<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (jmason)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from jmason</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dashes.com/anil/2009/07/the-pushbutton-web-realtime-becomes-real.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arstechnica.com/web/news/2009/03/not-so-open-cloud-manifesto-rains-on-interoperability-parade.ars"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.mailchannels.com/2008/10/update-to-email-standards.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5321.txt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5322.txt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5218"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hueniverse.com/hueniverse/2008/05/the-big-pink-el.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://topicmaps.wordpress.com/2008/04/18/the-norway-vote-what-really-happened/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.campaignmonitor.com/blog/archives/2007/09/why_we_need_web_standards_supp_1.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.whatfettle.com/2007/10/31/the_web_is_agreement/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://adjb.net/index.php?entry=entry070322-214025"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://diveintomark.org/archives/2006/08/23/overton-window"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections#Document_metadata"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://times.usefulinc.com/2006/12/11-pox"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fanf.livejournal.com/64205.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3834.txt"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=1597"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://dashes.com/anil/2009/07/the-pushbutton-web-realtime-becomes-real.html">
    <title>The Pushbutton Web: Realtime Becomes Real</title>
    <dc:date>2009-07-24T15:48:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://dashes.com/anil/2009/07/the-pushbutton-web-realtime-becomes-real.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jmason</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[good wrap-up from Anil Dash on "the new push"]]></description>
<dc:subject>http-push http feeds atom ping standards messaging pubsubhubbub pubsub async comet realtime web</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/b:36509eabf07f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:http-push"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:http"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:feeds"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:atom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:ping"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:messaging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:pubsubhubbub"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:pubsub"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:async"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:comet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:realtime"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:web"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arstechnica.com/web/news/2009/03/not-so-open-cloud-manifesto-rains-on-interoperability-parade.ars">
    <title>Not-so-open Cloud Manifesto rains on interoperability parade</title>
    <dc:date>2009-04-01T09:23:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arstechnica.com/web/news/2009/03/not-so-open-cloud-manifesto-rains-on-interoperability-parade.ars</link>
    <dc:creator>jmason</dc:creator><description><![CDATA['The controversy surrounding the Open Cloud Manifesto demonstrates the risk of trying to build interoperability behind closed doors and through exclusionary practices. Such environments are not conducive to building consensus, which is one of the key ingredients of successful standards.']]></description>
<dc:subject>collaboration cloud-computing sun open-source open standards politics vendors</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/b:f9618a804ec4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:cloud-computing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:sun"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:open-source"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:open"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:vendors"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.mailchannels.com/2008/10/update-to-email-standards.html">
    <title>MailChannels' Ken Simpson on the new email RFCs</title>
    <dc:date>2008-10-03T09:10:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.mailchannels.com/2008/10/update-to-email-standards.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jmason</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[diffed.  the explicit statement that there is no length limit to mail headers is potentially tricky]]></description>
<dc:subject>rfcs rfc-5321 rfc-5322 email standards internet smtp</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/b:c0e22da8e742/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:rfcs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:rfc-5321"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:rfc-5322"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:email"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:smtp"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5321.txt">
    <title>RFC-5321 (Obsoletes: 2821)</title>
    <dc:date>2008-10-02T08:56:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5321.txt</link>
    <dc:creator>jmason</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The newest rev to the Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (via fanf)]]></description>
<dc:subject>rfcs rfc-2821 standards internet smtp email rfc-5321</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/b:cab650a5e755/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:rfcs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:rfc-2821"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:smtp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:email"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:rfc-5321"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5322.txt">
    <title>RFC-5322 (Obsoletes: 2822)</title>
    <dc:date>2008-10-02T08:55:27+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5322.txt</link>
    <dc:creator>jmason</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[the newest rev to the Internet Message Format for email (via fanf)]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:fanf rfc rfc-2822 rfc-5322 standards email internet</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/b:d9f3f34ff2f7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:via:fanf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:rfc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:rfc-2822"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:rfc-5322"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:email"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:internet"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5218">
    <title>RFC 5218 - What Makes For a Successful Protocol?</title>
    <dc:date>2008-07-21T10:22:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5218</link>
    <dc:creator>jmason</dc:creator><description><![CDATA['Based on case studies, this document identifies some of the factors influencing success and failure of protocol designs.' (via spicylinks)]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:spicylinks rfcs protocols tcp standards networking collaboration</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/b:72300c281a48/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:via:spicylinks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:rfcs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:protocols"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:tcp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:networking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:collaboration"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.hueniverse.com/hueniverse/2008/05/the-big-pink-el.html">
    <title>Hueniverse: The Big Pink Elephant of DataPortability</title>
    <dc:date>2008-05-23T09:23:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.hueniverse.com/hueniverse/2008/05/the-big-pink-el.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jmason</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[wow, shit hits fan (via Aehso)]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:aehso dataportability web standards oauth openid yahoo google tech</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/b:cfb3ee5fba5f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:via:aehso"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:dataportability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:oauth"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:openid"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:yahoo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:tech"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://topicmaps.wordpress.com/2008/04/18/the-norway-vote-what-really-happened/">
    <title>The Norway Vote - What really happened</title>
    <dc:date>2008-04-21T09:30:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://topicmaps.wordpress.com/2008/04/18/the-norway-vote-what-really-happened/</link>
    <dc:creator>jmason</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[the OOXML fiasco.  unsurprisingly, bureaucrats go to do whatever they wanted -- come on, what did people expect from the ISO?]]></description>
<dc:subject>iso ooxml microsoft corruption norway bureaucracy standards fiasco</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/b:30544a429064/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:iso"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:ooxml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:corruption"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:norway"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:bureaucracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:fiasco"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.campaignmonitor.com/blog/archives/2007/09/why_we_need_web_standards_supp_1.html">
    <title>Why we need standards support in HTML email</title>
    <dc:date>2007-11-26T16:07:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.campaignmonitor.com/blog/archives/2007/09/why_we_need_web_standards_supp_1.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jmason</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[interesting (via Michele)]]></description>
<dc:subject>html mail email standards</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/b:f960eeeddc53/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:mail"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:email"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:standards"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.whatfettle.com/2007/10/31/the_web_is_agreement/">
    <title>The Web is Agreement</title>
    <dc:date>2007-10-31T15:07:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.whatfettle.com/2007/10/31/the_web_is_agreement/</link>
    <dc:creator>jmason</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[a massive poster -- covers pretty much every technical aspect of the web, featuring the Towers of WS-Babel, Oxymoronic Intellectual Property, IP as nukes, the paved cowpaths of Microformats, the ruins of CORBA (represented as dolmens, Orbix fans) etc.]]></description>
<dc:subject>posters web orbix corba ws-star ietf standards w3c microformats openness osmosoft</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/b:93ddc2b99351/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:posters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:orbix"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:corba"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:ws-star"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:ietf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:w3c"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:microformats"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:osmosoft"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://adjb.net/index.php?entry=entry070322-214025">
    <title>Microsoft packing ISO meetings to push through their OOXML &quot;standard&quot;</title>
    <dc:date>2007-03-23T11:32:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://adjb.net/index.php?entry=entry070322-214025</link>
    <dc:creator>jmason</dc:creator><description><![CDATA['SC34 suddenly has a lot of new ['participating member' countries] sending representatives, and I am interested to note the majority of their representatives are, as individuals, also Microsoft employees.'  up to their old dirty tricks, then]]></description>
<dc:subject>microsoft dirty-tricks ooxml openoffice via:simonphipps open-source iso standards politics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/b:72cecb54591a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:dirty-tricks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:ooxml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:openoffice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:via:simonphipps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:open-source"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:iso"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:politics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://diveintomark.org/archives/2006/08/23/overton-window">
    <title>The Overton window</title>
    <dc:date>2007-03-20T10:46:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://diveintomark.org/archives/2006/08/23/overton-window</link>
    <dc:creator>jmason</dc:creator><description><![CDATA['start by outlining the continuum of opinions, including the ridiculous or unthinkable. Then the narrower range of the reasonable; the Overton window. The job of the think tank is to move this, so that ideas that were once unthinkable become acceptable']]></description>
<dc:subject>overton-window think-tanks discourse politics w3c mark-pilgrim web standards discussion</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/b:2590791c33f3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:overton-window"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:think-tanks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:discourse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:w3c"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:mark-pilgrim"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:discussion"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections#Document_metadata">
    <title>EOOXML objections - Grokdoc</title>
    <dc:date>2007-01-24T10:34:12+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections#Document_metadata</link>
    <dc:creator>jmason</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[a concise, but complete, list of objections to Microsoft's proposed standardisation of the MS Word file format as an ISO standard.  a strong case; tey even invent a new date representation, and treat 1900 as a leap year (MS vs. the Gregorian calendar!)]]></description>
<dc:subject>microsoft proprietary iso ecma ms-word ms-office openoffice formats interchange interoperability standards</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/b:cbcde0539b8b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:proprietary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:iso"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:ecma"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:ms-word"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:ms-office"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:openoffice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:formats"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:interchange"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:interoperability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:standards"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://times.usefulinc.com/2006/12/11-pox">
    <title>Edd Dumbill: Afraid of the POX?</title>
    <dc:date>2006-12-11T13:41:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://times.usefulinc.com/2006/12/11-pox</link>
    <dc:creator>jmason</dc:creator><description><![CDATA['Our justified love of open standards inadvertently promoted a straitjacketed approach to using XML. XML was felt to need a schema language.' ... 'The rise of agile programming techniques .. emphasizes the hazards of prematurely freezing a design.']]></description>
<dc:subject>xml agile-programming software web w3c standards complexity</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/b:932221786a84/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:xml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:agile-programming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:w3c"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:complexity"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fanf.livejournal.com/64205.html">
    <title>Tony Finch - Message header manipulation by mailing lists</title>
    <dc:date>2006-08-23T10:29:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://fanf.livejournal.com/64205.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jmason</dc:creator><description><![CDATA['Mailing list managers should be considered MUAs, i.e. that the result of list explosion should be considered a new message submission rather than anything like relaying or redirecting'.  This is certainly the way DKIM and other standards are heading]]></description>
<dc:subject>dkim standards smtp mlms mailing-lists mail email rfc-2822 anti-spam</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/b:d92a39e82dc4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:dkim"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:smtp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:mlms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:mailing-lists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:mail"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:email"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:rfc-2822"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:anti-spam"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3834.txt">
    <title>RFC 3834 - Recommendations for Automatic Responses to Electronic Mail</title>
    <dc:date>2006-02-09T17:58:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3834.txt</link>
    <dc:creator>jmason</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[an RFC for email autoresponders.  If all the half-assed C/R mail-filter and "out-of-office" autoreply coders read this, my life would be so much easier]]></description>
<dc:subject>email autoresponders bounces rfcs standards smtp mail-filtering</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/b:549b3adffe6a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:email"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:autoresponders"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:bounces"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:rfcs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:smtp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:mail-filtering"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=1597">
    <title>Open source: Are Microsoft and other holdouts about to crack? | Between the Lines | ZDNet.com</title>
    <dc:date>2005-07-15T22:56:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=1597</link>
    <dc:creator>jmason</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[good article on the OASIS situation, explaining how "open standard" != "implementable by open source" necessarily, and discussing how to fix this]]></description>
<dc:subject>oasis standards patents microsoft apache ibm</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/b:bca7dc147650/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:oasis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:apache"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jmason/t:ibm"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>