<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (josephholsten)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from josephholsten</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2010/03/19/software-patents/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hueniverse.com/hueniverse/2009/07/trust-us-is-not-a-good-model-for-opening-specifications.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dashes.com/anil/2009/04/fair-use-for-fair-people.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/first-sale-president-obama-and-queen-england"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2010/03/19/software-patents/">
    <title>Why I Am Against Software Patents</title>
    <dc:date>2012-01-21T08:25:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2010/03/19/software-patents/</link>
    <dc:creator>josephholsten</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["[F]or some of the proposed inventions, there may only be a handful of people in the world qualified to actually make a judgment on whether a development is sufficiently innovative so as to justify a patent. None of those people, presumably, will be employed by the patent office."
Which reminds me, whoever hired Einstein really deserved a bonus.]]></description>
<dc:subject>static intellectual-property patents pragmatism</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://instapaper.com/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/b:e2b077250a2d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:static"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:pragmatism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.hueniverse.com/hueniverse/2009/07/trust-us-is-not-a-good-model-for-opening-specifications.html">
    <title>&quot;Trust Us&quot; is not a Good Model for Opening Specifications</title>
    <dc:date>2009-07-22T06:16:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.hueniverse.com/hueniverse/2009/07/trust-us-is-not-a-good-model-for-opening-specifications.html</link>
    <dc:creator>josephholsten</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Eran Hammer-Lahav encourages companies that want to contribute to standards to make their IP claims clear from the start.]]></description>
<dc:subject>intellectual-property standards open-web static</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/b:da3554b9ad24/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:open-web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:static"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dashes.com/anil/2009/04/fair-use-for-fair-people.html">
    <title>Fair Use for Fair People</title>
    <dc:date>2009-07-21T03:16:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://dashes.com/anil/2009/04/fair-use-for-fair-people.html</link>
    <dc:creator>josephholsten</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[by Anil Dash]]></description>
<dc:subject>copyright fair-use law intellectual-property static</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/b:32df76d9ad80/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:fair-use"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:static"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/first-sale-president-obama-and-queen-england">
    <title>iPods, First Sale, President Obama, and the Queen of England</title>
    <dc:date>2009-04-06T17:55:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/first-sale-president-obama-and-queen-england</link>
    <dc:creator>josephholsten</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The EFF discusses the legal impact of Obama's gift of an iPod to the Queen of England, focusing on first sale, fair use and breach of contract.]]></description>
<dc:subject>law copyright obama eff intellectual-property</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/b:d88da541b79f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:obama"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:eff"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:josephholsten/t:intellectual-property"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>