<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (mcmorgan)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from mcmorgan</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://daringfireball.net/2021/07/safari_15_public_betas_for_mac_and_ios"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://go.theregister.com/feed/www.theregister.com/2021/04/09/people_complicate_things/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hackeducation.com/2018/10/18/skinner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_7_EMjjysA&amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;a"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://medium.com/backchannel/the-failed-promise-of-deep-links-aa307b3abaa5"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thenextweb.com/dd/2015/03/24/how-to-create-visual-relationships-with-contrast-similarity/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://halfanhour.blogspot.com/2015/03/design-elements-in-personal-learning.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hapgood.us/2014/09/10/learning-design-patterns-as-an-alternative-model-of-course-design/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www3.alcatel-lucent.com/bstj/vol39-1960/articles/bstj39-4-995.pdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://defarch.wordpress.com/category/the-edinburgh-manifesto-for-teaching-online/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.eyemagazine.com/?p=5875"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/four_modes_of_seeking_information_and_how_to_design_for_them"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://lifehacker.com/5800882/in-defense-of-hard-why-easy-isnt-always-the-best-answer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://homepage.ntlworld.com/clivebillson/tube/tube.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scribd.com/doc/14787499/Blogging-as-New-Literacy-Practice#open_download"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://web.princeton.edu/sites/opplab/papers/Diemand-Yauman_Oppenheimer_2010.pdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/content-strategy-the"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://transliteracies.english.ucsb.edu/images/flash_projects/john-morph.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ple.elg.ca/course/?p=33"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.gyford.com/phil/writing/2010/06/09/todays-guardian.php#section-summary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://informationarchitects.jp/designing-for-ipad-reality-check/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://craigmod.com/journal/ipad_and_books/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.moleskine.com/msk.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://deeplinking.net/website-addiction/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.speakingaboutpresenting.com/design/new-evidence-bullet-points/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/8207849.stm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/08/03/090803fa_fact_baker?currentPage=all"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://flowingdata.com/2009/07/15/collect-data-about-yourself-with-twitter-your-flowingdata-is-live/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://nogoodreason.typepad.co.uk/no_good_reason/2009/07/social-media-learning-principles.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.futureofthebook.org/blog/archives/2009/03/design_and_dasein_heidegger_ag.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.open.ac.uk/blogs/socialearn/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.flickr.com/photos/davegray/sets/72157600167673224/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.garrreynolds.com/Design/basics.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.presentationzen.com/presentationzen/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://wiki.vizthink.com/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.37signals.com/svn/posts/808-a-very-different-approach-to-tagging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.brainjar.com/dhtml/intro/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.presentationzen.com/presentationzen/2007/04/is_it_finally_t.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://captology.stanford.edu/#captologyOverview"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/card_based_classification_evaluation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scottberkun.com/essays/essay13.htm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.outer-court.com/archive/2005-12-31-n34.html"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://daringfireball.net/2021/07/safari_15_public_betas_for_mac_and_ios">
    <title>Regarding the Safari 15 Public Betas for Mac and iOS</title>
    <dc:date>2021-07-03T15:27:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://daringfireball.net/2021/07/safari_15_public_betas_for_mac_and_ios</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[> One can only presume that Apple’s HI team thinks they’re reducing needless “clutter”, but what they’re doing is systematically removing the coherence between what apps look like and the functionality they offer.

Gruber offers up some good UI design principles on his weay to a solid UI critique of the beta Safari. I used the beta. I removed it.

What’s interesting is considering why oh why oh why Apple designers, who know their stuff, are considering *these* changes that seem to break the coherence of the interface unnecessarily. It’s a *beta* of course. Maybe they’re trying to settle an internal designer war. 

Gruber quotes Heer,

> > I see it as an extension of what Maciej Cegłowski memorably called “chickenshit minimalism”. He defined it as “the illusion of simplicity backed by megabytes of cruft”; I see parallels in a “junk drawer” approach that prioritizes the appearance of simplicity over functional clarity. It adds complexity because it reduces clutter, and it allows UI designers to avoid making choices about interface hierarchy by burying everything but the most critical elements behind vague controls.

And Gruber offers this:

 > It’s worse. It just looks simpler. All the old functionality remains — it’s just harder to access, harder to discover intuitively, and more distracting. One can only presume that Apple’s HI team thinks they’re reducing needless “clutter”, but what they’re doing is systematically removing the coherence between what apps look like and the functionality they offer. 

I wish Apple would come up with *significant* updates. More emoji and dynamic address bars (stuff we need to use *shouldn’t move*!) are not updates.]]></description>
<dc:subject>interface design usability apple</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:848c0f80b762/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:interface"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:usability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:apple"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://go.theregister.com/feed/www.theregister.com/2021/04/09/people_complicate_things/">
    <title>Feature bloat: Psychology boffins find people tend to add elements to solve a problem rather than take things away</title>
    <dc:date>2021-04-09T16:18:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://go.theregister.com/feed/www.theregister.com/2021/04/09/people_complicate_things/</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This is why subscription software is a Bad Idea: The tendency is to add improvements rather than refactor improvements. Applies in composition, too: Students tended to try to solve problems by adding text rather than cutting.

> The researchers seem to have discovered a heuristic that people are biased towards creating solutions by adding features rather than taking them away. A study also observed the tendency at an organisational level. 

The interesting bit is that *they don’t even consider subtractive options*.]]></description>
<dc:subject>heuristics design</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:c45b91e22b63/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:heuristics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hackeducation.com/2018/10/18/skinner">
    <title>B. F. Skinner: The Most Important Theorist of the 21st Century</title>
    <dc:date>2018-10-19T14:29:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://hackeducation.com/2018/10/18/skinner</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Audrey guides a re-visit to PSY 2100: Behaviorism (aka Rat Lab) c 1977. Thorndyke, Dewey, Skinner, and Walden 2. Classical SR and the learning curve. Meanwhile, Englebart and PARC Xerox are in the background. I trashed my undergrad notes after finishing my Master’s. My lessons learned. 

> I would argue, in total seriousness, that one of the places that Skinnerism thrives today is in computing technologies, particularly in “social” technologies. This, despite the field’s insistence that its development is a result, in part, of the cognitive turn that supposedly displaced behaviorism. 

Add to this the LMS, education design, the modern nation state. Cog science never replaced the Skinner box. ]]></description>
<dc:subject>design history behaviorism education</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:3684af84eeb6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:behaviorism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:education"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_7_EMjjysA&amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;a">
    <title>Richard Bartle on MUDs and British Snobbery - YouTube - Matt Chat 296</title>
    <dc:date>2015-06-21T16:07:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_7_EMjjysA&amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;a</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[How ideology - and not necessarily the dominant one - gets laced into design. Dr. Matt Barton, SCSU, interviews Dr. Richard Bartle, co-creator of MUD. The MUD as a place that cancels out accent: On the internet, no one knows you're a northerner, so you're free to become a wizard.]]></description>
<dc:subject>DH design opensource semiotics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:8fe363a4e6e2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:DH"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:semiotics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://medium.com/backchannel/the-failed-promise-of-deep-links-aa307b3abaa5">
    <title>The Failed Promise of Deep Links — Backchannel — Medium</title>
    <dc:date>2015-05-19T00:37:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://medium.com/backchannel/the-failed-promise-of-deep-links-aa307b3abaa5</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Reconsideration of link history from Bush to oogle commercializing the link.  "Instead of sharing linked trails of knowledge that we’ve blazed, we leave piles of data around that service providers mine for value." - and sell back to us as value. We need to Recover the Link. ]]></description>
<dc:subject>ia fedwiki hypertext design links linking DevonThink</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:cc43695b1595/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:ia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:fedwiki"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:hypertext"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:links"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:linking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:DevonThink"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thenextweb.com/dd/2015/03/24/how-to-create-visual-relationships-with-contrast-similarity/">
    <title>How to create visual relationships with contrast &amp; similarity</title>
    <dc:date>2015-03-24T21:26:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://thenextweb.com/dd/2015/03/24/how-to-create-visual-relationships-with-contrast-similarity/</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[A too-fast primer.]]></description>
<dc:subject>webdesign design wcw erhetoric</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:876d15676cc6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:webdesign"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:wcw"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:erhetoric"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://halfanhour.blogspot.com/2015/03/design-elements-in-personal-learning.html">
    <title>Half an Hour: Design Elements in a Personal Learning Environment</title>
    <dc:date>2015-03-06T17:36:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://halfanhour.blogspot.com/2015/03/design-elements-in-personal-learning.html</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[the core design elements in the development of a personal learning architecture being developed in the National Research Council's Learning and Performance Support Systems program. ]]></description>
<dc:subject>ple design</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:09924f45f87d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:ple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hapgood.us/2014/09/10/learning-design-patterns-as-an-alternative-model-of-course-design/">
    <title>Learning Design Patterns as an Alternative Model of Course Design</title>
    <dc:date>2014-09-11T18:13:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://hapgood.us/2014/09/10/learning-design-patterns-as-an-alternative-model-of-course-design/</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Mike brings Alexander's design patterns into play for course design. Light in two rooms, and place structures to create spaces to congregate.  ]]></description>
<dc:subject>pedagogy design learning patterns architecture</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:1f2855046766/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:patterns"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:architecture"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www3.alcatel-lucent.com/bstj/vol39-1960/articles/bstj39-4-995.pdf">
    <title>Design of telephone keysets</title>
    <dc:date>2013-08-31T16:20:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www3.alcatel-lucent.com/bstj/vol39-1960/articles/bstj39-4-995.pdf</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><dc:subject>design</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:812c6d4afa5f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://defarch.wordpress.com/category/the-edinburgh-manifesto-for-teaching-online/">
    <title>The Edinburgh Manifesto for Teaching Online</title>
    <dc:date>2012-12-16T15:02:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://defarch.wordpress.com/category/the-edinburgh-manifesto-for-teaching-online/</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Interesting embedded project. Designer muses on the EBurough Online Teaching Manifesto proclamation by proclamation and connects. Via The Manifesto. ]]></description>
<dc:subject>en3177 weblog education design spaces</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:aeec9f03a866/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:en3177"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:weblog"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:spaces"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.eyemagazine.com/?p=5875">
    <title>Eye blog » (No) end of print. Reports of print’s death have been greatly exaggerated</title>
    <dc:date>2011-06-27T16:20:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.eyemagazine.com/?p=5875</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Overview, with links and artifacts, of the print debate from a print designer's perspective. ]]></description>
<dc:subject>visualdesign printculture print design</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:f284ef7436e4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:visualdesign"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:printculture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:print"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/four_modes_of_seeking_information_and_how_to_design_for_them">
    <title>Four Modes of Seeking Information and How to Design for Them - Boxes and Arrows: The design behind the design</title>
    <dc:date>2011-06-10T20:52:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/four_modes_of_seeking_information_and_how_to_design_for_them</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><dc:subject>PLE webdesign IA UX design ontology</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:4b4e7e8378f9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:PLE"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:webdesign"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:IA"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:UX"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:ontology"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://lifehacker.com/5800882/in-defense-of-hard-why-easy-isnt-always-the-best-answer">
    <title>In Defense of Hard: When Easier Isn't Better</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-14T13:49:38+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://lifehacker.com/5800882/in-defense-of-hard-why-easy-isnt-always-the-best-answer</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Are we dumbing down processes that ought to be difficult? valuing ease at the cost of growth?  heard it before, but this is a sloghtly different angle: " The goal of design should be to turn the most difficult into the most enjoyable. While nothing below is particularly new, they are still worth noting." : "]]></description>
<dc:subject>design readlater literacy new_literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:7e25051fedea/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:readlater"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:literacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:new_literacy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://homepage.ntlworld.com/clivebillson/tube/tube.html">
    <title>A History of the London Tube Maps</title>
    <dc:date>2011-03-23T13:51:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://homepage.ntlworld.com/clivebillson/tube/tube.html</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[One for the anoraks from clivebillson. Thanks, Clive.]]></description>
<dc:subject>design london_underground map history</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:0d66fead9bf3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:london_underground"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:map"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:history"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.scribd.com/doc/14787499/Blogging-as-New-Literacy-Practice#open_download">
    <title>McNeill - Blogging as New Literacy Practice</title>
    <dc:date>2011-01-23T16:37:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.scribd.com/doc/14787499/Blogging-as-New-Literacy-Practice#open_download</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Looks at some affordances in weblogs that enable "a new literacy practice characterised by what Lankshear and Knobel call an “active sociality” (2006: 1). This “active sociality” is exemplified by modes of participation and displays of identity and affiliation that mark it out as significantly different from other forms of textual communication."]]></description>
<dc:subject>en3177 literacy affordances transliteracy weblogs design</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:9abe7140de3a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:en3177"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:literacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:affordances"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:transliteracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:weblogs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://web.princeton.edu/sites/opplab/papers/Diemand-Yauman_Oppenheimer_2010.pdf">
    <title>Fortune favors the bold and the italicized</title>
    <dc:date>2011-01-17T16:55:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://web.princeton.edu/sites/opplab/papers/Diemand-Yauman_Oppenheimer_2010.pdf</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[A little upset here on the visual side: designing texts for difficult reading: "disfluency – the subjective experience of difficulty associated with cognitive operations – leads to deeper processing ... Study 1 found that information in hard-to-read fonts was better remembered than easier to read information in a controlled laboratory setting. Study 2 extended this finding to high school classrooms. The results suggest that superficial changes to learning materials could yield significant improvements in educational outcomes."]]></description>
<dc:subject>reading vizualization visualdesign design</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:77fe90af6938/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:vizualization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:visualdesign"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/content-strategy-the">
    <title>Content Strategy: The Philosophy of Data - Boxes and Arrows: The design behind the design</title>
    <dc:date>2010-11-18T19:02:22+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/content-strategy-the</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[by Rachel Lovinger. Early piece on content strategy and thinking about difference between copy and content
]]></description>
<dc:subject>wcw content_strategy copywriting design IA marketing ux freelancing writing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:bc209e69384c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:wcw"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:content_strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:copywriting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:IA"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:marketing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:ux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:freelancing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:writing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://transliteracies.english.ucsb.edu/images/flash_projects/john-morph.html">
    <title>the page as interface</title>
    <dc:date>2010-08-12T14:23:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://transliteracies.english.ucsb.edu/images/flash_projects/john-morph.html</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[via techrhet Flash
]]></description>
<dc:subject>writing history the_page design fyc</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:1ea6966acc80/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:the_page"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:fyc"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ple.elg.ca/course/?p=33">
    <title>Patterns of Change | Critical Literacies Online Course Blog</title>
    <dc:date>2010-06-11T15:18:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://ple.elg.ca/course/?p=33</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Excellent overview article on change, especially for sense of modeling and IA and design: linear, slope, driver, attractor, dialectic.  Doesn't cover change in organic networks.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>critical_thinking design information_design visualization networks networking #CritLit2010</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:b681aecd24ce/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:critical_thinking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:information_design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:visualization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:networks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:networking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:#CritLit2010"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.gyford.com/phil/writing/2010/06/09/todays-guardian.php#section-summary">
    <title>Today's Guardian (Phil Gyford’s website)</title>
    <dc:date>2010-06-10T13:32:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.gyford.com/phil/writing/2010/06/09/todays-guardian.php#section-summary</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Although the finished site looks nothing like a newspaper I think it has more in common with newspapers’ best features than most news websites do. The sense of browsing quickly through stories and reading the ones that catch your eye, feels similar.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>weddesign wcw design</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:28273a33d335/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:weddesign"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:wcw"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://informationarchitects.jp/designing-for-ipad-reality-check/">
    <title>iA » Designing for iPad: Reality Check</title>
    <dc:date>2010-04-23T16:17:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://informationarchitects.jp/designing-for-ipad-reality-check/</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><dc:subject>ipad usability design IA interface reading</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:3af5dedd21ef/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:ipad"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:usability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:IA"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:interface"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:reading"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://craigmod.com/journal/ipad_and_books/">
    <title>Books in the Age of the iPad — Craig Mod</title>
    <dc:date>2010-03-05T22:58:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://craigmod.com/journal/ipad_and_books/</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><dc:subject>Print iPad Publishing Design author2.0 ebook reading usability</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:afabe668c660/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:Print"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:iPad"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:Publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:Design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:author2.0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:ebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:usability"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.moleskine.com/msk.php">
    <title>MSK - Moleskine</title>
    <dc:date>2010-02-08T00:40:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.moleskine.com/msk.php</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Moleskine has gone hybrid with templates and generators to add print and web data to your journals.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>moleskine generator diy printing notebook writing notebooks paper design</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:6f293e5aa952/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:moleskine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:generator"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:diy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:printing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:notebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:notebooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:paper"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://deeplinking.net/website-addiction/">
    <title>Deeplinking » Consciousness, Pleasure and Website Addiction</title>
    <dc:date>2009-12-19T14:05:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://deeplinking.net/website-addiction/</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Map of visual processing centers of the brain, and extension of Ware's ideas.  Why droodles are more satisfying than doodles.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>fyc design visualdesign erhetoric</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:03eaced40d07/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:fyc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:visualdesign"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:erhetoric"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.speakingaboutpresenting.com/design/new-evidence-bullet-points/">
    <title>New evidence that bullet-points don’t work : Speaking about Presenting</title>
    <dc:date>2009-11-03T13:48:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.speakingaboutpresenting.com/design/new-evidence-bullet-points/</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[well-known principles: give both visual and auditory channels something to do, and reinforce the message with both.  "When a presenter uses bullet-point slides, they’re not using both pathways as effectively as they could. The audience member has to read the words on the slide and listen to the presenter at the same time, leading to overloading of the language areas whilst leaving the visual cortex with very little to do."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>ppt powerpoint visualdesign design educationaldesign</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:cc6a513edb35/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:ppt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:powerpoint"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:visualdesign"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:educationaldesign"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/8207849.stm">
    <title>BBC NEWS Magazine | The problem with PowerPoint</title>
    <dc:date>2009-08-20T12:28:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/8207849.stm</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Another critique of PPT.  This one is interesting for the comments.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>ppt powerpoint multimedia design usability</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:c2fb84a9325b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:ppt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:powerpoint"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:multimedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:usability"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/08/03/090803fa_fact_baker?currentPage=all">
    <title>Kindle and the future of reading : The New Yorker</title>
    <dc:date>2009-08-08T14:43:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/08/03/090803fa_fact_baker?currentPage=all</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[From ordering to unboxing to reading. I saved the article to Instapaper so I can read it later, in leisure, on my iPhone. 

"I squeezed no new joy from these great books, though. The Gluyas Williams drawings were gone from the Benchley, and even the wasp passage in “Do Insects Think?” just wasn’t the same in Kindle gray. I did an experiment. I found the Common Reader reprint edition of “Love Conquers All” and read the very same wasp passage. I laughed: ha-ha. Then I went back to the Kindle 2 and read the wasp passage again. No laugh. Of course, by then I’d read the passage three times, and it wasn’t that funny anymore. But the point is that it wasn’t funny the first time I came to it, when it was enscreened on the Kindle. Monotype Caecilia was grim and Calvinist; it had a way of reducing everything to arbitrary heaps of words."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>Kindle reading ebooks books design culture usability iPhone</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:00adadaa1e8e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:Kindle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:ebooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:usability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:iPhone"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://flowingdata.com/2009/07/15/collect-data-about-yourself-with-twitter-your-flowingdata-is-live/">
    <title>Collect Data About Yourself with Twitter – your.flowingdata</title>
    <dc:date>2009-08-01T14:38:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://flowingdata.com/2009/07/15/collect-data-about-yourself-with-twitter-your-flowingdata-is-live/</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[A project in data collection and visualization by Nathan Yau, a statistics graduate student at UCLA.  Use twitter to post data points <action> or <action> <value> to a direct twitter feed.  Collect enough data entries and patterns begin to emerge.  Visualizations are at <http://your.flowingdata.com/home/> Keep this project in sight.  It's likely to be useful in classes, but it will also become news soon.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>visualization twitter socialmedia design statistics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:7d00bba7fd9f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:visualization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:statistics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://nogoodreason.typepad.co.uk/no_good_reason/2009/07/social-media-learning-principles.html">
    <title>The Ed Techie: Social media learning principles</title>
    <dc:date>2009-07-19T12:47:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://nogoodreason.typepad.co.uk/no_good_reason/2009/07/social-media-learning-principles.html</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Martin Weller on six principles to keep in mind while designing networked instruction.
   1.  <embed> is the universal acid of the web – we should build around it.
   2. Simple with reach trumps complex with small audience.
   3. Sharing is a motivation to participation - so make it easy and rewarding to do.
   4. Start simple and let others build on top
   5. Providing limitations frames input (Cf twitter, 12seconds, etc)
   6. Complexity resides in the network not the application
]]></description>
<dc:subject>newmedia newliteracy socialmedia design educationaldesign teaching coursedesign</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:463b8b955876/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:newmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:newliteracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:educationaldesign"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:teaching"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:coursedesign"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.futureofthebook.org/blog/archives/2009/03/design_and_dasein_heidegger_ag.html">
    <title>design and dasein: heidegger against the birkerts argument</title>
    <dc:date>2009-04-05T12:39:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.futureofthebook.org/blog/archives/2009/03/design_and_dasein_heidegger_ag.html</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["the most tendentious part of Birkerts's argument has little to do with the Kindle or context. It's that he believes humanity would wittingly adopt deficient tools at the expense of effective ones. This fundamental cynicism is, to a point, understandable; much of marketing and advertising, after all, devotes itself to convincing us that what's new is necessarily superior ... But Birkerts underestimates, I think, the functional and aesthetic requisites of an average reader. If Heidegger is right, then the catastrophic, decontextualized info-culture of Birkerts's imagination is patently absurd -- readers won't, in the short- or long-term, shutter our libraries just because some novel, convenient alternative has asserted itself.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>books reading Kindle ebooks design newliteracy Birkerts</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:7ba2a5e3d80e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:reading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:Kindle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:ebooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:newliteracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:Birkerts"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.open.ac.uk/blogs/socialearn/">
    <title>SocialLearn</title>
    <dc:date>2008-09-01T16:15:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.open.ac.uk/blogs/socialearn/</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><dc:subject>scholarship2.0 socialpractices learning2.0 learningenvironments design</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:0723c64c1a49/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:scholarship2.0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:socialpractices"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:learning2.0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:learningenvironments"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.flickr.com/photos/davegray/sets/72157600167673224/">
    <title>Visual language - a set on Flickr</title>
    <dc:date>2008-07-30T11:59:33+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.flickr.com/photos/davegray/sets/72157600167673224/</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><dc:subject>visualization language design illustration</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:3491f9a54590/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:visualization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:illustration"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.garrreynolds.com/Design/basics.html">
    <title>Garr Reynolds - Graphic Design Fundamental Elements</title>
    <dc:date>2008-03-12T13:24:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.garrreynolds.com/Design/basics.html</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[as adapted from A White - and just about every visual design text published
]]></description>
<dc:subject>techwriting design webdesign</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:0c2ffe232ae1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:techwriting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:webdesign"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.presentationzen.com/presentationzen/">
    <title>Presentation Zen</title>
    <dc:date>2008-03-12T13:14:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.presentationzen.com/presentationzen/</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Promotional blog by Garr Reynolds on tradiional and contemporary professional presentations.  Eschews the terms but is steeped in Socratic rhetoric turned towards the digital.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>techwriting PowerPoint presentations marketing design erhetoric</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:6f9f41081ee8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:techwriting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:PowerPoint"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:presentations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:marketing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:erhetoric"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://wiki.vizthink.com/">
    <title>VizThink - Welcome to the VizThink Wiki Home</title>
    <dc:date>2008-02-06T12:22:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://wiki.vizthink.com/</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><dc:subject>wiki design visualization presentations</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:63e9b7fdd316/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:wiki"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:visualization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:presentations"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.37signals.com/svn/posts/808-a-very-different-approach-to-tagging">
    <title>A very different approach to tagging - (37signals)</title>
    <dc:date>2008-01-28T13:09:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.37signals.com/svn/posts/808-a-very-different-approach-to-tagging</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><dc:subject>folksonomy taxonomy tags usability design</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:b557f2bf7ee3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:folksonomy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:taxonomy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:tags"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:usability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.brainjar.com/dhtml/intro/">
    <title>BrainJar.com: Introduction to the Document Object Model</title>
    <dc:date>2007-07-26T12:38:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.brainjar.com/dhtml/intro/</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><dc:subject>DOM tutorials design web2.0</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:0478767b5e50/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:DOM"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:tutorials"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:web2.0"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.presentationzen.com/presentationzen/2007/04/is_it_finally_t.html">
    <title>Presentation Zen: Is it finally time to ditch PowerPoint?</title>
    <dc:date>2007-07-25T22:52:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.presentationzen.com/presentationzen/2007/04/is_it_finally_t.html</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[PPoint taken through cognitive load theory.  Modalites of presentation. Glad this was posted. Trashing PP for poor use is two easy.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>PowerPoint visualization design presentations modalities newmedia</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:ff19b85c1b4d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:PowerPoint"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:visualization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:presentations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:modalities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:newmedia"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://captology.stanford.edu/#captologyOverview">
    <title>Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab: Captology</title>
    <dc:date>2007-07-01T14:42:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://captology.stanford.edu/#captologyOverview</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[the study of computers as persuasive technology.  The blog is the most interesting section.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>rhetoric credibility design en3177 research usability webdesign</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:fb7ed1303fa4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:rhetoric"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:credibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:en3177"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:research"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:usability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:webdesign"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/card_based_classification_evaluation">
    <title>Card-Based Classification Evaluation - Boxes and Arrows</title>
    <dc:date>2006-12-27T13:27:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/card_based_classification_evaluation</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[companion piece to Card sorting: a definitive guide
]]></description>
<dc:subject>design howto IA webdesign wcw taxonomy folksonomy tagging</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:c8fdb7f150cd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:howto"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:IA"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:webdesign"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:wcw"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:taxonomy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:folksonomy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:tagging"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.scottberkun.com/essays/essay13.htm">
    <title>The role of flow in web design - scottberkun.com</title>
    <dc:date>2006-07-30T14:21:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.scottberkun.com/essays/essay13.htm</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><dc:subject>webdesign design WebDesignExample</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:fe95954b63c5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:webdesign"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:WebDesignExample"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.outer-court.com/archive/2005-12-31-n34.html">
    <title>10 Web Trends That Should Die in 2006</title>
    <dc:date>2006-01-02T05:16:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.outer-court.com/archive/2005-12-31-n34.html</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><dc:subject>usability design wcw</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:25fc078c14f6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:usability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:wcw"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>