<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (michielbuddingh)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from michielbuddingh</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.msdn.com/cashto/archive/2009/03/31/it-s-ok-not-to-write-unit-tests.aspx"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://blogs.msdn.com/cashto/archive/2009/03/31/it-s-ok-not-to-write-unit-tests.aspx">
    <title>cashto's blog : It's OK Not to Write Unit Tests</title>
    <dc:date>2009-11-05T18:12:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.msdn.com/cashto/archive/2009/03/31/it-s-ok-not-to-write-unit-tests.aspx</link>
    <dc:creator>michielbuddingh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[" ... Let's be honest. Your tests mostly follow the “happy path”. Sure, on occasion you remember to test “the failure case”—the caller passed in null or a negative integer as an argument—mostly because you just got done writing that check and wouldn't it be a waste not to write a test to show how clever you were? Never mind that null or a negative argument is an assertable precondition that could never happen in production anyways. ... "   The way I've felt for years.  Roland Backhouse had an even more damning critique of testing as a method for catching bugs in one of his books.]]></description>
<dc:subject>programming development testing unittest</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/b:8ec368b6ca18/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/t:programming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/t:development"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/t:testing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/t:unittest"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>