<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (jamesmelzer)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from jamesmelzer</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.alistapart.com/articles/design-criticism-creative-process/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.lukew.com/ff/entry.asp?968&amp;utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+FunctioningForm+(Functioning+Form+-+Interface+Design+Blog)"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.andyrutledge.com/where-wireframes-are-concerned.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.alistapart.com/articles/the-myth-of-usability-testing/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jamesmelzer.com/information-architecture/we-can-critique-information-architecture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.emdezine.com/deziningInteractions/2009/03/24/defining-a-language-of-critique/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://davemalouf.com/?p=1560."/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.uxmatters.com/mt/archives/2009/02/reviewing-user-interfaces.php"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://www.alistapart.com/articles/design-criticism-creative-process/">
    <title>A List Apart: Articles: Design Criticism and the Creative Process</title>
    <dc:date>2011-01-17T15:39:33+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.alistapart.com/articles/design-criticism-creative-process/</link>
    <dc:creator>jamesmelzer</dc:creator><dc:subject>critique design ux cassie_mcdaniel</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/b:1ea21d2f155d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:critique"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:ux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:cassie_mcdaniel"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.lukew.com/ff/entry.asp?968&amp;utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+FunctioningForm+(Functioning+Form+-+Interface+Design+Blog)">
    <title>Functioning Form - The Apple Store's Checkout Form Redesign</title>
    <dc:date>2010-01-09T23:15:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.lukew.com/ff/entry.asp?968&amp;utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+FunctioningForm+(Functioning+Form+-+Interface+Design+Blog)</link>
    <dc:creator>jamesmelzer</dc:creator><dc:subject>luke_wroblewski apple ux ixd forms analysis critique</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/b:90f1bee0e6a8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:luke_wroblewski"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:ux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:ixd"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:forms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:analysis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:critique"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.andyrutledge.com/where-wireframes-are-concerned.php">
    <title>Design View / Andy Rutledge - Where Wireframes Are Concerned</title>
    <dc:date>2009-12-24T01:13:43+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.andyrutledge.com/where-wireframes-are-concerned.php</link>
    <dc:creator>jamesmelzer</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Andy concludes that wireframes are not useful for visual design. However, his argument and examples are contrived. It is not news that poor wireframes can yield poor design.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>andy_rutledge design visual_design wireframes critique methods</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/b:26837059f6d4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:andy_rutledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:visual_design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:wireframes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:critique"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:methods"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.alistapart.com/articles/the-myth-of-usability-testing/">
    <title>A List Apart: Articles: The Myth of Usability Testing</title>
    <dc:date>2009-11-04T00:57:33+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.alistapart.com/articles/the-myth-of-usability-testing/</link>
    <dc:creator>jamesmelzer</dc:creator><dc:subject>robert_hoekman in:alistapart usability myths ux methods critique</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/b:ea86d6c3dc1f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:robert_hoekman"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:in:alistapart"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:usability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:myths"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:ux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:methods"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:critique"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://jamesmelzer.com/information-architecture/we-can-critique-information-architecture">
    <title>We Can Critique Information Architecture at Getting My Bearings - James Melzer</title>
    <dc:date>2009-07-14T12:31:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://jamesmelzer.com/information-architecture/we-can-critique-information-architecture</link>
    <dc:creator>jamesmelzer</dc:creator><dc:subject>james_melzer critique ux methods design design_thinking</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/b:8ee4bc953a8c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:james_melzer"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:critique"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:ux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:methods"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:design_thinking"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.emdezine.com/deziningInteractions/2009/03/24/defining-a-language-of-critique/">
    <title>dezining interactions » Blog Archive » defining a language of critique</title>
    <dc:date>2009-07-14T12:30:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.emdezine.com/deziningInteractions/2009/03/24/defining-a-language-of-critique/</link>
    <dc:creator>jamesmelzer</dc:creator><dc:subject>erin_malone critique design ux pattern_language methods analysis design_thinking</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/b:426e3b2af0fa/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:erin_malone"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:critique"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:ux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:pattern_language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:methods"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:analysis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:design_thinking"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://davemalouf.com/?p=1560.">
    <title>–Engage » The language we use</title>
    <dc:date>2009-04-02T14:29:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://davemalouf.com/?p=1560.</link>
    <dc:creator>jamesmelzer</dc:creator><dc:subject>david_malouf language critique ixd ux</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/b:ac1ec96e7f99/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:david_malouf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:critique"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:ixd"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:ux"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.uxmatters.com/mt/archives/2009/02/reviewing-user-interfaces.php">
    <title>Reviewing User Interfaces :: UXmatters</title>
    <dc:date>2009-03-01T00:28:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.uxmatters.com/mt/archives/2009/02/reviewing-user-interfaces.php</link>
    <dc:creator>jamesmelzer</dc:creator><dc:subject>usability ui ux heuristics review critique rhonda_bracey ixd in:uxmatters</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/b:e28cff0c9b5c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:usability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:ui"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:ux"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:heuristics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:review"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:critique"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:rhonda_bracey"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:ixd"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:jamesmelzer/t:in:uxmatters"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>