<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (jschneider)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from jschneider</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.rogerclarke.com/EC/IGI%20Fair%20Use%20Policy.pdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/10/jailbreaking-now-legal-under-dmca-for-smartphones-but-not-tablets/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://laboratorium.net/archive/2012/05/13/inside_the_georgia_state_opinion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://kcoyle.blogspot.com/2012/01/google-book-search-redux.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2018396.2018408"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://peterbrantley.com/gbs-settle-or-litigate-340"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://acrlog.org/2010/09/29/underground-resource-sharing/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cameronneylon.net/blog/driving-uk-research-is-copyright-a-help-or-a-hindrance/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ScienceInTheOpen+%28Science+in+the+open%29"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://kcoyle.blogspot.com/2010/02/doj-bridge-too-far.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://worldsfairuseday.org/Worlds_Fair_Use_Day/Worlds_Fair_Use_Day.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.jonudell.net/2009/10/08/magic-glasses-and-magic-projectors-private-versus-public-augmentation-of-experience/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2009/07/26/readers-need-help-from-authors-and-publishers-to-retain-digital-ebook-rights/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.semantic-conference.com/session/1822/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/05/harvard-prof-tells-judge-that-p2p-filesharing-is-fair-use.ars"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://newmedialiteracies.org/library/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/14/a-pirates-victim-wonders-how-to-fight-back/#comment-289685"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://kcoyle.blogspot.com/2009/05/walt-crawford-should-read-document.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/08/ap-exec-doesnt-know-it-has-a-youtube-channel-threatens-affiliate-for-embedding-videos/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6483876.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/13475/is-internet-linking-legal/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2009/03/01/why-amazon-was-wrong-to-back-down-from-authors-guild/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.cdt.org/2008/10/29/google-settles-lawsuit-with-book-publishers-and-authors/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://pegasuslibrarian.blogspot.com/2009/02/this-i-believe-copyright-policies-as.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://acrlog.org/2008/11/04/libraries-on-planet-google/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.lib.berkeley.edu/shimenawa.php/2008/11/01/eff-s-settlement-concerns"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://kcoyle.blogspot.com/2008/12/google-and-fair-use.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://efoundations.typepad.com/efoundations/2008/10/muxtape-is-dead.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/08/judge-rules-content-owners-must-consider-fair-use-"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.librarylaw.com/librarylaw/2008/08/book-jackets--.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://librarycopyright.net/digitalslider/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.lib.berkeley.edu/shimenawa.php/2008/06/07/shrinking_fair_use"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://youtube.com/watch?v=CJn_jC4FNDo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fairuse.stanford.edu/primary_materials/legislation/teach.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://chronicle.com/free/2008/06/3583n.htm?utm_source=at&amp;utm_medium=en"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/index.php/id;1770252980;fp;2;fpid;3"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Booksquare/~3/274783911/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://loomware.typepad.com/loomware/2008/03/proof-positive.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bibliodyssey.blogspot.com/2008/03/permission-unpossible-i.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/educationalfairusetoday.pdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://digitaleccentric.blogspot.com/2008/01/peter-brantley-on-google-books.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://digitaleccentric.blogspot.com/2008/01/copyright-and-images-online.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlpubs/crlnews/backissues2007/october07/washingtonhotline.cfm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.radioopensource.org/google-print/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.lessig.org/blog/2007/09/a_big_victory_golan_v_gonzales.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://lessig.org/blog/05-1259.pdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://digitaleccentric.blogspot.com/2007/09/fair-use-decision.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ccianet.org/index.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/11568/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dltj.org/2007/02/fairuse-nfl-youtube/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://esilibrary.com/blog"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.centerforsocialmedia.org/resources/fair_use/"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://www.rogerclarke.com/EC/IGI%20Fair%20Use%20Policy.pdf">
    <title>[untitled]</title>
    <dc:date>2013-02-10T21:12:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.rogerclarke.com/EC/IGI%20Fair%20Use%20Policy.pdf</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><dc:subject>IGI fairuse</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:aecafbede7b0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:IGI"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/10/jailbreaking-now-legal-under-dmca-for-smartphones-but-not-tablets/">
    <title>Jailbreaking now legal under DMCA for smartphones, but not tablets | Ars Technica</title>
    <dc:date>2012-12-10T14:48:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/10/jailbreaking-now-legal-under-dmca-for-smartphones-but-not-tablets/</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[via https://twitter.com/arstechnica/status/261599381285904384 " You'll be able to unlock phones purchased before January 2013 but not phones purchased after that. It will be legal to rip DVDs to use an excerpt in a documentary, but not to play it on your iPad. None of these distinctions makes very much sense. But Congress probably deserves more blame for this than the Librarian of Congress.""But the Librarian did not allow circumvention for space-shifting purposes. While public interest groups had argued that consumers should be allowed to rip a DVD in order to watch it on an iPad that lacks a built-in DVD drive, the Librarian concluded that no court has found that such "space shifting" is a fair use under copyright law."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>DMCA copyright ebooks fairuse</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:975d7fdcf208/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:DMCA"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:ebooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://laboratorium.net/archive/2012/05/13/inside_the_georgia_state_opinion">
    <title>The Laboratorium : Inside the Georgia State Opinion</title>
    <dc:date>2012-05-13T15:56:12+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://laboratorium.net/archive/2012/05/13/inside_the_georgia_state_opinion</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[via https://twitter.com/#!/GaviaLib/status/201697590692167682  "There was a trial a year ago, and then long silence from the court. Now we know why it was taking so long: the opinion is 350 pages. That number is a little misleading, in that over two thirds of the opinion are dedicated to a highly methodical copyright ownership, infringement, and fair use analysis of seventy-four separate claims of infringement, using standard templates and highly repetitive language. Having now dug through the details, I’d like to offer a few observations.""Other claims dropped out before the fair use stage because they were uploaded to the e-reserves system but never downloaded by students. The court dismisses these from the lawsuit as de minimis, explaining that these uses by the University, while technical implicating the copyright owners’ exclusive rights, don’t affect the incentives for authors to create. This puts more teeth in the de minimis doctrine in copyright: it goes beyond the view that de minimis means “not substantially similar.” It also strengthens the argument that “internal use” copies never used to reach an to an audience that reads them for their content don’t infringe. Think, for example, of the HathiTrust’s archive of scans from Google Books.""When the court did reach fair use, it held across the board that two of the four factors favored Georgia State. The purpose of the use, while not transformative, was nonetheless for highly favored educational purposes by a nonprofit institution. And the nature of the works was consistently informational.

On the third factor, the amount copied, the court repudiated the Classroom Guidlines, calling them “not compatible with the language and intent of § 107.” It noted that the numerical limits in the Guidelines are so stringent that not one of the excerpts at issue in the case would fit within them. It was particularly uninterested in the Guidelines’ position that copying not “be repeated with respect to the same item by the same teacher from term to term,” which the court described as “an impractical, unnecessary limitation.”""Instead, the court fashioned its own quantitative test. For books of nine or fewer chapters, the court set a threshold of 10% of the total page count; for books of ten chapters or more, the threshold was a single complete chapter. (The chapter-based rule creates an odd incentive for publishers to create books with a surfeit of tiny chapters.) Copying of any amount under this threshold, the court held, would be treated as “decidedly small.” In practical terms, this ended up being a one-sided bright-line rule: copying of less than 10% or one chapter always ended in a fair use win for Georgia State.""no digital license meant an instant win for Georgia State. The court repeatedly emphasized that students would not have bought the assigned books as a substitute for the excerpts posted on the e-reserve system.""Only in seven instances did Georgia State use more than 10% or one chapter of a book that was available for digital licensing. When this happened, the court took a more detailed look at the specifics of the book’s licensing market and the portion copied. Generally, this turned on whether the book made significant revenues via licensing: if so, the use was unfair. (In one instance, the court did a “heart of the work” analysis under factor three to find no fair use because the professor had assigned chapters that “essentially sum up the ideas in the book.”)""Thus, the operational bottom line for universities is that it’s likely to be fair use to assign less than 10% of a book, to assign larger portions of a book that is not available for digital licensing, or to assign larger portions of a book that is available for digital licensing but doesn’t make significant revenues through licensing. This third prong is almost never going to be something that professors or librarians can evaluate, so in practice, I expect to see fair-use e-reserves codes that treat under 10% as presumptively okay, and amounts over 10% but less than some ill-defined maximum as presumptively okay if it has been confirmed that a license to make digital copies of excerpts from the book is not available.""The most interesting issue open in the case is the scope of any possible injunction. Given that Georgia State won on sixty-nine out of seventy-four litigated claims, while the publishers won on only five, I expect that the any injunction will need to be rather narrow. But given how amenable the court’s proposed limits are to bright-line treatment, it is likely that the publishers will push to write them in to the injunction.""The big winner is CCC. It gains leverage against universities for coursepack and e-reserve copying with a bright-line rule, and it gains leverage against publishers who will be under much more pressure to participate in its full panoply of licenses."]]></description>
<dc:subject>eresearves copyright fairuse logfiles licensing orphan-works</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:d1c73c68cdff/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:eresearves"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:logfiles"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:orphan-works"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://kcoyle.blogspot.com/2012/01/google-book-search-redux.html">
    <title>Google Book Search Redux</title>
    <dc:date>2012-01-25T22:55:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://kcoyle.blogspot.com/2012/01/google-book-search-redux.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><dc:subject>googlebooks fairuse copyright digitization intellectual-property</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:f454713b53c4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:googlebooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:digitization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:intellectual-property"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2018396.2018408">
    <title>Why the Google book settlement failed</title>
    <dc:date>2011-12-12T13:16:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2018396.2018408</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><dc:subject>googlebooks ACM fairuse orphanworks privacy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:31e87aed9f16/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:googlebooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:ACM"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:orphanworks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:privacy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://peterbrantley.com/gbs-settle-or-litigate-340">
    <title>Shimenawa » Blog Archive » GBS: Settle or Litigate?</title>
    <dc:date>2011-07-24T17:46:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://peterbrantley.com/gbs-settle-or-litigate-340</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["As James Grimmelmann noted at The Laboratorium, Chin also suggested that if settlement talks do not reach fruition and there was a return to litigation, the path would be clearly lit:
Judge Chin suggested that he saw the case, if it were to be litigated, in terms of fairly straightforward cross motions for summary judgment on whether snippet display is a fair use.
""It seems to me that the only benefit Google obtains from a new settlement is clean hands over the past claims of infringement for digitization, but if the only operation they conduct is snippet-view, there is not necessarily a requirement for all-party approval. One could well argue from Google’s perspective that they actually don’t want to establish a precedent for asking permission for a broad class of activities that have been held as Fair Use when they have been litigated. Regardless, the barrier of final class certification still resides in the settlement house."]]></description>
<dc:subject>googlebooks copyright fairuse</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:004d9bf6cf16/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:googlebooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://acrlog.org/2010/09/29/underground-resource-sharing/">
    <title>Underground Resource Sharing</title>
    <dc:date>2010-10-04T07:34:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://acrlog.org/2010/09/29/underground-resource-sharing/</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Turns out they do, and most of those offering advice don’t seem too concerned about taking the moral high ground – or even abiding by their university or library’s guidelines for sharing accounts:

Do what everybody I know who’s been in your position has done: get a friend who has access to a research library and its databases to share their log-in and password with you. I know I’ve helped a few people out in this way, and I’ve done it with a spring in my step and a song in my heart. Sure, it’s technically “wrong” but I’d argue that it’s more wrong to charge underemployed people money for access to scholarly resources.

I just ran into this, where my new school has some journal accesses but not many, and I crowdsourced it on facebook — some current Gradschooland students offered me their proxy server login, and another was already in the library and emailed me the pdf.

Everyone does it. Hell, I’ll give you MY login if you want

Virtually everyone I know who’s not employed by a top-tier R1 has a bootlegged EEBO account: through friends who are still grad students, advisors, or friends with cushier jobs.

Makes you wonder why we even bother with licensing agreements in the first place? As long as you can get it for free somewhere else that’s all that matters. Just how rampant is this practice? Wish I had a way to do an anonymous poll of faculty, grad students and alums to see how many think it’s all right to provide or take an account to give someone else free access to restricted resources. Based on this post – probably a lot more than we think. So much for setting good examples."]]></description>
<dc:subject>licensing fairuse netflix JStor</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:98679af4d43b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:licensing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:netflix"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:JStor"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://cameronneylon.net/blog/driving-uk-research-is-copyright-a-help-or-a-hindrance/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ScienceInTheOpen+%28Science+in+the+open%29">
    <title>Science in the Open » Blog Archive » Driving UK Research – Is copyright a help or a hindrance?</title>
    <dc:date>2010-08-01T10:56:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://cameronneylon.net/blog/driving-uk-research-is-copyright-a-help-or-a-hindrance/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ScienceInTheOpen+%28Science+in+the+open%29</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Until recently we would use texts or data by reading, taking notes, making photocopies, and then writing down new insights. We would refer to the originals by citing them. A person making limited copies or taking notes (perhaps quoting the text) does not breach copyright because of the notion of “fair dealing”. Making copies of reasonable portions of a work is explicitly not a violation of copyright. If it were we wouldn’t be able to do any useful work at all.

Today, scholarship and research cannot effectively proceed via manual human processes. There is simply too much for us to handle. On the other hand we have excellent computer systems that can, to some extent at least, take these notes for us. Automated assistants that can read the text for us, that can do text mining, data aggregation and indexing allowing us to cope with the volume of information. As these tools improve we have an opportunity to radically increase the speed of the innovation cycle, using the human brain for what it is best at: insight and creative thinking; and using machines for what they are best at: indexing, checking, collecting."]]></description>
<dc:subject>copyright fairuse semantic-publishing indexing</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:dbaa1c3ea529/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:semantic-publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:indexing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://kcoyle.blogspot.com/2010/02/doj-bridge-too-far.html">
    <title>Coyle's InFormation: DOJ: &quot;A Bridge Too Far&quot;</title>
    <dc:date>2010-03-18T14:39:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://kcoyle.blogspot.com/2010/02/doj-bridge-too-far.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[""]]></description>
<dc:subject>copyright GoogleBooks fairuse class-action DOJ Karen Coyle</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:b9fdfb89a6b3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:GoogleBooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:class-action"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:DOJ"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:Karen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:Coyle"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://worldsfairuseday.org/Worlds_Fair_Use_Day/Worlds_Fair_Use_Day.html">
    <title>World's Fair Use Day</title>
    <dc:date>2010-01-12T22:34:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://worldsfairuseday.org/Worlds_Fair_Use_Day/Worlds_Fair_Use_Day.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><dc:subject>fairuse celebrations</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:c40219b4eee7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:celebrations"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.jonudell.net/2009/10/08/magic-glasses-and-magic-projectors-private-versus-public-augmentation-of-experience/">
    <title>Magic glasses and magic projectors: Private versus public augmentation of experience « Jon Udell</title>
    <dc:date>2009-10-08T18:32:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.jonudell.net/2009/10/08/magic-glasses-and-magic-projectors-private-versus-public-augmentation-of-experience/</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><dc:subject>DOM JavaScript Libraries context fairuse mashups jon udell</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:8063ad9e3454/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:DOM"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:JavaScript"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:Libraries"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:context"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:mashups"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:jon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:udell"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2009/07/26/readers-need-help-from-authors-and-publishers-to-retain-digital-ebook-rights/">
    <title>Dear Author: Romance Novel Reviews, Industry News, and Commentary » Blog Archive » Readers Need Help from Authors and Publishers to Retain Digital eBook Rights</title>
    <dc:date>2009-07-27T12:38:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2009/07/26/readers-need-help-from-authors-and-publishers-to-retain-digital-ebook-rights/</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["If the current law makes us criminals for wanting to own books, then the copyright holders should advocate for changing that law""3)  Criminalizing an activity that enables the reader to read her own legimately purchased books engenders illwill toward the author and the publisher and in this market, ill will is something the publishing community can scarce afford."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>DRM ebooks kindle legal DMCA fairuse</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:0456b549b6cb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:DRM"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:ebooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:kindle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:legal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:DMCA"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.semantic-conference.com/session/1822/">
    <title>FRM: Fair Rights Management</title>
    <dc:date>2009-06-21T16:32:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.semantic-conference.com/session/1822/</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Fair Rights Management (FRM) is our work towards fair use in the digital world. We propose taking advantage of social networks and terms negotiations. FRM is also a semantic fair content distribution platform. The platform provides a reliable identity management system using FOAF, machine-readable digital licenses using Creative Commons RDF Vocabulary, and protection means for the content that is distributed."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>fairuse DRM semanticweb</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:5664401eaf38/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:DRM"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:semanticweb"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/05/harvard-prof-tells-judge-that-p2p-filesharing-is-fair-use.ars">
    <title>Harvard prof tells judge that P2P filesharing is &quot;fair use&quot; - Ars Technica</title>
    <dc:date>2009-05-18T21:11:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/05/harvard-prof-tells-judge-that-p2p-filesharing-is-fair-use.ars</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Nesson argues that it doesn't matter if Tenenbaum copied music; such noncommercial uses are presumptively "fair" and anyone seeking to squeeze file-swappers for statutory damages is entitled to precisely zero dollars."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>p2p fairuse copyright</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:79ab52b84659/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:p2p"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://newmedialiteracies.org/library/">
    <title>Project New Media Literacies</title>
    <dc:date>2009-05-18T06:35:43+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://newmedialiteracies.org/library/</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><dc:subject>media-literacy fairuse copyright creativecommons elearning participatory-media</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:369770d66232/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:media-literacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:creativecommons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:elearning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:participatory-media"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/14/a-pirates-victim-wonders-how-to-fight-back/#comment-289685">
    <title>A Book Author Wonders How to Fight Piracy - Bits Blog - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2009-05-15T19:56:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/14/a-pirates-victim-wonders-how-to-fight-back/#comment-289685</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><dc:subject>piracy textbooks nytimes copyright fairuse googlebooks</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:db98d977ce32/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:piracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:textbooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:nytimes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:googlebooks"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://kcoyle.blogspot.com/2009/05/walt-crawford-should-read-document.html">
    <title>Coyle's InFormation: Walt Crawford should read the document</title>
    <dc:date>2009-05-11T12:54:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://kcoyle.blogspot.com/2009/05/walt-crawford-should-read-document.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["there is general agreement that Google gets a monopoly... at least on out-of-print books, which is the vast majority of books in libraries. (Not on public domain books, which is what the OCA digitizes, but anyone can digitize public domain books.) So although the libraries and their contents will still be there, and can be used in hard copy as they are today, no one but Google can digitize the in-copyright works without incurring liability. So "monopoly on online version of their contents" is a factual statement, if you understand that public domain is public domain."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>Walt Crawford google digitization Karen Coyle fairuse</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:bdb88a12a19c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:Walt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:Crawford"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:digitization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:Karen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:Coyle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/08/ap-exec-doesnt-know-it-has-a-youtube-channel-threatens-affiliate-for-embedding-videos/">
    <title>A.P. Exec Doesn’t Know It Has A YouTube Channel: Threatens Affiliate For Embedding Videos</title>
    <dc:date>2009-04-12T18:01:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/08/ap-exec-doesnt-know-it-has-a-youtube-channel-threatens-affiliate-for-embedding-videos/</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><dc:subject>AP youtube fail embedding fairuse</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:9bb0ac28bcf2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:AP"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:youtube"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fail"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:embedding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6483876.html">
    <title>Down with E-Reserves - 10/1/2007 - Library Journal</title>
    <dc:date>2009-03-10T14:41:24+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6483876.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><dc:subject>ereserves LJ AAP copyright fairuse</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:56df8f018f2f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:ereserves"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:LJ"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:AAP"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/13475/is-internet-linking-legal/">
    <title>» Is Internet Linking Legal? MaisonBisson.com</title>
    <dc:date>2009-03-10T01:22:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/13475/is-internet-linking-legal/</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><dc:subject>linking fairuse copyright legal lawsuits</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:cb07dd39120c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:linking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:legal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:lawsuits"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2009/03/01/why-amazon-was-wrong-to-back-down-from-authors-guild/">
    <title>Why Amazon Was Wrong to Back Down from Authors’ Guild | Dear Author: Romance Novel Reviews, Industry News, and Commentary</title>
    <dc:date>2009-03-01T16:39:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2009/03/01/why-amazon-was-wrong-to-back-down-from-authors-guild/</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The Kindle itself does not violate any of the copyright holder’s bundle of rights. Instead, copyright holders can only argue that the Kindle enables the end user, readers like you and I, to violate the copyright holder’s right to public performances of their works. At best, Amazon would be vicariously/contributorily liable for the end users misuse of the Kindle TTS.""...the reader is sold her own set of rights with the book. In the case of physical books, she can resell the book, share it, or even scan it in and create a digital copy of the book. The ability to utilize software to read the book aloud in a private, single person performance, is not a) publication or b) a violation of the derivative copyright""Blind readers want the absolute right to read what book they want, when they want. One of my readers complains to me that she has to wait until the book shows up on a sight impaired reading website or has to find someone to help her strip the DRM or find a pirated book."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>author's-guild amazon fairuse copyright audio accessibility</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:99c1081300dd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:author's-guild"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:amazon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:audio"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:accessibility"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.cdt.org/2008/10/29/google-settles-lawsuit-with-book-publishers-and-authors/">
    <title>PolicyBeta - Blog Archive - Google Settles Lawsuit with Book Publishers and Authors</title>
    <dc:date>2009-03-01T06:26:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.cdt.org/2008/10/29/google-settles-lawsuit-with-book-publishers-and-authors/</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["If there’s a downside here, it is that the path Google has pursued here will not be easy for others to follow. Google’s scanning and display of excerpts of out-of-print books will rely not on fair use, but rather on what amounts to a broadly binding license derived from the class action settlement. ...any new would-be new entrant in this market would either have to seek out its own set of licenses with a vast number of authors and publishers, or proceed based on fair use and expose itself to the same kind of lawsuit that Google faced. Because Google did not litigate the fair use question through to the end, it didn’t blaze a fair use trail that others could follow. Naturally, that’s just fine with the publishing industry, which rejects the idea that what Google was doing could have qualified as fair use. But it creates a considerable challenge for anyone eyeing the creation of some type of new indexing, search, or analogous service."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>googebooks copyright fairuse publishing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:ec3f0fa50c5c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:googebooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:publishing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://pegasuslibrarian.blogspot.com/2009/02/this-i-believe-copyright-policies-as.html">
    <title>Pegasus Librarian: This I Believe: Copyright policies as an exercise in good faith</title>
    <dc:date>2009-02-07T23:00:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://pegasuslibrarian.blogspot.com/2009/02/this-i-believe-copyright-policies-as.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["libraries everywhere have to make one fundamental decision without guidance from the courts: are electronic reserves more like coursepacks or more like print reserves?"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>reserves libraries copyright fairuse</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:f109e341c747/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:reserves"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:libraries"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://acrlog.org/2008/11/04/libraries-on-planet-google/">
    <title>Libraries on Planet Google</title>
    <dc:date>2008-12-25T20:22:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://acrlog.org/2008/11/04/libraries-on-planet-google/</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><dc:subject>Zigtag_Imported_Bookmarks google copyright fairuse walled-gardens Google-analytics privacy-hole Orphan-works</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:e0da9beb2931/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:Zigtag_Imported_Bookmarks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:walled-gardens"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:Google-analytics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:privacy-hole"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:Orphan-works"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.lib.berkeley.edu/shimenawa.php/2008/11/01/eff-s-settlement-concerns">
    <title>EFF's Settlement Concerns</title>
    <dc:date>2008-12-25T20:22:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.lib.berkeley.edu/shimenawa.php/2008/11/01/eff-s-settlement-concerns</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><dc:subject>Zigtag_Imported_Bookmarks googlebooks copyright privacy fairuse toreread EFF datamining Peter-Brantley</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:32cb3692b02d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:Zigtag_Imported_Bookmarks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:googlebooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:toreread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:EFF"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:datamining"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:Peter-Brantley"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://kcoyle.blogspot.com/2008/12/google-and-fair-use.html">
    <title>Coyle's InFormation: Google and Fair Use</title>
    <dc:date>2008-12-24T23:03:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://kcoyle.blogspot.com/2008/12/google-and-fair-use.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Libraries have gotten the short end of the stick because their use of their own materials became commercialized through their partnership with Google. If instead libraries had managed to digitize the books on their own, the outcome would have likely have been entirely different (if any lawsuit had been brought, which might not have happened). I believe that libraries could be found to have a fair use case for digitizing their works for the purposes of searching, and could be allowed to use those digitized copies for the exceptions spelled out in section 108 of the copyright law (such as providing access to the sight impaired, or for replacement of deteriorated originals). Unfortunately, the concept of digitization of the contents of libraries has now been tainted with the air of commercialization and has earned the wrath of the publishers and authors. The Google/AAP settlement has created a mechanism that ignores the inherent rights of the libraries, but also makes it more difficult f
]]></description>
<dc:subject>copyright Karen fairuse Coyle digitization</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:d61479eca16d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:Karen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:Coyle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:digitization"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://efoundations.typepad.com/efoundations/2008/10/muxtape-is-dead.html">
    <title>Muxtape is dead, long live Muxtape</title>
    <dc:date>2008-10-22T22:10:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://efoundations.typepad.com/efoundations/2008/10/muxtape-is-dead.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><dc:subject>fairuse muxtape copyright</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:0723e9ada016/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:muxtape"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/08/judge-rules-content-owners-must-consider-fair-use-">
    <title>Judge Rules That Content Owners Must Consider Fair Use Before Sending Takedowns | Electronic Frontier Foundation</title>
    <dc:date>2008-08-25T12:00:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/08/judge-rules-content-owners-must-consider-fair-use-</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The court also noted that consideration of fair use is necessary to make sure that content owners do not abuse the takedown process""Judge Fogel has put content owners on notice: ignore fair use at your peril!"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>fairuse DMCA copyright EFF</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:eb0b6238b8cc/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:DMCA"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:EFF"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.librarylaw.com/librarylaw/2008/08/book-jackets--.html">
    <title>LibraryLaw Blog: Book jackets - can libraries put pictures of book covers on the websites?</title>
    <dc:date>2008-08-14T12:14:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.librarylaw.com/librarylaw/2008/08/book-jackets--.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><dc:subject>fairuse opencovers bookcovers</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:5deddbde8184/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:opencovers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:bookcovers"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://librarycopyright.net/digitalslider/">
    <title>PDTool (Digital Copyright Slider)</title>
    <dc:date>2008-07-18T14:22:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://librarycopyright.net/digitalslider/</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><dc:subject>copyright documentation ALA publicdomain fairuse</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:f26b2593ec02/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:documentation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:ALA"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:publicdomain"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.lib.berkeley.edu/shimenawa.php/2008/06/07/shrinking_fair_use">
    <title>shimenawa - Shrinking Books, Shrinking Fair Use</title>
    <dc:date>2008-07-13T13:07:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.lib.berkeley.edu/shimenawa.php/2008/06/07/shrinking_fair_use</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Does "a trend by publishers and ebook vendors to commoditize at an increasingly granular level -- e.g. from the book, towards the chapter, and perhaps even below that -- has any implications for the ability of libraries to continue providing Fair Use base
]]></description>
<dc:subject>ebooks publishing fairuse ereserve copyright publicdomain</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:a3f4612202ed/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:ebooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:ereserve"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:publicdomain"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://youtube.com/watch?v=CJn_jC4FNDo">
    <title>A Fair(y) Use Tale</title>
    <dc:date>2008-07-05T14:46:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://youtube.com/watch?v=CJn_jC4FNDo</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><dc:subject>disney youtube videos fairuse</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:77b46c8d8a9c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:disney"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:youtube"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:videos"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fairuse.stanford.edu/primary_materials/legislation/teach.html">
    <title>Stanford Copyright &amp; Fair Use - The TEACH Act</title>
    <dc:date>2008-07-02T18:13:41+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://fairuse.stanford.edu/primary_materials/legislation/teach.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><dc:subject>Stanford copyright fairuse</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:a0edcd73d8e7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:Stanford"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://chronicle.com/free/2008/06/3583n.htm?utm_source=at&amp;utm_medium=en">
    <title>In Lawsuit, University Asserts That Downloading Copyrighted Texts Is Fair Use - Chronicle.com</title>
    <dc:date>2008-07-01T19:14:07+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://chronicle.com/free/2008/06/3583n.htm?utm_source=at&amp;utm_medium=en</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><dc:subject>copyright ereserves fairuse universities Chronicle</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:5590bad6ec15/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:ereserves"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:universities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:Chronicle"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/index.php/id;1770252980;fp;2;fpid;3">
    <title>PC World - Who owns 'public' content?</title>
    <dc:date>2008-05-15T01:24:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/index.php/id;1770252980;fp;2;fpid;3</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><dc:subject>RSS copyright fairuse</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:fa6f0b4a3728/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:RSS"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Booksquare/~3/274783911/">
    <title>JK Rowling Is Wrong</title>
    <dc:date>2008-04-24T15:03:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Booksquare/~3/274783911/</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["if derivative works are subject to approval of copyright owners, that leads to a chilling effect on criticism.""Rowling’s refusal to release an ebook version of the “Harry Potter” series due to fear of piracy (among other reasons) lead to, you gues
]]></description>
<dc:subject>copyright fairuse HarryPotter JKRowling ebooks irony</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:fe072cae83d6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:HarryPotter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:JKRowling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:ebooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:irony"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://loomware.typepad.com/loomware/2008/03/proof-positive.html">
    <title>Proof Positive that Academic Publishing is Broken</title>
    <dc:date>2008-03-25T13:44:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://loomware.typepad.com/loomware/2008/03/proof-positive.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[MIT & Elseiver "The agreement allows the project to use up to three illustrations per journal article, and up to 100 words of text." "Why do I feel like we have just defined away our fair-dealing/fair use rights?"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>MIT copyright Elsevier OpenCourseWare fairuse</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:afc54fadf052/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:MIT"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:Elsevier"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:OpenCourseWare"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bibliodyssey.blogspot.com/2008/03/permission-unpossible-i.html">
    <title>Permission Unpossible I</title>
    <dc:date>2008-03-09T00:21:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://bibliodyssey.blogspot.com/2008/03/permission-unpossible-i.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[" This immediately brings us to a kind of crossroads in technical, if not strictly legal, differences between publishing on the web and in the hard-copy world. While the superficial frontier style of legality online means that, for most practical purpose
]]></description>
<dc:subject>fairuse copyright publishing blogging permissions</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:35e255728c83/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:blogging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:permissions"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/educationalfairusetoday.pdf">
    <title>Jonathan Band: Educational Fair Use Today</title>
    <dc:date>2008-03-07T16:40:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/educationalfairusetoday.pdf</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Three recent appellate decision concerning fair use should give educators and librarians greater confidentence and guidance."--Blanch v. Koons, Perfect10 v. Amazon.com, Vill Graham Archives v. Dorling Kindersley
]]></description>
<dc:subject>fairuse ARL college copyright libraries</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:d7b32a7a2a99/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:ARL"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:college"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:libraries"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://digitaleccentric.blogspot.com/2008/01/peter-brantley-on-google-books.html">
    <title>Peter Brantley on Google Books</title>
    <dc:date>2008-01-21T21:24:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://digitaleccentric.blogspot.com/2008/01/peter-brantley-on-google-books.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["    Q: Shouldn't Google be commended for helping to preserve library books?

    A. The company is not preserving books. It is creating an archive for Google's own purposes."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>googlebooks Peter Brantley fairuse google digital preservation</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:4f1aa6ece592/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:googlebooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:Peter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:Brantley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:digital"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:preservation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://digitaleccentric.blogspot.com/2008/01/copyright-and-images-online.html">
    <title>copyright and images online</title>
    <dc:date>2008-01-09T17:06:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://digitaleccentric.blogspot.com/2008/01/copyright-and-images-online.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["There was an interesting article today in the Washington Post about folks who have posted images on flickr and in blogs, only to discover their images co-opted for commercial use. (I don't know how long the article will be publicly available)"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>flickr creativecommons copyright fairuse news WashingtonPost</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:07ef67b3ad2b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:flickr"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:creativecommons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:news"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:WashingtonPost"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlpubs/crlnews/backissues2007/october07/washingtonhotline.cfm">
    <title>ACRL -</title>
    <dc:date>2008-01-04T14:40:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlpubs/crlnews/backissues2007/october07/washingtonhotline.cfm</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Computer and Communications Industry Association "fair use ...[and library copyright exemptions] significantly contribute to the economic growth of the United States"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>fairuse copyright economy U.S. CCIA</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:3b57e16a0666/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:economy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:U.S."/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:CCIA"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.radioopensource.org/google-print/">
    <title>Open Source » Blog Archive » Google Print</title>
    <dc:date>2007-10-22T16:11:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.radioopensource.org/google-print/</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><dc:subject>google digitization copyright fairuse 2005 Karen Schneider Siva</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:54ae62b1a447/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:digitization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:2005"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:Karen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:Schneider"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:Siva"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.lessig.org/blog/2007/09/a_big_victory_golan_v_gonzales.html">
    <title>A big victory: Golan v. Gonzales (Lessig Blog)</title>
    <dc:date>2007-09-09T15:34:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.lessig.org/blog/2007/09/a_big_victory_golan_v_gonzales.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><dc:subject>fairuse copyright law Lessig</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:11922317c93d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:Lessig"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://lessig.org/blog/05-1259.pdf">
    <title>05-1259.pdf</title>
    <dc:date>2007-09-09T15:34:12+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://lessig.org/blog/05-1259.pdf</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><dc:subject>Lawrence Lessig fairuse copyright</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:bb28fb7879de/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:Lawrence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:Lessig"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://digitaleccentric.blogspot.com/2007/09/fair-use-decision.html">
    <title>fair use decision</title>
    <dc:date>2007-09-09T03:58:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://digitaleccentric.blogspot.com/2007/09/fair-use-decision.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><dc:subject>fairuse copyright Lawrence Lessig</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:70811a6eb622/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:Lawrence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:Lessig"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.ccianet.org/index.html">
    <title>CCIA</title>
    <dc:date>2007-08-07T20:23:12+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.ccianet.org/index.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><dc:subject>CCIA fairuse copyright</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:1900ad5aa2ff/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:CCIA"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/11568/">
    <title>The True Spirit Of Copyright « MaisonBisson.com</title>
    <dc:date>2007-03-08T02:13:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/11568/</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><dc:subject>copyright fairuse egoless-programming</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:8a144bd09bbd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:egoless-programming"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dltj.org/2007/02/fairuse-nfl-youtube/">
    <title>Fair Use Versus the NFL with YouTube Caught in the Middle</title>
    <dc:date>2007-02-24T02:19:24+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://dltj.org/2007/02/fairuse-nfl-youtube/</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><dc:subject>NFL copyright fairuse YouTube law</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:a53b9137e1bd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:NFL"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:YouTube"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:law"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://esilibrary.com/blog">
    <title>Equinox Software Incorporated</title>
    <dc:date>2007-02-06T00:04:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://esilibrary.com/blog</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><dc:subject>opensource libraries openstandards collaboration protocol automation gift-culture content DRM copyright public-domain fairuse freespeech evergreen</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:024c3040aad7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:opensource"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:libraries"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:openstandards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:protocol"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:automation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:gift-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:content"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:DRM"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:public-domain"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:freespeech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:evergreen"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.centerforsocialmedia.org/resources/fair_use/">
    <title>Fair Use and Free Speech Resources -- Center for Social Media at American University</title>
    <dc:date>2006-06-15T13:57:24+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.centerforsocialmedia.org/resources/fair_use/</link>
    <dc:creator>jschneider</dc:creator><dc:subject>free speech use fair filmmaking copyright fairuse</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/b:479dd00f9796/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:free"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:speech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:use"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fair"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:filmmaking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jschneider/t:fairuse"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>