<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (jm)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from jm</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982221007946"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.thejournal.ie/selling-our-genes-5219781-Oct2020/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://nextstrain.org/narratives/ncov/sit-rep/2020-03-05"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://twitter.com/rossamcmahon/status/1145436655756689409"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/10/horsepox-smallpox-virus-science-ethics-debate/572200/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/08/one-five-genetics-papers-contains-errors-thanks-microsoft-excel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://twitter.com/antonioregalado/status/1011675054709661696"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://twitter.com/drg1985/status/961217607838896128"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/03/17/a-mans-discovery-of-bones-under-his-pub-could-forever-change-what-we-know-about-the-irish/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.instituteofcaninebiology.org/blog/health-of-purebred-vs-mixed-breed-dogs-the-data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.technologyreview.com/featuredstory/532796/who-owns-the-biggest-biotech-discovery-of-the-century/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/10/gene-patents-probably-dead-worldwide-following-australian-court-decision/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dogbehaviorscience.wordpress.com/2012/09/29/100-years-of-breed-improvement/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.law.yale.edu/documents/pdf/LEO/LEO_Williams.pdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/04/28/0914771107"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/frontpage/2009/0902/1224253666155.html"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982221007946">
    <title>An ancient viral epidemic involving host coronavirus interacting genes more than 20,000 years ago in East Asia - ScienceDirect</title>
    <dc:date>2021-12-14T09:48:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982221007946</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Some interesting COVID-related history -- an indication of a massive pandemic sweeping east Asia 20,000 years ago, killing off large portions of the population:

<blockquote>
Our analyses find a strong enrichment in sweep signals at CoV-VIPs across multiple East Asian populations, which is absent from other populations. This suggests that an ancient coronavirus epidemic (or another virus using similar VIPs) drove an adaptive response in the ancestors of East Asians. Further, by leveraging ancestral recombination graph approaches,20,21 we find that 42 CoV-VIPs may have come under selection around 900 generations (∼25,000 years) ago and exhibit a coordinated adaptive response. We further show that the CoV-VIP genes are enriched for anti- and proviral effects and variants that affect COVID-19 etiology in the modern British population (https://grasp.nhlbi.nih.gov/Covid19GWASResults.aspx).22,23 We further show that the inferred underlying causal mutations are situated near to regulatory variants active in lungs and other tissues impacted by COVID-19. These independent lines of evidence support an ancient coronavirus (or a similarly interacting virus) epidemic that emerged in the ancestors of contemporary East Asian populations.</blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>pandemics disease history asia covid-19 coronavirus genes genetics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:4c8833dfd5cd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:pandemics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:disease"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:asia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:covid-19"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:coronavirus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:genes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:genetics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.thejournal.ie/selling-our-genes-5219781-Oct2020/">
    <title>Selling Our Genes: Government inaction allowing private sector to take control of our DNA</title>
    <dc:date>2020-10-05T09:56:24+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.thejournal.ie/selling-our-genes-5219781-Oct2020/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Genuity Science, the main company involved in DNA sequencing in Ireland, has at least 25 links to facilities around Ireland. These include funding and collaborations with major hospitals, universities, research facilities and charities.
A collaboration agreement signed between Genuity Science and UCD is “restrictive”, according to an academic expert, though Genuity Science Ireland disagree with this assessment. We have the full details in this breakout article.
Hospital clinicians have become “agents of a company” due to the nature of agreements in place, according to experts.
Researchers are making “the best of the situation” in Ireland by working with the private sector but most would prefer a public system due to data access concerns.
Lack of Government policy and adequate regulation means that private companies have no limit on how long they have exclusive access to the data they collect from Irish patients.
Researchers and patient representatives are concerned about a potential erosion of trust in genetics research in Ireland.</blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>genomics genuity genetics ucd gmi ireland data-privacy data-protection research</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:ec2dde2c0218/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:genomics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:genuity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:genetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ucd"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:gmi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ireland"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:data-privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:data-protection"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:research"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://nextstrain.org/narratives/ncov/sit-rep/2020-03-05">
    <title>Nextstrain / narratives / ncov / sit-rep / 2020-03-05</title>
    <dc:date>2020-03-09T11:55:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://nextstrain.org/narratives/ncov/sit-rep/2020-03-05</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This is an amazing piece of data -- phylogenetic analysis of the COVID-19 epidemic as it spreads across the globe.

'The following pages contain analysis performed using Nextstrain. Scrolling through the left-hand sidebar will reveal paragraphs of text with a corresponding visualization of the genomic data on the right-hand side.  To have full genomes of a novel and large RNA virus this quickly is a remarkable achievement. These analyses have been made possible by the rapid and open sharing of genomic data and interpretations by scientists all around the world (see the final slide for a visualization of sequencing authorship).']]></description>
<dc:subject>genetics phylogenetics nextstrain covid-19 diseases epidemics viruses</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:53d503bf8a50/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:genetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:phylogenetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:nextstrain"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:covid-19"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:diseases"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:epidemics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:viruses"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://twitter.com/rossamcmahon/status/1145436655756689409">
    <title>Rossa McMahon re GMI</title>
    <dc:date>2019-07-15T17:03:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://twitter.com/rossamcmahon/status/1145436655756689409</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Rossa McMahon with a twitter thread on the legality of GMI's genomic data collection program in Ireland:

<blockquote>GMI is a big, expensive company. It announced planned investment injection of $400m last year. It is engaged in a hot industry - hot because of investor interest and hot because of regulatory/ethics concerns.

GDPR is not new. It has been known since 2016. Data protection law is not new. It has been known since 1988. The impact of these laws on genetic data collection & use is not a surprise.  So if you have a $400m+ business and this is a key business issue, you have taken advice.  And you have, no doubt, been in a position to take that advice from some of the best and/or most expensive advisors available. Assumptions are dangerous, but I think it is fair to assume this has happened.

So read the story again.

Would you be looking for repeated meetings with [Department of Health], answers to questions on regulatory matters and assurances from the State, if you had legal advice of your own to the effect that you are operating or can operate as your currently are?</blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>gmi genomics genetics data-privacy privacy gdpr ireland</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:aa19ff9e3bf1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:gmi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:genomics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:genetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:data-privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:gdpr"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ireland"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/10/horsepox-smallpox-virus-science-ethics-debate/572200/">
    <title>A Controversial Virus Study Shows Flaws in How Science Is Done - The Atlantic</title>
    <dc:date>2018-10-10T11:21:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/10/horsepox-smallpox-virus-science-ethics-debate/572200/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Absent clearer guidelines, the burden falls on the scientific enterprise to self-regulate—and it isn’t set up to do that well. Academia is intensely competitive, and “the drivers are about getting grants and publications, and not necessarily about being responsible citizens,” says Filippa Lentzos from King’s College London, who studies biological threats. This means that scientists often keep their work to themselves for fear of getting scooped by their peers. Their plans only become widely known once they’ve already been enacted, and the results are ready to be presented or published. This lack of transparency creates an environment where people can almost unilaterally make decisions that could affect the entire world.

Take the horsepox study [the main topic of this article]. Evans was a member of a World Health Organization committee that oversees smallpox research, but he only told his colleagues about the experiment after it was completed. He sought approval from biosafety officers at his university, and had discussions with Canadian federal agencies, but it’s unclear if they had enough ethical expertise to fully appreciate the significance of the experiment. “It’s hard not to feel like he opted for agencies that would follow the letter of the law without necessarily understanding what they were approving,” says Kelly Hills, a bioethicist at Rogue Bioethics.

She also sees a sense of impulsive recklessness in the interviews that Evans gave earlier this year. Science reported that he did the experiment “in part to end the debate about whether recreating a poxvirus was feasible.” And he told NPR that “someone had to bite the bullet and do this.” To Hills, that sounds like I did it because I could do it. “We don’t accept those arguments from anyone above age 6,” she says.</blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>the-atlantic science news smallpox horsepox diseases danger risk academia papers publish-or-perish bioethics ethics biology genetics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:7848b9738f56/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:the-atlantic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:news"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:smallpox"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:horsepox"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:diseases"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:danger"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:risk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:papers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:publish-or-perish"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:bioethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:biology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:genetics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/08/one-five-genetics-papers-contains-errors-thanks-microsoft-excel">
    <title>One in five genetics papers contains errors thanks to Microsoft Excel | Science | AAAS</title>
    <dc:date>2018-08-22T22:24:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/08/one-five-genetics-papers-contains-errors-thanks-microsoft-excel</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA['Autoformatting in Microsoft Excel has caused many a headache — but now, a new study shows that one in five genetics papers in top scientific journals contains errors from the program, The Washington Post reports. The errors often arose when gene names in a spreadsheet were automatically changed to calendar dates or numerical values.']]></description>
<dc:subject>science microsoft excel spreadsheets autoformatting clippy fail papers genetics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:143492bf59ec/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:microsoft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:excel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spreadsheets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:autoformatting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:clippy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:fail"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:papers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:genetics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://twitter.com/antonioregalado/status/1011675054709661696">
    <title>Antonio Regalado Twitter thread on genetic genealogy, DNA privacy, and total DNA de-anonymity</title>
    <dc:date>2018-06-27T10:57:41+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://twitter.com/antonioregalado/status/1011675054709661696</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I used to know some technicians in the NYC Medical Examiner's lab. They had all been DNA typed (to detect accidental contamination).  So, their little society was a picture of what is to come, of total DNA transparency.

They would do stuff like find out who stuck gum under the table. Also, who was peeing on the toilet seat in the bathroom.

So There’s a second technology at play: environmental DNA sampling. Once police get a name they tail the suspect and try to get some DNA he leaves behind. To make the match to crime scene sample. Police have gotten DNA from: 
- a car door handle
- a straw
- a paper napkin

Imagine storm troopers of a repressive regime descending on a meeting place of the resistance. Just swab the whole place and find out who was there from DNA left behind.
Technically, total DNA de-anonymity is possible. Far as I know there’s no law, no protection, against identifying you from your DNA. 

In crime cases, [this is] being done by “amateur” using a database (GEDmatch) that itself is highly informal. </blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>privacy dna genetics genetic-genealogy gedmatch law transparency</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:c533ab41ac49/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:dna"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:genetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:genetic-genealogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:gedmatch"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:transparency"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://twitter.com/drg1985/status/961217607838896128">
    <title>why Cheddar Man was dark skinned</title>
    <dc:date>2018-02-07T13:41:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://twitter.com/drg1985/status/961217607838896128</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA['But why should that be surprising? He's over 10,000 years old, while mutations that led to white skin [the depigmentation gene SLC24A5] only began to spread widely [across Europe] 5,800 years old!']]></description>
<dc:subject>europe history prehistory skin-colour cheddar-man race skin slc24a5 genetics david-grimes</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:faca50d2d956/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:europe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:prehistory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:skin-colour"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:cheddar-man"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:race"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:skin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:slc24a5"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:genetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:david-grimes"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/03/17/a-mans-discovery-of-bones-under-his-pub-could-forever-change-what-we-know-about-the-irish/">
    <title>Modern Irish genome closely matches pre-Celt DNA, not Celtic</title>
    <dc:date>2016-03-20T22:02:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/03/17/a-mans-discovery-of-bones-under-his-pub-could-forever-change-what-we-know-about-the-irish/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Radiocarbon dating shows that the bones discovered at McCuaig's go back to about 2000 B.C. That makes them hundreds of years older than the oldest artifacts generally considered to be Celtic — relics unearthed from Celt homelands of continental Europe, most notably around Switzerland, Austria and Germany.

For a group of scholars who in recent years have alleged that the Celts, beginning from the middle of Europe, may never have reached Ireland, the arrival of the DNA evidence provides the biological certitude that the science has sometimes brought to criminal trials.

“With the genetic evidence, the old model [of Celtic colonisation of Ireland] is completely shot,” John Koch, a linguist at the Center for Advanced Welsh and Celtic Studies at the University of Wales.</blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>celts ireland history dna genetics genome carbon-dating bronze-age europe colonisation</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:555711ff236d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:celts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ireland"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:dna"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:genetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:genome"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:carbon-dating"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:bronze-age"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:europe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:colonisation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.instituteofcaninebiology.org/blog/health-of-purebred-vs-mixed-breed-dogs-the-data">
    <title>Health of purebred vs mixed breed dogs: the actual data - The Institute of Canine Biology</title>
    <dc:date>2016-03-16T21:22:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.instituteofcaninebiology.org/blog/health-of-purebred-vs-mixed-breed-dogs-the-data</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
This study found that purebred dogs have a significantly greater risk of developing many of the hereditary disorders examined in this study. No, mixed breed dogs are not ALWAYS healthier than purebreds; and also, purebreds are not "as healthy" as mixed breed dogs. The results of this study will surprise nobody who understands the basics of Mendelian inheritance. Breeding related animals increases the expression of genetic disorders caused by recessive mutations, and it also increases the probability of producing offspring that will inherit the assortment of genes responsible for a polygenic disorder. </blockquote>

In conclusion, go mutts.]]></description>
<dc:subject>dogs breeding genetics hereditary-disorders science inheritance recessive-mutation data</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:aa7d3937bf61/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:dogs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:breeding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:genetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:hereditary-disorders"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:inheritance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:recessive-mutation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:data"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.technologyreview.com/featuredstory/532796/who-owns-the-biggest-biotech-discovery-of-the-century/">
    <title>CRISPR Patents Spark Fight to Control Genome Editing | MIT Technology Review</title>
    <dc:date>2016-01-12T09:55:38+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.technologyreview.com/featuredstory/532796/who-owns-the-biggest-biotech-discovery-of-the-century/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Patents ruin everything, CRISPR edition]]></description>
<dc:subject>crispr algorithms gene-editing genetics genomics genes patents</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:fd50896c8bd9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:crispr"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:algorithms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:gene-editing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:genetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:genomics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:genes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:patents"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/10/gene-patents-probably-dead-worldwide-following-australian-court-decision/">
    <title>Gene patents probably dead worldwide following Australian court decision</title>
    <dc:date>2015-10-09T12:39:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/10/gene-patents-probably-dead-worldwide-following-australian-court-decision/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The court based its reasoning on the fact that, although an isolated gene such as BRCA1 was "a product of human action, it was the existence of the information stored in the relevant sequences that was an essential element of the invention as claimed." Since the information stored in the DNA as a sequence of nucleotides was a product of nature, it did not require human action to bring it into existence, and therefore could not be patented.</blockquote>

Via Tony Finch.]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:fanf australia genetics law ipr medicine ip patents</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:46c25adbed67/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:via:fanf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:australia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:genetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ipr"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:medicine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ip"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:patents"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dogbehaviorscience.wordpress.com/2012/09/29/100-years-of-breed-improvement/">
    <title>100 Years of Breed “Improvement” | Science of Dogs</title>
    <dc:date>2013-12-04T15:51:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://dogbehaviorscience.wordpress.com/2012/09/29/100-years-of-breed-improvement/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The English bulldog has come to symbolize all that is wrong with the dog fancy and not without good reason; they suffer from almost every possible disease. A 2004 survey by the Kennel Club found that they die at the median age of 6.25 years (n=180). There really is no such thing as a healthy bulldog. The bulldog’s monstrous proportions makes them virtually incapable of mating or birthing without medical intervention.</blockquote>

(via Bryan)]]></description>
<dc:subject>dogs eugenics breeding horror science genetics traits animals pets bulldog pedigree</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:b7af1a957a63/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:dogs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:eugenics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:breeding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:horror"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:genetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:traits"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:animals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:pets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:bulldog"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:pedigree"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.law.yale.edu/documents/pdf/LEO/LEO_Williams.pdf">
    <title>_Intellectual property rights and innovation: Evidence from the human genome_ (PDF)</title>
    <dc:date>2012-02-04T20:59:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.law.yale.edu/documents/pdf/LEO/LEO_Williams.pdf</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA['Do intellectual property (IP) rights on existing technologies hinder subsequent
innovation? Using newly-collected data on the sequencing of the human genome by
the public Human Genome Project and the private rm Celera, this paper estimates
the impact of Celera's gene-level IP on subsequent scientic research and product
development. Genes initially sequenced by Celera were held with IP for up to two
years, but moved into the public domain once re-sequenced by the public eort.
Across a range of empirical specications, I nd evidence that Celera's IP led to
reductions in subsequent scientic research and product development on the order of
20 to 30 percent. Taken together, these results suggest that Celera's short-term IP
had persistent negative eects on subsequent innovation relative to a counterfactual
of Celera genes having always been in the public domain.' (via Tony Finch)]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:fanf genetics ip copyright open-source celera patents papers pdf</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:15a4006a8c83/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:via:fanf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:genetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ip"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:open-source"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:celera"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:patents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:papers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:pdf"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/04/28/0914771107">
    <title>Comparing genomes to computer operating systems in terms of the topology and evolution of their regulatory control networks — PNAS</title>
    <dc:date>2010-05-06T10:00:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/04/28/0914771107</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA['we present a comparison between the transcriptional regulatory network of a well-studied bacterium (E. coli) and the call graph of a canonical OS (Linux) in terms of topology and evolution. ... both networks have a fundamentally hierarchical layout, but there is a key difference: The transcriptional regulatory network possesses a few global regulators at the top and many targets at the bottom; conversely, the call graph has many regulators controlling a small set of generic functions. This top-heavy organization leads to highly overlapping functional modules in the call graph, in contrast to the relatively independent modules in the regulatory network. ... These findings stem from the design principles of the two systems: robustness for biological systems and cost effectiveness (reuse) for software systems.' (via adulau)]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:adulau papers toread genetics genome call-graph linux kernel e-coli operating-systems transcriptional-regulatory-network</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:eae2a1ce682d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:via:adulau"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:papers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:toread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:genetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:genome"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:call-graph"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:linux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:kernel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:e-coli"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:operating-systems"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:transcriptional-regulatory-network"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/frontpage/2009/0902/1224253666155.html">
    <title>TCD researchers first to find genes unique to humans</title>
    <dc:date>2009-09-02T09:28:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/frontpage/2009/0902/1224253666155.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[go Aoife!  “This is the first ever discovery of novel human-specific protein coding genes,” said Dr McLysaght. “They are found in humans and nowhere else.”]]></description>
<dc:subject>science genetics research biology evolution tcd sfi genome junk-dna</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:86812cc4e864/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:genetics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:research"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:biology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:tcd"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:sfi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:genome"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:junk-dna"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>