<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (infovore)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from infovore</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://mislav.uniqpath.com/2013/02/merge-vs-rebase/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://speirs.org/2007/12/07/if-your-proprietary-raw-workflow-dies/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ask.metafilter.com/mefi/16280"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://mislav.uniqpath.com/2013/02/merge-vs-rebase/">
    <title>Git merge vs. rebase</title>
    <dc:date>2014-08-11T10:19:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://mislav.uniqpath.com/2013/02/merge-vs-rebase/</link>
    <dc:creator>infovore</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This is good, and I will be endeavouring to tidy up my commits in future. I'm good at the "little and often" mantra, less good at leaving all my typos/dodgy moments in.]]></description>
<dc:subject>git development workflow versioncontrol</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/b:1a4898c0f283/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:git"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:development"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:workflow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:versioncontrol"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://speirs.org/2007/12/07/if-your-proprietary-raw-workflow-dies/">
    <title>Fraser Speirs – If your proprietary RAW workflow dies</title>
    <dc:date>2007-12-09T12:33:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://speirs.org/2007/12/07/if-your-proprietary-raw-workflow-dies/</link>
    <dc:creator>infovore</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Will they build RAW converters for prehistoric digital cameras?" That's not the only biggie Fraser asks in this thoughtful piece - most of our RAW workflows are awfully reliant on proprietary technology. What happens when it's all obsolete?
]]></description>
<dc:subject>data photography raw workflow obsolescence</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/b:e035ce1fa15f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:photography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:raw"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:workflow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:obsolescence"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ask.metafilter.com/mefi/16280">
    <title>Digital photography workflow on a Macintosh | Ask MetaFilter</title>
    <dc:date>2005-03-15T12:08:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/mefi/16280</link>
    <dc:creator>infovore</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Useful discussion on just how to handle photos -> mac
]]></description>
<dc:subject>photography digital iphoto workflow</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/b:1e1fc99e50c7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:photography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:digital"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:iphoto"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:workflow"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>