<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (jm)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from jm</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://mahmoud-salem.net/the-invisible-shield"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.reddit.com/r/LegalAdviceUK/comments/1rk690v/i_run_a_selfhelp_forum_for_people_with_depression/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://krebsonsecurity.com/2025/09/gop-cries-censorship-over-spam-filters-that-work/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://torrentfreak.com/piracy-shield-cloudflare-disaster-blocks-countless-sites-fires-up-opposition-240226/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://cleanaircrew.org/air-cleaners/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.quora.com/What-is-a-life-hack-that-you-think-everybody-should-know/answer/Thomas-Talhelm?ch=10&amp;share=0a302e89&amp;srid=iLBX"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.theverge.com/2019/8/7/20759191/white-house-trump-administration-social-media-bias-executive-order-report"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/a3xgq5/why-wont-twitter-treat-white-supremacy-like-isis-because-it-would-mean-banning-some-republican-politicians-too"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.theverge.com/2016/7/13/12165194/youtube-content-id-2-billion-paid"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/xwkbad/this-music-theory-professor-just-showed-how-stupid-and-broken-copyright-filters-are"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://meetcircle.com/?ref=GIFTTT"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/10/google-and-facebook-have-failed-us/541794/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/new-security-whitepaper-now-available-use-aws-waf-to-mitigate-owasps-top-10-web-application-vulnerabilities/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ikydz.com/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arstechnica.co.uk/tech-policy/2016/06/uk-serious-risk-over-blocking-content-online-human-rights-watchdog/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.fastcoexist.com/3059742/social-network-algorithms-are-distorting-reality-by-boosting-conspiracy-theories"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7754"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://boingboing.net/2016/02/02/doxxing-sherlock-3.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-33783539"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://medium.com/backchannel/crowdsourcing-isnt-broken-5681da92b109"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/01/26/whole-haystack"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.schneier.com/essays/archives/2005/03/why_data_mining_wont.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thehackernews.com/2015/01/indian-government-blocks-32-sites.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.wired.com/2014/10/content-moderation/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.kevinmarks.com/twitterhatespeech.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://moderncrypto.org/mail-archive/messaging/2014/000780.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://bpjmleak.neocities.org/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.dcenr.gov.ie/NR/rdonlyres/0BCE1511-508E-4E97-B1A9-23A6BE9124AA/0/InternetContentGovernanceAdvisoryGroup.pdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7492000"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.torproject.org/docs/bridges.html.en"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.google.com/transparencyreport/traffic/explorer/?r=US&amp;l=EVERYTHING"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.independent.ie/business/technology/more-and-more-children-upset-by-online-content-survey-29995307.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.thinkbroadband.com/news/6261-sky-parental-controls-break-jquery-website.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.dcenr.gov.ie/Broadcasting/ICG/Terms+of+Reference.htm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jan/21/uk-porn-filter-blocks-game-update-that-contained-sex?CMP=twt_gu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://torrentfreak.com/internet-censors-came-for-torrentfreak-now-im-really-mad-140105/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://torrentfreak.com/irish-internet-providers-roll-out-kickasstorrents-blockade-140119/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://revk.www.me.uk/2014/01/nanny-state-getting-worse.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Content_filtering_by_UK_ISPs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.openrightsgroup.org/blog/2013/website-filtering-problems-are-a-load-of-cock"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.krank.ie/category/opinions/same-stories-sean-sherlock/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/01/sunday-review/who-is-watching-the-watch-lists.html?smid=tw-share&amp;_r=0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130815/09563524186/massive-overblocking-hits-hundreds-uk-sites.shtml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/filters-not-a-silver-bullet-that-will-stop-perverts-warns-interpol-chief-29470817.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://status.python.org/incidents/jj8d7xn41hr5"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://store.opendns.com/familyshield/setup/device/router"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://technology.ie/isp-association-responds-to-porn-filtering-debacle/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-23452097"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/rabbitte-ignores-calls-for-state-role-in-blocking-online-porn-29443620.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130705/19340023726/3d-printer-manufacturer-creates-software-filter-to-prevent-firearm-printing.shtml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://boingboing.net/2013/07/22/uk-internet-censorship-plan-no.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://torrentfreak.com/porn-to-be-blocked-in-the-uk-whats-new-say-pirate-bay-users-130722/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://torrentfreak.com/how-the-copyright-industry-pushed-for-internet-surveillance-130630/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://blog.pinboard.in/2013/06/persuading_david_simon/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://torrentfreak.com/uk-isps-secretly-start-blocking-torrent-site-proxies-130611/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/music-firms-secure-orders-blocking-access-to-pirate-bay-1.1425810"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://delimiter.com.au/2013/05/15/interpol-filter-scope-creep-asic-ordering-unilateral-website-blocks/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://delimiter.com.au/2013/05/10/did-conroys-afp-filter-wrongly-block-1200-sites/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krebsonsecurity.com/2012/06/a-closer-look-recent-email-based-malware-attacks/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://about.piratereverse.info/proxy/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2012/0619/1224318195843.html#.T-B7cvJ5Qto.twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://torrentfreak.com/google-facebook-and-8000-other-sites-accidentally-dns-blocked-120302/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.tjmcintyre.com/2012/01/adrian-weckler-confims-that-irelands.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://grepular.com/Punching_through_The_Great_Firewall_of_TMobile"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://publicaffairs.linx.net/news/?p=6253"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://petermblair.com/fbl-n-gram-analyzer/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://en.rsf.org/turkey-online-censorship-now-bordering-on-29-04-2011,40194.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2456206"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://obriend.info/2011/03/29/doing-the-right-thing/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.digitalrights.ie/2011/03/29/garda-plans-to-introduce-web-blocking-in-ireland/"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://mahmoud-salem.net/the-invisible-shield">
    <title>How Do You Find an Illegal Image Without Looking at It?</title>
    <dc:date>2026-04-07T10:18:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://mahmoud-salem.net/the-invisible-shield</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[A very good writeup of how illegal-image detection algorithms like PhotoDNA and PDQ work, and the Hasher-Matcher-Actioner three stage pattern

(via Erin Kissane)]]></description>
<dc:subject>csam detection filtering photodna pdq classifiers photos videos classification hashing fuzzy-hashing via:erin-kissane</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:b9d795d6a889/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:csam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:detection"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:photodna"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:pdq"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:classifiers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:photos"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:videos"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:classification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:hashing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:fuzzy-hashing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:via:erin-kissane"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.reddit.com/r/LegalAdviceUK/comments/1rk690v/i_run_a_selfhelp_forum_for_people_with_depression/">
    <title>Ofcom don't consider geoblocking the UK to be sufficient for an overseas website</title>
    <dc:date>2026-03-20T10:10:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.reddit.com/r/LegalAdviceUK/comments/1rk690v/i_run_a_selfhelp_forum_for_people_with_depression/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[r/LegalAdviceUK: "I run a self-help forum for people with depression. Ofcom has been bombarding me with emails demanding I start ID-verifying and age gating my website":

<blockquote>I started getting email from Ofcom [regarding OSA compliance] around November 2025 and now have multiple letters. I've repeatedly told them I'm from Canada, I'm not based in the UK.

Eventually, I blocked all UK IP addresses in mid-February 2026 and told them I'd blocked the UK and that I was done engaging with them.

I've now got ANOTHER email from them saying they're going to commence enforcement action against me because simply blocking UK IPs is "insufficient to comply with the Online Safety Act 2023." </blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>osa uk politics filtering censorship law geoblocking ofcom web</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:62264b402830/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:osa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:uk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:censorship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:geoblocking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ofcom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:web"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://krebsonsecurity.com/2025/09/gop-cries-censorship-over-spam-filters-that-work/">
    <title>GOP Cries Censorship Over Spam Filters That Work</title>
    <dc:date>2025-09-09T11:48:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://krebsonsecurity.com/2025/09/gop-cries-censorship-over-spam-filters-that-work/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[LOL.  Republican political email campaigns (like WinRed) keep getting marked as spam, because they're using shitty lists:

<blockquote>
Tossavainen told KrebsOnSecurity that WinRed’s emails hit its spamtraps in the .com, .net, and .org space far more frequently than do fundraising emails sent by ActBlue. Koli-Lõks published a graph of the stark disparity in spamtrap activity for WinRed versus ActBlue, showing a nearly fourfold increase in spamtrap hits from WinRed emails in the final week of July 2025.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>spam anti-spam spamtraps winred us-politics gop republicans filtering</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:677abd183e10/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spamtraps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:winred"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:us-politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:gop"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:republicans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://torrentfreak.com/piracy-shield-cloudflare-disaster-blocks-countless-sites-fires-up-opposition-240226/">
    <title>Italy's &quot;Piracy Shield&quot; blocked Cloudflare</title>
    <dc:date>2024-03-04T10:16:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://torrentfreak.com/piracy-shield-cloudflare-disaster-blocks-countless-sites-fires-up-opposition-240226/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Italy recently installed the AGCOM "anti-pezotto" system -- a web filtering system for the entire country, to block piracy.  After only a few weeks, it suffered its first major false positive by blocking a Cloudflare IP:

"Around 16:13 on Saturday, an IP address within Cloudflare’s AS13335, which currently accounts for 42,243,794 domains according to IPInfo, was targeted for blocking."

The false positive block lasted for 5 hours before being quietly reverted:

"Around five hours after the blockade was put in place, reports suggest that the order compelling ISPs to block Cloudflare simply vanished from the Piracy Shield system."

Cloudflare have written about the risk of false positives from IP blocking in the past: https://blog.cloudflare.com/consequences-of-ip-blocking/]]></description>
<dc:subject>cloudflare ip-blocks blocking piracy anti-pezzoto agcom fail filtering false-positives networking</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:986c513a9105/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:cloudflare"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ip-blocks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:blocking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:piracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-pezzoto"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:agcom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:fail"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:false-positives"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:networking"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://cleanaircrew.org/air-cleaners/">
    <title>Portable Air Cleaner (HEPA filter) buying guide</title>
    <dc:date>2021-12-14T10:17:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://cleanaircrew.org/air-cleaners/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[handy resource, via Orla Hegarty]]></description>
<dc:subject>hepa filtering air air-quality covid-19 health gadgets tips</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:f2324a73f5b3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:hepa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:air"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:air-quality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:covid-19"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:health"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:gadgets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:tips"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.quora.com/What-is-a-life-hack-that-you-think-everybody-should-know/answer/Thomas-Talhelm?ch=10&amp;share=0a302e89&amp;srid=iLBX">
    <title>Thomas Talhelm's DIY air purifier</title>
    <dc:date>2019-11-07T10:28:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.quora.com/What-is-a-life-hack-that-you-think-everybody-should-know/answer/Thomas-Talhelm?ch=10&amp;share=0a302e89&amp;srid=iLBX</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Simply strap a HEPA air filter to a desk fan for $30:

<blockquote>I tested it over and over—hundreds of days, with a control room, with a stronger fan, against the big brand purifiers that I borrowed from my rich friends. Eventually, I saw enough data that I was convinced. This $30 DIY purifier was removing significant amounts of tiny particulate from my Beijing bedroom.  I wanted to tell the world that those $1,000 purifiers were ripoffs. I made all the data and testing methods open source. I wrote up the instructions for how to make one.</blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>air air-quality beijing hepa filters filtering diy hacks</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:d824cc90cde3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:air"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:air-quality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:beijing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:hepa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filters"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:diy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:hacks"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.theverge.com/2019/8/7/20759191/white-house-trump-administration-social-media-bias-executive-order-report">
    <title>The White House is reportedly drafting an order to stop social media ‘bias’ - The Verge</title>
    <dc:date>2019-08-08T10:32:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.theverge.com/2019/8/7/20759191/white-house-trump-administration-social-media-bias-executive-order-report</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>One shooting was apparently an act of far-right terrorism, based on an anti-immigrant screed posted online. There was a fine line between its rhetoric and the views of major conservative figures like Tucker Carlson or Trump himself. Preemptively flagging the shooter — or one of several far-right killers before him — could have looked like egregious anti-conservative bias. And since predictive AI has sky-high error rates, it would probably catch a lot of non-violent conservative accounts (alongside those of non-conservatives) purely by accident. That’s already a recipe for a PR disaster, and it gets even dicier if Trump adds new legal punishments.</blockquote>

(via JK)]]></description>
<dc:subject>filtering ai terrorism far-right fascism nazis trump twitter social-media</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:3fe0493a26e9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:terrorism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:far-right"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:fascism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:nazis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:trump"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:social-media"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/a3xgq5/why-wont-twitter-treat-white-supremacy-like-isis-because-it-would-mean-banning-some-republican-politicians-too">
    <title>Why Won’t Twitter Treat White Supremacy Like ISIS? Because It Would Mean Banning Some Republican Politicians Too. - VICE</title>
    <dc:date>2019-08-08T10:31:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/a3xgq5/why-wont-twitter-treat-white-supremacy-like-isis-because-it-would-mean-banning-some-republican-politicians-too</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[“Cracking down on white nationalists will therefore involve removing a lot of people who identify to a greater or lesser extent as Trump supporters, and some people in Trump circles and pro-Trump media will certainly seize on this to complain they are being persecuted,” Berger said. “There's going to be controversy here that we didn't see with ISIS, because there are more white nationalists than there are ISIS supporters, and white nationalists are closer to the levers of political power in the US and Europe than ISIS ever was.”]]></description>
<dc:subject>gop corruption twitter politics filtering ai fascism republicans</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:038061c5ca96/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:gop"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:corruption"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:fascism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:republicans"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.theverge.com/2016/7/13/12165194/youtube-content-id-2-billion-paid">
    <title>Google spent $60 million on building Content ID</title>
    <dc:date>2018-09-13T10:12:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.theverge.com/2016/7/13/12165194/youtube-content-id-2-billion-paid</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[That's how much it costs to build a not-particularly-accurate UGC copyright filter:

<blockquote>Google’s new report takes aim at this claim. It asserts that Content ID is a highly effective solution, with over 98 percent of copyright management on YouTube happening through Content ID, and just 2 percent coming from humans filing copyright removal notices. Google also says the music industry opts to monetize more than 95 percent of its copyright claims, meaning they leave the videos up on the service. It claims a whopping half of the music industry's YouTube revenue comes from fan content — covers, remixes, dance versions, etc. — claimed via Content ID.  The report also puts a hard figure on how much Google has spent so far on Content ID: $60 million.</blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>filtering copyright eu article-13 copyfight content-id google web ugc</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:d8ce4f90612d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:eu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:article-13"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:copyfight"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:content-id"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ugc"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/xwkbad/this-music-theory-professor-just-showed-how-stupid-and-broken-copyright-filters-are">
    <title>This Music Theory Professor Just Showed How Stupid and Broken Copyright Filters Are - Motherboard</title>
    <dc:date>2018-08-30T14:20:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/xwkbad/this-music-theory-professor-just-showed-how-stupid-and-broken-copyright-filters-are</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Kaiser then decided to test Google’s system more fully. He opened a new YouTube account named Labeltest, and began sharing additional examples of copyright-free music.

“I quickly received Content ID notifications for copyright-free music by Bartok, Schubert, Puccini, and Wagner,” Kaiser said. “Again and again, YouTube told me that I was violating the copyright of these long-dead composers, despite all of my uploads existing in the public domain.”

Google’s Content ID is the result of more than $100 million in investment funds and countless development hours. Yet Kaiser found the system was largely incapable of differentiating between copyrighted music and content in the public domain. And the appeals process that Google has erected to tackle these false claims wasn’t any better.</blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>content-id copyright copyright-filtering youtube fail google public-domain ip music filtering bartok schubert wagner puccini</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:dee06ff1aaab/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:content-id"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:copyright-filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:youtube"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:fail"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:public-domain"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ip"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:music"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:bartok"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:schubert"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:wagner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:puccini"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://meetcircle.com/?ref=GIFTTT">
    <title>Parental Controls &amp; Internet Filtering — Circle</title>
    <dc:date>2017-11-27T11:25:22+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://meetcircle.com/?ref=GIFTTT</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[this looks interesting; internet time limits and per-user/per-device content filtering, for kids]]></description>
<dc:subject>apps kids android ios circle filtering family parenting</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:384a9f04177b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:apps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:kids"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:android"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ios"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:circle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:family"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:parenting"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/10/google-and-facebook-have-failed-us/541794/">
    <title>Google and Facebook Have Failed Us - The Atlantic</title>
    <dc:date>2017-10-03T13:04:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/10/google-and-facebook-have-failed-us/541794/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>There’s no hiding behind algorithms anymore. The problems cannot be minimized. The machines have shown they are not up to the task of dealing with rare, breaking news events, and it is unlikely that they will be in the near future. More humans must be added to the decision-making process, and the sooner the better.</blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>algorithms facebook google las-vegas news filtering hoaxes 4chan abuse breaking-news responsibility silicon-valley</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:eae114275e75/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:algorithms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:facebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:las-vegas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:news"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:hoaxes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:4chan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:abuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:breaking-news"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:responsibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:silicon-valley"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/new-security-whitepaper-now-available-use-aws-waf-to-mitigate-owasps-top-10-web-application-vulnerabilities/">
    <title>Use AWS WAF to Mitigate OWASP’s Top 10 Web Application Vulnerabilities</title>
    <dc:date>2017-07-06T14:43:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/new-security-whitepaper-now-available-use-aws-waf-to-mitigate-owasps-top-10-web-application-vulnerabilities/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA['describes how you can use AWS WAF, a web application firewall, to address the top application security flaws as named by the Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP). Using AWS WAF, you can write rules to match patterns of exploitation attempts in HTTP requests and block requests from reaching your web servers. This whitepaper discusses manifestations of these security vulnerabilities, AWS WAF–based mitigation strategies, and other AWS services or solutions that can help address these threats.']]></description>
<dc:subject>security waf aws http owasp filtering</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:91ec197fb992/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:security"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:waf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:aws"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:http"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:owasp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.ikydz.com/">
    <title>iKydz</title>
    <dc:date>2017-05-11T10:51:33+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.ikydz.com/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA['Total Parent Control' for kids internet access at home.  Dublin-based product, dedicated wifi AP with lots of child-oriented filtering capabilities]]></description>
<dc:subject>filtering security ikydz kids children internet wifi ap hardware blocking</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:de9f1248a02d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:security"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ikydz"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:kids"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:wifi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ap"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:hardware"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:blocking"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arstechnica.co.uk/tech-policy/2016/06/uk-serious-risk-over-blocking-content-online-human-rights-watchdog/">
    <title>UK at serious risk of over-blocking content online, human rights watchdog warns | Ars Technica UK</title>
    <dc:date>2016-06-08T16:58:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arstechnica.co.uk/tech-policy/2016/06/uk-serious-risk-over-blocking-content-online-human-rights-watchdog/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The IWF in the spotlight...

<blockquote>The blacklist operated by the IWF effectively amounts to censorship. Not only are the blacklist and notices sent to members of the IWF kept secret, but there is no requirement to notify website owners when their site has been added to the blacklist.  Even where statutory rules do exist with respect to notice and take-down procedures (namely, the Terrorism Act 2006 and the Defamation (Operators of Websites) Regulations 2013), the provisions are not so concerned with safeguards for the protection of freedom of expression, as with offering an exemption from liability for ISPs.</blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>iwf censorship uk filtering coe eu europe</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:8305aa5ac7c7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:iwf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:censorship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:uk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:coe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:eu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:europe"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.fastcoexist.com/3059742/social-network-algorithms-are-distorting-reality-by-boosting-conspiracy-theories">
    <title>Social Network Algorithms Are Distorting Reality By Boosting Conspiracy Theories | Co.Exist | ideas + impact</title>
    <dc:date>2016-05-12T13:04:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.fastcoexist.com/3059742/social-network-algorithms-are-distorting-reality-by-boosting-conspiracy-theories</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>In his 1962 book, The Image: A Guide to Pseudo-Events in America, former Librarian of Congress Daniel J. Boorstin describes a world where our ability to technologically shape reality is so sophisticated, it overcomes reality itself. "We risk being the first people in history," he writes, "to have been able to make their illusions so vivid, so persuasive, so ‘realistic’ that they can live in them."
</blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>algorithms facebook ethics filtering newsfeed conspiracy-theories twitter viral crazy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:51b1f7baf155/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:algorithms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:facebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:newsfeed"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:conspiracy-theories"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:viral"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:crazy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7754">
    <title>RFC 7754 - Technical Considerations for Internet Service Blocking and Filtering</title>
    <dc:date>2016-03-16T12:13:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7754</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The Internet is structured to be an open communications medium.  This
   openness is one of the key underpinnings of Internet innovation, but
   it can also allow communications that may be viewed as undesirable by
   certain parties.  Thus, as the Internet has grown, so have mechanisms
   to limit the extent and impact of abusive or objectionable
   communications.  Recently, there has been an increasing emphasis on
   "blocking" and "filtering", the active prevention of such
   communications.  This document examines several technical approaches
   to Internet blocking and filtering in terms of their alignment with
   the overall Internet architecture.  When it is possible to do so, the
   approach to blocking and filtering that is most coherent with the
   Internet architecture is to inform endpoints about potentially
   undesirable services, so that the communicants can avoid engaging in
   abusive or objectionable communications.  We observe that certain
   filtering and blocking approaches can cause unintended consequences
   to third parties, and we discuss the limits of efficacy of various
   approaches.</blockquote>

(via Tony Finch)]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:fanf blocking censorship filtering internet rfcs rfc isps</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:3b43dcc1f35e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:via:fanf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:blocking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:censorship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:rfcs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:rfc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:isps"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://boingboing.net/2016/02/02/doxxing-sherlock-3.html">
    <title>Exclusive: Snowden intelligence docs reveal UK spooks' malware checklist / Boing Boing</title>
    <dc:date>2016-02-03T14:02:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://boingboing.net/2016/02/02/doxxing-sherlock-3.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This is an excellent essay from Cory Doctorow on mass surveillance in the post-Snowden era, and the difference between HUMINT and SIGINT.  So much good stuff, including this (new to me) cite for, "Goodhart's law", on secrecy as it affects adversarial classification:

<blockquote>The problem with this is that once you accept this framing, and note the happy coincidence that your paymasters just happen to have found a way to spy on everyone, the conclusion is obvious: just mine all of the data, from everyone to everyone, and use an algorithm to figure out who’s guilty.  The bad guys have a Modus Operandi, as anyone who’s watched a cop show knows. Find the MO, turn it into a data fingerprint, and you can just sort the firehose’s output into ”terrorist-ish” and ”unterrorist-ish.”

Once you accept this premise, then it’s equally obvious that the whole methodology has to be kept from scrutiny. If you’re depending on three ”tells” as indicators of terrorist planning, the terrorists will figure out how to plan their attacks without doing those three things.

This even has a name: Goodhart's law. "When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure." Google started out by gauging a web page’s importance by counting the number of links they could find to it. This worked well before they told people what they were doing. Once getting a page ranked by Google became important, unscrupulous people set up dummy sites (“link-farms”) with lots of links pointing at their pages.</blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>adversarial-classification classification surveillance nsa gchq cory-doctorow privacy snooping goodharts-law google anti-spam filtering spying snowden</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:4d0273cfe1c7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:adversarial-classification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:classification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:surveillance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:nsa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:gchq"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:cory-doctorow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:snooping"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:goodharts-law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spying"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:snowden"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-33783539">
    <title>India lifts porn ban after widespread outrage - BBC News</title>
    <dc:date>2015-08-06T09:02:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-33783539</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[After a brief couple of days.<blockquote>News of the ban caused a furore on Indian social media, with several senior politicians and members of civil society expressing their opposition to the move. The Indian government said that it was merely complying with the Supreme Court order and was committed to the freedom of communication on the Internet. "I reject with contempt the charge that it is a Talibani government, as being said by some of the critics. Our government supports free media, respects communication on social media and has respected freedom of communication always," Mr Prasad told PTI.</blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>india porn filtering isps internet web child-porn censorship</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:038036469d03/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:india"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:porn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:isps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:child-porn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:censorship"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://medium.com/backchannel/crowdsourcing-isnt-broken-5681da92b109">
    <title>Crowdsourcing isn’t broken — Backchannel — Medium</title>
    <dc:date>2015-02-18T23:19:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://medium.com/backchannel/crowdsourcing-isnt-broken-5681da92b109</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA['A great compendium by @harper of techniques for handling trolls and griefers in online communities', via kragen]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:kragen antispam filtering trolls community crowdsourcing threadless harper griefers abuse tips</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:23d2e4dfefe3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:via:kragen"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:antispam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:trolls"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:crowdsourcing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:threadless"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:harper"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:griefers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:abuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:tips"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/01/26/whole-haystack">
    <title>How to Catch a Terrorist - The New Yorker</title>
    <dc:date>2015-01-24T21:28:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/01/26/whole-haystack</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This is spot on -- <blockquote>By flooding the system with false positives, big-data approaches to counterterrorism might actually make it harder to identify real terrorists before they act. Two years before the Boston Marathon bombing, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, the older of the two brothers alleged to have committed the attack, was assessed by the city’s Joint Terrorism Task Force. They determined that he was not a threat. This was one of about a thousand assessments that the Boston J.T.T.F. conducted that year, a number that had nearly doubled in the previous two years, according to the Boston F.B.I. As of 2013, the Justice Department has trained nearly three hundred thousand law-enforcement officers in how to file “suspicious-activity reports.” In 2010, a central database held about three thousand of these reports; by 2012 it had grown to almost twenty-eight thousand. “The bigger haystack makes it harder to find the needle,” Sensenbrenner told me. Thomas Drake, a former N.S.A. executive and whistle-blower who has become one of the agency’s most vocal critics, told me, “If you target everything, there’s no target.”</blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>terrorism false-positives filtering detection jttf nsa fbi surveillance gchq</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:7511e50e15ec/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:terrorism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:false-positives"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:detection"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:jttf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:nsa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:fbi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:surveillance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:gchq"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.schneier.com/essays/archives/2005/03/why_data_mining_wont.html">
    <title>Schneier on Security: Why Data Mining Won't Stop Terror</title>
    <dc:date>2015-01-12T15:07:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.schneier.com/essays/archives/2005/03/why_data_mining_wont.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[A good reference URL to cut-and-paste when "scanning internet traffic for terrorist plots" rears its head:

<blockquote>This unrealistically accurate system will generate 1 billion false alarms for every real terrorist plot it uncovers. Every day of every year, the police will have to investigate 27 million potential plots in order to find the one real terrorist plot per month. Raise that false-positive accuracy to an absurd 99.9999 percent and you're still chasing 2,750 false alarms per day -- but that will inevitably raise your false negatives, and you're going to miss some of those 10 real plots.</blockquote>

Also, Ben Goldacre saying the same thing: http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/datamining-would-be-lovely-if-it-worked/]]></description>
<dc:subject>internet scanning filtering specificity statistics data-mining terrorism law nsa gchq false-positives false-negatives</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:40691f3d07b8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:scanning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:specificity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:statistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:data-mining"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:terrorism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:nsa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:gchq"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:false-positives"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:false-negatives"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thehackernews.com/2015/01/indian-government-blocks-32-sites.html">
    <title>Indian Government blocks 32 Sites, including GitHub, Pastebin, Imgur and Vimeo</title>
    <dc:date>2015-01-03T12:32:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://thehackernews.com/2015/01/indian-government-blocks-32-sites.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Spectacularly inept. Pretty much every UGC site there is]]></description>
<dc:subject>ugc india filtering blocking terrorism isis github vimeo pastebin censorship</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:7a80d7f09a1d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ugc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:india"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:blocking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:terrorism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:isis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:github"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:vimeo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:pastebin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:censorship"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.wired.com/2014/10/content-moderation/">
    <title>The Laborers Who Keep Dick Pics and Beheadings Out of Your Facebook Feed | WIRED</title>
    <dc:date>2014-10-28T21:05:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.wired.com/2014/10/content-moderation/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>“Everybody hits the wall, generally between three and five months,” says a former YouTube content moderator I’ll call Rob. “You just think, ‘Holy shit, what am I spending my day doing? This is awful.’”</blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>facebook wired beheadings moderation nsfw google youtube social-media filtering porn abuse</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:71b37988025a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:facebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:wired"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:beheadings"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:moderation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:nsfw"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:youtube"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:social-media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:porn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:abuse"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.kevinmarks.com/twitterhatespeech.html">
    <title>How did Twitter become the hate speech wing of the free speech party?</title>
    <dc:date>2014-10-06T11:30:24+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.kevinmarks.com/twitterhatespeech.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Kevin Marks has a pretty good point here:

<blockquote>Your tweet could win the fame lottery, and everyone on the Internet who thinks you are wrong could tell you about it. Or one of the "verified" could call you out to be the tribute for your community and fight in their Hunger Games.

Say something about feminism, or race, or sea lions and you'd find yourself inundated by the same trite responses from multitudes. Complain about it, and they turn nasty, abusing you, calling in their friends to join in. Your phone becomes useless under the weight of notifications; you can't see your friends support amongst the flood.

The limited tools available - blocking, muting, going private - do not match well with these floods. Twitter's abuse reporting form takes far longer than a tweet, and is explicitly ignored if friends try to help.</blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>harassment twitter 4chan abuse feminism hate-speech gamergate sea-lions filtering social-media kevin-marks</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:05196a963f79/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:harassment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:4chan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:abuse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:feminism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:hate-speech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:gamergate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:sea-lions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:social-media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:kevin-marks"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://moderncrypto.org/mail-archive/messaging/2014/000780.html">
    <title>'The very first release of Gmail simply used spamassassin on the backend'</title>
    <dc:date>2014-09-06T22:42:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://moderncrypto.org/mail-archive/messaging/2014/000780.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Excellent. Confirming what I'd heard from a few other sources, too ;)

This is a well-written history of the anti-spam war so far, from Mike Hearn, writing with the Google/Gmail point of view:

<blockquote>
Brief note about my background, to establish credentials:  I worked at
Google for about 7.5 years. For about 4.5 of those I worked on the Gmail
abuse team, which is very tightly linked with the spam team (they use the
same software, share the same on-call rotations etc).
</blockquote>

Reading this kind of stuff is awesome for me, since it's a nice picture of a fun problem to work on -- the Gmail team took the right ideas about how to fight spam, and scaled them up to the 10s-of-millions DAU mark. Nicely done.

The second half is some interesting musings on end-to-end encrypted communications and how it would deal with spam. Worth a read...]]></description>
<dc:subject>gmail google spam anti-spam filtering spamassassin history</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:f10b10591ff0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:gmail"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spamassassin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:history"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://bpjmleak.neocities.org/">
    <title>#BPjMleak</title>
    <dc:date>2014-07-08T08:53:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://bpjmleak.neocities.org/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA['Leak of the secret German Internet Censorship URL blacklist BPjM-Modul'.

Turns out there's a blocklist of adult-only or prohibited domains issued by a German government department, The Federal Department for Media Harmful to Young Persons (German: "Bundesprüfstelle für jugendgefährdende Medien" or BPjM), issued in the form of a list of hashes of those domains.  These were extracted from an AVM router, then the hashes were brute forced using several other plaintext URL blocklists and domain lists.

Needless to say, there's an assortment of silly false positives, such as the listing of the website for the 1997 3D Realms game "Shadow Warrior": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadow_Warrior]]></description>
<dc:subject>hashes reversing reverse-engineering germany german bpjm filtering blocklists blacklists avm domains censorship fps</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:7ebb5a2bc5a1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:hashes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:reversing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:reverse-engineering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:germany"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:german"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:bpjm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:blocklists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:blacklists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:avm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:domains"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:censorship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:fps"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.dcenr.gov.ie/NR/rdonlyres/0BCE1511-508E-4E97-B1A9-23A6BE9124AA/0/InternetContentGovernanceAdvisoryGroup.pdf">
    <title>Report of the Internet Content Governance Advisory Group</title>
    <dc:date>2014-06-24T15:36:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.dcenr.gov.ie/NR/rdonlyres/0BCE1511-508E-4E97-B1A9-23A6BE9124AA/0/InternetContentGovernanceAdvisoryGroup.pdf</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[looking at the summary, looks broadly sensible; no government-mandated filtering/blocking I can spot quickly]]></description>
<dc:subject>internet filtering safety kids porn blocking ireland pegi ratings reports pdf</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:4bc433f2eaf5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:safety"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:kids"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:porn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:blocking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ireland"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:pegi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ratings"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:reports"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:pdf"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7492000">
    <title>DNS results now being manipulated in Turkey</title>
    <dc:date>2014-03-31T08:49:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7492000</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Deep-packet inspection and rewriting on DNS packets for Google and OpenDNS servers.  VPNs and DNSSEC up next!]]></description>
<dc:subject>turkey twitter dpi dns opendns google networking filtering surveillance proxying packets udp</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:e014bcbe14a6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:turkey"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:dpi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:dns"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:opendns"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:networking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:surveillance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:proxying"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:packets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:udp"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.torproject.org/docs/bridges.html.en">
    <title>Tor Bridge Relays</title>
    <dc:date>2014-03-24T10:22:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.torproject.org/docs/bridges.html.en</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The next step in the Turkish twitter-block arms race.

<blockquote>Bridge relays (or "bridges" for short) are Tor relays that aren't listed in the main Tor directory. Since there is no complete public list of them, even if your ISP is filtering connections to all the known Tor relays, they probably won't be able to block all the bridges. If you suspect your access to the Tor network is being blocked, you may want to use the bridge feature of Tor.  The addition of bridges to Tor is a step forward in the blocking resistance race. It is perfectly possible that even if your ISP filters the Internet, you do not require a bridge to use Tor. So you should try to use Tor without bridges first, since it might work.</blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>tor privacy turkey bridging networking tor-bridges twitter filtering blocking censorship</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:3cad725cd377/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:tor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:turkey"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:bridging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:networking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:tor-bridges"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:blocking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:censorship"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.google.com/transparencyreport/traffic/explorer/?r=US&amp;l=EVERYTHING">
    <title>Traffic Graph – Google Transparency Report</title>
    <dc:date>2014-02-20T17:43:41+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.google.com/transparencyreport/traffic/explorer/?r=US&amp;l=EVERYTHING</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[this is cool.  Google are exposing an aggregated 'all services' hit count time-series graph, broken down by country, as part of their Transparency Report pages]]></description>
<dc:subject>transparency filtering web google http graphs monitoring syria</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:903ee1300110/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:transparency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:http"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:graphs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:monitoring"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:syria"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.independent.ie/business/technology/more-and-more-children-upset-by-online-content-survey-29995307.html">
    <title>Survey results of EU teens using the internet</title>
    <dc:date>2014-02-10T15:20:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.independent.ie/business/technology/more-and-more-children-upset-by-online-content-survey-29995307.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[A lot of unsupervised use:

<blockquote>Just under half of children said they access the internet from their own bedroom on a daily basis with 22pc saying they do so several times a day.</blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>surveys eu ireland politics filtering internet social-media facebook children teens cyber-bullying</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:35ecc7699ff9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:surveys"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:eu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ireland"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:social-media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:facebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:teens"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:cyber-bullying"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.thinkbroadband.com/news/6261-sky-parental-controls-break-jquery-website.html">
    <title>Sky parental controls break many JQuery-using websites</title>
    <dc:date>2014-01-27T13:53:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.thinkbroadband.com/news/6261-sky-parental-controls-break-jquery-website.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[An 11 hour outage caused by a false positive in Sky's anti-phishing filter; all sites using the code.jquery.com CDN for JQuery would have seen errors.

<blockquote>Sky still appears to be blocking code.jquery.com and all files served via the site, and more worryingly is that if you try to report the incorrect category, once signing in on the Sky website you an error page.  We suspect the site was blocked due to being linked to by a properly malicious website, i.e. code.jquery.com and some javascript files were being used on a dodgy website and every domain mentioned was subsequently added to a block list.</blockquote>

(via Tony Finch)

]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:fanf sky filtering internet uk anti-phishing phish jquery javascript http web fps false-positives</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:583339fa52bd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:via:fanf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:sky"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:uk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-phishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:phish"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:jquery"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:javascript"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:http"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:fps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:false-positives"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.dcenr.gov.ie/Broadcasting/ICG/Terms+of+Reference.htm">
    <title>Terms of Reference for the DCENR Internet Content Advisory Group</title>
    <dc:date>2014-01-24T21:19:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.dcenr.gov.ie/Broadcasting/ICG/Terms+of+Reference.htm</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[this is definitely one to send a consultation document response to]]></description>
<dc:subject>internet policing cyberbullying bullying antisocial free-speech governance children blocking filtering consultations dcenr</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:7f4fcbbc3dda/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:policing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:cyberbullying"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:bullying"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:antisocial"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:free-speech"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:governance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:blocking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:consultations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:dcenr"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jan/21/uk-porn-filter-blocks-game-update-that-contained-sex?CMP=twt_gu">
    <title>UK porn filter blocks game update that contained 'sex' in URL</title>
    <dc:date>2014-01-22T10:35:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jan/21/uk-porn-filter-blocks-game-update-that-contained-sex?CMP=twt_gu</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Staggeringly inept.  The UK national porn filter blocks based on a regexp match of the URL against /.*sex.*/i -- the good old "Scunthorpe problem".  Better, it returns a 404 response.  This is also a good demonstration of how web filtering has unintended side effects, breaking third-party software updates with its false positives.

<blockquote>The update to online strategy game League of Legends was disrupted by the internet filter because the software attempted to access files that accidentally include the word “sex” in the middle of their file names. The block resulted in the update failing with “file not found” errors, which are usually created by missing files or broken updates on the part of the developers.</blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>uk porn filtering guardian regular-expressions false-positives scunthorpe http web league-of-legends sex</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:f94e6eca9c08/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:uk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:porn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:guardian"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:regular-expressions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:false-positives"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:scunthorpe"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:http"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:league-of-legends"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:sex"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://torrentfreak.com/internet-censors-came-for-torrentfreak-now-im-really-mad-140105/">
    <title>Internet Censors Came For TorrentFreak &amp; Now I’m Really Mad</title>
    <dc:date>2014-01-20T14:52:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://torrentfreak.com/internet-censors-came-for-torrentfreak-now-im-really-mad-140105/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[TF are not happy about Sky blocking their blog.

<blockquote>There can be little doubt that little by little, piece by piece, big corporations and governments are taking chunks out of the free Internet. Today they pretend that the control is in the hands of the people, but along the way they are prepared to mislead and misdirect, even when their errors are pointed out to them.  I’m calling on Sky, Symantec, McAfee and other ISPs about to employ filtering to categorize this site correctly as a news site or blog and to please start listening to people’s legitimate complaints about other innocent sites. It serves nobody’s interests to wrongfully block legitimate information.</blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>censorship isps uk sky torrentfreak piracy copyright filtering blocking symantec filesharing</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:80a78770e042/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:censorship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:isps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:uk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:sky"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:torrentfreak"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:piracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:blocking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:symantec"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filesharing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://torrentfreak.com/irish-internet-providers-roll-out-kickasstorrents-blockade-140119/">
    <title>Irish Internet Providers Roll Out KickassTorrents Blockade</title>
    <dc:date>2014-01-20T14:48:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://torrentfreak.com/irish-internet-providers-roll-out-kickasstorrents-blockade-140119/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The lucrative whack-a-mole business continues -- mostly in response to High Court actions, although Eircom are just helping out.  I bet a google for "kickass proxy" doesn't return anything useful at all, of course....]]></description>
<dc:subject>kat kickasstorrents bittorrent piracy copyright high-court ireland eircom filtering blocking</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:2c0ac5818ae5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:kat"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:kickasstorrents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:bittorrent"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:piracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:high-court"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ireland"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:eircom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:blocking"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://revk.www.me.uk/2014/01/nanny-state-getting-worse.html">
    <title>Nominet now filtering .uk domain registrations for 'sex-crime content'</title>
    <dc:date>2014-01-16T17:55:38+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://revk.www.me.uk/2014/01/nanny-state-getting-worse.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Amazing. Massive nanny-stateism of the 'something must be done' variety, with a 100% false-alarm hit rate, and it's now policy.

<blockquote>'Nominet have made a decision, based on a report by Lord Macdonald QC, that recommends that they check any domain registration that signals sex crime content or is in itself a sex crime. This is screening of domains within 48 hours of registration, and de-registration. The report says that such domains should be reported to the police.' [....]

'The report itself states [...] that in 2013 Nominet checked domains for key words used by the IWF, and as a result reported tens of thousands of domains to IWF for checking, all of which were false positives. Not one was, in fact, related to child sex abuse.'</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>filtering nominet false-positives nanny-state uk sex-crimes false-alarms domains iwf</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:4d154888a1a0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:nominet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:false-positives"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:nanny-state"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:uk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:sex-crimes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:false-alarms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:domains"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:iwf"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Content_filtering_by_UK_ISPs">
    <title>Content filtering by UK ISPs</title>
    <dc:date>2013-12-21T18:22:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Content_filtering_by_UK_ISPs</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[An exhaustive list from the UK's Open Rights Group]]></description>
<dc:subject>filtering uk isps org porn blocklists internet</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:79ff2f07e032/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:uk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:isps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:org"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:porn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:blocklists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:internet"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.openrightsgroup.org/blog/2013/website-filtering-problems-are-a-load-of-cock">
    <title>MP Claire Perry tells UK that worrying about filter overblocking is a &quot;load of cock&quot;</title>
    <dc:date>2013-12-19T10:23:37+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.openrightsgroup.org/blog/2013/website-filtering-problems-are-a-load-of-cock</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[the bottom line appears to be "think of the children" -- in other words, any degree of overblocking is acceptable as long as children cannot access porn:

<blockquote>
The debate and letter confuse legal, illegal and potentially harmful content, all of which require very different tactics to deal with. Without a greater commitment to evidence and rational debate, poor policy outcomes will be the likely result. There's a pattern, much the same as the Digital Economy Act, or the Snooper's Charter.  Start with moral panic; dismiss evidence; legislate; and finally, watch the policy unravel, either delivering unintended harms, even to children in this case, or simply failing altogether.
</blockquote>

See https://www.openrightsgroup.org/blog/2013/talktalk-wordpress for a well-written exploration of a case of overblocking and its fallout.  Talk Talk, one UK ISP, has filters which incorrectly dealt with IWF data and blocked WordPress.com's admin interface, resulting in all blogs there become unusable for their owners for over a week, with seemingly nobody able to diagnose and fix the problem competently.]]></description>
<dc:subject>filtering overblocking uk politics think-of-the-children porn cam claire-perry open-rights-group false-positives talk-talk networking internet wordpress</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:8af23d560cf5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:overblocking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:uk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:think-of-the-children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:porn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:cam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:claire-perry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:open-rights-group"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:false-positives"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:talk-talk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:networking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:wordpress"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.krank.ie/category/opinions/same-stories-sean-sherlock/">
    <title>Same Old Stories From Sean Sherlock</title>
    <dc:date>2013-12-07T20:57:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.krank.ie/category/opinions/same-stories-sean-sherlock/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Sherlock’s record is spotty at best when it comes to engagement. Setting aside the 80,680 people who were ignored by the minister, he was hostile and counter productive to debate from the beginning, going so far as to threaten to pull out of a public debate because a campaigner against the ['Irish SOPA'] SI would be in attendance. His habit of blocking people online who publicly ask him tough yet legitimate questions has earned him the nickname “Sherblock”.</blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>sean-sherlock sherblock labour ireland politics blocking filtering internet freedom copyright emi music law piracy debate twitter</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:eec69ef2d6a1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:sean-sherlock"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:sherblock"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:labour"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ireland"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:blocking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:freedom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:emi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:music"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:piracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:debate"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:twitter"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/01/sunday-review/who-is-watching-the-watch-lists.html?smid=tw-share&amp;_r=0">
    <title>Who Is Watching the Watch Lists? - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2013-12-02T16:00:12+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/01/sunday-review/who-is-watching-the-watch-lists.html?smid=tw-share&amp;_r=0</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>it might seem that current efforts to identify and track potential terrorists would be approached with caution. Yet the federal government’s main terrorist watch list has grown to at least 700,000 people, with little scrutiny over how the determinations are made or the impact on those marked with the terrorist label.
“If you’ve done the paperwork correctly, then you can effectively enter someone onto the watch list,” said Anya Bernstein, an associate professor at the SUNY Buffalo Law School and author of “The Hidden Costs of Terrorist Watch Lists,” published by the Buffalo Law Review in May. “There’s no indication that agencies undertake any kind of regular retrospective review to assess how good they are at predicting the conduct they’re targeting.”

</blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>terrorism watchlists blacklists filtering safety air-travel government security dhs travel</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:843dcaafdc27/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:terrorism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:watchlists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:blacklists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:safety"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:air-travel"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:government"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:security"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:dhs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:travel"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130815/09563524186/massive-overblocking-hits-hundreds-uk-sites.shtml">
    <title>Massive Overblocking Hits Hundreds Of UK Sites | Techdirt</title>
    <dc:date>2013-08-16T10:34:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130815/09563524186/massive-overblocking-hits-hundreds-uk-sites.shtml</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Customers of UK ISPs Virgin Media and Be Broadband found they were unable to access hundreds of sites, including the Radio Times and Zooniverse, due to a secret website-blocking court order from the Premier League.  PC Pro believe that 3 other ISPs' customers were also affected.

According to customers reverse-engineering, it looks like the court order incorrectly demanded the blocking of "http-redirection-a.dnsmadeeasy.com", a HTTP redirector operated by the DNS operator DNSMadeEasy.

<blockquote>The fact that the court could issue an order which didn’t see this coming and that the ISPs would act on it without checking that what they were doing was sensible is, in my opinion, extremely worrying.</blockquote>
]]></description>
<dc:subject>overblocking censorship org uk sky be-broadband virgin-media dnsmadeeasy filtering premier-league false-positives isps</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:d38ce8b8c67f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:overblocking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:censorship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:org"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:uk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:sky"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:be-broadband"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:virgin-media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:dnsmadeeasy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:premier-league"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:false-positives"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:isps"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/filters-not-a-silver-bullet-that-will-stop-perverts-warns-interpol-chief-29470817.html">
    <title>Filters 'not a silver bullet' that will stop perverts, warns Interpol chief - Independent.ie</title>
    <dc:date>2013-08-05T21:41:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/filters-not-a-silver-bullet-that-will-stop-perverts-warns-interpol-chief-29470817.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Sunday Independent interview with Interpol assistant director Mick Moran:

<blockquote>Moran spoke out after child welfare organisations here called on the Government to follow the UK's example by placing anti-pornography filters on Irish home broadband connections. The Irish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children argued that pornography was damaging to young children and should be removed from their line of sight.

But Moran warned this would only lull parents into a false sense of security.  "If we imagine the access people had to porn in the past – that access is now complete and total. They have access to the most horrific material out there.  We now need to focus on parental responsibility about how kids are using the internet."</blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>mick-moran cam interpol policing ispcc filtering parenting children broadband</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:f2b71c6f260c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:mick-moran"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:cam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:interpol"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:policing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ispcc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:parenting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:children"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:broadband"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://status.python.org/incidents/jj8d7xn41hr5">
    <title>Python Infrastructure Status - SSL Verification Errors on PyPI</title>
    <dc:date>2013-07-31T10:07:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://status.python.org/incidents/jj8d7xn41hr5</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>There appears to be a problem affecting a number of users where SSL verification errors will be shown saying "pypi.python.org" does not match "addvocate.com".  As Best we can tell this appears to be related to the ISP. It seems to be affecting folks using O2 or O2 related companies. We've also reports of it affecting people using Free.

Cause appears to be one of the IP addresses returned in the Geo DNS for Europe returning a certificate for addvocate.com. It's not clear at this time *why* that IP address is returning a certificate for addvocate.com.</blockquote>

Turned out to be a routing loop in the fast.ly London POP (via Mick Twomey)]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:micktwomey o2 censorship filtering internet ssl tls pypi python geodns pki</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:8b4fd4083f6e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:via:micktwomey"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:o2"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:censorship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ssl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:tls"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:pypi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:python"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:geodns"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:pki"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://store.opendns.com/familyshield/setup/device/router">
    <title>Setting up FamilyShield</title>
    <dc:date>2013-07-30T15:30:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://store.opendns.com/familyshield/setup/device/router</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[OpenDNS's simple DNS-based blocking of dodgy content.  Will need to set this up on the home router now that the kids are surfing...]]></description>
<dc:subject>opendns dns blocking filtering home porn familyshield</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:63e666109f64/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:opendns"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:dns"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:blocking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:home"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:porn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:familyshield"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://technology.ie/isp-association-responds-to-porn-filtering-debacle/">
    <title>ISPAI Responds to Porn Filtering Debacle</title>
    <dc:date>2013-07-29T13:00:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://technology.ie/isp-association-responds-to-porn-filtering-debacle/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Quite a strong statement:

<blockquote>The issue of access to age-inappropriate content is not a new matter and it is important not to have “knee-jerk” reactions which don’t solve the perceived problem and have major implications for the public’s right to access information in general. Notably the European Commission, as stated by vice-president Nellie Kroes [jm: sic], has come out strongly against blocking of the Internet, seeing it as an important platform for freedom of speech and she intends to “guarantee access without restriction.”  We in Ireland would do well to consider carefully the impact that any rash adoption or attempted copying of UK measures might have here in the light of current and future EU legislation and policy.</blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>ispai filtering overblocking david-cameron porn internet ireland politics blocking web uk</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:d55e7eef2506/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ispai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:overblocking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:david-cameron"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:porn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ireland"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:blocking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:uk"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-23452097">
    <title>BBC News - Chinese firm Huawei controls net filter praised by PM</title>
    <dc:date>2013-07-26T13:26:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-23452097</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Talk Talk's porn-filtering, system praised by David Cameron in the UK as a model for porn filtering for the country's ISPs, is operated by Huawei.  Of course, there's no possible problems with allowing Huawei, with its alleged close ties to the Chinese government, operate a state-wide internet censorship system in the UK without any functioning oversight, right? ;)

Also worth noting: all TalkTalk traffic passes through the Huawei filtering infrastructure, even when the customer has "opted in".]]></description>
<dc:subject>huawei talk-talk oversight overblocking politics china uk david-cameron filtering censorship</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:2c4e0c1973c4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:huawei"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:talk-talk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:oversight"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:overblocking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:china"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:uk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:david-cameron"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:censorship"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/rabbitte-ignores-calls-for-state-role-in-blocking-online-porn-29443620.html">
    <title>Irish Comms Minister Pat Rabbitte ignores calls for State role in blocking online porn</title>
    <dc:date>2013-07-24T09:42:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/rabbitte-ignores-calls-for-state-role-in-blocking-online-porn-29443620.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Good call.

<blockquote>Mr Rabbitte says that legal concerns attached to mandatory filters, as well as a fear of imposing censorship, have persuaded him against trying to force ISPs to impose mandatory pornography-blocking internet filters.  "I remain to be convinced that blanket censorship or a default-on blocker is the correct or workable response," he said.  "Even if it were possible to ensure that such measures were not easily circumvented or didn't inadvertently block perfectly acceptable content, the principled question of whether the State should be encouraging service providers to filter or block content to all users, regardless of whether there are children resident, would still arise."</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>pat-rabbitte internet filtering censorship blocking porn overblocking default-on isps ireland</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:f88e7ebf9e1c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:pat-rabbitte"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:censorship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:blocking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:porn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:overblocking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:default-on"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:isps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ireland"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130705/19340023726/3d-printer-manufacturer-creates-software-filter-to-prevent-firearm-printing.shtml">
    <title>3D-Printer Manufacturer Creates Software Filter To Prevent Firearm Printing</title>
    <dc:date>2013-07-23T14:22:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130705/19340023726/3d-printer-manufacturer-creates-software-filter-to-prevent-firearm-printing.shtml</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA['[Create It REAL], which sells 3D printer component parts and software, recently announced that it has come up with a firearm component detection algorithm that will give 3D printers the option to block any gun parts. The software compares each component a user is trying to print with a database of potential firearms parts, and shuts down the modeling software if it senses the user is trying to make a gun.']]></description>
<dc:subject>blocklists filtering guns weapons 3d-printing future firearms</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:7dffc125d7ca/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:blocklists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:guns"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:weapons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:3d-printing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:future"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:firearms"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://boingboing.net/2013/07/22/uk-internet-censorship-plan-no.html">
    <title>UK Internet censorship plan no less stupid than it was last year - Boing Boing</title>
    <dc:date>2013-07-23T09:56:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://boingboing.net/2013/07/22/uk-internet-censorship-plan-no.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Cory Doctorow's long list of articles describing how the UK's censorware-for-all plan is going to fail.  I like this bit:

<blockquote>When we argued our case to the vendor's representative, he was categorical: any nudity, anywhere on [Boing Boing], makes it into a "nudity site" for the purposes of blocking. The vendor went so far as to state that a single image of Michelangelo's David, on one page among hundreds of thousands on a site, would be sufficient grounds for a nudity classification.  I suspect that none of the censorship advocates in the Lords understand that the offshore commercial operators they're proposing to put in charge of the nation's information access apply this kind of homeopathic standard to objectionable material.</blockquote>

I guess this means the Daily Mail will be similarly classified as containing "nudity" and blocked, given their smut column on every page?]]></description>
<dc:subject>daily-mail fail censorship censorware boing-boing michelangelo sculpture nudity uk politics filtering overblocking web internet</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:1a34ea5b44c1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:daily-mail"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:fail"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:censorship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:censorware"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:boing-boing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:michelangelo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:sculpture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:nudity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:uk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:overblocking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:internet"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://torrentfreak.com/porn-to-be-blocked-in-the-uk-whats-new-say-pirate-bay-users-130722/">
    <title>Porn to be Blocked in the UK – “What’s new?” Say Pirate Bay Users | TorrentFreak</title>
    <dc:date>2013-07-22T14:17:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://torrentfreak.com/porn-to-be-blocked-in-the-uk-whats-new-say-pirate-bay-users-130722/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>It seems likely that the ISPs will implement a system similar to the one currently being used by TalkTalk, as the prime minister will specifically single the ISP out for praise in his speech. TalkTalk’s HomeSafe is a system which filters out URLs based on a remote blocklist provided and maintained by…. well, no one quite knows. This is worrying since when things don’t go quite to plan there’s no one to complain to.

As previously reported, when TalkTalk customers are asked whether they want to block file-sharing sites, TorrentFreak.com is rendered inaccessible. Despite our pleas and complaints that we are a news resource, the company said it would not remove us from their blocklist. We doubt we’re the only ones being silenced.</blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>talktalk blocking uk isps torrentfreak politics filtering david-cameron porn overblocking</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:3d58e647fabd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:talktalk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:blocking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:uk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:isps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:torrentfreak"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:david-cameron"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:porn"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:overblocking"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://torrentfreak.com/how-the-copyright-industry-pushed-for-internet-surveillance-130630/">
    <title>How The Copyright Industry Pushed For Internet Surveillance | TorrentFreak</title>
    <dc:date>2013-07-01T09:37:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://torrentfreak.com/how-the-copyright-industry-pushed-for-internet-surveillance-130630/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Rick Falkvinge with a good point:

<blockquote>The reason for the copyright industry to push for surveillance is simple: any digital communications channel can be used for private conversation, but it can also be used to share culture and knowledge that is under copyright monopoly. In order to tell which communications is which, you must sort all of it – and to do that, you must look at all of it.  In other words, if enforcing the copyright monopoly is your priority, you need to kill privacy, and specifically anonymity and secrecy of correspondence. </blockquote>

This was exactly my biggest worry -- a side-effect of effective copyright filtering is the creation of infrastructure for online oppression by the state.]]></description>
<dc:subject>copyright privacy state data-protection rick-falkvinge copyfight internet filtering surveillance anonymity</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:dc056a81c09b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:state"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:data-protection"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:rick-falkvinge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:copyfight"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:surveillance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anonymity"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://blog.pinboard.in/2013/06/persuading_david_simon/">
    <title>Persuading David Simon (Pinboard Blog)</title>
    <dc:date>2013-06-17T14:13:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://blog.pinboard.in/2013/06/persuading_david_simon/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Maciej Ceglowski with a strongly-argued rebuttal of David Simon's post about the NSA's PRISM.  This point in particular is key:

<blockquote>The point is, you don't need human investigators to find leads, you can have the algorithms do it [based on the call graph or network of who-calls-who]. They will find people of interest, assemble the watch lists, and flag whomever you like for further tracking. And since the number of actual terrorists is very, very, very small, the output of these algorithms will consist overwhelmingly of false positives.</blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>false-positives maciej privacy security nsa prism david-simon accuracy big-data filtering anti-spam</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:5fb59daa02a0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:false-positives"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:maciej"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:security"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:nsa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:prism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:david-simon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:accuracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:big-data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://torrentfreak.com/uk-isps-secretly-start-blocking-torrent-site-proxies-130611/">
    <title>UK ISPs Secretly Start Blocking Torrent Site Proxies | TorrentFreak</title>
    <dc:date>2013-06-15T11:58:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://torrentfreak.com/uk-isps-secretly-start-blocking-torrent-site-proxies-130611/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The next step of cat-and-mouse.  Let's see what the pirate sites do next...

<blockquote>The blocking orders are intended to deter online piracy and were requested by the music industry group BPI on behalf of a variety of major labels. Thus far they’ve managed to block access to The Pirate Bay, Kat.ph, H33T and Fenopy, and preparations are being made to add many others.

The effectiveness of these initial measures has been called into doubt, as they are relatively easy to bypass. For example, in response to the blockades hundreds of proxy sites popped up, allowing subscribers to reach the prohibited sites via a detour.
However, as of this week these proxies are also covered by the same blocklist they aim to circumvent, without a new court ruling.

The High Court orders give music industry group BPI the authority to add sites to the blocklist without oversight. Until now some small changes have been made, mostly in response to The Pirate Bay’s domain hopping endeavors, but with the latest blocklist update a whole new range of websites is being targeted.</blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>bittorrent blocking filesharing copyright bpi piracy pirate-bay proxies fenopy kat.ph h33t filtering uk</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:04f514e86341/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:bittorrent"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:blocking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filesharing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:bpi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:piracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:pirate-bay"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:proxies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:fenopy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:kat.ph"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:h33t"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:uk"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/music-firms-secure-orders-blocking-access-to-pirate-bay-1.1425810">
    <title>Music firms secure orders blocking access to Pirate Bay - Crime &amp; Law News from Ireland &amp; Abroad | The Irish Times - Wed, Jun 12, 2013</title>
    <dc:date>2013-06-12T11:36:30+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/music-firms-secure-orders-blocking-access-to-pirate-bay-1.1425810</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Four major music companies have secured court orders requiring six internet service providers to block access by subscribers to various Pirate Bay websites within some 30 days in a bid to prevent illegal downloading of copyright music and other material. [...]

Today, Mr Justice Brian McGovern said he was satisfied to make the order in circumstances including that new copyright laws here and in the EU permitted such orders to be made. He said he fully agreed with a previous High Court judge who had said he would make such blocking orders if the law permitted and noted the law now allowed for such orders. The form of the orders means the music companies will not have to make fresh applications to court if Pirate Bay changes its location on the internet.</blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>pirate-bay blocking filtering internet ireland upc eircom vodafone digiweb three imagine o2 copyright</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:49e3f79acd6c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:pirate-bay"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:blocking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ireland"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:upc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:eircom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:vodafone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:digiweb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:three"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:imagine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:o2"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:copyright"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://delimiter.com.au/2013/05/15/interpol-filter-scope-creep-asic-ordering-unilateral-website-blocks/">
    <title>Interpol filter scope creep: ASIC ordering unilateral website blocks</title>
    <dc:date>2013-05-16T13:32:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://delimiter.com.au/2013/05/15/interpol-filter-scope-creep-asic-ordering-unilateral-website-blocks/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Bloody hell.  This is stupidity of the highest order, and a canonical example of "filter creep" by a government -- secret state censorship of 1200 websites due to a single investment scam site.

<blockquote>
The Federal Government has confirmed its financial regulator has started requiring Australian Internet service providers to block websites suspected of providing fraudulent financial opportunities, in a move which appears to also open the door for other government agencies to unilaterally block sites they deem questionable in their own portfolios.

The instrument through which the ISPs are blocking the Interpol list of sites is Section 313 of the Telecommunications Act. Under the Act, the Australian Federal Police is allowed to issue notices to telcos asking for reasonable assistance in upholding the law.  [...] Tonight Senator Conroy’s office revealed that the incident that resulted in Melbourne Free University and more than a thousand other sites being blocked originated from a different source — financial regulator the Australian Securities and Investment Commission.

On 22 March this year, ASIC issued a media release warning consumers about the activities of a cold-calling investment scam using the name ‘Global Capital Wealth’, which ASIC said was operating several fraudulent websites — www.globalcapitalwealth.com and www.globalcapitalaustralia.com. In its release on that date, ASIC stated: “ASIC has already blocked access to these websites.”
</blockquote>
]]></description>
<dc:subject>scams australia filtering filter-creep false-positives isps asic fraud secrecy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:b46809e3182b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:scams"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:australia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filter-creep"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:false-positives"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:isps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:asic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:fraud"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:secrecy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://delimiter.com.au/2013/05/10/did-conroys-afp-filter-wrongly-block-1200-sites/">
    <title>Did Conroy’s AFP filter wrongly block 1,200 sites?</title>
    <dc:date>2013-05-14T20:33:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://delimiter.com.au/2013/05/10/did-conroys-afp-filter-wrongly-block-1200-sites/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Looks like many Aussie network operators were legally required to block 1,200 websites (presumably, one target and 1199 false positives), in secret.

Quoting http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/2013-April/017993.html : "You get a notice to
block.  You block or either get fined, go to jail or lose your carrier
licence.  It is a blunt instrument and it is a condition of being at 'the
big boys table' i.e. you're a carrier or a carriage service provider."]]></description>
<dc:subject>australia law afp filtering internet blocking censorship secret eff</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:92e56117ae4f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:australia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:afp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:blocking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:censorship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:secret"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:eff"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krebsonsecurity.com/2012/06/a-closer-look-recent-email-based-malware-attacks/">
    <title>A Closer Look: Email-Based Malware Attacks</title>
    <dc:date>2012-06-21T13:00:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krebsonsecurity.com/2012/06/a-closer-look-recent-email-based-malware-attacks/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA['The average detection rate for these samples was 24.47 percent, while the median detection rate was just 19 percent.'  That is *atrocious*.  (via Tony Finch)]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:fanf fail malware filtering av smtp email viruses</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:0e1513006509/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:via:fanf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:fail"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:malware"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:av"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:smtp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:email"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:viruses"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://about.piratereverse.info/proxy/">
    <title>The Hydra Bay</title>
    <dc:date>2012-06-20T08:43:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://about.piratereverse.info/proxy/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["How to set up a Pirate Bay proxy".  Step-by-step instructions for MacOS and Linux on how to run a fully-functional reverse proxy for The Pirate Bay -- in other words, provide a duplicate URL for users to circumvent ISP blocks of TPB.  http://about.piratereverse.info/proxy/list.html contains about a hundred others.  See also  http://unblockedpiratebay.com/ for a standalone PHP script which does the same (albeit a little less efficiently).

A good demonstration of how futile filtering techniques like IP or domain name blocks are, when applied to a popular website like TPB.]]></description>
<dc:subject>piratebay filtering censorship copyright php proxies reverse-proxies ip-blocking dns-blocking</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:24091b301c0b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:piratebay"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:censorship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:proxies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:reverse-proxies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ip-blocking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:dns-blocking"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2012/0619/1224318195843.html#.T-B7cvJ5Qto.twitter">
    <title>Issue of web access raises hackles at conference - The Irish Times - Tue, Jun 19, 2012</title>
    <dc:date>2012-06-19T15:37:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2012/0619/1224318195843.html#.T-B7cvJ5Qto.twitter</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA['Prof Michael O’Flaherty, the vice-chairman of the UN Human Rights Committee, told the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) conference on internet freedom that the rights of copyright holders to make a living had to be balanced with the right to freedom of expression.'  'THE PUNISHMENT for breakers of the “three strikes” illegal download rule was “exceptionally disproportionate” [...] The internet was a vehicle for a wide range of human rights so excluding someone from it was an “extraordinary penalty”.']]></description>
<dc:subject>osce coverage unhrc conferences dublin copyright freedom internet censorship filtering</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:890a5673ba75/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:osce"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:coverage"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:unhrc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:conferences"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:dublin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:freedom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:censorship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://torrentfreak.com/google-facebook-and-8000-other-sites-accidentally-dns-blocked-120302/">
    <title>Danish Police Censor Google, Facebook and 8,000 Other Sites by Accident | TorrentFreak</title>
    <dc:date>2012-03-02T18:09:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://torrentfreak.com/google-facebook-and-8000-other-sites-accidentally-dns-blocked-120302/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA['Lundberg said that his organization was sorry for the mistake and has now adopted a new system whereby blocked sites have to now be approved by two employees instead of one, although why that was not the case already for such a serious process is up for debate.  The other question is how at the flick of a switch do 8,000 sites suddenly get added to a blacklist – for whatever reason – without any kind of oversight. Denmark’s IT-Political Association is critical and has called for ISPs to cease cooperation with the voluntary scheme which operates without any kind of judicial review. “Today’s story shows that the police are not able to secure against manual errors that could escalate into something that actually works as a ‘kill switch’ for the Internet,” the group said in a statement.']]></description>
<dc:subject>censorship denmark internet filtering review google facebook blocking</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:4192f7fe3add/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:censorship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:denmark"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:review"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:facebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:blocking"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.tjmcintyre.com/2012/01/adrian-weckler-confims-that-irelands.html">
    <title>Adrian Weckler confims that &quot;Ireland's SOPA&quot; will be vague and open-ended</title>
    <dc:date>2012-01-22T21:14:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.tjmcintyre.com/2012/01/adrian-weckler-confims-that-irelands.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA['The clear implication from [Adrian's] interview with Sean Sherlock is that the proposed measures will be lacking in any real detail, leaving it entirely up to the judges as to what types of blocking might emerge. (Possibly going beyond web blocking to also target hosting and other services.) This ambiguity -- as well as jeopardising fundamental rights -- will create intolerable uncertainty for businesses such as Google who might find themselves at risk of business threatening and unpredictable injunctions and will certainly deter others from setting up in Ireland.'  -- this is much, much worse than I thought, particularly given the level of technical knowledge among Ireland's judges (if Mr. Justice Charleton's performance in EMI v. UPC is anything to go by).]]></description>
<dc:subject>sopa ireland law filesharing piracy internet filtering blocking</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:bcfa78080292/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:sopa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ireland"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filesharing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:piracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:blocking"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://grepular.com/Punching_through_The_Great_Firewall_of_TMobile">
    <title>Punching through The Great Firewall of T-Mobile</title>
    <dc:date>2012-01-05T22:41:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://grepular.com/Punching_through_The_Great_Firewall_of_TMobile</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[well, this is bizarre -- it seems T-Mobile UK are blocking encrypted email submission and OpenVPN traffic in their mobile internet access products.  Why?  Who knows -- but at least filtering RST packets evades the block, as in the Great Firewall of China]]></description>
<dc:subject>china filtering rst internet iptables t-mobile uk payg mobile-internet</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:c53894cccffc/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:china"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:rst"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:iptables"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:t-mobile"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:uk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:payg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:mobile-internet"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://publicaffairs.linx.net/news/?p=6253">
    <title>LINX Public Affairs » Scarlet wins in European Court</title>
    <dc:date>2011-11-26T09:22:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://publicaffairs.linx.net/news/?p=6253</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA['The Court judgement therefore goes well beyond saying what a court may decide, by means of an injunction: it also sets out the limits of Member States’ powers to legislate to draft ISPs as copyright police. It will be a crucial precedent in future arguments about the Digital Economy Act, in the UK, HADOPI in France, various blocking requirements in Italy, and numerous other schemes across the EU.  As victories for ISPs in the copyright wars go, this one was comprehensive. It will be seen as a landmark ruling for years to come.'  woot]]></description>
<dc:subject>linx scarlet isps hadopi eu privacy filtering copyright irma filesharing</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:a4cc97dd27ca/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:linx"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:scarlet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:isps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:hadopi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:eu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:irma"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filesharing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://petermblair.com/fbl-n-gram-analyzer/">
    <title>feedback loop n-gram analyzer</title>
    <dc:date>2011-09-29T21:10:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://petermblair.com/fbl-n-gram-analyzer/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA['a simple parser of ARF compliant FBL complaints, which normalizes the email complaints and generates a 6-tuple n-gram version of the message. These n-grams are stored in a Redis database, keyed by the file in which they can be found. An inverse index also exists that allow you to find all messages containing a particular n-gram word.'
]]></description>
<dc:subject>anti-spam spam fbl feedback filtering n-grams similarity hashing redis searching</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:00bea3b79665/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:fbl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:feedback"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:n-grams"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:similarity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:hashing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:redis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:searching"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://en.rsf.org/turkey-online-censorship-now-bordering-on-29-04-2011,40194.html">
    <title>Online censorship now bordering on the ridiculous in Turkey - Reporters Without Borders</title>
    <dc:date>2011-04-29T20:04:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://en.rsf.org/turkey-online-censorship-now-bordering-on-29-04-2011,40194.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA['access to websites containing words on the list would in theory be suspended and it would be impossible to create new ones containing them. However, it is not clear how and to what extent the directive will be implemented in practice. The TIB could decide to suppress or block pages for just one blacklisted word.  ... The list, which borders on the ridiculous, includes words such as “etek” (skirt), “baldiz” (sister-in-law) and “hayvan” (animals). It poses serious problems for access to online information. If words such as “free” and “pic” are censored, countless references to freedom and everyday photos will be eliminated from the Turkish Internet.'  Incredible (via Danny)]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:mala repression internet turkey censorship filtering false-positives</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:5decbddf835a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:via:mala"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:repression"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:turkey"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:censorship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:false-positives"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2456206">
    <title>Virgin and NTL filtering fail</title>
    <dc:date>2011-04-18T22:40:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2456206</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA['Virgin and NTL [in the UK] blocked [del.icio.us] for years' due to a false positive -- joshua]]></description>
<dc:subject>del.icio.us false-positives filtering uk isps virgin ntl fail via:hackernews</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:4aa4e638a352/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:del.icio.us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:false-positives"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:uk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:isps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:virgin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ntl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:fail"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:via:hackernews"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://obriend.info/2011/03/29/doing-the-right-thing/">
    <title>Daragh O'Brien on the Gardai's plans to force ISPs to implement IP filtering</title>
    <dc:date>2011-03-29T15:54:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://obriend.info/2011/03/29/doing-the-right-thing/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA['Internet blocking is ineffective. The current proposal lacks sufficient checks and balances, and may even require ISPs and telcos to break other laws to comply. It will inevitably result in innocents being tarred as offenders. Data Protection principles (such as “Adequate, Relevant, and Not Excessive” are being blatantly ignored to implement an ineffective solution.  Far better is to shut down the shop by removing the images at source and invest time, energy, and resources into a more transparent effort to manage this issue.'  well said]]></description>
<dc:subject>internet filtering censorship blocking gardai isps ireland data-protection privacy</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:2a012333ede3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:censorship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:blocking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:gardai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:isps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ireland"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:data-protection"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:privacy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.digitalrights.ie/2011/03/29/garda-plans-to-introduce-web-blocking-in-ireland/">
    <title>Digital Rights Ireland » Garda plans to introduce web blocking in Ireland</title>
    <dc:date>2011-03-29T12:28:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.digitalrights.ie/2011/03/29/garda-plans-to-introduce-web-blocking-in-ireland/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA['Last year we revealed that the Department of Justice was working on secret plans to introduce internet filtering in Ireland. Now, despite a complete lack of any legislation, public consultation or democratic discussion, these plans have moved to the implementation stage.'  wtf, this is just appalling lack of oversight]]></description>
<dc:subject>gardai blocking filtering ireland politics legislation oversight isps ispai alto censorship eff</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:1e0e7241c2d5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:gardai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:blocking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ireland"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:legislation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:oversight"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:isps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ispai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:alto"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:censorship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:eff"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>