<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (kellyramsey)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from kellyramsey</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/07/the-war-on-stupid-people/485618/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.councilforresponsiblegenetics.org/blog/post/Quest-for-Intelligence-Genes-Churns-Out-More-Dubious-Results.aspx"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nature.com/news/smart-genes-prove-elusive-1.15858"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pjf.id.au/ethics/2014/01/25/how-to-screw-learning-with-one-simple-belief.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://slatestarcodex.com/2013/10/20/the-anti-reactionary-faq/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://techcrunch.com/2013/11/22/geeks-for-monarchy/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=artificial-brains-are-imminentnot-2010-05-14"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/06/opinion/06chabon.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jewcy.com/cabal/will_saletans_scandalous_source"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cscs.umich.edu/~crshalizi/weblog/541.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cscs.umich.edu/~crshalizi/weblog/542.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/11/us/11dna.html?_r=1&amp;ref=science&amp;oref=login"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.acceleratingfuture.com/michael/blog/?p=603#comment-100242"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.12/genius.html?pg=1&amp;topic=&amp;topic_set="/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.slate.com/id/2176709/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cscs.umich.edu/~crshalizi/weblog/523.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2007/10/18/science-watson-controversy.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article2677098.ece"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/07/the-war-on-stupid-people/485618/">
    <title>The War on Stupid People (David H. Freedman, The Atlantic)</title>
    <dc:date>2017-01-10T06:29:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/07/the-war-on-stupid-people/485618/</link>
    <dc:creator>kellyramsey</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[" A few numbers help clarify the nature and scope of the problem. The College Board has suggested a “college readiness benchmark” that works out to roughly 500 on each portion of the SAT as a score below which students are not likely to achieve at least a B-minus average at “a four-year college”—presumably an average one. (By comparison, at Ohio State University, a considerably better-than-average school ranked 52nd among U.S. universities by U.S. News & World Report, freshmen entering in 2014 averaged 605 on the reading section of the SAT and 668 on the math section.)

" How many high-school students are capable of meeting the College Board benchmark? This is not easy to answer, because in most states, large numbers of students never take a college-entrance exam (in California, for example, at most 43 percent of high-school students sit for the SAT or the ACT). To get a general sense, though, we can look to Delaware, Idaho, Maine, and the District of Columbia, which provide the SAT for free and have SAT participation rates above 90 percent, according to The Washington Post. In these states in 2015, the percentage of students averaging at least 500 on the reading section ranged from 33 percent (in D.C.) to 40 percent (in Maine), with similar distributions scoring 500 or more on the math and writing sections. Considering that these data don’t include dropouts, it seems safe to say that no more than one in three American high-school students is capable of hitting the College Board’s benchmark. Quibble with the details all you want, but there’s no escaping the conclusion that most Americans aren’t smart enough to do something we are told is an essential step toward succeeding in our new, brain-centric economy—namely, get through four years of college with moderately good grades. "]]></description>
<dc:subject>cult-of-intelligence</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://apple.com/iphone/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/b:7bcdbfc84cfd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:cult-of-intelligence"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.councilforresponsiblegenetics.org/blog/post/Quest-for-Intelligence-Genes-Churns-Out-More-Dubious-Results.aspx">
    <title>Quest for Intelligence Genes Churns Out More Dubious Results (Council for Responsible Genetics)</title>
    <dc:date>2014-10-15T19:54:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.councilforresponsiblegenetics.org/blog/post/Quest-for-Intelligence-Genes-Churns-Out-More-Dubious-Results.aspx</link>
    <dc:creator>kellyramsey</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[" He elaborates: “The three variants the researchers identified were each responsible for an average of 0.3 points on an IQ test. (About two-thirds of the population score between 85 and 115.) That means that a person with two copies of each variant would score 1.8 points higher on an intelligence test than a person with none of them. To put those figures in perspective, those variants have about one-twentieth the influence on intelligence as do gene variants linked to other complex traits such as height, "]]></description>
<dc:subject>cult-of-intelligence</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/b:dc79e4a1b668/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:cult-of-intelligence"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nature.com/news/smart-genes-prove-elusive-1.15858">
    <title>'Smart genes' prove elusive (Ewen Callaway | Nature)</title>
    <dc:date>2014-09-09T03:40:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nature.com/news/smart-genes-prove-elusive-1.15858</link>
    <dc:creator>kellyramsey</dc:creator><dc:subject>cult-of-intelligence</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/b:2f8b1e31ad6f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:cult-of-intelligence"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://pjf.id.au/ethics/2014/01/25/how-to-screw-learning-with-one-simple-belief.html">
    <title>How to screw learning with one simple belief (Paul Fenwick)</title>
    <dc:date>2014-01-28T16:51:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://pjf.id.au/ethics/2014/01/25/how-to-screw-learning-with-one-simple-belief.html</link>
    <dc:creator>kellyramsey</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[" The kids who are taught that effort count increase in the number of problems they can solve. Those who are told that they’re smart show a frightening decrease.

" What’s the difference? Those being told that they’re smart are taught that abilities are fixed. If you’re finding a puzzle hard, then it must be because you’re not very good at that, and you should try something else. Kids taught that results are based on effort see the hard puzzles as something they can learn to do, and then they do so. "]]></description>
<dc:subject>cult-of-intelligence</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/b:33115a55911f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:cult-of-intelligence"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://slatestarcodex.com/2013/10/20/the-anti-reactionary-faq/">
    <title>The Anti-Reactionary FAQ (Scott Alexander)</title>
    <dc:date>2013-11-25T15:51:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://slatestarcodex.com/2013/10/20/the-anti-reactionary-faq/</link>
    <dc:creator>kellyramsey</dc:creator><dc:subject>cult-of-intelligence conservatism cranks white-supremacists</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/b:01961f79f860/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:cult-of-intelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:conservatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:cranks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:white-supremacists"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://techcrunch.com/2013/11/22/geeks-for-monarchy/">
    <title>Geeks for Monarchy: The Rise of the Neoreactionaries (Klint Finley | TechCrunch)</title>
    <dc:date>2013-11-25T15:45:24+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://techcrunch.com/2013/11/22/geeks-for-monarchy/</link>
    <dc:creator>kellyramsey</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[“I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible.”

“neoreactionaries are obsessed with a concept called “human biodiversity” (HBD) — what used to be called “scientific racism.” Specifically, they believe that IQ is one of — if not the — most important personal traits, and that it’s predominately genetic. Neoreactionaries would replace, or supplement, the “divine right” of kings and the aristocracy with the “genetic right” of elites.”]]></description>
<dc:subject>cult-of-intelligence conservatism cranks white-supremacists</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/b:f800e631f09a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:cult-of-intelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:conservatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:cranks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:white-supremacists"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=artificial-brains-are-imminentnot-2010-05-14">
    <title>Artificial brains are imminent...not! (John Horgan @ Scientific American)</title>
    <dc:date>2010-07-07T19:07:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=artificial-brains-are-imminentnot-2010-05-14</link>
    <dc:creator>kellyramsey</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Current brain simulations resemble the "planes" and "radios" that Melanesian cargo-cult tribes built out of palm fronds, coral and coconut shells after being occupied by Japanese and American troops during World War II. "Brains" that can't think are like "planes" that can't fly."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>cult-of-intelligence singularitarianism</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/b:907fb991c30c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:cult-of-intelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:singularitarianism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/06/opinion/06chabon.html">
    <title>Chosen, but Not Special (Michael Chabon @ New York Times)</title>
    <dc:date>2010-06-07T03:42:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/06/opinion/06chabon.html</link>
    <dc:creator>kellyramsey</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[" As a Jewish child I was regularly instructed, both subtly and openly, that Jews, the people of Maimonides, Albert Einstein, Jonas Salk and Meyer Lansky, were on the whole smarter, cleverer, more brilliant, more astute than other people. "
]]></description>
<dc:subject>cult-of-intelligence</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/b:75d17330930e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:cult-of-intelligence"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.jewcy.com/cabal/will_saletans_scandalous_source">
    <title>No, Blacks are Not Dumber than Whites (Daniel Koffler @ Jewcy)</title>
    <dc:date>2007-11-26T17:38:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.jewcy.com/cabal/will_saletans_scandalous_source</link>
    <dc:creator>kellyramsey</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Rushton and Jensen are anything but a new wave of scholars come to shed light on a heretofore intractable problem, as Saletan presents them. On the contrary, they have spent nearly a century combined harping on the same theme... black racial inferiority"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>cult-of-intelligence pseudoscience journalism failure white-supremacists</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/b:be4ff7a2d893/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:cult-of-intelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:pseudoscience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:journalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:failure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:white-supremacists"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://cscs.umich.edu/~crshalizi/weblog/541.html">
    <title>In Which I Demand That Slate Refund My Subscription (Cosma Shalizi @ Three-Toed Sloth)</title>
    <dc:date>2007-11-22T20:27:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://cscs.umich.edu/~crshalizi/weblog/541.html</link>
    <dc:creator>kellyramsey</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["[Saletan] has just demonstrated that he is either unable or unwilling to do his job. His readers might attempt to extract information from his words by undoing the distortions imposed by his folly and manipulations, but life is too short."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>cult-of-intelligence cranks journalism failure</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/b:847c092f61c3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:cult-of-intelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:cranks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:journalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:failure"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://cscs.umich.edu/~crshalizi/weblog/542.html">
    <title>Reading Skills (Cosma Shalizi @ Three-Toed Sloth)</title>
    <dc:date>2007-11-22T20:25:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://cscs.umich.edu/~crshalizi/weblog/542.html</link>
    <dc:creator>kellyramsey</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[on Saletan's race-and-IQ sources in his Slate article: "Demonstrations that, even if you accept IQ is valid, his sources are quacks who couldn't think their way out of a wet paper bag."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>cult-of-intelligence cranks journalism failure</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/b:68c2d6c1adc0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:cult-of-intelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:cranks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:journalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:failure"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/11/us/11dna.html?_r=1&amp;ref=science&amp;oref=login">
    <title>In DNA Era, New Worries About Prejudice (Amy Harmon, New York Times)</title>
    <dc:date>2007-11-11T22:37:38+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/11/us/11dna.html?_r=1&amp;ref=science&amp;oref=login</link>
    <dc:creator>kellyramsey</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["“I’ve spent the last 10 years of my life researching how much genetic variability there is between populations,” said Dr. Altshuler... it is so clear that the economic and social and educational differences have so much more influence than genes.""
]]></description>
<dc:subject>cult-of-intelligence overconfident-amateurism eugenics race-ethnicity</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/b:1a81e63a1ae5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:cult-of-intelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:overconfident-amateurism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:eugenics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:race-ethnicity"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.acceleratingfuture.com/michael/blog/?p=603#comment-100242">
    <title>Singularity Debate (Anne C, comment @ Accelerating Future)</title>
    <dc:date>2007-11-03T22:45:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.acceleratingfuture.com/michael/blog/?p=603#comment-100242</link>
    <dc:creator>kellyramsey</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["a lot of superintelligence-oriented folks seem to flip back and forth almost seamlessly between their own, private definitions of intelligence (e.g., that exemplified by people they think of as “smart”) and statistical constructs like g."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>cult-of-intelligence singularitarianism</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/b:406bde128271/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:cult-of-intelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:singularitarianism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.12/genius.html?pg=1&amp;topic=&amp;topic_set=">
    <title>The Key to Genius (Steve Silberman, Wired)</title>
    <dc:date>2007-10-27T20:02:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.12/genius.html?pg=1&amp;topic=&amp;topic_set=</link>
    <dc:creator>kellyramsey</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["For the most part, however, real genius slipped through Terman's net. None of his prodigies won major scientific prizes or became important artists, while two students excluded from the study for having insufficient test scores...went on to earn Nobels."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>cult-of-intelligence</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/b:80d2109becbe/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:cult-of-intelligence"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.slate.com/id/2176709/">
    <title>Racism, science, politics, and James Watson (William Saletan @ Slate)</title>
    <dc:date>2007-10-27T19:41:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.slate.com/id/2176709/</link>
    <dc:creator>kellyramsey</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["No, the reason I don't want to let Watson go quietly is that he didn't really clean up his original comments. ... His revisions... Scientifically, they say nothing and retract nothing. All they do is make racism harder to identify, scrutinize, and test."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>pseudoscience race-ethnicity cult-of-intelligence eugenics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/b:5cc66d919ba2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:pseudoscience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:race-ethnicity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:cult-of-intelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:eugenics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://cscs.umich.edu/~crshalizi/weblog/523.html">
    <title>g, a Statistical Myth (Cosma Shalizi)</title>
    <dc:date>2007-10-26T04:30:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://cscs.umich.edu/~crshalizi/weblog/523.html</link>
    <dc:creator>kellyramsey</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["factor analysis can give the appearance of a general factor when there are actually many thousands of completely independent and equally strong causes at work. Heritability doesn't distinguish these alternatives either."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>cult-of-intelligence eugenics race-ethnicity</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/b:a67f4f035d93/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:cult-of-intelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:eugenics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:race-ethnicity"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2007/10/18/science-watson-controversy.html">
    <title>DNA pioneer's lecture cancelled after comments on race (AP)</title>
    <dc:date>2007-10-20T17:24:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2007/10/18/science-watson-controversy.html</link>
    <dc:creator>kellyramsey</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["In 2000 Watson shocked an audience at the University of California, Berkeley, when he advanced his theory about a link between skin colour and sex drive. ... "That's why you have Latin lovers," he said, according to people who attended the lecture."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>pseudoscience overconfident-amateurism DNR race-ethnicity cult-of-intelligence eugenics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/b:ed591cf72575/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:pseudoscience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:overconfident-amateurism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:DNR"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:race-ethnicity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:cult-of-intelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:eugenics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article2677098.ece">
    <title>Black people 'less intelligent' scientist claims (Helen Nugent, Times)</title>
    <dc:date>2007-10-20T17:23:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article2677098.ece</link>
    <dc:creator>kellyramsey</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["[Watson] said he hoped that everyone was equal, but countered that “people who have to deal with black employees find this not true”."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>pseudoscience overconfident-amateurism DNR race-ethnicity cult-of-intelligence eugenics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/b:763c3f401a2e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:pseudoscience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:overconfident-amateurism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:DNR"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:race-ethnicity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:cult-of-intelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:eugenics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>