<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (mcmorgan)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from mcmorgan</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.futureofthebook.org/blog/archives/2006/06/the_commodification_of_news_th.html"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://www.futureofthebook.org/blog/archives/2006/06/the_commodification_of_news_th.html">
    <title>if:book: the commodification of news / the washingtonpost.com turns 10</title>
    <dc:date>2006-07-04T04:35:43+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.futureofthebook.org/blog/archives/2006/06/the_commodification_of_news_th.html</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[interesting critique of two crits on the development of of journalism on the web.  All "objective" news sources sound alike, while perspective carries a distinguishable voice. "Therefore, the examples of the Economist and the New Yorker show the importanc
]]></description>
<dc:subject>blogging citizenjournalism journalism readme</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:c58d039619c8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:blogging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:citizenjournalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:journalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:readme"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>