<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (mcmorgan)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from mcmorgan</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/07/brandeis-language-police-have-suggestions-you/619347/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=45575"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=44656"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=43605"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=43559"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=43432"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=39224"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/posteverything/wp/2018/05/23/trumps-bizarre-understanding-of-capitalization-is-surprisingly-strategic/?noredirect=on"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=3764"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2017/12/12/politics/donald-trump-gillibrand-tweet-analysis/index.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=34000"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/aug/07/usda-climate-change-language-censorship-emails?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://docs.voyant-tools.org/tools/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=30164"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/01/01/very-the-loud-empty-word-that-defines-president-elect-trump.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=27515"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=20963"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.academia.edu/12372400/Audience_Invoked_vs_Audience_Addressed_in_Pinkers_The_Sense_of_Style?auto=download&amp;campaign=weekly_digest"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/10692897/Are-grammar-Nazis-ruining-the-English-language.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/~gpullum/passive_loathing.pdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=9363"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=9000"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=7069"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=5315"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2012/05/21/congressional-speech/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://chronicle.com/blogs/linguafranca/2012/12/07/a-rule-which-will-live-in-infamy/?cid=wb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://techcrunch.com/2011/03/18/the-pedants-revolt-does-the-aps-killing-of-e-mail-mark-a-worrying-escalation/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/2010/12/29/myth-instant-communication-is-shallow/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/aRF25dGX4dw/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Webworkerdaily/~3/utnz5j0JXjU/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.whitneyannetrettien.com/thesis/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://mp3.morningcoffeenotes.com/cn025Feb08.mp3"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bl.uk/collections/sound-archive/accents.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/05/magazine/05cyber.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;pagewanted=all"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/001843.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/002493.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/003312.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/003414.html"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/07/brandeis-language-police-have-suggestions-you/619347/">
    <title>This is not language change as we know it: Even Trigger Warning Is Now Off-Limits</title>
    <dc:date>2021-07-09T14:33:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/07/brandeis-language-police-have-suggestions-you/619347/</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[> these sanctions are based on no general agreement among even sensitive, sociologically concerned people. Couched as compassionate counsel, this list is mostly a series of prim concoctions by people who, one suspects, simply need more to do. In the end, working to change conditions is much more important than obsessively curating the words and expressions we use to describe them.]]></description>
<dc:subject>linguistics rhetoric politics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:4d8a6b23a66b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:rhetoric"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:politics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=45575">
    <title>So</title>
    <dc:date>2019-12-26T19:23:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=45575</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Making semiotic sense of an annoying stylistic tic: So says more than you might want it to. 

> This is apparently is an example of semantic bleaching, similar to the process that turned very and really (and more recently literally) into intensifiers. The OED lists so as an "adv. and conj." glossed as "In the way or manner described, indicated, or suggested; in that style or fashion", with examples going back to the 9th century. Over the centuries, if the bleaching theory is correct, a sense emerged that's something more like "in relation to the issue described, suggested, or presupposed".

“So” also seems to indicate a connection between the interviewer and  interviewed, a suggestion that the answer really is going to address the question. But often, the interviewed answers a different question, snd the particle becomes a rhetorical backhander. Compare it to using “Well ...” in the same context. “So” indicates that the response is canned, being delivered by rote - which also appears in the general tone of voice and cadence. “Well” can suggest the response is more thoughtful and tailored for the context. ]]></description>
<dc:subject>linguistics semantic_bleaching so semiotics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:09072a92fd78/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:semantic_bleaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:so"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:semiotics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=44656">
    <title>OED cites Language Log again: they</title>
    <dc:date>2019-10-14T13:57:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=44656</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[OED updates some senses of they, their. Commentary on how singular use of they has been used to conceal identity. ]]></description>
<dc:subject>linguistics gender grammar</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:8db6ac78b35a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:gender"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:grammar"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=43605">
    <title>Language Log » They triumphs?</title>
    <dc:date>2019-07-12T13:11:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=43605</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Because language is always political. Pronouns reawaken. Remember tis/ter/tem? A statement from Manjoo, a commentary from Language Log, and an index to earlier columns. 

> Manjoo is apparently suggesting that everyone should choose the opt-out option, at least with respect to pronoun choices,  so that they replaces he and she just as you replaced thou. This will certainly get pushback from traditionalists like Mary Norris. Will there also be objections from people on the other side, who want to see explicit non-gendered pronoun choice retained as an expression of personal identity?

]]></description>
<dc:subject>identity linguistics pronouns</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:d171e70d863b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:identity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:pronouns"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=43559">
    <title>Language Log » Corpora and the Second Amendment: &quot;bear arms&quot; (part 3)</title>
    <dc:date>2019-07-11T14:35:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=43559</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[From part 1

> My focus in this post will be on the Supreme Court's conclusion that at the time the Second Amendment was proposed and ratified, bear arms unambiguously meant 'carry weapons, for purposes of being prepared for a confrontation,' without regard to whether the carrying was in connection with military service. What I conclude is that even without taking account of how bear arms was actually used, the court's arguments don't hold up. Assuming for the sake of argument that bear arms could reasonably have been understood to mean what the court said it meant, the court didn't show that it unambiguously meant that. 

If you doubt the conclusions, you can run your own analysis on the data he provides. 

> the pool of data that is inconsistent with Heller (not including lines that are ambiguous) is increased by about two-thirds, from 505 to 847.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>second_amendment linguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:fa7114cfc855/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:second_amendment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=43432">
    <title>Linguistic purity in the EU</title>
    <dc:date>2019-07-01T14:14:24+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=43432</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[What? It’s a metaphor? An analogy?]]></description>
<dc:subject>EU linguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:1386c6dc4412/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:EU"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=39224">
    <title>Clarification by misnegation</title>
    <dc:date>2018-07-18T15:01:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=39224</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[I wouldn’t want to not overlook this. ]]></description>
<dc:subject>negation trump politics linguistics rhetoric</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:34df3d10473c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:negation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:trump"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:rhetoric"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/posteverything/wp/2018/05/23/trumps-bizarre-understanding-of-capitalization-is-surprisingly-strategic/?noredirect=on">
    <title>Trump’s bizarre understanding of Capitalization is surprisingly Strategic - The Washington Post</title>
    <dc:date>2018-05-28T13:01:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/posteverything/wp/2018/05/23/trumps-bizarre-understanding-of-capitalization-is-surprisingly-strategic/?noredirect=on</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Set aside the idea that it had to do with monetary capitalization. 

> Initial capitals make words and ideas seem Really Important. They are to meaning-making what flag pins are to patriotism and gold-plating is to value — cheap signals of depth and quality that are somehow taken seriously by enormous numbers of people. (How seriously? There’s not one but two PolitiFact articles dedicated to discussions of Obama’s pin philosophy.) This capitalization technique is common in get-rich-quick and quack medicine books desperate to sell readers on the Truth of their claims. ]]></description>
<dc:subject>rhetoric linguistics trump capitalization</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:53fb967ddeb5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:rhetoric"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:trump"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:capitalization"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=3764">
    <title>Language Log » Cultural diffusion and the Whorfian hypothesis</title>
    <dc:date>2018-03-11T15:02:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=3764</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Co-diffusion as a mechanism]]></description>
<dc:subject>Linguistic_change classification linguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:732462410380/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:Linguistic_change"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:classification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2017/12/12/politics/donald-trump-gillibrand-tweet-analysis/index.html">
    <title>How 6 words got Donald Trump into big trouble today</title>
    <dc:date>2017-12-12T20:46:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2017/12/12/politics/donald-trump-gillibrand-tweet-analysis/index.html</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><dc:subject>trump politics linguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:36a63812e46d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:trump"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=34000">
    <title>North Korea best not ...</title>
    <dc:date>2017-08-10T13:00:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=34000</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Trump remixes Truman]]></description>
<dc:subject>linguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:f69492c0a26d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/aug/07/usda-climate-change-language-censorship-emails?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other">
    <title>US federal department is censoring use of term 'climate change', emails reveal</title>
    <dc:date>2017-08-08T02:45:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/aug/07/usda-climate-change-language-censorship-emails?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Just leaving a trace of the accepted terms here. 

> “These records reveal Trump’s active censorship of science in the name of his political agenda,” said Meg Townsend, open government attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>linguistics trump rhetoric semantics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:6ef3625573dc/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:trump"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:rhetoric"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:semantics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://docs.voyant-tools.org/tools/">
    <title>Tools Index | Voyant Tools Documentation</title>
    <dc:date>2017-05-24T07:29:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://docs.voyant-tools.org/tools/</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Tools for corpus analysis]]></description>
<dc:subject>tools linguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:fcdf34ac552f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:tools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=30164">
    <title>Language Log » Metaphor of the month</title>
    <dc:date>2017-01-02T15:28:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=30164</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[A finer account of language use and Emerson's analysis for the linguist in each of us. Verily. 

> But it's hard to put "informative Dirichlet priors" into a palatable mass-media sandwich.]]></description>
<dc:subject>linguistics register</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:b4efbafc7959/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:register"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/01/01/very-the-loud-empty-word-that-defines-president-elect-trump.html">
    <title>The Loud, Empty Word That Defines President-Elect Trump - The Daily Beast</title>
    <dc:date>2017-01-02T15:23:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/01/01/very-the-loud-empty-word-that-defines-president-elect-trump.html</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Trump's idiolect, register, memes, and Sapir-Whorf simplified. 

> an administration that privileges the volume of the song more than its melody. Like the word itself, the 45th president is an indiscriminate megaphone, adding fire- and horsepower to whosoever holds his attention]]></description>
<dc:subject>linguistics register memes</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:fc73baf95dc3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:register"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:memes"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=27515">
    <title>The rhetorical style of spontaneous speech</title>
    <dc:date>2016-08-17T18:43:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=27515</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><dc:subject>linguistics orality erhetoric Authenticity ethos</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:b0f6ecb0d53e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:orality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:erhetoric"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:Authenticity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:ethos"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=20963">
    <title>More BS from George F. Will</title>
    <dc:date>2015-08-28T13:46:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=20963</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[It's not about Will, or Trump, except by insinuation. But it is about bullshit. 

"The bullshitter may not deceive us, or even intend to do so, either about the facts or about what he takes the facts to be. What he does necessarily attempt to deceive us about is his enterprise. His only indispensably distinctive characteristic is that in a certain way he misrepresents what he is up to."]]></description>
<dc:subject>bs linguistics idiom jargon</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:8fb710133d34/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:bs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:idiom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:jargon"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.academia.edu/12372400/Audience_Invoked_vs_Audience_Addressed_in_Pinkers_The_Sense_of_Style?auto=download&amp;campaign=weekly_digest">
    <title>Audience Invoked vs Audience Addressed in Pinker's The Sense of Style | David Durian</title>
    <dc:date>2015-05-15T15:46:38+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.academia.edu/12372400/Audience_Invoked_vs_Audience_Addressed_in_Pinkers_The_Sense_of_Style?auto=download&amp;campaign=weekly_digest</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Ultimately, it seems the case that, although the text does have mismatch issues between audience invoked and audience imagined, it has still proven to be a successful text, none the less. In terms of its status as "popular linguistics" text, it actually appears to conform pretty strongly to the genre conventions of that genre, at least, if earlier works such as Pinker's The Language Instinct and Tannen's You Just Don't Understand are used as a gauge for success. "]]></description>
<dc:subject>rhetoric stylebook review linguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:055029f09ae0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:rhetoric"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:stylebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:review"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/10692897/Are-grammar-Nazis-ruining-the-English-language.html">
    <title>Are 'grammar Nazis' ruining the English language? - Telegraph</title>
    <dc:date>2014-03-22T19:51:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/10692897/Are-grammar-Nazis-ruining-the-English-language.html</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[A light introduction to the focus of linguistics and the Language Log. Followed by 100s of inane comments. "Despite what many people think, the rules of a language – any language – are only defined by how people use that language. When you think about it, that has to be the case: the rules of English are different now from how they were in Milton’s time, let alone Chaucer’s, and no one has ever sat down and deliberately changed them; they’ve changed because the language has evolved, through changing use. Pullum’s job is determining what those rules are."]]></description>
<dc:subject>linguistics grammar prescriptivism</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:dae1776f3e85/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:grammar"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:prescriptivism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/~gpullum/passive_loathing.pdf">
    <title>Fear and Loathing of the English Passive</title>
    <dc:date>2014-01-10T22:31:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/~gpullum/passive_loathing.pdf</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Hey, FYC faculty. Get a read on. It ain't gramma you wanna call into play, it's rhetoric. What we see here is that, like many critiques of style (ponderous, heavy, lively! active! wonderful!) the critique of The Passive is a critique of rhetorical choices, not grammatical ones. Your move.]]></description>
<dc:subject>linguistics Linguistic_change</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:9a03ad7c960d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:Linguistic_change"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=9363">
    <title>Language Log » School grammar, round two</title>
    <dc:date>2013-12-30T16:21:38+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=9363</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Continuing loving it to death, our hero turns to implementation. English Depts are driven too much by literature and suffer from a lack of training in analytical methods so we might place the study of grammar elsewhere: "But at least in the U.S., my suggestion would be to turn away from English departments, and pursue a plan based on an alliance of linguists with people in computer science, psychology, statistics, medicine, law, sociology, business, etc., who increasingly see linguistic analysis (e.g. in the form of "text mining" or "text analytics") as an interesting object of study in itself, and as a means to enable research on other (applied or fundamental) topics. This alliance — which eventually might even include some people from Digital Humanities — is a plausible basis for college-level courses in "grammar" as practical text analysis."  With this, we need a change in marketing The English Major, away from Book Club and towards theory in practice (aka analytic methods, study of text, NLP). It'll take a generation, ]]></description>
<dc:subject>DH linguistics grammar</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:fc9c1b22e1e5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:DH"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:grammar"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=9000">
    <title>Putting grammar back in grammar schools: A modest proposal</title>
    <dc:date>2013-12-26T04:41:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=9000</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Loving the grammarians to death. Kiss kiss. ]]></description>
<dc:subject>grammar linguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:93179476eb60/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:grammar"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=7069">
    <title>A century of complaints about business jargon</title>
    <dc:date>2013-09-16T15:43:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=7069</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><dc:subject>linguistics jargon</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:bb7cb1b8d037/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:jargon"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=5315">
    <title>Rowling and &quot;Galbraith&quot;: an authorial analysis</title>
    <dc:date>2013-07-16T19:49:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=5315</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Stylistic analysis explained on the way to Rowling's confession. ]]></description>
<dc:subject>erhetoric linguistics prosestyle</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:90b83cfbf447/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:erhetoric"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:prosestyle"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2012/05/21/congressional-speech/">
    <title>The changing complexity of congressional speech - Sunlight Foundation Blog</title>
    <dc:date>2013-02-16T02:51:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2012/05/21/congressional-speech/</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Linguistic and ideological analysis of public language change. ]]></description>
<dc:subject>Linguistic_change linguistics rhetoric</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:a3a56b50bb97/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:Linguistic_change"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:rhetoric"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://chronicle.com/blogs/linguafranca/2012/12/07/a-rule-which-will-live-in-infamy/?cid=wb">
    <title>A Rule Which Will Live in Infamy - Lingua Franca - The Chronicle of Higher Education</title>
    <dc:date>2012-12-10T15:24:41+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://chronicle.com/blogs/linguafranca/2012/12/07/a-rule-which-will-live-in-infamy/?cid=wb</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Whacks the prescriptivist mole of which/that. But what I really like is the side note that White edited Strunk's original version to comply with White's stylistic prescriptions. ]]></description>
<dc:subject>linguistics FYC prescriptivism</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:4fbcb6e03b34/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:FYC"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:prescriptivism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://techcrunch.com/2011/03/18/the-pedants-revolt-does-the-aps-killing-of-e-mail-mark-a-worrying-escalation/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29">
    <title>The Pedants’ Revolt: Does The AP’s Killing Of E-Mail Mark A Worrying Escalation?</title>
    <dc:date>2011-03-19T02:57:37+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://techcrunch.com/2011/03/18/the-pedants-revolt-does-the-aps-killing-of-e-mail-mark-a-worrying-escalation/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Ah, techcrunch finally catches some of the Reg's attitude. The Big Deal? The AP finally catches up with the colloquial use of email, cellphone, and smartphone. One more win for the corruption of language.]]></description>
<dc:subject>editing stylebook linguistics #en3177 publishing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:53d821ed9400/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:editing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:stylebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:#en3177"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:publishing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/2010/12/29/myth-instant-communication-is-shallow/">
    <title>myth: instant communication is shallow » Cyborgology</title>
    <dc:date>2011-01-05T20:10:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/2010/12/29/myth-instant-communication-is-shallow/</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Good entry point to the ongoing discussion on digital comm, education, et al. "Ultimately, putting down ways of communicating foreign to you as inherently less deep, real and worthwhile is a claim to power. It is a way to reduce the ‘other’ as less fully human and capable."]]></description>
<dc:subject>linguistics cultofamateur</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:4bcbcd3deeaf/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:cultofamateur"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/aRF25dGX4dw/">
    <title>Sarah Palin’s Kids: The Complete Lack of Online Self-Control Doesn’t Fall Far from the Tree</title>
    <dc:date>2010-11-19T14:45:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/aRF25dGX4dw/</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[A quick commentary on decorum. Those krazy Palins.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>facebook twitter linguistics fyc</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:a05896d5b279/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:facebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:fyc"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Webworkerdaily/~3/utnz5j0JXjU/">
    <title>Sincerely, Me: What Our Email Sign-offs Say About Us</title>
    <dc:date>2010-06-08T23:28:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Webworkerdaily/~3/utnz5j0JXjU/</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><dc:subject>erhetoric linguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:1360ebb5accd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:erhetoric"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.whitneyannetrettien.com/thesis/">
    <title>COMPUTERS, CUT-UPS AND COMBINATORY VOLVELLES, by whitney anne trettien</title>
    <dc:date>2009-05-28T22:47:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.whitneyannetrettien.com/thesis/</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[An interesting demo of combinatory prose.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>linguistics cutups newliteracy newmedia</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:b873254cb124/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:cutups"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:newliteracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:newmedia"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/">
    <title>Plain English Campaign | Homepage</title>
    <dc:date>2008-08-31T14:50:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><dc:subject>fyc fyw linguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:5ad78b75d248/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:fyc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:fyw"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://mp3.morningcoffeenotes.com/cn025Feb08.mp3">
    <title>Lakoff interview by Winer: framing, language, politics</title>
    <dc:date>2008-03-07T13:22:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://mp3.morningcoffeenotes.com/cn025Feb08.mp3</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[cn025Feb08.mp3 (audio/mpeg Object)
]]></description>
<dc:subject>linguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:7abdcdaa80e9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.bl.uk/collections/sound-archive/accents.html">
    <title>Accents and Dialects at the BL</title>
    <dc:date>2007-07-10T17:29:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.bl.uk/collections/sound-archive/accents.html</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><dc:subject>language linguistics dialects accents</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:1a75bd262e3e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:dialects"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:accents"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/05/magazine/05cyber.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;pagewanted=all">
    <title>Cyber-Neologoliferation - New York Times</title>
    <dc:date>2006-11-06T13:00:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/05/magazine/05cyber.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;pagewanted=all</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The OED is using the internet corpus
]]></description>
<dc:subject>linguistics literacy web2.0 fyc twwt</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:d050ab504797/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:literacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:web2.0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:fyc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:twwt"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/001843.html">
    <title>Language Log: &quot;Everything is correct&quot; versus &quot;nothing is relevant&quot;</title>
    <dc:date>2006-08-24T12:48:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/001843.html</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[the term correctness conditions for whatever are the actual conditions on your expressions that make them the expressions of your language — and likewise for anyone else's language .[...] The expressions of your language are the ones that comply with al
]]></description>
<dc:subject>linguistics prescriptivism grammar</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:caffa0735a27/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:prescriptivism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:grammar"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/002493.html">
    <title>Language Log: An apology</title>
    <dc:date>2006-08-24T12:25:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/002493.html</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[summary post concerning "email makes you stupid" media reports of 2005.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>erhetoric email linguistics research scholarship journalism</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:cb69b5462c7a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:erhetoric"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:email"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:research"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:scholarship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:journalism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/003312.html">
    <title>Language Log: Linguifying</title>
    <dc:date>2006-08-12T14:30:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/003312.html</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><dc:subject>LanguageLog linguistics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:d0b75625d755/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:LanguageLog"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/003414.html">
    <title>Language Log: When men were men, and verbs were passive</title>
    <dc:date>2006-08-12T14:23:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/003414.html</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[use of passive
]]></description>
<dc:subject>linguistics language LanguageLog 2101</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:91db7037e603/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linguistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:LanguageLog"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:2101"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>