<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (mcmorgan)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from mcmorgan</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tcjournal.org/drupal/vol2/ingleton"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.artnet.com/magazineus/reviews/davis/art-and-social-media8-4-10.asp"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://tcjournal.org/drupal/vol2/ingleton">
    <title>Critical Article—How Do You Solve a Problem Like Twitterature? Reading and Theorizing “Print” Technologies in the Age of Social Media | Technoculture</title>
    <dc:date>2013-05-01T15:09:43+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://tcjournal.org/drupal/vol2/ingleton</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[On the difficulty of framing our discourse about online discourse in frames other than print. A ramble. ]]></description>
<dc:subject>dh twitter semiotics socialmedia</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:3d74e20a28e2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:dh"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:semiotics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:socialmedia"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.artnet.com/magazineus/reviews/davis/art-and-social-media8-4-10.asp">
    <title>Ben Davis on social media art - artnet Magazine</title>
    <dc:date>2010-08-10T03:30:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.artnet.com/magazineus/reviews/davis/art-and-social-media8-4-10.asp</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Is there any more interesting way to think about the topic than the loose and impressionistic manner that it is currently framed?" Of course there is.  And the doscussion is just getting started.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>semiotics social_art socialmedia newmedia rhetoric</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:5f0b9e0e21c9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:semiotics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:social_art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:newmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:rhetoric"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>