<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (jnchapel)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:jnchapel/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from jnchapel</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/15/AR2011021504891.html"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/15/AR2011021504891.html">
    <title>Microbets: Overall, the benefits trump any drawbacks</title>
    <dc:date>2011-02-16T02:35:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/15/AR2011021504891.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jnchapel</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Some forms of microbets are more attractive than others, and I believe the worst of them is Gulfstream's Rainbow Six. Though it has proved popular since it was introduced here this winter, it is, in my view, a sucker bet."]]></description>
<dc:subject>horseracing wagering microbets</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jnchapel/b:c66e3252d85f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jnchapel/t:horseracing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jnchapel/t:wagering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jnchapel/t:microbets"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>