Pinboard (robertogreco)
https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/public/
recent bookmarks from robertogrecoJ. D. Vance Changes the Subject | Online Only | n+1 | Gabriel Winant2023-04-26T02:33:58+00:00
https://www.nplusonemag.com/online-only/online-only/j-d-vance-changes-the-subject/
robertogrecojdvance 2023 politics blame gabrielwinant class classbetrayal classsolidarity trauma yale amychuahttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:8338f1d65836/The Angel of Geography: Superman, Tiger Mother, aspiration management, and the child as waste* - Cindi Katz, 20182021-09-26T00:30:18+00:00
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0309132517708844
robertogrecocindikatz capitalism neoliberalism privatization commodification financialization everydaylife childhood children future schools schooling families socialreproduction racetonowhere waitingdforsuperman amychua class middleclass inequality education society tigermomshttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:79d4046915e9/John Warner on Twitter: "So It looks like the whole damn thing is rotten to its core with lots of powerful, privileged people protecting each other from scrutiny or punishment. Of course we all know this has been going on, but it's rare that it's exposed 2018-09-23T18:59:12+00:00
https://twitter.com/biblioracle/status/1042785133194039296
robertogrecoA top professor at Yale Law School who strongly endorsed supreme court nominee Brett Kavanaugh as a “mentor to women” privately told a group of law students last year that it was “not an accident” that Kavanaugh’s female law clerks all “looked like models” and would provide advice to students about their physical appearance if they wanted to work for him, the Guardian has learned.
Amy Chua, a Yale professor who wrote a bestselling book on parenting called Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother, was known for instructing female law students who were preparing for interviews with Kavanaugh on ways they could dress to exude a “model-like” femininity to help them win a post in Kavanaugh’s chambers, according to sources.]
What's interesting is how mundane all this is to the people inside the privileged spaces. This is just how things work for them, powerful men who get to prey upon women to varying degrees, with women who are granted admittance to that club willing to be some of the enforcers.
This is the meritocracy at work. As someone who has moved in meritocracy-adjacent spaces, but never joined, I've always known the meritocracy was total bullshit based on the people I knew who were inside it, but maybe, just maybe, the lid is being peeled back a bit.
I'm highly skeptical that these revelations will have any impact on the meritocracy, places like Yale/Harvard, the Supreme Court. Ultimately, these places are about power and no group in power has ever relinquished it willingly. The only alternative is to shift the locus of power
At the least, we should end the fiction that these privileged institutions are places of great wisdom or probity, rooted in enduring values. They're among the most corrupt places we have. Note this from the Guardian story about how Kavanaugh likes his female clerks to look.
[image: "Sources who spoke to the Guardian about their experiences with Chua and Rubenfeld would only speak under the condition of anonymity because they feared retribution and damage to their future careers."]
Those who are telling the truth know that to tell the truth publicly about the cesspool they're required to navigate would result in expulsion from the group. Next time someone says someone like Kavanaugh comes from the "best" places, remember it's more like the opposite.
The deep irony is that if all that these people are up to was truly known and exposed, a huge proportion of those coming out of these elite law schools would never be able to pass the American Bar Association's ethics requirement.
Here's how one of the court chroniclers of the meritocracy tries to thread the needle on the accusations. It should be embarrassing to commit this opinion into print, but to hold onto the perch, must placate the powerful while giving a sop to audience. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/is-there-a-kavanaugh-doppelganger/2018/09/18/88418f52-bb86-11e8-a8aa-860695e7f3fc_story.html
I mean can we believe for even a second that this is Kathleen Parker's genuine opinion? How foolish do they expect us to be? Don't answer that. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/is-there-a-kavanaugh-doppelganger/2018/09/18/88418f52-bb86-11e8-a8aa-860695e7f3fc_story.html
This Chua statement at the end of the Guardian article is an illustration of the self-reinforcing insularity of the meritocracy. In her mind, Kavanaugh only hires the most qualified clerks because so many are go on to the SC, as though the network of connections didn't matter.
[image: "The couple have hired a well-known crisis communications expert but he did not respond to specific questions from the Guardian about Chua’s remarks or the internal investigation.
In an emailed statement, Chua told the Guardian: “For the more than 10 years I’ve known him, Judge Kavanaugh’s first and only litmus test in hiring has been excellence. He hires only the most qualified clerks, and they have been diverse as well as exceptionally talented and capable.
“There is good reason so many of them have gone on to supreme court clerkships; he only hires those who are extraordinarily qualified. As I wrote in the Wall Street Journal, he has also been an exceptional mentor to his female clerks and a champion of their careers. Among my proudest moments as a parent was the day I learned our daughter would join those ranks.”"]
Consider the psychology underpinning this. Amy Chua is convinced she's helping identify the best, a very important perch, and it matters little that she may be perpetuating sexist and abusive practices as long as these people are reaching the heights of SC clerkships.
It's as thought success inside the meritocracy absolves all previous sins (if they were sins to begin with). If you achieve the spoils, who cares about who or what was damaged on the way? The connections to Chua's tiger mom-ing seem obvious.
Chua and her husband's championing of self-control is also interesting here. Apparently one of the things you're supposed to have self-control over is reporting potentially predatory behavior by powerful people. Chua new about Kozinski for years. Great ethics there.
In sum, those elite spaces are always going to be totally fucked up and if you want to play in those circles you figure out how to justify either tolerating and/or doing some fucked up shit. That we let these people run our most important and powerful institutions is a scandal.
When you hear that someone came out of an exclusive D.C. prep school, Yale undergrad and Yale law, we shouldn't be thinking how great they are, but instead wondering what kind of fucked up shit they've seen or done in order to navigate in such corrupt spaces.
Like a good way to trip up a Kavanaugh-type in an hearing would be to just say: Where did you and friends bury the drifter you hit with the car when you were driving home drunk from the Cape that one summer, and their eyes will go wide and they'll say, "How did you know?"
Now dreaming of a future where a big appointment is announced: Prep school educated, Yale undergrad, Yale law, Supreme Court clerkship, and the public knows to say, "Uh-oh."""]]>johnwarner meritocracy corruption elitism 2018 privilege brettkavanaugh amychua jedrubenfeld collusion politics scotus donaldtrump ivyleague law legal alexkozinskihttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:0e5d3131e4c4/21 Of The Most Powerful Things Ever Said About Being An Immigrant2016-11-25T05:16:35+00:00
https://www.buzzfeed.com/ahmedaliakbar/you-broke-the-ocean-in-half-to-be-here#.taal7MBwL
robertogrecoimmigrants immigration rupikaur writing literature amychua chriscleaves durgachew-bose chimamandangoziadichie colmtóibín arnesabuljusmic-kustura ijeomaumebinyuo adelinenieto michaelondaatje aeschylus agamemnon francoisrabelais migration linmanuelmiranda jhumpalahiri gregorydavidroberts ryūmurakami warsanshire evahoffman tanhhalai chimamandaadichiehttps://pinboard.in/https://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:5708c545212a/Does a strict upbringing make you a better designer?: Observatory: Design Observer2011-02-03T22:07:45+00:00
http://observatory.designobserver.com/entry.html?entry=24558
robertogrecodesign typography modernism michaelbierut via:migurski parenting amychua rigidity graphicdesign massimovignelli authoritarianism creativity criticalthinking toughlove teaching education learning identity unschooling deschooling discipline tiborkalman rules constraintshttps://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:4ca7d92cdb00/Amy Chua Is a Wimp - NYTimes.com2011-01-18T15:54:13+00:00
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/18/opinion/18brooks.html
robertogrecoamychua davidbrooks parenting tcsnmy groups socialemotionallearning schools social adolescence motivation education life socialemotionalhttps://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:4d3dfb311808/Parenting: Is Amy Chua right when she explains "Why Chinese Mothers Are Superior" in an op/ed in the Wall Street Journal? - Quora2011-01-16T23:31:15+00:00
http://www.quora.com/Parenting/Is-Amy-Chua-right-when-she-explains-Why-Chinese-Mothers-Are-Superior-in-an-op-ed-in-the-Wall-Street-Journal
robertogrecoparenting education amychua children chinese culture discussionhttps://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:a607a8513948/Why American Mothers are Superior2011-01-16T17:26:11+00:00
http://techcrunch.com/2011/01/14/american-mothers-superior/
robertogrecoparenting education culture tcsnmy freedom interests interestdriven duty cv teaching schools schooling schooliness identity prodigies admissions gpa testing standardizedtesting passion learning well-being china society success meaning lcproject unschooling deschooling amychuahttps://pinboard.in/u:robertogreco/b:575fb176c936/