<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (mcmorgan)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from mcmorgan</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2010/05/14/facebook-and-radical-transparency-a-rant.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.masternewmedia.org/news/2006/12/23/iraq_news_bloggers_and_independent.htm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://credibilityserver.stanford.edu/guidelines/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.webcredible.co.uk/user-friendly-resources/web-credibility/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://captology.stanford.edu/#captologyOverview"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://credibility.stanford.edu/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.britannica.com/blog/main/2007/06/web-20-the-sleep-of-reason-part-i/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/lanier06/lanier06_index.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ojr.org/ojr/glaser/1094678265.php"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2010/05/14/facebook-and-radical-transparency-a-rant.html">
    <title>apophenia » Blog Archive » Facebook and “radical transparency” (a rant)</title>
    <dc:date>2010-05-15T20:12:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2010/05/14/facebook-and-radical-transparency-a-rant.html</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[radical transparency.” In short, Kirkpatrick argues that Zuckerberg believes that people will be better off if they make themselves transparent. Not only that, society will be better off. (We’ll ignore the fact that Facebook’s purse strings may be better off too.) My encounters with Zuckerberg lead me to believe that he genuinely believes this, he genuinely believes that society will be better off if people make themselves transparent
]]></description>
<dc:subject>facebook privacy socialmedia socialnetworking credibility fyc</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:123edf090e7b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:facebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:socialmedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:socialnetworking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:credibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:fyc"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.masternewmedia.org/news/2006/12/23/iraq_news_bloggers_and_independent.htm">
    <title>Iraq News: Bloggers And Independent Journalists Are The Only Reliable Sources For Western Media News (Before They Are Censored) - Robin Good's Latest News</title>
    <dc:date>2008-01-31T23:55:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.masternewmedia.org/news/2006/12/23/iraq_news_bloggers_and_independent.htm</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[From Dec 2006.  News from on the ground can be uncensored and immediate.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>en3177 blogging credibility</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:c75794e63f94/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:en3177"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:blogging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:credibility"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://credibilityserver.stanford.edu/guidelines/">
    <title>Guidelines for Web Credibility: Stanford</title>
    <dc:date>2007-07-01T14:52:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://credibilityserver.stanford.edu/guidelines/</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Part of Stanford Web Cred Research.  A table of 10 guidelines,
]]></description>
<dc:subject>credibility usability webdesign en3177 fyc</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:dbb1b933ad73/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:credibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:usability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:webdesign"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:en3177"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:fyc"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.webcredible.co.uk/user-friendly-resources/web-credibility/">
    <title>Web credibility articles &amp; resources</title>
    <dc:date>2007-07-01T14:50:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.webcredible.co.uk/user-friendly-resources/web-credibility/</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[from a commercial UK web design and consulting site
]]></description>
<dc:subject>credibility webdesign en3177</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:971154fe825d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:credibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:webdesign"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:en3177"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://captology.stanford.edu/#captologyOverview">
    <title>Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab: Captology</title>
    <dc:date>2007-07-01T14:42:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://captology.stanford.edu/#captologyOverview</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[the study of computers as persuasive technology.  The blog is the most interesting section.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>rhetoric credibility design en3177 research usability webdesign</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:fb7ed1303fa4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:rhetoric"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:credibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:en3177"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:research"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:usability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:webdesign"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://credibility.stanford.edu/">
    <title>The Web Credibility Project - Stanford University</title>
    <dc:date>2007-07-01T14:33:22+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://credibility.stanford.edu/</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[An OV page
]]></description>
<dc:subject>webdesign wcw credibility findability marketing authenticity authority</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:86ca01274390/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:webdesign"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:wcw"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:credibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:findability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:marketing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:authenticity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:authority"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.britannica.com/blog/main/2007/06/web-20-the-sleep-of-reason-part-i/">
    <title>Web 2.0: The Sleep of Reason, Part I - Britannica Blog</title>
    <dc:date>2007-06-15T15:47:05+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.britannica.com/blog/main/2007/06/web-20-the-sleep-of-reason-part-i/</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Gorman goes back to the interplay of print = Authority and net does not.  Good entry point to the main issues: "Print does not necessarily bestow authenticity, and an increasing number of digital resources do not, by themselves, reflect an increase in exp
]]></description>
<dc:subject>web2.0 rhetoric literacy socialpractices authenticity scholarship2.0 credibility authority</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:6faabb963be6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:web2.0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:rhetoric"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:literacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:socialpractices"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:authenticity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:scholarship2.0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:credibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:authority"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/lanier06/lanier06_index.html">
    <title>DIGITAL MAOISM: The Hazards of the New Online Collectivism By Jaron Lanier</title>
    <dc:date>2006-06-19T20:00:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/lanier06/lanier06_index.html</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[by JARON LANIER
]]></description>
<dc:subject>wikipedia wikis knowledgeproduction socialpractices credibility collectivism</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:c236d97000d3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:wikipedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:wikis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:knowledgeproduction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:socialpractices"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:credibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:collectivism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ojr.org/ojr/glaser/1094678265.php">
    <title>Do Wikis Have a Place in the Newsroom?</title>
    <dc:date>2006-02-12T09:02:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://ojr.org/ojr/glaser/1094678265.php</link>
    <dc:creator>mcmorgan</dc:creator><dc:subject>wikis wikipedia socialsoftware credibility web2.0 erhetoric en3177</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/b:170813bbec8f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:wikis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:wikipedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:socialsoftware"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:credibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:web2.0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:erhetoric"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:mcmorgan/t:en3177"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>