<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (jnchapel)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:jnchapel/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from jnchapel</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-okeefe/american-thoroughbred-rac_b_351293.html"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-okeefe/american-thoroughbred-rac_b_351293.html">
    <title>American thoroughbred racing needs a lifeline ...</title>
    <dc:date>2009-11-10T16:54:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-okeefe/american-thoroughbred-rac_b_351293.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jnchapel</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[And the answer can be found in Australia. "America's great dailies? They just don't get it." See also: http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/28/is-the-times-ignoring-the-boxing-ring/ (Is the Times ignoring boxing?).
]]></description>
<dc:subject>horseracing marketing media media-coverage australia</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jnchapel/b:a38214a405f2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jnchapel/t:horseracing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jnchapel/t:marketing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jnchapel/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jnchapel/t:media-coverage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jnchapel/t:australia"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>