<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (mcmorgan)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from mcmorgan</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.academia.edu/12372400/Audience_Invoked_vs_Audience_Addressed_in_Pinkers_The_Sense_of_Style?auto=download&amp;campaign=weekly_digest"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://techcrunch.com/2011/03/18/the-pedants-revolt-does-the-aps-killing-of-e-mail-mark-a-worrying-escalation/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://www.academia.edu/12372400/Audience_Invoked_vs_Audience_Addressed_in_Pinkers_The_Sense_of_Style?auto=download&amp;campaign=weekly_digest">
    <title>Audience Invoked vs Audience Addressed in Pinker's The Sense of Style | David Durian</title>
    <dc:date>2015-05-15T15:46:38+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.academia.edu/12372400/Audience_Invoked_vs_Audience_Addressed_in_Pinkers_The_Sense_of_Style?auto=download&amp;campaign=weekly_digest</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Ultimately, it seems the case that, although the text does have mismatch issues between audience invoked and audience imagined, it has still proven to be a successful text, none the less. In terms of its status as "popular linguistics" text, it actually appears to conform pretty strongly to the genre conventions of that genre, at least, if earlier works such as Pinker's The Language Instinct and Tannen's You Just Don't Understand are used as a gauge for success. "]]></description>
<dc:subject>rhetoric stylebook review linguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:055029f09ae0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:rhetoric"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:stylebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:review"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://techcrunch.com/2011/03/18/the-pedants-revolt-does-the-aps-killing-of-e-mail-mark-a-worrying-escalation/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29">
    <title>The Pedants’ Revolt: Does The AP’s Killing Of E-Mail Mark A Worrying Escalation?</title>
    <dc:date>2011-03-19T02:57:37+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://techcrunch.com/2011/03/18/the-pedants-revolt-does-the-aps-killing-of-e-mail-mark-a-worrying-escalation/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Ah, techcrunch finally catches some of the Reg's attitude. The Big Deal? The AP finally catches up with the colloquial use of email, cellphone, and smartphone. One more win for the corruption of language.]]></description>
<dc:subject>editing stylebook linguistics #en3177 publishing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:53d821ed9400/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:editing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:stylebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:#en3177"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:publishing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>