<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (matthewmcvickar)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from matthewmcvickar</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://qntm.org/mmacevedo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://sfdictionary.com/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.vox.com/culture/21363945/hp-lovecraft-racism-examples-explained-what-is-lovecraftian-weird-fiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.topherpayne.com/giving-tree"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/07/dehumanizing-condescension-white-fragility/614146/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://clarkesworldmagazine.com/kritzer_11_15/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.theguardian.com/books/2020/apr/03/corona-crisis-tiger-king-lockdown-life-hilary-mantel-simon-armitage-julian-barnes-anne-enright-jeannette-winterson-diane-evans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.tor.com/2020/04/14/didnt-i-write-this-story-already-when-your-fictional-pandemic-becomes-reality/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://theoutline.com/post/8789/woody-allen-book-hachette-walk-out?zd=1&amp;zi=ya3rydoy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://bombmagazine.org/articles/amina-cain-renee-gladman/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://bombmagazine.org/articles/housesofravicka/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pitchfork.com/features/article/8722-the-words-of-others/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://medium.com/@ZivW/standbacks-musings-on-too-like-the-lightning-3a2443ecbf6c"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2020/01/15/the-myth-of-self-reliance/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://popula.com/2019/10/11/the-failures-of-ayn-rand/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.newyorker.com/culture/persons-of-interest/ted-chiangs-soulful-science-fiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://theoutline.com/post/7886/ursula-le-guin-carrier-bag-theory?zd=1&amp;zi=yktqt2ay"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://popula.com/2018/10/24/since-man-first-crept-from-the-primeval-slurry/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.buzzfeed.com/jennybagel/they-pretend-to-be-us-while-pretending-we-dont-exist"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://popula.com/2018/10/15/the-center-held-just-fine/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://kalamu.com/neogriot/2013/07/09/history-octavia-butler-gave-us-a-few-rules-for-predicting-the-future/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://siminiblocker.tumblr.com/tagged/The-Long-Way-to-a-Small-Angry-Planet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.newyorker.com/business/currency/how-staying-small-helps-new-directions-publish-great-books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://us2.campaign-archive.com/?u=1854296747731744c923a33ef&amp;id=a902e5b6af&amp;buffer_share=e16b5"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://strangehorizons.com/non-fiction/reviews/binti-by-nnedi-okorafor/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://vajra.me/2015/04/15/margin/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://enkare.org/key-nnedi-okorafor/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://newrepublic.com/article/137128/shirley-jacksons-disappearing-act"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.newyorker.com/books/page-turner/frog-and-toad-an-amphibious-celebration-of-same-sex-love"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/wishlist/1ZAXWN8YDG79D"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://correlatedcontents.com/?p=1989"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://newrepublic.com/article/119996/hp-lovecrafts-philosophy-horror"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.tor.com/2011/08/31/wikihistory/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/books/2015/11/ancillary_mercy_reviewed_the_final_novel_in_ann_leckie_s_imperial_radch.single.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://interfictions.com/translating-gender-ancillary-justice-in-five-languages-alex-dally-macfarlane/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.wired.com/2015/08/won-science-fictions-hugo-awards-matters/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.culturemachine.net/index.php/cm/article/viewArticle/487"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hellotailor.tumblr.com/post/96488138470/some-thoughts-on-harry-potter-as-a-dystopia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://aeon.co/magazine/altered-states/creepypasta-is-how-the-internet-learns-our-fears/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://parabasis.typepad.com/blog/2013/10/the-realism-canard.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/08/spoilers-dont-spoil-anything/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pitchfork.com/features/paper-trail/9104-devon-powers/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/books/2012/08/how-lester-bangs-taught-me-to-read.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arts.nationalpost.com/2012/09/14/what-cant-be-published/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hulu.com/watch/360251/tell-them-anything-you-want-a-portrait-of-maurice-sendak"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://multivax.com/last_question.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://c-d.tumblr.com/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.teleread.com/paul-biba/an-open-letter-to-cursor-by-richard-eoin-nash/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.avclub.com/articles/what-will-be-the-next-abstinence-vampire,8312/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.tifilms.com/wild/call_debunked.htm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/42914044"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.gourmet.com/magazine/2000s/2004/08/consider_the_lobster"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://harpers.org/archive/2006/02/0080935"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://neojaponisme.com/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://houseoffame.blogspot.com/2007/05/i-can-hath-cheezburger.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.japanreview.net/interview_mentzas.htm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sjca.edu/asp/main.aspx?page=1302"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://myweb.cableone.net/adoerr/"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://qntm.org/mmacevedo">
    <title>qntm: Lena</title>
    <dc:date>2021-04-14T17:08:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://qntm.org/mmacevedo</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>MMAcevedo (Mnemonic Map/Acevedo), also known as Miguel, is the earliest executable image of a human brain. It is a snapshot of the living brain of neurology graduate Miguel Álvarez Acevedo (2010–2073), taken by researchers at the Uplift Laboratory at the University of New Mexico on August 1, 2031.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>scifi literature</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:832904b12d42/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:scifi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://sfdictionary.com/">
    <title>Historical Dictionary of Science Fiction</title>
    <dc:date>2021-01-30T06:46:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://sfdictionary.com/</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Welcome to the Historical Dictionary of Science Fiction. This work-in-progress is a comprehensive quotation-based dictionary of the language of science fiction. The HD/SF is an offshoot of a project begun by the Oxford English Dictionary (though it is no longer formally affiliated with it). It is edited by Jesse Sheidlower. Please explore the menu links to learn more.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>dictionary language scifi literature nerds</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:f371aa73b7af/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:dictionary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:scifi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:nerds"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.vox.com/culture/21363945/hp-lovecraft-racism-examples-explained-what-is-lovecraftian-weird-fiction">
    <title>Aja Romano: Just how racist was H.P. Lovecraft? (Vox)</title>
    <dc:date>2020-08-24T00:24:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.vox.com/culture/21363945/hp-lovecraft-racism-examples-explained-what-is-lovecraftian-weird-fiction</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>H.P. Lovecraft was one of the most influential writers of the 20th century. He was also one of its most racist.

---

Still, there’s an extent to which all of this discussion has been taking place within Lovecraft’s niche community of genre writers — still well below the mainstream radar, away from the broader influence of his work. (As late as 2014, it was possible to read Lovecraft explainers in media outlets that made no mention of his racism.) That might finally be changing with HBO’s Lovecraft Country now spotlighting the conversation around the author’s racist legacy — but it also inevitably yields frustration because Lovecraftian imagery and themes are so embedded within the pop culture landscape.

[…]

[Victor LaValle] also stressed capitalizing on Lovecraft’s love of fanfiction of his own stories to overwrite that legacy into newer, more progressive visions of horror. For instance, his award-winning Lovecraftian horror novel The Ballad of Black Tom largely revolves around the underlying premise that much of Lovecraft’s horror is predicated on ridiculous white privilege. That horrific realization that all Lovecraft’s characters undergo that the universe doesn’t revolve around them? That’s not a problem any Black character would ever have.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>literature racism scifi tv</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:867f55138ff6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:racism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:scifi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:tv"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.topherpayne.com/giving-tree">
    <title>Topher Payne: The Tree Who Set Healthy Boundaries</title>
    <dc:date>2020-08-05T06:05:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.topherpayne.com/giving-tree</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Read ‘The Giving Tree’ as usual. When the boy comes hustling for a house, switch to this.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>books literature parenting humor psychology</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:99c4f37da755/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:parenting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:humor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:psychology"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/07/dehumanizing-condescension-white-fragility/614146/">
    <title>John McWhorter: The Dehumanizing Condescension of ‘White Fragility’ (The Atlantic)</title>
    <dc:date>2020-07-19T03:25:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/07/dehumanizing-condescension-white-fragility/614146/</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>And herein is the real problem with White Fragility. DiAngelo does not see fit to address why all of this agonizing soul-searching is necessary to forging change in society. One might ask just how a people can be poised for making change when they have been taught that pretty much anything they say or think is racist and thus antithetical to the good. What end does all this self-mortification serve? Impatient with such questions, DiAngelo insists that “wanting to jump over the hard, personal work and get to ‘solutions’” is a “foundation of white fragility.” In other words, for DiAngelo, the whole point is the suffering. And note the scare quotes around solutions, as if wanting such a thing were somehow ridiculous.

A corollary question is why Black people need to be treated the way DiAngelo assumes we do. The very assumption is deeply condescending to all proud Black people. In my life, racism has affected me now and then at the margins, in very occasional social ways, but has had no effect on my access to societal resources; if anything, it has made them more available to me than they would have been otherwise. Nor should anyone dismiss me as a rara avis. Being middle class, upwardly mobile, and Black has been quite common during my existence since the mid-1960s, and to deny this is to assert that affirmative action for Black people did not work.

In 2020—as opposed to 1920—I neither need nor want anyone to muse on how whiteness privileges them over me. Nor do I need wider society to undergo teachings in how to be exquisitely sensitive about my feelings. I see no connection between DiAngelo’s brand of reeducation and vigorous, constructive activism in the real world on issues of import to the Black community. And I cannot imagine that any Black readers could willingly submit themselves to DiAngelo’s ideas while considering themselves adults of ordinary self-regard and strength. Few books about race have more openly infantilized Black people than this supposedly authoritative tome.

---

White Fragility is, in the end, a book about how to make certain educated white readers feel better about themselves. DiAngelo’s outlook rests upon a depiction of Black people as endlessly delicate poster children within this self-gratifying fantasy about how white America needs to think—or, better, stop thinking. Her answer to white fragility, in other words, entails an elaborate and pitilessly dehumanizing condescension toward Black people. The sad truth is that anyone falling under the sway of this blinkered, self-satisfied, punitive stunt of a primer has been taught, by a well-intentioned but tragically misguided pastor, how to be racist in a whole new way.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>racism literature antiracism</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:bd096bd37d19/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:racism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:antiracism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://clarkesworldmagazine.com/kritzer_11_15/">
    <title>Naomi Kritzer: So Much Cooking</title>
    <dc:date>2020-04-28T17:03:43+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://clarkesworldmagazine.com/kritzer_11_15/</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[A story about a pandemic written in 2015 that is eerily resonant with our current pandemic.

<blockquote>Some days it’s hard to imagine that this will ever be over, that we’ll ever be able to get things back to normal at all. When everyone is sniping at each other it feels like you’ve always been trapped in the middle of a half-dozen bickering children and always will be. When you’re in the midst of grief, it’s hard to imagine spring ever coming.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>fiction literature scifi</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:995fa2724e52/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:fiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:scifi"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.theguardian.com/books/2020/apr/03/corona-crisis-tiger-king-lockdown-life-hilary-mantel-simon-armitage-julian-barnes-anne-enright-jeannette-winterson-diane-evans">
    <title>Compiled by Lisa Allardice: Tiger King and a bloody mary: Hilary Mantel, Simon Armitage and other writers on lockdown life (The Guardian)</title>
    <dc:date>2020-04-23T18:51:43+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.theguardian.com/books/2020/apr/03/corona-crisis-tiger-king-lockdown-life-hilary-mantel-simon-armitage-julian-barnes-anne-enright-jeannette-winterson-diane-evans</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Worth it for this quote primarily:

<blockquote>Anne Enright:

Honestly, there is a lot to be said for tooling about all day, looking up recipes and not making them, not bothering to paint the living room and failing to write a novel. In the middle of the messy non-event called your mid-afternoon, you might get something – a thought to jot down, a good paragraph, a piece of gossip to text a pal. Boredom is a productive state so long as you don’t let it go sour on you. Try not to confuse the urge to get something done with the idea that you are useless. Try not to confuse the urge to contact someone with the thought that you are unloved. Do the thing or don’t do it. Either is fine.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>literature covid19</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:307a881adfc1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:covid19"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.tor.com/2020/04/14/didnt-i-write-this-story-already-when-your-fictional-pandemic-becomes-reality/">
    <title>Naomi Kritzer: Didn’t I Write This Story Already? When Your Fictional Pandemic Becomes Reality (Tor)</title>
    <dc:date>2020-04-18T21:03:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.tor.com/2020/04/14/didnt-i-write-this-story-already-when-your-fictional-pandemic-becomes-reality/</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Sometimes, you’re haunted by your own stories. I wrote “So Much Cooking” in 2015: in it, a food blogger describes cooking in quarantine during a pandemic, feeding an ever-increasing number of children she’s sheltering at her house with an ever-decreasing supply of food.

[…]

Researching the story in 2015 was when I first encountered the phrase “social distancing.” Obviously, you’d close the schools, and public gathering spaces like movie theaters; you’d have everyone telecommute who possibly could. How would you get food? Would grocery delivery services be instantly overloaded? Would restaurants continue to serve take-out? What are the ethics of ordering delivery if you’re just outsourcing your own risk to someone more financially desperate?

[…]

I’ve been struggling to end this essay—I think because we’re still in the midst of the crisis. But I think part of what appeals to people about the story is that it ends with the crisis unresolved. There’s hope; the protagonist absolutely believes that she’ll see her household through to the other side; but it’s not over, any more than it’s over for us.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>food fiction scifi literature covid19</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:9b582ca85228/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:food"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:fiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:scifi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:covid19"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://theoutline.com/post/8789/woody-allen-book-hachette-walk-out?zd=1&amp;zi=ya3rydoy">
    <title>Maris Kreizman: Woody Allen’s book could signal a new era in the publishing industry (The Outline)</title>
    <dc:date>2020-03-23T05:05:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://theoutline.com/post/8789/woody-allen-book-hachette-walk-out?zd=1&amp;zi=ya3rydoy</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Dozens of Hachette employees walked out after learning the company planned to publish Allen’s memoir. Their protest worked.

---

Allen has not been censored or denied the right to publish in any way. He has merely lost a deal that came with an advance on royalties and a corporate marketing machine to help him to sell his book. To be published by a major publisher is not a right covered by the First Amendment; it is and has always been a privilege.

[…]

By simply listening to and evaluating the concerns of lower level employees — a recent study by found that the industry’s interns are significantly more diverse than the industry as a whole — publishers have the opportunity to avoid making bad business decisions before contracts are even signed. And, if those employees are valued more, both in their opinions and their salaries, the publishing industry has a better shot at retaining them and becoming more diverse at higher levels.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>publishing literature metoo</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:ebedcdd195ed/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:metoo"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://bombmagazine.org/articles/amina-cain-renee-gladman/">
    <title>Amina Cain &amp; Renee Gladman (BOMB Magazine)</title>
    <dc:date>2020-03-04T21:57:24+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://bombmagazine.org/articles/amina-cain-renee-gladman/</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Lingering with a moment, operating in the dark, and moving through membranes.

---

Renee Gladman: In Ana Patova the city becomes a three-dimensional embodiment of writing, a world propelled by sentences. Sentences, thus, become both propellants and consequences of the events of Ravicka. Ana Patova writes so that she can act in the world. The writing is the site of that action. What happens in between, where she’s actually walking down the hill, is unmappable. I don’t believe that there is any language without narrative, but there seems to be (in Ravicka and in Providence, RI) plenty of language without events. In Ana Patova, I’m trying to follow the line of thinking, letting it pass through these sentence-corridors that are bridges, and I’m doing this because something is being produced through this particular shape. A crossing reverberates, something being crossed. One consciousness crossing another. One’s books crossing others’ books. One’s walking with another’s walking. One attempt to see the crisis with every other attempt, and not only by the one person but also every other person in the city. I think of narrative as the story of our thinking and of language as that material.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>literature</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:5cd919558970/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://bombmagazine.org/articles/housesofravicka/">
    <title>J.W. McCormack: Nebulous Geography: On Renee Gladman’s Houses of Ravicka (BOMB Magazine)</title>
    <dc:date>2020-03-04T17:22:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://bombmagazine.org/articles/housesofravicka/</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The imagined city from Gladman’s Ravicka series is as elusive as human self-hood. 

---

What Gladman’s work does have in common with the aforementioned works is a faith that language creates the thing it describes. As opposed to the commercial novel, which gestures at the consensual reality beyond the page, Gladman begins with the internal and constructs her world from the ground up, finding meaning in negative spaces. Jakobi proposes that streets should be built according to “qualified voids” and muses that “You can design a flag and name a country, then design another flag and name another country, years before you have to bring that country into existence,” which might have been Gladman’s process with Ravicka—a coherent imaginary place, slowly solidified book to book.

[…]

It’s possible to read the novel without being aware of how much of it Gladman intends as a dwelling against “the atrocities of the political and social present,” but what comes across in all of Gladman’s work is that there is a world worth discovering and which lives both outside and within us, a place “changing all the time” where “there is too much to say about it, too much to see to want to keep seeing.”</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>literature writing</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:5d2194521640/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:writing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://pitchfork.com/features/article/8722-the-words-of-others/">
    <title>Dave Tompkins: The Words of Others (Pitchfork)</title>
    <dc:date>2020-03-04T16:52:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://pitchfork.com/features/article/8722-the-words-of-others/</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Dave Tompkins chronicles the adventures he's had while touring his acclaimed vocoder history ‘How to Wreck a Nice Beach,’ like when he introduced the National Security Agency to Cybotron.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>sound literature</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:94a36cd4680e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:sound"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://medium.com/@ZivW/standbacks-musings-on-too-like-the-lightning-3a2443ecbf6c">
    <title>Standback’s Musings on “Too Like The Lightning”</title>
    <dc:date>2020-03-02T17:21:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://medium.com/@ZivW/standbacks-musings-on-too-like-the-lightning-3a2443ecbf6c</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>In the past year-ish of my life, it’s become a minor goal of mine for people to discuss Ada Palmer’s debut novel, Too Like The Lightning, from now and until eternity. It’s just that kind of book. Here I’m collecting my own thoughts and musings on Too Like The Lightning.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>literature</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:af45f01d8d12/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2020/01/15/the-myth-of-self-reliance/">
    <title>Jenny Odell: The Myth of Self-Reliance (The Paris Review)</title>
    <dc:date>2020-02-12T17:19:07+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2020/01/15/the-myth-of-self-reliance/</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I saw that I had absorbed from my family and my upbringing a specific brand of individualism, valorizing and transmitting it unknowingly. I’d done this throughout my entire life, but especially in How to Do Nothing. Around my favored versions of contemplative solitude, so similar to Emerson’s, a whole suite of circumstances appeared in full relief, like something coming into focus. The women in the kitchen made the mens’ conversation possible, just as my trip to the mountain—and really all of my time spent walking, observing, and courting the “over-soul”—rested upon a long list of privileges, from the specific (owning a car, having the time), to the general (able-bodied, upper-middle-class, half white and half “model minority,” a walkable neighborhood in a desirable city, and more). There was an entire infrastructure around my experience of freedom, and I’d been so busy chasing it that I hadn’t seen it.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>books philosophy literature</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:e3852ffb2adb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://popula.com/2019/10/11/the-failures-of-ayn-rand/">
    <title>Maria Bustillos: The failures of Ayn Rand (Popula)</title>
    <dc:date>2019-12-08T17:14:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://popula.com/2019/10/11/the-failures-of-ayn-rand/</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>For those who are inclined to find such ideas ludicrous, the book will fail, and utterly; its premises betray a bottomless ignorance of the deep interconnectedness of humankind, the needs — economic, social, emotional, intellectual — of human beings for one another, and of the ultimate inalienable reality of life on Earth as a whole, the totality of which each is a part, and our need to live in this wholeness.

Rand is 100% pro-inequality; she preaches the intellectual and moral superiority of wealth, and scorn and hatred of those who have “less.” Objectivism actively praises inequality. But nobody has “less,” because all have the same, of the only thing that matters—life, for a moment, and then?—something, nothing, nobody knows. Equality is not a fantasy, nor even a goal; it is just a fact.

[…]

Rand’s books have sold nonstop from the moment they were published because people love hearing how not only can they get away with being totally selfish, it’s absolutely the right way to be. The best way to be, as in, morally the best. 

[…]

The real looters, it increasingly appears, are the self-styled Objectivist “elites,” rabidly pursuing their own “happiness” at the cost of our social safety net, the prosperity and well-being of the world’s people and even, quite possibly, of this planet’s capacity to sustain life. So much for the triumph of individualism.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>america economics literature</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:c306dc50e5b8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:america"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.newyorker.com/culture/persons-of-interest/ted-chiangs-soulful-science-fiction">
    <title>Joshua Rothman: Ted Chiang’s Soulful Science Fiction (New Yorker)</title>
    <dc:date>2019-09-14T23:13:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.newyorker.com/culture/persons-of-interest/ted-chiangs-soulful-science-fiction</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>In the course of our conversations, he and I discussed various theories about his writing—about what, in general, his project might be. At lunch, he proffered one theory—that his stories were an attempt to resist “the identification of materialism with nihilism.”</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>literature biography scifi</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:dcc369a28ee4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:biography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:scifi"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://theoutline.com/post/7886/ursula-le-guin-carrier-bag-theory?zd=1&amp;zi=yktqt2ay">
    <title>Siobhan Leddy: We should all be reading more Ursula Le Guin (The Outline)</title>
    <dc:date>2019-09-08T22:34:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://theoutline.com/post/7886/ursula-le-guin-carrier-bag-theory?zd=1&amp;zi=yktqt2ay</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Her novels imagine other worlds, but her theory of fiction can help us better live in this one.

---

Le Guin’s carrier bag is, in addition to a story about early humans, a method for storytelling itself, meaning it’s also a method of history. But unlike the spear (which follows a linear trajectory towards its target), and unlike the kind of linear way we’ve come to think of time and history in the West, the carrier bag is a big jumbled mess of stuff. One thing is entangled with another, and with another.

[…]

As well as its meandering narrative, a carrier bag story also contains no heroes. There are, instead, many different protagonists with equal importance to the plot. This is a very difficult way to tell a story, fictional or otherwise. While, in reality, most meaningful social change is the result of collective action, we aren’t very good at recounting such a diffusely distributed account. The meetings, the fundraising, the careful and drawn-out negotiations — they’re so boring! Who wants to watch a movie about a four-hour meeting between community stakeholders?

[…]

We will not “beat” climate change, nor is “nature” our adversary. If the planet could be considered a container for all life, in which everything — plants, animals, humans — are all held together, then to attempt domination becomes a self-defeating act. By letting ourselves “become part of the killer story,” writes Le Guin, “we may get finished along with it.” All of which is to say: we have to abandon the old story.

[…]

We are still learning how to tell stories about climate change. It is fundamentally a more-than-human problem, one that simultaneously affects all communities of people, animals, plants — albeit asymmetrically. The kind of story we need right now is unheroic, incorporating social movements, political imagination and nonhuman actors. In this story, time doesn’t progress in an easily digestible straight line, with a beginning, middle and end. Instead there are many timelines, each darting around, bringing actions of the past and future into the present. It collapses nature as a category, recognizing that we’re already a part of it. In a climate change story, nobody will win, but if we learn to tell it differently more of us can survive.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>literature scifi society</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:275749be9503/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:scifi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:society"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://popula.com/2018/10/24/since-man-first-crept-from-the-primeval-slurry/">
    <title>Maria Bustillos: The Artist is the Art (Popula)</title>
    <dc:date>2019-08-21T16:35:33+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://popula.com/2018/10/24/since-man-first-crept-from-the-primeval-slurry/</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Regarding David Foster Wallace, who Maria argues simply dismissing as “problematic” is not quite the answer.

<blockquote>The artist of special gifts who is also a “hideous man” is a deeply valuable source of information for a society seeking to better itself.</blockquote>

This piece doesn’t do enough—it says simply dismissing DFW is unrealistic, but doesn’t offer any of its own ideas about how we’re expected to extract special value from reading the work of a serially abusive man, only that it’s possible and that his work is so good we can’t ignore it. We can learn from troubled people who weren’t abusive, so what makes David Foster Wallace so special?]]></description>
<dc:subject>literature sexualassault</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:968a14b04b0e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:sexualassault"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.buzzfeed.com/jennybagel/they-pretend-to-be-us-while-pretending-we-dont-exist">
    <title>Jenny Zhang: They Pretend To Be Us While Pretending We Don't Exist (Buzzfeed)</title>
    <dc:date>2019-08-19T23:02:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.buzzfeed.com/jennybagel/they-pretend-to-be-us-while-pretending-we-dont-exist</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>It may seem totally nuts now, but as far as who gets credit for simply being affected by black pain, it doesn’t seem very removed from our current world where we heap lavish praise on someone like Jon Stewart for announcing on the Daily Show that he was too heartbroken to make jokes after the Charleston church shooting, as if all throughout this country’s present and past, black people and people of color have not been so heartbroken and so violated that we were left humorless, or worse, dead. To praise Stewart as excessively as he was praised is to say to black people: Your pain is unexceptional and does not matter until a white man feels it too.

What I want is to get paid for my labor and be credited for my excellence. What I want is to not have to be made aware that because most publications only ever make room for one or two writers of color when those publications publish me it means another excellent writer of color does not get to have that spot, and yes, we internalize that scarcity and it makes us act wild and violent toward each other sometimes instead of kind.

Why are we so perversely interested in narratives of suffering when we read things by black and brown writers? Where are my carefree writers of color at? Seriously, where?</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>writing racism literature</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:3496a55d24f1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:racism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://popula.com/2018/10/15/the-center-held-just-fine/">
    <title>Maria Bustillos: The Center Held Just Fine (Popula)</title>
    <dc:date>2019-08-07T05:08:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://popula.com/2018/10/15/the-center-held-just-fine/</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Joan Didion, First Lady of Neoliberalism

---

Didion’s work is an unrelenting exercise in class superiority, and it will soon be as unendurable as a minstrel show. It is the calf-bound, gilt-edged bible of neoliberal meritocracy. The weirdest thing about it is that this dyed-in-the-wool conservative woman (she started her career at the National Review) somehow became the irreproachable darling of New York media and stayed that way for decades, all on the strength of a dry, self-regarding prose style and a “glamor shot” with a Corvette. The toast of Broadway and the face of Céline, decorated by Barack Obama himself, Didion is the mascot of the 20th century’s ruling class (both “liberal” and “conservative”)—that is, people who “went to a good school” and know how to ski and what kind of wine to order, and thus believe themselves entitled to be in charge of your life and mine, and just… planet Earth.

[...]

For all their hanging out among the counterculturalists and jazz musicians and rock stars and hippies and desperately trying to be cool, I don’t think Joan Didion, or Capote, Updike, Wolfe, et al., ever wanted an egalitarian society. American writers like to pretend that their work is apolitical; it’s hard to imagine what the American equivalent of Marquez or Václav Havel might be. But no writing is apolitical. Didion and her cohort wanted a society where people like themselves could keep comfortably chronicling the interesting inferiorities of those in the classes below their own.

[...]

Didion and co. produced fake cultural leadership for the comfort and protection of the well-heeled and powerful. Better people, better writers, would have connected with the youth movement and the working class to protect and expand democracy—say, by putting their bodies upon the gears, and upon the wheels of the machine. Instead, they kept it running.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>class literature politics neoliberalism</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:4f50cf3a35a3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:class"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:neoliberalism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://kalamu.com/neogriot/2013/07/09/history-octavia-butler-gave-us-a-few-rules-for-predicting-the-future/">
    <title>Octavia Butler’s ‘Rules for Predicting the Future’</title>
    <dc:date>2019-07-18T15:31:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://kalamu.com/neogriot/2013/07/09/history-octavia-butler-gave-us-a-few-rules-for-predicting-the-future/</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>How many combinations of unintended consequences and human reactions to them does it take to detour us into a future that seems to defy any obvious trend? Not many. That’s why predicting the future accurately is so difficult. Some of the most mistaken predictions I’ve seen are of the straight-line variety–that’s the kind that ignores the inevitability of unintended consequences, ignores our often less-than-logical reactions to them, and says simply, “In the future, we will have more and more of whatever’s holding our attention right now.”

[...]

So why try to predict the future at all if it’s so difficult, so nearly impossible? Because making predictions is one way to give warning when we see ourselves drifting in dangerous directions. Because prediction is a useful way of pointing out safer, wiser courses. Because, most of all, our tomorrow is the child of our today. Through thought and deed, we exert a great deal of influence over this child, even though we can’t control it absolutely. Best to think about it, though. Best to try to shape it into something good. Best to do that for any child.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>future literature</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:f4ec15e2f1c3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:future"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://siminiblocker.tumblr.com/tagged/The-Long-Way-to-a-Small-Angry-Planet">
    <title>Simini Blocker #The Long Way to a Small Angry Planet</title>
    <dc:date>2018-12-27T16:38:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://siminiblocker.tumblr.com/tagged/The-Long-Way-to-a-Small-Angry-Planet</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Sissix and Rosemary, again from Becky Chambers’ ‘The Long Way to a Small Angry Planet.’ I finished the second one last week as well, which has another cast of excellent characters. I love how cozy and lived in these books feel, while still being really thoughtful on challenging your perspective—it’s not something I’d come to expect from science fiction. </blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>art scifi literature fandom fanart</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:0a7ac8c3b11b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:scifi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:fandom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:fanart"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.newyorker.com/business/currency/how-staying-small-helps-new-directions-publish-great-books">
    <title>Maria Bustillos: How Staying Small Helps New Directions Publish Great Books (The New Yorker)</title>
    <dc:date>2018-10-05T21:22:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.newyorker.com/business/currency/how-staying-small-helps-new-directions-publish-great-books</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The size of the company, which is held in trust, is dictated by the terms of Laughlin’s will. There are, and will be, just nine employees, and the number of books the company may publish each year is also fixed. Profits are generally reinvested, and the relatively low salaries paid to staff are balanced out by policies like an annual bonus system—which alone might make up ten or fifteen percent of a year’s earnings—and a retirement savings plan. These constraints were baked into New Directions’ business model in the interest of quality and longevity. “We’re expected to make our own way financially,” Epler told me. “The trust is just how he left it to make it safe, so we couldn’t be bought by a larger corporation.”

As intended, those constraints have factored deeply into the company’s acquisition strategy. Its employees leverage connections, taste, a worldly sensibility, a capacity for risk, and thrift in order to bring revenues to the company and fine new books to a global readership.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>literature business</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:0875a4ee5c46/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:business"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://us2.campaign-archive.com/?u=1854296747731744c923a33ef&amp;id=a902e5b6af&amp;buffer_share=e16b5">
    <title>Longreads Member Exclusive: 'The Nature of Social Evil'</title>
    <dc:date>2018-03-08T22:47:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://us2.campaign-archive.com/?u=1854296747731744c923a33ef&amp;id=a902e5b6af&amp;buffer_share=e16b5</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Maria Bustillos picked Ernest Becker’s ‘Escape from Evil’.

<blockquote>Becker won a Pulitzer for his previous book, The Denial of Death, but this one, published posthumously and building on ideas from that earlier work, is far, far better, to my mind, more compact, more advanced, more compelling. This book is pragmatic synthesis of multiple disciplines in the science of man, the place where humanities and science collide. Theories about Becker's work abound, but for me his great gift was the way he seemed to have led us to the threshold of a new enlightenment, clear-eyed, undeceived, ready to take the next step. It's a step the reader may be able to intuit, and perhaps even gain, and make practical use of in his or her own life: '[W]e have to take a full look at the worst in order to begin to get rid of illusions. Realism, even brutal, is not cynicism.'</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>literature psychology world history politics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:046af1729d05/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:world"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:politics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://strangehorizons.com/non-fiction/reviews/binti-by-nnedi-okorafor/">
    <title>Vajra Chandrasekera: ‘Binti’ by Nnedi Okorafor (Strange Horizons)</title>
    <dc:date>2016-12-03T05:13:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://strangehorizons.com/non-fiction/reviews/binti-by-nnedi-okorafor/</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[A brilliant piece of literary criticism for a novelette I loved and am looking forward to the next installment of.

<blockquote>As a metaphor for acculturation into empire, this works almost too well. You can walk in the halls of empire, yes, as long as you're willing to accept invasive alien tentacles into your mind, to put alien needs above your own, to allow yourself to be instrumentalized.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>literature criticism writing culture race scifi</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:7eaa2fa19aa7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:criticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:race"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:scifi"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://vajra.me/2015/04/15/margin/">
    <title>Vajra Chandrasekera: Which This Margin Is Too Small To Contain</title>
    <dc:date>2016-11-28T04:33:38+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://vajra.me/2015/04/15/margin/</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Some thoughts on "diversity" in sf/f and discovering that I'm apparently a "writer of colour" and all that. I never actually use these words myself, whether to refer to either myself or anybody else. Though at the same time I don't object to their use to refer to myself or anybody else either. It's complicated.

…

If essentialism is the pernicious idea that categories are more real than people, strategic essentialisms are a rhetorical technique when you’re aware that the essentialism in question is bullshit but you temporarily accept being identified with a category in order to achieve something, even if that something is just making a point. There are all sorts of good, practical reasons to collectivize identity in this way, but I think it works best when it’s goal-oriented and time-bound. Because when it’s not, then it can also mean just signing up to be reduced to a category for somebody else’s convenience.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>literature race</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:e14f9923b78a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:race"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://enkare.org/key-nnedi-okorafor/">
    <title>Nnedi Okorafor: The Key</title>
    <dc:date>2016-11-26T22:07:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://enkare.org/key-nnedi-okorafor/</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>It was due to a stupid thing done in a fit of panic that Fwadausi Bello altered her life forever.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>writing literature fiction</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:3431bc214990/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:fiction"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://newrepublic.com/article/137128/shirley-jacksons-disappearing-act">
    <title>Jane Hu: Shirley Jackson’s Disappearing Act (The New Republic)</title>
    <dc:date>2016-10-05T16:14:41+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://newrepublic.com/article/137128/shirley-jacksons-disappearing-act</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Underrated for most of her life, the author of "The Lottery" is at last experiencing a revival.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>biography literature</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:563e111af898/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:biography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.newyorker.com/books/page-turner/frog-and-toad-an-amphibious-celebration-of-same-sex-love">
    <title>Colin Stokes: “Frog and Toad”: An Amphibious Celebration of Same-Sex Love (The New Yorker)</title>
    <dc:date>2016-06-13T14:29:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.newyorker.com/books/page-turner/frog-and-toad-an-amphibious-celebration-of-same-sex-love</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Colin Stokes on Arnold Lobel, his Frog and Toad illustrated children’s series, and its lessons about friendship and acceptance.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>sexuality gay literature</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:af027f6029b1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:sexuality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:gay"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/wishlist/1ZAXWN8YDG79D">
    <title>Woke</title>
    <dc:date>2016-02-08T21:28:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/wishlist/1ZAXWN8YDG79D</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[An Amazon.com Wishlist by Erica Joy (@ericajoy) with books about black America.

Added to GoodReads here: https://www.goodreads.com/review/list/3519627-matthew-mcvickar?shelf=erica-joy-woke-list&view=table]]></description>
<dc:subject>america history literature books racism</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:4edc0d4d30fc/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:america"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:racism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://correlatedcontents.com/?p=1989">
    <title>Michael Lutz: Is There a Community Outside This Text?</title>
    <dc:date>2015-12-20T01:00:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://correlatedcontents.com/?p=1989</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Kilduff-Taylor’s tired handwashing here is not so much an indictment of the problem of two interpretive communities — whose existence and cross-reference is facilitated by the internet as a mode of critical reception — as it is an attempt to escape the problem entirely.  At some undesignated time before now, people just would have read the game correctly, no problem!  Meaning would have been obvious, and interpretation would have been a pleasant exercise in riffing upon its verities from that point on.  We’ve thus already lost, and all we can do is take solace in our own knowledge and interpretation as things fall apart.

This is disingenuous because the fact that anyone is even taking issue with the implication that Wreden should not be paid for his work is a sign that, indeed, people are not willing to let the patently worse interpretation of the game stand.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>videogames literature criticism truth</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:0be91b51a544/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:videogames"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:criticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:truth"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://newrepublic.com/article/119996/hp-lovecrafts-philosophy-horror">
    <title>John Gray: H.P. Lovecraft Invented a Horrific World to Escape a Nihilistic Universe (The New Republic)</title>
    <dc:date>2015-11-21T07:28:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://newrepublic.com/article/119996/hp-lovecrafts-philosophy-horror</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The weird realism that runs through his writings undermines any belief system—religious or humanist—in which the human mind is the center of the universe. There is a tendency nowadays to think of the world in which we live as an artefact of mind or language: a human construction. For Lovecraft, human beings are too feeble to shape a coherent view of the universe. Our minds are specks tossed about in the cosmic melee; though we look for secure foundations, we live in perpetual free fall. With its emphasis on the radical contingency of the human world, this is a refreshing alternative to the anthropocentric philosophies in which so many find intellectual reassurance. It may seem an unsettling view of things; but an inhuman cosmos need not be as horrific as Lovecraft seems to have found it.

He is often described as misanthropic, but this isn’t quite right—a true misanthrope would find the inhumanity of the universe liberating. There is no intrinsic reason why a universe in which people are marginal should be a horror-inducing place. A world vastly larger and stranger than any the human mind can contain could just as well evoke a sense of excitement or an acceptance of mystery.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>literature history america</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:a3b60e19c1da/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:america"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.tor.com/2011/08/31/wikihistory/">
    <title>Desmond Warzel: Wikihistory</title>
    <dc:date>2015-11-09T21:17:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.tor.com/2011/08/31/wikihistory/</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>At 14:57:44, SilverFox316 wrote:
Back from 1936 Berlin; incapacitated FreedomFighter69 before he could pull his little stunt. Freedomfighter69, as you are a new member, please read IATT Bulletin 1147 regarding the killing of Hitler before your next excursion. Failure to do so may result in your expulsion per Bylaw 223.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>literature scifi timetravel</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:696ccb0683fa/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:scifi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:timetravel"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/books/2015/11/ancillary_mercy_reviewed_the_final_novel_in_ann_leckie_s_imperial_radch.single.html">
    <title>Tammy Oler: This Groundbreaking Science Fiction Trilogy Has Won Pretty Much Every Award There Is</title>
    <dc:date>2015-11-09T00:52:22+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/books/2015/11/ancillary_mercy_reviewed_the_final_novel_in_ann_leckie_s_imperial_radch.single.html</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[A review of Ann Leckie’s ‘Imperial Radch’ trilogy.

<blockquote>Central to Leckie’s trilogy is how important it is to feel a sense of control over one’s identity and how being recognized is a precondition for having power. These themes are not exclusive to one particular time or place, of course, but Leckie taps acutely into the feelings (and fears) that drive current American politics and movements for change. One of the chief pleasures of the trilogy is just how many wrongs Breq tries to make right and how committed she is to making incremental progress even when problems become fraught and complicated. Breq’s actions are underscored by her profound grief, anger, and shame that give way, even if just a little bit, to the solace and hope she finds in her crew and her makeshift family of A.I.s. The end of Ancillary Mercy is satisfying because it is so very un-Radchaai: diverse, messy, and honest. “In the end,” Breq realizes, “it’s only ever been one step, and then the next.”</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>scifi literature</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:15b9148de223/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:scifi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://interfictions.com/translating-gender-ancillary-justice-in-five-languages-alex-dally-macfarlane/">
    <title>Alex Dally McFarlane: Translating Gender: Ancillary Justice in Five Languages</title>
    <dc:date>2015-11-09T00:50:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://interfictions.com/translating-gender-ancillary-justice-in-five-languages-alex-dally-macfarlane/</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[On translation Ann Leckie's ‘Imperial Radch’ series:

<blockquote>What is clear in all of these responses is that by examining the notions of ‘neutral’ and ‘feminine’ in grammar and gender through the lens of translation, we reveal their complexity – and some of their possible futures in languages, in both literature and speech.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>translation scifi literature gender</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:7a34169e066e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:translation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:scifi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:gender"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.wired.com/2015/08/won-science-fictions-hugo-awards-matters/">
    <title>Amy Wallace: Who Won Science Fiction's Hugo Awards, and Why It Matters (WIRED)</title>
    <dc:date>2015-09-13T00:45:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.wired.com/2015/08/won-science-fictions-hugo-awards-matters/</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>After a group of fans tried to guarantee a whiter, more male slate, most of the big Hugos instead went to "No Winner."</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>literature</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:d86e40d92037/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.culturemachine.net/index.php/cm/article/viewArticle/487">
    <title>Frédérik Lesage: Review of ‘Alien Phenomenology, or What It's Like to Be a Thing’ by Ian Bogost (Culture Machine)</title>
    <dc:date>2015-05-09T02:17:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.culturemachine.net/index.php/cm/article/viewArticle/487</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>In an account of designing one of these litanizers for an OOO symposium website, Bogost writes how it inadvertently shocked a visitor to the site by randomly generating a sexist image of a scantily clad woman on the symposium’s main page. Bogost’s response to the visitor’s complaint was to modify the code for his litanizer so as to exclude these kinds of images. For me, this encounter and subsequent compromise is where carpentry becomes most interesting. If carpentry is about exploring how things playfully hang together, the point where this hanging breaks down or encounters resistance would seem to me to be of particular interest. Instead of recognising this disruption and attempting to develop a means through which carpentry can address this challenge, Bogost is happy to have the litanizer simply raise thorny questions ‘in a unique way’ and vents his frustration that resolving the complaint means compromising its flat ontology of objects.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>literature philosophy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:31351a1d3b39/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:philosophy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hellotailor.tumblr.com/post/96488138470/some-thoughts-on-harry-potter-as-a-dystopia">
    <title>Gavia Baker-Whitelaw: Some thoughts on Harry Potter as a dystopia.</title>
    <dc:date>2014-09-03T16:26:37+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://hellotailor.tumblr.com/post/96488138470/some-thoughts-on-harry-potter-as-a-dystopia</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Wizarding Britain is so fucked up that the rest of the wizarding world has just given up on it.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>literature</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:ae884b7788d4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://aeon.co/magazine/altered-states/creepypasta-is-how-the-internet-learns-our-fears/">
    <title>Will Wiles: Creepypasta (Aeon)</title>
    <dc:date>2014-02-19T18:30:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://aeon.co/magazine/altered-states/creepypasta-is-how-the-internet-learns-our-fears/</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>With a flood of dark memes and viral horror stories, the internet is mapping the contours of modern fear.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>creepypasta internet literature horror</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:6e169c7bf37f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:creepypasta"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:horror"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://parabasis.typepad.com/blog/2013/10/the-realism-canard.html">
    <title>Isaac Butler: The Realism Canard, Or: Why Fact-Checking Fiction Is Poisoning Criticism</title>
    <dc:date>2013-10-14T04:58:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://parabasis.typepad.com/blog/2013/10/the-realism-canard.html</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>In real life, people don't talk the way they do in movies or television or (especially) books. Real locations aren't styled, lit, or shot the way they are on screen. The basic conceits of point of view in literature actually make no sense and are in no way "realistic." Realism isn't verisimilitude. It's a set of stylistic conventions that evolve over time, are socially agreed upon, and are hotly contested. The presence of these conventions is not a sign of quality. Departure from them is not a sign of quality's absence.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>literature criticism writing</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:75cbb3d0d745/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:criticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:writing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/08/spoilers-dont-spoil-anything/">
    <title>Jonah Lehrer: Spoilers Don't Spoil Anything (Wired Science)</title>
    <dc:date>2013-09-07T22:40:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/08/spoilers-dont-spoil-anything/</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>It turns out … spoilers don’t spoil anything. In fact, a new study suggests that spoilers can actually increase our enjoyment of literature. Although we’ve long assumed that the suspense makes the story—we keep on reading because we don’t know what happens next—this new research suggests that the tension actually detracts from our enjoyment.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>psychology media film literature tv</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:cc860a583a11/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:film"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:tv"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://pitchfork.com/features/paper-trail/9104-devon-powers/">
    <title>Eric Harvey: Writing the Record (Pitchfork)</title>
    <dc:date>2013-07-15T01:11:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://pitchfork.com/features/paper-trail/9104-devon-powers/</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Author Devon Powers on how Village Voice writers Richard Goldstein and Robert Christgau helped create rock journalism, and the evolving role of music critics.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>music writing literature criticism culture</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:9ca66976b990/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:music"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:criticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:culture"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/books/2012/08/how-lester-bangs-taught-me-to-read.html">
    <title>Maria Bustillos: How Lester Bangs Taught Me to Read (The New Yorker)</title>
    <dc:date>2012-11-02T09:20:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/books/2012/08/how-lester-bangs-taught-me-to-read.html</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><dc:subject>literature music writing culture criticism</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:6664318839a9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:music"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:criticism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arts.nationalpost.com/2012/09/14/what-cant-be-published/">
    <title>Stacey May Fowles: What can’t be published (National Post)</title>
    <dc:date>2012-09-18T03:59:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arts.nationalpost.com/2012/09/14/what-cant-be-published/</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The idea of it — their liberty vs. my need to be gratefully, soberly escorted by virtue of my sex — enraged me. In fact, we should all be enraged, every moment of every day, in a way that words can never express.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>rape violence women humanrights writing literature society</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:e39b11ff71ef/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:rape"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:violence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:women"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:humanrights"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:society"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.hulu.com/watch/360251/tell-them-anything-you-want-a-portrait-of-maurice-sendak">
    <title>Tell Them Anything You Want: A Portrait of Maurice Sendak (Hulu)</title>
    <dc:date>2012-05-27T01:31:24+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.hulu.com/watch/360251/tell-them-anything-you-want-a-portrait-of-maurice-sendak</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[A great, short profile directed by Spike Jonze]]></description>
<dc:subject>art literature children life death writing documentary interview</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:13810e32aa4e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:death"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:documentary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:interview"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://multivax.com/last_question.html">
    <title>Isaac Asimov: The Last Question</title>
    <dc:date>2012-04-10T00:59:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://multivax.com/last_question.html</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Asimov’s favorite of his short stories, and widely regarded to have an astonishing ending.]]></description>
<dc:subject>literature science scifi god religion universe future</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:1c3d94dfce7c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:scifi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:god"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:religion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:universe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:future"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://c-d.tumblr.com/">
    <title>seedy</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-01T03:40:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://c-d.tumblr.com/</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This Tumblr posts PDFs of poetry anthologies and books of cultural writing and other classic texts, bits of important historical music-related interviews, old, rare, or otherwise important or interesting records, etc. Would that I had the time to take in everything listed here.]]></description>
<dc:subject>literature poetry music musicwriting history culture</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:0bcdf9a1a2d7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:poetry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:music"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:musicwriting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:culture"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.teleread.com/paul-biba/an-open-letter-to-cursor-by-richard-eoin-nash/">
    <title>An Open Letter to Cursor by Richard Eoin Nash | TeleRead: Bring the E-Books Home</title>
    <dc:date>2010-10-30T00:59:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.teleread.com/paul-biba/an-open-letter-to-cursor-by-richard-eoin-nash/</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["I’m afraid of what the systematic harnessing of communities will result in." Specifically, he's afraid that it will result in a) fans wasting their time and money and b) the artist being relegated to the sidelines while context and 'engagement' take over. Valid fears if you ask me, and exactly the sort of the thing that Matt LeMay outlines in the MBV post 'Living in the Age of Art vs Content' (http://www.mbvmusic.com/2010/10/19/living-in-the-age-of-art-vs-content/26911).
]]></description>
<dc:subject>literature books culture consumerism contentculture music</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:740973e40d87/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:consumerism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:contentculture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:music"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.avclub.com/articles/what-will-be-the-next-abstinence-vampire,8312/">
    <title>A.V. Club: What Will Be the Next Abstinence Vampire?</title>
    <dc:date>2009-03-20T04:15:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.avclub.com/articles/what-will-be-the-next-abstinence-vampire,8312/</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The ones in the comments are better than the ones in the article. Laughed until I cr*ed y'all!
]]></description>
<dc:subject>twilight humor writing culture america literature monsters fiction youth</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:60bd991ba24d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:twilight"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:humor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:america"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:monsters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:fiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:youth"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.tifilms.com/wild/call_debunked.htm">
    <title>Terra Incognita Films: 'Into the Wild' Debunked</title>
    <dc:date>2009-03-17T07:46:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.tifilms.com/wild/call_debunked.htm</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Not so much 'debunked', but this article calls out Krakauer on a number of conclusions and omissions from his book (and the subsequent movie). To summarize: the poison/moldy seeds theory doesn't hold water, and McCandless probably just simply starved to death. McCandless had money and a map with him on his final trek, but the book and movie omit this. Also, one of the final self-portrait photographs might have a clue as to the "injury" alluded to in his final note: one sleeve of his shirt looks armless.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>intothewild film book literature criticism truth outdoors hiking people mccandless</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:233ab60b9638/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:intothewild"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:film"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:book"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:criticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:truth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:outdoors"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:hiking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:people"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:mccandless"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/42914044">
    <title>Goodreads: Kevin Fanning reviews 'Twilight'</title>
    <dc:date>2009-01-19T02:55:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/42914044</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Basically: It's sometimes amateurish, and there's troubling misogyny, but is that so bad? I say, and I think this is what Kevin is getting at, is that the age-old paradigm of adults worrying about young minds being influenced by media is a bit more complicated -- I think more than a new idea being introduced and etched onto a young mind by 'Twilight', the more likely circumstance is that the ideas therein subtly reinforce existing ideas that the child is already exposed to.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>books literature twilight media culture children</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:17cd079bbb5a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:twilight"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:children"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.gourmet.com/magazine/2000s/2004/08/consider_the_lobster">
    <title>Gourmet.com: Consider the Lobster (David Foster Wallace)</title>
    <dc:date>2009-01-02T00:25:43+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.gourmet.com/magazine/2000s/2004/08/consider_the_lobster</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Typically disinterested in the tourism of Maine's lobster festival, DFW gives a great history of the lobster. The bulk of the article, most interestingly, is dedicated to the ethics of boiling a living creature alive (or otherwise killing it) in order to eat it.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>dfw lobster maine journalism environment food writing ethics literature funny</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:c47389f586df/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:dfw"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:lobster"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:maine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:journalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:environment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:food"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:ethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:funny"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://harpers.org/archive/2006/02/0080935">
    <title>Harper's: Blood and time: Cormac McCarthy and the twilight of the West</title>
    <dc:date>2008-10-22T06:04:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://harpers.org/archive/2006/02/0080935</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[A great profile of the author, who wrote "No Country for Old Men". "At its root, McCarthy's fiction arises from the tragedy of all wild creatures, of whatever is begotten, born, and dies, the tragedy of autonomous life in a world increasingly circumscribed by a rage for order and captivity. More than merely human. It is the tragedy of warm blood itself, of blood and time."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>harpers writing books literature</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:b40c4a8e1e1c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:harpers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://neojaponisme.com/">
    <title>Néojaponisme</title>
    <dc:date>2008-10-21T23:05:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://neojaponisme.com/</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[A fantastic blog on Japanese language, literature, and culture. I revel in this. (And this is what a blog should be — written only so often, and every post is high-quality. Comments are few and long and educated and of very high quality themselves.)
]]></description>
<dc:subject>japan literature language japanese culture people history writing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:8084b055797b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:japan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:japanese"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:people"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:writing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://houseoffame.blogspot.com/2007/05/i-can-hath-cheezburger.html">
    <title>Geoffrey Chaucer Hath a Blog: I CAN HATH CHEEZBURGER?</title>
    <dc:date>2007-05-28T20:51:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://houseoffame.blogspot.com/2007/05/i-can-hath-cheezburger.html</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["PLZ BE RESPECTING FEUDALIZM"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>blog humor literature chaucer lolcats</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:ea16a9a6398c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:blog"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:humor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:chaucer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:lolcats"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.japanreview.net/interview_mentzas.htm">
    <title>Japan Review.net Interviews: Ioannis Mentzas</title>
    <dc:date>2007-03-04T07:16:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.japanreview.net/interview_mentzas.htm</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[All about the Japanese->English translation house Vertical Inc.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>japanese literature english translation</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:cde7df818f47/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:japanese"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:english"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:translation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.sjca.edu/asp/main.aspx?page=1302">
    <title>St. John's College: Reading List</title>
    <dc:date>2006-06-30T14:28:38+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.sjca.edu/asp/main.aspx?page=1302</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><dc:subject>literature education</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:0a83bf207659/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:education"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://myweb.cableone.net/adoerr/">
    <title>Anthony Doerr</title>
    <dc:date>2006-04-06T06:39:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://myweb.cableone.net/adoerr/</link>
    <dc:creator>matthewmcvickar</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["welcome to the home page for fiction writer Anthony Doerr"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>writing literature</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/b:90ff95b90741/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:matthewmcvickar/t:literature"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>