<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (josephholsten)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from josephholsten</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/google-doesnt-use-openid/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://netmesh.info/jernst/digital_identity/the-credentialed-account-provisioning-anti-pattern"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hueniverse.com/hueniverse/2009/08/making-the-case-for-a-new-acct-uri-scheme-for-accounts.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://openid.net/2009/08/10/announcing-the-redesign-of-openid-net/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://claimid.com/josephholsten"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/google-doesnt-use-openid/">
    <title>Google Abandons Standards, Forks OpenID</title>
    <dc:date>2012-02-16T18:30:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://neosmart.net/blog/2008/google-doesnt-use-openid/</link>
    <dc:creator>josephholsten</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Outright wrong]]></description>
<dc:subject>static openid standards authentication identity</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/b:d1f48d493ca4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:static"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:openid"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:authentication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:identity"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://netmesh.info/jernst/digital_identity/the-credentialed-account-provisioning-anti-pattern">
    <title>The Credentialed Account Provisioning Anti-Pattern</title>
    <dc:date>2009-12-09T10:10:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://netmesh.info/jernst/digital_identity/the-credentialed-account-provisioning-anti-pattern</link>
    <dc:creator>josephholsten</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Johannes Ernst points out the trouble of usernames, passwords, and account numbers decreed from on high. The solution? OpenID, of course.]]></description>
<dc:subject>openid static anti-pattern</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/b:2f6540c73233/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:openid"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:static"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:anti-pattern"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.hueniverse.com/hueniverse/2009/08/making-the-case-for-a-new-acct-uri-scheme-for-accounts.html">
    <title>Making the Case for a New 'acct' URI Scheme for Accounts</title>
    <dc:date>2009-08-21T06:48:22+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.hueniverse.com/hueniverse/2009/08/making-the-case-for-a-new-acct-uri-scheme-for-accounts.html</link>
    <dc:creator>josephholsten</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Eran Hammer-Lahav introduces this weeks solution to the email-address-as-OpenID problem.]]></description>
<dc:subject>static identity webfinger uris openid</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/b:c87116094b90/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:static"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:identity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:webfinger"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:uris"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:openid"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://openid.net/2009/08/10/announcing-the-redesign-of-openid-net/">
    <title>OpenID.net redesigned</title>
    <dc:date>2009-08-12T09:09:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://openid.net/2009/08/10/announcing-the-redesign-of-openid-net/</link>
    <dc:creator>josephholsten</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Should help with all the attention they'll get with the talk of government adoption these days]]></description>
<dc:subject>static redesign openid</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/b:2c3b9bc9e1ad/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:static"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:redesign"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:openid"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://claimid.com/josephholsten">
    <title>claimID</title>
    <dc:date>2007-03-12T03:44:05+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://claimid.com/josephholsten</link>
    <dc:creator>josephholsten</dc:creator><dc:subject>openid identity service</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/b:a003330507ff/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:openid"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:identity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:service"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>