<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (michielbuddingh)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from michielbuddingh</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.wired.com/2014/10/privacy-friendster/?mbid=social_twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20627606.100-living-in-denial-why-sensible-people-reject-the-truth.html?full=true&amp;print=true"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://www.wired.com/2014/10/privacy-friendster/?mbid=social_twitter">
    <title>Not on a Social Network? You've Still Got a Privacy Problem | WIRED</title>
    <dc:date>2014-10-12T10:50:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.wired.com/2014/10/privacy-friendster/?mbid=social_twitter</link>
    <dc:creator>michielbuddingh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[”... We learned about shadow profiles last year when security researchers at a company called Packetstorm discovered Facebook was maintaining its own files on users’ contacts. For example, if Facebook found two users were connected to a non-member—say, bob@wired.com—it would pool other information—different phone numbers, for example—into one master dossier ...” — Contrast with Eben Moglen's concept of privacy as 'ecological'; ]]></description>
<dc:subject>privacy shadow profiles social network</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/b:cf5c64c347da/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/t:shadow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/t:profiles"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/t:social"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/t:network"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20627606.100-living-in-denial-why-sensible-people-reject-the-truth.html?full=true&amp;print=true">
    <title>Living in denial: Why sensible people reject the truth - opinion - 19 May 2010 - New Scientist</title>
    <dc:date>2010-06-03T10:42:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20627606.100-living-in-denial-why-sensible-people-reject-the-truth.html?full=true&amp;print=true</link>
    <dc:creator>michielbuddingh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Long, elaborate treatment of the increasingly virulent denial of unpleasant scientific claims.  Touches upon but doesn't seem to fully explore the consequences of the fact that the 'rift' between science-believers and science-deniers is increasingly one determined by the willingness of the former group to trust the white-labcoated priest class.  For all science's legitimate claims to falsifiability, the average consumer cannot test scientific claims for him or herself.]]></description>
<dc:subject>science denialism social masspsychology</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/b:1e70ff0f5729/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/t:denialism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/t:social"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/t:masspsychology"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>