<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (mcmorgan)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from mcmorgan</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://lefsetz.com/wordpress/2021/06/11/spatial-audio/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.publicseminar.org/2016/05/the-sublime-language-of-my-century/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://opensource.com/life/13/8/stealing-ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://chronicle.com/article/AAUP-Sees-MOOCs-as-Spawning/139743/?cid=wc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://feeds.arstechnica.com/~r/arstechnica/index/~3/JGPqAajfKfQ/new-government-report-on-ip-doesnt-say-what-big-content-thinks-it-says.ars"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-16338040"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://lefsetz.com/wordpress/2021/06/11/spatial-audio/">
    <title>Spatial Audio - Danger Will Robinson. Or “Look What They’ve Done to My Song, Ma”.</title>
    <dc:date>2021-06-14T14:21:22+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://lefsetz.com/wordpress/2021/06/11/spatial-audio/</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Lefsetz on the Apple’s audio innovation-fad. The samples I’ve listened to are bland at best, and  probably should be pulled by the artists.

> … It is sacrilegious to remix/Atmosfy classic tracks. They weren’t cut that way to begin with. It even bugs me that they’re using remixed tracks from “Abbey Road” to Atmosfy, now you’re multiple steps from the original.

The edit of “Come Together,” sounds as though Lennon’s voice is being run through a Leslie. An artifact? If it is, some engineer let it pass.  

> Wait, it gets worse. Forget the big budget records, more and more music is being made by individuals in bedrooms, home studios, on a budget. They have neither the equipment nor the skill to mix in Dolby Atmos. As for just sending the file to Dolby to be processed…that’s like finishing a painting and having an amateur come in and completely change it, make it 3-D.

Bring in Benjamin’s sense of the aura. Will the original become an NFT?]]></description>
<dc:subject>music digital_literacy IP aura NFT</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:6f3088ca1323/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:music"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:digital_literacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:IP"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:aura"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:NFT"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.publicseminar.org/2016/05/the-sublime-language-of-my-century/">
    <title>Wark - The Sublime Language of My Century</title>
    <dc:date>2018-08-29T14:50:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.publicseminar.org/2016/05/the-sublime-language-of-my-century/</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[On the ontology of capitalism after commodification. A thought experiment. 

> Quite simply, we have run out of world to commodify. And now commodification can only cannibalize its own means of existence, both natural and social. Its like that silent film where the train runs out of firewood, so the carriages themselves have to be hacked to pieces and fed to the fire to keep it moving, until nothing but the bare bogies are left.

> Could there be a way to write after Marx that isn’t based on conservative habits of mastery and interpretation, but which are based instead on experimentation and détournement?

> The thought experiment that might result is quite simple. What if it was like this: There really is something qualitatively distinct about the forces of production that produce and instrumentalize and control information. This is because information really does turn out to have strange ontological properties. Making information a force of production produces something of a conundrum within the commodity form. Information wants to be free but is everywhere in chains. It isn’t scarce, and the whole premise of the commodity is its scarcity.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>capitalism commodification hacking IP detournment</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:302f5b81ba46/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:capitalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:commodification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:hacking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:IP"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:detournment"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://opensource.com/life/13/8/stealing-ideas">
    <title>Afraid someone will steal your idea?</title>
    <dc:date>2013-12-31T11:41:43+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://opensource.com/life/13/8/stealing-ideas</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["No genius. No mystique. Only work.  Don't buy into the genius mystique. It is a mirage. Maybe there are geniuses out there, but you can't go assuming that you're one. That's like living as if you're going to win the lottery on a regular basis. No, the value comes from the work and no one's going to do more of it than you."]]></description>
<dc:subject>open_source openaccess IP authorship</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:a0958006812e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:open_source"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:openaccess"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:IP"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:authorship"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://chronicle.com/article/AAUP-Sees-MOOCs-as-Spawning/139743/?cid=wc">
    <title>AAUP Sees MOOCs as Spawning New Threats to Professors' Intellectual Property - Faculty - The Chronicle of Higher Education</title>
    <dc:date>2013-06-13T15:14:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://chronicle.com/article/AAUP-Sees-MOOCs-as-Spawning/139743/?cid=wc</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["If we lose the battle over intellectual property, it's over," Mr. Nelson warned. "Being a professor will no longer be a professional career or a professional identity," and faculty members will instead essentially find themselves working in "a service industry," he said.]]></description>
<dc:subject>copyright mooc IP privatization</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:202895ec0a83/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:mooc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:IP"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:privatization"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://feeds.arstechnica.com/~r/arstechnica/index/~3/JGPqAajfKfQ/new-government-report-on-ip-doesnt-say-what-big-content-thinks-it-says.ars">
    <title>New government report on IP doesn't say what Big Content thinks it says</title>
    <dc:date>2012-04-15T18:33:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://feeds.arstechnica.com/~r/arstechnica/index/~3/JGPqAajfKfQ/new-government-report-on-ip-doesnt-say-what-big-content-thinks-it-says.ars</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[fudging the numbers. can you patent that?]]></description>
<dc:subject>ip copyright</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:463489da95a8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:ip"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:copyright"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-16338040">
    <title>Man sued for keeping company Twitter followers</title>
    <dc:date>2011-12-28T15:04:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-16338040</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[One for Weblogs and Wikis and A&E: "Corporate control of Twitter accounts has been a highly debated subject. Legal experts believe this latest case could set a precedent for future ownership tussles."]]></description>
<dc:subject>twitter IP socialmedia</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:756284736a33/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:IP"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:socialmedia"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>