<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (robertogreco)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from robertogreco</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.oaklandreviewofbooks.org/mac-barnett-make-believe-childrens-literature/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.publicpedagogies.org/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://macleans.ca/society/my-university-students-cheat-i-dont-blame-them/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/the-algorithmic-order/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/22/opinion/schools-testing-accountability.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.bostonglobe.com/2026/06/22/opinion/american-schools-failure-myth-scores/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://educationwars.substack.com/p/tied-up-in-knots"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.corriere.it/opinioni/26_maggio_22/educare-e-un-atto-politico-8a22c14f-d58c-4a60-b3cf-807949c16xlk.shtml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2470045"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/at-what-cost/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://jeppestricker.substack.com/p/the-slow-work-of-becoming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://walledgardenedu.substack.com/p/the-right-tool-for-the-right-hands"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://jacobin.com/2026/05/educational-technology-children-learning-iready"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/04/us/social-media-schools.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/01/magazine/ai-university-college-california.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/moral-panic-moral-imagination/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqZZIdp0_TY"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://walledgardenedu.substack.com/p/the-surveillance-classroom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://freddiedeboer.substack.com/p/raj-chettys-just-so-stories"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2026/05/is-there-room-for-enmity-in-the-a-i-classroom/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6yHDTgcYqaI"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://theamericanvandal.substack.com/p/afteropenai?triedRedirect=true"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.aaup.org/issue/spring-2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://thepointmag.substack.com/p/classroom-cope"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/broken-record/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://theamericanvandal.substack.com/p/historyofcanvas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://patrickfarenga.substack.com/p/learning-yes-of-course-education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.newyorker.com/culture/progress-report/what-will-it-take-to-get-ai-out-of-schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/19/opinion/schools-edtech-laptops-games-learning.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://freddiedeboer.substack.com/p/the-school-reformer-accountability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://danmeyer.substack.com/p/rip-khanmigo-and-edtech-industry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/04/teachers-screens-edtech-students/686681/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5buUquvf1I"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/miseducative-experiences/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://undark.org/2026/04/01/sweden-schools-books/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://freddiedeboer.substack.com/p/when-people-say-they-want-good-schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://freddiedeboer.substack.com/p/what-people-want-from-our-schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://thedispatch.com/article/artificial-intelligence-college-essay-teachers-innovation/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.techdirt.com/2026/03/06/were-training-students-to-write-worse-to-prove-theyre-not-robots-and-its-pushing-them-to-use-more-ai/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://patrickfarenga.substack.com/p/mathematician-knocks-school"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://unherd.com/2026/02/why-your-kid-hates-learning-apps/?edition=us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://educationwars.substack.com/p/overselling-the-mississippi-miracle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://hammer.ucla.edu/now-dig-this/artists/raymond-saunders"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.davidzwirner.com/exhibitions/2026/exceptional-works-raymond-saunders-it-wasn-t-easy-being-a-first-grader-1979-1984"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.davidzwirner.com/exhibitions/2026/raymond-saunders-notes-from-la"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/the-broken-record/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://danmeyer.substack.com/p/highlights-from-stanfords-aieducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://overthefield.substack.com/p/enthralling-little-minds-with-nature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://aeon.co/videos/ai-isnt-merely-bad-at-writing-it-does-not-and-cannot-write"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://bayareacurrent.com/sf-educators-win-protections-against-ai-but-tech-expansion-continues/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.404media.co/students-are-being-treated-like-guinea-pigs-inside-an-ai-powered-private-school/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://freddiedeboer.substack.com/p/no-thats-not-what-the-research-says"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://timothyburke.substack.com/p/academia-rigor-mortis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://missionlocal.org/2026/02/sf-teachers-salaries-sfusd-strike/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2026/02/dont-call-it-a-comeback/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://calmatters.org/commentary/2026/02/test-scores-schools-california-teachers/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.vulture.com/article/justin-mcdaniel-existential-despair-course.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/spot-the-difference/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2026/01/in-praise-of-bibliographies/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://walklistencreate.org/2026/01/15/the-walking-assembly-2026/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://patrickfarenga.substack.com/p/the-empty-ritual-of-schooling-part"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://patrickfarenga.substack.com/p/the-empty-rituals-of-schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kS-muAuq62E"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/18/opinion/japan-education-childhood.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W2o52jF4BCY"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/days-gone-by/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2025/12/29/dyslexia-and-the-reading-wars"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://matthewbattles.substack.com/p/for-want-of-a-story"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.publicbooks.org/four-frictions-or-how-to-resist-ai-in-education/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.currentaffairs.org/news/ai-is-destroying-the-university-and-learning-itself"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://www.oaklandreviewofbooks.org/mac-barnett-make-believe-childrens-literature/">
    <title>A map to being human</title>
    <dc:date>2026-07-13T10:25:41+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.oaklandreviewofbooks.org/mac-barnett-make-believe-childrens-literature/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["An Oakland schoolteacher on Mac Barnett's “Make Believe” and the good books her young readers deserve."

...

"What is all of this debate for? Why is children’s literature important for adults, particularly and especially for those who don’t have kids, don’t work with kids, and perhaps don’t care for kids much or at all?

Asking what children’s literature is for pushes us to ask what literature as a whole is for. Why looking at a page instead of a screen still matters, a fact that we loudly insist is critical for children but silently ignore for ourselves. If we believe that children’s literature is for teaching kids how a person should be, maybe that will remind us that is the secret hidden in books for adults, too. And in any other art that requires engagement for more than thirty seconds, with an objective greater than having us subscribe, spend money, or consent to being surveilled. Children need art that engages their thoughts and emotions; we demand that for them and we should demand it for ourselves too. 

I want children’s literature to be a place to go to undisturbed, away from ads and algorithms, with our thoughts that are our own, in private communion with the writer/artist and no one else. To help us think, breathe, recoup, and have our nervous systems left undisturbed by bright lights and cheap tricks. Art, literature, children’s literature return us to being human through the very real human experiences of awe and meaning-making. Kids need this, and artists like Barnett remind us why this matters."]]></description>
<dc:subject>aliciasimba macbarnett books children literature 2026 reading howweread childrensliterature childrensbooks humanities art human humanness awe meaningmaking engagement attention howtolive life living education learning howwelearn teaching howweteach</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:5f0073bfbe65/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aliciasimba"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:macbarnett"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:childrensliterature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:childrensbooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:human"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:awe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meaningmaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:engagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howtolive"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:living"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.publicpedagogies.org/">
    <title>Public Pedagogies Institute | Interconnecting public, learning and research</title>
    <dc:date>2026-07-13T10:18:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.publicpedagogies.org/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["School of Public Pedagogies — Contexts, Collectives and Action

Public Pedagogies Institute
Interconnecting public, learning and research

Public Pedagogies Institute (PPI) aims to provide a platform for engagement and exchange between practitioners, researchers and organisations working in the areas of learning and teaching in the community or outside formal education institutions.

You can subscribe to our free newsletter below. You can also connect with us on facebook and twitter.

About the Institute

The Institute developed following the 2014 Public Pedagogies Day at Victoria University and has drawn together people from a range of disciplines and locations locally and globally.

We aim to increase the profile of work being done in the area of Public Pedagogies, as well as provide an opportunity for connections to be made between community members and researchers who are interested in collaborating on projects.

Public Pedagogies Institute  works in partnership with communities to develop and promote learning and teaching opportunities outside conventional educational contexts. Ideas for projects are generated from community,  with  academics  working  alongside community groups to foster and expand research partnerships.

A focus of the Institute is the development of an annual conference and Journal.

The Institute is open to new members and is interested in hearing from anyone who would like to become involved with our projects."

[via:

https://www.publicpedagogies.org/news/call-for-submissions/

"School of Public Pedagogies — Contexts, Collectives and Action

Wednesdays, 10.00am-12.00pm (AEST)
October 14 – November 18, 2026

The Public Pedagogies Institute is inviting submissions to present at our 2026 online seminar series: Contexts, Collectives and Action.

The theme for the series is Collectives, both in practice and through representation. What do collective formations offer the public as a way of organising? What are the elements that make up a collective? What are the challenges in actualising collectives and what are the hopes generated through imaginings?  

If you are interested in hosting a session as a part of the School of Public Pedagogies, the seminars will take place online once per week on Wednesdays – beginning Wednesday, October 14 through to Wednesday, November 18.  Each session will be two hours with two people taking carriage of an hour each. The time is 10.00am-12.00pm (AEST).

Contributors will also be invited to submit an abstract for a forthcoming issue of the Journal of Public Pedagogies. 

Please send your proposals to Karen.Charman@vu.edu.au by Monday August 24.
Notes on Collectives

We recently invited members of the Public Pedagogies Institute to submit some notes on collectives to stimulate ideas for the upcoming seminar series, which we have provided below.

The term ‘collective’ as an organising principle has a long history.  Associated with political groups and informed by ideas of egalitarianism, collectives offer another way of undertaking ‘work’ that is informed by egalitarian principles and enacted in ways that are non-hierarchical. By their nature to be egalitarian and non-hierarchical they must interrogate their own composition to address power dynamics and to establish the terms through which they will work. Democratic imperatives in education (Freire 1971, Dewey 1990) are closely aligned with collectivist modes in that there is an aim on behalf of the educator to bring students together to be active participants in both the school and ultimately in the broader society. They also provide fertile ground for questioning, advocacy and reassessing shared values in perpetuity.

Collective plurality is also a condition for political and philosophical realisations (Arendt 1952). Feminist collectives have formed at different times in history in an ongoing challenge or dismantling of patriarchy to address the needs of women. Worker’s collectives have initiated structures whereby profits are shared that challenge the quintessential concept of self-interest in capitalism. Collectives constitute ways of imagining that move us beyond what we now term as neo-liberalism. Larger ways of organising societies have been illustrated through configurations of collectives whether this be in practice or through representation in film, fiction or theatre such as French film makers of the 1930’s, Socialist Realist writers of the same era alongside the ‘New Theatre’ in Australia. More contemporary iterations are collective arts groups who work to realise projects in public settings as well as collectives that meet together to generate social change.

Some community and participant-led research also values the collective over either the individual or hierarchical structure, bringing the questioning of the political act of the distribution of power into the creative and empowering process. This is often done with the realisation that empowerment is not a gift that can be given by others but is act against oppression and is best facilitated by fostering and seeking out collectives, with shared values and experiences.

The idea of collective, collective action, and collectivity when looked from the perspective of a rebellion against the dominant hegemonic system very often tend to overlook the idea of the hegemonic as also the collectives of the individuals (who represent the same idea). The status quo or the shared, consensus values that inform our everyday lives are themselves governed by a kind of silent collective, There is a need for exploration of the meanings of what the term collective may entail. The idea of the collective and the ones which are rebelled against are not fragmented and are a result and part of the process of the same system. Each individual in a group/collective is a representative of complexities of ideas and a result of the processes exposed to different ideas and situations.

The idea of the circles is the representation of different groups of people working on different ideas as collectives they are also the representations of the different populations having different interests. As a result, each group is a set of different ideas and individuals with different interests and intentions. Hence a collective as not a homogenous group rather a mix of complexities of ideas, interests, connections, situations, geographies, demography, ideologies, and temporality. 

Therefore, there is a need to explore the idea of collective from different perspective of being; 

1) Positive vs negative: how one defines positive and negative is also as situated in the positionality of the individual, the temporal situation and the larger idea of society in relation of what is excepted, not excepted, ideas of equality, justice, equity and access);  

2) Existence of hierarchies: the collective actions as lead by people, individuals, or groups. The constitution of groups as also hegemonic powers and people, and may have hierarchies within a group; 

3) Intentional and organic: how different groups are formed: just as a result of being situated in a space or as a result of intentionally working for a cause and taking actions (irrespective of whether people like or dislike, agree with each other on some idea and situation), the idea of people working together as a result of the intentionality of the state or institutions; 

4) Ephemeral: the groups may come together and dissolve over time with different reasons; 

5) Process (constant change, evolution and connected progression, and circling back to the same idea and not necessarily always in a linear form at times in an entangled and nonlinear form): the ideas of the different groups may evolve, dissolve, and change with time and as result the formation of collectives also lead to further bifurcations, change in groups, and formation of different groups. 

There is also the shadow side of “collectivity”. We should bear in mind that as other concepts/terms in social organisation have been abused (such as republic), Collective has been hi-jacked at different times throughout history for different political purposes. This shadow side of collectives also occurs in  contemporary times where social movements can be orchestrated or used for destructive purposes. So, values are fundamental to understanding collectivity and collective work in community development. The work cannot be separated from the values. That’s why process is important and why reflection is important. The phenomenon of group think, group bullying, group shaming, group scapegoating are interesting experiences of the dark side of collectivity. 

The common environmentalist cliche “Think globally, act locally” also evokes collectives and signals the importance of collective action at local levels. So, there is the possibility of the relevance of collectives to social and other circumstances on the ground. 

Lastly collective memory—instances of history that have been memorialised or in more recent times contested.  The dismantling of monuments; social history museums and the work of Monument Lab https://monumentlab.com all attest to a reconsideration of collective memorialisation.  The most recent special issue of the Journal of Public Pedagogies (no 8 2026) is focussed on the public pedagogical formations of history. One of the prompts for this issue was what pedagogical responsibilities do we as communities have to bring a public into a relationship with the past and what might the public contours of this relationship look like?"]]]></description>
<dc:subject>contexts collectives action pedagogy informal learning public teaching howwelearn howweteach education lcproject openstudioproject</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:97b95a0fca5a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:contexts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collectives"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:action"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:informal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:public"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lcproject"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openstudioproject"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://macleans.ca/society/my-university-students-cheat-i-dont-blame-them/">
    <title>My University Students Cheat. I Don’t Blame Them. - Macleans.ca</title>
    <dc:date>2026-07-02T02:26:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://macleans.ca/society/my-university-students-cheat-i-dont-blame-them/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Marks reward cheating over learning—and students can’t afford to fail"

...

"Last semester, on the final exam of the health-care law class I teach, my students scored the highest grades I’ve seen in 20 years as an instructor. It was an at-home, closed-book exam. Eight per cent of the class scored perfect on the multiple-choice section, and over half scored over 90. In the long-answer section, the responses were formulaic, typo-free and detached from the course material; they lacked the telltale signs of rushed exam writing. It was clear my students were using AI to cheat.

After the exam, I gave the class an anonymous, informal poll: I asked how many of them were cheating. Of those who responded, eight per cent admitted to it. How many students did they think were cheating? Over a quarter of respondents indicated they knew other students had cheated on the exam, and 73 per cent indicated they knew of students cheating in other classes. And that doesn’t account for the response bias: just under half the class responded to the poll, and I suspect those who didn’t respond were more likely to have cheated. I decided to annul the exam results, not counting them toward final grades.

I’ve spent my whole life in academia, first in theology, then in law. I know cheating has always been around. But I’m deeply alarmed by the idea that students are cheating en masse. There’s a whole online ecosystem for cheating: forums to share advice on circumventing AI detectors and proctor technology; software for humanizing AI-generated writing; tips for using AI to reduce (or eliminate) workload. Cheating is becoming culturally normalized. Two thirds of the people who responded to my survey agreed that students widely perceive cheating as acceptable. I’m not surprised. Think about what this generation has witnessed: the mortgage crisis driven by corrupt bankers, an American president who cheats and lies and is still elected; lawyers using AI to write for them and lying about it, a sporting world full of doping scandals. Students are repeating what we’ve modelled for them.

In the past few years, the way young people value their education has shifted. Universities are increasingly corporatized. They function as businesses, oriented toward maximizing revenue: professors are rewarded for grants and publications rather than leadership or mentorship, and students are reduced to head counts and tuition dollars. In turn, students behave like customers. It’s a fee for service: they pay their tuition and expect good grades and a degree. Learning becomes superfluous.

When I was studying the humanities, my classmates and I were concerned with ideas and arguments. We were reading course material to understand it, not to get a mark. Now, grades have become the sole currency of academic life. Students frequently email me asking outright for a higher grade, sometimes literally seconds after they receive it. They all want a 90 or higher. Marks are inflated across the board. At Ontario high schools, there was a six per cent increase in grade averages for graduating students between 2011 and 2021. I’ve seen 100 per cent averages on scholarship applications. Some schools are implementing policies to try to curb the inflation—including Harvard, which just put a cap on the number of As assigned in each undergraduate course.

Students know an undergraduate degree doesn’t automatically land a well-paying job—or any job, for that matter—so they’re vying for acceptance to highly competitive postgraduate programs. There’s an enormous financial imperative to succeed academically, and students tell me that if you don’t cheat, you’re at a disadvantage. I went to university on my own dollar; my parents couldn’t afford to support me. I only paid off my undergraduate student loans last year, at 45 years old. For students today, the debts are even worse. They’re pushed to maximize productivity and output, racking up accolades and resumé entries while maintaining previously unattainable averages.

At the same time, cheating has become more accessible than ever thanks to AI. I see students using generative AI in all aspects of their work: summarizing the readings, research, note-taking, essay writing. Not all AI usage is cheating by default, and in some ways, it’s even levelling the playing field by making the same shortcuts available to everyone. When I was in law school, you could purchase CANS—consolidated annotated notes—from previous years as study aids. But they were expensive. Resources like CANS and tutors were reserved for students who could afford them. For the rest of us, AI could have been a free alternative. The problems arise when students use AI despite instructions not to, as was the case with my exam.

My options as an educator are limited. I’m exploring different grading schemas, but all of them require more resources than are made available to me. I could have one in-person exam worth 100 per cent of the course grade and put all my TA hours toward grading it. I could rely on oral exams, which would take weeks out of the semester to schedule and administer. One professor I know tried to introduce a participation grade in a class with hundreds of students. Students could scan a QR code to register their attendance. They would show up, talk until they got the code, then walk out.

Ultimately, this reveals the failures of an antiquated grading system. Our standard modes of assessment primarily track recall and memorization, not engagement or progress. One semester, I had a student who had some challenges with her grammar and syntax. We worked on her writing together throughout the semester, and it was a successful learning experience. Another student that semester had a flair for well-crafted drivel. I couldn’t give the first student an A-plus—her end product couldn’t justify it. But who put more work in? Who learned the most? The people with the highest grades are not necessarily my best or hardest-working students. They may just have the most free time, money, educational support or family backing. Some schools are attuned to this tension and adapting accordingly. The U of T law school, for example, uses an honours-pass-fail grading system. If we reimagined grading to assess skills that can’t be replicated by ChatGPT, students wouldn’t use it. As it is, marks are a perverse incentive—they reward cheating over learning.

My colleagues and I feel completely unsupported by the school administration. Publishing requirements are going up, and class sizes are ballooning. We have less faculty doing more work with less support, meaning there’s less time to build relationships with students. When I annulled the exam results, I told the administration that I need substantive guidance on how to run a class this large because I can no longer reliably mark it. They didn’t have a useful policy in place to address my concerns. Instead, they overrode my decision. Against my recommendations, they included the multiple-choice portion of the exam in the final grade—despite knowing that I called out cheating in this section. Their decision sent a singular message: cheating is fine and faculty has to accept it. This is anathema to the goals of education.

I’ve been told I should just use anti-cheating technology, like online proctors or AI detectors. I don’t use either in my classes. For one, they can easily be circumvented. More importantly, you can’t police people into having integrity. Instead, I try to impart to my students the reasons why cheating is morally wrong. The first question on my exam was about the deontological duty not to cheat. It was something we’d discussed at length throughout the semester. Within this ethical framework, relationships give rise to duties—the health-care provider to the patient or the lawyer to the client—and the rightness of your actions depends on how they align with those duties. Students have a duty not to cheat. It should be that simple. Anti-cheating technology can’t teach them that, and we can’t expect that students who lack integrity in school will spontaneously develop it in order to meet their professional obligations after they graduate.

Academic integrity needs to be taught starting on day one at every level of education. Every university student should have to take an ethics course in their first year, no matter their major. And there needs to be accountability when there are breaches. Administrators need to support their faculty, not railroad them. Colleagues have shared with me that even when students have been caught cheating, no penalty was imposed. Cheating is a product of the society we’ve created. It’s learned behaviour—and that means, with enough work, it can be unlearned."]]></description>
<dc:subject>jacobshelly highered highereducation academia education universities colleges grades grading assessment ethics cheating pedagogy ai artificialintelligence culture behavior ideas humanities gradeinflation memorization recall writing howwewrite howwelearn learning teaching howweteach economics motivation technology integrity academicintegrity society</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:c1abc1e9db1d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jacobshelly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colleges"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:grades"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:grading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:assessment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cheating"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:behavior"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gradeinflation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:memorization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:recall"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:motivation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:integrity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academicintegrity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/the-algorithmic-order/">
    <title>The Algorithmic Order</title>
    <dc:date>2026-06-27T06:22:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/the-algorithmic-order/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The history of education technology is inseparable from the history of standardized testing."]]></description>
<dc:subject>audreywatters 2026 edtech technology education schools schooling standardizedtesting testing coding natashasinger google chromebooks politics policy high-stakestesting rossweiner nclb educationreform reform teaching curriculum learning howwelearn howweteach pedagogy democracy technocracy australia uk us canada texasideology californianideology fredturner secularism christianity whitesupremacy surveillance military extraction extractivism texas bible individualism libertarianism neoliberalism mooc moocs quinnslobodian bentarnoff muskism fordism elonmusk henryford spacex starlink southafrica business society capitalism sciencefiction scifi futurism ailiteracy literacy ai artificialintelligence benwilliamson arjunappadurai theobaker stanford universities colleges highereducation highered academia lmsacasas emilybender nannainue language anthropomorphization socialmedia moralpanic regulation deregulation</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:dc6b54329945/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:audreywatters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:standardizedtesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:testing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:coding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:natashasinger"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chromebooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:high-stakestesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rossweiner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nclb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:educationreform"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reform"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:curriculum"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:democracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technocracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:australia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:uk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:canada"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:texasideology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:californianideology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fredturner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:secularism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christianity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:whitesupremacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:surveillance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:military"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:extraction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:extractivism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:texas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bible"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:individualism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:libertarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neoliberalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mooc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:moocs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quinnslobodian"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bentarnoff"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:muskism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fordism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elonmusk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:henryford"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:spacex"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:starlink"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:southafrica"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sciencefiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scifi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:futurism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ailiteracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:literacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:benwilliamson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:arjunappadurai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:theobaker"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stanford"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colleges"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lmsacasas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:emilybender"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nannainue"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anthropomorphization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:moralpanic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:regulation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:deregulation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/22/opinion/schools-testing-accountability.html">
    <title>Opinion | The ‘No Child Left Behind’ Nostalgia Is Delusional - The New York Times</title>
    <dc:date>2026-06-27T06:13:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/22/opinion/schools-testing-accountability.html</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[[via Audrey Watters:
https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/the-algorithmic-order/ 

"In a recent op-ed in The New York Times, Ross Weiner argues that the calls to bring back the test-based accountability of “No Child Left Behind” is delusional. (Well, to be fair that’s the word that the headline writer chose: "delusional.") Weiner describes these policies as insufficient then and inadequate now. “Young people are placing more emphasis on purpose, relationships and contribution than on older markers of status,” he argues.

<blockquote>For a generation, the reform coalition took its validation from economists and accountability metrics, while treating parents, students and communities as mere functionaries rather than partners in a shared civic enterprise.

    Taking their priorities seriously would mean broadening what we expect from the classroom. Schools should put what students can do on equal footing with what they know, embedding real skills in academic learning rather than leaving them to chance or sequencing them to later in life. Schools should reconnect with the communities they serve, so young people learn through and about the places where they live. And they should reanimate the character-forming, developmental mission a pluralistic democracy requires.

    Federal policy has an essential role to play in public education: protecting civil rights, funding quality data and research, and encouraging promising practices to spread. But the formative mission cannot be mandated by Washington. Belonging, the foundation of both learning and civic commitment, is relational and starts local; it cannot be standardized or scaled, but must be cultivated by schools that are responsive to the communities they serve.</blockquote>

It’s not a fully-fleshed out vision for education, to be sure, but it does gesture at something quite different from the technocratic one that schools have spent the last few decades delivering -- and delivering via education technology, via a machinery that shapes the form and increasingly the content, the curricula and the pedagogy. Funny, for all the invocation of "the future of education" from ed-tech evangelists and testing companies and politicians, they're almost always talking about the past, or at least about much older narratives of what that future might look like. (And in doing so, they ignore that computers have been ubiquitous in classrooms for a very very long time now.)"]]]></description>
<dc:subject>rosswiener education schools schooling nclb 2026 audrey watters policy schoolreform reform civilrights technocracy pedagogy curriculum edtech teaching howweteach democracy belonging civics pluralism academics learning howwelearn</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:b31695b25cce/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rosswiener"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nclb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:audrey"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:watters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schoolreform"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reform"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:civilrights"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technocracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:curriculum"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:democracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:belonging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:civics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pluralism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.bostonglobe.com/2026/06/22/opinion/american-schools-failure-myth-scores/">
    <title>Opinion | No, American schools aren't failing</title>
    <dc:date>2026-06-25T08:13:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.bostonglobe.com/2026/06/22/opinion/american-schools-failure-myth-scores/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["A claim so familiar, people no longer feel obligated to back it up with evidence."

[archived: https://archive.is/WHzji ]

"The belief that American public schools are an international embarrassment, sites of endless failure, is one of the few things our polarized political system seems to agree on. After all, the transition from George W. Bush’s presidential education policy to that of Barack Obama was one of remarkable continuity, based on a shared premise: Our schools were in a broad state of emergency. Today, politicians of both parties still tell that story, as do op-ed pages and nonprofit organizations and bipartisan cable panels. The notion has hardened into an axiom, a claim so familiar that the people making it no longer feel obligated to back it up with evidence. But we don’t have to buy this narrative, and we shouldn’t — because the evidence tells us that the narrative just isn’t true.

The best way to consider a country’s educational performance is in relation to the performance of international peers, and the most authoritative international benchmark is the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development’s Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) exam, which tests 15-year-olds across 81 education systems. In the most recent results, from 2022, American students tested better in reading than 68 of the 80 other systems and well above the international average. In science, they bested 56 of 80. Math is our weakest subject, but even there we outscore 43 systems and tie with a dozen more, meaning that on our worst day we still do better than more than half the developed world. Our top performers look particularly good on the PISA; for example, 14 percent of American teenagers scored at the highest level in reading, double the OECD average.

Some critics note that our education system is expensive and say that we should demand better results for our money. But this demand implies that there’s a straightforward relationship between per-pupil spending and test scores; decades of evidence demonstrate that there is not. And the results show that we produce many sterling students for our money.

Indeed, the students at the top of our system aren’t merely fine; they’re the best on earth. American teams have placed in the top three at the International Mathematical Olympiad every year for a decade and won or tied for first in 2015, 2016, 2018, 2019, and 2024. In 2025, all five members of the US physics team won gold at the International Physics Olympiad, making the United States the only country to sweep gold that year. Our chemistry, biology, informatics, linguistics, and other teams collect medals year after year. These are overwhelmingly public-school kids from ordinary suburban and urban districts, outcompeting the best academic talent the world can produce. You rarely read about them because their success doesn’t fit the declinist story.

But scores are dropping, aren’t they? Yes, and that’s exactly why international context matters. The 2022 PISA results showed an unprecedented worldwide collapse, with average scores across the OECD falling roughly 10 points in reading and 15 in math. When students in Germany, Norway, and New Zealand decline in lockstep with students in Arizona and Connecticut, the cause is plainly not American teachers, unions, or curricula. (My own guess is that the smartphone is to blame, but I can’t prove it.) Even as our raw scores fell, our international rank rose in all three subjects because our peers’ scores fell further. Again, when was the last time you heard that in our media?

None of this is to deny that some American schools are in crisis. But those failures aren’t spread evenly across our system; they’re concentrated in a small number of places suffering from poverty, structural racism, and institutional decline. The United States has the highest child-poverty rate in the OECD (roughly a quarter of our children live in poverty, versus less than 10 percent in top-scoring nations like Finland and Denmark) and our socioeconomic and demographic stratification is pronounced. As such, our aggregate scores on assessments like PISA are weighed down disproportionately by disadvantaged students.

In Detroit, which sits at the bottom of every large urban US district tested, two-thirds of students were chronically absent in a recent year, speaking to a lack of stability and resources at the family level. What teachers could succeed in those conditions? Cleveland, Baltimore, districts in the impoverished rural areas of West Virginia — they all tell a similar story. The American schools that struggle the worst share no common curriculum, union contract, or pedagogy. What they share is extreme poverty, segregation, and decades of disinvestment — in local labor markets, transportation, and health care.

Imagine swapping the students of Detroit with those of wealthy Bloomfield Hills next door, where the schools have excellent performance metrics. Does anyone believe the students from Detroit would suddenly excel?

Simply shoveling money at urban schools is not the answer. In fact, poorer, higher-minority schools in the United States receive significantly more per-pupil funding than richer and whiter schools. As it stands, the teachers in the Detroit public school system are asked to achieve similar results to the ones in the Bloomfield system, despite the vast disparities in living and learning environments of the students they teach.

I’m known to be very skeptical about the influence of schools and teachers on test scores, which tend to reflect the socioeconomic conditions of groups and the variation in talent levels between individuals. But you don’t have to share my views in that regard to acknowledge that our worst-performing schools face conditions that no amount of teaching quality can overcome. And consider a fact that’s almost never reported: America’s most disadvantaged students, those in the bottom international decile in socioeconomic status, rank sixth out of 64 comparable nations in math. In other words, even in the midst of all that poverty and dysfunction, our poorest kids outperform almost all of the world’s other poorest kids. The problem is not that our schools fail poor children at an unusual rate. It is that some of our communities are deprived to a scandalous degree.

In sum, our median student does just fine, our best students are the envy of the world, but our worst-performing students drag down our averages in a way that makes our overall performance look much worse than it is — and those extreme negative outliers are almost universally found in communities with intense socioeconomic challenges.

This resolves a puzzle that has baffled pollsters for 40 years. American parents consistently rate the nation’s schools quite poorly while giving their own children’s schools high marks. Average grades for the American school system writ large typically fall in the C or D range, but more than three-quarters of parents typically give their own kids’ schools an A or B. Often this is regarded as a kind of cognitive bias, of irrationality on the part of those parents; surely, they must be viewing their own schools with rose-colored glasses, or so the conventional wisdom has long held. In fact, that attitude makes perfect sense when you reflect on the quantitative reality I’ve described: Most American K-12 schools and students really are doing quite well, which is reflected in the high marks parents give to their own local schools, but like all of us, parents have heard the relentless doomsaying about the country’s schools. Parents judge their own schools from direct experience and the national system from what they see on television. That is, on the question they actually know something about, about which they have the best evidence, they’re quite positive, and they have every reason to be.

The myth of universal failure didn’t come out of nowhere, and for the record I don’t think it was born entirely in bad faith. Some of the people who spread it were no doubt animated by a real and decent impulse to improve the lives of American children, saw the awful conditions in our inner cities, and overextrapolated their impression of school failure. Others were likely so motivated to attack public schools for ideological reasons that they didn’t care much about misrepresenting the data. Whatever the motives, over time it became far too common for politicians, pundits, and members of the media to take data that showed a handful of distressed communities dragging down otherwise strong averages and present it as proof that American education was rotten from root to branch. An honest reading pointed toward investing in poor places and pursuing avenues for shared prosperity other than just schooling; the sensationalist reading pointed toward dismantling public schools. Many people chose the sensationalist one and repeated it until it became something “everybody knew.”

The stakes are significant. If the failures of American education really are systemwide, the response has to be wholesale reform — new national mandates and perhaps a federal takeover of local education policy; even more standardized testing; the criminalization of teacher unions; private school vouchers for all. But the reality is that our educational failure is concentrated, and it’s concentrated in predictable places, which means the remedy must be too: Serious investment for the communities where poverty has done its damage, not merely for the schools that sit inside them, along with an effort to build more pathways to middle class stability for those who are not academically motivated.

There is some evidence that such investment, for example in environmental cleanup or direct financial assistance for poorer families, can improve learning outcomes. There too, though, the evidence is contested and the effects unclear. But this investment offers obvious advantages: Even if bringing more money and development into poor communities does not close academic gaps, the direct economic advantages will endure.

These efforts are both harder and more expensive than yet another round of complaining about teachers and their unions, but they have the advantage of potentially solving real problems. If we have a moral duty to improve our schools, as the school reformers insist, then that begins with a moral duty to tell the truth."]]></description>
<dc:subject>freddiedeboer 2026 us schools schooling policy politics reading howweread math mathematics education pedagogy pisa oecd germany norway connecticut arizona newzealand poverty finland comparison cleveland baltimore detroit westvirginia teaching howweteach teacherunions privatization charters charterschools vouchers</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:4de0f95b2291/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freddiedeboer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:math"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mathematics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pisa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:oecd"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:germany"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:norway"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:connecticut"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:arizona"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:newzealand"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:poverty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:finland"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:comparison"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cleveland"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:baltimore"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:detroit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:westvirginia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teacherunions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:privatization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charterschools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:vouchers"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://educationwars.substack.com/p/tied-up-in-knots">
    <title>Tied Up in Knots - by Jennifer Berkshire</title>
    <dc:date>2026-06-12T13:35:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://educationwars.substack.com/p/tied-up-in-knots</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["For the 'reform' wing of the Democratic Party, education is a knotty business"]]></description>
<dc:subject>education reform edreform democrats 2026 us jenniferberkshire policy schools schooling privatization voucehers donaldtrump charleskoch christiannationalism politics mattbarnum barackobama mattamahan arneduncan commoncore mississippi mississippimiracle publiceducation publicschools chedrickgreen schoolchoice michigan southernsurge unions labor teaching howweteach teachers michaelhartney rahmemanuel mattyglesias jorgeelorza gregabbott ginahinojosa edtech tylerkingkade moderates centrism centrists tuckercarlson collegeforall caitlindrey republicans colleges universities highered highereducation academia</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:fcebe9f57544/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reform"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edreform"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:democrats"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jenniferberkshire"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:privatization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:voucehers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:donaldtrump"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charleskoch"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christiannationalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mattbarnum"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:barackobama"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mattamahan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:arneduncan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:commoncore"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mississippi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mississippimiracle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:publiceducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:publicschools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chedrickgreen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schoolchoice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:michigan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:southernsurge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teachers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:michaelhartney"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rahmemanuel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mattyglesias"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jorgeelorza"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gregabbott"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ginahinojosa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tylerkingkade"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:moderates"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:centrism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:centrists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tuckercarlson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collegeforall"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:caitlindrey"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:republicans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colleges"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academia"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.corriere.it/opinioni/26_maggio_22/educare-e-un-atto-politico-8a22c14f-d58c-4a60-b3cf-807949c16xlk.shtml">
    <title>Opinioni | Educare è un atto politico | Corriere.it</title>
    <dc:date>2026-06-09T07:15:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.corriere.it/opinioni/26_maggio_22/educare-e-un-atto-politico-8a22c14f-d58c-4a60-b3cf-807949c16xlk.shtml</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["La scuola è una delle grandi infrastrutture democratiche della nostra società"

...

"La mattina del 13 maggio, a Reggio Emilia, quando la Principessa del Galles ha incontrato bambini e bambine, insegnanti, atelieristi, ricercatori e comunità educanti del Reggio Emilia Approach, si è materializzato qualcosa di profondo. Il riconoscimento internazionale del fatto che l’educazione sia oggi una delle grandi questioni politiche del nostro tempo. Non «politiche educative» nel senso amministrativo del termine, ma politica nel suo significato originario e più alto: costruire le condizioni della convivenza civile.

In un’epoca segnata da guerre, polarizzazioni, linguaggi aggressivi e crescente frammentazione sociale, l’educazione rappresenta uno dei pochi strumenti capaci di generare coesione. 

Per questo credo che oggi si debba avere il coraggio di affermare una tesi apparentemente semplice, ma profondamente radicale: educare è un atto politico, nonviolento, di pace. L’educazione è un atto politico perché forma persone capaci di convivere nella complessità, accogliendo come ricchezza la differenza, senza trasformarla in conflitto. Perché insegna il dialogo, invece della sopraffazione a cui assistiamo nei massimi sistemi. Perché costruisce cittadini e cittadine, e non semplicemente individui in competizione. Negli ultimi anni abbiamo assistito a una trasformazione profonda dello spazio pubblico.

I social network hanno accelerato la velocità delle reazioni, ridotto il tempo della riflessione, amplificato la radicalizzazione. La comunicazione politica e sociale si è progressivamente spostata verso registri emotivi e conflittuali. Anche i giovani crescono immersi in un ecosistema che spinge verso la semplificazione, la polarizzazione, l’immediatezza e la performance continua.

Dentro questo scenario, la scuola rischia di essere percepita soltanto come luogo di valutazione, selezione e preparazione tecnica al lavoro. Ma se la riduciamo a questo, perdiamo la sua funzione più importante.

La scuola è una delle ultime grandi infrastrutture democratiche delle nostre società. È il luogo in cui una comunità decide che il futuro non può essere lasciato al caso né alle disuguaglianze di partenza. Ogni giorno, nelle scuole, si compie un lavoro silenzioso ma decisivo: si impara ad ascoltare, a collaborare, a rispettare, a discutere senza distruggere, a convivere tra differenze. Sono gesti apparentemente ordinari. In realtà sono gli anticorpi democratici di una società. Un dirigente scolastico non è soltanto un amministratore efficiente. È un costruttore di comunità. È la persona che deve creare le condizioni affinché una scuola diventi un luogo di fiducia, di crescita reciproca, di innovazione umana prima ancora che tecnologica. Allo stesso modo, ogni volta che un docente valorizza la parola di uno studente fragile, che sceglie di accompagnare, di includere, di costruire fiducia, costruisce non soltanto il sapere, ma il modo con cui una società impara a stare insieme. Ed è per questo che dirigenti e insegnanti sono oggi, forse più che in passato, figure decisive per la qualità democratica delle nostre comunità.

Esperienze come quella del Reggio Emilia Approach assumono allora un significato internazionale che va oltre la pedagogia dell’infanzia. Il mondo guarda a Reggio Emilia perché lì si è sviluppata un’idea di educazione fondata sulla relazione, sull’ascolto, sulla creatività e sul riconoscimento della dignità dei bambini e delle bambine come cittadini fin dall’inizio della vita. Loris Malaguzzi parlava dei «cento linguaggi» dei bambini. Quella intuizione oggi appare ancora più moderna. Perché nell’epoca dell’intelligenza artificiale il rischio più grande non è soltanto tecnologico. È antropologico.

L’intelligenza artificiale cambierà profondamente il lavoro, la produzione e l’accesso al sapere. Ma proprio per questo aumenterà il valore delle competenze più umane: l’ascolto, l’empatia, il pensiero critico, la capacità di cooperare, la responsabilità verso gli altri. Ecco perché l’educazione sarà il vero terreno politico del XXI secolo.

Non ci sarà democrazia stabile senza comunità educanti forti, né innovazione sostenibile senza cultura critica. Non ci sarà coesione sociale senza scuole capaci di generare appartenenza. Forse è anche questo che la visita della Principessa Kate ha simbolicamente riconosciuto: che il futuro delle società contemporanee si gioca molto prima delle università, dei mercati e della politica istituzionale. Si gioca nei luoghi in cui i bambini imparano a guardare il mondo e gli altri. Luoghi che in molti contesti mancano e di cui c’è massimo bisogno. Nel tempo delle macchine intelligenti, la vera sfida sarà restare umani. E l’educazione resterà il più potente atto politico nonviolento che una società possa compiere.

* Presidente di Fondazione Reggio Children"]]></description>
<dc:subject>schools schooling education democracy francescoprofumo 2026 politics reggioemilia society covilsociety civics politicaleducation polarization war fragmentization cohesion complexity difference differences diveristy conflict dialog citizens publicspace socialmedia reactionaries reflection simplification purpose inequality collaboration respect community inclusion inclusivity pedagogy howweteach teaching lorismalaguzzi ai artificialintelligence empathy criticalthinking cooperation responsibility culturalcriticism culture socialcohesion</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:0e68dd3bd533/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:democracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:francescoprofumo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reggioemilia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:covilsociety"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:civics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politicaleducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:polarization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fragmentization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cohesion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:difference"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:differences"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:diveristy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conflict"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dialog"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:citizens"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:publicspace"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reactionaries"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reflection"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:simplification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:purpose"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inequality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:respect"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inclusion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inclusivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lorismalaguzzi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:empathy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:criticalthinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cooperation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:responsibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culturalcriticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialcohesion"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.buzzsprout.com/2470045">
    <title>The Lower Frequencies</title>
    <dc:date>2026-06-07T01:23:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.buzzsprout.com/2470045</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["A podcast from the Ethnic Studies Council at the University of California."

[episode descriptions (at time of bookmarking)

"Episode 7: The Racial Environmental State with Keith Miyake
June 03, 2026 • 1:05:28
In this episode, we are joined by Keith Miyake, a professor in the Department of Ethnic Studies and Labor Studies at UC Riverside and a core member of the UC Ethnic Studies Council. Keith talks about how their moorings in STEM and ethnic studies inform and sharpen their research and organizing, including within the university, and how their work as an environmental engineer in Southern California helped inspire their new book, The Racial Environmental State: Contested Spaces of Resistance, published in June 2026 by the University of Washington Press. In this discussion, Keith addresses how activists and organizers have engaged with the Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) process in ways that exceed the parameters of the racial environmental state, opening up the possibility of redistribution of resources, the elimination of borders and prisons, challenging settler colonialism, and the forging of unlikely solidarities. They explore the pros and cons of working with the state in pursuit of racial and environmental justice and wrestles with how abolitionists can craft new relationships rooted in radical notions of democracy.  

Episode 6: The War Within: Repression and Resistance at UCSD with BT Werner
May 06, 2026 • 1:57:08
In the first episode of a new series, “The War Within,” featuring those fighting against war, imperialism, and repression from inside the UC system, we talk to BT Werner about their long history of organizing at UC San Diego (UCSD). Werner, a physicist who has been at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography for 35 years, discusses how understanding complex systems can help us fight back against UC repression while providing examples from the Black Winter of 2010 to the 2024 Gaza solidarity encampments. Two years after the May 6 police raid that violently dismantled the UCSD encampment, Werner and one other UCSD professor are still facing disciplinary changes and suspension. We encourage listeners to sign a petition demanding that the UCSD administration drop the charges immediately.

Episode 5: The UC v. Trump
December 05, 2025 • 47:29
When the UC Regents and administration failed to stand up to the demands of the Trump administration, faculty and workers stepped up to join the fight.  In this episode, Zoé Hamstead (Associate Professor of City and Regional Planning, UCB, co-chair of Berkeley Faculty Association, CUCFA Chair of Legal Affairs), Annie McClanahan, (Associate Professor of English, UCI, Co-President of the Council of UC Faculty Associations), and Anna Markowitz (Associate Professor of Education, UCLA, President of the executive board of the UCLA  Faculty Association) join The Lower Frequencies to discuss the role of faculty and the faculty associations (in partnership with UC unions, the AAUP, and other organizations) in waging a successful series of legal challenges that forced the Regents to disclose the federal demand letter and won a preliminary injunction against the Trump administration.

Episode 4: UC Move Your Money!
November 07, 2025 • 46:48
In this episode of The Lower Frequencies, we speak with UCLA Associate Professor of Anthropology Hannah Appel (who is also Associate Faculty Director of the Luskin Institute on Inequality and Democracy and co-founder and organizer with the Debt Collective), about a new systemwide UC campaign that empowers faculty to begin the process of divesting from war and genocide.  We walk through the three-step UC Move Your Money campaign and how it offers faculty a chance to take action today while building power for more ambitious efforts down the road.

Episode 3: The Right to Teach Truth: What K-12 Teachers Need to Know
October 14, 2025 • 1:05:55
In this third installment of The Lower Frequencies we host educators, lawyers, and activists who share practical advice and inspiration for teachers to defend the presentation of vital topics in K-12 schools. In response to the intensification of attacks to censor the teaching of genocide and queer and trans lives, for example,  Lupe Carrasco Cardona, Mark Kleiman, Tracie Noriego and Liz Jackson discuss how building community, knowing legal, employee, and union safeguards and responsibilities all protect our right to teach truth and defend student’s rights to a full and liberatory education.

Episode 2: The People V. UC: Thomas Harvey and Mark Kleiman
July 14, 2025 • 1:59:09
In the first of a series on “The People v. The UC,” The Lower Frequencies welcomes movement lawyers Thomas Harvey and Mark Kleiman to discuss their tireless work defending the students, staff, and faculty of the University of California from repression.  Mark and Thomas discuss what brought them to movement law, their work in defending ethnic studies from Zionist attacks, and their battles with the UC, including a successful court action against Regent Jay Sures and an ongoing lawsuit on behalf of those in the UCLA encampment who were brutalized by Zionist counter-protesters and police.  If you are interested in supporting their work, you can donate at the link to the UCLA lawsuit below or email Thomas Harvey at tbhlegal@proton.me.

Episode 1: Policing Ethnic Studies: The Legislative Jewish Caucus and AB 1468
April 14, 2025 • 57:22
The inaugural episode of The Lower Frequencies features guest Marcy Winograd and members of the UC Ethnic Studies Council discussing AB 1468, a bill authored and introduced by the California Legislative Jewish Caucus, without any consultation of ethnic studies experts, that would impose a massive and costly set of rules policing the ways in which ethnic studies can be taught by K-12 teachers in the state."]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:javierarbona ethnicstudies universityofcalifornia ucsd donaldtrump education highered highereducation academia colleges universities teaching howweteach learning howwelearn ucla keithmiyake repression resistance btwerner ucregents hannahappel zoéhamstead anniemcclanahan annamarkowitz carrascocardona markkleiman tracienoriego lizjackson schools schooling liberatoryeducation thomasharvey zionism israel palestine marcywinograd</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:31138a17a947/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:via:javierarbona"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ethnicstudies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universityofcalifornia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ucsd"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:donaldtrump"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colleges"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ucla"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:keithmiyake"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:repression"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:resistance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:btwerner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ucregents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hannahappel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:zoéhamstead"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anniemcclanahan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:annamarkowitz"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:carrascocardona"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:markkleiman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tracienoriego"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lizjackson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:liberatoryeducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thomasharvey"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:zionism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:israel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:palestine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marcywinograd"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/at-what-cost/">
    <title>At What Cost?</title>
    <dc:date>2026-06-05T09:42:43+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/at-what-cost/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["“What Do I Need To Get Done That I Don't Have To Think About?” asks historian Timothy Burke, pondering about the sorts of “mindless tasks” he’s supposed to gleefully hand over to “AI.” “This rhetoric drives me nuts because it is frequently offered without concrete existing examples,” he writes. “It’s always a vague, futureward offer made with no evident knowledge about what it is that most people actually do in work or in everyday life. As if, perhaps, the pitch is coming from billionaires who don’t have to do anything tedious except perhaps to order all those kinds of tasks to be done.”

It is mind-boggling to me that anyone, but especially the teachers’ labor union, would argue that any work an educator does is “mindless” or menial, that any work an educator does is the kind of task that one should automate if they don’t want to have to think about it. I’m not saying that teachers aren’t overworked -- good grief. Rather, I want to remind people that software is not a substitute for the kind of structural change necessary to improve everyone’s lives, in and around the classroom.

The kinds of tasks that I hear teachers being encouraged to offload to “AI” -- grading, lesson planning, communication with students and parents, design of handouts and other classroom material, IEPs -- are actually constitutive of the very work. These tasks -- and yes, some of them can be burdensome, time-consuming, annoying as hell -- are how you come to know the content, the community, the classroom, yourself and others. Nothing about teaching and learning should be thoughtless or careless the way in which “AI” promises thoughtlessness and carelessness as-a-service. Education isn’t comprised of tasks that should be automated; this isn’t work that needs to be made faster and cheaper. Teaching and learning are not something to be optimized or engineered like machinery, turned into the very “factory model of education” that Silicon Valley has spent decades inventing and positioning against.

If we’re worried about what the push-button classroom will do to students, we should probably stop demanding teachers become button-pushers as well."]]></description>
<dc:subject>2026 audreywatters education edtech schools schooling lms ai artificialintelligence popeleoxiv randiweingarten screentime teaching howweteach persistence friction cognition children openai microsoft technology criticalthinking andrewcantarutti productivity efficiency optimization labor work learning howwelearn googleclassroom timothyburke addiction socialmedia attention attentioneconomy meta resistance offline edzitron lizkrieger meghano'gieblyn universities colleges highered highereducation noralacour csu californiastateuniversity writing howwewrite toddfeathers benwilliamson scientism neuroscience translation policy tedchiang kieranhealy lmsacasas care caring grading lessonplanning communication</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:b2995e194099/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:audreywatters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:popeleoxiv"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:randiweingarten"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:screentime"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:persistence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:friction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cognition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:criticalthinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:andrewcantarutti"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:productivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:efficiency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:optimization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:googleclassroom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:timothyburke"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:addiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attentioneconomy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meta"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:resistance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:offline"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edzitron"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lizkrieger"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meghano'gieblyn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colleges"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:noralacour"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:csu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:californiastateuniversity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:toddfeathers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:benwilliamson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scientism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neuroscience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:translation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tedchiang"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kieranhealy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lmsacasas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:care"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:caring"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:grading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lessonplanning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:communication"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://jeppestricker.substack.com/p/the-slow-work-of-becoming">
    <title>The Slow Work of Becoming - by Jeppe Klitgaard Stricker</title>
    <dc:date>2026-06-05T09:35:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://jeppestricker.substack.com/p/the-slow-work-of-becoming</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["On Epistemological Sovereignty in an Age of Instant Information"

[via:
https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/at-what-cost/ ]

"Generative AI has caused a crisis in higher education, but I think we have largely misdiagnosed it. The conversation tends to focus on what students do with generative AI - whether they use it to cheat, whether they can evaluate its output, whether institutions can detect it - and how the technology affects critical thinking, this somewhat elusive term we often take for granted yet struggle to define.

These are important problems, but they also reveal how students arriving at our institutions have spent years inside an information environment that, largely unintentionally, undermines the kind of sustained, self-directed attention that education depends on.

Most students do not arrive at university having spent their formative years on JSTOR or with extensive online library resources. And even if they have, various social media apps will have been right by their side. Digital technologies, as a broad category, will have taught them that information should be fast, that uncertainty is a problem to be resolved immediately, and that anything requiring sustained effort is probably not worth the trouble.

The pedagogical problem here is not the internet, but something else. The issue is partly the instrumental logic institutions have fine-tuned over decades (I recently wrote about this here), partly that students carry the attentional habits formed in these environments into the domain of higher education - including, crucially, the seminar room, the library, and every encounter with ideas that rewards patience rather than speed.

The Attention Economy and the Borrowed Brain

A student cannot choose what counts as knowledge on their own. When they enter higher education, they enter conversations that have been going on for centuries, ones that carry accumulated judgments about what counts as evidence, argument, and truth.

However, the contemporary attention economy functions less like a collective intelligence and more like a cognitive environment that increasingly supplies ready-made opinions and judgments faster than individuals and certainly groups can form their own.

The consequences for education are serious, as what we might call epistemological sovereignty, or simply becoming, is not merely a personal achievement or judgement call. It is a collective responsibility, one that institutions, disciplines and academic communities have historically maintained on behalf of those entering the conversation. The attention economy erodes that responsibility. It answers the question of what matters before the student has had the chance to ask it, and it does so at a scale that no individual institution can easily counter alone.

Now, generative AI intensifies the problem considerably. In many ways it is the attention economy compressed into a single interface - sycophantically indifferent to whether the user is developing genuine understanding or merely obtaining a plausible output. I have previously written about the novice paradox: evaluating generative AI output well requires the very expertise students are still in the process of developing.

But there is a prior problem. Before students can even begin to evaluate what generative AI gives them, they need to have developed a sense of what they are looking for, and implicitly, what a good answer looks like. That prior formation of thought is precisely what the broader information environment has made harder to achieve. And it is precisely what universities exist to provide.

Becoming Equals Slow and Steady

There is a critical difference between having knowledge and becoming someone who knows. And the distance between them cannot be closed by more efficient information delivery, regardless of how that delivery is organised.

Becoming, in the sense that genuine education has always intended, is typically not very efficient. It requires motivation, time, failure, and space to think and develop. You do not develop judgment by acquiring answers, but by living through the process of arriving at them, getting them wrong, and trying again. This is hard work.

With the internet, and now especially generative AI, speed and availability are what these systems do best - and they have no inherent mechanism for valuing slower processes. The result is an optimisation trap: students learn to ask the questions these tools handle well, and gradually stop asking the ones they do not - narrowing rather than expanding their thinking, without quite noticing that this is happening.

This is a problem for individual students, and it is a problem for the institutions that are supposed to hold the line. Higher education should insist on the value of what takes longest to understand precisely because it takes a long time. Not every question deserves instant answers, and not every uncertainty needs to be closed immediately. Perhaps this is especially true in higher education: the capacity to remain productively uncertain, to hold a difficult question open long enough to actually think about it, is one of the things serious education, and research, are supposed to develop.

In an information environment that has evolved rapidly in recent years, universities must be able to retain a focus that the attention economy cannot offer: a higher resolution view of what is right here, human to human - the student in front of us, and the thesis idea that needs more than a moment to become clear.

This is not inefficiency.

It is the condition under which becoming is possible at all."]]></description>
<dc:subject>jeppeklitgaardstricker 2026 slow generativeai genai ai artificialintelligence jstor pedagogy teaching howweteach education learning howwelearn attention attentioneconomy becoming responsibility knowledge optimization highered highereducation colleges universities criticalthinking</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:cb4c0ab18e79/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jeppeklitgaardstricker"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:slow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:generativeai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:genai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jstor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attentioneconomy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:becoming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:responsibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:knowledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:optimization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colleges"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:criticalthinking"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://walledgardenedu.substack.com/p/the-right-tool-for-the-right-hands">
    <title>The Right Tool for the Right Hands - by Andrew Cantarutti</title>
    <dc:date>2026-06-05T09:33:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://walledgardenedu.substack.com/p/the-right-tool-for-the-right-hands</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Why the Same Tool Can Help a Teacher and Harm a Student"

[via:
https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/at-what-cost/ ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>andrewcantarutti education learning howwlearn teaching howweteach tools 20206 google clasroom edtech lms efficiency productivity administration gradebooks software communication lessonplanning ai artificialintelligence assessment grammarly quillbot writing howwewreite research audiobooks attention coding design production</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:82ebda45e0d2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:andrewcantarutti"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwlearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:20206"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:clasroom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:efficiency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:productivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:administration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gradebooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lessonplanning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:assessment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:grammarly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:quillbot"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewreite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:research"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:audiobooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:coding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:production"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://jacobin.com/2026/05/educational-technology-children-learning-iready">
    <title>The EdTech Backlash Is Here, and It's Just Getting Started</title>
    <dc:date>2026-06-05T09:30:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://jacobin.com/2026/05/educational-technology-children-learning-iready</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Tech vendors promised personalized, frictionless learning. What American schools got instead was mind-numbing, data-hungry junk software that devalues teachers and shortchanges students. A growing movement led by alarmed parents is saying, “Enough.”"

[via:
https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/at-what-cost/ ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>edtech education technology schools schooling noradelacour 2026 teaching howweteach learning howeelearn frictionlessness personalization chromebooks lausd siliconvalley friction howwelearn google</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:70d97659f97d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:noradelacour"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howeelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:frictionlessness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:personalization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chromebooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lausd"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:siliconvalley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:friction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:google"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/04/us/social-media-schools.html">
    <title>‘Teachers Are Going to Hate It’: How Social Media Apps Hooked Teens at School - The New York Times</title>
    <dc:date>2026-06-05T05:37:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/04/us/social-media-schools.html</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Internal documents show how tech giants grabbed children’s attention throughout the day, a strategy that schools say has undermined education."

[archived:
https://archive.is/ijKtV ]

"Snapchat sent phone alerts to adolescents during school hours, urging them to share what was going on in their classrooms.

Meta paid “teen ambassadors” to promote Instagram and hand out swag to their friends at school.

TikTok gave the National PTA millions of dollars, in part to throw school events about online safety and provide favorable comments to journalists.

Again and again, the world’s leading social media companies have targeted students, even as complaints have mounted that they are hurting teenagers’ mental health and academic performance, according to a New York Times review of internal documents that lay bare for the first time these tactics to hook young users.

The documents emerged from lawsuits filed by more than 1,400 school districts against Meta, Snap, TikTok and YouTube amid a rising backlash against social media, with parent movements and best-selling books blaming the platforms for loneliness, bullying, eating disorders and sexual exploitation.

The outcry, long focused on social media’s harm to mental health, has now shifted to its upending of the classroom. Many school districts are banning smartphones, and some are re-evaluating their reliance on devices like Chromebooks, the inexpensive laptops made by YouTube’s parent company, Google.

The companies’ push to keep children glued to their screens has overshadowed concerns from parents, teachers and even their own trust and safety teams about interfering with school, according to the documents and interviews with dozens of parents, teachers and former tech company employees.

TikTok’s leaders decided not to disable notifications during school hours, rejecting a change that its safety teams had pushed for years. A Snapchat strategy document referred to classroom phone use as “under the desk” time. Google managers knew YouTube was recommending videos to students during the school day that had nothing to do with their lessons.

The school districts contend that the apps’ addictive designs made teachers’ jobs more difficult. “It is so constantly tempting to these kids to be on a platform that promises endless, infinite, varied entertainment rather than actually focusing on what they should be at school to do,” said Previn Warren, one of the lead lawyers for the schools.

The companies argue that the Covid pandemic and other factors have harmed adolescents’ mental health, and that parents, schools and cellphone makers bear responsibility for children’s phone habits. They also say that they have made their platforms safer with parental-control features and account restrictions for minors.

All four companies recently settled with Breathitt County Schools, a small district in rural Kentucky that served as a test case for the litigation nationwide. The district, which has about 1,500 students, had sought $3 million in damages and about $60 million that it had planned to put toward a long-term education and mental health plan. The companies agreed to pay Breathitt $27 million: $9 million from Meta, $8 million each from Snap and TikTok and $2 million from Google, according to documents released on Friday and first reported by Bloomberg.

While it’s hard to say how the ongoing litigation might ultimately affect classrooms, it poses a substantial financial risk to the companies, possibly costing billions of dollars, said Alexandra Lahav, a civil litigation professor at Cornell Law School. She noted that the companies were also facing a barrage of claims from families and state attorneys general.

Breathitt was the first of six so-called bellwether cases, whose outcomes are likely to guide the rest. The next plaintiff in line for trial, Tucson Unified School District in Arizona, which has about 40,000 students, is seeking more than $1 billion.

“These are massive, massive lawsuits,” Ms. Lahav said.

Winning with Teens

In the early days of social media, before the industry came under angry public scrutiny, some company leaders were candid about their pursuit of teenagers — a key demographic that they knew could drive the next hit app and yield lifelong users.

In 2012, a few months after the launch of Snapchat, its co-founder Evan Spiegel, then 21, wrote a blog post about feedback he had heard from some of the app’s early users.

“We were thrilled to hear that most of them were high school students who were using Snapchat as a new way to pass notes in class,” Mr. Spiegel wrote, indicating that “peaks of activity” occurred during school hours.

Meta also tried to promote its brand in schools, desperate to keep young users from leaving its flagship apps, Facebook and Instagram, for competitors.

“Winning schools is the way to win with teens,” read an internal document from 2018.
Beginning that year, the company recruited teen ambassadors to “act as our plug at local high schools within five key markets.” The students received branded gear to share, and they earned $45 gift cards for completing monthly challenges, such as posting Instagram video chats with friends.

Leia Immanuel, a former teen ambassador who is now an artist in New York City, said her Instagram followers supported her when she was bullied at school. But she now feels conflicted about the role she played in encouraging other young people to use the platform.

“In recent years I have been rethinking it,” she said. She still feels addicted to posting online and believes it is unhealthy. “I didn’t understand that at 14.”

Meta said its outreach efforts at schools, including the ambassadors program, had largely focused on promoting kindness and soliciting feedback on new products.

“We proudly work with parents, schools, safety organizations and teens themselves to inform safety features,” said Liza Crenshaw, a spokeswoman for Meta. She added that some of the documents produced in the lawsuit represented the ideas of individuals, not the company.

Google employees cited classrooms as a source of long-term customers. A 2020 slide deck said that “investing in schools helps onboard kids into Google’s ecosystem.”

With its Chromebook laptops and software tailored for schools, Google has come to dominate the education technology market over the past 15 years. That business boomed during the pandemic, as many districts provided students with their own devices for remote learning. The majority of U.S. schools now use Google products to teach.

Members of the company’s education department were often excited about products they thought could improve learning, such as affordable laptops and educational YouTube videos, according to court documents and interviews. They worked alongside product managers, however, who were focused on a different upside: increasing YouTube’s viewership.

In one 2015 memo, YouTube employees noted that Saturdays drew 80 million hours’ more watch time than Thursdays, and that “increasing usage in schools M-F could decrease this gap!”

It was clear even back then that YouTube was proving problematic for schools, according to documents first reported by The Wall Street Journal. The company’s education team repeatedly complained that the algorithm often led children into a spiral of unrelated content.

One slide presentation illustrated how this could happen. If someone began a YouTube session with a query about linear equations, the platform would first offer a learning video, the presentation showed. But after that, the algorithm would recommend a Will Ferrell comedy video.

A Google spokesman said the documents were outdated. In 2022, the company released a tool that allows teachers to remove ads and recommendations on videos they assign students to watch, said the spokesman, José Castañeda. He also said that YouTube could be blocked, and that browsing on the site had been turned off by default on school Chromebooks for a decade.

But teachers and parents said that even when YouTube and other sites were blocked, students used internet proxies and other workarounds. And schools often allowed YouTube browsing so children could do research, which Google said highlighted its educational value but which made policing its use more difficult.

Joanna Houston, the mother of a sixth grader in Richmond Hill, Ga., said her son had watched more than 1,500 noneducational YouTube videos on his Chromebook during school between August and January.

She was concerned that her son’s school had embraced Chromebooks and YouTube, but she blamed Google for marketing to schools and making it so easy to mindlessly consume its content.

“It’s this whole ecosystem that ultimately benefits this company, and I don’t think it very much benefits students,” she said.

‘The #1 Cause of Drama’

The companies heard complaints not only from parents and teachers but from their own internal trust and safety teams.

At a conference on student safety in 2023, Snap representatives met with education officials from across the United States. According to internal emails, school administrators there raised alarms about their experiences with Snapchat — including children as young as 9 sending nude pictures.

A superintendent from Alabama told the executives that he had warned about the app in a newsletter to parents, which he shared with them. “Snapchat is the #1 cause of drama in school aged children,” it said, citing bullying and inappropriate images. “If YOU want to protect your child, make them delete it.”

That same year, a Snap employee pushed back against a new feature that sent high school students phone notifications during the day. The alerts urged the adolescents to share what was in their backpack or what their class was up to.

The employee said that children should be able to opt out of the notifications to “avoid legal risks around dark patterns” — a term referring to manipulative design features. The suggestion was not taken.

A Snap spokeswoman said that the company was pleased to have resolved the Breathitt lawsuit amicably and that many of the documents showed the company was listening to feedback.

“We do not target schools,” said Monique Bellamy, the spokeswoman, adding that Snapchat is simply popular among teenagers. “We care deeply about the safety and well-being of all Snapchatters, and our teams have worked for years to raise the bar on safety.”

At TikTok, some employees warned that frequent interruptions in the classroom would lead to a backlash.

“Teachers are going to hate it,” an employee wrote in 2022 to an internal group focused on child safety, referring to a new feature prodding users to post within the next three minutes. “Kids already have smartphone addiction in class.”

In response, a manager said the team’s job was to support as well as challenge the business. Competitors, she said, were doing the same thing.

“If we assume teens are going to do this anyway, we’d rather them be here on TikTok,” she wrote. The company removed the feature in 2023.

That same year, TikTok considered turning off notifications altogether for minors during school hours, but the plan was scrapped. Internal documents about the feature noted it would reduce the number of daily active users and would be difficult for the company to administer because of the variety of school schedules.

TikTok declined to comment on the internal documents about app features that affected children in school. A spokeswoman said the app had dozens of privacy and safety settings, including parental controls.

PTA ‘Propaganda’

Leading technology companies have long partnered with parent-teacher associations to burnish their reputations and promote internet safety. But the new documents show how the National PTA, a nonprofit that represents some 22,000 local chapters, actively solicited such contracts.

In a 2024 email pitching its services to Snap, the National PTA promised it could “help with sentiment” and create “more understanding and comfort” among parents. (Snap ultimately declined to offer funding.)

Exactly how much the National PTA has received from social media companies remains secret, but some details emerged in the documents. In 2024, a National PTA official told Snap executives that companies generally paid the organization $250,000 to $500,000 a year, and that a handful gave millions of dollars a year.

“Parents, students and school communities rely on PTA to help them navigate the challenges of a changing world,” said Heidi May Wilson, a spokeswoman for the National PTA, in a statement responding to questions about the lawsuit documents. “That includes technology and social media, which are now central parts of children’s lives.”

TikTok signed the first of several contracts with the group in 2019, just as the app’s thriving business in America was coming under fire. Prominent lawmakers like Senator Marco Rubio had accused its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, of censorship, painting it as a propaganda tool of the Chinese Communist Party.

The deal with the National PTA aimed to “positively raise ByteDance’s profile among parents,” according to a PTA slide deck for the company that was quoted in a plaintiff brief.

In November 2019, a National PTA employee asked its new sponsor where it should host an internet safety event. In emails, TikTok employees discussed that the ideal schools would be in “major market media centers” and “sensitive political districts.”

Tampa, which was represented by Mr. Rubio and had the most populous TV viewing area in Florida, met both criteria. The National PTA gave a county chapter $1,000 to put on the event at Buchanan Middle School.

In addition to about 75 parents and children, local TV reporters showed up to the cafeteria event in February 2020. Surrounded by balloons with TikTok’s logo, parents talked about screen-time rules, and a panel of students answered questions. A local influencer said that TikTok had helped her build a career traveling the world.

While many parents appreciated that the event helped them talk about social media with their children, the influencer’s presence felt like “propaganda,” said Damaris Allen, who was then the chapter president. “I just remember being very, very annoyed.”

Later that year, TikTok gave the National PTA $2 million for support during the pandemic. It paid another $3 million in 2024 for the group to promote the company’s youth safety efforts, including providing “positive” quotes to news outlets. The TikTok spokeswoman said the company was proud to fund the organization.

In December of last year, a publication in northeast Ohio covered a TikTok-sponsored event about online safety. A National PTA representative told the outlet: “It was important for the youth to illustrate how they use platforms and how they use TikTok for good.”"]]></description>
<dc:subject>socialmedia addiction children youth teens siliconvalley bigtech attention schools schooling education howweteach teaching distraction jennifervalentino-devries snapchat meta facebook instagram tiktok google chromebooks ethics psychology adolescence bytedance edtech manipulation youtube screentime</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:ecd893a3d377/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:addiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:youth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teens"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:siliconvalley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bigtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:distraction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jennifervalentino-devries"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:snapchat"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meta"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:facebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:instagram"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tiktok"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chromebooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:adolescence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bytedance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:manipulation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:youtube"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:screentime"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/01/magazine/ai-university-college-california.html">
    <title>California’s Public Universities Went All in on A.I. Now They’re Tearing Themselves Apart. - The New York Times</title>
    <dc:date>2026-06-01T22:24:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/01/magazine/ai-university-college-california.html</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["California’s public universities spent $16.9 million on A.I. during a financial crisis, and the result has been chaos."]]></description>
<dc:subject>csu california californiastateuniversity 2026 education highered highereducation colleges universities academia howweteach teaching pedagogy ai artificialintelligence</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:c1d554168849/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:csu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:california"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:californiastateuniversity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colleges"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/moral-panic-moral-imagination/">
    <title>Moral Panic, Moral Imagination</title>
    <dc:date>2026-05-30T23:13:37+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/moral-panic-moral-imagination/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["It's become quite commonplace to charge those of us who challenge technology – specifically children's use of technology -- with fomenting some sort of "moral panic." To do so invokes a long history of opposition to television and rock-n-roll and video games and comic books, and posits that any complaints about cell phones and social media and “AI” are simply the latest manifestation of this kind of outrage -- an outrage that is grounded in cultural conservativism and un-grounded from science.

New media always generate a frenzied concern from certain corners – concerns that range from quiet handwringing to loud outrage; and importantly, if these concerns are unchecked – or so the story goes – they will extend beyond consternation and pearl-clutching and aim for outright censorship. The charge of "moral panic," therefore is meant to elicit its own sort of highly charged response: the need to thwart those critics and to label them as standing in the way of progress, science, and/or simply "fun".

It's been some fifty years now since the sociologist Stanley Cohen first used the phrase “moral panic” to describe a "condition, episode, person or group of persons [that] emerges to become defined as a threat to societal values and interests" -- in his work specifically, the youth cultures in post-war Britain (even more specifically, the conflict between the mods and the rockers). According to Cohen, moral panics arise when a group's beliefs and practices are marked as deviant, and when the threat – whether real or perceived, literal or symbolic – the group allegedly poses to the social order gets magnified by the mass media. "Moral entrepreneurs" – clergy, politicians, “socially-accredited experts,” and “right-thinking people” – step up to man the “moral barricades,” as Cohen puts it: to diagnose the deviance and to draw the lines of normativity, sometimes to propose solutions, but mostly to pontificate.

There are many ways in which we can see these barricades built and torn down in the decades since Cohen’s work first appeared, as what constitutes “deviance” has, in many instances, has changed radically (as perhaps too has society’s tolerance for “folk devils.”) And there has been major upheaval as well in the main conduit, in Cohen’s formulation at least, for spreading moral panics: the mass media.

But that’s hardly stopped the phrase from being used to police boundaries – cultural, social, technological, political alike. To call something a "moral panic" remains a fairly common rhetorical move, one that serves to dismiss and delegitimate people's concerns, particularly about the ways in which the world around them might be changing. The phrase posits these concerns as hysterical – a panic. It conflates having a moral or ethical stance with being (politically, culturally) reactionary. And it implies that complainants are un- or even anti-scientific.

Ironically perhaps, this dismissive attitude seems to demand its own sort of compliance and complacency. "Don't worry," it tries to reassure everyone, even though, when you look around, there's a lot to be concerned about.

With apologies to Douglas Adams, there are reasons we might panic.

I do wonder what the pundits and posters who always shout “moral panic!” in response to any criticism of technology make of the moral campaign of Pope Leo XIV, who expressly chose that name to pay down a challenge to digital technology and “AI” and, importantly, to directly link his papacy to that of Leo XIII who “stood up for the rights of factory workers during the Gilded Age, when industrial robber barons presided over rapid change and extreme inequality.”

I spent much of the week reading the Pope’s new, 40,000 word encyclical, Magnifica Humanitas (and assiduously avoiding any knee-jerk “takes” from those who can’t seem to handle the written word in any form longer than a tweet. This is why I am not on social media any more, incidentally. Reading and writing and thinking are too important – and life is too short – to waste words performing “intelligence” on the tech billionaires’ platforms. Do I sound panicky? I don't know...).

The history of the Catholic Church is long (and in plenty of ways, awful), but as Pope Leo narrates it, it’s a story of the institution ever moving towards a fuller recognition of social justice and human dignity – a move that he credits in part to the earlier Leo’s 1891 encyclical Rerum Novarum, “a milestone in the development of the Church’s social teaching,” that

<blockquote>“places the dignity of work and of workers at the forefront of its reflection; affirms the right to a fair wage for oneself and one’s family; recognizes that persons have a fundamental value that takes precedence over capital and profit; defends private property along with its indispensable societal role; esteems workers’ associations; and proposes forms of cooperation between the different components of society as an alternative to the mentality of class struggle.”</blockquote>

Human dignity – the word “dignity” appears over one hundred times in this latest encyclical – is undermined by the ongoing exploitations of capitalism; and it is increasingly threatened by the acceleration of technologies, particularly “AI” which

<blockquote>“promises to boost productivity by taking over mundane tasks, [but] frequently forces workers to adapt to the speed and demands of machines, rather than machines being designed to support those who work. As a result, contrary to the advertised benefits of AI, current approaches to technology can paradoxically de-skill workers, subject them to automated surveillance and relegate them to rigid and repetitive tasks. The need to keep up with the pace of technology can erode workers’ sense of agency and stifle the innovative abilities they are expected to bring to their work.”</blockquote>

With a remarkable apology for the Church’s role in colonialism, the Pope links the violence of slavery and human trafficking in the past to the violence of slavery and human trafficking today and the threats of new forms of slavery in the future – “a decisive test for the ethical discernment of AI and digital transformation,” particularly as new technologies curb human freedoms, intellectually and bodily. “Without this ethical and humanizing reflection, the growing power of digital systems could lead us toward new atrocities that are no less shameful than those of the past that we now deplore, while we continue to present ourselves as ‘advanced’ and ‘civilized’ societies.”

To avoid this future – to avoid the reduction of everyone to objects, to eschew the tech industry’s valorization of efficiency and extraction, to end its demands to control all aspects of our lives – it is imperative that we build systems that are “centered on the human person and not solely on performance,” the Pope argues. He’s speaking here specifically of how we push back on automation and technology in the workplace, but I think this is absolutely relevant to education as well. Teachers’ working conditions are, as the union saying goes, students’ learning conditions; but I think we need to see students as doing work too – important intellectual work of their own, work that also matters for minds and souls and bodies and futures and freedom. Both teachers and students deserve dignity and care; both deserve systems that are human and humane; both deserve systems that are not mechanistic and exploitative as almost every single piece of education technology that’s flooded classrooms most certainly is.

And I’d add here too that students – children and adult students like – deserve systems that do not view them solely or even primarily as vulnerable and weaker beings in need of protection. When children are described as “precious treasure,” as the Magifica Humanitas does, it is too easy then to cast them as the objects of education and to deny their agency, their inquiry, their rights."]]></description>
<dc:subject>audreywatters ai artificialintelligence moralpanic edtech technology luddism neoluddism neoluddites luddites 2026 magnificahumanitas popeleoxiv popeleoxiii douglasadams panic catholicchurch catholicism slavery colonialism colonization rerumnovarum dignity humanism human humans humanity society work labor workers capitalism education teaching howweteach learning howwelearn schools schooling colleges universities highered highereducation academia agency humanrights automation humandignity encyclicals enslavement</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:adc0c3f703ec/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:audreywatters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:moralpanic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:luddism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neoluddism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neoluddites"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:luddites"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:magnificahumanitas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:popeleoxiv"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:popeleoxiii"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:douglasadams"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:panic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:catholicchurch"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:catholicism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:slavery"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colonialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colonization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rerumnovarum"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dignity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:human"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:workers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colleges"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:agency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanrights"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:automation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humandignity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:encyclicals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:enslavement"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqZZIdp0_TY">
    <title>Do Chatbots Really Belong in Schools? with Tom Mullaney - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2026-05-29T07:21:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqZZIdp0_TY</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Generative AI is making its way into many parts of society, and schools are no different. Tom Mullaney joins Paris Marx to discuss how generative AI has been adopted in K-12 education and the many concerns it presents for students and teachers.

Tom Mullaney is a high school social studies teacher in the suburbs of Philadelphia.

Tech Won’t Save Us offers a critical perspective on tech, its worldview, and wider society with the goal of inspiring people to demand better tech and a better world. Support the show on Patreon.

The podcast is made in partnership with The Nation. Production is by Kyla Hewson."]]></description>
<dc:subject>generativeai parismarx tommullaney chatbots ai artificialintelligence genai education schools schooling pedagogy children emilybender timnitgebru agi artificialgeneralintelligence singularitarianism singularity edtech google microsoft influence googleclassroom lms canvas pandemic covid-19 coronavirus criticalthinking training highered highereducation colleges universities jobtraining self-advocacy iste chatgpt personalization personalizedlearning individualizedlearning individualization society screentime laptops teaching howweteach learning howwelearn socialization llms skepticism stochasticparrots eliza cuttingedge fomo teachers innovation chromebooks resistance datacenters robotaxis avs</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:6cd6eac41b38/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:generativeai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:parismarx"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tommullaney"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatbots"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:genai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:emilybender"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:timnitgebru"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:agi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialgeneralintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:singularitarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:singularity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:influence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:googleclassroom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:canvas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pandemic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:covid-19"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:coronavirus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:criticalthinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:training"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colleges"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jobtraining"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:self-advocacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:iste"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatgpt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:personalization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:personalizedlearning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:individualizedlearning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:individualization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:screentime"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:laptops"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:llms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:skepticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stochasticparrots"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:eliza"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cuttingedge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fomo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teachers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:innovation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chromebooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:resistance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:datacenters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robotaxis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:avs"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://walledgardenedu.substack.com/p/the-surveillance-classroom">
    <title>The Surveillance Classroom - by Andrew Cantarutti</title>
    <dc:date>2026-05-27T07:45:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://walledgardenedu.substack.com/p/the-surveillance-classroom</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["What Watching Students Teaches Them About What We Believe"

...

"What the Watched Student Learns

The strongest argument against surveillance in schools is not unreliability — though that’s real enough. It is what surveillance models. Our core objective as educators is not to ensure compliance toward an easily measured goal; it’s to assist in the formation of young people so that they may become trusting, caring, and capable members of a healthy society.

The philosopher Onora O’Neill draws a distinction between trust and control. Trust requires vulnerability and the acceptance of risk. She says, “Where we have guarantees of proofs, placing trust is redundant.” In other words, if a system uses watertight monitoring to ensure that someone performs perfectly, you aren’t actually trusting them; you’re just managing their compliance. Trust only exists where we give up control.

Surveillance produces compliance, not character. If we wish for someone to be trustworthy, we have to, as Emerson suggested, open up the space for trust to take root. A student completing an essay inside keystroke-monitoring software isn’t learning to be honest; they’re learning to perform honesty for the system. This is a different skill entirely, and it’s not one that schools should be teaching. A classroom that surveils its students teaches them that they are suspect, that their inner processes are a liability, and that the school’s relationship to them is adversarial.

O’Neill’s characterization of trust and control is amplified by Nguyen’s thesis. A student whose behaviour is optimized for an integrity score develops the capacity for score-management, not integrity. A student whose emotions are measured continuously develops performance awareness, not self-awareness. Ironically, surveillance produces convincing imitations of the qualities we hope young people develop while stifling their actual formation.

A camera or an algorithm can’t replace the relational — and immeasurable — knowledge that a teacher develops about a student over time, through repeated observation, exchange, and authentic care. As Barrett explains, trying to measure and analyze a student’s emotions actually displaces the opportunity to build relational trust that only occurs between people, not people and machines.

The Walled Garden’s answer to the illegibility of genuine learning isn’t surveillance, but redesigned conditions. Artifacts of Attention — handwritten drafts, annotated sources, and in-class work periods — don’t monitor students for compliance; they create the conditions under which authentic student engagement becomes more likely and more visible. A teacher who reads a student’s essay outline, subsequent drafts, and their final product doesn’t need a keystroke log to know whether thinking and growth occurred. They created the conditions that made thinking possible, and with it, genuine interest in the process.

There is a stark distinction to be made here: assessment that reveals process versus surveillance that monitors compliance. The first treats students as trustworthy learners. The second treats them as untrustworthy liabilities. Both can produce a document. Only one produces a student.

Schools Built for Trust

Consider what young people are inheriting:

• According to the 2025 Edelman Trust Barometer, an annual global report, only 36% of people believe things will be better for the next generation. 61% believe that government and business make their lives harder and serve narrow interests. And 53% of 18-34 year-olds approve of hostile activism: “attacking people online, intentionally spreading disinformation, threatening or committing violence, damaging public or private property.”

• According to a UN DESA Policy Brief from December of last year, “more than half of the world’s population reports little or no trust in their government.”

Young people in classrooms right now are forming their foundational sense of what institutions are, what they do, and whether they deserve engagement. They’re forming those opinions through their lived experience, not through civics lessons.

The good news is that schools, among institutions, are in a unique position. According to Edelman’s 2026 report, teachers are trusted by 70% of people, second only to scientists. Their 2023 report noted that 64% considered teachers “a unifying force”, higher than any other profession. If we do the math — eight hours a day, across twelve years — it’s clear that what schools model through their practices, rather than their stated values, shapes civic dispositions at scale.

The AMP State of Global Youth Report (2025) reinforces this claim: “the thread that runs through all of these is that the youth trust people they know or people that work directly with individuals far more than they trust systems, platforms, or any political structure.” This makes sense when we consider what we know about trust — that it’s built through relational experience: through fairness, by being heard, and through small acts of consistent care. This is what good teachers do.

Schools, and the professionals who work within them, need to remember that they aren’t passive mirrors of social conditions. Their design choices, the metrics they record, and the software they license are pedagogical and civic acts. Fashion assessment in a humane manner and watch trust grow. Outsource surveillance to an algorithm and watch it erode.

If we want students who will grow into citizens capable of trusting and being trusted, that capacity has to be practised somewhere. The surveillance classroom can’t produce it. The Walled Garden can."]]></description>
<dc:subject>andrewcantarutti 2026 surveillance pedagogy teaching howweteach schools schooling ralphwaldoemerson ai artificialintelligence data emotionalsurveillance focuspocus morphcast engagement attention lisafeldmanbarrett neuroscience integrity learning howwelearn cthinguyen onorao'neill trust control honesty relationships care exchange observation compliance democracy governance government civics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:7c6af47609f8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:andrewcantarutti"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:surveillance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ralphwaldoemerson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:emotionalsurveillance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:focuspocus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:morphcast"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:engagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lisafeldmanbarrett"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neuroscience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:integrity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cthinguyen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:onorao'neill"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:trust"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:control"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:honesty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:relationships"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:care"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:exchange"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:observation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:compliance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:democracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:governance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:government"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:civics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://freddiedeboer.substack.com/p/raj-chettys-just-so-stories">
    <title>Raj Chetty's Just-So Stories - Freddie deBoer</title>
    <dc:date>2026-05-26T23:47:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://freddiedeboer.substack.com/p/raj-chettys-just-so-stories</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["For a long time I’ve been getting some version of the comment, “What about Chetty!” in response to my perspective on education, as in Raj Chetty, the economist who for the past decade has made a lot of waves asserting that our education problems are straightforwardly the product of bad teachers and that replacing them will have implausibly large economic effects. I tend to try and work from a broader perspective than “this is why I think this guy is wrong,” but I get this request so often, here you go. This is why I think Raj Chetty is wrong."

...

"So, to recap. The thing being measured changes year to year for the same teacher; sometimes it changes from period to period; it changes when you switch statistical models; it changes when you switch the composition of the class. Meanwhile, the supposed quasi-experimental defense against student-sorting bias does not survive replication. And when deployed in the real world, the system is broken enough that a federal court treated it as a due-process violation. This all describes a body of research and chief researcher which have both received pretty close to unanimous positive coverage in the media! The ed reform reality distortion field is very powerful, and nowhere has it been more powerful than when it comes to the halo effect around Raj Chetty.

It’s possible to maintain that there is some true underlying “teacher quality” out there, and that we simply lack the instruments to measure it reliably. I’m not married to the idea that there’s no such thing as teacher quality. (I am however married to the idea that there’s no such thing as school quality.) But there are two highly-plausible possibilities that render this factor largely irrelevant. First is the possibility that teacher influence on student outcomes just isn’t very large at all, probably in the single digits in terms of what portion of the variance in student test scores teachers can control, and thus not a solution to any large-scale problems. Second, there’s the possibility in of meaningful interaction effects, that what teachers contribute to student outcomes is genuine but emerges from the interaction of a particular teacher with a particular group of students in a particular school under particular conditions, rather than a stable, transferable individual attribute that can be ranked on a single dimension. If true, the bottom-five-percent teacher whose dismissal would supposedly net $250,000 per classroom is largely a statistical artifact: a person who happened to land below the cutoff in a noisy estimate that in another year or based on another model would have placed elsewhere.

Chetty and his team have made some serious empirical efforts. There was, at one time, a plausible story to be told about their findings. But we now have more than a decade’s worth of reasons to be deeply skeptical of their claims; the fact that so many informed people come to me with the assumption that Chetty’s work is some sort of neoliberal trump card just shows the degree to which the establishment media has advanced an anti-teacher point of view. The strong policy claims that have hitched onto Chetty’s work, the insistence that we can fairly identify, reward, and dismiss teachers on the basis of value-added scores, and that doing so will yield large, predictable gains in lifetime outcomes - it all rests on measurements that are noisy, fickle, arbitrary, and unfair. Until the construct of teacher quality passes the tests we would demand of any other quantitative trait, the responsible reading of the evidence is not that we have found a powerful tool for increasing social justice but that we have learned how easy it is to mistake noise, sorting, and modeling choice for the thing we wish we were measuring.

Unfortunately, the previously-mentioned media effort to inoculate Chetty from criticism had proven quite effective, and he’s very rarely put in a position to defend his views. Still, someone email this to Chetty. And, fuck it, to Barack Obama, Michelle Rhee, Eva Moskowitz, Matt Yglesias, Jon Chait, Arne Duncan…"]]></description>
<dc:subject>freddiedeboer rajchetty teaching howweteach pedagogy education schools schooling us 2026 economics policy valueadded barackobama outcomes standardizedtesting testing jonathanchait lindadarling-hammond jesserothstein hisd houston measurement michellerhee evamoskowitz mattyglesias arneduncan socialjustice teachers</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:89fac66fa660/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freddiedeboer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rajchetty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:valueadded"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:barackobama"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:outcomes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:standardizedtesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:testing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jonathanchait"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lindadarling-hammond"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jesserothstein"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hisd"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:houston"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:measurement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:michellerhee"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:evamoskowitz"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mattyglesias"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:arneduncan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialjustice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teachers"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2026/05/is-there-room-for-enmity-in-the-a-i-classroom/">
    <title>Is There Room for Enmity in the A.I. Classroom? - Front Porch Republic</title>
    <dc:date>2026-05-22T08:21:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2026/05/is-there-room-for-enmity-in-the-a-i-classroom/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["By heightening emotion, hatred deepens the personhood of both teachers and students."

...

"Over the past year, the deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) in high school and college classrooms has called into question the uniquely human elements of teaching. What can a flesh-and-blood instructor offer that a well-tuned machine cannot?

One naturally thinks of affirmation and love, of the teacher as a moral exemplar and a trusted advisor, which are roles that disembodied algorithms can at best counterfeit.

Less obvious is the student’s need for hatred.

Theorists have long recognized that opposition drives identity-formation. As Walter Ong puts it, an individual’s sense of self comes from the knowledge “that something else is not me and is (in some measure) set against me.” We often associate eye-rolling, scorn, spite, and defiance with middle-schoolers, but the same reactions remain important (if more subtly expressed) through all levels of education. Schooling is a protracted struggle, and students learn their lessons in part from feelings of revulsion and revolt.

Alarmed by the sycophancy that LLMs employ and the intellectual laziness that they allow, critics have begun to use similar language, exhorting students to “normalize struggle,” seek out “friction” or “disagreement,” and “grapple with A.I.” Professor Marc Watkins advises his students to

<blockquote>choose courses that will challenge you, even unsettle you. Don’t accept being coddled. When you choose to engage in debates, please have the intellectual curiosity to explore the topic in depth, have the intellectual honesty to recognize the merits of arguments of the opposing side, admit to the weaknesses in your own viewpoint, and have the intellectual humility to admit when you don’t know and wish to learn more.</blockquote>

Sound advice, but woefully incomplete in the current context.

LLMs are already capable of exploring topics and weighing arguments with students, not to mention structuring personal goals and offering encouragement. (“Let’s dive in!”) Thus, Watkins’s vision of “struggle,” construed as a matter of personal choice and individual self-improvement, is easily reconciled with the quantification and benchmarks of artificial intelligence.

Loathing (like love) operates quite differently, creating meaning through human relationships, in which willfulness, idiosyncrasy, and feelings preclude quantification or smooth standardization. By heightening emotion, hatred deepens the personhood of both teachers and students.

Of course, feelings of hatred spring from many sources and encompass many shades of meaning. Some students nurse petty grudges to avoid responsibility for their own wrongdoing. Others perceive condescension from their teachers and repay it in kind. Some rankle at teachers with strong personalities and worldviews. Others feel the stirring of metaphysical revolt, objecting to the very existence of injustice, suffering, and constraint in the classroom or the world at large.

Uniting all these types of hatred are their mimetic effects on the student. Strong feelings bind the individual to the object of disdain, whose attributes he internalizes and mirrors (if only in negation). Thus, every type of hatred is educational insofar as it holds the student’s attention and shapes his character.

The trouble is that not all these lessons are equally educational or necessarily salutary. To set oneself against another can spur achievement (as in athletic rivalries) but, if one is not careful, it can also lead to what the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche calls ressentiment: an unworthy type of envy, insecurity, and conformity that debases the individual as it tears others down. That is why Nietzsche urges students to choose their enemies carefully, noting that “the most spiritual human beings” will test themselves only against life’s “most formidable weapons.”

One need not agree with every aspect of Nietzsche’s philosophy to grant the point. We all need someone to pitch our deepest aspirations against, someone we can both respect and pointedly reject as we chart our own course. It is in this sense that “the man of knowledge must be able not only to love his enemies but also to hate his friends,” Nietzsche writes. “One repays a teacher badly if one remains only a pupil.”

To help students strive toward selfhood, the teacher must embody authority—not only communicating information but personifying standards of wisdom, taste, and morals—and must do so knowing that pupils will chafe not only at the lessons but at the teacher herself. Yet, she cannot simply play the foil, pull punches, or abdicate responsibility for the struggle. To become the bearer of student hatred—to stand as an obstacle for the next generation to overcome—is a tragic aspect of teaching, but there is nothing to do but to press on in sincerity and faith.

Unfortunately, both the rhetoric and reality of teachers’ authority have been in decline for a long time. By bifurcating knowledge and value, LLMs now threaten to dissolve this authority entirely. The teacher can no longer be the master of content or technique, while the algorithm cannot embody truth, culture, or human excellence. LLMs already provide students with detailed (sometimes problematic) feedback, but as Abeba Birhane points out, “There is nothing at stake for a generative AI model. It cannot feel a sense of loss, embarrassment, accomplishment or care towards a student, as human teachers do.” An algorithm cannot feel the pangs of doubt or resolve, and for the same reason it cannot elicit existential scorn or hatred. Students know that a machine’s praise or censure rings hollow. They cannot define themselves in opposition to an LLM, and why should they want to?

In Being and Time (1927), Martin Heidegger argues that the modern individual (Dasein) “stands in subjection to Others.” Worse, they are not even “definite Others” but an anonymous amalgam of social conventions: a “dictatorship of the ‘they.’” It is hard to read Heidegger’s diagnosis without thinking about LLMs. In today’s world, he writes, anonymous authority

<blockquote>prescribes what can and may be ventured, it keeps watch over everything exceptional that thrusts itself to the fore. Every kind of priority gets noiselessly suppressed. Overnight, everything that is primordial gets glossed over as something that has long been well known. Everything gained by a struggle becomes just something to be manipulated. Every secret loses its force. This case of averageness reveals in turn an essential tendency … which we call the ‘levelling down’ of all possibilities of Being…. The ‘they’ is there alongside everywhere, but in such a manner that it has always stolen away whenever Dasein presses for a decision. Yet because the ‘they’ presents every judgment and decision as its own, it deprives the particular Dasein of its answerability.</blockquote>

LLMs stifle self-realization because, while they seem ubiquitous and almost omniscient, they also deprive students of any answerable or embodied authority, trapping them instead in a web of probability, generalization, and disembodied “expertise.” Subjection is in some ways intrinsic to education, part of a broader project of discipline and formation, but it must be experienced concretely, in relationship to “definite Others.”

Hannah Arendt warns that as technology expands, it becomes less likely “that man will encounter anything in the world around him that is not man-made and hence is not, in the last analysis, he himself in a different disguise.” Drawing from Heidegger, she underscores the danger of this eerie echo chamber. It is only through encounters with reality (not artificiality) that one becomes truly human. Consciousness begins not in the familiarity and sameness of one’s own mind but in confrontation with an unpredictable, inflexible entity outside the self—whether Nature, God, or (for our purposes) a recalcitrant teacher.

LLMs merely masquerade as the Other. Aggregated and amorphous, designed for fluidity and user satisfaction, they are artificial in the fullest sense of the word. When students engage with an LLM, they are literally talking to no one. How much classroom time should be occupied with such activities? What lessons should they replace?

However one responds to those questions, the answers have nothing to do with processing speed, safety guardrails, or other technical matters. They are fundamentally questions about how we conceive of humanity and whether we are committed to its formation and perpetuation. If we hope to prevent “cognitive atrophy” in our students, if we hope to awaken them to existential meaning, we have to invest in teachers worthy of their attention, their respect, and, sometimes, their hate."]]></description>
<dc:subject>campbellfrankscribner 2026 ai artificialintelligence teaching howweteach education llms affirmation love morality walterong idenitity opposition friction disagreement marcwatkins loathing humility nietzche ressentiment envy insecurity conformity authority selfhood identity wisdom taste morals sincerity faith algorithms loss embarrassment heidegger others self-realization probability generalization disembodiment discipline formation nature god cognitiveatrophy answerability dasein perspective viewpoint struggle learning howwelearn injustice suffering hate constraint negation humanity humanism cognition hannaharendt consciousness abebabirhane aisycophancy self knowledge schooling humandevelopment revolt revulsion</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:fbf3b60776ef/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:campbellfrankscribner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:llms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:affirmation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:love"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:morality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:walterong"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:idenitity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:opposition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:friction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:disagreement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marcwatkins"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:loathing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nietzche"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ressentiment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:envy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:insecurity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conformity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:selfhood"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:identity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wisdom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:taste"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:morals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sincerity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:faith"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:algorithms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:loss"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:embarrassment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:heidegger"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:others"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:self-realization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:probability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:generalization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:disembodiment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:discipline"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:formation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:god"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cognitiveatrophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:answerability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dasein"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:perspective"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:viewpoint"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:struggle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:injustice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:suffering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:constraint"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:negation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cognition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hannaharendt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consciousness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:abebabirhane"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aisycophancy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:self"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:knowledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humandevelopment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:revolt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:revulsion"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6yHDTgcYqaI">
    <title>Publication Praxis Zine Pedagogy Within and Against the Academy - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2026-05-20T06:11:43+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6yHDTgcYqaI</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Publication Praxis: Zine Pedagogy Within (and Against) the Academy, with Mark Allen, Brandon Bandy, Frankie Gutierrez, and Kayla Romberger

How can a historically radical form of anti-institutional knowledge transmission exist inside the academy without being subsumed by it? What are the opportunities and limits of codifying a countercultural mode of production into a standardized curriculum? What is gained and what is lost when a DIY ethos is paired with mandated learning outcomes? This panel discussion, moderated by Alex Lukas (Associate Professor of Print & Publication, University of California Santa Barbara), brings together educators Mark Allen, Brandon Bandy, Frankie Gutierrez, and Kayla Romberger, all of whom teach zinemaking at the post-secondary level to interrogate the pedagogical structures they employ in the classroom to maintain the medium's liberatory potential. Presented by Written Names Fanzine."]]></description>
<dc:subject>zines academy undercommons 2026 pegagogy highered highereducation academia colleges universities diy praxis markallen brandonbandy frankiegutierrez kaylaromberger zinemaking teaching howweteach learning alexlukas</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:897d8af5f50e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:zines"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:undercommons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pegagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colleges"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:diy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:praxis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:markallen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brandonbandy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:frankiegutierrez"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kaylaromberger"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:zinemaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alexlukas"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://theamericanvandal.substack.com/p/afteropenai?triedRedirect=true">
    <title>After OpenAI (Vandal Live at Wake Forest Humanities Institute)</title>
    <dc:date>2026-05-14T04:33:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://theamericanvandal.substack.com/p/afteropenai?triedRedirect=true</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Apple Podcasts | Spotify

As part of the Spring Symposium at the Wake Forest Humanities Institute, Matt Seybold discusses the present and future of AI speculation, including an extended discussion with Wake Forest faculty, many who were part of WFHI’s Interdisciplinary Faculty Seminar on Language, Theory, & Artificial Intelligence.

Cast (in order of appearance): Jennifer Greiman, Matt Seybold, Derek Lee, Michaela Appeltova, Nisrine Rahal, Barry Trachtenberg, Jeff Bills-Solomon, Dean Franco, Amanda Gengler

Featured Guests

Jennifer Greiman is Professor of English at Wake Forest University and Director of The Humanities Institute there.

Matt Seybold is Associate Professor of American Literature & Mark Twain Studies at Elmira College, as well as resident scholar at the Center For Mark Twain Studies and executive producer of The American Vandal Podcast.

Episode Bibliography

Emily Bender & Alex Hanna, The AI Con (HarperCollins, 2025)

Emily Bender, Timnit Gebru, et al. “On The Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big?” FAccT 2021

Tressie McMillan Cottom, “The Tech Fantasy That Powers AI is Running on Fumes” The New York Times (April 29, 2025)

Michel de Certeau, The Practice of Everyday Life (U California Press, 1984)

Virginia Dignum, The AI Paradox: How To Make Sense of a Complex Future (Princeton UP, 2026)

Ronan Farrow & Andrew Marantz, “Moment of Truth” The New Yorker (April 13, 2026)

Karen Hao, Empire of AI: Dreams & Nigthmares in Sam Altman’s Open AI (Penguin Random House, 2026)

Andy Hines, Outside Literary Studies: Black Criticism & The University (U Chicago Press, 2022)

E. D. Hirsch, Cultural Literacy (Houghton Mifflin, 1987)

Tyler Johnston, “The reporters at this new site are AI bots. OpenAI’s Super PAC appears to be funding it.” Model Republic (April 24, 2026)

Matthew Kirschenbaum, “Grok is an Epistemic Weapon” Tech Policy Press (January 13, 2026)

Matthew Kirschenbaum, “Texpocalypse Now: AI and The New Political Economy of Writing” PennAI (April 17, 2026)

Matthew Kirschenbaum & Rita Raley, “AI & The University as a Service” PMLA (May 2024)

Christopher Newfield, Unmaking The Public University (Harvard UP, 2011)

Britt S. Paris, Radical Infrastructure: Imagining The Internet From The Ground Up (U. California, 2026)

Ann Pettifor, The Global Casino: How Wall Street Gambles with People & The Planet (Verso, 2026)

Ann Pettifor, “The Next Crisis is Coming” Politics Joe (April 1, 2026)

Ann Pettifor, “Is the next financial crisis only a matter of time?” De Balie (February 16, 2026)

Daniel Roher & Charlie Tyrell, The AI Doc, or How I Became An Apocaloptimist (2026)

Matt Seybold, “Against Technofeudal Education” The American Vandal (June 10, 2025)

Matt Seybold, “The Technofeudal Text” The American Vandal (August 25, 2025)

Matt Seybold, “Mamdani Win Could Be The First Step Towards Seizing The Means of Knowledge Production” The American Vandal (November 5, 2025)

Matt Seybold & Eric Hayot, “The ‘Crisis In The Humanities’ Is Over. That’s Not a Good Thing.” Chronicle Of Higher Education (December 29, 2025)

Matt Seybold & John Warner, “The Technology That’s Taking Your Freedom” Academic Freedom On The Line (February 3, 2026)

Matt Seybold et al, “The Secret History of Canvas LMS, Corporate Raiders, & The Chatbot Bubble” The American Vandal (March 24, 2026)

Matt Seybold et al, “HBCUs & The Philanthrocapitalist Swindle” The American Vandal (February 4, 2025)

Jacob Silverman, “The Death of an AI Whistleblower” The Nation (May 2026)

Nick Srnicek, Silicon Empires: The Fight For The Future of AI (Polity, 2026)

Ben Tarnoff, “Frankenstein’s Regret” The Nation (May 2026)

Wake Forest Humanities Institute, “Language, Theory, & Artificial Intelligence” (May 2026)

McKenzie Wark, Capital Is Dead: Is This Something Worse? (Verso, 2019)"]]></description>
<dc:subject>openai chatgpt anthropic mattseybold dereklee michaelaappeltova nisrinerahal barrytrachtenberg jeffbills-solomon deanfrnaco amandagengler 2026 emilybender timnitgebru tressiemcmillancottom micheldecerteau virginiadignum ronanfarrow andrewmarantz karenhao andyhines edhirsch tylerjohnston matthewkirschenbaum ritaraely christophernewfield brittparis annpettifor danielroher charlietyrell erichayot johnwarner jacobsilverman nichsrnicek bentarnoff mckenziewark media journalism reporting ipos opeanai samaltman spacex xai grok agiu artificialintelligence artificialgeneralintelligence suchirbalaji bigtech darioamodei microsoft alphabet oracle meta blackrock google liquidity finance wallstreet aibubble aihype speculation llms singularitarianism singularity humanextinction larryellison alexkarp china writing howwewrite text literature environment humanrights armsrace datacenters palantir us resources institutions anxiety anger futility nihilism highered highereducation colleges and universities reading howweread literac</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:69c20805dd99/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatgpt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anthropic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mattseybold"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dereklee"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:michaelaappeltova"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nisrinerahal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:barrytrachtenberg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jeffbills-solomon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:deanfrnaco"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:amandagengler"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:emilybender"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:timnitgebru"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tressiemcmillancottom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:micheldecerteau"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:virginiadignum"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ronanfarrow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:andrewmarantz"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:karenhao"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:andyhines"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edhirsch"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tylerjohnston"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:matthewkirschenbaum"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ritaraely"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christophernewfield"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brittparis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:annpettifor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:danielroher"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charlietyrell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:erichayot"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnwarner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jacobsilverman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nichsrnicek"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bentarnoff"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mckenziewark"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:journalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reporting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ipos"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:opeanai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:samaltman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:spacex"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:xai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:grok"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:agiu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialgeneralintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:suchirbalaji"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bigtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:darioamodei"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alphabet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:oracle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meta"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:blackrock"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:liquidity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:finance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wallstreet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aibubble"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aihype"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:speculation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:llms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:singularitarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:singularity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanextinction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:larryellison"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alexkarp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:china"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:text"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:environment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanrights"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:armsrace"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:datacenters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:palantir"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:resources"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:institutions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anxiety"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anger"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:futility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nihilism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colleges"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:and"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:literac"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.aaup.org/issue/spring-2026">
    <title>Spring 2026: AI in the Corporate University | AAUP</title>
    <dc:date>2026-05-07T05:58:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.aaup.org/issue/spring-2026</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Volume 112, Number 2

Features

What Does AI Do?
By Daniel Greene

AI and Critical Thinking
By Heather Hax

Cal State’s War on Working-Class Education
By Martha Lincoln and Martha Kenney

Color-Coded Austerity and Shades of Gray
By David Kinsella

AI as a War Issue, War as a Workers’ Issue
By Justine Zhang, Shreya Chowdhary, and Nathan Kim

Keeping Humans in the Loop
By Troy A. Swanson

Bringing the Fragments Together
By Britt Paris and Rebecca Reynolds

The AI Nuisance
By Jonathan Rees

Online Only

Lessons from the Faculty of a Small Denominational Seminary on Defending Academic Freedom
By Richard L. Hester

Intellectual Property and Brainpower Versus AI in Academic Publishing
By Kelly Hand

Teaching Climate Change in the Age of ChatGPT
By Debra J. Rosenthal

Book Reviews

Lessons and Cautionary Tales from Big Tech
By Lisa Pinley Covert

Pedagogical Practices to Close the Achievement Gap
By Terry Carter

Respect for Me but Not for Thee
By Dan-el Padilla Peralta

Columns

From the Editor: AI in the Corporate University
By Michael Ferguson

Nota Bene

AAUP Members Mobilize in Campus Actions
By Kelly Benjamin

2025–26 AAUP Faculty Compensation Survey Results
By Glenn Colby

Legal Developments
By Johnda Bentley

AAUP and AFT Launch Higher Education Platform
By Kelly Benjamin

Coalition Challenges Campus Ties to ICE Contractors
By Sean Rudolph

Faculty Raise Concerns About Proposed Accreditor
By Sean Rudolph

New Faculty Unions in Maryland Secure First Contracts
By Michael Ferguson

UAKU Ratifies Landmark First Contract
By Michael Ferguson

Report on Academic Freedom and Collective Bargaining
By Anita Levy

CDAF Resources for the Academic Community
By Kathryn Taylor

Organize Every Campus Campaign Builds Core Skills
By Trent McDonald

New Staff Appointments
By Austin Rhea"]]></description>
<dc:subject>ai artificialintelligence highered highereducation academia universities colleges 2026 via:javierarbona danielgreene criticalthinking pedagogy education csu class marthalincoln marthakenney daidkinsella justinezhang shreyachowdhary nathankim troyswanson brittparis rebeccareynolds jonathanrees richardhester debrarosenthal kellyhand lisapinleycovert terrycarter dan-elpadillaperalta michaelferguson kellybenjamin glenncolby johndabentley seanrudolph anitalevy trendtmcdonald austinrhea austerity academicfreedom climatechange globalwarming climate administration howweteach teaching californiastateuniversity california</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:85ec3cb710f1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colleges"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:via:javierarbona"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:danielgreene"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:criticalthinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:csu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:class"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marthalincoln"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marthakenney"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:daidkinsella"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:justinezhang"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:shreyachowdhary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nathankim"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:troyswanson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brittparis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rebeccareynolds"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jonathanrees"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:richardhester"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:debrarosenthal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kellyhand"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lisapinleycovert"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:terrycarter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dan-elpadillaperalta"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:michaelferguson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kellybenjamin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:glenncolby"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johndabentley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:seanrudolph"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anitalevy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:trendtmcdonald"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:austinrhea"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:austerity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academicfreedom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:climatechange"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:globalwarming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:climate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:administration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:californiastateuniversity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:california"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://thepointmag.substack.com/p/classroom-cope">
    <title>Classroom Cope - by Anastasia Berg - The Point’s Substack</title>
    <dc:date>2026-05-06T05:46:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://thepointmag.substack.com/p/classroom-cope</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Once we identify the problem—the sheer magnitude of what is being lost—it becomes immediately clear what any solution worthy of the name must accomplish: the hours must be recovered. How to do this is a good question. I have heard tales of complicated incentive schemes involving baroque grade distributions, of in-class writing samples used as internal benchmarks for outside-class writing, of Dead Poets Society reenactments. I don’t know that these won’t work. But I know what I think about when I confront this question: a big room. A pleasant-enough room with tables and chairs, and maybe some cookies at 9 p.m., budget permitting. A room that it is very easy for an instructor to require a student to spend time in—as easy as checking a box. A room with lockers for your bag, that you can walk into with just a book or a question to spend a few hours with, without distractions, without any offers of “help.” Sometimes when I tell colleagues about it they express concern that requiring students to spend time in my room would feel punitive and paternalistic. But most people just say it sounds like heaven."

[via:
https://ablerism.micro.blog/2026/05/02/an-architectural-haven-for-slow.html
https://micro.blog/ayjay/89477118 ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>anastasiaberg howweread howwewrite ai artificialintelligence technology attention pedagogy learning howwelearn classrooms writing teaching howweteach education</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:38f307e22b2f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anastasiaberg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:classrooms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/broken-record/">
    <title>Broken Record</title>
    <dc:date>2026-05-05T14:20:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/broken-record/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["I often feel like I’m repeating myself here, because in fact I am. I am, in part, because ed-tech entrepreneurs and evangelists keep repackaging the same ideas, desperate to sound innovative instead of stuck in some Cold War science fiction fantasy. “Intelligent tutoring systems” become “adaptive learning” then “personalized learning” and now AI tutors, for example.

I thought I’d write something about conversation-ending cliches in today’s newsletter -- about the ways in which certain phrases get trotted out repeatedly in education-technology and serve to shut down debate and inquiry. You know the stuff: all the talk about the inevitability of AI and the “jobs of the future” and whatnot. Then I remembered that I’d written about this very thing: about psychologist Robert Jay Lifton’s notion of the "thought-terminating cliche" as a way to end a conversation and, importantly, to silence criticism or doubt: "brief, highly reductive, definitive-sounding phrases, easily memorized, and easily expressed. They become the start and finish of any ideological analysis,” as he put it. It’s a rhetorical tactic of cults, Amanda Montell argues in her book on the language of fanaticism.

I wrote about this very thing not even six months ago. It’s as good a sign as any, I suppose, that I need to take a little break. But truthfully, it’s May 1 and the first couple of weeks of May are just really, really hard for me. My head and heart aren’t here; they’re there.

There were some really important stories this week: the news from ASU, for starters, about the school’s new “AI” tool Atomic that, without professors’ knowledge or consent, has vacuumed up their course materials from the LMS -- lecture materials, videos, and so on -- to train a chatbot that will offer “personalized” (LOL) micro-lessons full of short, fast AI slop. (For the bargain subscription fee of $5/month.)

Ben Williamson observes that this is part of a push on the part of universities to reduce everything to a data asset that can be further monetized. That is, this isn’t simply about the elimination of faculty labor and expertise through automation -- although it is assuredly also that -- but the turn in the purpose of of higher education institutions from “academics” -- teaching, learning, research -- to “financialization.” It shouldn’t be a surprise that ASU is at the forefront of this, with its long history of working with GSV and its connection to the god-awful ASU-GSV event (bonus: ASU professor wil.i.am and “AI” “future-proofing”).

Something about thought-terminating cliches and cults there, for sure.

So here are a bunch of links to a bunch of stories that hopefully you won’t spend your weekend reading. Hopefully you’ll be offline, outside.

I will be. And I’ll be back in a few weeks, not with a clear head or happy heart. But I will be back."]]></description>
<dc:subject>audreywatters edtech robertjaylifton 2026 amandamontell lms benwilliamson academia education highered highereducation financialization wil.i.am ai artificialintelligence teaching howweteach pedagogy tutoring chatbots history fanaticism jillbarshay christophercox eugenics siliconvalley technology janusrose charlottakronblad algorithms johnherrman schools schooling marcandreessen jenniferberkshire</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:f5958257762d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:audreywatters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robertjaylifton"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:amandamontell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:benwilliamson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:financialization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wil.i.am"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tutoring"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatbots"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fanaticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jillbarshay"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christophercox"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:eugenics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:siliconvalley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:janusrose"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charlottakronblad"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:algorithms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnherrman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marcandreessen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jenniferberkshire"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://theamericanvandal.substack.com/p/historyofcanvas">
    <title>The Secret History of Canvas LMS, Corporate Raiders, &amp; The Chatbot Bubble (Vandal Live at UVU)</title>
    <dc:date>2026-04-29T05:31:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://theamericanvandal.substack.com/p/historyofcanvas</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Opens with Matt Seybold's short history of Instructure, the makers of Canvas LMS, with special emphasis on the takeover by Dragoneer and KKR in 2024.

This talk was delivered at Utah Valley University, but a selection from another talk at University of Albany has also been inserted as supplement.

The recording of the talk is followed by a studio conversation with two UVU faculty and a student about the impact of the Generative AI boom on their institution.

Date Recorded: March 3, 2026"

[also here:
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-secret-history-of-canvas-lms-corporate/id1535513355?i=1000756962541

https://open.spotify.com/episode/793HpGIJcSBEqPbN58WQIA ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>canvas lms canvaslms history edtech universities colleges highereducation highered 2026 mattseybold christaalbrecht-crane angiemckinnoncarter chilermoore kkr chatobots ai artificialintelligence enshittificaiton privateequity vc venturecapital dataharvesting chatgpt openai emilybvender alexhanna timnitgebru leebruno brianburrough johnhelyar brettchristophers jessearmstrong sofiabarnett plagiarism academia teaching howweteach education michellechihara joshcoates sonelcutler corydoctrorow matthewgault andyhines thomashitton christophernewfield tomnichols mnichellekassorla roxanamarachi lawrencequill megwalter johnwarenr marcwatkins brianwhitmer technology humanities tecnhnofeudalism utah siliconvalley data via:javierarbona</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:0a89bd39039d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:canvas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:canvaslms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colleges"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mattseybold"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christaalbrecht-crane"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:angiemckinnoncarter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chilermoore"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kkr"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatobots"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:enshittificaiton"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:privateequity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:vc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:venturecapital"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dataharvesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatgpt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:emilybvender"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alexhanna"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:timnitgebru"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:leebruno"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brianburrough"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnhelyar"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brettchristophers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jessearmstrong"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sofiabarnett"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:plagiarism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:michellechihara"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:joshcoates"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sonelcutler"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:corydoctrorow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:matthewgault"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:andyhines"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thomashitton"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christophernewfield"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tomnichols"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mnichellekassorla"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:roxanamarachi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lawrencequill"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:megwalter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnwarenr"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marcwatkins"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brianwhitmer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tecnhnofeudalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:utah"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:siliconvalley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:via:javierarbona"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://patrickfarenga.substack.com/p/learning-yes-of-course-education">
    <title>Learning? Yes, of course. Education? No thanks.</title>
    <dc:date>2026-04-26T08:05:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://patrickfarenga.substack.com/p/learning-yes-of-course-education</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[[part 2:
https://patrickfarenga.substack.com/p/learning-of-course-education-no-thanks ]

"The legal reasons for forcing people to attend school, created in the 19th century and still in operation today, are based on the logic that school attendance creates good citizens, good workers, and provides a place where children can be while their parents work. While compulsory school laws can be cited for its part in increasing literacy and math skills, these increases are also due to forces outside of school, such as families, tutors, and friends, the growth of mass media, guilds and unions, museums, public libraries, and government and business policies that increase people’s wellbeing and skills. There is little evidence that just graduating elementary, high school, or college makes people better citizens or workers.

Nonetheless, we continue to promote education as the solution for nearly all our problems without questioning if education, as we’ve structured it, is the best way to help children learn and adults to teach. We can question the tools of education—curricula, evaluation, teacher training—but we can’t question the reason education exists as an institution that takes up so much of our time and money: “How would society progress without education?”

Teaching and learning are human activities that existed long before they became professionalized and regulated into education. But learning skills and knowledge for personal gain is no longer the emphasis for getting a degree. School has become the vehicle for education to create social justice, better jobs, better living, better morals, more intelligent government policies. Higher education, in particular, is where you learn how to change the world!

[screenshot]

Nonetheless, bad citizens and workers continue to graduate and influence society. Further, as many school critiques note, schooling often reproduces social class differences and promotes herd behavior over independent democratic engagement.

The usual efforts to reform school—more schools, more intensive curricula—continue to be insufficient. The National Assessment of Educational Progress (“the Nation’s Report Card”) shows that U.S. student performance has been stalled or slightly down in reading, math, and science for the past 20 years.1 Plus, the introduction of system-wide school practices, such as New Math in the 1960s or the Units of Study reading program in 2003, often confuse or diminish learning for many students (and confounds some teachers too!).

Higher education is no better. Legacy admissions and nepotism undermine the chances for less wealthy but more worthy students to get into elite schools. Further, a large and growing number of published academic research is being challenged or revoked based on citing fake studies and plagiarism.2 It is no surprise that students use AI and paper mills to write research papers and essays since their elders do so and get rewarded for it.

Why is it so hard for schools to fix these problems? Perhaps it is due to Upton Sinclair’s observation: “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”

Dr. Seymour Sarason, in his book The Culture of the School and the Problem of Change (Allyn and Bacon, 1971), argues that school reforms confront existing behavioral and programmatic regularities, yet the intended outcomes are seldom clearly stated and often disappear during the change process. As a result, reforms frequently reproduce old practices. Sarason writes, “It certainly was not an intended outcome of the introduction of new math that it should be taught precisely the way the old math was taught. But that has been the outcome, and it would be surprising if it were otherwise. … Discerning overt behavior or programmatic regularities requires that one look at the school culture from a nonjudgmental, non-interpretive stance, a requirement that is not natural to us. We are so used to thinking about what other people are thinking that we pay little attention to what is there to see. (PF: My emphasis.) (p.3)

Though it is obscured by educators’ claims that schooling is the only way children can learn to be productive citizens in modern times, if we remove school’s rose-tinted glasses we can see that compulsory education’s main purpose—to make children obey authority—is well documented through history and research. If education can get off this track and focus on a mission of enabling and appreciating learning in all its forms, instead of just results from inside school, we can start to see what else is possible besides more intensive instruction and forced attendance.

This has been the impetus for many people to create their own schools, such as Bronson Alcott in the 19th century US and A.S. Neil (UK), Maria Montessori (Italy,) and Rudolph Steiner (Germany) in the 20th. These founders saw that children learn in many different modes and places, and though they have different methods and theories for teaching and learning and, in some cases, have become expensive private schools, they are all still suspect in the eyes of professional educators.

What, exactly, does education mean? Aaron Falbel wrote how John Holt defined education:

<blockquote>In 1982, a British interviewer asked John Holt how he defined the word “education.” He responded: “It’s not a word I personally use. … The word “education” is a word much used, and different people mean different things by it. But on the whole, it seems to me what most people mean by “education” has got some ideas built into it or contains certain assumptions, and one of them is that learning is an activity which is separate from the rest of life and done best of all when we are not doing anything else and best of all in places where nothing else is done–learning places, places especially constructed for learning. Another assumption is that education is a designed process in which some people do things to other people or get other people to do things which will presumably be for their own good. Education means that some A is doing something to somebody else B. I guess that, basically, is what most people understand education to be about” The interviewer pressed John further: “Very well, but what is your definition?” John replied: “I don’t know of any definition of it that would seem to me to be acceptable. I wrote a book called Instead of Education, and what I mean by this is instead of this designed process which is carried on in specially constructed places under various kinds of bribe and threat. I don’t know what single word I’d put [in its place]. I would talk about a process in which we become more informed, intelligent, curious, competent, skillful, aware by our interaction with the world around us, because of the mainstream of life, so to speak. In other words, I learn a great deal, but I do it in the process of living, working, playing, being with friends. There is no division in my life between learning, work, play, etc. These things are all one. I don’t have a word which I could easily put in the place of “education,” unless it might be “living.”3</blockquote>

Children and adults have lived and learned successfully in the flow of community and family life throughout human history without compulsory schooling. We know that people who are talented or knowledgeable can share their wisdom with others in a variety of settings, not just in special places reserved for professional teaching and learning. But our laws, customs, and mind sets have been directed away from our heritage of learning towards the regime of instruction.

John Holt’s book Instead of Education: Ways to Help People Do Things Better provides not just an analysis of the limits of schooling but also examples of other places, institutions, people, and experiences that exist or could be created for children and adults to learn and grow throughout their lives. What also makes this book interesting is how it ends with a call for people to take their children out of school and teach them in their homes and local communities if the schools are not helping their children. This statement led people from around the world who were already teaching their own children to contact John, and this became the impetus for him to found Growing Without Schooling magazine in 1977.

John was certainly influenced by Illich’s work and book Deschooling Society (Harper & Row, 1971) and he moved his own work from theory to practice when he founded Growing Without Schooling magazine in 1977. 49 years have passed since GWS was founded and homeschooling has grown from the 25,000 estimate John used in 1981 to an estimate of 3.5 million children taught at home in the United States in 2026.4 John hoped school, like a business seeing it’s sales decline, would alter its course and let families that want to use school on an as-needed basis to do so.

Holt wrote about children learning in their communities, in play, sports, projects, and theatrical efforts, from neighbors, friends, and family, and places like the Peckham Center in London—a combined medical research and health support program with a lively community center/cafeteria/gymnasium for working class adults and children. Rather than try to incorporate these and other ideas that expand what education can be, our government and school policymakers continue to double down on the existing structure: more tests, more instruction, and more after-school tutoring to make sure students stay focused on task.

One thing most school administrators and teachers agree upon is that children need more time in school, which became terribly clear during the pandemic. Few educators thought to provide children with social or learning opportunities outdoors during the pandemic, in a schoolyard or public park. Instead they decided to keep students glued to their computer screens while they were being marched through the school curriculum in their homes. This shows how devotion to theories of education subsume common sense about what engenders learning, self-esteem, and social activity, which are entwined.

I’m reminded about all this due to a provocative education policy paper I read in NORRAG, the Global Education Center of the Geneva Graduate Institute: Fighting Against Education: No Alternatives Within the Educated Mind. The authors are united as “Le Goliard: A collective, nomadic, de-professionalized intellectual who wanders erratically on the fringes of dominant certainties and institutions.” It is a strong polemic, as these quotes show:"]]></description>
<dc:subject>johnholt education learning howwelearn children society deschooling unschooling ivanillich 2026 plagiarism highered highereducation academia colleges universities schools schooling admission inequality deymoursarason change instruction pedagogy howweteach teaching bronsonalcott asneil mariamontessori rudolphsteiner aaronfalbel institutions adults life living community covid-19 coronavirus pandemic growingwithoutschooling play sports projects self-esteem social patfarenga gws</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:616aa987c7a9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnholt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:deschooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unschooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ivanillich"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:plagiarism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colleges"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:admission"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inequality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:deymoursarason"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:change"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:instruction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bronsonalcott"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:asneil"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mariamontessori"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rudolphsteiner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aaronfalbel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:institutions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:adults"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:living"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:covid-19"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:coronavirus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pandemic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:growingwithoutschooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:play"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sports"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:projects"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:self-esteem"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:social"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:patfarenga"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gws"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.newyorker.com/culture/progress-report/what-will-it-take-to-get-ai-out-of-schools">
    <title>What Will It Take to Get A.I. Out of Schools? | The New Yorker</title>
    <dc:date>2026-04-26T00:45:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.newyorker.com/culture/progress-report/what-will-it-take-to-get-ai-out-of-schools</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The tech world assumes that A.I.-aided education is necessary and inevitable. A growing number of parents, educators, and cognitive scientists say the opposite."]]></description>
<dc:subject>jessicawinter 2026 ai artificialintelligence edtech education schools schooling chromebooks gemini teaching howweteach google chatgpt openai anthropic cluade llms chatbots criticalthinking learning howwelearn cognition mitchprinstein amandabickerstaff drewbent audreywatters bfskinner technology randiweingarten amira naveedhasan magicschool miatheresapate lausd albertocarvalho privacy katebrody melaniatrump donaldtrump maryhelenimmordino-yang amazon shantanusinha</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:ef772cb69fca/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jessicawinter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chromebooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gemini"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatgpt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anthropic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cluade"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:llms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatbots"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:criticalthinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cognition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mitchprinstein"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:amandabickerstaff"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:drewbent"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:audreywatters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bfskinner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:randiweingarten"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:amira"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:naveedhasan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:magicschool"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:miatheresapate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lausd"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:albertocarvalho"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:katebrody"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:melaniatrump"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:donaldtrump"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maryhelenimmordino-yang"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:amazon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:shantanusinha"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/19/opinion/schools-edtech-laptops-games-learning.html">
    <title>Opinion | You Can’t Game Your Way to a Real Education - The New York Times</title>
    <dc:date>2026-04-19T20:37:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/19/opinion/schools-edtech-laptops-games-learning.html</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["By Molly Worthen

Dr. Worthen, a professor of history at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, is the author of “Spellbound: How Charisma Shaped American History From the Puritans to Donald Trump.”"

[archived: https://archive.ph/93DSh ]


"Paige Drygas, who teaches high school English at a private school just north of Dallas, feels no pressure to make learning fun. She distinguishes between “fun” — meaning stress-free amusement — and the burden she feels to “get students engaged as much as possible. I can see it in their eye contact,” she told me. “I’m trying to get their minds going. For example, I don’t think many people would describe Emerson and Thoreau as fun.”

Maybe that’s why some teachers have their students play “Walden,” a video game in which players simulate Thoreau’s solitary sojourn at Walden Pond. The game is free for teachers, but Ms. Drygas sticks to the texts. “The idea of self-reliance is really interesting. Once you engage that big idea, class moves quickly.”

Ms. Drygas is not only a fun-skeptic. She also requires her students to hand write their essays, read books in hard copy and use laptops as little as possible. These countercultural classroom policies all go together, because fun used to be a wonderful thing in school. Then screens came to dominate instruction time and software developers answered the call to make school fun and personalize learning with a growing marketplace of online games.

This has been the greatest blunder in the past decade of K-12 education: the decision to give every child a personal computer and to gamify everything from standardized test preparation to recess. Mistaken ideas about the nature of learning have combined with a hefty dose of Big Tech propaganda to distort our picture of what school is for. Technology must return to its proper place in the classroom — as a supplemental tool, rather than the source and summit of education.

The logic for bringing more technology into K-12 classrooms seemed intuitive, even before the Covid-19 pandemic pushed school onto screens. If adults were using the latest personal devices and software to do their jobs more efficiently, then surely using them in the classroom would make learning more efficient, too, and prepare students for the modern workplace.

Besides, so the thinking goes, kids today are digital natives. Because they’ve grown up around screens, their brains must be fundamentally different from those of older generations. Teachers need to “meet them where they are” by catering to shorter attention spans and swapping books for multimedia lessons. The more that math and language assignments resemble a video game, the more students will learn.

Every step in this argument is wrong. Researchers have begun to correlate falling test scores in wealthy countries around the world with aggressive adoption of devices in schools (88 percent of American public schools now follow what’s known as the 1-to-1 policy, providing one laptop or tablet for every student). In the United States, math and reading scores among 13-year-olds peaked in 2012 and have declined since.

The analogy between the workplace and the classroom ignores the fact that young people learn differently from adults: They need far more direction and exposure to a variety of sensory activities. Perhaps that means sand and blocks in younger grades. For me, history came alive through the homemade costumes of a “medieval times” fair in high school, especially the memorable sensory activity of trying to make my timeline project look “really medieval” by soaking it in tea and browning it in the oven — where it caught fire. (I then spent hours recreating it.)

My quest to simulate ancient vellum may have been a little eccentric, but my basic mental wiring wasn’t. The concept of a digital native is a myth. The advent of iPhones and laptops did not undo eons of brain evolution in the space of a few years — even if excessive screen time is associated with the thinning of the cerebral cortex. (The damage appears to be reversible, thanks to the brain’s plasticity.)

“People are mistaking kids’ preference for deep biological reality,” Jared Cooney Horvath, a neuroscientist who consults with schools on digital policy, told me. “My daughter loves Popsicles. I have a choice: I could meet her where she’s at and start every meal with a Popsicle. But that doesn’t change the fact that, biologically, Popsicles aren’t good for her, and she needs some vegetables.”

In his new book, “The Digital Delusion,” Dr. Horvath surveys the vast body of research demonstrating the damage to learning that comes with overuse of so-called ed tech, the mass of digital devices and software that have saturated schools. Studies indicate that comprehension collapses when students read texts on screens. Their attention spans shrivel as well: A study of college students working on laptops during a lecture class found that they spent an average of 38 minutes of every hour off task. And even in the age of Google, old-fashioned memorization remains important: Knowledge stored in our brains, not in the cloud, is the seedbed for creative thinking.

Perhaps the most insidious aspect of ed tech’s invasion is the widespread adoption of video-game-style apps to teach, assess and entertain students. These apps feed a broader ethos of gamification that encourages students to fixate on points, badges and other digital dopamine hits — and shy away from the experimentation, frustration and struggle that real learning demands.

The problem is not games themselves. Good teachers have always used games to motivate students and connect them with classmates. But over the past 15 years or so, the hubbub of active, analog games has given way to far quieter classrooms where students spend significant blocks of time in headphones, swiping and scrolling through onscreen activities.

The company Kahoot! says that eight million teachers worldwide use its quiz games for “future-ready skill building.” About 17 million students — roughly one-third of American students from pre-K through 12th grade — use iReady, a digital platform that promises “an active experience that motivates students to take ownership of their learning.” If students get to school early, or bad weather keeps them inside at recess, they can kill time with iReady games like “Hungry Fish” (an arithmetic game) and “Cupcake” (a virtual cupcake business that requires math and map reading).

In some cases, the more they play, the more credits they earn to unlock new games. The curriculum giant McGraw-Hill offers a mobile study app called Sharpen, which chops up lessons into bite-size videos and quizzes. Cartoon avatars and bursts of animated confetti encourage users to “keep up your streak and earn new rewards.”

Denise Champney is a speech pathologist in Rhode Island who has worked in public schools for 25 years, mainly with neurodivergent learners. “The persuasive design of computer games is meant to keep kids using, with no interaction with other people, just with a screen,” she told me. “I’ve seen it with iReady math. They’re just clicking; they want to get through it. They are not reading, because they don’t really need to read. They say, ‘I kind of know what they’re asking, so I’ll click on what I think the answer is.’”

The overuse of online games — and screen-based technology in general — may be especially harmful to students with A.D.H.D. and autism. These students master narrow pattern recognition “instead of working on the skills they need, like reading, writing and multisensory engagement,” Ms. Champney said. She has noticed that they also use laptops to escape from challenging social situations: “Kids bring these devices from class to class, and if they struggle with an interaction, they’ll just pull out their computer and play video games.”

Multiplayer games do not necessarily encourage healthy social skills. Inge Esping, the principal of McPherson Middle School in central Kansas, recalled the final day of school two years ago, when an all-grade online rock-paper-scissors tournament devolved into Lord of the Flies. “I don’t think I’ve ever seen so much lying, cheating, meanness or crying,” Ms. Esping told me. “It was the worst last day ever. We had to end the game early.”

Her school made headlines this year by abandoning the 1-to-1 laptop policy, mainly at the behest of teachers, who argued that “gravely limiting time on technology will be a positive step for the students,” Ms. Esping said.

Every kind of learning requires facing uncomfortable situations, navigating ambiguity and coping with failure — whether the subject is group dynamics at recess or the details of cell biology. Too often, online games provide friction-free pseudo-engagement, cultivate a narrow set of skills and encourage the assumption that all questions have a single correct answer.

“The more varied the contexts in which you apply a skill, the broader that skill becomes. But computers are wickedly narrow,” Dr. Horvath, the neuroscientist, said. Students “get good at the game, and their score will go up, but as soon as you take them off the screen, most of those skills will go.”

Emily Cherkin, who works with families and schools as “the Screentime Consultant,” taught middle school English for 12 years before her frustration with technology as a teacher and a parent turned her into an “accidental activist,” she told me. “When you gamify lessons, you’re not enhancing learning, but holding students’ attention so they stay engaged with a product longer. That’s at odds with child development. Children should not be spending hours on a screen.” (Ms. Cherkin also worries about the student data that ed tech companies collect, often without parents’ knowledge. She is the lead plaintiff in a class-action lawsuit against the software company PowerSchool, whose 2024 security breach affected millions of children and teachers, exposing personal information to hackers who demanded extortion payments from schools.)

Ms. Cherkin doesn’t oppose technology outright. “I’m not anti-tech. I just want schools to be tech-intentional,” she said. “Of course, kids should learn how technology works, but that is very different from giving 6-year-olds an iPad to learn how to read.”

In my conversations with the growing community of parents, teachers and researchers who criticize ed tech, no one seemed to share my enthusiasm for going back to vellum and quills. The solution, instead, is thoughtful moderation.

Schools should drop the 1-to-1 policy that has encouraged students to see their laptops and tablets as extensions of themselves. Digital games can be effective tools — as long as they emphasize collaboration, creativity and risk-taking rather than lonely scrolling for the next dopamine hit.

I’m intrigued — warily — by Skyler Carr’s approach. He co-founded Mission.io after a few years working in charter schools. As a STEM specialist, he tried “to reach students who were struggling to be engaged in a traditional classroom environment,” he told me. Mission.io creates simulations that embed Common Core grade-level standards in dramatic scenarios that inject real-life stakes into class material. Mission.io is trying to do gamification the right way.

For example, if a sixth-grade teacher uses the company’s program to test students on molecular biology, “we encourage the teacher to say, ‘We’ll be learning about particles and compounds, and you need to know this stuff because tomorrow we’re going on a mission. If you don’t know it, we won’t succeed.’ We want you to introduce it with an understanding that it’s got purpose,” Mr. Carr said.

On mission day, students learn that a nearby lab has suffered a dangerous chemical leak, leaving a researcher trapped. They split into teams and analyze data on airborne molecules in different parts of the lab to figure out which atom they can change to make the floating molecules nontoxic.

Mission.io’s online interface is full of cool graphics and adaptive, choose-your-own-adventure-style story lines. “We’ve got some amazing artists who were unfulfilled making skins for video games,” Mr. Carr said. But the point is to get students on their feet and moving around the classroom, sharing information and brainstorming solutions face to face.

Laptops become tools for in-person collaboration, rather than private gaming consoles (if — and it’s a big “if” — players resist the temptations of the internet). At the end of a mission, students and teachers evaluate both the outcome and the process.

“You can fail the mission and still get good scores on collaboration and critical thinking,” Mr. Carr said. “That’s enlightening for kids who are used to failing. It can open up their minds about how they should be working.”

Mr. Carr and his colleagues have made one decision that sets Mission.io apart from many ed tech companies: Their funding comes from foundation grants and the schools that purchase their programs. “We had a chance to bring on investors early on, and it was an intense conversation. But we knew venture capital and the expectations,” he said. He had seen investors acquire other games and prioritize profit over education. “We needed to be able to let schools call the shots,” he said.

To call the right shots, however, teachers, administrators and families need a clear vision of what education is for. It’s no accident that American schools fell hard and fast for ed tech while the old consensus about what it means to be “college and career ready” was unraveling.

For decades, culture-war debates over American history and science curriculums have consumed public schools. At the same time, many researchers have called the Common Core national curriculum standards a failure. Even elite private schools now struggle to define their purpose, to figure out what mishmash of personal taste and identity categories should replace the politically incorrect Western canon.

“Even highly educated parents don’t put a lot of thought into the deeper purpose of school,” Ms. Drygas, the English teacher in Texas, said. “They just think about how to get their kids into whatever college they want to get to.”

So it has been comforting to think that everyone can still agree on one thing: The more innovation, the better. “Most schools have no guiding ballast anymore,” Dr. Horvath told me. “Tech filled that void for a while.”

But no technology is philosophically neutral. The apps and games that provide a simulacrum of educational progress also encourage students to absorb a certain worldview, an idea of what they should strive for. They end up with the impression that learning is a matter of box ticking, pattern recognition, completing discrete tasks and “leveling up.”

When they get to college and face open-ended essay questions and other forms of ambiguity — when they begin thinking about what they should do after graduation and try to figure out the point of it all — they panic. When a professor asks them to read an entire novel, the task feels overwhelming.

They got into college by mastering a gamified system. But that’s a false picture of the world. Take it from Emerson. He wrote in “Self-Reliance” that real education requires a person to learn that there is no algorithm for fulfillment: “Though the wide universe is full of good, no kernel of nourishing corn can come to him but through his toil.” Serious intellectual work and moral reasoning cannot be gamified."]]></description>
<dc:subject>teaching howweteach gamification videogames gaming games 2026 schools schooling pedagogy mollyworthen digitalnatives learning. howwelearn reading howweread neuroscience jaredcooneyhorvath digital kahoot curriculum denisechampney emilycherkin technology edtech skylercarr commoncore reasoning criticalthinking algorithms ambiguity writing howwewrite</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:47bbb8ea065d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gamification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:videogames"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gaming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:games"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mollyworthen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:digitalnatives"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning."/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neuroscience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jaredcooneyhorvath"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:digital"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kahoot"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:curriculum"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:denisechampney"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:emilycherkin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:skylercarr"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:commoncore"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reasoning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:criticalthinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:algorithms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ambiguity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://freddiedeboer.substack.com/p/the-school-reformer-accountability">
    <title>The School Reformer &quot;Accountability Era&quot; Narrative Simply Does Not Add Up</title>
    <dc:date>2026-04-18T22:31:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://freddiedeboer.substack.com/p/the-school-reformer-accountability</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The PISA declines visible in American math and reading scores over the 2003–2022 period aren’t remotely anomalous; they’re part of a near-universal pattern among wealthy, developed democracies. In particular, the Netherlands, Finland, Belgium, Canada, and Australia - that is, countries with many economic and social similarities but radically different curriculum philosophies, funding structures, pedagogical traditions, etc - all show trajectories strikingly similar to that of the United States. (In fact Finland, long held up as the gold standard of education reform and frequently invoked as a rebuke to American approaches, has seen some of the steepest reading declines in the developed world.) If policy and pedagogy were the primary drivers of American underperformance, one would expect American trends to diverge from those of peer nations, to look distinctively bad in ways that track distinctively American choices. Instead, what the data show is convergence: a broad, shared downward drift across the developed world that almost certainly reflects forces operating above the level of any individual nation’s classroom policy. Pinning these trends on American policy choices, without accounting for why virtually identical trends appear in countries that made very different choices, is not serious analysis.

What could those “forces operating above the level of any individual nation’s classroom policy” be? Well, I was just telling you not to make broad claims about the causes of widespread changes in educational metrics without strong evidence. But what do I suspect? I suspect that it’s related to the fact that children and adolescence have, in the past ten or fifteen years, almost universally adopted a kind of technology that has unique capacity to suck up their attention, drain their mental energy, and waste their time. I think in a decade we’re going to have very strong evidence that it was always the smartphones.

Which means that, once again, American teachers and schools are not guilty of the horrible crimes against children’s potential that they have been accused of. Then again, “accountability” was always less about education policy in the substantive sense and more of a political and moral narrative. Demanding accountability allowed elites to believe that compassion consisted of demanding more from teachers who were asked to do the impossible and students struggling against major socioeconomic barriers. But politicians and neoliberal wonks found that this profoundly unfair behavior towards public educators could be effectively rebranded as high expectations. Accountability rhetoric allowed politicians to posture as champions of children while systematically undermining the working conditions of teachers and narrowing the curriculum to whatever could be cheaply measured. We allowed pundits to talk endlessly about “what works” to improve test scores while refusing to confront the most basic empirical fact in all of education: that schools are downstream of society, not the other way around."]]></description>
<dc:subject>pisa education policy us schools schooling accountability finland netherlands freddiedeboer belgium canada australia standardizedtesting pedagogy teaching howweteach oecd europe japan southkorea korea singapore taiwan humanity humanism economics culture history comparison naep nclb davidberliner reform schoolreform poverty commoncore curriculum equity inequality sanfrancisco algebra standardization standards rttt florida ohio texas arizona louisiana indiana mississippi essa 2015 2026 socialjustice mattyglesias jonathanchait</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:59d7e5c1063b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pisa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:accountability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:finland"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:netherlands"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freddiedeboer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:belgium"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:canada"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:australia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:standardizedtesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:oecd"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:europe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:japan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:southkorea"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:korea"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:singapore"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:taiwan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:comparison"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:naep"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nclb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davidberliner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reform"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schoolreform"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:poverty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:commoncore"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:curriculum"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:equity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inequality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sanfrancisco"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:algebra"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:standardization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rttt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:florida"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ohio"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:texas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:arizona"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:louisiana"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:indiana"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mississippi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:essa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2015"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialjustice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mattyglesias"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jonathanchait"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://danmeyer.substack.com/p/rip-khanmigo-and-edtech-industry">
    <title>RIP Khanmigo &amp; Edtech Industry Dreams of AI Tutors</title>
    <dc:date>2026-04-16T04:08:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://danmeyer.substack.com/p/rip-khanmigo-and-edtech-industry</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["These are stages of grief, and Khan, himself, seems to have moved towards “acceptance.” He now says, “I think our biggest lever is really investing in the human systems,” with technology playing a supporting rather than leading role. This is doubtlessly a more fruitful path for education technology, as edtech historians like Larry Cuban and Justin Reich and edtech critics like Audrey Watters have argued for decades. It remains to be seen, however, if this path will appeal to Khan’s benefactors in the technology industry. Will they be as excited to support human systems as they have been software that tries to abstract humans away from human systems?

Indeed, given that Sal Khan has tried unsuccessfully for nearly two decades to abstract humans away from human systems—first with human explanation, then with human evaluation, and most recently with human tutoring—it seems unlikely that he is the right person now to pivot edtech towards humanity. Instead, it seems more likely that he should sit the next decade out and spend that time learning everything he can about the humans at the heart of the system that, for two decades, he has tried and failed to transform."]]></description>
<dc:subject>danmeyer salmankhan khanacademy khanmigo edtech education automation chatbots ai artificialintelligence humanism humanity salkhan teaching howweteach pedagogy laurenceholt kristendicerbo mattbarnum</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:7c87144e5212/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:danmeyer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:salmankhan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:khanacademy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:khanmigo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:automation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatbots"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:salkhan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:laurenceholt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kristendicerbo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mattbarnum"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/04/teachers-screens-edtech-students/686681/">
    <title>What Happened After a Teacher Ditched Screens - The Atlantic</title>
    <dc:date>2026-04-11T06:21:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/04/teachers-screens-edtech-students/686681/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Why one early adopter of computers in classrooms has decided to toss them"

[via:
https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/and-i-would-have-gotten-away-with-it-too-if-it-werent-for-those-pesky-kids/ ]

"Education, Kane knows, is profoundly and stubbornly social. “There are a lot of students who need accountability,” he said. The answer is not more surveillance, but more companionship in the struggle. “Students benefit from being in a room with a bunch of other people who are learning the same thing, the collective effervescence of all trying to make progress together,” he said. “And they benefit from an adult who knows them, who is in the room, who says ‘I care about your learning.’”

Screens, Kane noticed, had made it easier for students — and, if he’s being honest, for teachers — to opt out of that contract. “Chromebooks can be a classroom-management strategy,” he said. “Students tend to be a little more docile with a screen in front of them. And it was just so easy for me to sit behind my screen and watch the little dots marching across the dashboard and not really teach.” He’s noticed that teaching in an analog environment is more demanding. “I’m more fatigued,” he said. “But I’m happy with that.”"]]></description>
<dc:subject>jennyanderson edtech 2026 teaching howweteach technology schools schooling education chromebooks companionship struggle learning howwelearn pedagogy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:3a5351884f5d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jennyanderson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chromebooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:companionship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:struggle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5buUquvf1I">
    <title>Unfolding the Deleuze Seminars: Experimental Pedagogy, Philosophy, and Politics inside Deleuze's Classroom (with Charles J. Stivale) - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2026-04-06T00:15:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5buUquvf1I</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["What would it mean to experience philosophy not as a body of knowledge to be transmitted, but as a sensation to be felt? Craig is joined by Charles J. Stivale, author of Unfolding the Deleuze Seminars 1970-1987 and co-director of the Deleuze Seminars Archive at Purdue, and Dr. Bob Langan to reconstruct the atmosphere of Deleuze's legendary classroom: the overcrowded rooms, the student contestations, and the radical pedagogical experiment that post-68 French university life made possible. This is the closest you're going to get to sitting at Deleuze's feet on a Tuesday afternoon. Continuing discussion is available for subscribers via our Patreon account.

Unfolding the Deleuze Seminars, 1970-1987: Summaries and Commentary -  https://edinburghuniversitypress.com/book-unfolding-the-deleuze-seminars-1970-1987.html

Dr. Bob Langan's links:
https://www.roberthlangan.com/
ig: roberthlangan

Jung and Spinoza: Passage Through The Blessed Self - https://www.routledge.com/Jung-and-Spinoza-Passage-Through-The-Blessed-Self/Langan/p/book/9781032851853 "

[Aslo here:
https://open.spotify.com/episode/3O4a66ePEKHXusdvZx9MnR
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/unfolding-the-deleuze-seminars-experimental-pedagogy/id1512615438?i=1000759422080 ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>acidhorizon deleuze 2026 charlesstivale boblangan teaching howweteach pedagogy philosophy politics highered highereducation academia colleges universities gillesdeleuze spinoza pierrebourdieu foucault michelfoucault</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:5356e79014f9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:acidhorizon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:deleuze"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charlesstivale"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:boblangan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colleges"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gillesdeleuze"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:spinoza"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pierrebourdieu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:foucault"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:michelfoucault"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/miseducative-experiences/">
    <title>Miseducative Experiences</title>
    <dc:date>2026-04-05T05:38:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/miseducative-experiences/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[""Tell me, what is it you plan to do/ with your one wild and precious life?"

Arguably and more than a little ironically, this may be one of the most frequently invoked lines of poetry on social media – I won't add "for better or worse," although I'm tempted to, because as much as I frown when art is reduced to meme, I'm never mad when I read Mary Oliver's words. How could I be? Just these two lines unlock other lines and other poems, and I'm always hopeful that their simplicity and accessibility and power will lure people into reading more. Not just more Mary Oliver, but more poetry of any and all sorts.

Poetry, after all, isn't something you can "optimize" -- neither its reading nor its writing -- and "optimization" seems to be the despairingly destructive driving force of our culture, an exercise that, if nothing else, serves to make our lives much much less beautiful and wild.

"Tell me, what is it you plan to do/ with your one wild and precious life?"

I ask this question -- "plead" may be the better verb -- of those who are spending an increasing amount of time typing to chatbots, who are handing over important cognitive tasks and key decisions -- personal and professional -- to "artificial intelligence." I ask this question -- "implore" even -- of those who are hunched over their laptops or their phones, those who are watching television on multiple screens, almost every waking minute of their day.

Because this is what you've decided to do with your one wild and precious life.

"I don't know exactly what a prayer is," Oliver admits in that same poem, but continues, "I do know how to pay attention, how to fall down / into the grass, how to kneel down in the grass, / how to be idle and blessed, how to stroll through the fields, / which is what I have been doing all day. / Tell me, what else should I have done?"

Tech writer Taylor Lorenz tells Wired she spends 17 hours a day online. She does not want to "touch grass," she insists. She's a 40-something year old woman; she can do what she wants.

"Tell me, what is it you plan to do/ with your one wild and precious life?"

What you decide to do with your one wild and precious life is up to you -- whether your prayers of devotion are to the computer or to "AI" or to social media and not, as Oliver might encourage us, to the grasshopper and other planetary intelligences.

What you decide to do with your one wild and precious life, where your attention and your prayers are directed, is also, of course, what you've opted not to do. And these decisions do, in fact, matter.

Lorenz (and plenty of others) like to argue that "there is no evidence" that social media (or the Internet or computers or ed-tech or television or video games or whatever) harms children – an exaggeration, no doubt, as there is evidence; they just don't like it. (They don't like Jonathan Haidt, to be specific. And I get that, I really do.)

Lorenz's latest newsletter cites the work of psychologist Christopher Ferguson, best known for his challenges to his field's prevailing research on video games: that there is a link between video games and aggressive behavior. Ferguson contends that claims about the relationship between violence and video games is not just exaggerated; it is non-existent, that is all merely a moral panic. This is the framing that Lorenz leans into with recent efforts to regulate social media too, which she explicitly links to the push to censor LGBTQ content online.

The right-wing movements that are actively seeking to ban books, eliminate academic departments, circumscribe what can be taught in the classroom, and yes, limit children's access to social media should not be ignored. Indeed, it is imperative that those who seek to curb Silicon Valley's power and influence over education and information delineate how their efforts are not politically aligned with the Moms of Liberty ilk.

But to frame any opposition to technology as a "moral panic" is a rhetorical sleight of hand in which one side gets to invoke "science" and "research" while dismissing the other as mere "hysteria." To dismiss people's concerns about what kids – any of us, really – are up to online as fundamentally reactionary, as censorious is more than a little disingenuous.

There is research (and plenty of it) that finds that various forms of new media – apps, games, and so on – affects us, affects how and what we think and know. I mean, of course it does. People are spending hour after hour after hour after hour – almost every waking minute of every day – clicking on things.

"Tell me, what is it you plan to do/ with your one wild and precious life?"

What we do with our time -- online or off -- matters, and profoundly so. Everything we do shapes who we are. Everything we experience shapes who we become.

This belief is at the core of progressive education – contrary to those accusations above that arguments against technology only come from right-wing zealots – and certainly this belief is at the core of the work of John Dewey. In Experience and Education, he too turns to poetry to make his point, citing Tennyson: "...all experience is an arch wherethro' / Gleams the untraveled world, whose margin shades / For ever and for ever when I move."

But as Dewey argues, not all experiences are necessarily educative; and as repeated experiences can become habits, we might find ourselves adopting patterns that are incredibly destructive not just to our own learning, but to our relationships with one another, with the world around us – destructive even to democracy. We might find ourselves having been fundamentally changed by the behaviorist practices and libertarian ideologies that undergird every single piece of computer technology we use.

"Tell me, what is it you plan to do/ with your one wild and precious life?"

At what point can you no longer even plan to do things with your one wild and precious life because these technologies have obliterated your ability to even imagine something outside their dictates, their designs for you?"]]></description>
<dc:subject>audreywatters 2026 maryoliver life living online internet taylorlorenz screentime socialmedia ai artificialintelligence jonathanhaidt christopherferguson videogames games gaming regulation siliconvalley power media moralpanic moralpanics influence newmedia addiction johndewey children teens youth education experience attention teaching learning howweteach howwelearn policy edtech chromebooks computers computing</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:de9495051bd0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:audreywatters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maryoliver"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:living"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:taylorlorenz"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:screentime"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jonathanhaidt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christopherferguson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:videogames"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:games"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gaming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:regulation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:siliconvalley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:power"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:moralpanic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:moralpanics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:influence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:newmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:addiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johndewey"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teens"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:youth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:experience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chromebooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://undark.org/2026/04/01/sweden-schools-books/">
    <title>Why Swedish Schools Are Bringing Back Books</title>
    <dc:date>2026-04-02T05:38:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://undark.org/2026/04/01/sweden-schools-books/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Amid declining test scores, the country has pivoted away from screens and invested in back-to-basics school materials."

[Also posted here:

"Sweden goes back to basics, swapping screens for books in the classroom
Sweden is bringing back books amid declining test scores."
https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/04/sweden-goes-back-to-basics-swapping-screens-for-books-in-the-classroom/ ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>sweden schools schooling education 2026 joshuacohen howweread howwewrite reading writing books analog digital paper technology textbooks screens digitallearning learning howeelearn us policy openai microsoft google ai artificialintelligence digitalfluency chatbots memory readingcomprehension pandemic covid-19 coronavirus computers computing tablets ipad jaredcooneyhorvath jonathanhaidt pamkastner literacy lindafälth teaching howweteach pedagogy naominbaron linguistics edtech distraction attention</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:fe20b5013955/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sweden"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:joshuacohen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:analog"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:digital"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:paper"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:textbooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:screens"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:digitallearning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howeelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:digitalfluency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatbots"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:memory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:readingcomprehension"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pandemic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:covid-19"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:coronavirus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tablets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ipad"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jaredcooneyhorvath"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jonathanhaidt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pamkastner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:literacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lindafälth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:naominbaron"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:distraction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://freddiedeboer.substack.com/p/when-people-say-they-want-good-schools">
    <title>When People Say They Want to Send Their Kid to a Good School, They Usually Mean Schools Without &quot;Bad Kids&quot;</title>
    <dc:date>2026-03-24T20:43:27+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://freddiedeboer.substack.com/p/when-people-say-they-want-good-schools</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["parents intuitively understand that a school's "quality" is a product of how its student body was selected"

...

"The notion that we should help students learn by purging the worst-performing, most-disruptive students is appealing to anyone who has ever witnessed a classroom torpedoed by a student who has no interest in learning, but of course it’s also dangerous. There’s an inherent inflationary tendency, when we’re defining the worst, least-committed students. Charter school roster-pruning can be, in some instances, sufficiently aggressive to root out students who have an interest in learning but limited talent. And those less-talented kids, below a certain age, have to end up somewhere; this is, indeed, core to the complaints of public school teachers, that they run the schools of last resort and are then blamed when many of their kids fail. From a broader perspective, we could be adults and admit that many parents who send their kids to private schools just want to avoid the “bad kids,” and that whether they admit it to themselves or not, they’re really talking about Black kids or poor kids. We had to have a Supreme Court decision outlawing segregation, followed by a massive desegregation effort that was never fully completed, because parents want their kids to be kept away from certain other kids. There is a more sympathetic version of this in the pro-charter-selectivity attitude, and as I’ve intimated, this version is very often made by Black parents who want their kids to escape their station. Whether we decide to give them what they want by engineering benevolent segregation or not, can we at least admit that that’s what we’re doing, and that the public schools who get their leftovers will inevitably look worse for that very reason?"]]></description>
<dc:subject>schools schooling parenting 2026 freddiedeboer education robertpondiscio learning howwelearn successacademy charters charterschools selectivity publicschools exclusivity privateschools zoning exclusion nclb geofreycanada harlemchildrenszone teaching howweteach pedagogy disruption behavior children jonathanchait segregation desegregation society inequality admissions demographics policy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:da158314f581/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:parenting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freddiedeboer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:robertpondiscio"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:successacademy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charterschools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:selectivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:publicschools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:exclusivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:privateschools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:zoning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:exclusion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nclb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:geofreycanada"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:harlemchildrenszone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:disruption"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:behavior"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jonathanchait"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:segregation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:desegregation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inequality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:admissions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:demographics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://freddiedeboer.substack.com/p/what-people-want-from-our-schools">
    <title>What People Want From Our Schools Has Never Been Accomplished, Anywhere, Ever</title>
    <dc:date>2026-03-13T05:14:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://freddiedeboer.substack.com/p/what-people-want-from-our-schools</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["educating an entire society into prosperity is a radical modern fantasy, not "getting things back to normal""

...

"We Don’t Know If What We’re Trying is Possible

The United States has embarked on a project that is historically unprecedented: the attempt to make every student “college-ready” and to build a labor market that presumes universal higher education. The degree to which “college for all” is an explicit demand can be lawyered forever; if you’d like to say “No one actually wants college for all,” go ahead. The simple reality is that making all students college ready has long been a thinktank demand, a politician promise, and a goal of charter school networks; whether you want to call it a strawman or not, the idea that the entire labor market is going to flow through schooling, that we’re going to educate our citizenry into employability, is a central reality of modern American economics and politics. In The Cult of Smart I quoted (I believe) every president from Carter through Obama as endorsing education as the path to prosperity. And in the neoliberal era, where so much of the labor market for uneducated citizens has been dismantled, nobody has a very good idea of how people reach the good life without education. So we’re trying to educate everybody. Simple!

I need people to understand this: no society in history has ever achieved such a thing, not even the most aggressively meritocratic or education-obsessed ones. There are countries with better aggregate education data than ours (although there’s always caveats and context) and there’s countries with a higher percentage of adults with college degrees (although in some countries college-level work is similar to the high school-level work that American students do). There are no countries that have built an economy where every worker actually possesses the kind of skills that most are thinking of when they think of a college education, and there are no societies in history where education has been the dominant creator of jobs and financial opportunity in the way implied by the rhetoric we routinely hear from politicians. The idea that we can take a population of tens of millions of young people, with all the diversity of ability, interest, and circumstance that entails, and funnel them into a single academic track is a radical social experiment, and the fact that there’s still so much constant angst about education suggests that it’s not going well. Pretending that we’re just trying to get education “back to normal” is a way of laundering a wildly ambitious scheme into inevitability, as if the failure to achieve this impossible standard is a deviation rather than the natural outcome of the attempt.

To imagine that we are simply replicating the supposed good old days by demanding college readiness for all is to ignore the fact that no country’s default has ever looked like this. And the constant escalation of crisis rhetoric has consequences. By treating universal college readiness as the baseline, we set ourselves up for perpetual crisis, because the system cannot deliver what it promises. Students who do not thrive in academic environments are cast as failures, even though they may possess skills and talents that societies have historically valued in other ways. Employers, meanwhile, inflate credential requirements not because the work demands it, but because the education arms race has made degrees into proxies for discipline and compliance. The result is a labor market that is both exclusionary and brittle, built on the false premise that education can be the sole engine of economic life. To insist that this is “normal” is to deny history, and to guarantee disappointment.

If you want to go ahead and grind whatever your particular axe about education happens to be, knock yourself out. But please, stop saying things like “I just want us to get back to a world where kids were graduating high school with basic skills!” Because the world you’re referring to never existed."]]></description>
<dc:subject>education schools schooling society 2026 history germany france netherlands finland us china equality inequality economics plato europe oecd children chidlhood horacemann johndewey curriculum pedagogy howweteach teaching learning howwelearn hierarchy civilrightsmovement anationatrisk nclb selectiviy charterschools charters sat testing standardizedtesting southkorea israel academics conscription aptitude compulsory labor work unionization unions brucespringsteen nafta gatt vrettonwoods mexico vietnam ronaldreagan barackobama lobbyists lobbying policy politics corporations corporatism democrats republicans thinktanks socialmobility freddiedeboer</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:d7136e98b930/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:germany"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:france"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:netherlands"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:finland"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:china"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:equality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inequality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:plato"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:europe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:oecd"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chidlhood"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:horacemann"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johndewey"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:curriculum"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hierarchy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:civilrightsmovement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anationatrisk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nclb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:selectiviy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charterschools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sat"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:testing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:standardizedtesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:southkorea"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:israel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conscription"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aptitude"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:compulsory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unionization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brucespringsteen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nafta"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gatt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:vrettonwoods"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mexico"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:vietnam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ronaldreagan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:barackobama"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lobbyists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lobbying"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:corporations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:corporatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:democrats"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:republicans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thinktanks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmobility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freddiedeboer"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://thedispatch.com/article/artificial-intelligence-college-essay-teachers-innovation/">
    <title>What AI Is Teaching Us About Humanities Education</title>
    <dc:date>2026-03-10T06:36:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://thedispatch.com/article/artificial-intelligence-college-essay-teachers-innovation/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["How I learned to stop worrying and be thankful for chatbots."

[archived:
https://archive.is/tDR2g ]

"If you are a professor of humanities, as I am, then widespread use of chatbots by your students is either the worst thing that’s ever happened to you—or one of the best. What I suggest is scary for non-academics, I know, but bear with me: Let’s try looking at these matters from the teacher’s point of view.

If you are committed to doing what you’ve always done—which you may well be, because what you’ve always done is all you know how to do—then the rise of the chatbots will hurt, and hurt a lot. If you’re the typical humanities professor, what you’ve always done is assign the good old thesis essay (with or without research, depending on the situation): an essay that stakes a claim and then defends that claim against possible objections. In its most classic form, such an essay will have an introductory paragraph that states the thesis, then three major points in which that thesis is developed and defended against potential objections, and then a conclusion. In high school, that’s a five-paragraph essay; in college, the essays are often longer, but they have essentially the same structure. (If you’re not a humanities professor, you’re still probably having some essay memories right now … painful ones, I expect.)

If that’s what you assign, you can be very clear about this: No matter what rules you establish, your students are going to get AI to do these essays for them. It’s exactly the kind of thing the chatbots are really good at, because it’s completely formulaic and mechanical, and there are zillions of examples out there for the LLMs to draw upon.

Your university has likely purchased some software that claims to be able to detect AI use. But all such services occasionally produce false positives, and that has made many universities very wary about using them. It would not be good publicity—nor good marketing—to let it be known that students were denied credit, or perhaps even denied graduation, because a service said that their work was AI-generated when in fact it was not. So if you want to game your students’ system for gaming your system, hard times are a-comin’—unless, like some professors I know, you keep assigning the same things you’ve always assigned while merely telling your students that they’re on their honor not to use AI. (If you can do that and sleep at night, I admire your powers of compartmentalization. But only your powers of compartmentalization.)

One of the favors that chatbots have done for humanities professors is to reveal to us that chatbots are so good at doing the thesis-essay assignment because it has always been an exceptionally formulaic thing. If we engage in a little self-examination, we’ll realize that we like it formulaic, because that reduces the time and mental energy we have to invest in grading. It’s easy to compare any given student’s essay to the template in your mind and quickly see the extent to which it matches or deviates from it. The rise of the chatbots—with their algorithmic pattern-matching, their stochastic parrot behavior—has revealed that students and faculty alike have been, for many decades, functioning in exactly the same way. If we could confront our chatbots the way parents confront their kids about drug use, the bots would surely reply “I learned it by watching you!”

If we’re willing to let the rise of the chatbots force certain questions upon us, this could be not the worst of times, but the best of them. A little reflection would allow us to see the ways that we have for many years misunderstood what we’re all about: We may have thought we wanted our students to be more sensitive readers, more thoughtful interpreters, more rigorous analysts, but what we were really telling our students was that we wanted them to be better writers of thesis essays.

What do such essay assignments achieve? Well, you might say, they show that students have understood the texts assigned to them, that they can read intelligently, interpret with some degree of sophistication, and relay those interpretations in clear prose. Fine. But what if that’s not what the assignments actually do? What if they don’t mark genuine engagement with and response to literature? What if, instead, they simply reward students who internalize the formula and are able to regurgitate it? On some level, we’ve probably all realized that in many cases that’s exactly what happens. The rise of the chatbots gives us an opportunity to admit it. And that’s a pretty good thing. 

I should pause here to say that, of course, there are many professors in the humanities who want their students to use AI to do their assignments—who wish to increase their students’ dependence on the big AI companies. To those professors I say: Go in peace, and may our paths never cross.

To resume:

When I have talked with my fellow professors in the Great Texts program at Baylor’s Honors College, I have learned a few things. Some professors have for many years been giving oral examinations in the old Oxford and Cambridge tutorial style, where students read their papers aloud, and the professor interrupts to ask questions like “What do you mean by that word? What does that phrase mean?” This allows the professor to discover whether the student actually knows what he or she is talking about. In such situations, and in full oral exams, there are few ways to hide your ignorance. Professors who teach this way can largely (if not wholly) ignore the AI freakout. 

Other professors have been using this new world as an opportunity to rethink what they’re doing and why. One colleague, for instance, went to Walmart and bought her students a bunch of cheap composition notebooks, handed them out, and asked the students to use them to make commonplace books—that is, choice quotations from wise authors written out in your own hand. I have been bringing into class handouts with a paragraph or two on them, and asking the students to annotate them thoroughly in class. This does take up more classroom time, but I compensate by making short audio lectures that I email to my students. I’ve always given a lot of reading quizzes; now I give more. This is a version of what some people call the flipped classroom, but accelerated by the rise of chatbots.

I’ll be retiring from teaching at the end of this year. It has been wonderful to spend time coming up with alternative assignments—trying, after more than 40 years in the classroom, to think in fresh ways about what I want my students to know and what I want them to be able to do. Properly understood, the disruption of humanities teaching by AI is a gift, and I plan to receive it as such, rather than complain about a burden. As a teacher, I find these new conditions invigorating and refreshing. I feel like Charles Foster Kane when he started his career as a newspaper publisher: I don’t know how to teach masterpieces of literature and philosophy and theology, I just try everything I can think of. I find that my students—even if they’re not always as excited as I am—welcome these experiments and are quite willing to engage in them.

I’m teaching a course on fantasy this semester, and we’re now reading The Lord of the Rings. I asked my students to note the extensive maps printed at the end of that book, which the previous books we’ve read—George MacDonald’s Phantastes, Lord Dunsany’s The King of Elfland’s Daughter, and Lud-in-the-Mist by Hope Mirrlees—do not have. I handed my students some blank sheets of paper and asked them to draw, as best they could, maps of the worlds of those books. They quickly discovered that it was not possible to do this for Phantastes—though it was quite easy, if with some debate about how best to do it, for the other two. Phantastes is unmappable. Which leads to an interesting question: Why? Why did MacDonald write a book set in a world you can’t map? That turns out to be a very important question if you want to understand his peculiar and powerful book.

I don’t think we would have gotten into these issues about the visualization of fictional worlds—why it matters, and what you do instead when you can’t visualize—if I hadn’t been on the lookout for a different kind of assignment.

So for me, the rise of the chatbots has been an unexpected, late-career gift. It has made my teaching more fun for me, and I think more interesting for my students. And I believe the lessons I have learned can be generalized.

As humanities education has become more threatened by budget cuts, an all-consuming university focus on STEM, and self-inflicted unpopularity, it has in a circling-the-wagons way become more and more fad-obsessed and formulaic in its gestures. I remember when, 25 years ago, every English department in America suddenly decided it had to have a “body critic” to talk about “representations of the body” in literature. (Never “bodies,” by the way: the body.) That led to graduate seminars on “Feminism and the Body,” or “The Black Body in the Southern Imagination,” or “The Colonized Body”—which then became undergraduate classes. That’s just one example among many. This trickling-down of concepts from initial critical writings to graduate seminars to undergraduate classes, and then the expectation that undergraduates would be able to (stochastically!) parrot this discourse in their essays, has been how humanities departments function. The boundaries of academic discourse got policed more vigorously as the territory shrank.

The circling of wagons makes sense when we’re confident that the enemy is outside our perimeter, but when the enemy is everywhere, including inside our wagons’ tents and holding the reins of our horses, then some new and imaginative strategies are called for. The current circumstances, properly seized, could prompt a genuine reinvigoration of the humanities, and even of student interest in taking humanities classes. By depriving students of constant AI use—or, to put it more accurately, by allowing them some respite from the tyranny of the chatbots over their lives—we actually enable them to exercise their minds in unfamiliar, and for some unprecedented, ways. 

In short, there’s a great opportunity here for those who want to take it. Humanities professors of the world, unite! We have nothing to lose but our self-forged chains."]]></description>
<dc:subject>alanjacobs writing howwwrite 2025 ai artificialintelligence chatbots education humanities llms pedagogy teaching howweteach</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:097ca7455d0e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alanjacobs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwwrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2025"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatbots"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:llms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.techdirt.com/2026/03/06/were-training-students-to-write-worse-to-prove-theyre-not-robots-and-its-pushing-them-to-use-more-ai/">
    <title>We’re Training Students To Write Worse To Prove They’re Not Robots, And It’s Pushing Them To Use More AI | Techdirt</title>
    <dc:date>2026-03-09T19:30:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.techdirt.com/2026/03/06/were-training-students-to-write-worse-to-prove-theyre-not-robots-and-its-pushing-them-to-use-more-ai/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><dc:subject>mikemasnick 2026 ethics ai artificialintelligence language writing howwewrite education technology dadlandmaye teaching howweteach pedagogy cobraeffect policy cheating surveillance aidetection</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:12a6af107cc1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mikemasnick"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dadlandmaye"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cobraeffect"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cheating"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:surveillance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aidetection"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://patrickfarenga.substack.com/p/mathematician-knocks-school">
    <title>Mathematician Knocks School - by Patrick Farenga</title>
    <dc:date>2026-03-04T03:08:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://patrickfarenga.substack.com/p/mathematician-knocks-school</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["This is another article in the “more things change the more they stay the same” mold. This one features an expert mathematician from 40 years ago making a similar critique Holt first made in the sixties and that some researchers and teachers are making today: “… very young children learn in manifold ways, at a rate that will never be equaled in later life, and with no formal teaching. Yet the same children find much simpler things far more difficult as soon as they are formally taught in school.”

From the article “Learning Math By Thinking” by Fred M. Hechinger, the New York Times, 6/10/86:

… Dr. Hassler Whitney, a distinguished mathematician at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, says that for several decades mathematics teaching has largely failed. He predicts that the current round of tougher standards and longer hours threatens to “throw great numbers, already with great math anxiety, into severe crisis.”

Dr. Whitney has spent many years in classrooms, both teaching mathematics and observing how it is taught, and he calls for an end to what he considers wrongheaded ways.

Long before school, he says, very young children “learn in manifold ways, at a rate that will never be equaled in later life, and with no formal teaching.” For example, they learn to speak and communicate, and to deal with their environment. Yet the same children find much simpler things far more difficult as soon as they are formally taught in school.

Learning mathematics, Dr. Whitney says, should mean “finding one’s way through problems of new sorts, and taking responsibility for the results.”

“This has been completely forgotten” in most schools, he finds. “The pressure is now to pass standardized tests. This means simply to remember the rules for a certain number of standard exercises at the moment of the test and thus ‘show achievement.’ This is the lowest form of learning, of no use in the outside world.”

Dr. Whitney, in a recent report in the Journal of Mathematical Behavior recalled an experiment begun in 1929 by L.P. Benezet, then superintendent of schools in Manchester, N.H. Mr. Benezet was distressed over eighth graders’ poor command of English and their inability to communicate ideas.

“In the fall of 1929,” he wrote in 1935, “I made up my mind to try an experiment of abandoning all formal instruction in arithmetic below the seventh grade and concentrate instead on teaching the children to read, to reason. and recite” by reporting on books they had read and incidents they had seen. The children were no longer made to struggle with long division. “For some years,” Mr. Benezet went on, “I had noticed that the effect of early introduction of arithmetic had been too dull and almost chloroform the child’s reasoning faculties.”

Over the years numbers crept into children’s experience, Mr Benezet said. They learned to deal with “halves” and “doubles,” with estimates of size, with a natural development of multiplication tables and slowly, with formal arithmetic.

Mr. Benezet concluded that children who had not been dragged into early but only dimly understood mathematics eventually outdistanced those who had. Literacy in English and a capacity to think independently and to speak and write clearly helped many to do well in mathematics, too.

In the traditional school climate, Dr. Whitney writes, children’s natural thinking “becomes gradually replaced by attempts at rote learning, with disaster as a result.” In high school, students increasingly say, “Just tell me which formula to use,” a way of saying “Don’t ask me to think.”

Because teachers must “cover the material,” Dr. Whitney adds, there is less time to think. When students are called on, they must answer instantly. Wrong answers are not discussed.

“Students and teachers are all victims” as national commissions clamor for more mathematics without realizing, Dr. Whitney warns, that they may create less knowledge and more anxiety. He says it is crucial to stop just learning the rules."]]></description>
<dc:subject>1986 unschooling education math mathematics schools schooling testing standardization standardizedtesting hasslerwhitney fredhechinger patfarenga learning howwelearn lpbenezet literacy reading howwereaf criticalthinking children algorithms teaching howweteach pedagogy rules knowledge anxiety mathanxiety</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:72de31ecfd0d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1986"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unschooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:math"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mathematics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:testing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:standardization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:standardizedtesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hasslerwhitney"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fredhechinger"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:patfarenga"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lpbenezet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:literacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwereaf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:criticalthinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:algorithms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rules"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:knowledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anxiety"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mathanxiety"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://unherd.com/2026/02/why-your-kid-hates-learning-apps/?edition=us">
    <title>The plot to replace teachers with tech</title>
    <dc:date>2026-02-28T17:14:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://unherd.com/2026/02/why-your-kid-hates-learning-apps/?edition=us</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The popular i-Ready platform dulls young minds"

[archived:
https://archive.ph/hsvbh

via:

https://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2026/02/seeds-scribes-and-jeremiahs/

"John Allen Wooden eviscerates a major player in the ed-tech industry: “Partisan tribalists may blame their favorite villains — lazy union teachers and woke-ness for the Right, structural racism and poverty for the Left. But both political parties have been equally guilty of legislating more and more standardized testing over the past 25 years, creating an ideal environment for Big Tech to hawk ‘data-based’ panaceas like i-Ready. Marketed as a high-tech solution to lagging scores on government-mandated tests, i-Ready is used across 30-plus US states and a staggering 70% of the top-100 school districts, covering nearly half of elementary- and middle-school children. This, even though i-Ready has never been proved to successfully teach, immerses already-screen-addled kids in yet more screens, and in all likelihood is making America’s children quantifiably dumber.”"

and 

https://social.ayjay.org/2026/02/28/this-story-about-a-universally.html

"This story about a universally despised, utterly useless, and yet widely deployed e-learning app should remind us of a key truth: American schools at all levels will buy and mandate the use of anything that promises them cost savings. (And “cost savings” = “employing fewer humans.”) "]]]></description>
<dc:subject>johnallenwooden education schools publicschools teaching howweteach schooling gamification edtech technology automation 2026 i-ready surveillance testing childten us policy standardizedtesting standardization learning howwelearn bigtech testprep tutoring coercion monotony schoolwork howwlearn sitejabber curriculumassociates lessonplanning curriculum pedagogy data datacollection nclb sciencewashing resistance research wested lobbying lausd kellysia stileeducation coppa privacy benjamincoleman</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:be4704569217/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnallenwooden"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:publicschools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gamification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:automation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:i-ready"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:surveillance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:testing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:childten"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:standardizedtesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:standardization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bigtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:testprep"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tutoring"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:coercion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:monotony"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schoolwork"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwlearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sitejabber"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:curriculumassociates"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lessonplanning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:curriculum"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:datacollection"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nclb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sciencewashing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:resistance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:research"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wested"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lobbying"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lausd"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kellysia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stileeducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:coppa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:benjamincoleman"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://educationwars.substack.com/p/overselling-the-mississippi-miracle">
    <title>Overselling the Mississippi Miracle - by Jennifer Berkshire</title>
    <dc:date>2026-02-27T22:37:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://educationwars.substack.com/p/overselling-the-mississippi-miracle</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><dc:subject>mississippimiracle mississippi education poverty schools schooling pandemic covid-19 coronavirus 2026 jenniferberkshire us alabama reading pedagogy instruction learning howwelearn publiceducation publicschools readinginstruction teaching howweteach policy southernsurge louisiana funding propertytaxes taxes taxation nicholaskristof standards standardization corporalpunishment texas unions teachers labor work workers melissaarnoldlyon trunover economics redistribution childtaxcredit letrs</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:57396a7500c3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mississippimiracle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mississippi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:poverty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pandemic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:covid-19"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:coronavirus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jenniferberkshire"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alabama"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:instruction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:publiceducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:publicschools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:readinginstruction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:southernsurge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:louisiana"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:funding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:propertytaxes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:taxes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:taxation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nicholaskristof"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:standardization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:corporalpunishment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:texas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:unions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teachers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:workers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:melissaarnoldlyon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:trunover"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:redistribution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:childtaxcredit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:letrs"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://hammer.ucla.edu/now-dig-this/artists/raymond-saunders">
    <title>Raymond Saunders | Hammer Museum</title>
    <dc:date>2026-02-26T06:36:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://hammer.ucla.edu/now-dig-this/artists/raymond-saunders</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Found objects, lumped and dripped pigments, chalk drawings, and magazine photographs all find their way into a painting by Raymond Saunders. Crammed with multiple sources of inspiration and focus points, the works require care and attention to decipher their stories of life and its experiences. Urbanity—made personal, public, and important—is a recurring theme in the artist's rendering of city spaces and sounds. Billboard advertisements, graffiti, flashing lights, and police sirens are only some of the references Saunders makes to construct an urban world that oftentimes envelops the viewer in a visual cacophony of brash colors and assorted shapes. The dissonance is deceiving, however, since his works are grounded in an extensive formal art training.

Saunders was born and raised in Pittsburgh, an alumnus of the city's public school system. He found a mentor in Joseph C. Fitzpatrick, his elementary and high school art teacher and the director of art for Pittsburgh Public Schools. Through Fitzpatrick's encouragement and support, Saunders began showing his work at local venues and obtained a scholarship to the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts. He also studied at the Barnes Foundation before earning his BFA from the Carnegie Institute of Technology in 1960. He moved to Oakland, where he still lives, to pursue an MFA from the California College of Arts and Crafts (1961). Saunders began teaching in 1968, when he accepted a faculty position at California State University, Hayward; he is currently a professor of painting at California College of the Arts in Oakland.

Saunders's art combines his interests in expressionism, the cityscape, education, and life experiences. Although his aesthetic is akin to that of artists such as Cy Twombly and Robert Rauschenberg, Saunders constructs a social narrative by bringing together a host of influences, including African American history, jazz, and the classroom. Many of his paintings feature a black background, a reference both to his race and to the blackboards used in schools. The frequent appearance of chalk as a medium adds to this latter association, as do the artist's scribbles, drawings, and scrawled-out math problems and letters.

Saunders also looks to the city—its simultaneous abundance and dearth of opportunities, and its residents' struggles—to comment on the paradoxes of our society. Chalk-drawn hopscotch grids paired with remnants of used paper and pop culture symbols emphasize the coexistence of childhood innocence and urban reality. Discarded objects, the trash of the streets, take on new meaning when combined and reconfigured within Saunders's compositions. Torn posters and plastic figurines voice the dreams and defeats of urban neighborhoods, becoming the materials that “teach” the viewer about city life and its concerns. An educator at heart, Saunders uses his art as a tool to express the momentum of the street and the experiences of urban minorities.

Contradictory in nature, with childlike lettering and found objects placed within and among elegant, technical drawings and paintings, Saunders's works are of the moment and show little concern for permanence. The artist is notorious for adding more scrawls and items to paintings already hanging on gallery walls, suggesting his belief in the constant evolution of his art and the role of ephemerality in decoding it. Very much in the spirit of the music of Miles Davis and Charlie Parker, Saunders's art celebrates improvisation and transience. Sights and sounds pass by as one moves along a city street, encountering the world, making decisions, and changing one's mind as one goes. Such is the beauty of Saunders's paintings. They are about life and all of its battles and victories, dirtiness and splendor.

Saunders's works ask the viewer to study and examine them before reaching a conclusion. The paintings, while drawn from the artist's personal experiences and ideas, welcome individual, and universal, interpretations. The abundance of imagery and text— stylistically dense and at times bordering on the absurd—allows viewers to draw connections and discover dissonances. Appropriating elements from both high and low culture, Saunders plays with the expectations of the art world to create paintings that stay true to his influences and motivations as both artist and teacher.

—Connie H. Choi"]]></description>
<dc:subject>raymondsaunders art conniechoi assemblage artists jazz teaching howweteach arteducation milesdavis charlieparker collage oakland pittsburgh foundobjects urbanity experience expressionism cityscapes education lifeexperiences socialnarrative struggles urban life living splendor dirtiness dissonance</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:dceb03b5b60d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:raymondsaunders"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conniechoi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:assemblage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jazz"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:arteducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:milesdavis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charlieparker"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:oakland"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pittsburgh"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:foundobjects"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:urbanity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:experience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:expressionism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cityscapes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lifeexperiences"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialnarrative"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:struggles"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:urban"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:living"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:splendor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dirtiness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dissonance"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.davidzwirner.com/exhibitions/2026/exceptional-works-raymond-saunders-it-wasn-t-easy-being-a-first-grader-1979-1984">
    <title>Exceptional Works: Raymond Saunders | It Wasn't Easy Being a First Grader, 1979/1984 | David Zwirner</title>
    <dc:date>2026-02-26T06:14:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.davidzwirner.com/exhibitions/2026/exceptional-works-raymond-saunders-it-wasn-t-easy-being-a-first-grader-1979-1984</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["“To me [making art is] like writing, it’s like poetry. When do you end the line? There’s a beginning, middle, and end, but the process is the middle, the essence of where you are.”

—Raymond Saunders

[image: "Raymond Saunders, It Wasn't Easy Being a First Grader, 1979/1984"]

The works of celebrated American artist Raymond Saunders (1934–2025) bring together the artist’s extensive formal training with his own observations and experience. Expressionistic swaths of paint, minimalist motifs, line drawings, and passages of vibrant color tangle with found objects from his urban environment, creating unexpected visual rhymes and resonances.

Saunders taught art throughout his career. It Wasn't Easy Being a First Grader (1979/1984) speaks vividly of this important aspect of the artist’s work, and includes crayons, cursive handwriting, and numbers as emblems of early education.

[image: "M. R. Robinson, at right, presenting award to Raymond “Ray” Saunders at National High School Art Exhibition, 1953. Photo by Charles “Teenie” Harris. © Carnegie Museum of Art, Pittsburgh"]

Having earned his MFA from the California College of Arts and Crafts, Oakland, in 1961, Saunders began teaching at California State University, Hayward, in 1968 and went on to join the faculty of his alma mater (later known as California College of the Arts), where he was given the distinction of professor emeritus. For Saunders, teaching and artmaking were equal pursuits, and each in turn informed the other, resulting in the frequently didactic, shorthand mode of expression that is a hallmark of his works.

Saunders’s creative and holistic approach to education was in part a response to his skepticism around traditional systems of training. As the artist stated, “I’ve had too much schooling to think of myself as either naive or childish.… I mean, children paint beautifully, but as long as the designation ‘children’s art’ exists, there will be an undermining of their content.”

A publication made in 2002 is the result of a semester-long project with Saunders and a first grade class at Park Day School, Oakland. The booklet features transcribed conversations between Saunders and the class, as well as students’ artwork.

[two images:

"This publication is the culmination of a semester-long project with Saunders and a first grade class at Park Day School, Oakland, in 2002, and intersperses transcribed conversations between Saunders and the class with students’ artwork."]

Saunders developed a nonhierarchical relationship to pedagogy that came to echo the expansive nature of his artmaking.

Nothing to Say, an interview between Saunders and the writer Christopher Cook, was published on the occasion of the exhibition Raymond Saunders: Paintings, Drawings, Collages at Addison Gallery of American Art at Phillips Academy, Massachusetts, in 1987. The interview between Saunders and Cook, then director of the Addison Gallery, inspired a collection of twenty-five postcards with excerpted quotes from their conversation which include the artist's meditations on teaching art.
A postcard from “NOTHING TO SAY”, dated 1987

[image: "A postcard from the series Nothing to Say by Raymond Saunders in conversation with the writer Christopher Cook, 1987"]

In It Wasn’t Easy Being a First Grader, real crayons and fragments of children’s drawings and book illustrations are among the elements affixed to the striking royal blue canvas, a rare use of colored ground for the artist. The work overtly references grade school and the growing pains of youth, with color swatches, a number table, and “Raymond” written in neat cursive at the top of the canvas.

[image: "Raymond Saunders, It Wasn't Easy Being a First Grader, 1979/1984 (detail)"]

“Saunders’s visual alchemy ultimately renders the picture a layered, essentially abstract, composition. His narratives wander freely. Chronological sequence is fluid, and the story being told is an impressionistic one.”

—Richard Armstrong, then-director at Carnegie Museum of Art, Pittsburgh, 1996

[image: "Installation view, Raymond Saunders: Flowers from a Black Garden, Carnegie Museum of Art, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 2025. Photo by Zachary Riggleman"]

Saunders’s first retrospective at Carnegie Museum of Art in 2025 reflected the artist’s early connection to the museum; growing up in Pittsburgh, Saunders participated in the museum’s Saturday art classes for young people, which continue to this day. His mentor, Joseph C. Fitzpatrick, teacher and director of art for Pittsburgh public schools, also taught Andy Warhol, Philip Pearlstein, and Mel Bochner. Saunders obtained a scholarship to the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts and went on to earn a BFA from Carnegie Institute of Technology in 1960.

[image: "A postcard from the series Nothing to Say by Raymond Saunders in conversation with the writer Christopher Cook, 1987"]

[images:

"Joan Miró, Blue II, 1961, reproduced as part of a selection of postcards from Saunders’s collection, gathered by the artist throughout his domestic and international travels over the years"

"Kazimir Malevich, Suprematism, 1915–1916, reproduced as part of a selection of postcards from Saunders’s collection, gathered by the artist throughout his domestic and international travels over the years"

"Balthasar van der Ast, Basket of Flowers, c. 1622, reproduced as part of a selection of postcards from Saunders’s collection, gathered by the artist throughout his domestic and international travels over the years"

"Emil Nolde, Twilight, early twentieth century; part of a selection of postcards from Saunders’s collection, gathered by the artist throughout his domestic and international travels over the years"]

A consummate student as well as a dedicated teacher, Saunders collected images of other artists’ work, as discussed in an interview with Judith Wilson in 1980:

“I need what they do.... It makes me who I am.... It’s like a piece of music, and someone says, ‘How does it make you feel?’ You cannot ever say how it makes you feel, but you will continue to listen. And in that same sense, I can’t tell you what it does, but I’d hate to be without it.... But because it’s someone else’s [art], I can leave it alone. I can be happy with it ... because it’s theirs.... But I’m not happy because, thank you, but I want to do something else.” 

[image: "A spread from Here for the Children, a fundraising booklet published to benefit the Children’s Hospital Medical Center of Northern California in the mid-1980s"]

It Wasn't Easy Being a First Grader is illustrated in Here for the Children, a fundraising booklet published to benefit the Children’s Hospital Medical Center of Northern California in the mid-1980s. This image shows the painting in its earlier iteration—Saunders first executed it in 1979 and reworked it in 1984, in keeping with the loose, ever-evolving, and improvisatory nature of his painting style. Saunders understood making art, like teaching, to be an ongoing process, and the artist would frequently return to his compositions. The present version of the painting shows the addition of spray-painted markings and supplementary collage elements.

[embed: "Raymond Saunders discussing his work and process in an interview, 1994" (SFMOMA)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6QQUnMlvzTI ]

“Raymond Saunders reconstitutes reality for us and with us.... We look at his pictures and (suddenly or slowly) begin to imagine our own humanity—a kind of trembling tenderness touched with menace, exhilaration, relief, and the outrageous bounty at our disposal. From an environment of the lost, the discarded, Saunders creates another wholly inscribed world of found things in which chalk and metal and paint and wallpaper and toys and insignia combine to destabilize and soothe us—then to change us altogether like a tropical medicine belt. Glorious.”

—The author Toni Morrison in her 1993 introduction to a solo exhibition of Saunders’s work"]]></description>
<dc:subject>art raymondsaunders tonimorrison 2026 artists arteducation education teaching pedagogy howweteach emilnolde balthasarvanderast kazimirmalevich joanmiró christophercook andywarhol philippearlstein melbochner pittsburgh oakland parkdayschool artmaking 2002 hayward 1961 1953 mrrobinson collage assemblage</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:9fb775206331/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:raymondsaunders"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tonimorrison"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:arteducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:emilnolde"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:balthasarvanderast"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kazimirmalevich"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:joanmiró"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christophercook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:andywarhol"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philippearlstein"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:melbochner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pittsburgh"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:oakland"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:parkdayschool"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artmaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2002"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hayward"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1961"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1953"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mrrobinson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:assemblage"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.davidzwirner.com/exhibitions/2026/raymond-saunders-notes-from-la">
    <title>Raymond Saunders: Notes from LA | Los Angeles | February 24—April 25, 2026 | David Zwirner</title>
    <dc:date>2026-02-26T06:14:43+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.davidzwirner.com/exhibitions/2026/raymond-saunders-notes-from-la</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["David Zwirner is pleased to present an exhibition of works by Raymond Saunders (1934–2025) at the gallery’s 616 N Western Avenue location in Los Angeles. Curated by Ebony L. Haynes, this is Saunders’s third solo exhibition with David Zwirner and will mark the first exhibition in Los Angeles devoted to the artist’s work in more than a decade."

...

"“California felt physical to me.... I prefer to be [there] really for just those reasons, that I like how it feels.”

—Raymond Saunders, interview with the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art, 1994"

...

"Celebrating Saunders’s time in California—the artist lived and worked in Oakland for most of his adult life—this exhibition features a selection of paintings and works on paper that embody many of the distinct material and conceptual concerns of the artist’s decades-long practice.

Saunders had close ties to the West Coast, where most of his studio years were spent, and he became well-known as an arts educator there. For Saunders, teaching and artmaking were equal pursuits, and each in turn informed the other, resulting in the frequently didactic, shorthand mode of expression that is a hallmark of his works."

...

"Saunders understood teaching to be, like making art, an ongoing process of learning, and embraced the classroom as a vital site for exchange—of knowledge, of experiences, of ways of seeing the world. He embodied a creative and holistic approach to education that was in part a response to his skepticism around traditional, didactic systems of training. Beginning with his early art training in Pittsburgh’s public schools, Saunders developed a nonhierarchical relationship to pedagogy that came to echo the expansive nature of his artmaking."

...

"“Sights and sounds pass by as one moves along a city street, encountering the world, making decisions, and changing one’s mind as one goes. Such is the beauty of Saunders’s paintings. They are about life and all of its battles and victories, dirtiness and splendor.”

—Connie H. Choi, associate curator, The Studio Museum in Harlem, in the exhibition catalogue for Now Dig This! Art and Black Los Angeles 1960–1980, Hammer Museum, University of California, Los Angeles, 2011–2012"

...

"Saunders’s assemblage-style paintings frequently begin with a monochromatic black ground elaborated with white chalk—both a pointed reversal of the traditional figure-ground relationship and a nod to his decades spent as a teacher—to which he would subsequently add a range of other markings, materials, and talismans.

Expressionistic swaths of paint, minimalist motifs, line drawings, and passages of vibrant color tangle with found objects, signs, and doors collected from his urban environment, creating unexpected visual rhymes and resonances that reward careful and sustained looking."

...

"“From an environment of the lost, the discarded, Saunders creates another wholly inscribed world of found things in which chalk and metal and paint and wallpaper and toys and insignia combine to destabilize and soothe us—then to change us altogether like a tropical medicine belt. Glorious.”

—Toni Morrison in her catalogue introduction for Raymond Saunders, Stephen Wirtz Gallery, San Francisco, California, 1993"

...

"Untitled (1996) is exemplary of Saunders’s late style, which is loosely characterized by the artist’s embrace of a more limited palette and the occasional employment of a white ground instead of his signature black. It Wasn't Easy Being a First Grader (1979/1984) incorporates motifs that speak to Saunders’s lifelong role as an educator."

...

"As seen here, he often included children’s drawings and children’s book illustrations as part of the collaged elements in his compositions. The title of the present work overtly references grade school and the growing pains of youth, with the inclusion of crayons, cursive handwriting, and number tables appearing as emblems of early education."

...

"“Residue is a potent, active force, Saunders’ work attests, whether in material form or the shifting shapes of memory. Personal recollections of painting the living room when he was seven skirt alongside images extracted from collective memory.... The dissonance here yields terrific visual energy. There’s not a moment of blandness or passivity.”

—Leah Ollman, “An All-Embracing View of Life Emerges in Saunders’ Works,” Los Angeles Times, 2001"

...

"As well as an artist and a teacher, Saunders was a committed correspondent. Along with his large-scale, assemblage-style paintings, Saunders also made works on paper and intimate collages whose mixed materials point to the artist’s practices of note-taking—an extension of his mark-making that encompassed scribbling notes to himself, giving notes to his students, receiving notes from colleagues and friends—and the related routine of collecting."

...

"“In these small works on paper the images of Saunders’ graphic vocabulary combine in a resourceful variety of exuberant statements.... All the painterly effects of spatial and atmospheric definition are possible within this limited medium, and it is in this that Saunders excels.”

—Suzanne Foley, curator of Raymond Saunders, San Francisco Museum of Modern Art, 1971"

...

"His collages—which, along with graphite and watercolor drawings, were the subject of his first major museum presentation in a solo exhibition at the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art in 1971—are intimately scaled, elegant, and restrained compositions defined by the fine and occasionally whimsical quality of Saunders’s line. The artist employs lyrical contours and cryptic gestural marks to depict abstracted figures, text-like inscriptions, and organic objects such as plants, flowers, or vegetables."

...

"“Saunders does not see himself following in the tradition of Pop Art, Assemblage, or other art forms which incorporate found objects. Rather, he uses real objects to provide compositional, textural, and spatial contrasts; their psychological and narrative significance is secondary to formal issues.”

—Joy Feinberg, curator of Raymond Saunders: Recent Work, University Art Museum, University of California, 1976"

...

"Saunders was an archivist who gathered and kept objects and mementos both personal and cultural, precious and abandoned, and these materials appear throughout his work. This throughline is underscored by an illustrative selection of archival materials from his Oakland studio, which are displayed in vitrines installed in the gallery space and further demonstrate the artist’s lifelong impulse to annotate, keep in touch, and accumulate."

...

"These materials include selections from Saunders’s extensive collection of postcards, photographs, and stamps, as well as ephemera from exhibitions, conferences, and classes, among other documents from the artist’s life, one that produced a rich archive both professional and personal."

...

"Saunders’s tall, towering paintings inhabit a physicality that suggests both presence and displacement—embodying an artist who worked across mediums, formats, and cities to produce an inimitable and ever-evolving oeuvre. At once deliberately constructed and improvisatory, didactic and deeply felt, Saunders’s richly built surfaces conjure the fullness of life and its complications, allowing for a vast and nuanced multiplicity of meanings."

...

"“Saunders’ confidence is not displayed in glib ways; it is a quality one perceives through his paintings and the discipline of his methods, his very work ethic. While he is reluctant to offer interpretations of his work, what he does say communicates an understanding of, and respect for, the creative process he experiences.”

—Philip Linhares, curator of Raymond Saunders: Recent Work, Oakland Museum, 1994"]]></description>
<dc:subject>art losangeles raymondsaunders philiplinhares 1994 assemblage artists joyfeinberg arteducation education collage suzannefoley 1971 1976 sfmoma leahollman 2001 teaching howweteach pedagogy 1993 1996 tonimorrison 2011 2012 conniechoi artmaking classroom oakland pittsburgh archiving</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:13e64593d198/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:losangeles"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:raymondsaunders"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:philiplinhares"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1994"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:assemblage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:joyfeinberg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:arteducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:suzannefoley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1971"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1976"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sfmoma"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:leahollman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2001"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1993"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1996"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tonimorrison"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2011"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2012"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conniechoi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artmaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:classroom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:oakland"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pittsburgh"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:archiving"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/the-broken-record/">
    <title>The Broken Record</title>
    <dc:date>2026-02-22T00:59:38+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/the-broken-record/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The schools like Alpha School, AltSchool, Summit, and Rocketship are all strikingly dystopian insofar as they compromise, if not reject, any sort of agency for students; they compromise, if not reject, any sort of democratic vision for the classroom. School is simply an exercise in engineering and optimization: command and control and test-prep and feedback loops. There is no space for community or cooperation, no time for play -- there is no openness, no curiosity, no contemplation, no pause. There is no possibility for anything, other than what the algorithm predicts."]]></description>
<dc:subject>audreywatters 2026 edtech alphaschool altschool rocketship children democracy agency teaching howweteach chatbots opeanai artificialintelligence ai community optimization curiosity contemplation optimism productivity efficiency openness transparency moocs michaelpershan danmeyer emanuelmaiberg markzuckerberg reidhoffman marcandreessen learning howelearn pedagogy schools schooling samkriss roylee meta facebook cameras privacy surveillance highered highereducation colleges universities academia automation technooptimism chunginlee mooc technolgy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:2d78fa8c2787/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:audreywatters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alphaschool"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:altschool"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rocketship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:democracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:agency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatbots"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:opeanai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:optimization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:curiosity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:contemplation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:optimism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:productivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:efficiency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:transparency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:moocs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:michaelpershan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:danmeyer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:emanuelmaiberg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:markzuckerberg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reidhoffman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marcandreessen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:samkriss"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:roylee"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meta"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:facebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cameras"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:surveillance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colleges"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:automation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technooptimism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chunginlee"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mooc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technolgy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://danmeyer.substack.com/p/highlights-from-stanfords-aieducation">
    <title>Highlights from Stanford's AI+Education Summit</title>
    <dc:date>2026-02-21T21:44:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://danmeyer.substack.com/p/highlights-from-stanfords-aieducation</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Several good quotes. An interesting new study. A debate that was one, maybe two chili peppers spicy."

...

"The party is sobering up. The triumphalism of 2023 is out. The edtech rapture is no longer just one more model release away. Instead, from the first slide of the Summit above, panelists frequently argued that any learning gains from AI will be contingent on local implementation and just as likely to result in learning losses, such as those in the second column of the slide."

...

"Teacher Michael Taubman had the line that brought down the house.

<blockquote>In the last year or so, it’s really started to feel like we have 45 minutes together and the together part is what’s really mattering now. We can have screens involved. We can use AI. We should sometimes. But that is a human space. The classroom is taking on an almost sacred dimension for me now. It’s people gathering together to be young and human together, and grow up together, and learn to argue in a very complicated country together, and I think that is increasingly a space that education should be exploring in addition to pedagogy and content.</blockquote>"

...

"Look—this is more or less how the same crowd talked about MOOCs ten years ago. Copy and paste. And AI tutors will fall short of the same bar for the same reason MOOCs did: it’s humans who help humans do hard things. Ever thus. And so many of these technologies—by accident or design—fit a bell jar around the student. They put the kid into an airtight container with the technology inside and every other human outside. That’s all you need to know about their odds of success.

It’ll be another set of panelists in another ten years scratching their heads over the failure of chatbot tutors to transform K-12 education, each panelist now promising the audience that AR / VR / wearables / neural implants / et cetera will be different this time. It simply will."]]></description>
<dc:subject>danmeyer 2026 ai artificialintelligence edtech education schools schooling learning howwelearn teaching howweteach chatbots miriamrivera learningloss michaeltaubman llms openai khanacademy googel anthropic chatgpt cuilhermelichand creativity humanism pedagogy society johnhennessy moocs rebeccawinthrop susannaloeb neeravkingsland shantanusinha human humans learnlm mooc</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:feda499f59bb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:danmeyer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatbots"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:miriamrivera"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learningloss"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:michaeltaubman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:llms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:khanacademy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:googel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anthropic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatgpt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cuilhermelichand"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:creativity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnhennessy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:moocs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rebeccawinthrop"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:susannaloeb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neeravkingsland"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:shantanusinha"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:human"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learnlm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mooc"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://overthefield.substack.com/p/enthralling-little-minds-with-nature">
    <title>Enthralling Little Minds With Nature - by Hadden Turner</title>
    <dc:date>2026-02-21T07:27:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://overthefield.substack.com/p/enthralling-little-minds-with-nature</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["How to encourage children to take up natural history hobbies"

...

"Receiving a gift is a special and significant moment, a moment that may lead to great rewards, but a moment the receiver nevertheless possesses little control over. Gifts are often unexpected, undeserved, and, until the moment we receive them, unknown. We do not get to decide what we are given, or even if we will be given the gift in the first place; those decisions are in the hands of the giver alone. That being said, we do have control over two critical decisions in relation to a gift: whether we will accept it, and, more importantly, what we will do with it

When given with wisdom, generosity, and thoughtfulness, and when received with gratitude, gifts are powerful things. The most thoughtful and substantial ones may even change the life of the recipient — if, that is, they use it well. I have been fortunate to receive such a gift: a little green book my great grandmother gave me on my fourth Christmas. Neither of us knew at the time just how profoundly this little book was to set the course for the rest of my life; but for those looking on, the tell-tale signs that this was going to be a significant gift were plain — namely, my delight, captivation, and crucially, the subject of the book itself.

The little green book was a bird book, a most wonderful volume, filled with colourful illustrations of British birds alongside easy to understand facts, figures, and symbols. It was my very first field guide — an indispensable companion for any birdwatcher — and, for little Hadden, it was my window into the new and exciting world of ornithology; a world I am still exploring the length, breath, and depth of, and a world which continues to bring me delight with every new discovery that greets my eyes.

Not only had my great grandmother given me a thoughtful gift. She had given me something far greater than that; she had gifted me a hobby — and one which was set to develop into a core part of my life’s vocation as a naturalist.

***

As I have reflected on why this particular gift had such a profound and lasting impact on me, the factor I have concluded to be the most important is the young age at which I received it. Anyone who has had the privilege of spending time in the company of excitable little children will be well aware that their capacity for awe and enjoyment is relentless and infinite. Need I say more than “Do it again!”. This innate capacity for being enthralled is like dry kindling; all that may be required to ignite the flames of interest, captivation, and delight in their little hearts is a small spark of intrigue. There are few better and more effective sparks in this regard than the endless diversity and abundance of creatures in the natural world. All it may take is the sight of one lizard, one butterfly, one creepy crawly, or one beautiful kingfisher (which was the spark for me), to make a child tremble with delight and, perhaps, set in motion a chain of events that culminate in the adoption of a worthwhile hobby that continues to delight them for the rest of their lives.

At this point, I expect two questions are occupying in the minds of any parents, grandparents, and elder siblings who are reading this. “How can we best instil this delight for nature and the wilds in the hearts of our little ones?” and “How can this spark of delight be fanned into an enduring passion?” Concerning these questions, I have much to say, but I will focus my efforts in this piece on outlining what I believe to be the most effective strategies and helps from my own experience.

But before we even begin to consider our children and young ones, we must consider ourselves. It is difficult to pass on a passion and a hobby if we are not enthused by it ourselves. Children are born imitators; if we are bored by nature, it is likely so too will they. If we do not know the names of the creatures we are looking at, our children will also remain ignorant. If we find nature or certain creatures dirty and disgusting, our children will be trained to despise these things too. Our own personal relationship to the natural world may be the biggest help or the biggest hindrance to our children’s delight in it.

I firmly believe the natural world is one of God’s greatest gifts to each and every one of us. It is something which has been expertly designed to delight us and is one of the purest and most natural sources of human enjoyment there is. As delightful as honey is to our tongue, beautiful creatures should be to our eyes. I will even go as far as to say I believe there is something wrong with the person who stands unmoved by natural wonders both great and small or the one who persistently ignores the natural beauty and wonder all around them. If we never take time to “consider the birds” or “the lilies of the field”, then we are missing out on something we were made for and are ignoring God’s masterpieces. It is like someone spending all their time looking down at the floor whilst in the Louvre. With those who find nature boring or not worthy of their attention, it suggests to me that their affections and attentions are disordered and immature — especially so if they are captivated instead by triviality and the base things of this world.

I stress I am not arguing here that everyone must take up wildlife watching as a hobby or devote many hours of our lives to field craft. I do, though, believe all of us should, at the very least, be interested in nature, and that we should all take the time to appreciate, enjoy, and know a bit about the good creaturely gifts around us — and then make sure we fulfil our responsibility to pass this appreciation and awareness on to our children. I say all this because enjoying creation is part of what we were made for and is one of the greatest gifts we can give to our children — especially so when we do all this alongside them somewhere out there in the wonderful wilds.

A problem, though, that hinders us from noticing and delighting in nature is that we are daily flooded with an endless barrage of other distractions for our attention, most notably the great mass of trivial media on our screens. A substantial part of our efforts to cultivate our own delight in nature will, therefore, necessarily involve subduing these digital predators of our affections and attentions. For some, this may require radical action: prolonged digital fasts or permanent abstentions from some forms of digital media. For others, it will certainly involve retraining the direction of our instinctive gaze in those moments of transition and dead time: up towards the sky and trees or down to the flowers and the fields instead towards the screens in our pockets. This subduing and rejection of the digital becomes all the more vital with regards to our impressionable little ones. Thus, the primary piece of advice I will give for cultivating a love for nature is this: as far as it is possible, keep the screens away from your children.

As I have mentioned, young hearts and minds are highly impressionable and easily captivated. Whilst these dispositions are a great help in cultivating a love for nature, they also fraught with danger; children can be just as much captivated by screens, cartoons, and video games than they are by living and moving creatures. Even worse, it is likely that screens and media rank among the most potent forms of captivation, seeing as they are designed by their makers to be as addictive as possible. As moths are attracted to lights that give them no sustenance, children are all to easily attracted to screens that enthral them with nothingness and triviality. So, as far as it is possible, keep young eyes away from screens. By doing so you will give nature a chance to capture their attention instead.

This will not be easy. Screens and distractions surround those of us who live in urban environments, and even in our homes, the temptation of the screen is often ever-present. Keeping young eyes averted will be an uphill struggle; it will require will power, wisdom, and crucially, consistency. This is my second piece of advice: be consistent in exposing children to nature.

Not only will regularly going out into nature keep your children far away from the domain of the screen, but I have found that it is consistency above all else that nurtures competency and delight with regard to wildlife watching. Many are the hours I have spent since my youth out in the field, getting to know the names and identification features of many different species and becoming well aquatinted with their habits and behaviours. This consistent exposure to nature has matured into competency, and competency has matured into instinct. I now immediately know when entering a new environment what species are likely to be present, know without a second’s thought the identification of most of the birds I encounter even from a distance, and know how to interpret much of the behaviour and patterns I witness in the wilds.

The above are the marks of a well-trained naturalist but these instincts take time to form. There are no short cuts; hours upon hours of field work is necessary and so too are endless reserves of patience (for any birdwatcher, many hours will be spent looking at bushes waiting for yet-to-be-identified brown little birds to appear). But great are the rewards. My wife likes to joke I can never be bored wherever I am, for there is always something for me to see, enjoy, and know more about. She is right — and for this I have all those hours out in the field to thank.

I come next to competition, though with some degree of hesitancy. Great care needs to be taken in this regard so as not to encourage an overly competitive or acquisitive engagement with nature, perhaps best characterised by the most die-hard and compulsive “twitchers”1 who wish merely to see as many different species as possible. All they are interested in getting that all coveted tick in their books by any means possible (even to the detriment of the welfare of the creature in question) and then moving on to the next species. In effect, this is a form of “nature consumerism”, and it can be incredibly ugly.2 However, only the most addictive of temperaments will fall into this trap, and encouraging a bit of harmless competition, such as trying to find as many species as you can in a day, puts some stimulating fun into nature. Keeping a record of species seen in a book or field guide is also a great way to inspire children to want to see more and more of nature, which, in turn, will require spending more time in the field and travelling to new habitats if rarer species are to be ticked off.

Competition may well, then, provide the spark of inspiration and enjoyment necessary to delight children with nature and to keep them enthralled. If it leads them on to greater knowledge and understanding of the natural world and greater competencies in identification and field work, then I am wholly supportive of a bit of harmless competition. And perhaps, before you know it, you will have a competent little naturalist at your side who is teaching you a thing or two and who is spotting rare creatures before you do.

I now come to my final piece of advice. It is the simplest but perhaps most effective: do what my great grandmother did and give them a gift. A pair of good binoculars, a magnifying glass, a bird guide or a butterfly net. Give the children in your lives a gift that opens up new worlds of delight and wonder and encourage them on in the hobby you have gifted them. Provide them with first little spark that may grow into the flame of a fully-fledged and enduring passion; a passion that will delight them for a lifetime.

Nature is struggling in our modern and industrialising world — severely so. Many species are declining at rates which ought to make us ashamed, pollution is affecting almost all natural habitats, and vast numbers of creatures are being made homeless on a daily basis by our industrial and economic actions. So much of this destruction and loss is allowed to happen because we do not see and enjoy the creatures around us, for, as the general principles tell us, what we do not see we cannot care for; what we remain in ignorance of we cannot defend; and what we do not love we will have no motivation to protect. Thus, it may well be that the greatest work of conservation in our age is done when a grandparent gives their grandchild a bird book for Christmas. For this seemingly small and insignificant event may just be the spark that first ignites the passion of the great naturalists and conservationists of the future."]]></description>
<dc:subject>2026 children nature observation birds gifts attention education curiosity haddenturner naturalhistory parenting teaching howweteach modeling</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:3deb9f430a2f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:observation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:birds"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gifts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:curiosity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:haddenturner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:naturalhistory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:parenting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:modeling"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://aeon.co/videos/ai-isnt-merely-bad-at-writing-it-does-not-and-cannot-write">
    <title>AI isn’t merely bad at writing. It does not and cannot write | Aeon Videos</title>
    <dc:date>2026-02-20T05:40:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://aeon.co/videos/ai-isnt-merely-bad-at-writing-it-does-not-and-cannot-write</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["‘Why did you write it?’

As an English professor, the YouTube video essayist known as ‘josh (with parentheses)’ has, over the past few years, witnessed a faculty-wide panic about students using large language models (LLMs) to plagiarise assignments. The experience inspired him to create this sprawling video essay on the meaning of LLMs – what they can do and, more to the point, what they can’t. To him, this includes the very act of writing itself, which he contends, borrowing the words of Stephen King, requires a ‘meeting of the minds’. The entertaining and insightful piece spans the poetry of Gertrude Stein and contemporary ‘brainrot’ videos, all while he prods at ChatGPT and his friends. Travelling to some surprising places, he generates an unusually perceptive meditation on what might, at first glance, seem like a near-exhausted topic."

[direct link to video:

"You are a better writer than AI. (Yes, you.)"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5wLQ-8eyQI

"As an English professor, I hear people at every level talking constantly about the use of AI in writing, but nobody seems to be talking about the thing that matters most: AI cannot write. Writing has language, and writing has communication, but the communication does not live inside the language. This is a video essay about what writing is. Meetings of the mind with Stephen King, Gertrude Stein, Lewberger, Max Teeth, CyberGrapeUK, and others--but by necessity not with ChatGPT.

Recorded on a Macbook Pro using OBS and a little bit of editing trickery. If you look at the timestamps on the files you can probably deduce that when I say "two weeks ago" I mean about four months ago."]]]></description>
<dc:subject>ai artificialintelligence llms chatgpt writing howwewrite videoessays gertrudestein stephenking teaching howweteach edtech technology maxteeth language communication policy joshwithparenthesis modernism ernesthemingway fscottfitzgerald sinclairlewis thorntonwilder jamesjoyce ezrapound nonsense poetry poems decoding keatonpatti lingusitics meaning meaningmaking understanding titosantana autocomplete linguistics tenderbuttons connection human humanism humans openai literature humanexperience consciousness perception experience subjectivity humansubjectivity plagiarism mashups recombinance remixing milesdavis lcdsoundsystem media mediamixing kleptones dangermouse macglocky cubism lasmeninas picasso velázquez recombination variation thinking howwethink education humanunderstanding criticalthinking context confusion playfulness 2025 notice turingtest personhood senses sensoryperception feeling feelings logic algortihms victorhugo lesmisérables damienowens onelsaymore brainrot intention conversation barbaraeh</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:906a8da3152e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:llms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatgpt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:videoessays"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gertrudestein"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:stephenking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:maxteeth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:joshwithparenthesis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:modernism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ernesthemingway"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fscottfitzgerald"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sinclairlewis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thorntonwilder"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jamesjoyce"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ezrapound"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nonsense"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:poetry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:poems"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:decoding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:keatonpatti"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lingusitics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meaning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meaningmaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:understanding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:titosantana"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:autocomplete"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tenderbuttons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:connection"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:human"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanexperience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:consciousness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:perception"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:experience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:subjectivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humansubjectivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:plagiarism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mashups"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:recombinance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:remixing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:milesdavis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lcdsoundsystem"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mediamixing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:kleptones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dangermouse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:macglocky"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cubism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lasmeninas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:picasso"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:velázquez"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:recombination"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:variation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwethink"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanunderstanding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:criticalthinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:context"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:confusion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:playfulness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2025"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:notice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:turingtest"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:personhood"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:senses"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sensoryperception"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:feeling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:feelings"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:logic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:algortihms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:victorhugo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lesmisérables"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:damienowens"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:onelsaymore"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:brainrot"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:intention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:conversation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:barbaraeh"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://bayareacurrent.com/sf-educators-win-protections-against-ai-but-tech-expansion-continues/">
    <title>SF Educators Win Protections Against AI, but Tech Expansion Continues</title>
    <dc:date>2026-02-19T22:12:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://bayareacurrent.com/sf-educators-win-protections-against-ai-but-tech-expansion-continues/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["There’s money behind AI in SF schools. Striking teachers don’t want it taking jobs."]]></description>
<dc:subject>simonbrown 2026 ai artificialintelligence teaching howweteach sfusd schools education schooling pedagogy labor work autimation marcbenioff salesforce sanfrancisco oakland uesf mariasu teannatillery amira chatgpt openai</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:b7242235c241/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:simonbrown"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sfusd"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:autimation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marcbenioff"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:salesforce"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sanfrancisco"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:oakland"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:uesf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mariasu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teannatillery"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:amira"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatgpt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openai"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.404media.co/students-are-being-treated-like-guinea-pigs-inside-an-ai-powered-private-school/">
    <title>'Students Are Being Treated Like Guinea Pigs:' Inside an AI-Powered Private School</title>
    <dc:date>2026-02-18T17:54:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.404media.co/students-are-being-treated-like-guinea-pigs-inside-an-ai-powered-private-school/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Leaked documents reveal the inner workings of Alpha School, which both the press and the Trump administration have applauded. The documents show Alpha School's AI is generating faulty lessons that sometimes do "more harm than good.""

...

"Alpha School’s company Workflowy lists “ideas for enhanced tracking & monitoring of kids beyond screentime data.” The goal, according to the note written in Workflowy, was to monitor the way kids are using apps and then use AI to analyze that activity, flag inappropriate behavior like bullying or drug use, and produce a general report about what kids are doing. “Potentially can detect things like changes in friend group or sentiment to flag potential emotional issues to parents,” one bullet point said. 

Alpha School identified Bark, an app that allows parents to surveil their children’s online activity, as potentially offering some of these features, but also said it was “pretty limited” in what data it could get on what kids were doing on apps like Instagram. Alpha School then lists what it calls “hacky” ideas beyond “normal APIs” to get more data on what kids are doing. This includes “fake social media accout [sic] bots to follow the kids and collect what they like, post, comment, etc,” and “use the kid’s logins and scraping the data (would give not just public info like from following but also stuff like the DMs).”

Nothing 404 Media has seen in internal Alpha School documents or heard from former employees indicates that the company ever seriously pursued any of these ideas, but close surveillance of students is fundamental to how Alpha School operates. 

Alpha School makes an app called StudyReel, which monitors activity on a student’s screen, their computer camera and microphone, what apps and websites they’re using, and how they’re moving their mouse. If StudyReel notices that a student is using an unrelated website or app, idling, or not at their computer, the app can nudge them to get back to work. If StudyReel notices that a student is struggling with a particular question, it can direct them to an AI tutor or assign other lessons that will help them. 

Internally and in public messaging, Alpha School refers to these recordings of students as “game tape,” which it reviews in order to help students and improve its teaching. In October, a Wired investigation revealed how this close surveillance upset some students and eventually led their parents to pull them from Alpha School. 

The type of surveillance Alpha School uses on students is functionally identical to the type of surveillance used by Crossover, a platform that matches companies with remote workers. Crossover is also owned by Alpha School’s principal Joe Liemandt. Much like Alpha School, Crossover requires employees to install spyware on their computer that records their screens and tracks their mouse movements to make sure they are being productive. Previous reporting described Crossover as a “software sweatshop,” and that the company’s goal is to turn workers into “algorithms” and “human CPUs.”

“I think it would be great if people understand that Alpha School basically has the same psychological effects as Crossover,” one person with knowledge of Alpha School’s software told me. 

“The idea of installing software that tracks and records everything our kids do and is designed to not let us turn it off is understandably uncomfortable,” an employee who was listed as the product manager of StudyReel wrote in the Workflowy. “We need to do more to justify it, be better at selling it.” 

To do this, the product manager suggested the company “Find StudyReel recordings of students reading the coaching and enjoying it,” and to “Get consent from parents to use it as promotional material (too far?).”

Internally, Alpha School wrote that the “KEY MESSAGE” about StudyReel is that “99% of recordings are never watched by a human” and that “Your data is safe.” However, I saw that Alpha School maintains a spreadsheet which contains a list of student names, their grade, and an archive of their recordings which shows what’s happening on their screen, their remote tutor, and a video of the student taken via their webcam. This spreadsheet is not only available to anyone at the company, but is also shared in such a way that anyone on the internet who has the link can access the spreadsheet and the videos of students.

“If I wanted to, I could go there and just watch students. Anybody who worked in this capacity could watch the videos of students working on their laptops,” one Alpha School employee told me. “So many hours of just students’ faces [...] I'm not sure parents understand exactly what's going on with that data [...] I don't think that this is clearly communicated, because I'm sure there'd be a lot more opt outs if it was.”

Alpha School acknowledged my request for comment but did not provide one in time for publication. 

The former Alpha School employees I talked to all agreed that the company’s goal of condensing core education requirements to two hours of learning in order to give students more time for other, more enriching activities is a good, admirable goal. They also agreed that Alpha School students’ test scores are very high compared to the national average, though they credit the human “guides” at Alpha School for that accomplishment. 

Alpha School’s cofounder MacKenzie Price also admits in the interview with the Hard Fork Podcast that it’s possible the high test scores could be explained by selection bias. Alpha School is an expensive private school. Most students at Alpha School have parents who are concerned about their education and the financial means to send them there, which might be a bigger determining factor in their academic success. Multiple studies have shown that grades, SAT scores, and standardized tests are highly correlated with income. 

The issue according to these former employees is that Alpha School’s two hour learning program usually requires much more than two hours, and more importantly, that the AI products are not working as advertised. 

“Basically the claim that this is some AI magic and much more advanced than other tools is incorrect,” one former employee said. "

[See also:

"Inside an AI-Powered School"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fy-38hIhykQ

"This week we start with Emanuel’s wild story about Alpha School, a very hyped AI-powered school. Emanuel got leaked documents and spoke to former employees. After the break, Sam tells us what happens when someone decides to make an AI nudify OnlyFans with your likeness. In the subscribers-only section, Joseph tells us about the agencies buying GeoSpy, an AI that can geolocate photos in seconds.

2:49 - Understood: Deepfake Porn Empire: https://link.mgln.ai/N8BSUA
5:47 - 'Students Are Being Treated Like Guinea Pigs:' Inside an AI-Powered Private School: https://www.404media.co/students-are-being-treated-like-guinea-pigs-inside-an-ai-powered-private-school/
40:01 - 'The Most Dejected I’ve Ever Felt:' Harassers Made Nude AI Images of Her, Then Started an OnlyFans: https://www.404media.co/grok-nudify-ai-images-impersonation-onlyfans/

Image credit: Unsplash

Subscriber's Story - Cops Are Buying ‘GeoSpy’, an AI That Geolocates Photos in Seconds: https://www.404media.co/cops-are-buying-geospy-ai-that-geolocates-photos-in-seconds/ "]]]></description>
<dc:subject>emmanuelmaiberg alphaschool ai artificialintelligence schools schooling education children 2026 donaldtrump mackenzieprice surveillance bossware joeliemandt management remotework lindamcmahon 2hourlearning criticalthinking hype aihype aibubble llms chatbots data privacy technology edtech workflowy ixl commoncore khanacademy niceacademy ckla mcgraw-hill crossover studyreel grades grading sat inequality chatgpt curriculum instruction teaching howweteach pedagogy lessonplanning scraping copyright ip intellectualproperty textbooks albert.io</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:8290a6904240/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:emmanuelmaiberg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alphaschool"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:donaldtrump"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mackenzieprice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:surveillance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bossware"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:joeliemandt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:management"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:remotework"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lindamcmahon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2hourlearning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:criticalthinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hype"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aihype"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:aibubble"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:llms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatbots"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:workflowy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ixl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:commoncore"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:khanacademy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:niceacademy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ckla"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mcgraw-hill"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:crossover"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:studyreel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:grades"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:grading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sat"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inequality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatgpt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:curriculum"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:instruction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lessonplanning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:scraping"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ip"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:intellectualproperty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:textbooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:albert.io"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://freddiedeboer.substack.com/p/no-thats-not-what-the-research-says">
    <title>No, That's Not What &quot;the Research&quot; Says About Exam Schools</title>
    <dc:date>2026-02-18T02:00:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://freddiedeboer.substack.com/p/no-thats-not-what-the-research-says</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><dc:subject>freddiedeboer schools schooling education testing pedagogy teaching howweteach 2026 jessicawinter inequality giftedandtalented publicschools atilaabdulkadiroğlu joshuaangrist paragpathak meritocracy nyc examschools china selectivity standardizedtesting douglasdetterman edunihilism sociaslmobility intelligence elitism patronage data egalitarianism charterschools sat enrollment admissions us achievement gpa nepotism</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:39a977b186f3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:freddiedeboer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:testing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jessicawinter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inequality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:giftedandtalented"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:publicschools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:atilaabdulkadiroğlu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:joshuaangrist"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:paragpathak"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meritocracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nyc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:examschools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:china"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:selectivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:standardizedtesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:douglasdetterman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edunihilism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sociaslmobility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:intelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elitism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:patronage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:egalitarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:charterschools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sat"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:enrollment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:admissions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:achievement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gpa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nepotism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://timothyburke.substack.com/p/academia-rigor-mortis">
    <title>Academia: Rigor Mortis - by Timothy Burke - Eight by Seven</title>
    <dc:date>2026-02-16T04:01:12+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://timothyburke.substack.com/p/academia-rigor-mortis</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Work the problem from the other end. What do we know about the outcomes for the “A” students of yore, when the A allegedly really meant something? Well, there is some evidence, and it’s not really very comforting for the “we need accurate signals to sort meritocratic worth” camp. The famous Harvard Study of Adult Development, for example, shows both that meritocratic achievement isn’t well mapped to generally good life outcomes and that there have been a lot of B students who have done very well for themselves both in terms of being happy and healthy and in terms of leadership and contribution to society.

More anecdotally, I would point out that I’ve long kept my eye out in memoirs and biographies for a relationship between high academic achievement in college and general achievements in life (artistic, political, entrepreneurial, scholarly, and so on) and there doesn’t seem to be much of a correlation, let alone a clear line of causation, between doing an indifferent job as a college student and being a high-achieving person later on.

Except (perhaps) in one context: you are generally going to find that professors are people who excelled in school, received high grades, and overcame difficult academic challenges, in whatever era of rigor and intensity they personally passed through. Although you do meet astonishingly accomplished scholars and wonderfully gifted teachers who struggled in undergraduate or graduate work (personally, I sometimes think that’s why they are wonderful teachers and highly motivated scholars—they know how to teach and think their way to someone who isn’t a natural at it), broadly speaking academia is a place where high academic performance is the backdrop to becoming a professional and succeeding as one.

Since I think that the education I aspire to provide and the academic institutions I deeply admire are consequential for students and their futures, I believe that good outcomes follow from quality teaching. Since I think quality teaching involves strong feedback loops that include critical assessment of relative performance by individuals and expectations of improvement that can be described and measured, I agree there’s some relationship between what you set as expectations and about telling a student when they’ve fallen short of expectations. Since I agree that some of what I’d like to expect from students, like reading deeply and well or communicating with expressive distinctiveness, is changing at the moment and not for the better, I’m open to thinking about what to do about that change.

When I think about the difference between different students I’ve taught, I think both in terms of the cultivation of repertoires of skills and interests and the sharpening of a student’s ability to narrate their interests in relation to longer-term goals and ambitions. I think about the development of intrinsic motivations over four years and beyond. I see some students really improve in their relative performance within the skills and interests they’re narrowing towards and in how they explain what they know and want, and in the ways they work on their own motivations. I see some students actually get worse in these competencies, and sometimes it is because they’re not paying attention to what they’re doing. Sometimes they’re getting overwhelmed by contradictory guidance from family, professors, mentors, or poor-quality signals from the wider environment about the future that may await them. Sometimes I see a mismatch, that what a student is capable of is not what they’ve decided to do. Or I see a student who indulging some negative feedback loops in terms of clarity of thought, ambition and effort, for any number of reasons—poor mental health, self-pity, uncertainty, fear, anger at an institutional environment that is in fact not built for their presence or ambition. 

Sometimes I see students where I am absolutely confident that this is not the time for them to be in college, but that there will be a time. In many cases, the time to do it right will never come to pass if they don’t work through the time now. Sometimes it’s the lack of thriving now that makes an understanding of later thriving possible. I don’t know how to get that across to a student sometimes, and I’m really sure I don’t want to attempt to tell the world about it through one simple grade. Is that what a B- or a C means to people looking at a transcript? That shouldn’t mean “throw this person away”: it often means instead “put this in the wine cellar for a while and let it age, it’s going to be brilliant later on.”

I don’t think faculty anywhere should attach themselves easily to the maintenance of a past meritocratic ideology, nor assume that grades and standards once upon a time produced such a meritocracy via the maintenance of a clear signaling regime that was avidly consumed by several generations of employers and graduate institutions. If nothing else, that proposition crashes into a way of easy falsifiability by noting that political and economic leadership in the contemporary United States in 2026 is still very associated with past regimes of selective higher education and allegedly rigorous standards of achievement, despite the fact that numerous Ivy League graduates in the Republican Party have pronounced their unending disdain for the educations they rode into professional life and political power.

At the very least, the real actions and demonstrated skills of the people in power now may tell us that there is something far less directly causal about the standards and content of higher education and the professional comportment and ethics that follow from that training. I don’t see anywhere I look, in fact, a tight predictive relationship between how we have measured academic performance within a particular band of selective higher education in any era and any distribution of socioeconomic status or professional accomplishment later on. Let alone happiness, contribution to the world, love, joy, or wisdom. Whatever we do that matters, it matters in ways that are not so easily sorted and annotated. "]]></description>
<dc:subject>timothyburke academia highered highereducation colleges universities education gradeinflation grades grading training skills knowledge globalization tests testing socialmobility society meritocracy teaching howweteach pedagogy ideology power economics love joy wisdom happiness contribution whatatters standards content ivyleague politics leadership economy signaling mentalhealth self-pity uncertainty fear anger institutions criticalthinking motivation intrinsicmotivation change outcomes expectations relationships communication presence ambition</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:1c25d7550b4d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:timothyburke"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colleges"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gradeinflation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:grades"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:grading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:training"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:skills"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:knowledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:globalization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tests"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:testing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmobility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meritocracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ideology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:power"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:love"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:joy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:wisdom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:happiness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:contribution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:whatatters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:content"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ivyleague"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:leadership"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:signaling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mentalhealth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:self-pity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:uncertainty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fear"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:anger"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:institutions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:criticalthinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:motivation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:intrinsicmotivation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:change"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:outcomes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:expectations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:relationships"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:presence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ambition"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://missionlocal.org/2026/02/sf-teachers-salaries-sfusd-strike/">
    <title>How much do S.F. teachers make vs. city workers? Much less. </title>
    <dc:date>2026-02-15T23:19:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://missionlocal.org/2026/02/sf-teachers-salaries-sfusd-strike/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The average schoolteacher makes $20K less than the average librarian, and a whole lot less than police, firefighters, leg aides, and nurses"]]></description>
<dc:subject>sfusd teachers teaching howweteach sanfrancisco sffd sfpd comparison salaries labor work</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:c8dc645eaea9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sfusd"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teachers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sanfrancisco"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sffd"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sfpd"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:comparison"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:salaries"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:work"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2026/02/dont-call-it-a-comeback/">
    <title>Don’t Call it a Comeback - Front Porch Republic</title>
    <dc:date>2026-02-05T21:32:27+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2026/02/dont-call-it-a-comeback/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["We may ask ourselves how we can defend academic integrity from AI, but we should first ask how we became so vulnerable to AI in academia."]]></description>
<dc:subject>elizabethstice ai artificialintelligence academia pedagogy highered highereducation education teaching howweteach learning howwelearn colleges universities covid-19 pandemic coronavirus cheating assessment testing standardizedtesting online internet web joshuatravis innovation edtech technology chromebooks rodenyscott ferranadrià bluebooks policy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:22c3073d3c0e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elizabethstice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colleges"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:covid-19"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pandemic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:coronavirus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cheating"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:assessment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:testing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:standardizedtesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:joshuatravis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:innovation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chromebooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rodenyscott"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ferranadrià"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bluebooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://calmatters.org/commentary/2026/02/test-scores-schools-california-teachers/">
    <title>Opinion | California’s teachers can’t fix low test scores alone</title>
    <dc:date>2026-02-04T21:33:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://calmatters.org/commentary/2026/02/test-scores-schools-california-teachers/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["California’s latest standardized test results have triggered the usual alarm: Why are students underperforming? 

But the familiar narrative — blaming teachers, curriculum or school culture — misses deeper structural realities behind the numbers.

Just 47% of students met English standards and 36% met math standards, according to the 2024–25 California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress results. On the National Assessment of Educational Progress exam, only 29% of California 4th-graders and 25% of  8th-graders scored proficient in reading and math. 

These numbers look stark, but in context they reveal far more about the conditions California children are growing up in than the quality of classroom instruction.

California educates a disproportionate share of children experiencing housing insecurity. A 2024 analysis found that 4% of California students were homeless, with some counties reaching 16%. The California Department of Education reports 230,443 homeless students statewide, a 26% increase over five years that mirrors broader trends in affordability, overcrowding and displacement. 

Poverty and residential instability suppress academic outcomes across states. Still, California’s much higher share of students facing these hardships and attending public schools — rather than being absorbed into private ones — exerts a downward pressure on statewide scores.

Another defining factor is California’s substantial English learner population. According to the Public Policy Institute of California, current and former English learner students score 16–17 percentage points lower, on average, than peers who were never classified as English learners.

This is not evidence of system failure; it reflects the time and stability required to learn academic English. California’s public schools serve more English learner students than any other state. These students need multi-year support, consistent teaching and predictable housing.

Pandemic recovery, too, remains uneven. California’s national assessment results are still below pre-pandemic levels, and the lowest-performing students lost the most ground — an inequity that the Public Policy Institute and CalMatters have repeatedly documented. Chronic absenteeism also has not returned to pre-2020 levels.

Additionally, in some higher-income districts, many of the highest-achieving students now opt out of the state’s standardized testing altogether, meaning statewide averages increasingly reflect a more skewed testing pool.

Who’s not taking the tests?

The least-discussed factor may be the most important: who is not included in California’s test scores. 

The state and national tests rely almost entirely on public school samples. Private school students — who are disproportionately affluent, stably housed and high-performing — are not included in state averages. According to the California Department of Education, 494,464 students attend private schools statewide, representing 7.8% of all K–12 students. 

In San Francisco, the share reaches nearly 30%. A full county-by-county breakdown is available here. 

The exclusion of these students reshapes the public school landscape. Public schools end up serving a much more concentrated population of high-need students, independent of teaching quality. And the fiscal consequences are severe: public-school funding follows enrollment. When families move to private schools, districts lose revenue.

KQED reports that San Francisco Unified’s loss of 4,000 students cost the district roughly $80 million annually, or $20,000 per student. 

Fewer students mean fewer counselors, fewer reading specialists, and fewer supports that help struggling learners succeed. Loss of federal funding also affected English learners and other support services, exacerbating the problem.

Improving the odds

Raising California’s test scores requires solving the right problem. Scores are low because a higher proportion of children live in deep poverty, experience housing instability or homelessness, are learning English, or are attending school inconsistently — and because a significant share of higher-income students is not in the testing pool at all.

Test scores improve when children’s conditions improve. That means expanding stable, affordable housing; adopting and scaling the science of reading statewide; providing targeted, meaningful support for English learners; reducing chronic absenteeism, and stabilizing district funding in communities experiencing enrollment loss.

California’s public schools are doing the most challenging work with the fewest advantages. If we continue judging them without acknowledging who they serve — and who they don’t — we will continue diagnosing the wrong problem and offering the wrong solutions."]]></description>
<dc:subject>jillstegman 2026 education schools schooling standardizedtesting testing panedmic poverty teaching howweteach policy sfusd inequality housing homelessness housingcrisis california learning howwelearn children childhoodpoverty society absenteeism covid-19 coronavirus pandemic privateschools publicschools enrollment funding revenue</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:49f8bfd19860/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jillstegman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:standardizedtesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:testing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:panedmic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:poverty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sfusd"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inequality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:housing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:homelessness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:housingcrisis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:california"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:childhoodpoverty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:absenteeism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:covid-19"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:coronavirus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pandemic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:privateschools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:publicschools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:enrollment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:funding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:revenue"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.vulture.com/article/justin-mcdaniel-existential-despair-course.html">
    <title>Justin McDaniel Found a Way to Make Students Read Again</title>
    <dc:date>2026-01-18T00:16:41+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.vulture.com/article/justin-mcdaniel-existential-despair-course.html</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Gluttons for Punishment
Justin McDaniel has developed a cult following for getting his students to read — as long as they follow his rules."

[via:
https://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2026/01/memorization-gamification-sanctification/

"Lila Shapiro reports on a strange teacher with a strange method of getting students to read. McDaniel doesn’t sound like a healthy man, and cults of personality are also unhealthy, but I’m always intrigued by these Ernest-Shackleton-style sales pitches that seem compelling in a milieu where many students are desperate for someone to give them a challenge: “In his popular class Existential Despair, the students gather one evening each week for seven or eight hours to read an entire book in total silence, then discuss it in a darkened classroom. Some had never read a whole novel before. ‘I’d be lucky if I got through one every four years,’ said a recent graduate named Ryan, who has floppy hair parted in the middle and a marketing degree from Wharton, Penn’s business school. After McDaniel’s class, he said, ‘I got into a rhythm: Every night before bed, I put my phone in another room and I knocked out one chapter.’”"]]]></description>
<dc:subject>reading howweread teaching howweteach education colleges universities pedagogy justinmcdaniel academia 2206 lilashapiro attention upenn</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:1a8b1c7237ee/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colleges"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:justinmcdaniel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2206"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lilashapiro"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:upenn"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/spot-the-difference/">
    <title>Spot the Difference</title>
    <dc:date>2026-01-17T03:59:33+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/spot-the-difference/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[""School hasn't changed in hundreds of years." So goes the story invoked by politicians, entrepreneurs, and journalists -- a cliche often followed with an urgent call for school administrators to buy and teachers to adopt the latest technological gadgetry, gadgetry that's poised so these storytellers insist, to "revolutionize education," to utterly transform how teaching and learning will happen.

Of course, school has changed over the last century, in ways both big and small. (This is, as many of you know, some of the Introduction to Teaching Machines, which opens by arguing that Sal Khan’s “history of education,” just one of these popular “schools haven’t changed” stories, is wrong.) There have been changes in demographics, laws, expectations, pedagogies, and science, just for starters. But I’d say that we can no longer pretend that technological changes, particularly those brought about by digitization, are somehow yet to happen in education. Computers are always marketed to schools as "the future." But they are also very much now the past.

Even “AI,” which is [barf emoji] heralded as the latest and greatest revolution humankind has ever seen, is old. “AI” has been a part of education technology now for over fifty years.

2026 marks the 100th anniversary of Sidney Pressey's landmark article that launched the whole teaching machine industry: "A simple apparatus which gives tests and scores-- and teaches." Pressey, like many early educational psychologists, had worked on early efforts to develop standardized testing -- at first a way to rank and rate soldiers in World War I and then a way to rank and rate students. Pressey and others believed that an educational machinery could automate both testing and, importantly, teaching. And while his device predated the computer by decades, the digital tools that followed have never really broken from this legacy, one bound up in eugenics, behaviorism, control. Indeed, these are the values that underpin education technology to this day.

And these ideas, these technologies have changed education. They have reshaped how we think about thinking (the pervasiveness of the mind-as-machine metaphor); they have altered pedagogical practices; they have shifted the kinds of work that students and teachers do, along with the ways in which they do them. They have shaped the expectations of what students and teachers believe they can do -- not just the “everyone should learn to code” stuff and the twisting of the purpose of education to be solely about job training and “career and future readiness,” but about how students understand their own abilities, how they see (or don’t see) their own agency, how they control (or don’t control) their own inquiry, curiosity, attention.

The algorithms tell you who you are, who you can be, what you should do; you cannot be trusted, students have been told by the machinery for decades now, to know yourself ...as anything other than a consumer, that is.

<blockquote>“Formatting as many minds as possible, shaping people’s desires, recrafting their symbolic world, blurring the distinction between reality and fiction, and, eventually, colonizing their unconscious have become key operations in the dissemination of microfascism in the interstices of the real.” – Achille Mbembe, Necropolitics</blockquote>

As one of the core ideologies of computing is individualism, education technologies have served to undermine a democratic vision of schooling -- often quite explicitly through the funding of various educational initiatives by the tech industry’s wealthy investors. Powerful forces have convinced us to invest in computers, but not in one another, not in people; and we’ve dismantled democracy with a shrug -- but hey, at least the kids have Internet.

The damage to education is even more awful, even more insidious than this: the kinds of pedagogical practices that these technologies encourage -- students working alone, “at their own pace,” for starters -- have helped to undermine our shared understanding of, our shared respect for one another. The answer, these technologies insist, is in the machine, not in one another.

The machine, so the “AI” supporters now insist, is vastly superior to the human. Why learn when you can never be as fast or as shiny as a computer? Why even try? Why even practice? Why even bother?

Epistemic nihilism is a fundamental element of this surrender to an “AI”-assisted technofascism; but perhaps we should look at how this has been building -- has been built into -- education technologies for a much much longer time."]]></description>
<dc:subject>audrewatters 2026 edtech technology schools schooling change history sidneypressey ai artificialintelligence teachingmachines howweteach teaching computers computing thinking howwethink labor work nihilism achillembembe necropolitics reality microfascism technofascism fascism</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:ff0a28c3702c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:audrewatters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:change"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sidneypressey"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teachingmachines"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:computing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:thinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwethink"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nihilism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:achillembembe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:necropolitics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:microfascism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technofascism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fascism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2026/01/in-praise-of-bibliographies/">
    <title>In Praise of Bibliographies, by Christine Norvell (2026) - Front Porch Republic</title>
    <dc:date>2026-01-15T20:47:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.frontporchrepublic.com/2026/01/in-praise-of-bibliographies/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Accessible and hospitable."

...

"Whenever I’ve taught research methods to middle school and high school students, I’ve often claimed a magic resource exists for the object of their research. Sometimes, just sometimes, a scholar, author, or historian is so fluent in their topic that they clearly credit numerous others in a single text. And that book is magic in its ability to point to ideas, connections, subtopics, and other books and journals. I attempt to inspire my students to read bibliographies and endnotes with that in mind, to think of it like an investigation. Some do find a magic resource, but only a few experience the thrill of the hunt and the sigh of relief that help has been found.

Sometimes you find that magic book in a bibliography; sometimes it’s hiding in an old-school footnote, “See Charles Augustus Milverton for further thoughts on acquiring the personal correspondence of others (Blackmailing for Everyone, 1880).” I look it up, and there it is. Milverton has already done a chunk of research and written on the very thing I need! I order the book immediately. If only it were always this easy.

I found this to be true years ago in my own research stacks when I was reading lots of Willa Cather’s short and long fiction. The fiction I could find easily, but I also had to know what other scholars had already said. I wouldn’t want my research interest (or thesis!) to duplicate another’s. In my early Cather research, I was borrowing books from within the local library system and through interlibrary loans. Some books were helpful. Many were not. It’s the age-old riddle of research work, much like perusing a flea market looking for a valuable antique. I had to determine what was valuable to me. That Cather culling helped me know what to invest in and literally purchase for my own library.

I distinctly remember Sharon O’Brien’s Willa Cather: The Emerging Voice (Oxford University Press, 1987). O’Brien wove biography and literary analysis together, which was easy to see at the end of each chapter in her extensive footnotes. That, along with a thorough subject index, made it a handy resource.

Predating O’Brien’s work, though, was James Woodress’s Willa Cather: Her Life and Art (University of Nebraska Press, 1970). His “Bibliography and Notes” section was and is a wonder! Woodress introduced it “as a convenience for the reader,” and it was—a convenience store gas station with everything you could want. Woodress first listed Cather’s works in order, a perfectly normal and expected aid, but then he detailed all the books written about her before his book was published in 1970, all before the Wiki lists of the internet existed. Chapter by chapter, Woodress proceeded to explain where he found his information and where he made his connections. He credited all of those in the Cather community who had gone before him and made it incredibly easy to find needed resources. It was much more than an annotated bibliography.

Here’s an example. Chapter 4 is titled “Literary Debut,” and Woodress’s bibliographic notes begin by mentioning where the Nebraska State Journal letters were reprinted in Europe and in The World and the Parish. He kindly says fellow scholar Brown needs to update his notes about this fact. Then Woodress lists two articles from 1903 and 1958 before describing where Cather’s original version of the poem “Prairie Dawn” was published before she made “substantive changes.” For anyone trying to chase connections between her letters and publications or researching the fine points of a given year, Woodress is like a brilliant investigator, generously sharing his notes for every chapter

For decades, many books across subjects have included a “Further Reading” section, perhaps providing a statement or brief paragraph for certain resources. It’s not a new practice, but it’s hardly standard. I have hope that that is changing. In “Bibliographies for the People: How Trade Books Can Effectively Communicate Our Expertise,” Rhiannon Garth Jones and Matthew Gabriele offer a newer idea, an extension of traditional annotation. Jones and Gabriele describe how they came to write their bibliographies, hospitably catering to both the academic and the public reader, to those who had asked them as historians, Where do I start to learn about . . .?

By way of example, Gabriele describes how he and his co-author in The Bright Ages: A New History of Medieval Europe (Harper, 2021) created their “Further Reading” section. Like Woodress, they proceed with a chapter-by-chapter approach, introducing readers to “general overviews, cutting-edge scholarship on specific topics, and, perhaps most important, primary sources in translation.” It’s a passion project. They share their expertise while acknowledging the scholars before them. They call it a discursive bibliography, “an invitation to the reader to explore the past with us as historians.”

Jones also includes a traditional bibliography in her All Roads Lead to Rome: Why We Think of the Roman Empire Daily, but in addition to these chapter-by-chapter notes, she chose to include a separate section with citations for publicly accessible resources like podcasts, public essays and blogs, open-access translations of primary sources, and trade books or books available for free online. Jones calls it citation ethics, properly acknowledging fellow scholars but also making a way for interested readers. Accessibility and hospitality are intentional.

I think authors should revel in their investigative work and model all the good research methods for our students. What if bibliographies were not required afterthoughts of citation ethics but instead showcases? I’ve only mentioned a few creative forms of bibliographies, endnotes, and “Further Reading” sections. There are so many in publication already, and there should be many more in the future. As I finished my “discursive” bibliography for a completed manuscript, I’m happy to acknowledge that I found three magic resources, books that meant everything to me in my meandering research, authors that freely shared their knowledge and passion, allowing me to connect parts of my life and new ideas to those of the past. I hope to do the same."]]></description>
<dc:subject>howweread howwewrite reading writing bibliographies christinenorvell 2026 teaching howweteach learning howwelearn hospitality accessibility research</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:72dc145419b3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwewrite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bibliographies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christinenorvell"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hospitality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:accessibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:research"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://walklistencreate.org/2026/01/15/the-walking-assembly-2026/">
    <title>The Walking Assembly 2026 – walk · listen · create</title>
    <dc:date>2026-01-15T20:41:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://walklistencreate.org/2026/01/15/the-walking-assembly-2026/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Dynamic Knowledge: moving together in practice. How to learn without teaching
9–13 May 2026 · Salt → Albanyà → Muga River (Girona, Catalonia, Spain)

The Walking Assembly 2026 is a nomadic, field-based gathering for artists, researchers, educators, and collectives interested in walking as a form of knowledge-making, relational practice, and ecological inquiry. Building on the Walking Arts and Relational Geographies encounters held in Catalonia in 2022 and 2024, the 2026 edition marks a decisive shift: from conference to assembly, from encounter to movement.

Rather than relying on conventional academic formats, The Walking Assembly proposes an experimental model in which knowledge emerges through shared walking, presence, and collective experience. Learning is understood not as something transmitted or taught, but as something that arises through movement, attention, and being together in place.

Organised by Nau Côclea with an international curatorial team, The Walking Assembly 2026 takes place within the framework of the HO1 POCTEFA cross-border project (Spain–France).
Concept & Theme

Dynamic Knowledge: moving together in practice. How to learn without teaching

The Assembly starts from the recognition that certain forms of knowledge are embodied, relational, ecological, and situated—and cannot be fully grasped through disciplinary research or formal instruction alone. Walking is proposed as:

- a mode of knowing grounded in movement, care, and attention
- a commons based on hospitality, reciprocity, and co-creation
- a way to explore relationships between human and more-than-human worlds

Water, and specifically the Muga River, serves as both guiding metaphor and material presence throughout the Assembly, foregrounding flow, transformation, accumulation, erosion, and return as pedagogical forces.
Structure

Part 1 – Confluence in Salt (Saturday, 9 May 2026)
A one-day open Confluence hosted in Salt (near Girona), bringing together up to 120 participants. Moving beyond traditional conference formats, participants share materials in advance and engage on site through conversations, walks, workshops, and collective sessions. Highlights include a public conversation with Tim Ingold, and an introduction to the walking expedition and thematic walkshops. As part of the parallel programme, expedition participants will take part in an experiential walk in the Urban Gardens of Salt with the Milfulles Association, while non-expedition participants are invited to a counter-mapping workshop led by Luce Choules.

Part 2 – Walking Expedition along the Muga River (10–13 May 2026)
A four-day, three-night nomadic walking expedition based in Albanyà, limited to 30 selected participants. Working in small groups, participants engage in sustained dialogue with the river and its landscapes through themed walkshops, including:

- The river that sees us – Clara Garí and Marc Caellas
- Walking, Writing, and the Commons of Attention – Geert Vermeire
- Personal and Other Pilgrimages – Claudia Zeiske
- Walking on Water – Pau Cata

Evenings are dedicated to collective reflection and sharing. A live photographic fieldwork process, coordinated by Luce Choules, will form an evolving expedition archive."]]></description>
<dc:subject>walking pedagogy howwelearn learning 2026 claragarí marccaellas geeryvermeire claudiazeiske paucata mugariver lucechoules timingold ethnography accumulation erosion water cocreation knowledge knowing care method movement reciprocity hospitality morethanhuman multispecies ecology place practice naucôclea presence collective collectivism teaching attention howweteach howwlearn place-basedlearning catalonia place-basededucation land-basedlearning land-basededucation</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:39cc2dbda80d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:walking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:claragarí"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marccaellas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:geeryvermeire"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:claudiazeiske"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:paucata"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mugariver"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:lucechoules"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:timingold"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ethnography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:accumulation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:erosion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:water"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cocreation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:knowledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:knowing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:care"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:method"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:movement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reciprocity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:hospitality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:morethanhuman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:multispecies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ecology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:place"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:practice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:naucôclea"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:presence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collective"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:collectivism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwlearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:place-basedlearning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:catalonia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:place-basededucation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:land-basedlearning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:land-basededucation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://patrickfarenga.substack.com/p/the-empty-ritual-of-schooling-part">
    <title>The Empty Ritual of Schooling (Part Two) - by Patrick Farenga</title>
    <dc:date>2026-01-12T22:10:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://patrickfarenga.substack.com/p/the-empty-ritual-of-schooling-part</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Reclaiming Public Spaces for Learning and Friendship"

[See also:

"The Empty Ritual of Schooling (Part One)"
https://patrickfarenga.substack.com/p/the-empty-rituals-of-schooling 

"The Empty Ritual of Schooling (Part Three)"
https://patrickfarenga.substack.com/p/the-empty-ritual-of-schooling-part-cdc ] ]]></description>
<dc:subject>2026 patfarenga education schools schooling children society learning howwelearn friendship policy howweteach teaching johnmcknight johnholt janejacobs rayoldenburg augustinapaglayan politics politicalscience</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:1d0de3350bd9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:patfarenga"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:friendship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnmcknight"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnholt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:janejacobs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rayoldenburg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:augustinapaglayan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politicalscience"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://patrickfarenga.substack.com/p/the-empty-rituals-of-schooling">
    <title>The Empty Ritual of Schooling (Part One)</title>
    <dc:date>2026-01-12T22:08:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://patrickfarenga.substack.com/p/the-empty-rituals-of-schooling</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[[See also:

"The Empty Ritual of Schooling, (Part Two)"
https://patrickfarenga.substack.com/p/the-empty-ritual-of-schooling-part

"The Empty Ritual of Schooling (Part Three)"
https://patrickfarenga.substack.com/p/the-empty-ritual-of-schooling-part-cdc ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>patfarenga school schooling education children 2026 johnholt us history society policy nclb rttt essa nationatrisk 1983 1968 bilingualeducationact 1965 2001 1994 2009 2015 howwelearn learning howweteach teaching jonathanhaidt cevisoling childhood parenting politics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:27e4075f210a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:patfarenga"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:school"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2026"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:johnholt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nclb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rttt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:essa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:nationatrisk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1983"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1968"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bilingualeducationact"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1965"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2001"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1994"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2009"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2015"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jonathanhaidt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cevisoling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:childhood"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:parenting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kS-muAuq62E">
    <title>Game Theory #2: Why Schools Suck - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2026-01-08T17:49:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kS-muAuq62E</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[[Professor Jiang likes to use his schooling (his bragging about Yale and being "the first" to do things in China) to argue you should believe him while also questioning schooling.]

"In this Thursday, January 8, 2026 lecture to his Beijing high school students, Professor Jiang uses game theory to explore the limitations of schools."]]></description>
<dc:subject>schools schooling education learning gametheory society china finland 2025 howwelearn schooliness motivation parenting teaching howweteach xueqinjiang</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:8470555ba57f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:gametheory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:china"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:finland"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2025"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooliness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:motivation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:parenting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:xueqinjiang"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/18/opinion/japan-education-childhood.html">
    <title>Opinion | What a School Performance Shows Us About Japanese Education - The New York Times</title>
    <dc:date>2026-01-05T02:27:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/18/opinion/japan-education-childhood.html</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[[archived:
https://archive.ph/4LdAc

See also:

"Opinion | What a School Performance Shows Us About Japanese Education - The New York Times"
https://www.nytimes.com/video/opinion/100000009295681/instruments-of-a-beating-heart.html

"Documentary Filmmaker Explores Japan’s Rigorous Education Rituals
Her movies try to explain why Japan is the way it is, showing both the upsides and downsides of the country’s commonplace practices. Her latest film focuses on an elementary school."
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/05/world/asia/japan-documentary-films-ema-ryan-yamazaki.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W2o52jF4BCY (filmmaker conversation)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QM3tThvbdi8 (trailer) ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>documentary japan education schools schooling learning society emaryanyamazaki pedagogy culture film filmmaking 2024 teaching howweteach howwelearn parenting</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:637de619d011/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:documentary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:japan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:emaryanyamazaki"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:film"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:filmmaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2024"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:parenting"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W2o52jF4BCY">
    <title>The Making of a Japanese | Ema Ryan Yamazaki - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2026-01-05T02:23:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W2o52jF4BCY</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The Shorenstein APARC's Japan Program held a special advance screening of the forthcoming film THE MAKING OF A JAPANESE. This documentary chronicles life at a large Japanese elementary school in suburban Tokyo, where filmmaker Ema Ryan Yamazaki has distilled over 700 hours of footage into a compelling examination of how Japanese educational institutions cultivate culturally distinct characteristics in young students.

Following the screening, the filmmaker joined in a conversation with Katherine (Kemy) Monahan to discuss the making of the documentary.

Speaker
Raised in Osaka by a Japanese mother and British father, Ema Ryan Yamazaki grew up navigating between Japanese and Western cultures. Having studied filmmaking at New York University, she uses her unique storytelling perspective as an insider and outsider in Japan. In 2017, Ema’s first feature documentary, MONKEY BUSINESS: THE ADVENTURES OF CURIOUS GEORGE’S CREATORS was released worldwide after raising over $186,000 on Kickstarter. In 2019, Ema’s second feature documentary about the phenomenon of high school baseball in Japan, KOSHIEN: JAPAN’S FIELD OF DREAMS, premiered at DOC NYC. In 2020, the film aired on ESPN, and was released theatrically in Japan. It was a New York Times recommendation for international streaming and featured on the Criterion Channel. Ema's latest documentary feature, THE MAKING OF A JAPANESE, follows one year in a Japanese public school. The film premiered at the Tokyo International Film Festival in 2023 and is currently playing festivals around the world, with a release set in Japan for December 2024. 

Moderator
Katherine (Kemy) Monahan joins the Walter H. Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center (APARC) as a visiting scholar, Japan Program Fellow, for the 2025-2026 academic year. She has served 30 years as a Foreign Service Officer with the U.S. Department of State, across 16 assignments on four continents.  She most recently served as Deputy Chief of Mission of the U.S. Embassy in Japan, following an assignment as Charge d’affaires for Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, and Vanuatu, and an assignment as Deputy Chief of Mission to New Zealand, Samoa, Cook Islands, and Niue.  Ms. Monahan established and led UNICEF’s Washington D.C.-based International Financial Institutions liaison office, where she negotiated over $1 billion in funding for children in need. Ms. Monahan also served in the U.S. Embassy Mexico as Advisor in the World Bank’s Africa Office, as Deputy Executive Director of the Secretary of State’s Global Health Initiative, and as Senior Development Counselor at the U.S. Mission to the European Union in Brussels. Earlier in her career, she worked in Warsaw, Poland, to privatize the energy and telecommunications sectors and led the team to ratify the Hague Intercountry Adoption Convention."

[See also:

"Opinion | What a School Performance Shows Us About Japanese Education - The New York Times"
https://www.nytimes.com/video/opinion/100000009295681/instruments-of-a-beating-heart.html

"Documentary Filmmaker Explores Japan’s Rigorous Education Rituals
Her movies try to explain why Japan is the way it is, showing both the upsides and downsides of the country’s commonplace practices. Her latest film focuses on an elementary school."
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/05/world/asia/japan-documentary-films-ema-ryan-yamazaki.html

"Instruments of a Beating Heart | An Oscar-Nominated Op-Doc"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRW0auOiqm4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QM3tThvbdi8 (trailer)]]></description>
<dc:subject>japan schools schooling education emaryanyamazaki film filmmaking documentary society pedagogy culture 2025 2023 2021 2020 2022 pandemic coronavirus covid-19 teaching howweteach learning howwelearn parenting</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:0a7dc74f4bb2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:japan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:emaryanyamazaki"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:film"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:filmmaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:documentary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2025"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2023"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2021"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2020"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2022"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pandemic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:coronavirus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:covid-19"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:parenting"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/days-gone-by/">
    <title>Days Gone By</title>
    <dc:date>2025-12-31T21:38:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://2ndbreakfast.audreywatters.com/days-gone-by/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["What a terrible year. Good riddance to today being the very last of it.

Way back when I used to publish things on Hack Education, I was always proud of my end-of-year stories -- the series of articles I posted annually that tried to chronicle all the incredibly awfulness that ed-tech had wrought in the prior months [https://hackeducation.com/2019/12/31/what-a-shitshow ]. It was important, I believed, to remember and reflect; capitalism and technology work hand-in-hand to encourage us to forget, to move on. I toyed with the idea of doing the same thing here, on Second Breakfast; but new site, new name, new distribution mechanism... it seems best to leave some things behind.

Or more accurately, I’m not sure I have the stamina right now to revisit the horrors of 2025 in detail, the kind of detail that I’d carefully track in those Hack Education essays. It has, since the very first days of January -- Trump’s inauguration, surrounded and applauded by Silicon Valley’s leaders -- been dangerous, disastrous, deadly, inside and outside of schools.

And I’ve received one too many email newsletters in the past week or so in which someone boasted that they’d had ChatGPT identify the important themes and trends for the year for them -- a good reminder that these sorts of seasonal prompts for content production (lists after lists after lists after lists) have never really been about inquiry or criticism, but more about the churning out of data for someone else’s algorithmic machinery. It’s insulting. It’s undignified. But it’s the future that some men sure seem to yearn for.

That said, I do think I'd be remiss to not make a few observations here on December 31, particularly before the usual suspects launch into the new year peddling the very same bullshit they've tried to have us choke down with a smile for decades now. (Indeed, 2026 marks the 100th anniversary of Sidney Pressey's landmark article that launched the whole teaching machine industry [https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262546065/teaching-machines/ ]: "A simple apparatus which gives tests and scores-- and teaches." I'll have more to say about that anniversary in the coming weeks.)

Artificial intelligence has, no doubt, sucked all the proverbial oxygen out of the proverbial room in education and education technology. It is not just the top of the year-end list; it is the list. (And as I noted above, too many people let the technology “generate” the list for them.) “AI” seemed to be almost all that anyone could talk about, certainly all that many hope to sell. Of course, this is why the ed-tech amnesia does matter: the myriad of ed-tech products with some sort of algorithmic teaching and testing and bureaucratic classroom-management procedures -- built and sold that way for decades now -- have all rebranded as "AI," and "AI" has been inserted into almost every single piece of software, whether you like it or not.

And you shouldn't. It's bad fucking news. It's bad for thinking. It's bad for learning. It's bad for teaching. It's bad for research. It's bad for knowledge. It's bad for justice. It’s bad for democracy. It's bad for humanity. It's bad for the planet. Everyone knows it [https://blog.ayjay.org/everyone-knows/ ], as Alan Jacobs recently wrote. But plenty of folks are out there hustling hustling hustling. They’re willing to ignore the bad, in no small part because that's what their privilege affords them.

<blockquote>It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it – Upton Sinclair</blockquote>

As the Department of Justice slowly releases more documents relating to Jeffrey Epstein, perhaps it's worth reminding people of this convicted sex offender's connection not just to artificial intelligence, but to those working in AI and ed-tech specifically. Bill Gates. Marvin Minsky. Roger Schank. Joi Ito. Whether or not these men -- or any of the men listed in Epstein's "little black book" -- were engaged in child sex trafficking is beside the point: they were willing to ignore its occurrence, willing to continue their own access to money and power and influence at the expense of the health and safety of girls.

And so it continues: the willingness of those supporting some "AI" future to overlook the real harms, the substantive exploitation, the actual violence in order to maintain their own access to money and power and influence.

It's par for the course, I suppose. Because "the big story" in "AI" doesn't necessarily involve this new generative "AI" hoopla, but rather an older, even more dangerous version of / vision for the technology: prediction, facial recognition, geolocation, surveillance, policing. "The big story" in education and "AI" isn't necessarily students using the technology to cheat themselves of learning or teachers using the technology to automate their profession away; but rather the usage of "AI" by ICE -- with the assistance of every major technology company, not just Palantir [https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/03/business/dealbook/palantir-alex-karp-ice-trump.html ]-- to identify [https://www.404media.co/cbp-quietly-launches-face-scanning-app-for-local-cops-to-do-immigration-enforcement/ ], mis-identify [https://www.404media.co/how-a-us-citizen-was-scanned-with-ices-facial-recognition-tech/ ], harass, arrest, imprison, and deport people. Hundreds of thousands of people. People in our communities. People in and around our schools. Our neighbors. Our co-workers. Our students. Our teachers. Families. Parents. Children.

This is the story of what "AI" means in education – or part of it, at least. “AI” is central to the move towards techno-authoritarianism [https://www.authoritarian-stack.info/ ], a move that of course will target democratic institutions – institutions tasks with building knowledge and building human capacity – first.

"AI" is, after all, an endeavor undeniably intertwined with eugenics [https://bookshop.org/p/books/disabling-intelligences-legacies-of-eugenics-and-how-we-are-wrong-about-ai-rua-m-williams/b5e49f6b89f846a8?ean=9783032026644&next=t&next=t&affiliate=93920 ]. It is fundamentally a reactionary effort – despite all the rhetoric about it being future-facing – an effort inseparable from the anti-diversity initiatives undertaken throughout governments and corporations this year. "AI" is a backlash to civil rights movements, a backlash to the advancements of the past few decades that shifted (ever so slightly) the power away from white men.

You can see this in the onslaught of "AI" hype, almost entirely vocalized by men – the Sams and the Marks and the Peters and the Jasons so deeply aggrieved at having to share the stage, the mic, the platform, the workplace, the classroom, the world with women, with Black people, with queer folk, with people with disabilities, with indigenous people, with refugees, with non-English speakers, with Muslims, with anyone from the majority world. And this isn't simply a matter of representation in their datafied corpus – although that still matters. "AI" means erasure, epistemic erasure – all writing, all images, all sounds, all expression squeezed towards the middle, the mundane, the Man. AI is a silencing; "AI" is genocidal [https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/dec/30/israeli-military-big-tech ]. Its acceptance, begrudging or willful, means the normalization of this violence – of its harms to ourselves and to one another and to the environment; of its demands for efficiency and optimization; of its sing-song allure of sycophantic mediocrity at the expense of creativity, spontaneity, diversity, life.

But “let’s be clear: AI" is not the only technology being wielded right now to control bodies, to control minds, to control labor, to control knowledge. And here's where the incessant focus on "AI" -- whether it be promotion or critique -- easily serves to further impoverish our understanding of what's happening in education. Among the other important stories of 2025: the banning of books [https://thelibrariansfilm.com/ ]; the banning of cellphones in the classroom [https://www.afterbabel.com/ ]; age-restrictions on social media [https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/australia-to-enforce-social-media-age-limit-of-16-with-fines-up-to-33-million ]; the re-emergence of the “standards” (and standardized testing) cadre [https://www.theatlantic.com/podcasts/archive/2025/10/the-david-frum-show-margaret-spellings-school-testing/684489/ ]; the digital surveillance and silencing (and firing) of professors [https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/oct/10/academics-professors-charlie-kirk ] for what’s on the syllabus, what’s discussed in class -- all efforts, to one degree or another, to limit access to information. To certain kinds of information, of course. To acquiesce to “AI” is to surrender to what Neil Postman so presciently called Technopoly [https://bookshop.org/p/books/technopoly-the-surrender-of-culture-to-technology-neil-postman/411fadc13061d77a?ean=9780679745402&next=t&next=t&affiliate=93920 ] – the monopolistic control of knowledge and information and media, the control of our very understanding of ourselves and the world around us, in the hands of a small handful of fascistic tech billionaires.

And look, I’ll be the first to suggest that we’d all be well-served to step away from our digital devices, to spend much much much less time on the Internet. Put your phone away while you eat and while you walk down the street, for crying out loud. “Touch grass.” Read a book. Read a book to your children. Please.

But I’m wary of many of the efforts to curb children’s access to technology because these initiatives are, at their heart, often not about the tech (and certainly not about structural redress) but about curbing children’s access to knowledge. These are efforts at stifling children’s self-discovery – particularly around questions of gender identity – and their discovery of like-minded community.

***

<blockquote>"Narrative power, maybe all power, was never about flaunting the rules, yelling at a cop, making trouble – it was about knowing that, for a privileged class, there existed a hard ceiling on the consequences.

    And on the heels of that realization, a converse one: I began to suspect that the principles holding up this place might not withstand as much as I first thought. That the entire edifice of equality under law and process, of fair treatment, could just as easily be set aside to reward those who belong as to punish those who don't. A hard ceiling for some, no floor for others."

    – Omar El Akkad, One Day Everyone Will Have Always Been Against This [https://bookshop.org/p/books/one-day-everyone-will-have-always-been-against-this-omar-el-akkad/4191784c40750b09?ean=9780593804148&next=t&next=t&affiliate=93920 ]</blockquote>

***

There’s a refrain you’ll often hear, that “the kids are alright.” I get it. It’s comforting to think that, despite all the horrors that surround them – environmental destruction, genocide, school shootings, immigration raids, anti-trans policies, economic inequality, homelessness, mental health crises, job insecurity (hell, job non-existence [https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/ai-replacing-entry-level-jobs-gen-z-careers.html ], some say) – that younger folks are good and strong and resilient. And maybe some are. Maybe some can put on a good face. They can still go through the motions. They over-schedule; they over-achieve. What choice is there, really? Right?

But what if they aren’t okay? (I mean, crikey, what if none of us grownups really are either? And I’m looking right at those of you lulled by the siren call of “AI," driving this ship straight into the rocks. But I'm looking at, I'm looking to all of us.)

A day doesn’t go by where I don’t think about my son – about my own losses, my own grief in the face of this abysmal world we have built for our children. And since this summer, barely a day has gone by when I haven’t thought about Adam Raine, the 16-year-old who died by suicide after lengthy discussions -- encouragement, even -- from ChatGPT [https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/26/technology/chatgpt-openai-suicide.html ]. And for the past few weeks now I think about the Reiner family too, a very famous stand-in, I suppose, for all the families who have chronically mentally ill children – violent or not, adult or not, in or not in active addiction. I’d say “you have no idea what it’s like” but so many of us do. More than we care to admit, more than we care to talk about, and obviously – fucking hell – more than we care to address.

“The purpose of a system is what it does,” the cybernetician Stafford Beer famously said. It is clear to me what the purpose of “AI,” what the purpose of ed-tech is. 2025 made it oh so clear. Sure, people still like to talk about innovation and enhancement. They wave their hands around excitedly – some "think bigger!" gesture, extolling some imaginary shiny future of cognitive speed and efficiency. But the purpose of these systems is what they do. And look what they have done.

Everyone knows. Everyone sees it. Some of us try to convince ourselves otherwise. But it's right there. The purpose of the system is extraction. The purpose is obedience. The purpose is compliance. The purpose is death – death of agency and death of dignity and death of joy.

We have much work to do to make our institutions – educational and otherwise – into something else. We cannot do it chained to the technologies that are designed to stop us from ever even thinking about becoming free.

But we can do it.

***

Today’s bird is the starling, which has been called one of the worst invasive species [https://www.invasivespeciesinfo.gov/terrestrial/vertebrates/european-starling ] in the world, brought to the US from Europe in the late nineteenth century, according to one story at least, by Eugene Schieffelin [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Schieffelin ], an ornithologist who thought it'd be neat to introduce into the US – via a release in Central Park in the case of the starling – every bird mentioned in Shakespeare's works. (Good grief, the hell men will unleash just to get you to pay attention to western literature.)

I see starlings almost every day in the park – during warmer months at least. Close up, their plumage is striking: an iridescent purple and green. Their beak is yellow. Their calls are comprised of squeaks and clicks, but they're known to mimic other birds. (Hotspur tries to teach a starling to say "Mortimer" in Henry IV, Part 1.)

Starlings are aggressive birds, attacking and displacing other species and, according to the USDA at least [https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1023&context=nwrcinvasive ], causing hundreds of millions of dollars of damage to agricultural crops every year. But what happens when we mark up the world – who belongs, who belongs where – into "native" and "invader" and "alien" [https://www.allaboutbirds.org/news/essay-are-starlings-really-invasive-aliens/ ]?

Starlings are "gregarious," meaning their flocks are often very large. Very very large – roosts can be comprised of over one million birds. Their swarm-like flights are called murmurations; and these are beautiful, almost musical, magical feats of coordination.

We don't know why the birds move this way; there's so much we do not know about the beings with whom we inhabit this world (although I'm sure ChatGPT, that other shiny invasive species specious, would surely tell you that it knows.)"]]></description>
<dc:subject>audreywatters 2025 edtech technology technofascism eugenics society donaldtrump siliconvalley samaltman openai elonmusk chatgpt automation humanism humanity sidneypressey education teaching schools howweteach learning howwelearn alanjacobs uptonsinclair billgates jeffreyepestein mit marvinminsky rogerschank joiito ice police policing terror palantir schooling colleges universities highered highereducation academia markzuckerberg meta facebook peterthiel smartphones screentime web internet online socialmedia surveillance silencing censorshipn academicfreedom billionaires oligarchy fascism knowledge omarelakkad genocide ethniccleansing palestine israel iof idf military environment schoolshootings mentalhealth labor work inecurity economics adamraine staffordbeer systems systemsthinking eugeneschieffeilin starlings birds invasivespecies authoritarianism standardization standardizedtesting standards technopoly neilpostman</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:5e6e21c341a7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:audreywatters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2025"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technofascism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:eugenics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:donaldtrump"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:siliconvalley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:samaltman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:elonmusk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatgpt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:automation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sidneypressey"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:alanjacobs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:uptonsinclair"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:billgates"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:jeffreyepestein"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marvinminsky"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rogerschank"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:joiito"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:police"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:terror"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:palantir"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schooling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colleges"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:markzuckerberg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:meta"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:facebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:peterthiel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:smartphones"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:screentime"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:surveillance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:silencing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:censorshipn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academicfreedom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:billionaires"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:oligarchy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fascism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:knowledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:omarelakkad"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:genocide"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ethniccleansing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:palestine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:israel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:iof"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:idf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:military"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:environment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schoolshootings"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:mentalhealth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:work"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inecurity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:adamraine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:staffordbeer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:systems"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:systemsthinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:eugeneschieffeilin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:starlings"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:birds"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:invasivespecies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:authoritarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:standardization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:standardizedtesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technopoly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neilpostman"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2025/12/29/dyslexia-and-the-reading-wars">
    <title>Dyslexia and the Reading Wars | The New Yorker</title>
    <dc:date>2025-12-30T20:21:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2025/12/29/dyslexia-and-the-reading-wars</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Proven methods for teaching the readers who struggle most have been known for decades. Why do we often fail to use them?"

[archived:
https://archive.ph/7Om2d ]]]></description>
<dc:subject>dyslexia reading howweread education teaching pedagogy howweteach phonics decoding 2025 davidowen instruction</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:709245b8e5e4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:dyslexia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:phonics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:decoding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2025"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davidowen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:instruction"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://matthewbattles.substack.com/p/for-want-of-a-story">
    <title>For want of a story - by Matthew Battles</title>
    <dc:date>2025-12-24T06:40:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://matthewbattles.substack.com/p/for-want-of-a-story</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["In the violence of our moment, can the pattern of trust hold?"

...

"As the recent semester drew to a close, I found myself wondering, what is the pattern of the college class? What is its compact, its qualities; what world does it come from or constitute? My friend S. and I have been discussing “pattern languages,” the concept of which comes from the work of architect Christopher Alexander, who developed this understanding of the “timeless way of building” with collaborators Sara Ishikawa, Murray Silverstein, and others at Berkeley’s Center for Environmental Structure in the 1970s. Interestingly, there isn’t a “classroom” pattern per se in their 1977 book, A Pattern Language, though such education-related patterns as NETWORK OF LEARNING and SHOPFRONT SCHOOLS are proposed there. Though they feel as though they preexist, that they are not invented but discovered, patterns are less archetypes than aspirations. Open, porous, and radically accessible, so many of them seem to assume relations of trust as a deep resource.

But what of the class itself—that “social institution – workgroup” (patterns 80–86) in which we find ourselves, twelve or twenty or ninety or two hundred students and an instructor, thrown together into this space of expectation, this envelope of institutional mandate, normative hierarchy, and hope for the future, which is the university? Increasingly, I’m aware how little of what happens here, how little of what it means or will come to mean, is determined by that envelope: by the role of higher education in society, say, or the importance of accrued expertise, or the promise of potential.

The writer Paul Elie defines pilgrimage as “a journey taken in light of a story.” To call a class a journey feels shopworn; to call it a pilgrimage, however enlivens it, I think. As pilgrims, we thirteen or thirty-three or ninety-nine go forth in search of the story we will share. Success in the classroom, I’m coming to understand, isn’t a “journey” with the institution as the ship, but is bound up with the discovery of our shared story. Though the story exists before we coax it into presence, this crucially is a beginning and not an end.

The idea of a shared story has fallen on hard times, however. Scandalized by master narratives, we have sought after a seeming lightness in jettisoning the weight of story, falling back on that normative envelope—the “we believe in” of class, college, science, truth; of institution, and order, and rubric. Under the sign of the journey, the class becomes less a pilgrimage than the concourse of some shadowy station, all of us bustling toward our private trains, our own special destinations—a grade, a degree, a job, a like, an evaluation.

The story is patient, however; it waits at the edges of those shadows; it asks only for trust in its discovery. Trust is the pilgrim’s path: trust that sustenance will be offered along the way; trust that one’s fellow pilgrims will teach us and fortify us; trust that we have a guide who recognize the pattern of the way well enough to know its marks even in a changed land. Often the teacher will be this guide, though sometimes someone else from the fellowship will stand and say, just here, I know the way. Their ferocity, their fiat, depends on the trust, however. We all depend on it.

In class, this constellation of trust, this shelter, is the pattern we follow, the habit in which we attire ourselves. The coming-together is ephemeral, and yet it’s the nature of the pattern, and of the stories in light of which we venture forth, to linger long after our fellowship comes to its formal end.

The pattern of the class—the coming together, the rustle of papers, the settle and the setting forth—nurtures this trust, frames it and enfolds it. The pattern is no guarantee, though it will hold the trust with so much more intimacy and strength than any institutional envelope. For we must give ourselves to trust. It is in the nature of the gift.

The story we seek was here before the blossoming of the trust. But if the story is to be found or coaxed forth, this flowering happens before the story may be found. We might have glimpses of the story, the way a pilgrim’s shadow pinioned in the mist will feel like a fellow traveler; the way a deer will browse slowly ahead on the path, attentive even in its disinterest, in its being before and beyond us. Long before the story is caught or drawn close, however, the trust must bloom. And the one who would be silent finds strength of voice; and the one who would speak first finds the silence and helps to hold it open.

When trust trembles on a knife’s edge and the story keeps its distance, there is a dusky chill of enormity in the air. As pilgrims, we ply the edge of that uncertainty, the abyss of it. And sometimes, as we have been told, the abyss looks back; sometimes, the abyss finds its own dark ferocity. In this transit, so much depends on the silent one; the silent one carries such a weight. And we begin to wonder—will the silent one break? Is it in the nature of this silent one to break?

For my class and me this term, the pattern held; the speaker and the silent one came together to carry and to compensate, and the story stole forth and fed from our hands. And yet we were reminded how fragile, how vulnerable, the pattern remains. In the advent of this vulnerability, I felt keenly how the trust has been failed again and again in our time. And I felt the pressure of that failure take the form of fear.

S. reminds me how little we rely in patterns, now, with the modern injunction to make it new giving rise to the existential injunction to find one’s own story. We’re all stumbling through the dusky station, it’s near to midnight, and the last trains are leaving without us. And yet I think it in the nature of the pattern to do its work even in the ruins; that out of the pattern’s matrix, the primordium of the story may open and unfurl and offer itself as gift. We must accept the gift, however, if the pattern is to hold, if its language is to persist. And in trust, S. suggests, in its conjugation of courage and humility, we may find a doorway open to virtue as well.

So the gift is received in trust, a trust that is no mere given, no contrivance of doors and keycards, of who gets in and who is kept out. It’s something we make and hold together. I don’t think that even violence can destroy the pattern. But it makes living into the trust of it ever harder. For the story again and again is uprooted and cast aside. And it is there that violence grows, not in the broken envelope, but in the disturbed soil where the story once grew."]]></description>
<dc:subject>matthewbattles teaching howweteach pedagogy education highered highereducation learning howwelearn christopheralexander shopfrontschools networkedlearning paulelie pilgrimage workgroups social fellowship trust patterns apatternlanguage 2025 saraishikawa murraysilverstein presence process sharedstory story shelter intimacy uncertainty vulnerability</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:69ff66758f08/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:matthewbattles"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christopheralexander"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:shopfrontschools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:networkedlearning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:paulelie"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pilgrimage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:workgroups"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:social"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fellowship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:trust"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:patterns"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:apatternlanguage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2025"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:saraishikawa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:murraysilverstein"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:presence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:process"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sharedstory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:story"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:shelter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:intimacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:uncertainty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:vulnerability"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.publicbooks.org/four-frictions-or-how-to-resist-ai-in-education/">
    <title>Four Frictions: or, How to Resist AI in Education - Public Books</title>
    <dc:date>2025-12-23T04:00:37+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.publicbooks.org/four-frictions-or-how-to-resist-ai-in-education/</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Centering Humanity through Small Acts of Friction

And so, we write here as a call to action. We hope that other educators will join us in helping students and professors to pave an exit ramp off the alienating highway of automated education, and we aspire to achieve this in community, rather than as solitary prompt engineers.

Resistance must entail what Emily Bender and Alex Hanna call in The AI Con “strategic refusal.”

The strategic refusal for which we call takes the form of “acts of friction.”

Friction One: Resolutely center students in our teaching. Maintaining students at the center of our focus means not only refusing to use AI in teaching. Paradoxically, it also means refusing to devise assignments that deflect AI, and, thus, making AI the main focus again. Students, not LLMs, are the protagonists of education and should be treated as such. The friction here means accepting that it is a waste of our and our students’ time to redefine education for the purposes of ChatGPT-proofing our classrooms. Defensive maneuvers, like in-class essay writing exclusively, are acts of deprivation. They deprive students of the opportunity to reflect and refine away from the pressures of the classroom clock. Don’t fulfill the prophecy that “the college essay is dead” because The Atlantic told you so. Keep the essay; but don’t be a cop. Meet thoughtless text extrusion with desultory feedback. Reserve your energy instead for crafting assignments that compel care from students who care enough to think, offering thoughtful feedback on the papers that exhibit their own thoughtfulness.

Friction Two: Cultivate the moments between graded reckonings; slow down the momentum of “optimizing.” What we mean here are small acts of extracurricular and uncredited communion. Reading groups, lightning round presentations, unambitious programs of being in simple, un-CV-able conversations. These pauses alone will insist on humanity’s place in learning. And while these pauses themselves insist on the vitality of getting to think with one another without being subject to metrics and rubrics or succumbing to the thrall of their being against AI, we can also talk to our colleagues and students about our stance on it to show them that there are those who are skeptical.

Friction Three: Interrupt the digital landscape. Erect small speed bumps that jostle and slow our course, drawing attention back to our control over the direction we are taking. This can take the form of sharing print-outs of reading in hallways, leaflets in folders tacked to office doors, pamphlets on tables in common spaces. It also means rejecting the online-ification of education and opting out of Learning Management Systems, while also distributing resources such as those being compiled on the website Against AI.

Friction Four: Ask questions. Rather than accepting the premise that education needs reforming—that the sight of a graph or bar chart proves that a problem exists and that products offer solutions—ask questions of your administration. But this resistance must happen person-to-person. Only once we have created this kind of community will we be comfortable and secure in asking these questions.

In the end, friction means being sand in the gears. It means being the squeaky wheel and the pebble in the shoe, and even the thorn in the side. What this will look like will differ from person to person, and from institution to institution: to propose a single solution would only resemble the disregard for context on which the AI industry thrives.

Whatever small acts of friction one takes, let them make it hard for universities to charge ahead, pouring resources into a technology that none of us asked for. It’s only friction that can bring this momentum to a halt."]]></description>
<dc:subject>sonjadrimmer christophernygren 2025 ai artificialintelligence refusal chatgpt edtech pedagogy technology teaching howweteach education resistance highered highereducation colleges universities schools academia technosolutionism bfskinner history khanacademy salkhan audreywatters via:javierarbona openai learning howwelearn 1980s humanism human friction luddism neoluddism luddites neoluddites marcwatkins cspeirce salmankhan</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:ca627ebcd3d7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sonjadrimmer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christophernygren"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2025"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:refusal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatgpt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:resistance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colleges"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:schools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technosolutionism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bfskinner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:khanacademy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:salkhan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:audreywatters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:via:javierarbona"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:1980s"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:humanism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:human"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:friction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:luddism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neoluddism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:luddites"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neoluddites"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marcwatkins"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cspeirce"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:salmankhan"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.currentaffairs.org/news/ai-is-destroying-the-university-and-learning-itself">
    <title>AI is Destroying the University and Learning Itself</title>
    <dc:date>2025-12-15T04:54:22+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.currentaffairs.org/news/ai-is-destroying-the-university-and-learning-itself</link>
    <dc:creator>robertogreco</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Students use AI to write papers, professors use AI to grade them, degrees become meaningless, and tech companies make fortunes. Welcome to the death of higher education."]]></description>
<dc:subject>ronaldpurser 2025 ai artificialintelligence academia education culture chatgpt csu highered highereducation colleges universities labor teaching howwelearn learning howweteach sfsu csueastbay sonomastate openai faculty chatbots henrygiroux sheilaslaughter garyrhoades christophernewfield benjaminginsberg marthanussbaum administration administrativebloat democracy civics criticalthinking california policy economy economics marthakenney marthalincoln optimization efficieny edtech technology peterhershock neilpostman technopoly society judgement knowledge logistics curiosity discernment presence langdonwinner politics priorities cheating chegg turnitin surveillance surveillancecapitalism marcwatkins perplexity fraud chunginlee roylee tylercowen columbia neelshanmugam cluely siliconvalley ethics cognition inevitibility technodeterminism ravibellamkonda christiancollins debt studentdebt tuition ellastapleton rickarrowood chatversity davidgraeber bullshijobs bullshitdegrees credentials credentialism siyarajpurohit p</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:fb94f9625692/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ronaldpurser"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:2025"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:artificialintelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatgpt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:csu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highered"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:highereducation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:colleges"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:universities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howwelearn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:howweteach"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sfsu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:csueastbay"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sonomastate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:openai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:faculty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatbots"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:henrygiroux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:sheilaslaughter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:garyrhoades"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christophernewfield"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:benjaminginsberg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marthanussbaum"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:administration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:administrativebloat"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:democracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:civics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:criticalthinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:california"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marthakenney"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marthalincoln"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:optimization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:efficieny"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:edtech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:peterhershock"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neilpostman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technopoly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:judgement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:knowledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:logistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:curiosity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:discernment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:presence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:langdonwinner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:priorities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cheating"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chegg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:turnitin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:surveillance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:surveillancecapitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:marcwatkins"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:perplexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:fraud"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chunginlee"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:roylee"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tylercowen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:columbia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:neelshanmugam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cluely"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:siliconvalley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:cognition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:inevitibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:technodeterminism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ravibellamkonda"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:christiancollins"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:debt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:studentdebt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:tuition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:ellastapleton"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:rickarrowood"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:chatversity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:davidgraeber"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bullshijobs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:bullshitdegrees"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:credentials"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:credentialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:siyarajpurohit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/t:p"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>