<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (infovore)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from infovore</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://gameshelf.jmac.org/2011/03/the-if-theory-reader/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+GameshelfBlog+%28The+Gameshelf+%28blog%29%29"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.etc.cmu.edu/etcpress/wellplayed1.0"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://gameshelf.jmac.org/2011/03/the-if-theory-reader/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+GameshelfBlog+%28The+Gameshelf+%28blog%29%29">
    <title>The IF Theory Reader | The Gameshelf</title>
    <dc:date>2011-03-02T11:03:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://gameshelf.jmac.org/2011/03/the-if-theory-reader/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+GameshelfBlog+%28The+Gameshelf+%28blog%29%29</link>
    <dc:creator>infovore</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["So is it worth reading dusty IF history? Well, I haven't read it yet. But I can say that the book really represents a tour through the past ten years of the IF community's thinking. Some of the essays are from 2001; some have been revised for this edition; some are brand-new. Many have been published in other forms, so if you've been devouring our blog posts and essays for the past few years, you will see few surprises. But if your awareness of IF dates from the last century -- or if you've been following us only casually -- I think this book has something to offer."]]></description>
<dc:subject>if interactivefiction games writing criticism reader</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/b:ebe3cdd825fc/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:if"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:interactivefiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:games"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:criticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:reader"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.etc.cmu.edu/etcpress/wellplayed1.0">
    <title>Well Played 1.0: Video Game, Value and Meaning | ETC-Press (Beta)</title>
    <dc:date>2009-05-21T17:26:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.etc.cmu.edu/etcpress/wellplayed1.0</link>
    <dc:creator>infovore</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Well Played is now out, and can be read online and purchased from Lulu. It's exactly the sort of thing I've wanted for a while - a reader for videogames, and for the actual experiential side of them - and it's got some great authors contributing pieces on a host of games. Worth your time, for sure.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>games writing reader stories books publishing analysis criticism</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/b:7d4929c33b09/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:games"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:reader"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:stories"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:analysis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:criticism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>