<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (jpcody)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:jpcody/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from jpcody</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://kkovacs.eu/cassandra-vs-mongodb-vs-couchdb-vs-redis"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://kkovacs.eu/cassandra-vs-mongodb-vs-couchdb-vs-redis">
    <title>Cassandra vs MongoDB vs CouchDB vs Redis vs Riak vs HBase comparison :: KKovacs</title>
    <dc:date>2011-01-13T16:44:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://kkovacs.eu/cassandra-vs-mongodb-vs-couchdb-vs-redis</link>
    <dc:creator>jpcody</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[But the differences between "NoSQL" databases are much bigger than it ever was between one SQL database and another. This means that it is a bigger responsibility on software architects to choose the appropriate one for a project right at the beginning.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>nosql comparison</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jpcody/b:0674092e56ca/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jpcody/t:nosql"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jpcody/t:comparison"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>