<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (keithly)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:keithly/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from keithly</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://douthat.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/09/05/sam-harris-and-scientism/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.economist.com/node/21530078"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://douthat.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/09/05/sam-harris-and-scientism/">
    <title>Sam Harris and Scientism - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2013-09-08T01:34:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://douthat.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/09/05/sam-harris-and-scientism/</link>
    <dc:creator>keithly</dc:creator><dc:subject>philosophy ethics science utilitarianism</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:keithly/b:e391de9b2174/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:keithly/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:keithly/t:ethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:keithly/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:keithly/t:utilitarianism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.economist.com/node/21530078">
    <title>Moral philosophy: Goodness has nothing to do with it | The Economist</title>
    <dc:date>2011-10-08T02:11:22+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.economist.com/node/21530078</link>
    <dc:creator>keithly</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Dr Bartels and Dr Pizarro knew from previous research that around 90% of people refuse the utilitarian act of killing one individual to save five. What no one had previously inquired about, though, was the nature of the remaining 10%.]]></description>
<dc:subject>utilitarianism philosophy ethics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:keithly/b:0b894f8aa53d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:keithly/t:utilitarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:keithly/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:keithly/t:ethics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>