<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (mcmorgan)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from mcmorgan</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1137/2130"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cultofmac/bFow/~3/n39vIdxvuSI/75072"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1137/2130">
    <title>Examining the reuse of open textbooks | Hilton III | The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning</title>
    <dc:date>2012-04-16T02:28:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1137/2130</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Looking at remixing in oers, they find little happening.  "As with Duncan (2009), we found that the rates of revision and remix were relatively low. Only 7.5% of textbook adoptions over a two-year period were adoptions of custom books. This indicates that while the ability to revise and remix sounds exciting, the number of those who take advantage of this opportunity is relatively small."]]></description>
<dc:subject>oer collective commons open publishing remix textbook</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:2639743dfd12/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:oer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:collective"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:commons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:remix"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:textbook"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cultofmac/bFow/~3/n39vIdxvuSI/75072">
    <title>Why iPad Magazines Are Failing</title>
    <dc:date>2010-12-30T00:52:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cultofmac/bFow/~3/n39vIdxvuSI/75072</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Good news for open content fans. The problem isn't just subscription charges. The iPad mag is a closed system: can't link in or out, can't share it with others, can't tag it on pinboad or add it to Instapaper. Closed systems - like paper textbooks - are failing.]]></description>
<dc:subject>ipad publishing opencontent oer</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:76cdfa94087d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:ipad"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:opencontent"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:oer"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>