<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (michielbuddingh)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from michielbuddingh</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://outline.com/Km5Svm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jacobinmag.com/2013/09/locked-out/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-23462290"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.lysator.liu.se/c/dmr-on-noalias.html"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://outline.com/Km5Svm">
    <title>The Rise and Fall of Getting Things Done</title>
    <dc:date>2020-11-22T21:42:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://outline.com/Km5Svm</link>
    <dc:creator>michielbuddingh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[“... Drucker predicted that corporate profits would depend on mental effort, and that each individual knowledge worker, possessing skills too specialized to be broken down into “repetitive, simple, mechanical motions” choreographed from above, would need to decide how to “apply his knowledge as a professional” and monitor his own productivity. “The knowledge worker cannot be supervised closely or in detail,” Drucker wrote, in “The Effective Executive,” from 1967. “He must direct himself.” ...]]></description>
<dc:subject>knowledgework focus organisation history</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/b:d000dc74e742/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/t:knowledgework"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/t:focus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/t:organisation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/t:history"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jacobinmag.com/2013/09/locked-out/">
    <title>Locked Out | Jacobin</title>
    <dc:date>2013-09-08T16:41:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://jacobinmag.com/2013/09/locked-out/</link>
    <dc:creator>michielbuddingh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[An argument that copyright and IP law have their origins in censorship.]]></description>
<dc:subject>intellectualproperty law politics english history</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/b:e92e6fd2bf86/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/t:intellectualproperty"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/t:english"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/t:history"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-23462290">
    <title>BBC News - Are there too many managers?</title>
    <dc:date>2013-07-31T05:44:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-23462290</link>
    <dc:creator>michielbuddingh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[“ … But it also has a meaning, in popular early 19th Century culture, of dishonesty. A manager was someone who will run off with your money. Someone like a cowboy builder taking your business, getting control of it, and running off. Manager meant something quite disreputable, quite unprofessional. …”]]></description>
<dc:subject>management article history workplace</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/b:c1f5ce2d2fa2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/t:management"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/t:article"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/t:workplace"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.lysator.liu.se/c/dmr-on-noalias.html">
    <title>Dennis Ritchie: Why I do not like X3J11 type qualifiers</title>
    <dc:date>2010-04-17T20:44:41+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.lysator.liu.se/c/dmr-on-noalias.html</link>
    <dc:creator>michielbuddingh</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[An interesting summary of problems with C89 (and C99) type qualifiers.  'noalias' sounds very, very similar to C99's 'restrict', but it's possible that a subtle difference in the semantics invalidates most of Ritchie's criticism in this page.]]></description>
<dc:subject>c programming history</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/b:e5a36ac30752/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/t:c"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/t:programming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:michielbuddingh/t:history"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>