<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (jm)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from jm</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://krebsonsecurity.com/2025/09/gop-cries-censorship-over-spam-filters-that-work/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://lwn.net/Articles/769917/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://motherboard.vice.com/en_uk/read/gchqs-spam-problem"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://boingboing.net/2016/02/02/doxxing-sherlock-3.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://iconewsblog.wordpress.com/2014/08/12/an-effective-regulator-needs-effective-powers/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dataprotection.ie/documents/legal/SI336of2011.pdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://moderncrypto.org/mail-archive/messaging/2014/000780.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://blog.twitter.com/2014/fighting-spam-with-botmaker"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/next-clothing-retailer-loses-appeal-over-100-fine-in-spam-case-1.1730846#.UyohKRjbLjY.twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://krebsonsecurity.com/2013/11/spam-friendly-registrar-dynamic-dolphin-shuttered/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.slideshare.net/ashleywbrown/storm-at-spiderio-london-storm-meetup-20130618"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://twitter.com/tjmcintyre/statuses/390034109630009344"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jl.ly/Email/spamarrest.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://blog.pinboard.in/2013/06/persuading_david_simon/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.irishtimes.com/business/sectors/technology/spamalot-reigns-the-spoils-of-ireland-s-eu-kingship-1.1426389#.UbmEcGHAdss.twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.huntonprivacyblog.com/2013/06/articles/council-of-the-european-union-releases-draft-compromise-text-on-the-proposed-eu-data-protection-regulation/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dpreform.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/edri-analysis-of-libe-ams.pdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.privacysurgeon.org/blog/incision/eu-council-deals-killer-blow-to-privacy-reforms/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jeremydhoon.github.com/2013/03/19/abusing-hash-kernels-for-wildly-unprincipled-machine-learning/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.slideshare.net/jasontrost/flo-con-clairvoyant-squirrel-final"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.david-andrzejewski.com/machine-learning/practical-machine-learning-tricks-from-the-kdd-2011-best-industry-paper/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.wired.com/underwire/2012/04/press-enter-to-execute/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.virusbtn.com/news/2011/11_17.xml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://petermblair.com/fbl-n-gram-analyzer/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2011/02/28/uk-government-agency-wants-your-email-scams-but-is-doing-it-the-right-way/#IDComment131650035"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.spamtrackers.eu/wiki/index.php/Main_Page"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.dnswl.org/news/archives/18-Changes-at-dnswl.org.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.spamhauswhitelist.com/en/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jam-software.com/spamassassin/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ceas.cc/2010/papers/Paper%2019.pdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.herald.ie/national-news/tesco-fined-for-sending-junk-email-by-andrew-phelan-2256532.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://developer.yahoo.net/blogs/hadoop/2010/06/hadoop_and_yahoo_maill_anti_sp.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+YDNHadoop+%28Hadoop+and+Distributed+Computing+at+Yahoo%21%29"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8528672.stm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://mailchannels.com/blog/?p=117"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.spamhaus.org/news.lasso?article=655"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5782"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.insideview.ie/irisheyes/2010/02/analysing-electronic-forensics-evidence.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://secure.grepular.com/Spamalyser_Lives"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/the-apache-software-foundation-announces-apache-spamassassin-version-330-82677727.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.icir.org/christian/publications.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.annaliviaford.com/2010/01/postmaster-team-update.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.darkreading.com/securityservices/security/app-security/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=220900608"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/9xrn1/iama_person_who_sends_spam_email_for_a_living_ama/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jules.fm/Logbook/files/anti-spear-phishing.html"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://krebsonsecurity.com/2025/09/gop-cries-censorship-over-spam-filters-that-work/">
    <title>GOP Cries Censorship Over Spam Filters That Work</title>
    <dc:date>2025-09-09T11:48:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://krebsonsecurity.com/2025/09/gop-cries-censorship-over-spam-filters-that-work/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[LOL.  Republican political email campaigns (like WinRed) keep getting marked as spam, because they're using shitty lists:

<blockquote>
Tossavainen told KrebsOnSecurity that WinRed’s emails hit its spamtraps in the .com, .net, and .org space far more frequently than do fundraising emails sent by ActBlue. Koli-Lõks published a graph of the stark disparity in spamtrap activity for WinRed versus ActBlue, showing a nearly fourfold increase in spamtrap hits from WinRed emails in the final week of July 2025.</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>spam anti-spam spamtraps winred us-politics gop republicans filtering</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:677abd183e10/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spamtraps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:winred"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:us-politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:gop"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:republicans"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://lwn.net/Articles/769917/">
    <title>SpamAssassin is back [LWN.net]</title>
    <dc:date>2018-11-15T14:52:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://lwn.net/Articles/769917/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The SpamAssassin 3.4.2 release was the first from that project in well over three years. At the 2018 Open Source Summit Europe, Giovanni Bechis talked about that release and those that will be coming in the near future. It would seem that, after an extended period of quiet, the SpamAssassin project is back and has rededicated itself to the task of keeping junk out of our inboxes.</blockquote>

This is good to see!  Also, newsy thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18458212]]></description>
<dc:subject>spamassassin open-source oss anti-spam</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:ad7b21874c70/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spamassassin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:open-source"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:oss"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://motherboard.vice.com/en_uk/read/gchqs-spam-problem">
    <title>GCHQ's Spam Problem</title>
    <dc:date>2016-02-05T13:15:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://motherboard.vice.com/en_uk/read/gchqs-spam-problem</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA['“Spam emails are a large proportion of emails seen in SIGINT [signals intelligence],” reads part of a dense document from the Snowden archive, published by Boing Boing on Tuesday. “GCHQ would like to reduce the impact of spam emails on data storage, processing and analysis.”'  (circa 2011).  Steganography, anyone?  (via Tony Finch)]]></description>
<dc:subject>spam anti-spam gchq funny boing-boing sigint snowden surveillance</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:9191635e58f3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:gchq"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:funny"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:boing-boing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:sigint"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:snowden"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:surveillance"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://boingboing.net/2016/02/02/doxxing-sherlock-3.html">
    <title>Exclusive: Snowden intelligence docs reveal UK spooks' malware checklist / Boing Boing</title>
    <dc:date>2016-02-03T14:02:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://boingboing.net/2016/02/02/doxxing-sherlock-3.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This is an excellent essay from Cory Doctorow on mass surveillance in the post-Snowden era, and the difference between HUMINT and SIGINT.  So much good stuff, including this (new to me) cite for, "Goodhart's law", on secrecy as it affects adversarial classification:

<blockquote>The problem with this is that once you accept this framing, and note the happy coincidence that your paymasters just happen to have found a way to spy on everyone, the conclusion is obvious: just mine all of the data, from everyone to everyone, and use an algorithm to figure out who’s guilty.  The bad guys have a Modus Operandi, as anyone who’s watched a cop show knows. Find the MO, turn it into a data fingerprint, and you can just sort the firehose’s output into ”terrorist-ish” and ”unterrorist-ish.”

Once you accept this premise, then it’s equally obvious that the whole methodology has to be kept from scrutiny. If you’re depending on three ”tells” as indicators of terrorist planning, the terrorists will figure out how to plan their attacks without doing those three things.

This even has a name: Goodhart's law. "When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure." Google started out by gauging a web page’s importance by counting the number of links they could find to it. This worked well before they told people what they were doing. Once getting a page ranked by Google became important, unscrupulous people set up dummy sites (“link-farms”) with lots of links pointing at their pages.</blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>adversarial-classification classification surveillance nsa gchq cory-doctorow privacy snooping goodharts-law google anti-spam filtering spying snowden</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:4d0273cfe1c7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:adversarial-classification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:classification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:surveillance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:nsa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:gchq"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:cory-doctorow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:snooping"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:goodharts-law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spying"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:snowden"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://iconewsblog.wordpress.com/2014/08/12/an-effective-regulator-needs-effective-powers/">
    <title>UK's ICO spam regulator even more toothless now</title>
    <dc:date>2014-09-16T09:26:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://iconewsblog.wordpress.com/2014/08/12/an-effective-regulator-needs-effective-powers/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>We appealed this decision, but on June 2014 the Upper Tribunal agreed with the First-tier Tribunal, cancelling our monetary penalty notice against Niebel and McNeish, and largely rendering our power to issue fines for breaches of PECR involving spam texts redundant.</blockquote>

This is pretty terrible. The UK appears to have the weakest anti-spam regime in Europe due to the lack of powers given to ICO.]]></description>
<dc:subject>ico anti-spam uk law regulation spam sms</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:d733c758b0b7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ico"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:uk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:regulation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:sms"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dataprotection.ie/documents/legal/SI336of2011.pdf">
    <title>SI336 - current Irish anti-spam law</title>
    <dc:date>2014-09-08T10:27:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://dataprotection.ie/documents/legal/SI336of2011.pdf</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[ "European Communities (Electronic Communications Networks and Services) (Privacy and Electronic Communications) Regulations 2011".  Spam is covered under 13.1, "Unsolicited communications", on page 16 of this PDF]]></description>
<dc:subject>spam anti-spam law ireland eu ec sms email si336 privacy regulation</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:c2c1c676b86d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ireland"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:eu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ec"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:sms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:email"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:si336"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:regulation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://moderncrypto.org/mail-archive/messaging/2014/000780.html">
    <title>'The very first release of Gmail simply used spamassassin on the backend'</title>
    <dc:date>2014-09-06T22:42:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://moderncrypto.org/mail-archive/messaging/2014/000780.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Excellent. Confirming what I'd heard from a few other sources, too ;)

This is a well-written history of the anti-spam war so far, from Mike Hearn, writing with the Google/Gmail point of view:

<blockquote>
Brief note about my background, to establish credentials:  I worked at
Google for about 7.5 years. For about 4.5 of those I worked on the Gmail
abuse team, which is very tightly linked with the spam team (they use the
same software, share the same on-call rotations etc).
</blockquote>

Reading this kind of stuff is awesome for me, since it's a nice picture of a fun problem to work on -- the Gmail team took the right ideas about how to fight spam, and scaled them up to the 10s-of-millions DAU mark. Nicely done.

The second half is some interesting musings on end-to-end encrypted communications and how it would deal with spam. Worth a read...]]></description>
<dc:subject>gmail google spam anti-spam filtering spamassassin history</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:f10b10591ff0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:gmail"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spamassassin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:history"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://blog.twitter.com/2014/fighting-spam-with-botmaker">
    <title>Fighting spam with BotMaker</title>
    <dc:date>2014-08-22T15:13:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://blog.twitter.com/2014/fighting-spam-with-botmaker</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Some vague details of the antispam system in use at Twitter.

<blockquote>The main challenges in supporting this type of system are evaluating rules with low enough latency that they can run on the write path for Twitter’s main features (i.e., Tweets, Retweets, favorites, follows and messages), supporting computationally intense machine learning based rules, and providing Twitter engineers with the ability to modify and create new rules instantaneously.</blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>spam realtime scaling twitter anti-spam botmaker rules</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:608530e05a81/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:realtime"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:scaling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:botmaker"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:rules"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/next-clothing-retailer-loses-appeal-over-100-fine-in-spam-case-1.1730846#.UyohKRjbLjY.twitter">
    <title>Next clothing retailer loses appeal over €100 fine in ‘spam’ case - Crime &amp; Law News from Ireland &amp; Abroad | The Irish Times - Wed, Mar 19, 2014</title>
    <dc:date>2014-03-20T10:32:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/next-clothing-retailer-loses-appeal-over-100-fine-in-spam-case-1.1730846#.UyohKRjbLjY.twitter</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[as TJ McIntyre noted: '€100 fine for a repeat spammer. Data Protection Commissioner calls this "strong protection". With a straight face.'

Next will doubtless fork over the 100 Euros out of the petty cash drawer, then carry on regardless. This isn't a useful fine. What a farce...]]></description>
<dc:subject>cheap farce dpc data-protection privacy anti-spam next spam convictions fines ireland</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:223f349a1567/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:cheap"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:farce"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:dpc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:data-protection"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:next"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:convictions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:fines"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ireland"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://krebsonsecurity.com/2013/11/spam-friendly-registrar-dynamic-dolphin-shuttered/">
    <title>Spam-Friendly Registrar ‘Dynamic Dolphin’ Shuttered</title>
    <dc:date>2013-11-25T15:58:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://krebsonsecurity.com/2013/11/spam-friendly-registrar-dynamic-dolphin-shuttered/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[yay (via Tony Finch)]]></description>
<dc:subject>dynamic-dolphin registrars dns spam scott-richter anti-spam brian-krebs</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:6e64ea7e2de6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:dynamic-dolphin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:registrars"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:dns"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:scott-richter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:brian-krebs"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.slideshare.net/ashleywbrown/storm-at-spiderio-london-storm-meetup-20130618">
    <title>Storm at spider.io - London Storm Meetup 2013-06-18</title>
    <dc:date>2013-10-29T11:18:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.slideshare.net/ashleywbrown/storm-at-spiderio-london-storm-meetup-20130618</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Not just a Storm success story.  Interesting slides indicating where a startup *stopped* using Storm as realtime wasn't useful to their customers]]></description>
<dc:subject>storm realtime hadoop cascading python cep spider.io anti-spam events architecture distcomp low-latency slides rabbitmq</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:3fcd16536c76/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:storm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:realtime"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:hadoop"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:cascading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:python"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:cep"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spider.io"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:events"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:architecture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:distcomp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:low-latency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:slides"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:rabbitmq"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://twitter.com/tjmcintyre/statuses/390034109630009344">
    <title>Even the NSA is finding it hard to cope with spam</title>
    <dc:date>2013-10-15T14:32:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://twitter.com/tjmcintyre/statuses/390034109630009344</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[3 new Snowden leaks, covering acquisition of Yahoo address books, buddy lists, and email account activity, and how spammer activity required intervention to avoid losing useful data in the noise]]></description>
<dc:subject>spam spammers nsa snowden leaks anti-spam yahoo im mail</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:adb60d7f01ca/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spammers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:nsa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:snowden"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:leaks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:yahoo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:im"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:mail"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jl.ly/Email/spamarrest.html">
    <title>How not to stop spammers</title>
    <dc:date>2013-09-16T22:37:41+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://jl.ly/Email/spamarrest.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>Spam Arrest is a company that sells an anti-spam service. They attempted to sue some spammers and, as has been widely reported, lost badly. This case emphasizes three points that litigious antispammers seem not to grasp:

Under CAN SPAM, a lot of spam is legal.
Judges hate plaintiffs who try to be too clever, and hate sloppy preparation even more.
Never, ever, file a spam suit in Seattle.</blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>anti-spam spam law seattle us can-spam spamarrest sentient-jets</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:9276665bfc83/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:seattle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:us"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:can-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spamarrest"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:sentient-jets"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://blog.pinboard.in/2013/06/persuading_david_simon/">
    <title>Persuading David Simon (Pinboard Blog)</title>
    <dc:date>2013-06-17T14:13:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://blog.pinboard.in/2013/06/persuading_david_simon/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Maciej Ceglowski with a strongly-argued rebuttal of David Simon's post about the NSA's PRISM.  This point in particular is key:

<blockquote>The point is, you don't need human investigators to find leads, you can have the algorithms do it [based on the call graph or network of who-calls-who]. They will find people of interest, assemble the watch lists, and flag whomever you like for further tracking. And since the number of actual terrorists is very, very, very small, the output of these algorithms will consist overwhelmingly of false positives.</blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>false-positives maciej privacy security nsa prism david-simon accuracy big-data filtering anti-spam</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:5fb59daa02a0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:false-positives"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:maciej"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:security"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:nsa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:prism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:david-simon"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:accuracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:big-data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.irishtimes.com/business/sectors/technology/spamalot-reigns-the-spoils-of-ireland-s-eu-kingship-1.1426389#.UbmEcGHAdss.twitter">
    <title>Spamalot reigns: the spoils of Ireland’s EU kingship | The Irish Times - Thu, Jun 13, 2013</title>
    <dc:date>2013-06-13T13:44:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.irishtimes.com/business/sectors/technology/spamalot-reigns-the-spoils-of-ireland-s-eu-kingship-1.1426389#.UbmEcGHAdss.twitter</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>The spam presidency. As European citizens are made the miserable targets of unimpeded “direct marketing”, that may be how Ireland’s stint in the EU presidency seat is recalled for years to come.
Under the guiding hand of Minister for Justice Alan Shatter, the Council of the European Union has submitted proposals for amendments to a proposed new data protection regulation, all of which overwhelmingly favour business and big organisations, not citizens.
The most obviously repugnant and surprising element in the amendments is a watering down of existing protections for EU citizens against the willy-nilly marketing Americans are forced to endure. In the US there are few meaningful restrictions on what businesses can do with people’s personal information when pitching products and services at them.
In the EU, this has always been strictly controlled; information gathered for one purpose cannot be used by a business to sell whatever it wants – unless you have opted in to receive such solicitations. This means you are not constantly bombarded by emails and junk mail, nor do you get non-stop phone calls from telemarketers.
Under the proposed amendments to the draft data protection regulation, direct marketing would become a legal form of data processing. In effect, this would legitimise spam email, junk print mail and marketing calls. This unexpected provision signals just how successful powerful corporate lobbyists have been in convincing ministers that business matters more than privacy or giving citizens reasonable control over their personal information.
Far worse is contained in other amendments, which in effect turn the original draft of the regulation upside down.
</blockquote>

Fantastic article from Karlin Lillington in today's Times on the terrible amendments proposed for the EU's data protection law.]]></description>
<dc:subject>eu law prism data-protection privacy ireland ec marketing spam anti-spam email</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:11445f4c180f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:eu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:prism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:data-protection"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ireland"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ec"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:marketing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:email"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.huntonprivacyblog.com/2013/06/articles/council-of-the-european-union-releases-draft-compromise-text-on-the-proposed-eu-data-protection-regulation/">
    <title>Council of the European Union Releases Draft Compromise Text on the Proposed EU Data Protection Regulation</title>
    <dc:date>2013-06-09T21:53:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.huntonprivacyblog.com/2013/06/articles/council-of-the-european-union-releases-draft-compromise-text-on-the-proposed-eu-data-protection-regulation/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Oh god.  this sounds like an impending privacy and anti-spam disaster.  "business-focussed":

<blockquote>Overall, the [Irish EC Presidency’s] draft compromise text can be seen as a more business-focused, pragmatic approach. For example, the Presidency has drafted an additional recital (Recital 3a), clarifying the right to data protection as a qualified right, highlighting the principle of proportionality and importance of other competing fundamental rights, including the freedom to conduct a business.</blockquote>

and some pretty serious relaxation of how consent for use of personal data is measured:

<blockquote>
The criterion for valid consent is amended from “explicit” to “unambiguous,” except in the case of processing special categories of data (i.e., sensitive personal data) (Recital 25 and Article 9(2)). This reverts to the current position under the Data Protection Directive and is a concession to the practical difficulty of obtaining explicit consent in all cases.

The criteria for valid consent are further relaxed by the ability to obtain consent in writing, orally or in an electronic manner, and where technically feasible and effective, valid consent can be given using browser settings and other technical solutions. Further, the requirement that the controller bear the burden of proof that valid consent was obtained is limited to a requirement that the controller be able to “demonstrate” that consent was obtained (Recital 32 and Article 7(1)). The need for “informed” consent is also relaxed from the requirement to provide the full information requirements laid out in Article 14 to the minimal requirements that the data subject “at least” be made aware of: (1) the identity of the data controller, and (2) the purpose(s) of the processing of their personal data (Recitals 33 and 48).
</blockquote>]]></description>
<dc:subject>anti-spam privacy data-protection spam ireland eu ec regulation</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:b59985c24906/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:data-protection"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ireland"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:eu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ec"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:regulation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dpreform.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/edri-analysis-of-libe-ams.pdf">
    <title>EDRI's comments on EU proposals to reform privacy law</title>
    <dc:date>2013-06-07T14:49:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://dpreform.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/edri-analysis-of-libe-ams.pdf</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Amendments 762, 764 and 765 in particular seem to move portions of the law from "confirmed opt-in required" to "opt-out is ok" -- which sounds like a risk where spam and unsolicited actions on a person's data are concerned]]></description>
<dc:subject>law privacy anti-spam eu spam edri</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:0418ca2907a6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:eu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:edri"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.privacysurgeon.org/blog/incision/eu-council-deals-killer-blow-to-privacy-reforms/">
    <title>EU Council deals killer blow to privacy reforms</title>
    <dc:date>2013-06-06T21:15:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.privacysurgeon.org/blog/incision/eu-council-deals-killer-blow-to-privacy-reforms/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>'In an extraordinary result for corporate lobbying, direct marketing would by default be considered a legitimate data process and would therefore – by default – be lawful.'</blockquote>

]]></description>
<dc:subject>eu politics data-protection privacy anti-spam spam eu-council direct-marketing</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:6e42e3094f30/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:eu"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:data-protection"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:eu-council"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:direct-marketing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jeremydhoon.github.com/2013/03/19/abusing-hash-kernels-for-wildly-unprincipled-machine-learning/">
    <title>Abusing hash kernels for wildly unprincipled machine learning</title>
    <dc:date>2013-04-04T23:01:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://jeremydhoon.github.com/2013/03/19/abusing-hash-kernels-for-wildly-unprincipled-machine-learning/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[what, is this the first time our spam filtering approach of hashing a giant feature space is hitting mainstream machine learning?  that can't be right!]]></description>
<dc:subject>ai machine-learning python data hashing features feature-selection anti-spam spamassassin</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:28d641a0b96e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ai"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:machine-learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:python"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:hashing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:features"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:feature-selection"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spamassassin"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.slideshare.net/jasontrost/flo-con-clairvoyant-squirrel-final">
    <title>Clairvoyant Squirrel: Large Scale Malicious Domain Classification</title>
    <dc:date>2013-02-04T12:10:24+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.slideshare.net/jasontrost/flo-con-clairvoyant-squirrel-final</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Storm-based service to detect malicious DNS domain usage from streaming pcap data in near-real-time.  Uses string features in the DNS domain, along with randomness metrics using Markov analysis, combined with a Random Forest classifier, to achieve 98% precision at 10,000 matches/sec]]></description>
<dc:subject>storm distributed distcomp random-forest classifiers machine-learning anti-spam slides</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:a15baf072e8e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:storm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:distributed"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:distcomp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:random-forest"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:classifiers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:machine-learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:slides"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.david-andrzejewski.com/machine-learning/practical-machine-learning-tricks-from-the-kdd-2011-best-industry-paper/">
    <title>Practical machine learning tricks from the KDD 2011 best industry paper</title>
    <dc:date>2012-07-30T20:20:41+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.david-andrzejewski.com/machine-learning/practical-machine-learning-tricks-from-the-kdd-2011-best-industry-paper/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Wow, this is a fantastic paper.  It's a Google paper on detecting scam/spam ads using machine learning -- but not just that, it's how to build out such a classifier to production scale, and make it operationally resilient, and, indeed, operable.

I've come across a few of these ideas before, and I'm happy to say I might have reinvented a few (particularly around the feature space), but all of them together make extremely good sense.  If I wind up working on large-scale classification again, this is the first paper I'll go back to.  Great info! (via Toby diPasquale.)]]></description>
<dc:subject>classification via:codeslinger training machine-learning google ops kdd best-practices anti-spam classifiers ensemble map-reduce</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:c81a4d28d529/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:classification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:via:codeslinger"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:training"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:machine-learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ops"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:kdd"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:best-practices"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:classifiers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ensemble"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:map-reduce"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.wired.com/underwire/2012/04/press-enter-to-execute/">
    <title>Sci-Fi Short Story: 'Press Enter to Execute'</title>
    <dc:date>2012-04-18T13:15:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.wired.com/underwire/2012/04/press-enter-to-execute/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[a short story about a spam assassin. (via Lee Maguire)]]></description>
<dc:subject>scifi spamassassin anti-spam spam via:lee-maguire whoa fiction short-stories</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:3249615b406e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:scifi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spamassassin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:via:lee-maguire"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:whoa"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:fiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:short-stories"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.virusbtn.com/news/2011/11_17.xml">
    <title>IETF expedited publication of RFC6449 before J.D. Falk passed away</title>
    <dc:date>2011-11-17T13:21:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.virusbtn.com/news/2011/11_17.xml</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[I had no idea JD was sick.  Very saddened to hear about this, he was a nice guy and a great member of the anti-spam community :(]]></description>
<dc:subject>jd-falk death cancer rfcs ietf anti-spam people</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:a7394e2b729c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:jd-falk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:death"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:cancer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:rfcs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ietf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:people"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://petermblair.com/fbl-n-gram-analyzer/">
    <title>feedback loop n-gram analyzer</title>
    <dc:date>2011-09-29T21:10:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://petermblair.com/fbl-n-gram-analyzer/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA['a simple parser of ARF compliant FBL complaints, which normalizes the email complaints and generates a 6-tuple n-gram version of the message. These n-grams are stored in a Redis database, keyed by the file in which they can be found. An inverse index also exists that allow you to find all messages containing a particular n-gram word.'
]]></description>
<dc:subject>anti-spam spam fbl feedback filtering n-grams similarity hashing redis searching</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:00bea3b79665/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:fbl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:feedback"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:n-grams"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:similarity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:hashing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:redis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:searching"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2011/02/28/uk-government-agency-wants-your-email-scams-but-is-doing-it-the-right-way/#IDComment131650035">
    <title>UK Government Agency wants your spam, but filters the submission address</title>
    <dc:date>2011-03-01T18:01:05+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2011/02/28/uk-government-agency-wants-your-email-scams-but-is-doing-it-the-right-way/#IDComment131650035</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[doh (via Graham Cluley)]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:gcluley spam uk filtering anti-spam doh funny</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:c390e032036f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:via:gcluley"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:uk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:doh"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:funny"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.spamtrackers.eu/wiki/index.php/Main_Page">
    <title>Spamwiki</title>
    <dc:date>2011-02-03T11:16:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.spamtrackers.eu/wiki/index.php/Main_Page</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[good wiki tracking spam operations, their current campaigns, who's doing it etc.]]></description>
<dc:subject>wiki spam anti-spam</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:78a1fc6cb03b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:wiki"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.dnswl.org/news/archives/18-Changes-at-dnswl.org.html">
    <title>Changes at dnswl.org</title>
    <dc:date>2010-10-04T09:06:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.dnswl.org/news/archives/18-Changes-at-dnswl.org.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[DNSWL will charge for subscriptions to "heavy" users and anti-spam vendors]]></description>
<dc:subject>dnswl dns whitelists dnsbls filtering anti-spam</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:60f92b3a0d9c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:dnswl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:dns"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:whitelists"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:dnsbls"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.spamhauswhitelist.com/en/">
    <title>The Spamhaus Whitelist</title>
    <dc:date>2010-09-26T20:48:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.spamhauswhitelist.com/en/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[exactly what it says on the tin]]></description>
<dc:subject>spamhaus anti-spam whitelisting spamassassin</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:76c68a2be594/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spamhaus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:whitelisting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spamassassin"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.jam-software.com/spamassassin/">
    <title>JAM Software - SpamAssassin for Windows</title>
    <dc:date>2010-09-17T10:37:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.jam-software.com/spamassassin/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA['adapted for Windows by JAM Software' -- cool!  Thanks Daniel]]></description>
<dc:subject>windows spamassassin anti-spam software win32 jam-software</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:cccf02bcdc3d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:windows"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spamassassin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:win32"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:jam-software"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ceas.cc/2010/papers/Paper%2019.pdf">
    <title>Exploring the Spam Arms Race to Characterize Spam Evolution</title>
    <dc:date>2010-07-23T14:50:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://ceas.cc/2010/papers/Paper%2019.pdf</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[from last week's CEAS conference; research comparing SpamAssassin releases against the evolution of the surrounding spam environment.  Nice work, I always wanted to write up something like this (via JD)]]></description>
<dc:subject>spam anti-spam ceas conference papers research spamassassin adversarial-classification evolution arms-race via:jd</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:8d00be060af0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ceas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:conference"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:papers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:research"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spamassassin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:adversarial-classification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:evolution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:arms-race"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:via:jd"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.herald.ie/national-news/tesco-fined-for-sending-junk-email-by-andrew-phelan-2256532.html">
    <title>Tesco fined for sending junk e-mail</title>
    <dc:date>2010-07-13T16:21:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.herald.ie/national-news/tesco-fined-for-sending-junk-email-by-andrew-phelan-2256532.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[first successful conviction under Irish anti-spam laws -- for a whopping, er, 2,000 Euros.  at least it only took 2 complaints from 2 customers each (via Brian Nisbet)]]></description>
<dc:subject>dpc anti-spam ireland law tesco prosecutions convictions via:bnisbet</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:87bae3c5d61a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:dpc"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ireland"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:tesco"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:prosecutions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:convictions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:via:bnisbet"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://developer.yahoo.net/blogs/hadoop/2010/06/hadoop_and_yahoo_maill_anti_sp.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+YDNHadoop+%28Hadoop+and+Distributed+Computing+at+Yahoo%21%29">
    <title>Hadoop and the fight against shape-shifting spam</title>
    <dc:date>2010-06-23T16:06:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://developer.yahoo.net/blogs/hadoop/2010/06/hadoop_and_yahoo_maill_anti_sp.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+YDNHadoop+%28Hadoop+and+Distributed+Computing+at+Yahoo%21%29</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Yahoo! anti-spam engineers talk about their extensive use of Hadoop and scale]]></description>
<dc:subject>hadoop yahoo anti-spam filtering</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:13551b9233b3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:hadoop"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:yahoo"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:filtering"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8528672.stm">
    <title>BBC News - How spam filters dictated Canadian magazine's fate</title>
    <dc:date>2010-03-30T15:34:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8528672.stm</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[the Canadian mag "The Beaver" is changing its name due to broken filters' false positives.  Bennett Haselton reckons that there's no incentive to fix FPs, which as Henry Stern notes isn't the case]]></description>
<dc:subject>anti-spam false-positives beaver canadia canada bbc</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:2f342c7c49aa/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:false-positives"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:beaver"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:canadia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:canada"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:bbc"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://mailchannels.com/blog/?p=117">
    <title>TLS-encrypted spam</title>
    <dc:date>2010-03-30T10:31:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://mailchannels.com/blog/?p=117</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[the Rustock botnet is now attempting TLS encryption of spam delivery sessions]]></description>
<dc:subject>tls rustock botnets anti-spam mailchannels ssl encryption</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:6933155bd46e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:tls"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:rustock"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:botnets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:mailchannels"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ssl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:encryption"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.spamhaus.org/news.lasso?article=655">
    <title>Approaching 100% spam block: Spamhaus releases the Domain Block List</title>
    <dc:date>2010-03-01T11:45:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.spamhaus.org/news.lasso?article=655</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[DBL announcement.  working on the SpamAssassin support for 3.3.1...]]></description>
<dc:subject>spamassassin anti-spam dbl spamhaus dnsbls</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:bb8b8ef4c980/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spamassassin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:dbl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spamhaus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:dnsbls"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5782">
    <title>RFC 5782 - DNS Blacklists and Whitelists</title>
    <dc:date>2010-02-18T21:59:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5782</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[John Levine gets DNS*Ls standardized, at last.  we should really check SpamAssassin to see if it's compliant, I guess ;)]]></description>
<dc:subject>dnsbls anti-spam dnswl dnsbl rfcs standards via:fanf</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:98ea42e82a8b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:dnsbls"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:dnswl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:dnsbl"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:rfcs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:via:fanf"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.insideview.ie/irisheyes/2010/02/analysing-electronic-forensics-evidence.html">
    <title>Inside View from Ireland: Analysing Electronic Forensics Evidence</title>
    <dc:date>2010-02-07T22:32:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.insideview.ie/irisheyes/2010/02/analysing-electronic-forensics-evidence.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[fascinating note from Bernie Goldbach: 'MORE THAN 20 YEARS ago, I worked with message traffic and the work told me the importance of verifying source material.']]></description>
<dc:subject>bernie spam anti-spam authentication spoofing security phishing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:a0a606b6bd03/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:bernie"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:authentication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spoofing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:security"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:phishing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://secure.grepular.com/Spamalyser_Lives">
    <title>Spamalyser</title>
    <dc:date>2010-02-01T15:08:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://secure.grepular.com/Spamalyser_Lives</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[a custom pastebin for spam messages. cool]]></description>
<dc:subject>spamalyser spam anti-spam paste pastebin web</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:d725a8a97ffa/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spamalyser"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:paste"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:pastebin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:web"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/the-apache-software-foundation-announces-apache-spamassassin-version-330-82677727.html">
    <title>The Apache Software Foundation Announces Apache SpamAssassin Version 3.3.0</title>
    <dc:date>2010-01-26T16:34:43+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/the-apache-software-foundation-announces-apache-spamassassin-version-330-82677727.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[w00t!]]></description>
<dc:subject>asf apache spamassassin releases 3.3.0 anti-spam</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:1d69fed5b2e1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:asf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:apache"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spamassassin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:releases"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:3.3.0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.icir.org/christian/publications.html">
    <title>_Botnet Judo: Fighting Spam with Itself_</title>
    <dc:date>2010-01-26T00:11:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.icir.org/christian/publications.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[reverse-engineering the output of spam templates.  paper isn't published yet, but sounds very interesting, particularly since it overlaps with the SpamAssassin SOUGHT ruleset's methodology, a little, it sounds like.  looking forward to reading it]]></description>
<dc:subject>spam anti-spam botnets templates toread papers</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:906a1e87dc66/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:botnets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:templates"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:toread"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:papers"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.annaliviaford.com/2010/01/postmaster-team-update.html">
    <title>AOL sacks pretty much the entire US postmaster team</title>
    <dc:date>2010-01-22T22:25:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.annaliviaford.com/2010/01/postmaster-team-update.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA['This is a totally devastating blow to everyone']]></description>
<dc:subject>aol anti-spam layoffs postmaster email smtp</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:1cc5778c0b54/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:aol"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:layoffs"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:postmaster"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:email"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:smtp"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.darkreading.com/securityservices/security/app-security/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=220900608">
    <title>MAAWG notes drop in spam levels</title>
    <dc:date>2009-10-28T17:41:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.darkreading.com/securityservices/security/app-security/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=220900608</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA['MAAWG [..] says that spam and malicious emails dropped to 89 percent in the second quarter from 90.4 percent in the first quarter of 2009.']]></description>
<dc:subject>spam anti-spam maawg press-releases isps internet abuse</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:94e37d321f73/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:maawg"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:press-releases"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:isps"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:internet"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:abuse"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/9xrn1/iama_person_who_sends_spam_email_for_a_living_ama/">
    <title>IAMA person who sends &quot;spam&quot; email for a living</title>
    <dc:date>2009-10-27T13:03:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/9xrn1/iama_person_who_sends_spam_email_for_a_living_ama/</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Reddit mass-interview of a spammer. apparently he's working on IPv6 support]]></description>
<dc:subject>reddit spam anti-spam interviews ipv6 iama spammers</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:1738c8e9da5f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:reddit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:interviews"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:ipv6"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:iama"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spammers"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.jules.fm/Logbook/files/anti-spear-phishing.html">
    <title>Anti Spear-phishing SpamAssassin ruleset</title>
    <dc:date>2009-08-07T09:06:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.jules.fm/Logbook/files/anti-spear-phishing.html</link>
    <dc:creator>jm</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[from Julian "MailScanner" Field (via the SA users list)]]></description>
<dc:subject>spamassassin anti-spam rulesets sa-update phishing blocklists</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jm/b:1944e08a83e0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:spamassassin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:anti-spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:rulesets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:sa-update"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:phishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jm/t:blocklists"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>