<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (infovore)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from infovore</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.robinsloan.com/note/pictures-and-vision/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://berglondon.com/blog/2011/08/03/the-robot-readable-world/#comments"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://www.robinsloan.com/note/pictures-and-vision/">
    <title>Pictures and vision</title>
    <dc:date>2012-06-01T08:58:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.robinsloan.com/note/pictures-and-vision/</link>
    <dc:creator>infovore</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["In this context, Google+ is not the company’s most strategic project. That distinction goes to Glass, to the self-driving cars, and to Google Maps, Street View, and Earth—Google’s model of the real, physical world. Maybe in twenty years we’ll think of Google primarily as a vision company—augmenting our vision, helping us share it—and, oh wow, did you realize they once, long ago, sold ads?" This is good. I like the distinction between pictures and vision a lot.]]></description>
<dc:subject>robinsloan facebook google seeing vision pictures photography computervision robotreadableworld</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/b:20241163ab57/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:robinsloan"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:facebook"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:seeing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:vision"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:pictures"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:photography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:computervision"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:robotreadableworld"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://berglondon.com/blog/2011/08/03/the-robot-readable-world/#comments">
    <title>The Robot-Readable World – Blog – BERG</title>
    <dc:date>2011-08-04T16:17:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://berglondon.com/blog/2011/08/03/the-robot-readable-world/#comments</link>
    <dc:creator>infovore</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["...let’s be clear that it is a phenomena to design for, and with. It’s something we will invent, within the frame of the cultural and technical pressures that force design to evolve.

That was the message I was trying to get across at Glug: we’re the ones making the robots, shaping their senses, and the objects and environments they relate to.

Hence we make a robot-readable world."

Solid Jonesgold. Very true, and something that's been in the back of my mind - like many others - for a while now.]]></description>
<dc:subject>robotreadableworld machines computervision newaesthetic future</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/b:e407a2db1199/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:robotreadableworld"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:machines"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:computervision"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:newaesthetic"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:infovore/t:future"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>