tedium of academic bureaucracy, he loved activist meetings, savouring the ideological debates and revelling in various forms of planning, scheming, and mischief.” He was hopeful, not foolishly so, but due to the evidence he had amassed that human societies have taken myriad forms, that the people who are supposedly powerless can together wield quite a lot of power, and that ideas matter. One of my favourite scraps of information in Fragments of an Anarchist Anthropology is about Madagascar’s Sakalava people, who officially revere dead kings – but these kings make their wishes known “through spirit mediums who are usually elderly women of commoner descent.” That is, a system officially led by elite men is controlled by non-elite women.

Hope is a tricky business among intellectuals and activists. Cynicism, though it’s often inaccurate about both human nature and political possibilities, gives the appearance of sophistication; despair is often seen as sophisticated and worldly-wise while hopefulness is seen as naive, when the opposite is not infrequently true. Hope is risky; you can lose, and you often do, but the records show that if you try, sometimes you win.

His essay Despair Fatigue opens: “Is it possible to become bored with hopelessness?” David’s superpower was being an outsider. He did not proceed from widely shared assumptions but sought to dismantle them, urging us to see they’re arbitrary, confining and optional, and inviting everyone into the spaces this opens up (while saluting those already there). So much of his writing says, in essence, “What happens if we don’t accept this?” – if we dissect it to see its origins and impacts, or if we reject it, if we lift it off like some burden we don’t have to carry, some outfit we don’t have to wear? What happens is we get free."]]></description>
<dc:subject>davidgraeber 2024 rebeccasolnit anarchism change everyday ordinary ows occupywallstreet marcusrediker academia academics highered highereducation workingclass class struggle inequality 1999 1994 zapatistas battleofseattle wto 2011 astrataylor lyndseystonebridge hannaharendt activism anthropology marxism marxists sakalava madagascar cynicism despair despairfatigue outsiders joy hope liberation changemaking ideas debt writing howwewrite politics hierarchy hierarchies horizontality power us mutualaid voluntaryassociation selforganization humans humanity history engagement participation participatory hopelessness coercion bureaucracy mischief elitism unfreedom society civilization barbarism socialhierarchy abundance technology freedom egalitarianism creativity imagination possibility possibilities bullshitjobs socialconstructs narrative variety diversity gender 2020 money finance violence labor work zapatismo emilianozapata chiapas mexico autonomy indigenous indigeneity ezln</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:57be7509ae69/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davidgraeber"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2024"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rebeccasolnit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anarchism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:change"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:everyday"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ordinary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ows"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:occupywallstreet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marcusrediker"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:workingclass"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:class"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:struggle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inequality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1999"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1994"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:zapatistas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:battleofseattle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wto"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2011"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:astrataylor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lyndseystonebridge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hannaharendt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:activism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anthropology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marxism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marxists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sakalava"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:madagascar"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cynicism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:despair"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:despairfatigue"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:outsiders"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:joy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hope"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:liberation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:changemaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:debt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hierarchy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hierarchies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:horizontality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:power"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mutualaid"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:voluntaryassociation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:selforganization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:engagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:participation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:participatory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hopelessness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:coercion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bureaucracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mischief"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elitism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unfreedom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:civilization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:barbarism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialhierarchy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:abundance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freedom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:egalitarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:creativity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:imagination"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:possibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:possibilities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bullshitjobs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialconstructs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:narrative"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:variety"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:diversity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gender"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2020"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:money"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:finance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:violence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:zapatismo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:emilianozapata"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chiapas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mexico"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:autonomy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:indigenous"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:indigeneity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ezln"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-jazz-musicians-guide-to-the-universe/id1081584611?i=1000666609060">
    <title>The jazz musician’s guide to the universe - The Gray Area with Sean Illing - Apple Podcasts</title>
    <dc:date>2024-09-10T01:02:38+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-jazz-musicians-guide-to-the-universe/id1081584611?i=1000666609060</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["How is the origin of our universe like an improvised saxophone solo? This week, Sean Illing talks to Stephon Alexander, a theoretical physicist and world-class jazz musician. Alexander is the author of The Jazz of Physics and his most recent book, Fear of a Black Universe. This episode features music by Stephon Alexander throughout, from his latest 2024 album Spontaneous Fruit and his 2017 EP True to Self."

[also here:
https://open.spotify.com/episode/1lvWQfEfR13ndtlYHWOkl2 ]

[transcript:
https://app.podscribe.ai/episode/108939122 ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>seanilling thegrayarea stephonalexander jazz physics 2024 universe multiverse quantumphysics donaldharrison sonnyrollins johanneskepler astrophysics improvisation melvingibbs willcalhoun quantummechanics alberteinstein consciousness philosophy poetry metaphor notknowing uncertainty math mathematics arthurschopenhauer erwinschrödinger maxplanck nielsbohr ideas howwethink music musicmaking understanding matter science scientists research thinking cosmology leoncooper questionasking inquiry sound time quantumtheory</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:f2b2dcdb44ce/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:seanilling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thegrayarea"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stephonalexander"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jazz"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:physics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2024"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:multiverse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quantumphysics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:donaldharrison"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sonnyrollins"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johanneskepler"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:astrophysics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:improvisation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:melvingibbs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:willcalhoun"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quantummechanics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alberteinstein"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consciousness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:poetry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:metaphor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:notknowing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:uncertainty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:math"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mathematics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:arthurschopenhauer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:erwinschrödinger"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maxplanck"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nielsbohr"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwethink"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:music"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:musicmaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:understanding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:matter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scientists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:research"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cosmology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:leoncooper"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:questionasking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inquiry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sound"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:time"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quantumtheory"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMQJrNbgGIo">
    <title>Echo Chambers, Explained - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2024-08-22T01:10:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMQJrNbgGIo</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Sources:
Overview: What Is Media Literacy, Who Cares, and Why?, Gretchen Schwartz
RISE, DECLINE, AND RE-EMERGENCE OF MEDIA LITERACY EDUCATION IN THE UNITED STATES: 1960-2000, Ranjit Tigga
Echo Chambers and Epistemic Bubbles, C. Thi Nguyen
Understanding New Media Literacy: An Explorative Theoretical Framework, Tzu-Bin Lin, Jen-Yi Li, Feng Deng and Ling Lee
Why We Call Things 'Porn', C. Thi Nguyen"]]></description>
<dc:subject>horsesonyt 2024 echochambers authority behavior belief medialiteracy cthinguyen gretchenschwartz education learning howwelearn tzu-binlin jen-yili fengdeng linglee media culture understanding online internet web newmedia criticalthinking tv television socialmedia web2.0 twitter ideas information outrage misinformation news influence attention synthesis perspective knowledge subjectivity subtext evaluation motivation ideology power powerdynamics experts expertise division rhetoric us government billclinton richardnixon georgewbush barackoabama technocracy manipulation algorithms capitalism cynicism foxnews corporations reality michaelsorensen</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:40b9c64f7ce1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:horsesonyt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2024"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:echochambers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:behavior"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:belief"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:medialiteracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cthinguyen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gretchenschwartz"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tzu-binlin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jen-yili"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fengdeng"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:linglee"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:understanding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:newmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:criticalthinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tv"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:television"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web2.0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:information"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:outrage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:misinformation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:news"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:influence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:synthesis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:perspective"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:knowledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:subjectivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:subtext"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:evaluation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:motivation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:power"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:powerdynamics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:experts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:expertise"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:division"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rhetoric"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:government"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:billclinton"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:richardnixon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:georgewbush"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:barackoabama"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technocracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:manipulation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:algorithms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cynicism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:foxnews"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:corporations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:michaelsorensen"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://aeon.co/essays/the-realist-vs-the-pragmatist-view-of-epistemology">
    <title>The realist vs the pragmatist view of epistemology | Aeon Essays</title>
    <dc:date>2024-07-30T19:30:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://aeon.co/essays/the-realist-vs-the-pragmatist-view-of-epistemology</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Knowledge is often a matter of discovery. But when the nature of an enquiry itself is at question, it is an act of creation"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>célinehenne 2024 epistemology knowledge discovery inquiry creation creativity ideas thinking howwethink</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:7713ccdc8e37/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:célinehenne"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2024"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:epistemology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:knowledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:discovery"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inquiry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:creation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:creativity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwethink"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://aeon.co/essays/what-hannah-arendt-proposed-as-an-alternative-to-authenticity">
    <title>What Hannah Arendt proposed as an alternative to authenticity | Aeon Essays</title>
    <dc:date>2024-07-19T16:01:41+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://aeon.co/essays/what-hannah-arendt-proposed-as-an-alternative-to-authenticity</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["In her final unfinished work, Hannah Arendt mounted an incisive critique of the idea that we are in search of our true selves"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>hannaharendt 2024 identity authenticity samantharosehill ideas values beliefs meaning meaningmaking self knowing unknowing solitude self-belonging belonging uncertainty freedom staugustine willing will individuation disharmony existence heidegger jean-paulsartre sartre albertcamus camus existentialism carmenleadege everyday karljaspers rousseau simonedebeauvoir saintaugustine augustine sensemaking augustineofhippo makingsense</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:92226c206583/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hannaharendt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2024"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:identity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:authenticity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:samantharosehill"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:values"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:beliefs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meaning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meaningmaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:self"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:knowing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unknowing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:solitude"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:self-belonging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:belonging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:uncertainty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freedom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:staugustine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:willing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:will"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:individuation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:disharmony"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:existence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:heidegger"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jean-paulsartre"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sartre"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:albertcamus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:camus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:existentialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:carmenleadege"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:everyday"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:karljaspers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rousseau"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:simonedebeauvoir"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:saintaugustine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:augustine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sensemaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:augustineofhippo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:makingsense"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://harpers.org/archive/2024/07/yesterdays-men-alan-jacobs/">
    <title>Yesterday’s Men, by Alan Jacobs</title>
    <dc:date>2024-06-19T02:32:24+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://harpers.org/archive/2024/07/yesterdays-men-alan-jacobs/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><dc:subject>alanjacobs 2024 rolandbarthes jacquesderrida ideas myth literature criticism northropfrye archetype ritual symbol literarycriticism structure michelfoucault foucault georgeeliot percyshelley dante divinecomedy whauden freud discursivity literarytheory thinking howwethink giambattistavico rhetoric peterlombard decline wisdom ancestors barbarism theology culture descartes poeticwisdom philosophy rationalism poetry homer metaphysics mythmaking philology comparativeliterature comparitivestudies universalknowledge knowledge universality isaiahberlin conuter-enlightenment society justusmöser charlesdickens missionaries anthropology ruthbenedict culturalimperialism culturalanthropology jamesgeorgefrazer carljung jung commonnature gskirk wkcguthrie religion ernstcassirer émiledurkheim seasons purpose magic science tseliot jamesjoyce thewasteland ulysses agriculture psychology hitler nazism wwii ww2 geneweltfish humanism identitypolitics scripture bible thefamilyofman humanrights humanity mirceaeliade josephcamp</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:7f5aeafae8d3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alanjacobs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2024"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rolandbarthes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jacquesderrida"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:myth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:criticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:northropfrye"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:archetype"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ritual"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:symbol"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:literarycriticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:structure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:michelfoucault"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:foucault"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:georgeeliot"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:percyshelley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dante"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:divinecomedy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:whauden"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freud"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:discursivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:literarytheory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwethink"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:giambattistavico"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rhetoric"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:peterlombard"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:decline"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wisdom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ancestors"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:barbarism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:theology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:descartes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:poeticwisdom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rationalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:poetry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:homer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:metaphysics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mythmaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:comparativeliterature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:comparitivestudies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universalknowledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:knowledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:isaiahberlin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conuter-enlightenment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:justusmöser"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charlesdickens"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:missionaries"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anthropology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ruthbenedict"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culturalimperialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culturalanthropology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jamesgeorgefrazer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:carljung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jung"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:commonnature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gskirk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wkcguthrie"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:religion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ernstcassirer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:émiledurkheim"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:seasons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:purpose"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:magic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tseliot"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jamesjoyce"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thewasteland"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ulysses"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:agriculture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hitler"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nazism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wwii"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ww2"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:geneweltfish"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:identitypolitics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scripture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bible"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thefamilyofman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanrights"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mirceaeliade"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:josephcamp"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eegzTvPT6xY">
    <title>An Honest Living: A Memoir of Peculiar Itineraries with Steven Salaita - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2024-03-14T18:34:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eegzTvPT6xY</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["In this episode we welcome Steven Salaita back to MAKC to discuss his most recent book An Honest Living: A Memoir of Peculiar Itineraries

Book Description:

In the summer of 2014, Steven Salaita was fired from a tenured position in American Indian Studies at the University of Illinois for his unwavering stance on Palestinian human rights and other political controversies. A year later, he landed a job in Lebanon, but that, too, ended badly. With no other recourse, Salaita found himself trading his successful academic career for an hourly salaried job. Told primarily from behind the wheel of a school bus―a vantage point from which Salaita explores social anxiety, suburban architecture, political alienation, racial oppression, working-class solidarity, pro­fessional malfeasance, and the joy of chauffeuring children to and from school―An Honest Living describes the author’s decade of turbulent post-professorial life and his recent return to the lectern.

Steven Salaita was practically born to a life in academia. His father taught physics at an HBCU in southern West Virginia and his earliest memories are of life on campus and the cinder walls of the classroom. It was no surprise that he ended up in the classroom straight after graduate school. Yet three of his university jobs―Virginia Tech, the University of Illinois, and the American University of Beirut [AUB] ―ended in public controversy. Shaken by his sudden notoriety and false claims of antisemitism, Salaita found himself driving a school bus to make ends meet. While some considered this just punishment for his anti-Zionist beliefs, Steven found that driving a bus provided him with not just a means to pay the bills but a path toward freedom of thought.

Now ten years later, with a job at American University at Cairo, Salaita reconciles his past with his future. His restlessness has found a home, yet his return to academe is met with the same condition of fugitivity from whence he was expelled: an occasion for defiance, not conciliation. An Honest Living presents an intimate personal narrative of the author’s decade of professional joys and travails."]]></description>
<dc:subject>stevensalaita millennialsarekillingcapitalism 2024 academia highered highereducation palestine israel colleges universities zionism capitalism anxiety quiet socialpressure socialfunctions cliques labor work antizionism solitude grace jaredware oppression repression censorship principles solidarity media circumspection rulingclass brandequity radicalism orthodoxy careerism socialmedia compromises medialiteracy gatekeeping tastemakers activism scholars scholarship promotion education socialcapital cliquishness decolonization kinship community ostracism exposure mainstreammedia transactionalrelationships aspirations branding personalbranding audience ideas discussion debate networking values transactional conversation organizing presence onlinepresence internet online culture algorithms attention consumerism 2014 2017 ulteriormotives motivation politics workplacepolitics workplace left socialdemocrats exploitation sensationalism snitching snitches busdriving schoolbus children language immigrants us unemployment</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:7dcf0578ec40/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stevensalaita"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:millennialsarekillingcapitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2024"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:palestine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:israel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colleges"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:zionism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anxiety"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quiet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialpressure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialfunctions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cliques"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:antizionism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:solitude"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:grace"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jaredware"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:oppression"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:repression"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:censorship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:principles"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:solidarity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:circumspection"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rulingclass"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brandequity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:radicalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:orthodoxy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:careerism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:compromises"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:medialiteracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gatekeeping"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tastemakers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:activism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scholars"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scholarship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:promotion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialcapital"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cliquishness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:decolonization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kinship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ostracism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:exposure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mainstreammedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:transactionalrelationships"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aspirations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:branding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:personalbranding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:audience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:discussion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:debate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:networking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:values"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:transactional"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conversation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:organizing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:presence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:onlinepresence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:algorithms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consumerism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2014"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2017"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ulteriormotives"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:motivation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:workplacepolitics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:workplace"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:left"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialdemocrats"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:exploitation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sensationalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:snitching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:snitches"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:busdriving"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schoolbus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:immigrants"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unemployment"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-OFnHwuTBg">
    <title>&quot;Anything that comes out of a writer is fiction.&quot; | Writer Benjamín Labatut | Louisiana Channel - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2024-02-01T02:45:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-OFnHwuTBg</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[""Fiction is a human tool we developed to give reality a human shape to understand what is presented to us, and that goes on at all levels. It is part of perception. There is a large part of fiction in perception itself." Meet the award-winning Chilean writer Benjamín Labatut.

It has been said that Benjamín Labatut writes fiction that, from the first page, questions the parameters of reality and what we understand by literature. For instance, in his bestselling novel 'When We Cease to Understand the World' (2020), which weaves a web of associations between the founders of quantum mechanics and the evils of two world wars, where it is hard to distinguish the borders between fiction and reality.

"Anything that comes out of a writer is fiction. In non-fiction, they are really kind of naïve. Fiction is something that is not appreciated for what it is. It is not the making up of a story; it doesn't have to do with imagination. Fiction is a tool, it is a human tool we developed to give reality a human shape to understand what is presented to us, and that goes on at all levels; it is part of perception. There is a large part of fiction in perception itself; it is not just stories. It goes on all the time; we just don't notice that it is going on", says Labatut.

Therefore, Labatut's writing process is very much driven by research: "I don't worry much about the shapes of the stories; it is all about research; I try to find things. To me, finding some other person's phrase is more important than coming up with it myself. It is the part that I enjoy. In that sense, writing has become more akin to walking and picking stuff above the ground." 

"While I am researching it, it will determine many things. I am not just looking for data, I am looking for the shape of the story, and that's got to do with what is available. For example, in certain texts, there are scraps of information, lesser-known characters, and people who left no mark on history. Then I must create fiction around it, but the heart of the story is something that comes out of the research. So, to me, it is more akin to looking at the world than to thinking about it," he says.

What is most important to Labatut as a writer is 'fascination': "Fascination is the key to all of this, and I think that is what writing should aspire to at its best. And the Latin root of the word comes from 'fascinus', which means the male sexual organ. To be aroused is something art does in a very special way. It is an excitement; it is not just entertainment. It should touch you very deeply." 

"You should be moved by what you are investigating. You should be moved by the world and transmit that. That feeling you get when you perceive or bump into something hard to believe or so beautiful that it is hard to put into words. Fascination lies at the root of everything that I try to do. The world is becoming so that it is very hard to feel fascinated. We are dulled down." 

Benjamín Labatut is a Chilean author born in Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1980. He spent his childhood in The Hague, Buenos Aires, and Lima, before settling in Chile, where he currently lives and works. His first book of short stories, 'Antarctica starts here', won the 2009 Caza de Letras Prize in Mexico, and the Santiago Municipal Prize, in Chile. His second book, 'After the Light', consists of scientific, philosophical, and historical notes on the void, written after a deep personal crisis. His third book, 'When We Cease to Understand the World' has been translated into more than 20 languages. The English edition of the book was shortlisted for the International Booker Prize in 2021. In July 2021, Barack Obama included the book in his last reading list for the summer, which Obama shared on his Twitter account. It was selected for the New York Times Book Review's "10 Best Books of 2021" list.

Benjamín Labatut was interviewed by his Danish translator Peter Adolphsen in connection with the Louisiana Literature festival in August 2022 at the Louisiana Museum of Modern Art in Denmark."

[also here:
https://vimeo.com/837912943
https://channel.louisiana.dk/video/benjam%c3%adn-labatut-fiction-gives-reality-a-human-shape

Goes with another video:
""Writing should give access to the world." | Writer Benjamín Labatut"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohsQ3WtdWoM ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>2022 benjamínlabatut writing literature fiction nonfiction science howwewrite research wonder fascination reality robertobolaño pascalquignard eliotweinberger williamburroughs wgsebald form stories storytelling citation cv canon information text texts knowledge art entertainment despair inspiration boredom books reading howweread references stealing ideas excitement pace speed style beauty poetry publishing audience audiencesofone relationships discovery self-expression blogs blogging obsessions self identity writers crisis brain howwethink nature jabaker theperegrine spirit soul meaning meaningmaking sensemaking expression makingsense universe thinking philosophy life living</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:9262dbacad7c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2022"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:benjamínlabatut"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nonfiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:research"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wonder"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fascination"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robertobolaño"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pascalquignard"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:eliotweinberger"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:williamburroughs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wgsebald"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:form"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stories"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:storytelling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:citation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cv"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:canon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:information"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:text"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:texts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:knowledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:entertainment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:despair"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inspiration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:boredom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:references"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stealing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:excitement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pace"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:speed"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:style"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:beauty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:poetry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:audience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:audiencesofone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:relationships"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:discovery"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:self-expression"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:blogs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:blogging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:obsessions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:self"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:identity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:crisis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brain"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwethink"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jabaker"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:theperegrine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:spirit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:soul"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meaning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meaningmaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sensemaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:expression"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:makingsense"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:living"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://every.to/p/writing-is-a-tool-for-making-new-ideas">
    <title>Writing is a Tool for Making New Ideas - Every</title>
    <dc:date>2022-10-20T04:38:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://every.to/p/writing-is-a-tool-for-making-new-ideas</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[[See also:
https://interconnected.org/home/2022/10/12/filtered ]

"Some writers love planning. The legendary creative nonfiction writer and teacher John McPhee, who helped shape the voice of the New Yorker, draws detailed structural diagrams and outlines every story with extraordinary precision before he embarks on a draft.

Readers can be forgiven for assuming that extensive outlining is the norm. In school, English teachers assign five paragraph essays that proceed in lockstep from thesis to conclusion. The way many of us are taught to write makes writing appear to be the act of typing out a preexisting idea.

This is the assumption most people start with:

1. Figure out what you want to say.
2. Write it down.
3. Congrats, you’re a writer!

Makes sense, right? And indeed, that’s how many writers do what they do. It’s a valid, effective, and popular approach to craft. But for me, reading and writing feel surprisingly similar: I discover the story as I go.

There’s a major plot twist two thirds of the way through Neon Fever Dream that reframes everything leading up to it. I didn’t see the twist coming as I was writing the rough draft of the novel. I just reached that point in the story and realized what had to happen next. It blew my mind, and from what I’ve heard, many readers shared my experience.

Likewise, I didn’t start this essay with a plan. Matt Webb, author of the consistently insightful and delightful blog, Interconnected, planted the seed that grew into this essay with a tweet:

<blockquote>Writing, as a process, is almost impossibly inventive. I know it, and know it, and am reminded so often, and yet — how on earth do new angles spontaneously emerge, grinding through the words</blockquote>

You can certainly capture an idea by writing it down. But you can also explore an idea by writing it down, and the results may surprise you. The fact that the results can surprise you is surprising in itself. Why would typing out a thought change what you think? 

When I’m not writing, I’m often surfing. Something most non-surfers don’t realize is that surfing is mostly waiting. You paddle out and then wait for the right wave to roll in. When a promising set rears up out of the deep, you try to catch it. If you hesitate, even for a moment, you’ll either miss the wave or, worse, get sucked over the falls as it breaks. To catch a wave, you have to fully commit.

I suspect the same principle is at work when writing about something changes your mind. The brain is an intricate, sparkling, densely interconnected maze—an easy place for ideas to hide in vague generalities. But writing forces you to commit to specifics as surely as surfers must commit to waves. Seeing an idea reveal itself on the page, you may find yourself entranced or repulsed or inspired by its specificity, its naked meaning.

By externalizing your thoughts, writing puts you into conversation with yourself. It’s always easier to diagnose other people’s problems, and to identify opportunities they might be missing. Just so, writing from the heart gives you a new vantage on you. This is certainly useful if you’re writing for an audience, but it’s at least as useful if you’re writing for yourself.

Next time you’re struggling with a big decision, write down a complete explanation of the situation just as you would describe it to a close friend or mentor. It can’t hurt, and it will clarify your thinking. You never know, it might even, in Matt’s memorable words, open up a new angle for you—a real life plot twist.

I didn’t start this essay with a plan. I started this essay with a sentence: “Reading and writing feel surprisingly similar: I discover the story as I go.” Then I followed where that sentence led, like Theseus blindly following Ariadne’s twine out of the labyrinth.

So, what happens next? You’ll know when I do."]]></description>
<dc:subject>writing howwethink 2022 thinking howwewrite mattwebb communication eliotpeper waysofthinking decisionmaking clarification understanding ideas howwelearn learning language process mindchanging johnmcphee</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:5e99913278f1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwethink"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2022"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mattwebb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:eliotpeper"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:waysofthinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:decisionmaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:clarification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:understanding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:process"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mindchanging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnmcphee"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.vox.com/culture/23005220/benjamin-labatut-interview-when-we-cease-to-understand-the-world">
    <title>Benjamín Labatut interview: When We Cease to Understand the World - Vox</title>
    <dc:date>2022-07-14T16:08:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.vox.com/culture/23005220/benjamin-labatut-interview-when-we-cease-to-understand-the-world</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Benjamín Labatut’s When We Cease to Understand the World is one of the weirdest and most beautiful books I’ve read in a while. It deals with the horror of trying to understand the world, and how as the scientific concepts we use to try to describe reality edge closer and closer to reality, they move further away from the mundane world that we see and live in with our small human senses.

We think that we live in a world where space and time function in predictable and rational ways. But physics tells us that the universe is full of black holes that exist at both sides of time, and that on a quantum level, mass exists not as a concrete fact but as a possibility. How, When We Cease to Understand the World seems to ask, do we just live in a world that functions like this?

These are rich, heady questions, and they’re hard to parse out with any degree of nuance. So I met Labatut live on Zoom to talk them through, and then some. In our full (captioned) conversation above, you can learn why Labatut considers himself an “epiphany junkie,” the limitations he sees in science, and why he hates the novel.

A few weeks later, I sat down with Unexplainable host Noam Hassenfeld to further discuss Labutut’s book and the aftershocks of the revelation, asking “What’s real?” Listen to the conversation in the player below or wherever you get podcasts."

[See also:
https://www.vox.com/culture/22972613/when-we-cease-to-understand-the-world-review-benjamin-labatut ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>constancegrady 2022 science reality philosophy thinking curiosity noamhassenfeld howwewrite writing learning howwelearn perspective uncertainty howwethink understanding wisdom form narrative stories storytelling time space blackholes quantummechanics benjamínlabatut epiphanies physics mathematics math religion belief life living ideas mind bodies body wonder dread psychology being existence context seeing perception whatmatters importance sensemaking reinvention interconnected interconnectedness perceiving mysticism magic esotericism shinichimochizuki alexandergrothendieck františekvláčil annecarson robertocalasso howweread reading juanforn eliotweinberger luissagasti netflix novels structure interconnectivity quantumphysics quantumtheory makingsense</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:66dc8e5ab568/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:constancegrady"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2022"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:curiosity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:noamhassenfeld"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:perspective"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:uncertainty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwethink"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:understanding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wisdom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:form"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:narrative"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stories"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:storytelling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:time"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:space"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:blackholes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quantummechanics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:benjamínlabatut"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:epiphanies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:physics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mathematics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:math"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:religion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:belief"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:living"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mind"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bodies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:body"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wonder"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:being"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:existence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:context"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:seeing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:perception"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:whatmatters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:importance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sensemaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reinvention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interconnected"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interconnectedness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:perceiving"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mysticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:magic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:esotericism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:shinichimochizuki"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alexandergrothendieck"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:františekvláčil"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:annecarson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robertocalasso"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:juanforn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:eliotweinberger"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:luissagasti"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:netflix"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:novels"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:structure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interconnectivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quantumphysics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quantumtheory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:makingsense"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/newsletter/2022-07-09/benjamin-labatut-when-we-cease-to-understand-the-world-novel-essential-arts">
    <title>A novel by Benjamín Labatut explores the dark side of science — and the color blue - Los Angeles Times</title>
    <dc:date>2022-07-14T15:55:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/newsletter/2022-07-09/benjamin-labatut-when-we-cease-to-understand-the-world-novel-essential-arts</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Blue has sent me down a rabbit hole. Specifically, Prussian blue, which appears as a silent, deadly character in Benjamín Labatut’s 2020 novel, “When We Cease to Understand the World.”

This slender volume — it is only 192 pages long — weaves together, in engrossing and disquieting ways, stories of scientific discovery. They are stories rife with obsession in the pursuit of knowledge but also the devastating ways in which that knowledge is ultimately deployed.

Hence, a chapter that takes the reader into the history of Prussian blue, the first modern synthetic pigment, created by Johann Jacob Diesbach in the early 18th century — which critically provided a stable source of blue for European artists at a time when blue pigments were wildly expensive and difficult to source. (These were generally derived from natural materials such as lapis lazuli, which had to be imported from Afghanistan.)

Prussian blue, also known as Berlin blue, after the city in which it was devised, makes its earliest known appearance in an early 18th century painting titled “The Entombment of Christ,” by Adriaen or Pieter van der Werff — in which the Virgin Mary’s luminous blue mantle catches the eye amid a palette of earthier, fleshier tones. (The painting’s attributions vary depending on the source, likely because the Van Der Werffs were brothers, with Pieter working in Adriaen’s studio, where he often made copies of existing works. As a result, different versions of this scene, under Adriaen’s name, appear in different European collections. In his novel, Labatut attributes the work to Pieter.)

Regardless of who painted what, by the 19th century, Prussian blue had developed an artistic fan base as far away as Japan, where artists such as Hokusai used it in landscape prints such as his iconic “Great Wave Off Kanagawa.” (The version seen above is from the permanent collection at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art.)

And that’s just the beginning of the story for Prussian blue. Because when it’s combined with diluted sulfuric acid, it turns into hydrogen cyanide, otherwise known as cyanide, one of the deadliest poisons known to man. (“Cyan” is a reference to its origin as a blue pigment.) It is one of humanity’s more devastating inventions — a commercial version of cyanide, Zyklon B, was deployed by the Nazis in their genocide chambers.

Prussian blue, writes Labatut, is “the blue that shines not only in Van Gogh’s ‘Starry Night’ and in the water of Hokusai’s ‘Great Wave,’ but also on the uniforms of the infantrymen of the Prussian army, as though something in the colour’s chemical structure involved violence: a fault, a shadow, an existential station passed down from those experiments in which the alchemist dismembered living animals to create it, assembling their broken bodies in dreadful chimeras.”

“When We Cease to Understand the World” is inspired by scientific history, but it is not a straight historical account. It is a novel. And if at first it reads like a collection of essays about the history of science, as the book progresses, it expands into more metaphysical and mystical spaces — all of which are ultimately woven together with the appearance of a mysterious character called “the night gardener.”

Critic John Banville, in the Guardian, described the book as a “nonfiction novel.” I think of it more as a dramatization, in novel form, inspired by real events. However you choose to categorize it, the book functions as a series of linked meditations on the nature of discovery and what it means to confront that which we do not — and cannot — know. Over five spare but poetic chapters, Labatut covers color and mass death. He also writes about the singularity and black holes, along with the scientists who aimed to quantify these phenomena.

Labatut, a Chilean writer of Dutch descent, originally published the novel in Spanish in 2020 as “Un Verdor Terrible.” Last fall, New York Review Books released an English-language translation by Adrian Nathan West. It quickly materialized on former President Obama’s list of summer reads. It was also shortlisted for the International Booker Prize and the National Book Award for Translated Literature.

I’ll confess that I knew little about Labatut or the book when I picked it up shortly before going on vacation. It was an impulse buy: I was intrigued by its scientific inspirations and the odd, diagrammatic nature of the cover. But I quickly found myself engrossed by the story it presents — of men who compulsively race to decode the workings of nature only to face chaos, violence and uncertainty.

We look to science for answers, but sometimes all we find is ourselves."]]></description>
<dc:subject>carolinamiranda benjamínlabatut 2021 books blue color history writing chile poetry howwewrite science singularity blackholes epiphanies quantummechanics physics mathematics math religion belief uncertainty stories narrative storytelling life living ideas mind bodies body wonder dread psychology philosophy being existence context seeing perception whatmatters importance sensemaking reinvention learning howwelearn reality form interconnected interconnectedness perceiving mysticism magic esotericism shinichimochizuki alexandergrothendieck interconnectivity quantumphysics singularitarianism quantumtheory makingsense</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:7b8f89558b5e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:carolinamiranda"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:benjamínlabatut"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2021"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:blue"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:color"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chile"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:poetry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:singularity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:blackholes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:epiphanies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quantummechanics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:physics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mathematics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:math"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:religion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:belief"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:uncertainty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stories"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:narrative"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:storytelling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:living"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mind"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bodies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:body"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wonder"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:being"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:existence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:context"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:seeing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:perception"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:whatmatters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:importance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sensemaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reinvention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:form"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interconnected"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interconnectedness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:perceiving"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mysticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:magic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:esotericism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:shinichimochizuki"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alexandergrothendieck"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interconnectivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quantumphysics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:singularitarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quantumtheory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:makingsense"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.nyrb.com/collections/new-york-review-books/products/when-we-cease-to-understand-the-world?_pos=1&amp;_sid=adc3a07ae&amp;_ss=r&amp;variant=37890166784168">
    <title>When We Cease to Understand the World – New York Review Books</title>
    <dc:date>2022-07-14T15:51:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.nyrb.com/collections/new-york-review-books/products/when-we-cease-to-understand-the-world?_pos=1&amp;_sid=adc3a07ae&amp;_ss=r&amp;variant=37890166784168</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["One of The New York Times Book Review’s 10 Best Books of 2021

Shortlisted for the 2021 International Booker Prize and the 2021 National Book Award for Translated Literature

When We Cease to Understand the World is a book about the complicated links between scientific and mathematical discovery, madness, and destruction.

Fritz Haber, Alexander Grothendieck, Werner Heisenberg, Erwin Schrödinger—these are some of luminaries into whose troubled lives Benjamín Labatut thrusts the reader, showing us how they grappled with the most profound questions of existence. They have strokes of unparalleled genius, alienate friends and lovers, descend into isolation and insanity. Some of their discoveries reshape human life for the better; others pave the way to chaos and unimaginable suffering. The lines are never clear.

At a breakneck pace and with a wealth of disturbing detail, Labatut uses the imaginative resources of fiction to tell the stories of the scientists and mathematicians who expanded our notions of the possible.

On October 21, 2021, Benjamín Labatut discussed When We Cease to Understand the World with author Lawrence Weschler. This virtual event is part of New York Review Books’ ongoing series with Brooklyn’s Community Bookstore.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ch9YMmpzQKc

(also here) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3VyxWvsJGM "]]></description>
<dc:subject>llawrenceweschler 2021 science fiction literature books benjamínlabatut wgsebald howwelearn howweread howwethink howwewrite writing thinking philosophy creativity alberteinstein nielsbohr solvayconference alexandergrothendieck relativity quantummechanics understanding singularity multiplicity intelligence karlschwarzschild erwinschrodinger blackholes chile epiphanies physics mathematics math religion belief uncertainty stories narrative storytelling life living ideas mind bodies body wonder dread psychology being existence context seeing perception whatmatters importance sensemaking reinvention learning reality form interconnected interconnectedness perceiving mysticism magic esotericism shinichimochizuki erwinschrödinger wernerheisenberg interconnectivity quantumphysics singularitarianism quantumtheory makingsense</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:29c622cac559/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:llawrenceweschler"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2021"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:benjamínlabatut"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wgsebald"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwethink"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:creativity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alberteinstein"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nielsbohr"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:solvayconference"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alexandergrothendieck"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:relativity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quantummechanics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:understanding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:singularity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:multiplicity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:intelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:karlschwarzschild"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:erwinschrodinger"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:blackholes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chile"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:epiphanies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:physics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mathematics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:math"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:religion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:belief"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:uncertainty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stories"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:narrative"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:storytelling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:living"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mind"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bodies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:body"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wonder"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:being"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:existence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:context"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:seeing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:perception"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:whatmatters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:importance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sensemaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reinvention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:form"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interconnected"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interconnectedness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:perceiving"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mysticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:magic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:esotericism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:shinichimochizuki"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:erwinschrödinger"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wernerheisenberg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interconnectivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quantumphysics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:singularitarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quantumtheory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:makingsense"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJXadXhP5ew">
    <title>Monstruos y milagros de la ciencia: Benjamín Labatut habla de Un verdor terrible - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2022-07-14T15:42:33+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJXadXhP5ew</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["“¡Dios no juega a los dados con el universo!” le gritó Einstein a Niels Bohr, en la Conferencia Solvay, realizada en Bruselas en 1927, uno de los encuentros científicos claves para el nacimiento de la mecánica cuántica.  Bohr, años antes, tomó como discípulo a Heisenberg convenciéndolo de que al hablar de los átomos el lenguaje solo puede ser usado como poesía.  La crónica de estos sucesos da forma a Un verdor terrible (Anagrama, 2020), del escritor Benjamín Labatut, donde confluyen la literatura y la ciencia.

En las páginas de este texto híbrido e inclasificable, donde se cruzan la ficción y la no ficción, se narran las primeras y acaloradas discusiones científicas de la mecánica cuántica o el nacimiento de la teoría de la relatividad, entrelazados con historias alucinantes de algunos de los más importantes científicos de la historia, como las exploraciones matemáticas de Alexander Grothendieck, que le llevaron al delirio místico; o los orígenes del cianuro de hidrógeno que los nazis terminarían usando para suicidarse y asesinar a miembros de sus propias familias al verse derrotados.

En esta conversación Labatut nos compartirá sus inquietudes y experiencias en torno a cómo la ciencia puede convertirse en literatura."]]></description>
<dc:subject>benjamínlabatut 2021 wgsebald robertobolaño borges science literature howwelearn howweread howwethink howwewrite writing thinking philosophy creativity adamcurtis williamburroughs nicanorparra kafka alberteinstein nielsbohr solvayconference fiction alexandergrothendieck relativity quantummechanics understanding singularity multiplicity intelligence karlschwarzschild erwinschrodinger chile epiphanies physics mathematics math religion belief uncertainty stories narrative storytelling life living ideas mind bodies body wonder dread psychology being existence context seeing perception whatmatters importance sensemaking reinvention learning reality form interconnected interconnectedness perceiving mysticism magic esotericism shinichimochizuki eliotweinberger erwinschrödinger wernerheisenberg interconnectivity quantumphysics singularitarianism quantumtheory makingsense</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:07e1a41b1f2c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:benjamínlabatut"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2021"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wgsebald"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robertobolaño"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:borges"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwethink"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:creativity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:adamcurtis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:williamburroughs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nicanorparra"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kafka"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alberteinstein"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nielsbohr"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:solvayconference"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alexandergrothendieck"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:relativity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quantummechanics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:understanding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:singularity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:multiplicity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:intelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:karlschwarzschild"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:erwinschrodinger"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chile"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:epiphanies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:physics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mathematics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:math"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:religion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:belief"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:uncertainty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stories"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:narrative"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:storytelling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:living"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mind"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bodies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:body"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wonder"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:being"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:existence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:context"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:seeing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:perception"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:whatmatters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:importance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sensemaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reinvention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:form"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interconnected"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interconnectedness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:perceiving"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mysticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:magic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:esotericism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:shinichimochizuki"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:eliotweinberger"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:erwinschrödinger"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wernerheisenberg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interconnectivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quantumphysics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:singularitarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quantumtheory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:makingsense"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://sub.rescapement.com/p/cover-watches-and-accessibility-of?s=r">
    <title>‘Cover Watches’ and Accessibility of Ideas in the Watch World</title>
    <dc:date>2022-03-27T21:05:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://sub.rescapement.com/p/cover-watches-and-accessibility-of?s=r</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["[Ed. note: Friend of Rescapement Agaki sent in this essay back in January. Coincidentally, I finally got around to editing it this week, just before Swatch and Omega broke the internet with the MoonSwatch. So while it doesn’t directly reference the MoonSwatch, it’s kind of about the MoonSwatch, as you’ll see.]

"The power of Cover Watches, adjacent marketing, and accessibility for new collectors
By: Agaki (@agakistuff)

Once in a while, an exceptional cover song is exalted into a status equal to or greater than the original. Johnny Cash’s, ‘Hurt’ or Amy Winehouse’s, ‘Valerie’. Jazz and blues standards and immortal songs make their way into the music lexicon like the re-telling of a fairytale. Sample-based songs transpose from one context to another. Christmas songs follow a vague set of rules that nobody can really define but we all just, ‘know’. (Please listen to ’Christmas in Harlem’ and ’Lights On’, Christmas Hip-Hop for the family). Covers and re-interpretations are at the very core of modern music. This concept of carrying ideas is something worth exploring in other fields.

From Breguet to Benzinger: A Bridge to Something New

Jaeger-Benzinger is an independent brand that hails from Baden-Baden, Germany. If you relate geographical locations by proximity to sports teams as I do, Baden-Baden is nearest to Karlsruher SC (notable for producing Oliver Kahn) and VfB Stuttgart (notable for that one time I helped a bunch of tourists in Stuttgart kits catch the train and being Bundesliga Champions in 2006-7). The Jaeger-Benzinger Edition 3.3 Vintage is a 38mm watch with a repurposed FHF 96 movement, hence the “vintage” in the name. The guilloche dial and engraved movement come courtesy of master engraver Jochen Benzinger. 

For the description of the 3.3 Vintage Jaeger-Benzinger states the following:

<blockquote>“Jaeger & Benzinger have always been vocal about their love of Abraham-Louis Breguet’s style and, whereas with their other Editions this has been tempered with modern touches, this limited-edition Edition 3 Vintage is their unabashed take on this look.”</blockquote>

Is Jaeger-Benzinger an exceptional alternative to a Breguet? Yes. It’s a high-value proposition, hand-engraved independent watch. There’s nothing like it in this price range. For fun and at a little extra cost I had my initials engraved onto the movement. This increases resale value for people with the initials, ‘AB’. Or people with the rare AB blood-type. Or start-of-alphabet enthusiasts. Gotta think long term about my investment here right?

What’s more important than the watch is reflecting on why buying a watch like this is an essential step in building a watch collection. Especially to those early on in the lifetime journey of collecting watches.

Over a year ago a few things allowed me to finally dive into the Mariana Trench of watch collecting. I’d reached a comfortable place in my other collecting hobbies where I could pass on most things that came my way. The process of shedding my raggedy high school clothes and refreshing my wardrobe into some semblance of an adult was almost complete yet lacked... icing. A watch. I knew this was a rabbit hole. Yet, armed with a recent bump up in my pay I, as the kids say, yeeted myself into the world of watches.

The mission was to wholly upgrade my unbranded street-stall quartz watches. Maybe gain a fun new research-heavy hobby. But where does somebody with no real prior reference go? I don’t have a story about my grandfather’s father’s son’s military Patek/Rolex that survived the second Captain America: Civil War. My mom bought me cheap fake gold watches when I was a teenager because I liked gold, wearing things on my wrist and because she just thought they were neat. So to cross a bridge into something new, you have to find the bridge first right?

Unintentionally the greatest single piece of modern watch advertising

Contemporary fashion and celebrities are the path toward a watch addiction for a layman. What’s this ‘Patek’ thing I keep hearing in these bars? That watch that Nadal is wearing during a match is crazy, right? Young people need a modern icon to relate watches to. A ‘Nadal’ Richard Mille or ‘Federer’ Rolex is relatable. This “adjacent’” marketing is the quickest way to someone’s heart. The LVMH group are masters of this and you can read these choice words straight out of Jean-Claude Biver’s mouth.

There’s a weird resistance to modern celebrity in watch circles. What if Hiroshi Fujiwara is to me what Paul Newman is to older collectors? As a brand, recontextualizing can expand your demographic even if your current core audience doesn’t appreciate it. You might not remember the Zenith x Lupin the Third collaboration series, an obscure collab to most but this was Zenith as a brand speaking my language.  The first, unique example sold at auction for CHF189,000, so somebody else must speak my language too! Rolex has known this for an eternity. The entirety of Hublot marketing is built around this recontextualization idea with a lot of help from outside sources mixed in: ‘NEW WATCH ALERT, HUBLOTS.’ These bridge-building tactics (or, “gimmicks” if you’re a cynical no-fun type) are a way into a brand.

My way in as a streetwear-inclined guy originated from an image of a watch posted on the account of tastemaker @hidden.ny. Stopping my infinite feed scrolling and seeing an octagonal looking shiny thing I thought, ‘Hey this looks really really cool, this’ll be like $5,000 or something right? Guess I’ll save up.’ Google-fu led to this article on GQ, where I learned how “[streetwear brand] Alyx transformed the Royal Oak” and this shiny octagonal “Royal Oak” cost way more than $5,000. Sure, I didn’t know anything about Audemars Piguet, but I was somewhat familiar with Alyx. This led me down my first watch-related rabbit hole, eventually asking perhaps the most common question of a new watch collector: “This is great, but how can I not sell my kidney to get this?” The core of the classic newbie struggle planted the seed of a concept I’d like to dub the Cover Watch™.

The Cover Watch™

There’s a big difference between something that’s made to look like another thing – and something that’s a take on another thing. Plenty of watch brands offer cheaper alternatives to their more expensive counterparts. Where a watch brand can excel is providing its own take on an established idea or design language. This is the Cover watch™. The cover watch is a unique watch that is riffing on the language of another watch, like a cover song. To buy a cover watch is to buy into an idea and way of thinking about design.

This brings us to the greatest strength of the cover watch for a new collector. Accessibility of ideas. I wanted to have a piece of the Genta Royal Oak design language on my wrist. There were a lot of “alternatives” presented to me that didn’t quite scratch the itch. A lot of “Top 10 CHEAP Royal Oak Alternatives” articles and videos.

Let’s frame it this way: I have an urge to listen to “Fly Me To The Moon”. Then you tell me to listen to “My Way” instead. Yeah, we’re kinda close, but no! I want “Fly Me To The Moon” whether it’s Sinatra or Buble or some person in their bedroom. If I want an octagon-y watch case, why am I presented with all these things that just… aren’t an octagon? This conundrum drives many laymen to fake watches because there aren’t any decent alternatives. The true Cover Watch is the antidote. The Cover Watch retains the vibes. It’s a shameless celebration of the elements of design that make you fall in love with the stuff that’s just inaccessible sometimes. Like a movie remake, companies even cover their own watches from time to time. The Longines Tuxedos, the Omega Seamaster 1948. The Massena Lab Uni-Racer is a cover watch too [Ed. note: Of course, so is the MoonSwatch]. When done right these watches are a celebration for the collector. An accessible way for people to get into a subsection of watches they enjoy without selling an organ.

Done right, much like an iconic cover song, cover watches can even carve out their own place amongst the collective watch sphere, as the CasiOak did (even if Casio says the watch actually wasn’t inspired by the Royal Oak). It’s quite the paradox, a remix of something becoming inherently unique. The primary appeal of these watches is accessibility. The enjoyable part of the cover watch is the reinterpretation itself. The CasiOak, while sharing design language with the Royal Oak, is clearly still a G-Shock. When a core idea is taken through a unique filter a different yet familiar product is born. That’s what makes re-interpretations so fun (and is also why they keep making James Bond films).

I’ve amassed a small spattering of what can be deemed Cover Watches (or, ‘-ish’ watches). From the CasiOaks, to my vintage Zenith (Calatrava-ish) and the Hodinkee X Timex Q (Polar Explorer-ish). These have all stemmed from an initial want of the original. Then settling for an alternative. And finally an appreciation of what the alternative brings to the point of preferring it over what I had originally wanted. Would I have just straight up bought a vintage Calatrava initially if I could? Of course! Did I find something more interesting due to the fact that I couldn’t? Hell yeah. That’s the fun.

Choosing the Mood (and the Cover Watch)

There's a certain charm in choosing a mood of watch and seeing where your own personal hunt takes you. I wanted a Breguet. A Breguet is not possible for me at the moment, so I looked to scratch that itch in another way. These are the ideas of Breguet filtered through the lens of Jaeger-Benzinger. It’s not a one-to-one of a Breguet but the spirit is carried over and presented as something new at a price point that is more than accommodating.

Instead of idolizing specific watches we should instead sanctify ideas and design languages. That might make the collecting hivemind a bit more interesting. You can hold the original song in the utmost esteem but why not listen to a cover? You might find that it's just as special."]]></description>
<dc:subject>watches replicas homages 2022 omega swatch moonswatch speedmaster mood ideas accessibility jaeger-benzinger breguet collaborations streetwear royaloak casiooak g-shock casio longines massenalab audemarspiguet rolex patekphilippe tonytraina williammassena omegaspeedmaster anthonytraina</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:383e0a6dd1ae/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:watches"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:replicas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:homages"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2022"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:omega"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:swatch"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:moonswatch"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:speedmaster"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mood"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:accessibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jaeger-benzinger"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:breguet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collaborations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:streetwear"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:royaloak"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:casiooak"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:g-shock"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:casio"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:longines"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:massenalab"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:audemarspiguet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rolex"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:patekphilippe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tonytraina"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:williammassena"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:omegaspeedmaster"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anthonytraina"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://twitter.com/ZoeSTodd/status/1451922675295682569">
    <title>Dr Fish Philosopher Todd (Dr FPT)🐟 {an archive ✨} on Twitter: &quot;1. When I wrote my ‘ontology is just another world for colonialism’ piece, it was to draw attention to ways that non-Indigenous scholars &amp;amp; whole disciplines refuse to cite decades</title>
    <dc:date>2021-10-23T20:18:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://twitter.com/ZoeSTodd/status/1451922675295682569</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[“1. When I wrote my ‘ontology is just another world for colonialism’ piece, it was to draw attention to ways that non-Indigenous scholars & whole disciplines refuse to cite decades/centuries/millennia of Indigenous thinking or treat Indigenous people as theorists in our own right

2. @cricketcrocker identifies systemic problem in western+Global North conservation biology/ecology of not enacting fulsome citation practices needed to ground current interest in Indigenous topics in decades/generations of Indigenous work on these issues https://twitter.com/chase_prairie/status/1451641245688860678

<blockquote>Looking forward to seeing how Smith defines plagiarism. Apparently there are many definitions going around, given the discussions going on.

I hope the findings are disclosed sooner than later. https://twitter.com/SmithFellows/status/1451598365796470785

<blockquote>The Smith Fellows Program takes concerns with the scholarly integrity of fellows’ publications seriously. Please see the statement below. [image]</blockquote>

As an online public scholar and an alternative mode scholar as an artist, I’m personally invested in making citation inclusive and collaborative

Anyway it’s always a good day to read Zoe Todd on citation:
http://mathewarthur.com/whats-new/pdf/todd-ontological-turn.pdf </blockquote>

3. It is unfortunate that Conservation Biology, Ecology, other natural sciences are not spending time reading, engaging & citing whole generations of Indigenous thinking already published on topics that non-Indigenous scholars are engaging in fairly shallow and appropriative ways

4. Perhaps part of this issue comes down to citation conventions in the colonial natural sciences that differ from how Indigenous Studies understands citations. In Indigenous Studies we generally try to enact generous citations so that readers can follow generations of thought.

5. As a Métis person bound to obligations to cosmologies, philosophies, and legal orders in the prairies, I try to situate very explicitly where my ideas come from (including thinking with the land as per @Vanessa_A_Watts’ work on Indigenous Place-Thought). This is important.

6. Within a Métis context, I make very sure you know who has shaped my ideas so that a) you can evaluate these sources on your own, and b) to credit the incredible Indigenous warriors who made space for my generation and subsequent generations to express our stories and work.

7. And in fact, when I was a PhD student studying in Scotland and I first published my blog post on ‘ontology is another world for colonialism’, many brilliant scholars reached out to share similar work they had published. I rewrote the intro to the blog to cite them.

8. And when I was invited to turn the blog post into an article in the Journal of Historical Sociology, I made sure to cite them and think with these brilliant folks more extensively and incorporated their work into many future pieces, syllabi etc.

9. Citations are political. I was lucky to learn this early on from @SaraNAhmed’s work, and I was so lucky that Indigenous colleagues helped me undo the disciplinary erasures baked into my training in colonial anthro and modelled enthusiastic/generous citation practices to me.

10. Rather than try to position oneself as the first to say something, I know from my learning in Métis contexts that it’s ok (in fact usually more honest) to place yourself in rivers of thought.

11. I hope we can undo current erasures of generations of Indigenous scholarship, advocacy, thinking in current turns to ‘decolonize’, ‘Indigenize’, ‘reconcile’ or ‘integrate’ Indigenous knowledges+western sciences in Global North. Undo the ‘white possessive’ (Moreton-Robinson).

12. we must encourage settlers to understand their obligations to sovereign plural Indigenous nations and societies, and this goes beyond liberal ideas of ‘reconciliation’ and ‘integration’. This requires settlers become good relatives & letting go of need to control or possess.

13. The work requires humility from settlers: you don’t know what you don’t know. The water you currently swim in is shaped by white supremacy, colonialism, capital, imperialism, extraction —  these drive the urge to exterminate (erase) & replace Indigenous voices (Wolfe 1999).

14. In summary: err on side of citing generously. I guarantee someone has written on the topic you are exploring. Good, ethical scholarship acknowledges these lineages & ensures folks know who shaped your thinking. That’s not just good manners but good intellectual kinship

(15. And thank you to the scholars who generously taught me these lessons when I was a PhD student so that I could enact good citational relations — relations not honoured or modelled in my colonial academic training!)

(16. Also, I got my PhD 4 years ago — I remain as fallible as anyone and threads like this are meant to be more an invitation to imagine different relationships, not a declaration of perfection. Imagine if we thought of scholars as ‘always learners’ instead of ‘already experts’).”]]></description>
<dc:subject>zoetodd 2021 indigenous indigeneity academia citation highered highereducation biology ecology knowledge plagiarism collaboration inclusion inclusivity colonialism scholarship writing howwewrite conservation land water science sciences ideas saraahmed decolonization settlercolonialism reconciliation integration capitalism imperialism extraction extractivism</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:8c31d3be2347/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:zoetodd"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2021"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:indigenous"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:indigeneity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:citation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:biology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ecology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:knowledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:plagiarism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inclusion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inclusivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colonialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scholarship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conservation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:land"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:water"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sciences"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:saraahmed"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:decolonization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:settlercolonialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reconciliation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:integration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:imperialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:extraction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:extractivism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/13/podcasts/ezra-klein-podcast-tressie-mcmillan-cottom-transcript.html">
    <title>Transcript: Ezra Klein Interviews Tressie McMillan Cottom - The New York Times</title>
    <dc:date>2021-04-29T23:22:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/13/podcasts/ezra-klein-podcast-tressie-mcmillan-cottom-transcript.html</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[“TRESSIE MCMILLAN COTTOM: Oh, man. I wish I could say that I did train myself to write in so many ways. I think what happens instead is that — first of all, I’m a very curious person. I’m in these spaces anyway. I am an internet person for better or for worse, right? I came of age as a public person and like live journal, right? Like, I have followed the development of these spaces just like any other person, I think, of my generation, though. That’s just kind of where. That’s where we were hanging out.

And when I’m in a space, this predates being a sociologist or an academic. When I’m in a space, I’m very much a one step, in one step removed kind of person. I’m watching the thing I’m participating in, can’t turn that off. It’s just what I am and who I am. And so it makes sense for me that if I’m on Twitter, I’m also thinking about Twitter, right? I’m thinking about, why are all these people here? What’s the audience looking? What’s that about? And so that comes out in the things that I’m interested in. So that’s one thing.

I think training myself to write to that audience — understanding it is one thing, to be fair. Understanding everything as a genre is another thing, and there was a moment when I realized this is just like learning how to write the five paragraph essay, right, as opposed to a long form piece of creative nonfiction. Every medium has a genre, and some of that, cracking some of it really is just fun for me.

It’s like, OK. Let me see if I can do this. I can’t do them all, to be fair. There are definitely some genres, especially ones that lean more visual, because I’m a textual kind of girl. And I just don’t get like visual and editing, but some of it is just fun for me to see if I can remix the genre. First of all, can I capture it? And then can I remix it a little? Can I make an essay you have like the freewheeling feeling of Twitter? Can I surprise an audience that thought they were showing up for like a first person essay with a little bit of empirical thinking? Can I just sort of surprise people? That’s part of the fun for me.”

…

“There was a class of thinkers, a class of writers who came up in that web 2.0 that does feel like, yeah, we lost something there.

There was a humanity there for good or for bad. Humanity is messy, but there was a sense that those ideas were attached to people, and there were things driving those people, there’s a reason they had chosen to be in that space before it all became about chasing an audience in a platform and turning that into influencer and translating that into that — before all that happened, the professionalization of it all. And that’s what I think we’re missing when we become nostalgic for that web 2.0. I think it’s the people in the machine.

Having said that, I am very resistant to nostalgia as a thing because usually what we are nostalgic for is a time that just was not that great for a lot of people. And so what we were usually a really nostalgic for is a time when we didn’t have to think so much about who was missing in the room, who wasn’t at the table. So when I talk to friends, and especially younger people coming up behind us either in the internet or in writing spaces, we’re like, that time was horrible for young queer people.

They talk about looking for little safe pockets of space in web 2.0 world where it was still very OK to be homophobic, for example, in those spaces and our casual language and how we structured that kind of thing. And they love being able to leave that part behind in this new world of whatever the web is now, both a consolidated and a disaggregated new web.

That’s why I’m like resistant to nostalgia. At the same time, I’m like, yeah. I also laugh and go, I really miss having a blog. In some ways, coming back to the newsletter, and Substack was kind part of that. It’s me being nostalgic for having a place where I could put thoughts that didn’t fit into any other discourse or genre, and I wanted a space where I could talk to people who were actually interacting like real people. They weren’t acting like bots, or trolls, or whatever your internet persona is.

So, I mean, I say I’m resistant to nostalgia. I just try not to reproduce, but even I get a little — I’ll always have a soft spot for Blogger, which is coincidentally my first “where I state” space on Blogger.”

…

“One of the things I like to say to people is that we think that broadening access in any realm — we do this with everything, by the way. It’s such an American way to approach the world. We think that broadening access will broaden access on the terms of the people who have benefited from it being narrowed, which is just so counterintuitive.

Broadening access doesn’t mean that everybody has the experience that I, privileged person, had in the discourse. Broadening it means that we are all equally uncomfortable, right? That’s actually what pluralism and plurality is. It isn’t that everybody is going to come in and have the same comforts that privilege and exclusion had extended to a small group of people. It’s that now everybody sits at the table, and nobody knows the exact right thing to say about the other people.

Well, that’s fair. That means we all now have to be thoughtful. We all have to consider, oh, wait a minute. Is that what we say in this room? We all have to reconsider what the norms are, and that was the promise of like expanding the discourse, and that’s exactly what we’ve gotten. And if that means that I’m not sure about letting it rip on a joke, that’s probably a pretty good thing.”

…

“human nature is resistant to learning. I mean, nobody knows that more than people who teach for a living. But for all we valorize learning and education, human nature really trends towards inertia, and every layer of privilege you layer on top of somebody makes that more true. And so what we’re fundamentally, I think, saying to people is — who achieved something where part of the promise of the achievement was that I’ll never have to learn anything new again, right?

This was the promise, right? I’m now the editor. I’m the gatekeeper or whatever, and the whole promise of that was I’ll never have to worry about learning anything new again. And then we come to them and we go, no. You got to relitigate. You got to reconsider what your role is, and now there actually are people who can hold you accountable for that in a way that wasn’t always true.

And I found it to be true in every space I’ve ever been in, every organization. It is true of myself. Nobody likes being reminded that they are not done yet, that there’s still more work for them to do. And that’s, I think, what we’re fundamentally saying to people, and they resist that because that’s human nature. It’s just that some people get to resist it in a way more aggressive fashion than other people.”

…

“Nothing is funny to me than when I realize, we wrote all of this stuff. We did all this stuff. We threw out all these theories of change, and then people believed us. That’s literally what happened. You’ve got young people who said, wait a minute. Gender is a spectrum? OK. I’m a live it like a spectrum. And we’re like, no, but we didn’t mean that.

Really, what fundamentally happened is we hypothesized and imagined all of this stuff, wrote it into the ether, and then we’re surprised that people actually took it up and lived it. That does happen faster, as you point out. We do owe that to the internet. The generations are now like four and a half years long, but it happens faster, and so we feel older faster, and we feel outdated faster.

But I get so inspired by the people who, within a generation, have resisted becoming that old person. And I’m just like, OK. I’m just going to double down, right? I think we’ve got a choice. You can become like the Angela Davis of the world, or you’re like, OK, I hear you. Each new generation comes along, and I hear you. I got to get with it, and I’ve seen Angela do that in real time.

Like a young person will stand up in the audience and go, and we say “sibs” now. And she’s like, I’m with you. Gotcha. Like, you just take it, and you’re supposed to go. And I think we’ve got a choice. You can become that person within your generation who lives in that uncomfortable space, or you can become the person — I won’t name a name — but you can become the person who doesn’t and resists it. I just don’t want them writing about me like that later. So I’m really shooting for the Angela Davis model.”

…

“What a culture needs from its smart people at any given point in time changes. We can have a very different value system about what constitutes smart. What I want to keep in mind, and one of the things I hope that people take away when I say something about the correspondence of how smart you are is just really about your place in the world is because I want people to feel obligated to think about what world they’re creating for somebody else, but first we got to recognize how vulnerable our own identity is.

If you build your whole identity on how smart you are, I think it can make you very small and selfish in thinking about the world for everybody else. And so that’s why I try to pinpoint, like, if you think that I’m good enough, if you think, wow. Tressie’s really sharp, right? Tressie’s really brilliant. What I want you to imagine is how easy it would be for you to not think that and for me to just not exist, right?

I’d still be me. I’d still have my talents and abilities, and that we do that to people every day. We build a world that’s just not allowable or acceptable, and then I also really want to push the idea that we have so embodied the idea of smart as being something that a person is that it makes us really easy to disinvest from the things that make smart actually possible because smart is like a social problem.

We make smart. We make smart with schools. We make smart with our political decisions and choices, right? And if you think nature is just going to take care of it and it’s just going to give you a once in a lifetime genius every go round, then you don’t invest in the things that produce smartness. And a fixed idea of intelligence invites us to disinvest from the social contract of making more smart people. Just make more by expanding your understanding of it.”

…

“But we were having coffee one day with some of those folks, and friend Adam turns to me. And he’s like, the thing is, it’s not about who is disabled. It’s about when are you going to become disabled. We will all be disabled at some point in our life course, and so much middle class consumption, by the way, and our obsession with health and wellness is about that.

We are fundamentally — because we know how horrible we are to other disabled people, so we are terrified of becoming in any way disabled or differently-able, right? So take your bee pollen, and get your magnesium, and — well, you’re going to age. If nothing else, your eyesight is going to go. You’re going to lose some of your mobility, speaking about smart as a fixed idea. Just the way your brain works is going to change. We’re just so vulnerable to nature and time and biology, and we’re so terrified of it, I think, because we know that a lot of what we have built our ideas of who we are on are really far more vulnerable than we think they are.”

…

“So thick description is ultimately about asking as many questions of yourself as you’re asking of other people. So a thin way of engaging with the world is to assume that everybody has already made the decisions that you’ve made prior to the discussion, and all of your questions are going to be reserved for the object that you’re talking about, right, the people you’re talking about, the idea you’re talking about. I think that’s one way to think about it.

We also think about thick description as being really evocative, and that’s true, too. Using language to really try to capture people’s experience of things, that’s also true. Whereas thin description usually tries to flatten differences between experiences because it wants to tell you about sort of a universal experience, right, that I can make you understand your connection to something by pointing out what’s universal in it.

We think that we’re going to lose people when we start talking about the differences, by the way. And I’m not sure that’s true, and I try to show in my work that that’s not true, that you can absolutely seduce people into having a thick, nuanced conversation. It’s just going to take work on your part, right? I think you have to be dead on with craft. I think you have to be brutal about your empirics being accurate. I think you have to consecrate your own belief in yourself as being the universal storyteller.

But I think if you do all of that, people will follow you into a thick, uncomfortable conversation that they did not know they needed to have, but the mediums you talk about, who’s going to do that, right? The economics of that are horrible, and I know that. I get it, but I think what we’re seeing is an unspoken desire for exactly that kind of work, but a media ecosystem and an attention economy that just cannot allow that to happen.

That takes a lot of human beings, a lot of human power, takes a lot of willingness to embrace risk because you’re going to mess it up. You’re going to fail, and you’re going to piss somebody — right? This is just going to happen. There’s a lot of risk involved. And initially, it’s not profitable, but that is one of our struggles, I think, in the public discourse where we are trying to have that kind of conversation that I think people absolutely are attracted to even if that attraction feels like they’re angry about it, but that’s still desire for the conversation. I think they’re attracted to it, but we’ve only figured out the economics for very thin genre.”

…

“We don’t have a culture right now for scale and efficiency that can be productive. That’s for a culture that mostly agrees on who and what it is is mostly functioning the way most people need it to function for a good life. We don’t have that culture. And so I tell people, maximizing efficiency is for very different political body and public discourse than the one we have.

The one we have is trying to grapple with potentially massive social change and social transformation. That is a culture that needs messier, more nuanced places for public discourse. Trying to skip over that to get to the scale and efficiency part is how you become antagonistic to the audience. Even as y’all are sort of in a dance together, I think that thin stuff that is narrowed, asking the least from the audience, is actually fundamentally antagonistic to the idea of having an audience.”

…


“A lot of people woke up to find that the merit culture that they have been operating in has been, for a very long time, an honor culture. See, we were supposed to be too sophisticated for our honor culture of ritual and honor, exchanges of prestige and status and privilege, right? We were supposed to be too sophisticated for that.

And so you work hard and that the status will follow, economic achievement. And when that economic promise starts to collapse but the ritual of status remains, you really just have an honor-based culture where people will defend honor, will determine their honor in relation to other people. They’ll build hierarchies of honor within their own little corner of the world that might be at odds with another corner.

That’s when we talk about the siloing effect of culture. It’s not that people don’t know that people disagree with them. It’s that they’ve built their own little honor culture over here. And if there are no economic incentives to leave it, why would you?”]]></description>
<dc:subject>tressiemcmillancottom 2021 interviews internet nostalgia online howwewrite howwelearn web socialmedia web2.0 writing twitter smartness canon education aging angeladavis categories categorization disability vision thickness learning change silos process economics scale audience success communication status sociology race gender racism history socialchange class identity us uk socialclass hierarchy cancelculture donaldtrump values ideas behavior merit meritocracy livedexperience military veterans highered highereducation gibill policy politics money society trumpism shame fairness unfairness prestige honor arjumandsiddiqi sandydarity deathsofdespair perception whiteness information confirmationbias vulnerability digital storytelling modeling understanding celebrity microcelebrities attractiveness beauty dollyparton sarahsmarsh desire morality objectivity subjectivity bias religion belief socialstatus</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:1d85d8045483/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tressiemcmillancottom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2021"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interviews"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nostalgia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web2.0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:smartness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:canon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:angeladavis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:categories"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:categorization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:disability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:vision"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thickness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:change"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:silos"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:process"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scale"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:audience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:success"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:status"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sociology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:race"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gender"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:racism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialchange"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:class"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:identity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:uk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialclass"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hierarchy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cancelculture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:donaldtrump"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:values"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:behavior"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:merit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meritocracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:livedexperience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:military"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:veterans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gibill"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:money"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:trumpism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:shame"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fairness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unfairness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:prestige"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:honor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:arjumandsiddiqi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sandydarity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:deathsofdespair"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:perception"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:whiteness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:information"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:confirmationbias"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:vulnerability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:digital"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:storytelling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:modeling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:understanding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:celebrity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:microcelebrities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attractiveness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:beauty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dollyparton"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sarahsmarsh"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:desire"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:morality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:objectivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:subjectivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bias"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:religion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:belief"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialstatus"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9aK4OztueuE">
    <title>Yanis Varoufakis: From an Economics without Capitalism to Markets without Capitalism | DiEM25 - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2021-01-27T03:31:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9aK4OztueuE</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[“A lecture organised by University of Tübingen economics students, delivered on Monday February 3, 2020, on the theme “From an Economics without Capitalism to Markets without Capitalism”.

Mainstream economic models lack some important features of really-existing capitalism, including money, time and space. Its models offer ideological cover for a capitalist system that has usurped
competitive, free markets. 

The result? Unbearable inequality, climate catastrophe and permanent stagnation. A fork on the road is approaching: It will take us either into deeper stagnation and environmental degradation or to a society with markets but no capitalism. Prof. Yanis Varoufakis talks about the future of our economy and the current state of economics with special regard to pluralism in economics.

Source: https://timms.uni-tuebingen.de/tp/UT_20200203_001_rethinkeco_0001

“Introduction to Pluralism in Economics - From an Economics-without-Capitalism to Markets-without-Capitalism

abstract:An Introduction to Pluralism in Economics Lecture Series in the Winter Term of 2019/20 Debates about economic theory are omnipresent. There is increasing doubt if complex economic relationships can be modelled precisely enough through rationality-based mathematical models. Dynamic equilibrium theory and prognoses have often been deficient to anticipate crises and upheavals in reality. This criticism is mostly brought forward by so called heterodox or pluralist economists, who have gained popularity and momentum in recent years. Even in public discourse, questions about a new economic order have become more present. Nonetheless, the progress made in research and the debates amongst scholars are not taught to undergraduate students of economics. It is often said that new students firstly need to learn the basics before they can participate in controversial discussions. Lectures presenting different schools of thought, the history and emergence of economic thought and heterodox perspectives are mostly postponed to graduate studies - or not taught at all. The lectures series by Rethinking Economics Tübingen wants to change this fact and start teaching a broad understanding of economics. What are the beginnings of the discipline and how did it depart from other social sciences? What can a philosophy of economics contribute to contemporary debates in the field? How many schools of thoughts do exist and what are their theoretical underpinnings? Are economic models the only way to do research for economists? We want to show that studying economics can be much more than integral functions, time series and indifference curves and furthermore give a prospect to what economics courses can be: controversial, interdisciplinary, multi-perspective, diversified and in tune with the latest economic developments. The lecture series will present a broad array of perspectives that - from our point of view - belong in any undergraduate program and aims at proving how divers and pluralistic economics can and should be. The series starts with remains from the previous lecture series in the summer term of 2019 dealing with the topic of capitalism. We managed to win excellent speakers who could not attend in the past semester. They can show with their talks about capitalism how heterodox economics is connected to real-life processes and even the entire economic system. We continue the lecture series by exploring the various perspectives of economics: Starting with qualitative research methods, to a critical analysis of what the blind spots of economics are and ending with an outlook on the future of pluralism in economics. Feminist economics, ecological economics, post-Keynesian economic and others are an integral part of the lecture series.””]]></description>
<dc:subject>yanisvaroufakis economics socialsciences ethics science sciences humans humanism behavior capitalism academia politics policy highered highereducation theory theories 2020 thinking philosophy howwethink howweteach education history abstraction context adamsmith morality industrialization greed economichistory crisis employment unemployment johnmaynardkeynes 1929 greatdepression markets demand supply equilibrium prices math mathematics time microeconomics money modeling gametheory influence observereffect bartering monetization debt macroeconomics interestrates risk greece globalfinancialcrisis greatrecession labor work unions monopolies monopoly savings investment generalequilibrium economists canon friedrichhayek reason disequilibrium logic truth keynes hayek society land commodification realestate market globalization karlmarx stockmarket electromagnetism electricity magnetism radio telecommunications networks networkedfirm thomasedison generalelectric competition pluralism economiesofscale networkedcapital</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:2532f3a48803/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:yanisvaroufakis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialsciences"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sciences"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:behavior"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:theory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:theories"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2020"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwethink"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:abstraction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:context"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:adamsmith"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:morality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:industrialization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:greed"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economichistory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:crisis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:employment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unemployment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnmaynardkeynes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1929"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:greatdepression"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:markets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:demand"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:supply"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:equilibrium"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:prices"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:math"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mathematics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:time"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:microeconomics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:money"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:modeling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gametheory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:influence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:observereffect"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bartering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:monetization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:debt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:macroeconomics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interestrates"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:risk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:greece"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:globalfinancialcrisis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:greatrecession"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:monopolies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:monopoly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:savings"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:investment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:generalequilibrium"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:canon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:friedrichhayek"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reason"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:disequilibrium"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:logic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:truth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:keynes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hayek"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:land"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:commodification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:realestate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:market"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:globalization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:karlmarx"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stockmarket"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:electromagnetism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:electricity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:magnetism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:radio"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:telecommunications"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:networks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:networkedfirm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thomasedison"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:generalelectric"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:competition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pluralism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economiesofscale"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:networkedcapital"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/the-analog-city-and-the-digital-city">
    <title>The Analog City and the Digital City — The New Atlantis</title>
    <dc:date>2020-11-08T23:13:43+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/the-analog-city-and-the-digital-city</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["One way to understand our moment is to recognize that digital technology is reconfiguring the nature of the self that enters into the political arena, even as it restructures the arena itself. The contrast between those who mainly inhabit the Digital City and those who still primarily inhabit the Analog City becomes increasingly stark. Simple appeals to conventions and solutions grounded in the Analog City now ring hollow. The old virtues and ideals, as well as the institutions they sustained, have lost their purchase on the imagination. They have lost their “self-evident” character. Like the early moderns, our reigning world picture has shattered and we are casting about for new ways of building consensus, new ways of coping with the challenges of pluralism, new ways of ordering society toward the common good. At the moment, however, it appears that digital media tends toward political and epistemic fragmentation, not consensus, and toward the implausibility of any substantive account of the common good. In other words, it may be that things will get worse before they get better.

In a 1982 talk on the cultural and political consequences of computation, Ivan Illich issued a warning that is even more urgent today:

<blockquote>The machine-like behavior of people chained to electronics constitutes a degradation of their well-being and of their dignity which, for most people in the long run, becomes intolerable. Observations of the sickening effect of programmed environments show that people in them become indolent, impotent, narcissistic and apolitical. The political process breaks down, because people cease to be able to govern themselves; they demand to be managed.</blockquote>

We have focused on how digital media transforms the subjective experience of individuals. The political corollary is that it enables and empowers regimes of algorithmic governance, predictive analytics, and social credit. The profound erosion of trust in the Digital City leaves a vacuum, and we look to our tools to fill it. We seem set upon interlocking trajectories: of ever greater swaths of the human experience being computationally managed, and of intractable human subjects increasingly breaking down or revolting against these conditions.

From another vantage point, however, we might see this as a hopeful moment, full of promise and opportunity. Another path also seems possible. Freed from certain unsustainable illusions about the nature of the self and the world, we may now be called back to reckon with reality in a new, more chastened and more responsible manner. It is possible that the Promethean aspirations that characterized the modern self and modern society may now yield to a more sober assessment of the limits within which genuine human flourishing might occur. It is possible, too, that we may learn once again the necessity of virtues, public and private — that we will no longer, as T. S. Eliot put it, be “dreaming of systems so perfect that no one will need to be good.”"]]></description>
<dc:subject>lmsacasas digital newmedia writing howwewrite reading 2020 howweread secondaryorality walterong politics discourse audience abundance scarcity news print text communication neilpostman digitalcity analogcity truth speech digitalmedia socialmedia saintaugustine change liminality factchecking publishing jaydavidbolter reformation scientificrevolution history internet web online smartphones publiclife cities urban urbanism community howwethink thinking nicholascarr 2008 web2.0 facebook twitter algorithms moderation commenting tv television video dialogue criticalthinking affordances technology citizenship censorship values char charlestaylor bufferedself disenchantment meaning meaningmaking magic power objects heresy security purity bots data bigdata automation knowledge systems systemsthinking vulnerability time place now identity sharedtime sharedspace simultaneity realtime telegraph radio presence social belonging ivanillich memory memories language literacy orality oraltradition fables institutions bureaucra</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:9c6b35065c0c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lmsacasas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:digital"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:newmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2020"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:secondaryorality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:walterong"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:discourse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:audience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:abundance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scarcity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:news"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:print"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:text"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neilpostman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:digitalcity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:analogcity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:truth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:speech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:digitalmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:saintaugustine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:change"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:liminality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:factchecking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jaydavidbolter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reformation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scientificrevolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:smartphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:publiclife"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:urban"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:urbanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwethink"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nicholascarr"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2008"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web2.0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:facebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:algorithms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:moderation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:commenting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tv"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:television"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:video"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dialogue"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:criticalthinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:affordances"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:citizenship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:censorship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:values"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:char"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charlestaylor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bufferedself"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:disenchantment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meaning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meaningmaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:magic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:power"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:objects"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:heresy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:security"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:purity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bots"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bigdata"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:automation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:knowledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:systems"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:systemsthinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:vulnerability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:time"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:place"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:now"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:identity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sharedtime"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sharedspace"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:simultaneity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:realtime"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:telegraph"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:radio"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:presence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:social"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:belonging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ivanillich"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:memory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:memories"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:literacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:orality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:oraltradition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fables"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:institutions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bureaucra"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvaTDayyT18">
    <title>Technology and the good life | Navneet Alang - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2020-10-27T00:57:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvaTDayyT18</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><dc:subject>navneetaalang 2019 technology life living monoskop twitter socialmedia community howwelive humanism humanity information attention newsletters email commenting conversation discourse subscriptions discord disinformation humans howwethink howwelearn learning education art poetry literature ideas groupchat texting whatsapp imessage messaging maxread interpersonal technohumanism</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:ca88c8146738/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:navneetaalang"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2019"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:living"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:monoskop"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelive"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:information"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:newsletters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:email"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:commenting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conversation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:discourse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:subscriptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:discord"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:disinformation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwethink"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:poetry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:groupchat"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:texting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:whatsapp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:imessage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:messaging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maxread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interpersonal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technohumanism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://directory.libsyn.com/episode/index/id/15743372/tdest_id/1617341">
    <title>Libsyn Directory: THE RED NATION PODCAST: Learning &amp; unlearning w/ Noname</title>
    <dc:date>2020-08-29T19:31:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://directory.libsyn.com/episode/index/id/15743372/tdest_id/1617341</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[[See also: https://soundcloud.com/therednationpod/learning-unlearning-w-noname ]

[Discussion of Land Back (and reparations) starts around 21:40 and continues on from there until 27:00 and beyond

Nick Estes also references Cheryl Harris's "Whiteness As Property"
https://harvardlawreview.org/1993/06/whiteness-as-property/ ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>noname rednation radicalization unlearning learning howwlearn howweread education unschooling deschooling pedagogyoftheoppressed angeladavis frantzfanon 2020 interviews nickestes georgejackson activism politics politicization violence prisonabolition self-defense autonomy prisons blackpanthers blackpantherparty capitalism socialism economics poverty radicals left bookclubs nonamebookclub mutualaid care caretaking anarchism survivalists sovereignty multispecies howwelearn howethink thinking philosophy colonialism decolonization imperialism gardening farming twitter socialmedia democracy reading race racism us covid-19 acabspring blackness dialogue walterrodney pronunciation language impostersyndrome impostorsyndrome organizing inequality motivation revolution oppression incarceration revolutionaries whitesupremacy statues monuments property land ownership indigenous indigeneity landreturn liberation freedom solidarity internationalsolidarity hypodescent cedricrobinson settlercolonialism michelleobama electoral</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:bb3e0eb583b4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:noname"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rednation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:radicalization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unlearning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwlearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unschooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:deschooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogyoftheoppressed"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:angeladavis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:frantzfanon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2020"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interviews"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nickestes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:georgejackson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:activism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politicization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:violence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:prisonabolition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:self-defense"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:autonomy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:prisons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:blackpanthers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:blackpantherparty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:poverty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:radicals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:left"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bookclubs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nonamebookclub"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mutualaid"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:care"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:caretaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anarchism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:survivalists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sovereignty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:multispecies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howethink"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colonialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:decolonization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:imperialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gardening"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:farming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:democracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:race"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:racism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:covid-19"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:acabspring"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:blackness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dialogue"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:walterrodney"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pronunciation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:impostersyndrome"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:impostorsyndrome"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:organizing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inequality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:motivation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:revolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:oppression"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:incarceration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:revolutionaries"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:whitesupremacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:statues"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:monuments"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:land"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ownership"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:indigenous"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:indigeneity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:landreturn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:liberation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freedom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:solidarity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internationalsolidarity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hypodescent"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cedricrobinson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:settlercolonialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:michelleobama"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:electoral"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://sites.google.com/ucsd.edu/commplayground/">
    <title>CommPlayground</title>
    <dc:date>2019-11-18T19:42:41+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://sites.google.com/ucsd.edu/commplayground/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[“A machine for thinking and imagining otherwise

The CommPlayground is a space of intellectual exchange and conversation. The idea behind it is to move beyond conventional academic formats of knowledge production (e.g. the seminar, the reading group, the paper presentation) to create a space of intellectual and pedagogic experimentation where it is possible to think and imagine otherwise.

The COMM Playground is organized around 5 simple (& nonnegotiable) rules

THE COMM PLAYGROUND Rules of Engagement

1.- The playground is a space of **play** not of competition
Egos should be left at home or will be confiscated at the entrance

2.- The playground is **flat**
Nobody owns the playground; although it can be temporally appropriated by anyone proposing a game

3.- The playground is a space of **games**
The playground only comes alive through games Games should be fun to play

4.- The playground is a space of **honesty and sincerity**
Bullies are not allowed in the playground

5.- The playground is a **creative machine**
The aim of the playground is to generate ideas, controversies and discussion“]]></description>
<dc:subject>commplayground ucsd pedagogy seminars conversation exchange via:javierarbona academia knowledgeproduction readinggroups presentations experimentation altedu competition play flatness horizontality games honesty sincerity creativity ideas classideas lcproject openstudioproject rules egos playgrounds fun bullies bullying</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:1f3afa1ec96e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:commplayground"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ucsd"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:seminars"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conversation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:exchange"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:via:javierarbona"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:knowledgeproduction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:readinggroups"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:presentations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:experimentation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:altedu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:competition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:play"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:flatness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:horizontality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:games"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:honesty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sincerity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:creativity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:classideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lcproject"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openstudioproject"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rules"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:egos"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:playgrounds"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fun"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bullies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bullying"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://hyperallergic.com/525985/why-libraries-have-a-public-spirit-that-most-museums-lack/">
    <title>Why Libraries Have a Public Spirit That Most Museums Lack</title>
    <dc:date>2019-11-08T04:28:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://hyperallergic.com/525985/why-libraries-have-a-public-spirit-that-most-museums-lack/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["A broad swath of society seems to feel more welcome in a public library rather than a museum. I examined the Brooklyn Public Library as a model of heightened engagement through collective knowledge creation."

...

"At a time when museums are being held accountable by a variety of publics for every aspect of their operations — from programming and exhibition-making to financial support and governance structures — perhaps it is useful to look at parallel institutions that are doing similar work for guidance on alternative ways of working.

I have spent a great deal of time thinking about the relationship between museums and public libraries, to understand what makes libraries feel different from museums. Why do they have a public spirit that most museums don’t? Why are there lines around the block at some NYC library branches at 9 am? I’ve been reading about the roots of both institutions in the United States, and they have evolved in similar ways; so how do they diverge? And is this divergence relevant to the ways in which a stunningly broad swath of society feels welcome within a public library and not a museum?

John Cotton Dana, the Progressive Era thinker and radical re-imaginer of public libraries, wrote a particularly important essay in 1917 titled “The Gloom of the Museum.” It includes a section about expertise that is particularly germane today:

<blockquote>They become enamoured of rarity, of history … They become lost in their specialties and forget their museum. They become lost in their idea of a museum and forget its purpose. They become lost in working out their idea of a museum and forget their public. And soon, not being brought constantly in touch with the life of their community … they become entirely separated from it and go on making beautifully complete and very expensive collections but never construct a living, active, and effective institution.</blockquote>

Museums and libraries in the US originated in similar places and via similar patronage models with their foundational collections coming largely from wealthy collectors of books and art objects, sometimes in conjunction with institutions of higher learning. However, the word “public” remains embedded in what we call the library. And while some branches are named for generous funders, these are secondary to the overall system. In fact, the Queens Public Library system, the largest in the nation, boasts of a branch within a mile of every Queens resident."]]></description>
<dc:subject>libraries museums public 2019 lauraraicovich community brooklyn brooklynpubliclibrary society welcome johncottondana corafisher jakoborsos kameelahjananrasheed participation co-creation engagement visitors participatory workshops sheryloring scoringthestacks ideas information</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:e5cbeeeb8445/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:libraries"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:museums"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:public"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2019"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lauraraicovich"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brooklyn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brooklynpubliclibrary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:welcome"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johncottondana"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:corafisher"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jakoborsos"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kameelahjananrasheed"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:participation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:co-creation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:engagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:visitors"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:participatory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:workshops"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sheryloring"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scoringthestacks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:information"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://soundcloud.com/citationsneeded/episode-87-nate-silver-and-the-crisis-of-pundit-brain">
    <title>Episode 87: Nate Silver and the Crisis of Pundit Brain by Citations Needed Podcast</title>
    <dc:date>2019-09-23T01:20:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://soundcloud.com/citationsneeded/episode-87-nate-silver-and-the-crisis-of-pundit-brain</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Nate Silver tell us Joe Biden’s inconsistent political beliefs are, in fact, a benefit. They’re “his calling card” and evidence he “reads the room pretty well”. Venality, we are told, is “a normal and often successful [mode] for a politician.” Insurgent progressive groups like Justice Democrats shouldn’t call Biden out of touch with the base because, Silver tell us, “only 26 of the 79 candidates it endorsed last year won their primaries, and only 7 of those went on to win the general election.”

On Twitter and his in columns, high-status pundit Nate Silver, has made a career reporting on the polls and insisting he’s just a dispassionate, non-ideological conduit of Cold Hard Facts, just channeling the holy word of data. Empirical journalism, he calls it. But this schtick, however, is very ideological - a reactionary worldview that prioritizes describing the world, rather than changing it. For Silver - and data-fetishists like him - politics is a sport to be gamed, rather than a mechanism for improving people’s lives.

We are joined by Current Affairs editor-in-chief Nathan J. Robinson."]]></description>
<dc:subject>natesilver statistics elections politics 2008 2012 2016 2020 2019 polling data punditry 538 cynicism snark smartpeople joebiden nathanrobinson citationsneeded racism mattyglesias justicedemocrats progressive elizabethwarren barackobama hillaryclinton berniesanders change meaning purpose belief capitalism statusquo ideology morality ethics debates priorities quantification policy horseraces gamification horseracepolitics electibility ideas gaming chicktodd media nytimes abcnews espn donaldtrump datafetishism progressivism values betting observationeffect voting us analysis trolling entertainment probability apathy apolitical</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:cfb186643019/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:natesilver"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:statistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elections"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2008"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2012"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2016"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2020"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2019"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:polling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:punditry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:538"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cynicism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:snark"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:smartpeople"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:joebiden"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nathanrobinson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:citationsneeded"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:racism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mattyglesias"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:justicedemocrats"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:progressive"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elizabethwarren"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:barackobama"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hillaryclinton"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:berniesanders"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:change"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meaning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:purpose"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:belief"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:statusquo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:morality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:debates"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:priorities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quantification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:horseraces"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gamification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:horseracepolitics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:electibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gaming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chicktodd"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nytimes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:abcnews"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:espn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:donaldtrump"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:datafetishism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:progressivism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:values"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:betting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:observationeffect"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:voting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:analysis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:trolling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:entertainment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:probability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:apathy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:apolitical"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://zine-machine.glitch.me/">
    <title>Zine machine!</title>
    <dc:date>2019-06-27T14:59:07+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://zine-machine.glitch.me/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[“That magic is what means this web page is also a zine if you print it! Go ahead, try pressing your 🖨️ Print button now. You will need to set the page to landscape and make sure there’s no margins or scaling. We want to print on the edge, baby! You should see a preview laid out like this:”

…

“Steal this zine!
Please take this template and copy it for your own work.

This is a Glitch app!
Since it’s all hosted on Glitch, this friendly fish will give you the instructions to take a peek at the code and fire up your own version.

Creative Commons Licence
The content and images are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Code highlighting via Prism.js.”]]></description>
<dc:subject>class ideas paper zines papernet templates css webdesign</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:fb15ced5bda4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:class"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:paper"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:zines"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:papernet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:templates"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:css"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:webdesign"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.warscapes.com/conversations/conversation-mahmood-mamdani">
    <title>In Conversation with Mahmood Mamdani | Warscapes</title>
    <dc:date>2019-04-22T21:31:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.warscapes.com/conversations/conversation-mahmood-mamdani</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["MM: One night. They let you make one phone call, and I called the Ugandan Ambassador in Washington, DC, talked to him, and he said, “What are you doing interfering in the affairs of a foreign country?” I said, “What? We just got our independence! This is the same struggle. Have you forgotten?” Anyway, he got me out. Two or three weeks later, I was in my room. There was a knock at the door. Two gentlemen in trench coats and hats said, “FBI.” I thought, “Wow, just like on television.” They sat down. They were there to find out why I had gone – because this turned out to be big – it is after Montgomery that King organized his march on Selma. They wanted to know who had influenced me. After one hour of probing, the guy said, “Do you like Marx?” 

I said, “I haven’t met him.” 

Guy said, “No, no, he’s dead.” 

“Wow, what happened?” 

“No, no, he died long ago.” 

I thought the guy Marx had just died. So then, “Why are you asking me if he died long ago?”  

“No, he wrote a lot. He wrote that poor people should not be poor.”  

I said, “Sounds amazing.” 

I’m giving you a sense of how naïve I was. After they left, I went to the library to look for Marx. So that was my introduction to Karl Marx.

BS: The FBI. 

MM: The FBI. Then, of course, I took a class on Marx. Couldn’t just get Marx out of the library. But, basically, it is the US – the civil rights movement and the anti-war movement – which gave me a new take on my own experience, and on the Asian experience in east Africa. It gave me a way of rethinking my own experience of growing up in east Africa and growing up in an Africa with a lens crafted by the civil rights movement."]]></description>
<dc:subject>colonialism academia history mahmoodmamdani karlmarx marxism 2013 interviews fbi radicalization ideas inequality poverty capitalism unintendedconsequences</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:d1dfd9e69878/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colonialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mahmoodmamdani"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:karlmarx"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marxism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2013"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interviews"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fbi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:radicalization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inequality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:poverty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unintendedconsequences"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRPyql3cezo">
    <title>Art + Life Rules from a Nun - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2019-03-31T21:16:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRPyql3cezo</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Sister Corita Kent was a master printmaker and teacher, and her rules for artists and teachers are legendary - let’s break them down."

[vi: https://austinkleon.com/2019/03/26/camus-and-corita/ ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>sistercorita coritakent art design 2019 rules teaching howweteach via:austinkleon howwelearn education screenprinting benshahn losangeles cv pedagogy play work plork discipline self-discipline charleseames rayeames eames film life living howwework buckminsterfuller saulbass alfredhitchcock johncage making make failure mistakes persistence accessibility egalitarianism process creativity analysis learningbyheart brainstorming productivity production quantity ideas ideation happiness classideas critique socialjustice protest criticism wisdom inspiration messaging advertising remixing religion catholicism mercecunningham readiness reading video collecting looking seeing noticing meaning meaningmaking openness openended open-ended learning</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:7539c0b534ef/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sistercorita"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:coritakent"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2019"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rules"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:via:austinkleon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:screenprinting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:benshahn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:losangeles"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cv"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:play"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:plork"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:discipline"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:self-discipline"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charleseames"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rayeames"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:eames"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:film"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:living"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwework"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:buckminsterfuller"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:saulbass"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alfredhitchcock"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johncage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:making"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:make"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:failure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mistakes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:persistence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:accessibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:egalitarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:process"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:creativity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:analysis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learningbyheart"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brainstorming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:productivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:production"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quantity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:happiness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:classideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:critique"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialjustice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:protest"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:criticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wisdom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inspiration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:messaging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:advertising"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:remixing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:religion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:catholicism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mercecunningham"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:readiness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:video"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collecting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:looking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:seeing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:noticing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meaning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meaningmaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openended"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:open-ended"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.instagram.com/p/BnEEKkpFJtE/">
    <title>James Luckett en Instagram: ““The world we want to transform has already been worked on by history and is largely hollow. We must nevertheless be inventive enough to…”</title>
    <dc:date>2018-08-30T03:15:41+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.instagram.com/p/BnEEKkpFJtE/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[“The world we want to transform has already been worked on by history and is largely hollow. We must nevertheless be inventive enough to change it and build a new world. Take care and do not forget ideas are also weapons.” - subcomandante insurgente Marcos]]></description>
<dc:subject>subcomandantemarcos change reform ideas</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:db9dfa8a552f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:subcomandantemarcos"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:change"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reform"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://austinkleon.com/2018/07/10/ideas-in-cars-honking/">
    <title>Ideas in cars, honking</title>
    <dc:date>2018-07-10T21:10:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://austinkleon.com/2018/07/10/ideas-in-cars-honking/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[[To these examples, I’d add what Earl Sweatshirt says about moments and his process in this interview: 
https://www.npr.org/sections/microphonecheck/2015/03/24/394987116/earl-sweatshirt-im-grown
https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:30b20a46fed3 ]

"There was one great spot in the Dave Chappelle episode, though, that I felt was worth transcribing and sharing. Seinfeld asks Chappelle whether he feels like, knowing he can do a great TV show, he shouldn’t try to do another one.

<blockquote>CHAPPELLE: Sometimes the offering drives. If I [have] an idea, it should drive. It’s like the idea says, “Get in the car.” And I’m like, “Where am I going?” And the idea says, “Don’t worry, I’m driving.” And then you just get there.

SEINFELD: The idea’s driving.

CHAPPELLE: Sometime’s I’m shotgun. Sometimes I’m in the f—ing trunk. The idea takes you where it wants to go.

SEINFELD: That’s great.

CHAPPELLE: And then other times, there’s me, and it’s my ego, like, “I should do something!”

SEINFELD: “I should be driving!”

CHAPPELLE: Yeah.

SEINFELD: That’s not good.

CHAPPELLE: No, ‘cause there’s no idea in the car. It’s just me. That formula doesn’t work.

SEINFELD: If the idea is in the car honking, going, “Let’s go…” It pulls up in front of your house.

CHAPPELLE: That’s exactly right.

SEINFELD: “You’re in your pajamas. Get dressed!”

CHAPPELLE: “I’m not ready!” “You can go like this.” “Where are we going? What are we doing?” “Don’t worry about it. You’ll see.”</blockquote>

Although, there’s another great story about cars and ideas, told by Elizabeth Gilbert:

<blockquote>Tom [Waits], for most of his life, he was pretty much the embodiment of the tormented contemporary modern artist, trying to control and manage and dominate these sort of uncontrollable creative impulses that were totally internalized.

But then he got older, he got calmer, and one day he was driving down the freeway in Los Angeles, and this is when it all changed for him. And he’s speeding along, and all of a sudden he hears this little fragment of melody, that comes into his head as inspiration often comes, elusive and tantalizing, and he wants it, it’s gorgeous, and he longs for it, but he has no way to get it. He doesn’t have a piece of paper, or a pencil, or a tape recorder.

So he starts to feel all of that old anxiety start to rise in him like, “I’m going to lose this thing, and I’ll be be haunted by this song forever. I’m not good enough, and I can’t do it.” And instead of panicking, he just stopped. He just stopped that whole mental process and he did something completely novel. He just looked up at the sky, and he said, “Excuse me, can you not see that I’m driving?”

“Do I look like I can write down a song right now? If you really want to exist, come back at a more opportune moment when I can take care of you. Otherwise, go bother somebody else today. Go bother Leonard Cohen.”

And his whole work process changed after that. Not the work, the work was still oftentimes as dark as ever. But the process, and the heavy anxiety around it was released when he took the genie, the genius out of him where it was causing nothing but trouble, and released it back where it came from, and realized that this didn’t have to be this internalized, tormented thing.</blockquote>

Gilbert interviewed Waits in 2002 and he elaborated on his attitude:

<blockquote>“Kids are always working on songs and throwing them away, like little origami things or paper airplanes. They don’t care if they lose it; they’ll just make another one.” This openness is what every artist needs. Be ready to receive the inspiration when it comes; be ready to let it go when it vanishes. He believes that if a song “really wants to be written down, it’ll stick in my head. If it wasn’t interesting enough for me to remember it, well, it can just move along and go get in someone else’s song.” “Some songs,” he has learned, “don’t want to be recorded.” You can’t wrestle with them or you’ll only scare them off more. Trying to capture them sometimes “is trying to trap birds.” Fortunately, he says, other songs come easy, like “digging potatoes out of the ground.” Others are sticky and weird, like “gum found under an old table.” Clumsy and uncooperative songs may only be useful “to cut up as bait and use ’em to catch other songs.” Of course, the best songs of all are those that enter you “like dreams taken through a straw.’ In those moments, all you can be, Waits says, is grateful.</blockquote>

Brian Eno puts it in terms of surrender and control:

<blockquote>On one side of Eno’s scale diagram, he writes “control”; on the other “surrender”. “We’ve tended to dignify the controlling end of the spectrum,” he says. “We have Nobel prizes for that end.” His idea is that control is what we generally believe the greats – Shakespeare, Picasso, Einstein, Wagner – were about. Such people, the argument goes, controlled their chosen fields, working in isolation, never needing any creative input from others. As for surrender, that idea has become debased: it’s come to mean what the rest of us do when confronted by a work of genius. “We’ve tended to think of the surrender end as a luxury, a nice thing you add to your life when you’ve done the serious work of getting a job, getting your pension sorted out. I’m saying that’s all wrong.”

He pauses, then asks: “I don’t know if you’ve ever read much about the history of shipbuilding?” Not a word. “Old wooden ships had to be constantly caulked up because they leaked. When technology improved, and they could make stiffer ships because of a different way of holding boards together, they broke up. So they went back to making ships that didn’t fit together properly, ships that had flexion. The best vessels surrendered: they allowed themselves to be moved by the circumstances.

“Control and surrender have to be kept in balance. That’s what surfers do – take control of the situation, then be carried, then take control. In the last few thousand years, we’ve become incredibly adept technically. We’ve treasured the controlling part of ourselves and neglected the surrendering part.” Eno considers all his recent art to be a rebuttal to this attitude. “I want to rethink surrender as an active verb,” he says. “It’s not just you being escapist; it’s an active choice. I’m not saying we’ve got to stop being such controlling beings. I’m not saying we’ve got to be back-to-the-earth hippies. I’m saying something more complex.”</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>austinkleon davechappelle jerryseinfeld elizabethgilbert tomwaits brianeno control flow ideas howwethink creativity neoteny children surrender tension howwework howwelearn productivity earlsweatshirt 2018 rap hiphop thebenerudakgositsile music</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:99b1ba5e1cbe/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:austinkleon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davechappelle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jerryseinfeld"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elizabethgilbert"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tomwaits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brianeno"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:control"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:flow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwethink"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:creativity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neoteny"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:surrender"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tension"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwework"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:productivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:earlsweatshirt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2018"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rap"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hiphop"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thebenerudakgositsile"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:music"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.jonbecker.net/are-we-overthinking-general-education/">
    <title>Are we overthinking general education? – Jonathan D. Becker, J.D., Ph.D.</title>
    <dc:date>2018-06-09T21:20:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.jonbecker.net/are-we-overthinking-general-education/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Many colleges and universities are trying to figure out new ways to tackle general education requirements. My own employer, VCU, has been undergoing an effort “to re-imagine our general education curriculum.”  The proposed framework that my VCU colleagues came up with isn’t bad, but it still feels like picking courses out of individual boxes and checking boxes to complete a checklist. It feels like what happens when universities try to be innovative and break out of boxes, but turf wars ensue and departments dig in their heels. The result is an overwrought compromise that doesn’t serve anyone particularly well.

Here is something I wrote on Twitter back in 2015.

[embedded tweet: https://twitter.com/jonbecker/status/670360697105174529

<blockquote>@gsiemens I seriously want to teach a course where all we do is read and discuss @brainpicker and @Longreads. </blockquote> ]

Imagine this learning experience: 1 faculty member with 20-25 students just reading and discussing the Longreads Weekly Top 5. They’d meet once a week, in a meeting room or a coffee shop or outside on a lawn or in the forest; it doesn’t matter. And they’d just talk about what they learned. And maybe they’d blog about it so they could expand their discussion beyond the designated class time and space and could get others outside the class to weigh in. That’s it; that’s the whole instructional design. No predetermined curriculum; very little by way of planning. Learning outcomes? How about curiosity, wonder, critical thinking? Those are your “learning outcomes.” I’d bet students would learn more by reading and deeply discussing those 5 articles each week than they would in most other tightly-designed, pre-packaged curriculum-driven course.

I would also love to involve students in a learning experience built around food shows like Alton Brown’s Good Eats. Seriously. Watch just the first few minutes of this episode. In just the first 3+ minutes, we get history (information about the Ottoman Empire), science (cooking and surface area), and math (computing surface area). In a show about kabobs.

[embedded video: "Good Eats S09E2 Dis-Kabob-Ulated"
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x5skv9x ]

What if general education was more like this? What if students read Longreads and watched episodes of Good Eats as part of an effort around interdisciplinary studies?

And then there’s Anthony Bourdain. To me, Parts Unknown was, at its heart, educational media.

I’m not from West Virginia like Craig Calcaterra (see below) is. But, I spent a lot of time in that state doing field research at the end of the 20th century. When I watched the episode of Parts Unknown that Calcaterra shares, I felt like Bourdain had really captured what I had come to know about the state and then some. Watch the episode and tell me that you didn’t learn a ton. The way Bourdain juxtaposes New York City and his fellow New Yorkers with the “existential enemy” in West Virginia is classic Bourdain."

[embedded tweet: https://twitter.com/craigcalcaterra/status/1005077364131422208

<blockquote>Anthony Bourdain went to West Virginia last year. In one hour he did way better capturing my home state than 1,000 poverty porn tourist journalists with pre-written stories parachuting in from coastal publications have ever done. https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6inwh4 </blockquote> ]

Parts Unknown is an interdisciplinary curriculum. It is about culture, food, history, politics, economics, etc. It’s about people.

[embedded tweet: https://twitter.com/ablington/status/1005056496609169409

<blockquote>Anthony Bourdain had one of the only shows on tv that tried with all its might to teach Americans not to be scared of other people.</blockquote> ]

And isn’t that what general education is?

Replace the word “travel” with the word “learning” in the following quote from Anthony Bourdain.

[embedded tweet: https://twitter.com/Tribeca/status/1005073364531269633

<blockquote>“Travel isn’t always pretty. It isn’t always comfortable. Sometimes it hurts, it even breaks your heart. But that’s okay. The journey changes you; it should change you... You take something with you. Hopefully, you leave something good behind.” — Anthony Bourdain #RIP</blockquote> ]

Maybe we’re overthinking general education in higher education. Probably, in fact.]]></description>
<dc:subject>jonbecker education generaleducation anthonybourdain 2018 interdisciplinary learning travel sharing ideas unschooling deschooling cv culture exploration conversation longreads lcproject openstudioproject howweteach howwelearn</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:e9c2673162fd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jonbecker"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:generaleducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anthonybourdain"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2018"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interdisciplinary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:travel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sharing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unschooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:deschooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cv"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:exploration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conversation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:longreads"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lcproject"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openstudioproject"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://twitter.com/jsamlarose/status/982550369619398656">
    <title>Jacob Sam-La Rose on Twitter: &quot;Spent part of the week on a research dive into platforms for collaborative research, networked learning and collective intelligence. Changed my thinking on the way I use the web (w/ thanks to @rogre and @nomadpoet). (Faceboo</title>
    <dc:date>2018-06-02T20:16:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://twitter.com/jsamlarose/status/982550369619398656</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Spent part of the week on a research dive into platforms for collaborative research, networked learning and collective intelligence. Changed my thinking on the way I use the web (w/ thanks to @rogre and @nomadpoet). 

(Facebook: Twitter link = full thread)
#alt_springbreak

One of the outcomes: it took me a while to see it, but http://Are.na  (@AREdotNA) is now and the future for this kind of effort. I needed to shift my thinking around tagging and categorisation of items.

This blows my mind, and I'm keen to play with it further:
http://pilgrim.are.na/

...and: https://github.com/hxrts/spider  is something I've been trying to figure out how to do with my own personal knowledge management system in order to be able to visualise links between notes/ideas. Exciting stuff.

Put simply, I'm thinking of http://Are.na  as the publicly accessible place I go to synthesise meaning from a range of sources, and collaborate with others in doing so. 

I think my jetpack just arrived.

From https://www.are.na/blog/hello%20world/2017/12/21/to-2018.html "]]></description>
<dc:subject>jacobsam-larose 2018 are.na learning cv howwelearn collectiveintelligence friends collaboration collaborativeresearch research web online socialbookmaking bookmarks bookmarking constructivism ideas api meaning meaningmaking</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:10ba8625393f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jacobsam-larose"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2018"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:are.na"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cv"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collectiveintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:friends"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collaborativeresearch"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:research"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialbookmaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bookmarks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bookmarking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:constructivism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:api"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meaning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meaningmaking"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://thecreativeindependent.com/people/jenny-odell-how-to-grow-an-idea/">
    <title>On how to grow an idea – The Creative Independent</title>
    <dc:date>2018-04-08T07:57:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://thecreativeindependent.com/people/jenny-odell-how-to-grow-an-idea/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["In the 1970s, a Japanese farmer discovered a better way to do something—by not doing it. In the introduction to Masasobu Fukuoka’s One-Straw Revolution, Frances Moore Lappé describes the farmer’s moment of inspiration:

<blockquote>The basic idea came to him one day as he happened to pass an old field which had been left unused and unplowed for many years. There he saw a tangle of grasses and weeds. From that time on, he stopped flooding his field in order to grow rice. He stopped sowing rice seed in the spring and, instead, put the seed out in the autumn, sowing it directly onto the surface of the field when it would naturally have fallen to the ground… Once he has seen to it that conditions have been tilted in favor of his crops, Mr. Fukuoka interferes as little as possible with the plant and animal communities in his fields.</blockquote>

Fukuoka’s practice, which he perfected over many years, eventually became known as “do nothing farming.” Not that it was easy: the do-nothing farmer needed to be more attentive and sensitive to the land and seasons than a regular farmer. After all, Fukuoka’s ingenious method was hard-won after decades of his own close observations of weather patterns, insects, birds, trees, soil, and the interrelationships among all of these.

In One Straw Revolution, Fukuoka is rightly proud of what he has perfected. Do-nothing farming not only required less labor, no machines, and no fertilizer—it also enriched the soil year by year, while most farms depleted their soil. Despite the skepticism of others, Fukuoka’s farm yielded a harvest equal to or greater than that of other farms. “It seems unlikely that there could be a simpler way of raising grain,” he wrote. “The proof is ripening right before your eyes.”

One of Fukuoka’s insights was that there is a natural intelligence at work in existing ecosystems, and therefore the most intelligent way to farm was to interfere as little as possible. This obviously requires a reworking not only of what we consider farming, but maybe even what we consider progress.

“The path I have followed, this natural way of farming, which strikes most people as strange, was first interpreted as a reaction against the advance and reckless development of science. But all I have been doing, farming out here in the country, is trying to show that humanity knows nothing. Because the world is moving with such furious energy in the opposite direction, it may appear that I have fallen behind the times, but I firmly believe that the path I have been following is the most sensible one.”

The One Straw Revolution by Masanobu Fukuoka

✶✶

In my view, Fukuoka was an inventor. Typically we associate invention and progress with the addition or development of new technology. So what happens when moving forward actually means taking something away, or moving in a direction that appears (to us) to be backward? Fukuoka wrote: “This method completely contradicts modern agricultural techniques. It throws scientific knowledge and traditional farming know-how right out the window.”

This practice of fitting oneself into the greater ecological scheme of things is almost comically opposite to the stories in John McPhee’s Control of Nature. There, we find near-Shakespearean tales of folly in which man tries and fails to master the sublime powers of his environment (e.g. the decades-long attempt to keep the Mississippi river from changing course).

Any artist or writer might find this contrast familiar. Why is it that when we sit down and try to force an idea, nothing comes—or, if we succeed in forcing it, it feels stale and contrived? Why do the best ideas appear uninvited and at the strangest times, darting out at us like an impish squirrel from a shrub?

The key, in my opinion, has to do with what you think it is that’s doing the producing, and where. It’s easy for me to say that “I” produce ideas. But when I’ve finished something, it’s often hard for me to say how it happened—where it started, what route it took, and why it ended where it did. Something similar is happening on a do-nothing farm, where transitive verbs seem inadequate. It doesn’t sound quite right to say that Fukuoka “farmed the land”—it’s more like he collaborated with the land, and through his collaboration, created the conditions for certain types of growth.

“A great number, if not the majority, of these things have been described, inventoried, photographed, talked about, or registered. My intention in the pages that follow was to describe the rest instead: that which is generally not taken note of, that which is not noticed, that which has no importance: what happens when nothing happens other than the weather, people, cars, and clouds.”

Attempt at Exhausting a Place in Paris by George Perec

✶✶

I’ve known for my entire adult that going for a walk is how I can think most easily. Walking is not simply moving your thinking mind (some imagined insular thing) outside. The process of walking is thinking. In fact, in his book Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-than-Human World, David Abram proposes that it is not we who are thinking, but rather the environment that is thinking through us. Intelligence and thought are things to be found both in and around the self. “Each place is a unique state of mind,” Abram writes. “And the many owners that constitute and dwell within that locale—the spiders and the tree frogs no less than the human—all participate in, and partake of, the particular mind of the place.”

This is not as hand-wavy as it sounds. Studies in cognitive science have suggested that we do not encounter the environment as a static thing, nor are we static ourselves. As Francisco Varela, Evan Thompson, and Eleanor Rosch put it in The Embodied Mind (a study of cognitive science alongside Buddhist principles): “Cognition is not the representation of a pre-given world by a pre-given mind but is rather the enactment of a world and a mind… “ (emphasis mine). Throughout the book, the authors build a model of cognition in which mind and environment are not separate, but rather co-produced from the very point at which they meet.

[image]

“The Telegarden is an art installation that allows web users to view and interact with a remote garden filled with living plants. Members can plant, water, and monitor the progress of seedlings via the tender movements of an industrial robot arm.”

✶✶

Ideas are not products, as much as corporations would like them to be. Ideas are intersections between ourselves and something else, whether that’s a book, a conversation with a friend, or the subtle suggestion of a tree. Ideas can literally arise out of clouds (if we are looking at them). That is to say: ideas, like consciousness itself, are emergent properties, and thinking might be more participation than it is production. If we can accept this view of the mind with humility and awe, we might be amazed at what will grow there.


breathing [animation]

✶✶

To accompany this essay, I’ve created a channel on Are.na called “How to grow an idea.” There you’ll find some seeds for thought, scattered amongst other growths: slime molds, twining vines, internet gardens, and starling murmurations. The interview with John Cage, where he sits by an open window and rejoices in unwritten music, might remind you a bit of Fukuoka, as might Scott Polach’s piece in which an audience applauds the sunset. The channel starts with a reminder to breathe, and ends with an invitation to take a nap. Hopefully, somewhere in between, you might encounter something new."]]></description>
<dc:subject>intelligence methodology ideas jennyodell 2018 are.na masasobufukuoka francesmoorelappé farming slow nothing idleness nature time patience productivity interdependence multispecies morethanhuman do-nothingfarming labor work sustainability ecosystems progress invention technology knowledge johnmcphee collaboration land growth georgesperec walking thinking slowthinking perception language davidabram cognitivescience franciscovarela evanthompson eleanorrosch buddhism cognition johncage agriculture</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:a3681d7be3e8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:intelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:methodology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jennyodell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2018"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:are.na"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:masasobufukuoka"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:francesmoorelappé"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:farming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:slow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nothing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:idleness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:time"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:patience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:productivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interdependence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:multispecies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:morethanhuman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:do-nothingfarming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sustainability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ecosystems"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:progress"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:invention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:knowledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnmcphee"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:land"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:growth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:georgesperec"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:walking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:slowthinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:perception"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davidabram"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cognitivescience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:franciscovarela"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:evanthompson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:eleanorrosch"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:buddhism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cognition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johncage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:agriculture"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.fs.blog/2018/03/dacher-keltner-power/">
    <title>Survival of the Kindest: Dacher Keltner Reveals the New Rules of Power</title>
    <dc:date>2018-03-10T20:36:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.fs.blog/2018/03/dacher-keltner-power/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["When Pixar was dreaming up the idea for Inside Out, a film that would explore the roiling emotions inside the head of a young girl, they needed guidance from an expert. So they called Dacher Keltner.

Dacher is a psychologist at UC Berkeley who has dedicated his career to understanding how human emotion shapes the way we interact with the world, how we properly manage difficult or stressful situations, and ultimately, how we treat one another.

In fact, he refers to emotions as the “language of social living.” The more fluent we are in this language, the happier and more meaningful our lives can be.

We tackle a wide variety of topics in this conversation that I think you’ll really enjoy.

You’ll learn:

• The three main drivers that determine your personal happiness and life satisfaction
• Simple things you can do everyday to jumpstart the “feel good” reward center of your brain
• The principle of “jen” and how we can use “high-jen behaviors” to bootstrap our own happiness
• How to have more positive influence in our homes, at work and in our communities.
• How to teach your kids to be more kind and empathetic in an increasingly self-centered world
• What you can do to stay grounded and humble if you are in a position of power or authority
• How to catch our own biases when we’re overly critical of another’s ideas (or overconfident in our own)

And much more. We could have spent an hour discussing any one of these points alone, but there was so much I wanted to cover. I’m certain you’ll find this episode well worth your time."]]></description>
<dc:subject>compassion kindness happiness dacherkeltner power charlesdarwin evolution psychology culture society history race racism behavior satisfaction individualism humility authority humans humanism morality morals multispecies morethanhuman objects wisdom knowledge heidegger ideas science socialdarwinism class naturalselection egalitarianism abolitionism care caring art vulnerability artists scientists context replicability research socialsciences 2018 statistics replication metaanalysis socialcontext social borntobegood change human emotions violence evolutionarypsychology slvery rape stevenpinker torture christopherboehm hunter-gatherers gender weapons democracy machiavelli feminism prisons mentalillness drugs prisonindustrialcomplex progress politics 1990s collaboration canon horizontality hierarchy small civilization cities urban urbanism tribes religion dogma polygamy slavery pigeons archaeology inequality nomads nomadism anarchism anarchy agriculture literacy ruleoflaw humanrights governance government hannah</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:7a8edfb20402/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:compassion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kindness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:happiness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dacherkeltner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:power"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charlesdarwin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:race"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:racism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:behavior"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:satisfaction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:individualism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:morality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:morals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:multispecies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:morethanhuman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:objects"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wisdom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:knowledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:heidegger"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialdarwinism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:class"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:naturalselection"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:egalitarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:abolitionism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:care"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:caring"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:vulnerability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scientists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:context"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:replicability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:research"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialsciences"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2018"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:statistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:replication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:metaanalysis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialcontext"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:social"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:borntobegood"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:change"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:human"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:emotions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:violence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:evolutionarypsychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:slvery"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rape"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stevenpinker"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:torture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christopherboehm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hunter-gatherers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gender"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:weapons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:democracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:machiavelli"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:feminism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:prisons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mentalillness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:drugs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:prisonindustrialcomplex"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:progress"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1990s"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:canon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:horizontality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hierarchy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:small"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:civilization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:urban"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:urbanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tribes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:religion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dogma"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:polygamy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:slavery"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pigeons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:archaeology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inequality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nomads"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nomadism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anarchism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anarchy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:agriculture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:literacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ruleoflaw"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanrights"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:governance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:government"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hannah"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/22/books/review/brian-selznick-by-the-book.html">
    <title>Brian Selznick: By the Book - The New York Times</title>
    <dc:date>2018-02-26T01:11:22+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/22/books/review/brian-selznick-by-the-book.html</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["I learned that Leonardo da Vinci was a failure. Walter Isaacson’s wonderful biography turns Leonardo from an icon into a human being. For me Leonardo becomes the most human in the explorations of his endless failures: unfinished paintings and statues, ruined frescoes, unpublished ideas, unbuilt machines. Michelangelo even made fun of Leonardo for never managing to finish a giant bronze horse. Of course, these failures are tied to Leonardo’s deep curiosity, which kept him endlessly moving forward, questing for more knowledge and understanding, while the things that we recognize as his “work” often seemed to suffer. Isaacson points out that many experts bemoan all the unfinished work left in the wake of Leonardo’s self-education, but he also points out that it’s the same self-education that enabled Leonardo to create the “Vitruvian Man,” the “Mona Lisa” and “The Last Supper.” Not bad for a failure, I guess."]]></description>
<dc:subject>failure leonardodavinci 2018 brianselznick unfinished curiosity michelangelo messiness self-education education howwelearn learning distraction art invention ideas</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:115d9b682bb7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:failure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:leonardodavinci"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2018"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brianselznick"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unfinished"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:curiosity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:michelangelo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:messiness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:self-education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:distraction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:invention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://austinkleon.com/2018/02/24/the-tools-matter-and-the-tools-dont-matter/">
    <title>The tools matter and the tools don’t matter</title>
    <dc:date>2018-02-25T23:08:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://austinkleon.com/2018/02/24/the-tools-matter-and-the-tools-dont-matter/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["What I love about Gardner and Barry is that they believe that the tools you use do matter, but the point, for them, is finding the proper tools that get you to a certain way of working in which you can get your conscious, mechanical mind out of the way so that your dreaming can go on, undeterred.

You have to find the right tools to help your voice sing.

For Lynda, it was the paintbrush that allowed her to get to the point where she could basically take dictation—“to dream it out” without editing—but it could’ve been anything, really. (I should note that Lynda happily details the exact sumi-e brush and ink she used to make One! Hundred! Demons! in the back of the book.) While I don’t myself use a brush and legal paper to draft my work, I keep a page from the manuscript hanging in my bedroom to remind me of the importance of handwriting and slowing down."

…

"As for non-fiction writing, my friend Clive Thompson took the “pencil vs. typewriter” thing literally and researched when you should write with a pencil and when you should type on the keyboard.

What he discovered was that handwriting is great for coming up with ideas, for note-taking and big picture thinking. So, when you’re at lectures or in meetings or brainstorming ideas, it’s a good idea to scribble or doodle in your notebook. So always carry a pencil. (Clive got me into Palamino Blackwings.)

Typing, on the other hand, is great for producing writing for other people, say, writing an article. The faster you type, Clive said, the better your ideas will be. There’s a thing called “transcription fluency,” which boils down to: “when your fingers can’t move as fast as your thoughts, your ideas suffer.” If you help people increase their typing speed, their thoughts improve. (Learn to type faster!)

So, yes, the tools matter, but again, it’s all about what you are trying to achieve. So a question like, “What brand of pen do you use?” is not as good as “How do you get that thick line quality?” or “How do you dodge Writer’s Block?”"]]></description>
<dc:subject>austinkleon tools writing howwework 2018 advice art lyndabarry johngardner clivethompson typing handwriting ideas notetaking</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:1672674a145f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:austinkleon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwework"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2018"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:advice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lyndabarry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johngardner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:clivethompson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:typing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:handwriting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:notetaking"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://medium.com/@sts_news/design-thinking-is-kind-of-like-syphilis-its-contagious-and-rots-your-brains-842ed078af29">
    <title>Design Thinking is Kind of Like Syphilis — It’s Contagious and Rots Your Brains</title>
    <dc:date>2017-12-31T05:30:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://medium.com/@sts_news/design-thinking-is-kind-of-like-syphilis-its-contagious-and-rots-your-brains-842ed078af29</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Miller never bothers to define all the modes, and we will consider them more below. But for now, we should just note that the entire model is based on design consulting: You try to understand the client’s problem, what he or she wants or needs. You sharpen that problem so it’s easier to solve. You think of ways to solve it. You try those solutions out to see if they work. And then once you’ve settled on something, you ask your client for feedback. By the end, you’ve created a “solution,” which is also apparently an “innovation.”

Miller also never bothers to define the liberal arts. The closest he comes is to say they are ways of “thinking that all students should be exposed to because it enhances their understanding of everything else.” Nor does he make clear what he means by the idea that Design Thinking is or could be the new liberal arts. Is it but one new art to be added to the traditional liberal arts, such as grammar, logic, rhetoric, math, music, and science? Or does Miller think, like Hennessy and Kelly, that all of education should be rebuilt around the DTs? Who knows.

Miller is most impressed with Design Thinking’s Empathize Mode. He writes lyrically, “Human-centered design redescribes the classical aim of education as the care and tending of the soul; its focus on empathy follows directly from Rousseau’s stress on compassion as a social virtue.” Beautiful. Interesting.

But what are we really talking about here? The d.school’s An Introduction to Design Thinking PROCESS GUIDE says, “The Empathize Mode is the work you do to understand people, within the context of your design challenge.” We can use language like “empathy” to dress things up, but this is Business 101. Listen to your client; find out what he or she wants or needs.

Miller calls the Empathize Mode “ethnography,” which is deeply uncharitable — and probably offensive — to cultural anthropologists who spend their entire lives learning how to observe other people. Few, if any, anthropologists would sign onto the idea that some amateurs at a d.school “boot camp,” strolling around Stanford and gawking at strangers, constitutes ethnography. The Empathize Mode of Design Thinking is roughly as ethnographic as a marketing focus group or a crew of sleazoid consultants trying to feel out and up their clients’ desires.

What Miller, Kelly, and Hennessy are asking us to imagine is that design consulting is or could be a model for retooling all of education, that it has some method for “producing reliably innovative results in any field.” They believe that we should use Design Thinking to reform education by treating students as customers, or clients, and making sure our customers are getting what they want. And they assert that Design Thinking should be a central part of what students learn, so that graduates come to approach social reality through the model of design consulting. In other words, we should view all of society as if we are in the design consulting business."

…

In recent episode of the Design Observer podcast, Jen added further thoughts on Design Thinking. “The marketing of design thinking is completely bullshit. It’s even getting worse and worse now that [Stanford has] three-day boot camps that offer certified programs — as if anyone who enrolled in these programs can become a designer and think like a designer and work like a designer.” She also resists the idea that any single methodology “can deal with any kind of situation — not to mention the very complex society that we’re in today.”

In informal survey I conducted with individuals who either teach at or were trained at the top art, architecture, and design schools in the USA, most respondents said that they and their colleagues do not use the term Design Thinking. Most of the people pushing the DTs in higher education are at second- and third-tier universities and, ironically, aren’t innovating but rather emulating Stanford. In afew cases, respondents said they did know a colleague or two who was saying “Design Thinking” frequently, but in every case, the individuals were using the DTs either to increase their turf within the university or to extract resources from college administrators who are often willing to throw money at anything that smacks of “innovation.”

Moreover, individuals working in art, architecture, and design schools tend to be quite critical of existing DT programs. Reportedly, some schools are creating Design Thinking tracks for unpromising students who couldn’t hack it in traditional architecture or design programs — DT as “design lite.” The individuals I talked to also had strong reservations about the products coming out of Design Thinking classes. A traditional project in DT classes involves undergraduate students leading “multidisciplinary” or “transdisciplinary” teams drawing on faculty expertise around campus to solve some problem of interest to the students. The students are not experts in anything, however, and the projects often take the form of, as one person put it, “kids trying to save the world.”

One architecture professor I interviewed had been asked to sit in on a Design Thinking course’s critique, a tradition at architecture and design schools where outside experts are brought in to offer (often tough) feedback on student projects. The professor watched a student explain her design: a technology that was meant to connect mothers with their premature babies who they cannot touch directly. The professor wondered, what is the message about learning that students get from such projects? “I guess the idea is that this work empowers the students to believe they are applying their design skills,” the professor told me. “But I couldn’t critique it as design because there was nothing to it as design. So what’s left? Is good will enough?

As others put it to me, Design Thinking gives students an unrealistic idea of design and the work that goes into creating positive change. Upending that old dictum “knowledge is power,” Design Thinkers giver their students power without knowledge, “creative confidence” without actual capabilities.

It’s also an elitist, Great White Hope vision of change that literally asks students to imagine themselves entering a situation to solve other people’s problems. Among other things, this situation often leads to significant mismatch between designers’ visions — even after practicing “empathy” — and users’ actual needs. Perhaps the most famous example is the PlayPump, a piece of merry-go-round equipment that would pump water when children used it. Designers envisioned that the PlayPump would provide water to thousands of African communities. Only kids didn’t show up, including because there was no local cultural tradition of playing with merry-go-rounds.

Unsurprisingly, Design Thinking-types were enthusiastic about the PlayPump. Tom Hulme, the design director at IDEO’s London office, created a webpage called OpenIDEO, where users could share “open source innovation.” Hulme explained that he found himself asking, “What would IDEO look like on steroids? [We might ask the same question about crack cocaine or PCP.] What would it look like when you invite everybody into everything? I set myself the challenge of . . . radical open-innovation collaboration.” OpenIDEO community users were enthusiastic about the PlayPump — even a year after the system had been debunked, suggesting inviting everyone to everything gets you people who don’t do research. One OpenIDEO user enthused that the PlayPump highlighted how “fun can be combined with real needs.”

Thom Moran, an Assistant Professor of Architecture at the University of Michigan, told me that Design Thinking brought “a whole set of values about what design’s supposed to look like,” including that everything is supposed to be “fun” and “play,” and that the focus is less on “what would work.” Moran went on, “The disappointing part for me is that I really do believe that architecture, art, and design should be thought of as being a part of the liberal arts. They provide a unique skill set for looking at and engaging the world, and being critical of it.” Like others I talked to, Moran doesn’t see this kind of critical thinking in the popular form of Design Thinking, which tends to ignore politics, environmental issues, and global economic problems.

Moran holds up the Swiffer — the sweeper-mop with disposable covers designed by an IDEO-clone design consultancy, Continuum — as a good example of what Design Thinking is all about. “It’s design as marketing,” he said. “It’s about looking for and exploiting a market niche. It’s not really about a new and better world. It’s about exquisitely calibrating a product to a market niche that is underexploited.” The Swiffer involves a slight change in old technologies, and it is wasteful. Others made this same connection between Design Thinking and marketing. One architect said that Design Thinking “really belongs in business schools, where they teach marketing and other forms of moral depravity.”

“That’s what’s most annoying,” Moran went on. “I fundamentally believe in this stuff as a model of education. But it’s business consultants who give TED Talks who are out there selling it. It’s all anti-intellectual. That’s the problem. Architecture and design are profoundly intellectual. But for these people, it’s not a form of critical thought; it’s a form of salesmanship.”

Here’s my one caveat: it could be true that the DTs are a good way to teach design or business. I wouldn’t know. I am not a designer (or business school professor). I am struck, however, by how many designers, including Natasha Jen and Thom Moran, believe that the DTs are nonsense. In the end, I will leave this discussion up to designers. It’s their show. My concern is a different one — namely that some fools are proposing that we build the DTs into many other parts of education. With even a bit of critical reflection, it’s clear that Design Thinking is even worse in these other contexts."

…

"There is reason for hope. There really is.

The greatest and most savage critic of Design Thinking has emerged from the heart of the Design Thinking world itself. His name is Bill Burnett, and he is a comedic genius.

Burnett is the Executive Director of “Stanford’s innovative Product Design program.” As his bio explains, Burnett has a “Masters of Science in Product Design at Stanford and has worked in start-ups and Fortune 100 companies, including seven years at Apple designing award-winning laptops and a number of years in the toy industry designing Star Wars action figures.”

No one is really clear what made Burnett break. Perhaps he just got tired of pretending that making yet another Chewbacca figurine constituted any kind of meaningful innovation. But about a decade ago, he began plotting to overthrow the Design Thinking madness that surrounded him — and to do so solely through the use of comedy.

Burnett’s first step was to found something called the “Life Design Lab” at the d.school and to create a new course, “Designing Your Life,” where he would begin rehearsing his satirical material. The conceit was that you could use Design Thinking as a form of self-help. He called the class d.life to lampoon Stanford’s ridiculous fashions and to skewer the idiocy of thinking a paint-by-numbers system for consulting could also be used to “design” human existence.

After nine years of creating and rehearsing jokes and one-liners in d.life, Burnett was ready for prime time. With his co-author Dave Evans, he wrote and published the 2016 book, Designing Your Life: How to Build a Well-Lived, Joyful Life.

If you thought Stephen Colbert’s I am America (and So Can You!), John Hodgman’s The Areas of My Expertise, or Amy Schumer’s The Girl with the Lower Back Tattoo were hysterical, you really must rush out and get a copy of Designing Your Life right now! I have read the book aloud at parties and nearly killed everyone in the room.

Designing Your Life is full of wonderful satirical moments where Burnett and Evans unmask Design Thinking as a fraud. For instance, they write, “Design doesn’t just work for creating cool stuff like computers and Ferraris; it works in creating a cool life.” They also poke fun at DT’s habit of overselling its promises, “A well-designed life is a life that is generative — it is constantly creative, productive, changing, evolving, and there is always the possibility of surprise.” (italics in the original) The book mauls Design Thinkers’ oversimplification of the world through absurd diagrams and formulas, like this one: Problem Finding + Problem Solving = Well-Designed Life. (Bolding and italics in original).

There’s a deeper level to Burnett’s humor, though, a layer beyond farce, which is a kind of meta-commentary on Design Thinking’s hucksterism. The best example is how Burnett and Evans use the term “reframe” in the book. In Design Thinking, “reframe” is jargon for looking at a problem in a different way. As an article titled, “How Reframing a Problem Unlocks Innovation,” puts it, “Mastering the ability to reframe problems is an important tool for your imagination because it unlocks a vast array of solutions.”

In Design Your Life, Burnett and Evans apply the reframe to self-help. Here’s one example from page xii:

[image]

B&A’s too-cruel satire works in this way: anyone who knows anything about the history of psychology will instantly see that “reframe” as a reformulation of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). CBT has been one of the most prominent schools of therapy since at least the 1980s. A core assumption of CBT is that individuals are tortured by “negative thought patterns” or “negative automatic thoughts.” CBT encourages us to “challenge” those often by coming up with mantras that give a more realistic and supportive perspective. We can challenge “I am a fat turd” with “I’m good enough, I’m smart enough, and gosh darn it, people like me.”

This CBT rubric has formed the basis for hundreds, thousands, maybe even hundreds of thousands of self-help books for the last three decades, but Burnett and Evans make nary a mention of this fact. They just call negative thought patterns “dysfunctional beliefs” and challenges “reframes.”

In a gorgeous example of meta-commentary, what they are pointing out is that Design Thinking is the act of taking ideas that already exist, sexing up them up with a bit of rouge, and putting them in other words. Typically, people with a bad case of the DTs do this without recognizing their predecessors but instead claim to have done something new, to have made some “innovation.” As the historians David Edgerton and Will Thomas have argued, such bogus novelty claims actually produce ignorance because they hide the true nature of social reality from the speaker’s audience; they elide whole traditions of thought.

Burnett and Evans unmask all of this for us. Truly, this is some of the smartest humor in decades.

Writing humor is hard, but doing standup is much harder, and Burnett turned out to be a master. Watch at least the first minute and ten seconds of this video, and listen for the line, “Now, I’m gonna give you the first reframe, designers love reframes.”

[video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SemHh0n19LA ]

Did you see and hear how he totally nails it? A perfect landing. He doesn’t even smirk. If you weren’t in on his brilliance, you might not even realize he was joking. He’s just that good.

Now, you can pay Burnett and Company $950 or more to take trademarked “Life Design” workshops — like this one, Designing Your Life for Women — though it’s not clear if the rumors are true and these are actually improv comedy classes or if Burnett just decided to take advantage of people who are stupid enough to believe that self-help banalities put in other words as Design Thinking could somehow improve their lives. My own guess is that these are comedy seminars, though. Just read this description: “We will focus on balance and energy, use ideation techniques to help get you unstuck, build Odyssey Plans for three potential futures, and define ways to prototype the compelling parts of these futures.”

Burnett has become the first comedian of the emerging and uncertain Post-Innovation-Speak Age. His wry voice is one of wisdom. He’s showing us the path away from bullshit and away from a juvenile picture of culture. As some book once said, “When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child.” Burnett is imploring us to put away our childish things, to donate our Star Wars toys to Goodwill. It’s why his fall-down-laughing “reframe” jokes work so flawlessly. Burnett’s saying that we have to move beyond a moment where we put old wine in new bottles and call it genuine progress, that we have to move beyond this hollow era of repackaging. Burnett is reminding us that, for whatever reason, God did not fill his promised land full of Juiceros. He’s arguing that we shouldn’t pretend that we can boil education and, like, human life down into five-point diagram for selling shit. What he’s telling us is that it takes so many years of training, discipline, and hard work to even recognize something that is genuinely new, let alone pull it off.

Burnett is also pushing us to move beyond Design Thinking’s lipstick-on-a-pig conception of innovation. For instance, there is the question of where the pig came from and how to maintain and care for the pig so that it lives a long, healthy, happy piggy life. Burnett is begging us to adopt a mature, grounded, realistic picture of ordinary human life with technology. It’s the view of technology you get from authors who write books for grownups, like Ruth Schwartz Cowan’s More Work for Mother and David Edgerton’s Shock of the Old. It’s the conception of technology Andy Russell, many others, and I have been trying to explore through The Maintainers, an international research network dedicated to studying maintenance, repair, upkeep, and all the mundane labor that keeps the world going.

For all of these reasons and more, we’ve recently adopted Burnett as the Patron Comedy Saint of The Maintainers. I mean, how could we not? Virtually everything that comes out of his mouth is hilarious. That dude SLAYS!!!!!!!!!"]]></description>
<dc:subject>designthinking innovation ideas 2017 design leevinsel maintenance repair ideation problemsolving davidedgerton willthomas billburnett daveevans stanford d.school natashajen herbertsimon robertmckim ideo singularity singularityuniversity d.tech education schools teaching liberalarts petermiller esaleninstitute newage hassoplattner johnhennessey davidkelly jimjones empathy ethnography consulting business bullshit marketing snakeoil criticism criticalthinking highereducation highered thomamoran tedtalks openideo playpump designimperialism whitesaviors post-its transdisciplinary multidisciplinary crossdisciplinary art architecture complexity simplicity methodology process emptiness universities colleges philipmirowski entrepreneurship lawrencebusch elizabethpoppberman nathanielcomfort margaretbrindle peterstearns christophermckenna hucksterism self-promotion hype georgeorwell nathanrosenberg davidmowery stevenklepper davidhounshell patrickmccray marianamazzucato andréspicer humanitariandesign themaintainers ma</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:afd19e14ccba/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:designthinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:innovation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2017"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:leevinsel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maintenance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:repair"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:problemsolving"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davidedgerton"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:willthomas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:billburnett"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:daveevans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stanford"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:d.school"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:natashajen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:herbertsimon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robertmckim"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:singularity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:singularityuniversity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:d.tech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:liberalarts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:petermiller"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:esaleninstitute"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:newage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hassoplattner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnhennessey"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davidkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jimjones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:empathy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ethnography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consulting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bullshit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marketing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:snakeoil"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:criticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:criticalthinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thomamoran"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tedtalks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openideo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:playpump"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:designimperialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:whitesaviors"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:post-its"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:transdisciplinary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:multidisciplinary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:crossdisciplinary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:architecture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:simplicity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:methodology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:process"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:emptiness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colleges"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philipmirowski"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:entrepreneurship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lawrencebusch"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elizabethpoppberman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nathanielcomfort"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:margaretbrindle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:peterstearns"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christophermckenna"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hucksterism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:self-promotion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hype"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:georgeorwell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nathanrosenberg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davidmowery"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stevenklepper"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davidhounshell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:patrickmccray"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marianamazzucato"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:andréspicer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanitariandesign"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:themaintainers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ma"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hurryslowly.co/003-craig-mod/">
    <title>003: Craig Mod - I Want My Attention Back! • Hurry Slowly</title>
    <dc:date>2017-11-21T21:58:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://hurryslowly.co/003-craig-mod/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Did you know that the mere presence of a smartphone near you is slowly draining away your cognitive energy and attention? (Even if it’s tucked away in a desk drawer or a bag.) Like it or not, the persistent use of technology is changing the quality of our attention. And not in a good way.

In this episode, I talk with writer, designer and technologist Craig Mod — who’s done numerous experiments in reclaiming his attention — about how we can break out of this toxic cycle of smartphone and social media addiction and regain control of our powers of concentration.

Key takeaways from the interview:

• How Facebook and other social media apps are lulling us into “attention slavery”

• Why interrupting your workflow to post on social media — and sharing pithy thoughts or ideas — shuts down your creative process

• How short digital detox retreats and/or meditation sessions can “defrag your mind” so that you can deploy your attention more consciously and more powerfully

• Why mapping your ideas in large offline spaces — e.g. on a whiteboard or blackboard — gives you “permission” to get messy and evolve your thinking in a way that’s impossible on a screen

• How changing the quality of your attention can change your relationship to everything — art, conversations, creativity, and business"

…

"Favorite Quotes

“If there was a meter of 1 to 10 of how present you are or how much you can manipulate your own attention — how confident you are that you could, say, read a book for three hours without an interruption, without feeling pulled to something else. I would say the baseline pre-smartphone was a 4 or 3. Now, it’s a 1.”

“I think that a life in which you are never present, in which you have no control over your attention, in which you’re constantly being pulled in different directions, is kind of sad — because there is this incredible gift of consciousness. And when that consciousness is deployed smartly, it’s amazing the things that can be built out of it.”

Resources

Here’s a shortlist of things Craig and I talked about in the course of the conversation, including where you can go on a meditation retreat. You should be aware that vipassana retreats are offered free of charge, and are open to anyone.

Craig’s piece on attention from Backchannel magazine
https://www.wired.com/2017/01/how-i-got-my-attention-back/

Vipassana meditation retreat locations
https://www.dhamma.org/en-US/index

Craig’s article on post-100 hours of meditation
https://craigmod.com/roden/013/

Film director Krzysztof Kieslowski
http://www.indiewire.com/2013/03/the-essentials-krzysztof-kieslowski-100770/

Writer and technologist Kevin Kelly
http://kk.org/thetechnium/

The Large Hadron Collider at Cern
http://www.wired.co.uk/article/large-hadron-collider-explained "]]></description>
<dc:subject>attention craigmod zoominginandout ideas thinking focus meditation technology blackboards messiness presence writing relationships conversation art creativity digitaldetox maps mapping brainstorming socialmedia internet web online retreats jocelynglei howwethink howewrite concentration interruption kevinkelly vipassana krzysztofkieslowski largehadroncollider cern</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:ec2fb2dcb6a2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:craigmod"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:zoominginandout"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:focus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meditation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:blackboards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:messiness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:presence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:relationships"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conversation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:creativity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:digitaldetox"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mapping"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brainstorming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:retreats"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jocelynglei"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwethink"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:concentration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interruption"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinkelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:vipassana"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:krzysztofkieslowski"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:largehadroncollider"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cern"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o341S4xh1r0">
    <title>Impakt Festival 2017 - Performance: ANAB JAIN. HQ - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2017-11-14T06:32:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o341S4xh1r0</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[[Embedded here: http://impakt.nl/festival/reports/impakt-festival-2017/impakt-festival-2017-anab-jain/ ]

"'Everything is Beautiful and Nothing Hurts': @anab_jain's expansive keynote @impaktfestival weaves threads through death, transcience, uncertainty, growthism, technological determinism, precarity, imagination and truths. Thanks to @jonardern for masterful advise on 'modelling reality', and @tobias_revell and @ndkane for the invitation."
https://www.instagram.com/p/BbctTcRFlFI/ ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>anabjain 2017 superflux death aging transience time temporary abundance scarcity future futurism prototyping speculativedesign predictions life living uncertainty film filmmaking design speculativefiction experimentation counternarratives designfiction futuremaking climatechange food homegrowing smarthomes iot internetofthings capitalism hope futures hopefulness data dataviz datavisualization visualization williamplayfair society economics wonder williamstanleyjevons explanation statistics wiiliambernstein prosperity growth latecapitalism propertyrights jamescscott objectivity technocrats democracy probability scale measurement observation policy ai artificialintelligence deeplearning algorithms technology control agency bias biases neoliberalism communism present past worldview change ideas reality lucagatti alextaylor unknown possibility stability annalowenhaupttsing imagination ursulaleguin truth storytelling paradigmshifts optimism annegalloway miyamotomusashi annatsing smarthome ursulakleguin latestagec</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:0eae1abc104e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anabjain"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2017"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:superflux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:death"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:transience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:time"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:temporary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:abundance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scarcity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:future"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:futurism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:prototyping"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:speculativedesign"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:predictions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:living"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:uncertainty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:film"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:filmmaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:speculativefiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:experimentation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:counternarratives"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:designfiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:futuremaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:climatechange"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:food"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:homegrowing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:smarthomes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:iot"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internetofthings"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hope"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:futures"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hopefulness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dataviz"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:datavisualization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:visualization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:williamplayfair"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wonder"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:williamstanleyjevons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:explanation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:statistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wiiliambernstein"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:prosperity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:growth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:latecapitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:propertyrights"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jamescscott"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:objectivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technocrats"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:democracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:probability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scale"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:measurement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:observation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:deeplearning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:algorithms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:control"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:agency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bias"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:biases"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neoliberalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:communism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:present"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:past"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:worldview"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:change"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lucagatti"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alextaylor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unknown"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:possibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:annalowenhaupttsing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:imagination"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ursulaleguin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:truth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:storytelling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:paradigmshifts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:optimism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:annegalloway"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:miyamotomusashi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:annatsing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:smarthome"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ursulakleguin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:latestagec"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://theundefeated.com/features/ibram-kendi-leading-scholar-of-racism-says-education-and-love-are-not-the-answer/">
    <title>Ibram Kendi, one of the nation’s leading scholars of racism, says education and love are not the answer</title>
    <dc:date>2017-09-25T01:09:12+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://theundefeated.com/features/ibram-kendi-leading-scholar-of-racism-says-education-and-love-are-not-the-answer/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["“We have been taught that ignorance and hate lead to racist ideas, lead to racist policies,” Kendi said. “If the fundamental problem is ignorance and hate, then your solutions are going to be focused on education, and love and persuasion. But of course [Stamped from the Beginning] shows that the actual foundation of racism is not ignorance and hate, but self-interest, particularly economic and political and cultural.” Self-interest drives racist policies that benefit that self-interest. When the policies are challenged because they produce inequalities, racist ideas spring up to justify those policies. Hate flows freely from there.

The self-interest: The Portuguese had to justify their pioneering slave trade of African people before the pope.

The racist idea: Africans are barbarians. If we remove them from Africa and enslave them, they could be civilized.

“We can understand this very simply with slavery. I’m enslaving people because I want to make money. Abolitionists are resisting me, so I’m going to convince Americans that these people should be enslaved because they’re black, and then people will start believing those ideas: that these people are so barbaric, that they need to be enslaved, or that they are so childlike that they need to be enslaved.”

Kendi boils racist ideas down to an irreducible core: Any idea that suggests one racial group is superior or inferior to another group in any way is a racist idea, he says, and there are two types. Segregationist ideas contend racial groups are created unequal. Assimilationist ideas, as Kendi defines them, argue that both discrimination and problematic black people are to blame for inequalities.

Americans who don’t carry tiki torches react viscerally to segregationist ideas like those on display at the white nationalist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, that left one young counter-protester dead. Assimilationist ideas are more subtle, seductive and coded.

“You can be someone who has no intention to be racist,” who believes in and fights for equality, “but because you’re conditioned in a world that is racist and a country that is structured in anti-black racism, you yourself can perpetuate those ideas,” says Kendi. No matter what color you are.

Anti-racist ideas hold that racial groups are equal. That the only thing inferior about black people is their opportunities. “The only thing wrong with black people is that we think there is something wrong with black people,” a line that Kendi uses like a mantra.

The Blue Lives Matter (the problem is violent black people) Black Lives Matter (the problem is the criminal justice system, poor training and police bias) and All Lives Matter (the problem is police and black people) arguments are extensions of the same, three-way debate (segregationist, anti-racist and assimilationist) that Americans have been having since the founding of the country.

“We’ve been taught American history as a steady march of racial progress,” but it’s always been a dual march of racial and racist progress, which we see from Charlottesville to “their Trump Tower,” Kendi says.

This is the jump-off Kendi uses to frame the most roiling issues of the day. But before he could build that frame, he first had to deal with his own racism."]]></description>
<dc:subject>racism history ideas 2017 ibramkendi via:ablerism assimilation inequlity blacklivesmatter bluelivesmatter alllivesmatter self-interest capitalism politics culture</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:db5ac6cd9555/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:racism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2017"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ibramkendi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:via:ablerism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:assimilation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inequlity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:blacklivesmatter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bluelivesmatter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alllivesmatter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:self-interest"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.wordworkskingston.com/WordWorks/Home.html">
    <title>The WordWorks Literacy Centre [structured word inquiry]</title>
    <dc:date>2017-06-28T23:02:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.wordworkskingston.com/WordWorks/Home.html</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[[See also: http://www.nuevaschool.org/academics/structured-word-inquiry ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>spelling writing english language class ideas petebowers structuredwordinquiry</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:2dc4ebe8bfec/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:spelling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:english"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:class"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:petebowers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:structuredwordinquiry"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.theguardian.com/film/2017/jan/06/john-berger-obituary-letter">
    <title>Letter: John Berger was generous with his knowledge | Film | The Guardian</title>
    <dc:date>2017-01-08T21:38:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.theguardian.com/film/2017/jan/06/john-berger-obituary-letter</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["In 1972, while a student at the London Film School, I directed, with a team of other students, a film based on John Berger’s book A Fortunate Man, for the British Film Institute. Being young and inexperienced, I was extremely nervous about asking John if we could use his book as a basis for a film, knowing how publishers and agents guard their intellectual property. But with just one phone call to John everything was agreed. He maintained that the ideas contained within the book were, in his words, “open to all”.

That was typical of Berger, a generous and open-minded man who encouraged young people to make the most of their opportunities."]]></description>
<dc:subject>open openness johnberger 2017 generosity jeffperks mentorship ideas</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:876bfe0d6ab3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnberger"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2017"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:generosity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jeffperks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mentorship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://web.stanford.edu/~manup/CabinetofCuriosity.html">
    <title>Organismic Biophysics and Living Soft-Matter: Prakash Lab, Stanford University</title>
    <dc:date>2016-11-28T01:14:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://web.stanford.edu/~manup/CabinetofCuriosity.html</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Historically, "Cabinets of Curiosity" were physical cabinets (or rooms) containing a collection of objects which could not be categorized (or understood methodologically) in any way. Since I primarily run a curiosity driven lab, I am fascinated with this Renaissance notion of collecting objects, ideas and problems that don't fit our current framework of thinking.

Mostly I will use this space to share my thoughts on science (akin of a blog), highlight mentorship advice for young scientists (like myself) and just share with a general audience why (and how) we do science. 

Feel free to write me any comments you might have. 

cheers, manu"]]></description>
<dc:subject>manuprakash cabinetsofcuriosity classideas sfsh collections museums curiosity curiosities ideas moodboards</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:58a58e45de23/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:manuprakash"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cabinetsofcuriosity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:classideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sfsh"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collections"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:museums"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:curiosity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:curiosities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:moodboards"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://alyssafisher.tumblr.com/post/134129230588/i-have-a-million-ideas-im-boiling-over-with">
    <title>anf — I have a million ideas. I’m boiling over with...</title>
    <dc:date>2015-12-09T06:27:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://alyssafisher.tumblr.com/post/134129230588/i-have-a-million-ideas-im-boiling-over-with</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["I have a million ideas. I’m boiling over with them. I had to go for a walk to get away from them, but the problem with ideas is that the more you walk, the more you get. They breed in the brainpan."
— Lauren Groff, Fates and Furies, page 129]]></description>
<dc:subject>quotes ideas larengroff brains via:lukeneff</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:f50a2a05522e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quotes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:larengroff"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brains"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:via:lukeneff"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://medium.com/@zachlieberman/lessons-for-students-cf1acf200ee#.7an1bo5as">
    <title>lessons for students — Medium</title>
    <dc:date>2015-11-28T00:20:27+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://medium.com/@zachlieberman/lessons-for-students-cf1acf200ee#.7an1bo5as</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["lesson 1: Everything is about curiosity …

lesson 2: The world is Hungry for Ideas …

Lesson 3: Questions are key. Questions lead to conversation, conversation leads to learning. 

At the School for Poetic Computation we start the first day always with the same activity — sit quietly by yourself for 20–30 mins and write down every question you have about what we are studying. Then, in smaller groups (and then finally in a larger group) we organize and collate these questions, developing a taxonomy. In some ways this is a contrast to typical school term, where you are presented with a syllabus that kind of lays out the answers.

The reason we do this is that invariably questions lead to discussion and talking and we’re really of the mindset that education is basically structured conversation — that the key to learning is talking, and through talking, we can find better metaphors, better illustrations, better explanations to make harder things simple, or explain how a gets to z.

Lesson 4. Together we know more …

Lesson 5: Simple and honest things win …

Lesson 6: Artistic practice is research, take that obligation seriously. 

You are a researcher.

I’ve made the argument for a long time that artistic practice is a form or research, the same way a car company might have an R&D department to think about cars of the future, artists are a kind of R&D department for humanity thinking about different possible futures. It’s important to take the job of research seriously: to study the history, to take notes about process, to publish, etc. In terms of history, I think it’s crucial to know your field, who came before you and to explore the work of the past. We have a tendency to work and think ahistorically (think about how often you hear about “what a revolutionary time we live in”) and it can present profound limitations to creative practice. Note taking is also crucial — I think the more you approach the creative process as a study vs some sort of magical moment of inspiration, the more fruitful your work will be. Finally, publishing is crucial. Scientists write papers, synthasize findings, etc — artists should do the same. In my case, I use open source as a mechanism, but there are plenty of mechanisms for publishing. I think it’s a crucial part of taking R&D seriously.

Lesson 7: Everything operates at a time scale you don’t know.

You are a farmer.

I’ve found (from over a decade working in media art) that things you do take time and work in timescales that you don’t understand. A project you start one year will come back years later, or an idea you have can only be realized at some later point in your life. I think it’s hard as a student to understand timescale. I try to use the metaphor of a farmer, since it feels to me that things you do one year might have impacts years later.

At eyeo festival two years ago I mentioned to the audience during a talk that at the beginning of every class I tell students, “I adopt you.” After the talk, someone came up to me and he said, “10 years ago, I was in a workshop you gave in Brazil where you said, ‘I adopt you’… I didn’t even recognize you here, but when you said that on stage I remembered that moment. Your workshop is why I started doing what I do now.” When I think about that workshop, all I can remember that it was in a hot and stuffy computer lab, I can’t remember anything from that day just that it was, but being face to face with my former student reminded me that the work you at one time can come back many years later. Plant seeds, tend soil, be a farmer.

Lesson 8: Take the time you need.

There’s a tendency in programming education to have these “learn x in y time” type books and approaches. “Learn C++ in 30 days”, “Learn HTML in 24 hours”, etc. It’s important to remind students to take the time they need.

As a side note: at SFPC we are fortunate to have Amit Pitaru as a co-founder and steering committee member, and Amit to me is one of the best advocates for this notion of taking time. I think of him almost as a kind of sherpa for education. check out his talk at eyeo 2013 (https://vimeo.com/69477201) where mid-way through he breaks into a spontaneous discussion of learning.

Lesson 9: Find your team.

One of the best things you can do as a student is find and surround yourself with people who are supportive, understanding and help you know your own value. I think that is a crucial part of success.

Lesson 10: The past gets made again

I found this amazing book from 1993 called the art of computer designing:

archive.org version of the book [https://archive.org/details/satoArtOfComputerDesigning ]

It’s a pretty amazing book because it’s very fresh even by today’s standards — there’s clever and fun ideas of using shapes and geometry:

but the best part of the book is the afterword, where the author thanks a bunch of people and also members of the Bauhaus. He writes:

<blockquote>I would also like to acknowledge my favorites, Russian Avant-garde, Futurism and Bauhaus, whose brilliant typefaces and designs have in many ways shaped my own mind. If the artists of these movements where alive now to work with computers, I am certain they would discover new artistic possabilities. The work of past ages accumulates, and is remade again.</blockquote>

I love this last sentence of the book,

<blockquote>“the work of past ages accumulates, and is remade again”</blockquote>

It’s a reminder (and license) that the job of every generation is to remake the past.]]></description>
<dc:subject>sfpc schoolforpoeticcomputation 2015 zachlieberman teaching pedagogy learning education curiosity tcsnmy lcproject openstudioproject time scale purpose questions questionasking art research conversation osamusato andrewzolli amitpitaru mitchgoldstein ideas howweteach howwelearn schools arteducation inquiry inquirybasedlearning convesation askingquestions björk</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:8db7d10183b1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sfpc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schoolforpoeticcomputation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2015"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:zachlieberman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:curiosity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tcsnmy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lcproject"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openstudioproject"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:time"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scale"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:purpose"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:questions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:questionasking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:research"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conversation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:osamusato"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:andrewzolli"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:amitpitaru"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mitchgoldstein"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:arteducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inquiry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inquirybasedlearning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:convesation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:askingquestions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:björk"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://adanewmedia.org/2013/11/issue3-haraway/">
    <title>SF: Science Fiction, Speculative Fabulation, String Figures, So Far - Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology</title>
    <dc:date>2015-10-19T06:14:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://adanewmedia.org/2013/11/issue3-haraway/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The British social anthropologist Marilyn Strathern, who wrote The Gender of the Gift based on her ethnographic work in highland Papua New Guinea (Mt. Hagen), taught me that “It matters what ideas we use to think other ideas (with)” (Reproducing the Future 10). Marilyn embodies for me the practice of feminist speculative fabulation in the scholarly mode. It matters what matters we use to think other matters with; it matters what stories we tell to tell other stories with; it matters what knots knot knots, what thoughts think thoughts, what ties tie ties. It matters what stories make worlds, what worlds make stories. Marilyn wrote about accepting the risk of relentless contingency; she thinks about anthropology as the knowledge practice that studies relations with relations, that puts relations at risk with other relations, from unexpected other worlds. In 1933 Alfred North Whitehead, the American mathematician and process philosopher who infuses my sense of worlding, wrote The Adventures of Ideas. SF is precisely full of such adventures. Isabelle Stengers, a chemist, scholar of Whitehead, and a seriously quirky Belgian feminist philosopher, gives me “speculative thinking” in spades. Isabelle insists we cannot denounce the world in the name of an ideal world. In the spirit of feminist communitarian anarchism and the idiom of Whitehead’s philosophy, she maintains that decisions must take place somehow in the presence of those who will bear their consequences.[2] In this same virtual sibling set, Marleen Barr morphed Heinlein’s speculative fiction into feminist fabulation for me. In relay and return, SF morphs in my writing and research into speculative fabulation and string figures. Relays, cat’s cradle, passing patterns back and forth, giving and receiving, patterning, holding the unasked-for pattern in one’s hands, response-ability, Octavia Butler’s Patternmaster series. My debts mount. Again and again, SF has given me the ideas, the stories, and the shapes with which I think ideas, shapes, and stories in feminist theory and science studies. There is no way I can name all of my debts to SF’s critters and worlds, human and not, and so I will record only a few and hope for a credit extension for years yet to come. I will enter these debts in a short ledger of my teaching and publishing. I start with Marge Piercy’s Woman on the Edge of Time, a typescript of my curriculum vitae that was part of a file for consideration for promotion in the History of Science Department at Johns Hopkins in 1979-80, and a bottle of chalky white out. I had written an essay review of Woman on the Edge of Time for the activist publication, Women, a Journal of Liberation and duly recorded this little publication on the CV. “The past is the contested zone”—the past that is our thick, not-yet-fixed, present, wherewhen what is yet-to-come is now at stake—is the meme that drew me into Piercy’s story, and I was proud of the review. A senior colleague in History of Science, a supporter of my promotion, came to me with a too-friendly smile and that betraying bottle of white-out, asking me to blot out this publication from the scholarly record, “for my own good.”[3] He also wanted me to expunge “Signs of Dominance,” a long, research-dense essay about the semiotics and sociograms developed in mid-20th-century primate field studies of monkeys and apes.[4] To my shame to this day, I obeyed; to my relief to this day, no one was fooled. Piercy’s temporalities and my growing sense of the SF-structure of primate field work made me write two essays for the brave, new, hyper-footnoted, University of Chicago feminist theory publication, Signs, and to title the essays in recognition of Piercy’s priority and patterned relay to me.[5] I could not forget—or disavow—Piercy’s research for Woman on the Edge of Time, which led her to psychiatrist José Delgado’s Rockland State Hospital experiments with remote-controlled telemetric implants, and my finding in my own archival research Delgado’s National Institutes of Mental Health-funded work applied to gibbon studies in the ape colony on Hall’s Island. The colonial and imperial roots & routes of SF are relentlessly real and inescapably fabulated. Later, living (non-optionally, in really real SF histories) with and as cyborgs, Piercy and I played cat’s cradle again, this time with my “Cyborg Manifesto” and then her He, She, and It. Cyborgs were never just about the interdigitations of humans and information machines; cyborgs were from the get-go the materialization of imploded (not hybridized) human beings-information machines-multispecies organisms. Cyborgs were always simultaneously relentlessly real and inescapably fabulated. Like all good SF, they redid what counts as—what is—real. The obligatory multispecies story-telling script was written in 1960 United States space research, when Manfred Clynes and Nathan Kline coined the word “cyborg” in an article about their implanted rats and the advantages of self-regulating human-machine systems in outer space."]]></description>
<dc:subject>speculativefiction scifi sciencefiction donnaharaway toread speculativefabrication alfrednorthwhitehead knowledge ideas philosophy anarchism marilynstrathern octaviabutler manfredclynes nathankline cyborgs joannaruss samueldelany evahayward katieking gregorybateson historyofconsciousness hiscon herscam jamestiptree suzettehadenelgin linguists linguistics johnvarley fredjameson suzymckeecharnass ursulaleguin worlding cat'scradle anthropology ethnography gwynethjones heidegger kant multispecies sheritepper laurenoyaolamina helenmerrick margaretgrebowicz dogs animals marleenbarr marilynhacker sarahlefanu pamelasargent viviansobchack margaretatwood vondamcintyre ericrabkin laurachernaik sherrylvint joshualebare istvancsicsery-ronay shulamithfirestone judithmerril franbartkowsky 2013 isabellestrengers immanuelkant ursulakleguin</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:6720567119bd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:speculativefiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scifi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sciencefiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:donnaharaway"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:toread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:speculativefabrication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alfrednorthwhitehead"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:knowledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anarchism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marilynstrathern"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:octaviabutler"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:manfredclynes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nathankline"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cyborgs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:joannaruss"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:samueldelany"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:evahayward"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:katieking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gregorybateson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:historyofconsciousness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hiscon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:herscam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jamestiptree"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:suzettehadenelgin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:linguists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnvarley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fredjameson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:suzymckeecharnass"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ursulaleguin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:worlding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cat'scradle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anthropology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ethnography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gwynethjones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:heidegger"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kant"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:multispecies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sheritepper"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:laurenoyaolamina"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:helenmerrick"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:margaretgrebowicz"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dogs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:animals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marleenbarr"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marilynhacker"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sarahlefanu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pamelasargent"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:viviansobchack"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:margaretatwood"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:vondamcintyre"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ericrabkin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:laurachernaik"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sherrylvint"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:joshualebare"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:istvancsicsery-ronay"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:shulamithfirestone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:judithmerril"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:franbartkowsky"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2013"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:isabellestrengers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:immanuelkant"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ursulakleguin"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://tinyletter.com/vruba/letters/6-67-side-pass">
    <title>6, 67: Side pass</title>
    <dc:date>2015-09-28T21:54:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://tinyletter.com/vruba/letters/6-67-side-pass</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Q: Where do you find the time to write a newsletter?

A: I think of things that I was going to do, but which I don’t want to do as much as I want to do a newsletter, and then I don’t do those other things, and do the newsletter instead.

Q: You said once that you were pretty optimistic about the world’s future, despite your deep fear of climate change. Why?

A: Well, short version, because of what I think of as the genre of whig graphs. I strongly disagree with the hypercapitalist, only-humans-matter, business-as-usual agenda of most people I see deploying those graphs. (← Between that sentence and the coming sentence is where a longer version would have to do a lot of careful bridge-building. →) But I have much more trust in the futures of vaccinated, nourished, educated, relatively non-traumatized children who are close to the world’s biggest problems than I do in my own analyses. The risk in this stance is quietism. In any case, I think we’re in big trouble. My optimism isn’t a kind of satisfaction, only a kind of hope.

…

Q: How do I learn to write better?

A: Not sure. But maybe try stuff like: Write about things you care about. When you read something that surprises you, think about why, and how it could have been different. Good writing teaches you how to read it. As a reader, pay attention. As a writer, reward attention. Accept that you can’t make any one piece of writing avoid every valid criticism, communicate the whole truth, or please everyone you’d like to please. Notice peers whose writing is like yours and watch them learn. Find things you appreciate in writing that you (or common wisdom) don’t like. Ask someone who knows better than me.

Q: As you might expect from the fact that I subscribe to your newsletter, I think we share some tastes and interests. 

A: What do you read and pay attention to? Dunno. I follow a lot of amazing people on Twitter. When I come across something especially interesting, I assume it’s part of a network of interesting things and try to map that out. (For example, if I particularly enjoy a book, I’ll do web searches for the people thanked in the acknowledgments.) Looking for gaps, ruthlessness about things that are supposed to be interesting but aren’t, etc. I don’t know! Really there’s nothing in particular that I would point to other than the entire internet."]]></description>
<dc:subject>charlieloyd 2015 reading writing howweread howwewrite process learning howwelearn generalists twitter education unschooling attention interestedness interested classideas communication ideas hypercapitalism future hope optimism climatechange humanism newsletters futures quietism</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:811bc0563f1d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charlieloyd"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2015"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:process"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:generalists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unschooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interestedness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interested"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:classideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hypercapitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:future"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hope"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:optimism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:climatechange"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:newsletters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:futures"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quietism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://early-access.notion.so/">
    <title>Notion – Document Reimagined</title>
    <dc:date>2015-09-15T06:34:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://early-access.notion.so/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Beautiful. Lightweight. Always organized. Notion is an expressive and collaborative document editor that gives your ideas a place to grow.

Drag. Drop. Work as fluidly as you think
Create from an assortment of building blocks: to-dos, files, videos, code snippets, and more. Notion helps you work the way you think.

A unique & effortless way to stay organized
Tired of messy folders? We invented a new and intuitive way to organize: just drop one page inside another. Let your ideas grow organically.

Real collaboration in real-time
Share your work with anyone. See what others are doing on your page. It’s like having your collaborators in the same room with you.

Powerful tools made with creators in mind
Notion builds upon power features used in your favorite design and writing tools. So you can create at the speed of thought.

Visually stunning layouts made easy
Arrange your page any way you like — your work will always look its best. We take care of design so you can focus on content.

An ever-growing collection of building blocks
All Notion content is made from Web Components
– the next generation open web standard."]]></description>
<dc:subject>documentation ideas writing documents software collaborative collaboration wordprocessing</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:919f109ef13c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:documentation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:documents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collaborative"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wordprocessing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67EKAIY43kg">
    <title>I Could Do That | The Art Assignment | PBS Digital Studios - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2015-09-11T05:30:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67EKAIY43kg</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["So you look at a work of art and think to yourself, I could have done that. And maybe you really could have, but the issue here is more complex than that -- why didn't you? Why did the artist? And why does it have an audience? We delve into it by looking at work by artists like Felix Gonzalez-Torres, Piet Mondrian, and Cy Twombly, among others. You might find it’s not quite as simple as you think."]]></description>
<dc:subject>art video felixgonzalez-torres pietmondrian cytwombly 2015 craft via:ablerism production ideas photography reproduction skill research deduction craftsmanship though thinking criticalthinking thewhy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:1923f0b145b5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:video"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:felixgonzalez-torres"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pietmondrian"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cytwombly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2015"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:craft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:via:ablerism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:production"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:photography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reproduction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:skill"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:research"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:deduction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:craftsmanship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:though"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:criticalthinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thewhy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.theparisreview.org/interviews/4485/the-art-of-fiction-no-34-jean-cocteau">
    <title>Paris Review - The Art of Fiction No. 34, Jean Cocteau</title>
    <dc:date>2015-03-18T06:34:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.theparisreview.org/interviews/4485/the-art-of-fiction-no-34-jean-cocteau</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["If the ideas come, one must hurry to set them down out of fear of forgetting them. They come once; once only. On the other hand, if I am obliged to do some little task—such as writing a preface or notice—the labor to give the appearance of easiness to the few lines is excruciating. I have no facility whatever. Yes, in one respect what you say is true. I had written a novel, then fallen silent. And the editors at the publishing house of Stock, seeing this, said, You have too great a fear of not writing a masterpiece. Write something, anything. Merely to begin. So I did—and wrote the first lines of Les Enfants Terribles. But that is only for beginnings—in fiction. I have never written unless deeply moved about something. The one exception is my play La Machine à Écrire. I had written the play Les Parents Terribles and it was very successful, and something was wanted to follow. La Machine à Écríre exists in several versions, which is very telling, and was an enormous amount of work. It is no good at all. Of course, it is one of the most popular of my works. If you make fifty designs and one or two please you least, these will nearly surely be the ones most liked. No doubt because they resemble something. People love to recognize, not venture. The former is so much more comfortable and self-flattering.

It seems to me nearly the whole of your work can be read as indirect spiritual autobiography.  "]]></description>
<dc:subject>jeancocteau resemblance comfort interviews adventure via:anne 1964 ideas memory forgetting writing howwewrite</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:a7889c248db5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jeancocteau"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:resemblance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:comfort"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:interviews"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:adventure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:via:anne"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1964"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:memory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:forgetting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://medium.com/@kevin_ashton/the-end-of-creativity-cc5c27e7e42d">
    <title>The End of Creativity — Medium</title>
    <dc:date>2015-03-11T19:20:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://medium.com/@kevin_ashton/the-end-of-creativity-cc5c27e7e42d</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["People living in the twentieth century heard a lot of talk about “creativity.” People living in the twenty-first century will not. Creativity is not dead yet, but its end is in sight. Alfred North Whitehead invented the word in 1926."

75 years later, it was one in every 70,000 words published and had become the name of a popular hypothesis: that new things are created by “geniuses” who solve problems by deliberately not thinking about them — a step called “incubation” — until they receive answers in sudden, dramatic moments of “insight.” One of the most frequently cited examples is attributed to Mozart:

<blockquote>“When I am, as it were, completely myself, and of good cheer, my ideas flow best and most abundantly. My subject stands almost complete in my mind. When I write down my ideas everything is already finished; and it rarely differs from what was in my imagination.”</blockquote>

These words, which I have edited for length, first appeared in a letter to Germany’s General Music Journal in 1815, then in many other places, including Jacques Hadamard’s 1945 The Mathematician’s Mind; Creativity, edited by Philip Vernon in 1976; and Roger Penrose’s 1989 The Emperor’s New Mind. They remain popular: in 2015, they have already appeared in at least one book and one journal.

But Mozart did not write them, they do not describe how he composed, and we have known this since 1856, when Mozart biographer Otto Jahn showed that they were forged.

"Why do so many people writing about creativity keep citing them as if they were true? Because there is little else to cite. Psychologists have been trying to prove the creativity hypothesis for nearly a hundred years. Their results are, at best, mixed.

In the 1920s, Stanford’s Lewis Terman sought to prove the existence of the general, hereditary superiority called “genius” by testing 168,000 children and placing them on a scale “from idiocy on the one hand to genius on the other.” He identified 1,500 “geniuses,” then tracked their accomplishments for the rest of their lives. Some did creative work, like making movies, but many did not. And what of the “non-geniuses” Terman rejected? Two, William Shockley and Luis Alvarez, won Nobel Prizes. Terman’s results are typical: all other attempts to predict future accomplishments by measuring “genius” have also failed.

“Incubation,” or solving problems by not thinking about them, has been widely studied. Berkeley’s Robert Olton spent the 1970s looking for it. In one experiment, he asked 160 people to solve a brainteaser, giving some breaks, while making others work continuously. The breaks made no difference. Olton was forced to conclude that,

<blockquote>“No evidence of incubation was apparent,” and added, “No study reporting evidence of incubation has survived replication by an independent investigator.”</blockquote>

And “insight” — the fully formed solution in a flash? German Gestalt psychologist Karl Duncker was one of the first to study that. In his most famous experiment, he gave people a box of tacks and a book of matches, and asked them to fix a candle to a wall so that it could be used as a reading light. The solution is to tack the tack-box to the wall — to see it as a thing for holding the candle, not a thing for holding the tacks. The shift from “tack-box” to “candle-holder” is the supposed “insight.” By having people think aloud, Duncker showed that the solution came incrementally, not instantly: everyone who discovered it thought of making a platform out of tacks, then realized the tack-box would be a better platform.

These experiments, although a few of hundreds, are representative. There is probably no such thing as creativity. But Duncker’s work laid the foundation for an alternative hypothesis: that extraordinary solutions come from ordinary people doing ordinary thinking. Robert Weisberg, a psychologist at Temple University in Philadelphia, put it this way:

<blockquote>“Although the impact of creative ideas and products can sometimes be profound, the mechanisms through which an innovation comes about can be very ordinary.”</blockquote>



…

"This idea that extraordinary creations come from ordinary people and ordinary thinking has become more popular recently. Jon Gertner wrestled with the problem of “the great men versus the yeomen,” in The Idea Factory, his history of Bell Labs, and concluded that innovation needs both; Walter Isaacson found he had to tell the story of many lives, not one, to describe the invention of computing in his latest bestseller The Innovators; and Steven Johnson refutes the “non-explanation of genius” and argues that “innovation comes out of collaborative networks” in his new book and PBS television series, How We Got to Now.

It is an important change. We are rejecting the myths of “creativity” and developing a better understanding of how we create at a time when, because of the growing problems of our growing population, we need creation more than ever. We are not all equally creative, just as we are not all equally good at anything. But each of us is more like Mozart than not. We can all create, we can all contribute, and we all should."]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:anne 2015 creativity incubation ideas ordinariness kevinashton jongertner walterisaacson stevenjohnson innovation robertburton georgeherbert diegodeestrella johnofsalisbury bernardofchartres alberteinstein ernstmach carlfriedrichgauss bernhardriemann marcelgrossman gregorioricci-curbastro mozart karldunker ottojahn alfrednorthwhitehead lewisterman genius williamshockley luisalvarez psychology robertolton history insight ordinary</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:eee4e6b5d739/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:via:anne"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2015"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:creativity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:incubation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ordinariness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kevinashton"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jongertner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:walterisaacson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stevenjohnson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:innovation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robertburton"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:georgeherbert"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:diegodeestrella"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnofsalisbury"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bernardofchartres"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alberteinstein"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ernstmach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:carlfriedrichgauss"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bernhardriemann"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marcelgrossman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gregorioricci-curbastro"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mozart"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:karldunker"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ottojahn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alfrednorthwhitehead"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lewisterman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:genius"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:williamshockley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:luisalvarez"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robertolton"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:insight"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ordinary"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>