<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (joeclark)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from joeclark</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.accessifyforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=4182#30706"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005OctDec/att-0435/validity.htm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005OctDec/0442.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005OctDec/0356.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005OctDec/0271.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2005/Talks/0908-wcag/Table_7b.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2005/Talks/0908-wcag/validity-errors.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2005/Talks/1018-wcag/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/index.php?title=Proposed_Guide_to_4.1_L1_SC1"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://www.accessifyforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=4182#30706">
    <title>Accessify Forum: WCAG 2.0</title>
    <dc:date>2005-11-29T23:22:29+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.accessifyforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=4182#30706</link>
    <dc:creator>joeclark</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[‘Whenever talk of validity comes up, the focus quickly moves to whether WAI want to impose something that could potentially be legislated, even though it's not in their remit to concern themselves with legislation and everyone knows the real reason’
]]></description>
<dc:subject>juicystudio wcag-validation wcag wai</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/b:26f90bcc948d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:juicystudio"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:wcag-validation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:wcag"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:wai"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005OctDec/att-0435/validity.htm">
    <title>Standards, Validity and Conformance</title>
    <dc:date>2005-11-10T14:17:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005OctDec/att-0435/validity.htm</link>
    <dc:creator>joeclark</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Arguments for and against valid code in WCAG 2 (yet again)
]]></description>
<dc:subject>accessibility validation webstandards wcag-validation</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/b:7061fd6a0399/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:accessibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:validation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:webstandards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:wcag-validation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005OctDec/0442.html">
    <title>W3C specs requiring valid code</title>
    <dc:date>2005-11-10T14:07:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005OctDec/0442.html</link>
    <dc:creator>joeclark</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Curiously, HTML 4.01 isn’t one of them
]]></description>
<dc:subject>html validation wcag-validation webstandards</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/b:12b915a51744/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:validation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:wcag-validation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:webstandards"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005OctDec/0356.html">
    <title>Arguments for and against valid code in WCAG 2 (Bruce Bailey)</title>
    <dc:date>2005-11-07T21:56:24+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005OctDec/0356.html</link>
    <dc:creator>joeclark</dc:creator><dc:subject>wcag-validation webstandards webaccessibility accessibility html</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/b:a4e79db2f30b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:wcag-validation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:webstandards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:webaccessibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:accessibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:html"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005OctDec/0271.html">
    <title>Arguments for and against valid code in WCAG 2 (Gez Lemon)</title>
    <dc:date>2005-11-07T21:55:33+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005OctDec/0271.html</link>
    <dc:creator>joeclark</dc:creator><dc:subject>wcag-validation accessibility webstandards html webaccessibility juicystudio</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/b:d2b220520f07/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:wcag-validation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:accessibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:webstandards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:webaccessibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:juicystudio"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/2005/Talks/0908-wcag/Table_7b.html">
    <title>Examples of invalid markup that could cause accessibility issues</title>
    <dc:date>2005-10-19T18:12:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.w3.org/2005/Talks/0908-wcag/Table_7b.html</link>
    <dc:creator>joeclark</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[From WCAG WG
]]></description>
<dc:subject>wcag accessibility validation webstandards wcag-validation</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/b:54edfc2f4546/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:wcag"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:accessibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:validation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:webstandards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:wcag-validation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/2005/Talks/0908-wcag/validity-errors.html">
    <title>Common HTML 4.01 validity errors and their effect on accessibility</title>
    <dc:date>2005-10-19T18:11:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.w3.org/2005/Talks/0908-wcag/validity-errors.html</link>
    <dc:creator>joeclark</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[From WCAG WG
]]></description>
<dc:subject>wcag webstandards validation webaccessibility wcag-validation</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/b:2f0ca9cbd29d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:wcag"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:webstandards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:validation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:webaccessibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:wcag-validation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/2005/Talks/1018-wcag/">
    <title>Guideline 4.1 Background and Proposal</title>
    <dc:date>2005-10-19T17:55:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.w3.org/2005/Talks/1018-wcag/</link>
    <dc:creator>joeclark</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Wendy Chisholm’s proposal for requiring valid code in WCAG 2
]]></description>
<dc:subject>wcag wai webstandards validation wendychisholm wcag-validation</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/b:771b950ea6d8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:wcag"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:wai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:webstandards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:validation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:wendychisholm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:wcag-validation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/index.php?title=Proposed_Guide_to_4.1_L1_SC1">
    <title>WAI’s latest (to this very moment) plans for requiring valid (X)HTML in WCAG 2</title>
    <dc:date>2005-10-19T17:53:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/index.php?title=Proposed_Guide_to_4.1_L1_SC1</link>
    <dc:creator>joeclark</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[See if you can understand this. I sure can’t
]]></description>
<dc:subject>wai wcag webstandards validation wcag-validation</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/b:48852a1136e8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:wai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:wcag"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:webstandards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:validation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:joeclark/t:wcag-validation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>