<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (lukeneff)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from lukeneff</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://news.umich.edu/study-evolution-now-accepted-by-majority-of-americans/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ehbonline.org/article/S1090-5138(17)30209-X/fulltext?rss=yes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/03/why-watching-comb-jellies-poop-has-stunned-evolutionary-biologists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/06/110615094514.htm?_cldee=bmVmZmxAbmV3YmVyZy5rMTIub3IudXM%3d"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3631412/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rIBU2pWrB8g&amp;feature=youtube_gdata"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reddit.com/r/nba/comments/25a7gc/im_dying_to_go_to_the_wizards_game_tonight_but/chfaukv"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdWLhXi24Mo#t=198"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ehbonline.org/article/S1090-5138(14)00022-1/abstract?rss=yes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://kottke.org/14/02/test-tube-time-machine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/files/2014/01/26271801-1.jpg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ehbonline.org/article/S1090-5138(13)00095-0/abstract?rss=yes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.diy.org/post/70529890749/tolkeen-horse-evolution-visualized"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPLgfGX1I5Y"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://harkaway.tumblr.com/post/68056258420/aaaarg-i-love-the-sentiment-and-the-poetry-of"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.statedclearly.com/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cymi4-whLKQ&amp;feature=youtube_gdata"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&amp;id=3169"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOfRN0KihOU#t=39"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://neurodojo.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/misconceptions-about-evolution-video.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://spittoon.23andme.com/ancestry/find-your-inner-neanderthal/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.slate.com/articles/life/food/2012/09/tasting_like_chicken_its_evolutionary_origins_.single.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2012/07/23/rick_warren_accusing_people_of_acting_like_animals_doesn_t_really_make_sense.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/02/scrambled-eggs-and-the-demise-of-the-dinosaurs/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/2XdkqE/www.good.is/post/women-find-happy-men-less-attractive-than-grumps/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://kottke.org/11/12/elephants-and-human-evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://biologos.org/blog/nprs-adam-and-eve-story"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://stevemiranda.wordpress.com/2011/08/03/would-you-like-to-try-something-different/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frans_de_Waal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ditext.com/diamond/mistake.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bensonian.org/2011/06/29/an-encomium-for-christianity-today-on-the-search-for-the-historical-adam/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clusterflock.org/2011/06/enter-title-here.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/27/books/robert-w-fogel-investigates-human-evolution.html?_r=2&amp;partner=rss&amp;emc=rss&amp;pagewanted=all"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.thehumanist.org/humanist/11_mar_apr/Swanson.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clusterflock.org/2011/02/nova-becoming-human.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.instapaper.com/go/127814237/text"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/animals/photos/11-intriguing-transparent-animals/glasswing-butterfly"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ecco.vub.ac.be/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2010/11/mutated-manuscripts-the-evolution-of-genes-and-texts/66617/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_Human_Extinction_Movement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.jayparkinsonmd.com/post/1082982978/as-a-400-000-year-old-species-in-the-past-50#"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cburell/~3/DXm1XFMdd3M/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bigthink.com/ideas/22980"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.frankchimero.com/post/1049185277"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archaeology.about.com/od/hterms/g/handaxe.htm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/08/kin-selection-challenged/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/01/ancient-seafarers/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/08/oldest-tool-use/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pbs.org/gunsgermssteel/educators/index.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://news.discovery.com/human/early-human-ancestors-faces.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/06/100630171711.htm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.adbusters.org/magazine/90/eat.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/kelly06/kelly06_index.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://37signals.com/svn/archives2/an_amazing_story_of_discovery_in_new_guinea.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hopeful_Monster"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science_and_environment/10461066.stm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/16/science/16archeo.html?ref=science&amp;pagewanted=all"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://kottke.org/10/02/not-your-fathers-evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/print/200912/dobbs-orchid-gene"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.worldwithoutus.com/did_you_know.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scientificblogging.com/gadfly/twelve_misunderstandings_evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/27/books/27garn.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss&amp;pagewanted=all"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/28/science/28hobbit.html?8dpc=&amp;pagewanted=all"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/28/science/28hobbit.html?8dpc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article5705331.ece"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megafauna"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2009/03/the_world_witho.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123440723977275883.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.michaelberube.com/index.php/weblog/comments/1218/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/02/who-agrees-with.html"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://news.umich.edu/study-evolution-now-accepted-by-majority-of-americans/">
    <title>Study: Evolution now accepted by majority of Americans | University of Michigan News</title>
    <dc:date>2022-01-10T22:03:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://news.umich.edu/study-evolution-now-accepted-by-majority-of-americans/</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[As of 2019, 34% of conservative Republicans accepted evolution compared to 83% of liberal Democrats.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>evolution usa religion stupidity society</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:3a88ec7cdfe5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:usa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:religion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:stupidity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:society"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.ehbonline.org/article/S1090-5138(17)30209-X/fulltext?rss=yes">
    <title>Optimising human community sizes - Evolution and Human Behavior</title>
    <dc:date>2017-11-04T14:26:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.ehbonline.org/article/S1090-5138(17)30209-X/fulltext?rss=yes</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[We examine community longevity as a function of group size in three historical, small scale agricultural samples. Community sizes of 50, 150 and 500 are disproportionately more common than other sizes; they also have greater longevity. These values mirror the natural layerings in hunter-gatherer societies and contemporary personal networks. In addition, a religious ideology seems to play an important role in allowing larger communities to maintain greater cohesion for longer than a strictly secular ideology does. The differences in optimal community size may reflect the demands of different ecologies, economies and social contexts, but, as yet, we have no explanation as to why these numbers seem to function socially so much more effectively than other values.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>community evolution</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:15ab49bfdf92/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/03/why-watching-comb-jellies-poop-has-stunned-evolutionary-biologists">
    <title>Why watching comb jellies poop has stunned evolutionary biologists | Science | AAAS</title>
    <dc:date>2016-03-26T17:05:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/03/why-watching-comb-jellies-poop-has-stunned-evolutionary-biologists</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[No buts about it, the butthole is one of the finest innovations in the past  540 million years of animal evolution]]></description>
<dc:subject>evolution science</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:934d9e447e31/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:science"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/06/110615094514.htm?_cldee=bmVmZmxAbmV3YmVyZy5rMTIub3IudXM%3d">
    <title>Dawn of agriculture took toll on health -- ScienceDaily</title>
    <dc:date>2016-03-01T00:43:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/06/110615094514.htm?_cldee=bmVmZmxAbmV3YmVyZy5rMTIub3IudXM%3d</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[When populations around the globe started turning to agriculture around 10,000 years ago, regardless of their locations and type of crops, a similar trend occurred: The height and health of the people declined.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>evolution agriculture history history_writing_prompt</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:ef778a5248ad/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:agriculture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:history_writing_prompt"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3631412/">
    <title>Australasian sky islands act as a diversity pump facilitating peripheral speciation and complex reversal from narrow endemic to widespread ecological supertramp</title>
    <dc:date>2015-05-27T16:42:33+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3631412/</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The Australasian archipelago is biologically extremely diverse as a result of a highly puzzling geological and biological evolution.

New Guinea sky islands as cradles of evolution, in line with geological evidence suggesting very recent origin of high altitudes in the region]]></description>
<dc:subject>evolution science seb via:charlie_loyd</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:6637bbffe054/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:seb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:via:charlie_loyd"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rIBU2pWrB8g&amp;feature=youtube_gdata">
    <title>The Neanderthal Inside Us | The New York Times - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2014-06-30T04:15:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rIBU2pWrB8g&amp;feature=youtube_gdata</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><dc:subject>evolution</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:377704ca6e15/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.reddit.com/r/nba/comments/25a7gc/im_dying_to_go_to_the_wizards_game_tonight_but/chfaukv">
    <title>dsklerm comments on I'm dying to go to the Wizards game tonight, but none of my friends want to go. How awkward is it to go to a game by yourself?</title>
    <dc:date>2014-05-13T13:09:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.reddit.com/r/nba/comments/25a7gc/im_dying_to_go_to_the_wizards_game_tonight_but/chfaukv</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Good. goooooooood.
Sports are such a communal activity. I was seeing a girl a year or so back who hated sports. Hated jock culture, said things like she hoped if she had a son he wouldn't play sports... Etc. Don't get me wrong, amazing girl but we talked a lot about this. I tend to think outside of sex, sports are the the closest we get to our baser instincts of fight flight and fuck. You gather a few hundred people in a shabby soccer stadium in a 3rd world country, you get 110,000 people in a college football arena, you get everything in between. You get everyone together for one cause, one goal; root for your guys. Songs are sung, chants are said, people dance, people dress up, people make events of these things. Don't tell me the hair didn't stand up straight on your neck when David Ortiz said this is ourrrrr fuckin city. Sports are so beautiful.
We put our children, our weakest and most vulnerable members of society though the gauntlet. So they can learn how to win with grace, how to tolerate defeat, how to overcome adversity. The way grass and sweat smell will always be ingrained in me because of sports, it will always trigger a nostalgic memory of a simpler time. We learn how to make friends and we build lifelong bonds. Did you know the old saying actually goes blood (of the covenant) is thicker than water (of the womb)? We grow together, as a society, as a community. As people as humans as growth through experience, and sports are an integral part of the human experience.
Go to that fucking game. Cheer your ass off. Talk some hoops with the guy next to you. Talk some shit to that guy in a pacer jersey. It's what we were meant to do. It's what we were born to do. I fucking love sports.]]></description>
<dc:subject>sports athletics culture evolution humanity</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:50ba05e5d923/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:sports"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:athletics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:humanity"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdWLhXi24Mo#t=198">
    <title>There Was No First Human | It's Okay To Be Smart | PBS Digital Studios - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2014-04-15T13:35:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xdWLhXi24Mo#t=198</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><dc:subject>evolution humanity</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:2647c7c0b3f1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:humanity"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.ehbonline.org/article/S1090-5138(14)00022-1/abstract?rss=yes">
    <title>Hunter–Gatherer population structure and the evolution of contingent cooperation</title>
    <dc:date>2014-04-11T17:18:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.ehbonline.org/article/S1090-5138(14)00022-1/abstract?rss=yes</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Unlike other vertebrates, humans cooperate in large groups with unrelated individuals. Many authors have argued that the evolution of such cooperation has resulted from reciprocity and other forms of contingent cooperation. This argument is not well supported by existing theory. The theory of contingent cooperation in pairs is well developed: reciprocating strategies are stable when common, and can increase when rare as long as population structure leads to modest levels of relatedness. In larger groups, however, it is not clear whether contingent cooperation can increase when rare. Existing work suggests that contingent strategies cannot increase unless relatedness is high, but depends on unrealistic assumptions about the effects of population structure. Here we develop and analyze a model incorporating a two level population structure that captures important features of human hunter–gatherer societies. This model suggests that previous work underestimates the range of conditions under which contingent cooperation can evolve, but also predicts that cooperation will not evolve unless (1) social groups are small, and (2) the relatedness within ethnolinguistic groups is at the high end of the range of empirical estimates.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>cooperation leadership organizational_change human_behavior evolution</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:48e1ce3657aa/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:cooperation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:leadership"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:organizational_change"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:human_behavior"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://kottke.org/14/02/test-tube-time-machine">
    <title>Test tube time machine</title>
    <dc:date>2014-02-28T14:26:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://kottke.org/14/02/test-tube-time-machine</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[After testing 10 trillion ancestral cells from early generations, he got no growth. But when he tested cells from the 20,000th generation on, he began to get results, eventually finding 19 mutants that could use citrate as a power source. The results showed that the citrate-eating mutation was most likely not the result of a single mutation, but one enabled by multiple changes over 20,000 generations.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>science seb genetics evolution</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:392de6999978/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:seb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:genetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/files/2014/01/26271801-1.jpg">
    <title>26271801-1.jpg (1804×936)</title>
    <dc:date>2014-01-14T23:14:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/files/2014/01/26271801-1.jpg</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><dc:subject>evolution</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:d3ef64766090/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.ehbonline.org/article/S1090-5138(13)00095-0/abstract?rss=yes">
    <title>Foundations of the Crazy Bastard Hypothesis: Nonviolent physical risk-taking enhances conceptualized formidability</title>
    <dc:date>2013-12-31T18:54:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.ehbonline.org/article/S1090-5138(13)00095-0/abstract?rss=yes</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[ One interpretation of this thesis, which we term the Crazy Bastard Hypothesis, holds that the correlation between violence and other forms of physical risk-taking occurs because the latter behaviors inherently index the general propensity to take risks with one’s life.]]></description>
<dc:subject>evolution violence human_behavior</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:cb0d4d932bdb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:violence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:human_behavior"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.diy.org/post/70529890749/tolkeen-horse-evolution-visualized">
    <title>tolkeen: Horse evolution visualized- Blog - DIY</title>
    <dc:date>2013-12-20T05:00:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.diy.org/post/70529890749/tolkeen-horse-evolution-visualized</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><dc:subject>evolution</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:a0844ffe2268/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPLgfGX1I5Y">
    <title>▶ How did feathers evolve? - Carl Zimmer - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2013-12-12T14:52:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPLgfGX1I5Y</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><dc:subject>evolution dinosaurs birds</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:fee0c76d7263/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:dinosaurs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:birds"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://harkaway.tumblr.com/post/68056258420/aaaarg-i-love-the-sentiment-and-the-poetry-of">
    <title>AAAARG!!!! I love the sentiment and the poetry of... • Harkaway</title>
    <dc:date>2013-11-26T14:36:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://harkaway.tumblr.com/post/68056258420/aaaarg-i-love-the-sentiment-and-the-poetry-of</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[You are you. Your body is you. Your cognition exists in the flesh. It is not separate, not spun glass in the hands of a chimp. Your body creates your mind. Your gut, the ropy intestinal tract that digests your food, has 100,000,000 neurons in it. There are quite a lot of animals with fewer than that. Your whole physical shape, your food and drink, exercise, amount of sunshine, of sex, of affection, sitting position and amount of sleep, affects not only your mood but your supposedly pure cognitive choices. Look down and to the left and name a string of random number between zero and ten million. Now do the same looking up and to the right. The second batch will be higher. And your body’s genes play a role in your thinking, too - identical twins separated at birth and raised separately are often seen to develop, if not similar politics, similar moods of political opinion.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>evolution biology cognition complexity</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:37e7a02adbf9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:biology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:cognition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:complexity"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.statedclearly.com/">
    <title>What is DNA and how does it work?</title>
    <dc:date>2013-11-21T13:03:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.statedclearly.com/</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><dc:subject>evolution</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:98e23f3dcfcf/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cymi4-whLKQ&amp;feature=youtube_gdata">
    <title>▶ Teaching Evolution with Animations - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2013-11-21T13:03:33+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cymi4-whLKQ&amp;feature=youtube_gdata</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><dc:subject>evolution</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:f2d0e36c1fe0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&amp;id=3169">
    <title>Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal</title>
    <dc:date>2013-11-18T23:24:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&amp;id=3169</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><dc:subject>evolution</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:35222322bff8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOfRN0KihOU#t=39">
    <title>▶ How Evolution works - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2013-09-21T13:00:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOfRN0KihOU#t=39</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><dc:subject>biology evolution</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:7144d2c50abb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:biology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://neurodojo.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/misconceptions-about-evolution-video.html">
    <title>NeuroDojo: Misconceptions about evolution video has its own misconceptions</title>
    <dc:date>2013-08-04T18:55:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://neurodojo.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/misconceptions-about-evolution-video.html</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><dc:subject>biology evolution science</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:bdf908ff880c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:biology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:science"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://spittoon.23andme.com/ancestry/find-your-inner-neanderthal/">
    <title>Find Your Inner Neanderthal | The Spittoon</title>
    <dc:date>2012-10-10T13:51:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://spittoon.23andme.com/ancestry/find-your-inner-neanderthal/</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Most people have Neanderthal DNA, on average about 2.5 percent, but there are outliers, who have much more.

What it means to have a higher percentage of Neanderthal DNA — whether you’re hairier, or brutish or short, for instance — isn’t known. There are some theories, however, of how Neanderthals contributed to modern humans, including that they gave us some sort of “hybrid vigor,” according to Peter Parham, a geneticist at Stanford University School of Medicine.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>evolution human neanderthal</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:495bcbd7d48c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:human"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:neanderthal"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.slate.com/articles/life/food/2012/09/tasting_like_chicken_its_evolutionary_origins_.single.html">
    <title>Tasting like chicken: its evolutionary origins. - Slate Magazine</title>
    <dc:date>2012-09-24T17:57:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.slate.com/articles/life/food/2012/09/tasting_like_chicken_its_evolutionary_origins_.single.html</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[why everything tastes like chicken]]></description>
<dc:subject>food evolution</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:3087f7bf1408/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:food"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2012/07/23/rick_warren_accusing_people_of_acting_like_animals_doesn_t_really_make_sense.html">
    <title>Rick Warren: Accusing people of acting like animals doesn't really make sense</title>
    <dc:date>2012-07-23T21:54:05+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2012/07/23/rick_warren_accusing_people_of_acting_like_animals_doesn_t_really_make_sense.html</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><dc:subject>evolution fundamentalism idiocy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:88105701f699/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:fundamentalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:idiocy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/02/scrambled-eggs-and-the-demise-of-the-dinosaurs/">
    <title>Scrambled Eggs and the Demise of the Dinosaurs | Dinosaur Tracking</title>
    <dc:date>2012-02-21T03:49:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/dinosaur/2012/02/scrambled-eggs-and-the-demise-of-the-dinosaurs/</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Wieland believed that egg-eating must have been rampant during the age of the dinosaurs. In fact, he thought that a diet of eggs may have even led to the evolution of some of the largest of all predatory dinosaurs. Considering the giant Tyrannosaurus, Wieland wrote, “What more likely than the immediate ancestors of this dinosaur got their first impulse toward gigantism on a diet of sauropod eggs, and that, aside from the varanids, the theropod dinosaurs were the great egg-eaters of all time?” The cruel irony of this idea was that the immense predatory dinosaurs also reproduced by laying eggs, and Wieland considered it “quite inferable” that their nests, in turn, would have been raided by smaller monitor lizards and snakes.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>dinosaurs evolution history</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:d00e5c07be5f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:dinosaurs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:history"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/2XdkqE/www.good.is/post/women-find-happy-men-less-attractive-than-grumps/">
    <title>women-find-happy-men-less-attractive-than-grumps from good.is - StumbleUpon</title>
    <dc:date>2012-01-27T14:54:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/2XdkqE/www.good.is/post/women-find-happy-men-less-attractive-than-grumps/</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[According to new research on body language out of the University of British Columbia, women find happy men—in this study, men who were smiling in photos—significantly less attractive than men portraying other emotions. In a survey of 1,000 adults, women generally preferred men who looked strong and proud, arms raised into the sky, or sullen and ashamed—in that order. Happy men were rated the least attractive. Interestingly, when it came to male preferences, things were reversed: Men rated happy women the most attractive and proud, strong women least attractive.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>nature psychology evolution beauty</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:bd48362b4b53/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:nature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:beauty"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://kottke.org/11/12/elephants-and-human-evolution">
    <title>Elephants and human evolution</title>
    <dc:date>2011-12-13T20:04:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://kottke.org/11/12/elephants-and-human-evolution</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[When elephants began to die out, Homo erectus "needed to hunt many smaller, more evasive animals. Energy requirements increased, but with plant and protein intake limited, the source had to come from fat. He had to become calculated about hunting," Ben-Dor says, noting that this change is evident in the physical appearance of modern humans, lighter than Homo erectus and with larger brains.]]></description>
<dc:subject>evolution</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:e8e10fd8ae2d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://biologos.org/blog/nprs-adam-and-eve-story">
    <title>NPR’S Adam and Eve Story | The BioLogos Forum</title>
    <dc:date>2011-08-12T01:13:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://biologos.org/blog/nprs-adam-and-eve-story</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Evangelical Christians have long suspected there are allegorical components to the Genesis story—a talking snake, for example—but as to whether Adam and Eve were not real people, there has been much more hesitancy--and for theologically important reasons. The science itself is silent—the most it can say is that there were never just two individuals who were the sole genetic progenitors of the entire human race. Several independent lines of genetic evidence unambiguously point to this conclusion. Science also make it very clear that humans developed through an evolutionary process. As Christians, we interpret all this in light of our belief in God as Creator.]]></description>
<dc:subject>a/theism evolution</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:0124587743bc/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:a/theism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://stevemiranda.wordpress.com/2011/08/03/would-you-like-to-try-something-different/">
    <title>Would you like to try something different? « Re-educate Seattle</title>
    <dc:date>2011-08-10T03:09:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://stevemiranda.wordpress.com/2011/08/03/would-you-like-to-try-something-different/</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[It’s a negative focus. How about if we look at this differently: what if dyslexia is an advanced form of evolution?”

That was more than 20 years ago.

Meanwhile, later this month on August 18, Drs. Brock and Fernette Eide will release their latest book, The Dyslexic Advantage: Unlocking the Hidden Potential of the Dyslexic Brain. They write, “Some of the most successful people in the world have dyslexia and it’s no accident. There’s a remarkable strength-producing aspect to dyslexic processing and some of the latest brain research tells us why.”]]></description>
<dc:subject>SPED dyslexia evolution education</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:e88c0b9348cf/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:SPED"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:dyslexia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:education"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frans_de_Waal">
    <title>Frans de Waal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia</title>
    <dc:date>2011-07-29T19:08:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frans_de_Waal</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The possibility that empathy resides in parts of the brain so ancient that we share them with rats should give pause to anyone comparing politicians with those poor, underestimated creatures."[3]
"I've argued that many of what philosophers call moral sentiments can be seen in other species. In chimpanzees and other animals, you see examples of sympathy, empathy, reciprocity, a willingness to follow social rules. Dogs are a good example of a species that have and obey social rules; that's why we like them so much, even though they're large carnivores."[4]
"To endow animals with human emotions has long been a scientific taboo. But if we do not, we risk missing something fundamental, about both animals and us."[5]
[edit]]]></description>
<dc:subject>ethics evolution</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:43af50bed3ff/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:ethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.ditext.com/diamond/mistake.html">
    <title>The Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race</title>
    <dc:date>2011-07-14T03:24:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.ditext.com/diamond/mistake.html</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[While the case for the progressivist view seems overwhelming, it's hard to prove. How do you show that the lives of people 10,000 years ago got better when they abandoned hunting and gathering for farming? Until recently, archaeologists had to resort to indirect tests, whose results (surprisingly) failed to support the progressivist view. Here's one example of an indirect test: Are twentieth century hunter-gatherers really worse off than farmers? Scattered throughout the world, several dozen groups of so-called primitive people, like the Kalahari bushmen, continue to support themselves that way. It turns out that these people have plenty of leisure time, sleep a good deal, and work less hard than their farming neighbors. For instance, the average time devoted each week to obtaining food is only 12 to 19 hours for one group of Bushmen, 14 hours or less for the Hadza nomads of Tanzania. One Bushman, when asked why he hadn't emulated neighboring tribes by adopting agriculture, replied, "Why should we, when there are so many mongongo nuts in the world?"

...

One answer boils down to the adage "Might makes right." Farming could support many more people than hunting, albeit with a poorer quality of life. (Population densities of hunter-gatherers are rarely over on person per ten square miles, while farmers average 100 times that.) Partly, this is because a field planted entirely in edible crops lets one feed far more mouths than a forest with scattered edible plants. Partly, too, it's because nomadic hunter-gatherers have to keep their children spaced at four-year intervals by infanticide and other means, since a mother must carry her toddler until it's old enough to keep up with the adults. Because farm women don't have that burden, they can and often do bear a child every two years.


]]></description>
<dc:subject>evolution humanity economics history</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://instapaper.com/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:59ab3b728011/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:humanity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:history"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bensonian.org/2011/06/29/an-encomium-for-christianity-today-on-the-search-for-the-historical-adam/">
    <title>An Encomium for Christianity Today on “The Search for the Historical Adam” | Bensonian</title>
    <dc:date>2011-07-01T16:50:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://bensonian.org/2011/06/29/an-encomium-for-christianity-today-on-the-search-for-the-historical-adam/</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The editors of Christianity Today strike an appropriate balance between caution (steadfastly keeping core biblical doctrines) and openness (conceding that our understanding of the Book of Scripture may need to undergo adjustment in light of what we discover from the Book of Nature). The editorial concludes: “At this juncture, we counsel patience. We don’t need another fundamentalist reaction against science. We need instead a positive interdisciplinary engagement that recognizes the good will of all involved and that creative thinking takes time.”

]]></description>
<dc:subject>a/theism evolution science christianity fundamentalism</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:00b69320a0c9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:a/theism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:christianity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:fundamentalism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.clusterflock.org/2011/06/enter-title-here.html">
    <title>Enter title here | clusterflock</title>
    <dc:date>2011-07-01T16:48:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2011/06/enter-title-here.html</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Miss USA on Should Evolution Be Taught in Schools?]]></description>
<dc:subject>a/theism evolution science fundamentalism politics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:48e965763541/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:a/theism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:fundamentalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:politics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/27/books/robert-w-fogel-investigates-human-evolution.html?_r=2&amp;partner=rss&amp;emc=rss&amp;pagewanted=all">
    <title>Robert W. Fogel Investigates Human Evolution - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2011-04-26T22:53:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/27/books/robert-w-fogel-investigates-human-evolution.html?_r=2&amp;partner=rss&amp;emc=rss&amp;pagewanted=all</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[ But Mr. Fogel said that he remained an optimist at heart. The human body is enormously flexible and responsive, he said, a fact that fills him with confidence that “the trend of larger bodies and longer lives will continue into the future.” ]]></description>
<dc:subject>evolution science humanity</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:f7f6623965bf/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:humanity"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.thehumanist.org/humanist/11_mar_apr/Swanson.html">
    <title>The Humanist - a magazine of critical inquiry and social concern</title>
    <dc:date>2011-04-05T21:25:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.thehumanist.org/humanist/11_mar_apr/Swanson.html</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Anthropologists have tended to imagine warfare as something that existed in some form through all the millions of years of human evolution. But “imagine” is the key word. Wounded Australopithecine bones thought to show war injuries actually show the tooth marks of leopards. The Walls of Jericho were apparently built to protect against flooding, not warfare. There is, in fact, no evidence of warfare older than 10,000 years, and there would be, because war leaves its mark in wounds and weapons. This suggests that of the 50,000 years modern Homo sapiens have existed, 40,000 saw no warfare, and that millions of years of prior ancestry were also war-free. Or, as an anthropologist put it, “People have lived in hunter-gatherer bands for 99.87 percent of human existence.” War arises in some, but not all, complex, sedentary societies, and tends to grow along with their complexity. This fact makes it unlikely war could be found more than 12,500 years ago.]]></description>
<dc:subject>war evolution pacifism history</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:d270149bbbb0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:pacifism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:history"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.clusterflock.org/2011/02/nova-becoming-human.html">
    <title>Nova, Becoming Human | clusterflock</title>
    <dc:date>2011-02-16T18:38:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.clusterflock.org/2011/02/nova-becoming-human.html</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[imagine elephants were the size of cows. would we raise them like cattle? would we make elephant burgers? an idea from ]]></description>
<dc:subject>evolution human science</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:07a85d8e202e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:human"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:science"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.instapaper.com/go/127814237/text">
    <title>earth</title>
    <dc:date>2011-02-12T16:29:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.instapaper.com/go/127814237/text</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Imagine that life develops on Theia as it spins out into the universe, describe this world.  


We are now in the Cenozoic era of the Phanerozoic eon. The Holocene era has just ended, and the Anthropocene has begun, characterized by significant human impact on ecoystems and climate. By demolishing natural habitats, humans have set into motion a mass extinction event that may rank with the end of the Cretaceous 65 million years ago. We are also boosting atmospheric carbon dioxide levels at an incredible rate. If the temperature rises one more degree, the Earth’s temperature will be the hottest it’s been in 1.35 million years, before the current cycle of ice ages began. Where are we headed? Nobody knows. ]]></description>
<dc:subject>science evolution global_warming history writing_prompt</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:803eb4c3595f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:global_warming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:writing_prompt"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/animals/photos/11-intriguing-transparent-animals/glasswing-butterfly">
    <title>11 intriguing transparent animals: Glasswing Butterfly | MNN - Mother Nature Network</title>
    <dc:date>2011-01-24T18:10:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/animals/photos/11-intriguing-transparent-animals/glasswing-butterfly</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Glasswing Butterfly
This butterfly with transparent wings has a Spanish name, "espejitos," which means "little mirrors." If it wasn't for the opaque outline around the wings, the average observer might not see one perched on a leaf or flower.
 
Adult glasswing butterflies will often migrate great distances, and males of the species are known to lek, or gather in large groups for the purpose of competitive mating displays.]]></description>
<dc:subject>animals nature interesting evolution</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:4cc07d2817b8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:animals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:nature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ecco.vub.ac.be/">
    <title>ECCO Home | ecco.vub.ac.be</title>
    <dc:date>2010-12-08T18:11:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://ecco.vub.ac.be/</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[ECCO, the Evolution, Complexity and COgnition group, is a multidisciplinary research group, directed by Francis Heylighen. We are localized at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), although our members are distributed across four continents. While founded under the present name in 2004, our informal history goes back many years earlier.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>evolution research complexity cognition</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:07898ba1f439/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:research"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:cognition"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2010/11/mutated-manuscripts-the-evolution-of-genes-and-texts/66617/">
    <title>Mutated Manuscripts: The Evolution of Genes and Texts - Samuel Arbesman - Technology - The Atlantic</title>
    <dc:date>2010-11-20T02:57:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2010/11/mutated-manuscripts-the-evolution-of-genes-and-texts/66617/</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[“I look forward to the day where studying biology is a prerequisite for a PhD in Classics, and biblical criticism can help round out your doctorate in evolutionary biology.”
]]></description>
<dc:subject>integrative_units science history evolution</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:0ee695d58b1e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:integrative_units"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_Human_Extinction_Movement">
    <title>Voluntary Human Extinction Movement</title>
    <dc:date>2010-10-23T20:16:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_Human_Extinction_Movement</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The Voluntary Human Extinction Movement, or VHEMT (pronounced “vehement”), is a movement which calls for the voluntary gradual self-extinction of the human species through abstaining from reproduction. VHEMT’s motto is May we live long and die out. Proponents of its philosophy call themselves extinctionists.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>seb evolution interesting green</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:273ba0b86b4e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:seb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:green"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.jayparkinsonmd.com/post/1082982978/as-a-400-000-year-old-species-in-the-past-50#">
    <title>Jay Parkinson + MD + MPH = a doctor in NYC (As a 400,000 year old species, In the past 50...)</title>
    <dc:date>2010-09-08T19:06:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.jayparkinsonmd.com/post/1082982978/as-a-400-000-year-old-species-in-the-past-50#</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[As a 400,000 year old species, In the past 50 years, the exercise we’ve gotten has migrated from our arms and legs to our fingers.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>evolution</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:5212ad9245f0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cburell/~3/DXm1XFMdd3M/">
    <title>Two for the Ancestors: TED Talks Bring Paleontology and Homo Habilis Alive</title>
    <dc:date>2010-09-04T00:46:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cburell/~3/DXm1XFMdd3M/</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[I started World History this year with a brief tour of the 4.5 billion year age of earth, then slowed down to trace the miracles of standing up, grasping with thumbs, making tools, mastering fire, making words, inventing gods and afterlifes, making music and art, and so forth, all over between 5 million and 40,000 years ago.  Then I told my new students their job was to make these and many future “dead history” stories interesting, because “boring is a average and average means ‘C’.” Many still struggle to find the fuse to detonate this mental bomb in their own minds, and I and the angels weep. (Others, bless them, are risking finding history interesting quite well.)
]]></description>
<dc:subject>evolution history teaching</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:13bc37e03783/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:teaching"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bigthink.com/ideas/22980">
    <title>#28: Create New Life Forms | Dangerous Ideas | Big Think</title>
    <dc:date>2010-09-01T23:11:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://bigthink.com/ideas/22980</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><dc:subject>Seb science evolution</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:5822898fd86d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:Seb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.frankchimero.com/post/1049185277">
    <title>Crafting</title>
    <dc:date>2010-09-01T20:31:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.frankchimero.com/post/1049185277</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><dc:subject>design evolution creativity</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:da6849f9c41f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:creativity"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://archaeology.about.com/od/hterms/g/handaxe.htm">
    <title>Acheulean Handaxe - What is an Acheulean Handaxe</title>
    <dc:date>2010-09-01T06:05:05+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://archaeology.about.com/od/hterms/g/handaxe.htm</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><dc:subject>evolution history</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:13d05e055f8e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:history"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/08/kin-selection-challenged/">
    <title>E.O. Wilson Proposes New Theory of Social Evolution | Wired Science | Wired.com</title>
    <dc:date>2010-08-26T19:28:38+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/08/kin-selection-challenged/</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Kin selection made sense of this by targeting evolution at shared genes, and portraying individuals and groups as mere vessels for those genes. Before long, kin selection was a cornerstone of evolutionary biology. It was invoked to explain social and cooperative behavior across the animal kingdom, even in humans.

But according to Wilson, Nowak and Tarnita, the great limitation of kin selection is that it simply doesn’t fit the data.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>evolution</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:1af552d41b7b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/01/ancient-seafarers/">
    <title>Hominids Went Out of Africa on Rafts | Wired Science | Wired.com</title>
    <dc:date>2010-08-11T18:41:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/01/ancient-seafarers/</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><dc:subject>history evolution science africa</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:e7ceb8fee56a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:africa"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/08/oldest-tool-use/">
    <title>New Find Pushes Age of Stone Tools Back A Million Years | Wired Science | Wired.com</title>
    <dc:date>2010-08-11T18:41:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/08/oldest-tool-use/</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><dc:subject>history evolution</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:fd93a12f9312/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.pbs.org/gunsgermssteel/educators/index.html">
    <title>Guns Germs &amp; Steel: Educators . Lesson Plans | PBS</title>
    <dc:date>2010-07-07T17:41:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.pbs.org/gunsgermssteel/educators/index.html</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><dc:subject>education history evolution science integrative_units</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:1ebfb9b55365/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:integrative_units"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://news.discovery.com/human/early-human-ancestors-faces.html">
    <title>Faces of Our Ancestors : Discovery News</title>
    <dc:date>2010-07-07T17:39:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://news.discovery.com/human/early-human-ancestors-faces.html</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><dc:subject>evolution science</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:3d12acc380f9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:science"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/06/100630171711.htm">
    <title>Complex, multicellular life from over two billion years ago discovered</title>
    <dc:date>2010-07-07T00:49:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/06/100630171711.htm</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The discovery in Gabon of more than 250 fossils in an excellent state of conservation has provided proof, for the first time, of the existence of multicellular organisms 2.1 billion years ago. This finding represents a major breakthrough: until now, the first complex life forms (made up of several cells) dated from around 600 million years ago.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>evolution history science</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:826652081d08/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:science"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.adbusters.org/magazine/90/eat.html">
    <title>Eat This!</title>
    <dc:date>2010-07-06T13:05:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.adbusters.org/magazine/90/eat.html</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Mischel’s study points to the need to teach our children self-control, to give them the tools to resist the temptations of consumer culture and the notion that all wants must be immediately satiated. According to Mischel, the daily rituals and activities that go on in the home can be a training ground where we teach our children how to think so they can outsmart desire. Simple things – not snacking before dinner, saving up allowance, not opening gifts until Christmas morning – are actually important exercises in cognitive training that equip children to resist.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>evolution food values digital millennials</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:e25dd04ce885/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:food"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:values"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:digital"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:millennials"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/kelly06/kelly06_index.html">
    <title>kevin kelly on science</title>
    <dc:date>2010-07-05T02:44:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/kelly06/kelly06_index.html</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[“Science is the way we surprise God,” said Kelly. “That’s what we’re here for.” Our moral obligation is to generate possibilities, to discover the infinite ways, however complex and high-dimension, to play the infinite game. It will take all possible species of intelligence in order for the universe to understand itself. Science, in this way, is holy. It is a divine trip.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>quote science evolution ideas philosophy history</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:5d95503044f2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:quote"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:history"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://37signals.com/svn/archives2/an_amazing_story_of_discovery_in_new_guinea.php">
    <title>An amazing story of discovery in New Guinea - Signal vs. Noise (by 37signals)</title>
    <dc:date>2010-07-05T02:35:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://37signals.com/svn/archives2/an_amazing_story_of_discovery_in_new_guinea.php</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[An astonishing mist-shrouded “lost world” of previously unknown and rare animals and plants high in the mountain rainforests of New Guinea has been uncovered by an international team of scientists… The scientists are the first outsiders to see it. They could only reach the remote mountainous area by helicopter, which they described it as akin to finding a “Garden of Eden”… In a jungle camp site, surrounded by giant flowers and unknown plants, the researchers watched rare bowerbirds perform elaborate courtship rituals. The surrounding forest was full of strange mammals, such as tree kangaroos and spiny anteaters, which appeared totally unafraid, suggesting no previous contact with humans.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>science evolution nature interesting</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:545faae5e989/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:nature"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:interesting"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hopeful_Monster">
    <title>Hopeful Monster - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia</title>
    <dc:date>2010-07-02T16:13:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hopeful_Monster</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Hopeful Monster
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Hopeful Monster is the colloquial term used in evolutionary biology to describe an event of instantaneous speciation, saltation, or systemic mutation, which contributes positively to the production of new major evolutionary groups. The memorable phrase was coined by the geneticist Richard Goldschmidt, who thought that small gradual changes could not bridge the hypothetical divide between microevolution and macroevolution.

In Goldschmidt's seminal work The Material Basis of Evolution, he wrote "the change from species to species is not a change involving more and more additional atomistic changes, but a complete change of the primary pattern or reaction system into a new one, which afterwards may again produce intraspecific variation by micromutation."[1]

Goldschmidt's thesis however was universally rejected and widely ridiculed within the biological community, which favored the neo-Darwinian explanatio
]]></description>
<dc:subject>seb evolution science</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:5b3cd26bdc86/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:seb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:science"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science_and_environment/10461066.stm">
    <title>BBC News - 'Sea monster' whale fossil unearthed</title>
    <dc:date>2010-07-02T16:06:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science_and_environment/10461066.stm</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The researchers speculate that Leviathan was able to feed on very large prey up to 8m long. It would catch the prey in its huge jaws and tear it apart quickly and effectively with its giant teeth.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>evolution science</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:d42cab7bf565/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:science"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/16/science/16archeo.html?ref=science&amp;pagewanted=all">
    <title>In a Desert in China, a Trove of 4,000-Year-Old Mummies - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2010-03-16T16:44:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/16/science/16archeo.html?ref=science&amp;pagewanted=all</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><dc:subject>evolution science</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:fe8b76edf2d3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:science"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://kottke.org/10/02/not-your-fathers-evolution">
    <title>Not your father's evolution</title>
    <dc:date>2010-02-05T07:03:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://kottke.org/10/02/not-your-fathers-evolution</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Recent evidence of horizontal gene transfer -- in which genes are exchanged from other organisms, not from ancestors -- has some scientists thinking that the dominant form of evolution for most of the Earth's history was between non-related organisms and not among ancestors.

    In the past few years, a host of genome studies have demonstrated that DNA flows readily between the chromosomes of microbes and the external world. Typically around 10 per cent of the genes in many bacterial genomes seem to have been acquired from other organisms in this way, though the proportion can be several times that. So an individual microbe may have access to the genes found in the entire microbial population around it, including those of other microbe species. "It's natural to wonder if the very concept of an organism in isolation is still valid at this level," says Goldenfeld.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>evolution</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:5f455413d301/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/print/200912/dobbs-orchid-gene">
    <title>David Dobbs tells us about a new theory in genetics called the orchid hypothesis</title>
    <dc:date>2010-01-06T16:16:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/print/200912/dobbs-orchid-gene</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[David Dobbs tells us about a new theory in genetics called the orchid hypothesis that suggests that the genes that underlie some of the most troubling human behaviors -- violence, depression, anxiety -- can, in combination with the right environment, also be responsible for our best behaviors.

    Most of us have genes that make us as hardy as dandelions: able to take root and survive almost anywhere. A few of us, however, are more like the orchid: fragile and fickle, but capable of blooming spectacularly if given greenhouse care. So holds a provocative new theory of genetics, which asserts that the very genes that give us the most trouble as a species, causing behaviors that are self-destructive and antisocial, also underlie humankind's phenomenal adaptability and evolutionary success. With a bad environment and poor parenting, orchid children can end up depressed, drug-addicted, or in jail -- but with the right environment and good parenting, they can grow up to be society's most cr
]]></description>
<dc:subject>psychology science evolution creativity interesting</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:9b233f79f094/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:creativity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:interesting"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.worldwithoutus.com/did_you_know.html">
    <title>The World Without Us - Alan Weisman</title>
    <dc:date>2009-09-20T15:54:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.worldwithoutus.com/did_you_know.html</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><dc:subject>science culture interesting history evolution green</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:3c68415232c3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:green"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.scientificblogging.com/gadfly/twelve_misunderstandings_evolution">
    <title>Twelve Misunderstandings of Evolution</title>
    <dc:date>2009-06-10T16:24:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.scientificblogging.com/gadfly/twelve_misunderstandings_evolution</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><dc:subject>evolution</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:3ad07e3d47c0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/27/books/27garn.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss&amp;pagewanted=all">
    <title>NYT</title>
    <dc:date>2009-05-27T01:39:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/27/books/27garn.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss&amp;pagewanted=all</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[““Cooked food does many familiar things,” [Richard Wrangham] observes. “It makes our food safer, creates rich and delicious tastes and reduces spoilage. Heating can allow us to open, cut or mash tough foods. But none of these advantages is as important as a little-appreciated aspect: cooking increases the amount of energy our bodies obtain from food… . The extra energy gave the first cooks biological advantages. They survived and reproduced better than before. Their genes spread. Their bodies responded by biologically adapting to cooked food, shaped by natural selection to take maximum advantage of the new diet. There were changes in anatomy, physiology, ecology, life history, psychology and society.” Put simply, Mr. Wrangham writes that eating cooked food — whether meat or plants or both —made digestion easier, and thus our guts could grow smaller. The energy that we formerly spent on digestion (and digestion requires far more energy than you might imagine) was freed up, enabling our
]]></description>
<dc:subject>evolution</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:5fe925b4161f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/28/science/28hobbit.html?8dpc=&amp;pagewanted=all">
    <title>A Tiny Hominid With No Place on the Family Tree - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2009-04-28T03:57:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/28/science/28hobbit.html?8dpc=&amp;pagewanted=all</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Scientists who reviewed hobbit research at a symposium here last week said that a consensus had emerged among experts in support of the initial interpretation that H. floresiensis is a distinct hominid species much more primitive than H. sapiens. On display for the first time at the meeting was a cast of the skull and bones of a H. floresiensis, probably an adult female.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>evolution</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:e435d3aeb84f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/28/science/28hobbit.html?8dpc">
    <title>A Tiny Hominid With No Place on the Family Tree - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2009-04-28T03:56:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/28/science/28hobbit.html?8dpc</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Scientists who reviewed hobbit research at a symposium here last week said that a consensus had emerged among experts in support of the initial interpretation that H. floresiensis is a distinct hominid species much more primitive than H. sapiens. On display for the first time at the meeting was a cast of the skull and bones of a H. floresiensis, probably an adult female.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>evolution</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:da8f4ed549ab/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article5705331.ece">
    <title>Vatican buries the hatchet with Charles Darwin -Times Online</title>
    <dc:date>2009-04-13T15:06:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article5705331.ece</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[A leading official declared yesterday that Darwin’s theory of evolution was compatible with Christian faith, and could even be traced to St Augustine and St Thomas Aquinas. “In fact, what we mean by evolution is the world as created by God,” said Archbishop Gianfranco Ravasi, head of the Pontifical Council for Culture. The Vatican also dealt the final blow to speculation that Pope Benedict XVI might be prepared to endorse the theory of Intelligent Design, whose advocates credit a “higher power” for the complexities of life.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>religion evolution science christianity</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:a27823717b7c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:religion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:christianity"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megafauna">
    <title>Megafauna - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia</title>
    <dc:date>2009-04-11T04:09:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megafauna</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><dc:subject>science evolution fun</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:4c46f390a62c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:fun"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2009/03/the_world_witho.php">
    <title>The Technium: The World Without Technology</title>
    <dc:date>2009-03-25T17:00:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2009/03/the_world_witho.php</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[We are not the same folks who marched out of Africa. Our genes have co-evolved with our inventions. In the past 10,000 years alone, in fact, our genes have evolved 100 times faster than the average rate for the previous 6 million years. This should not be a surprise. In the same period we domesticated the dog (all those breeds) from wolves, and cows and corn and more from their unrecognizable ancestors. We, too, have been domesticated. We have domesticated ourselves. Our teeth continue to shrink, our muscles thin out, our hair disappear, our molecular digestion adjust to new foods. Technology has domesticated us. As fast as we remake our tools, we remake ourselves. We are co-evolving with our technology, so that we have become deeply co-dependent on it. Sapiens can no longer survive biologically without some kind of tools. Nor can our humanity continue without the technium.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>to_read evolution ideas</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:444255cdfb8e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:to_read"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:ideas"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123440723977275883.html">
    <title>Last-Minute Changes - WSJ.com</title>
    <dc:date>2009-02-18T18:35:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123440723977275883.html</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[But genomes don't just speed up their evolution willy-nilly. So what happened, the authors ask, to keep human evolution going in the "recent" past? Two crucial events, they contend, had to do with food production. As humans learned the techniques of agriculture, they abandoned their diffuse hunter-gatherer ways and established cities and governments. The resulting population density made humans ripe for infectious diseases like smallpox and malaria. Alleles that helped protect against disease proved useful and won out. The domestication of cattle for milk production also led to genetic change. Among people of northern European descent, lactose intolerance -- the inability to digest milk in adulthood -- is unusual today. But it was universal before a genetic mutation arose about 8,000 years ago that made lactose tolerance continue beyond childhood. Since you can get milk over and over from a cow, but can get meat from it only once, you can harvest a lot more calories over time for the s
]]></description>
<dc:subject>science evolution</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:133985cf3e1d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.michaelberube.com/index.php/weblog/comments/1218/">
    <title>Michael Bérubé :: Diversity and dangerality</title>
    <dc:date>2009-02-17T19:54:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.michaelberube.com/index.php/weblog/comments/1218/</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Complaining about the preponderance of liberals and leftists in the arts and humanities and social sciences has so far allowed the right to dodge the question of how many young conservatives are actually interested enough in education in arts, humanities, and social sciences to devote six or eight years of graduate study to these subjects. The really curious thing, however, is that there is also a preponderance of liberals and leftists in the sciences, and no one can plausibly suggest that this is due to selection bias—as if physicists are looking for new Ph.D.s who bring a multicultural approach to superstring theory and biologists are subtly biased in favor of geneticists whose work criticizes Western imperialism. The problem here—the elephant in the room, if you will—is that there is now an entire wing of the conservative moment that is opposed to science, be it the science of climate change or the science of stem cell research or the science of evolutionary theory.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>academia evolution</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:2a59725844c6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/02/who-agrees-with.html">
    <title>Who Accepts Evolution?</title>
    <dc:date>2009-02-15T17:54:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/02/who-agrees-with.html</link>
    <dc:creator>lukeneff</dc:creator><dc:subject>evolution</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/b:197f0510f24a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:lukeneff/t:evolution"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>