<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (kellyramsey)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from kellyramsey</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://gizmodo.com/experts-held-a-secret-meeting-to-consider-building-a-hu-1776538323"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/amateurs-give-genetic-engineering-a-try/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://technology.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn12780&amp;feedId=online-news_rss20"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.wired.com/medtech/health/magazine/15-11/ff_clonedmeat"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713606739~db=all"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://gizmodo.com/experts-held-a-secret-meeting-to-consider-building-a-hu-1776538323">
    <title>Experts Held a Secret Meeting to Consider Building a Human Genome From Scratch (George Dvorsky | Gizmodo)</title>
    <dc:date>2016-05-13T22:04:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://gizmodo.com/experts-held-a-secret-meeting-to-consider-building-a-hu-1776538323</link>
    <dc:creator>kellyramsey</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[" According to George Church, a professor of genetics at Harvard medical school and a key organizer of the proposed project, the whole thing is an unfortunate misunderstanding. Church says the meeting wasn’t really about synthetic human genomes, but rather it was about efforts to improve the ability to synthesize long strands of DNA, which geneticists could use to create all manner of animals, plants and microbes. Church was quoted in the NYT as saying: “They’re painting a picture which I don’t think represents the project. If that were the project, I’d be running away from it.”

" This is all very interesting because, as Pollack points out, the original name of the project was “HGP2: The Human Genome Synthesis Project.” What’s more, an invitation to the meeting clearly stated that the primary goal would be “to synthesize a complete human genome in a cell line within a period of ten years.” Later, the organizers changed the name of the meeting to “HGP-Write: Testing Large Synthetic Genomes in Cells.” The reason for the change, they said, was that the original name was meant to be headline-grabbing. Which is a super strange thing to say given that the meeting was closed to the press. "]]></description>
<dc:subject>biotechnology academia</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/b:a1a57807f5b9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:biotechnology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:academia"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/amateurs-give-genetic-engineering-a-try/">
    <title>Amateurs are trying genetic engineering at home (Marcus Wohlsen, AP)</title>
    <dc:date>2008-12-31T19:42:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.cbsnews.com/news/amateurs-give-genetic-engineering-a-try/</link>
    <dc:creator>kellyramsey</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Many of these amateurs may have studied biology in college but have no advanced degrees and are not earning a living in the biotechnology field. Some proudly call themselves "biohackers" — innovators who push technological boundaries and put the spread of knowledge before profits."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>social-movements biotechnology</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/b:4c3a3aa7f0c8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:social-movements"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:biotechnology"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://technology.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn12780&amp;feedId=online-news_rss20">
    <title>Cell-squirting needles could 'weave' new organs (Colin Barras, New Scientist)</title>
    <dc:date>2007-10-18T15:27:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://technology.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn12780&amp;feedId=online-news_rss20</link>
    <dc:creator>kellyramsey</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["A new approach to "printing" living cells could make it easier to arrange them into precise structures without harming them. This could enable future therapies where replacement limbs or organs can be printed to order."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>biotechnology</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/b:374ca7409fd1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:biotechnology"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.wired.com/medtech/health/magazine/15-11/ff_clonedmeat">
    <title>Cloned Beef (and Pork and Milk): It's What's for Dinner (Ben Paynter, Wired)</title>
    <dc:date>2007-10-18T15:23:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.wired.com/medtech/health/magazine/15-11/ff_clonedmeat</link>
    <dc:creator>kellyramsey</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["ndianhead was able to pick her up on the cheap for $2,800 — about $1,000 less than a non-clone adult cow of the same age (calves cost much more — older animals depreciate like cars)."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>biotechnology</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/b:ffedea88f5b6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:biotechnology"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713606739~db=all">
    <title>Biotechnology and the New Right: Neoconservatism's Red Menace (Johathan D. Moreno &amp; Sam Berger @ American Journal of Bioethics)</title>
    <dc:date>2007-10-18T15:09:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713606739~db=all</link>
    <dc:creator>kellyramsey</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[and other articles re: biotechnology and neoconservative critiques
]]></description>
<dc:subject>biotechnology bioethics conservatism</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/b:50e2371365f0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:biotechnology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:bioethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:kellyramsey/t:conservatism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>